U.S. patent application number 16/963969 was filed with the patent office on 2021-02-11 for machine gun.
The applicant listed for this patent is FN Herstal S.A.. Invention is credited to Pascal Franssen.
Application Number | 20210041194 16/963969 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 1000005225177 |
Filed Date | 2021-02-11 |
United States Patent
Application |
20210041194 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Franssen; Pascal |
February 11, 2021 |
MACHINE GUN
Abstract
The present invention relates to a firearm fired from an open
bolt comprising a firing control mechanism 3 arranged below a frame
inside which moving parts 2, moved backward by gas recovery and
forward by a return spring 12, slide, the gas recovery and the
return spring 12 being arranged below the axis of the barrel 5,
said firearm comprising a hammer 14 arranged, in the loaded
position, above the axis of the barrel 5, and the release of said
hammer 14 being independent of the firing control mechanism 3.
Inventors: |
Franssen; Pascal;
(Saint-Remy, BE) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
FN Herstal S.A. |
Herstal |
|
BE |
|
|
Family ID: |
1000005225177 |
Appl. No.: |
16/963969 |
Filed: |
January 17, 2019 |
PCT Filed: |
January 17, 2019 |
PCT NO: |
PCT/EP2019/051140 |
371 Date: |
July 22, 2020 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
1/1 |
Current CPC
Class: |
F41A 3/26 20130101; F41A
19/14 20130101; F41A 5/26 20130101 |
International
Class: |
F41A 3/26 20060101
F41A003/26; F41A 5/26 20060101 F41A005/26; F41A 19/14 20060101
F41A019/14 |
Foreign Application Data
Date |
Code |
Application Number |
Jan 22, 2018 |
EP |
18152691.4 |
Claims
1. An open-bolt firearm comprising a fire-control mechanism
arranged under a frame in which there slide moving parts which are
moved rearward by a gas recovery piston and forward by a recoil
spring, the gas recovery piston and the recoil spring being
positioned under an axis of the barrel, said firearm comprising a
hammer positioned, in a loaded position, above the axis of the
barrel, and release of said hammer being independent of the
fire-control mechanism.
2. The firearm as claimed in claim 1, wherein the moving parts
comprise a cam actuating the release of the hammer during locking
of a bolt.
3. The firearm as claimed in claim 2, comprising a sear configured
to control the release of the hammer when the cam moves said
sear.
4. The firearm as claimed in claim 1, wherein the hammer comprises
a concave sliding surface directed toward the moving parts.
5. The firearm as claimed in claim 4, further comprising a slide
having at its lower rear end an upper cam configured to bear on the
lower end of the concave sliding surface during a first section of
a recoil of the slide.
6. The firearm as claimed in claim 5, wherein the slide comprises
at its upper rear end a lower cam configured to bear on the concave
sliding surface during a second section of the recoil of the slide.
Description
SUBJECT OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention relates to the percussion system of an
open-bolt firearm.
PRIOR ART
[0002] For a machinegun firing with an open bolt or with an
ammunition belt, the percussive energy is generally stored in the
form of the potential energy of compression of the recoil spring,
in the form of the kinetic energy of the moving parts, or in a
spring precompressed between the striker and the bolt.
[0003] Specifically, in the case of open-bolt operation, the shot
is triggered by the release of the moving parts, initially arranged
in a rearward position, unlike the situation in a gun operating on
a closed-bolt principle, in which the shot is triggered by the
release of a hammer by the trigger blade, the moving parts being
initially at rest, in a forward position, with the breech
locked.
[0004] For example, in the case of the FN Minimi.RTM. machinegun,
the striker is actuated by the forward movement of the moving parts
after the breech has been locked by the bolt.
[0005] Nevertheless, the percussion induced by the return movement
of the moving parts has the disadvantage of being dependent on the
efficiency of the weapon operating cycle. Thus, when operating
under harsh conditions (sand, mud), the speed of the moving parts
is slowed before the position in which the breech is closed is
reached. The striking energy may then no longer be sufficient.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0006] A first aspect of the invention relates to an open-bolt
firearm, preferably a machinegun, comprising a fire-control
mechanism arranged under a frame in which there slide moving parts
which are moved rearward by gas recovery and forward by a recoil
spring, the gas recovery and the recoil spring being positioned
under the axis of the barrel, said firearm comprising a hammer
positioned, in the loaded position, above the axis of the barrel,
and the release of said hammer being independent of the
fire-control mechanism.
[0007] Preferably, the moving parts comprise a cam actuating
release of the hammer during locking of the breech.
[0008] Advantageously, a sear is arranged in such a way as to
control release of the hammer when the cam moves said sear.
[0009] Preferably, the hammer comprises a concave sliding surface
directed toward the moving parts.
[0010] Advantageously, the slide comprises at its lower rear end a
cam arranged in such a way as to bear on in the vicinity of the
lower end of the sliding surface during a first section of the
recoil of the slide.
[0011] Preferably, the slide comprises at its upper rear end a cam
arranged in such a way as to bear on the sliding surface during a
second section of the recoil of the slide.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
[0012] FIG. 1 depicts an overall view of a machinegun according to
the invention, with the frame not depicted, so as to be able to see
the various elements of the mechanism.
[0013] FIG. 2 depicts a view of a detail of the device of FIG. 1,
showing the various components of the mechanism of the invention,
upon release of the moving parts.
[0014] FIG. 3 depicts a detailed view of the mechanism of FIG. 1,
during the forward movement of the moving parts.
[0015] FIG. 4 depicts a detailed view of the mechanism of FIG. 1,
after the locking of the breech.
