U.S. patent application number 17/160803 was filed with the patent office on 2021-05-20 for agricultural trench closing systems, methods, and apparatus.
The applicant listed for this patent is Precision Planting LLC. Invention is credited to Jeremy Hodel, Cory Muhlbauer, Derek Sauder.
Application Number | 20210144910 17/160803 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 1000005362516 |
Filed Date | 2021-05-20 |
View All Diagrams
United States Patent
Application |
20210144910 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Sauder; Derek ; et
al. |
May 20, 2021 |
AGRICULTURAL TRENCH CLOSING SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND APPARATUS
Abstract
A closing wheel assembly is provided for a row unit agricultural
planter. The planter is configured to open a trench in the soil and
the closing wheel assembly is configured to close the trench.
Inventors: |
Sauder; Derek; (Tremont,
IL) ; Hodel; Jeremy; (Morton, IL) ; Muhlbauer;
Cory; (Bloomington, IL) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
Precision Planting LLC |
Tremont |
IL |
US |
|
|
Family ID: |
1000005362516 |
Appl. No.: |
17/160803 |
Filed: |
January 28, 2021 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
16528589 |
Jul 31, 2019 |
|
|
|
17160803 |
|
|
|
|
15853692 |
Dec 22, 2017 |
10721858 |
|
|
16528589 |
|
|
|
|
14437978 |
Apr 23, 2015 |
9848524 |
|
|
PCT/US2013/066634 |
Oct 24, 2013 |
|
|
|
15853692 |
|
|
|
|
61815540 |
Apr 24, 2013 |
|
|
|
61718087 |
Oct 24, 2012 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
1/1 |
Current CPC
Class: |
A01C 7/203 20130101;
A01B 63/008 20130101; A01B 63/32 20130101; A01B 49/027 20130101;
A01C 5/068 20130101; A01C 7/205 20130101; A01C 5/066 20130101 |
International
Class: |
A01C 7/20 20060101
A01C007/20; A01C 5/06 20060101 A01C005/06; A01B 49/02 20060101
A01B049/02; A01B 63/00 20060101 A01B063/00; A01B 63/32 20060101
A01B063/32 |
Claims
1. An adaptive closing force system for attachment to a row unit
comprising a closing unit, the adaptive closing force system
comprising: a) at least one closing actuator in operational
communication with the row unit; and b) a processor, wherein the
adaptive closing system is constructed and arranged to receive one
or more closing force inputs to generate closing force output to
increase, decrease or maintain closing actuator force.
2. The adaptive closing force system of claim 1, wherein the at
least one closing actuator further comprises at least one of an
airbag and a hydraulic actuator.
3. The adaptive closing force system of claim 1, wherein the force
applied by the at least one closing actuator on the at least one
closing disc is a direct force.
4. The adaptive closing force system of claim 1, wherein the one or
more closing force inputs comprises closing wheel downforce.
5. An adaptive closing force system comprising: a) at least one row
unit comprising a supplemental downforce system; b) at least one
closing unit comprising at least one closing disc and at least one
closing actuator in operational communication with the at least one
row unit and supplemental downforce system; and c) a control system
comprising at least a processor, wherein: i) the processor
calculates a closing force output from the one or more closing
force inputs, ii) the closing force output is determinative of a
closing force applied by the at least one closing actuator to the
at least one closing disc, and iii) the closing force output is
updated based on changes in the one or more closing force inputs
received by the closing actuator over time.
6. The adaptive closing force system of claim 5, wherein the at
least one closing actuator is selected from the group consisting of
an airbag and a hydraulic actuator.
7. The adaptive closing force system of claim 5, wherein the
closing force input comprises closing wheel downforce.
8. The adaptive closing force system of claim 5, wherein the
processor is further is constructed and arranged to receive user
input data.
9. The adaptive closing force system of claim 5, wherein the
operations system further comprises a non-transitory
computer-readable medium in operational communication with the
processor.
10. An adaptive closing force system comprising: a) at least one
row unit comprising a supplemental downforce system; b) at least
one closing system comprising at least one closing disc and at
least one closing actuator in operational communication with the at
least one row unit and the supplemental downforce system; and c) a
control system comprising at least a processor, wherein changes to
a closing force input generate changes in a closing force output
applied by the at least one closing actuator to the at least one
closing disc.
11. The adaptive closing force system of claim 10, wherein the at
least one closing actuator is selected from the group consisting of
an airbag and a hydraulic actuator.
