U.S. patent number 3,557,814 [Application Number 04/724,473] was granted by the patent office on 1971-01-26 for modulated pure fluid oscillator.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Bowles Engineering Corporation. Invention is credited to Vincent F. Neradka.
United States Patent |
3,557,814 |
Neradka |
January 26, 1971 |
MODULATED PURE FLUID OSCILLATOR
Abstract
A modulated pure fluid oscillator wherein the amplitude of a
cyclically deflected power stream is periodically modulated at a
frequency which is substantially lower than the cyclical deflection
frequency. Amplitude modulation is achieved by issuing a periodic
modulation stream in interacting relation with the power stream at
sufficient pressure to limit but not override the primary cyclical
power stream deflections. The modulation stream is generated by
feeding back portions of the power stream which are scooped into a
cylindrical vent passage disposed adjacent an output passage of the
oscillator, the vent passage pressure varying as a function of the
power stream deflection amplitude. Fluid is exhausted from the vent
passage which acts as a vortex valve in throttling exhaust fluid as
a function of vent passage pressure. Flow not exhausted from the
vent passage is recirculated to interact with and limit the
deflection amplitude of the power stream. Limiting the deflection
amplitude reduces flow into the vent passage to cause reduced
pressure therein, thereby reducing the vortex valve throttling
action and reducing the flow of recirculated fluid interacting with
the power stream. Consequently, the amplitude of power stream
deflections increases and the modulation cycle starts over again.
The modulation frequency, being dependent on vent passage pressure
can be varied either by varying the power stream pressure of
controlling the fluid exhaust from the vortex valve.
Inventors: |
Neradka; Vincent F. (Rockville,
MD) |
Assignee: |
Bowles Engineering Corporation
(Silver Spring, MD)
|
Family
ID: |
24910579 |
Appl.
No.: |
04/724,473 |
Filed: |
April 26, 1968 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
137/10; 137/835;
137/839 |
Current CPC
Class: |
F15C
1/14 (20130101); Y10T 137/2256 (20150401); Y10T
137/0368 (20150401); Y10T 137/2234 (20150401) |
Current International
Class: |
F15C
1/00 (20060101); F15C 1/14 (20060101); F15c
001/08 () |
Field of
Search: |
;137/81.5 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Scott; Samuel
Claims
I claim:
1. A fluidic element comprising:
nozzle means responsive to application of pressurized fluid thereto
for issuing a power stream of fluid;
oscillatory control means for cyclically transversly deflecting
said power stream at a carrier frequency;
output means for selectively receiving the deflected power stream;
and
modulating means for cyclically limiting the deflection amplitude
of said power stream at a modulation frequency which is
substantially lower than said carrier frequency; said modulating
means comprising: a vent passage in said element disposed for
receiving varying power stream flow in proportion to the deflection
amplitude of said power stream; exhaust port means disposed near
the downstream end of said vent passage and communicating with an
ambient pressure environment, said exhaust port means being
configured wherein its maximum fluid exhaust flow rate is smaller
than the power stream flow rate into said vent passage for maximum
deflection amplitude of said power stream; and recirculation means
responsive to power stream flow rates into said vent passage in
excess of said maximum fluid exhaust flow rate for directing a
fluid modulating stream into interacting relation with said power
stream, said modulating stream having a maximum momentum which is
sufficient to limit the deflection amplitude of said power stream
and insufficient to entirely override said oscillatory control
means.
2. The combination according to claim 1 wherein the downstream end
of said vent passage is curved sufficiently to induce vortical flow
about said exhaust port means in response to fluid flow in said
vent passage, said vortical flow throttling fluid exhaust from said
exhaust port as a function of the power stream flow into said vent
passage, and wherein said recirculation means includes a sidewall
of said vent passage disposed for receiving peripheral fluid from
said vortical flow as a function of vortical flow rate and for
directing said peripheral fluid into interacting relation with said
power stream.
3. The combination according to claim 1 further comprising
demodulation and low pass filter means connected to said output
passage for providing a fluid output signal at said modulation
frequency and for blocking said carrier frequency.
