U.S. patent application number 17/071329 was filed with the patent office on 2021-02-11 for microdevice platform recapitulating hypoxic tissue microenvironments.
The applicant listed for this patent is UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA. Invention is credited to YUTA ANDO, KEYUE SHEN, HOANG TA, DANIEL YEN.
Application Number | 20210040433 17/071329 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 1000005168627 |
Filed Date | 2021-02-11 |
View All Diagrams
United States Patent
Application |
20210040433 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
SHEN; KEYUE ; et
al. |
February 11, 2021 |
MICRODEVICE PLATFORM RECAPITULATING HYPOXIC TISSUE
MICROENVIRONMENTS
Abstract
Hypoxia plays a central role in cancer progression and
resistance to therapy. A microdevice platform is engineered to
recapitulate the intratumor oxygen gradients that drive the
heterogeneous hypoxic landscapes in solid tumors. The microdevice
design features a "tumor section"-like culture by incorporating a
cell layer between two diffusion barriers, where an oxygen gradient
is established by cellular metabolism and physical constraints. The
oxygen gradient is confirmed by numerical simulation and
imaging-based oxygen sensor measurement. Spatially-resolved hypoxic
signaling in cancer cells is also demonstrated through
immunostaining, gene expression assay, and hypoxia-targeted drug
treatment. The microdevice platform can accurately generate and
control oxygen gradients, eliminates complex microfluidic handling,
allows for incorporation of additional tumor components, and is
compatible with high-content imaging and high-throughput
applications. It is well suited for understanding hypoxia-mediated
mechanisms in cancer disease and other biological tissues and
processes, and discovery of new therapeutics.
Inventors: |
SHEN; KEYUE; (LOS ANGELES,
CA) ; ANDO; YUTA; (LOS ANGELES, CA) ; YEN;
DANIEL; (LOS ANGELES, CA) ; TA; HOANG; (LOS
ANGELES, CA) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA |
Los Angeles |
CA |
US |
|
|
Family ID: |
1000005168627 |
Appl. No.: |
17/071329 |
Filed: |
October 15, 2020 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
15941374 |
Mar 30, 2018 |
10829730 |
|
|
17071329 |
|
|
|
|
62478810 |
Mar 30, 2017 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
1/1 |
Current CPC
Class: |
C12N 5/0693 20130101;
C12M 25/02 20130101; C12M 23/16 20130101; C12M 3/04 20130101; C12M
41/34 20130101 |
International
Class: |
C12M 1/34 20060101
C12M001/34; C12M 3/06 20060101 C12M003/06; C12M 3/04 20060101
C12M003/04; C12M 1/12 20060101 C12M001/12 |
Claims
1. A method for inducing an oxygen concentration gradient, the
method comprising: providing a first component that is a diffusion
barrier, the first component including a central pillar having a
first space-defining surface; providing a second component having a
second space-defining surface, the first component being positioned
proximate to the second component such that the first
space-defining surface and the second space-defining surface define
a confined space; providing an aqueous solution having dissolved
oxygen that fills the confined space; and placing a layer of living
cells over the second space-defining surface, wherein the first
space-defining surface and the second space-defining surface are
sufficiently close that passive oxygen diffusion in the confined
space is insufficient to replenish oxygen consumed by cells thereby
establishing an oxygen gradient in the confined space.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the central pillar is an oxygen
barrier.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the first space-defining surface
and the second space-defining surface are separated by a gap
distance from about 30 .mu.m to about 1000 .mu.m.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein the first space-defining surface
and the second space-defining surface are separated by a gap
distance from about 50 .mu.m to about 500 .mu.m.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein the first space-defining surface
and the second space-defining surface are substantially flat in the
vicinity of the confined space.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein the first space-defining surface
is curved or cone-shaped.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein the confined space is open along a
periphery.
8. The method of claim 1 wherein the first space-defining surface
is circular.
