U.S. patent application number 17/576513 was filed with the patent office on 2022-05-05 for secure multi-party computation attribution.
The applicant listed for this patent is Meta Platforms, Inc.. Invention is credited to Andrew Knox.
Application Number | 20220141035 17/576513 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 1000006082408 |
Filed Date | 2022-05-05 |
United States Patent
Application |
20220141035 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Knox; Andrew |
May 5, 2022 |
SECURE MULTI-PARTY COMPUTATION ATTRIBUTION
Abstract
Secure multi-party computations may be used to get attribution
results without compromising user privacy. A content provider and
an advertiser may each sign a calculation indicating that they wish
to share data using a secure multi-party computation. A measurement
company may sign the calculation indicating that the measurement
company has evaluated the computation and that the computation will
protect user privacy. A user device may confirm with the
verification service that all parties have signed the calculation.
The user device may transmit one-time identifiers to the
measurement company, which allows impression data and conversion
data stored by the content provider and the advertiser to be
linked. The content provider, the advertiser, and the measurement
company may perform the secure multi-party computation, which
allows the advertiser to evaluate attribution results without
accessing the user data stored by the content provider.
Inventors: |
Knox; Andrew; (Brooklyn,
NY) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
Meta Platforms, Inc. |
Menlo Park |
CA |
US |
|
|
Family ID: |
1000006082408 |
Appl. No.: |
17/576513 |
Filed: |
January 14, 2022 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
16386103 |
Apr 16, 2019 |
11245536 |
|
|
17576513 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
726/4 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H04L 63/10 20130101;
H04L 9/3228 20130101; H04L 9/3247 20130101; G06Q 30/0242
20130101 |
International
Class: |
H04L 9/32 20060101
H04L009/32; G06Q 30/02 20060101 G06Q030/02 |
Claims
1. A computer-implemented method comprising: transmitting, by an
advertiser server, a digital signature to a verification service,
wherein the digital signature indicates that the advertiser server
has agreed to a secure multi-party computation protocol to be
performed by the advertiser server, a content publisher, and a
measurement company; receiving, by the advertiser server, a request
for content from a client device; transmitting, by the advertiser
server, a cross-origin resource sharing (CORS) exception request to
the client device, wherein the CORS is verified by the verification
service; storing, by the advertiser server, a one-time identifier
and conversion data for the client device regarding an
advertisement, wherein the one-time identifier is generated by the
advertiser server or the client device; receiving, by the
advertiser server, the one-time identifier from the measurement
company; inputting, by the advertiser server and based on receiving
the one-time identifier from the measurement company, the
conversion data to the secure multi-party computation protocol; and
performing, by the advertiser server, the secure multi-party
computation protocol, wherein the measurement company inputs a
linked pair of one-time identifiers including the one-time
identifier to the secure multi-party computation protocol, and
wherein the content publisher inputs impression data to the secure
multi-party computation protocol.
2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, further comprising
using an output of the secure multi-party computation as an input
to an attribution model.
3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, further comprising
receiving the one-time identifier from the client device.
4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the
measurement company verifies that the secure multi-party
computation is secure.
5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein an output of
the secure multi-party computation does not contain personally
identifiable information.
6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the digital
signature identifies the content publisher, the advertiser, and the
measurement company.
7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the client
device transmits the one-time identifier to the measurement company
in response to the verification service authorizing a cross-origin
resource sharing exception.
8. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium comprising
instructions executable by a processor of an advertiser server, the
instructions when executed causing the processor to perform actions
comprising: transmitting, by the processor, a digital signature to
a verification service, wherein the digital signature indicates
that the advertiser server has agreed to a secure multi-party
computation protocol to be performed by the advertiser server, a
content publisher, and a measurement company; receiving, by the
processor, a request for content from a client device;
transmitting, by the processor, a cross-origin resource sharing
(CORS) exception request to the client device, wherein the CORS is
verified by the verification service; storing, by the processor, a
one-time identifier and conversion data for the client device
regarding an advertisement, wherein the one-time identifier is
generated by the advertiser server or the client device; receiving,
by the processor, the one-time identifier from the measurement
company; inputting, by the processor and based on receiving the
one-time identifier from the measurement company, the conversion
data to the secure multi-party computation protocol; and
performing, by the processor, the secure multi-party computation
protocol, wherein the measurement company inputs a linked pair of
one-time identifiers including the one-time identifier to the
secure multi-party computation protocol, and wherein the content
publisher inputs impression data to the secure multi-party
computation protocol.
9. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 8,
the actions further comprising using an output of the secure
multi-party computation as an input to an attribution model.
10. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 8,
the actions further comprising receiving, by the processor, the
one-time identifier from the client device.
11. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 8,
wherein the measurement company verifies that the secure
multi-party computation is secure.
12. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 8,
wherein an output of the secure multi-party computation does not
contain personally identifiable information.
13. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 8,
wherein the digital signature identifies the processor, the
advertiser, and the measurement company.
14. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 8,
wherein the client device transmits the one-time identifier to the
measurement company in response to the verification service
authorizing a cross-origin resource sharing exception.
15. A computer-implemented method comprising: receiving, by a
processor, a cross-origin resource sharing verification request
from a client device; determining, by the processor and in response
to the receiving the cross-origin resource sharing verification
request, that a content publisher, an advertiser, and a measurement
company signed a secure multi-party computation protocol; and
transmitting, by the processor, a verification response to the
client device.
16. The computer-implemented method of claim 15, further comprising
receiving, by the processor, a digital signature for the advertiser
indicating that the advertiser is willing to share data as part of
the secure multi-party computation protocol.
17. The computer-implemented method of claim 15, wherein the
verification response indicates that the content publisher, the
advertiser, and the measurement company signed the secure
multi-party computation protocol.
18. The computer-implemented method of claim 15, wherein the
measurement company verifies that the secure multi-party
computation protocol is secure.
19. The computer-implemented method of claim 15, wherein an output
of the secure multi-party computation protocol does not contain
personally identifiable information.
20. The computer-implemented method of claim 15, further comprising
receiving, by the processor, a digital signature identifying the
content publisher, the advertiser, and the measurement company.
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application is a continuation of co-pending U.S.
application Ser. No. 16/386,103, filed Apr. 16, 2019, which is
incorporated by reference in its entirety.
FIELD OF ART
[0002] The present disclosure generally relates to the field of
computer technology, and more specifically, to attribution for
conversions.
BACKGROUND
[0003] Computer systems use various software programs and methods
to evaluate marketing attribution. Attribution describes how
different actions and events contribute to the success of marketing
and sales efforts. For example, cookies may be used to track a
user's online actions. HTTP cookies (also referred to as a web
cookie, Internet cookie, browser cookie, or simply cookie) are
small pieces of data sent from a website and stored on the user's
computer by the user's web browser while the user is browsing.
Cookies allow websites to remember stateful information (such as
items added in the shopping cart in an online store) or to record
the user's browsing activity (including clicking buttons, logging
in, or recording which pages were visited in the past).
[0004] The cookies may cause the user's actions to be stored in a
log file, and when the user makes a purchase, the log file may
indicate what advertisements and content the user previously
viewed. However, many users and content publishers concerned with
user privacy are hesitant to allow cookies to track an individual's
online activity, especially when the tracking is performed by third
parties. Additionally, many newer browsers and operating system
implement standards that prevent cross-site sharing of user data.
It is difficult for existing systems to accurately calculate
marketing attribution while maintaining sufficient user
privacy.
SUMMARY
[0005] Content providers, advertisers, measurement companies,
verification services, and browser developers may collaborate to
protect user privacy while analyzing distributed data. Secure
multi-party computations may be used to get attribution results
without compromising user privacy. A content provider and an
advertiser may each sign a calculation indicating that they wish to
share data using a secure multi-party computation. A measurement
company may sign the calculation indicating that the measurement
company has evaluated the computation and that the computation will
protect user privacy. A user device may confirm with the
verification service that all parties have signed the calculation.
The user device may transmit one-time identifiers to the
measurement company, which allows impression data and conversion
data stored by the content provider and the advertiser to be
linked. The content provider, the advertiser, and the measurement
company may perform the secure multi-party computation, which
allows the advertiser to evaluate attribution results without
accessing the user data stored by the content provider.