4. A fluidic element comprising: nozzle means responsive to
application of pressurized fluid thereto for issuing a power stream
of fluid, oscillatory control means for cyclically transversely
deflecting said power stream at a carrier frequency; output means
for selectively receiving the deflected power stream; said output
means comprising a pair of output passages disposed for selectively
receiving said power stream; modulating means for cyclically
limiting the deflection amplitude of said power stream at a
modulation frequency which is substantially lower than said carrier
frequency; said modulating means comprising: a pair of vent
passages, each disposed adjacent a respective output passage and
separated therefrom by respective flow dividers, said vent passages
being disposed to receive power stream fluid only in response to
transverse deflections of said power stream beyond said respective
output passages, each said vent passages having an exhaust port
communicating between its downstream end and ambient pressure, the
walls of each vent passage being curved to produce vortical flow
about said exhaust port in response to power stream flow into said
vent passage, said vortical flow throttling fluid exhaust via said
exhaust port as a function of the flow rate into said vent passage,
said exhaust port being sufficiently small and said vent passage
wall being so configured that for large power stream deflections by
said oscillatory control means a substantial portion of the fluid
received by said vent passage is circulated about the periphery of
the vortical flow and back into interacting relation with said
power stream, the maximum momentum of the flow so circulated being
sufficient to reduce but not override the deflection amplitude of
said power stream produced by said oscillatory control means.
5. The combination according to claim 4 further comprising
demodulation and low pass filter means connected to said output
passages for providing a fluid output signal at said modulation
frequency and for blocking said carrier frequency.
6. The combination according to claim 4 where said element is a
pressure controlled oscillator in which said modulation frequency
and said carrier frequency vary as functions of the pressure of the
fluid applied to said nozzle means.
7. The combination according to claim 6 where said oscillatory
control means includes negative feedback passages extending from
each of said output passages for applying a portion of the flow
received by each output passage in interacting relation with said
power stream.
8. The combination according to claim 7 further comprising
demodulation and low pass filter means connected to said output
passages for providing a fluid output signal at said modulation
frequency and for blocking said carrier frequency.
9. The method of monitoring an acoustic disturbance utilizing a
pressure controlled fluidic oscillator in which a power stream of
fluid is cyclically transversely deflected and which has a variable
power stream deflection frequency versus input pressure
characteristic, said method comprising the steps of:
adjusting the frequency of said pressure controlled oscillator to a
value from which a predetermined power stream deflection frequency
deviation ensues in response to said acoustic disturbance;
subjecting said pressure controlled oscillator to said acoustic
disturbance; and
monitoring the power stream deflection frequency of said pressure
controlled oscillator to provide an indication in response to said
predetermined power stream deflection frequency deviation.
10. The method of generating a low frequency fluid signal
comprising the steps of:
issuing a power stream of fluid at a specified pressure;
cyclically deflecting said power stream transversely of its flow
direction and at a predetermined amplitude and frequency of
deflection;
cyclically limiting the amplitude of deflection of said power
stream at a lower frequency than said predetermined frequency by
recirculating at least one low velocity portion of said power
stream into deflecting relationship with said power stream, the
portion of said power stream so recirculated being dependent upon
the amplitude of deflection of said power stream such that more
fluid is recirculated for high deflection amplitudes than low
deflection amplitudes.
11. The method according to claim 10 wherein said step of
cyclically limiting includes the step of recirculating fringe
portions of said power stream into deflecting relationship with
said power stream, the amount of fluid so recirculated being
relatively large when the deflection amplitude of said power stream
is maximum and relatively small when the deflection amplitude of
said power stream is minimum.
12. The method according to claim 11, wherein said predetermined
frequency is a function of said specified pressure and wherein said
specified pressure is selectively variable.
13. The method according to claim 11 further comprising the step of
selectively impeding and augmenting the recirculating fluid to vary
said low frequency.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to pure fluid oscillators and more
particularly to modulation techniques for producing very low
frequency oscillatory fluid signals.
Prior art techniques for generating low frequency fluid signals,
for example on the order of 1--10Hz., generally require pure fluid
oscillators of relatively large size. for example, in negative
feedback fluidic oscillators, between negative feedback loops
extend between the output passages of the amplifier and its control
nozzles. The oscillator output frequency is determined by the
transit time required for the power stream fluid to travel from the
point of contact with a control stream, through an output passage,
around the feedback loops, and back through the control nozzle to
the point of contact. If very low frequencies are desired,
concomitant long transit times must be provided. Long transit times
may be achieved by operating the oscillator at low power stream
pressure, in the case of pressure controlled oscillators, or
providing relatively long feedback paths for the feedback fluid to
travel. Neither alternative is desirable for low frequency
operation. Specifically, operation at low power stream pressures
results in low pressure output signals and also has the
disadvantage or providing a sporadically operative device since the
feedback fluid, having a low pressure to begin with, when subjected
to the losses inherent in the system produces a control signal
having a pressure which is often insufficient to cause switching of
the power stream. Where the power stream pressure is maintained
sufficient to produce power stream switching, but the length of the
feedback passage is increased sufficiently to obtain the desired
low frequency signal, limitations an important consideration and
often preclude practical utilization of the device.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a
reliable pure fluid oscillator for generating low frequency fluid
signals wherein the oscillator can be kept relatively small
regardless of the output frequency.