9. The method of claim 1 further comprising an extracellular
component associated with the layer of living cells, the
extracellular component having tunable mechanical properties and/or
biochemical properties.
10. The method of claim 1 wherein the layer of living cells
includes cells selected from the group consisting of cancer cells,
stem cells, cardiomyocytes, neurons, hepatocytes, pancreatic cells,
fibroblasts, immune cells, epithelial cells, endothelial cells, and
combinations thereof.
11. The method of claim 1 wherein the first component includes a
cap structure that includes the central pillar
12. The method of claim 1 wherein the first component further
includes three spatial reference pillars that are longer than the
central pillar thereby defining a gap distance between the layer of
living cells and the central pillar.
13. The method of claim 12 wherein the second component includes a
base structure and a glass plate held by the base structure, the
plurality of living cells being disposed over the glass plate.
14. A device for inducing an oxygen concentration gradient, the
device comprising: a first component that is a diffusion barrier,
the first component including a central pillar having a first
space-defining surface; a second component having a second
space-defining surface, the first component being positioned
proximate to the second component such that the first
space-defining surface and the second space-defining surface define
a confined space; a layer of living cells disposed over the second
space-defining surface; and an aqueous solution having dissolved
oxygen therein that fills the confined space, wherein the first
space-defining surface and the second space-defining surface are
sufficiently close that passive oxygen diffusion in the confined
space is insufficient to replenish oxygen consumed by cells thereby
establishing an oxygen gradient in the confined space.
15. The device of claim 14 wherein the central pillar is an oxygen
barrier.
16. The device of claim 14 wherein the first space-defining surface
and the second space-defining surface are separated by a gap
distance from about 30 .mu.m to about 1000 .mu.m.
17. The device of claim 14 wherein the first component includes a
cap structure that includes the central pillar
18. The device of claim 14 wherein the first component further
includes three spatial reference pillars that are longer than the
central pillar thereby defining a gap distance between the layer of
living cells and the central pillar.
19. The device of claim 14 wherein the confined space is open along
a periphery.
20. The device of claim 14 wherein the first space-defining surface
is circular.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application is a continuation of U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 15/941,374 filed Mar. 30, 2018, which claims
the benefit of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 62/478,810
filed Mar. 30, 2017, the disclosures of which are hereby
incorporated in their entirety by reference herein.
TECHNICAL FIELD
[0002] In at least one aspect, the present invention is related to
devices that simulate hypoxia as observed in various tumor cells
and stem cell niches.
BACKGROUND
[0003] Cancer remains one of the leading causes of death despite
the vast investment and efforts in research and drug development.
Over 1.68 million new cancer cases and 0.6 million cancer deaths
are projected to occur in the United States alone in 2017.sup.1.
Resistance towards conventional chemo- and radio-therapies as well
as the fast-growing immunotherapies presents a significant
challenge in cancer treatments, particularly in solid
tumors.sup.2,3. The tumor microenvironment (TME) consists of
complex cellular and molecular interactions that regulate the
progression and therapeutic response of tumors.sup.4. Hypoxia, the
condition of oxygen deficiency, is a central player in the TME and
cancer progression.sup.5,6. Notably, degrees of hypoxia in solid
tumors are very heterogeneous and can range from 0.5-2% oxygen
saturation compared to 4-7% in healthy tissues and 21% in
atmospheric air.sup.7,8. Different degrees of hypoxia induce
varying levels of metabolic adaptation, extracellular matrix (ECM)
remodeling, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), angiogenesis,
pH regulation, and immune suppression.sup.9,10. It also promotes
cancer stem-like cell (CSC) phenotypes, adding to tumor
heterogeneity and therapy resistance.sup.11. Recapitulating in vivo
hypoxic conditions will therefore facilitate the screening and
development of new therapeutics.sub.12.
[0004] Considerable efforts have been made to establish hypoxic
tumor models that can be analyzed with ease and reproducibility. In
vivo models provide naturally formed.sup.13 or induced.sup.14
hypoxia. However, these models typically involve significant
individual variabilities, high cost, and low throughput.sup.15-17.