12. The adaptive closing force system of claim 10, wherein the
closing force input comprises closing wheel downforce.
13. The adaptive closing force system of claim 10, wherein the
actuator is constructed and arranged to increase, decrease or
maintain closing actuator force in response to the closing force
input.
14. The adaptive closing force system of claim 14, wherein the
control system further comprises a graphical user interface.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] The present application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No.
16/528,589, filed 31 Jul. 2019; which is a continuation of U.S.
Ser. No. 16/853,692, filed on 22 Dec. 2017, now U.S. Pat. No.
10,721,858; which is a continuation of Ser. No. 14/437,978, filed
on 23 Apr. 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,848,524; which is a national
stage entry of PCT/US2013/066634, filed on 24 Oct. 2013, which
claims priority to U.S. Ser. No. 61/815,540, filed 24 Apr. 2013,
and U.S. Ser. No. 61/718,087, filed on 24 Oct. 2012, the contents
of all of these applications are incorporated herein by reference
in their entireties.
BACKGROUND
[0002] In recent years, increased farm operation sizes and time
constraints caused by field conditions and weather have increased
the need to perform planting operations at faster speeds. However,
effectively creating a proper seed environment at high speeds is
problematic, particularly in wet or high-residue conditions.
"Plugging" of the apparatus used to close the trench is a
particular problem, as is failure to return and level the displaced
soil into the planting trench. Thus, there is a need for a trench
closing system, apparatus and methods providing for more effective
closing of the planting trench.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0003] FIG. 1 is a right side elevation view of an embodiment of an
agricultural row unit.
[0004] FIG. 2 is a right side elevation of an embodiment of a
closing wheel assembly mounted to the row unit of FIG. 1.
[0005] FIG. 3 is a right side elevation view of the closing wheel
assembly of FIG. 2 with a right closing wheel not shown for
clarity.
[0006] FIG. 4 is a top view of the closing wheel assembly of FIG.
2.
[0007] FIG. 5 is a rear view of the closing wheel assembly of FIG.
2.
[0008] FIG. 6 is a perspective view of the closing wheel assembly
of FIG. 2 with the closing wheels removed for clarity.
[0009] FIG. 7 is a bottom view of a pivot arm of the closing wheel
assembly of FIG. 2.
[0010] FIG. 8 is a bottom view of a flap of the closing wheel
assembly of FIG. 2.
[0011] FIG. 9A schematically illustrates an embodiment of a closing
wheel control system.
[0012] FIG. 9B schematically illustrates another embodiment of a
closing wheel control system.
[0013] FIG. 9C schematically illustrates still another embodiment
of a closing wheel control system.
[0014] FIG. 10A is a right side elevation view of another
embodiment of a closing wheel assembly.
[0015] FIG. 10B is a perspective view of the closing wheel assembly
of FIG. 10A.
[0016] FIG. 11 is a right side elevation view of an embodiment of a
closing assembly including an embodiment of a closing wheel with a
right closing wheel not shown for clarity.
[0017] FIG. 12 is a right side elevation view of the closing
assembly of FIG. 11 with the right closing wheel shown.
[0018] FIG. 13 is a rear elevation view of the closing assembly of
FIG. 11 with certain components not shown for clarity.
[0019] FIG. 14 is a rear elevation view of another embodiment of a
closing wheel assembly with certain components not shown for
clarity.
[0020] FIG. 15 illustrates an embodiment of a process for
controlling downpressure on a closing wheel assembly.
DESCRIPTION
[0021] Referring to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals
designate identical or corresponding parts throughout the several
views, FIG. 1 illustrates an agricultural planter, comprising a
toolbar (not shown) to which multiple row units 10 are mounted in
transversely spaced relation. The row unit 10 preferably comprises
one of the row unit embodiments disclosed in applicant's co-pending
U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/718,051 ("the '051
application"), the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated
herein in its entirety by reference. Each row unit 10 is preferably
mounted to the toolbar by a parallel arm arrangement (not shown)
such that the row unit is permitted to translate vertically with
respect to the toolbar.
[0022] The row unit 10 preferably includes a frame 14. The row unit
10 preferably includes an opening disc assembly 18 including two
angled discs rollingly mounted to the frame 14 and disposed to open
a v-shaped trench 3 in the soil as the row unit traverses a field.