[0006] Systems, articles of manufacture, and computer-implemented
methods are described herein. The recited components may perform
actions including: transmitting a digital signature to a
verification service; receiving a request for content from a client
device; transmitting the content and an advertisement for an
advertiser to the client device; storing a one-time identifier and
impression data regarding the advertisement; receiving the one-time
identifier from a measurement company; inputting, based on the
one-time identifier, the impression data to a secure multi-party
computation; and calculating the secure multi-party computation
with the measurement company and the advertiser.
[0007] In various embodiments, the actions may include using an
output of the secure multi-party computation as an input to an
attribution model. The content publisher may generate the one-time
identifier. The measurement company may verify that the secure
multi-party computation is secure. An output of the secure
multi-party computation may not contain personally identifiable
information. The digital signature may identify the content
publisher, the advertiser website, and the measurement company. The
client device may transmit the one-time identifier to the
measurement company in response to the verification service
authorizing a cross-origin resource sharing exception.
[0008] In various embodiments, the components may perform actions
including: receiving a first digital signature from a content
publisher for a secure multi-party computation; receiving a second
digital signature from an advertiser for the secure multi-party
computation; receiving a third digital signature from a measurement
company for the secure multi-party computation; receiving a
cross-origin resource sharing verification request from a client
device; determining, in response to the receiving the cross-origin
resource sharing verification request, that the content publisher,
the advertiser server, and the measurement server signed the secure
multi-party computation; and transmitting a verification response
to the client device.
[0009] The features and advantages described in the specification
are not all inclusive and, in particular, many additional features
and advantages will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art
in view of the drawings, specification, and claims. Moreover, it
should be noted that the language used in the specification has
been principally selected for readability and instructional
purposes, and may not have been selected to delineate or
circumscribe the inventive subject matter.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0010] FIG. 1 illustrates a computing environment in secure
multi-party computation is used for attribution, according to one
embodiment.
[0011] FIG. 2 illustrates the interactions that take place between
different entities of FIG. 1 when utilizing secure multi-party
computation for attribution, according to one embodiment.
[0012] The figures depict embodiments of the present invention for
purposes of illustration only. One skilled in the art will readily
recognize from the following description that alternative
embodiments of the structures and methods illustrated herein may be
employed without departing from the principles of the invention
described herein.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0013] FIG. 1 illustrates a detailed view of a system 100 for
calculating attribution using secure multi-party computation. The
system 100 may comprise a content publisher 110, an advertiser
server 120, a measurement server 130, a verification service 140,
and a client device 150. These various components are now described
in additional detail.
[0014] The content publisher 110 may comprise one or more
computers, servers, and/or databases configured to generate digital
content, such as a website or application, which may be accessed
over a network. The content publisher 110 may be configured to
transmit advertisements to client devices, such as the client
device 150 on behalf of third party advertisers, such as the
advertiser server 120. The content publisher 110 may be configured
to store a log file of actions performed by the client device 150,
such as URLs visited by the client device 150 and advertisements
displayed to the client device 150. The content publisher 110 may
store demographic information of users which maintain accounts with
the content publisher 110.
[0015] The advertiser server 120 may comprise one or more
computers, servers, and/or databases configured to generate digital
content, such as a website or application, which may be accessed
over a network. The advertiser server 120 may be operated by an
advertiser that sells goods or services. The advertiser may
advertise on third-party websites or applications, such as those
provided by the content publisher 110. The advertiser server 120
may be configured to store a log file of actions performed by the
client device 150, such as URLs visited by the client device 150
and purchases made by the client device 150.
[0016] The measurement server 130 may comprise one or more
computers, servers, and/or databases configured to determine
whether a calculation is secure. The measurement server 130 may be
configured to review a proposed multi-party computation and sign
the calculation if the proposed multi-party computation is secure.
The multi-party computation may be considered secure if the
computation results in an anonymous output where personally
identifiable information is protected and data is not traceable
back to individual users.
[0017] The verification service 140 may comprise one or more
computers, servers, and/or databases configured to verify that the
involved parties have signed a calculation. The verification
service 140 may comprise a trusted third party configured to verify
the authenticity of signatures to the calculation on behalf of a
web browser. The verification service 140 may be configured to
authorize a cross-origin resource sharing (CORS) exception. The
verification service 140 may act similar to a certificate authority
that issues certificates that contain a public key and the identity
of the owner of the public key. The verification service 140 may
store master public keys for the various entities. Each entity may
use a private key to sign content to prove that they created or
endorsed the content.
