U.S. patent application number 17/317133 was filed with the patent office on 2021-10-14 for histone acetyltransferase activators and uses thereof.
The applicant listed for this patent is The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York. Invention is credited to Ottavio ARANCIO, Shixian DENG, Mauro FA, Yan FENG, Yitshak FRANCIS, Donald W. LANDRY.
Application Number | 20210317074 17/317133 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 1000005678727 |
Filed Date | 2021-10-14 |
United States Patent
Application |
20210317074 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
FENG; Yan ; et al. |
October 14, 2021 |
HISTONE ACETYLTRANSFERASE ACTIVATORS AND USES THEREOF
Abstract
The invention provides for a method for screening compounds that
bind to and modulate a histone acetyltransferase protein. The
invention further provides methods for treating neurodegenerative
disorders, conditions associated with accumulated amyloid-beta
peptide deposits, Tau protein levels, and/or accumulations of
alpha-synuclein as well as cancer by administering a HAT-activating
compound to a subject.
Inventors: |
FENG; Yan; (Shanghai,
CN) ; FA; Mauro; (Brooklyn, NY) ; ARANCIO;
Ottavio; (New York, NY) ; DENG; Shixian;
(White Plains, NY) ; LANDRY; Donald W.; (New York,
NY) ; FRANCIS; Yitshak; (New York, NY) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New
York |
New York |
NY |
US |
|
|
Family ID: |
1000005678727 |
Appl. No.: |
17/317133 |
Filed: |
May 11, 2021 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
16708190 |
Dec 9, 2019 |
11034647 |
|
|
17317133 |
|
|
|
|
13493490 |
Jun 11, 2012 |
10640457 |
|
|
16708190 |
|
|
|
|
PCT/US2010/059925 |
Dec 10, 2010 |
|
|
|
13493490 |
|
|
|
|
61539697 |
Sep 27, 2011 |
|
|
|
61363009 |
Jul 9, 2010 |
|
|
|
61354964 |
Jun 15, 2010 |
|
|
|
61355110 |
Jun 15, 2010 |
|
|
|
61317765 |
Mar 26, 2010 |
|
|
|
61285287 |
Dec 10, 2009 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
1/1 |
Current CPC
Class: |
C07C 323/60 20130101;
C07C 235/64 20130101; G01N 2800/2814 20130101; C12Q 1/48 20130101;
C07C 235/56 20130101; C07D 213/75 20130101; A61K 49/00 20130101;
C07C 323/42 20130101; C07D 213/82 20130101; C07D 333/38 20130101;
C07C 237/40 20130101; C07C 323/67 20130101; C07D 239/52 20130101;
C07C 2601/08 20170501; C07C 323/44 20130101; G01N 2500/04
20130101 |
International
Class: |
C07C 235/64 20060101
C07C235/64; C07C 323/67 20060101 C07C323/67; C07C 323/42 20060101
C07C323/42; C07D 213/82 20060101 C07D213/82; C07D 213/75 20060101
C07D213/75; C07C 235/56 20060101 C07C235/56; C07C 237/40 20060101
C07C237/40; C07D 239/52 20060101 C07D239/52; C07D 333/38 20060101
C07D333/38; A61K 49/00 20060101 A61K049/00; C12Q 1/48 20060101
C12Q001/48; C07C 323/60 20060101 C07C323/60; C07C 323/44 20060101
C07C323/44 |
Goverment Interests
GOVERNMENT SUPPORT
[0002] This invention was made with government support under
NS049442, AG017490, AG031294 and AG14351 awarded by the NIH. The
government has certain rights in the invention.
Claims
1. A method for treating a neurodegenerative disease in a subject,
the method comprising administering to a subject a therapeutic
amount of a pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound having
the following structure: ##STR00031## or a pharmaceutically
acceptable salt or hydrate thereof.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the neurodegenerative disease
comprises Adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD), Alcoholism, Alexander's
disease, Alper's disease, Alzheimer's disease, Amyotrophic lateral
sclerosis (Lou Gehrig's Disease), Ataxia telangiectasia, Batten
disease (also known as Spielmeyer-Vogt-Sjogren-Batten disease),
Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), Canavan disease, Cockayne
syndrome, Corticobasal degeneration, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease,
Familial fatal insomnia, Frontotemporal lobar degeneration,
Huntington's disease, HIV-associated dementia, Kennedy's disease,
Krabbe's disease, Lewy body dementia, Neuroborreliosis,
Machado-Joseph disease (Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3), Multiple
System Atrophy, Multiple sclerosis, Narcolepsy, Niemann Pick
disease, Parkinson's disease, Pelizaeus-Merzbacher Disease, Pick's
disease, Primary lateral sclerosis, Prion diseases, Progressive
Supranuclear Palsy, Rett's syndrome, Tau-positive FrontoTemporal
dementia, Tau-negative FrontoTemporal dementia, Refsum's disease,
Sandhoff disease, Schilder's disease, Subacute combined
degeneration of spinal cord secondary to Pernicious Anaemia,
Spielmeyer-Vogt-Sjogren-Batten disease, Batten disease,
Spinocerebellar ataxia, Spinal muscular atrophy,
Steele-Richardson-Olszewski disease, Tabes dorsalis, or Toxic
encephalopathy.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the neurodegenerative disease
comprises Alzheimer's disease, Huntington's disease, or Parkinson's
disease.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the compound is a
pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the compound is an acid addition
salt thereof.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the compound is a hydrochloride
salt thereof.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the effective amount is at least
about 1 mg/kg body weight, at least about 2 mg/kg body weight, at
least about 3 mg/kg body weight, at least about 4 mg/kg body
weight, at least about 5 mg/kg body weight, at least about 6 mg/kg
body weight, at least about 7 mg/kg body weight, at least about 8
mg/kg body weight, at least about 9 mg/kg body weight, at least
about 10 mg/kg body weight, at least about 15 mg/kg body weight, at
least about 20 mg/kg body weight, at least about 25 mg/kg body
weight, at least about 30 mg/kg body weight, at least about 40
mg/kg body weight, at least about 50 mg/kg body weight, at least
about 75 mg/kg body weight, or at least about 100 mg/kg body
weight.
8. A method for increasing memory retention in a subject afflicted
with a neurodegenerative disease, the method comprising
administering to a subject a therapeutic amount of a pharmaceutical
composition comprising a compound having the following structure:
##STR00032## or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or hydrate
thereof.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the neurodegenerative disease
comprises Alzheimer's disease, Huntington's disease, or Parkinson's
disease.
10. The method of claim 8, wherein the compound is a
pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
11. The method of claim 8, wherein the compound is an acid addition
salt thereof.
12. The method of claim 8, wherein the compound is a hydrochloride
salt thereof.
13. A method for increasing synaptic plasticity in a subject
afflicted with a neurodegenerative disease, the method comprising
administering to a subject a therapeutic amount of a composition
that increases histone acetylation in the subject, wherein the
composition comprises a compound having the following structure:
##STR00033## or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or hydrate
thereof.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein synaptic plasticity comprises
learning, memory, or a combination thereof.
15. The method of claim 13, wherein synaptic plasticity comprises
long term potentiation (LTP).
16. The method of claim 13, wherein the neurodegenerative disease
comprises Alzheimer's disease, Huntington's disease, or Parkinson's
disease.
17. The method of claim 13, wherein the compound is a
pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
18. The method of claim 13, wherein the compound is an acid
addition salt thereof.
19. The method of claim 13, wherein the compound is a hydrochloride
salt thereof.
Description
[0001] This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application
Ser. No. 16/708,190, filed Dec. 9, 2019, which is a divisional of
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/493,490, filed Jun. 11, 2012,
which is a continuation-in-part of International Patent Application
No. PCT/US2010/059925, filed Dec. 10, 2010, which claims priority
to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Nos. 61/285,287, filed Dec.
10, 2009, 61/317,765, filed Mar. 26, 2010, 61/354,964, filed Jun.
15, 2010, 61/355,110, filed Jun. 15, 2010, 61/363,009, filed Jul.
9, 2010. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/493,490 also claims
priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/539,697,
filed Sep. 27, 2011, the contents of each of which are hereby
incorporated by reference in their entireties.
[0003] All patents, patent applications and publications cited
herein are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. The
disclosures of these publications in their entireties are hereby
incorporated by reference into this application in order to more
fully describe the state of the art as known to those skilled
therein as of the date of the invention described and claimed
herein.
[0004] This patent disclosure contains material that is subject to
copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the
facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the
patent disclosure as it appears in the U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves any and all
copyright rights.
SEQUENCE LISTING
[0005] The instant application contains a Sequence Listing which
has been submitted electronically in ASCII format and is hereby
incorporated by reference in its entirety. Said ASCII copy, created
on Jun. 17, 2021, is named 0019240_00868US8_SL.txt and is 31,498
bytes in size.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0006] Cognitive neurodegenerative disorders are characterized by
synaptic dysfunction, cognitive abnormalities, and/or the presence
of inclusion bodies throughout the CNS containing, for example, but
not limited to native beta-amyloid fragments, native and
phosphorylated Tau, native and phosphorylated alpha-synuclein,
lipofuscin, cleaved TARDBP (TDB-43), in various percentages and in
relation to the specific disease.
[0007] Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder
characterized by memory loss, synaptic dysfunction and accumulation
of amyloid .beta.-peptides (A.beta.). It is caused in part by
increased levels of amyloid-.beta.-peptide 1-42 (A.beta..sub.42).
Although Alzheimer's Disease (AD) was described almost a century
ago, the molecular mechanisms that lead to its development are
still unknown. From a neuropathological point of view it is
characterized by the presence of amyloid plaques and
neurofibrillary tangles associated with neuronal degeneration,
whereas the clinical hallmark is a progressive memory loss
associated with a number of neuropsychiatric symptoms
[0008] Histone Acetyltransferases (HATs) are involved in histone
acetylation (leading to gene activation), chromosome
decondensation, DNA repair and non-histone substrate
modification.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0009] The invention is directed to compounds with histone
acetyltransferase (HAT) activity, high selectivity, and
blood-brain-barrier (BBB) permeability. In one aspect, the compound
is a compound of Formula (I),
##STR00001##
wherein, [0010] R.sup.1 is H, or CF.sub.3; [0011] R.sup.2 is H, Cl,
or CN; [0012] R.sup.3 is H, O-methyl, O-ethyl, S-ethyl,
O-cyclopentyl, OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2, or
CH.sub.2CH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2; [0013] R.sup.4 is H;
C(.dbd.O)NH-phenyl, wherein phenyl is substituted with one or more
halo or CF.sub.3; [0014] R.sup.5 is H, C.sub.1-C.sub.5-alkyl, OH,
OCH.sub.3, O-ethyl, OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2,
CH.sub.2CH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2,
SCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2, or OCH.sub.2C(.dbd.O)O-alkyl;
[0015] R.sup.6 is H, O-methyl, O-ethyl,
OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2; and [0016] X is CONH, SONH,
SO.sub.2NH, NHC(.dbd.O)NH, or NHCO, or a pharmaceutically
acceptable salt or hydrate thereof.
[0017] In one aspect of the invention, the compound is a compound
of Formula (II),
##STR00002##
wherein, [0018] R.sup.7 is H or CF.sub.3; [0019] R.sup.8 is O-ethyl
or S-methyl; [0020] R.sup.9 is butyl or
OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2; [0021] Y is C--Cl, C--CN,
C--NO.sub.2, or N; [0022] W is CH or N; and [0023] Z is CH or N, or
a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or hydrate thereof.
[0024] In one aspect, the compound is a compound of Formula
(III),
##STR00003##
wherein [0025] R.sup.10 is CF.sub.3; [0026] R.sup.11 is CN; and
[0027] R.sup.12 is O-ethyl, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt
or hydrate thereof.
[0028] In another aspect, the compound is a compound of Formula
(IV),
##STR00004##
wherein [0029] X is S, S(O).sub.2, NH, O, or C; [0030] Y is --C(O),
S(O).sub.2, or NH--C(O); [0031] R.sup.1 is H, Methyl, Ethyl,
n-Propyl, Isopropyl, n-butyl, t-butyl, C.sub.8H.sub.18,
C.sub.15H.sub.26, C.sub.15H.sub.28, C.sub.15H.sub.30,
C.sub.15H.sub.32, SR.sup.4, or OR.sup.4; [0032] R.sup.2 is H,
methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl, t-butyl, or
(C.sub.1-C.sub.6 alkyl)-CO.sub.2R.sup.6; [0033] R.sup.3 is H,
methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl, t-butyl, CF.sub.3,
CCl.sub.3, Cl.sub.3, F, Cl, I, NO.sub.2, or CN; [0034] R.sup.4 is
(C.sub.1-C.sub.6 alkyl)-N(R.sup.5).sub.2-- or C.sub.1-C.sub.6
alkyl; [0035] R.sup.5 is independently hydrogen, C.sub.1-C.sub.6
alkyl, or C.sub.3-C.sub.8 cycloalkyl; and [0036] R.sup.6 is
hydrogen, C.sub.1-C.sub.6 alkyl, or C.sub.3-C.sub.8 cycloalkyl, or
a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or hydrate thereof.
[0037] In a further aspect, the compound is a compound of Formula
(V),
##STR00005##
wherein [0038] X is S, S(O).sub.2, NH, O, or C; [0039] Y is --C(O),
S(O).sub.2, or NH--C(O); [0040] AR1 is a 5-membered aromatic ring
or a 6-membered aromatic ring containing 1-2 Nitrogens; [0041] AR2
is a 5-membered aromatic ring, a 6-membered aromatic ring or a
6-membered aromatic ring containing 1-2 Nitrogens; [0042] R.sup.1
is H, Methyl, Ethyl, n-Propyl, Isopropyl, n-butyl, t-butyl,
C.sub.8H.sub.18, C.sub.15H.sub.26, C.sub.15H.sub.28,
C.sub.15H.sub.30, C.sub.15H.sub.32, SR.sup.4, or OR.sup.4; [0043]
R.sup.2 is H, methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl, t-butyl,
or (C.sub.1-C.sub.6 alkyl)-CO.sub.2R.sup.6; [0044] R.sup.3 is H,
methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl, t-butyl, CF.sub.3,
CCl.sub.3, Cl.sub.3, F, Cl, I, NO.sub.2, or CN; [0045] R.sup.4 is
(C.sub.1-C.sub.6 alkyl)-N(R.sup.5).sub.2-- or C.sub.1-C.sub.6
alkyl; [0046] R.sup.5 is independently hydrogen, C.sub.1-C.sub.6
alkyl, or C.sub.3-C.sub.8 cycloalkyl; and [0047] R.sup.6 is
hydrogen, C.sub.1-C.sub.6 alkyl, or C.sub.3-C.sub.8 cycloalkyl, or
a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or hydrate thereof.
[0048] In one embodiment, the compound of Formula (I) is YF2
compound:
##STR00006##
[0049] In other embodiments, the compound of Formula (I) i
##STR00007##
wherein R of compound 3 is H, methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, isopropyl,
n-butyl, t-butyl, C.sub.8H.sub.18, C.sub.15H.sub.26,
C.sub.15H.sub.28, C.sub.15H.sub.30, or C.sub.15H.sub.32.
[0050] In some embodiments, the compound of Formula (I) is:
##STR00008## ##STR00009## ##STR00010##
[0051] In some embodiments, the compound of Formula (II) is:
##STR00011##
[0052] In some embodiments, the compound of Formula (V) is:
##STR00012##
[0053] An aspect of the invention provides a method for screening
compounds of Formula (I), Formula (II), Formula (III), Formula
(IV), Formula (V), or Formula (VI) to treat conditions associated
with accumulated amyloid-beta peptide deposits. The method
comprises (a) administering a HAT Activator compound of Formula
(I), Formula (II), Formula (III), Formula (IV), Formula (V), or
Formula (VI) to an animal model of amyloid-beta peptide deposit
accumulation; and (b) selecting a HAT Activator compound of Formula
(I), Formula (II), Formula (III), Formula (IV), Formula (V), or
Formula (VI) that can modulate histone acetylation after
administration of the HAT Activator compound in an animal model of
amyloid-beta peptide deposit accumulation.
[0054] An aspect of the invention further provides a method for
identifying a histone acetyltransferase (HAT) activator compound of
Formula (I), Formula (II), Formula (III), Formula (IV), Formula
(V), or Formula (VI) to treat conditions associated with
accumulated amyloid-beta peptide deposits, wherein the method
comprises selecting a HAT Activator compound of Formula (I),
Formula (II), Formula (III), Formula (IV), Formula (V), or Formula
(VI) having one or more of the following features: (a) the
EC.sub.50 of the compound is no more than about 1000 nM; (b) the
histone acetylation activity in vitro targets histone protein H2,
H3, and/or H4; (c) the compound penetrates the blood brain barrier;
(d) or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the compound has a
molecular mass less than about 500 Da, has a polar surface area
less than about 90 .ANG..sup.2, has less than 8 hydrogen bonds, or
a combination thereof, in order to penetrate the blood brain
barrier.
[0055] An aspect of the invention provides a method for reducing
amyloid beta (A.beta.) protein deposits in a subject wherein the
method comprises administering to the subject an effective amount
of a composition comprising a HAT Activator compound of Formula
(I), Formula (II), Formula (III), Formula (IV), Formula (V), or
Formula (VI), thereby decreasing A.beta. protein deposits in the
subject. In one embodiment, the subject exhibits abnormally
elevated levels of amyloid beta plaques. In another embodiment, the
subject is afflicted with Alzheimer's disease, Lewy body dementia,
inclusion body myositis, or cerebral amyloid angiopathy. In a
further embodiment, the A.beta. protein deposit comprises an
A.beta..sub.40 isomer, an A.beta..sub.42 isomer, or a combination
of isomers. In one embodiment, the compound is YF2. In other
embodiments, the effective amount is at least about 1 mg/kg body
weight, at least about 2 mg/kg body weight, at least about 3 mg/kg
body weight, at least about 4 mg/kg body weight, at least about 5
mg/kg body weight, at least about 6 mg/kg body weight, at least
about 7 mg/kg body weight, at least about 8 mg/kg body weight, at
least about 9 mg/kg body weight, at least about 10 mg/kg body
weight, at least about 15 mg/kg body weight, at least about 20
mg/kg body weight, at least about 25 mg/kg body weight, at least
about 30 mg/kg body weight, at least about 40 mg/kg body weight, at
least about 50 mg/kg body weight, at least about 75 mg/kg body
weight, or at least about 100 mg/kg body weight. In some
embodiments, the composition crosses the blood brain barrier. In
some embodiments, the compound is compound 1, compound 2, compound
3, compound 4, compound 5, compound 6, compound 7, compound 8,
compound 9, compound 10, compound 11, compound 12, compound 13,
compound 14, compound 15, compound 16, compound 17, compound 18, or
compound 19. In other embodiments, the compound increases histone
acetylation. In further embodiments, histone acetylation comprises
acetylation of histones H2B, H3, H4, or a combination thereof. In
further embodiments, histone acetylation comprises acetylation of
histone lysine residues H3K4, H3K9, H3K14, H4K5, H4K8, H4K12,
H4K16, or a combination thereof.
[0056] An aspect of the invention further provides a method for
treating Alzheimer's Disease in a subject, the method comprising
administering to a subject a therapeutic amount of a pharmaceutical
composition comprising a HAT activator compound. In one embodiment,
the compound is YF2. In other embodiments, the effective amount is
at least about 1 mg/kg body weight, at least about 2 mg/kg body
weight, at least about 3 mg/kg body weight, at least about 4 mg/kg
body weight, at least about 5 mg/kg body weight, at least about 6
mg/kg body weight, at least about 7 mg/kg body weight, at least
about 8 mg/kg body weight, at least about 9 mg/kg body weight, at
least about 10 mg/kg body weight, at least about 15 mg/kg body
weight, at least about 20 mg/kg body weight, at least about 25
mg/kg body weight, at least about 30 mg/kg body weight, at least
about 40 mg/kg body weight, at least about 50 mg/kg body weight, at
least about 75 mg/kg body weight, or at least about 100 mg/kg body
weight. In some embodiments, the composition crosses the blood
brain barrier. In some embodiments, the compound is compound 1,
compound 2, compound 3, compound 4, compound 5, compound 6,
compound 7, compound 8, compound 9, compound 10, compound 11,
compound 12, compound 13, compound 14, compound 15, compound 16,
compound 17, compound 18, or compound 19. In other embodiments, the
compound increases histone acetylation. In further embodiments,
histone acetylation comprises acetylation of histones H2B, H3, H4,
or a combination thereof. In further embodiments, histone
acetylation comprises acetylation of histone lysine residues H3K4,
H3K9, H3K14, H4K5, H4K8, H4K12, H4K16, or a combination
thereof.
[0057] An aspect of the invention further provides a method for
treating Alzheimer's Disease in a subject, the method comprising
administering to a subject a therapeutic amount of a pharmaceutical
composition comprising a compound of Formula (I), Formula (II),
Formula (III), Formula (IV), Formula (V), or Formula (VI). In one
embodiment, the compound is YF2. In other embodiments, the
effective amount is at least about 1 mg/kg body weight, at least
about 2 mg/kg body weight, at least about 3 mg/kg body weight, at
least about 4 mg/kg body weight, at least about 5 mg/kg body
weight, at least about 6 mg/kg body weight, at least about 7 mg/kg
body weight, at least about 8 mg/kg body weight, at least about 9
mg/kg body weight, at least about 10 mg/kg body weight, at least
about 15 mg/kg body weight, at least about 20 mg/kg body weight, at
least about 25 mg/kg body weight, at least about 30 mg/kg body
weight, at least about 40 mg/kg body weight, at least about 50
mg/kg body weight, at least about 75 mg/kg body weight, or at least
about 100 mg/kg body weight. In some embodiments, the composition
crosses the blood brain barrier. In some embodiments, the compound
is compound 1, compound 2, compound 3, compound 4, compound 5,
compound 6, compound 7, compound 8, compound 9, compound 10,
compound 11, compound 12, compound 13, compound 14, compound 15,
compound 16, compound 17, compound 18, or compound 19. In other
embodiments, the compound increases histone acetylation. In further
embodiments, histone acetylation comprises acetylation of histones
H2B, H3, H4, or a combination thereof. In further embodiments,
histone acetylation comprises acetylation of histone lysine
residues H3K4, H3K9, H3K14, H4K5, H4K8, H4K12, H4K16, or a
combination thereof.
[0058] Another aspect of the invention provides a method for
increasing memory retention in a subject afflicted with a
neurodegenerative disease, the method comprising administering to a
subject a therapeutic amount of a pharmaceutical composition
comprising a compound of Formula (I), Formula (II), Formula (III),
Formula (IV), Formula (V), or Formula (VI). In one embodiment, the
neurodegenerative disease comprises Adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD),
Alcoholism, Alexander's disease, Alper's disease, Alzheimer's
disease, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Lou Gehrig's Disease),
Ataxia telangiectasia, Batten disease (also known as
Spielmeyer-Vogt-Sjogren-Batten disease), Bovine spongiform
encephalopathy (BSE), Canavan disease, Cockayne syndrome,
Corticobasal degeneration, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, Familial
fatal insomnia, Frontotemporal lobar degeneration, Huntington's
disease, HIV-associated dementia, Kennedy's disease, Krabbe's
disease, Lewy body dementia, Neuroborreliosis, Machado-Joseph
disease (Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3), Multiple System Atrophy,
Multiple sclerosis, Narcolepsy, Niemann Pick disease, Parkinson's
disease, Pelizaeus-Merzbacher Disease, Pick's disease, Primary
lateral sclerosis, Prion diseases, Progressive Supranuclear Palsy,
Rett's syndrome, Tau-positive FrontoTemporal dementia, Tau-negative
FrontoTemporal dementia, Refsum's disease, Sandhoff disease,
Schilder's disease, Subacute combined degeneration of spinal cord
secondary to Pernicious Anaemia, Spielmeyer-Vogt-Sjogren-Batten
disease (also known as Batten disease), Spinocerebellar ataxia
(multiple types with varying characteristics), Spinal muscular
atrophy, Steele-Richardson-Olszewski disease, Tabes dorsalis, or
Toxic encephalopathy. In one embodiment, the compound is YF2. In
other embodiments, the effective amount is at least about 1 mg/kg
body weight, at least about 2 mg/kg body weight, at least about 3
mg/kg body weight, at least about 4 mg/kg body weight, at least
about 5 mg/kg body weight, at least about 6 mg/kg body weight, at
least about 7 mg/kg body weight, at least about 8 mg/kg body
weight, at least about 9 mg/kg body weight, at least about 10 mg/kg
body weight, at least about 15 mg/kg body weight, at least about 20
mg/kg body weight, at least about 25 mg/kg body weight, at least
about 30 mg/kg body weight, at least about 40 mg/kg body weight, at
least about 50 mg/kg body weight, at least about 75 mg/kg body
weight, or at least about 100 mg/kg body weight. In some
embodiments, the composition crosses the blood brain barrier. In
some embodiments, the compound is compound 1, compound 2, compound
3, compound 4, compound 5, compound 6, compound 7, compound 8,
compound 9, compound 10, compound 11, compound 12, compound 13,
compound 14, compound 15, compound 16, compound 17, compound 18, or
compound 19. In other embodiments, the compound increases histone
acetylation. In further embodiments, histone acetylation comprises
acetylation of histones H2B, H3, H4, or a combination thereof. In
further embodiments, histone acetylation comprises acetylation of
histone lysine residues H3K4, H3K9, H3K14, H4K5, H4K8, H4K12,
H4K16, or a combination thereof.
[0059] An aspect of the invention further provides a method for
increasing synaptic plasticity in a subject afflicted with a
neurodegenerative disease, the method comprising administering to a
subject a therapeutic amount of a composition that increases
histone acetylation in the subject, wherein the composition
comprises a compound of Formula (I), Formula (II), Formula (III),
Formula (IV), Formula (V), or Formula (VI). In one embodiment, the
compound is YF2. In other embodiments, the effective amount is at
least about 1 mg/kg body weight, at least about 2 mg/kg body
weight, at least about 3 mg/kg body weight, at least about 4 mg/kg
body weight, at least about 5 mg/kg body weight, at least about 6
mg/kg body weight, at least about 7 mg/kg body weight, at least
about 8 mg/kg body weight, at least about 9 mg/kg body weight, at
least about 10 mg/kg body weight, at least about 15 mg/kg body
weight, at least about 20 mg/kg body weight, at least about 25
mg/kg body weight, at least about 30 mg/kg body weight, at least
about 40 mg/kg body weight, at least about 50 mg/kg body weight, at
least about 75 mg/kg body weight, or at least about 100 mg/kg body
weight. In some embodiments, the composition crosses the blood
brain barrier. In one embodiment, the neurodegenerative disease
comprises Adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD), Alcoholism, Alexander's
disease, Alper's disease, Alzheimer's disease, Amyotrophic lateral
sclerosis (Lou Gehrig's Disease), Ataxia telangiectasia, Batten
disease (also known as Spielmeyer-Vogt-Sjogren-Batten disease),
Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), Canavan disease, Cockayne
syndrome, Corticobasal degeneration, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease,
Familial fatal insomnia, Frontotemporal lobar degeneration,
Huntington's disease, HIV-associated dementia, Kennedy's disease,
Krabbe's disease, Lewy body dementia, Neuroborreliosis,
Machado-Joseph disease (Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3), Multiple
System Atrophy, Multiple sclerosis, Narcolepsy, Niemann Pick
disease, Parkinson's disease, Pelizaeus-Merzbacher Disease, Pick's
disease, Primary lateral sclerosis, Prion diseasesm Progressive
Supranuclear Palsy, Rett's syndrome, Tau-positive FrontoTemporal
dementia, Tau-negative FrontoTemporal dementia, Refsum's disease,
Sandhoff disease, Schilder's disease, Subacute combined
degeneration of spinal cord secondary to Pernicious Anaemia,
Spielmeyer-Vogt-Sjogren-Batten disease (also known as Batten
disease), Spinocerebellar ataxia (multiple types with varying
characteristics), Spinal muscular atrophy,
Steele-Richardson-Olszewski disease, Tabes dorsalis, or Toxic
encephalopathy. In another embodiment, synaptic plasticity
comprises learning, memory, or a combination thereof. In some
embodiments, synaptic plasticity comprises long term potentiation
(LTP). In some embodiments, the compound is compound 1, compound 2,
compound 3, compound 4, compound 5, compound 6, compound 7,
compound 8, compound 9, compound 10, compound 11, compound 12,
compound 13, compound 14, compound 15, compound 16, compound 17,
compound 18, or compound 19. In other embodiments, the compound
increases histone acetylation. In further embodiments, histone
acetylation comprises acetylation of histones H2B, H3, H4, or a
combination thereof. In further embodiments, histone acetylation
comprises acetylation of histone lysine residues H3K4, H3K9, H3K14,
H4K5, H4K8, H4K12, H4K16, or a combination thereof.
[0060] An aspect of the invention further provides a method for
treating Alzheimer's Disease in a subject, the method comprising
administering to a subject a therapeutic amount of a pharmaceutical
composition comprising a compound of Formula (I), Formula (II),
Formula (III), Formula (IV), Formula (V), or Formula (VI). In one
embodiment, the compound is YF2. In other embodiments, the
effective amount is at least about 1 mg/kg body weight, at least
about 2 mg/kg body weight, at least about 3 mg/kg body weight, at
least about 4 mg/kg body weight, at least about 5 mg/kg body
weight, at least about 6 mg/kg body weight, at least about 7 mg/kg
body weight, at least about 8 mg/kg body weight, at least about 9
mg/kg body weight, at least about 10 mg/kg body weight, at least
about 15 mg/kg body weight, at least about 20 mg/kg body weight, at
least about 25 mg/kg body weight, at least about 30 mg/kg body
weight, at least about 40 mg/kg body weight, at least about 50
mg/kg body weight, at least about 75 mg/kg body weight, or at least
about 100 mg/kg body weight. In some embodiments, the composition
crosses the blood brain barrier. In some embodiments, the compound
is compound 1, compound 2, compound 3, compound 4, compound 5,
compound 6, compound 7, compound 8, compound 9, compound 10,
compound 11, compound 12, compound 13, compound 14, compound 15,
compound 16, compound 17, compound 18, or compound 19. In other
embodiments, the compound increases histone acetylation. In further
embodiments, histone acetylation comprises acetylation of histones
H2B, H3, H4, or a combination thereof. In further embodiments,
histone acetylation comprises acetylation of histone lysine
residues H3K4, H3K9, H3K14, H4K5, H4K8, H4K12, H4K16, or a
combination thereof.
[0061] An aspect of the invention provides a method for
ameliorating symptoms of Parkinson's Disease in a subject, the
method comprising administering to a subject a therapeutic amount
of a pharmaceutical composition comprising a HAT activator
compound. In one embodiment, the HAT activator compound can be a
compound of Formula (I), Formula (II), Formula (III), Formula (IV),
Formula (V), or Formula (VI). In one embodiment, the compound is
YF2. In other embodiments, the effective amount is at least about 1
mg/kg body weight, at least about 2 mg/kg body weight, at least
about 3 mg/kg body weight, at least about 4 mg/kg body weight, at
least about 5 mg/kg body weight, at least about 6 mg/kg body
weight, at least about 7 mg/kg body weight, at least about 8 mg/kg
body weight, at least about 9 mg/kg body weight, at least about 10
mg/kg body weight, at least about 15 mg/kg body weight, at least
about 20 mg/kg body weight, at least about 25 mg/kg body weight, at
least about 30 mg/kg body weight, at least about 40 mg/kg body
weight, at least about 50 mg/kg body weight, at least about 75
mg/kg body weight, or at least about 100 mg/kg body weight. In some
embodiments, the composition crosses the blood brain barrier. In
some embodiments, the compound is compound 1, compound 2, compound
3, compound 4, compound 5, compound 6, compound 7, compound 8,
compound 9, compound 10, compound 11, compound 12, compound 13,
compound 14, compound 15, compound 16, compound 17, compound 18, or
compound 19. In other embodiments, the compound increases histone
acetylation. In further embodiments, histone acetylation comprises
acetylation of histones H2B, H3, H4, or a combination thereof. In
further embodiments, histone acetylation comprises acetylation of
histone lysine residues H3K4, H3K9, H3K14, H4K5, H4K8, H4K12,
H4K16, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the symptoms of
Parkinson's Disease comprise tremor, bradykinesia, dyskinesia,
rigidity, postural instability, dystonia, akathisia, dementia,
impaired gross motor coordination, or a combination of the listed
symptoms. In another embodiment, the postural instability comprises
impaired imbalance, impaired coordination, or a combination
thereof.
[0062] An aspect of the invention also provides a method for
treating cancer in a subject, the method comprising administering
to a subject a therapeutic amount of a pharmaceutical composition
comprising a compound of Formula (I), Formula (II) or Formula
(III). In one embodiment, the compound is YF2. In other
embodiments, the effective amount is at least about 1 mg/kg body
weight, at least about 2 mg/kg body weight, at least about 3 mg/kg
body weight, at least about 4 mg/kg body weight, at least about 5
mg/kg body weight, at least about 6 mg/kg body weight, at least
about 7 mg/kg body weight, at least about 8 mg/kg body weight, at
least about 9 mg/kg body weight, at least about 10 mg/kg body
weight, at least about 15 mg/kg body weight, at least about 20
mg/kg body weight, at least about 25 mg/kg body weight, at least
about 30 mg/kg body weight, at least about 40 mg/kg body weight, at
least about 50 mg/kg body weight, at least about 75 mg/kg body
weight, or at least about 100 mg/kg body weight. In some
embodiments, the composition crosses the blood brain barrier. In
one embodiment, the cancer comprises B cell lymphoma, colon cancer,
lung cancer, renal cancer, bladder cancer, T cell lymphoma,
myeloma, leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia, acute myeloid
leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, acute lymphocytic leukemia,
hematopoietic neoplasias, thymoma, lymphoma, sarcoma, lung cancer,
liver cancer, non-Hodgkins lymphoma, Hodgkins lymphoma, uterine
cancer, renal cell carcinoma, hepatoma, adenocarcinoma, breast
cancer, pancreatic cancer, liver cancer, prostate cancer, head and
neck carcinoma, thyroid carcinoma, soft tissue sarcoma, ovarian
cancer, primary or metastatic melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma,
basal cell carcinoma, brain cancer, angiosarcoma, hemangiosarcoma,
bone sarcoma, fibrosarcoma, myxosarcoma, liposarcoma,
chondrosarcoma, osteogenic sarcoma, chordoma, angiosarcoma,
endotheliosarcoma, lymphangiosarcoma, lymphangioendotheliosarcoma,
synovioma, testicular cancer, uterine cancer, cervical cancer,
gastrointestinal cancer, mesothelioma, Ewing's tumor,
leiomyosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, colon carcinoma, pancreatic
cancer, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, squamous
cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, sweat gland
carcinoma, sebaceous gland carcinoma, papillary carcinoma,
Waldenstroom's macroglobulinemia, papillary adenocarcinomas,
cystadenocarcinoma, bronchogenic carcinoma, bile duct carcinoma,
choriocarcinoma, seminoma, embryonal carcinoma, Wilms' tumor, lung
carcinoma, epithelial carcinoma, cervical cancer, testicular tumor,
glioma, astrocytoma, medulloblastoma, craniopharyngioma,
ependymoma, pinealoma, hemangioblastoma, acoustic neuroma,
oligodendroglioma, meningioma, retinoblastoma, leukemia, melanoma,
neuroblastoma, small cell lung carcinoma, bladder carcinoma,
lymphoma, multiple myeloma, or medullary carcinoma. In some
embodiments, the compound is compound 1, compound 2, compound 3,
compound 4, compound 5, compound 6, compound 7, compound 8,
compound 9, compound 10, compound 11, compound 12, compound 13,
compound 14, compound 15, compound 16, compound 17, compound 18, or
compound 19.
[0063] An aspect of the invention provides a method for treating
Huntington's Disease in a subject, the method comprising
administering to a subject a therapeutic amount of a pharmaceutical
composition comprising a HAT activator compound. In one embodiment,
the HAT activator compound can be a compound of Formula (I),
Formula (II), Formula (III), Formula (IV), Formula (V), or Formula
(VI). In one embodiment, the compound is YF2. In other embodiments,
the effective amount is at least about 1 mg/kg body weight, at
least about 2 mg/kg body weight, at least about 3 mg/kg body
weight, at least about 4 mg/kg body weight, at least about 5 mg/kg
body weight, at least about 6 mg/kg body weight, at least about 7
mg/kg body weight, at least about 8 mg/kg body weight, at least
about 9 mg/kg body weight, at least about 10 mg/kg body weight, at
least about 15 mg/kg body weight, at least about 20 mg/kg body
weight, at least about 25 mg/kg body weight, at least about 30
mg/kg body weight, at least about 40 mg/kg body weight, at least
about 50 mg/kg body weight, at least about 75 mg/kg body weight, or
at least about 100 mg/kg body weight. In some embodiments, the
composition crosses the blood brain barrier. In some embodiments,
the compound is compound 1, compound 2, compound 3, compound 4,
compound 5, compound 6, compound 7, compound 8, compound 9,
compound 10, compound 11, compound 12, compound 13, compound 14,
compound 15, compound 16, compound 17, compound 18, or compound 19.
In other embodiments, the compound increases histone acetylation.
In further embodiments, histone acetylation comprises acetylation
of histones H2B, H3, H4, or a combination thereof. In further
embodiments, histone acetylation comprises acetylation of histone
lysine residues H3K4, H3K9, H3K14, H4K5, H4K8, H4K12, H4K16, or a
combination thereof.
[0064] An aspect of the invention provides for a method of treating
a neurodegenerative disease in a subject, the method comprising
administering to a subject a therapeutic amount of a pharmaceutical
composition comprising a compound of Formula (I), Formula (II),
Formula (III), or Formula (V), thereby treating the
neurodegenerative disease in the subject. In one embodiment, the
compound is YF2. In other embodiments, the effective amount is at
least about 1 mg/kg body weight, at least about 2 mg/kg body
weight, at least about 3 mg/kg body weight, at least about 4 mg/kg
body weight, at least about 5 mg/kg body weight, at least about 6
mg/kg body weight, at least about 7 mg/kg body weight, at least
about 8 mg/kg body weight, at least about 9 mg/kg body weight, at
least about 10 mg/kg body weight, at least about 15 mg/kg body
weight, at least about 20 mg/kg body weight, at least about 25
mg/kg body weight, at least about 30 mg/kg body weight, at least
about 40 mg/kg body weight, at least about 50 mg/kg body weight, at
least about 75 mg/kg body weight, or at least about 100 mg/kg body
weight. In some embodiments, the composition crosses the blood
brain barrier. In one embodiment, the neurodegenerative disease
comprises Adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD), Alcoholism, Alexander's
disease, Alper's disease, Alzheimer's disease, Amyotrophic lateral
sclerosis (Lou Gehrig's Disease), Ataxia telangiectasia, Batten
disease (also known as Spielmeyer-Vogt-Sjogren-Batten disease),
Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), Canavan disease, Cockayne
syndrome, Corticobasal degeneration, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease,
Familial fatal insomnia, Frontotemporal lobar degeneration,
Huntington's disease, HIV-associated dementia, Kennedy's disease,
Krabbe's disease, Lewy body dementia, Neuroborreliosis,
Machado-Joseph disease (Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3), Multiple
System Atrophy, Multiple sclerosis, Narcolepsy, Niemann Pick
disease, Parkinson's disease, Pelizaeus-Merzbacher Disease, Pick's
disease, Primary lateral sclerosis, Prion diseasesm Progressive
Supranuclear Palsy, Rett's syndrome, Tau-positive FrontoTemporal
dementia, Tau-negative FrontoTemporal dementia, Refsum's disease,
Sandhoff disease, Schilder's disease, Subacute combined
degeneration of spinal cord secondary to Pernicious Anaemia,
Spielmeyer-Vogt-Sjogren-Batten disease (also known as Batten
disease), Spinocerebellar ataxia (multiple types with varying
characteristics), Spinal muscular atrophy,
Steele-Richardson-Olszewski disease, Tabes dorsalis, or Toxic
encephalopathy. In another embodiment, synaptic plasticity
comprises learning, memory, or a combination thereof. In some
embodiments, synaptic plasticity comprises long term potentiation
(LTP). In some embodiments, the compound is compound 1, compound 2,
compound 3, compound 4, compound 5, compound 6, compound 7,
compound 8, compound 9, compound 10, compound 11, compound 12,
compound 13, compound 14, compound 15, compound 16, compound 17,
compound 18, or compound 19. In other embodiments, the compound
increases histone acetylation. In further embodiments, histone
acetylation comprises acetylation of histones H2B, H3, H4, or a
combination thereof. In further embodiments, histone acetylation
comprises acetylation of histone lysine residues H3K4, H3K9, H3K14,
H4K5, H4K8, H4K12, H4K16, or a combination thereof.
[0065] An aspect of the invention provides for a method of
decreasing inclusion bodies in a subject afflicted with a
neurodegenerative disorder, the method comprising administering to
the subject an effective amount of a composition comprising a HAT
Activator compound of Formula (I), Formula (II), Formula (III), or
Formula (V), thereby decreasing inclusion bodies in the subject. In
one embodiment, the inclusion bodies comprise beta-amyloid
peptides, native and phosphorylated Tau proteins, native and
phosphorylated alpha-synuclein, lipofuscin, cleaved TARDBP
(TDB-43), or a combination thereof. In another embodiment, the
subject exhibits abnormally elevated levels of amyloid beta
plaques. In a further embodiment, the beta-amyloid peptides
comprise an A.beta..sub.40 isomer, an A.beta..sub.42 isomer, or a
combination of isomers. In one embodiment, the compound is YF2. In
other embodiments, the effective amount is at least about 1 mg/kg
body weight, at least about 2 mg/kg body weight, at least about 3
mg/kg body weight, at least about 4 mg/kg body weight, at least
about 5 mg/kg body weight, at least about 6 mg/kg body weight, at
least about 7 mg/kg body weight, at least about 8 mg/kg body
weight, at least about 9 mg/kg body weight, at least about 10 mg/kg
body weight, at least about 15 mg/kg body weight, at least about 20
mg/kg body weight, at least about 25 mg/kg body weight, at least
about 30 mg/kg body weight, at least about 40 mg/kg body weight, at
least about 50 mg/kg body weight, at least about 75 mg/kg body
weight, or at least about 100 mg/kg body weight. In some
embodiments, the composition crosses the blood brain barrier. In
one embodiment, the neurodegenerative disease comprises
Adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD), Alcoholism, Alexander's disease,
Alper's disease, Alzheimer's disease, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
(Lou Gehrig's Disease), Ataxia telangiectasia, Batten disease (also
known as Spielmeyer-Vogt-Sjogren-Batten disease), Bovine spongiform
encephalopathy (BSE), Canavan disease, Cockayne syndrome,
Corticobasal degeneration, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, Familial
fatal insomnia, Frontotemporal lobar degeneration, Huntington's
disease, HIV-associated dementia, Kennedy's disease, Krabbe's
disease, Lewy body dementia, Neuroborreliosis, Machado-Joseph
disease (Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3), Multiple System Atrophy,
Multiple sclerosis, Narcolepsy, Niemann Pick disease, Parkinson's
disease, Pelizaeus-Merzbacher Disease, Pick's disease, Primary
lateral sclerosis, Prion diseasesm Progressive Supranuclear Palsy,
Rett's syndrome, Tau-positive FrontoTemporal dementia, Tau-negative
FrontoTemporal dementia, Refsum's disease, Sandhoff disease,
Schilder's disease, Subacute combined degeneration of spinal cord
secondary to Pernicious Anaemia, Spielmeyer-Vogt-Sjogren-Batten
disease (also known as Batten disease), Spinocerebellar ataxia
(multiple types with varying characteristics), Spinal muscular
atrophy, Steele-Richardson-Olszewski disease, Tabes dorsalis, or
Toxic encephalopathy. In another embodiment, synaptic plasticity
comprises learning, memory, or a combination thereof. In some
embodiments, synaptic plasticity comprises long term potentiation
(LTP). In some embodiments, the compound is compound 1, compound 2,
compound 3, compound 4, compound 5, compound 6, compound 7,
compound 8, compound 9, compound 10, compound 11, compound 12,
compound 13, compound 14, compound 15, compound 16, compound 17,
compound 18, or compound 19. In other embodiments, the compound
increases histone acetylation. In further embodiments, histone
acetylation comprises acetylation of histones H2B, H3, H4, or a
combination thereof. In further embodiments, histone acetylation
comprises acetylation of histone lysine residues H3K4, H3K9, H3K14,
H4K5, H4K8, H4K12, H4K16, or a combination thereof.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
[0066] The present application includes the following figures:
[0067] FIG. 1 is photograph of a western blot that shows histone 3
acetylation levels of mice hippocampus.
[0068] FIG. 2 is a bar graph showing that contextual fear
conditioning of A.beta..sub.42 infused memory deficit mice.
[0069] FIG. 3 is the chemical structure of lead compound YF2, a HAT
agonist/activator.
[0070] FIG. 4 is the chemical structure of compound 6J (CTB),
N-(4-chloro-3-trifluoromethyl-phenyl)-2-ethoxy-benzamide. 6J had no
solubility and precipitated as soon as it was put in H.sub.2O.
[0071] FIG. 5 is the chemical structure of compound MOM (YF1). YF1
was administered 25 mg/kg to WT mice (i.p.). The mice liver and
hippocampus were extracted 1 hr after treatment. Hippocampus and
liver had no increase in AcH3 levels.
[0072] FIG. 6 is a photograph of a western blot showing acetylation
levels of H3 in the liver and hippocampus.
[0073] FIG. 7 is a photograph of a western blot showing acetylation
levels of H3 in the liver, cortex, and hippocampus of mice that
were administered by gavage and i.p. 25 mg/kg of the HAT agonist,
MOM. Mice were subsequently subjected to fear conditioning
treatment to see if the drug is active after induction of
learning.
[0074] FIG. 8 is a photograph of a western blot showing acetylation
levels of H3 in the cortex and hippocampus. Mice were administered
with MOM via cannula (100 .mu.g/.mu.l per side) or mice were
administered YF2 (50 mg/kg, i.p.).
[0075] FIG. 9 is a photograph of a western blot showing acetylation
levels of H3 in the hippocampus. Mice were administered with YF2
(i.p. dissolved in saline) at 5 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, or 20 mg/kg.
[0076] FIG. 10 is a bar graph demonstrating cued fear conditioning
responses after administration of the HAT activator, YF2, to mice
treated with amyloid-beta (A.beta. or A-beta).
[0077] FIG. 11 is a bar graph demonstrating contextual fear
conditioning responses after administration of the HAT activator,
YF2, to mice treated with amyloid-beta (A.beta. or A-beta).
[0078] FIG. 12 is a bar graph demonstrating the assessment of
sensory threshold in mice treated with vehicle, YF2 alone, A.beta.
alone, or YF2 plus A.beta..
[0079] FIG. 13 is a graph showing the kinetics of the HAT agonist,
YF2, in the blood. YF2 was administered (20 mg/kg. i.p.) to mice
and then blood was sampled from tails at different time points.
[0080] FIG. 14 is a graph showing the results from the radial arm
water maze for mice that were administered the HAT agonist, YF2.
The graph shows vehicle, A.beta. (200 nM), YF2 (5 mg/kg) and YF2 (5
mg/kg)+A.beta. (200 nM).
[0081] FIG. 15 is a graph showing the results from platform trials
for mice that were administered the HAT activator, YF2.
[0082] FIG. 16 is a graph showing the speed of mice during the
radial arm water maze that were administered the HAT activator,
YF2.
[0083] FIG. 17 is a graph that shows that TSA reverses CA1-LTP
impairment in slices from 3-4 month old APP/PS1 mice. Summary graph
showing that 30 min HDAC inhibition ameliorates LTP in APP/PS1 mice
with no effect on WT littermates. *p<0.05 compared to
vehicle-treated APP/PS1 slices (two-way ANOVA). The horizontal bar
represents TSA application. The 3 arrows correspond to the
.theta.-burst. TSA-treated APP/PS1 and WT mice (n=7 and n=8,
respectively), vehicle-treated APP/PS1 and WT mice (n=6).
[0084] FIG. 18 is a graph that shows that HDAC inhibition improves
contextual FC in 3-4 month-old APP/PS1 mice. (Baseline) APP/PS1 and
WT littermates treated with TSA or vehicle show no difference in
immediate freezing in the training chamber. (24 hrs) Contextual FC
performed 24 hrs after training shows a reduction of freezing in
APP/PS1 mice treated with vehicle compared to vehicle-treated WT
littermates. Treatment with TSA ameliorates deficit in freezing
responses in APP/PS1 mice, and has no effect in WT mice. *
p<0.05 vs. APP/PS1-vehicle. (n=13 for all groups).
[0085] FIG. 19 is a schematic of a CBP/Gal4 hybrid and a reporter
plasmid in which luciferase expression is driven by a Gal4 yeast
promoter. CBP is CREB binding protein.
[0086] FIGS. 20A-B are graphs that show the Role of CBP and its HAT
region on transcription following PS1 stimulation. FIG. 20A depicts
the relative luciferase activity in F11 cells cotransfected with 2
.mu.g of a promoter-reporter construct containing Gal4 DNA binding
sites upstream of the luciferase gene and constructs containing
either functional CBP (WT-CBP) or a mutant lacking HAT activity
(WY-CBP) linked to the DNA binding domain of Gal4. Cells were
transfected with WT or mutated PS1. Values are expressed relative
to the level of luciferase in control, neural cells transfected
with Gal-luciferase and Gal-CBP. n=3 per each group. t=7.788,
p=0.0015 vs. control; * p<0.05 vs. control. FIG. 20B shows basal
luciferase activity in F11 cells co-transfected with 2 .mu.g of
Gal4 DNA binding sites upstream of the luciferase gene and
constructs containing either WT-CBP or WY-CBP linked to the DNA
binding domain of Gal4. No significant difference was found.
[0087] FIG. 21 shows photographs of western blots showing that
endogenous expression of CBP and PCAF is reduced in APP/PS1 mice. A
decrease in PCAF and CBP levels, but not p300 or GCN5, was observed
in A.beta.-infused mice. 4 month old APP/PS1 mice displayed reduced
CBP levels compared to WT controls.
[0088] FIG. 22 is a photograph of a western blot showing acetylated
H4 expression is reduced in APP/PS1 mice 1 hour after contextual
FC. Treatment with TSA, 2 hours before training, rescued the
histone 4 acetylation level defect of Tg mice. n=3 per each
group.
[0089] FIG. 23 is a schematic showing that CBP is recruited to act
as a bridge between DNA-bound phosphorylated CREB and the basal
transcription machinery located at the start site of transcription.
In addition, CBP acts as a HAT, making the chromatin more
accessible and increasing the transcription of memory associated
genes. Unlike CBP, HDACs remove an acetyl group from histones, thus
restricting access of the transcriptional machinery to the DNA
(figure was modified from [B1]; herein incorporated by reference in
its entirety).