The row unit 10 preferably includes a gauge wheel assembly 16
including two gauge wheels pivotally mounted to either side of the
frame 14 (by two gauge wheel arms 17 on either side of the frame
14) and disposed to roll along the surface of the soil, thus
limiting the depth of the trench opened by the opening disc
assembly 18. A closing assembly 100 is preferably pivotally coupled
to the frame 14 and configured to move displaced soil back into the
trench 3 as described in further detail herein.
[0023] Continuing to refer to FIG. 1, seeds 5 are communicated from
a hopper 12 to a seed meter 30 preferably configured to singulate
the supplied seeds. The meter 30 is preferably a vacuum-type meter
such as that disclosed in Applicant's co-pending international
patent application no. PCT/US2012/030192 (Pub. No. WO/2012/129442),
the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein
in its entirety. In operation, the seed meter 30 preferably
deposits the supplied seeds into a seed conveyor 20 such as one of
the seed conveyor embodiments disclosed in applicant's co-pending
international patent application no. PCT/US2012/57327, the
disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in
its entirety. The seed conveyor 20 is preferably removably mounted
to the frame 14 and preferably conveys the seeds 5 deposited by the
meter 30 to a lower end of the seed conveyor and deposits the seeds
into the trench 3. As disclosed in the '051 application, in some
embodiments the seed conveyor 20 is replaced with a seed tube. In
such embodiments, seeds deposited by the meter 30 fall through the
seed tube into the trench 3.
Closing Wheel Systems and Apparatus
[0024] Turning to FIGS. 2 and 3, the closing assembly 100
preferably includes a left closing wheel 110-1 pivotally mounted to
the row unit frame 14 by a pivot arm 150. A right closing wheel
110-2 is preferably pivotally mounted to the row unit frame 14 by
the pivot arm 150. Both closing wheels 110 are preferably rotatably
mounted to the pivot arm 150 by respective pivots 152 and disposed
to roll along the surface of the soil. Referring to FIG. 4, the
pivot arm 150 includes pivots 152-1,152-2 extending to the left and
right side, respectively, of the row unit frame 14. The pivot arm
150 is preferably pivotally mounted to both sides of the row unit
frame 14 by shafts extending through pivots 152. Referring to FIGS.
4 and 5, the closing wheels 110 are preferably angled to open
upward and forward. In operation, the closing wheels 110 preferably
gather soil previously displaced to the side of the trench 3 by the
opening disc assembly 18 and move the displaced soil back into the
trench.
[0025] Referring to FIG. 3, each closing wheel 110 preferably
comprises a hub 112 and a rim 114 circumferentially mounted to the
hub 112. The rims 114 are preferably comprised of a wear-resistant
material having a relatively high coefficient of friction such as
rubber. The hubs 112 are preferably comprised of a relatively
lightweight material such as plastic. In other embodiments the hubs
112 are comprised of a relatively heavy material such as cast iron.
In still other embodiments, one or both of the closing wheels 110
comprise tined wheels such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No.
5,443,023, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by
reference herein in its entirety.
[0026] It should be appreciated that in some applications, the
closing wheels 110 do not satisfactorily return displaced soil to
the trench 3. Moreover, in some implementations, particularly at
operating speeds of 8 to 10 miles per hour, the closing wheels do
not satisfactorily firm or level the soil returned to the trench 3.
Thus, referring to FIGS. 1 through 3, the closing assembly 100
preferably includes a flap 130 disposed to resiliently contact the
surface of the soil behind the closing wheels 110. The flap 130 is
preferably resiliently mounted to the pivot arm 150. Specifically,
the flap 130 is preferably mounted to a spring 134 by a bracket
132. The spring 134 is preferably mounted at a forward end to an
attachment portion 154 of the pivot arm 150.
[0027] Turning to FIGS. 5 and 6, the flap 130 preferably includes
two wings sections 131-1,131-2 extending to the left and right,
respectively, of the trench 3. The bracket 132 preferably retains
an upper portion of each wing section 131 in a forward-swept
orientation. The flap 130 additionally includes a center section
135 which passes directly over the trench 3 and contacts the trench
at a lower end. Turning to FIG. 8, a thickness D of the flap 130
and the stiffness of the flap material is preferably selected to
permit resilient engagement of the soil surface without disturbing
the soil surface or causing the closing wheels 110 to ride off the
ground. The flap 130 is preferably made of a relatively flexible
material such as rubber. The flap 130 is preferably made of
neoprene. The thickness D of the flap 130 is preferably
approximately 3/8 inch.