They also have limited spatiotemporal and cellular resolutions
inherent to most in vivo imaging modalities.sup.17. In vitro models
can provide a high level of manipulation, specificity, sensitivity,
and reproducibility that are difficult to obtain in vivo.sup.16
Hypoxia can be induced in vitro using chemical methods.sup.18,
hypoxia chambers.sup.19, spheroid cultures.sup.20, and
micro-engineering approaches.sup.21. Chemical induction of hypoxia
can adversely affect signaling pathways other than those regulated
by hypoxia.sup.18. Commercially available hypoxia chambers provide
one oxygen concentration at a time, thus limiting its throughput in
testing cell responses to different oxygen levels. Moreover, these
approaches fail to capture the spatial complexity of oxygen
profiles and the resulted crosstalk in a hypoxic tumor.sup.22,23.
Tumor spheroid cultures can induce a hypoxic gradient that
histologically resemble avascular tumor nests.sup.24. However,
spheroids are generally incompatible with high-content analysis
such as live-cell tracking and spatiotemporally resolved
single-cell analysis, which would otherwise require laborious
post-processing such as embedding and sectioning, or expensive,
deep imaging platforms.sup.25,26. Engineered 3-dimensional (3D)
cultures have also emerged as an alternative method to capture
gradients of oxygen and nutrients. For instance, paper-supported 3D
cell cultures have been developed to recapitulate gradients in
spheroids and tumors, where layers of 2D cultures are stacked to
establish the gradients, and disassembled for imaging and
analysis.sup.27. Such methods lack a lateral gradient profile for
microscopy, and require additional handling to analyze cells on
each layer. Microfluidic platforms have been established to create
oxygen gradients on a lateral surface to facilitate microscopic
observation.sup.28-32. However, they often face challenges of high
oxygen permeability of fabrication materials, maintenance of an
accurate gradient, complicated fabrication processes, and
microfluidic design/handling that are challenging to biological
research laboratories. Those designs with continuous flow over the
cells also prohibits lateral cell-cell communications between
gradient zones through soluble mediators.sup.33. To date, there has
not been a user-friendly, scalable in vitro hypoxic model that
mimics the in vivo oxygen gradient and is compatible with
high-content imaging and high-throughput applications.
[0005] Accordingly, there is need for a biomimetic cancer culture
platform that is easy to handle and can be reproducibly
analyzed.
SUMMARY
[0006] In at least one aspect, a novel approach to recapitulate a
hypoxic gradient within a micropatterned monolayer culture of human
cells, and in particular cancer cells is provided. Cellular
metabolism is combined with micro-milled oxygen diffusion barriers
to establish a natural hypoxic gradient. Induction of hypoxia in a
microdevice is driven by cellular oxygen consumption, similar to
the formation of tumor hypoxia due to increased oxygen demand by
uncontrollably proliferating cells; therefore, the microdevice is
able to mimic natural hypoxia induction while eliminating the need
for an external source of oxygen control. The platform is
integrated with oxygen sensors for real-time, spatially-resolved
measurements and is compatible with microscopy-based techniques. It
enables high-content, spatially-resolved analyses of cell
phenotypic and gene expressions, and further allows for assessment
of hypoxia-targeted drugs, as demonstrated below using tirapazamine
(TPZ). Advantageously, the device and platform are a versatile tool
for gaining insights into cancer biology and accelerate the
development and discovery of new therapeutics.
[0007] In another aspect, the present invention provides a novel
approach for recapitulating a hypoxic gradient within a
micropatterned design of human tissue cells, and in particular
cancer cells, referred to as 2D spheroids. These 2D spheroids were
set into a microdevice, in which an oxygen concentration gradient
is induced independently. With this biomimetic tissue (e.g., tumor)
model, rapid insight into cancer biology can be achieved while
reducing the high failure rate in the development of new anticancer
drugs. In addition, the capacity for the chip to incorporate a
patient's own cancer, stromal, and immune cells can revolutionize
personalized, precision medicine for cancer therapies.