[0090] FIGS. 24A-C depicts HDAC inhibition improves contextual fear
conditioning in mice in which dorsal hippocampi were infused with a
preparation containing oligomeric A.beta.42. FIG. 24A is a
schematic representation of cannulas implanted bilaterally into the
dorsal hippocampi. FIG. 24B is a photograph of a Tris-Tricine PAGE
Western blot depicting the analysis of A.beta. preparation in
non-denaturing/non-reducing conditions, showing different bands
corresponding to monomers (4.5 kDa), trimers (13.5 kDa) and
tetramers (18 kDa). FIG. 24C is a graph that represents: (Baseline)
Bilateral infusions of human A.beta.42 (200 nM in a final volume of
1 .mu.l slowly over 1 min) into dorsal hippocampi, 15 min prior to
training, do not affect immediate freezing in the training chamber
either in conjunction with TSA or vehicle injected (i.p) 2 hrs
before training. (24 hrs) Contextual fear conditioning performed 24
hrs after training shows a reduction of freezing in A.beta.-infused
mice injected with vehicle compared to vehicle-infused mice
injected with vehicle. Treatment with TSA ameliorates deficit in
freezing responses in A.beta.-infused mice, and has no effect in
vehicle-infused mice. (A.beta.-infused mice with TSA injection:
n=14, A.beta.-infused mice with vehicle injection: n=12,
vehicle-infused mice with TSA injection: n=8 and vehicle-infused
mice with vehicle injection: n=11).
[0091] FIGS. 25A-B depicts histone acetylation reduction in APP/PS1
mice. FIG. 25A is photograph of a western blot (top) and the
normalized results in graphic form (bottom). Western blotting of
protein extracts from APP/PS1 and WT mice, which were injected with
vehicle and TSA 2 hours before training, and euthanized 1 hour
after contextual fear conditioning. Vehicle-treated APP/PS1 animals
showed a decrease in acetylated H4 levels. However, TSA-treated
APP/PS1 mice showed an enhancement of H4 acetylation, reaching the
same levels of acetylation as TSA-treated WT mice. Results were
normalized against vehicle-treated WT mice. n=4 per each group
except for TSA-treated WT mice with n=5. FIG. 25B is photograph of
a western blot (top) and the normalized results in graphic form
(bottom). Basal acetylation levels of H4 in APP/PS1 mice and WT
littermates, which were exposed to the context without receiving an
electrical shock, were similar n=3 per each group. The data shown
in FIG. 25A and FIG. 25B are presented as a ratio of acetylated-H4
to total H4.
[0092] FIGS. 26A-B is a synthetic scheme showing the synthesis and
HAT activity assessment of the agonist MOM. FIG. 26A shows that the
o-ethoxybenzolic acid was refluxed in SOCl.sub.2 (1.66 g, 10 mmol)
overnight. Removal of the organic solvent in vacuum gave the
corresponding benzoyl chloride, which was dissolved in 20 mL of
CH.sub.2Cl.sub.2, followed by addition of
4-chloro-3-trifluoromethylaniline (1.96 g, 10 mmol). The resulting
solution was put in an ice-H.sub.2O bath and added 20 mL of
saturated NaHCO.sub.3 aqueous solution dropwise. The mixture was
then allowed to react at room temperature for 4 hours. The organic
phase was separated and washed with 2N HCl, H.sub.2O and brine.
After dried over Na.sub.2SO.sub.4, the organic solvent was removed
in vacuum to yield an off-white crystalline as the desired product
(3.1 g, yield 90%). FIG. 26B is a photograph of a western blot
showing that endogenous levels of acetylated H3 are increased by
MOM (100 .mu.g in 1 .mu.l infused into dorsal hippocampi through
cannulas) in mouse hippocampi which were harvested 2 hrs after the
agonist administration.
[0093] FIG. 27 is a photograph of a western blot showing that
histone acetylation is reduced in A.beta. (A-beta) infused mice.
Vehicle-treated A-beta infused animals showed a decrease in
acetylated H3/4 levels both before and after following associative
memory.
[0094] FIG. 28 is a schematic of histone acetylation and the role
of HATs in such. YF2 is an example of a compound that activates
HAT.
[0095] FIG. 29 is a synthetic scheme for the HAT Activator
compound, YF2.
[0096] FIG. 30 is a schematic showing the role of a HDAC inhibitor
(HDACi; e.g., TSA) in histone acetylation and deacetylation.
[0097] FIGS. 31A-D are graphs showing the effect of YF2 on cancer
cell viability in NCI-ADR-RES cells (FIG. 31A; ovarian cancer),
U251 cells (FIG. 31B; glioblastoma cells), Hs578T cells (FIG. 31C;
breast cancer cells), and CCRF-CEM cell (FIG. 31D; leukemia cells).
Values represent an average of 3 wells. Error bars represent
standard deviations.
[0098] FIGS. 32A-B are graphs showing the effect of YF2 on cancer
cell proliferation in NCI-ADR-RES cells (FIG. 32A; ovarian cancer)
and U251 cells (FIG. 32B; glioblastoma cells).
[0099] FIGS. 32C-D are graphs showing the effect of YF2 on cancer
cell proliferation in Hs578T cells (FIG. 32C; breast cancer cells)
and CCRF-CEM cell (FIG. 32D; leukemia cells).
[0100] FIG. 33 is a table showing the IC.sub.50 measurements for
YF2 and Vinblastine (VBL) on cell viability (Cell Titer Glo column)
and cell proliferation (Cyquant column) in NCI-ADR-RES cells
(ovarian cancer), U251 cells (glioblastoma cells), Hs578T cells
(breast cancer cells), CCRF-CEM cells (leukemia cells), ACHN cells
(human renal carcinoma cells), and A549 cells (human lung carcinoma
cells).
[0101] FIG. 34 is a graph showing YF2 specificity. YF2 activates
CREB Binding Protein (CBP) and the histone acetyltransferase,
GCN5.
[0102] FIGS. 35A-B are graphs showing the effect of YF2 on cancer
cell viability in ACHN cells (FIG. 35A; human renal carcinoma
cells) and A549 cells (FIG. 35B; human lung carcinoma cells).
Values represent an average of 3 wells. Error bars represent
standard deviations.
[0103] FIGS. 36A-B are graphs showing the effect of YF2 on cancer
cell proliferation in ACHN cells (FIG. 36A; human renal carcinoma
cells) and A549 cells (FIG. 36B; human lung carcinoma cells).
[0104] FIG. 37 is a synthetic scheme for the HAT Activator
compound, 10.
[0105] FIG. 38 is a synthetic scheme for the HAT Activator
compound, 20.
[0106] FIG. 39 is a synthetic scheme for the HAT Activator
compound, 11.
[0107] FIG. 40 is a synthetic scheme for the HAT Activator
compound, 12.
[0108] FIG. 41 is a synthetic scheme for the HAT Activator
compound, 14.
[0109] FIG. 42 is a synthetic scheme for the HAT Activator
compound, 13.
[0110] FIG. 43 is a synthetic scheme for the HAT Activator
compound, 15. The synthetic scheme is continued to a second page at
the hatched line.
[0111] FIG. 44 is a synthetic scheme for the HAT Activator
compound, 16.
[0112] FIG. 45 is a synthetic scheme for the HAT Activator
compound, 17.
[0113] FIG. 46 is a synthetic scheme for the HAT Activator
compound, 18.
[0114] FIGS. 47A-D are graphs showing the effect of Vinblastine on
cancer cell viability in NCI-ADR-RES cells (FIG. 47A; ovarian
cancer), U251 cells (FIG. 47B; glioblastoma cells), Hs578T cells
(FIG. 47C; breast cancer cells), and CCRF-CEM cell (FIG. 47D;
leukemia cells). Values represent an average of 3 wells. Error bars
represent standard deviations.
[0115] FIGS. 48A-B are graphs showing the effect of Vinblastine on
cancer cell viability in ACHN cells (FIG. 48A; human renal
carcinoma cells) and A549 cells (FIG. 48B; human lung carcinoma
cells). Values represent an average of 3 wells. Error bars
represent standard deviations.
[0116] FIGS. 49A-B are graphs showing the effect of Vinblastine on
cancer cell proliferation in NCI-ADR-RES cells (FIG. 49A; ovarian
cancer) and U251 cells (FIG. 49B; glioblastoma cells). Values
represent an average of 3 wells. Error bars represent standard
deviations.
[0117] FIGS. 49C-D are graphs showing the effect of Vinblastine on
cancer cell proliferation in Hs578T cells (FIG. 49C; breast cancer
cells) and CCRF-CEM cell (FIG. 49D; leukemia cells). Values
represent an average of 3 wells. Error bars represent standard
deviations.
[0118] FIGS. 50A-B are graphs showing the effect of Vinblastine on
cancer cell proliferation in ACHN cells (FIG. 50A; human renal
carcinoma cells) and A549 cells (FIG. 50B; human lung carcinoma
cells). Values represent an average of 3 wells. Error bars
represent standard deviations.
[0119] FIG. 51 is a synthetic scheme for the HAT Activator
compound, 19.
[0120] FIG. 52 is a graph showing the effect of OA2 (YF2 compound)
on HDAC1 activity.
[0121] FIG. 53 is a graph showing the effect of OA2 (YF2 compound)
on HDAC3/NCOR2 activity.
[0122] FIG. 54 is a graph showing the effect of OA2 (YF2 compound)
on HDAC5FL activity.
[0123] FIG. 55 is a graph showing the effect of OA2 (YF2 compound)
on HDAC7 activity.
[0124] FIG. 56 is a graph showing the effect of OA2 (YF2 compound)
on HDAC8 activity.
[0125] FIG. 57 is a graph showing the effect of OA2 (YF2 compound)
on HDAC10 activity.
[0126] FIG. 58 is a graph showing the effect of OA2 (YF2 compound)
on HDAC11 activity.
[0127] FIG. 59 is a graph showing the effect of OA2 (YF2 compound)
on Sirtuin1 activity.
[0128] FIG. 60 is a graph showing the effect of OA2 (YF2 compound)
on Sirtuin2 activity.
[0129] FIG. 61 is a graph showing the effect of the HDAC inhibitor,
SAHA, on HDAC1 activity.
[0130] FIG. 62 is a graph showing the effect of the HDAC inhibitor,
SAHA, on HDAC3/NCOR2 activity.
[0131] FIG. 63 is a graph showing the effect of the HDAC inhibitor,
SAHA, on HDAC6 activity.
[0132] FIG. 64 shows that an acute administration of YF2 increased
specific acetylation of H3, H4, and H2B in hippocampal lysates. n=3
and p<0.05 per group.
[0133] FIG. 65 is a photograph of a western blot showing that YF2
(i.p., 5 mg/kg) was able to rescue the A.beta.-induced decrease in
H3 acetylation levels (n=3 per each group, p<0.05). A.beta. (200
nM in a final volume of 1 .mu.l over 1 min, 75 min before mice were
sacrificed) was infused through cannulas onto dorsal
hippocampi.
[0134] FIGS. 66A-B are graphs that show the beneficial effect of
YF2 on A.beta.42-induced synaptic and cognitive dysfunction. YF2
ameliorates the LTP deficit in A.beta.42-treated slices (FIG. 66A;
the graph represents the average of the last 5 min of recording at
60 min after the tetanus) P<0.05. YF2 ameliorates the contextual
fear memory deficit in A.beta.42-infused mice, P<0.01 (FIG.
66B).
[0135] FIG. 66C is a graph that shows the beneficial effect of YF2
on A.beta.42-induced cognitive dysfunction using a water
maze/reference memory test. YF2 ameliorates the reference memory
deficit in A.beta.42-infused mice, P<0.01.
[0136] FIGS. 67A-B shows graphs depicting the beneficial effect of
YF2 against memory defect in APP/PS1 mice using fear conditioning
or reference memory tests. YF2 ameliorates the reference (FIG. 67A)
and contextual fear (FIG. 67B) memory deficit in APP/PS1 mice
compared to WT littermates (P<0.02 for both tests).
[0137] FIGS. 68A-B show that YF2 rescues the reduction in
acetylated H3 levels after infusion of A.beta.42.
[0138] FIGS. 69A-D are graphs that show the Latency (FIG. 69A) and
speed (FIG. 69B) to reach a visible platform and open field
assessment of YF2 in mice infused with A.beta.42. Percent of time
spend in the center are shown in FIG. 69C and number of entries
into the center are shown in FIG. 69D.
[0139] FIG. 70 shows that histone acetylation levels are reduced in
AD patients. Compared to control, Alzheimer's disease patients
showed a decrease in acetylation of histone residues important for
memory.
[0140] FIG. 71 is a graph showing pharmacokinetic properties of
YF2. The amount of YF2 in the brain is higher than that in the
plasma. YF2 is rapidly absorbed in the brain (see Table 14). The
elimination half-lives of YF2 in the brain and plasma are .about.40
min. The distribution of YF2 to the brain is fast. YF2 does not
induce any adverse effects up to 300 mg/kg (i.p.) in acute toxicity
experiments.
[0141] FIG. 72A are dose-response curves for human CBP, p300, PCAF
and GCN5 activation by different YF2 concentrations.
[0142] FIG. 72B is a table that represents the calculated EC.sub.50
values of CBP, p300, PCAF, and GCN5.
[0143] FIG. 73 is a graph showing NIH cell lines growth inhibition
values for 10 .mu.M YF2 treatment.
[0144] FIG. 74 is a graph showing the effect of OA2 (YF2 compound)
on HDAC6 activity.
[0145] FIGS. 75A-B is (FIG. 75A) a Western blot and (FIG. 75B) a
graph showing histone acetylation levels important for memory are
reduced in AD patients relative to control.
[0146] FIGS. 76A-B is (FIG. 76A) a Western blot and (FIG. 76B) a
graph showing histone acetylation levels are reduced following
A.beta. elevation in basal conditions.
[0147] FIGS. 77A-B is (FIG. 77A) a Western blot and (FIG. 77B) a
graph showing histone acetylation levels are not reduced following
A.beta. elevation and foot shock.
[0148] FIG. 78 is a graph showing i.p. and oral pharmacokinetic
properties of YF2.
[0149] FIGS. 79A-B is (FIG. 79A) a Western blot and (FIG. 79B) a
graph showing that YF2 restores histone acetylation levels
following A.beta. elevation in basal conditions.
[0150] FIGS. 80A-B is (FIG. 80A) a Western blot and (FIG. 80B) a
graph showing that YF2 restores histone acetylation levels
following A.beta. elevation after foot shock.
[0151] FIG. 81 shows that YF2 rescues the synaptic defect following
A.beta. elevation.
[0152] FIG. 82 shows that YF2 rescues the memory defect in APP/PS1
mice.
[0153] FIGS. 83A-B shows accelerating rotarod data in wild-type and
Huntington's Disease mice models treated with YF2 at (FIG. 83A) 4
months and (FIG. 83B) 6 months of age.
[0154] FIGS. 84A-D shows total locomotion in an open field assay in
wild-type and Huntington's Disease mice models treated with YF2.
Total distance travelled is shown at (FIG. 84A) 6 months and (FIG.
84B) 8 months of age. Total locomotor activity is shown at (FIG.
84C) 6 months and (FIG. 84D) 8 months of age.
[0155] FIGS. 85A-D shows total locomotion in the center of the maze
versus periphery in wild-type and Huntington's Disease mice models
treated with YF2. Distance travelled in center is shown at (FIG.
85A) 6 months and (FIG. 85B) 8 months of age. Distance travelled in
periphery is shown at (FIG. 85C) 6 months and (FIG. 85D) 8 months
of age.
[0156] FIGS. 86A-B shows total rearing or vertical movements in
wild-type and Huntington's Disease mice models treated with YF2 at
(FIG. 86A) 6 months and (FIG. 86B) 8 months of age.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0157] Early amnesic changes in Alzheimer's disease (AD) are
thought to be linked to synaptic dysfunction. .beta.-amyloid
(A.beta.), a peptide that is present in high amounts in the
disease, has been found to inhibit memory.sup.[P1,P2] (each herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety) and its
electrophysiological model, long-term potentiation
(LTP).sup.[P3-P8] (each herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety). Memory is known to be modulated by epigenetics through
regulation of gene expression. Epigenetics is defined as the
mechanism that changes gene expression by `marking` DNA or its
associated proteins, through processes such as DNA methylation and
histone (H) modification, without changing the DNA sequence
itself.sup.[P9] (each herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety). Modification of histones by, for example, the addition
or removal of acetyl or methyl functional groups causes the
chromatin structure to open or close, so that the information
contained within the DNA is made more or less accessible to
transcription factors. Hence, it is not surprising that
deregulation of one of the epigenetic mechanisms might lead to
memory disruption. For instance, reduction of histone acetylation
causes the chromatin structure to close, so that the information
contained within the DNA might be less accessible to transcription
factors and memory formation.sup.[P9] (each herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety).
[0158] The main strategy that is currently used to up-regulate
histone acetylation involves inhibition of histone deacetylases
(HDACs), enzymes that remove an acetyl group from histones.
However, the pleiotropic effect of nonspecific HDAC inhibition may
hamper the therapeutic potential of HDAC inhibitors.sup.[P10-P13]
(each herein incorporated by reference in its entirety).
[0159] HATs share a highly conserved motif containing an acetyl-CoA
binding site. HATs can be involved in the pathology of cancer,
asthma, neurodegenerative diseases and viral infection. This
indicates that specific HAT activators are potential tools for
pharmacological research and might find therapeutic applications.
So far only one group has reported HAT activators. However, their
compounds are neither soluble, nor membrane permeant, which makes
them not good drug candidates for the treatment for the diseases
described above.
[0160] This invention is about the synthesis of a new class of HAT
activators, which have good potency, excellent solubility,
reasonable pharmacokinetic profiles and good membrane and
Blood-brain-Barrier (BBB) permeability, hence can be used as a new
medicine with minimum amount of side effect for patients with
neurodegenerative diseases and cancers.
[0161] The invention provides for compounds with histone
acetyltransferase activity, HAT activation potency, high
selectivity, reasonable pharmacokinetics and good permeability
across the blood-brain-barrier (BBB). These compounds may be used
to minimize the side effects for AD patients, the third most costly
disease in the U.S., such as improving cognition or memory in AD
and Alzheimer's-like pathologies, as well as minimize the side
effects for subjects afflicted with other neurodegenerative
diseases. The compounds of the invention may also be developed as
anti-cancer drugs.
[0162] In some embodiments, the invention provides methods for
identifying HAT activators that can acetylate histone proteins thus
increasing gene expression in a subject resulting in enhanced
memory and cognition.
[0163] In further embodiments, the invention provides for the
utilization of HAT agonists as memory enhancers in normal subjects
(for example, a subject not afflicted with a neurodegenerative
disease). In further embodiments, the invention provides for the
utilization of HAT agonists as memory enhancers in aging subjects
(for example, a subject who is >55 years old). In further
embodiments, the invention provides for the utilization of HAT
agonists as memory enhancers for other conditions associated with
cognitive decrease/impairment. Non-limiting examples of conditions
associated with cognitive decrease/impairment include a variety of
syndromes associated with mental retardation and syndromes
associated with learning disabilities, Parkinson's disease, Pick's
disease, a Lewy body disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis,
Huntington's disease, Creutzfeld-Jakob disease, Down syndrome,
multiple system atrophy, neuronal degeneration with brain iron
accumulation type I (Hallervorden-Spatz disease), pure autonomic
failure, REM sleep behavior disorder, mild cognitive impairment
(MCI), cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), mild cognitive deficits,
aging, vascular dementias mixed with Alzheimer's disease, a
neurodegenerative disease characterized by abnormal amyloid
deposition, and any combination thereof.
[0164] To shrink the candidate pool of HAT activator compounds to
be tested in animal models of neurodegenerative diseases, such as
animals that exhibit elevated levels of inclusion bodies, for
example A.beta. accumulation animal models (e.g., animal models of
AD), or, for example, a mouse model for Huntington's disease, HAT
activators can first be screened or selected based on their
possession of certain characteristics, such as having one or more
of: an EC.sub.50 no greater than about 100 nM; a histone
acetylation activity in vitro; and the ability to penetrate the
BBB.
[0165] In some embodiments, the candidate pool of HAT activators to
be tested in animal models of neurodegenerative diseases, such as,
but not limited to, animals that exhibit elevated levels of
inclusion bodies, for example A.beta. accumulation animal models
(e.g., animal models of AD), or, for example, a mouse model for
Huntington's disease, can first be screened or selected based on
"medicinal chemistry" strategies. For example, based on the
structure analysis of reported HAT activators, a class of
structurally related, but nevertheless formally independent
scaffolds, can be generated to be deemed as HAT activator
candidates. Compounds derived from these scaffolds can first be
screened and optimized on computational models. Compounds with
highest score will be synthesized and tested for potency. At this
stage, the synthetic effort will be guided by the testing results
of potency/selectivity. Compounds with satisfactory potency and
selectivity (lead compounds) will be further studied for PK,
bioavailability/brain penetration and off-target activities
(safety). Selected compounds can be tested in the animal models of
neurodegenerative diseases, such as, but not limited to, animals
that exhibit elevated levels of inclusion bodies, for example
A.beta. accumulation animal models (e.g., animal models of AD), or
a mouse model for Huntington's disease to determine whether they
increase gene expression in a subject resulting in enhanced memory
and cognition. As used herein, a HAT activator compound does not
necessarily preclude the possibility that the compound may also be
able to inhibit other HATs.
Acetylation and Methylation of DNA and Histones
[0166] Eukaryotic DNA is highly organized and packaged into the
nucleus. The organization and packaging are achieved through the
addition of proteins, including core histones H2A, H2B, H3 and H4,
which form a complex structure, the chromatin, together with DNA
(see FIG. 28). The modification of core histones is of fundamental
importance to conformational changes of the chromatin. The level of
acetylation is related to transcription activity, and then the
acetylation induces an open chromatin confirmation that allows the
transcription machinery access to promoters. Histone deacetylase
(HDAC) and histone acetyltransferase (HAT) are enzymes that
influence transcription by selectively deacetylating or acetylating
the .epsilon.-amino groups of lysine located near the amino termini
of core histone proteins. Chromatin acetylation correlates with
transcriptional activity (euchromatin), whereas deacetylation
correlates with gene silencing. Interestingly, it was shown that
increased acetylation of H3 in area CA1 of the hippocampus (an area
in the brain that plays an important role in long-tem memory)
occurs following associative memory. Additionally, by inhibiting
HDAC, they were able to manipulate changes in the chromatin and
enhance the formation of long-tem memory.
[0167] Histone acetylation and deacetylation are increasingly
recognized for their contribution to the tight regulation of gene
activation and silencing, respectively. Hence, it is not surprising
that deregulation of these mechanisms might lead to the disruption
of memory-associated gene expression, resulting in a number of
syndromes associated with mental retardation.
[0168] Histones.
[0169] The DNA is firstly wrapped around an octamer complex of
histones (H) to form nucleosomal units, giving the appearance of
beads on a string [B31] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety). In turn, these nucleosomal units, fold into a
higher-order chromatin fiber [B32] (herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety). Each histone-octamer complex contains
two copies of histones H3 and H4 bordered by two copies of histones
2A and 2B [B32] (herein incorporated by reference in its entirety).
H1 and its avian variant H5 are linker histones that bind the
nucleosome and both the entry and exit sites of the DNA, thus
locking the DNA into place and allowing the formation of higher
order structure. Every histone has a globular domain, which
mediates histone-histone interactions, and an N-terminal `tail`
extension. The histone cores and in particular their tails, are
targets for a considerable number of covalent modifications, such
as acetylation, ubiquitination, sumoylation, phosphorylation,
citrullination, ADP-ribosylation, and methylation [B33] (herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety). Histone modifications
associated with active gene transcription, such as H3 Lys4
methylation and H3 Lys56 acetylation, were found to lead to gene
expression. On the other hand, histone modifications associated
with the inactivation of gene transcription, such as H3 Lys27
methylation and H2A Lys119 ubiquitination were found to cause gene
silencing. Of particular interest for this application are histone
2B, 3 and 4 because they have been shown to be involved in memory
processes [B19, B25] (each herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety).
[0170] HATs and HDACs.
[0171] Histone modifications and their combinations have been
proposed to be involved in gene regulation by modifying the
chromatin accessibility and by acting as docking sites for
transcription factors and modifying enzymes [B34, B35] (each herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety). One of the most studied
histone modifications is the acetylation of the
evolutionary-conserved lysine residues on the histone N-termini by
histone acetyltransferase (HAT). In contrast, histone
deacetylation, catalyzed by histone deacetylase (HDAC), was found
to package the DNA into a more condensed form, limiting the access
of transcription factors and thus acting as a gene silencer [B36]
(herein incorporated by reference in its entirety). The HATs
involved in the regulation of gene expression include at least
three groups of enzymes [B37] (herein incorporated by reference in
its entirety). The general control non-derepressible 5 (Gcn5) is
the founding member of the Gcn5 N-acetyltransferases (GNATs). The
GNAT family members include Gcn5, PCAF, Elp3, HAT1m Hpa2 and Nut1.
The MYST family is named after the founding members of the family:
Morf, Ybf2, Sas2 and Tip60 [B37] (herein incorporated by reference
in its entirety). In addition, other proteins including CBP/p300,
Taf1 and a number of nuclear receptor co-activators have been shown
to possess intrinsic HAT activity. However, these proteins do not
contain a consensus domain and therefore represent an `orphan
class` of HAT enzymes [B37] (herein incorporated by reference in
its entirety).
[0172] HDACs form repressor complexes with transcription activators
and with other HDACs [B38] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety). Mammalian HDACs can be divided into the classical and
the silent information regulator 2 (Sir2)-related protein
(sirtruin) families [B39] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety). In humans, members of the classical family have another
subdivision, which include class I, II and IV, that share sequence
similarity and require Zn+ for deacetylase activity. Class I HDACs
(HDAC1-3, HDAC8) are related to the yeast gene repressor Rpd3p, and
are subunits of at least two distinct co-repressor complexes, the
Sin3 complex and the NuRD complex. Class II HDACs (HDAC4-7, 9 and
10) are similar to the yeast Hdalp HDAC, they act as gene
repressors and have been implicated in various roles in cell
differentiation and development. Class IV comprises HDAC11, which
has some features of both class I and II HDACs. The sirtruin family
includes class III HDACs (SIRT1-7), which are similar to yeast
Sir2. Class III HDACs are biochemically and structurally distinct
from the classical family and require NAD.sup.+ as a cofactor.
HDACs appear to be involved in gene silencing and heterochromatin
formation at centromeres and telomeres (for a review see [B40]
(herein incorporated by reference in its entirety)).
[0173] Alterations in epigenetic modifications including
acetylation and methylation of DNA and histones may contribute to
gene expression changes in cancer and neurological diseases.
Addition of acetyl group on histones by Histone Acetyltransferases
(HATs) enhances gene expression, while its removal by Histone
Deacytylases (HDAC) reduces gene expression. Reduction in histone
acetylation has been found in a variety of ailments such as tumors,
mood disorders, and neurodegenerative diseases. Examples of HATs
include, but are not limited to GCN5, GCN5L, PCAF, HAT1, ELP3,
HPA2, ESA1, SAS2, SAS3, TIP60, HBO1, MOZ, MORF, MOF, SRC1, SRC3,
TIF2, GRIP1, ATF-2 [see Lee and Workman (2007) Nat Rev Mol Cell
Biol., 8(4):284-95, Marmorstein (2001) J Molec Biol. 311: 433-444;
and Kimura et al., (2005) J Biochem. 138(6): 647-662, which are
each hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties]. In one
embodiment, the HAT activator compound of the invention is directed
to GCN5, GCN5L, HAT1, PCAF, or a combination thereof. In some
embodiments, the HAT activator compound of the invention is
directed to proteins that possess intrinsic HAT activity, such as
nuclear receptor co-activators (for example, CBP/p300 and Taf1). In
another embodiment, the acetylation of H2, H3, and/or H4 histones
is increased. In some embodiments, the HAT Activator compound is
YF2, depicted in FIG. 3.
[0174] Increasing histone acetylation has been shown to improve
outcome in a wide variety of diseases as diverse as asthma,
infectious disease and psychiatric diseases. Although clinical
trials of several HDAC inhibitors are currently underway, the
alternative strategy where by histone acetylation is increased by
HAT activation has not been extensively explored. For example,
compounds in U.S. Patent Publication No. US2009076155 and PCT
Publication No. WO2004053140 (each herein incorporated by reference
in its entirety) have poor solubility and membrane permeability.
Furthermore, the compounds disclosed in the patent applications do
not disclose any data for the treatment of any diseases.
[0175] No HAT activator is currently in drug trials, however
several HDAC inhibitors are currently in clinical trials. Some of
these HDAC inhibitors (HDACi) have shown therapeutic efficacy in
preclinical trials. Without being bound by theory, HAT activators
can be a useful drug candidate with a role similar to HDACi.
However, previously available HAT activators had little solubility
and membrane permeability, making them unsuitable as drugs.
[0176] Several HDACi are in trials for cancer some of which are,
for example, 4SC-202 (Nycomed, Germany), which is in a Preclinical
stage; AR-42 (Arno therapeutics, Parsippany, N.J.) which is in a
Preclinical stage; Belinostat (TopoTarget, Rockaway, N.J.) which is
in Phase II clinical trials; and Entinostat (Bayer Schering) which
is in Phase II clinical trials. For example, in Table 3 of Lane and
Chabner (2009, J Clin Oncol., 27(32):5459-68; incorporated by
reference in its entirety), selected clinical trials of HDAC
inhibitors are discussed, which include Vorinostat, Depsipeptide,
and MGCD0103. In Table 2 of Lane and Chabner (2009, J Clin Oncol.,
27(32):5459-68; incorporated by reference in its entirety),
selected HDAC inhibitors in clinical use or development are
discussed, which include hydroxamic acid compounds (e.g.,
Vorinostat, Trichostatin A, LAQ824, Panobinostat, Belinostat, and
ITF2357), cyclic tetrapeptide compounds (e.g., Depsipeptide),
benzamide compounds (e.g., Entinostat and MGCD0103), and
short-chain aliphatic acid compounds (e.g., valproic acid, phenyl
butyrate, and pivanex).
[0177] Some HDACi are or were being developed for neurological
diseases, such as an HDACi from Merck (Whitehouse Station, N.J.)
that is being used for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases;
and HDACi from TopoTarget (Rockaway, N.J.) that was being used for
the treatment of Huntington's disease, now discontinued;
isovaleramide NPS-1776 (NPS Pharmaceutical, Bedminster, N.J.) that
was being used for bipolar disorder, epilepsy, and migraines, now
discontinued; and a histone acetyltransferase inhibitor for cancer
from TopoTarget A/S (Kobenhavn, Denmark), which was discontinued in
the preclinical stage.
[0178] Here, the synthesis of a new class of HAT activators with
improved solubility and membrane permeability are described and its
potency in-vitro as well as in an animal model are shown (see
EXAMPLES). In vitro and behavioral data show that a HAT activator
compound of the invention, YF2, can acetylate histone H3 in brain
and ameliorate memory deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer's
disease. For example, the HAT activator shown in FIG. 3 can be used
as adjuvant therapy in several cancers, psychiatric and
neurodegenerative diseases and may improve efficacy and safety of
treatment for these disorders. Furthermore, the HAT activator
compound, YF2, has a moiety which was not mentioned in the
above-referenced patent applications that significantly improves
the solubility and membrane and Blood-brain-Barrier (BBB)
permeability. See Abel and Zukin (2008) Current Opinion in
Pharmacology 8:57-64; and Lee and Workman (2007) Nat Rev Mol Cell
Biol 8:284-295 (each herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety).
[0179] In one embodiment, a HAT activator compound can be used to
treat a cancer in a subject in need thereof. Non-limiting examples
of cancers include B cell lymphoma, colon cancer, lung cancer,
renal cancer, bladder cancer, T cell lymphoma, myeloma, leukemia,
chronic myeloid leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, chronic
lymphocytic leukemia, acute lymphocytic leukemia, hematopoietic
neoplasias, thymoma, lymphoma, sarcoma, lung cancer, liver cancer,
non-Hodgkins lymphoma, Hodgkins lymphoma, uterine cancer, renal
cell carcinoma, hepatoma, adenocarcinoma, breast cancer, pancreatic
cancer, liver cancer, prostate cancer, head and neck carcinoma,
thyroid carcinoma, soft tissue sarcoma, ovarian cancer, primary or
metastatic melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma,
brain cancer, angiosarcoma, hemangiosarcoma, bone sarcoma,
fibrosarcoma, myxosarcoma, liposarcoma, chondrosarcoma, osteogenic
sarcoma, chordoma, angiosarcoma, endotheliosarcoma,
lymphangiosarcoma, lymphangioendotheliosarcoma, synovioma,
testicular cancer, uterine cancer, cervical cancer,
gastrointestinal cancer, mesothelioma, Ewing's tumor,
leiomyosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, colon carcinoma, pancreatic
cancer, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, squamous
cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, sweat gland
carcinoma, sebaceous gland carcinoma, papillary carcinoma,
Waldenstroom's macroglobulinemia, papillary adenocarcinomas,
cystadenocarcinoma, bronchogenic carcinoma, bile duct carcinoma,
choriocarcinoma, seminoma, embryonal carcinoma, Wilms' tumor, lung
carcinoma, epithelial carcinoma, cervical cancer, testicular tumor,
glioma, astrocytoma, medulloblastoma, craniopharyngioma,
ependymoma, pinealoma, hemangioblastoma, acoustic neuroma,
oligodendroglioma, meningioma, retinoblastoma, leukemia, melanoma,
neuroblastoma, small cell lung carcinoma, bladder carcinoma,
lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and medullary carcinoma.
[0180] In one embodiment, the cancer is colon cancer, lung cancer,
renal cancer, leukemia, CNS cancer, melanoma, ovarian cancer,
breast cancer, or prostate cancer.
[0181] In one embodiment, the cancer is colon cancer, renal cancer,
T cell leukemia, myeloma, leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, acute
lymphocytic leukemia, renal cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma,
glioblastoma, breast carcinoma, prostate carcinoma, or lung
carcinoma.
[0182] In one embodiment, a HAT activator compound can be used to
treat a neurodegenerative disease in a subject in need thereof.
Non-limiting examples of neurodegenerative diseases include
Adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD), Alcoholism, Alexander's disease,
Alper's disease, Alzheimer's disease, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
(Lou Gehrig's Disease), Ataxia telangiectasia, Batten disease (also
known as Spielmeyer-Vogt-Sjogren-Batten disease), Bovine spongiform
encephalopathy (BSE), Canavan disease, Cockayne syndrome,
Corticobasal degeneration, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, Familial
fatal insomnia, Frontotemporal lobar degeneration, Huntington's
disease, HIV-associated dementia, Kennedy's disease, Krabbe's
disease, Lewy body dementia, Neuroborreliosis, Machado-Joseph
disease (Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3), Multiple System Atrophy,
Multiple sclerosis, Narcolepsy, Niemann Pick disease, Parkinson's
disease, Pelizaeus-Merzbacher Disease, Pick's disease, Primary
lateral sclerosis, Prion diseasesm Progressive Supranuclear Palsy,
Refsum's disease, Rett's syndrome, Tau-positive FrontoTemporal
dementia, Tau-negative FrontoTemporal dementia, Sandhoff disease,
Schilder's disease, Subacute combined degeneration of spinal cord
secondary to Pernicious Anaemia, Spielmeyer-Vogt-Sjogren-Batten
disease (also known as Batten disease), Spinocerebellar ataxia
(multiple types with varying characteristics), Spinal muscular
atrophy, Steele-Richardson-Olszewski disease, Tabes dorsalis, and
Toxic encephalopathy.
Gene Transcription and Memory
[0183] A schematic representation of the processes involved in gene
transcription and memory is shown in FIG. 23. In the brain, CREB
phosphorylation is required for CREB ability to bind to CBP and to
stimulate memory associated gene expression. CBP functions as a
co-activator that facilitates interactions with the basal
transcription machinery and through its HAT activity catalyzes
acetylation of the histones, causing a loss in chromosomal
repression and increase in the transcription of memory associated
genes. In agreement with this scheme, mutations in HAT domain CBP
were found to cause LTM impairment. For instance, Korzus et al.
demonstrated that inducible dominant-negative CBP mice, with no CBP
HAT activity, exhibited normal short-tem memory while LTM was
impaired [B8] (herein incorporated by reference in its entirety).
Moreover, the impaired LTM was rescued by suppression of the
transgene expression and by HDAC inhibitor administration [B8]
(herein incorporated by reference in its entirety).
[0184] The relevance of histone deacetylation in memory processes
is underscored by a study from Levenson et al. [B26] (herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety). In this work
acetylation of H3 in area CA1 of the hippocampus (an area in the
brain that plays important roles in LTM) was found to be increased
following training for contextual fear conditioning, a form of
associative memory in which mice associate a novel context with an
aversive stimulus. However, HDAC inhibition enhanced LTM [B26]
(herein incorporated by reference in its entirety). In agreement
with this study, HDAC inhibition may be beneficial in certain
neurodegenerative disorders, such as Huntington's disease, spinal
muscular atrophy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, ischemia and
Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome [B19, B25, B41, B42] (each herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety). Interestingly, the
effect of HDAC inhibitors are likely to depend upon specific HDACs,
as neuron-specific overexpression of HDAC2, but not that of HDAC1,
reduced dendritic spine density, synapse number, synaptic
plasticity and memory formation [B43] (herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety). Conversely, HDAC2 deficiency increased
synapse number and facilitated memory, similar to chronic treatment
with HDAC inhibitors in mice [B43] (herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety). Taken together, these findings indicate
that HDAC inhibition may provide a therapeutic avenue for memory
impairment in neurodegenerative diseases characterized by cognitive
disorders such as AD.
Transcriptional Machinery and AD
[0185] Recent studies have linked CREB/CBP dysfunction to AD.
APP(K670N:M671L) transgenic animals showed a decrease in CREB
phosphorylation at the downstream level of the
.alpha.-7-nicotinic-receptor (a7-nAChR)/ERK/MAPK cascade [B44, B45]
(each herein incorporated by reference in its entirety). Perfusion
of hippocampal slices with a preparation containing oligomeric
A.beta.42 revealed a reduction of the tetanus-induced increase in
CREB phosphorylation, providing a clue to the mechanisms underlying
the A.beta.-mediated changes in LTP [B12] (herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety). Consistent with these results A.beta.
blocked the glutamate-induced increase in CREB phosphorylation in
rat hippocampal cultures [B11] (herein incorporated by reference in
its entirety). Gong et al. also found that rolipram, a selective
PDE IV inhibitor which increases cAMP levels and therefore CREB
phosphorylation, ameliorates deficits in both LTP and contextual
learning in the APP/PS1 double-transgenic mouse [B46] (herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety). This protective effect
is possibly due to CREB activation that might lead to CBP
recruitment and thus histone acetylation. Another investigation
demonstrated that in PS1 and 2 conditional double knockout (PS
cDKO) mice showed impaired memory and LTP that were amplified with
age. In addition PS cDKO mice showed a reduction in CBP levels and
in CRE-dependent gene expression in the cerebral cortex, which is
likely to contribute to subsequent neuronal degeneration [B15]
(herein incorporated by reference in its entirety). In addition, a
recent study has demonstrated that wild-type (WT) PS1 stimulates
the transcriptional ability of CBP and p300, whereas the AD
associated mutant of PS1 (M146L) does not have this effect [B18,
B47] (each herein incorporated by reference in its entirety). In
these experiments a response to WT PS1 was observed with a
construct containing the 721-1679 region of CBP, which contains the
CBP acetyltransferase domain [B18] (herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety). Moreover, it was shown that CBP loss
and histone deacetylation takes place during neuronal death, which
was induced by an APP-directed antibody in primary cortical neurons
[B48] (herein incorporated by reference in its entirety).
Alzheimer's Disease--an Example of a Neurodegenerative Disease
[0186] An emerging view of the processes involved in memory
impairment indicates that the subtlety and variability of the
earliest amnesic symptoms, occurring in the absence of any other
clinical signs of brain injury, could be due to discrete changes in
the function of a single synapse, produced at least in part, by
A.beta. [B11, B27-B29] (each herein incorporated by reference in
its entirety).
[0187] Several evidences have shown that LTM and synaptic
plasticity rely on gene expression after an early induction phase
characterized by the activation of a number of pathways (for a
review, see [B30] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety)). More recently, a fine regulation of memory-related
genes and long-term synaptic plasticity has been discovered to
involve epigenetic factors [B6] (herein incorporated by reference
in its entirety). Indeed, epigenetic modifications, such as DNA
methylation and histone post-translational modifications,
profoundly affect the ability of polymerases to interact with the
open reading frame of DNA without changing the DNA sequence itself.
Hence, it would not be surprising that deregulation of epigenetic
mechanisms might lead to the disruption of memory-associated gene
expression and synaptic plasticity [B6] (herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety), contributing to the pathogenesis of
diseases characterized by cognitive disorders, such as AD.
[0188] The process of memory storage has been described as a
dialogue between genes and synapses [B2] (herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety). The formation of long-term memory (LTM)
is dependent upon gene transcription [B3] (herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety), synthesis of new proteins [B4] (herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety) and structural changes
of the synapse [B5] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety). In addition, the proper regulation of gene expression in
LTM is modulated by epigenetics [B6] (herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety). Epigenetics is defined as the mechanism
that changes gene expression by `marking` DNA or its associated
proteins, through processes such as histone modification and DNA
methylation, without changing the DNA sequence itself [B7] (herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety). The N-terminal tails of
histone proteins are known to undergo posttranslational
modifications, such as histone acetylation, ubiquitination,
sumoylation, phosphorylation, citrullination, ADP-ribosylation, and
methylation that can dictate the transitions between
transcriptionally active or transcriptionally silent chromatin
states [B7] (herein incorporated by reference in its entirety).
Hence, it is not surprising that deregulation of one of these
mechanisms might lead to disruption of memory associated gene
expression and cognitive disorders.
[0189] Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by neuronal loss,
extracellular senile plaques and intracellular neurofibrillary
tangles, leading to memory loss. AD purportedly begins as a
synaptic disorder produced at least in part, by A.beta. (Selkoe, D.
J. Alzheimer's disease is a synaptic failure. Science (New York,
N.Y. 298, 789-791 (2002)); herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety. A.beta.-induced reduction in long-term-potentiation
(LTP), a physiological correlate of synaptic plasticity that is
thought to underlie learning and memory, and phosphorylation of the
memory transcription factor CREB, are ameliorated by nitric oxide
(NO) donors and cGMP-analogs (Puzzo, D., et al. Amyloid-beta
peptide inhibits activation of the nitric
oxide/cGMP/cAMP-responsive element-binding protein pathway during
hippocampal synaptic plasticity. J Neurosci 25, 6887-6897 (2005));
herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. Vice-versa,
genetic ablation of NO-synthase 2 (NOS2) results in worsening of
the AD phenotype in mice expressing mutated amyloid precursor
protein (APP) (Colton, C. A., et al. NO synthase 2 (NOS2) deletion
promotes multiple pathologies in a mouse model of Alzheimer's
disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the
United States of America 103, 12867-12872 (2006); herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety). These findings show
that up-regulation of the NO pathway can be protective in AD.
[0190] Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a chronic progressive
neurodegenerative disorder, in which the earliest stages are
thought to be linked to synaptic dysfunction leading to memory
disorders. In this regard, .beta.-amyloid (A.beta.) has been found
to inhibit memory.sup.[A1,A2] (each herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety) and its cellular model, long-term
potentiation (LTP).sup.[A3-A8] (each herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety). A.beta. is the proteolytic product of a
larger precursor protein, the amyloid precursor protein (APP),
which in its mutant form has been found to be implicated in
familial AD (FAD).sup.[A9] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety). Subsequently, two AD associated genes, presenilin 1
(PS1) and presenilin 2 (PS2).sup.[A10, A11] (each herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety), were found to be
involved in FAD as well.sup.[A12] (herein incorporated by reference
in its entirety). Presenilins are part of the .gamma.-secretase
complex responsible for cleaving APP and producing the A.beta.42
peptide.sup.[A13] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety).
[0191] AD is characterized neuropathologically by neuronal loss,
extracellular senile plaques (SPs) and intracellular
neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs). SPs are chiefly comprised of
A.beta. aggregates. The major component of NFTs is the microtubule
binding protein tau. Clinically, AD is characterized by cognitive
dysfunction and begins as a synaptic disorder that involves
progressively larger areas of the brain over time [S1] (herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety). An emerging view of the
processes involved in synaptic impairment shows that the subtlety
and variability of the earliest amnesic symptoms, occurring in the
absence of any other clinical signs of brain injury, can be due to
discrete changes in the function of a single synapse, produced at
least in part, by A.beta. [S5, S7, S10, S11] (each herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety).
[0192] An important target for developing a causal therapy for
Alzheimer's disease is represented by synapses. Synaptic
alterations are highly correlated with the severity of clinical
dementia [51, S2] (each herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety), whereas other important variables such as senile plaques
and neurofibrillary tangles are involved to a lesser extent [S1]
(herein incorporated by reference in its entirety). The importance
of synaptic alterations in AD has been confirmed by studies of
transgenic (Tg) mouse models of AD [S3] (herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety) as well as of long-term potentiation
(LTP), a widely studied cellular model of learning and memory
(L&M) [S4] (herein incorporated by reference in its entirety),
which is impaired following application of amyloid-.beta. (A.beta.)
both in slices and in vivo [S3, S5-S12] (each herein incorporated
by reference in its entirety). A.beta. has been found to markedly
inhibit LTP. Electrophysiological studies using Tg, human A.beta.
producing mice have often revealed significant deficits in basal
synaptic transmission and/or LTP in the hippocampus [S23-S30] (each
herein incorporated by reference in its entirety).
[0193] Regulation of gene expression in long-term memory is known
to be modulated by epigenetics. Epigenetics is defined as the
mechanism that changes gene expression by `marking` DNA or its
associated proteins, through processes such as DNA methylation and
histone modification, without changing the DNA sequence
itself.sup.[A14]. Modification of histones by, for example, the
addition or removal of acetyl or methyl functional groups causes
the chromatin structure to open or close, so that the information
contained within the DNA is made more or less accessible to
transcription factors. Hence, it is not surprising that
deregulation of one of the epigenetic mechanisms might lead to
disruption of memory associated gene expression. Studies of the
mechanisms underlying synaptic and memory dysfunction in AD have
indicated central roles for the transcription factor CREB (CRE
binding protein) and the coactivator CREB binding protein
(CBP).
[0194] Recent studies have linked the transcriptional machinery to
Alzheimer's disease (AD), a pathology characterized by profound
memory disorders. Both the transcription factor CREB (CRE binding
protein) and the coactivator CREB binding protein (CBP), two
molecules that are known to be associated with chromatin and memory
processes [B8-B10] (each herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety), are likely to play central roles in the mechanisms
underlying synaptic and memory dysfunction in AD. Drugs enhancing
CREB phosphorylation were shown to ameliorate memory and long-term
potentiation (LTP), a type of synaptic plasticity that is thought
to underlie learning and memory, both in mouse models of AD and
following exposure to sublethal doses of A.beta.42, a proteolytic
product of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) [B11-B14] (each
herein incorporated by reference in its entirety). In addition,
cerebral CBP levels are reduced in mice lacking functional
presenilin 1 (PS1) and presenilin 2 (PS2) [B15] (herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety), two genes that have
been implicated in AD [B16, B17] (each herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety). Moreover, wild-type (WT) PS1 stimulates
CBP transcriptional ability, whereas PS1(M146L) mutation does not
have this effect [B18] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety).
[0195] Following exposure to sublethal doses of A.beta..sub.42 and
in mouse models of AD, drugs enhancing CREB phosphorylation were
shown to ameliorate LTP and memory.sup.[A5, A15-A17] (each herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety). Dysregulation of CBP
histone acetyltransferase (HAT) activity disrupts memory associated
gene expression.sup.[A18] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety). In addition, cerebral CBP levels are reduced in mice
lacking functional PS1 and PS2.sup.[A19] (herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety). Moreover, wild-type (WT) PS1 stimulates
CBP transcriptional ability, whereas PS1(M146L) mutation does not
have this effect.sup.[A20] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety).
[0196] NO is a central molecule in cellular biochemical processes.
The gas has been established as an important messenger molecule in
various steps of brain physiology, from development to synaptic
plasticity and learning and memory. In AD research, NO has been
found to have a protective effect on A.beta.-induced damage of the
nervous system [S38-S40] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety). Studies performed on PC12 cells, sympathetic neurons and
hippocampal neurons, have shown that treatment with the NO
generator S-nitroso penicillamine exerts a neuroprotective effect
due to the inhibition of the pro-apoptotic factor caspase-2 by
nitrosylation [S39] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety), whereas inhibition of NO synthesis by N-nitro-L-arginine
methyl ester does not protect against A.beta.-induced
neurotoxicity. A.beta. has been found to impair NO generation by
decreasing NMDA receptor signal transduction [S38] (herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety), by subtracting NADPH
availability to NO-synthase (NOS) [S41], or by inhibiting the
phosphorylation of the serine-threonine kinase Akt [S42]. Moreover,
i-NOS deletion enhances AD pathology in the APP mice [S43]. Thus,
drugs enhancing the NO-cascade have a beneficial effect against AD
[S44] (herein incorporated by reference in its entirety).
[0197] Despite the neuroprotective function of NO is clear and
indisputable, the gas has also been viewed as a major agent of
neuropathology and cell death when it is produced in high quantity.
High amounts of NO lead to generation of significant quantity of
peroxinitrites that are responsible for oxidative and nitrosative
stress in A.beta.-induced cell death [S45-S51] (each herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety). In fact, release of low
amounts of NO by the constitutive forms of NOS that include both
the neuronal and the endothelial isoforms, n-NOS and e-NOS,
promotes synaptic plasticity and learning, whereas uncontrolled
production of high amounts of the gas by the inducible form of NOS
(i-NOS) can promote oxidative and nitrosative stress via production
of peroxinitrite [S45-S51] (each herein incorporated by reference
in its entirety). Thus, both A.beta.-induced downregulation of the
NO cascade which blocks plasticity and memory and generation of
peroxinitrites leading to cell death, can play roles in AD. The
current status of drug research exploiting these discoveries is
focused both on finding ways to upregulate the NO cascade and
therefore elicit neuroprotection, as well as on finding ways to
block peroxinitrite toxic effects in order to limit neuropathology
[S52] (herein incorporated by reference in its entirety).
HAT Activators Optimized for CNS Diseases and Cancer
[0198] None of the commercially available HAT activators were
developed to have the characteristics required for administration
in a chronic disease of the CNS, for example neurodegenerative
diseases (such as AD, Parkinson's Disease, Huntington's Disease),
or for cancer. Thus, in some embodiments, the invention provides
methods for identifying an agent or compound for the treatment of
neurodegenerative diseases (such as AD, Huntington's Disease,
Parkinson's Disease, other A.beta.-accumulation related
neurodegenerative disorders or diseases characterized by elevated
levels of inclusion bodies) that comprise selecting the agent or
compound on the basis of having one or more characteristics that
make the compound optimized for treating CNS diseases. For example,
the characteristics can comprise: an EC.sub.50 no greater than
about 100 nM; histone acetylation activity in vitro; the ability to
penetrate the BBB; or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the
HAT Activator compound is YF2, depicted in FIG. 3.
[0199] In some embodiments, the invention provides methods for
identifying or designing agents or compounds for the treatment of
neurodegenerative diseases, treatment of conditions associated
with, but not limited to, elevated inclusion bodies, (e.g.,
conditions associated with A.beta., alpha-synuclein, lipofuscin,
cleaved TARDBP-TDP-43, and/or Tau protein accumulation), where
computer aided-medicinal chemistry methods are used to identify
and/or design agents or compounds tailored to satisfy one or more
of the characteristics mentioned above and/or to suit the strengths
of various bioassays described herein.
