U.S. patent number 3,558,001 [Application Number 04/848,317] was granted by the patent office on 1971-01-26 for thermoplastic container.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Esso Research and Engineering Company. Invention is credited to Lawrence D. Barr, Robert R. Fritz, George R. Ingram.
United States Patent |
3,558,001 |
Fritz , et al. |
January 26, 1971 |
THERMOPLASTIC CONTAINER
Abstract
Thermoplastic containers having a single open end of improved
vertical strength properties are secured by employing a series of
interconnected, vertically disposed supporting columns as part of
the wall of the container. Preferably, the supporting columns
extend laterally, outwardly from the noncolumn containing surface
of the container sidewall. Each of the columns comprises two
substantially identical isosceles trapezoids, each having a base
and a side opposite therefrom of from 25 to 75 percent of the
length of the base, and an elongated rectangular member of a length
substantially equal to the length of the base of the trapezoids.
The rectangular member is positioned between and connected to the
bases of the trapezoids. Successive columns are interconnected
along the side opposite the base of the trapezoids.
Inventors: |
Fritz; Robert R. (Santa Ana,
CA), Ingram; George R. (Houston, TX), Barr; Lawrence
D. (Eloy, AZ) |
Assignee: |
Esso Research and Engineering
Company (N/A)
|
Family
ID: |
25302959 |
Appl.
No.: |
04/848,317 |
Filed: |
August 7, 1969 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
623448 |
Mar 15, 1967 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
220/614; 220/611;
D9/556 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B65D
1/44 (20130101); B65D 15/18 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
B65D
1/44 (20060101); B65D 1/40 (20060101); B65d
007/42 () |
Field of
Search: |
;220/72,83,67 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
1683841 |
September 1928 |
Mullen et al. |
3120322 |
February 1964 |
Henninger |
3341059 |
September 1967 |
Schild et al. |
|
Primary Examiner: Leclair; Joseph R.
Assistant Examiner: Garrett; James R.
Parent Case Text
This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No.
623,448 filed Mar. 15, 1967, now abandoned, by the same inventors.
Claims
We claim:
1. A thermoplastic container comprising a hollow thermoplastic,
cup-shaped body of generally circular, horizontal cross section
having a bottom portion and a sidewall portion terminating in a
single open end provided with an outwardly turned peripheral
flange, said sidewall portion having formed therein a series of
vertically disposed, interconnected supporting columns, each of
said columns comprising two substantially identical isosceles
trapezoids each having a base and a geometrically opposite second
side parallel to said base of from 25 to 75 percent of the length
of the base, and an elongated rectangular member having a length
substantially equal to the length of the base of said trapezoids
located on the outermost surface of said cup body, said rectangular
member being positioned between and connected to the bases of the
said trapezoids with the planes of said trapezoids receding
inwardly of the planes of said rectangles by an amount of between
10-- 25 degrees and wherein said columns are interconnected through
joinder of the opposite second sides of the trapezoids of one
column with said opposite second side of the trapezoids of
adjacently located columns.
2. The container of claim 1 having a metal lid comprising a central
disc portion and an upstanding, continuous, peripheral flange with
an outwardly turned portion thereof, circumferentially clinched to
the flange portion of the said container.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to an improved container for products such
as motor oil, and other heavy, dense liquids. More particularly,
the invention is directed to an improved container, the main body
portion thereof being formed of a thermoplastic resin and having a
sidewall configuration particularly adapted for a container made of
such material. The top closure part of the container is preferably
a metal lid.
Containers formed from thermoplastic material are gradually
assuming greater commercial importance. There are many obvious
advantages in forming containers for heavy, dense fluids such as
motor oil from thermoplastic materials as containers are light in
weight, can be readily pigmented and can be produced in large
quantities are relatively low cost. However, thermoplastic
containers possess several deficiencies which deter their ready
acceptance in the market place. For example, lube oil containers,
when fabricated from a thermoplastic resin, are not readily
stackable nor can they be easily opened with conventional bayonet
type openers as the wall of walls of the container tends to deform
with the application of the compressive pressures encountered upon
stacking and opening. If the container wall deforms upon the
exertion of a vertically applied pressure, opening of the container
with a conventional bayonet type opener is extremely difficult and
sometimes impossible. If a container deforms from stacking forces,
a warehouse stack will begin to tilt and ultimately collapse,
presenting imminent danger to warehouse personnel and an
economically intolerable damage rate.