[0008] In another aspect, a device for inducing an oxygen
concentration gradient is provided. The device includes a first
component that is a diffusion barrier having a first space-defining
surface, a second component having a second space-defining surface,
and a layer of living cells disposed over the second space-defining
surface. The first component is positioned proximate to the second
component such that the first space-defining surface and the second
space-defining surface define a confined space. An aqueous solution
having dissolved oxygen therein fills the confined space.
Characteristically, the first space-defining surface and the second
space-defining surface are sufficiently close that passive oxygen
diffusion in the confined space is insufficient to replenish oxygen
consumed by cells thereby establishing an oxygen gradient in the
confined space.
[0009] In another aspect, a device for inducing an oxygen
concentration gradient is provided. The device includes a first
component that is a diffusion barrier having a first space-defining
surface; and a second component having a second space-defining
surface. The first component is positioned proximate to the second
component such that the first space-defining surface and the second
space-defining surface define a confined space. Characteristically,
the confined space defines a gap distance that is sufficiently
small to inducing an oxygen concentration gradient when a layer of
living cells in aqueous medium is disposed in the confined
space.
[0010] In another aspect, an integrated system that combines
microfluidic channels with the devices for inducing oxygen
concentration gradients set forth herein. Advantageously, the
microfluidics channel provides materials to the layer of living
cells.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0011] FIGS. 1A-1E. Recapitulation of a gradient of oxygen in a
hypoxic microdevice. (A) Illustration of the working principle.
Differential levels of oxygen across a cell monolayer are achieved
with the addition of a physical barrier immediately above it. Cells
are exposed to varying degrees of oxygen owing to the limited
passive diffusion of oxygen in confined spaces, further enhanced by
the cells' innate ability to consume oxygen. (B) Side view of the
microdevice capable of inducing hypoxia. Computer-aided designs of
the (C) cap and (D) base structures. (E) Assembled microdevice
after micro-milling.
[0012] FIG. 2A. Device variation in which the cell island with
smaller diameter than diffusion barrier can mimic growth of tumor
under more physiological or pathophysiological level of oxygen
concentrations in tumors.
[0013] FIG. 2B: Plot of oxygen concentration versus radial distance
for the variation of FIG. 3A.
[0014] FIG. 3. Different topological shape of the diffusion barrier
will alter the radial profile of oxygen concentration.
[0015] FIG. 4. Device can integrate extracellular component
including the mechanical properties (using materials with tunable
mechanical properties) or biochemical properties (using ECM
coating).
[0016] FIGS. 5A and 5B. Alternative shapes of microdevice with the
same diffusion barrier concept. (A) Perspective view of a
longitudinal channel; (B) Cross section of the longitudinal
channel.
[0017] FIGS. 6A and 6B. Scaling cell culture from 2-D monolayer to
3-D bulk in the gap to allow tissue-like cell organization while
maintaining control over diffusion profile. (A) Confined space with
open ends or periphery; (B) Confined space that is a longitudinal
channel with a closed end.
[0018] FIGS. 7A and 7B. Integration of the device with microfluidic
channel and addition of endothelial cells mimic physiological
delivery of soluble materials and cells (including drugs or
therapeutic cells).
[0019] FIGS. 8 A, 8B, 8C, and 8D. (A) Steady state oxygen in the
hypoxia microdevice as a result of oxygen barriers and oxygen
consumption by a micropatterned cell layer. (B) Evolvement of
oxygen levels in the microdevice within 1,440 minutes of device
assembly with the micropatterned cell monolayer. (C) Modulation of
the steady state oxygen distribution by the gap size in a hypoxia
microdevice. (D) Sensitivity of oxygen level at pillar center to
gap sizes and radii of the oxygen barrier pillar.