[0200] The invention generally provides methods for identifying
compounds which can be used for treating a neurodegenerative
disease in a subject. The invention provides methods for
identifying compounds which can be used for treating subjects that
exhibit abnormally elevated amyloid beta plaques, or elevated Tau
protein levels, or elevated alpha-synuclein levels, or inclusions,
or lipofuscin level or inclusions, or cleaved TARDBP-TDP-43 level
or inclusion, or accumulation of cleaved TARDBP/TDP-43 inclusions.
In addition, the invention provides methods for identifying
compounds which can be used for the treatment of Alzheimer's
disease, Lewy body dementia, inclusion body myositis, cerebral
amyloid angiopathy, Huntington's Disease, Parkinson's Disease, and
cancer. The methods can comprise the identification of test
compounds or agents (e.g., peptides (such as antibodies or
fragments thereof), small molecules, nucleic acids (such as siRNA
or antisense RNA), or other agents) that can bind to a HAT
polypeptide molecule and/or activate or enhance the biological
activity of a HAT polypeptide or its expression. In one embodiment,
the compound is a HAT activator (for example a HAT activator
compound having Formula (I), (II), (III), (IV), (V), or (VI). In
another embodiment, the HAT Activator compound is YF2, depicted in
FIG. 3.
[0201] The term "modulate", as it appears herein, refers to a
change in the activity or expression of a protein molecule. For
example, modulation can cause an increase or a decrease in protein
activity, binding characteristics, or any other biological,
functional, or immunological properties of a secretase protein
molecule.
[0202] In one embodiment, a HAT activator compound can be a peptide
fragment of a HAT protein that binds to a histone acetyltransferase
protein. For example, the HAT activator molecule can encompass any
portion of at least about 8 consecutive amino acids of SEQ ID NO:
1, 3, or 5. The fragment can comprise at least about 10 amino
acids, a least about 20 amino acids, at least about 30 amino acids,
at least about 40 amino acids, a least about 50 amino acids, at
least about 60 amino acids, or at least about 75 amino acids of SEQ
ID NO: 1, 3, or 5. In one embodiment, the peptide fragment is
directed to a HAT protein, such as GCN5, GCN5L, HAT1, or PCAF.
[0203] The polypeptide sequence of a HAT protein, human HAT1, is
depicted in SEQ ID NO: 1. The nucleotide sequence of human HAT1 is
shown in SEQ ID NO: 2. Sequence information related to HAT1 is
accessible in public databases by GenBank Accession numbers NM
003642 (for mRNA) and NP 003633 (for protein). HAT1 is also known
as KAT1 (K(lysine) acetyltransferase 1). The protein encoded by
this gene is a type B histone acetyltransferase (HAT) that is
involved in the rapid acetylation of newly synthesized cytoplasmic
histones, which are in turn imported into the nucleus for de novo
deposition onto nascent DNA chains. Histone acetylation,
particularly of histone H4, plays an important role in
replication-dependent chromatin assembly.
[0204] SEQ ID NO: 1 is the human wild type amino acid sequence
corresponding to the HAT protein, the HAT1 enzyme (residues
1-419):
TABLE-US-00001 1 MAGFGAMEKF LVEYKSAVEK KLAEYKCNTN TAIELKLVRF
PEDLENDIRT FFPEYTHQLF 61 GDDETAFGYK GLKILLYYIA GSLSTMFRVE
YASKVDENFD CVEADDVEGK IRQIIPPGFC 121 TNTNDFLSLL EKEVDFKPFG
TLLHTYSVLS PTGGENFTFQ IYKADMTCRG FREYHERLQT 181 FLMWFIETAS
FIDVDDERWH YFLVFEKYNK DGATLFATVG YMTVYNYYVY PDKTRPRVSQ 241
MLILTPFQGQ GHGAQLLETV HRYYTEFPTV LDITAEDPSK SYVKLRDFVL VKLCQDLPCF
301 SREKLMQGFN EDMAIEAQQK FKINKQHARR VYEILRLLVT DMSDAEQYRS
YRLDIKRRLI 361 SPYKKKQRDL AKMRKCLRPE ELTNQMNQIE ISMQHEQLEE
SFQELVEDYR RVIERLAQE
[0205] SEQ ID NO: 2 is the human wild type nucleotide sequence
corresponding to HAT protein, the HAT1 enzyme (residues 1-1682),
wherein the underscored ATG denotes the beginning of the open
reading frame:
TABLE-US-00002 1 ctgtgcggtc acttccggcc cgggagcgcg cgggttgatt
cgtccttcct cagccgcggg 61 tgatcgtagc tcggaaatgg cgggatttgg
tgctatggag aaatttttgg tagaatataa 121 gagtgcagtg gagaagaaac
tggcagagta caaatgtaac accaacacag caattgaact 181 aaaattagtt
cgttttcctg aagatcttga aaatgacatt agaactttct ttcctgagta 241
tacccatcaa ctctttgggg atgatgaaac tgcttttggt tacaagggtc taaagatcct
301 gttatactat attgctggta gcctgtcaac aatgttccgt gttgaatatg
catctaaagt 361 tgatgagaac tttgactgtg tagaggcaga tgatgttgag
ggcaaaatta gacaaatcat 421 tccacctgga ttttgcacaa acacgaatga
tttcctttct ttactggaaa aggaagttga 481 tttcaagcca ttcggaacct
tacttcatac ctactcagtt ctcagtccaa caggaggaga 541 aaactttacc
tttcagatat ataaggctga catgacatgt agaggctttc gagaatatca 601
tgaaaggctt cagacctttt tgatgtggtt tattgaaact gctagcttta ttgacgtgga
661 tgatgaaaga tggcactact ttctagtatt tgagaagtat aataaggatg
gagctacgct 721 ctttgcgacc gtaggctaca tgacagtcta taattactat
gtgtacccag acaaaacccg 781 gccacgtgta agtcagatgc tgattttgac
tccatttcaa ggtcaaggcc atggtgctca 841 acttcttgaa acagttcata
gatactacac tgaatttcct acagttcttg atattacagc 901 ggaagatcca
tccaaaagct atgtgaaatt acgagacttt gtgcttgtga agctttgtca 961
agatttgccc tgtttttccc gggaaaaatt aatgcaagga ttcaatgaag atatggcgat
1021 agaggcacaa cagaagttca aaataaataa gcaacacgct agaagggttt
atgaaattct 1081 tcgactactg gtaactgaca tgagtgatgc cgaacaatac
agaagctaca gactggatat 1141 taaaagaaga ctaattagcc catataagaa
aaagcagaga gatcttgcta agatgagaaa 1201 atgtctcaga ccagaagaac
tgacaaacca gatgaaccaa atagaaataa gcatgcaaca 1261 tgaacagctg
gaagagagtt ttcaggaact agtggaagat taccggcgtg ttattgaacg 1321
acttgctcaa gagtaaagat tatactgctc tgtacaggaa gcttgcaaat tttctgtaca
1381 atgtgctgtg aaaaatctga tgactttaat tttaaaatct tgtgacattt
tgcttatact 1441 aaaagttatc tatctttagt tgaatatttt cttttggaga
gattgtatat tttaaaatac 1501 tgtttagagt ttatgagcat atattgcatt
taaagaaaga taaagcttct gaaatactac 1561 tgcaattgct tcccttctta
aacagtataa taaatgctta gttgtgatat gttaatgtgt 1621 gatgatatga
ttcttaaata cttacaataa acctcattct taaatactta aaaaaaaaaa 1681 aa
[0206] The polypeptide sequence of a HAT protein, human PCAF, is
depicted in SEQ ID NO: 3. The nucleotide sequence of human PCAF is
shown in SEQ ID NO: 4. Sequence information related to PCAF is
accessible in public databases by GenBank Accession numbers
NM_003884 (for mRNA) and NP_003875 (for protein). PCAF is also
known as KAT2B (K(lysine) acetyltransferase 2B). CBP and p300 are
large nuclear proteins that bind to many sequence-specific factors
involved in cell growth and/or differentiation, including c-jun and
the adenoviral oncoprotein E1A. The protein encoded by this gene
associates with p300/CBP. It has in vitro and in vivo binding
activity with CBP and p300, and competes with E1A for binding sites
in p300/CBP. It has histone acetyl transferase activity with core
histones and nucleosome core particles, indicating that this
protein plays a direct role in transcriptional regulation
[0207] SEQ ID NO: 3 is the human wild type amino acid sequence
corresponding to the HAT protein, the PCAF enzyme (residues
1-832):
TABLE-US-00003 1 MSEAGGAGPG GCGAGAGAGA GPGALPPQPA ALPPAPPQGS
PCAAAAGGSG ACGPATAVAA 61 AGTAEGPGGG GSARIAVKKA QLRSAPRAKK
LEKLGVYSAC KAEESCKCNG WKNPNPSPTP 121 PRADLQQIIV SLTESCRSCS
HALAAHVSHL ENVSEEEMNR LLGIVLDVEY LFTCVHKEED 181 ADTKQVYFYL
FKLLRKSILQ RGKPVVEGSL EKKPPFEKPS IEQGVNNFVQ YKFSHLPAKE 241
RQTIVELAKM FLNRINYWHL EAPSQRRLRS PNDDISGYKE NYTRWLCYCN VPQFCDSLPR
301 YETTQVFGRT LLRSVFTVMR RQLLEQARQE KDKLPLEKRT LILTHFPKFL
SMLEEEVYSQ 361 NSPIWDQDFL SASSRTSQLG IQTVINPPPV AGTISYNSTS
SSLEQPNAGS SSPACKASSG 421 LEANPGEKRK MTDSHVLEEA KKPRVMGDIP
MELINEVMST ITDPAAMLGP ETNFLSAHSA 481 RDEAARLEER RGVIEFHVVG
NSLNQKPNKK ILMWLVGLQN VFSHQLPRMP KEYITRLVFD 541 PKHKTLALIK
DGRVIGGICF RMFPSQGFTE IVECAVTSNE QVKGYGTHLM NHLKEYHIKH 601
DILNFLTYAD EYAIGYFKKQ GESKEIKIPK TKYVGYIKDY EGATLMGCEL NPRIPYTEFS
661 VIIKKQKEII KKLIERKQAQ IRKVYPGLSC FKDGVRQIPI ESIPGIRETG
WKPSGKEKSK 721 EPRDPDQLYS TLKSILQQVK SHQSAWPFME PVKRTEAPGY
YEVIRFPMDL KTMSERLKNR 781 YYVSKKLFMA DLQRVFTNCK EYNPPESEYY
KCANILEKFF FSKIKEAGLI DK
[0208] SEQ ID NO: 4 is the human wild type nucleotide sequence
corresponding to HAT protein, the PCAF enzyme (residues 1-4824),
wherein the underscored ATG denotes the beginning of the open
reading frame:
TABLE-US-00004 1 gcggaaaaga ggccgtgggg ggcctcccag cgctggcaga
caccgtgagg ctggcagccg 61 ccggcacgca cacctagtcc gcagtcccga
ggaacatgtc cgcagccagg gcgcggagca 121 gagtcccggg caggagaacc
aagggagggc gtgtgctgtg gcggcggcgg cagcggcagc 181 ggagccgcta
gtcccctccc tcctggggga gcagctgccg ccgctgccgc cgccgccacc 241
accatcagcg cgcggggccc ggccagagcg agccgggcga gcggcgcgct agggggaggg
301 cgggggcggg gaggggggtg ggcgaagggg gcgggagggc gtggggggag
ggtctcgctc 361 tcccgactac cagagcccga gagggagacc ctggcggcgg
cggcggcgcc tgacactcgg 421 cgcctcctgc cgtgctccgg ggcggcatgt
ccgaggctgg cggggccggg ccgggcggct 481 gcggggcagg agccggggca
ggggccgggc ccggggcgct gcccccgcag cctgcggcgc 541 ttccgcccgc
gcccccgcag ggctccccct gcgccgctgc cgccgggggc tcgggcgcct 601
gcggtccggc gacggcagtg gctgcagcgg gcacggccga aggaccggga ggcggtggct
661 cggcccgaat cgccgtgaag aaagcgcaac tacgctccgc tccgcgggcc
aagaaactgg 721 agaaactcgg agtgtactcc gcctgcaagg ccgaggagtc
ttgtaaatgt aatggctgga 781 aaaaccctaa cccctcaccc actcccccca
gagccgacct gcagcaaata attgtcagtc 841 taacagaatc ctgtcggagt
tgtagccatg ccctagctgc tcatgtttcc cacctggaga 901 atgtgtcaga
ggaagaaatg aacagactcc tgggaatagt attggatgtg gaatatctct 961
ttacctgtgt ccacaaggaa gaagatgcag ataccaaaca agtttatttc tatctattta
1021 agctcttgag aaagtctatt ttacaaagag gaaaacctgt ggttgaaggc
tctttggaaa 1081 agaaaccccc atttgaaaaa cctagcattg aacagggtgt
gaataacttt gtgcagtaca 1141 aatttagtca cctgccagca aaagaaaggc
aaacaatagt tgagttggca aaaatgttcc 1201 taaaccgcat caactattgg
catctggagg caccatctca acgaagactg cgatctccca 1261 atgatgatat
ttctggatac aaagagaact acacaaggtg gctgtgttac tgcaacgtgc 1321
cacagttctg cgacagtcta cctcggtacg aaaccacaca ggtgtttggg agaacattgc
1381 ttcgctcggt cttcactgtt atgaggcgac aactcctgga acaagcaaga
caggaaaaag 1441 ataaactgcc tcttgaaaaa cgaactctaa tcctcactca
tttcccaaaa tttctgtcca 1501 tgctagaaga agaagtatat agtcaaaact
ctcccatctg ggatcaggat tttctctcag 1561 cctcttccag aaccagccag
ctaggcatcc aaacagttat caatccacct cctgtggctg 1621 ggacaatttc
atacaattca acctcatctt cccttgagca gccaaacgca gggagcagca 1681
gtcctgcctg caaagcctct tctggacttg aggcaaaccc aggagaaaag aggaaaatga
1741 ctgattctca tgttctggag gaggccaaga aaccccgagt tatgggggat
attccgatgg 1801 aattaatcaa cgaggttatg tctaccatca cggaccctgc
agcaatgctt ggaccagaga 1861 ccaattttct gtcagcacac tcggccaggg
atgaggcggc aaggttggaa gagcgcaggg 1921 gtgtaattga atttcacgtg
gttggcaatt ccctcaacca gaaaccaaac aagaagatcc 1981 tgatgtggct
ggttggccta cagaacgttt tctcccacca gctgccccga atgccaaaag 2041
aatacatcac acggctcgtc tttgacccga aacacaaaac ccttgcttta attaaagatg
2101 gccgtgttat tggtggtatc tgtttccgta tgttcccatc tcaaggattc
acagagattg 2161 tcttctgtgc tgtaacctca aatgagcaag tcaagggcta
tggaacacac ctgatgaatc 2221 atttgaaaga atatcacata aagcatgaca
tcctgaactt cctcacatat gcagatgaat 2281 atgcaattgg atactttaag
aaacagggtt tctccaaaga aattaaaata cctaaaacca 2341 aatatgttgg
ctatatcaag gattatgaag gagccacttt aatgggatgt gagctaaatc 2401
cacggatccc gtacacagaa ttttctgtca tcattaaaaa gcagaaggag ataattaaaa
2461 aactgattga aagaaaacag gcacaaattc gaaaagttta ccctggactt
tcatgtttta 2521 aagatggagt tcgacagatt cctatagaaa gcattcctgg
aattagagag acaggctgga 2581 aaccgagtgg aaaagagaaa agtaaagagc
ccagagaccc tgaccagctt tacagcacgc 2641 tcaagagcat cctccagcag
gtgaagagcc atcaaagcgc ttggcccttc atggaacctg 2701 tgaagagaac
agaagctcca ggatattatg aagttataag gttccccatg gatctgaaaa 2761
ccatgagtga acgcctcaag aataggtact acgtgtctaa gaaattattc atggcagact
2821 tacagcgagt ctttaccaat tgcaaagagt acaacccccc tgagagtgaa
tactacaaat 2881 gtgccaatat cctggagaaa ttcttcttca gtaaaattaa
ggaagctgga ttaattgaca 2941 agtgattttt tttcccctct gcttcttaga
aactcaccaa gcagtgtgcc taaagcaagg 3001 tggtttagtt ttttacaaag
aattggacat gatgtattga agagacttgt aaatgtaata 3061 attagcactt
ttgaaaaaac aaaaaacctc cttttagctt ttcagatatg tatttaaatt 3121
gaagtcatag gacattttta ttttatggaa tagattttaa tctatttact actattaagg
3181 taaattttct atggcatgtc cattagctat ttcatgatag atgattaggg
gtttcctcaa 3241 aacctgtgtg tgaggaaatt gcacacagta gcaaaatttg
gggaaatcca taacattttc 3301 agaccatgaa tgaatgtttc catttttttc
taatggaatg tgagagttta cttttatttt 3361 attctgaagg actttaagga
agggatacat gattttaaaa aagcctgtaa gaggtgaaat 3421 atgtgatgtt
tgaagtctct ttatagactt tttatatata ttttttaaaa cactcatcta 3481
gatgaggtgc tttgagcagt tctgaaaaat gcagttccag gaaagcaact gctttggttc
3541 ctaaggaaga aattctaaat aatgcaaact tttaaaataa gcatctaggt
ttttgataat 3601 tctgtctact tacaacaaac ttgttagtac ataaccacta
ttttaataat tattttctct 3661 acacaaatgt gtaatatcat atttgacttt
gcttatgcag gccataagtt ccaaaagata 3721 atttccctgc ccacaaaggc
ataaacttga aaacacatga gattgaatca acatgcttta 3781 ataggaaaag
atgtatggtc tatatatgta tcaatctggt gaatcctcgt tctaataaag 3841
gttctttttc ttttctatga tacacacagc cacgctgata atatgcaaat gaacattttc
3901 ctttatgtct ctccagataa tgtttattgt ctgaggtaaa ttaaattccc
accagggttt 3961 gctgtcagta ttttaacacc cacattagta tatgcgtcca
gggtcataac cccctaaaat 4021 ccatcatgca accttattaa tctgtcttgg
gattccagtt tagtgcttgg atttatttcc 4081 tgattacact acatagaaaa
gtgagacatc tgccattccc aactctggga aaaccaacta 4141 atatacaacc
atataaatga aggccatctt gatggtctca acactaattt ttatgatgca 4201
aatttataca ctgatttttg taaaggacaa agttttaaaa gcgtatttaa cttgatgttt
4261 tctatcagca taaataaaat ggtcatgaat agtcattaaa aacagttgcc
agtgataatc 4321 tgcatgaagg aaaaagaacc ctgcaaatgg ctattgagtt
ggaagtattg tttttgatat 4381 gtaagagata ttcagaatgc tcacactgaa
aatgcctcaa ctttttaaag tgtaagaaac 4441 caccatgagt ggtgtctaga
tttctaatga agaatcatga tacagtttgg attaagtatc 4501 ttggactggt
tttaaacagt gctttgtacc ggatctgctg aagcatctgt ccagctggta 4561
tcctgtgaaa gtttgttatt ttctgagtag acattcttat agagtattgt ctttaaaatc
4621 agattgtctc ttctatattg aaagcatttt tatgttttct aatttaaaaa
ttaatatttt 4681 cttatagata ttgtgcaata aagctgaagt agaatgtgtg
gtttttgcaa atgctttaac 4741 agctgataaa aattttacat ttgtaaaatt
aatatattgt actggtacaa aatagtttta 4801 aattatattt taaaaagctt
ccaa
[0209] The polypeptide sequence of a HAT protein, human GCN5L, is
depicted in SEQ ID NO: 5. The nucleotide sequence of human GCN5L is
shown in SEQ ID NO: 6. Sequence information related to GCN5L is
accessible in public databases by GenBank Accession numbers
NM_021078 (for mRNA) and NP_066564.2 (for protein). GCN5L is also
known as KAT2A (K(lysine) acetyltransferase 2A). KAT2A, or GCN5, is
a histone acetyltransferase (HAT) that functions primarily as a
transcriptional activator. It also functions as a repressor of
NF-kappa-B by promoting ubiquitination of the NF-kappa-B subunit
RELA in a HAT-independent manner (Mao et al., Genes Dev. 2009 Apr.
1; 23(7):849-61; herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety).
[0210] SEQ ID NO: 5 is the human wild type amino acid sequence
corresponding to the HAT protein. the GCN5L enzyme (residues
1-8371:
TABLE-US-00005 1 MAEPSQAPTP APAAQPRPLQ SPAPAPTPTP APSPASAPIP
TPTPAPAPAP AAAPAGSTGT 61 GGPGVGSGGA GSGGDPARPG LSQQQRASQR
KAQVRGLPRA KKLEKLGVFS ACKANETCKC 121 NGWKNPKPPT APRMDLQQPA
ANLSELCRSC EHPLADHVSH LENVSEDEIN RLLGMVVDVE 181 NLFMSVHKEE
DTDTKQVYFY LFKLLRKCIL QMTRPVVEGS LGSPPFEKPN IEQGVLNFVQ 241
YKFSHLAPRE RQTMFELSKM FLLCLNYWKL ETPAQFRQRS QAEDVATYKV NYTRWLCYCH
301 VPQSCDSLPR YETTHVFGRS LLRSIFTVTR RQLLEKFRVE KDKLVPEKRT
LILTHFPKFL 361 SMLEEETYGA NSPIWESGFT MPPSEGTQLV PRPASVSAAV
VPSTPIFSPS MGGGSNSSLS 421 LDSAGAEPMP GEKRTLPENL TLEDAKRLRV
MGDIPMELVN EVMLTITDPA AMLGPETSLL 481 SANAARDETA RLEERRGIIE
FHVIGNSLTP KANRRVLLWL VGLQNVFSHQ LPRMPKEYIA 541 RLVFDPKHKT
LALIKDGRVI GGICFRMFPT QGFTEIVFCA VTSNEQVKGY GTHLMNHLKE 601
YHIKHNILYF LTYADEYAIG YFKKQGFSKD IKVPKSRYLG YIKDYEGATL MECELNPRIP
661 YTELSHIIKK QKEIIKKLIE RKQAQIRKVY PGLSCFKEGV RQIPVESVPG
IRETGWKPLG 721 KEKGKELKDP DQLYTTLKNL LAQIKSHPSA WPFMEPVKKS
EAPDYYEVIR FPIDLKTMTE 781 RLRSRYYVTR KLFVADLQRV IANCREYNPP
DSEYCRCASA LEKFFYFKLK EGGLIDK
[0211] SEQ ID NO: 6 is the human wild type nucleotide sequence
corresponding to HAT protein, the GCN5L enzyme (residues 1-3127),
wherein the underscored ATG denotes the beginning of the open
reading frame:
TABLE-US-00006 1 ggttgcccat gcggccctag ggctgggagc gcggcgccgc
tctccgctgc gggggaggcc 61 atggcggaac cttcccaggc cccgaccccg
gccccggctg cgcagccccg gccccttcag 121 tccccagccc ctgccccaac
tccgactcct gcacccagcc cggcttcagc cccgattccg 181 actcccaccc
cggcaccagc ccctgcccca gctgcagccc cagccggcag cacagggact 241
ggggggcccg gggtaggaag tgggggggcc gggagcgggg gggatccggc tcgacctggc
301 ctgagccagc agcagcgcgc cagtcagagg aaggcgcaag tccgggggct
gccgcgcgcc 361 aagaagcttg agaagctagg ggtcttctcg gcttgcaagg
ccaatgaaac ctgtaagtgt 421 aatggctgga aaaaccccaa gccccccact
gcaccccgca tggatctgca gcagccagct 481 gccaacctga gtgagctgtg
ccgcagttgt gagcacccct tggctgacca cgtatcccac 541 ttggagaatg
tgtcagagga tgagataaac cgactgctgg ggatggtggt ggatgtggag 601
aatctcttca tgtctgttca caaggaagag gacacagaca ccaagcaggt ctatttctac
661 ctcttcaagc tactgcggaa atgcatcctg cagatgaccc ggcctgtggt
ggaggggtcc 721 ctgggcagcc ctccatttga gaaacctaat attgagcagg
gtgtgctgaa ctttgtgcag 781 tacaagttta gtcacctggc tccccgggag
cggcagacga tgttcgagct ctcaaagatg 841 ttcttgctct gccttaacta
ctggaagctt gagacacctg cccagtttcg gcagaggtct 901 caggctgagg
acgtggctac ctacaaggtc aattacacca gatggctctg ttactgccac 961
gtgccccaga gctgtgatag cctcccccgc tacgaaacca ctcatgtctt tgggcgaagc
1021 cttctccggt ccattttcac cgttacccgc cggcagctgc tggaaaagtt
ccgagtggag 1081 aaggacaaat tggtgcccga gaagaggacc ctcatcctca
ctcacttccc caaattcctg 1141 tccatgctgg aggaggagat ctatggggca
aactctccaa tctgggagtc aggcttcacc 1201 atgccaccct cagaggggac
acagctggtt ccccggccag cttcagtcag tgcagcggtt 1261 gttcccagca
cccccatctt cagccccagc atgggtgggg gcagcaacag ctccctgagt 1321
ctggattctg caggggccga gcctatgcca ggcgagaaga ggacgctccc agagaacctg
1381 accctggagg atgccaagcg gctccgtgtg atgggtgaca tccccatgga
gctggtcaat 1441 gaggtcatgc tgaccatcac tgaccctgct gccatgctgg
ggcctgagac gagcctgctt 1501 tcggccaatg cggcccggga tgagacagcc
cgcctggagg agcgccgcgg catcatcgag 1561 ttccatgtca tcggcaactc
actgacgccc aaggccaacc ggcgggtgtt gctgtggctc 1621 gtggggctgc
agaatgtctt ttcccaccag ctgccgcgca tgcctaagga gtatatcgcc 1681
cgcctcgtct ttgacccgaa gcacaagact ctggccttga tcaaggatgg gcgggtcatc
1741 ggtggcatct gcttccgcat gtttcccacc cagggcttca cggagattgt
cttctgtgct 1801 gtcacctcga atgagcaggt caagggttat gggacccacc
tgatgaacca cctgaaggag 1861 tatcacatca agcacaacat tctctacttc
ctcacctacg ccgacgagta cgccatcggc 1921 tacttcaaaa agcagggttt
ctccaaggac atcaaggtgc ccaagagccg ctacctgggc 1981 tacatcaagg
actacgaggg agcgacgctg atggagtgtg agctgaatcc ccgcatcccc 2041
tacacggagc tgtcccacat catcaagaag cagaaagaga tcatcaagaa gctgattgag
2101 cgcaaacagg cccagatccg caaggtctac ccggggctca gctgcttcaa
ggagggcgtg 2161 aggcagatcc ctgtggagag cgttcctggc attcgagaga
caggctggaa gccattgggg 2221 aaggagaagg ggaaggagct gaaggacccc
gaccagctct acacaaccct caaaaacctg 2281 ctggcccaaa tcaagtctca
ccccagtgcc tggcccttca tggagcctgt gaagaagtcg 2341 gaggcccctg
actactacga ggtcatccgc ttccccattg acctgaagac catgactgag 2401
cggctgcgaa gccgctacta cgtgacccgg aagctctttg tggccgacct gcagcgggtc
2461 atcgccaact gtcgcgagta caaccccccg gacagcgagt actgccgctg
tgccagcgcc 2521 ctggagaagt tcttctactt caagctcaag gagggaggcc
tcattgacaa gtaggcccat 2581 ctttgggccg cagccctgac ctggaatgtc
tccacctcgg attctgatct gatccttagg 2641 gggtgccctg gccccacgga
cccgactcag cttgagacac tccagccaag ggtcctccgg 2701 acccgatcct
gcagctcttt ctggaccttc aggcaccccc aagcgtgcag ctctgtccca 2761
gccttcactg tgtgtgagag gtctcctggg ttggggccca gcccctctag agtagctggt
2821 ggccagggat gaaccttgcc cagccgtggt ggcccccagg cctggtcccc
aagagctttg 2881 gaggcttgga ttcctgggcc tggcccaggt ggctgtttcc
ctgaggacca gaactgctca 2941 ttttagcttg agtgatggct tcaggggttg
gaagttcagc ccaaactgaa gggggccatg 3001 ccttgtccag cactgttctg
tcagtctccc ccaggggtgg ggggtatggg gaccattcat 3061 tccctggcat
taatccctta gagggaataa taaagctttt tatttctctg tgaaaaaaaa 3121
aaaaaaa
[0212] Fragments include all possible amino acid lengths between
and including about 8 and 100 about amino acids, for example,
lengths between about 10 and 100 amino acids, between about 15 and
100 amino acids, between about 20 and 100 amino acids, between
about 35 and 100 amino acids, between about 40 and 100 amino acids,
between about 50 and 100 amino acids, between about 70 and 100
amino acids, between about 75 and 100 amino acids, or between about
80 and 100 amino acids. These peptide fragments can be obtained
commercially or synthesized via liquid phase or solid phase
synthesis methods (Atherton et al., (1989) Solid Phase Peptide
Synthesis: a Practical Approach. IRL Press, Oxford, England; herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety). The HAT peptide
fragments can be isolated from a natural source, genetically
engineered, or chemically prepared. These methods are well known in
the art.
[0213] A HAT Activator compound can also be a protein, such as an
antibody (monoclonal, polyclonal, humanized, and the like), or a
binding fragment thereof, directed against a histone
acetyltransferase enzyme, such as GCN5, GCN5L, PCAF, or HAT1. An
antibody fragment can be a form of an antibody other than the
full-length form and includes portions or components that exist
within full-length antibodies, in addition to antibody fragments
that have been engineered. Antibody fragments can include, but are
not limited to, single chain Fv (scFv), diabodies, Fv, and
(Fab').sub.2, triabodies, Fc, Fab, CDR1, CDR2, CDR3, combinations
of CDR's, variable regions, tetrabodies, bifunctional hybrid
antibodies, framework regions, constant regions, and the like (see,
Maynard et al., (2000) Ann. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2:339-76; Hudson
(1998) Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 9:395-402; each herein incorporated
by reference in its entirety). Antibodies can be obtained
commercially, custom generated, or synthesized against an antigen
of interest according to methods established in the art (Janeway et
al., (2001) Immunobiology, 5th ed., Garland Publishing, herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety).
[0214] Inhibition of RNA encoding a HAT protein can effectively
modulate the expression of a HAT gene (e.g., GCN5, GCN5L, PCAF, or
HAT1) from which the RNA is transcribed. Inhibitors are selected
from the group comprising: siRNA, interfering RNA or RNAi; dsRNA;
RNA Polymerase III transcribed DNAs; ribozymes; and antisense
nucleic acid, which can be RNA, DNA, or artificial nucleic
acid.
[0215] Antisense oligonucleotides, including antisense DNA, RNA,
and DNA/RNA molecules, act to directly block the translation of
mRNA by binding to targeted mRNA and preventing protein
translation. For example, antisense oligonucleotides of at least
about 15 bases and complementary to unique regions of the DNA
sequence encoding a HAT polypeptide can be synthesized, e.g., by
conventional phosphodiester techniques (Dallas et al., (2006) Med.
Sci. Monit. 12(4):RA67-74; Kalota et al., (2006) Handb. Exp.
Pharmacol. 173:173-96; Lutzelburger et al., (2006) Handb. Exp.
Pharmacol. 173:243-59; each herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety).
[0216] siRNA comprises a double stranded structure containing from
about 15 to about 50 base pairs, for example from about 21 to about
25 base pairs, and having a nucleotide sequence identical or nearly
identical to an expressed target gene or RNA within the cell.
Antisense nucleotide sequences include, but are not limited to:
morpholinos, 2'-O-methyl polynucleotides, DNA, RNA and the like.
RNA polymerase III transcribed DNAs contain promoters, such as the
U6 promoter. These DNAs can be transcribed to produce small hairpin
RNAs in the cell that can function as siRNA or linear RNAs that can
function as antisense RNA. The HAT activator compound can contain
ribonucleotides, deoxyribonucleotides, synthetic nucleotides, or
any suitable combination such that the target RNA and/or gene is
inhibited. In addition, these forms of nucleic acid can be single,
double, triple, or quadruple stranded. (see for example Bass (2001)
Nature, 411, 428 429; Elbashir et al., (2001) Nature, 411, 494 498;
and PCT Publication Nos. WO 00/44895, WO 01/36646, WO 99/32619, WO
00/01846, WO 01/29058, WO 99/07409, WO 00/44914; each herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety).
[0217] In some embodiments, a HAT Activator compound can be a small
molecule that binds to a histone acetyltransferase enzyme, such as
GCN5, GCN5L, PCAF, or HAT1, and disrupts its function. Small
molecules are a diverse group of synthetic and natural substances
generally having low molecular weights. They can be isolated from
natural sources (for example, plants, fungi, microbes and the
like), are obtained commercially and/or available as libraries or
collections, or synthesized. Candidate small molecules that
interact with a HAT protein can be identified via in silico
screening or high-through-put (HTP) screening of combinatorial
libraries. Most conventional pharmaceuticals, such as aspirin,
penicillin, and many chemotherapeutics, are small molecules, can be
obtained commercially, can be chemically synthesized, or can be
obtained from random or combinatorial libraries as described below
(Werner et al., (2006) Brief Funct. Genomic Proteomic 5(1):32-6;
herein incorporated by reference in its entirety).
[0218] Knowledge of the primary sequence of a molecule of interest,
such as a HAT polypeptide, and the similarity of that sequence with
other proteins of the same histone acetyltransferase family (such
as the GNAT family, the MYST family or the GCN5 family [see Lee and
Owrkman (2007) Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol., 8(4):284-95, Marmorstein
(2001) J Molec Biol. 311: 433-444; and Kimura et al., (2005) J
Biocehm. 138(6): 647-662; each herein incorporated by reference in
its entirety], can provide information as to the inhibitors or
antagonists of the protein of interest. Identification and
screening antagonists can be further facilitated by determining
structural features of the protein, e.g., using X-ray
crystallography, neutron diffraction, nuclear magnetic resonance
spectrometry, and other techniques for structure determination.
These techniques provide for the rational design or identification
of antagonists, in addition to protein agonists.
[0219] The invention provides methods for screening and identifying
compounds useful for treating a neurodegenerative disease in a
subject. The invention provides methods for identifying compounds
which can be used for treating subjects that exhibit, for example,
abnormally elevated amyloid beta plaques, or elevated Tau protein
levels, or elevated alpha-synuclein levels, or inclusions, or
lipofuscin level or inclusions, or cleaved TARDBP-TDP-43 level or
inclusion, or accumulation of cleaved TARDBP/TDP-43 inclusions, or
a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the method comprises
selecting a HAT Activator compound that comprises one or both of
the following features: (a) the EC.sub.50 of the compound is no
more than about 1000 nM; (b) the compound penetrates the blood
brain barrier; (c) the compound enhances histone acetylation (for
example acetylates histone protein H3 or H4), or a combination
thereof. In a further embodiment, the compound, for example the HAT
Activator, has an EC.sub.50 of at least about 0.1 nM, at least
about 1 nM, at least about 5 nM, at least about 10 nM, at least
about 25 nM, at least about 50 nM, at least about 100 nM, at least
about 200 nM, at least about 300 nM, at least about 400 nM, at
least about 500 nM, at least about 600 nM, at least about 700 nM,
at least about 800 nM, or at least about 900 nM. In some
embodiments, the HAT Activator compound can have a molecular mass
less than about 500 Da in order to penetrate the blood brain
barrier. In other embodiments, the HAT Activator compound can have
a polar surface area less than about 90 .ANG..sup.2 and should have
8 or fewer hydrogen bonds in order to penetrate the blood brain
barrier. The screening and identifying of the compound can comprise
in silico screening, molecular docking, in vivo screening, in vitro
screening, or a combination thereof.
[0220] Test compounds, such as HAT Activator compounds, can be
screened from large libraries of synthetic or natural compounds
(see Wang et al., (2007) Curr Med Chem, 14(2):133-55; Mannhold
(2006) Curr Top Med Chem, 6 (10):1031-47; and Hensen (2006) Curr
Med Chem 13(4):361-76; each herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety). Numerous means are currently used for random and
directed synthesis of saccharide, peptide, and nucleic acid based
compounds. Synthetic compound libraries are commercially available
from Maybridge Chemical Co. (Trevillet, Cornwall, UK), Comgenex
(Princeton, N.J.), Brandon Associates (Merrimack, N.H.), and
Microsource (New Milford, Conn.). A rare chemical library is
available from Aldrich (Milwaukee, Wis.). Alternatively, libraries
of natural compounds in the form of bacterial, fungal, plant and
animal extracts are available from e.g. Pan Laboratories (Bothell,
Wash.) or MycoSearch (N.C.), or are readily producible.
Additionally, natural and synthetically produced libraries and
compounds are readily modified through conventional chemical,
physical, and biochemical means (Blondelle et al., (1996) Tib Tech
14:60; herein incorporated by reference in its entirety).
[0221] Methods for preparing libraries of molecules are well known
in the art and many libraries are commercially available. Libraries
of interest in the invention include peptide libraries, randomized
oligonucleotide libraries, synthetic organic combinatorial
libraries, and the like. Degenerate peptide libraries can be
readily prepared in solution, in immobilized form as bacterial
flagella peptide display libraries or as phage display libraries.
Peptide ligands can be selected from combinatorial libraries of
peptides containing at least one amino acid. Libraries can be
synthesized of peptoids and non-peptide synthetic moieties. Such
libraries can further be synthesized which contain non-peptide
synthetic moieties, which are less subject to enzymatic degradation
compared to their naturally-occurring counterparts. Libraries are
also meant to include for example but are not limited to
peptide-on-plasmid libraries, polysome libraries, aptamer
libraries, synthetic peptide libraries, synthetic small molecule
libraries, neurotransmitter libraries, and chemical libraries. The
libraries can also comprise cyclic carbon or heterocyclic structure
and/or aromatic or polyaromatic structures substituted with one or
more of the functional groups described herein.
[0222] Small molecule combinatorial libraries can also be generated
and screened. A combinatorial library of small organic compounds is
a collection of closely related analogs that differ from each other
in one or more points of diversity and are synthesized by organic
techniques using multi-step processes. Combinatorial libraries
include a vast number of small organic compounds. One type of
combinatorial library is prepared by means of parallel synthesis
methods to produce a compound array. A compound array can be a
collection of compounds identifiable by their spatial addresses in
Cartesian coordinates and arranged such that each compound has a
common molecular core and one or more variable structural diversity
elements. The compounds in such a compound array are produced in
parallel in separate reaction vessels, with each compound
identified and tracked by its spatial address. Examples of parallel
synthesis mixtures and parallel synthesis methods are provided in
U.S. Ser. No. 08/177,497, filed Jan. 5, 1994 and its corresponding
PCT published patent application WO95/18972, published Jul. 13,
1995 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,712,171 granted Jan. 27, 1998 and its
corresponding PCT published patent application WO96/22529, each
herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
[0223] Examples of chemically synthesized libraries are described
in Fodor et al., (1991) Science 251:767-773; Houghten et al.,
(1991) Nature 354:84-86; Lam et al., (1991) Nature 354:82-84;
Medynski, (1994) BioTechnology 12:709-710; Gallop et al., (1994) J.
Medicinal Chemistry 37(9):1233-1251; Ohlmeyer et al., (1993) Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:10922-10926; Erb et al., (1994) Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA 91:11422-11426; Houghten et al., (1992)
Biotechniques 13:412; Jayawickreme et al., (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA 91:1614-1618; Salmon et al., (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA 90:11708-11712; PCT Publication No. WO 93/20242, dated Oct. 14,
1993; and Brenner et al., (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:5381-5383; each herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety.
[0224] Examples of phage display libraries are described in Scott
et al., (1990) Science 249:386-390; Devlin et al., (1990) Science,
249:404-406; Christian, et al., (1992) J Mol. Biol. 227:711-718;
Lenstra, (1992).sub.1 Immunol. Meth. 152:149-157; Kay et al.,
(1993) Gene 128:59-65; and PCT Publication No. WO 94/18318; each
herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
[0225] In vitro translation-based libraries include but are not
limited to those described in PCT Publication No. WO 91/05058; and
Mattheakis et al., (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:9022-9026;
each herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
[0226] In one non-limiting example, non-peptide libraries, such as
a benzodiazepine library (see e.g., Bunin et al., (1994) Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:4708-4712; herein incorporated by reference
in its entirety), can be screened. Peptoid libraries, such as that
described by Simon et al., (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:9367-9371 (herein incorporated by reference in its entirety),
can also be used. Another example of a library that can be used, in
which the amide functionalities in peptides have been permethylated
to generate a chemically transformed combinatorial library, is
described by Ostresh et al. (1994), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:11138-11142; herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety.
[0227] The three dimensional geometric structure of an active site,
for example that of a HAT polypeptide can be determined by known
methods in the art, such as X-ray crystallography, which can
determine a complete molecular structure. Solid or liquid phase NMR
can be used to determine certain intramolecular distances. Any
other experimental method of structure determination can be used to
obtain partial or complete geometric structures. The geometric
structures can be measured with a complexed ligand, natural or
artificial, which can increase the accuracy of the active site
structure determined. In one embodiment, a compound that binds to a
HAT protein, such as GCN5, GCN5L, PCAF, or HAT1, can be identified
via: (1) providing an electronic library of test compounds; (2)
providing atomic coordinates listed in PDB Entry No. 1YGH or 2RC4,
for at least 20 amino acid residues for the acetyltransferase
active site of the HAT protein (the HAT domain), wherein the
coordinates have a root mean square deviation therefrom, with
respect to at least 50% of C.alpha. atoms, of not greater than
about 2 .ANG., in a computer readable format; (3) converting the
atomic coordinates into electrical signals readable by a computer
processor to generate a three dimensional model of the HAT protein;
(4) performing a data processing method, wherein electronic test
compounds from the library are docked onto the three dimensional
model of the HAT protein; and determining which test compound fits
into the active site of the three dimensional model of the HAT
protein, thereby identifying which compound would bind to a HAT
protein. In another embodiment, the method can further comprise:
synthesizing or obtaining the compound determined to dock to the
active site of the HAT protein; contacting the HAT protein with the
compound under a condition suitable for binding; and determining
whether the compound modulates HAT protein expression or mRNA
expression, or HAT protein activity using a diagnostic assay.
[0228] Methods for predicting the effect on protein conformation of
a change in protein sequence, are known in the art, and the skilled
artisan can thus design a variant which functions as an antagonist
according to known methods. One example of such a method is
described by Dahiyat and Mayo in Science (1997) 278:82 87 (herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety), which describes the
design of proteins de novo. The method can be applied to a known
protein to vary only a portion of the polypeptide sequence.
Similarly, Blake (U.S. Pat. No. 5,565,325; herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety) teaches the use of known ligand
structures to predict and synthesize variants with similar or
modified function.
[0229] Other methods for preparing or identifying peptides that
bind to a target are known in the art. Molecular imprinting, for
instance, can be used for the de novo construction of
macromolecular structures such as peptides that bind to a molecule.
See, for example, Kenneth J. Shea, Molecular Imprinting of
Synthetic Network Polymers: The De Novo synthesis of Macromolecular
Binding and Catalytic Sites, TRIP Vol. 2, No. 5, May 1994; Mosbach,
(1994) Trends in Biochem. Sci., 19(9); and Wulff, G., in Polymeric
Reagents and Catalysts (Ford, W. T., Ed.) ACS Symposium Series No.
308, pp 186-230, American Chemical Society (1986); each herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety. One method for preparing
mimics of a HAT protein involves the steps of: (i) polymerization
of functional monomers around a known substrate (the template) that
exhibits a desired activity; (ii) removal of the template molecule;
and then (iii) polymerization of a second class of monomers in, the
void left by the template, to provide a new molecule which exhibits
one or more desired properties which are similar to that of the
template. Other binding molecules such as polysaccharides,
nucleosides, drugs, nucleoproteins, lipoproteins, carbohydrates,
glycoproteins, steroids, lipids, and other biologically active
materials can also be prepared. This method is useful for designing
various biological mimics that are more stable than their natural
counterparts, because they are prepared by the free radical
polymerization of functional monomers, resulting in a compound with
a nonbiodegradable backbone. Other methods for designing such
molecules include, e.g., drug design based on structure activity
relationships, which require the synthesis and evaluation of a
number of compounds and molecular modeling.
[0230] The invention also provides in vivo and in vitro methods for
identifying a compound that binds to a HAT protein. In one
embodiment, the method comprises: (a) obtaining a tissue and/or
cells that express a HAT protein (such as GCN5, GCN5L, PCAF, or
HAT1); (b) contacting the tissue and/or cell with a ligand source
for an effective period of time; (c) measuring a secondary
messenger response, wherein the response is indicative of a ligand
binding to a HAT protein; (d) isolating the ligand from the ligand
source; and (e) identifying the structure of the ligand that binds
a HAT protein, thereby identifying which compound would bind to a
HAT protein. As used herein, the term "ligand source" can be any
compound library described herein, or a library of
neurotransmitters that can be used to screen for compounds that
would act as an agonist of a HAT protein (such as GCN5, GCN5L,
PCAF, or HAT1). Screening compound libraries listed herein [also
see U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2005/0009163, which is
hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety], in combination
with in vivo animal studies and functional assays can be used to
identify HAT Activator compounds that can be used to treat subjects
afflicted with abnormal A.beta. deposits, such as AD or to treat
cancer.
[0231] A HAT Activator compound can be a compound that increases
the activity and/or expression of a HAT molecule (e.g., GCN5,
GCN5L, PCAF, or HAT1) in vivo and/or in vitro. HAT Activator
compounds can be compounds that exert their effect on the activity
of a HAT protein via the expression, via post-translational
modifications, or by other means. In one embodiment, a HAT
Activator compound can increase HAT protein or mRNA expression, or
acetyltransferase activity by at least about 10%, at least about
20%, at least about 30%, at least about 40%, at least about 50%, at
least about 60%, at least about 70%, at least about 75%, at least
about 80%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about
95%, at least about 97%, at least about 99%, or 100%.
[0232] Test compounds or agents which bind to a HAT molecule (such
as GCN5, GCN5L, PCAF, or HAT1), and/or have a stimulatory effect on
the activity or the expression of a HAT molecule, can be identified
by various assays. The assay can be a binding assay comprising
direct or indirect measurement of the binding of a test compound or
a known HAT ligand to the active site of a HAT protein. The assay
can also be an activity assay comprising direct or indirect
measurement of the activity of a HAT molecule. The assay can also
be an expression assay comprising direct or indirect measurement of
the expression of a HAT mRNA or protein. The various screening
assays can be combined with an in vivo assay comprising measuring
the effect of the test compound on cognitive and synaptic function
in an animal model for neurodegenerative disorders, such as, but
not limited to, AD or Huntington's Disease.
[0233] The diagnostic assay of the screening methods of the
invention can also involve monitoring the expression of a HAT
molecule. For example, inhibitors of the expression of a HAT
molecule can be identified via contacting a HAT-positive cell or
tissue with a test compound and determining the expression of a HAT
protein or HAT mRNA in the cell. The protein or mRNA expression
level of a HAT molecule in the presence of the test compound is
compared to the protein or mRNA expression level of a HAT protein
in the absence of the test compound. The test compound can then be
identified as an inhibitor of expression of a HAT protein (such as
GCN5, GCN5L, PCAF, or HAT1) based on this comparison. Activators of
the expression of a HAT molecule can also be identified via
contacting a HAT-positive cell or tissue with a test compound and
determining the expression of a HAT protein or HAT mRNA in the
cell. The protein or mRNA expression level of a HAT molecule in the
presence of the test compound is compared to the protein or mRNA
expression level of a HAT protein in the absence of the test
compound. The test compound can then be identified as an activator
of expression of a HAT protein (such as GCN5, GCN5L, PCAF, or HAT1)
based on this comparison. For example, when expression of HAT
protein or mRNA is statistically or significantly more in the
presence of the test compound than in its absence, the compound is
identified as an activator of the expression of a HAT protein or
mRNA. In other words, the test compound can also be said to be a
HAT Activator compound (such as an agonist). The expression level
of a HAT protein or mRNA in cells can be determined by methods
described herein.
[0234] Determining the ability of a test compound to bind to a HAT
molecule or a variant thereof can be accomplished using real-time
Bimolecular Interaction Analysis (BIA) [McConnell, (1992);
Sjolander, (1991); herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety]. BIA is a technology for studying biospecific
interactions in real time, without labeling any of the interactants
(e.g., BIA-core.TM.). Changes in optical phenomenon surface plasmon
resonance (SPR) can be used as an indication of real-time reactions
between biological molecules.
Exemplary HAT Activator Compounds Optimized for CNS Disorders and
Cancer
[0235] The invention provides for compounds that bind to a HAT
activator protein, such as GCN5, GCN5L, PCAF, or HAT1. These
compounds can be identified by the screening methods and assays
described herein, and enhance the activity or expression of HAT
activator proteins. In one embodiment, the invention encompasses a
compound of Formula (I):
##STR00013##
wherein, [0236] R.sup.1 is H, or CF.sub.3; [0237] R.sup.2 is H, Cl,
or CN; [0238] R.sup.3 is H, O-methyl, O-ethyl, S-ethyl,
O-cyclopentyl, OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2, or
CH.sub.2CH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2; [0239] R.sup.4 is H;
C(.dbd.O)NH-phenyl, wherein phenyl is substituted with one or more
halo or CF.sub.3; [0240] R.sup.5 is H, C.sub.1-C.sub.5-alkyl, OH,
OCH.sub.3, O-ethyl, OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2,
CH.sub.2CH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2,
SCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2, or OCH.sub.2C(.dbd.O)O-alkyl;
[0241] R.sup.6 is H, O-methyl, O-ethyl,
OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2; and [0242] X is CONH, SONH,
SO.sub.2NH, NHC(.dbd.O)NH, or NHCO, or a pharmaceutically
acceptable salt or hydrate thereof.
[0243] In one embodiment of the compound of Formula (I), [0244]
R.sup.1 is H, or CF.sub.3; [0245] R.sup.2 is H, Cl, or CN; [0246]
R.sup.3 is H, O-methyl, O-ethyl, S-ethyl, O-cyclopentyl,
OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2, or
CH.sub.2CH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2; [0247] R.sup.4 is H;
C(.dbd.O)NH-phenyl, wherein phenyl is substituted with one or more
halo or CF.sub.3; [0248] R.sup.5 is C.sub.1-C.sub.5-alkyl, OH,
OCH.sub.3, O-ethyl, OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2,
CH.sub.2CH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2,
SCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2, or OCH.sub.2C(.dbd.O)O-alkyl;
[0249] R.sup.6 is H, O-methyl, O-ethyl,
OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2; and [0250] X is CONH, SONH,
SO.sub.2NH, NHC(.dbd.O)NH, or NHCO.
[0251] In one embodiment of the compound of Formula (I), le is H.
In one embodiment of the compound of Formula (I), le is
CF.sub.3.
[0252] In one embodiment of the compound of Formula (I), R.sup.2 is
H, Cl, or CN. In one embodiment of the compound of Formula (I),
R.sup.2 is C1 or CN. In one embodiment of the compound of Formula
(I), R.sup.2 is C1. In one embodiment of the compound of Formula
(I), R.sup.2 is CN.
[0253] In one embodiment of the compound of Formula (I), R.sup.3 is
O-methyl, O-ethyl, S-ethyl, O-cyclopentyl,
OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2, or
CH.sub.2CH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2. In one embodiment of the
compound of Formula (I), R.sup.3 is O-methyl, O-ethyl, S-ethyl, or
O-cyclopentyl. In one embodiment of the compound of Formula (I),
R.sup.3 is O-methyl, O-ethyl, or S-ethyl. In one embodiment of the
compound of Formula (I), R.sup.3 is O-methyl or O-ethyl. In one
embodiment of the compound of Formula (I), R.sup.3 is O-ethyl, or
S-ethyl. In one embodiment of the compound of Formula (I), R.sup.3
is O-ethyl.