It is another object of the present invention to utilize modulation
techniques in order to provide a low frequency fluidic oscillator
which is smaller than prior art oscillators having corresponding
output frequencies.
This invention is also concerned with techniques for effecting
modulation. More specifically, there has been a relatively recent
recognition by those working in fluidics of the fact that
alternating-flow systems are more advantageous for many
applications than direct-flow systems. The terms " alternating" and
"direct" as applied to flow herein are analogous to the terms
alternating-current (AC) and direct-current (DC) employed in
electronic systems. For example, direct-flow fluidic systems are
susceptible to drift, and more particularly to self-generated noise
within the fluidic components. If, instead of using the direct-flow
output level of an amplifier as an information signal, the
amplitude of an alternating flow level is so employed, the
amplifier may provide gain without being sensitive to drift. In
addition, employing tuning techniques to modify the frequency
responses of an amplifier results in higher gain in a limited
frequency band than is generally achievable in direct-flow
amplifiers. Increased utilization of alternating-flow systems has
resulted in a requirement for simple and efficient modulation
techniques for fluid systems. Specifically, since it is the
modulating signal which carries the information of interest,
techniques for accurately and efficiently modulating an alternating
flow carrier become quite important.
It is therefore another object of the present invention to provide
a simple technique for modulating the amplitude of an alternating
flow carrier signal in a pure fluid amplifier.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In one aspect of the present invention a pure fluid oscillator
having a cyclically deflected power stream is amplitude modulated
by means of a modulation control stream which periodically varies
the deflection amplitude of the power stream at a frequency which
is substantially lower than the power stream cyclical deflection
frequency. The modulation control stream is derived from power
stream fluid received by a vent passage disposed adjacent an output
passage of the oscillator so as to scoop a portion of the power
stream into the vent passage. Fluid exhaust from the vent passage
is controlled by a vortex valve disposed at the downstream end of
the vent passage. Exhaust of fluid via the vent passage is
throttled by the valve, the exhaust being increasingly throttled as
the fluid flow received by the vent passage increases. A
recirculation path is provided from the valve to a location
adjacent the upstream portion of the cyclically deflected power
stream. For large amplitudes of deflection of the oscillating power
stream relatively large portions of the power streams are received
by the vent passage. This in turn heavily throttles the valve and
relatively large proportions of the fluid received by the vent
passage are recirculated to interact with the power stream.
Consequently, the amplitude of deflection of the power stream is
limited, thereby limiting the amplitude of the output signal and
also reducing the amount of fluid received by the vent passage. The
reduction in fluid received by the vent passage reduces throttling
at the vortex valve, thereby reducing recirculated modulation flow.
The limiting effect on the amplitude of deflection of the power
stream is thereby removed, whereupon the power stream deflection
amplitude increases fluid directed to the vent passage. Increased
fluid flow to the vent passage begins the modulation cycle once
again. It will be seen therefore that the amplitude of deflection
of the power stream is cyclically limited by cyclically increasing
recirculation flow. The resulting output signal takes the form of
an amplitude modulated wave which may be detected and filtered as
to provide an oscillatory fluid signal having a frequency
determined by the throttling action of the vortex valve, the length
of the recirculation path, and the power stream pressure.
Since exhaust flow is proportional to the pressure in the vent
passage, it follows that increasing power stream pressure serves to
increase throttling at the vortex valve so as to increase the
buildup of recirculated modulation and control flow and thereby
increase the frequency of the modulation signal. If the modulated
output signal from the oscillator is filtered by a low pass filter
so as to block the carrier or deflection frequency of the
oscillator, only the modulation frequency will be recovered, and
this frequency can be controlled as a function of the power stream
pressure. Thus a low frequency oscillator can be provided without
requiring excessively large fluidic devices. Further, control of
the modulation frequency may be achieved other than by varying the
power stream pressure. Specifically, the throttling action of the
vortex valve may be varied as a function of variation in size of
the output port in the vortex valve. Similarly, introduction of
additional fluid flow into the exhaust port of the vortex valve can
effect valve throttling as desired and thereby vary the frequency
of the modulating signal.