[0028] In operation, as the row unit 10 traverses the field, the
flap 130 is preferably elastically deformed as it resiliently
contacts the surface of the soil as best illustrated in FIG. 1. As
the forward-swept wing sections 131 pass over the soil displaced to
the side of the trench, the wings move soil displaced by the
opening disc assembly 18 (and not returned to the trench 3 by the
closing wheels 110) into the trench. Further, the center section
135 resiliently contacts and firms the replaced soil in the trench
3.
[0029] Turning to FIG. 3, the closing assembly 100 preferably
includes an actuator 120 disposed to modify the forces between the
closing wheels 110 and the soil surface, as well as between the
flap 130 and the soil surface. The actuator 120 preferably
comprises a pneumatic actuator such as the pneumatic actuator
embodiments disclosed in Applicant's co-pending U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 12/970,708 ("the '708 application"), the
disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein in its entirety
by reference. In other embodiments, the actuator comprises an
airbag or a pair of counter-acting airbags. In still other
embodiments, the actuator 120 comprises a hydraulic actuator.
[0030] The actuator 120 is preferably pivotally mounted at a first
end to the row unit frame 14 by a shaft 124-2. The actuator 120 is
preferably pivotally mounted at a second end to a rearward portion
of the pivot arm 150 by a shaft 124-1. The actuator 120 includes a
cylinder 125 and a rod 127. The rod 127 divides an interior volume
of the cylinder 125 into a lift chamber 126 and a down chamber 124.
An inlet 122-2 is in fluid communication with the down chamber 124.
An inlet 122-1 is in fluid communication with the lift chamber
126.
[0031] In operation, as fluid pressure in the down chamber 124 is
increased relative to the fluid pressure in the lift chamber 126, a
load is transferred from the frame 14 to the closing assembly 100
such that the force imposed on the soil by the closing wheels 110
and the flap 130 increases. Likewise, as fluid pressure in the down
chamber 124 is decreased relative to the fluid pressure in the lift
chamber 126, the force imposed on the soil by the closing wheels
110 and the flap 130 decreases.
[0032] In the closing assembly embodiment of FIGS. 1-8, it should
be appreciated that the amount of force transmitted from the
actuator 120 to the flap 130 is related to the effective stiffness,
i.e., the spring constant, of the spring 134. In an alternative
closing assembly 800 illustrated in FIGS. 10A and 10B, the flap 130
is resiliently held in contact with the soil surface by an
adjustably retained spring, enabling the user to adjust the amount
of force transmitted to the flap 130.
[0033] Referring to FIG. 10A, a pivot arm 850 of the closing
assembly 800 is pivotally mounted to the row unit frame 14 at
pivots 852. Closing wheels 110 are rollingly mounted to the pivot
arm 850 at shafts 812. The pivot arm 850 includes a rearward
portion 854 to which an actuator 120 is pivotally mounted at an
aperture 824-1 in the rearward portion 854 of the pivot arm 850. As
with the closing assembly 100, the actuator is also pivotally
mounted to the row unit frame 14. The rearward portion 854 is
preferably rigidly mounted to the pivot arm 850, e.g., by welding,
and in other embodiments is formed as a part of the pivot arm.
[0034] A rigid link 834 is preferably pivotally mounted to the
rearward portion 854 of the pivot arm 850 at a pivot 814. The rigid
link 834 preferably includes a force adjustment slot 836 having
multiple notches along the length of the slot. A tension spring 860
is preferably retained at a first end by the force adjustment slot
836. The tension spring 860 is preferably retained at a second end
by an attachment aperture 870 formed in the rearward portion 854 of
the pivot arm 850. The user adjusts the tension in spring 860 (and
thus the force transmitted from the pivot arm 850 to the flap 130)
by selecting the notch in which the first end of the spring 860 is
retained. The flap 130 is preferably mounted to the rigid link 834
by a mounting bracket 832 which, as with the mounting bracket 132,
preferably retains the wing sections 131 of the flap in a
forward-swept orientation.