Numerous solutions have been advanced for improving the vertical
strength characteristics of thermoplastic containers. These
solutions normally take the form of modification made to the
sidewall of the container to render the same less subject to
deformation or stress cracking. Typical sidewall designs that have
been advanced involve (1) forming the container sidewall with a
plurality of vertically disposed members of the type depicted in
FIGS. 1 and 2 of U.S. 2,063,013 or (2) modifying the container
sidewall with a plurality of horizontally disposed reinforcement
members of the type shown in U.S. Design Patents 199,869 and
200,444. However, even with these modifications, thermoplastic
containers do not possess sufficient vertical strength to render
them readily suitable for applications where the container must
withstand high levels of compressive pressure without sidewall
deformation or stress cracking.
Accordingly, it is the object of the present invention to provide
an improved container structure which substantially eliminates the
above discussed shortcomings of containers having a plastic
body.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This object is accomplished by employing as part of the sidewall of
the container a plurality of vertically disposed interconnected
supporting columns that extend outwardly from the noncolumn
containing surface of the container sidewall. Each of the columns
is composed of two essentially identical inwardly inclining
isosceles trapezoids each having a base and a side opposite
therefrom of from 25 to 75 percent of the length of the base and an
elongated rectangular member. The bases and opposite sides of the
trapezoids are disposed substantially parallel to the longitudinal
axis of the container. The elongated rectangular member is of a
length substantially equal to the length of the base of the
trapezoids and is positioned between and connected to the bases of
the trapezoids. The planes of the trapezoids recede inwardly from
the planes of the rectangle by an amount between 10 and 25 degrees.
Successive columns are interconnected along the aid side opposite
the bases of the trapezoids.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Additional objects and advantages of the present invention will
become more apparent with the following description taken in
conjunction with the accompanying drawing in which:
FIG. 1 is a side elevational view of a container for motor oil
formed according to the principles of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the container taken along lines
A-A;
FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of the container taken along line
B-B; and
FIG. 4 is a vertical sectional view of a lid showing the
configuration thereof when the lid is clinched onto the container
of FIG. 1, the upper portion of the container being shown in FIG.
4.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Container 10 comprises a relatively deep cup-shaped body 11
(preferably of circular horizontal cross section) having a sidewall
12 stacking ring 13 and a lid flange 14. Flange 14 extends
completely about the upper outer periphery of the container 10 and
extends outwardly from the inner periphery of the container. A
metal lid is attached to the flange during closing operations to
provide an essentially leakproof enclosure. Stacking ring 13
present on the container to prevent tipping or jiggling of
containers when stacked on top of each other. The lower portion of
container 10 is made up of stacking ring 13, transitional plane 15
and bottom segment 16.
The outer periphery of sidewall 12 of container 10 is composed of a
plurality of vertically disposed laterally extending,
interconnected supporting columns 20 of substantially the same
length. Each of the columns 20 is composed of two substantially
identical inwardly inclining isosceles trapezoids 20, each having a
base 22 and a geometrically opposite second side 23 opposite
therefrom of from 25 to 75 percent of the length of the base 22,
and an elongated rectangular member 24 of a length substantially
equal to the length of base 22 of the trapezoids. The planes of the
trapezoids recede inwardly of the planes of the rectangles by an
amount of between 10 to 25 degrees. The rectangular member 24
having a length of the base of the trapezoids, is positioned
between and connected to the bases 22 of the trapezoidal sections
21. The columns preferably extend completely about the outer
periphery of sidewall 12 and are interconnected by joining the
opposite second side 23 of the trapezoid of an individual column
with the opposite sides 23 of the trapezoid of the next adjacent
supporting column 20. Preferably the said opposite sides of all of
the trapezoids employed in the supporting columns are of the same
length.
The total length of the base of the trapezoids varies from 8 cm. to
12 cm. for 1-quart containers, or more broadly from 55 to 85
percent of the total height of the container. For 1-quart lube oil
containers, the base of the trapezoidal sections is preferably 75
to 85 percent of the total height of the container. The number of
supporting columns used to lend vertical rigidity to a
thermoplastic container can vary from about 10 to 20, preferably 13
to 18.
