U.S. patent application number 16/653533 was filed with the patent office on 2021-04-15 for system and method for implementing an automated regression testing module.
This patent application is currently assigned to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. The applicant listed for this patent is JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. Invention is credited to Riddhi B. BHATT, Alejandro DOMINGUEZ, Angel LEON, Dennis MACKE, Katelyn V. RUMENIK, Shyamal J. SHAH.
Application Number | 20210109848 16/653533 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 1000004410221 |
Filed Date | 2021-04-15 |
![](/patent/app/20210109848/US20210109848A1-20210415-D00000.png)
![](/patent/app/20210109848/US20210109848A1-20210415-D00001.png)
![](/patent/app/20210109848/US20210109848A1-20210415-D00002.png)
![](/patent/app/20210109848/US20210109848A1-20210415-D00003.png)
![](/patent/app/20210109848/US20210109848A1-20210415-D00004.png)
![](/patent/app/20210109848/US20210109848A1-20210415-D00005.png)
United States Patent
Application |
20210109848 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
LEON; Angel ; et
al. |
April 15, 2021 |
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING AN AUTOMATED REGRESSION TESTING
MODULE
Abstract
Various methods, apparatuses/systems, and media for implementing
an automated testing module are disclosed. A processor creates a
draft test suite that incorporates a plurality of features, each
feature including a test scenario that comprises steps that
describe the test scenario in a human readable form. The processor
also compiles the steps of the test scenario into a single step in
a reusable format; receives a request to perform a testing for an
application; de-compiles the single step, in response to received
request, to create a complete list of steps used in the scenario;
generates a final test suite based on the de-complied single step
in response to the received request; and automatically executes the
final test suite to test the application without rewriting
code.
Inventors: |
LEON; Angel; (Tampa, FL)
; DOMINGUEZ; Alejandro; (Tampa, FL) ; BHATT;
Riddhi B.; (Tampa, FL) ; RUMENIK; Katelyn V.;
(Tampa, FL) ; MACKE; Dennis; (St. Petersburg,
FL) ; SHAH; Shyamal J.; (Wesley Chapel, FL) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
New York |
NY |
US |
|
|
Assignee: |
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
New York
NY
|
Family ID: |
1000004410221 |
Appl. No.: |
16/653533 |
Filed: |
October 15, 2019 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
1/1 |
Current CPC
Class: |
G06F 11/3664 20130101;
G06F 11/3684 20130101; G06F 11/3688 20130101 |
International
Class: |
G06F 11/36 20060101
G06F011/36 |
Claims
1. A method for implementing an automated regression testing module
that provides a framework for automatic regression testing by
utilizing one or more processors and one or more memories, the
method comprising: creating, by utilizing a graphical user
interface (GUI), a draft test suite, the draft test suite
incorporating a plurality of features, each feature including a
test scenario that comprises steps that describe the test scenario
in a human readable form; compiling the steps of the test scenario
into a single step in a reusable format configured to be utilized
in executing all previously defined steps associated with the
plurality of features and corresponding test scenarios within the
draft test suite; receiving a request to perform a regression
testing for an application; de-compiling the single step, in
response to the received request, to create a complete list of
steps used in the scenario; generating a final test suite based on
the de-complied single step in response to the received request,
wherein generating the final test suite includes: accessing a local
database to fetch a data file utilized in the scenario to obtain
the complete list of steps used in the scenario and distribution of
example headers and data; and formatting the data in the fetched
data file; and inserting the formatted data into the scenario; and
automatically executing the final test suite to test the
application.
2. The method according to claim 1, further comprising: receiving a
request to perform additional regression testing for the
application; incorporating the reusable format including the single
step into another test suite for subsequent regression testing of
the application without rewriting code to generate the final test
suite; and automatically executing the final test suite to perform
additional regression testing for the application.
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein generating a final test
suite further comprising: compiling the steps corresponding to the
test scenario into importables to support re-usability of the steps
in executing all previously defined steps associated with the
plurality of features and corresponding test scenarios within the
draft test suite; storing the importables onto a local database;
de-compiling the importables, in response to the receive request,
by performing lookups within the local database based on a
content-value of a step with a keyword "import"; replacing the step
with the keyword "import" with step-collection of a found
importable based on a result of the lookups to create a complete
list of steps used in the scenario; and generating the final test
suite based on the complete list of steps used in the scenario
without rewriting code.
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein generating a final test
suite further comprising: performing lookups within a local
database to determine whether a dynamic keyword is used; replacing
the keyword, including its delimiters, by a value of a found
keyword based on a result of the lookups to create a complete list
of steps used in the scenario; and generating the final test suite
based on the complete list of steps used in the scenario without
rewriting code.
5. The method according to claim 1, further comprising: formatting
the data in the fetched data file into Gherkin language.
6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the final test suite is
represented as the highest hierarchy object in the GUI.
7. The method according to claim 1, further comprising: exporting
the final test suite to a file format having any one of the
following file extensions: .xls, .xlsx, .xlsm, .xlt, .xlts, and
.xml; and wherein the exported file format is fully executable in
an automated mode that automatically executes the regression
testing of the application without rewriting code.
8. The method according to claim 1, further comprising: generating,
by utilizing the GUI, a report comprising one or more graphs, one
or more charts, or one or more encountered errors, based on the
execution of the final test suite.
9. The method according to claim 8, further comprising: packaging
the report in both JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) and Hypertext
Markup Language (HTML) formats; and transmitting the packaged
report to emails associated with the test suite.
10. A system for implementing an automated regression testing
module that provides a framework for automatic regression testing,
comprising: a receiver configured to receive a request for testing
an application; and a processor operatively connected to the
receiver via a communication network and configured to: create, by
utilizing a graphical user interface (GUI), a draft test suite, the
draft test suite incorporating a plurality of features, each
feature including a test scenario that comprises steps that
describe the test scenario in a human readable form; compile the
steps of the test scenario into a single step in a reusable format
configured to be utilized in executing all previously defined steps
associated with the plurality of features and corresponding test
scenarios within the draft test suite; de-compile the single step,
in response to the received request, to create a complete list of
steps used in the scenario; generate a final test suite based on
the de-complied single step in response to the received request,
wherein, in generating the final test suite, the processor is
further configured to: access a local database to fetch a data file
utilized in the scenario to obtain the complete list of steps used
in the scenario and distribution of example headers and data; and
format the data in the fetched data file; and insert the formatted
data into the scenario; and automatically execute the final test
suite to test the application.
11. The system according to claim 10, wherein the receiver is
configured to receive a request to perform additional regression
testing for the application, and wherein the processor is further
configured to: incorporate the reusable format including the single
step into another test suite for subsequent regression testing of
the application without rewriting code to generate the final test
suite; and automatically execute the final test suite to perform
additional regression testing for the application.
12. The system according to claim 10, wherein, in generating a
final test suite, the processor is further configured to: compile
the steps corresponding to the test scenario into importables to
support re-usability of the steps in executing all previously
defined steps associated with the plurality of features and
corresponding test scenarios within the draft test suite; store the
importables onto a local database; de-compile the importables, in
response to the receive request, by performing lookups within the
local database based on a content-value of a step with a keyword
"import"; replace the step with the keyword "import" with
step-collection of a found importable based on a result of the
lookups to create a complete list of steps used in the scenario;
and generate the final test suite based on the complete list of
steps used in the scenario without rewriting code.
13. The system according to claim 10, wherein, in generating a
final test suite, the processor is further configured to: perform
lookups within a local database to determine whether a dynamic
keyword is used; replace the keyword, including its delimiters, by
a value of a found keyword based on a result of the lookups to
create a complete list of steps used in the scenario; and generate
the final test suite based on the complete list of steps used in
the scenario without rewriting code.
14. The system according to claim 10, wherein the processor is
further configured to: format the data in the fetched data file
into Gherkin language.
15. A non-transitory computer readable medium configured to store
instructions for implementing an automated regression testing
module that provides a framework for automatic regression testing,
wherein, when executed, the instructions cause a processor to
perform the following: creating, by utilizing a graphical user
interface (GUI), a draft test suite, the draft test suite
incorporating a plurality of features, each feature including a
test scenario that comprises steps that describe the test scenario
in a human readable form; compiling the steps of the test scenario
into a single step in a reusable format configured to be utilized
in executing all previously defined steps associated with the
plurality of features and corresponding test scenarios within the
draft test suite; receiving a request to perform a regression
testing for an application; de-compiling the single step, in
response to the received request, to create a complete list of
steps used in the scenario; generating a final test suite based on
the de-complied single step in response to the received request,
wherein in generating the final test suite, the instructions, when
executed, cause the processor to further perform the following:
accessing a local database to fetch a data file utilized in the
scenario to obtain the complete list of steps used in the scenario
and distribution of example headers and data; and formatting the
data in the fetched data file; and inserting the formatted data
into the scenario; and automatically executing the final test suite
to test the application.