It is important to bear in mind that the length of the path
traveled by the recirculating control fluid, namely the vent
passage length added to path length within the vortex valve and the
recirculation path communicating with the power stream, determines
in part the modulation frequency. Naturally, changes in power
stream pressure and externally controlled valve throttling will
produce variations of this frequency as determined by the
circulation path; however, it is the transmission time of the
vented flow around this recirculation path which is the primary
determining factor. Since the recirculation path receives only the
boundary portions from the power stream, which are at substantially
lower pressures than the power stream core, the recirculation time
for the modulation signal is substantially longer than the
recirculation time for the main portion of the power stream around
a path of a similar length In addition, the recirculation time for
the modulation signal is extended relative to the recirculation
time for the main portion of the power stream due to the frequency
response of the vortex valve action in the vent passages.
In a second embodiment of the invention a fluidic beat frequency
oscillator is obtained by mixing two oscillating fluid signals of
slightly different frequencies. The mixed signals are then detected
and passed through a low pass filter to provide the desired beat
frequency output. If one of the mixed signals is generated by a
fixed frequency oscillator, and the other signal is generated by a
pressure control oscillator, the beat signal frequency is variable
as a function of the input pressure to the pressure controlled
oscillator.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The above and still further objects, features and advantages of the
present invention will become apparent upon consideration of the
following detailed description of several specific embodiments
thereof, especially when taken in conjunction with the accompanying
drawings, wherein:
FIG. 1 is a plan view of a self-modulating pure fluid oscillator
constructed in accordance with the principles of the present
invention;
FIG. 1a is an illustrative waveform representing a typical signal
at the output passages of the device of FIG. 1; and
FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of another embodiment of the
present invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Referring now specifically to FIG. 1 of the accompanying drawings,
there is illustrated a negative feedback pressure controlled
oscillator employing the principles of the present invention. It is
to be understood that applicability of the principles of the
present invention is not limited to negative feedback type
oscillators, but rather are appropriate in any pure fluid device
having an oscillatory power stream. The oscillator of FIG. 1 is
substantially similar to the oscillator described in copending U.S.
Pat. application Ser. No. 430,696 by F. Manion, filed Feb. 5, 1965,
now abandoned and assigned to the same assignee as the present
invention, and comprises a pure fluid proportional amplifier
generally designated by the reference numeral 1. The cavities,
passages, and nozzles needed to provide the pure fluid amplifier 1
are formed in a flat plate 11 and plate 11 is covered by a flat
plate 12, the two plates being sealed in fluid tight relationship,
one to the other, by means of machine screws, clamps, adhesives, or
the like. For the purposes of clarity, the plates 11 and 12 are
shown to be composed of a clear plastic material, however, it
should be understood that any material compatible with the working
fluid may be used in the construction of the amplifier. Amplifier 1
has a power nozzle 2, control nozzles 3 and 4, and a pair of output
passages 6 and 7 located downstream of the nozzles. The sidewalls
of the amplifier are removed by providing recesses 8 and 9 which
are vented to ambient pressure via exhaust port 16 and 17
respectively to prevent boundary layer effects from affecting the
position of the power stream. Output passages 6 and 7 are separated
from respective recesses 8 and 9 by means of flow dividers 13 and
14, respectively. Exhaust ports or apertures 16 and 17 are defined
through cover plate 12 so as to communicate between the downstream
ends of respective recesses 8 and 9 and ambient pressure via
respective exhaust tubes 3- and 32.