[0018] The client device 150 may comprise a computing device such
as a smart phone, laptop computer, desktop computer, or any other
device that can communicate over a network. A user may utilize the
client device 150 to access content. For example, the client device
150 may be used to access a social networking website or
application provided by the content publisher 110 or to access a
website or application provided by the advertiser server 120. The
client device 150 may utilize a browser and/or an operating system
and one or more applications.
[0019] The various system components may communicate over one or
more networks 160. The network 160 may be any suitable
communications network for data transmission. In an embodiment such
as that illustrated in FIG. 1, the network 160 uses standard
communications technologies and/or protocols and can include the
Internet. In another embodiment, the entities use custom and/or
dedicated data communications technologies.
[0020] FIG. 2 illustrates the interactions that take place between
different entities of FIG. 1 when performing secure multi-party
computations according to one embodiment. The advertiser server,
the content publisher, and the measurement company may agree to
follow a protocol for a secure multi-party computation. The
protocol may define what the inputs for each party will be, and how
to calculate the output. The protocol may make use of secret
sharing. Secret sharing allows one to distribute a secret among
multiple parties by distributing shares to each party. In one
embodiment, the protocol may use Shamir secret sharing or additive
secret sharing, in which the shares are random elements of a finite
field that add up to the secret in the field. The protocol may
utilize Beaver triples, which allow additive secret sharing to
calculate secure sum. The protocol may comprise the BGW protocol, a
virtual party protocol, a secure sum protocol, a Yao-based protocol
(also referred to as Garbled Circuit), SPDZ, ABY, SCALE-MAMBA,
Oblivious Transfer, Fully Homomorphic Encryption, or any other
suitable multi-party computation protocol. The measurement company
may evaluate the protocol and determine whether the secure
multi-party computation will result in a secure anonymized output
that does not share personally identifiable information or
otherwise comprise user information.
[0021] The content publisher may transmit a digital signature to
the verification service (step 201). The digital signature may
indicate that the content publisher is willing to share data as
part of the secure multi-party computation agreed to by the
advertiser server, the content publisher, and the measurement
company. The digital signature may identify the advertiser server,
the content publisher, and the measurement company as the entities
that will be involved in the secure multi-party computation. The
digital signature may be applied to a permission, such as a
permission indicating that the advertiser, the content publisher,
and the measurement company may use the data shared by the content
publisher for the secure multi-party computation.
[0022] The advertiser server may transmit a digital signature to
the verification service (step 202). The digital signature may
indicate that the advertiser server is willing to share data as
part of the secure multi-party computation agreed to by the
advertiser server, the content publisher, and the measurement
company. The digital signature may identify the advertiser server,
the content publisher, and the measurement company as the entities
that will be involved in the secure multi-party computation.
[0023] The measurement company may transmit a digital signature to
the verification service (step 203). The digital signature may
indicate that the measurement company has evaluated the secure
multi-party computation and determined that the secure multi-party
computation will protect personally identifiable information and
any other necessary private user information, such as browsing
history. The digital signature may identify the advertiser server,
the content publisher, and the measurement company as the entities
that will be involved in the secure multi-party computation.
[0024] A user may use a client device to access content provided by
the content publisher (step 204). For example, the user may visit a
website provided by the content publisher using a browser on a
client device, the user may open a mobile application provided by
the content publisher, or the user may access a skill using a voice
personal assistant. In one embodiment, the client device may
transmit an HTTP request to the content publisher to access a
webpage. In response to the request, the content publisher may
transmit the requested content to the client device.
[0025] The content publisher may provide one or more advertisements
to the user in conjunction with content requested by the user. One
or more of the provided advertisements may be an advertisement for
the advertiser server. For example, the advertisement may provide
an offer for a product sold by the advertiser, and the
advertisement may include a link to visit a website provided by the
advertiser server.
[0026] The content publisher may record actions performed by the
user when interacting with the content publisher. For example, the
content publisher may place a first-party cookie on the client
device, and the content publisher may store the actions performed
by the client device in a log file. Each time the user visits a
webpage, the browser may transmit information including the URL of
the requested webpage and the date/time of the request, and the
content publisher may store the information in the log file.