16. The non-transitory computer readable medium according to claim
15, wherein the instructions, when executed, cause the processor to
further perform the following: receiving a request to perform
additional regression testing for the application; incorporating
the reusable format including the single step into another test
suite for subsequent regression testing of the application without
rewriting code to generate the final test suite; and automatically
executing the final test suite to perform additional regression
testing for the application.
17. The non-transitory computer readable medium according to claim
15, wherein in generating a final test suite, the instructions,
when executed, cause the processor to further perform the
following: compiling the steps corresponding to the test scenario
into importables to support re-usability of the steps in executing
all previously defined steps associated with the plurality of
features and corresponding test scenarios within the draft test
suite; storing the importables onto a local database; de-compiling
the importables, in response to the receive request, by performing
lookups within the local database based on a content-value of a
step with a keyword "import"; replacing the step with the keyword
"import" with step-collection of a found importable based on a
result of the lookups to create a complete list of steps used in
the scenario; and generating the final test suite based on the
complete list of steps used in the scenario without rewriting
code.
18. The non-transitory computer readable medium according to claim
15, wherein in generating a final test suite, the instructions,
when executed, cause the processor to further perform the
following: performing lookups within a local database to determine
whether a dynamic keyword is used; replacing the keyword, including
its delimiters, by a value of a found keyword based on a result of
the lookups to create a complete list of steps used in the
scenario; and generating the final test suite based on the complete
list of steps used in the scenario without rewriting code.
19. The non-transitory computer readable medium according to claim
15, wherein the instructions, when executed, cause the processor to
further perform the following: formatting the data in the fetched
data file into Gherkin language.
20. The non-transitory computer readable medium according to claim
15, wherein the instructions, when executed, cause the processor to
further perform the following: representing the final test suite as
the highest hierarchy object in the GUI; and exporting the final
test suite to a file format having any one of the following file
extensions: .xls, .xlsx, .xlsm, .xlt, .xlts, and .xml, wherein the
exported file format is fully executable in an automated mode that
automatically executes the regression testing of the application
without rewriting code.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] This disclosure generally relates to automated testing of
software application, and, more particularly, to methods and
apparatuses for implementing an automated regression testing module
for automating regression testing of software application using
reusable test suites.
BACKGROUND
[0002] As software application becomes increasingly more complex,
testing such software application may also become more complex as a
large number of unique combinations of paths and modules may be
tested for each program. Conventional tools may exist for
automating software application testing. However, many of these
conventional tools may require writing code that may require
specific skill set and expertise to develop in order to test the
software application. Software development in the Internet-era has
grown increasingly complex. Software applications must not only
handle and process complex calculations and tasks, but must be able
to accurately and efficiently process a large variety of data types
and data content.
[0003] Moreover, such conventional tools may have shortcomings that
may make them highly unorganized. These conventional tools may
operate with application features being the highest level of data
organization. That is, entire applications may not have their
individual features organized under a testing suite. In addition,
the tests generated by conventional tools may also tend to be rigid
and non-reusable in nature due to the peculiarities of an
application business logic. Depending on the complexity of this
logic, test steps may generally become highly specialized, hence
not reusable. In addition, data used on these tests may be defined
within the tests themselves. That is, changes to this data may
require direct code and test changes, thereby necessitating
re-packaging and re-distributing of the test application.
SUMMARY
[0004] The present disclosure, through one or more of its various
aspects, embodiments, and/or specific features or sub-components,
provides, among other features, various systems, servers, devices,
methods, media, programs, and platforms for implementing an
automated regression testing module for executing automated
regression testing of software application in a much faster, easier
and more efficient manner compared to conventional testing by using
a graphical user interface that may allow organizing individual
features of entire applications under a testing suite and making
the test suite reusable without requiring to recode or requiring
any high level code developing skills, but the disclosure is not
limited thereto.
[0005] According to an aspect of the present disclosure, a method
for implementing an automated regression testing module that
provides a framework for automatic regression testing by utilizing
one or more processors and one or more memories is disclosed. The
method may include: creating, by utilizing a graphical user
interface (GUI), a draft test suite, the draft test suite
incorporating a plurality of features, each feature including a
test scenario that comprises steps that describe the test scenario
in a human readable form; compiling the steps of the test scenario
into a single step in a reusable format configured to be utilized
in executing all previously defined steps associated with the
plurality of features and corresponding test scenarios within the
draft test suite; receiving a request to perform a regression
testing for an application; de-compiling the single step, in
response to the received request, to create a complete list of
steps used in the scenario; generating a final test suite based on
the de-complied single step in response to the received request;
and automatically executing the final test suite to test the
application.
[0006] According to another aspect of the present disclosure, the
method may further include: receiving a request to perform
additional regression testing for the application; incorporating
the reusable format including the single step into another test
suite for subsequent regression testing of the application without
rewriting code to generate the final test suite; and automatically
executing the final test suite to perform additional regression
testing for the application.
[0007] According to yet another aspect of the present disclosure,
wherein generating a final test suite may further include:
compiling the steps corresponding to the test scenario into
importables to support re-usability of the steps in executing all
previously defined steps associated with the plurality of features
and corresponding test scenarios within the draft test suite;
storing the importables onto a local database; de-compiling the
importables, in response to the receive request, by performing
lookups within the local database based on a content-value of a
step with a keyword "import"; replacing the step with the keyword
"import" with step-collection of a found importable based on a
result of the lookups to create a complete list of steps used in
the scenario; and generating the final test suite based on the
complete list of steps used in the scenario without rewriting
code.
[0008] According to a further aspect of the present disclosure,
wherein generating a final test suite may further include:
performing lookups within a local database to determine whether a
dynamic keyword is used; replacing the keyword, including its
delimiters, by a value of a found keyword based on a result of the
lookups to create a complete list of steps used in the scenario;
and generating the final test suite based on the complete list of
steps used in the scenario without rewriting code.
[0009] According to yet another aspect of the present disclosure,
wherein generating a final test suite may further include:
accessing a local database to fetch a data file utilized in the
scenario to obtain the complete list of steps used in the scenario
and distribution of example headers and data; and formatting the
data in the fetched data file into Gherkin language; and inserting
the formatted data into the scenario.
[0010] According to an additional aspect of the present disclosure,
wherein the final test suite may be represented as the highest
hierarchy object in the GUI.
[0011] According to a further aspect of the present disclosure, the
method may further include: exporting the final test suite to a
file format having any one of the following file extensions: .xls,
.xlsx, .xlsm, .xlt, .xlts, and .xml; and wherein the exported file
format is fully executable in an automated mode that automatically
executes the regression testing of the application without
rewriting code.
[0012] According to yet another aspect of the present disclosure,
the method may further include: generating, by utilizing the GUI, a
report comprising one or more graphs, one or more charts, or one or
more encountered errors, based on the execution of the final test
suite.
[0013] According to a further aspect of the present disclosure, the
method may further include: packaging the report in both JavaScript
Object Notation (JSON) and Hypertext Markup Language (HTML)
formats; and transmitting the packaged report to emails associated
with the test suite.
[0014] According to another aspect of the present disclosure, a
system for implementing an automated regression testing module that
provides a framework for automatic regression testing is disclosed.
The system may include a receiver configured to receive a request
for testing an application; and a processor operatively connected
to the receiver via a communication network and configured to:
create, by utilizing a graphical user interface (GUI), a draft test
suite, the draft test suite incorporating a plurality of features,
each feature including a test scenario that comprises steps that
describe the test scenario in a human readable form; compile the
steps of the test scenario into a single step in a reusable format
configured to be utilized in executing all previously defined steps
associated with the plurality of features and corresponding test
scenarios within the draft test suite; de-compile the single step,
in response to the received request, to create a complete list of
steps used in the scenario; generate a final test suite based on
the de-complied single step in response to the received request;
and automatically execute the final test suite to test the
application.