[0254] In one embodiment of the compound of Formula (I), R.sup.4 is
H. In one embodiment of the compound of Formula (I), R.sup.4 is
C(.dbd.O)NH-phenyl, wherein phenyl is substituted with one or more
halo or CF.sub.3.
[0255] In one embodiment of the compound of Formula (I), R.sup.5 is
C.sub.1-C.sub.4-alkyl, OH, OCH.sub.3, O-ethyl,
OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2,
CH.sub.2CH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2,
SCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2, or OCH.sub.2C(.dbd.O)O-alkyl.
In one embodiment of the compound of Formula (I), R.sup.5 is OH,
OCH.sub.3, O-ethyl, OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2,
CH.sub.2CH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2,
SCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2, or OCH.sub.2C(.dbd.O)O-alkyl.
In one embodiment of the compound of Formula (I), R.sup.5 is
OCH.sub.3, O-ethyl, OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2,
CH.sub.2CH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2,
SCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2, or OCH.sub.2C(.dbd.O)O-alkyl.
In one embodiment of the compound of Formula (I), R.sup.5 is
OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2,
CH.sub.2CH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2,
SCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2, or OCH.sub.2C(.dbd.O)O-alkyl.
In one embodiment of the compound of Formula (I), R.sup.5 is
OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2,
CH.sub.2CH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2, or
SCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2. In one embodiment of the
compound of Formula (I), R.sup.5 is
OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2 or
SCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2. In one embodiment of the
compound of Formula (I), R.sup.5 is
OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2.
[0256] In one embodiment of the compound of Formula (I), R.sup.6 is
H, O-methyl, O-ethyl, or OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2. In one
embodiment of the compound of Formula (I), R.sup.6 is H or
OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2. In one embodiment of the
compound of Formula (I), R.sup.6 is H.
[0257] In one embodiment of the compound of Formula (I), X is CONH,
SONH, SO.sub.2NH, NHC(.dbd.O)NH, or NHCO. In one embodiment of the
compound of Formula (I), X is CONH, SONH, or SO.sub.2NH. In one
embodiment of the compound of Formula (I), X is CONH or SO.sub.2NH.
In one embodiment of the compound of Formula (I), X is CONH. In one
embodiment of the compound of Formula (I), X is SO.sub.2NH.
[0258] In one embodiment of the compound of Formula (I), [0259]
R.sup.1 is CF.sub.3; [0260] R.sup.2 is H, Cl, or CN; [0261] R.sup.3
is H, O--(C.sub.1-C.sub.2)-alkyl, O--(C.sub.3-C.sub.6)-cycloalkyl,
O--(C.sub.1-C.sub.2)-alkyl-CO.sub.2--(C.sub.1-C.sub.2)-alkyl, or
S--(C.sub.1-C.sub.2)-alkyl; [0262] R.sup.4 is H; [0263] R.sup.5 is
H, (C.sub.1-C.sub.6)-alkyl, OH, OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2,
S--(C.sub.1-C.sub.2)-alkyl, or SCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2;
[0264] R.sup.6 is H, or OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2; and
[0265] X=SO.sub.2NH, CONH, NHCO, or NHCONH, or a pharmaceutically
acceptable salt or hydrate thereof.
[0266] In one embodiment of the compound of Formula (I), [0267]
R.sup.1 is CF.sub.3; [0268] R.sup.2 is H, Cl, or CN; [0269] R.sup.3
is H, O--(C.sub.1-C.sub.2)-alkyl, O--(C.sub.3-C.sub.6)-cycloalkyl,
O--(C.sub.1-C.sub.2)-alkyl-CO.sub.2--(C.sub.1-C.sub.2)-alkyl, or
S--(C.sub.1-C.sub.2)-alkyl; [0270] R.sup.4 is H; [0271] R.sup.5 is
(C.sub.1-C.sub.6)-alkyl, OH, OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2,
S--(C.sub.1-C.sub.2)-alkyl, or SCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2;
[0272] R.sup.6 is H, or OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2; and
[0273] X=SO.sub.2NH, CONH, NHCO, or NHCONH, or a pharmaceutically
acceptable salt or hydrate thereof.
[0274] In particular embodiments, the compound of Formula (I)
is:
##STR00014##
[0275] In some embodiments, the compound of Formula (I) is
##STR00015##
[0276] In another embodiment of the compound of Formula (I), [0277]
R.sup.1 is CF.sub.3; [0278] R.sup.2 is Cl; [0279] R.sup.3 is H,
O--(C.sub.1-C.sub.2)-alkyl, O--(C.sub.3-C.sub.6)-cycloalkyl, or
O--(C.sub.1-C.sub.2)-alkyl-CO.sub.2--(C.sub.1-C.sub.2)-alkyl;
[0280] R.sup.4 is H; [0281] R.sup.5 is H, (C.sub.1-C.sub.6)-alkyl,
OH, OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2, S--(C.sub.1-C.sub.2)-alkyl,
or SCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2; [0282] R.sup.6 is H, or
OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2; and [0283] X is SO.sub.2NH,
CONH, NHCO, or NHCONH, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or
hydrate thereof.
[0284] In another embodiment of the compound of Formula (I), [0285]
R.sup.1 is CF.sub.3; [0286] R.sup.2 is Cl; [0287] R.sup.3 is H,
O--(C.sub.1-C.sub.2)-alkyl, O--(C.sub.3-C.sub.6)-cycloalkyl, or
O--(C.sub.1-C.sub.2)-alkyl-CO.sub.2--(C.sub.1-C.sub.2)-alkyl;
[0288] R.sup.4 is H; [0289] R.sup.5 is (C.sub.1-C.sub.6)-alkyl, OH,
OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2, S--(C.sub.1-C.sub.2)-alkyl, or
SCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2; [0290] R.sup.6 is H, or
OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2; and [0291] X is SO.sub.2NH,
CONH, NHCO, or NHCONH, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or
hydrate thereof.
[0292] In particular embodiments, the compound of Formula (I)
is:
##STR00016##
[0293] In some embodiments, the compound is,
##STR00017##
[0294] In a further embodiment of the compound of Formula (I),
[0295] R.sup.1 is CF.sub.3; [0296] R.sup.2 is H, or CN; [0297]
R.sup.3 is S--(C.sub.1-C.sub.2)-alkyl, or
OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2; [0298] R.sup.4 is H; [0299]
R.sup.5 is H, or (C.sub.1-C.sub.4)-alkyl; [0300] R.sup.6 is H; and
[0301] X is CONH, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or hydrate
thereof.
[0302] In particular embodiments, the compound of Formula (I)
is:
##STR00018##
or
##STR00019##
[0303] In some embodiments of the compound of Formula (I), [0304]
R.sup.1 is CF.sub.3; [0305] R.sup.2 is Cl; [0306] R.sup.3 is H,
O--(C.sub.1-C.sub.2)-alkyl, OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2, or
CH.sub.2CH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2; [0307] R.sup.4 is
C(O)NH-(3-CF.sub.3, 4-Cl-phenyl); [0308] R.sup.5 is H,
O--(C.sub.1-C.sub.2)-alkyl, OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2, or
CH.sub.2CH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2; [0309] R.sup.6 is H, or
O--(C.sub.1-C.sub.2)-alkyl; and [0310] X=CONH, or a
pharmaceutically acceptable salt or hydrate thereof.
[0311] In some embodiments of the compound of Formula (I), [0312]
R.sup.1 is CF.sub.3; [0313] R.sup.2 is Cl; [0314] R.sup.3 is H,
O--(C.sub.1-C.sub.2)-alkyl, OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2, or
CH.sub.2CH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2; [0315] R.sup.4 is
C(O)NH-(3-CF.sub.3, 4-Cl-phenyl); [0316] R.sup.5 is
O--(C.sub.1-C.sub.2)-alkyl, OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2, or
CH.sub.2CH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2; [0317] R.sup.6 is H, or
O--(C.sub.1-C.sub.2)-alkyl; and [0318] X=CONH, or a
pharmaceutically acceptable salt or hydrate thereof.
[0319] In particular embodiments, the compound of Formula (I)
is:
##STR00020## ##STR00021## ##STR00022##
[0320] In one embodiment of the compound of formula (I), [0321]
R.sup.1 is CF.sub.3; [0322] R.sup.2 is Cl; [0323] R.sup.3 is
O--(C.sub.1-C.sub.2)-alkyl; [0324] R.sup.4 is H; [0325] R.sup.5 is
OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2; and [0326] X is CONH, or a
pharmaceutically acceptable salt or hydrate thereof.
[0327] In another embodiment of the compound of Formula (I),
[0328] R.sup.1 is CF.sub.3; [0329] R.sup.2 is Cl; [0330] R.sup.3 is
H, O--(C.sub.1-C.sub.2)-alkyl; [0331] R.sup.4 is H; [0332] R.sup.5
is SCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2; [0333] R.sup.6 is H; and
[0334] X=SO.sub.2NH, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or
hydrate thereof.
[0335] In one embodiment, the invention encompasses HAT Activator
compounds of
[0336] Formula (II), wherein:
##STR00023##
wherein, [0337] R.sup.7 is H or CF.sub.3; [0338] R.sup.8 is O-ethyl
or S-methyl; [0339] R.sup.9 is butyl or
OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2; [0340] Y is C--Cl, C--CN,
C--NO.sub.2, or N; [0341] W is CH or N; and [0342] Z is CH or N, or
a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or hydrate thereof.
[0343] In particular embodiments, the compound of Formula (II)
is:
##STR00024##
[0344] In one embodiment, the invention encompasses HAT Activator
compounds of Formula (III), wherein:
##STR00025##
wherein [0345] R.sup.10 is CF.sub.3; [0346] R.sup.11 is CN; and
[0347] R.sup.12 is O-ethyl, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt
or hydrate thereof.
[0348] In one embodiment, the invention encompasses HAT Activator
compounds of Formula (IV), wherein:
##STR00026##
wherein, [0349] X is S, S(O).sub.2, NH, O, or C; [0350] Y is
--C(O), S(O).sub.2, or NH--C(O); [0351] R' is H, methyl, ethyl,
n-propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl, t-butyl, C.sub.8H.sub.18,
C.sub.15H.sub.26, C.sub.15H.sub.28, C.sub.15H.sub.30,
C.sub.15H.sub.32, SR.sup.4, or OR.sup.4; [0352] R.sup.2 is H,
methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl, t-butyl, or
(C.sub.1-C.sub.6 alkyl)-CO.sub.2R.sup.6; [0353] R.sup.3 is H,
methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl, t-butyl, CF.sub.3,
CCl.sub.3, Cl.sub.3, F, Cl, I, NO.sub.2, or CN; [0354] R.sup.4 is
(C.sub.1-C.sub.6 alkyl)-N(R.sup.5).sub.2 or C.sub.1-C.sub.6 alkyl;
[0355] R.sup.5 is independently hydrogen, C.sub.1-C.sub.6 alkyl, or
C.sub.3-C.sub.8 cycloalkyl; and [0356] R.sup.6 is hydrogen,
C.sub.1-C.sub.6 alkyl, or C.sub.3-C.sub.8 cycloalkyl, or a
pharmaceutically acceptable salt or hydrate thereof.
[0357] In one embodiment, X is O, while Y is N--C.dbd.O. In another
embodiment, X is S, while Y is N--C.dbd.O.
[0358] In specific embodiments, the compound is YF2:
##STR00027##
[0359] In one embodiment, the HAT Activator compound, YF2, can be
synthesized according to the scheme depicted in FIG. 29. Other
analogs of HAT Activator compounds having Formula I can be
similarly synthesized.
[0360] In one embodiment, the HAT Activator compound, 10, can be
synthesized according to the scheme depicted in FIG. 37.
[0361] In one embodiment, the HAT Activator compound, 11, can be
synthesized according to the scheme depicted in FIG. 39.
[0362] In one embodiment, the HAT Activator compound, 12, can be
synthesized according to the scheme depicted in FIG. 40.
[0363] In one embodiment, the HAT Activator compound, 13, can be
synthesized according to the scheme depicted in FIG. 42.
[0364] In one embodiment, the HAT Activator compound, 14, can be
synthesized according to the scheme depicted in FIG. 41.
[0365] In one embodiment, the HAT Activator compound, 15, can be
synthesized according to the scheme depicted in FIG. 43.
[0366] In one embodiment, the HAT Activator compound, 16, can be
synthesized according to the scheme depicted in FIG. 44.
[0367] In one embodiment, the HAT Activator compound, 17, can be
synthesized according to the scheme depicted in FIG. 45.
[0368] In one embodiment, the HAT Activator compound, 18, can be
synthesized according to the scheme depicted in FIG. 46.
[0369] In one embodiment, the HAT Activator compound, 19, can be
synthesized according to the scheme depicted in FIG. 51.
[0370] In one embodiment, the HAT Activator compound, 20, can be
synthesized according to the scheme depicted in FIG. 38.
[0371] In one embodiment, the invention encompasses HAT Activator
compounds of Formula (V),
##STR00028##
wherein,
[0372] X is S, S(O).sub.2, NH, O, or C;
[0373] Y is --C(O), S(O).sub.2, or NH--C(O);
[0374] Ar1 is a 5-membered aromatic ring or a 6-membered aromatic
ring containing 1-2 Nitrogens;
[0375] Ar2 is a 5-membered aromatic ring, a 6-membered aromatic
ring or a 6-membered aromatic ring containing 1-2 Nitrogens;
[0376] R.sup.1 is H, methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl,
t-butyl, C.sub.8H.sub.18, C.sub.15H.sub.26, C.sub.15H.sub.28,
C.sub.15H.sub.30, C.sub.15H.sub.32, SR.sup.4, or OR.sup.4;
[0377] R.sup.2 is H, methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl,
t-butyl, or (C.sub.1-C.sub.6 alkyl)-CO.sub.2R.sup.6;
[0378] R.sup.3 is H, methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl,
t-butyl, CF.sub.3, CCl.sub.3, Cl.sub.3, F, Cl, I, NO.sub.2, or
CN;
[0379] R.sup.4 is (C.sub.1-C.sub.6 alkyl)-N(R.sup.5).sub.2-- or
C.sub.1-C.sub.6 alkyl;
[0380] R.sup.5 is independently hydrogen, C.sub.1-C.sub.6 alkyl, or
C.sub.3-C.sub.8 cycloalkyl; and
[0381] R.sup.6 is hydrogen, C.sub.1-C.sub.6 alkyl, or
C.sub.3-C.sub.8 cycloalkyl, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt
or hydrate thereof.
[0382] In one embodiment, X is O, while Y is N--C.dbd.O. In another
embodiment, X is S, while Y is N--C.dbd.O.
[0383] In particular embodiments, the compound of Formula (V)
is:
##STR00029##
[0384] The compounds of the invention can be generally synthesized
according to the scheme based on the diagram depicted in FIG.
29.
[0385] Pharmaceutically acceptable salts are known in the art, and
may be selected from those listed in Berge, et al. ["Pharmaceutical
Salts," J. Pharm. Sci., 66(1):1-19 (January 1977); herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety]. In one embodiment, a
pharmaceutically acceptable salt of a compound of Formula (I) is an
acid addition salt, for example a hydrochloride, sulfate, or
phosphate salt. In another embodiment, a pharmaceutically
acceptable salt of a compound of Formula (I) is a base addition
salt, for example a sodium, potassium, calcium, or ammonium salt.
In another embodiment, the base addition salt is a tetrafluoroboro
salt. In one embodiment, a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of a
compound of Formula (II) is an acid addition salt, for example a
hydrochloride, sulfate, or phosphate salt. In another embodiment, a
pharmaceutically acceptable salt of a compound of Formula (II) is a
base addition salt, for example a sodium, potassium, calcium, or
ammonium salt. In another embodiment, the base addition salt is a
tetrafluoroboro salt. In one embodiment, a pharmaceutically
acceptable salt of a compound of Formula (III) is an acid addition
salt, for example a hydrochloride, sulfate, or phosphate salt. In
another embodiment, a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of a
compound of Formula (III) is a base addition salt, for example a
sodium, potassium, calcium, or ammonium salt. In another
embodiment, the base addition salt is a tetrafluoroboro salt. In
one embodiment, a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of a compound of
Formula (IV) is an acid addition salt, for example a hydrochloride,
sulfate, or phosphate salt. In another embodiment, a
pharmaceutically acceptable salt of a compound of Formula (IV) is a
base addition salt, for example a sodium, potassium, calcium, or
ammonium salt. In another embodiment, the base addition salt is a
tetrafluoroboro salt. In one embodiment, a pharmaceutically
acceptable salt of a compound of Formula (V) is an acid addition
salt, for example a hydrochloride, sulfate, or phosphate salt. In
another embodiment, a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of a
compound of Formula (V) is a base addition salt, for example a
sodium, potassium, calcium, or ammonium salt. In another
embodiment, the base addition salt is a tetrafluoroboro salt.
[0386] The invention provides methods for reducing inclusion bodies
(e.g., amyloid beta (A.beta.) protein deposits, native and
phosphorylated Tau proteins, native and phosphorylated
alpha-synuclein, lipofuscin, cleaved TARDBP (TDB-43), or a
combination thereof) in a subject afflicted with a
neurodegenerative disease (e.g., a AD, Huntington's Disease, or
Parkinson's Disease) by administering any one of the HAT Activator
compounds having Formula (I), Formula (II), Formula (III), Formula
(IV), or Formula (V). The invention also provides methods for
treating a neurodegenerative disease in a subject by administering
any one of the HAT Activator compounds having Formula (I), Formula
(II), Formula (III), Formula (IV), or Formula (V). The invention
further provides methods for treating cancer in a subject by
administering any one of the HAT Activator compounds having Formula
(I), Formula (II), Formula (III), Formula (IV), or Formula (V). In
some embodiments, the compound administered to a subject is any one
of compounds 1-9. In specific embodiments, the HAT Activator
compound is YF2, depicted in FIG. 3. In some embodiments, the
compound administered is a HAT Activator compound of Formula
(VI):
##STR00030##
wherein: R.sup.1 is H, methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl,
t-butyl, C.sub.8H.sub.18, C.sub.15H.sub.26, C.sub.15H.sub.28,
C.sub.15H.sub.30, C.sub.15H.sub.32, S, O, SR.sup.4, or
OR.sup.4;
[0387] R.sup.2 is H, methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl,
t-butyl, or --C(O)R.sup.6;
[0388] R.sup.3 is H, methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl,
t-butyl, CF.sub.3, CCl.sub.3, Cl.sub.3, F, C1, I, NO.sub.2, or
CN;
[0389] R.sup.4 is --NR.sup.5;
[0390] R.sup.5 is hydrogen, C.sub.1-C.sub.6 alkyl, or
C.sub.3-C.sub.8 cycloalkyl;
[0391] R.sup.6 is hydrogen, C.sub.1-C.sub.6 alkyl, or
C.sub.3-C.sub.8 cycloalkyl, C(O)R.sup.7; and
[0392] R.sup.7 is hydrogen, C.sub.1-C.sub.6 alkyl, or
C.sub.3-C.sub.8 cycloalkyl, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt
or hydrate thereof.
[0393] In one embodiment, a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of a
compound of Formula (VI) is an acid addition salt, for example a
hydrochloride, sulfate, or phosphate salt. In another embodiment, a
pharmaceutically acceptable salt of a compound of Formula (VI) is a
base addition salt, for example a sodium, potassium, calcium, or
ammonium salt. In another embodiment, the base addition salt is a
tetrafluoroboro salt.
[0394] In some embodiments, HAT activator compounds having Formula
(I), Formula (II), Formula (III), Formula (IV), Formula (V), or
Formula (VI) are first screened for their ability to satisfy one or
more of the following characteristics: an EC.sub.50 no greater than
about 100 nM; a histone acetylation activity in vitro; the ability
to penetrate the BBB; or a combination thereof.
[0395] In one embodiment, the method comprises administering to the
subject an effective amount of a composition comprising a HAT
Activator compound. In another embodiment, the subject exhibits
abnormally elevated amyloid beta plaques, or elevated Tau protein
levels, or accumulations of alpha-synuclein, or accumulations of
lipofuscin, or accumulation of cleaved TARDBP (TDB-43) levels, or a
combination thereof. In some embodiments, the A.beta. protein
deposit comprises an A.beta..sub.40 isomer, an A.beta..sub.42
isomer, or a combination thereof. In a further embodiment, the
subject is afflicted with Alzheimer's disease, Lewy body dementia,
inclusion body myositis, Huntington's Disease, Parkinson's Disease,
or cerebral amyloid angiopathy. In further embodiments, the subject
is afflicted with cancer.
[0396] The dosage administered can be a therapeutically effective
amount of the composition sufficient to result in amelioration of
symptoms of a neurogenerative disease such as, but not limited to
reducing inclusion bodies (e.g., amyloid beta (A.beta.) protein
deposits, native and phosphorylated Tau proteins, native and
phosphorylated alpha-synuclein, lipofuscin, cleaved TARDBP
(TDB-43), or a combination thereof), or reducing memory loss in a
subject. For example, observing at least, about a 25% reduction, at
least about a 30% reduction, at least about a 40% reduction, at
least about a 50% reduction, at least about a 60% reduction, at
least about a 70% reduction, at least about a 80% reduction, at
least about a 85% reduction, at least about a 90% reduction, at
least about a 95% reduction, at least about a 97% reduction, at
least about a 98% reduction, or a 100% reduction in inclusion
bodies or memory loss in a subject is indicative of amelioration of
symptoms of a neurogenerative disease (for example, including, but
not limited to, AD, Huntington's Disease, Parkinson's Disease).
This efficacy in reducing inclusion occurrence, can be, for
example, a measure of ameliorating symptoms of a neurogenerative
disease.
[0397] In one embodiment, the therapeutically effective amount is
at least about 0.1 mg/kg body weight, at least about 0.25 mg/kg
body weight, at least about 0.5 mg/kg body weight, at least about
0.75 mg/kg body weight, at least about 1 mg/kg body weight, at
least about 2 mg/kg body weight, at least about 3 mg/kg body
weight, at least about 4 mg/kg body weight, at least about 5 mg/kg
body weight, at least about 6 mg/kg body weight, at least about 7
mg/kg body weight, at least about 8 mg/kg body weight, at least
about 9 mg/kg body weight, at least about 10 mg/kg body weight, at
least about 15 mg/kg body weight, at least about 20 mg/kg body
weight, at least about 25 mg/kg body weight, at least about 30
mg/kg body weight, at least about 40 mg/kg body weight, at least
about 50 mg/kg body weight, at least about 75 mg/kg body weight, at
least about 100 mg/kg body weight, at least about 200 mg/kg body
weight, at least about 250 mg/kg body weight, at least about 300
mg/kg body weight, at least about 3500 mg/kg body weight, at least
about 400 mg/kg body weight, at least about 450 mg/kg body weight,
at least about 500 mg/kg body weight, at least about 550 mg/kg body
weight, at least about 600 mg/kg body weight, at least about 650
mg/kg body weight, at least about 700 mg/kg body weight, at least
about 750 mg/kg body weight, at least about 800 mg/kg body weight,
at least about 900 mg/kg body weight, or at least about 1000 mg/kg
body weight.
[0398] A HAT activator compound can be administered to the subject
one time (e.g., as a single injection or deposition).
Alternatively, a HAT activator compound of the invention can be
administered once or twice daily to a subject in need thereof for a
period of from about 2 to about 28 days, or from about 7 to about
10 days, or from about 7 to about 15 days. It can also be
administered once or twice daily to a subject for a period of 1, 2,
3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 times per year, or a combination
thereof.
[0399] The dosage administered can vary depending upon known
factors such as the pharmacodynamic characteristics of the active
ingredient and its mode and route of administration; time of
administration of active ingredient; age, sex, health and weight of
the recipient; nature and extent of symptoms; kind of concurrent
treatment, frequency of treatment and the effect desired; and rate
of excretion.
[0400] Toxicity and therapeutic efficacy of therapeutic
compositions of the present invention can be determined by standard
pharmaceutical procedures in cell cultures or experimental animals,
e.g., for determining the LD.sub.50 (the dose lethal to 50% of the
population) and the ED.sub.50 (the dose therapeutically effective
in 50% of the population). The dose ratio between toxic and
therapeutic effects is the therapeutic index and it can be
expressed as the ratio LD.sub.50/ED.sub.50. Therapeutic agents that
exhibit large therapeutic indices are useful. Therapeutic
compositions that exhibit some toxic side effects can be used.
[0401] A therapeutically effective dose of a HAT activator compound
can depend upon a number of factors known to those of ordinary
skill in the art. The dose(s) of a HAT activator compound, for
example a compound of Formula (I), Formula (II), Formula (III),
Formula (IV), Formula (V), or Formula (VI), can vary, for example,
depending upon the identity, size, and condition of the subject or
sample being treated, further depending upon the route by which the
composition is to be administered, if applicable, and the effect
which the practitioner desires the HAT activator compound to have
upon a HAT protein or a protein exhibiting intrinsic HAT activity.
These amounts can be readily determined by a skilled artisan.
[0402] HAT activator compounds of the invention can be incorporated
into pharmaceutical compositions suitable for administration. Such
compositions can comprise a HAT activator compound (e.g., a
compound of HAT activator compounds having Formula (I), Formula
(II), Formula (III), Formula (IV), Formula (V), or Formula (VI), or
compound YF2 depicted in FIG. 3) and a pharmaceutically acceptable
carrier. The compositions can be administered alone or in
combination with at least one other agent, such as a stabilizing
compound, which can be administered in any sterile, biocompatible
pharmaceutical carrier including, but not limited to, saline,
buffered saline, dextrose, and water. The compositions can be
administered to a patient alone, or in combination with other
agents, drugs or hormones.
[0403] According to the invention, a pharmaceutically acceptable
carrier can comprise any and all solvents, dispersion media,
coatings, antibacterial and antifungal agents, isotonic and
absorption delaying agents, and the like, compatible with
pharmaceutical administration. The use of such media and agents for
pharmaceutically active substances is well known in the art. Any
conventional media or agent that is compatible with the active
compound can be used. Supplementary active compounds can also be
incorporated into the compositions.
[0404] Any of the therapeutic applications described herein can be
applied to any subject in need of such therapy, including, for
example, a mammal such as a dog, a cat, a cow, a horse, a rabbit, a
monkey, a pig, a sheep, a goat, or a human.
[0405] A pharmaceutical composition of the invention is formulated
to be compatible with its intended route of administration.
Examples of routes of administration include parenteral, e.g.,
intravenous, intradermal, subcutaneous, oral (e.g., inhalation),
transdermal (topical), transmucosal, and rectal administration.
Solutions or suspensions used for parenteral, intradermal, or
subcutaneous application can include the following components: a
sterile diluent such as water for injection, saline solution, fixed
oils, polyethylene glycols, glycerine, propylene glycol or other
synthetic solvents; antibacterial agents such as benzyl alcohol or
methyl parabens; antioxidants such as ascorbic acid or sodium
bisulfate; chelating agents such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic
acid; buffers such as acetates, citrates or phosphates and agents
for the adjustment of tonicity such as sodium chloride or dextrose.
pH can be adjusted with acids or bases, such as hydrochloric acid
or sodium hydroxide. The parenteral preparation can be enclosed in
ampoules, disposable syringes or multiple dose vials made of glass
or plastic.
[0406] Pharmaceutical compositions suitable for injectable use
include sterile aqueous solutions (where water soluble) or
dispersions and sterile powders for the extemporaneous preparation
of sterile injectable solutions or dispersions. For intravenous
administration, suitable carriers include physiological saline,
bacteriostatic water, Cremophor EM.TM. (BASF, Parsippany, N.J.) or
phosphate buffered saline (PBS). In all cases, the composition must
be sterile and should be fluid to the extent that easy
syringability exists. It must be stable under the conditions of
manufacture and storage and must be preserved against the
contaminating action of microorganisms such as bacteria and fungi.
The carrier can be a solvent or dispersion medium containing, for
example, water, ethanol, a pharmaceutically acceptable polyol like
glycerol, propylene glycol, liquid polyethylene glycol, and
suitable mixtures thereof. The proper fluidity can be maintained,
for example, by the use of a coating such as lecithin, by the
maintenance of the required particle size in the case of dispersion
and by the use of surfactants. Prevention of the action of
microorganisms can be achieved by various antibacterial and
antifungal agents, for example, parabens, chlorobutanol, phenol,
ascorbic acid, and thimerosal. In many cases, it can be useful to
include isotonic agents, for example, sugars, polyalcohols such as
mannitol, sorbitol, sodium chloride in the composition. Prolonged
absorption of the injectable compositions can be brought about by
including in the composition an agent which delays absorption, for
example, aluminum monostearate and gelatin.
[0407] Sterile injectable solutions can be prepared by
incorporating the HAT Activator compound in the required amount in
an appropriate solvent with one or a combination of ingredients
enumerated herein, as required, followed by filtered sterilization.
Generally, dispersions are prepared by incorporating the active
compound into a sterile vehicle which contains a basic dispersion
medium and the required other ingredients from those enumerated
herein. In the case of sterile powders for the preparation of
sterile injectable solutions, examples of useful preparation
methods are vacuum drying and freeze-drying which yields a powder
of the active ingredient plus any additional desired ingredient
from a previously sterile-filtered solution thereof.
[0408] Oral compositions generally include an inert diluent or an
edible carrier. They can be enclosed in gelatin capsules or
compressed into tablets. For the purpose of oral therapeutic
administration, the active compound can be incorporated with
excipients and used in the form of tablets, troches, or capsules.
Oral compositions can also be prepared using a fluid carrier for
use as a mouthwash, wherein the compound in the fluid carrier is
applied orally and swished and expectorated or swallowed.
[0409] Pharmaceutically compatible binding agents, and/or adjuvant
materials can be included as part of the composition. The tablets,
pills, capsules, troches and the like can contain any of the
following ingredients, or compounds of a similar nature: a binder
such as microcrystalline cellulose, gum tragacanth or gelatin; an
excipient such as starch or lactose, a disintegrating agent such as
alginic acid, Primogel, or corn starch; a lubricant such as
magnesium stearate or sterotes; a glidant such as colloidal silicon
dioxide; a sweetening agent such as sucrose or saccharin; or a
flavoring agent such as peppermint, methyl salicylate, or orange
flavoring.
[0410] Systemic administration can also be by transmucosal or
transdermal means. For transmucosal or transdermal administration,
penetrants appropriate to the barrier to be permeated are used in
the formulation. Such penetrants are generally known in the art,
and include, for example, for transmucosal administration,
detergents, bile salts, and fusidic acid derivatives. Transmucosal
administration can be accomplished through the use of nasal sprays
or suppositories. For transdermal administration, the active
compounds are formulated into ointments, salves, gels, or creams as
generally known in the art.
REFERENCES
[0411] S1. Masliah, E., Mechanisms of synaptic dysfunction in
Alzheimer's disease. Histol Histopathol, 1995. 10(2): p. 509-19.
[0412] S2. Selkoe, D. J., Alzheimer's disease is a synaptic
failure. Science, 2002. 298(5594): p. 789-91 [0413] S3.
Sant'Angelo, A., F. Trinchese, and O. Arancio, Usefulness of
behavioral and electrophysiological studies in transgenic models of
Alzheimer's disease. Neurochem Res, 2003. 28(7): p. 1009-15. [0414]
S4. Bliss, T. V. and G. L. Collingridge, A synaptic model of
memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Nature, 1993.
361(6407): p. 31-9. [0415] S5. Cullen, W. K., et al., Block of LTP
in rat hippocampus in vivo by beta-amyloid precursor protein
fragments. Neuroreport, 1997. 8(15): p. 3213-7. [0416] S6. Freir,
D. B., C. Holscher, and C. E. Herron, Blockade of long-term
potentiation by beta-amyloid peptides in the CA1 region of the rat
hippocampus in vivo. J Neurophysiol, 2001. 85(2): p. 708-13. [0417]
S7. Itoh, A., et al., Impairments of long-term potentiation in
hippocampal slices of beta-amyloid-infused rats. Eur J Pharmacol,
1999. 382(3): p. 167-75. [0418] S8. Kim, J. H., et al.,
Use-dependent effects of amyloidogenic fragments of (beta)-amyloid
precursor protein on synaptic plasticity in rat hippocampus in
vivo. J Neurosci, 2001. 21(4): p. 1327-33. [0419] S9. Stephan, A.,
S. Laroche, and S. Davis, Generation of aggregated beta-amyloid in
the rat hippocampus impairs synaptic transmission and plasticity
and causes memory deficits. J Neurosci, 2001. 21(15): p. 5703-14.
[0420] S10. Vitolo, O. V., et al., Amyloid beta-peptide inhibition
of the PKA/CREB pathway and long-term potentiation: reversibility
by drugs that enhance cAMP signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2002.
99(20): p. 13217-21. [0421] S11. Walsh, D. M., et al., Naturally
secreted oligomers of amyloid beta protein potently inhibit
hippocampal long-term potentiation in vivo. Nature, 2002.
416(6880): p. 535-9. [0422] S12. Puzzo, D., et al., Amyloid-beta
peptide inhibits activation of the nitric
oxide/cGMP/cAMP-responsive element-binding protein pathway during
hippocampal synaptic plasticity. J Neurosci, 2005. 25(29): p.
6887-97. [0423] S13. Selig, D. K., et al., Examination of the role
of cGMP in long-term potentiation in the CA1 region of the
hippocampus. Learn Mem, 1996. 3(1): p. 42-8. [0424] S14.
Prickaerts, J., et al., cGMP, but not cAMP, in rat hippocampus is
involved in early stages of object memory consolidation. Eur J
Pharmacol, 2002. 436(1-2): p. 83-7. [0425] S15. Paakkari, I. and P.
Lindsberg, Nitric oxide in the central nervous system. Ann Med,
1995. 27(3): p. 369-77. [0426] S16. Baratti, C. M. and M. M.
Boccia, Effects of sildenafil on long-term retention of an
inhibitory avoidance response in mice. Behav Pharmacol, 1999.
10(8): p. 731-7. [0427] S17. van Staveren, W. C., et al., Species
differences in the localization of cGMP-producing and NO-responsive
elements in the mouse and rat hippocampus using cGMP
immunocytochemistry. Eur J Neurosci, 2004. 19(8): p. 2155-68.
[0428] S18. Van Staveren, W. C., et al., mRNA expression patterns
of the cGMP-hydrolyzing phosphodiesterases types 2, 5, and 9 during
development of the rat brain. J Comp Neurol, 2003. 467(4): p.
566-80. [0429] S19. Schultheiss, D., et al., Central effects of
sildenafil (Viagra) on auditory selective attention and verbal
recognition memory in humans: a study with event-related brain
potentials. World J Urol, 2001. 19(1): p. 46-50. [0430] S20.
Kemenes, I., et al., Critical time-window for NO-cGMP-dependent
long-term memory formation after one-trial appetitive conditioning.
J Neurosci, 2002. 22(4): p. 1414-25. [0431] S21. Baltrons, M. A.,
et al., Regulation of NO-dependent cyclic GMP formation by
inflammatory agents in neural cells. Toxicol Lett, 2003. 139(2-3):
p. 191-8. [0432] S22. Bon, C. L. and J. Garthwaite, On the role of
nitric oxide in hippocampal long-term potentiation. J Neurosci,
2003. 23(5): p. 1941-8. [0433] S23. Trinchese, F., et al.,
Progressive age-related development of Alzheimer-like pathology in
APP/PS1 mice. Ann Neurol, 2004. 55(6): p. 801-14. [0434] S24.
Chapman, P. F., et al., Impaired synaptic plasticity and learning
in aged amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice. Nat Neurosci,
1999. 2(3): p. 271-6. [0435] S25. Fitzjohn, S. M., et al.,
Age-related impairment of synaptic transmission but normal
long-term potentiation in transgenic mice that overexpress the
human APP695SWE mutant form of amyloid precursor protein. J
Neurosci, 2001. 21(13): p. 4691-8. [0436] S26. Hsia, A. Y., et al.,
Plaque-independent disruption of neural circuits in Alzheimer's
disease mouse models. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1999. 96(6): p.
3228-33. [0437] S27. Jolas, T., et al., Long-term potentiation is
increased in the CA1 area of the hippocampus of APP(swe/ind) CRND8
mice. Neurobiol Dis, 2002. 11(3): p. 394-409. [0438] S28. Larson,
J., et al., Alterations in synaptic transmission and long-term
potentiation in hippocampal slices from young and aged PDAPP mice.
Brain Res, 1999. 840(1-2): p. 23-35 [0439] S29. Moechars, D., et
al., Early phenotypic changes in transgenic mice that overexpress
different mutants of amyloid precursor protein in brain. J Biol
Chem, 1999. 274(10): p. 6483-92. [0440] S30. Nalbantoglu, J., et
al., Impaired learning and LTP in mice expressing the carboxy
terminus of the Alzheimer amyloid precursor protein. Nature, 1997.
387(6632): p. 500-5. [0441] S31. Dineley, K. T., et al.,
Beta-amyloid activates the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade
via hippocampal alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: In vitro
and in vivo mechanisms related to Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci,
2001. 21(12): p. 4125-33. [0442] S32. Dineley, K. T., et al.,
Accelerated plaque accumulation, associative learning deficits, and
up-regulation of alpha 7 nicotinic receptor protein in transgenic
mice co-expressing mutant human presenilin 1 and amyloid precursor
proteins. J Biol Chem, 2002. 277(25): p. 22768-80. [0443] S33.
Gong, B., et al., Persistent improvement in synaptic and cognitive
functions in an Alzheimer mouse model following rolipram treatment.
J. Clin. Invest., 2004. 114: p. 1624-1634. [0444] S34. Yin, J. C.,
et al., Induction of a dominant negative CREB transgene
specifically blocks long-term memory in Drosophila. Cell, 1994.
79(1): p. 49-58. [0445] S35. Bourtchuladze, R., et al., Deficient
long-term memory in mice with a targeted mutation of the
cAMP-responsive element-binding protein. Cell, 1994. 79(1): p.
59-68. [0446] S36. Bach, M. E., et al., Age-related defects in
spatial memory are correlated with defects in the late phase of
hippocampal long-term potentiation in vitro and are attenuated by
drugs that enhance the cAMP signaling pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci
USA, 1999. 96(9): p. 5280-5. [0447] S37. Lu, Y. F., E. R. Kandel,
and R. D. Hawkins, Nitric oxide signaling contributes to late-phase
LTP and CREB phosphorylation in the hippocampus. J Neurosci, 1999.
19(23): p. 10250-61 [0448] S38. McCarty, M. F., Vascular nitric
oxide may lessen Alzheimer's risk. Med Hypotheses, 1998. 51(6): p.
465-76. [0449] S39. Troy, C. M., et al., Caspase-2 mediates
neuronal cell death induced by beta-amyloid. J Neurosci, 2000.
20(4): p. 1386-92. [0450] S40. Wirtz-Brugger, F. and A. Giovanni,
Guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate mediated inhibition of cell
death induced by nerve growth factor withdrawal and beta-amyloid:
protective effects of propentofylline. Neuroscience, 2000. 99(4):
p. 737-50. [0451] S41. Venturini, G., et al., Beta-amyloid inhibits
NOS activity by subtracting NADPH availability. Faseb J, 2002.
16(14): p. 1970-2. [0452] S42. Suhara, T., et al., Abeta42
generation is toxic to endothelial cells and inhibits eNOS function
through an Akt/GSK-3beta signaling-dependent mechanism. Neurobiol
Aging, 2003. 24(3): p. 437-51. [0453] S43. Colton, C. A., et al.,
NO synthase 2 (NOS2) deletion promotes multiple pathologies in a
mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2006.
103(34): p. 12867-72. [0454] S44. Thatcher, G. R., B. M. Bennett,
and J. N. Reynolds, Nitric oxide mimetic molecules as therapeutic
agents in Alzheimer's disease. Curr Alzheimer Res, 2005. 2(2): p.
171-82. [0455] S45. Haas, J., et al., Inducible nitric oxide
synthase and argininosuccinate synthetase: co-induction in brain
tissue of patients with Alzheimer's dementia and following
stimulation with beta-amyloid 1-42 in vitro. Neurosci Lett, 2002.
322(2): p. 121-5. [0456] S46. Tran, M. H., et al., Amyloid
beta-peptide induces nitric oxide production in rat hippocampus:
association with cholinergic dysfunction and amelioration by
inducible nitric oxide synthase inhibitors. Faseb J, 2001. 15(8):
p. 1407-9. [0457] S47. McCann, S. M., The nitric oxide hypothesis
of brain aging. Exp Gerontol, 1997. 32(4-5): p. 431-40. [0458] S48.
Xie, Z., et al., Peroxynitrite mediates neurotoxicity of amyloid
beta-peptide 1-42- and lipopolysaccharide-activated microglia. J
Neurosci, 2002. 22(9): p. 3484-92. [0459] S49. Wong, A., et al.,
Advanced glycation endproducts co-localize with inducible nitric
oxide synthase in Alzheimer's disease. Brain Res, 2001. 920(1-2):
p. 32-40. [0460] S50. Wang, Q., M. J. Rowan, and R. Anwyl,
Beta-amyloid-mediated inhibition of NMDA receptor-dependent
long-term potentiation induction involves activation of microglia
and stimulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase and superoxide.
J Neurosci, 2004. 24(27): p. 6049-56. [0461] S51. Monsonego, A., et
al., Microglia-mediated nitric oxide cytotoxicity of T cells
following amyloid beta-peptide presentation to Th1 cells. J
Immunol, 2003. 171(5): p. 2216-24. [0462] S52. Contestabile, A., et
al., Brain nitric oxide and its dual role in
neurodegeneration/neuroprotection: understanding molecular
mechanisms to devise drug approaches. Curr Med Chem, 2003. 10(20):
p. 2147-74.
EXAMPLES
[0463] Examples are provided below to facilitate a more complete
understanding of the invention. The following examples illustrate
the exemplary modes of making and practicing the invention.
However, the scope of the invention is not limited to specific
embodiments disclosed in these Examples, which are for purposes of
illustration only, since alternative methods can be utilized to
obtain similar results.
Example 1--a HAT Activator Compound
[0464] YF2, a Histone Acetyltransferase (HAT) Activator of the
invention (FIG. 3), is a good drug candidate to ameliorate memory
in neurodegenerative diseases (i.e. Alzheimer's disease and
Huntington's disease) and treatment for a variety of cancers. When
the YF2 compound was administrated to mice (i.p.), the western blot
showed that it not only crosses the BBB, but also increases histone
3 acetylation levels of the hippocampus (FIG. 1). In the behavior
experiments, the title compound ameliorates the contextual fear
memory deficit in A.beta.42-infused mice (FIG. 2). A.beta.42 is a
protein that is produced in high amount in AD and is responsible
for the impairment of synaptic functions and memory.
Example 2--HAT Activator Compound Characteristics
[0465] Compound 6J, from Mantelingu et al, was synthesized (FIG.
4). However, compound 6J had no solubility and precipitated as soon
as it was put in H.sub.2O. However, concerns existed that the drug
(even if dissolved in 100% DMSO) would precipitate as soon as it
was administrated. Thus, a new drug that was soluble was
synthesized, "MOM" (FIG. 5).
[0466] MOM has medium solubility (DMSO 10% in H.sub.2O). MOM was
administered 25 mg/kg to WT mice (i.p.). The mice liver and
hippocampus were extracted 1 hr after treatment. The liver showed a
very slight increase of AcH3, indicating that the drug has either
very little efficacy OR very little membrane permeability (FIG. 6).
The hippocampus had no increase in AcH3 levels, indicating the drug
is either ineffective OR does not cross the blood brain barrier
(BBB) (FIG. 6). Although MOM failed to increase AcH3 levels in the
hippocampus and liver, the experiment was repeated with a new
administration (gavage and i.p. 25 mg/kg). Fear conditioning
treatment of the mice was subsequently carried out to see if the
drug is active after induction of learning. In addition to the
mouse liver and hippocampus, the mouse cortex was also extracted.
Hippocampus, cortex, and liver samples again showed no increase of
AcH3 levels, indicating the drug is either ineffective OR does not
cross the BBB OR does not cross the cell membrane (FIG. 7).
[0467] Although MOM failed in increasing AcH3 levels, the
experiment was repeated with a different chemical vehicle (10% DMSO
and 10% Tween 80). The BBB was by-passed by giving it through
cannulas implanted onto the dorsal hippocampus. Both the
hippocampus and cortex were extracted at 2 hrs or 4 hrs after
treatment. Compared to vehicle, mice that were administered with
MOM via cannula (100 .mu.g/.mu.l per side) showed an increase of
AcH4 (lane 1 vs. lanes 2, 3). Mice that were given the drug i.p.
showed no increase of AcH3 (FIG. 8). This data indicates that the
compound MOM does not cross the BBB.
[0468] A new compound YF2 (FIG. 3), was synthesized. The
preparation of YF2 was without a column and 2 phases were visible:
clear and oily. YF2 (50 mg/kg, i.p.) was subsequently administered
to mice. Two and four hrs after its administration, the mice were
sacrificed and hippocampi were extracted. Interestingly, YF2 was
able to cross the BBB, penetrate the cells and increase AcH3 (lane
1 vs. lanes 9, 10) (FIG. 8). Given that the compound was not 100%
clean and needed to be further purified/verified, we synthesized
more YF2 and purified it. Purity was verified through Nuclear
Magnetic Resonance (NMR). Mice were administered with YF2 (i.p.
dissolved in saline) at 5, 10, 20 mg/Kg. Hippocampus extraction was
made at 3 different time points (0.5, 1 and 2 hrs post treatment).
We then ran a western blotting for AcH3. Except for the 1 hr-10
mg/kg administration of YF2, YF2 dramatically increased AcH3 levels
(FIG. 10), indicating that YF2 crosses the BBB and the cell
membrane.
Example 3--Contextual and Cued Fear Conditioning Experiments
[0469] Contextual and cued fear conditioning was performed to
assess whether the compound is capable of ameliorating amyloid-beta
(A.beta.) induced memory defect. A.beta. is a peptide which is
elevated in Alzheimer's disease. The hippocampus plays a key role
in contextual memory and in Alzheimer's Disease. This type of
cognitive test is much faster than other behavioral tasks that
require multiple days of training and testing [Q1, Q2]; each herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety. The conditioning chamber
was in a sound-attenuating box. A clear Plexiglas window allowed
the experimenter to film the mouse performance with a camera placed
on a tripod and connected to the Freezeframe software (MED Ass.
Inc.). To provide background white noise (72 dB), a single computer
fan was installed in one of the sides of the sound-attenuating
chamber. The conditioning chamber had a 36-bar insulated shock grid
floor. The floor was removable, and after each experimental
subject, we cleaned it with 75% ethanol and then with water. Only
one animal at a time was present in the experimentation room.
[0470] For the cued and contextual conditioning experiments, mice
were placed in the conditioning chamber for 2 min before the onset
of a discrete tone (CS) (a sound that lasted 30 sec at 2800 Hz and
85 dB). In the last 2 sec of the CS, mice were given a foot shock
(US) of 0.8 mA for 2 sec through the bars of the floor. After the
CS/US pairing, the mice were left in the conditioning chamber for
another 30 sec and were then placed back in their home cages.
Freezing behavior, defined as the absence of all movement except
for that necessitated by breathing, was scored using the Freezeview
software.
[0471] To evaluate contextual fear learning, freezing was measured
for 5 min (consecutively) in the chamber in which the mice was
trained 24 hr after training. To evaluate cued fear learning,
following contextual testing, the mice were placed in a novel
context (triangular cage with smooth flat floor) for 2 min (pre-CS
test), after which they were exposed to the CS for 3 min (CS test),
and freezing was measured. Sensory perception of the shock was
determined through threshold assessment. A sequence of single foot
shocks was delivered to animals placed on the same electrified grid
used for fear conditioning. Initially, a 0.1 mV shock was delivered
for 1 sec, and the animal behavior was evaluated for flinching,
jumping, and vocalization. At 30 sec intervals the shock intensity
was increased by 0.1 mV to 0.7 mV and then returned to 0 mV in 0.1
mV increments at 30 sec intervals. Threshold to vocalization,
flinching, and then jumping was quantified for each animal by
averaging the shock intensity at which each animal manifests a
behavioral response to the foot shock.
[0472] YF2 was i.p. administered to mice (one group of mice was
administered with 20 mg/kg, 2 hrs before the electric shock,
whereas another group was administered with 5 mg/kg, 30 minutes
before the electric shock). YF2 at both doses was capable of
dramatically increasing the freezing time demonstrating that the
compound rescues the defect in contextual memory. The compound
alone at the highest concentration (20 mg/kg) did not affect
contextual memory (FIG. 10) indicating that the compound per se is
not toxic with respect to memory. Cued memory was not changed in
the different groups indicating that YF2 does not affect amygdala
function (FIG. 11). Finally, no difference was observed among
different groups of mice in different sets of experiments in which
we assessed sensory threshold in the presence of vehicle, YF2
alone, A.beta. alone, or YF2 plus A.beta. (FIG. 12).
[0473] Based on the results obtained during the fear conditioning
tests, we decided to determine the kinetics of YF2 in blood to
verify the best time point for treatment. To this purpose, we
administered the compound (20 mg/kg. i.p.) and then sampled blood
from tails at different time points. The kinetics of YF2 shows a
peak around 30 minutes post-injection (FIG. 13).
REFERENCES
[0474] Q1. Gong, B., et al., Persistent improvement in synaptic and
cognitive functions in an Alzheimer mouse model after rolipram
treatment. J Clin Invest, 2004. 114(11): p. 1624-34. [0475] Q2.
Gong, B., et al., Persistent improvement in synaptic and cognitive
functions in an Alzheimer mouse model following rolipram treatment.
J. Clin. Invest., 2004. 114: p. 1624-1634.
Example 4--Two Day-Radial Arm Water Maze (RAWM)
[0476] The task is a hybrid of the Morris Water Maze (MWM) and the
radial arm land maze. This task is altered in A.beta.-infused mice.
The motivation for the animals is the immersion in water. The mouse
needed to swim in 6 alleys (arms) radiating from a central area
until it found a hidden (submerged) platform at the end of one of
the arms, based on visual cues placed in the room. The goal arm was
kept constant for all trials, with a different start arm on
successive trials, such that the learning criterion was reached in
2 days. The first day of the protocol was a training day. Mice were
trained to identify the platform location by alternating between a
visible and a hidden platform in a goal arm. The final 3 trials on
day 1 and all 15 trials on day 2 used a hidden escape platform to
force mice to use spatial cues to identify the location of the goal
arm.
[0477] To avoid learning limitations imposed by exhausting practice
and to avoid fatigue that may result from consecutive trials,
spaced practice training were established by running the mice in
cohorts of 4 and alternating different cohorts through the 15
training trials over 3 hours testing periods each day. On day 1, a
visible platform was placed in a goal location. Mouse 1 of cohort 1
was gently placed in the pool near the perimeter of the wall of the
first start arm (specified on a score sheet) and facing the center
of the pool. The number of incorrect arm entries (entries in arms
with no platform) was counted. If the animal entered the incorrect
arm it was gently pulled back to the start arm. Each trial lasted
up to 1 min. Failure to select an arm after 15 sec were counted as
an error and the mouse was returned to the start arm. After 1 min,
if the platform had not been located, the mouse was guided gently
through the water by placing a hand behind it to direct it towards
the platform. The mouse rested on the platform for 15 sec. After
completing the trial, the mouse was removed from the pool, gently
towel dried and placed back into its cage under a heat lamp. The
goal platform location was different for each mouse.