[0020] FIGS. 9A, 9B, 9C, and 9D. Oxygen levels in the
microenvironment measured by an oxygen-sensitive fluorophore. (A)
Schematics of oxygen sensor layer in the hypoxia device. (B)
Fluorescent signal from sensor layer without or with the cell layer
in the device. Scale bar: 500 .mu.m. (C) Normalized fluorescent
intensity of ruthenium compound by Nile blue in oxygen sensor
particles over radial distance (center to edge) with and without
cell layer from the same pillar. (D) Derived oxygen concentration
under the pillar (orange, N=3) compared to simulated oxygen
concentration (blue) show a good correlation (Pearson's correlation
coefficient r=0.9458). Error bars: standard deviation (SD).
[0021] FIGS. 10A, 10B, 10C, and 10D. Upregulation of hypoxic
markers in microdevice. (A) Hypoxyprobe.TM.-1 immunostaining in
micropatterned MCF-7 cells under normoxic condition and in hypoxia
device after 24 hours of incubation. (B) Radial analysis of areal
fractions with high Hypoxyprobe.TM.-1 signal (normoxia: N=4;
hypoxia: N=7). (C) Glut-1 immunostaining in micropatterned MCF-7
cells under normoxic condition and in hypoxia device after 24 hours
(normoxia: N=5; hypoxia: N=8). (D) Radial profile of areal
fractions with high Glut-1 expression. Scale bars: 500 .mu.m. Error
bars: SD.
[0022] FIGS. 11A, 11B, and 11C. Gene expression analysis in hypoxia
device. (A) Areal definition for laser capture microdissection in
micropatterned MCF-7 cells under hypoxia device and two types
comparisons of gene expression (1: hypoxia vs normoxia; 2: center
vs edge). PC: pillar center; PE: pillar edge. (B) Region-by-region
comparison between hypoxic and normoxic samples, and (C) In-sample
comparison between center and edge areas under hypoxia device, with
genes related to proliferation, apoptosis, glycolysis, and
migration/metastasis. (B, C) N=3. Student's t-test: *p<0.05 for
significant fold change in gene regulation; #p<0.05 for
significant paired difference. All other conditions (non-labeled):
not significant (p>0.05). Error bars: SD.
[0023] FIGS. 12A, 12B, and 12C. Cellular response to
hypoxia-targeting drugs in hypoxia device. (A) Live-dead staining
of micropatterned MCF-7 cells under normoxic condition or in
hypoxia device, without treatment or under the treatment of
tirapazamine (TPZ), a drug targeting hypoxic cells. Green: live
(calcein); red: dead (propidium iodide). (B) Areal density of live
(green) and dead (red) cells in the micropattern along the radial
direction. (C) Proportion of live cells in the inner/pillar region
versus outer region (N=3). One-way ANOVA; n.s.: not significant
(p>0.05). Error bars: SD.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0024] As required, detailed embodiments of the present invention
are disclosed herein; however, it is to be understood that the
disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary of the invention that
may be embodied in various and alternative forms. The figures are
not necessarily to scale; some features may be exaggerated or
minimized to show details of particular components. Therefore,
specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not
to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a representative basis
for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present
invention.
[0025] It must also be noted that, as used in the specification and
the appended claims, the singular form "a," "an," and "the"
comprise plural referents unless the context clearly indicates
otherwise. For example, reference to a component in the singular is
intended to comprise a plurality of components.
[0026] The term "comprising" is synonymous with "including,"
"having," "containing," or "characterized by." These terms are
inclusive and open-ended and do not exclude additional, unrecited
elements or method steps.
[0027] The phrase "consisting of" excludes any element, step, or
ingredient not specified in the claim. When this phrase appears in
a clause of the body of a claim, rather than immediately following
the preamble, it limits only the element set forth in that clause;
other elements are not excluded from the claim as a whole.
[0028] The phrase "consisting essentially of" limits the scope of a
claim to the specified materials or steps, plus those that do not
materially affect the basic and novel characteristic(s) of the
claimed subject matter.