Typically, a 1-quart container having a single open end and a
configuration as shown in FIG. 1 has 18 columns of a length of
about 4.4 inches; an overall height of about 5.5 to 5.6 inches; a
maximum diameter as defined by lid flange 14 of about 4.11 to 4.14
inches; a maximum sidewall diameter of about 4.09 inches (as
defined by rectangular segments 24); and a minimum diameter of
about 3.91 to 3.92 inches (as defined by the points of junction of
the opposite sides of 23 of the trapezoidal sections of two
individual columns). Flange 14 of the container is of a thickness
varying from 0.015 to 0.035 inches, preferably 0.020 to 0.025
inches, and extends from the planar surface 11 of the container
about 0.090 to 0.015 inches. Preferably flange 14 is inclined
upwardly from the horizontal at an angle of about 1 to 3
degrees.
The containers of the present invention may be conveniently formed
using blow-molding techniques. With this technique, a thermoplastic
tube or parison is formed using extrusion techniques. The severed
parison is then transferred to a blow-molding station. At the
blow-molding station, the open ends of the parison are clinched
between the upper end lower edges of the sectional molds normally
employed. A blowing needle or mandrel or other similar device is
then injected into the parison and air forced into the parison,
thereby forcing the parison into conformity with the walls of the
mold. Thereafter, the rough container is cooled, taken from the
sectional mold and the upper and lower portions of the rough
container trimmed away, leaving as the finished product a container
having a single open end.
After the thermoplastic container body has been formed, and the
container filled, the can or container 10 is conveniently closed
with a top or lid as shown in FIG. 4. The metal lid 40, typically
metal and preferably formed of tin plated steel or aluminum,
consists of a central disc portion 41 and an upstanding,
continuous, peripheral portion in the form of a circular groove 42.
The upstanding, continuous peripheral portion or flange 42 may be
in the form of a circular groove (when viewed from below in FIG.
4). The flange may also include an outwardly turned portion 43
which when inwardly rotated (as shown in FIG. 4) is clinched to the
flange portion 14 of container 10. Sealing may be facilitated by
coating 47 in the groove 42. The lid 40 may also include the inner
depressed annular portion 44 and the outer depressed annular
portion 45 which define annular ride ridge portion 46. When the lid
is positioned on the container body, the free circular flange
portion 14 and adjacent marginal portions of body 11 are enclosed
and concealed by the outwardly turned portions of the flange 45 of
the lid 40 at circumferentially closely spaced pints of or
circumferentially continuously to the circular flange area 14. This
is accomplished with equipment utilizing either a rolling action or
segmental jaws. When the container and lid are so circumferentially
clinched, the outer wall of the lid groove is embedded in the outer
portion of the flange area of the container and the inner wall of
the groove coextensively engaging the inner portion of the
container flange 14.
The inside surface of the metallic can lid may be either coated or
uncoated depending upon the materials to be packed within the
container. For example, the container lid may be coated with a thin
film of various types of resins. Acrylic resins, alkyd resins,
epoxy-amine resins, epoxy-ester resins, epoxy-phenolic resins,
polybutadiene resins, etc., are suitable as lid-coating
materials.
Thermoplastic materials that can be used to form the container body
of this invention include polyvinylchloride; high molecular weight
homopolymers and copolymers of alpha-olefins such as polypropylene,
polybutene, ethylene-propylene copolymers, ethylene-butene
copolymers, propylene-butene copolymers, etc., polypropylene
blended with from 2 to 40 wt. percent, preferably from 4 to 18 wt.
percent of low, medium or high density polyethylene,
polyisobutylene, isobutylene-isoprene copolymers, and
ethylene-propylene rubber; high density polyethylene having a
density of at least 0.957 grams/cc.,
acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene resins; and a
polymethylmethacrylate. High density polyethylene and
polyvinylchloti polyvinylchloride are particularly preferred
container forming materials.
Low density polyethylene (density less than 0.94 grams/cc.) and
polystyrene are generally not suitable container construction
materials if the containers are to be used to carry lubricating
oils. Low density polyethylene lacks rigidity and tends to become
oil-soluble and polystyrene is brittle and is also softened or
swollen by oil.
The invention will be further illustrate illustrated by the
following examples;
EXAMPLE 1
To demonstrate the superior compressive strength of containers
having the sidewall configuration of the present invention, a
series of tests were conducted with polyethylene containers of
substantially the same height (5.545 inches) and a maximum outside
body diameter (4.090 inches) The containers differed only in their
sidewall configuration.