In the embodiment of FIG. 1, a pair of RLC feedback loops are
provided, extending respectively from output passage 6 to control
nozzle 3 and output passage 7 to control nozzle 4. More
particularly, the feedback loop extending from output passage 6
comprises inductance (inertance) 19 which constitutes a relatively
long narrow passage, a capacitor 21 comprising an enlarged volume
in series with inductance 19, and a further inductance 22 having a
restriction 23 in series therewith to represent the resistance of
the feedback path. Restrictor 23 need not exist as such a in a high
system, the necessary resistance being present in the amplifier per
se. In a highly damped system, on the other hand, a restrictor such
as 23 or a porous plug or other type of fluid resistance may be
employed. A similar feedback path comprising similar components
exists between output passage 7 and control nozzle 4. This feedback
path is substantially identical with the feedback path previously
described in order to provide symmetrical oscillatory operation and
therefore will not be described in further detail. It is to be
understood however that if asymmetrical oscillation is desired, the
two feedback paths may include either different components or
similar components having different parameter values.
Upon issuance of a power stream from the nozzle 2, a larger
proportion of the stream flows to one or the other of the output
passages 6 or 7 due to some initial perturbation of the stream.
Assuming for the moment that a greater proportion of the flow is to
the passage 6, fluid is fed back through the feedback loop
extending therefrom and issues from control nozzle 3 so as to
divert the power stream to output passage 7. Fluid supplied to
output passage 7 then proceeds around the feedback loop extending
therefrom and upon issuing from nozzle 4 diverts the power stream
back to output passage 6. Thus the power stream oscillates back and
forth between passages 6 and 7 at some frequency which is equal to
the total transport time of the fluid about the system. The
transport time is determined by the lengths of the output passages,
and the feedback paths as well as the values of the RLC components
in the feedback paths. It is readily apparent that the frequency of
oscillation is also a function of the pressure of the power stream,
since the total transport time of the fluid about the feedback
loops reduces as the pressure increases, thus tending to increase
the frequency of oscillation with increase in pressure.
The system as thus far described is substantially identical with
the pressure control oscillator described in the above-referenced
copending patent application Ser. No. 430,696 except that the
pressure-controlled oscillator of said patent application provides
conventional relatively large vent ports at the downstream ends of
recesses 8 and 9 so as to maintain these recesses at ambient
pressure throughout the entire operating range of the oscillator.
In the present invention, however, relatively small exhaust ports
16 and 17 are provided and serve as a sink for exhausting fluid
from the recesses 8 and 9, respectively. The downstream ends of
passages 8 and 9 are curved to induce rotational or vortical flow
in fluid received by the recesses 8 and 9 by virtue of deflection
of the power stream at least partially beyond the apices of flow
dividers 13 and 14. Fluid received by recess 8, for example, is
directed around the periphery of the recess into a vortical path
and is exhausted through aperture 16. The relatively small diameter
of exhaust aperture 16 gives rise to a high velocity circulation at
the core of the vortex which in turn gives rise to a throttling
effect on the exhausting flow. The throttling action increases with
increasing vortical flow, and vortical flow increases with
increased power stream flow into recess 8. It is apparent that the
greater the amplitude of oscillations of the power streams, the
greater the flow into the recess 8. As the throttling action
increases more of the power stream spillage received by the recess
is spun around the periphery of the recess by the centrifugal force
created at the periphery of the vortex. This portion of the
spillage cannot be exhausted due to the increased throttling and is
therefore fed back along the recess wall into interacting
relationship with the power stream at a location slightly
downstream the control nozzle 3. The greater the spillage received
by recess 8 the greater the flow returned to interact with the
power stream. The recirculated spillage serves two separate
functions: first, it increases the pressure in the power stream;
second, it provides a secondary control stream. This secondary
control stream acts to limit deflection of the power stream towards
recess 8 and thereby reduce the amplitude of oscillation of the
power stream. The resulting smaller swing or amplitude of the power
stream results in less spillage into recess 8 and consequently in
less secondary control stream flow interacting with the power
stream. Consequently the amplitude of the power stream begins
increasing and spillage flow into recess 8 increases, thereby
increasing the vorticity of the exhaust flow in the recess which in
turn produces an increased throttling action of the exhaust flow.
As discussed above, increased throttling causes a return of more of
the spillage fluid into interacting relationship with the power
stream as part of the secondary control stream.