[0015] According to yet another aspect of the present disclosure,
the receiver may be configured to receive a request to perform
additional regression testing for the application, and the
processor may be further configured to: incorporate the reusable
format including the single step into another test suite for
subsequent regression testing of the application without rewriting
code to generate the final test suite; and automatically execute
the final test suite to perform additional regression testing for
the application.
[0016] According to a further aspect of the present disclosure,
wherein, in generating a final test suite, the processor may be
further configured to: compile the steps corresponding to the test
scenario into importables to support re-usability of the steps in
executing all previously defined steps associated with the
plurality of features and corresponding test scenarios within the
draft test suite; store the importables onto a local database;
de-compile the importables, in response to the receive request, by
performing lookups within the local database based on a
content-value of a step with a keyword "import"; replace the step
with the keyword "import" with step-collection of a found
importable based on a result of the lookups to create a complete
list of steps used in the scenario; and generate the final test
suite based on the complete list of steps used in the scenario
without rewriting code.
[0017] According to another aspect of the present disclosure,
wherein, in generating a final test suite, the processor may be
further configured to: perform lookups within a local database to
determine whether a dynamic keyword is used; replace the keyword,
including its delimiters, by a value of a found keyword based on a
result of the lookups to create a complete list of steps used in
the scenario; and generate the final test suite based on the
complete list of steps used in the scenario without rewriting
code.
[0018] According to a further aspect of the present disclosure,
wherein, in generating a final test suite, the processor may be
further configured to: access a local database to fetch a data file
utilized in the scenario to obtain the complete list of steps used
in the scenario and distribution of example headers and data; and
format the data in the fetched data file into Gherkin language; and
insert the formatted data into the scenario.
[0019] According to another aspect of the present disclosure, a
non-transitory computer readable medium configured to store
instructions for implementing an automated regression testing
module that provides a framework for automatic regression testing
is disclosed. The instructions, when executed, may cause a
processor to perform the following: creating, by utilizing a
graphical user interface (GUI), a draft test suite, the draft test
suite incorporating a plurality of features, each feature including
a test scenario that comprises steps that describe the test
scenario in a human readable form; compiling the steps of the test
scenario into a single step in a reusable format configured to be
utilized in executing all previously defined steps associated with
the plurality of features and corresponding test scenarios within
the draft test suite; receiving a request to perform a regression
testing for an application; de-compiling the single step, in
response to the received request, to create a complete list of
steps used in the scenario; generating a final test suite based on
the de-complied single step in response to the received request;
and automatically executing the final test suite to test the
application
[0020] According to a further aspect of the present disclosure,
wherein the instructions, when executed, may cause the processor to
further perform the following: receiving a request to perform
additional regression testing for the application; incorporating
the reusable format including the single step into another test
suite for subsequent regression testing of the application without
rewriting code to generate the final test suite; and automatically
executing the final test suite to perform additional regression
testing for the application.
[0021] According to another aspect of the present disclosure,
wherein in generating a final test suite, the instructions, when
executed, may cause the processor to further perform the following:
compiling the steps corresponding to the test scenario into
importables to support re-usability of the steps in executing all
previously defined steps associated with the plurality of features
and corresponding test scenarios within the draft test suite;
storing the importables onto a local database; de-compiling the
importables, in response to the receive request, by performing
lookups within the local database based on a content-value of a
step with a keyword "import"; replacing the step with the keyword
"import" with step-collection of a found importable based on a
result of the lookups to create a complete list of steps used in
the scenario; and generating the final test suite based on the
complete list of steps used in the scenario without rewriting
code.
[0022] According to a further aspect of the present disclosure,
wherein in generating a final test suite, the instructions, when
executed, may cause the processor to further perform the following:
performing lookups within a local database to determine whether a
dynamic keyword is used; replacing the keyword, including its
delimiters, by a value of a found keyword based on a result of the
lookups to create a complete list of steps used in the scenario;
and generating the final test suite based on the complete list of
steps used in the scenario without rewriting code.
[0023] According to yet another aspect of the present disclosure,
wherein in generating a final test suite, the instructions, when
executed, may cause the processor to further perform the following:
accessing a local database to fetch a data file utilized in the
scenario to obtain the complete list of steps used in the scenario
and distribution of example headers and data; and formatting the
data in the fetched data file into Gherkin language; and inserting
the formatted data into the scenario.
[0024] According to a further aspect of the present disclosure,
wherein the instructions, when executed, may cause the processor to
further perform the following: representing the final test suite as
the highest hierarchy object in the GUI; and exporting the final
test suite to a file format having any one of the following file
extensions: .xls, .xlsx, .xlsm, .xlts, and .xml, wherein the
exported file format may be fully executable in an automated mode
that automatically executes the regression testing of the
application without rewriting code.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0025] The present disclosure is further described in the detailed
description which follows, in reference to the noted plurality of
drawings, by way of non-limiting examples of preferred embodiments
of the present disclosure, in which like characters represent like
elements throughout the several views of the drawings.
[0026] FIG. 1 illustrates a computer system for implementing an
automated regression testing module in accordance with an exemplary
embodiment.
[0027] FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary diagram of a network
environment with an automated regression testing device in
accordance with an exemplary embodiment.
[0028] FIG. 3 illustrates a system diagram for implementing an
automated regression testing device with an automated regression
testing module in accordance with an exemplary embodiment.
[0029] FIG. 4 illustrates a system diagram for implementing an
automated regression testing module of FIG. 3 in accordance with an
exemplary embodiment.
[0030] FIG. 5 illustrates a flow chart for implementing an
automated regression testing module in accordance with an exemplary
embodiment.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0031] Through one or more of its various aspects, embodiments
and/or specific features or sub-components of the present
disclosure, are intended to bring out one or more of the advantages
as specifically described above and noted below.
[0032] The examples may also be embodied as one or more
non-transitory computer readable media having instructions stored
thereon for one or more aspects of the present technology as
described and illustrated by way of the examples herein. The
instructions in some examples include executable code that, when
executed by one or more processors, cause the processors to carry
out steps necessary to implement the methods of the examples of
this technology that are described and illustrated herein.
[0033] As is traditional in the field of the present disclosure,
example embodiments are described, and illustrated in the drawings,
in terms of functional blocks, units and/or modules. Those skilled
in the art will appreciate that these blocks, units and/or modules
are physically implemented by electronic (or optical) circuits such
as logic circuits, discrete components, microprocessors, hard-wired
circuits, memory elements, wiring connections, and the like, which
may be formed using semiconductor-based fabrication techniques or
other manufacturing technologies. In the case of the blocks, units
and/or modules being implemented by microprocessors or similar,
they may be programmed using software (e.g., microcode) to perform
various functions discussed herein and may optionally be driven by
firmware and/or software. Alternatively, each block, unit and/or
module may be implemented by dedicated hardware, or as a
combination of dedicated hardware to perform some functions and a
processor (e.g., one or more programmed microprocessors and
associated circuitry) to perform other functions. Also, each block,
unit and/or module of the example embodiments may be physically
separated into two or more interacting and discrete blocks, units
and/or modules without departing from the scope of the inventive
concepts. Further, the blocks, units and/or modules of the example
embodiments may be physically combined into more complex blocks,
units and/or modules without departing from the scope of the
present disclosure.
[0034] FIG. 1 is an exemplary system for use in accordance with the
embodiments described herein. The system 100 is generally shown and
may include a computer system 102, which is generally
indicated.
[0035] The computer system 102 may include a set of instructions
that can be executed to cause the computer system 102 to perform
any one or more of the methods or computer-based functions
disclosed herein, either alone or in combination with the other
described devices. The computer system 102 may operate as a
standalone device or may be connected to other systems or
peripheral devices. For example, the computer system 102 may
include, or be included within, any one or more computers, servers,
systems, communication networks or cloud environment. Even further,
the instructions may be operative in such cloud-based computing
environment.
[0036] In a networked deployment, the computer system 102 may
operate in the capacity of a server or as a client user computer in
a server-client user network environment, a client user computer in
a cloud computing environment, or as a peer computer system in a
peer-to-peer (or distributed) network environment. The computer
system 102, or portions thereof, may be implemented as, or
incorporated into, various devices, such as a personal computer, a
tablet computer, a set-top box, a personal digital assistant, a
mobile device, a palmtop computer, a laptop computer, a desktop
computer, a communications device, a wireless smart phone, a
personal trusted device, a wearable device, a global positioning
satellite (GPS) device, a web appliance, or any other machine
capable of executing a set of instructions (sequential or
otherwise) that specify actions to be taken by that machine.