[0478] After all the mice in the first cohort have had a trial to
locate a visible platform, the platform was switched from visible
to hidden. After each mouse from cohort 1 completed six alternating
trials between visible and hidden platforms, the mice was left to
rest under a heating source, and mice from the second cohort were
tested in the same way. After completing the six alternating
trials, mice from cohort 2 returned to their cages to rest.
[0479] Next, mice from the first cohort completed trials 7-12 again
using the alternating visible-hidden platform location. During
resting time for mice from the first cohort, mice from the second
cohort completed trials 7-12. At this point, all mice had performed
3 hidden platform trials. On day 2, the same procedure was repeated
as on day 1 for all 15 trials using only the hidden platform. For
data analysis, averages for each mouse were calculated using blocks
of 3 trials. As shown in FIG. 14, vehicle-treated mice exhibit
.about.1 error over three trials near the end of the second day.
The graph shows vehicle, A.beta. (200 nM), YF2 (5 mg/kg) and YF2 (5
mg/kg)+A.beta. (200 nM)
[0480] In contrast, A.beta.-infused mice [bilateral injections of
A.beta..sub.42; 200 nM in a final volume of 1 .mu.l over 1 min;
twice on each testing day: 15 min prior to the 1.sup.st trial (for
the 1.sup.st group of tests) and 15 min prior to the 7.sup.th trial
(for the 2.sup.nd group of tests) into dorsal hippocampi], failed
to learn, making 3-4 errors throughout the training session, with
no improvement over trials. Treatment with YF2 [(i.p., 5 mg/kg, 30
min prior to the 1.sup.st trial (for the 1.sup.st group of tests)
and 30 min prior to the 7.sup.th trial (for the 2' group of tests)]
rescued the A.beta.-induced memory impairment. In addition, YF2 by
itself did not affect the performance of the animals with this kind
of test. Controls for sensory, motor and motivational skills of the
mice that might have influenced the outcome of the test with the
2-day RAWM did not show any difference in the time needed to reach
the visible platform and in the swimming speed among the four
different groups of mice (FIG. 15 and FIG. 16).
Example 5--Dysregulation of Histone Acetylation in Alzheimer
Disease
[0481] We have recently shown that the inhibition of histone
de-acetylation through trichostatin A (TSA) ameliorates LTP and
contextual fear conditioning (FC) in an amyloid-depositing animal
model, the transgenic (Tg) mouse expressing the Swedish mutation in
APP(K670M:N671L) together with the mutation in PS1(M146L, line
6.2), termed APP/PS1 mouse.sup.[A1, A22] (each herein incorporated
by reference in its entirety). In addition, CBP HAT activity was
essential for enhancing transcription in vitro following PS1
stimulation and CBP levels in APP/PS1 mice were significantly lower
than in WT mice. Hippocampi from APP/PS1 mice exhibited, after FC
training, approximately a 50% reduction in acetylated histone 4
levels, an acetylation that was shown to be important in memory
formation.sup.[A23] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety). Based on these findings and without being bound by
theory, epigenetic changes, including histone acetylation, play an
important role in the A.beta.-induced damage of synaptic function
and memory associated with AD.
[0482] In the brain, CREB phosphorylation is required for CREB
ability to bind to CBP and to stimulate memory associated gene
expression. CBP functions as a co-activator that facilitates
interactions with the basal transcription machinery by working as
an acetyltransferase (HAT) that catalyzes acetylation of the
histones, causing a loss in chromosomal repression and increase in
the transcription of memory associated genes. Unlike HATs, HDACs
were found to remove an acetyl group from histones, thus
restricting access of the transcriptional machinery to the DNA.
Interestingly, HDAC inhibitors have been shown to enhance LTP and
contextual fear memory, a form of associative memory in which
animals must associate a neutral stimulus with an aversive one
[A25] (herein incorporated by reference in its entirety).
[0483] Also, memory and LTP deficits of CBP+/- mice were reversed
by the HDAC inhibitor, SAHA, supporting the potential use of this
class of drugs as therapeutic agents against mental retardation in
Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome (RTS)[A24] (herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety). Nicotinamide, an HDAC III inhibitor,
was found to restore cognition in the triple Tg mouse model of AD
via a mechanism involving reduction of Thr231-phosphotau [A26]
(herein incorporated by reference in its entirety). Moreover, HDAC
inhibitors induced sprouting of dendrites, an increased number of
synapses, and reinstated learning and access to long-term memories
in the CK-p25 Tg mouse model of neuronal loss [A23] (herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety). HDAC inhibitors could
affect neuronal function through a variety of mechanisms including
epigenetic and non-epigenetic changes [A27] (herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety). Whether cognitive deficits following
A.beta. elevation may be induced by epigenetic modification on
histone acetylation (via chromatin remodeling) has not been
determined.
[0484] WT-PS1 stimulates the transcriptional activity ability of
CBP whereas its AD M146L mutant did not produce such an effect
[A20] (herein incorporated by reference in its entirety) indicating
that CBP and its HAT activity in AD may be involved. In addition, a
CBP mutant lacking HAT activity is not capable of responding to
WT-PS1 in terms of increased transcription activating ability.
Hence, CBP and its HAT region appear to be essential for enhancing
transcription in vitro following PS1 stimulation. The inventors
find that histone acetylation level of APP/PS1 mice is different
than in WT mice, thus identifying AD as a disease of epigenetic
etiology.
[0485] Significance.
[0486] Although AD was described almost a century ago, the
molecular mechanisms that lead to the development of the neuronal
pathology are still unknown. Without being bound by theory,
epigenetics and histone acetylation might play a fundamental role
in AD. Moreover, inhibition of HDAC or conversely, activation of a
HAT, can effectively counteract the disease progression.
To Determine if A.beta.-Induced Synaptic and Memory Dysfunctions
are Ameliorated by Inhibition of Histone De-Acetylation.
[0487] Based on data showing that TSA rescues the reduction of LTP
and contextual learning in APP/PS1 mice, we will determine if the
inhibitor also rescues these deficits after A.beta. exposure in
order to separate A.beta. effects from other effects of APP and PS1
overexpression.
[0488] AD is thought to begin as a synaptic disorder that
progressively leads to greater neuronal dysfunction, leading to
memory loss [A28] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety). To obtain evidence in favor of the involvement of
epigenetics in A.beta.-induced synaptic and memory dysfunction, we
performed a series of experiments using the HDAC inhibitor TSA on
3-4 month-old APP/PS1 mice (for a detailed description of the
experiments showing the characterization of these mice see our
manuscripts [A17, A29] (each herein incorporated by reference in
its entirety).
[0489] At this age the Tg mice just start showing the synaptic
plasticity and memory impairments [A29] (herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety). Basal synaptic transmission (BST) was
similar between APP/PS1 and WT mice. We found no difference in BST
among the 2 groups as previously shown in mice of this age [A29]
(herein incorporated by reference in its entirety). Hippocampal
slices were then perfused with TSA (1.65 .mu.M) for 30 min before
inducing LTP through tetanic stimulation of the Schaeffer
collateral pathway. Potentiation in TSA treated APP/PS1 slices was
far greater than in vehicle-treated APP/PS1 slices (FIG. 17). But,
TSA did not change the amplitude of LTP in hippocampal slices of WT
mice compared to WT slices treated with vehicle alone. Moreover,
TSA perfusion did not affect baseline transmission in APP/PS1 and
WT slices that received no tetanus.
[0490] Following experiments on acute effect of TSA in synaptic
dysfunction, we determined if TSA is beneficial against impairment
of contextual FC in APP/PS1 mice.sub.[A17]. 4 month-old mice were
divided into 4 groups: APP/PS1 with TSA, APP/PS1 with vehicle, WT
with TSA and WT with vehicle. TSA and vehicle control solution were
administered i.p. at a concentration of 2 .mu.g/g body weight. We
found a similar shock threshold among the various groups of mice.
Then, mice were trained to associate neutral stimuli with an
aversive one. They were placed in a novel context (FC box), exposed
to a white noise cue paired with a mild foot shock, and injected
with TSA 2 hrs before training. Fear learning was assessed 24 hrs
later by measuring freezing behavior--the absence of all movement
except for that necessitated by breathing--in response to
representation of the context. We found no difference in the
freezing behavior among the 4 groups of mice during the training
phase of the FC. 24 hrs later, freezing behavior was decreased in
vehicle-treated APP/PS1 mice compared to vehicle-treated WT
littermates in analyzing contextual learning (FIG. 18). TSA
improved memory in Tg mice.
[0491] In future experiments, we will confirm electrophysiological
and behavioral findings described in FIG. 17 and FIG. 18 using a
structurally dissimilar inhibitor of histone-deacetylases, sodium
butyrate (NaB). As for TSA experiments, slices from 3-4 month old
APP/PS1 mice will be treated with NaB (300 .mu.M) for 30 min prior
to applying a theta-burst stimulation to induce LTP. Controls will
be performed on slices from APP/PS1 mice treated with vehicle, and
WT littermate mice treated with NaB or vehicle. Similarly to TSA,
we will also check if NaB (1.2 g/Kg) re-establishes normal
contextual fear memory in APP/PS1 mice.
[0492] The APP and PS1 transgenes could affect neuronal function
through different mechanisms [A30, A31] (each herein incorporated
by reference in its entirety), including direct effects by A.beta..
The trafficking and signaling properties of full-length APP and its
cleavage products are likely different, which could impact aspects
of synaptic function differently. To separate A.beta. effects from
other effects of APP and PS1 overexpression, we will determine
whether A.beta. per se is responsible for the deficits observed in
our studies on Tg mice. Since it has already been described that
natural oligomers of human A.beta., in the absence of monomers and
fibrils, markedly inhibit LTP in vivo [A6] (herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety), we will apply 200 nM oligomeric
A.beta..sub.42 concurrently with TSA (1.65 .mu.M) for 30 minutes to
WT slices prior to inducing LTP. In addition, we will impair
contextual fear memory through bilateral infusion of 200 nM
oligomeric A.beta..sub.42 onto dorsal hippocampi 15 min prior to
training for FC, concurrently with TSA (2 .mu.gr/gr body weight, 2
hrs prior to training, i.p.). Without being bound by theory,
oligomeric A.beta..sub.42 should inhibit LTP and fear memory, and
demonstrate that TSA reestablishes normal LTP and contextual fear
memory following A.beta..sub.42 treatment. TSA alone should not
have any effect. In additional experiments we will use NaB (300
.mu.M) plus 200 nM A.beta..sub.42 for 30 min prior to applying a
theta-burst stimulation to induce LTP. Controls will be performed
on slices treated with vehicle. Similarly to TSA, we will also
check if NaB (1.2 g/Kg) re-establishes normal contextual fear
memory in A.beta..sub.42-infused mice. Collectively, these
experiments will demonstrate that inhibition of histone deacetylase
is beneficial against synaptic and memory dysfunction caused by
elevation of oligomeric A.beta..
To Characterize CBP Involvement Following A.beta. Elevation.
[0493] Based on the observations that i) WT-PS1 no longer promotes
transcription on F11 cells transfected with a CBP construct lacking
HAT activity, and that ii) CBP levels are reduced in APP/PS1 mice,
we will determine if CBP HAT activity and levels are affected in
APP/PS1 mice and after A.beta. elevation.
[0494] We have recently examined if the HAT activity of CBP has any
role in the stimulus effect of WT-PS1 by using a construct in which
full-length CBP contains a mutation (WY--amino acids 1503-1504
replaced by alanine and serine). This mutation, which completely
abolishes its HAT activity [A32] (herein incorporated by reference
in its entirety), was linked to the DNA binding domain of Gal4
(FIG. 19). In contrast to the enhanced promoter activity of
full-length WT-CBP, no activity was observed with WY-CBP (FIG.
20A). There was no difference in the basal activity between WT and
WY Gal-CBP (FIG. 20B). Thus, a CBP mutant lacking HAT activity is
not capable of responding to WT-PS1 in terms of increased
transcription activating ability. Hence, CBP and its HAT region
appear to be essential for enhancing transcription in vitro
following PS1 stimulation. Additionally, we decided to measure
endogenous CBP levels in APP/PS1 mice.
[0495] Western blot analysis from the hippocampus of 4 month old
APP/PS1 mice revealed a significant decrease in CBP levels compared
to WT controls (FIG. 21). In future experiments we will replicate
these results. Alternative strategies will include measurement of
CBP from the nuclear fraction given that changes in the CBP
distribution (cytoplasm vs. nucleus) have been observed in F11
cells following overexpression of PS1(M146L) compared to WT-PS1
[A20] (herein incorporated by reference in its entirety). We will
also directly measure CBP HAT activity in APP/PS1 mice both in
basal condition and 1 hr after training for contextual learning
compared to their WT littermates. Controls will be performed using
a latent inhibition training paradigm to exclude that changes in
CBP HAT activity are due to novel context alone or the electric
shock instead of the association between them [A25] (herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety). In the latent
inhibition paradigm animals will be pre-exposed to a novel context
prior to receiving the electric shock so that the animal will form
a spatial memory that blocks the formation of an associative
contextual fear memory. Finally, we will measure HDAC activity
using a new fluorimetric assay on hippocampi using the experimental
paradigm as in the HAT assay. Without being bound by theory, these
experiments will establish if CBP and/or HDACs are altered
following overexpression of the APP and PS1 transgenes.
[0496] Similar to the electrophysiological and behavioral
experiments described herein, we will ask whether TSA
administration will rescue changes in CBP levels and CBP HAT
activity. We will repeat the same experiments as described herein
after treatment with TSA (2 .mu.g/g body weight; i.p), 2 hrs prior
to harvesting hippocampi from APP/PS1 mice. Vehicle- and
TSA-treated WT littermates will serve as controls. To separate APP
and PS1 overexpression effects from A.beta. per se effects,
experiments described herein (including CBP levels, CBP-HAT
activity and total HDAC activity with TSA or with vehicle only)
will be repeated in the presence of 200 nM oligomeric
A.beta..sub.42 infused onto dorsal hippocampi of WT mice compared
to vehicle infused mice. Without being bound by theory, these
experiments will establish if CBP and/or HDACs are altered
following A.beta. elevation.
Determine which Histones Acetylation Levels Change Following
A.beta.-Elevation.
[0497] Data have shown .about.50% reduction in acetylated histone 4
levels in hippocampi of APP/PS1 mice. In future experiments, we
will extend our investigation to histones 2B and 3 which also play
a key role in transcription and memory [A23-A25] (each herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety). We will finally check
if A.beta. elevation affects histone acetylation.
[0498] We will also test if defects seen in APP/PS1 mice, compared
to WT littermates, are due to epigenetic effects. Acetylation of
histones 2B, 3 and 4 was shown to play a key role in transcription
and memory [A23-A25] (each herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety). Acetylation of H4 in hippocampus from WT and APP/PS1
animals was measured. Vehicle control solution was administered
i.p. 2 hrs before FC training. 1 hr after contextual FC, the
APP/PS1 and WT mice were euthanized and hippocampi were extracted.
Western blot analysis demonstrated that, compared to WT mice,
APP/PS1 animals had an overall reduction of more than 50% in
acetylated histone 4 levels (FIG. 22). Whether HDAC inhibition
might rescue the histone 4 acetylation levels defect observed in
APP/PS1 mice was also tested. Injection of TSA (2 .mu.g/g body
weight; i.p) 2 hours prior to contextual fear conditioning enhanced
H4 acetylation of APP/PS1 mice (FIG. 22). Without being bound by
theory, AD is likely to be a disease with an epigenetic motif and
HDAC inhibitors can elevate decreased levels of histone 4 in an AD
mouse model.
[0499] In future experiments, we will measure basal acetylation
levels of histone 4, as well as controls using the latent
inhibition paradigm described herein. In addition, we will extend
our studies to histones 2B and 3 by measuring their acetylation in
the hippocampus of APP/PS1 and WT littermates of 4 months of age
both in basal conditions and following training for FC, with and
without TSA as for histone 4. Controls will be also performed using
a latent inhibition training paradigm as described herein. Finally,
we will confirm these findings using a structurally dissimilar
inhibitor of histone-deacetylases, NaB. As for TSA experiments, we
will check if NaB (1.2 g/Kg) re-establishes normal histone/s
acetylation levels in APP/PS1 mice.
[0500] To separate APP and PS1 overexpression effects from A.beta.
per se effects, experiments described herein related to
measurements of different histones acetylation levels will be
repeated in the presence of 200 nM oligomeric A.beta..sub.42
infused onto dorsal hippocampi of WT mice compared to vehicle
infused mice. Without being bound by theory, oligomeric
A.beta..sub.42 will affect histone 4 acetylation levels. Remaining
histones acetylation levels should be consistent with findings from
Transgenic (Tg) mice. Additional experiments will be performed with
NaB. As for TSA experiments, we will check if NaB (1.2 g/Kg)
re-establishes normal histone/s acetylation levels in
A.beta.42-infused mice. Without being bound by theory, these
experiments will demonstrate that epigenetic changes, such as
reduced histone acetylation, play an important role in the
A.beta.-induced damage of synaptic function and memory associated
with AD.
Methods
[0501] Animals:
[0502] Double Tg mice will be obtained by crossing APP and PS1
animals (genotyped by PCR)[.sup.A29] (herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety). For A.beta. experiments we will use
C57B16 mice.
[0503] A.beta. Preparation:
[0504] Oligomeric A.beta.42 will be prepared from commercially
available synthetic peptides (American Peptides Co), as
described.sup.[A33, A34] (each herein incorporated by reference in
its entirety).
[0505] For electrophysiology, 400 .mu.m slices will be cut and
maintained in an interface chamber at 29.degree. C. for 90 min
prior to recording, as reported.sup.[A5] (herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety). Briefly, CA1 fEPSPs will be recorded by
placing stimulating and the recording electrodes in CA1 stratum
radiatum. Following BST assessment, a 15 min baseline will be
recorded every min at an intensity that evokes a response
.about.35% of the maximum evoked response. LTP will be induced
using .theta.-burst stimulation (4 pulses at 100 Hz, with the
bursts repeated at 5 Hz and each tetanus including 3 ten-burst
trains separated by 15 sec).
[0506] For contextual and cued conditioning, mice will be placed in
the conditioning chamber for 2 min before the onset of a discrete
tone (CS) (a 30s, 85 dB sound at 2800 Hz), as described.sup.[A17]
(herein incorporated by reference in its entirety). In the last 2s
of the CS, mice will be given a 2s, 0.60 mA foot shock (US) through
the bars of the floor. After the CS/US pairing, mice will be left
in the conditioning chamber for 30s and will then be placed back in
their home cages. Freezing behavior will be scored using the
Freezeview software (MED Ass). To evaluate contextual fear
learning, freezing will be measured for 5 min in the chamber in
which the mice will be trained 24 hr after training. To evaluate
cued fear learning, 24 hr after contextual testing, mice will be
placed in a novel context for 2 min (pre-CS test), after which they
will be exposed to the CS for 3 min (CS test), and freezing will be
measured.
[0507] Sensory perception of the shock will be determined through
threshold assessment, as described.sup.[A17] (herein incorporated
by reference in its entirety).
[0508] CBP levels will be measured with western blot using specific
CBP antibodies. The nuclear fraction will be contained in the
pellet obtained from homogenated tissue, centrifuged at
7,700.times.g for 1 min.
[0509] CBP HAT activity will be measured by immunoprecipitation
from the lysis of hippocampal extracts using CBP antibodies. After
isolation, HAT activity will be assessed using indirect
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit to detect acetyl residues
according to the manufacturer's instruction (Upstate).
[0510] For HDAC activity assay, I will use a fluorimetric kit from
Biovision (CA), according to the manufacturer instruction.
[0511] For histone acetylation assay, Western blot will be
performed from snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen hippocampi. Nuclear
proteins will be acid-extracted and separated onto a denaturing,
7%-12% acrylamide gel followed by electroblotting onto
nitrocellulose. Acetylated histones (H3, H2A and H2B) will be
detected using antibodies purchased from Upstate and the Amersham
ECF Kit accordingly to the manufacturer protocol.
[0512] Statistical Analyses:
[0513] Experiments will be performed in blind. Results will be
analyzed with ANOVA with post-hoc correction with drug or genotype
as main effect.
REFERENCES
[0514] A1. Malm et al, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2006. 103:8852-7.
[0515] A2. Cleary et al, Nat Neurosci, 2005. 8:79 84. [0516] A3.
Cullen et al, Neuroreport, 1997. 8:3213-7. [0517] A4. Itoh et al,
Eur J Pharmacol, 1999. 382:167-75. [0518] A5. Vitolo, et al, Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA, 2002. 99:13217-21. [0519] A6. Walsh et al,
Nature, 2002. 416:535-9. [0520] A7. Chen et al, J Neurosci Res,
2000. 60:65-72. [0521] A8. Lambert et al, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,
1998. 95:6448-53. [0522] A9. Kang et al, Nature, 1987. 325:733-6.
[0523] A10. Sherrington et al, Nature, 1995. 375:754-60. [0524]
A11. Levy-Lahad et al, Science, 1995. 269:970-3. [0525] A12. Czech
et al, Prog Neurobiol. 2000. 60:363-84. [0526] A13. Takahashi et
al, Neurosci Lett. 1999. 260:121-4. [0527] A14. Rakvan et al,
Biochem J. 2001. 356:1-10. [0528] A15. Puzzo et al, J Neurosci.
2005. 25:6887-97. [0529] A16. Puzzo et al, in Soc Neurosci. Abstr.
2006. Atlanta. [0530] A17. Gong et al, J. Clin. Invest., 2004.
114:1624-1634. [0531] A18. Korzus et al, Neuron. 2004. 42:961-72.
[0532] A19. Saura et al, Neuron. 2004. 42:23-36. [0533] A20.
Francis et al, Neuroreport, 2006. 17:917-21. [0534] A21. Holcomb et
al, Nat Med. 1998. 4:97-100. [0535] A22. Gong et al, Cell, 2006.
126:775-88. [0536] A23. Fischer et al, Nature. 2007. 447:178-82.
[0537] A24. Alarcon et al, Neuron. 2004. 42:947-59. [0538] A25.
Levenson et al, J Biol Chem, 2004. 279:40545-59. [0539] A26. Green
et al, I Neurosci, 2008. 28:11500-10. [0540] A27. Kazantsev et al,
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008. 7:854-68. [0541] A28. Masliah. E.,
Histol Histopathol. 1995. 10:509-19. [0542] A29. Trinchese et al,
Ann Neurol. 2004. 55:801-14. [0543] A30. Kamal et al, Nature, 2001.
414:643-8. [0544] A31. Cao et al, Science. 2001. 293:115-20. [0545]
A32. Bordoli et al, Nucleic Acids Res. 2001. 29:589-97. [0546] A33.
Stine et al, J Biol Chem. 2003. 278: 11612-22. [0547] A34. Puzzo et
al, Neurosci., 2008. 28:14537-14545.
Example 6--Impairment of Chromatin Remodeling Following Amyloid
Elevation
[0548] In addition to CREB and CBP link to AD, epigenetic changes
might also contribute to AD development. Hippocampal levels of
acetylated histone 4, an acetylation important in memory formation
[B19] (herein incorporated by reference in its entirety), were
markedly reduced in an amyloid-depositing animal model after fear
conditioning training. Without being bound by theory, changes in
histone acetylation play an important role in AD.
[0549] Furthermore, after training for fear conditioning, levels of
hippocampal acetylated H4 in APP/PS1 mice were dramatically lower
than in wild-type littermates, indicating that changes in histone
acetylation are involved in memory loss in AD. This observation is
consistent with the finding that HDAC inhibition induced sprouting
of dendrites, an increased number of synapses, and reinstated
learning and access to LTM in the CK-p25 transgenic mouse with
neuronal loss [B19] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety). Although levels of histone acetylation were not
investigated, the use of HDAC inhibitors in two additional studies
is encouraging. Nicotinamide, an HDAC III inhibitor, was found to
restore cognition in the triple transgenic mouse model of AD via a
non-epigenetic mechanism involving reduction of cytosolic
Thr231-phosphotau [B49] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety). However, many questions remain to be answered: Does a
treatment with HDAC inhibitors rescue the defects in histone
acetylation, synaptic plasticity and memory both in transgenic mice
with a mild plaque load and those with a more profound amyloid
deposition? Can the beneficial effect of HDAC inhibitors be
extended to other forms of explicit memory in addition to fear
memory, such as reference memory? Are other histones, such as
histones H2B and 3 which are also known to play a key role in
transcription and memory [B19, B25, B26] (each herein incorporated
by reference in its entirety), abnormally acetylated during memory
processes in AD? Given that experiments were performed on mice
overexpressing mutated APP and PS1 transgenes which might cause a
variety of effects independent of A.beta. elevation, is histone
acetylation affected following A.beta. elevation? Does the histone
acetyl-transferase CBP play a role in the reduction of histone
acetylation in APP/PS1 mice and following A.beta. elevation?
[0550] The inventors will also discuss in this Example whether
chromatin changes at the level of histone acetylation occur
following elevation of A.beta. during memory processes. Without
being bound by theory, the results obtained will provide a new type
of mechanism for A.beta.-induced impairment of memory and synaptic
function.
[0551] The therapies for AD that are currently in use include
augmentation of the cholinergic system by usage of
acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, or blockage of glutamate
neurotoxicity through NMDA antagonists. These agents have a limited
efficacy. Major efforts are underway to inhibit tangle formation,
to combat inflammation and oxidative damage, and to decrease
A.beta. load in the brain either by the use of agents that inhibit
.beta. and .gamma. secretases or increase a secretase, by the use
of drugs that inhibit A.beta. oligomerization, or by the use of
treatments such as immunization with A.beta. that appear to augment
the removal of A.beta. from the brain. However, the role of APP,
A.beta.40, and the secretases in normal physiological function
might present a problem in providing effective and safe approaches
to AD therapy. Drugs interfering with transcription machinery and
histone acetylation might represent a new approach to AD treatment
to make the cell with its synaptic contacts in which memories are
thought to reside, more robust and resistant to the effects of
A.beta..
[0552] HDAC Inhibition Ameliorates Deficits in Hippocampal
Long-Term Potentiation in APP/PS1 Mice.
[0553] The observation that inspired these studies was the result
of a series of experiments in which we tested whether a brief
application of the HDAC inhibitor TSA was capable of rescuing the
defect in LTP shown by slices from 3-4 month-old APP/PS1 mice (for
a detailed description of the experiments showing the
characterization of these mice [B50]; herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety). At this age the transgenic mice just
start showing the synaptic plasticity and memory impairments [B14,
B50] (each herein incorporated by reference in its entirety)). As
previously demonstrated [B50] (each herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety), basal synaptic transmission (BST) was
similar between APP/PS1 and WT mice. Hippocampal slices were then
perfused with TSA (1.65 .mu.M) for 30 min before inducing LTP
through tetanic stimulation of the Schaeffer collateral pathway.
Potentiation in TSA treated APP/PS1 slices was far greater than in
vehicle-treated APP/PS1 slices (two-way ANOVA: F.sub.1,11=13.166,
p=0.004; FIG. 17). On the other hand, TSA did not change the
amplitude of LTP in hippocampal slices from WT mice compared to WT
slices treated with vehicle alone (F.sub.1,12=0.512, p=0.488, FIG.
17). Moreover, TSA perfusion did not affect baseline transmission
in APP/PS1 and WT slices that received no tetanus (n=3 per each
group). Thus, HDAC inhibition is capable of rescuing the defect in
LTP in the APP/PS1 animal model of A.beta. deposition.
[0554] HDAC Inhibition Rescues the Defect in Associative Memory in
APP/PS1 Mice.
[0555] Similar to humans affected by AD [B51] (herein incorporated
by reference in its entirety), APP/PS1 mice exhibit a deficit in
associative memory [B46] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety). In rodents, associative learning can be assessed by
contextual fear conditioning. This behavioral task, which is based
on the association of a neutral stimulus with an aversive one, is
dependent on hippocampal function [B52] (herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety). Thus, following experiments on acute
effect of TSA in synaptic dysfunction, we determined if TSA is
beneficial against impairment of contextual fear conditioning in
3-4 month old APP/PS1 mice [B14] (herein incorporated by reference
in its entirety). Animals were divided into 4 groups: APP/PS1 with
TSA, APP/PS1 with vehicle, WT with TSA and WT with vehicle. TSA and
vehicle control solution were administered i.p. at a concentration
of 2 mg/Kg body weight. We found a similar shock threshold among
the various groups of mice. Then, mice were trained to associate
neutral stimuli with an aversive one. They were placed in a novel
context (fear conditioning box), exposed to a white noise cue
paired with a mild foot shock, and injected with TSA 2 hrs before
training. Fear learning was assessed 24 hrs later by measuring
freezing behavior--the absence of all movement except for that
necessitated by breathing--in response to representation of the
context. We found no difference in the freezing behavior among the
4 groups of mice during the training phase of the fear conditioning
(F.sub.3,47=0.02997, p=0.9929, n=12-13/group; FIG. 18). Twenty-four
hours later, we found a decreased freezing behavior in
vehicle-treated APP/PS1 mice compared to vehicle-treated WT
littermates in the analysis of the contextual learning
(F.sub.3,47=0.0526, p=0.0280, n=12-13/group; FIG. 18).
[0556] Freezing in vehicle-treated APP/PS1 mice was about 46% that
of vehicle-treated WT mice [vehicle-treated APP/PS1 mice:
14.88.+-.2.97% vs. vehicle-treated WT littermates: 31.68.+-.5.32%;
n=13 (11 females plus 2 males) and n=13 (11 females plus 2 males),
respectively; t=2.76, p=0.0109; FIG. 18]. However, the freezing
time was increased in APP/PS1 mice after the injection of TSA to
about 236.27% of vehicle-treated APP/PS1 mice [TSA-treated APP/PS1
mice: 35.15.+-.6.99%, n=12 (10 females plus 2 males); t=2.744,
p=0.0116; FIG. 18]. Statistical analysis revealed that freezing in
APP/PS1 mice was not significantly different with respect to both
TSA-treated (t=0.1902, p=0.8508) and vehicle-treated WT mice
(t=0.3982, p=0.6941). TSA-treated WT mice showed a slight
non-significant increase in freezing compared to vehicle-treated WT
mice [TSA-treated WT mice: 36.95.+-.6.43%; n=13 (11 females plus 2
males); t=0.6316, p=0.5336, FIG. 18]. We next tested cued fear
conditioning, a hippocampus-independent task [B46] (herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety), and did not find a
difference in freezing behavior among the 4 groups (both in the
pre-CS group, F.sub.3,25=0.8763, p=0.4666, and in the CS group,
F.sub.3,24=0.6398, p=0.5968). This result indicates that the
function of the amygdala, which is involved mainly in cued
conditioning and is known to be normal in APP/PS1 mice, is not
affected by the inhibition of HDACs by TSA, as previously
demonstrated [B53] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety). Taken together, these data show that the inhibition of
histone deacetylation is able to re-establish normal associative
memory in the APP/PS1 mouse while also restoring normal synaptic
plasticity.
[0557] HDAC Inhibition Rescues the Defect in Associative Memory by
A.beta. Elevation.
[0558] The APP and PS1 transgenes could affect neuronal function
through different mechanisms [B23, B24] (each herein incorporated
by reference in its entirety), including direct effects by A.beta..
Full-length APP and its cleavage products could differently impact
H4 acetylation. To separate A.beta. effects from other effects of
APP and PS1 overexpression, we next determined whether A.beta. per
se is responsible for the deficit in H4 acetylation observed in our
studies on transgenic mice. Since it has already been described
that natural oligomers of human A.beta., markedly inhibit memory in
vivo [B54, B55] (each herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety), we applied a preparation containing oligomeric A.beta.42
(200 nM in a volume of 1 .mu.l, bilaterally, slowly over 1 min)
into dorsal hippocampi (FIG. 24A-B), 15 min prior to training for
fear conditioning, with injection of TSA or vehicle (2 mg/kg body
weight, 2 hrs prior to training, i.p.). Infusion occurred 5-7 days
after implanting cannulas onto dorsal hippocampi. We found no
difference in the freezing behavior among the 4 groups of mice
during the training phase of the fear conditioning
(F.sub.3,41=0.04188, p=0.9884, n=8-14/group; FIG. 24C). Twenty-four
hours later, freezing behavior was decreased in A.beta.-infused
mice compared to vehicle-infused mice in the analysis of the
contextual learning (F.sub.3,41=3.619, p=0.0209, n=8-14/group; FIG.
24C). Freezing in A.beta.-infused mice was about 25% that of
vehicle-infused mice [A.beta.-infused mice: 8.580.+-.2.119% vs.
vehicle-infused mice: 31.46.+-.5.373% n=12 and 11 males,
respectively; t=3.147, p=0.0049; FIG. 24C]. However, the freezing
time was increased in A.beta.-infused mice after the injection of
TSA to about 300% of A.beta.-infused mice (TSA+A.beta. treated
mice: 26.17.+-.4.747% n=14 males; t=3.066, p=0.0053; FIG. 24).
Statistical analysis revealed that freezing in A.beta.-infused mice
that were injected with TSA was not significantly different with
respect to both TSA-injected (t=0.1902, p=0.8508) and
vehicle-injected mice (t=0.3982, p=0.6941) that were infused with
vehicle. TSA-treated mice showed similar amounts of freezing as
vehicle-treated mice [TSA-treated mice: 27.01.+-.7.246%; n=8 males;
t=0.4335, p=0.6701, FIG. 24C]. We next tested cued fear
conditioning, and did not find a difference in freezing behavior
among the 4 groups (both in the pre-CS group, F.sub.3,52=1.547,
p=0.2135, and in the CS group, F.sub.3,52=0.4838, p=0.6950). Taken
together, these data show that the inhibition of histone
deacetylation is able to re-establish normal associative memory
following A.beta. elevation.
[0559] APP/PS1 Mice Display a Reduced Endogenous Level of Histone 4
Acetylation in Response to a Learning Task.
[0560] Given that HDAC inhibitors are known to acetylate other
molecules besides histones [B49] (herein incorporated by reference
in its entirety), our next goal was to determine whether the effect
of TSA on the defect in fear memory of APP/PS1 mice was linked, at
least in part, to chromatin changes at the level of histone
acetylation. Acetylation of H4 was shown to play a key role in
transcription and memory [B19] (herein incorporated by reference in
its entirety). Thus, we asked whether the memory deficit observed
in APP/PS1 mice are associated with altered acetylation of H4. We
measured acetylation of H4 in hippocampus from 3 to 4 month old
wild-type (WT) and APP/PS1 animals, after training for fear
conditioning. Vehicle control solution was administered i.p. 2 hrs
before training and 1 hour after it mice were euthanized and
hippocampi were extracted. Western blot analysis demonstrated that,
compared to WT mice, APP/PS1 animals had an overall reduction of
more than 50% in acetylated H4 levels (t=2.702, p=0.0355; FIG.
25A). Interestingly, in interleaved experiments, injection of the
class I/II HDAC inhibitor, TSA (2 mg/kg body weight; i.p, 2 hours
prior to training for fear conditioning) enhanced H4 acetylation of
APP/PS1 mice (t=3.283, p=0.0168 compared to vehicle-treated APP/PS1
littermates; FIG. 25A). Furthermore, H4 acetylation levels in
hippocampi from TSA-treated APP/PS1 mice were similar to levels in
TSA-treated WT littermates (t=0.2116, p=0.8385; FIG. 5A). Finally,
as previously demonstrated [B26] (herein incorporated by reference
in its entirety), TSA increased H4 acetylation levels in WT mice
(t=7.659, p=0.0001) compared to hippocampi from vehicle-treated WT
littermates; FIG. 25A).
[0561] We next wanted to determine if there are any changes in the
basal acetylation levels of H4 in APP/PS1 mice, compared to
wild-type mice. We therefore measured acetylation of H4 in
hippocampi from 3 to 4 month old WT and APP/PS1 animals which were
exposed to the context without receiving an electrical shock. We
found no difference between the two experimental groups in basal
acetylated H4 (t=0.076, p=0.9427; FIG. 25B). This demonstrates that
i) the overexpression of mutated APP and PS1 transgenes affects
epigenetic changes at the level of H4 acetylation after contextual
fear learning; and ii) TSA is able to elevate the decreased levels
of histone 4 in an AD mouse model.
[0562] Role of CBP and its HAT Region on Transcription Following
PS1 Stimulation.
[0563] Studies of the mechanisms underlying memory formation have
defined central roles for CRE-dependent gene expression, which is
mediated by the transcription factor CREB and the coactivator CBP.
CBP creates a bridge between CREB and the basal transcriptional
machinery and acetylates histones. Histone acetylation, in turn,
induces chromosomal changes resulting in loss of chromosomal
repression (see FIG. 23). This allows successful transcription of
the underlying genes needed for synthesis of proteins underlying
memory formation. We have recently examined if the HAT activity of
CBP has any role in the stimulus effect of WT-PS1 by using a
construct in which full-length CBP contains a mutation (WY--amino
acids 1503-1504 replaced by alanine and serine). This mutation,
which completely abolishes its HAT activity [B56] (herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety), was linked to the DNA
binding domain of Gal4 (FIG. 19). In contrast to the enhanced
promoter activity of full-length WT-CBP, no activity was observed
with WY-CBP (FIG. 20A). There was no difference in the basal
activity between WT and WY Gal-CBP (FIG. 20B). Thus, these findings
indicate that a CBP mutant lacking HAT activity is not capable of
responding to WT-PS1 in terms of increased transcription activating
ability. Hence, CBP and its HAT region appear to be essential for
enhancing transcription in vitro following PS1 stimulation.
[0564] APP/PS1 Mice Display Reduced CBP Levels.
[0565] We next decided to measure endogenous CBP levels in APP/PS1
mice. Western blot analysis from the hippocampus of 4 month old
APP/PS1 mice revealed a significant decrease in CBP levels compared
to WT controls (FIG. 21) consistent with the observation that
cerebral CBP levels are reduced in mice lacking functional PSs
[B15] (herein incorporated by reference in its entirety). In future
experiments, we will replicate these results to increase the number
of experiments to firmly establish that overexpression of mutated
APP and PS1 transgenes affects CBP levels.
Aims
1. To Determine if Inhibition of Histone De-Acetylation Rescues
Synaptic and Memory Defects Following A.beta. Elevation.
[0566] Inhibition of histone de-acetylation through trichostatin A
(TSA) rescues the deficits in LTP and contextual fear memory in
APP/PS1 mice [B20, B21] (each herein incorporated by reference in
its entirety), a transgenic animal expressing the Swedish mutation
in APP(K670M:N671L) together with the mutation in PS1(M146L, line
6.2) [B22]. We will now test whether the structurally dissimilar
inhibitor of histone-deacetylases, sodium butyrate (NaB), rescues
the synaptic and memory deficits. Given that these observations
were obtained in 4 month old APP/PS1 mice when amyloid plaques are
just starting to form, we will extend them to 7 month old
transgenic animals which have a more profound A.beta. deposition.
In addition, given that APP and PS1 transgenes could affect
neuronal function via different mechanisms [B23, B24] (each herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety), including direct
effects by A.beta., we will investigate whether inhibition of
histone de-acetylation rescues defects of LTP and contextual fear
memory induced by A.beta. per se. We will also extend these
findings to another form of explicit learning, the reference
memory.
Research Design and Methods.
[0567] Rationale.
[0568] A widely accepted concept in the memory field is that
memories are stored in the brains as long-lasting changes in
synaptic strength. Consistent with this concept AD is thought to
begin as a synaptic disorder that progressively leads to greater
neuronal dysfunction, leading to memory loss [B57] (herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety). Without being bound by
theory, HDAC inhibition counteracts the impairment of synaptic
plasticity and memory following amyloid elevation. We will test
this with an additional and structurally dissimilar inhibitor, NaB,
in addition to TSA. Next, given that APP and PS1 transgenes could
affect neuronal function through different mechanisms [B23, B24]
(each herein incorporated by reference in its entirety), we will
determine whether A.beta. per se is responsible for the deficit in
histone acetylation observed in our studies on transgenic mice.
Moreover, we will extend our findings to older APP/PS1 mice when
they have a severe plaque load [B50] (herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety). Finally, we will extend our findings to
another form of explicit memory in addition to fear memory, the
reference memory. Without being bound by theory, inhibition of
histone deacetylase is beneficial against synaptic and memory
dysfunction caused by elevation of oligomeric
[0569] Experimental Design.
[0570] We will confirm electrophysiological and behavioral findings
described in FIG. 17 and FIG. 18 using the structurally dissimilar
inhibitor NaB. As for TSA experiments, slices from 3-4 month old
APP/PS1 mice will be treated with NaB (300 .mu.M) for 30 min prior
to applying a theta-burst stimulation to induce LTP. Controls will
be performed on slices from APP/PS1 mice treated with vehicle, and
WT littermate mice treated with NaB or vehicle. Similarly to TSA,
we will also check if NaB (1.2 g/Kg) re-establishes normal
contextual fear memory in APP/PS1 mice. In these behavioral
experiments, animals were divided into 4 groups: APP/PS1 with NaB,
APP/PS1 with vehicle, WT with NaB and WT with vehicle. Controls
will be also performed using a latent inhibition training paradigm
to exclude that HDAC inhibitors act through an effect on novel
context alone or the electric shock instead of the association
between them [B26] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety). In the latent inhibition paradigm animals will be
pre-exposed to a novel context prior to receiving the electric
shock so that the animal will form a spatial memory that blocks the
formation of an associative contextual fear memory [B26] (herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety).
[0571] We will separate APP and PS1 overexpression effects from
A.beta. per se effects. We have already demonstrated that TSA
rescues the defect of contextual fear memory induced by a
preparation containing oligomeric A.beta.42 (see FIG. 24). Thus, we
will determine whether TSA rescues the defect in LTP induced by 200
nM oligomeric A.beta.42. Since it has already been described that
natural oligomers of human A.beta., in the absence of monomers and
fibrils, markedly inhibit LTP in vivo [B29] (herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety), we will apply 200 nM oligomeric
A.beta.42 concurrently with TSA (1.65 .mu.M) for 30 minutes to WT
slices prior to inducing LTP. In interleaved control experiments we
will apply oligomeric A.beta.42 alone, or TSA alone, or
vehicle.
[0572] We will replicate findings described herein using NaB (300
.mu.M) plus 200 nM A.beta.42 for 30 min prior to applying a
theta-burst stimulation to induce LTP. Controls will be performed
on slices treated with vehicle. As for TSA, we will also check if
NaB (1.2 g/Kg) rescues defect in contextual fear memory in
A.beta.42-infused mice. In these behavioral experiments controls
will be also performed using a latent inhibition training paradigm
to exclude that HDAC inhibitors act through an effect on novel
context alone or the electric shock instead of the association
between them [B26] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety).
[0573] We will repeat all of the experiments described herein with
older mice (7 months), when a more severe plaque load exists and
synaptic dysfunction includes also BST [B50] (herein incorporated
by reference in its entirety).
[0574] We will extend our findings on contextual fear memory to
another form of explicit memory, the reference memory. We have
recently implemented a method that has the advantage of taking very
short time [B58] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety). The method is a hybrid of the Morris water maze and the
radial arm land maze. The motivation for the animals is the
immersion in water. The mouse needs to swim in 6 alleys (arms)
radiating from a central area until it finds a hidden (submerged)
platform at the end of one of the arms. The goal arm is kept
constant for all trials, with a different start arm on successive
trials, such that the learning criterion will be reached in 2 days.
The number of incorrect arm entries will be. At the end of the
task, the mice will perform visible platform testing to exclude the
possibility that visual, motor and motivational deficits affect the
outcome of the experiments. In these experiments 3-4 and 7
month-old APP/PS1 and WT littermates will be injected with TSA or
NaB, 2 hrs prior to performing the task. Vehicle will be used in
control experiments. Similar experiments assessing reference memory
will be also performed in A.beta.42-infused mice (for these
experiments mice will be divided into the following groups:
A.beta.42-infused animals+TSA or NaB or vehicle, vehicle-infused
animals+TSA or NaB or vehicle).
[0575] Without being bound by theory, we will show that HDAC
inhibition rescues the deficits of LTP and memory. If not, as an
alternative strategy, we will try higher concentrations of the HDAC
inhibitors, or a structurally dissimilar HDAC inhibitor such as
MS-275 which has also been shown to cross the blood-brain-barrier
[B59] (herein incorporated by reference in its entirety). Then, the
rodent will undergo electrophysiological and behavioral testing as
described herein. Without being bound by theory, oligomeric
A.beta.42 will inhibits LTP and fear memory, and demonstrate that
TSA ameliorates LTP and contextual fear memory following A.beta.42
treatment. TSA alone should not have any effect. Findings from
young mice or A.beta.-infused animals should be confirmed in 7
month old transgenics. If not, as an alternative strategy, we will
try longer treatments with the HDAC inhibitors, starting 1 or 4
weeks before testing. Finally, without being bound by theory,
findings with the reference memory task should be in agreement with
those obtained with fear conditioning. If so, these results should
demonstrate that inhibition of histone deacetylase is beneficial
against cognitive loss in general in AD-like animal models. If not,
this will be equally interesting as it will demonstrate a
dissociation between different types of memory and usage of HDAC
inhibitors.
[0576] Studies investigating mechanisms underlying LTP in acute
hippocampal slices indicate that transcription is not necessary for
potentiation occurring prior to 2 hours [B26] (herein incorporated
by reference in its entirety). However, we observed an effect of
TSA immediately after induction of LTP (FIG. 17). This finding is
consistent with the result of Levenson et al. [B26] (herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety). The LTP induction
paradigm they applied induces a form of LTP that is dependent upon
transcription for either induction or expression. This was proved
by using 5,6-dichlorobenzimidazole riboside (DRB), a transcription
inhibitor, in WT mice. DRB was able to block both the early and
late phase of a TSA-induced LTP increase, indicating that both the
early and late enhancements of LTP by TSA are dependent upon
transcriptional modulation [B26] (herein incorporated by reference
in its entirety).
[0577] TSA and other HDAC inhibitors represent a new approach to AD
treatment that appears to make the synapse more robust and
resistant to the effects of A.beta.. With regards to the use of
HDAC inhibitors, it has been criticized that inhibition of HDACs
might alter gene expression globally and thus affect memory
processes in a nonspecific manner. However, Vecsey et al [B53]
(herein incorporated by reference in its entirety) showed that TSA
does not globally alter gene expression but instead increases the
expression of specific genes during memory consolidation. They were
able to show that HDAC inhibitors, including TSA, enhance memory
and synaptic plasticity mainly by the activation of key genes that
are dependent on CREB transcriptional activation [B53] (herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety). Thus, it is likely that
TSA may be capable of stopping memory degradation in the presence
of A.beta. accumulation as well as improving brain functions that
have already deteriorated, as in the case of the 3-month-old
APP/PS1 mouse. Interestingly, `rewiring` of the brain and recovery
of memory using HDAC inhibitors was recently reported in CK-p25
transgenic mice [B19] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety). Therefore, it is possible that HDAC inhibitors could be
capable of re-establishing neural networks in the AD brain. This
indicates that using small molecules to target HDACs in AD patients
could facilitate access to long-term memories. HDAC inhibitors with
minimized side-effects are currently being developed by the
pharmaceutical industry. It remains to be seen if these newer
inhibitors can readily enter the brain and if they are as effective
as TSA.
[0578] HDAC inhibitors could affect neuronal function through a
variety of mechanisms including epigenetic and non-epigenetic
changes [B19, B60] (each herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety). Thus, the block of HDACs class I/II may increase the
acetylation of non-histone substrates that, in turn, can contribute
to the amplification of cellular processes associated with memory.
Green et al. [B49] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety) showed that inhibition of class III NAD+-dependent HDACs
using vitamin B3 restored cognitive deficits in the triple
transgenic AD mice, via a mechanism involving the reduction of
Thr231-phosphotau in the cytoplasm.
2. To Determine if Histones 2B, 3 and 4 are Abnormally Acetylated
Following A.beta. Elevation.
[0579] Hippocampi from 3-4 month old APP/PS1 mice exhibit, after
fear conditioning training, approximately a 50% reduction in
acetylated histone 4 (H4) levels, an acetylation that was shown to
be important in memory formation [B19] (herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety). In future experiments, we will extend
our investigation to histones 2B and 3 because they also play a key
role in transcription and memory [B19, B25, B26] (each herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety). Furthermore, we will
examine older transgenic mice with a more severe plaque load (7
months). Finally, to separate A.beta. effects from other effects of
APP and PS1 overexpression, we will check if A.beta. infusion into
the hippocampi affects acetylation of histones 2B, 3 and 4.
Research Design and Methods.
[0580] Rationale.
[0581] Overexpression of mutated APP and PS1 transgenes affects
changes in H4 acetylation occurring during contextual fear learning
(see FIG. 25). In addition, HDAC inhibition through TSA is able to
elevate the decreased levels of H4 in an AD mouse model. Without
being bound by theory, epigenetic mechanisms at the level of
histone acetylation may be impaired during learning and memory in
AD. Additional histones undergoing changes in acetylation during
learning and memory are H2B and H3 [B19, B25] (each herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety). Therefore, in future
experiments we will extend our studies to these histones. Moreover,
we will test the structurally dissimilar inhibitor of
histone-deacetylases, NaB. Next, given that APP and PS1 transgenes
could affect neuronal function through different mechanisms [B23,
B24] (each herein incorporated by reference in its entirety), we
will determine whether A.beta. per se is responsible for the
deficit in histone acetylation observed in our studies on
transgenic mice. Finally, we will extend our findings to older
APP/PS1 mice when they have a severe plaque load [B50] (herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety).
[0582] Experimental Design.
[0583] We will measure acetylation of H2B and H3 in the hippocampus
of APP/PS1 and WT littermates of 4 months of age, both in basal
conditions and following training for fear conditioning, with TSA
(2 mg/kg body weight; i.p, 2 hours prior to training for fear
conditioning) or vehicle as for H4. Controls will be performed
using a latent inhibition training paradigm to exclude that histone
modifications are due to novel context alone or the electric shock
instead of the association between them [B26] (herein incorporated
by reference in its entirety). Immediately following sacrifice,
brain tissue will be dissected and the two hippocampi from each
mouse pooled and flash frozen for later homogenization and
analysis. Additional controls will use cerebellum.
[0584] We will test whether NaB (1.2 g/Kg) is also capable of
ameliorating acetylation of H2B, 3 and 4 in the same experimental
paradigm and controls as in the TSA experiments described herein in
Example 6.
[0585] We will repeat all of the experiments described herein
Example 6 to measure acetylation of H4, 2A and 3 in the presence of
200 nM oligomeric A.beta..sub.42 infused into dorsal hippocampi of
WT mice compared to vehicle-infused mice. Controls will be
performed using a latent inhibition training paradigm and also
using cerebellum.
[0586] Findings in Example 6 will be confirmed with the
structurally dissimilar NaB. As for TSA experiments, we will check
if NaB (1.2 g/Kg) re-establishes normal histones acetylation levels
in A.beta..sub.42-infused mice. Also for these experiments,
controls will be performed on vehicle-infused mice and using a
latent inhibition training paradigm, as well as cerebellum.
[0587] We will also investigate whether we can ameliorate levels of
histone acetylation when profound amyloid load occurs. To address
this question which is directly related to the therapeutic
possibility of using HDAC inhibitors in advanced stages of AD
pathology, we will repeat the experiments as described herein on
older APP/PS1 mice (7 months).