It is seen that the effects of the secondary control stream on the
amplitude of the oscillating power stream are cyclical, occurring
at a frequency determined by the pressure of the fluid received by
recess 8, the strength of the vortex created about exhaust port 16,
and the length of the peripheral path defining the boundary walls
of the recess for any given size of port 16. The secondary control
stream thus serves to amplitude-modulate the oscillator output
signal provided at output passage 6 of the oscillator. In a similar
manner, a secondary control stream is provided about the periphery
of recess 9 by means of the vortical flow induced about exhaust
aperture 17. In a unit which is entirely symmetrical about the
longitudinal axis of power nozzle 2, the two secondary control
streams are in phase so that a cyclical compressive force is
applied at both sides of the power stream to limit the amplitude or
swing of the power stream in both directions simultaneously. This
factor has been borne out by data resulting from tests of the
device illustrated in FIG. 1. This in-phase "beating" by the
secondary control streams is contrary to the 180.degree.
out-of-phase relationship existing between the control signals
employed at control nozzles 3 and 4 to cyclically deflect the power
stream at the oscillation or carrier frequency. As a result, the
output signals appearing across output passages 6 and 7 is an
amplitude modulated signal in which the carrier frequency is
determined by the transmit time for fluid traversing the output
passages, feedback paths, and the control nozzles, whereas the
modulation frequency is determined by the fluid transit time about
the periphery of recesses 8 and 9. The output waveform, appearing
as a differential pressure across passages 6 and 7, is illustrated
in FIG. 1a.
Even though the actual path length about the recesses 8 and 9 is
substantially shorter than the feedback path length from output to
control passages, the modulation frequency is substantially lower
than the basic oscillator carrier frequency. The reason for this is
two fold: first of all the power stream has a bell-shaped
transverse pressure gradient so that the spillage portion of the
power stream received by the vent passages is at a substantially
lower pressure and velocity than the core of the power stream which
is received by output passages 6 and 7. A secondary factor
accounting for the substantially lower frequency of the secondary
control signal as compared with the feedback signal is the time
required to increase and decrease the vorticity of flow in the vent
passages.
The throttling action of the vortexes created in the vent passages
may be likened to the action of a vortex valve such as the type
disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,324,891 to Rhoades. Specifically, in a
vortex, the rotating fluid creates a centrifugal force so that
there is a relatively large pressure at the outside of the vortex
and a pressure gradient across the vortex. The centrifugal force is
a function of the vortical velocity of the fluid which in turn is a
function of the fluid flow in recesses 8 and 9 in the unit of FIG.
1. Thus as the flow into a recess increases the centrifugal force
created by the vortex increases, thereby increasingly throttling
exhaust from the recess and increasing the flow returned to
interact with the power stream.
Since the modulation frequency is dependent to an extent on the
pressure of the fluid received by the recesses 8 and 9, it is not
surprising that the modulation frequency can be varied (along with
the carrier frequency) as the power stream pressure is varied.
Tests have shown that for a unit configured substantially like that
illustrated in FIG. 1, a linear modulation frequency versus power
stream pressure characteristic is achievable by varying the power
stream pressure over a predetermined range. This provides a
self-controlled feature whereby the modulation frequency can be
adjustably set to a desired value. This is particularly
advantageous where it is desired to utilize the modulation
frequency as a low frequency oscillatory signal. Specifically,
output passages 6 and 7 may be connected to a rectifier 26 such as
the full wave rectifier disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,292,648 To J.
R. Colston. The full wave rectified signal may then be passed to a
low pass filter 27 which blocks all carrier signal components and
passes a signal at twice the modulation frequency, the modulation
frequency being doubled by virtue of full wave rectification. The
output of the low pass filter 27 thereby constitutes a low
frequency oscillatory signal, the frequency of which may be readily
controlled, such as by controlling the pressure of the power stream
issued from nozzle 2. Low pass filter 27 may, for example, be of
the type described in the above-referenced Colston patent. Instead
of using rectifier 26 and filter 27 to obtain the low frequency
oscillatory signal, I have found that a turbulence amplifier, such
as the type disclosed in copending U.S. Pat. No. 3,234,955, may
serve the same purpose. Specifically, if each of output passages 6
and 7 is connected to a power stream tube of respective turbulence
amplifiers, the output passages of the turbulence amplifiers
receive the low frequency modulation fluid signal without any
carrier signal component. The reason for this is the relatively
high inductance of the power stream tubes of the turbulence
amplifiers, such inductance rendering the turbulence amplifier
incapable of responding to the relatively high carrier frequency
signal. It is important, of course, that a turbulence amplifier
having a sufficiently high inductance be chosen for this
purpose.