Further, while a single computer system 102 is illustrated,
additional embodiments may include any collection of systems or
sub-systems that individually or jointly execute instructions or
perform functions. The term system shall be taken throughout the
present disclosure to include any collection of systems or
sub-systems that individually or jointly execute a set, or multiple
sets, of instructions to perform one or more computer
functions.
[0037] As illustrated in FIG. 1, the computer system 102 may
include at least one processor 104. The processor 104 is tangible
and non-transitory. As used herein, the term "non-transitory" is to
be interpreted not as an eternal characteristic of a state, but as
a characteristic of a state that will last fora period of time. The
term "non-transitory" specifically disavows fleeting
characteristics such as characteristics of a particular carrier
wave or signal or other forms that exist only transitorily in any
place at any time. The processor 104 is an article of manufacture
and/or a machine component. The processor 104 is configured to
execute software instructions in order to perform functions as
described in the various embodiments herein. The processor 104 may
be a general-purpose processor or may be part of an application
specific integrated circuit (ASIC). The processor 104 may also be a
microprocessor, a microcomputer, a processor chip, a controller, a
microcontroller, a digital signal processor (DSP), a state machine,
or a programmable logic device. The processor 104 may also be a
logical circuit, including a programmable gate array (PGA) such as
a field programmable gate array (FPGA), or another type of circuit
that includes discrete gate and/or transistor logic. The processor
104 may be a central processing unit (CPU), a graphics processing
unit (GPU), or both. Additionally, any processor described herein
may include multiple processors, parallel processors, or both.
Multiple processors may be included in, or coupled to, a single
device or multiple devices.
[0038] The computer system 102 may also include a computer memory
106. The computer memory 106 may include a static memory, a dynamic
memory, or both in communication. Memories described herein are
tangible storage mediums that can store data and executable
instructions, and are non-transitory during the time instructions
are stored therein. Again, as used herein, the term
"non-transitory" is to be interpreted not as an eternal
characteristic of a state, but as a characteristic of a state that
will last for a period of time. The term "non-transitory"
specifically disavows fleeting characteristics such as
characteristics of a particular carrier wave or signal or other
forms that exist only transitorily in any place at any time. The
memories are an article of manufacture and/or machine component.
Memories described herein are computer-readable mediums from which
data and executable instructions can be read by a computer.
Memories as described herein may be random access memory (RAM),
read only memory (ROM), flash memory, electrically programmable
read only memory (EPROM), electrically erasable programmable
read-only memory (EEPROM), registers, a hard disk, a cache, a
removable disk, tape, compact disk read only memory (CD-ROM),
digital versatile disk (DVD), floppy disk, blu-ray disk, or any
other form of storage medium known in the art. Memories may be
volatile or non-volatile, secure and/or encrypted, unsecure and/or
unencrypted. Of course, the computer memory 106 may comprise any
combination of memories or a single storage.
[0039] The computer system 102 may further include a display 108,
such as a liquid crystal display (LCD), an organic light emitting
diode (OLED), a flat panel display, a solid-state display, a
cathode ray tube (CRT), a plasma display, or any other known
display.
[0040] The computer system 102 may also include at least one input
device 110, such as a keyboard, a touch-sensitive input screen or
pad, a speech input, a mouse, a remote control device having a
wireless keypad, a microphone coupled to a speech recognition
engine, a camera such as a video camera or still camera, a cursor
control device, a global positioning system (GPS) device, an
altimeter, a gyroscope, an accelerometer, a proximity sensor, or
any combination thereof. Those skilled in the art appreciate that
various embodiments of the computer system 102 may include multiple
input devices 110. Moreover, those skilled in the art further
appreciate that the above-listed, exemplary input devices 110 are
not meant to be exhaustive and that the computer system 102 may
include any additional, or alternative, input devices 110.
[0041] The computer system 102 may also include a medium reader 112
which is configured to read any one or more sets of instructions,
e.g., software, from any of the memories described herein. The
instructions, when executed by a processor, can be used to perform
one or more of the methods and processes as described herein. In a
particular embodiment, the instructions may reside completely, or
at least partially, within the memory 106, the medium reader 112,
and/or the processor 110 during execution by the computer system
102.
[0042] Furthermore, the computer system 102 may include any
additional devices, components, parts, peripherals, hardware,
software or any combination thereof which are commonly known and
understood as being included with or within a computer system, such
as, but not limited to, a network interface 114 and an output
device 116. The output device 116 may be, but is not limited to, a
speaker, an audio out, a video out, a remote control output, a
printer, or any combination thereof.
[0043] Each of the components of the computer system 102 may be
interconnected and communicate via a bus 118 or other communication
link. As shown in FIG. 1, the components may each be interconnected
and communicate via an internal bus. However, those skilled in the
art appreciate that any of the components may also be connected via
an expansion bus. Moreover, the bus 118 may enable communication
via any standard or other specification commonly known and
understood such as, but not limited to, peripheral component
interconnect, peripheral component interconnect express, parallel
advanced technology attachment, serial advanced technology
attachment, etc.
[0044] The computer system 102 may be in communication with one or
more additional computer devices 120 via a network 122. The network
122 may be, but is not limited to, a local area network, a wide
area network, the Internet, a telephony network, a short-range
network, or any other network commonly known and understood in the
art. The short-range network may include, for example, Bluetooth,
Zigbee, infrared, near field communication, ultraband, or any
combination thereof. Those skilled in the art appreciate that
additional networks 122 which are known and understood may
additionally or alternatively be used and that the exemplary
networks 122 are not limiting or exhaustive. Also, while the
network 122 is shown in FIG. 1 as a wireless network, those skilled
in the art appreciate that the network 122 may also be a wired
network.
[0045] The additional computer device 120 is shown in FIG. 1 as a
personal computer. However, those skilled in the art appreciate
that, in alternative embodiments of the present application, the
computer device 120 may be a laptop computer, a tablet PC, a
personal digital assistant, a mobile device, a palmtop computer, a
desktop computer, a communications device, a wireless telephone, a
personal trusted device, a web appliance, a server, or any other
device that is capable of executing a set of instructions,
sequential or otherwise, that specify actions to be taken by that
device. Of course, those skilled in the art appreciate that the
above-listed devices are merely exemplary devices and that the
device 120 may be any additional device or apparatus commonly known
and understood in the art without departing from the scope of the
present application. For example, the computer device 120 may be
the same or similar to the computer system 102. Furthermore, those
skilled in the art similarly understand that the device may be any
combination of devices and apparatuses.
[0046] Of course, those skilled in the art appreciate that the
above-listed components of the computer system 102 are merely meant
to be exemplary and are not intended to be exhaustive and/or
inclusive. Furthermore, the examples of the components listed above
are also meant to be exemplary and similarly are not meant to be
exhaustive and/or inclusive.
[0047] In accordance with various embodiments of the present
disclosure, the methods described herein may be implemented using a
hardware computer system that executes software programs. Further,
in an exemplary, non-limited embodiment, implementations can
include distributed processing, component/object distributed
processing, and an operation mode having parallel processing
capabilities. Virtual computer system processing can be constructed
to implement one or more of the methods or functionality as
described herein, and a processor described herein may be used to
support a virtual processing environment.
[0048] As described herein, various embodiments provide optimized
processes of implementing an automated regression testing module
for executing automated regression testing of software application
in a much faster, easier and more efficient manner compared to
conventional testing by using a graphical user interface that may
allow organizing individual features of entire applications under a
testing suite and making the test suite reusable without requiring
to recode or requiring any high level code developing skills, but
the disclosure is not limited thereto. For example, the various
embodiments may also provide optimized processes of implementing an
automated functional testing module for executing automated
functional testing of software application in a much faster, easier
and more efficient manner compared to conventional testing by using
a graphical user interface that may allow organizing individual
features of entire applications under a testing suite and making
the test suite reusable without requiring to recode or requiring
any high level code developing skills, but the disclosure is not
limited thereto.
[0049] Referring to FIG. 2, a schematic of an exemplary network
environment 200 for implementing an automated regression testing
device (ARTD) having the automated regression testing module (ARTM)
of the instant disclosure is illustrated.
[0050] Conventional system, that does not implement an ARTM of the
instant disclosure, may not be able to automate the regression
testing of software application and may not provide a platform to
allow organizing individual features of entire applications under a
testing suite and making the test suite reusable without requiring
to recode or requiring any high level code developing skills.