[0588] Without being bound by theory, oligomeric A.beta.42 will
affect H4 acetylation levels and oligomeric A.beta.42 will produce
the same effects on acetylation levels of histones 2B and 3 as in
transgenic mice. If not, we will try more prolonged applications of
200 nM oligomeric A.beta..sub.42 through Alzet osmotic mini-pumps
(1 day, 1 week, 1 month). Problems related to the use of a
synthetic preparation containing A.beta.42 are greatly alleviated
by the use of transgenic animals which produce natural forms of
A.beta.. Studies on H2B and 3 will provide a more complete picture
of the type of epigenetic changes occurring at the level of histone
acetylation. Finally, research in older mice will help
understanding whether HDAC inhibitors might be used at older
disease stages. Taken all together, the studies described herein
will help establishing epigenetic changes as events occurring
following A.beta. elevation.
[0589] In addition to histone acetylation, other histone
posttranslational modifications (PTMs) such as phosphorylation,
sumoylation, ubiquitination, and methylation were shown to regulate
transcription [B7] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety). For example, histone modifications associated with
active gene transcription, such as H3 Lys4 methylation and H3 Lys56
acetylation, were found to lead to gene expression. But, histone
modifications associated with the inactivation of gene
transcription, such as H3 Lys27 methylation and H2A Lys119
ubiquitination were found to cause gene silencing. PTMs that are
modified as a consequence of chronic neuronal exposure to
oligomeric forms of A.beta.42 in mice. As described (see FIG. 24),
200 nM oligomeric A.beta.42 will be infused into dorsal hippocampi
of WT mice. The hippocampi of A.beta.42-infused mice will be
removed and compared to those of vehicle-infused mice. We will
carry mass spectrometry, using immunoprecipitated H2B, 3 and 4, on
hippocampi and search for different histone PTMs between
A.beta.42-infused mice and vehicle-infused animals. To control for
non-specific effects, we will have a 3.sup.rd group of mice in
which we infuse a well studied neurotoxin, gamma-acetylenic GABA,
which is not directly related to AD. We will then test several of
the most interesting histone PTMs in our APP/PS1 mouse model. These
mice will be sacrificed at 1 month (prior to plaque formation), 2
months (as plaques start to form), 3-4 months (at early stages of
plaque formation), and 7 months (at late stages of plaque
formation) of age to test when this histone PTMs occur. Without
being bound by theory, epigenetic changes, such as reduced histone
acetylation, are likely to play an important role in the
A.beta.-induced damage of synaptic function and memory associated
with AD.
3. To Determine if Levels and/or Activity of the Histone
Acetyl-Transferase CBP are Modified Following A.beta.
Elevation.
[0590] CBP HAT activity is essential for enhancing transcription in
vitro following PS1 stimulation. Furthermore, CBP levels in 3-4
month old APP/PS1 mice were found to be lower than in WT mice. In
future experiments, we will extend this observation to older
transgenic mice and following hippocampal A.beta. infusion. In
addition, we will determine if CBP HAT activity is affected both in
young and older APP/PS1 mice as well as after A.beta. infusion.
Finally, we will determine whether stimulation of HAT activity
through a recently synthesized HAT agonist, MOM, rescues the
deficits in LTP, memory, and histone acetylation following A.beta.
elevation.
Research Design and Methods.
[0591] Rationale.
[0592] Endogenous CBP levels are reduced in APP/PS1 mice (see FIG.
21).
[0593] These data are consistent with the observation that cerebral
CBP levels are reduced in mice lacking functional PSs [B15] (herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety). In addition, given that
CBP and its HAT region appear to be essential for enhancing
transcription in vitro following PS1 stimulation (see FIG. 20), we
will directly measure CBP HAT activity in APP/PS1 mice both in
basal condition and 1 hr after training for contextual learning
compared to their WT littermates. If we find a reduction in both
CBP levels and/or HAT activity, we will also check whether use of a
HAT agonist [B61] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety) rescues the defect in contextual fear memory and histones
acetylation. Next, given that APP and PS1 transgenes could affect
neuronal function through different mechanisms [B23, B24] (each
herein incorporated by reference in its entirety), we will
determine whether A.beta. per se is responsible for the deficit in
CBP levels and/or activity observed in transgenic mice. Finally, we
will extend our findings to older APP/PS1 mice when they have a
severe plaque load [B50] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety). Taken together, whether CBP levels and/or activity are
altered following overexpression of the APP and PS1 transgenes will
be assessed, in addition to whether CBP levels and/or activity are
altered following A.beta. elevation. The investigators will examine
whether HAT agonists rescue defects in synaptic and memory
function, as well as histone acetylation.
[0594] Experimental Design.
[0595] We will measure CBP levels in the hippocampus of APP/PS1 and
WT littermates of 4 months of age. Immediately following sacrifice,
brain tissue will be dissected and the two hippocampi from each
mouse pooled and flash frozen for later homogenization and
analysis. Additional controls will use cerebellum.
[0596] We will directly measure CBP HAT activity in APP/PS1 mice
both in basal condition and 1 hr after training for contextual
learning compared to their WT littermates. Controls will be
performed using a latent inhibition training paradigm to exclude
that changes in CBP HAT activity are due to novel context alone or
the electric shock instead of the association between them [B26]
(herein incorporated by reference in its entirety). Additional
controls will use cerebellum.
[0597] A HAT agonist, such as
N-(4-chloro-3-trifluoromethyl-phenyl)-2-ethoxy-benzamide (CTB or
also referred to as compound 6J) [B61] (herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety) was synthesized. Another benzamide HAT
agonist, MOM, was synthesized to check if up-regulation of HAT
activity rescues the defect in LTP, contextual fear memory and
histone acetylation of APP/PS1 mice. We have synthesized the
compound (FIG. 26A) and shown that it induces histone acetylation
(FIG. 26B). We will test whether MOM rescues the LTP defect in
hippocampal slices from APP/PS1 mice following the same
experimental paradigm as described herein. MOM (10 .mu.M) or
vehicle will be applied for 30 min prior to inducing LTP with the
0-burst. WT littermate slices treated with MOM or vehicle will be
used as controls. Next, we will check if the agonist rescues the
defect in contextual fear memory in APP/PS1 animals following the
same experimental paradigm as described herein. We will also check
if MOM re-establishes normal reference memory.
[0598] Given that MOM does not cross the blood brain barrier,
cannulas will be implanted into the dorsal hippocampi of APP/PS1
mice and WT littermates to deliver it directly into the hippocampi.
We will infuse 100 .mu.s in 1 slowly over 1 min. The infusion will
occur 2 hrs prior to applying the foot shock for fear conditioning.
As in the experiments described herein, we will measure the amount
of freezing at 24 hrs to assess contextual fear memory followed by
cued fear memory at 48 hrs. For the water maze experiments, in
turn, we will measure the number of incorrect arm entries. Finally,
in a separate set of experiments hippocampi and cerebella will be
removed at 1 hr after training for fear conditioning and histone
acetylation levels will be measured. If we find that MOM rescues
the LTP and memory defects, as well as hippocampal histone
acetylation of APP/PS1 mice, we will conclude that HAT agonists
might ameliorate the defect in LTP, memory and histone acetylation
following overexpression of APP and PS1 transgenes. The protocol
will also be carried out for testing the effect of the HAT
activator, CTB.
[0599] All of the experiments described herein, including CBP
levels, HAT activity, and usage of MOM and CTB, will be repeated in
the presence of 200 nM oligomeric A.beta..sub.42 infused into
dorsal hippocampi of WT mice compared to vehicle infused mice.
[0600] We will also investigate whether we can ameliorate defect in
CBP levels and/or HAT activity when profound amyloid load occurs.
To address this question, we will repeat the experiments described
herein Example 6 on older APP/PS1 mice (7 months).
[0601] Problems related to the use of a synthetic preparation
containing A.beta.42 are greatly alleviated by the use of
transgenic animals which produce natural forms of A.beta..
Experiments examining CBP levels will be performed. However, if CBP
levels are not affected, we will employ an alternative strategy by
measuring CBP from the nuclear fraction. Changes in the CBP
distribution have been observed in F11 cells. CBP is mostly found
in the nucleus of cells over-expressing WT-PS1, whereas cells
over-expressing the mutant form of PS1 show CBP in both the
cytoplasm and the nucleus [B18] (herein incorporated by reference
in its entirety). Thus, we should be able to determine if changes
in CBP localization might play a role in the development of AD.
[0602] It is difficult to predict whether CBP HAT activity is
changed. Moreover, one cannot exclude the possibility that changes
in CBP HAT activity occur at a defined time after training for fear
conditioning. Therefore, we will also measure hippocampal HAT
activity at different time points (1 min, 5 min, 20 min and 2 hrs)
after the electric shock (with controls similar to experiments
described herein). Thus, a picture of the changes occurring at the
level of the transcription machinery following A.beta. elevation
should be able to be obtained.
[0603] We will measure HDAC activity through a new fluorimetric
assay on hippocampi using the experimental paradigm as in the HAT
assay (basal, 1 min, 5 min, 20 min and 1 hour after foot shock). An
additional alternative possibility is that other HATs are involved
in the reduction of histone acetylation. These include GNATs
family, MYST family, p300, and ACTR/SRC-1. We will measure levels
and activity of these HATs.
[0604] Finally, one cannot exclude the possibility that MOM or CTB
does not rescue the defect in LTP, memory and histones acetylation
in APP/PS1 mice as well as A.beta.-infused mice. If so, as an
alternative strategy, we will try longer treatments with the HAT
agonist, starting a week before testing or at 6 weeks of age prior
to plaque appearance for the experiments on double transgenic
animals.
General Methods of the Example
[0605] Animals.
[0606] Double transgenic mice will be obtained by crossing APP and
PS1 animals (genotyped by PCR) [B20, B21, B50] (each herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety). For A.beta. experiments
we will use C57B16 mice which will be obtained from a breeding
colony. All the mice will be maintained on a 12 h light/dark cycle
(with lights on at 6:00 A.M.) in temperature- and
humidity-controlled rooms. Food and water will be available ad
libitum.
[0607] Electrophysiological Studies.
[0608] We will cut 400 .mu.m hippocampal slices from C57B16 mice
and maintain them in an interface chamber at 29.degree. C. for 90
min prior to recording, as previously reported [B11] (herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety). The bath solution will
consist of 124.0 mM NaCl, 4.4 mM KCl, 1.0 mM Na.sub.2HPO4, 25.0 mM
NaHCO.sub.3, 2.0 mM CaCl.sub.2, 2.0 mM MgSO.sub.4, and 10.0 mM
glucose, continuously bubbled with 95% 02 and 5% CO.sub.2. As a
stimulating electrode we will use a bipolar tungsten electrode,
placed at the level of the Schaeffer collateral fibers. As a
recording electrode we will use a glass pipette filled with bath
solution and placed at the level of CA1 stratum radiatum. We will
first assess basal synaptic transmission (BST) to plot the stimulus
voltages against slopes of fEPSP and determine the intensity of
stimulation of our LTP experiments (it should evoke a response
.about.35% of the maximum evoked response). Baseline for LTP will
be recorded for 15 min, every min. LTP will be elicited using
.theta.-burst stimulation (4 pulses at 100 Hz, with the bursts
repeated at 5 Hz and each tetanus including 3 ten-burst trains
separated by 15 sec).
[0609] Fear Conditioning.
[0610] Contextual fear conditioning will be assessed as previously
described [B14, B21] (each herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety). Mice will be placed in a conditioning chamber for 2 min
before the onset of a tone (CS) (a 30 s, 85 dB sound at 2800 Hz).
In the last 2 s of the CS, mice will be given a 2 s, 0.45 mA foot
shock (US) through the bars of the floor. Then, the mice will be
left in the conditioning chamber for another 30 s. Freezing
behavior, defined as the absence of movement except for that needed
for breathing, will be scored using the Freezeview software.
Contextual fear learning, a type of memory for which hippocampal
function is indispensable, will be evaluated 24 hrs after training
by measuring freezing for 5 min in the chamber in which the mice
will be trained. Cued fear learning, a type of memory that depends
upon amygdala function, will be evaluated 24 hrs after contextual
testing by placing mice in a novel context for 2 min (pre-CS test),
after which they will be exposed to the CS for 3 min (CS test), and
freezing will be measured.
[0611] Sensory perception of the shock will be determined through
threshold assessment. Briefly, the electric current (0.1 mA for 1
s) will be increased at 30 s intervals by 0.1 mA to 0.7 mA.
Threshold to flinching (first visible response to shock), jumping
(first extreme motor response), and screaming (first vocalized
distress) will be quantified for each animal by averaging of the
shock intensity at which each animal manifest a behavioral response
of that type to the foot shock. No difference in the sensory
threshold assessment should be observed among different groups of
mice in experiments in which fear conditioning is tested if the
experimental procedure does not affect the sensory threshold of the
animals.
[0612] Moreover, different groups of mice will be checked with the
open-field test. The open field will be an arena made of white
acrylic with internal dimensions of 72.times.72.times.33 cm (An
area measuring 36.times.36 cm in the centre of the open field will
be defined as the `central zone`). Mice will be placed in the
center of a standard open field and their behavior monitored for 1
hr and scored for proportion of time in the center compartment vs.
periphery, and number of entries into the center compartment. Mice
will be returned for a second hour block after 24 hr. No difference
in exploratory behavior as demonstrated by a similar percentage of
time spent in the center compartment and the number of entries into
the center compartment should be observed if the manipulation does
not affect exploratory capabilities of the mice.
[0613] Reference Memory.
[0614] The first day of the protocol will be a training day. Mice
will be trained to identify the platform location by alternating
between a visible and a hidden platform in a goal arm. The final 3
trials on day 1 and all 15 trials on day 2 will use a hidden escape
platform to force mice to use spatial cues to identify the location
of the goal arm. To avoid learning limitations imposed by
exhausting practice and to avoid fatigue that may result from
consecutive trials, spaced practice training will be established by
running the mice in cohorts of 4 and alternating different cohorts
through the 15 training trials over 3 hours testing periods each
day. On day 1, a visible platform will be placed in a goal
location. Mouse 1 of cohort 1 will be gently placed in the pool
near the perimeter of the wall of the first start arm (specified on
a score sheet) and facing the center of the pool. The number of
incorrect arm entries (entries in arms with no platform) will be
counted. If the animal enters the incorrect arm it is gently pulled
back to the start arm. Each trial will last up to 1 minute. Failure
to select an arm after 15 seconds will be counted as an error and
the mouse will be returned to the start arm. After 1 minute, if the
platform has not been located, the mouse will be guided gently
through the water by placing a hand behind it to direct it towards
the platform. The mouse will rest on the platform for 15 seconds.
After completing the trial, the mouse will be removed from the
pool, gently towel dried and placed back into its cage under a heat
lamp. The goal platform location will be different for each mouse.
After all the mice in the first cohort have had a trial to locate a
visible platform, the platform will be switched from visible to
hidden. After each mouse from cohort 1 completes six alternating
trials between visible and hidden platforms, the mice will be left
to rest under a heating source, and mice from the second cohort
will be tested in the same way. After completing the six
alternating trials, mice from cohort 2 will return to their cages
to rest. Next, mice from the first cohort will complete trials 7-12
again using the alternating visible-hidden platform location.
During resting time for mice from the first cohort, mice from the
second cohort will complete trials 7-12. At this point, all mice
will have to perform 3 hidden platform trials. On day 2, the same
procedure will be repeated as on day 1 for all 15 trials using only
the hidden platform. For data analysis, the number of errors will
be input into statistics software (Statview by SAS, Chicago, Ill.),
and averages for each mouse will be calculated using blocks of 3
trials. As described [B58] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety), we expect that the mice will exhibit 1 or less errors
over three trials near the end of the second day. Mice that fail to
learn will make 3-5 errors throughout the training session, with no
improvement over trials.
[0615] At the end of the task visible platform training will be
used to test visual, motor and motivation skills of the mice. Both
time to reach the platform and swimming speed will be recorded and
analyzed with a video-tracking system (HVS 2020, HVS Image,
UK).
[0616] Infusion Technique.
[0617] Following anaesthesia with 20 mg/kg Avertin, mice will be
implanted with a 26-gauge guide cannula into the dorsal part of the
hippocampi (coordinates: P=2.46 mm, L=1.50 mm to a depth of 1.30
mm) [B62] (herein incorporated by reference in its entirety). The
cannulas will be fixed to the skull with acrylic dental cement
(Paladur). After 6-8 days we will bilaterally inject 200 pM
A.beta..sub.42, or vehicle in a final volume of 1 .mu.l over 1 min
through infusion cannulas that will be connected to a microsyringe
by a polyethylene tube. For Morris water maze, mice will be
injected 20 min prior to performing each session and the probe
trial, whereas for fear conditioning mice will receive a single
injection 20 min before the training. Mice will be handled once a
day for 3 days before behavioral experiments. During infusion
animals will be handled gently to minimize stress. After infusion,
the needle will be left in place for another minute to allow
diffusion. After behavioural testing, a solution of 4% methylene
blue will be infused into the cannulas. Animals will be sacrificed
and their brains removed, frozen, and then cut at -20.degree. with
cryostat for histological localization of infusion cannulas.
[0618] A.beta. Preparation.
[0619] Oligomeric A.beta.42 will be prepared from commercially
available synthetic peptides (American Peptides Co), as described
[B63, B64] (each herein incorporated by reference in its entirety).
Briefly, the lyophilized peptide will be resuspended in cold
1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-propanol (HFIP, Sigma) and aliquoted in
polypropylene vials. After 24 hrs the HFIP solution will be allowed
to evaporate in a fume hood until a thin film of peptide is formed
on the bottom of the vials. Peptide films will be dried under
gentle vacuum and stored in sealed vials at -20.degree. C. Prior to
use, anhydrous DMSO (Sigma) will be added to obtain a pure
monomeric A.beta./DMSO solution that will be sonicated for 10 min
[B63] (herein incorporated by reference in its entirety).
Oligomeric A.beta.42 will be obtained by incubating an aliquot of
monomeric A.beta./DMSO solution in sterile PBS at 4.degree. C.
overnight. The quality of these A.beta. preparations will be
routinely controlled using Western blot analysis in which A.beta.
samples will be resolved by Tris-Tricine PAGE under
non-denaturing/non-reducing conditions, and then transferred on
nitrocellulose membrane. Subsequent Western blotting will be
carried out after membrane incubation with the anti-human A.beta.
monoclonal antibody 6E10 (Signet Lab). The immunostaining will be
revealed by horseradish peroxidase chemi-luminescence.
[0620] Histone Acetylation Assay.
[0621] Western blot will be performed from snap-frozen in liquid
nitrogen hippocampi and cerebella. Tissue will be homogenized in
lysis buffer (62.5 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 3% SDS, 1 mM DTT) and
incubated at 4.degree. C. for 10 min, then sonicated before
centrifugation at 2,000 rpm for 5 min. Whole cell extracts will be
electrophoresed on 10-20% gradient PAGE gel (Invitrogen) and then
immunoblotted. Antibodies will be used at a 1:1,000 concentration
for immunoblotting. All anti-histone antibodies will be purchased
from Millipore. .beta.-III-Tubulin antibody will be purchased from
Promega. Immunoblot data will be quantified by measuring the band
intensity using imaging software (NIH ImageJ). For quantitative
immunoblot analysis, equal amounts of proteins will be loaded into
each lane. To confirm equal loading, blots will be reprobed with
corresponding pan-antibodies or antibodies for house-keeping
proteins such as .beta.-III-Tubulin. For quantification, we always
use a signal in the linear range.
[0622] Mass Spectrometry.
[0623] Characterization of modifications on immunoprecipitated
histones will be carried out by mass spectrometry.
Immunoprecipitated histones will be purified by reverse-phase HPLC
in the PSR or by SDS-PAGE, then subjected to enzymatic digestion.
Resulting peptides will be analyzed by LC-MS/MS on a Waters Qtof
mass spectrometer equipped with a Dionex nanflow LC. The standard
digestion protocol using trypsin is not feasible due to the number
of Lys residues in the N-terminal portion of histones, resulting in
peptides too small to be analyzed. Since this is also the region
most rich in modifications, a digestion protocol must be used that
results in peptides of optimum size (800-2000 Da) for analysis by
LC-MS/MS. We will derivatize the Lys residues with propionic
anhydride thus limiting tryptic digestion to Arg only. We have
already successfully carried out this derivatization and digestion
procedure on a commercial preparation of recombinant histone H3.1
and have obtained tryptic peptides from the N-terminal region that
are easily analyzed by mass spectrometry. For relative quantitation
of histone modifications, we will use a stable isotope-labeling
procedure [B65] (herein incorporated by reference in its entirety)
to modify carboxylic acid groups on the tryptic peptides followed
by mass spectrometric analysis.
[0624] CBP levels will be measured with western blot using specific
CBP antibodies. The nuclear fraction will be contained in the
pellet obtained from homogenated tissue, centrifuged at
7,700.times.g for 1 min.
[0625] CBP HAT activity will be measured by immunoprecipitation
from the lysis of hippocampal extracts using CBP antibodies. After
isolation, HAT activity will be assessed using indirect
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit to detect acetyl residues
according to the manufacturer's instruction (Upstate).
[0626] HDAC activity will be measured using a fluorimetric kit from
Biovision (CA), according to the manufacturer instruction.
[0627] Statistical Analyses.
[0628] Experiments will be performed in blind. Results will be
expressed as Standard Error of the Mean (SEM). Level of
significance will be set for p<0.05. Results will be analyzed by
Student's t test (pairwise comparisons) or ANOVA for repeated
measures (multiple comparisons) with treatment condition as main
effect. Planned comparisons will be used for post-hoc analysis. For
behavior, experiments will be designed in a balanced fashion, and
mice will be trained and tested at each of the different conditions
in three or four separate experiments. Experiments will be analyzed
with ANOVA with treatment as main effect.
REFERENCES
[0629] B1. Lodish H., B. A., Zipursky L S., Matsudaira P.,
Baltimore D., Darnell J., Molecular Cell Biology. 4 ed. 2000, New
York: W. H. Freeman and Company. [0630] B2. Kandel, E. R., The
molecular biology of memory storage: a dialog between genes and
synapses. Biosci Rep, 2001. 21(5): p. 565-611. [0631] B3. Dash, P.
K., B. Hochner, and E. R. Kandel, Injection of the cAMP-responsive
element into the nucleus of Aplysia sensory neurons blocks
long-term facilitation. Nature, 1990. 345(6277): p. 718-21. [0632]
B4. Montarolo, P. G., P. Goelet, V. F. Castellucci, J. Morgan, E.
R. Kandel, and S. Schacher, A critical period for macromolecular
synthesis in long-term heterosynaptic facilitation in Aplysia.
Science, 1986. 234(4781): p. 1249-54. [0633] B5. Bailey, C. H. and
M. Chen, Morphological basis of long-term habituation and
sensitization in Aplysia. Science, 1983. 220(4592): p. 91-3. [0634]
B6. Levenson, J. M. and J. D. Sweatt, Epigenetic mechanisms in
memory formation. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2005. 6(2): p. 108-18. [0635]
B7. Peterson, C. L. and M. A. Laniel, Histones and histone
modifications. Curr Biol, 2004. 14(14): p. R546-51. [0636] B8.
Korzus, E., M. G. Rosenfeld, and M. Mayford, CBP histone
acetyltransferase activity is a critical component of memory
consolidation. Neuron, 2004. 42(6): p. 961-72. [0637] B9.
Bourtchuladze, R., B. Frenguelli, J. Blendy, D. Cioffi, G. Schutz,
and A. J. Silva, Deficient long-term memory in mice with a targeted
mutation of the cAMP-responsive element-binding protein. Cell,
1994. 79(1): p. 59-68. [0638] B10. Yin, J. C., J. S. Wallach, M.
Del Vecchio, E. L. Wilder, H. Zhou, W. G. Quinn, and T. Tully,
Induction of a dominant negative CREB transgene specifically blocks
long-term memory in Drosophila. Cell, 1994. 79(1): p. 49-58. [0639]
B11. Vitolo, O. V., A. Sant'Angelo, V. Costanzo, F. Battaglia, O.
Arancio, and M. Shelanski, Amyloid beta-peptide inhibition of the
PKA/CREB pathway and long-term potentiation: reversibility by drugs
that enhance cAMP signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2002. 99(20):
p. 13217-21. [0640] B12. Puzzo, D., O. Vitolo, F. Trinchese, J. P.
Jacob, A. Palmeri, and O. Arancio, Amyloid-beta peptide inhibits
activation of the nitric oxide/cGMP/cAMP-responsive element-binding
protein pathway during hippocampal synaptic plasticity. J Neurosci,
2005. 25(29): p. 6887-97. [0641] B13. Puzzo, D., A. Staniszewski,
S. Deng, S. Liu, A. Palmeri, D. W. Landry, and O. Arancio.
Sildenafil rescues synaptic and cognitive impairment in a mouse
model of Alzheimer's disease. in Soc Neurosci. Abstr. 2006.
Atlanta. [0642] B14. Gong, B., O. V. Vitolo, F. Trinchese, S. Liu,
M. Shelanski, and O. Arancio, Persistent improvement in synaptic
and cognitive functions in an Alzheimer mouse model following
rolipram treatment. J. Clin. Invest., 2004. 114: p. 1624-1634.
[0643] B15. Saura, C. A., S. Y. Choi, V. Beglopoulos, S. Malkani,
D. Zhang, B. S. Shankaranarayana Rao, S. Chattarji, R. J. Kelleher,
3rd, E. R. Kandel, K. Duff, A. Kirkwood, and J. Shen, Loss of
presenilin function causes impairments of memory and synaptic
plasticity followed by age-dependent neurodegeneration. Neuron,
2004. 42(1): p. 23-36. [0644] B16. Sherrington, R., E. I. Rogaev,
Y. Liang, E. A. Rogaeva, G. Levesque, M. Ikeda, H. Chi, C. Lin, G.
Li, K. Holman, and et al., Cloning of a gene bearing missense
mutations in early-onset familial Alzheimer's disease. Nature,
1995. 375(6534): p. 754-60. [0645] B17. Levy-Lahad, E., E. M.
Wijsman, E. Nemens, L. Anderson, K. A. Goddard, J. L. Weber, T. D.
Bird, and G. D. Schellenberg, A familial Alzheimer's disease locus
on chromosome 1. Science, 1995. 269(5226): p. 970-3. [0646] B18.
Francis, Y. I., A. Stephanou, and D. S. Latchman, CREB-binding
protein activation by presenilin 1 but not by its M146L mutant.
Neuroreport, 2006. 17(9): p. 917-21. [0647] B19. Fischer, A., F. et
al., Recovery of learning and memory is associated with chromatin
remodelling. Nature, 2007. 447(7141): p. 178-82. [0648] B20.
Holcomb, L., et al., Accelerated Alzheimer-type phenotype in
transgenic mice carrying both mutant amyloid precursor protein and
presenilin 1 transgenes. Nat Med, 1998. 4(1): p. 97-100. [0649]
B21. Gong, B., et al., Ubiquitin Hydrolase Uch-L1 Rescues
beta-Amyloid-Induced Decreases in Synaptic Function and Contextual
Memory. Cell, 2006. 126(4): p. 775-88. [0650] B22. Francis, I. Y.,
M. Fa', H. Ashraf, H. Zhang, A. Staniszewski, D. Latchman, and O.
Arancio, Dysregulation of histone acetylation in the APP/PS1 mouse
model of Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis, 2009. In press.
[0651] B23. Kamal, A., A. Almenar-Queralt, J. F. LeBlanc, E. A.
Roberts, and L. S. Goldstein, Kinesin-mediated axonal transport of
a membrane compartment containing beta-secretase and presenilin-1
requires APP. Nature, 2001. 414(6864): p. 643-8. [0652] B24. Cao,
X. and T. C. Sudhof, A transcriptionally [correction of
transcriptively] active complex of APP with Fe65 and histone
acetyltransferase Tip60. Science, 2001. 293(5527): p. 115-20.
[0653] B25. Alarcon, J. M., G. Malleret, K. Touzani, S. Vronskaya,
S. Ishii, E. R. Kandel, and A. Barco, Chromatin acetylation,
memory, and LTP are impaired in CBP+/- mice: a model for the
cognitive deficit in Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome and its
amelioration. Neuron, 2004. 42(6): p. 947-59. [0654] B26. Levenson,
J. M., et al., Regulation of histone acetylation during memory
formation in the hippocampus. J Biol Chem, 2004. 279(39): p.
40545-59. [0655] B27. Cullen, W. K., Y. H. Suh, R. Anwyl, and M. J.
Rowan, Block of LTP in rat hippocampus in vivo by beta-amyloid
precursor protein fragments. Neuroreport, 1997. 8(15): p. 3213-7.
[0656] B28. Itoh, A., T. Akaike, M. Sokabe, A. Nitta, R. Iida, A.
Olariu, K. Yamada, and T. Nabeshima, Impairments of long-term
potentiation in hippocampal slices of beta-amyloid-infused rats.
Eur J Pharmacol, 1999. 382(3): p. 167-75. [0657] B29. Walsh, D. M.,
I. Klyubin, J. V. Fadeeva, W. K. Cullen, R. Anwyl, M. S. Wolfe, M.
J. Rowan, and D. J. Selkoe, Naturally secreted oligomers of amyloid
beta protein potently inhibit hippocampal long-term potentiation in
vivo. Nature, 2002. 416(6880): p. 535-9. [0658] B30. Pittenger, C.
and E. R. Kandel, In search of general mechanisms for long-lasting
plasticity Aplysia and the hippocampus. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B
Biol Sci, 2003. 358(1432): p. 757-63. [0659] B31. Lander, et al.,
Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature, 2001.
409(6822): p. 860-921. [0660] B32. Kornberg, R. D. and Y. Lorch,
Twenty-five years of the nucleosome, fundamental particle of the
eukaryote chromosome. Cell, 1999. 98(3): p. 285-94. [0661] B33.
Biel, M., V. Wascholowski, and A. Giannis, Epigenetics--an
epicenter of gene regulation: histones and histone-modifying
enzymes. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 2005. 44(21): p. 3186-216. [0662]
B34. de la Cruz, X., S. Lois, S. Sanchez-Molina, and M. A.
Martinez-Balbas, Do protein motifs read the histone code?
Bioessays, 2005. 27(2): p. 164-75. [0663] B35. Strahl, B. D. and C.
D. Allis, The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature,
2000. 403(6765): p. 41-5. [0664] B36. Ng, H. H. and A. Bird,
Histone deacetylases: silencers for hire. Trends Biochem Sci, 2000.
25(3): p. 121-6. [0665] B37. Kimura, A., K. Matsubara, and M.
Horikoshi, A decade of histone acetylation: marking eukaryotic
chromosomes with specific codes. J Biochem, 2005. 138(6): p.
647-62. [0666] B38. de Ruijter, A. J., A. H. van Gennip, H. N.
Caron, S. Kemp, and A. B. van Kuilenburg, Histone deacetylases
(HDACs): characterization of the classical HDAC family. Biochem J,
2003. 370(Pt 3): p. 737-49. [0667] B39. Yang, X. J. and E. Seto,
HATs and HDACs: from structure, function and regulation to novel
strategies for therapy and prevention. Oncogene, 2007. 26(37): p.
5310-8. [0668] B40. Gregoretti, I. V., Y. M. Lee, and H. V.
Goodson, Molecular evolution of the histone deacetylase family:
functional implications of phylogenetic analysis. J Mol Biol, 2004.
338(1): p. 17-31. [0669] B41. Langley, B., et al., Remodeling
chromatin and stress resistance in the central nervous system:
histone deacetylase inhibitors as novel and broadly effective
neuroprotective agents. Curr Drug Targets CNS Neurol Disord, 2005.
4(1): p. 41-50. [0670] B42. Hockly, E., V. M. Richon, B. Woodman,
D. L. Smith, X. Zhou, E. Rosa, K. Sathasivam, S. Ghazi-Noori, A.
Mahal, P. A. Lowden, J. S. Steffan, J. L. Marsh, L. M. Thompson, C.
M. Lewis, P. A. Marks, and G. P. Bates, Suberoylanilide hydroxamic
acid, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, ameliorates motor deficits
in a mouse model of Huntington's disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,
2003. 100(4): p. 2041-6. [0671] B43. Guan, J. S., S. J. Haggarty,
E. Giacometti, J. H. Dannenberg, N. Joseph, J. Gao, T. J. Nieland,
Y. Zhou, X. Wang, R. Mazitschek, J. E. Bradner, R. A. DePinho, R.
Jaenisch, and L. H. Tsai, HDAC2 negatively regulates memory
formation and synaptic plasticity. Nature, 2009. 459(7243): p.
55-60. [0672] B44. Dineley, K. T., M. Westerman, D. Bui, K. Bell,
K. H. Ashe, and J. D. Sweatt, Beta-amyloid activates the
mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade via hippocampal alpha7
nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: In vitro and in vivo mechanisms
related to Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci, 2001. 21(12): p.
4125-33. [0673] B45. Dineley, K. T., X. Xia, D. Bui, J. D. Sweatt,
and H. Zheng, Accelerated plaque accumulation, associative learning
deficits, and up-regulation of alpha 7 nicotinic receptor protein
in transgenic mice co-expressing mutant human presenilin 1 and
amyloid precursor proteins. J Biol Chem, 2002. 277(25): p.
22768-80. [0674] B46. Gong, B., O. V. Vitolo, F. Trinchese, S. Liu,
M. Shelanski, and O. Arancio, Persistent improvement in synaptic
and cognitive functions in an Alzheimer mouse model after rolipram
treatment. J Clin Invest, 2004. 114(11): p. 1624-34. [0675] B47.
Francis, Y. I., J. K. Diss, M. Kariti, A. Stephanou, and D. S.
Latchman, p300 activation by Presenilin 1 but not by its M146L
mutant. Neurosci Lett, 2007. 413(2): p. 137-40. [0676] B48. Rouaux,
C., N. Jokic, C. Mbebi, S. Boutillier, J. P. Loeffler, and A. L.
Boutillier, Critical loss of CBP/p300 histone acetylase activity by
caspase-6 during neurodegeneration. Embo J, 2003. 22(24): p.
6537-49. [0677] B49. Green, K. N., et al., Nicotinamide restores
cognition in Alzheimer's disease transgenic mice via a mechanism
involving sirtuin inhibition and selective reduction of
Thr231-phosphotau. J Neurosci, 2008. 28(45): p. 11500-10. [0678]
B50. Trinchese, F., et al., Progressive age-related development of
Alzheimer-like pathology in APP/PS1 mice. Ann Neurol, 2004. 55(6):
p. 801-14. [0679] B51. Sperling, R. A., et al., fMRI studies of
associative encoding in young and elderly controls and mild
Alzheimer's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2003. 74(1): p.
44-50. [0680] B52. Phillips, R. G. and J. E. LeDoux, Differential
contribution of amygdala and hippocampus to cued and contextual
fear conditioning. Behav Neurosci, 1992. 106(2): p. 274-85. [0681]
B53. Vecsey, C. G., et al., Histone deacetylase inhibitors enhance
memory and synaptic plasticity via CREB:CBP-dependent
transcriptional activation. J Neurosci, 2007. 27(23): p. 6128-40.
[0682] B54. Malm, T., et al., beta-Amyloid infusion results in
delayed and age-dependent learning deficits without role of
inflammation or beta-amyloid deposits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,
2006. 103(23): p. 8852-7. [0683] B55. Cleary, J. P., et al.,
Natural oligomers of the amyloid-beta protein specifically disrupt
cognitive function. Nat Neurosci, 2005. 8(1): p. 79-84. [0684] B56.
Bordoli, L., et al., Plant orthologs of p300/CBP: conservation of a
core domain in metazoan p300/CBP acetyltransferase-related
proteins. Nucleic Acids Res, 2001. 29(3): p. 589-97. [0685] B57.
Masliah, E., Mechanisms of synaptic dysfunction in Alzheimer's
disease. Histol Histopathol, 1995. 10(2): p. 509-19. [0686] B58.
Alamed, J., D. M. Wilcock, D. M. Diamond, M. N. Gordon, and D.
Morgan, Two-day radial-arm water maze learning and memory task;
robust resolution of amyloid-related memory deficits in transgenic
mice. Nat Protoc, 2006. 1(4): p. 1671-9. [0687] B59. Eyupoglu, I.
Y., et al., Experimental therapy of malignant gliomas using the
inhibitor of histone deacetylase MS-275. Mol Cancer Ther, 2006.
5(5): p. 1248-55. [0688] B60. Kim, D., et al., SIRT1 deacetylase
protects against neurodegeneration in models for Alzheimer's
disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. EMBO J, 2007. 26(13): p.
3169-79. [0689] B61. Mantelingu, K., et al., Activation of p300
histone acetyltransferase by small molecules altering enzyme
structure: probed by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. J Phys
Chem B, 2007. 111(17): p. 4527-34. [0690] B62. Paxinos, G., Mouse
brain in stereotaxic coordinates. 2nd ed. 1998, New York: Academic
Press. [0691] B63. Stine, W. B., et al., In vitro characterization
of conditions for amyloid-beta peptide oligomerization and
fibrillogenesis. J Biol Chem, 2003. 278(13): p. 11612-22. [0692]
B64. Puzzo, D., et al., Picomolar Amyloid-{beta} Positively
Modulates Synaptic Plasticity and Memory in Hippocampus. J.
Neurosci., 2008. 28(53): p. 14537-14545. [0693] B65. Garcia, B. A.,
et al., Chemical derivatization of histones for facilitated
analysis by mass spectrometry. Nat Protoc, 2007. 2(4): p.
933-8.
Example 7: Cell Viability Assays for ACHN, U251, NCI-ADR-RES, A549,
Hs578T, CCRF-CEM
[0694] Assay Parameters [0695] Read-out: Cell Proliferation by
Cell-TiterGlo, and Cyquant, [0696] Number of Compounds: 1 (YF2)
[0697] Concentrations: 10 (0.03, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, 15, 40
and 80 .mu.M) [0698] Reference Compound: Vinblastine (VBL) [0699]
Concentrations: 10 [0700] (0.001, 0.003, 0.01, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1,
3, and 10 .mu.M) [0701] Time of Drug Treatment: 72 hours [0702]
Replicates: 3 [0703] Solvent: Aqueous medium
Materials and Methods
[0704] Cells and Culture Medium:
[0705] All cell lines were purchased from the ATCC and were
expanded and archived under liquid nitrogen at CDAS as low passage
aliquots. Cells were maintained and passaged in recommended and
optimal culture medium (ACHN: EMEM, 2 mM L-Gln, 10% FBS; A549:
Ham's F12, 10% FBS; U251: RPMI 1640.2 mM L-Gln, 10% FBS; Hs578T:
DMEM, 4 mM L-Gln, 1 U/mL of Bovine Insulin, 10% FBS; CCRF-CEM: ATCC
RPMI, 2 mM L-Gln, 10% FBS; NCI-ADR-RES: RPMI 1640, 2 mM L-Gln, 10%
FBS). All experiments were carried out with cells which had
undergone less than 20 passages. Optimal seed densities were
determined for all cell lines. All cells were plated at 1500 cells
per well except CCRF-CEM which was plated at 6000 cells per
well.
[0706] Drugs:
[0707] YF2 was supplied as a 80 mM stock solution in 100% DMSO.
Vinblastine was purchased from Sigma (Catalogue Number V-1377) and
resuspended at 1.times.10.sup.-2M in 100% DMSO. All dilutions for
both drugs were carried out in culture medium containing 0.2% DMSO
such that the final solvent concentration never exceeded 0.1%.
[0708] Drug Treatment:
[0709] YF2 tested at 10 concentrations (0.03, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1,
2.5, 5, 15, 40 and 80 .mu.M) in triplicate wells. Vinblastine was
used as a reference control and tested at 10 concentrations in a
half-log series (0, 0.001, 0.003, 0.01, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, and
10 .mu.M). Cells were resuspended in medium at the appropriate
concentration and 180 .mu.l (1500 or 6000 cells) was added to each
well following which 20 .mu.l of drug at 10.times. of the final
concentration was added to attain the desired drug concentration in
every well. The drug treatment plates were incubated at 37.degree.
C. for 72 hours, following which cell viability was assayed by the
Cell Titer Glo or Cyquant method as described below.
[0710] Cell Titer Glo Assay:
[0711] Following the 72 hour drug treatment period, the assay
plates were centrifuged, and 100 .mu.L of the medium was aspirated
and replaced with 100 J.1L of Cell Titer Glo reagent (Promega)
according to the manufacturer's recommended protocol. The reagent
was mixed with the cells and the luminescence measured using a
Perkin Elmer Envision instrument. The average luminescence signal
obtained from wells containing untreated cells which had been
incubated for the entire length of the assay period was used to set
the 100% viability value. The percent proliferation was calculated
as (Test signal)/(Avg. plate background signal).times.100. The %
viability was graphed against drug concentration to calculate an
IC.sub.50 for each drug.
[0712] Cyquant Assay:
[0713] Following the 72 hour drug treatment period the assay plates
were centrifuged, the medium discarded, and frozen overnight. The
plates were assayed using the Cyquant.TM. reagent (Invitrogen)
according to the manufacturer's recommended protocol. The average
fluorescence signal obtained from wells containing untreated cells
which had been incubated for the entire length of the assay period
was used to set the 100% proliferation value. The percent
proliferation was calculated as (Test signal)/(Avg. plate
background signal).times.100. The % proliferation was graphed
against drug concentration to calculate an IC.sub.50 for each
drug.
Example 8: YF2 Increases Histone Acetylation by HAT Activation, not
HDAC Inhibition
[0714] HDAC inhibition causes an increase in histone acetylation.
The inventors examined whether histone acetylation occurred via
HDAC inhibition.
[0715] The summary of the results is depicted in Table 1. The mean
IC.sub.50 values of the compounds are summarized in Table 1.
TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 1 Inhibitory Effects of the Compounds on HDAC
Activities IC.sub.50 (nM) or % Inhibition HDACs YF2 SAHA HDAC1
>200 .mu.M 31 HDAC3/NCOR2 >200 .mu.M 38 HDAC5FL >200 .mu.M
>10 .mu.M HDAC6 >200 .mu.M 30 HADC7 >200 .mu.M >10
.mu.M HDAC8 >200 .mu.M 2,236 HDAC10 >200 .mu.M 65 HDAC11
>200 .mu.M >10 .mu.M Sirtuin 1 >200 .mu.M >10 .mu.M
Sirtuin 2 >200 .mu.M >10 .mu.M
[0716] The experiments were done blind, where the YF2 compound of
the invention corresponds to OA2. The studies show that YF2 has no
HDAC inhibition properties. YF2 does not inhibit HDACs.
Materials and Methods
[0717] Materials: [0718] HDAC Assay Buffer (BPS catalog number
50031) [0719] HDAC Assay Developer (BPS catalog number 50030)
[0720] HDAC Substrate 1 (BPS number 50032) [0721] HDAC Substrate 3
(BPS number 50037) [0722] HDAC Class 2a Substrate 1 (BPS number
50040) [0723] SAHA (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, Mich., Catalog
number 10009929)
TABLE-US-00008 [0723] TABLE 2 Compounds used in the studies Com-
Com- Dis- Test pound pound Stock solving Range Intermediate I.D.
Supplied Conc. Solvent (nM) Dilution OA2* Solution 10 mM DMSO
3-200,000 10% DMSO in HDAC Assay Buffer SAHA Powder 10 mM DMSO
0.3-10,000 10% DMSO in HDAC Assay Buffer *Compound OA2 is cloudy at
2 mM in 10% DMSO (The highest test point). **SAHA, and HDACi, is a
positive control for HDACs.
Experimental Conditions
TABLE-US-00009 [0724] TABLE 3 Enzymes and Substrates Enzyme Used
Assay Catalog # (ng)/Reaction Substrate HDAC1 50051 1.5 10 .mu.M of
50037 HADC3/NCOR2 50003 1.33 10 .mu.M of 50037 HDAC5FL 50045 1.25 2
.mu.M of 50040 HDAC6 50006 10 10 .mu.M of 50037 HDAC7 50007 0.3 2
.mu.M of 50040 HDAC8 50008 20 2 .mu.M of 50040 HDAC10 50010 1,300
10 .mu.M of 50037 HADC11 50011 400 2 .mu.M of 50040 Sirtuin 1 50012
400 10 .mu.M of 50032 Sirtuin 2 50013 5,600 10 .mu.M of 50032
[0725] Assay Conditions.
[0726] A series of dilution of the test compounds were prepared
with 10% DMSO in assay buffer and 5 .mu.l of the dilution was added
to a 50 .mu.l reaction so that the final concentration of DMSO is
1% in all of reactions. All of the enzymatic reactions were
conducted in duplicate at 37.degree. C. for 30 minutes except of
HDAC11 at room temperature for 3 hours. The 50 .mu.l reaction
mixture contains HDAC assay buffer, 5 .mu.g BSA, an HDAC substrate,
an HDAC enzyme and a test compound. After enzymatic reactions, 50
.mu.l of HDAC Developer was added to each well and the plate was
incubated at room temperature for an additional 20 minutes.
Fluorescence intensity was measured at an excitation of 360 nm and
an emission of 460 nm using a Tecan Infinite M1000 microplate
reader.
[0727] Data Analysis.
[0728] HDAC activity assays were performed in duplicates at each
concentration. The fluorescent intensity data were analyzed using
the computer software, Graphpad Prism. In the absence of the
compound, the fluorescent intensity (F.sub.t) in each data set was
defined as 100% activity. In the absence of HDAC, the fluorescent
intensity (F.sub.b) in each data set was defined as 0% activity.
Compound OA2 has fluorescence at assay condition; therefore the
fluorescent intensity at different concentration of OA2 was defined
as background (F.sub.b). The percent activity in the presence of
each compound was calculated according to the following equation: %
activity=(F-F.sub.b)/(F.sub.t-F.sub.b), where F=the fluorescent
intensity in the presence of the compound.
[0729] The values of % activity versus a series of compound
concentrations were then plotted using non-linear regression
analysis of Sigmoidal dose-response curve generated with the
equation Y=B+(T-B)/1+10.sup.((LogEC50-X).times.Hill Slope), where
Y=percent activity, B=minimum percent activity, T=maximum percent
activity, X=logarithm of compound and Hill Slope=slope factor or
Hill coefficient. The IC.sub.50 value was determined by the
concentration causing a half-maximal percent activity.
Results of Effect of OA2 (YF2 Compound) on HDAC Inhibition
TABLE-US-00010 [0730] TABLE 4 HDAC1 Assay - Data for the Effect of
OA2 on HDAC1 Activity HDAC Activity Background (Fluorescence
(Fluorescence OA2 count) count) % Activity (Log [nM]) Repeat1
Repeat2 Repeat1 Repeat2 Repeat1 Repeat2 No CPD 17721 17257 796 803
101.39 98.61 0.5 17287 17200 796 798 98.80 98.28 1.0 17083 17178
788 786 97.64 98.21 1.5 16949 17020 830 784 96.72 97.14 2.0 16879
16826 796 779 96.42 96.10 2.5 16792 17072 827 775 95.81 97.49 3.0
16943 16784 829 802 96.63 95.68 3.5 16387 17135 866 827 93.12 97.60
4.0 16140 16336 920 868 91.35 92.53 4.5 16432 16128 1117 1035 92.01
90.19 5.3 24780 24451 14884 13403 63.73 61.76
[0731] FIG. 52 corresponds to the results shown in Table 4.
TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 5 HDAC3/NCOR2 Assay - Data for the Effect of
OA2 on HDAC3/NCOR2 Activity HDAC Activity Background (Fluorescence
(Fluorescence OA2 count) count) % Activity (Log [nM]) Repeat1
Repeat2 Repeat1 Repeat2 Repeat1 Repeat2 No CPD 10787 10452 805 828
101.71 98.29 0.5 10928 9694 813 976 102.35 89.76 1.0 10423 10379
812 818 98.01 97.56 1.5 10752 10231 813 803 101.44 96.12 2.0 10827
10078 809 798 102.25 94.61 2.5 10718 10173 818 803 101.07 95.51 3.0
10587 10073 831 811 99.62 94.38 3.5 10362 10080 854 824 97.14 94.27
4.0 11530 10216 927 898 108.31 94.90 4.5 9872 10001 1467 1091 87.66
88.97 5.3 20905 22163 13408 10875 89.40 102.23
[0732] FIG. 53 corresponds to the results shown in Table 5.
TABLE-US-00012 TABLE 6 HDAC5FL Assay - Data for the Effect of OA2
on HDAC5FL Activity HDAC Activity Background (Fluorescence
(Fluorescence OA2 count) count) % Activity (Log [nM]) Repeat1
Repeat2 Repeat1 Repeat2 Repeat1 Repeat2 No CPD 4492 4892 345 348
95.40 104.60 0.5 4686 4386 355 343 99.80 92.90 1.0 4802 4581 341
347 102.59 97.50 1.5 4835 4874 359 342 103.20 104.10 2.0 5071 4991
344 356 108.64 106.80 2.5 5068 5006 344 354 108.60 107.17 3.0 4944
4685 342 354 105.76 99.80 3.5 4773 4686 353 389 101.30 99.30 4.0
4987 4983 449 407 104.91 104.82 4.5 4570 4514 451 398 95.40 94.11
5.3 9875 10983 7907 5878 68.63 94.13
[0733] FIG. 54 corresponds to the results shown in Table 6.
TABLE-US-00013 TABLE 7 HDAC7 Assay - Data for the Effect of OA2 on
HDAC7 Activity HDAC Activity Background (Fluorescence (Fluorescence
OA2 count) count) % Activity (Log [nM]) Repeat1 Repeat2 Repeat1
Repeat2 Repeat1 Repeat2 No CPD 7528 7176 382 377 102.52 97.48 0.5
7578 7200 394 383 103.11 97.69 1.0 6756 6763 385 386 91.37 91.47
1.5 7471 7705 389 381 101.63 104.98 2.0 7679 7196 390 380 104.61
97.68 2.5 7071 7068 385 398 95.80 95.75 3.0 7083 7269 384 392 96.02
98.69 3.5 7453 6898 397 462 100.73 92.77 4.0 6801 7568 416 534
90.73 101.73 4.5 7238 7518 554 565 95.78 99.80 5.3 9692 9912 3002
2871 96.89 100.04
[0734] FIG. 55 corresponds to the results shown in Table 7.
TABLE-US-00014 TABLE 8 HDAC8 Assay - Data for the Effect of OA2 on
HDAC8 Activity HDAC Activity Background (Fluorescence (Fluorescence
OA2 count) count) % Activity (Log [nM]) Repeat1 Repeat2 Repeat1
Repeat2 Repeat1 Repeat2 No CPD 3492 3483 346 346 100.14 99.86 0.5
3541 3581 339 342 101.88 103.15 1.0 3519 3391 349 342 101.02 96.94
1.5 3539 3456 336 331 102.04 99.40 2.0 3757 3425 338 340 108.80
98.23 2.5 3451 3428 335 341 99.09 98.36 3.0 3398 2995 337 347 97.28
84.45 3.5 3808 3407 346 366 109.88 97.12 4.0 3361 3365 433 374
94.14 94.27 4.5 3045 3090 375 364 85.17 86.60 5.3 6631 8117 4962
4635 58.33 105.63
[0735] FIG. 56 corresponds to the results shown in Table 8.