[0029] With respect to the terms "comprising," "consisting of" and
"consisting essentially of" where one of these three terms is used
herein, the presently disclosed and claimed subject matter can
include the use of either of the other two terms.
[0030] Throughout this application, where publications are
referenced, the disclosures of these publications in their
entireties are hereby incorporated by reference into this
application to more fully describe the state of the art to which
this invention pertains.
ABBREVIATIONS
[0031] "CNC" means computer numerical control.
[0032] "ECM" means extracellular matrix.
[0033] "LCM" means laser capture microdissection.
[0034] "PC" means pillar center.
[0035] "PDMS" means polydimethylsiloxane.
[0036] "PE" means pillar edge.
[0037] "TPZ" means tirapazamine.
[0038] In an embodiment of the present invention, a device for
inducing an oxygen concentration gradient (e.g., a gradient of
hypoxia) is provided. With reference to FIGS. 1A-E, schematic
illustrations of the oxygen concentration gradient-inducing device
are provided. Device 10 includes first component 12 that is a
diffusion barrier having a first space-defining surface 14. Device
10 also includes second component 16 which has second
space-defining surface 18. Characteristically, first component 12
is positioned proximate to the second component 16 such that the
first space-defining surface 14 and the second space-defining
surface 18 define a confined space 20. In a refinement, the
confined space is open along a periphery 21. The gap distance h
between first space-defining surface 14 and second space-defining
surface 18 is typically from about 30 .mu.m to about 1000 .mu.m. In
a refinement, the gap distance h is from about 50 .mu.m to about
500 .mu.m. A first space-defining surface 14 has a smaller area
than the area of second space-defining surface 18. When this is the
case, first space-defining surface 14 will define the region that
has the oxygen concentration gradient. In this regard, first
space-defining surface 14 has an area from about 1 mm.sup.2 to
about 25 mm.sup.2. In a variation, first space-defining surface 14
has an area from about 3 mm.sup.2 to about 15 mm.sup.2. In some
variations, first space-defining surface 14 is substantially
circular (e.g., disk-like). In these variations, first
space-defining surface 14 can have a radius from about 0.5 mm to
about 5 mm. In a refinement, first space-defining surface 14 has a
radius from about 1 mm to about 3 mm.
[0039] Layer of living cells 22 is disposed over the second
space-defining surface 18. In a refinement, the layer of living
cells 22 is patterned onto second space-defining surface 18. In
some refinements, the layer of living cells includes stem cells,
normal cells and/or cancer cells (e.g., breast cancer cells). In
other variations, the layer of living cells can include cells
selected from the group consisting of cancer cells, stem cells,
cardiomyocytes, neurons, hepatocytes, pancreatic cells,
fibroblasts, immune cells, epithelial cells, endothelial cells, and
combinations thereof. For example, cardiomyocytes can be used in
the device to investigate ischemic heart disease. In a variation,
an adhesion layer 23 (e.g., collagen or another ECM material) can
be used to assist in adhering living cells 22 to second
space-defining surface 18. It should be appreciated that layer of
living cells 22 can have a smaller spatial extent (e.g., length or
diameter) than the spatial extent d.sub.1 of first space-defining
surface 14. In this regard, d.sub.1 is the largest distance which
the living cells extend over second space-defining surface 18.
Typically, this d.sub.1 can be 1 to 20 mm. Alternatively, layer of
living cells 22 has an area that is smaller than the area of first
space-defining surface 14 set forth above. FIG. 2A illustrates the
variation in which the cell layer has a smaller diameter d.sub.c
than the diffusion barrier's diameter d.sub.1. FIG. 2B shows that
layer of cells with smaller diameter than diffusion barrier can
mimic growth of tumor under more physiological or
pathophysiological level of oxygen concentrations in tumors. In
other variations, layer of living cells 22 can have a larger or
equal spatial extent to that of first space-defining surface 14.