[0051] According to exemplary embodiments, the above-described
problems associated with conventional approach of software
application testing may be overcome by implementing an ARTD having
the automated regression testing module as illustrated in FIG. 2.
The ARTD 202 may be the same or similar to the computer system 102
as described with respect to FIG. 1. According to exemplary
embodiments, the ARTD 202 may be considered to be a two-way
interactive communication device such as a mobile computing device,
cellular phone, landline phone or an Internet appliance
controller.
[0052] The ARTD 202 may store one or more applications that can
include executable instructions that, when executed by the ARTD
202, cause the ARTD 202 to perform actions, such as to transmit,
receive, or otherwise process network messages, for example, and to
perform other actions described and illustrated below with
reference to the figures. The application(s) may be implemented as
modules or components of other applications. Further, the
application(s) can be implemented as operating system extensions,
modules, plugins, or the like.
[0053] Even further, the application(s) may be operative in a
cloud-based computing environment. The application(s) may be
executed within or as virtual machine(s) or virtual server(s) that
may be managed in a cloud-based computing environment. Also, the
application(s), and even the ARTD 202 itself, may be located in
virtual server(s) running in a cloud-based computing environment
rather than being tied to one or more specific physical network
computing devices. Also, the application(s) may be running in one
or more virtual machines (VMs) executing on the ARTD 202.
Additionally, in one or more embodiments of this technology,
virtual machine(s) running on the ARTD 202 may be managed or
supervised by a hypervisor.
[0054] In the network environment 200 of FIG. 2, the ARTD 202 is
coupled to a plurality of server devices 204(1)-204(n) that hosts a
plurality of databases 206(1)-206(n), and also to a plurality of
client devices 208(1)-208(n) via communication network(s) 210. A
communication interface of the ARTD 202, such as the network
interface 114 of the computer system 102 of FIG. 1, operatively
couples and communicates between the ARTD 202, the server devices
204(1)-204(n), and/or the client devices 208(1)-208(n), which are
all coupled together by the communication network(s) 210, although
other types and/or numbers of communication networks or systems
with other types and/or numbers of connections and/or
configurations to other devices and/or elements may also be
used.
[0055] The communication network(s) 210 may be the same or similar
to the network 122 as described with respect to FIG. 1, although
the ARTD 202, the server devices 204(1)-204(n), and/or the client
devices 208(1)-208(n) may be coupled together via other topologies.
Additionally, the network environment 200 may include other network
devices such as one or more routers and/or switches, tier example,
which are well known in the art and thus will not be described
herein.
[0056] By way of example only, the communication network(s) 210 may
include local area network(s) (LAN(s)) or wide area network(s)
(WAN(s)), and can use TCP/IP over Ethernet and industry-standard
protocols, although other types and/or numbers of protocols and/or
communication networks may be used. The communication network(s)
202 in this example may employ any suitable interface mechanisms
and network communication technologies including, for example,
teletraffic in any suitable form (e.g., voice, modem, and the
like), Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTNs), Ethernet-based
Packet Data Networks (PDNs), combinations thereof, and the
like.
[0057] The ARTD 202 may be a standalone device or integrated with
one or more other devices or apparatuses, such as one or more of
the server devices 204(1)-204(n), for example. In one particular
example, the ARTD 202 may be hosted by one of the server devices
204(1)-204(n), and other arrangements are also possible. Moreover,
one or more of the devices of the ARTD 202 may be in the same or a
different communication network including one or more public,
private, or cloud networks, for example.
[0058] The plurality of server devices 204(1)-204(n) may be the
same or similar to the computer system 102 or the computer device
120 as described with respect to FIG. 1, including any features or
combination of features described with respect thereto. For
example, any of the server devices 204(1)-204(n) may include, among
other features, one or more processors, a memory, and a
communication interface, which are coupled together by a bus or
other communication link, although other numbers and/or types of
network devices may be used. The server devices 204(1)-204(n) in
this example may process requests received from the ARTD 202 via
the communication network(s) 210 according to the HTTP-based and/or
JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) protocol, for example, although
other protocols may also be used.
[0059] The server devices 204(1)-204(n) may be hardware or software
or may represent a system with multiple servers in a pool, which
may include internal or external networks. The server devices
204(1)-204(n) hosts the databases 206(1)-206(n) that are configured
to store metadata sets, data quality rules, and newly generated
data.
[0060] Although the server devices 204(1)-204(n) are illustrated as
single devices, one or more actions of each of the server devices
204(1)-204(n) may be distributed across one or more distinct
network computing devices that together comprise one or more of the
server devices 204(1)-204(n). Moreover, the server devices
204(1)-204(n) are not limited to a particular configuration. Thus,
the server devices 204(1)-204(n) may contain a plurality of network
computing devices that operate using a master/slave approach,
whereby one of the network computing devices of the server devices
204(1)-204(n) operates to manage and/or otherwise coordinate
operations of the other network computing devices.
[0061] The server devices 204(1)-204(n) may operate as a plurality
of network computing devices within a cluster architecture, a
peer-to peer architecture, virtual machines, or within a cloud
architecture, for example. Thus, the technology disclosed herein is
not to be construed as being limited to a single environment and
other configurations and architectures are also envisaged.
[0062] The plurality of client devices 208(1)-208(n) may also be
the same or similar to the computer system 102 or the computer
device 120 as described with respect to FIG. 1, including any
features or combination of features described with respect thereto.
Client device in this context refers to any computing device that
interfaces to communications network(s) 210 to obtain resources
from one or more server devices 204(1)-204(n) or other client
devices 208(1)-208(n).
[0063] According to exemplary embodiments, the client devices
208(1)-208(n) in this example may include any type of computing
device that can facilitate the implementation of the ARTD 202 that
may efficiently provide a platform for implementing an automated
regression testing module for executing automated regression
testing of software application in a much faster, easier and more
efficient manner compared to conventional testing by using a
graphical user interface that may allow organizing individual
features of entire applications under a testing suite and making
the test suite reusable without requiring to recode or requiring
any high level code developing skills, but the disclosure is not
limited thereto. Accordingly, the client devices 208(1)-208(n) may
be mobile computing devices, desktop computing devices, laptop
computing devices, tablet computing devices, virtual machines
(including cloud-based computers), or the like, that host chat,
e-mail, or voice-to-text applications, for example.
[0064] The client devices 208(1)-208(n) may run interface
applications, such as standard web browsers or standalone client
applications, which may provide an interface to communicate with
the ARTD 202 via the communication network(s) 210 in order to
communicate user requests. The client devices 208(1)-208(n) may
further include, among other features, a display device, such as a
display screen or touchscreen, and/or an input device, such as a
keyboard, for example.
[0065] Although the exemplary network environment 200 with the ARTD
202, the server devices 204(1)-204(n), the client devices
208(1)-208(n), and the communication network(s) 210 are described
and illustrated herein, other types and/or numbers of systems,
devices, components, and/or elements in other topologies may be
used. It is to be understood that the systems of the examples
described herein are for exemplary purposes, as many variations of
the specific hardware and software used to implement the examples
are possible, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the
relevant art(s).
[0066] One or more of the devices depicted in the network
environment 200, such as the ARTD 202, the server devices
204(1)-204(n), or the client devices 208(1)-208(n), for example,
may be configured to operate as virtual instances on the same
physical machine. For example, one or more of the ARTD 202, the
server devices 204(1)-204(n), or the client devices 208(1)-208(n)
may operate on the same physical device rather than as separate
devices communicating through communication network(s) 210.
Additionally, there may be more or fewer ARTDs 202, server devices
204(1)-204(n), or client devices 208(1)-208(n) than illustrated in
FIG. 2.
[0067] In addition, two or more computing systems or devices may be
substituted for any one of the systems or devices in any example.
Accordingly, principles and advantages of distributed processing,
such as redundancy and replication also may be implemented, as
desired, to increase the robustness and performance of the devices
and systems of the examples. The examples may also be implemented
on computer system(s) that extend across any suitable network using
any suitable interface mechanisms and traffic technologies,
including by way of example only teletraffic in any suitable form
(e.g., voice and modem), wireless traffic networks, cellular
traffic networks, Packet Data Networks (PDNs), the Internet,
intranets, and combinations thereof.
[0068] FIG. 3 illustrates a system diagram for implementing an
automated regression testing device (ARTD) with an automated
regression resting module (ARTM) in accordance with an exemplary
embodiment.