[0027] The user may access content provided by the advertiser
server (step 205). For example, the user may visit a website
provided by the advertiser server using a browser on a client
device, the user may open a mobile application provided by the
advertiser server, or the user may access a skill using a voice
personal assistant. In one embodiment, the client device may
transmit an HTTP request to the advertiser server to access a
webpage. In one embodiment, the user may access the advertiser
content by selecting a link in an advertisement on the webpage
provided by the content publisher.
[0028] The advertiser server may record actions performed by the
user when interacting with the advertiser server. For example, the
advertiser server may place a first-party cookie on the client
device, and the advertiser server may store the actions performed
by the client device in a log file. Each time the user visits a
webpage, the browser may transmit information including the URL of
the requested webpage and the date/time of the request, and the
advertiser server may store the information in the log file.
[0029] The advertiser server may transmit a cross-origin resource
sharing (CORS) exception request to the user browser (step 206).
CORS is a mechanism that allows restricted resources on a web page
to be requested from another domain outside the domain from which
the first resource was served. The advertiser may wish to know
whether the user had viewed any of the advertiser's advertisements
displayed by the content publisher. However, CORS rules may prevent
the content publisher from sharing that information directly with
the advertiser server. The request may indicate which entities will
be involved in the secure multi-party computation. For example, the
request may identify the advertiser server, the content publisher,
the measurement company, and the verification service as entities
that will be involved in a secure multi-party computation.
[0030] In response to receiving the request for the CORS exception,
the browser on the client device may transmit a CORS verification
request to the verification service (step 207). The request may
include the identities of the entities as provided in the request
for the CORS exception received from the advertiser server.
[0031] The verification service may evaluate whether each of the
entities identified in the CORS verification request has signed a
calculation. The verification service may store each signature
received from the various entities. Each signature may identify the
content publisher, the advertiser server, and the measurement
company, and authorize the data provided by the respective entities
to be used for the secure multi-party computation. The signatures
may be signed by the public key of the respective entity.
[0032] The verification service may transmit a verification
response to the request for the CORS exception to the client device
(step 208). The verification response may indicate which entities
signed the calculation. A positive verification response may
indicate that the advertiser server, the content publisher, and the
measurement server all signed the calculation. A negative
verification response may indicate that at least one of the
advertiser server, the content publisher, or the measurement
company did not sign the calculation. The client device may receive
the public keys for the various entities from the verification
service, and the client device may use the public keys to verify
that the signatures were performed by the respective entities.
[0033] In response to receiving a positive verification from the
verification service, the client device may transmit one or more
one-time identifiers to the measurement company (step 209). The
one-time identifiers may allow the measurement company to inform
the advertiser server and the content publisher which data should
be used for the multi-party computation. In one embodiment, the
browser generates a one-time identifier for the content publisher
and shares the one-time identifier with the measurement company and
the content publisher. Similarly, the browser may generate a
one-time identifier for the advertiser server and share the
one-time identifier with the measurement company and the advertiser
server. In one embodiment, the advertiser server and the content
publisher may generate the one-time identifiers and transmit the
one-time identifiers to the client device, and the client device
may subsequently transmit the one-time identifiers to the
measurement company. In one embodiment, the content publisher may
generate the one-time identifier for the advertiser server, and the
content publisher may hash the one-time identifier using a unique
salt per advertiser. Hashing the one-time identifier using the
unique salt per advertiser may prevent colluding advertisers from
cross-site tracking by comparing identifiers. The measurement
company may store the one-time identifier for the advertiser server
and the one-time identifier for the content publisher as a linked
pair.
[0034] The advertiser server, the content publisher, and the
measurement company may perform the secure multi-party computation
(step 210). Each entity may provide an input. In one embodiment,
the measurement company may input the linked pair of one-time
identifiers. The one-time identifier for the advertiser server may
be transmitted to the advertiser server, and the one-time
identifier for the content publisher may be transmitted to the
content publisher. However, neither the advertiser server nor the
content publisher may have access to the other's one-time
identifier.
[0035] The measurement company may input multiple linked pairs of
one-time identifiers, each linked pair representing a different
user. Each one-time identifier for the advertiser server may be
transmitted to the advertiser server, and each one-time identifier
for the content publisher may be transmitted to the content
publisher.
[0036] In one embodiment, the advertiser server may input
conversion data. Based on the one-time identifiers received by the
advertiser server, the advertiser server may select the stored
conversion data associated with each received one-time identifier.