[0035] Referring to FIG. 10A, in a preferred embodiment the closing
assembly 800 includes lock-up features enabling the operator to
lock the flap 130 in a raised position such that the flap does not
contact the soil in operation while the remainder of the closing
assembly 800 remains in an operative, ground-engaging state. The
user preferably locks the flap 130 in the raised position by first
adjusting the spring 860 to the notch farthest to the right on the
view of FIG. 10 in order to loosen the spring. The user then
rotates the link 834 upward (clockwise on the view of FIG. 10A)
until a transverse hole 839 formed in the rigid link 834 is aligned
with a transverse hole 859 formed in the rearward portion 854 of
the pivot arm 850. The holes 859, 854 are preferably equidistant
from a central axis of the pivot 814 and are preferably equal in
diameter. The user then inserts a pin through both the holes 839,
859 in order to lock the link 834 (and thus the flap 130) in the
raised position. It should be appreciated that other mechanisms
could be used to lock up the other closing wheel assembly
embodiments disclosed herein.
Closing Wheel Downforce Control Systems
[0036] Turning to FIG. 9A, a control system 200 is illustrated for
controlling the net force applied by the actuator 120 to the
closing system embodiments described herein. The control system 200
preferably includes a fluid control system 230 having a first
solenoid valve 220-1 in fluid communication with the down chamber
124 and a second solenoid valve 220-2 in fluid communication with
the down chamber 124. Each solenoid valve 220 in the control system
200 is in fluid communication with an air compressor 210 preferably
mounted to a toolbar 8 of the planter and configured to supply
pressurized air to the fluid control system 230. A controller 250
having a processor, memory, and graphical user interface is
preferably in electrical communication with the fluid control
system and configured to set a pressure in the chambers 124,126 of
the actuator 120. The controller 250 is preferably mounted in a cab
of a tractor. In operation, the user inputs a desired net pressure
(e.g., the pressure in the down chamber 124 less the lift chamber
126) into the controller 250 and the controller communicates a
signal to the solenoid valve 220-1 and/or the solenoid valve 220-2
in order to achieve the desired net pressure in the actuator 120.
Each solenoid valve 220 is preferably a pressure control (e.g.,
pressure reducing-relieving) valve configured to establish and
maintain a selected pressure at a control outlet of the valve
corresponding to a command signal received by the solenoid
valve.
[0037] Turning to FIG. 9B, modified control system 200' is
illustrated further including a pivot arm angle sensor 280 mounted
to the closing wheel assembly 100 and in electrical communication
with the controller 250. The angle sensor 280 preferably comprises
a rotary potentiometer configured to generate a signal related to
the orientation of the pivot arm 150 relative to the row unit frame
14. In operation, the controller 250 determines a desired force
adjustment in the actuator 120 based on the output of the angle
sensor 280.
[0038] Some embodiments of the control system 200' further include
two gauge wheel arm angle sensors 290, one mounted to each gauge
wheel arm 17 of the gauge wheel assembly 16, in electrical
communication with the controller 250. The angle sensor 290
preferably comprises a rotary potentiometer configured to generate
a signal related to the orientation of the associated gauge wheel
arm 17 relative to the row unit frame 14. In operation, the
controller 250 determines a desired force adjustment in the
actuator 120 based on a summed signal equal to the difference
between the signal generated by the sensor 280 and the average of
the signals generated by the sensors 290-1,290-2. In some methods,
the controller 250 increases the net pressure (e.g., by increasing
the pressure in the down chamber 124) when the summed signal
exceeds a threshold, i.e., the closing wheels 110 have rotated
upward past one or more threshold angles relative to the gauge
wheels of the gauge wheel assembly 16. The threshold angle is
preferably exceeded when the bottom of the closing wheels 110
raises higher than a vertical plane representing the average height
of the bottom of the gauge wheels 17-1,17-2.
[0039] Referring to FIG. 15, a process 1500 for controlling
downpressure on the closing wheel assembly based on input from the
angle sensor 280 and/or angle sensors 290 is illustrated. At step
1510 the controller 250 preferably receives a signal from the angle
sensor 280. In some embodiments, at step 1515 the controller 250
additionally receives a signal from the angle sensors 290. At step
1520 the controller 250 determines a level value based on the
signal generated by the angle sensor 280 and/or the signal
generated by angle sensors 290. In some embodiments the level value
is equal to the sum of the closing wheel angle sensor signal and
the average of the gauge wheel angle sensor signals. At step 1530
the level value is compared to a desired value stored in memory.