As discussed previously, the large components required to produce
low frequency oscillations in prior art pure fluid devices are
extremely disadvantageous and uneconomical. The modulation
technique employed herein to produce low frequency oscillations
with the use of rectifier 26 and low pass filter 27 avoids the
disadvantages inherent in the prior art. In addition, both the
carrier and modulation frequencies are generated with a single
fluid amplifier element, thereby avoiding the uneconomical and
inefficient prior art fluidic modulation techniques requiring
separate fluid amplifier elements to generate the carrier and
modulation signals.
It is to be noted that the frequency versus pressure
characteristics of both the carrier and modulation signals are such
to enable frequency modulation of both signals by varying the power
stream pressure. Thus, where a sinusoidal pressure is applied at
power nozzle 2 both the modulation signal and the carrier signal
are frequency modulated at the sinusoidal signal frequency and can
be appropriately employed for separate or concurrent utilization.
Thus, the device of the present invention is suitable for both
amplitude and frequency modulation techniques.
The amplitude modulation feature of the present invention can be
used to even further advantage than previously described.
Specifically, the throttling action of the vortex valve in vent
passages 8 and 9 may be enhanced or retarded in various ways to
effect variations in amplitude and frequency of the recirculated
secondary control stream. Thus, control signals may be tangentially
applied at the periphery of the vent recesses 8 and 9 in either
aiding or impeding relation to the peripheral spillage flow
received by the recess. Moreover, the effective size of exhaust
apertures 16 and 17 may be adjusted as desired in accordance with
input information, or the apertures 16 and 17 may be blocked by
some external member such as a piston moving axially of the
aperture or a plate moving perpendicularly thereof so as to vary
the throttling action of the vortex in these recesses as a function
of some desired input information signal. Valves connected in
series with pipes 31 and 32 may accomplish this function. The input
information signal may then be recovered by demodulating the output
signal appearing at output passages 6 and 7 by utilizing a
nonlinear element such as a rectifier 26 connected thereacross.
In tests performed on an oscillator configured substantially as
illustrated in FIG. 1, it was found that the modulation frequency
varied linearly from 5 to 10 Hz. in response to input pressure
variation between 0.053 to 0.060 p.s.i.g. For the same input
pressure variation, the carrier frequency was found to vary
linearly between approximately 140 and 160 Hz. In the units tested,
the limits of the modulation frequency range were approximately 2
Hz. and 11 Hz. For input pressures outside the range for producing
these modulating frequencies, the units operated as simple sine
wave oscillators, producing only the carrier frequency signal.
An interesting phenomenon was observed during testing, namely the
sensitivity of the above-described unit to externally generated
noise. For example, a unit operating at or near an end of its
modulation range was found to switch to pure carrier mode of
operation (without modulation) in response to the snap of one's
fingers in the vicinity of the unit. This phenomenon would appear
to render the unit of FIG. 1 suitable for operation as an acoustic
detector, providing a low frequency signal from filter 27 unless
disturbed by an acoustic signal above a predetermined amplitude and
within a specified frequency range.
In addition to the acoustic sensitivity of the modulation signal in
the device of FIG. 1, it has been found that the carrier frequency
is also sensitive to externally provided acoustic signals.
Specifically, operating the PCO outside the modulation range, it
was found that the PCO frequency changed when subjected to acoustic
signals at certain frequencies, but remained constant when
subjected to signals throughout the remainder of the audio
frequency range. Depending upon the operating frequency of the PCO,
the number of audio frequencies to which the PCO was sensitive
changed. For example, only one audio frequency was found to change
the frequency of the PCO originally set to operate at 102 Hz.;
however, when the PCO was originally set to operate at 104 Hz., two
distinct audio frequencies produced PCO frequency changes. Further,
when subjected to an audio frequency to which it is
frequency-sensitive, the PCO frequency variation was found to vary
as a function of the audio signal level at that "sensitive
frequency."
In view of the above, it would appear that the PCO illustrated in
FIG. 1, apart from its self-modulating capability, is capable of
being modulated by acoustic signals at predetermined frequencies
and by an amount determined by the acoustic signal level at these
predetermined frequencies. The PCO could therefore serve as sonic
detector; or where an acoustic signal generator is provided in
proximity to the PCO, the PCO may be selectively modulated in
accordance with input information controlling the actuation of the
acoustic signal generator.