[0069] As illustrated in FIG. 3, the ARTD 302 including the ARTM
306 may be connected to a server 304, an importables database
314(1), a variables or keywords database 314(2), a data file
database 314(3), and a step definitions database 314(4) via a
communication network 310. Although the importables database
314(1), the variables or keywords database 314(2), the data file
database 314(3), and the step definitions database 314(4) are
illustrated as separate databases, the disclosure is not limited
thereto. According to exemplary embodiments, these four databases
may constitute a single database. The ARTD 302 may also be
connected to a first client device 308(1) and a second client
device 308(2) via the communication network 310, but the disclosure
is not limited thereto.
[0070] According to exemplary embodiment, the ARTD 302 is described
and shown in FIG. 3 as including the ARTM 306, although it may
include other rules, policies, modules, databases, or applications,
for example. According to exemplary embodiments, the importables
database 314(1), the variables or keywords database 314(2), the
data file database 314(3), and the step definitions database 314(4)
may constitute a local database and such local database may be
embedded within the ARTD 302.
[0071] According to exemplary embodiments, the importables may
create certain behaviors or interactions that can be injected into
multiple test cases without having to rewrite the test code or
redefine the test interactions.
[0072] As will be described below, the ARTM 306 may be configured
to execute automated regression testing of software application
much faster, easier and more efficient compared to conventional
testing by using a graphical user interface that may allow
organizing individual features of entire applications under a
testing suite (e.g., a single testing suite or one testing suite)
and make the test suite reusable without requiring to recode or
requiring any high level code developing skills, but the disclosure
is not limited thereto. According to exemplary embodiments, as will
be described below, in order to execute automated regression
testing of software application in a much faster, easier and more
efficient manner, the ARTM 306 may be configured to create, by
utilizing a graphical user interface (GUI), a draft test suite, the
draft test suite incorporating a plurality of features, each
feature including a test scenario that comprises steps that
describe the test scenario in a human readable form; compile the
steps of the test scenario into a single step in a reusable format
configured to be utilized in executing all previously defined steps
associated with the plurality of features and corresponding test
scenarios within the draft test suite; receive a request to perform
a regression testing for an application; de-compile the single
step, in response to the received request, to create a complete
list of steps used in the scenario; generate a final test suite
based on the de-complied single step in response to the received
request; and automatically execute the final test suite to test the
application. The results of execution may be stored onto a local
database or the server 304 for later access.
[0073] The first client device 308(1) and the second client device
308(2) are illustrated as being in communication with the ARTD 302.
In this regard, the first client device 308(1) and the second
client device 308(2) may be "clients" of the ARTD 302 and are
described herein as such. Nevertheless, it is to be known and
understood that the first client device 308(1) and/or the second
client device 308(2) need not necessarily be "clients" of the ARTD
302, or any entity described in association therewith herein. Any
additional or alternative relationship may exist between either or
both of the first client device 308(1) and the second client device
308(2) and the ARTD 302, or no relationship may exist.
[0074] The first client device 308(1) may be, for example, a smart
phone. Of course, the first client device 308(1) may be any
additional device described herein. The second client device 308(2)
may be, for example, a personal computer (PC). Of course, the
second client device 308(2) may also be any additional device
described herein. According to exemplary embodiments, the server
304 may be the same or equivalent to the server device 204 as
illustrated in FIG. 2.
[0075] The process may be executed via the communication network
310, which may comprise plural networks as described above. For
example, in an exemplary embodiment, either or both of the first
client device 308(1) and the second client device 308(2) may
communicate with the ARTD 302 via broadband or cellular
communication. Of course, these embodiments are merely exemplary
and are not limiting or exhaustive.
[0076] As will be described below, the ARTD 302 is configured for
executing automating regression or functional testing of software
application in a much faster, easier and more efficient manner
compared to conventional testing by using modifiable graphical user
interfaces that may provide error tracking, reporting, a dashboard
for choosing tests, and a platform for continuous integration
capabilities without requiring any high level code developing
skills. As will be further described below, the ARTD 302 is
configured for improving processing speed of conventional
regression or functional testing of software application by using
modifiable graphical user interfaces of the instant disclosure. In
addition, according to exemplary embodiments, by executing reusable
test suites generated by the ARTD 302 reduces memory spaces for
running a test for software application, thereby improving
conventional processes of software application testing.
[0077] FIG. 4 illustrates a system diagram for implementing an
automated regression testing module of FIG. 3 in accordance with an
exemplary embodiment. As shown in FIG. 4, the ARTM 406 may be in
communication with the server 404 via a communication network 410.
According to exemplary embodiments, the server 404 may be the same
or equivalent to the server 304 as illustrated in FIG. 3 or to the
server device 204 as illustrated in FIG. 2.
[0078] As shown in FIG. 4, according to exemplary embodiments, the
ARTM 406 may include a draft suite generation module 408, a
compiling module 412, a receiving module 416, a graphical user
interface (GUI) 418, a de-compiling module 420, a final suite
generation module 422, an execution module 424, a communication
module 426, and a local database 414.
[0079] The process may be executed via the communication network(s)
410, which may comprise plural networks as described above. For
example, in an exemplary embodiment, the various components of the
ARTM 406 may communicate with the test server 404 and the local
database 414 that includes step definitions, importables, variables
or keywords, and data file, etc. via the communication network(s)
410 and the communication module 426. Of course, these embodiments
are merely exemplary and are not limiting or exhaustive.
[0080] According to exemplary embodiments, each of the draft suite
generation module 408, the compiling module 412, the receiving
module 416, the de-compiling module 420, the final suite generation
module 422, the execution module 424, and the communication module
426 may be physically implemented by electronic optical) circuits
such as logic circuits, discrete components, microprocessors,
hard-wired circuits, memory elements, wiring connections, and the
like, which may be formed using semiconductor-based fabrication
techniques or other manufacturing technologies. Alternatively, each
of the draft suite generation module 408, the compiling module 412,
the receiving module 416, the de-compiling module 420, the final
suite generation module 422, the execution module 424, and the
communication module 426 may be implemented by dedicated hardware,
or as a combination of dedicated hardware to perform some functions
and a processor (e.g., one or more programmed microprocessors and
associated circuitry) to perform other functions.
[0081] According to exemplary embodiments, the draft suite
generation module 408 may be configured to create, by utilizing the
GUI 418, a draft test suite. The draft test suite may incorporate a
plurality of features, each feature may include a test scenario
that may comprise steps that describe the test scenario in a human
readable form.
[0082] According to exemplary embodiments, a plurality of scenarios
may be generated based on information stored on the local database
414. Referring to FIGS. 3, and 4, the local database 414 may be
constituted by the importables database 314(1), variables or
keywords database 314(2), data file database 314(3) and step
definitions database 314(4). For example, the local database 414
may store Cucumber step definitions, but the disclosure is not
limited thereto. According to exemplary embodiments, other step
definitions created by other languages may also be stored on the
local database 414 and may be accessed via the receiving module 416
and the GUI 418 to create the scenarios. Similarly, the scenarios
may also be created by accessing the importables, variables or
keywords and/or data file from the local database 414 by utilizing
the receiving module 416 and the GUI 418. The plurality of features
may be generated from the plurality of scenarios and the draft
suite may be generated by the draft suite generation module 408
from the plurality features. That is, the creation of testing
suites may incorporate a collection of features, and in turn, the
features may comprise a collection of scenarios that may contain
steps from a step definition library stored in the step definitions
database 314(4), importables stored in the importabales database
314(1), variables and keywords stored in the variables and keywords
database 314(2), and may utilize a data file stored on the data
file database 314(3),
[0083] According to exemplary embodiments, the compiling module 412
may be configured to compile the steps of the test scenario into a
single step in a reusable format configured to be utilized in
executing all previously defined steps associated with the
plurality of features and corresponding test scenarios within the
draft test suite generated by the draft suite generation module
408.
[0084] According to exemplary embodiments, the receiving module 416
may be configured to receive a request to perform a regression
testing for an application. According to exemplary embodiments, the
receiving module 416 may also be configured to receive a request to
perform a functional testing for an application.
[0085] According to exemplary embodiments, the de-compiling module
420 may be configured to de-compile the single step, in response to
the received request received by the receiving module 416, to
create a complete list of steps used in the scenario.