The conversion data may include a date and time of a website visit
by the user, the URLs of the advertiser server webpages visited by
the user, and a description of goods or services purchased by the
user from the advertiser. In one embodiment, the conversion data
may include demographic information about the user, such as age,
gender, location, education level, salary, etc. The conversion data
may also include the one-time identifier for the advertiser server.
In one embodiment, the advertiser server may provide all data
stored in the log file for the user. In other embodiments, the
advertiser server may provide a subset of the data stored in the
log file, such as only a description of goods or services purchased
by the user from the advertiser.
[0037] In one embodiment, the content publisher may input
impression data. Based on the one-time identifiers received by the
content publisher, the content publisher may select the stored
impression data associated with each received one-time identifier.
The impression data may include a date and time of a website visit
by the user, the URLs of the content publisher webpages visited by
the user, and a description of advertisements presented to the user
from the content publisher webpages. In one embodiment, the
impression data may include demographic information about the user,
such as age, gender, location, education level, salary, etc. The
impression data may also include the one-time identifier for the
content publisher. In one embodiment, the content publisher may
provide all data stored in the log file for the user. In other
embodiments, the content publisher may provide a subset of the data
stored in the log file, such as only a description of the
advertisements presented to the user on behalf of the
advertiser.
[0038] The advertiser server, the content publisher, and the
measurement company may follow the algorithm for the secure
multi-party computation as set forth in the previously agreed-upon
signed calculation. The advertiser server and/or the content
publisher may receive the output of the secure multi-party
computation. The output may provide information regarding the
effectiveness of advertisements for the advertiser that were
provided to the users on a webpage of the content publisher. The
output may be provided without revealing any personally
identifiable information or browsing history of any particular
user.
[0039] In one embodiment, the output may provide information
regarding a single user. For example, the output may indicate which
advertisements for the advertiser the user viewed on a webpage of
the content publisher, and the output may further indicate whether
the user subsequently made a purchase from the advertiser. In one
embodiment, the output does not contain any additional information
regarding other content viewed by the user, such as the URL of the
content publisher website where the advertisement was
displayed.
[0040] In one embodiment, the output may provide statistical
information regarding the advertisements. For example, the output
may indicate a percentage of users which visited the advertiser
server webpage after viewing an advertisement for the advertiser on
a webpage of the content publisher. The output may indicate a
percentage of users which purchased a good or service from the
advertiser after viewing an advertisement for the advertiser on a
webpage of the content publisher.
[0041] In one embodiment, the output may include demographic
information. For example, the output may indicate a percentage of
users in a specific zip code which visited the advertiser server
webpage after viewing an advertisement for the advertiser on a
webpage of the content publisher.
[0042] In one embodiment, the output may comprise a report. The
report may comprise a detailed demographic analysis of the results
from the calculation. The report may allow the advertiser server to
sort and filter the impressions and conversions based on the
demographic information. The advertiser server may utilize the
output in calculating attribution models to determine how effective
its advertisements had been. Attribution models can be complex and
are many are known in the art. However, as a simplified example,
the attribution model may calculate that if a user viewed an
advertisement presented by the content publisher and subsequently
made a purchase from the advertiser, then the purchase was made as
a result of the advertisement.
[0043] It is appreciated that although the figures and description
illustrate and describe interactions according to several
embodiments, the precise interactions and/or order of interactions
may vary in different embodiments.
[0044] The various system components described herein may include
at least one processor coupled to a chipset. Also coupled to the
chipset are a memory, a storage device, a graphics adapter, and a
network adapter. A display is coupled to the graphics adapter. In
one embodiment, the functionality of the chipset is provided by a
memory controller hub and an I/O controller hub. In another
embodiment, the memory is coupled directly to the processor instead
of the chipset.
[0045] The storage device is any non-transitory computer-readable
storage medium, such as a hard drive, compact disk read-only memory
(CD-ROM), DVD, or a solid-state memory device. The memory holds
instructions and data used by the processor. The graphics adapter
displays images and other information on the display. The network
adapter couples the computer to a local or wide area network.
[0046] As is known in the art, a computer can have different and/or
other components than those explicitly described herein. In
addition, the computer can lack certain illustrated components. In
one embodiment, a computer acting as a server may lack a graphics
adapter, and/or display, as well as a keyboard or pointing device.