Aqueous solution 24 fills the confined space 20. The aqueous
solution typically has dissolved oxygen there. In a refinement,
aqueous solution 24 is a cell culture medium. Characteristically,
first space-defining surface 14 and second space-defining surface
18 are sufficiently close that passive oxygen diffusion in the
confined space is insufficient to replenish oxygen consumed by
cells thereby establishing an oxygen gradient in the confined
space.
[0040] In a variation, first component 12 and second component 16
are each independently an oxygen diffusion barrier. Therefore, each
of these components are typically formed from a material having an
oxygen permeability of less than about 1.times.10.sup.-7
cm.sup.3/(cm.sup.2-sec-atm)) at 25.degree. C. and 1 atm. Examples
of suitable materials include, but are not limited to, glass,
metals, ceramics, polymers, and combinations thereof. In some
applications thermoplastic polymers can be used. Specific polymers
that are useful include poly(chloroprene),
poly(isobutene-coisonrene), poly(vinyl chloride),
poly(tetrafluoroethylene), low density poly(ethylene), high density
poly(ethylene), poly(propylene), poly(vinylidene chloride),
poly(trifluoro chloroethylene), poly(ethyl methacrylate),
polycarbonate, poly(ethylene terephthalate), and combinations
thereof. If transparency is needed, polycarbonate is a particularly
useful material. In a refinement, first component 12 includes
polycarbonate and second component 16 includes
polyoxymethylene.
[0041] With reference to FIGS. 1B-E, schematic illustrations of and
oxygen concentration gradient-inducing device formed from a cap
structure and a base structure is provided. Device 10 includes cap
structure 30 which mates to base structure 32 with a pillar
defining the diffusion barrier. As depicted in FIGS. 1B and 1C,
first component 12 is a cap structure with a central oxygen barrier
pillar 40 and spatial reference pillars 42 that are longer than the
central oxygen barrier pillar thereby defining a gap size h between
the layer of living cells and the central oxygen barrier pillar. In
this regard, the spatial reference pillars establish and maintain
the gap distance h. Cap structure 30 also includes additional
columns 34 that align to base structure 32. As depicted in FIGS. 1B
and 1D, the second component 16 is a base structure with glass
plate 44 (e.g., a 12 mm coverslip) being held by the base
structure. Significantly, the plurality of living cells is disposed
over the glass plate 34. In a refinement, the base structure
includes three pegs 46 that snugly immobilize glass plate 14. In
its assembled form, the reference pillars directly contact glass
plate 44, providing precise spatial control over the desired gap
size (FIG. 1 E).
[0042] Still referring to FIGS. 1A-E, device 10 can also include
one or more sensors 50. Useful sensors can be optical and chemical
sensors. Such sensors can be used for measuring microenvironmental
properties such as oxygen concentration, glucose concentration,
cytokine concentrations or activity, metabolite concentrations
and/or activity, and pH. In a refinement, sensor 50 can be a sensor
coating that includes a luminophore or fluorophore and in
particular, an oxygen-sensitive luminophore or fluorophore. An
example of such an oxygen-sensitive luminophore is
Ru(Ph.sub.2phen.sub.3)Cl.sub.2. The sensor coating can also include
an oxygen-insensitive fluorophore (e.g., Nile blue chloride) to be
used as a control.
[0043] With reference to FIG. 3, a schematic illustration showing
that the first space-defining surface 14 can have various
topologies is provided. For example, the surface can be flat having
a well-defined gap h between first space-defining surface 14 and
second space-defining surface 18. In another variation, the gap is
not constant with the first space-defining surface 14 having a cone
(14.sup.1) or curved (14.sup.2) shape. These latter shapes can
alter the radial profile of oxygen concentration.
[0044] FIG. 4 illustrates device 10 for inducing an oxygen
concentration gradient which integrates extracellular components
that can adjust mechanical properties (e.g., layer 60 with tunable
mechanical properties) or biochemical properties (e.g., ECM coating
62) proximate to layer of living cells 22. Each of layers 60 and 62
can be interposed between layer of cells 22 and second
space-defining surface 18. Examples of ECM materials that can be
contained in coating 62 include, but are not limited to collagens
(e.g., collagen I, collagen IV), fibronectin, hyaluronic acid,
fibrin, fibrinogen, elastin, laminin, and combinations thereof.