[0086] According to exemplary embodiments, the final suite
generation module 422 may be configured to generate a final test
suite based on the de-complied single step generated by the
de-compiling module 420 in response to the received request
received by the receiving module 416. The execution module 424 may
be configured to automatically execute the final test suite to test
the application without requiring rewriting of code.
[0087] According to exemplary embodiments, the receiving module 412
may be further configured to receive a request to perform
additional regression testing for the application. The ARTM 406 may
be configured to incorporate the reusable format including the
single step into another test suite for subsequent regression
testing of the application without rewriting code to generate the
final test suite by the final test suite generation module 422.
According to exemplary embodiments, the execution module 424 may be
further configured to automatically execute the final test suite to
perform additional regression testing for the application.
[0088] According to exemplary embodiments, in generating a final
test suite by the final suite generation module 422, the compiling
module 412 may be further configured to compile the steps
corresponding to the test scenario into importables to support
re-usability of the steps in executing all previously defined steps
associated with the plurality of features and corresponding test
scenarios within the draft test suite generated by the draft test
suite generation module 408. The local database 414 may be
configured to store the importables. The de-compiling module 420
may be further configured to de-compile the importables, in
response to the receive request received by the receiving module,
by performing lookups within the local database 414 based on a
content-value of a step with a keyword "import"; replace the step
with the keyword "import" with step-collection of a found
importable based on a result of the lookups to create a complete
list of steps used in the scenario. The final suite generation
module 422 may be further configured to generate the final test
suite based on the complete list of steps used in the scenario
without rewriting code.
[0089] According to exemplary embodiments, in generating a final
test suite by the final suite generation module 422, the compiling
module 412 may be further configured to perform lookups within the
local database 414 to determine whether a dynamic keyword is used;
and replace the keyword, including its delimiters, by a value of a
found keyword based on a result of the lookups to create a complete
list of steps used in the scenario. The final suite generation
module 422 may be configured to generate the final test suite based
on the complete list of steps used in the scenario without
rewriting code.
[0090] According to exemplary embodiments, in generating a final
test suite by the final suite generation module 422, the compiling
module 412 may be further configured to access the local database
414 to fetch a data file utilized in the scenario to obtain the
complete list of steps used in the scenario and distribution of
example headers and data, format the data in the fetched data file
into Gherkin language, and insert the formatted data into the
scenario.
[0091] According to exemplary embodiments, the final test suite may
be represented as the highest hierarchy object in the GUI 418.
[0092] According to exemplary embodiments, the ARTM 406 may be
configured to export the final test suite to a file format having
any one of the following file extensions: .xls, .xlsx, .xlsm, .xlt,
.xlts, and .xml, but the disclosure is not limited thereto. And the
exported file format may be fully executable in an automated mode
that automatically executes the regression testing of the
application by the execution module 424 without rewriting code.
[0093] According to exemplary embodiments, the ARTM 406 may be
configured to generate, by utilizing the GUI 418, a report
comprising one or more graphs, one or more charts, or one or more
encountered errors, based on the execution of the final test suite
by the execution module 424. Exemplary results are illustrated in
the attached Appendix A.
[0094] According to exemplary embodiments, the ARTM 406 may be
configured to package the report in both JavaScript Object Notation
(JSON) and Hypertext Markup Language (HTML) formats, but the
disclosure is not limited thereto. The ARTM 406 may be configured
to transmit the packaged report to emails associated with the test
suite by utilizing the communication module 426.
[0095] According to exemplary embodiments, the GUI 418 utilized for
creation of the test suites and reporting of the test results. Such
GUI 418 may be configured to expose the functionality of the
presently described ARTM 406 with referring to FIGS. 3 and 4 with a
variety of input fields and selectable options. The GUI 418 may
specifically provide menus or other selectable interfaces such as a
menu enabling selection and manipulation of reusable test suites
generated by the final suite generation module 422. An exemplary
GUI is illustrated in the attached Appendix A.
[0096] According to exemplary embodiments, each feature may
comprise a scenario that includes steps accessed from a step
definition library, importables, variables and keywords that are
utilized for automatic execution of the regression testing of the
application, and wherein the scenario may utilize a data file
accessed from an in-memory database running in a personal mode or
from a file system running in an automated mode. According to
exemplary embodiments, attached Appendix A illustrates a tutorial
as to how to construct a scenario that includes importables, data
files, and keywords, but the disclosure is not limited thereto.
[0097] According to exemplary embodiments, the ARTM 406 may be
configured to generate declarative test write up using in the
off-line mode or using a spreadsheet. According to this exemplary
embodiment, the ARTM 406 may be configured to allow a user to
define test suites into an excel file into different tabs following
a very simple constructs that illustrate a relationship between a
condition and an expected result based on the condition, and inject
those test suites into a framework generated by the ARTM 406 that
will execute the test based on a simple writeup in a human readable
way, but the disclosure is not limited thereto.
[0098] According to exemplary embodiments, the ARTM 406 may also be
configured to operate by utilizing a GUI element picker. In this
exemplary embodiment, a framework generated by the ARTM 406 may be
configured to support the GUI for creating a test suite. The ARTM
406 may be configured to allow a user to bring the test suite up by
the GUI and go to a desired web address and pick a desired element
from there and may instruct, by utilizing the GUI, the framework to
perform a further test execution and analyze the test result. While
the user is picking a desired element from the web address by
utilizing the GUI, in the background (without user's interactions)
the framework generated by the ARTM 406 may be configured to
automatically generate the actual test suite that needs the code
that needs to be generated for the test and execute it. Once this
is done, the generated test suite may be stored in a local database
for subsequent executions of the test suite over and over again
based on receiving subsequent requests for testing without
requiring rewriting of code. An exemplary GUI is illustrated in the
attached Appendix A.
[0099] According to exemplary embodiments, a non-transitory
computer readable medium may be configured to store instructions
for implementing an automated regression testing module that
provides a framework for automatic regression testing. According to
exemplary embodiments, a non-transitory computer readable medium
may be further configured to store instructions for implementing an
automated functional testing module that provides a framework for
automatic functional testing.
[0100] According to exemplary embodiments, the instructions, when
executed, may cause a processor embedded within the ARTD 302 to
perform the following: creating, by utilizing a graphical user
interface (GUI), a draft test suite, the draft test suite
incorporating a plurality of features, each feature including a
test scenario that comprises steps that describe the test scenario
in a human readable form; compiling the steps of the test scenario
into a single step in a reusable format configured to be utilized
in executing all previously defined steps associated with the
plurality of features and corresponding test scenarios within the
draft test suite; receiving a request to perform a regression
testing for an application; de-compiling the single step, in
response to the received request, to create a complete list of
steps used in the scenario; generating a final test suite based on
the de-complied single step in response to the received request;
and automatically executing the final test suite to test the
application. The processor may be the same or similar to the
processor 104 as illustrated in FIG. 1.
[0101] According to exemplary embodiments, the instructions, when
executed, may further cause the processor embedded within the ARTD
302 to perform the following: receiving a request to perform
additional regression testing for the application; incorporating
the reusable format including the single step into another test
suite for subsequent regression testing of the application without
rewriting code to generate the final test suite; and automatically
executing the final test suite to perform additional regression
testing for the application.
[0102] According to exemplary embodiments, in generating a final
test suite, the instructions, when executed, may further cause the
processor embedded within the ARTD 302 to perform the following:
compiling the steps corresponding to the test scenario into
importables to support re-usability of the steps in executing all
previously defined steps associated with the plurality of features
and corresponding test scenarios within the draft test suite;
storing the importables onto a local database; de-compiling the
importables, in response to the receive request, by performing
lookups within the local database based on a content-value of a
step with a keyword "import"; replacing the step with the keyword
"import" with step-collection of a found importable based on a
result of the lookups to create a complete list of steps used in
the scenario; and generating the final test suite based on the
complete list of steps used in the scenario without rewriting
code.
[0103] According to exemplary embodiments, in generating a final
test suite, the instructions, when executed, may further cause the
processor embedded within the ARTD 302 to perform the following:
performing lookups within a local database to determine whether a
dynamic keyword is used; replacing the keyword, including its
delimiters, by a value of a found keyword based on a result of the
lookups to create a complete list of steps used in the scenario;
and generating the final test suite based on the complete list of
steps used in the scenario without rewriting code.
[0104] According to exemplary embodiments, in generating a final
test suite, the instructions, when executed, may further cause the
processor embedded within the ARTD 302 to perform the following:
accessing a local database to fetch a data file utilized in the
scenario to obtain the complete list of steps used in the scenario
and distribution of example headers and data; and formatting the
data in the fetched data file into Gherkin language; and inserting
the formatted data into the scenario.