Moreover, the storage device can be local and/or remote from the
computer (such as embodied within a storage area network
(SAN)).
[0047] As is known in the art, the computer is adapted to execute
computer program modules for providing functionality described
herein. As used herein, the term "module" refers to computer
program logic utilized to provide the specified functionality.
Thus, a module can be implemented in hardware, firmware, and/or
software. In one embodiment, program modules are stored on the
storage device, loaded into the memory, and executed by the
processor.
[0048] Embodiments of the entities described herein can include
other and/or different modules than the ones described here. In
addition, the functionality attributed to the modules can be
performed by other or different modules in other embodiments.
Moreover, this description occasionally omits the term "module" for
purposes of clarity and convenience.
Other Considerations
[0049] The present invention has been described in particular
detail with respect to various possible embodiments. Those of skill
in the art will appreciate that the invention may be practiced in
other embodiments. First, the particular naming of the components
and variables, capitalization of terms, the attributes, data
structures, or any other programming or structural aspect is not
mandatory or significant, and the mechanisms that implement the
invention or its features may have different names, formats, or
protocols. Also, the particular division of functionality between
the various system components described herein is merely for
purposes of example, and is not mandatory; functions performed by a
single system component may instead be performed by multiple
components, and functions performed by multiple components may
instead performed by a single component.
[0050] Some portions of above the description present the features
of the present invention in terms of algorithms and symbolic
representations of operations on information. These algorithmic
descriptions and representations are the means used by those
skilled in the data processing arts to most effectively convey the
substance of their work to others skilled in the art. These
operations, while described functionally or logically, are
understood to be implemented by computer programs. Furthermore, it
has also proven convenient at times, to refer to these arrangements
of operations as modules or by functional names, without loss of
generality.
[0051] Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the
above discussion, it is appreciated that throughout the
description, discussions utilizing terms such as "determining" or
"displaying" or the like, refer to the action and processes of a
computer system, or similar electronic computing device, that
manipulates and transforms data represented as physical
(electronic) quantities within the computer system memories or
registers or other such information storage, transmission or
display devices.
[0052] Certain aspects of the present invention include process
steps and instructions described herein in the form of an
algorithm. It should be noted that the process steps and
instructions of the present invention could be embodied in
software, firmware or hardware, and when embodied in software,
could be downloaded to reside on and be operated from different
platforms used by real time network operating systems.
[0053] The present invention also relates to an apparatus for
performing the operations herein. This apparatus may be specially
constructed for the required purposes, or it may comprise a
general-purpose computer selectively activated or reconfigured by a
computer program stored on a computer readable medium that can be
accessed by the computer. Such a computer program may be stored in
a non-transitory computer readable storage medium, such as, but is
not limited to, any type of disk including floppy disks, optical
disks, CD-ROMs, magnetic-optical disks, read-only memories (ROMs),
random access memories (RAMs), EPROMs, EEPROMs, magnetic or optical
cards, application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), or any
type of computer-readable storage medium suitable for storing
electronic instructions, and each coupled to a computer system bus.
Furthermore, the computers referred to in the specification may
include a single processor or may be architectures employing
multiple processor designs for increased computing capability.
[0054] The algorithms and operations presented herein are not
inherently related to any particular computer or other apparatus.
Various general-purpose systems may also be used with programs in
accordance with the teachings herein, or it may prove convenient to
construct more specialized apparatus to perform the required method
steps. The required structure for a variety of these systems will
be apparent to those of skill in the art, along with equivalent
variations. In addition, the present invention is not described
with reference to any particular programming language. It is
appreciated that a variety of programming languages may be used to
implement the teachings of the present invention as described
herein, and any references to specific languages are provided for
invention of enablement and best mode of the present invention.
[0055] The present invention is well suited to a wide variety of
computer network systems over numerous topologies. Within this
field, the configuration and management of large networks comprise
storage devices and computers that are communicatively coupled to
dissimilar computers and storage devices over a network, such as
the Internet.
[0056] Finally, it should be noted that the language used in the
specification has been principally selected for readability and
instructional purposes, and may not have been selected to delineate
or circumscribe the inventive subject matter. Accordingly, the
disclosure of the present invention is intended to be illustrative,
but not limiting, of the scope of the invention, which is set forth
in the following claims.
* * * * *