TABLE-US-00015 TABLE 9 HDAC10 Assay - Data for the Effect of OA2 on
HDAC10 Activity HDAC Activity Background (Fluorescence
(Fluorescence OA2 count) count) % Activity (Log [nM]) Repeat1
Repeat2 Repeat1 Repeat2 Repeat1 Repeat2 No CPD 11695 12141 497 507
98.05 101.95 0.5 10894 12032 492 501 91.08 101.05 1.0 12341 12402
497 492 103.77 104.31 1.5 12564 12368 525 500 105.57 103.85 2.0
12262 12573 500 497 103.04 105.77 2.5 12472 12556 500 493 104.90
105.64 3.0 11935 12471 530 521 99.94 104.64 3.5 11622 12684 501 607
96.95 106.25 4.0 11588 12318 597 547 96.50 102.89 4.5 11448 12305
623 495 95.38 102.89 5.3 25769 22285 12210 12714 116.56 86.05
[0736] FIG. 57 corresponds to the results shown in Table 9.
TABLE-US-00016 TABLE 10 HDAC11 Assay - Data for the Effect of OA2
on HDAC11 Activity HDAC Activity Background (Fluorescence
(Fluorescence OA2 count) count) % Activity (Log [nM]) Repeat1
Repeat2 Repeat1 Repeat2 Repeat1 Repeat2 No CPD 2840 2860 426 406
99.59 100.41 0.5 2761 2530 411 423 96.30 86.81 1.0 2828 2898 425
415 98.93 101.81 1.5 2765 2851 411 406 96.82 100.35 2.0 2812 2864
408 409 98.75 100.88 2.5 2672 2655 412 408 92.93 92.24 3.0 2829
2806 417 424 98.95 98.01 3.5 2719 2712 427 463 93.43 93.14 4.0 2835
2860 467 524 96.12 97.14 4.5 3289 3064 699 617 108.09 98.85 5.3
6249 5842 2911 3158 132.07 115.35
[0737] FIG. 58 corresponds to the results shown in Table 10.
TABLE-US-00017 TABLE 11 Sirtuin 1 Assay - Data for the Effect of
OA2 on Sirtuin 1 Activity HDAC Activity Background (Fluorescence
(Fluorescence OA2 count) count) % Activity (Log [nM]) Repeat1
Repeat2 Repeat1 Repeat2 Repeat1 Repeat2 No CPD 5823 5974 412 410
97.91 100.64 0.5 5627 5940 414 420 94.26 99.92 1.0 5240 5913 422
413 87.25 99.42 1.5 5980 5273 418 457 100.27 87.48 2.0 5827 5527
411 411 97.98 92.56 2.5 6028 5987 413 416 101.56 100.81 3.0 6454
5681 422 452 108.86 94.87 3.5 5782 5964 422 426 96.93 100.23 4.0
5786 5408 442 441 96.69 89.85 4.5 5976 5697 502 524 98.83 93.79 5.3
7483 7591 2022 1997 99.02 100.98
[0738] FIG. 59 corresponds to the results shown in Table 11.
TABLE-US-00018 TABLE 12 Sirtuin 2 Assay - Data for the Effect of
OA2 on Sirtuin 2 Activity HDAC Activity Background (Fluorescence
(Fluorescence OA2 count) count) % Activity (Log [nM]) Repeat1
Repeat2 Repeat1 Repeat2 Repeat1 Repeat2 No CPD 3910 3919 413 419
99.87 100.13 0.5 3835 3981 420 413 97.71 101.89 1.0 3780 3821 406
422 96.21 97.38 1.5 3858 3954 408 410 98.59 101.33 2.0 3712 3912
420 413 94.20 99.91 2.5 3729 3788 409 420 94.74 96.43 3.0 3714 3861
405 409 94.53 98.73 3.5 3806 3856 422 417 96.80 98.23 4.0 3844 3883
425 426 97.71 98.83 4.5 3717 3811 485 480 92.45 95.14 5.3 5686 5717
2225 2245 98.64 99.53
[0739] FIG. 60 corresponds to the results shown in Table 12.
TABLE-US-00019 TABLE 13 HDAC6 Assay - Data for the Effect of OA2 on
HDAC6 Activity HDAC Activity Background (Fluorescence (Fluorescence
OA2 count) count) % Activity (Log [nM]) Repeat1 Repeat2 Repeat1
Repeat2 Repeat1 Repeat2 No CPD 5844 5616 773 733 102.29 97.71 0.5
5998 6074 832 737 104.75 106.28 1.0 6006 5728 747 704 106.10 100.51
1.5 5541 6126 746 706 96.75 108.50 2.0 5733 5981 748 731 100.33
105.31 2.5 5678 5677 763 709 99.30 99.28 3.0 5717 5446 758 716
100.06 94.62 3.5 5575 5616 781 735 96.79 97.61 4.0 5516 5789 828
786 94.62 100.10 4.5 4994 5418 1081 1030 79.13 87.65 5.3 8327 9938
4925 4721 70.40 102.77
[0740] FIG. 74 corresponds to the results shown in Table 13.
Results of Effect of SAHA on HDAC Inhibition
[0741] SAHA is an HDAC inhibitor (HDACi). It serves as a positive
control for HDACs. FIGS. 61-63 show the inhibitory effect of SAHA
on the HDACs HDAC1, HDAC3/NCOR2, and HDAC6. SAHA also inhibited
HDAC5FL, HDAC7, HDAC8, HDAC10, Sirtuin 1, and Sirtuin 2 (see Table
1).
Example 9: Design of Selective HAT Activators
[0742] Early amnesic changes in Alzheimer's disease (AD) are
thought to be linked to synaptic dysfunction. In this regard,
.beta.-amyloid (A.beta.), a peptide that is produced in elevated
amounts in the disease, has been found to inhibit memory.sup.[1,2]
(each herein incorporated by reference in its entirety) and its
electrophysiological model, long-term potentiation (LTP).sup.[3-8]
(each herein incorporated by reference in its entirety). Since
memory is modulated by epigenetics through regulation of gene
expression, deregulation of one of the epigenetic mechanisms such
as histone (H) acetylation, might lead to memory disruption.
Reduction of histone acetylation causes the chromatin structure to
close, so that the information contained within the DNA might be
less amenable to transcription factors and memory formation.sup.[9]
(herein incorporated by reference in its entirety).
[0743] The main strategy that is currently used to up-regulate
histone acetylation involves HDAC inhibitors. However, the
pleiotropic effect of nonspecific HDAC inhibition may hamper their
therapeutic potential.sup.[10-13] (each herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety). We have demonstrated that hippocampal
levels of two HATs, CBP and PCAF, are reduced following A.beta.
elevation. We have therefore focused towards another target which
also up-regulates histone acetylation, the HATs. To this end we
have synthesized a HAT activator, YF2. We propose a course of
investigation involving the design of selective HAT activators that
target specifically CBP and PCAF downstream of A.beta.. The aims of
our proposal are: [0744] 1) To design and synthesize new HAT
activators which are optimized for AD; [0745] 2) To identify
compounds with high affinity and good selectivity for selective HAT
activators that target specifically CBP and PCAF; [0746] 3) To
determine if new HAT activators have good pharmacokinetic (PK)
profile and are safe; [0747] 4) To select HAT activators that
rescue synaptic dysfunction in APP/PS1 mice; [0748] 5) Further
screen HAT activators to determine if they are beneficial against
cognitive abnormalities in APP/PS1 mice.
[0749] Background and Significance:
[0750] The post-translational acetylation status of chromatin is
governed by the competing activities of two classes of enzymes,
HATs and HDACs. HDAC inhibitors have been shown to enhance LTP and
contextual fear memory, a form of associative memory in which
animals must associate a neutral stimulus with an aversive
one.sup.[P17] (herein incorporated by reference in its entirety).
Also, memory and LTP deficits of CBP.sup.+/- mice were reversed by
HDAC inhibition.sup.[P15] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety). The potential of inhibiting HDACs to counteract
neurodegenerative disorders has been widely explored.sup.[14]
(herein incorporated by reference in its entirety). For instance,
in a set of experiments, Tsai et al. have reported that HDAC
inhibitors induced sprouting of dendrites, increased number of
synapses, and reinstated learning and access to long-term memories
in the CK-p25 Tg mouse model of neurodegeneration.sup.[15,16] (each
herein incorporated by reference in its entirety). Moreover, in
recent studies we have shown that the HDAC inhibitor TSA
ameliorates LTP and contextual fear conditioning (FC) in the double
Tg APP(K670M:N671L)/PS1(M146L, line 6.2) (APP/PS1) mouse model of
amyloid deposition.sup.[17] (herein incorporated by reference in
its entirety). Bolden et al., (2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery,
5:769-84; herein incorporated by reference in its entirety)
describe the histone deacetylases family, the reference which is
incorporated by reference in its entirety. HATs, however, have been
investigated to a lesser extent.
[0751] HATs can be divided in two main groups, the nuclear HATs and
cytoplasmic HATs.sup.[18] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety). Nuclear A-type HATs can be grouped into at least 4
different families based on sequence conservation within the HAT
domain: Gcn5 and p300/CBP associated factor (PCAF), MYST (MOZ,
Ybf2/Sas3, Sas2 and Tip60), p300 and CBP (named for the two human
paralogs p300 and CBP) and Rtt109. While the Gcn5/PCAF and MYST
families have homologs from yeast to man, p300/CBP is
metazoan-specific, and Rtt109 is fungal-specific. Cytoplasmic
B-type HATs, such as HAT1, are involved in histone
deposition.sup.[P22] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety). Marmorstein and Roth (2001, Curr Opin in Genet and
Develop., 11:155-161; herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety) list in Table 1 the HAT families and their
transcriptional-related functions, the reference which is
incorporated by reference in its entirety.
[0752] Although other nuclear HAT families have been described,
such as the steroid receptor coactivators, TAF250, ATF-2, and
CLOCK, their HAT activities have not been investigated as
extensively as the major HAT classes.sup.[18] (herein incorporated
by reference in its entirety). These 4 families show high sequence
similarity within families but poor to no sequence similarity
between families. Furthermore, the size of the HAT domain of the
different families is different.sup.[P22] (herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety). Interestingly, HATs are highly
conserved in mammals.sup.[P22] (herein incorporated by reference in
its entirety). Of all these HATs, three were shown to be involved
in memory: CBP, p300.sup.[19,20] (each herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety), and PCAF.sup.[21] (herein incorporated
by reference in its entirety). Interestingly, both CBP and PCAF
levels are reduced by A.beta. elevation.
[0753] HAT activators are a viable approach to enhance histone
acetylation. Two scaffolds for HAT activators have been identified.
The first one includes CTPB and its derivative CTB.sup.[22, 23]
(each herein incorporated by reference in its entirety). The second
one includes only one compound, nemorosone.sup.[24] (herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety). CTPB/CTB were found to
be insoluble and membrane-impermeable.sup.[22,23] (each herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety). Moreover, CTPB has
unfavorable characteristics to be used in CNS diseases (MW equal to
553,29, clogP equal to 12.70) and the clogP of CTB is 5.13.
Nemorosone has a 1\4W of 502 and a clogP of 8.42. In summary, ample
evidence exists supporting a promising therapeutic role for HAT
activators in the treatment of CNS disorders including AD. We will
exploit this possibility by developing new chemical entities
targeting specifically CBP and PCAF.
Research Design and Methods:
[0754] 1) To Design and Synthesize New HAT Activators which are
Optimized for AD.
[0755] We have designed a new compound based on SAR studies of the
CTPB/CTB scaffold, named YF2. YF2 (MW 430.13, clogP 5.15, clogBB
0.17) has increased solubility, membrane permeability and
blood-brain barrier permeability, is safe in acute toxicity tests.
YF2 rescued the reduction in hippocampal levels of H3 acetylation
following A.beta. elevation, enhanced enzymatic activity of PCAF,
CBP and Gcn5 as well as p300, had excellent selectivity for PCAF,
CBP and Gcn5 over HDACs, and was capable of rescuing deficits in
fear and reference memory induced by A.beta. exposure. We are
refining its druggability using a medicinal chemistry (med-chem)
approach, focusing on the synthesis of drug-like lead compounds
with good PK and ADMET profile. We will design and synthesize HAT
activators bearing different moieties at different positions of one
of the two aromatic rings of YF2. In particular, we will substitute
a dimethylamino group which is likely to be alkylated by microsomes
and protect an aromatic ring from oxidative reactions.
Additionally, we will explore the HAT binding site i) by evaluating
the importance of the amide group between the two aromatic rings,
ii) by constraining the molecular structure, iii) by modifying the
distance between two aromatic rings that currently form YF2, iv) by
replacing one of the two aromatic rings with an heterocyclic ring,
and v) by increasing the hindrance of the substituents of one of
the two aromatic rings. We will find HAT activators with a) HAT
specificity and potency, b) great CNS penetration, and c)
safety.
[0756] 2) To Identify Compounds with High Affinity and Good
Selectivity for Selective HAT Activators that Target Specifically
CBP and PCAF.
[0757] Following assessment of HAT activator potency (EC.sub.50),
we will check selectivity with respect to CBP and PCAF. For HAT
activators found to show good potency (<100 nM), selectivity (at
least 50-fold vs p300, Gcn5, MYST families and HDACs) and
solubility, we will use a functional assay to determine if they
increase hippocampal H3 and H4 acetylation in adult mice.
[0758] 3) To Determine Whether New HAT Activators have Good
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Profile and are Safe.
[0759] Selected HAT activators will be screened against unfavorable
PK properties including bioavailability, brain uptake, and BBB
penetration. Compounds passing these tests will be evaluated for
rudimentary ADMET characteristics including tests of acute and
chronic toxicity.
[0760] 4) To Select HAT Activators that Rescue LTP in APP/PS1
Mice.
[0761] We will determine if selected HAT activators ameliorate LTP
defect in APP/PS1 slices using electrophysiological
techniques.sup.[25] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety).
[0762] 5) Further Screen HAT Activators to Examine if they
Ameliorate Cognitive Abnormalities in APP/PS1 Mice.
[0763] We will determine if HAT activators screened in slices can
protect APP/PS1 mice against impairments of contextual and
reference memory using behavioral assays.sup.[25] (herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety). Next, we will
characterize our compounds for their more global selectivity
against targets other than HATs. We will also screen them with a
battery of assays focusing on two areas that have resulted in the
withdrawal of many drugs from the market: drug-drug interactions
(liver metabolism), hERG channel blockage (cardiac
dysfunction).
YF2, Alzheimer's Disease, and Drug Discovery Research:
[0764] Currently used AD therapies have limited efficacy. Major
efforts are underway to inhibit tangle formation, to combat
inflammation and oxidative damage, and to decrease A.beta. load in
the brain.sup.[26-28] (each herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety). However, the role of APP, A.beta., and the secretases in
normal physiological function.sup.[29-31] (each herein incorporated
by reference in its entirety) might present a problem in providing
effective and safe approaches to AD therapy. Developing agents that
interact with A.beta. targets that lead to neuronal dysfunction is
another approach that is currently tested by many laboratories.
Without being bound by theory, HAT activators represent a new class
of compounds that might effectively counteract the disease
progression.
REFERENCES
[0765] 1. Malm, T., et al., beta-Amyloid infusion results in
delayed and age-dependent learning deficits without role of
inflammation or beta-amyloid deposits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,
2006. 103(23): p. 8852-7. [0766] 2. Cleary, J. P., et al., Natural
oligomers of the amyloid-beta protein specifically disrupt
cognitive function. Nat Neurosci, 2005. 8(1): p. 79-84. [0767] 3.
Cullen, W. K., et al., Block of LTP in rat hippocampus in vivo by
beta-amyloid precursor protein fragments. Neuroreport, 1997. 8(15):
p. 3213-7. [0768] 4. Itoh, A., et al., Impairments of long-term
potentiation in hippocampal slices of beta-amyloid-infused rats.
Eur J Pharmacol, 1999. 382(3): p. 167-75. [0769] 5. Vitolo, O. V.,
et al., Amyloid beta-peptide inhibition of the PKA/CREB pathway and
long-term potentiation: reversibility by drugs that enhance cAMP
signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2002. 99(20): p. 13217-21.
[0770] 6. Walsh, D. M., et al., Naturally secreted oligomers of
amyloid beta protein potently inhibit hippocampal long-term
potentiation in vivo. Nature, 2002. 416(6880): p. 535-9. [0771] 7.
Chen, Q. S., et al., Impairment of hippocampal long-term
potentiation by Alzheimer amyloid beta-peptides. J Neurosci Res,
2000. 60(1): p. 65-72. [0772] 8. Lambert, M. P., et al.,
Diffusible, nonfibrillar ligands derived from Abeta1-42 are potent
central nervous system neurotoxins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1998.
95(11): p. 6448-53. [0773] 9. Rakyan, V. K., et al., The marks,
mechanisms and memory of epigenetic states in mammals. Biochem J,
2001. 356(Pt 1): p. 1-10. [0774] 10. Gwack, Y., et al.,
CREB-binding protein and histone deacetylase regulate the
transcriptional activity of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus
open reading frame 50. J Virol, 2001. 75(4): p. 1909-17. [0775] 11.
Lu, F., et al., Chromatin remodeling of the Kaposi's
sarcoma-associated herpesvirus ORF50 promoter correlates with
reactivation from latency. J Virol, 2003. 77(21): p. 11425-35.
[0776] 12. Knutson, S. K., In vivo characterization of the role of
histone deacetylase 3 in metabolic and transcriptional regulation,
in Biochemistry. 2008, Vanderbilt: Nashville. p. 167. [0777] 13.
Rajan, I., et al., Loss of the putative catalytic domain of HDAC4
leads to reduced thermal nociception and seizures while allowing
normal bone development. PLoS One, 2009. 4(8): p. e6612. [0778] 14.
Langley, B., et al., Remodeling chromatin and stress resistance in
the central nervous system: histone deacetylase inhibitors as novel
and broadly effective neuroprotective agents. Curr Drug Targets CNS
Neurol Disord, 2005. 4(1): p. 41-50. [0779] 15. Fischer, A., et
al., Recovery of learning and memory is associated with chromatin
remodelling. Nature, 2007. 447(7141): p. 178-82. [0780] 16. Kim,
D., et al., SIRT1 deacetylase protects against neurodegeneration in
models for Alzheimer's disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
EMBO J, 2007. 26(13): p. 3169-79. [0781] 17. Francis, Y. I., et
al., Dysregulation of histone acetylation in the APP/PS1 mouse
model of Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis, 2009. 18(1): p.
131-9. [0782] 18. Marmorstein, R. and R. C. Trievel, Histone
modifying enzymes: structures, mechanisms, and specificities.
Biochim Biophys Acta, 2009. 1789(1): p. 58-68. [0783] 19.
Roelfsema, J. H. and D. J. Peters, Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome:
clinical and molecular overview. Expert Rev Mol Med, 2007. 9(23):
p. 1-16. [0784] 20. Alarcon, J. M., et al., Chromatin acetylation,
memory, and LTP are impaired in CBP+/-mice: a model for the
cognitive deficit in Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome and its
amelioration. Neuron, 2004. 42(6): p. 947-59. [0785] 21. Maurice,
T., et al., Altered memory capacities and response to stress in
p300/CBP-associated factor (PCAF) histone acetylase knockout mice.
Neuropsychopharmacology, 2008. 33(7): p. 1584-602. [0786] 22.
Mantelingu, K., et al., Activation of p300 histone
acetyltransferase by small molecules altering enzyme structure:
probed by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. J Phys Chem B, 2007.
111(17): p. 4527-34. [0787] 23. Balasubramanyam, K., et al., Small
molecule modulators of histone acetyltransferase p300. J Biol Chem,
2003. 278(21): p. 19134-40. [0788] 24. Dal Piaz, F., et al., The
identification of a novel natural activator of p300 histone
acetyltransferase provides new insights into the modulation
mechanism of this enzyme. Chembiochem. 11(6): p. 818-27. [0789] 25.
Trinchese, F., et al., Progressive age-related development of
Alzheimer-like pathology in APP/PS1 mice. Ann Neurol, 2004. 55(6):
p. 801-14. [0790] 26. Nakagami, Y., et al., A novel beta-sheet
breaker, RS-0406, reverses amyloid beta-induced cytotoxicity and
impairment of long-term potentiation in vitro. Br J Pharmacol,
2002. 137(5): p. 676-82. [0791] 27. Walsh, D. M., et al., Certain
inhibitors of synthetic amyloid beta peptide (Abeta)
fibrillogenesis block oligomerization of natural Abeta and thereby
rescue long-term potentiation. J Neurosci, 2005. 25(10): p.
2455-62. [0792] 28. Schenk, D., et al., Immunization with
amyloid-beta attenuates Alzheimer-disease-like pathology in the
PDAPP mouse. Nature, 1999. 400(6740): p. 173-7. [0793] 29. Wu, J.,
R. Anwyl, and M. J. Rowan, beta-Amyloid-(1-40) increases long-term
potentiation in rat hippocampus in vitro. Eur J Pharmacol, 1995.
284(3): p. R.sup.1-3. [0794] 30. Kowalska, M. A. and K. Badellino,
beta-Amyloid protein induces platelet aggregation and supports
platelet adhesion. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 1994. 205(3): p.
1829-35. [0795] 31. Mattson, M. P., Z. H. Guo, and J. D. Geiger,
Secreted form of amyloid precursor protein enhances basal glucose
and glutamate transport and protects against oxidative impairment
of glucose and glutamate transport in synaptosomes by a cyclic
GMP-mediated mechanism. J Neurochem, 1999. 73(2): p. 532-7.
Example 10: HAT Agonists for the Treatment of AD
[0796] We have demonstrated that hippocampal levels of CREB binding
protein (CBP) and p300/CBP associated factor (PCAF), two histone
acetyltransferases (HATs) that catalyze histone acetylation and are
relevant to memory formation.sup.[P14-P16] (each herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety), are reduced following
A.beta. elevation.
[0797] We have designed and synthesized a HAT Activator compound,
YF2 (FIG. 29). YF2 was prepared by Mitsunobu reaction between
2-(dimethylamino)ethanol and 3, which was obtained through the
reaction of the acid 2 and 4-chloro-3-(trifluoromethyl)aniline, in
the presence of EDC. The acid was synthesized by ester hydrolysis
of 1. Finally, YF2 was treated with HCl/Et.sub.2O in order to
obtain a water soluble compound.
[0798] Ethyl 2-ethoxy-6-hydroxybenzoate (1) (0.095 mol) was
dissolved in 40 mL of EtOH and 100 mL of NaOH aq. 1N. The resulting
solution was stirred to reflux for 2h. EtOH was evaporated and the
aqueous phase was acidified by adding HCl conc. at 0.degree. C. and
the resulting precipitate (2, 91% of yield) was collected by
filtration and dried. .sup.1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) .delta.
12.15 (s, 1H), 11.58 (s, 1H), 7.38 (t, 1H, J=8.4 Hz), 6.70 (d, 1H,
J=8.4 Hz), 6.45 (d, 1H, J=8.4 Hz), 4.31 (t, 2H, J=6.9 Hz), 1.56 (q,
3H, J=6.9 Hz).
[0799] N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride
(0.071 mol) was added portionwise at 0.degree. C. to a solution of
2 (0.055 mol) and 3-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)aniline hydrochloride
(0.06 mol) in 70 mL of CH.sub.2C12. The mixture was stirred at rt
overnight. The solvent was evaporated off; compound 3 (82% of
yield) was obtained by crystallization from MeOH. .sup.1H NMR (300
MHz, CDCl.sub.3) .delta. 13.28 (s, 1H), 10.65 (br s, 1H), 7.91 (d,
1H, J=2.1 Hz), 7.76 (dd, 1H, J1=2.1, J2=8.7 Hz), 7.48 (d, 1H, J=8.7
Hz), 7.31 (t, 1H, J=8.4 Hz), 6.67 (d, 1H, J=8.4 Hz), 6.43 (d, 1H,
J=8.4 Hz), 4.27 (q, 2H, J=6.9 Hz), 1.64 (t, 3H, J=6.9 Hz).
[0800] Diisopropyl azodicarboxylate (0.036 mol) was added dropwise
at 0.degree. C. to a solution of 3 (0.028 mol),
2-dimethylaminoethanol (0.036 mol) and triphenylphosphine (0.036
mol) in 50 mL of THF. The reaction was stirred at rt for 24h. The
solvent was evaporated and the residue was dissolved in AcOEt (50
mL) and washed with H.sub.2O (3.times.50 mL), dried over
Na.sub.2SO.sub.4, filtered and evaporated. Purification by flash
chromatography (10% MeOH in CH.sub.2C12) gave a colorless oil (YF2)
that was treated with Et.sub.2O HCl 2M (70% of yield). .sup.1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) .delta. 8.70 (br s, 1H), 7.98 (d, 1H, J=8.1
Hz), 7.79 (s, 1H), 7.45 (d, 1H, J=8.4 Hz), 7.28 (t, 1H, J=8.4 Hz),
6.59 (dd, 2H, J1=3.2, J2=8.4 Hz), 4.19 (t, 2H, J=5.4 Hz), 4.11 (q,
2H, J=7.2 Hz), 2.65 (t, 2H, J=5.4 Hz), 2.25 (s, 6H), 1.39 (t, 3H,
J=7.2 Hz); MS ESI (m/z) 431 (M+1).
[0801] In M vitro assays, YF2 has activity versus CBP, PCAF, and
GCN5. The EC.sub.50's of YF2 for CBP, PCAF, and GCN5 are 2.7504,
29.04 .mu.M and 49.31 .mu.M, respectively. Additionally, YF2 did
not interfere with p300 and HDAC activity (HDAC1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8,
10, 11, and sirt1-2). YF2 also increases p300 activity as shown in
FIG. 72.
[0802] Encouraged by these results, we then investigated YF2
pharmacokinetic (PK) and blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration
capability. After i.p. and i.v. administration at 20 mg/kg to
BALB/c mice, plasma and brain concentrations were determined by
LC-MS/MS. The data in Table 14 indicates that YF2 is rapidly
absorbed in the brain (T.sub.max at 15 min).
TABLE-US-00020 TABLE 14 Pharmacokinetic parameters of YF2. IP
Administration IV Administration Parameters Plasma Brain Ratio*
Plasma Brain Ratio* T.sub.max (h) 0.25 0.25 -- 0.125 0.125 --
C.sub.max (ng/mL or ng/g) 843 4878 5.8 2132 27892 13.1 AUC.sub.0-t
(ng h/mL or ng h/g) 806 6493 8.1 1967 22222 11.3 AUC.sub.0-.infin.
(ng h/mL or ng h/g) 813 6564 8.1 2020 22581 11.2 t1/2 (h) 0.60 0.63
-- 0.70 0.63 -- MRT (h) 0.85 1.03 -- 0.84 0.74 -- F (%) 41.0 29.2
-- -- -- -- *Ratio = brain/plasma YF2 EC.sub.50's for CBP, PCAF and
GCN5 are: 2.75 .mu.M, 29.04 .mu.M and 49.31 .mu.M, respectively
[0803] The amount of YF2 in the brain was higher than that in the
plasma with an AUC.sub.0-t ratio of 8.2 and 10.8 for i.p. and i.v.
administration, respectively. The elimination half-lives of YF2 in
the brain and plasma were .about.40 min. The T.sub.max values in
the brain and plasma were similar, indicating that the distribution
of YF2 to the brain is also fast. Additionally, in acute toxicity
experiments YF2 did not induce any adverse effects up to 300 mg/kg
(i.p.).
[0804] We then tested if YF2 increases histone acetylation in mouse
hippocampus. The compound was i.p. administered at 20 mg/Kg, mice
were sacrificed 30 min later, and hippocampi were removed and
quickly frozen for WB analysis. As shown in FIG. 64, YF2 increased
acetylation of histone lysines that were shown to be involved in
memory formation (H3K4, H3K9, H3K14, H4K5, H4K8, H4K12, H4K16, and
H2B).sup.[P15, P33] (each herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety).
[0805] Next, we checked if YF2 could attenuate synaptic and
cognitive dysfunction after A.beta. elevation. YF2 rescued the
defect in H3 acetylation levels following A.beta. infusion onto
hippocampus (FIG. 65). Next, we induced LTP or contextual fear
memory as well as reference memory in the presence of oligomeric
A.beta..sub.42, or vehicle. In the LTP experiments 200 nM
A.beta..sub.42 or vehicle were perfused through the bath solution
for 20 min prior to the application of the .theta.-burst. In the
behavioral experiments 200 nM A.beta..sub.42 (in a final volume of
1 .mu.l over 1 min) or vehicle were bilaterally infused 15 min
prior to the foot shock or 15 min prior to the 1.sup.st trial (for
the 1.sup.st group of tests in a 2-day radial arm water maze (RAWM)
test assessing reference memory.sup.[P34] (herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety)) and 15 min prior to the 7.sup.th trial
(for the 2nd group of tests of the RAWM) into dorsal hippocampus of
the animal that had been pre-implanted with a cannula the week
before. A.beta. reduced LTP and both reference and contextual fear
memory (FIG. 66). However, YF2 (1 .mu.M, for 30 min prior to the
.theta.-burst in the LTP experiments; 5 or 20 mg/Kg, i.p., 15 min
before A.beta. administration in the behavioral experiments)
ameliorated the electrophysiological and behavioral deficits (FIG.
66).
[0806] Without being bound by theory, given that these experiments
were obtained with a synthetic preparation of A.beta..sub.42, it is
difficult to know if this is the same as A.beta. that causes
synaptic dysfunction in AD brains. Thus, we validated these
experiments in an A.beta.-depositing mouse model, the APP/PS1
mouse.sup.[P35] (herein incorporated by reference in its entirety).
These mice have been well characterized with respect to AD
pathology.sup.[P34-38] (each herein incorporated by reference in
its entirety). They start to show synaptic and memory impairment as
early as 3 months of age.sup.[P34] (herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety). Transgenic mice with a double mutation
APP (K670M:N671L)/PS1(M146L) (line 6.2) start to develop large
plaques in cortex and hippocampus at the age of 8-10 weeks. They
have a reduction in LTP by 3 months of age together with impairment
of contextual fear memory and spatial working memory.
[0807] As shown in FIG. 67, WT mice exhibited <2 errors over two
trials near the end of the second day with the RAWM task. APP/PS1
in turn failed to learn and made >3 errors throughout the
training session. The treatment with YF2 (20 mg/Kg, i.p. 30 min
before training for FC or before the 1.sup.st and 2.sup.nd group of
tests for the RAWM), however, rescued the memory defect in double
Tgs without affecting memory in WT mice. We obtained similar
results when double Tgs mice performed FC to assess contextual fear
memory (FIG. 67).
[0808] In summary, Histone 3 and 4 acetylation is decreased
following A.beta..sub.42 elevation. HATs levels (CBP and PCAF) are
reduced following A.beta..sub.42 elevation. HDAC inhibition is
beneficial against damage of synaptic function and memory following
A.beta..sub.42 elevation. HAT activation is beneficial against
memory loss following A.beta..sub.42 elevation. We have designed
and synthesized a HAT activator, YF2, that shifts the balance of
histone 3 acetylation and reinstates normal memory following
A.beta. elevation.
Example 11: Hat Activators with High Affinity and Good Selectivity
for CBP and/or PCAF and/or P300
[0809] Compounds will be tested for HAT activator activity first,
using the HAT Assay kit from Active Motif (USA, CA). For this
assay, we will use the catalytic domain of human CBP, PCAF, p300
and GCN5 (Enzo Life Sci., USA). The catalytic domains for the
remaining HATs will be produced using New England Biolabs K. lactis
Protein Expression Kit. In addition to being potent activators of
CBP and/or PCAF (EC.sub.50<100 nM), the candidate compounds must
also be selective. When assayed against all other HATs, they must
show at least a 50 fold greater potency towards CBP and/or PCAF.
Finally, on the most potent/selective compounds that show efficacy
in tests of synaptic and memory dysfunction outlined in Examples 13
and 14 we will check selectivity against HDACs. While performing
these tests, we will also evaluate solubility (neutral aqueous
buffer >10 .mu.g/ml).
[0810] Our next goal will be to confirm in vitro data, using a
neuronal preparation. In particular, we will test new HAT
activators in primary cultures and adult mice. We will first
determine whether the compounds can increase specific histone
acetylation in 10 day old cultured hippocampal neurons (prepared as
described.sup.[P47]; herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety). Media will be aspirated and replaced with 0.5 mL of PBS
containing the HAT activator. After 30 min at 37.degree. C., cells
will be removed and lysed for WB analysis. Compounds that pass the
test in hippocampal cultures will next be tested in adult mice,
following an assessment of acute toxicity to determine the dose of
compound to be administered to the animal (see "toxicity tests"
below). Testing in adult mice is essential as cell cultures do not
recapitulate the whole body with complex cell-cell interactions and
in vivo drug PK, BBB penetration, etc (see also Example 12 below).
Animals will be treated with the HAT activator, hippocampi will be
collected 30 min after the i.p. injection, and lysed for WB
analysis. All experiments will be performed in triplicate. If we
find an increase in specific histone acetylation, the candidate
compound will be deemed active.
[0811] On selected compounds we will also examine interactions with
channels, receptors, transporters using the NIMH PDSP program (see
http://pdsp.cwru.edu for a list of CNS targets), in addition to
ADMET/Tox studies discussed in Example 12.
Example 12: To Determine Whether New Hat Activators have Good
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Profile and are Safe
[0812] We will generate data addressing the rudimentary PK
properties and toxicity of the novel HAT activators. If necessary,
information obtained through the PK and toxicity studies will be
used to guide additional chemical modifications of the new
molecules with the ultimate goal of improving bioavailability,
brain uptake, and safety. Pharmacokinetic assays that need to be
performed will include the measurement of a) bioavailability and b)
brain uptake. Mice will be i.p. injected with the activator (for
final drug candidates PK tests will be also performed using p.o.
and i.v. routes of administration). 5-6 mice/sex will be used for
each time-point. For the assessment of bioavailability
(concentration of compound in the blood as a function of time after
administration), blood samples will be obtained from test animals
following a single acute administration (collected at 5 min, 15
min, 30 min, 1 hr, 2 hrs, 4 hrs, and 24 hrs). Blood will be
harvested by retro-orbital puncture, collected in heparanized
tubes, and plasma obtained by centrifugation. Samples will be
analyzed by LC-MS to measure the amounts of the candidate compound
and possible metabolites. An indication of brain uptake and BBB
penetration will be obtained by tissue extraction of the candidate
compound from brain. Briefly, brain homogenates will be centrifuged
11,000 rpm for 10 min. An aliquot of the sample will be added to
acetonitrile, then injected onto LC-MS/MS for analysis. Similar
patterns of brain and plasma concentrations will be indicative of
the fact that brain uptake reflects concentration of the blood. A
peak brain/blood concentration ratio >1 will indicate that brain
uptake for our compound is comparable with that of known CNS drugs
in clinical use. For example, the brain/blood ratio for minaprine,
a 6-phenylaminopyridazine CNS drug, is >2.sup.[P48] (herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety).
[0813] Next, we will evaluate acute toxicity. All clinical signs,
time of onset, duration, reversibility of toxicity and mortalities
will be recorded. Animals will be observed periodically during the
first 24 hrs with continuous monitoring given to the first 4 hrs,
then at least once a day for 14 days or until they die to check
food and liquid intake, weight, as well as locomotion and
exploratory behavior. We will also evaluate maximum tolerated dose
(MTD) and chronic toxicity. MTD will be computed as the maximum
administered dose that does not produce any toxicity effect in
terms of malaise or death (body weight will be monitored over
time). Chronic toxicity will assessed at the MTD. All clinical
signs, time of onset, duration, reversibility of toxicity and
mortalities will be recorded. The occurrence of possible chronic
toxicity signs will be assessed for at least 1 month after the end
of the treatment.
[0814] It has been estimated that over half of all drugs fail to
reach the market because of ADMET problems.sup.[P49] (herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety). Therefore, before
embarking on a course of costly animal toxicological work and
following efficacy assessment (see Examples 13 and 14), we will
take advantage of recent advances in in vitro ADMET testing to
screen our best three compounds with a quick, inexpensive battery
of assays. We will focus on two areas that have resulted in the
withdrawal of many drugs from the market: drug-drug interactions
(liver metabolism), hERG channel blockage (cardiac dysfunction). To
test for drug-drug interactions related to hepatotoxicity, we will
use the Cytochrome P450 inhibition assay (performed by SRI
international). hERG channel blockage assay will be performed using
the NIMH PDSP program.
Example 13: Selecting HAT Activators that Rescue LTP in APP/PS1
Mice
[0815] Synaptic dysfunction is a major hallmark of AD.sup.[P50]
(herein incorporated by reference in its entirety). A qualifying
aspect of our drug screening protocol will include a measurement of
the effect of the newly-synthesized compounds onto synaptic
function. The APP/PS1 mouse presents an impairment of LTP by the
age of 3 months.sup.[P34] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety) and therefore permits a relatively fast assessment of
synaptic function without waiting a long time for mice aging. We
will examine LTP because it is a type of synaptic plasticity that
is thought to underlie learning and memory. Based on the findings
that YF2 rescues the A.beta.-induced reduction of LTP, we will
screen the compounds indicated by our MedChem studies to select
those that can re-establish normal LTP. The compounds will be
applied for 30 min using the same experimental protocol as in FIG.
66A. Controls will be performed on slices from APP/PS1 mice treated
with vehicle, and WT mice treated with compound or vehicle. If the
compounds re-establish normal LTP in APP/PS1 slices, we will
conclude that the compounds can rescue impairment of synaptic
plasticity in APP/PS1 mice. We will also investigate another
important aspect of the disease, the cognitive impairment (see
Example 14).
[0816] Animals:
[0817] Tg mice will be obtained by crossing APP(K670M:N671L) with
PS1(M146L) (line 6.2) animals. The genotype will be identified by
PCR on tail samples.sup.[P51-P53] (each herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety).
[0818] Electrophysiology will be performed on males (see
description in Gong et al.sup.[P54]; herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety).
[0819] Statistical Analyses: see Example 14.
Example 14: Further Screening of Hat Activators to Examine if they
Ameliorate Cognitive Abnormalities in APP/PS1 Mice
[0820] Without being bound by theory, treatment with a novel HAT
activator indicated by Example 13 can rescue the cognitive deficits
in 3 and 6 month old APP/PS1 mice. As behavioral tasks we will use
the RAWM and contextual FC, two types of tests assessing different
types of memory (reference ad associative) that are affected in AD
patients. The treatment will be performed with the same timing
(i.e. 30 min before training for fear conditioning or before the
1.sup.st and 2.sup.nd group of tests for the RAWM). Conditions to
be tested include: APP/PS1 and WT treated with HAT activators,
APP/PS1 and WT treated with vehicle. After behavioral testing mice
will be sacrificed and their blood and brains used for A.beta.
level, Tau protein, TARDBP and TDB levels, and alpha-synuclein
measurements. As a control for effectiveness of HAT activation, we
will measure hippocampal acetyl-H4 levels after administration of
the compounds 30 min prior to training for fear conditioning and
removal of the hippocampi 1 hr after the electric shock (APP/PS1
mice have been shown to have a reduction of acetylated H4 after the
electric shock.sup.[P21] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety)). Finally, we will screen them with a battery of assays
focusing on two areas that have resulted in the withdrawal of many
drugs from the market: drug-drug interactions, hERG channel
blockage (see Example 12).
[0821] Animals:
[0822] see Example 13.
[0823] Behavioral Studies:
[0824] Experiments will be performed in blind only on male animals
to reduce variability. A) Spatial memory. This type of reference
memory can be studied with the 2-day RAWM test, as
described.sup.[P56] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety); see also FIG. 66B). The task is a hybrid of the Morris
Water Maze (MWM) and the radial arm land maze. For these
experiments, visible platform testing will be conducted to exclude
that visual, motor and motivation deficits affect the mouse
performance, as described.sup.[P34] (herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety). B) Fear Conditioning to examine both
contextual and cued learning will be assessed as
described.sup.[P57] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety). For these experiments, threshold assessment test will
performed to check sensory perception of electric foot in different
groups of mice.sup.[P57] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety). In addition, the open-field test will be conducted to
evaluate exploratory as described.sup.[P58,P59] (each herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety).
[0825] Histone Acetylation Assay:
[0826] Western blot will be performed from snap-frozen in liquid
nitrogen hippocampi. Tissue will be homogenized in RIPA buffer,
then sonicated before centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 5 min. Whole
cell extracts will be electrophoresed on 10-20% gradient PAGE gel
(Invitrogen) and then immunoblotted. Antibodies will be used at a
1:1,000 concentration for immunoblotting. All anti-histone
antibodies will be purchased from Millipore. Immunoblot data will
be quantified by measuring the band intensity using imaging
software (NIH ImageJ).
[0827] Determination of A.beta. levels will be performed on
homogenates of frozen hemi-brains and plasma as previously
described.sup.[P34] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety).
[0828] Determination of alpha-synuclein levels will be performed on
homogenates of frozen hemi-brains using an .alpha.-Synuclein ELISA
Kit (Catalog #NS400; Millipore, Billerica, Mass.) according to
manufacturer's instructions.
[0829] Determination of TARDBP/TDP-43 levels will be performed on
homogenates of frozen hemi-brains using a Human TAR DNA binding
protein 43, TARDBP/TDP-43 ELISA Kit (Catalog #E1951h; Wuhan EIAab
Science Co, Wuhan, China) according to manufacturer's
instructions.
[0830] Determination of total Tau and phosphorylated Tau (Thr 231)
levels will be performed on homogenates of frozen hemi-brains and
plasma using assay and kits according to manufacturer's
instructions available from MesoScale Discovery (Gaithersburg, Md.)
(see
http://www.mesoscale.com/catalogsystemweb/webroot/products/assays/alzheim-
ers.aspx).
[0831] Statistics:
[0832] Experiments mice will be performed in blind. Results will be
expressed as Standard Error Mean (SEM). Level of significance will
be set for p<0.05. Results will be analyzed with ANOVA with
post-hoc correction with drug or genotype as main effect.
REFERENCES
[0833] P1. Malm, T., et al., beta-Amyloid infusion results in
delayed and age-dependent learning deficits without role of
inflammation or beta-amyloid deposits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,
2006. 103(23): p. 8852-7. [0834] P2. Cleary, J. P., et al., Natural
oligomers of the amyloid-beta protein specifically disrupt
cognitive function. Nat Neurosci, 2005. 8(1): p. 79-84. [0835] P3.
Cullen, W. K., et al., Block of LTP in rat hippocampus in vivo by
beta-amyloid precursor protein fragments. Neuroreport, 1997. 8(15):
p. 3213-7. [0836] P4. Itoh, A., et al., Impairments of long-term
potentiation in hippocampal slices of beta-amyloid-infused rats.
Eur J Pharmacol, 1999. 382(3): p. 167-75. [0837] P5. Vitolo, O. V.,
et al., Amyloid beta-peptide inhibition of the PKA/CREB pathway and
long-term potentiation: reversibility by drugs that enhance cAMP
signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2002. 99(20): p. 13217-21.
[0838] P6. Walsh, D. M., et al., Naturally secreted oligomers of
amyloid beta protein potently inhibit hippocampal long-term
potentiation in vivo. Nature, 2002. 416(6880): p. 535-9. [0839] P7.
Chen, Q. S., et al., Impairment of hippocampal long-term
potentiation by Alzheimer amyloid beta-peptides. J Neurosci Res,
2000. 60(1): p. 65-72. [0840] P8. Lambert, M. P., et al.,
Diffusible, nonfibrillar ligands derived from Abeta1-42 are potent
central nervous system neurotoxins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1998.
95(11): p. 6448-53. [0841] P9. Rakyan, V. K., et al., The marks,
mechanisms and memory of epigenetic states in mammals. Biochem J,
2001. 356(Pt 1): p. 1-10. [0842] P10. Gwack, Y., et al.,
CREB-binding protein and histone deacetylase regulate the
transcriptional activity of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus
open reading frame 50. J Virol, 2001. 75(4): p. 1909-17. [0843]
P11. Lu, F., et al., Chromatin remodeling of the Kaposi's
sarcoma-associated herpesvirus ORF50 promoter correlates with
reactivation from latency. J Virol, 2003. 77(21): p. 11425-35.
[0844] P12. Knutson, S. K., In vivo characterization of the role of
histone deacetylase 3 in metabolic and transcriptional regulation,
in Biochemistry. 2008, Vanderbilt: Nashville. p. 167. [0845] P13.
Rajan, I., et al., Loss of the putative catalytic domain of HDAC4
leads to reduced thermal nociception and seizures while allowing
normal bone development. PLoS One, 2009. 4(8): p. e6612. [0846]
P14. Roelfsema, J. H. and D. J. Peters, Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome:
clinical and molecular overview. Expert Rev Mol Med, 2007. 9(23):
p. 1-16. [0847] P15. Alarcon, J. M., et al., Chromatin acetylation,
memory, and LTP are impaired in CBP+/-mice: a model for the
cognitive deficit in Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome and its
amelioration. Neuron, 2004. 42(6): p. 947-59. [0848] P16. Maurice,
T., et al., Altered memory capacities and response to stress in
p300/CBP-associated factor (PCAF) histone acetylase knockout mice.
Neuropsychopharmacology, 2008. 33(7): p. 1584-602. [0849] P17.
Levenson, J. M., et al., Regulation of histone acetylation during
memory formation in the hippocampus. J Biol Chem, 2004. 279(39): p.
40545-59. [0850] P18. Langley, B., et al., Remodeling chromatin and
stress resistance in the central nervous system: histone
deacetylase inhibitors as novel and broadly effective
neuroprotective agents. Curr Drug Targets CNS Neurol Disord, 2005.
4(1): p. 41-50. [0851] P19. Fischer, A., et al., Recovery of
learning and memory is associated with chromatin remodelling.
Nature, 2007. 447(7141): p. 178-82. [0852] P20. Kim, D., et al.,
SIRT1 deacetylase protects against neurodegeneration in models for
Alzheimer's disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. EMBO J,
2007. 26(13): p. 3169-79. [0853] P21. Francis, Y. I., et al.,
Dysregulation of histone acetylation in the APP/PS1 mouse model of
Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis, 2009. 18(1): p. 131-9.
[0854] P22. Marmorstein, R. and R. C. Trievel, Histone modifying
enzymes: structures, mechanisms, and specificities. Biochim Biophys
Acta, 2009. 1789(1): p. 58-68. [0855] P23. Mantelingu, K., et al.,
Activation of p300 histone acetyltransferase by small molecules
altering enzyme structure: probed by surface-enhanced Raman
spectroscopy. J Phys Chem B, 2007. 111(17): p. 4527-34. [0856] P24.
Balasubramanyam, K., et al., Small molecule modulators of histone
acetyltransferase p300. J Biol Chem, 2003. 278(21): p. 19134-40.
[0857] P25. Sbardella, G., et al., Identification of long chain
alkylidenemalonates as novel small molecule modulators of histone
acetyltransferases. Bioorg Med Chem Lett, 2008. 18(9): p. 2788-92.
[0858] P26. Dal Piaz, F., et al., The identification of a novel
natural activator of p300 histone acetyltransferase provides new
insights into the modulation mechanism of this enzyme. Chembiochem.
11(6): p. 818-27. [0859] P27. Nakagami, Y., et al., A novel
beta-sheet breaker, RS-0406, reverses amyloid beta-induced
cytotoxicity and impairment of long-term potentiation in vitro. Br
J Pharmacol, 2002. 137(5): p. 676-82. [0860] P28. Walsh, D. M., et
al., Certain inhibitors of synthetic amyloid beta peptide (Abeta)
fibrillogenesis block oligomerization of natural Abeta and thereby
rescue long-term potentiation. J Neurosci, 2005. 25(10): p.
2455-62. [0861] P29. Schenk, D., et al., Immunization with
amyloid-beta attenuates Alzheimer-disease-like pathology in the
PDAPP mouse. Nature, 1999. 400(6740): p. 173-7. [0862] P30. Wu, J.,
R. Anwyl, and M. J. Rowan, beta-Amyloid-(1-40) increases long-term
potentiation in rat hippocampus in vitro. Eur J Pharmacol, 1995.
284(3): p. R.sup.1-3. [0863] P31. Kowalska, M. A. and K. Badellino,
beta-Amyloid protein induces platelet aggregation and supports
platelet adhesion. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 1994. 205(3): p.
1829-35. [0864] P32. Mattson, M. P., Z. H. Guo, and J. D. Geiger,
Secreted form of amyloid precursor protein enhances basal glucose
and glutamate transport and protects against oxidative impairment
of glucose and glutamate transport in synaptosomes by a cyclic
GMP-mediated mechanism. J Neurochem, 1999. 73(2): p. 532-7. [0865]
P33. Peleg, S., et al., Altered histone acetylation is associated
with age-dependent memory impairment in mice. Science. 328(5979):
p. 753-6. [0866] P34. Trinchese, F., et al., Progressive
age-related development of Alzheimer-like pathology in APP/PS1
mice. Ann Neurol, 2004. 55(6): p. 801-14. [0867] P35. Holcomb, L.,
et al., Accelerated Alzheimer-type phenotype in transgenic mice
carrying both mutant amyloid precursor protein and presenilin 1
transgenes. Nat Med, 1998. 4(1): p. 97-100. [0868] P36. Kurt, M.
A., et al., Neurodegenerative changes associated with beta-amyloid
deposition in the brains of mice carrying mutant amyloid precursor
protein and mutant presenilin-1 transgenes. Exp Neurol, 2001.
171(1): p. 59-71. [0869] P37. McGowan, E., et al., Amyloid
phenotype characterization of transgenic mice overexpressing both
mutant amyloid precursor protein and mutant presenilin 1
transgenes. Neurobiol Dis, 1999. 6(4): p. 231-44. [0870] P38.
Sant'Angelo, A., F. Trinchese, and O. Arancio, Usefulness of
behavioral and electrophysiological studies in transgenic models of
Alzheimer's disease. Neurochem Res, 2003. 28(7): p. 1009-15. [0871]
P39. Coutts, R. T., P. Su, and G. B. Baker, Involvement of CYP2D6,
CYP3A4, and other cytochrome P-450 isozymes in N-dealkylation
reactions. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods, 1994. 31(4): p. 177-86.
[0872] P40. Thompson, T. N., Optimization of metabolic stability as
a goal of modern drug design. Med Res Rev, 2001. 21(5): p. 412-49.
[0873] P41. Chee, C. F., et al., An efficient synthesis of
(+)-panduratin A and (+)-isopanduratin A, inhibitors of dengue-2
viral activity. Tetrahedron Letters, 2010. 51: p. 495-498. [0874]
P42. Kuehne, M. E. and P J Shannon, Reduction of Amides and Lactams
to Amines by Reactions with Phosphorus Oxychloride and Sodium
Borohydride. J. Org. Chem., 1977. 42: p. 2082-2087. [0875] P43.
Mondal, M., V. G. Puranik, and N. P. Argade, Facile Synthesis of
1,3,7-Trihydroxyxanthone and Its Regioselective Coupling Reactions
with Prenal: Simple and Efficient Access to Osajaxanthone and
Nigrolineaxanthone F. J. Org. Chem., 2006. 71: p. 4992-4995. [0876]
P44. Melgar-Fernandez, R., et al., Synthesis of Novel Derivatives
of (1S,4S)-2,5-Diazabicyclo[2.2.1]heptane and Their Evaluation as
Potential Ligands in Asymmetric Catalysis. Eur. J. Org. Chem.,
2008: p. 655-672. [0877] P45. Mahmoud, M. R., et al., Synthesis of
novel indeno[1,2-c]isoquinolines derivatives. Synthetic
Communications, 2010. 40: p. 666-676. [0878] P46. Tsuritani, T., et
al., Efficient synthesis of 1,4-Diaryl-5-methyl-1,2,3-triazole, a
potential mGluR1 antagonist, and the risk assessment study of
arylazides. Organic Process Research & Development, 2009. 13:
p. 1407-1412. [0879] P47. Ninan, I. and O. Arancio, Presynaptic
CaMKII Is Necessary for Synaptic Plasticity in Cultured Hippocampal
Neurons. Neuron, 2004. 42(1): p. 129-41. [0880] P48. Caccia, S., T.