[0105] According to exemplary embodiments, in generating a final
test suite, the instructions, when executed, may further cause the
processor embedded within the ARTD 302 to perform the following:
representing the final test suite as the highest hierarchy object
in the GUI; and exporting the final test suite to a file format
having any one of the following file extensions: .xls, .xlsx,
.xlsm, .xlt, .xlts, and .xml, wherein the exported file format may
be fully executable in an automated mode that automatically
executes the regression testing of the application without
rewriting code.
[0106] FIG. 5 illustrates a flow chart for implementing an
automated regression testing module in accordance with an exemplary
embodiment. The automation suite module may be the same or similar
to the ARTMs illustrated herein with reference to FIGS. 2-4, but
the disclosure is not limited thereto.
[0107] In the process 500 of FIG. 5, at step S502, a draft test
suite may be created by a draft suite generation module by
utilizing a graphical user interface (GUI). The draft test suite
may incorporate a plurality of features, each feature may include a
test scenario that comprises steps that describe the test scenario
in a human readable form.
[0108] At step S504, the steps of the test scenario may be compiled
by a compiling module into a single step in a reusable format
configured to be utilized in executing all previously defined steps
associated with the plurality of features and corresponding test
scenarios within the draft test suite.
[0109] At step S506; a request to perform a regression testing for
an application may be received by a receiving module. According to
exemplary embodiments, at step S506, a request to perform a
functional testing for an application may also be received.
[0110] At step S508; the single step may be decompiled by a
de-compiling module, in response to the received request, to create
a complete list of steps used in the scenario.
[0111] At step S510, a final test suite may be generated based on
the de-complied single step in response to the received
request.
[0112] At step S512, the final test suite may be automatically
executed to test the application.
[0113] According to exemplary embodiments, the process 500 may
further include: receiving a request to perform additional
regression testing for the application; incorporating the reusable
format including the single step into another test suite for
subsequent regression testing of the application without rewriting
code to generate the final test suite; and automatically executing
the final test suite to perform additional regression testing for
the application.
[0114] According to exemplary embodiments, in generating a final
test suite, the process 500 may further include: compiling the
steps corresponding to the test scenario into importables to
support re-usability of the steps in executing all previously
defined steps associated with the plurality of features and
corresponding test scenarios within the draft test suite; storing
the importables onto a local database; de-compiling the
importables, in response to the receive request, by performing
lookups within the local database based on a content-value of a
step with a keyword "import"; replacing the step with the keyword
"import" with step-collection of a found importable based on a
result of the lookups to create a complete list of steps used in
the scenario; and generating the final test suite based on the
complete list of steps used in the scenario without rewriting
code.
[0115] According to exemplary embodiments, in generating a final
test suite, the process 500 may further include: performing lookups
within a local database to determine whether a dynamic keyword is
used; replacing the keyword, including its delimiters, by a value
of a found keyword based on a result of the lookups to create a
complete list of steps used in the scenario; and generating the
final test suite based on the complete list of steps used in the
scenario without rewriting code.
[0116] According to exemplary embodiments, in generating a final
test suite, the process 500 may further include: accessing a local
database to fetch a data file utilized in the scenario to obtain
the complete list of steps used in the scenario and distribution of
example headers and data; and formatting the data in the fetched
data file into Gherkin language; and inserting the formatted data
into the scenario.
[0117] According to exemplary embodiments, the process 500 may
further include: exporting the final test suite to a file format
having any one of the following file extensions: .xls, .xlsx,
.xlsm, .xlt, .xlts, and .xml; and wherein the exported file format
may be fully executable in an automated mode that automatically
executes the regression testing of the application without
rewriting code.
[0118] Although the invention has been described with reference to
several exemplary embodiments, it is understood that the words that
have been used are words of description and illustration, rather
than words of limitation. Changes may be made within the purview of
the appended claims, as presently stated and as amended, without
departing from the scope and spirit of the present disclosure in
its aspects. Although the invention has been described with
reference to particular means, materials and embodiments, the
invention is not intended to be limited to the particulars
disclosed; rather the invention extends to all functionally
equivalent structures, methods, and uses such as are within the
scope of the appended claims.
[0119] For example, while the computer-readable medium may be
described as a single medium, the term "computer-readable medium"
includes a single medium or multiple media, such as a centralized
or distributed database, and/or associated caches and servers that
store one or more sets of instructions. The term "computer-readable
medium" shall also include any medium that is capable of storing,
encoding or carrying a set of instructions for execution by a
processor or that cause a computer system to perform any one or
more of the embodiments disclosed herein.
[0120] The computer-readable medium may comprise a non-transitory
computer-readable medium or media and/or comprise a transitory
computer-readable medium or media. In a particular non-limiting,
exemplary embodiment, the computer-readable medium can include a
solid-state memory such as a memory card or other package that
houses one or more non-volatile read-only memories. Further, the
computer-readable medium can be a random access memory or other
volatile re-writable memory. Additionally, the computer-readable
medium can include a magneto-optical or optical medium, such as a
disk or tapes or other storage device to capture carrier wave
signals such as a signal communicated over a transmission medium.
Accordingly, the disclosure is considered to include any
computer-readable medium or other equivalents and successor media,
in which data or instructions may be stored.
[0121] Although the present application describes specific
embodiments which may be implemented as computer programs or code
segments in computer-readable media, it is to be understood that
dedicated hardware implementations, such as application specific
integrated circuits, programmable logic arrays and other hardware
devices, can be constructed to implement one or more of the
embodiments described herein. Applications that may include the
various embodiments set forth herein may broadly include a variety
of electronic and computer systems. Accordingly, the present
application may encompass software, firmware, and hardware
implementations, or combinations thereof. Nothing in the present
application should be interpreted as being implemented or
implementable solely with software and not hardware.
[0122] Although the present specification describes components and
functions that may be implemented in particular embodiments with
reference to particular standards and protocols, the disclosure is
not limited to such standards and protocols. Such standards are
periodically superseded by faster or more efficient equivalents
having essentially the same functions. Accordingly, replacement
standards and protocols having the same or similar functions are
considered equivalents thereof.
[0123] The illustrations of the embodiments described herein are
intended to provide a general understanding of the various
embodiments. The illustrations are not intended to serve as a
complete description of all of the elements and features of
apparatus and systems that utilize the structures or methods
described herein. Many other embodiments may be apparent to those
of skill in the art upon reviewing the disclosure. Other
embodiments may be utilized and derived from the disclosure, such
that structural and logical substitutions and changes may be made
without departing from the scope of the disclosure. Additionally,
the illustrations are merely representational and may not be drawn
to scale. Certain proportions within the illustrations may be
exaggerated, while other proportions may be minimized. Accordingly,
the disclosure and the figures are to be regarded as illustrative
rather than restrictive.
[0124] One or more embodiments of the disclosure may be referred to
herein, individually and/or collectively, by the term "invention"
merely for convenience and without intending to voluntarily limit
the scope of this application to any particular invention or
inventive concept. Moreover, although specific embodiments have
been illustrated and described herein, it should be appreciated
that any subsequent arrangement designed to achieve the same or
similar purpose may be substituted for the specific embodiments
shown. This disclosure is intended to cover any and all subsequent
adaptations or variations of various embodiments. Combinations of
the above embodiments, and other embodiments not specifically
described herein, will be apparent to those of skill in the art
upon reviewing the description.
[0125] The Abstract of the Disclosure is submitted with the
understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the
scope or meaning of the claims. In addition, in the foregoing
Detailed Description, various features may be grouped together or
described in a single embodiment for the purpose of streamlining
the disclosure. This disclosure is not to be interpreted as
reflecting an intention that the claimed embodiments require more
features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the
following claims reflect, inventive subject matter may be directed
to less than all of the features of any of the disclosed
embodiments. Thus, the following claims are incorporated into the
Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as
defining separately claimed subject matter.
[0126] The above disclosed subject matter is to be considered
illustrative, and not restrictive, and the appended claims are
intended to cover all such modifications, enhancements, and other
embodiments which fall within the true spirit and scope of the
present disclosure. Thus, to the maximum extent allowed by law, the
scope of the present disclosure is to be determined by the broadest
permissible interpretation of the following claims and their
equivalents, and shall not be restricted or limited by the
foregoing detailed description.
* * * * *