For example, a desired value corresponding to the bottom of the
closing wheels being level with the bottom of the gauge wheels. If
at step 1530 the controller determines that the level value is not
equal to or within a threshold range (e.g., plus or minus 5%) of
the desired value, then at step 1540 the controller preferably
adjusts a downpressure command (e.g., the control pressure of one
of the solenoid valves) to the fluid control system 230 to bring
the measured depth closer to the desired value. For example, the
controller 250 preferably reduces the net pressure in the actuator
(e.g., by decreasing the pressure in the down chamber 124) when the
signal corresponds to a position in which the pivot arm 150 has
rotated downward past a threshold angle relative to the gauge wheel
arms, indicating that the soil is too soft for the current pressure
setting. At step 1550 the controller 250 optionally determines
whether the rate of change of the signal generated closing wheel
angle sensor 280 is within a threshold range. If the rate of change
of the signal is not within the threshold range, then at step 1560
the controller 250 preferably increases the downpressure command by
an increment (e.g., 1 psi).
[0040] Turning to FIG. 9C, another control system 300 is
illustrated for controlling the pressure in one or more actuators
120 associated with one or more row units 10 mounted along the
toolbar 8. A pneumatic controller 350 similar to those controllers
disclosed in the '708 application (previously incorporated herein
by reference) is in fluid communication with an air compressor 310,
a lift supply line 320, and a down supply line 330. The lift supply
line 320 is in fluid communication with each lift chamber 126 and
the down supply line 330 is in fluid communication with each lift
chamber 124. In operation, the user adjusts the controller 350 to
set a desired net pressure in the actuator 120.
Tandem Wheel Embodiments
[0041] FIGS. 11-13 illustrate an embodiment of a closing assembly
100' of a row unit 10. The closing assembly 100' is preferably
pivotally coupled to the row unit frame 14 as disclosed previously
herein and configured to move displaced soil back into the trench 3
as described in further detail herein.
[0042] Similar to the closing assembly 100 described in previously
herein, the closing assembly 100' includes a pivot arm 150
preferably pivotally mounted to both sides of the row unit frame 14
by shafts extending through pivots 152 of the pivot arm. An
actuator 120 is preferably pivotally mounted at a first end to the
row unit frame 14 by a shaft 124-2. The actuator 120 is preferably
pivotally mounted at a second end to a rearward portion of the
pivot arm 150 by a shaft 124-1. The actuator 120 may be any
actuator configured to apply a variable force to the pivot arm,
such as a pneumatic or hydraulic actuator.
[0043] The closing assembly 100' also preferably includes a closing
wheel assembly 2000. The closing wheel assembly 2000 preferably
includes a bracket 2010. The bracket 2010 is preferably rigidly
mounted at an upper end to a rearward end of the pivot arm 150. A
walking arm 2020 is preferably pivotally mounted to a lower portion
of the bracket 2010 by a bushing 2012 extending through the bracket
2010 and the walking arm 2020.
[0044] The closing wheel assembly 2000 also preferably includes a
rear closing wheel 2032 and a forward closing wheel 2034. The
forward closing wheel 2034 is preferably rollingly mounted to a
forward end of the walking arm 2020 about a forward axis 2024. The
rear closing wheel 2032 is preferably rollingly mounted to a
rearward end of the walking arm 2020 about a rear axis 2022. As
best illustrated in FIG. 13, the rear axis 2022 and the forward
axis 2024 preferably descend as they extend in an outboard
direction such that the closing wheels 2032, 2034 open upward.
Additionally, the rear axis 2022 and the forward axis 2024
preferably extend rearwardly as they extend in an outboard
direction such that the closing wheels 2032, 2034 open forward. It
should be appreciated that the orientation of the closing wheels
with respect to the direction of travel Dt assists in moving soil
displaced from the trench 3 back into the trench. In some
embodiments, each of the closing wheels 2032, 2034 include a soil
disrupting feature or features (e.g., tines or blades) disposed
around the perimeter of the disc. However, the illustrated closing
wheels instead have a substantially constant radius.
[0045] As illustrated in FIG. 13, the points of contact between the
closing wheels 2032, 2034 and the soil are preferably separated by
a transverse distance Td. The transverse distance Td is preferably
slightly wider than an upper end of the trench 3 such that the
closing wheels 2032, 2034 are disposed to return soil displaced
from the trench back into the trench. The transverse distance Td is
thus preferably slightly wider (e.g., 0.25 to 1 inch wider) than
the separation between the opening discs of the opening disc
assembly 18 at the height at which the opening discs emerge from
the soil (e.g., at 1.75 inches from the bottom of the opening
discs). The transverse distance Td is preferably variable by
addition or removal of shims as is known in the art.