The first type of container (Case 1) tested had a plain sidewall of
substantially uniform thickness. The second type of container (Case
2) evaluated was of the type depicted in FIG. 2 of U.S. 3,297,194
and had a sidewall with a series of horizontally disposed
reinforcement members. The horizontal members consisted of five
concavely or inwardly directed ribs that extended completely about
the outer periphery of the container. The depth of the
reinforcement ribs was approximately three thirty-seconds inch
inward from the outer planar surface of the container. The rib
width was seven thirty-seconds inch. The ribs were spaced 0.5
inches apart and the first rib was formed about 1.52 inches from
the top of the container. The third container type (Case 3)
evaluated had a plurality of vertically disposed reinforcement
members positioned in the sidewall of the container. A total of 34
reinforcing members having a length of 4.4 inches and a width of
0.100 inches were used. The reinforcing members extended
approximately 0.030 inches from the planar surface of the container
and were placed approximately 0.375 inches apart. The last
container tested (Case 4) had the design configuration of the
present invention. Into the sidewall was formed a series of 18
supporting columns. The base of the trapezoidal sections forming
the columns had a length of about 4.40 inches and the opposite side
of the trapezoidal sections had a length of about 1.47 inches. The
supporting columns were centered on the container wall, with the
columns beginning at about 0.5 inches from the top of the container
and terminating about 0.58 inches from the bottom of the
container.
In each of the tests, the containers were filled with one quart of
lubricating oil and then sealed with a metal lid using conventional
techniques. The filled containers were then placed in an Instron
machine and a compressive load applied. The load necessary to
achieve a 0.25 inch deflection (reduction in the height of the
container) and the deflection secured with the application of a 50
pound load were recorded. All tests were conducted at 75.degree. F.
and 50 percent relative humidity. The results of the tests are set
forth in Table I. ##SPC1##
As can be seen by referring to the data of Table 1, at equivalent
container weights, the containers having the structure of the
present invention (Case 4) exhibited the highest compressive
strengths of all of the polyethylene blow-molded containers having
various sidewall configurations. All of the containers were formed
from polyethylene resins having a density of about 0.958 and a melt
index of 0.30 as determined by ASTM method D-1238.
The deflection values secured upon the application of a 50 pound
load to the containers are significant. A 50 pound load is
approximately the maximum load a container might experience in a 15
case (24 cans to the case packed on two levels) high stack with
wooden pallets placed between the fifth and sixth and tenth and
eleventh cases. The data presented indicates that the container
having the configuration of the present invention has the greatest
resistance to deflection upon the application of a 50 pound load.
As a result, warehousing of containers having the design of the
present invention is greatly simplified as the containers resist
deformation. Hence, tilting and collapsing of warehouse stacks is
avoided.
EXAMPLE 2
Exposure to certain chemical environments (particularly detergents)
and/or elevated temperatures is known to induce stress cracking in
polyolefin resins. Container design and the molecular weight and
density of the resin used in the formation of thermoplastic
containers can also significantly effect stress crack resistance
properties.
To demonstrate the superior stress crack resistance of containers
having the configuration of the present invention, a series of
containers having the configurations described with reference to
Example 1 were formed from polyethylene resin having a density of
about 0.958 grams/cc. and a melt index of 0.30 as determined by
ASTM method D-1238. Each container was filled with high detergent
content lubricating oil sealed with a conventional metal lid, a 50
pound vertical load applied and the containers aged at 140.degree.
F. The individual containers were inspected periodically and the
failure time (leaking of container contents) of each container
noted. The mean failure time (F.sub.50) was then determined from a
probability/time plot for each design. The average failure times
are tabulated in Table II. ##SPC2##
As can be seen by referring to the data above, the containers of
the present invention (Case 4) exhibit the best stress crack
resistance of the polyethylene containers. Since all of the
containers were formed from equivalent resins, the superior
performance of the container of this invention can be primarily
attributed to its design. Containers formed having a plurality of
vertically spaced ribs demonstrated the poorest stress crack
resistance performance at equivalent container weight levels.
Numerous modifications can be made to the container structures
previously described without departing from the spirit of the
invention. For example, stacking ring 13 can be removed and the
container provided with a simple flat base for applications where
stacking stability is not critical. Similarly, the upper opening of
the container can be provided with a threaded or beaded structure
rather than a flange 14, thereby permitting the use of other types
of container closures such as threaded caps and the like.
* * * * *