[0016] FIG. 5 depicts a detailed view of the mechanism of FIG. 1,
just after the percussion.
[0017] FIG. 6 depicts a detailed view of the mechanism of FIG. 1,
during the rearward return of the moving parts (intermediate
position 1).
[0018] FIG. 7 depicts a detailed view of the mechanism of FIG. 1,
during the rearward return of the moving parts (intermediate
position 2).
REFERENCES IN THE FIGURES
[0019] 1. Hammer mechanism [0020] 2. Moving parts [0021] 3. Trigger
mechanism (incorporated into the trigger guard) [0022] 4. Chamber
[0023] 5. Barrel [0024] 6. Butt [0025] 7. Slide (sometimes also
referred to as sliding block) [0026] 8. Bolt [0027] 9. Second
hammer reloading cam [0028] 10. Hammer sear release cam [0029] 11.
First hammer reloading cam [0030] 12. Recoil spring [0031] 13.
Hammer sear [0032] 14. Hammer [0033] 15. Concave sliding surface
[0034] 16. Hammer spring [0035] 17. Extension of the gas recovery
piston [0036] 18. First point of reloading contact between slide
and hammer [0037] 19. Second point of reloading contact between
slide and hammer [0038] 20. Firing pin
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0039] The present invention relates to a hammer mechanism 1
designed for firearms firing from an open bolt, in automatic or
semiautomatic mode. In such a weapon, belt-fed loading from the top
of the frame forces the designer to position the gas recovery and
the recoil spring below the axis of the barrel 5 rather than above
same.
[0040] The consequence of this positioning is that it is difficult
to site a hammer mechanism incorporated into the trigger guard, as
the latter is separated from the firing pin by the recoil spring
and the bottom of the moving parts in the continuation of the gas
recovery piston.
[0041] The present invention makes use of the fact that during
open-bolt operation, initiation of firing (the start of the cycle)
is associated not with the striking of a cartridge in the chamber 4
but with the release of the moving parts 2. That being the case,
there is no longer any need to incorporate the hammer mechanism
into the trigger guard, in mechanical connection with the trigger
mechanism.
[0042] Rather, in the present invention, the release of the hammer
14 is controlled entirely by the movement of the slide 7, which
ensures optimal synchronization between the locking of the breech
by the bolt 8 and the percussion.
[0043] Because the hammer mechanism 1 is no longer connected with
the trigger mechanism 3, it is then possible to position the hammer
mechanism 1 above the axis of the barrel rather than below this
axis.
[0044] FIG. 1 shows one example of a machinegun according to the
invention, without the frame, in order to show the elements
thereof. It shows a hammer mechanism 1 positioned above the axis of
the barrel 5 and operating entirely autonomously. In particular, no
mechanism connects the hammer mechanism 1 with the trigger
mechanism 3.
[0045] FIGS. 2 to 7 show detailed views of the various elements of
the percussion mechanism during a cycle of the machinegun. In FIG.
1, the moving parts are at rest awaiting firing. In that position,
the hammer mechanism 1 is practically out of the path of the slide
7 and allows same to move freely forward, as depicted in FIG.
3.
[0046] FIG. 4 shows the end of the forward movement of the slide 7,
at the moment of locking. At that moment, the cam 10 pushes the
sear 13 forward, and this releases the hammer 14, which begins to
rotate about its axis under the effect of the hammer spring 16.
[0047] FIG. 5 depicts the first few moments after percussion, at
the start of the recoil of the moving parts 2. At this moment, as
the slide 7 is recoiling, the cam 11 pushes on the sliding surface
15 beginning to compress the hammer spring. Note that the point 18
of contact between the slide 7 and the hammer 14 is as far away as
possible from the axis of rotation of the hammer, so as to reduce
the impact experienced by the hammer 14, and therefore the wearing
and fatigue thereof, thus reducing the risk of breakage in the long
term. The presence of the rounded cam 11 allows wear and fatigue to
be reduced still further.
[0048] FIG. 6 depicts the continuation of the cycle, with the
moving parts in a first intermediate position. Here it may be seen
that the firing pin is effaced from the slide 7. In this recoil
phase, the bolt 4 still remains attached to the chamber 4 while the
slide 7 is already recoiling rearward.
[0049] FIG. 7 depicts the continuation of the cycle, the moving
parts 2 being in a second intermediate position. In this position,
the slide 7 pushes on the sliding surface via a second cam 9 this
time arranged in the upper part of the slide. This is because, in
this position, the distance between the axis of the hammer and the
cam 9 is great enough for the acceleration of the hammer to be
limited.
[0050] The hammer lifting dynamics are optimized by the adoption of
a sliding surface 15 of the hammer in contact with the slide 7,
which is concave. This is because this shape, combined with the
presence of a cam 11 in the lower part of the rear of the slide 7,
allows contact to be made first of all on a surface of the slide
opposite the position of the hammer, thereby increasing the lifting
lever arm and reducing the impact associated therewith. The
curvature of this surface, with no sharp angles, also makes this
movement more continuous and avoids impacts that could lead to
material fatigue.
[0051] The end of the hammer lifting movement is brought about by a
cam 9 situated on the upper surface of the slide 7. This cam 9 is
set back with respect to the lower cam 11, so that the cam 11 acts
at the start of the lift and the cam 9 at the end of the lift.
[0052] Note that the positioning of the hammer mechanism in the
upper part of the weapon not only makes it possible to get around
the problem of the bulkiness of the recoil spring and of the moving
parts in the case of top loading, but also makes it possible to
reduce the bulkiness of the trigger guard, allowing for a more
compact design of the trigger guard.
* * * * *