Fossati, and A. Mancinelli, Disposition and metabolism of minaprine
in the rat. Xenobiotica, 1985. 15(12): p. 1111-9. [0881] P49.
Hodgson, J., ADMET--turning chemicals into drugs. Nat Biotechnol,
2001. 19(8): p. 722-6. [0882] P50. Masliah, E., Mechanisms of
synaptic dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease. Histol Histopathol,
1995. 10(2): p. 509-19. [0883] P51. Duff, K., et al., Increased
amyloid-beta42(43) in brains of mice expressing mutant presenilin
1. Nature, 1996. 383(6602): p. 710-3. [0884] P52. Hsiao, K., et
al., Correlative memory deficits, Abeta elevation, and amyloid
plaques in transgenic mice. Science, 1996. 274(5284): p. 99-102.
[0885] P53. Di Rosa, G., et al., Calpain inhibitors: a treatment
for Alzheimer's disease. J Mol Neurosci, 2002. 19(1-2): p. 135-41.
[0886] P54. Gong, B., et al., Ubiquitin Hydrolase Uch-L1 Rescues
beta-Amyloid-Induced Decreases in Synaptic Function and Contextual
Memory. Cell, 2006. 126(4): p. 775-88. [0887] P55. Bowers, E. M.,
et al., Virtual ligand screening of the p300/CBP histone
acetyltransferase: identification of a selective small molecule
inhibitor. Chem Biol. 17(5): p. 471-82. [0888] P56. Alamed, J., et
al., Two-day radial-arm water maze learning and memory task; robust
resolution of amyloid-related memory deficits in transgenic mice.
Nat Protoc, 2006. 1(4): p. 1671-9. [0889] P57. Gong, B., et al.,
Persistent improvement in synaptic and cognitive functions in an
Alzheimer mouse model following rolipram treatment. J. Clin.
Invest., 2004. 114: p. 1624-1634. [0890] P58. Sipos, E., et al.,
Beta-amyloid pathology in the entorhinal cortex of rats induces
memory deficits: implications for Alzheimer's disease.
Neuroscience, 2007. 147(1): p. 28-36. [0891] P59. Puzzo, D., et
al., Picomolar amyloid-beta positively modulates synaptic
plasticity and memory in hippocampus. J Neurosci, 2008. 28(53): p.
14537-45.
Example 15: Further Screening of Hat Activators to Examine if they
Ameliorate Cognitive Abnormalities in Mouse Models for Huntington's
Disease
[0892] We will examine whether treatment with a HAT activator
compound indicated by Example 13 can rescue the cognitive deficits
in a mouse model of Huntington's Disease (e.g.,
FVB-Tg(YAC128)53Hay/J and FVB/NJ-Tg(YAC72)2511Haya mice, available
from the Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor Me.). As behavioral tasks,
we will use the RAWM and contextual FC, two types of tests
assessing different types of memory (reference ad associative). The
treatment will be performed with the same timing (i.e. 30 min
before training for fear conditioning or before the 1.sup.st and
2.sup.nd group of tests for the RAWM). Conditions to be tested
include: Huntington's Disease mice and WT treated with HAT
activators, Huntington's Disease mice and WT treated with vehicle.
After behavioral testing mice will be sacrificed and their blood
and brains used for Huntingtin protein level measurement. As a
control for effectiveness of HAT activation, we will measure
hippocampal acetyl-H4 levels after administration of the compounds
30 min prior to training for fear conditioning and removal of the
hippocampi 1 hr after the electric shock. Finally, we will screen
them with a battery of assays focusing on two areas that have
resulted in the withdrawal of many drugs from the market: drug-drug
interactions, hERG channel blockage (see Example 12).
[0893] Animals:
[0894] Mouse models of Huntington's Disease (e.g.,
FVB-Tg(YAC128)53Hay/J [Stock no. 004938] and
FVB/NJ-Tg(YAC72)2511Hay/J mice [Stock no. 003640]) will be obtained
from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor Me.). See also, Hodgson et
al., (May 1999) Neuron, Vol. 23, 181-192; herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety.
[0895] Behavioral Studies:
[0896] Experiments will be performed in blind only on male animals
to reduce variability. A) Spatial memory. This type of reference
memory can be studied with the 2-day RAWM test, as
described.sup.[P56] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety). The task is a hybrid of the Morris Water Maze (MWM) and
the radial arm land maze. For these experiments, visible platform
testing will be conducted to exclude that visual, motor and
motivation deficits affect the mouse performance, as
described.sup.[P34] (herein incorporated by reference in its
entirety). B) Fear Conditioning to examine both contextual and cued
learning will be assessed as described.sup.[P57] (herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety). For these experiments,
threshold assessment test will performed to check sensory
perception of electric foot in different groups of mice.sup.[P57]
(herein incorporated by reference in its entirety). In addition,
the open-field test will be conducted to evaluate exploratory as
described.sup.[P58,P59] (each herein incorporated by reference in
its entirety).
[0897] Histone Acetylation Assay:
[0898] Western blot will be performed from snap-frozen in liquid
nitrogen hippocampi. Tissue will be homogenized in RIPA buffer,
then sonicated before centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 5 min. Whole
cell extracts will be electrophoresed on 10-20% gradient PAGE gel
(Invitrogen) and then immunoblotted. Antibodies will be used at a
1:1,000 concentration for immunoblotting. All anti-histone
antibodies will be purchased from Millipore. Immunoblot data will
be quantified by measuring the band intensity using imaging
software ImageJ).
[0899] Determination of huntingtin levels will be performed on
homogenates of frozen hemi-brains and plasma using a Huntingtin
(Htt) ELISA Kit (Catalog #ABIN423526; Antibodies-online, Atlanta,
Ga.) according to manufacturer's instructions.
[0900] Statistics:
[0901] Experiments mice will be performed in blind. Results will be
expressed as Standard Error Mean (SEM). Level of significance will
be set for p<0.05. Results will be analyzed with ANOVA with
post-hoc correction with drug or genotype as main effect.
Example 16: Further Screening of Hat Activators to Examine if they
Ameliorate Motor Activity Abnormalities in Mouse Models for
Parkinson's Disease
[0902] PD is a degenerative disease with a neuronal death up to
75-95% of the dopamine neurons in the substantia nigra nucleus. We
will examine whether treatment with a HAT activator compound
indicated by Example 13 can rescue abnormal motor movements in a
mouse model of Parkinson's Disease (PD) (e.g., see Parkinson's
Disease mice models available from the Jackson Laboratory, Bar
Harbor Me. at http://jaxmice.jax.org/list/ra1594.html; see also
Emborg, Journal of Neuroscience Methods 139 (2004) 121-143; Lane
Psychopharmacology (2008) 199:303-312; and Meredith et al., Acta
Neuropathol (2008) 115:385-398; each herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety). As behavioral tasks, we will examine,
for example, dyskinesia, bradykinesia, tremor, and/or grip force
for the evaluation of the compound's efficacy at various stages of
PD. Conditions to be tested include: PD mice and WT treated with
HAT activators, PD mice and WT treated with vehicle. After
behavioral evaluation, mice will be sacrificed and their brains
used for aggregated alpha-synuclein protein measurement. As a
control for effectiveness of HAT activation, we will measure
hippocampal acetyl-H4 levels.
[0903] Animals:
[0904] Mouse models of Parkinson's Disease will be obtained from
the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor Me.). See also, Meredith et al.,
Acta Neuropathol (2008) 115:385-398; herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety.
[0905] Behavioral Studies:
[0906] Experiments will be performed in blind only on male animals
to reduce variability, according to methods described by Fleming et
al., ((2004) The Journal of Neuroscience, 24(42):9434-9440) and
Hwang et al., ((2005) The Journal of Neuroscience, 25(8):2132-2137;
each herein incorporated by reference in its entirety).
[0907] Histone Acetylation Assay:
[0908] Western blot will be performed from snap-frozen in liquid
nitrogen hippocampi. Tissue will be homogenized in RIPA buffer,
then sonicated before centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 5 min. Whole
cell extracts will be electrophoresed on 10-20% gradient PAGE gel
(Invitrogen) and then immunoblotted. Antibodies will be used at a
1:1,000 concentration for immunoblotting. All anti-histone
antibodies will be purchased from Millipore. Immunoblot data will
be quantified by measuring the band intensity using imaging
software (NIH ImageJ).
[0909] Determination of alpha-synuclein levels will be performed on
homogenates of frozen hemi-brains using an .alpha.-Synuclein ELISA
Kit (Catalog #NS400; Millipore, Billerica, Mass.) according to
manufacturer's instructions or via standard neuropathological
methods (brain tissue histology).
[0910] Statistics:
[0911] Experiments mice will be performed in blind. Results will be
expressed as Standard Error Mean (SEM). Level of significance will
be set for p<0.05. Results will be analyzed with ANOVA with
post-hoc correction with drug or genotype as main effect.
Example 17: Further Screening of Hat Activators to Examine if they
Ameliorate Cognitive Abnormalities in Mouse Models for Huntington's
Disease
Assays: Accelerating Rotarod (4 and 6 Months) and Open Field (6 and
8 Months).
Accelerating Rotarod Assay:
[0912] Animals:
[0913] Mouse models of Huntington's Disease (YAC128) versus
wildtype (WT) littermates.
[0914] Treatment:
[0915] Mice were treated to either vehicle or YF2 (5 mg/kg)
beginning at age 2 months. Number of subjects tested at 4 and 6
months is shown in Table 16.
TABLE-US-00021 TABLE 16 Subjects tested in accelerating Rotarod
test at 4 months and 6 months of age. 4 Months 6 Months Count Count
Total 51 Total 32 Male, WT, Veh 9 Male, WT, Veh 4 Male, WT, YF2 8
Male, WT, YF2 6 Male, YAC128, Veh 4 Male, YAC128, Veh 1 Male,
YAC128, YF2 5 Male, YAC128, YF2 3 Female, WT, Veh 9 Female, WT, Veh
6 Female, WT, YF2 4 Female, WT, YF2 4 Female, YAC128, Veh 9 Female,
YAC128, Veh 6 Female, YAC128, YF2 4 Female, YAC128, YF2 4
[0916] Accelerating Rotarod:
[0917] This assay is a common assay used to monitor motor
coordination in mouse models of Huntington's disease (HD). After a
training period to acclimatize the mice to the apparatus, mice are
placed on a rod rotating at 5 rpm. Over the test period of 300 sec,
the rod increases its rotational speed from 5 rpm to 40 rpm. The
time at which the mouse falls off of the rod is recorded. Each
mouse is subject to 3 runs per day (shown as a per day average)
across 3 days (d1, d2, d3). Typically 8 to 12 mice per group are
used in this assay. Both male and female data are shown for age 4
months (FIG. 83A) and 6 months (FIG. 83B).
Rotarod Summary:
[0918] Consistent with previously published findings, 4 month old
male YAC128 mice fall off of the accelerating rotarod significantly
sooner (and hence stay on the rod for a shorter period of time)
than control littermates (ANOVA, F(1,22)=8.768; p=0.0072) (FIG.
83A). There are too few mice in the study to determine whether
there is a significant effect as the mice age. Female YAC128 mice
do not demonstrate a significant difference across genotype at age
4 mo (ANOVA, F(1,22)=1.066; p=0.3130), but is significantly
affected at 6 months of age (ANOVA, F(1,16)=13.671; p=0.0020) (FIG.
83A).
[0919] At 4 months of age, posthoc analysis (Fisher PLSD) in male
mice reveals that although YAC128 mice treated with Vehicle perform
significantly worse than WT mice treated with vehicle (p=0.0021),
this significance is lost once YAC128 mice are treated with YF2 (WT
mice treated with YF2 (p=0.1946) or WT mice treated with vehicle
(p=0.0792)) (FIG. 83A).
[0920] At 6 months of age, posthoc analysis in female mice reveals
a similar effect: although YAC128 mice treated with Vehicle perform
significantly worse than WT mice treated with vehicle (p=0.0100),
this significance is lost once YAC128 mice are treated with YF2 (WT
mice treated with YF2 (p=0.12734) or WT mice treated with vehicle
(p=0.1690)) (FIG. 83B).
Accelerating Rotarod Assay:
[0921] Animals:
[0922] Mouse models of Huntington's Disease (YAC128) versus
wildtype (WT) littermates.
[0923] Treatment:
[0924] Mice were treated to either vehicle or YF2 (5 mg/kg)
beginning at age 2 months. Number of subjects tested at 6 and 8
months is shown in Table 17.
TABLE-US-00022 TABLE 17 Subjects tested in accelerating Rotarod
test at 6 months and 8 months of age. 6 Months 8 Months Count Count
Total 51 Total 32 Male, WT, Veh 9 Male, WT, Veh 4 Male, WT, YF2 7
Male, WT, YF2 5 Male, YAC128, Veh 4 Male, YAC128, Veh 1 Male,
YAC128, YF2 5 Male, YAC128, YF2 2 Female, WT, Veh 9 Female, WT, Veh
6 Female, WT, YF2 4 Female, WT, YF2 4 Female, YAC128, Veh 8 Female,
YAC128, Veh 6 Female, YAC128, YF2 4 Female, YAC128, YF2 4
[0925] Open Field:
[0926] This assay is a common assay used to monitor total
spontaneous locomotor activity and exploratory behavior in mouse
models of Huntington's disease (HD). The spontaneous locomotor
activity of the animals was measured using an automated photo-beam
open-field system (Med-Associates, St Albans, Vt.). Mice were
placed individually in the center of a clear open-field chamber
(27.9 cm.times.27.9 cm.times.20 cm), and their horizontal and
vertical activities were measured immediately for 30 min with three
16-beam I/R arrays. Locomotor activity was assessed as the distance
traveled in 5-min intervals. The number of mice typically used for
open field range from 12 to 15 mice.
Open Field Summary:
Total Locomotion Measure of Total Activity in 30 Min.
[0927] In light of the low n values for age 8 mo., statistical
values have only been calculated for data collected at age 6 mo.
(ANOVA followed by Fisher PLSD posthoc analysis). FIGS. 84 A and B
show the total distance travelled in 30 min of male and female mice
aged 6 months and 8 months. In FIGS. 84 C and D the total locomotor
data is shown across each 5 min bins, again segregated for male and
female data.
[0928] Consistent with previously published findings, there is a
significant decrease of total locomotor activity by male YAC128
mice when compared to control (ANOVA, F(1,21)=5.651; p=0.0270) and
by female YAC128 mice when compared to control (ANOVA,
F(1,21)=6.149; p=0.0217).
[0929] In male mice, no significant effect of treatment (Rx) was
observed (ANOVA, F(1,21)=0.942; p=0.3429). In female mice, a
significant effect of Rx was observed (ANOVA, F(1,21)=8.838;
p=0.0073); however that effect was to diminish significantly (i.e.
worsen) the distance traveled by the mice.
Total Locomotion in the Center of Maze Versus Periphery: Measures
of Diminished Exploratory Behavior Possibly Due to Anxiety and
Fear.
[0930] The total distance travelled data from above to the distance
travelled in the center of the maze (FIGS. 85 A and B) and
periphery (FIGS. 85 C and D) are shown.
[0931] Center Locomotion:
[0932] Previously published findings indicated that the YAC128 mice
demonstrate diminished exploration in the center of the open field
maze. The data indicates that while there is no significant
decrease of locomotor activity in the center by male YAC128 mice
when compared to control (ANOVA, F(1,21)=2.851; p=0.1061) there is
a significant decrease by female YAC128 mice when compared to
control (ANOVA, F(1,21)=9.995; p=0.0047) (FIGS. 85 A and B).
[0933] Locomotion in the Periphery:
[0934] For males, in contrast to center movement, there is a
significant decrease of locomotor activity in the periphery by male
YAC128 mice when compared to control (ANOVA, F(1,21)=6.766;
p=0.0167), suggesting that the significant decrease of total
locomotor activity is likely due to diminished activity rather than
an avoidance of the center of the maze (FIGS. 85 C and D). For
females, there is no significant decrease of locomotor activity in
the periphery by female YAC128 mice when compared to control
(ANOVA, F(1,21)=2.040; p=0.1680), suggesting that the significant
decrease of total locomotor activity comes from an avoidance of
moving in the center.
Total Rearing or Vertical Movements: Measure of Vertical
Exploratory Movements, 30 Min.
[0935] Another measure of exploration are the vertical or rearing
events. Consistent with previously published data, male YAC128 mice
rear significantly less than control mice (ANOVA, F(1,21)=12.213;
p=0.0022); however no significant effect of genotype was observed
across the females (ANOVA, F(1,21)=0.290; p=0.5961) (FIG. 86).
There was no significant effect of treatment on either male YAC128
mice (ANOVA, F(1,21)=0.704; p=0.4108) or female YAC128 mice (ANOVA,
F(1,21)=2.622; p=0.1203).
EQUIVALENTS
[0936] Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to
ascertain, using no more than routine experimentation, numerous
equivalents to the specific substances and procedures described
herein. Such equivalents are considered to be within the scope of
this invention, and are covered by the following claims.
Sequence CWU 1
1
61419PRTHomo sapiens 1Met Ala Gly Phe Gly Ala Met Glu Lys Phe Leu
Val Glu Tyr Lys Ser1 5 10 15Ala Val Glu Lys Lys Leu Ala Glu Tyr Lys
Cys Asn Thr Asn Thr Ala 20 25 30Ile Glu Leu Lys Leu Val Arg Phe Pro
Glu Asp Leu Glu Asn Asp Ile 35 40 45Arg Thr Phe Phe Pro Glu Tyr Thr
His Gln Leu Phe Gly Asp Asp Glu 50 55 60Thr Ala Phe Gly Tyr Lys Gly
Leu Lys Ile Leu Leu Tyr Tyr Ile Ala65 70 75 80Gly Ser Leu Ser Thr
Met Phe Arg Val Glu Tyr Ala Ser Lys Val Asp 85 90 95Glu Asn Phe Asp
Cys Val Glu Ala Asp Asp Val Glu Gly Lys Ile Arg 100 105 110Gln Ile
Ile Pro Pro Gly Phe Cys Thr Asn Thr Asn Asp Phe Leu Ser 115 120
125Leu Leu Glu Lys Glu Val Asp Phe Lys Pro Phe Gly Thr Leu Leu His
130 135 140Thr Tyr Ser Val Leu Ser Pro Thr Gly Gly Glu Asn Phe Thr
Phe Gln145 150 155 160Ile Tyr Lys Ala Asp Met Thr Cys Arg Gly Phe
Arg Glu Tyr His Glu 165 170 175Arg Leu Gln Thr Phe Leu Met Trp Phe
Ile Glu Thr Ala Ser Phe Ile 180 185 190Asp Val Asp Asp Glu Arg Trp
His Tyr Phe Leu Val Phe Glu Lys Tyr 195 200 205Asn Lys Asp Gly Ala
Thr Leu Phe Ala Thr Val Gly Tyr Met Thr Val 210 215 220Tyr Asn Tyr
Tyr Val Tyr Pro Asp Lys Thr Arg Pro Arg Val Ser Gln225 230 235
240Met Leu Ile Leu Thr Pro Phe Gln Gly Gln Gly His Gly Ala Gln Leu
245 250 255Leu Glu Thr Val His Arg Tyr Tyr Thr Glu Phe Pro Thr Val
Leu Asp 260 265 270Ile Thr Ala Glu Asp Pro Ser Lys Ser Tyr Val Lys
Leu Arg Asp Phe 275 280 285Val Leu Val Lys Leu Cys Gln Asp Leu Pro
Cys Phe Ser Arg Glu Lys 290 295 300Leu Met Gln Gly Phe Asn Glu Asp
Met Ala Ile Glu Ala Gln Gln Lys305 310 315 320Phe Lys Ile Asn Lys
Gln His Ala Arg Arg Val Tyr Glu Ile Leu Arg 325 330 335Leu Leu Val
Thr Asp Met Ser Asp Ala Glu Gln Tyr Arg Ser Tyr Arg 340 345 350Leu
Asp Ile Lys Arg Arg Leu Ile Ser Pro Tyr Lys Lys Lys Gln Arg 355 360
365Asp Leu Ala Lys Met Arg Lys Cys Leu Arg Pro Glu Glu Leu Thr Asn
370 375 380Gln Met Asn Gln Ile Glu Ile Ser Met Gln His Glu Gln Leu
Glu Glu385 390 395 400Ser Phe Gln Glu Leu Val Glu Asp Tyr Arg Arg
Val Ile Glu Arg Leu 405 410 415Ala Gln Glu21682DNAHomo sapiens
2ctgtgcggtc acttccggcc cgggagcgcg cgggttgatt cgtccttcct cagccgcggg
60tgatcgtagc tcggaaatgg cgggatttgg tgctatggag aaatttttgg tagaatataa
120gagtgcagtg gagaagaaac tggcagagta caaatgtaac accaacacag
caattgaact 180aaaattagtt cgttttcctg aagatcttga aaatgacatt
agaactttct ttcctgagta 240tacccatcaa ctctttgggg atgatgaaac
tgcttttggt tacaagggtc taaagatcct 300gttatactat attgctggta
gcctgtcaac aatgttccgt gttgaatatg catctaaagt 360tgatgagaac
tttgactgtg tagaggcaga tgatgttgag ggcaaaatta gacaaatcat
420tccacctgga ttttgcacaa acacgaatga tttcctttct ttactggaaa
aggaagttga 480tttcaagcca ttcggaacct tacttcatac ctactcagtt
ctcagtccaa caggaggaga 540aaactttacc tttcagatat ataaggctga
catgacatgt agaggctttc gagaatatca 600tgaaaggctt cagacctttt
tgatgtggtt tattgaaact gctagcttta ttgacgtgga 660tgatgaaaga
tggcactact ttctagtatt tgagaagtat aataaggatg gagctacgct
720ctttgcgacc gtaggctaca tgacagtcta taattactat gtgtacccag
acaaaacccg 780gccacgtgta agtcagatgc tgattttgac tccatttcaa
ggtcaaggcc atggtgctca 840acttcttgaa acagttcata gatactacac
tgaatttcct acagttcttg atattacagc 900ggaagatcca tccaaaagct
atgtgaaatt acgagacttt gtgcttgtga agctttgtca 960agatttgccc
tgtttttccc gggaaaaatt aatgcaagga ttcaatgaag atatggcgat
1020agaggcacaa cagaagttca aaataaataa gcaacacgct agaagggttt
atgaaattct 1080tcgactactg gtaactgaca tgagtgatgc cgaacaatac
agaagctaca gactggatat 1140taaaagaaga ctaattagcc catataagaa
aaagcagaga gatcttgcta agatgagaaa 1200atgtctcaga ccagaagaac
tgacaaacca gatgaaccaa atagaaataa gcatgcaaca 1260tgaacagctg
gaagagagtt ttcaggaact agtggaagat taccggcgtg ttattgaacg
1320acttgctcaa gagtaaagat tatactgctc tgtacaggaa gcttgcaaat
tttctgtaca 1380atgtgctgtg aaaaatctga tgactttaat tttaaaatct
tgtgacattt tgcttatact 1440aaaagttatc tatctttagt tgaatatttt
cttttggaga gattgtatat tttaaaatac 1500tgtttagagt ttatgagcat
atattgcatt taaagaaaga taaagcttct gaaatactac 1560tgcaattgct
tcccttctta aacagtataa taaatgctta gttgtgatat gttaatgtgt
1620gatgatatga ttcttaaata cttacaataa acctcattct taaatactta
aaaaaaaaaa 1680aa 16823832PRTHomo sapiens 3Met Ser Glu Ala Gly Gly
Ala Gly Pro Gly Gly Cys Gly Ala Gly Ala1 5 10 15Gly Ala Gly Ala Gly
Pro Gly Ala Leu Pro Pro Gln Pro Ala Ala Leu 20 25 30Pro Pro Ala Pro
Pro Gln Gly Ser Pro Cys Ala Ala Ala Ala Gly Gly 35 40 45Ser Gly Ala
Cys Gly Pro Ala Thr Ala Val Ala Ala Ala Gly Thr Ala 50 55 60Glu Gly
Pro Gly Gly Gly Gly Ser Ala Arg Ile Ala Val Lys Lys Ala65 70 75
80Gln Leu Arg Ser Ala Pro Arg Ala Lys Lys Leu Glu Lys Leu Gly Val
85 90 95Tyr Ser Ala Cys Lys Ala Glu Glu Ser Cys Lys Cys Asn Gly Trp
Lys 100 105 110Asn Pro Asn Pro Ser Pro Thr Pro Pro Arg Ala Asp Leu
Gln Gln Ile 115 120 125Ile Val Ser Leu Thr Glu Ser Cys Arg Ser Cys
Ser His Ala Leu Ala 130 135 140Ala His Val Ser His Leu Glu Asn Val
Ser Glu Glu Glu Met Asn Arg145 150 155 160Leu Leu Gly Ile Val Leu
Asp Val Glu Tyr Leu Phe Thr Cys Val His 165 170 175Lys Glu Glu Asp
Ala Asp Thr Lys Gln Val Tyr Phe Tyr Leu Phe Lys 180 185 190Leu Leu
Arg Lys Ser Ile Leu Gln Arg Gly Lys Pro Val Val Glu Gly 195 200
205Ser Leu Glu Lys Lys Pro Pro Phe Glu Lys Pro Ser Ile Glu Gln Gly
210 215 220Val Asn Asn Phe Val Gln Tyr Lys Phe Ser His Leu Pro Ala
Lys Glu225 230 235 240Arg Gln Thr Ile Val Glu Leu Ala Lys Met Phe
Leu Asn Arg Ile Asn 245 250 255Tyr Trp His Leu Glu Ala Pro Ser Gln
Arg Arg Leu Arg Ser Pro Asn 260 265 270Asp Asp Ile Ser Gly Tyr Lys
Glu Asn Tyr Thr Arg Trp Leu Cys Tyr 275 280 285Cys Asn Val Pro Gln
Phe Cys Asp Ser Leu Pro Arg Tyr Glu Thr Thr 290 295 300Gln Val Phe
Gly Arg Thr Leu Leu Arg Ser Val Phe Thr Val Met Arg305 310 315
320Arg Gln Leu Leu Glu Gln Ala Arg Gln Glu Lys Asp Lys Leu Pro Leu
325 330 335Glu Lys Arg Thr Leu Ile Leu Thr His Phe Pro Lys Phe Leu
Ser Met 340 345 350Leu Glu Glu Glu Val Tyr Ser Gln Asn Ser Pro Ile
Trp Asp Gln Asp 355 360 365Phe Leu Ser Ala Ser Ser Arg Thr Ser Gln
Leu Gly Ile Gln Thr Val 370 375 380Ile Asn Pro Pro Pro Val Ala Gly
Thr Ile Ser Tyr Asn Ser Thr Ser385 390 395 400Ser Ser Leu Glu Gln
Pro Asn Ala Gly Ser Ser Ser Pro Ala Cys Lys 405 410 415Ala Ser Ser
Gly Leu Glu Ala Asn Pro Gly Glu Lys Arg Lys Met Thr 420 425 430Asp
Ser His Val Leu Glu Glu Ala Lys Lys Pro Arg Val Met Gly Asp 435 440
445Ile Pro Met Glu Leu Ile Asn Glu Val Met Ser Thr Ile Thr Asp Pro
450 455 460Ala Ala Met Leu Gly Pro Glu Thr Asn Phe Leu Ser Ala His
Ser Ala465 470 475 480Arg Asp Glu Ala Ala Arg Leu Glu Glu Arg Arg
Gly Val Ile Glu Phe 485 490 495His Val Val Gly Asn Ser Leu Asn Gln
Lys Pro Asn Lys Lys Ile Leu 500 505 510Met Trp Leu Val Gly Leu Gln
Asn Val Phe Ser His Gln Leu Pro Arg 515 520 525Met Pro Lys Glu Tyr
Ile Thr Arg Leu Val Phe Asp Pro Lys His Lys 530 535 540Thr Leu Ala
Leu Ile Lys Asp Gly Arg Val Ile Gly Gly Ile Cys Phe545 550 555
560Arg Met Phe Pro Ser Gln Gly Phe Thr Glu Ile Val Phe Cys Ala Val
565 570 575Thr Ser Asn Glu Gln Val Lys Gly Tyr Gly Thr His Leu Met
Asn His 580 585 590Leu Lys Glu Tyr His Ile Lys His Asp Ile Leu Asn
Phe Leu Thr Tyr 595 600 605Ala Asp Glu Tyr Ala Ile Gly Tyr Phe Lys
Lys Gln Gly Phe Ser Lys 610 615 620Glu Ile Lys Ile Pro Lys Thr Lys
Tyr Val Gly Tyr Ile Lys Asp Tyr625 630 635 640Glu Gly Ala Thr Leu
Met Gly Cys Glu Leu Asn Pro Arg Ile Pro Tyr 645 650 655Thr Glu Phe
Ser Val Ile Ile Lys Lys Gln Lys Glu Ile Ile Lys Lys 660 665 670Leu
Ile Glu Arg Lys Gln Ala Gln Ile Arg Lys Val Tyr Pro Gly Leu 675 680
685Ser Cys Phe Lys Asp Gly Val Arg Gln Ile Pro Ile Glu Ser Ile Pro
690 695 700Gly Ile Arg Glu Thr Gly Trp Lys Pro Ser Gly Lys Glu Lys
Ser Lys705 710 715 720Glu Pro Arg Asp Pro Asp Gln Leu Tyr Ser Thr
Leu Lys Ser Ile Leu 725 730 735Gln Gln Val Lys Ser His Gln Ser Ala
Trp Pro Phe Met Glu Pro Val 740 745 750Lys Arg Thr Glu Ala Pro Gly
Tyr Tyr Glu Val Ile Arg Phe Pro Met 755 760 765Asp Leu Lys Thr Met
Ser Glu Arg Leu Lys Asn Arg Tyr Tyr Val Ser 770 775 780Lys Lys Leu
Phe Met Ala Asp Leu Gln Arg Val Phe Thr Asn Cys Lys785 790 795
800Glu Tyr Asn Pro Pro Glu Ser Glu Tyr Tyr Lys Cys Ala Asn Ile Leu
805 810 815Glu Lys Phe Phe Phe Ser Lys Ile Lys Glu Ala Gly Leu Ile
Asp Lys 820 825 83044824DNAHomo sapiens 4gcggaaaaga ggccgtgggg
ggcctcccag cgctggcaga caccgtgagg ctggcagccg 60ccggcacgca cacctagtcc
gcagtcccga ggaacatgtc cgcagccagg gcgcggagca 120gagtcccggg
caggagaacc aagggagggc gtgtgctgtg gcggcggcgg cagcggcagc
180ggagccgcta gtcccctccc tcctggggga gcagctgccg ccgctgccgc
cgccgccacc 240accatcagcg cgcggggccc ggccagagcg agccgggcga
gcggcgcgct agggggaggg 300cgggggcggg gaggggggtg ggcgaagggg
gcgggagggc gtggggggag ggtctcgctc 360tcccgactac cagagcccga
gagggagacc ctggcggcgg cggcggcgcc tgacactcgg 420cgcctcctgc
cgtgctccgg ggcggcatgt ccgaggctgg cggggccggg ccgggcggct
480gcggggcagg agccggggca ggggccgggc ccggggcgct gcccccgcag
cctgcggcgc 540ttccgcccgc gcccccgcag ggctccccct gcgccgctgc
cgccgggggc tcgggcgcct 600gcggtccggc gacggcagtg gctgcagcgg
gcacggccga aggaccggga ggcggtggct 660cggcccgaat cgccgtgaag
aaagcgcaac tacgctccgc tccgcgggcc aagaaactgg 720agaaactcgg
agtgtactcc gcctgcaagg ccgaggagtc ttgtaaatgt aatggctgga
780aaaaccctaa cccctcaccc actcccccca gagccgacct gcagcaaata
attgtcagtc 840taacagaatc ctgtcggagt tgtagccatg ccctagctgc
tcatgtttcc cacctggaga 900atgtgtcaga ggaagaaatg aacagactcc
tgggaatagt attggatgtg gaatatctct 960ttacctgtgt ccacaaggaa
gaagatgcag ataccaaaca agtttatttc tatctattta 1020agctcttgag
aaagtctatt ttacaaagag gaaaacctgt ggttgaaggc tctttggaaa
1080agaaaccccc atttgaaaaa cctagcattg aacagggtgt gaataacttt
gtgcagtaca 1140aatttagtca cctgccagca aaagaaaggc aaacaatagt
tgagttggca aaaatgttcc 1200taaaccgcat caactattgg catctggagg
caccatctca acgaagactg cgatctccca 1260atgatgatat ttctggatac
aaagagaact acacaaggtg gctgtgttac tgcaacgtgc 1320cacagttctg
cgacagtcta cctcggtacg aaaccacaca ggtgtttggg agaacattgc
1380ttcgctcggt cttcactgtt atgaggcgac aactcctgga acaagcaaga
caggaaaaag 1440ataaactgcc tcttgaaaaa cgaactctaa tcctcactca
tttcccaaaa tttctgtcca 1500tgctagaaga agaagtatat agtcaaaact
ctcccatctg ggatcaggat tttctctcag 1560cctcttccag aaccagccag
ctaggcatcc aaacagttat caatccacct cctgtggctg 1620ggacaatttc
atacaattca acctcatctt cccttgagca gccaaacgca gggagcagca
1680gtcctgcctg caaagcctct tctggacttg aggcaaaccc aggagaaaag
aggaaaatga 1740ctgattctca tgttctggag gaggccaaga aaccccgagt
tatgggggat attccgatgg 1800aattaatcaa cgaggttatg tctaccatca
cggaccctgc agcaatgctt ggaccagaga 1860ccaattttct gtcagcacac
tcggccaggg atgaggcggc aaggttggaa gagcgcaggg 1920gtgtaattga
atttcacgtg gttggcaatt ccctcaacca gaaaccaaac aagaagatcc
1980tgatgtggct ggttggccta cagaacgttt tctcccacca gctgccccga
atgccaaaag 2040aatacatcac acggctcgtc tttgacccga aacacaaaac
ccttgcttta attaaagatg 2100gccgtgttat tggtggtatc tgtttccgta
tgttcccatc tcaaggattc acagagattg 2160tcttctgtgc tgtaacctca
aatgagcaag tcaagggcta tggaacacac ctgatgaatc 2220atttgaaaga
atatcacata aagcatgaca tcctgaactt cctcacatat gcagatgaat
2280atgcaattgg atactttaag aaacagggtt tctccaaaga aattaaaata
cctaaaacca 2340aatatgttgg ctatatcaag gattatgaag gagccacttt
aatgggatgt gagctaaatc 2400cacggatccc gtacacagaa ttttctgtca
tcattaaaaa gcagaaggag ataattaaaa 2460aactgattga aagaaaacag
gcacaaattc gaaaagttta ccctggactt tcatgtttta 2520aagatggagt
tcgacagatt cctatagaaa gcattcctgg aattagagag acaggctgga
2580aaccgagtgg aaaagagaaa agtaaagagc ccagagaccc tgaccagctt
tacagcacgc 2640tcaagagcat cctccagcag gtgaagagcc atcaaagcgc
ttggcccttc atggaacctg 2700tgaagagaac agaagctcca ggatattatg
aagttataag gttccccatg gatctgaaaa 2760ccatgagtga acgcctcaag
aataggtact acgtgtctaa gaaattattc atggcagact 2820tacagcgagt
ctttaccaat tgcaaagagt acaacccccc tgagagtgaa tactacaaat
2880gtgccaatat cctggagaaa ttcttcttca gtaaaattaa ggaagctgga
ttaattgaca 2940agtgattttt tttcccctct gcttcttaga aactcaccaa
gcagtgtgcc taaagcaagg 3000tggtttagtt ttttacaaag aattggacat
gatgtattga agagacttgt aaatgtaata 3060attagcactt ttgaaaaaac
aaaaaacctc cttttagctt ttcagatatg tatttaaatt 3120gaagtcatag
gacattttta ttttatggaa tagattttaa tctatttact actattaagg
3180taaattttct atggcatgtc cattagctat ttcatgatag atgattaggg
gtttcctcaa 3240aacctgtgtg tgaggaaatt gcacacagta gcaaaatttg
gggaaatcca taacattttc 3300agaccatgaa tgaatgtttc catttttttc
taatggaatg tgagagttta cttttatttt 3360attctgaagg actttaagga
agggatacat gattttaaaa aagcctgtaa gaggtgaaat 3420atgtgatgtt
tgaagtctct ttatagactt tttatatata ttttttaaaa cactcatcta
3480gatgaggtgc tttgagcagt tctgaaaaat gcagttccag gaaagcaact
gctttggttc 3540ctaaggaaga aattctaaat aatgcaaact tttaaaataa
gcatctaggt ttttgataat 3600tctgtctact tacaacaaac ttgttagtac
ataaccacta ttttaataat tattttctct 3660acacaaatgt gtaatatcat
atttgacttt gcttatgcag gccataagtt ccaaaagata 3720atttccctgc
ccacaaaggc ataaacttga aaacacatga gattgaatca acatgcttta
3780ataggaaaag atgtatggtc tatatatgta tcaatctggt gaatcctcgt
tctaataaag 3840gttctttttc ttttctatga tacacacagc cacgctgata
atatgcaaat gaacattttc 3900ctttatgtct ctccagataa tgtttattgt
ctgaggtaaa ttaaattccc accagggttt 3960gctgtcagta ttttaacacc
cacattagta tatgcgtcca gggtcataac cccctaaaat 4020ccatcatgca
accttattaa tctgtcttgg gattccagtt tagtgcttgg atttatttcc
4080tgattacact acatagaaaa gtgagacatc tgccattccc aactctggga
aaaccaacta 4140atatacaacc atataaatga aggccatctt gatggtctca
acactaattt ttatgatgca 4200aatttataca ctgatttttg taaaggacaa
agttttaaaa gcgtatttaa cttgatgttt 4260tctatcagca taaataaaat
ggtcatgaat agtcattaaa aacagttgcc agtgataatc 4320tgcatgaagg
aaaaagaacc ctgcaaatgg ctattgagtt ggaagtattg tttttgatat
4380gtaagagata ttcagaatgc tcacactgaa aatgcctcaa ctttttaaag
tgtaagaaac 4440caccatgagt ggtgtctaga tttctaatga agaatcatga
tacagtttgg attaagtatc 4500ttggactggt tttaaacagt gctttgtacc
ggatctgctg aagcatctgt ccagctggta 4560tcctgtgaaa gtttgttatt
ttctgagtag acattcttat agagtattgt ctttaaaatc 4620agattgtctc
ttctatattg aaagcatttt tatgttttct aatttaaaaa ttaatatttt
4680cttatagata ttgtgcaata aagctgaagt agaatgtgtg gtttttgcaa
atgctttaac 4740agctgataaa aattttacat ttgtaaaatt aatatattgt
actggtacaa aatagtttta 4800aattatattt taaaaagctt ccaa
48245837PRTHomo sapiens 5Met Ala Glu Pro Ser Gln Ala Pro Thr Pro
Ala Pro Ala Ala Gln Pro1 5 10 15Arg Pro Leu Gln Ser Pro Ala Pro Ala
Pro Thr Pro Thr Pro Ala Pro 20 25 30Ser Pro Ala Ser Ala Pro Ile Pro
Thr Pro Thr Pro Ala Pro Ala Pro 35 40 45Ala Pro Ala Ala Ala Pro Ala
Gly Ser Thr Gly Thr Gly Gly Pro Gly 50 55 60Val Gly Ser Gly Gly Ala
Gly Ser Gly Gly Asp Pro Ala Arg Pro Gly65 70 75 80Leu Ser Gln Gln
Gln Arg Ala Ser Gln Arg Lys Ala Gln Val Arg Gly 85 90 95Leu Pro Arg
Ala Lys Lys Leu Glu Lys Leu Gly Val Phe Ser Ala Cys 100 105 110Lys
Ala Asn Glu Thr Cys Lys Cys Asn Gly Trp Lys Asn Pro Lys Pro 115
120
125Pro Thr Ala Pro Arg Met Asp Leu Gln Gln Pro Ala Ala Asn Leu Ser
130 135 140Glu Leu Cys Arg Ser Cys Glu His Pro Leu Ala Asp His Val
Ser His145 150 155 160Leu Glu Asn Val Ser Glu Asp Glu Ile Asn Arg
Leu Leu Gly Met Val 165 170 175Val Asp Val Glu Asn Leu Phe Met Ser
Val His Lys Glu Glu Asp Thr 180 185 190Asp Thr Lys Gln Val Tyr Phe
Tyr Leu Phe Lys Leu Leu Arg Lys Cys 195 200 205Ile Leu Gln Met Thr
Arg Pro Val Val Glu Gly Ser Leu Gly Ser Pro 210 215 220Pro Phe Glu
Lys Pro Asn Ile Glu Gln Gly Val Leu Asn Phe Val Gln225 230 235
240Tyr Lys Phe Ser His Leu Ala Pro Arg Glu Arg Gln Thr Met Phe Glu
245 250 255Leu Ser Lys Met Phe Leu Leu Cys Leu Asn Tyr Trp Lys Leu
Glu Thr 260 265 270Pro Ala Gln Phe Arg Gln Arg Ser Gln Ala Glu Asp
Val Ala Thr Tyr 275 280 285Lys Val Asn Tyr Thr Arg Trp Leu Cys Tyr
Cys His Val Pro Gln Ser 290 295 300Cys Asp Ser Leu Pro Arg Tyr Glu
Thr Thr His Val Phe Gly Arg Ser305 310 315 320Leu Leu Arg Ser Ile
Phe Thr Val Thr Arg Arg Gln Leu Leu Glu Lys 325 330 335Phe Arg Val
Glu Lys Asp Lys Leu Val Pro Glu Lys Arg Thr Leu Ile 340 345 350Leu
Thr His Phe Pro Lys Phe Leu Ser Met Leu Glu Glu Glu Ile Tyr 355 360
365Gly Ala Asn Ser Pro Ile Trp Glu Ser Gly Phe Thr Met Pro Pro Ser
370 375 380Glu Gly Thr Gln Leu Val Pro Arg Pro Ala Ser Val Ser Ala
Ala Val385 390 395 400Val Pro Ser Thr Pro Ile Phe Ser Pro Ser Met
Gly Gly Gly Ser Asn 405 410 415Ser Ser Leu Ser Leu Asp Ser Ala Gly
Ala Glu Pro Met Pro Gly Glu 420 425 430Lys Arg Thr Leu Pro Glu Asn
Leu Thr Leu Glu Asp Ala Lys Arg Leu 435 440 445Arg Val Met Gly Asp
Ile Pro Met Glu Leu Val Asn Glu Val Met Leu 450 455 460Thr Ile Thr
Asp Pro Ala Ala Met Leu Gly Pro Glu Thr Ser Leu Leu465 470 475
480Ser Ala Asn Ala Ala Arg Asp Glu Thr Ala Arg Leu Glu Glu Arg Arg
485 490 495Gly Ile Ile Glu Phe His Val Ile Gly Asn Ser Leu Thr Pro
Lys Ala 500 505 510Asn Arg Arg Val Leu Leu Trp Leu Val Gly Leu Gln
Asn Val Phe Ser 515 520 525His Gln Leu Pro Arg Met Pro Lys Glu Tyr
Ile Ala Arg Leu Val Phe 530 535 540Asp Pro Lys His Lys Thr Leu Ala
Leu Ile Lys Asp Gly Arg Val Ile545 550 555 560Gly Gly Ile Cys Phe
Arg Met Phe Pro Thr Gln Gly Phe Thr Glu Ile 565 570 575Val Phe Cys
Ala Val Thr Ser Asn Glu Gln Val Lys Gly Tyr Gly Thr 580 585 590His
Leu Met Asn His Leu Lys Glu Tyr His Ile Lys His Asn Ile Leu 595 600
605Tyr Phe Leu Thr Tyr Ala Asp Glu Tyr Ala Ile Gly Tyr Phe Lys Lys
610 615 620Gln Gly Phe Ser Lys Asp Ile Lys Val Pro Lys Ser Arg Tyr
Leu Gly625 630 635 640Tyr Ile Lys Asp Tyr Glu Gly Ala Thr Leu Met
Glu Cys Glu Leu Asn 645 650 655Pro Arg Ile Pro Tyr Thr Glu Leu Ser
His Ile Ile Lys Lys Gln Lys 660 665 670Glu Ile Ile Lys Lys Leu Ile
Glu Arg Lys Gln Ala Gln Ile Arg Lys 675 680 685Val Tyr Pro Gly Leu
Ser Cys Phe Lys Glu Gly Val Arg Gln Ile Pro 690 695 700Val Glu Ser
Val Pro Gly Ile Arg Glu Thr Gly Trp Lys Pro Leu Gly705 710 715
720Lys Glu Lys Gly Lys Glu Leu Lys Asp Pro Asp Gln Leu Tyr Thr Thr
725 730 735Leu Lys Asn Leu Leu Ala Gln Ile Lys Ser His Pro Ser Ala
Trp Pro 740 745 750Phe Met Glu Pro Val Lys Lys Ser Glu Ala Pro Asp
Tyr Tyr Glu Val 755 760 765Ile Arg Phe Pro Ile Asp Leu Lys Thr Met
Thr Glu Arg Leu Arg Ser 770 775 780Arg Tyr Tyr Val Thr Arg Lys Leu
Phe Val Ala Asp Leu Gln Arg Val785 790 795 800Ile Ala Asn Cys Arg
Glu Tyr Asn Pro Pro Asp Ser Glu Tyr Cys Arg 805 810 815Cys Ala Ser
Ala Leu Glu Lys Phe Phe Tyr Phe Lys Leu Lys Glu Gly 820 825 830Gly
Leu Ile Asp Lys 83563127DNAHomo sapiens 6ggttgcccat gcggccctag
ggctgggagc gcggcgccgc tctccgctgc gggggaggcc 60atggcggaac cttcccaggc
cccgaccccg gccccggctg cgcagccccg gccccttcag 120tccccagccc
ctgccccaac tccgactcct gcacccagcc cggcttcagc cccgattccg
180actcccaccc cggcaccagc ccctgcccca gctgcagccc cagccggcag
cacagggact 240ggggggcccg gggtaggaag tgggggggcc gggagcgggg
gggatccggc tcgacctggc 300ctgagccagc agcagcgcgc cagtcagagg
aaggcgcaag tccgggggct gccgcgcgcc 360aagaagcttg agaagctagg
ggtcttctcg gcttgcaagg ccaatgaaac ctgtaagtgt 420aatggctgga
aaaaccccaa gccccccact gcaccccgca tggatctgca gcagccagct
480gccaacctga gtgagctgtg ccgcagttgt gagcacccct tggctgacca
cgtatcccac 540ttggagaatg tgtcagagga tgagataaac cgactgctgg
ggatggtggt ggatgtggag 600aatctcttca tgtctgttca caaggaagag
gacacagaca ccaagcaggt ctatttctac 660ctcttcaagc tactgcggaa
atgcatcctg cagatgaccc ggcctgtggt ggaggggtcc 720ctgggcagcc
ctccatttga gaaacctaat attgagcagg gtgtgctgaa ctttgtgcag
780tacaagttta gtcacctggc tccccgggag cggcagacga tgttcgagct
ctcaaagatg 840ttcttgctct gccttaacta ctggaagctt gagacacctg
cccagtttcg gcagaggtct 900caggctgagg acgtggctac ctacaaggtc
aattacacca gatggctctg ttactgccac 960gtgccccaga gctgtgatag
cctcccccgc tacgaaacca ctcatgtctt tgggcgaagc 1020cttctccggt
ccattttcac cgttacccgc cggcagctgc tggaaaagtt ccgagtggag
1080aaggacaaat tggtgcccga gaagaggacc ctcatcctca ctcacttccc
caaattcctg 1140tccatgctgg aggaggagat ctatggggca aactctccaa
tctgggagtc aggcttcacc 1200atgccaccct cagaggggac acagctggtt
ccccggccag cttcagtcag tgcagcggtt 1260gttcccagca cccccatctt
cagccccagc atgggtgggg gcagcaacag ctccctgagt 1320ctggattctg
caggggccga gcctatgcca ggcgagaaga ggacgctccc agagaacctg
1380accctggagg atgccaagcg gctccgtgtg atgggtgaca tccccatgga
gctggtcaat 1440gaggtcatgc tgaccatcac tgaccctgct gccatgctgg
ggcctgagac gagcctgctt 1500tcggccaatg cggcccggga tgagacagcc
cgcctggagg agcgccgcgg catcatcgag 1560ttccatgtca tcggcaactc
actgacgccc aaggccaacc ggcgggtgtt gctgtggctc 1620gtggggctgc
agaatgtctt ttcccaccag ctgccgcgca tgcctaagga gtatatcgcc
1680cgcctcgtct ttgacccgaa gcacaagact ctggccttga tcaaggatgg
gcgggtcatc 1740ggtggcatct gcttccgcat gtttcccacc cagggcttca
cggagattgt cttctgtgct 1800gtcacctcga atgagcaggt caagggttat
gggacccacc tgatgaacca cctgaaggag 1860tatcacatca agcacaacat
tctctacttc ctcacctacg ccgacgagta cgccatcggc 1920tacttcaaaa
agcagggttt ctccaaggac atcaaggtgc ccaagagccg ctacctgggc
1980tacatcaagg actacgaggg agcgacgctg atggagtgtg agctgaatcc
ccgcatcccc 2040tacacggagc tgtcccacat catcaagaag cagaaagaga
tcatcaagaa gctgattgag 2100cgcaaacagg cccagatccg caaggtctac
ccggggctca gctgcttcaa ggagggcgtg 2160aggcagatcc ctgtggagag
cgttcctggc attcgagaga caggctggaa gccattgggg 2220aaggagaagg
ggaaggagct gaaggacccc gaccagctct acacaaccct caaaaacctg
2280ctggcccaaa tcaagtctca ccccagtgcc tggcccttca tggagcctgt
gaagaagtcg 2340gaggcccctg actactacga ggtcatccgc ttccccattg
acctgaagac catgactgag 2400cggctgcgaa gccgctacta cgtgacccgg
aagctctttg tggccgacct gcagcgggtc 2460atcgccaact gtcgcgagta
caaccccccg gacagcgagt actgccgctg tgccagcgcc 2520ctggagaagt
tcttctactt caagctcaag gagggaggcc tcattgacaa gtaggcccat
2580ctttgggccg cagccctgac ctggaatgtc tccacctcgg attctgatct
gatccttagg 2640gggtgccctg gccccacgga cccgactcag cttgagacac
tccagccaag ggtcctccgg 2700acccgatcct gcagctcttt ctggaccttc
aggcaccccc aagcgtgcag ctctgtccca 2760gccttcactg tgtgtgagag
gtctcctggg ttggggccca gcccctctag agtagctggt 2820ggccagggat
gaaccttgcc cagccgtggt ggcccccagg cctggtcccc aagagctttg
2880gaggcttgga ttcctgggcc tggcccaggt ggctgtttcc ctgaggacca
gaactgctca 2940ttttagcttg agtgatggct tcaggggttg gaagttcagc
ccaaactgaa gggggccatg 3000ccttgtccag cactgttctg tcagtctccc
ccaggggtgg ggggtatggg gaccattcat 3060tccctggcat taatccctta
gagggaataa taaagctttt tatttctctg tgaaaaaaaa 3120aaaaaaa 3127
* * * * *
References