[0046] As illustrated in FIG. 12, the axes 2022, 2024 are separated
by a longitudinal (i.e., travel-direction) distance Ld such that
the points of contact between the closing wheels and the soil
surface 2 are also separated by the same longitudinal distance Ld
when the walking arm 2020 is oriented horizontally. The distance Ld
is preferably between 2 inches and 8 inches and is preferably
approximately 7 inches. Particularly in embodiments in which the
perimeter of each closing wheel is configured to consistently
maintain contact with the soil (e.g., both closing wheels 2032,
2034 illustrated in FIG. 13), and even more particularly in
embodiments in which the transverse distance Td between the closing
wheels is sized such that the closing wheels are positioned
adjacent to either side of the trench, a small or near-zero
longitudinal distance Ld distance between the closing wheels
results in "pinching" or "plugging" of soil between the closing
wheels.
[0047] In operation, as the row unit 10 encounters changes in
terrain, the closing wheels 2032, 2034 pivot relative to one
another about the bushing 2012. Thus upon encountering a soil
surface sloped along the travel direction Dt or transverse to the
travel direction, the closing wheels 2032, 2034 maintain
simultaneous contact with the soil surface despite the preferably
substantial longitudinal distance Ld between the points of contact
between closing wheels 2032, 2034 and the soil.
[0048] In operation as the row unit 10 traverses the field, the
soil surface 2 imposes a rearward horizontal force on the rear
closing wheel 2032 resulting in a rearward horizontal force F2 on
the rear axle 2022 (FIG. 11). The soil surface imposes a rearward
horizontal force on the forward closing wheel 2034 resulting in a
rearward horizontal force F4 on the forward axle 2024. As
illustrated in FIG. 13, the forces F2, F4 preferably act along a
common plane Pf. In a another embodiment of a closing wheel
assembly 2000' illustrated in FIG. 14, a central axis Ab of the
bushing 2012' intersects the plane Pf such that the forces F2, F4
act on the walking arm 2020' through the central axis Ab. Thus in
the embodiment of FIG. 14, the forces F2, F4 preferably impose a
very small or zero moment on the walking arm 2020' about the
bushing 2012' as the row unit 10 traverses the field.
[0049] In some embodiments of the closing assembly, a flap 130
configured and disposed to return and firm soil into the trench 3
is preferably resiliently mounted to the pivot arm 150 by a spring
134 as described elsewhere herein.
[0050] In some embodiments of the closing assembly, the walking arm
2020 is biased into a horizontal position. In some such
embodiments, a wrap spring is mounted to the bushing 2012 such that
the wrap spring does not rotate with respect to the bushing 2012.
The bushing 2012 is preferably press-fit into the bracket 2010. The
wrap spring preferably contacts the walking arm 2020 at two points
fore and aft of the bushing and imposes a counteracting moment on
the walking arm 2020 which increases according to the effective
spring constant of the wrap spring when the walking arm rotates in
either direction from the horizontal position illustrated in FIGS.
11-12.
[0051] In alternative closing assembly embodiments, two closing
wheels in the relative positions described herein with respect to
the closing wheels 2032, 2034 are each rollingly mounted to a
respective and independent closing wheel pivot arm which pivots
freely from the either the subframe 14 or the pivot arm 150. In
such embodiments, the closing wheel pivot arms are preferably
biased (e.g., by springs) such that the closing wheels are each
biased toward contact with the soil surface.
[0052] In the illustrated closing assembly embodiments, the forward
closing wheel is illustrated to the left of the trench 3 and the
rear closing wheel is illustrated to the right of the trench.
However, in other embodiments the transverse position and
orientation of the closing wheels could be reversed such that the
forward closing wheel is positioned to the right of the trench 3
and the rear closing wheel is positioned to the left of the
trench.
[0053] The foregoing description is presented to enable one of
ordinary skill in the art to make and use the invention and is
provided in the context of a patent application and its
requirements. Various modifications to the preferred embodiment of
the apparatus, and the general principles and features of the
system and methods described herein will be readily apparent to
those of skill in the art. Thus, the present invention is not to be
limited to the embodiments of the apparatus, system and methods
described above and illustrated in the drawing figures, but is to
be accorded the widest scope consistent with the spirit and scope
of the appended claims.
* * * * *