Referring now to FIG. 2 of the accompanying drawings, there is
illustrated in schematic form another embodiment of the present
invention wherein modulation techniques are employed to provide low
frequency oscillatory fluid signals. More specifically, a pair of
pressure controlled oscillators 40 and 60 are provided and by way
of example may be of the type described in the above-referenced
copending Pat. application Ser. No. 430,696 by F. M. Manion.
Oscillator 40 receives an input pressure signal P.sub.1 at its
power nozzle 41 and oscillator 60 receives an input pressure signal
P.sub.2 at its power nozzle 61. Oscillatory differential pressures
are provided across output passages 43 and 45 of oscillator 40 and
63 and 65 of oscillator 60 as functions of respective input
pressure signals P.sub.1 and P.sub.2. Output passages 43 and 45 are
connected to opposing control nozzles 51 and 53 respectively of a
proportional fluidic amplifier 50. Output passages 63 and 65 are
connected to opposing control nozzles 71 and 73 respectively of a
proportional fluidic amplifier 70. Amplifiers 50 and 70, by way of
example, may be of the type described and illustrated in U.S. Pat.
No. 3,275,013. Amplifiers 50 and 70 are provided with respective
pairs of output passages 55, 57 and 75, 77. Output passages 55 and
75 are connected together at a common point by means of a T-fitting
81; similarly output passages 57 and 77 are connected to a common
point by means of T-fitting 83. T-fittings 81 and 83 are not to be
construed as limiting but rather as illustrative of one of the
numerous conventional techniques by which two fluidic signals may
be connected to a common point. The output signals from the
T-fitting 81 is applied as an input signal to a rectifier 85, the
output signal from which is applied to a low pass filter 87.
Similarly, the signal from fitting 83 is applied to rectifier 86
and low pass filter 88. Rectifiers 85, 86 and filters 87, 88 may,
for example, be identical to rectifier 26 and filter 27 of FIG.
1.
In operation, assume that the frequencies of the output signals
from oscillators 40 and 60 are slightly different. This may be
achieved by employing identical oscillators and providing input
signals P.sub.1 and P.sub.2 at slightly different pressures; or the
oscillators themselves may be constructed to operate at different
frequencies for equal input pressures. The slightly different
frequency signals are fed to respective buffer amplifiers 50 and 70
which serve to isolate the two oscillators from one another and
thereby prevent mutual feedback between oscillators to produce
frequency distortion. The beat frequency (or difference frequency)
between the two amplifier output signal frequencies is generated at
fittings 81 and 83 with a 180.degree.-phase difference, and
recovered by respective rectifiers 85, 86 and filters 87, 88, the
latter passing only low frequency signals and blocking frequencies
on the order of the PCO output frequencies. A low frequency signal
may thus be obtained by spacing the frequencies of PCO's 40 and 60
as desired.
It is to be understood that the differential or push-pull
configuration illustrated and described above is by way of example
only. If desired, the individual output signals from fittings 81
and 83 may be used alone, rectified and filtered to provide a
single-ended device wherein a low frequency output signal is
provided.
If input signal P.sub.1 is held at constant pressure and input
signal P.sub.2 is made variable in response to a predetermined
parameter, the modulation signal appearing at the output passage of
low pass filter 87 is a prescribed function of the predetermined
parameter. If PCO 60 has a linear frequency versus pressure
characteristic, said prescribed function is linear and represents a
gain (in cycles per second versus p.s.i.) which is almost twice the
gain of PCO 60 alone. Similarly, where P.sub.1 and P.sub.2 are made
to vary differentially in response to the predetermined parameter,
even higher gains, on the order of four times that of a single PCO,
are achievable.
In a circuit configured substantially as that of FIG. 2, it was
found that a frequency range from substantially 0 to 25 Hz. was
obtainable, and that the frequency was linear with respect to input
pressure variations over the range from 0.5 to 20 Hz.
The utilization of pressure controlled oscillators 40 and 60 in the
embodiment of FIG. 2 should not be considered as limiting the scope
of the present invention. Specifically, any two fluidic oscillators
having their frequencies separated as desired would suffice to
provide the requisite low frequency signal at filters 87 or 88. The
advantage of pressure controlled oscillators resides primarily
where P.sub.1 and P.sub.2 are variable relative to one another and
the low frequency output signal is a function of the input pressure
variation.
While I have described and illustrated several specific embodiments
of my invention, it will be clear that variation of the details of
construction which are specifically illustrated and described may
be resorted to without departing from the spirit and scope of the
invention as defined in the appended claims.
* * * * *