Moreover, the ECM materials can be embedded in extracellular matrix
64.
[0045] FIGS. 5A and 5B illustrate alternative shapes of a
microdevice with the same diffusion barrier concept. In this
variation, confined space 20 is a longitudinal channel 66 having a
closed end 68 and an open end 70. In this variation, the length
d.sub.2 of channel 66 is from 1 to 25 mm. Moreover, the dimensions
and area for layer of living cells 22 is the same as that set forth
above.
[0046] FIGS. 6A and 6B illustrate scaling to cell culture from 2-D
monolayer to 3-D bulk in the gap to allow tissue-like cell
organization while maintaining control over diffusion profile. In
this variation, device 10 includes additional layers of living
cells 72 disposed over layer of living cells 22 to build up a 3-D
structure. In FIG. 6A, confined space 20 has open ends or periphery
while FIG. 6B shows an example in which confined space 20 is a
longitudinal channel 66 with a closed end 68. In this variation,
the length d.sub.2 of channel 66 is from 1 to 25 mm. Moreover, the
dimensions and area for layer of living cells 22 is the same as
that set forth above.
[0047] With reference to FIGS. 7A and 7B, schematics of an
integrated system that incorporates the device for inducing an
oxygen concentration gradient with microfluidic channels is
provided. Integrated system 78 includes device(s) 10 and
microfluidic channel(s) 80. In such variations, the microfluidic
channel 80 is proximate to device 10 so that material can be
delivered to layer of living cells 22. For this purpose,
microfluidic channel 80 includes porous membrane regions 84 (e.g.,
PDMS) in fluid communication with confined space 20 and layer of
living cells 22. In a variation, drugs and/or therapeutic cells are
delivered to layer of living cells 22 via microfluidic channel 80.
For example, endothelial cells 82 can be added to the microfluidic
channel 80 to mimic physiological delivery of soluble materials and
cells (including drugs or therapeutic cells). In a refinement,
layer of living cells 22 can be interposed between layers 86 and 88
that include ECM materials as set forth above. In a refinement,
microfluidic channel(s) 80 have a length from 1 to 50 mm. In
another refinement, microfluidic channel(s) 80 have a length from 5
to 25 mm. In a further refinement, microfluidic channel(s) 80 have
a cross sectional area from about 0.1 mm.sup.2 to about 1
mm.sup.2.
[0048] The following examples illustrate the various embodiments of
the present invention. Those skilled in the art will recognize many
variations that are within the spirit of the present invention and
scope of the claims.
[0049] I. Results
[0050] Diffusion barriers create an oxygen gradient in a cell
layer. In a 3D tumor mass, a gradient of oxygen or hypoxia is
established by the combined effects of cellular metabolism and
oxygen diffusion. With the same concept, a "tumor-section"-like
monolayer culture that incorporates "insulated" oxygen boundary
conditions on both sides of the monolayer is introduced (FIG. 1A).
Metabolic consumption and limited passive diffusion of oxygen in
the gap between the two barriers will thus result in a gradient of
oxygen and hypoxic levels in the monolayer (FIG. 1A). To achieve
this theoretical induction of hypoxia, a microdevice using a
computer numerical control (CNC) micro-milling platform is created
with high precision at the microscale.sup.34. The microdevice
consists of (1) a cap structure with a central pillar as an oxygen
barrier and three reference pillars that determine the gap size for
oxygen diffusion, and (2) a base structure that holds a culture
substrate with a cell monolayer (FIG. 1B). In its assembled form, a
DELRIN.RTM. base (white) holds a gas-impermeable glass coverslip
with a cell monolayer to form the bottom diffusion barrier and the
oxygen consumption layer; a polycarbonate pillar provides the other
oxygen diffusion barrier as well as a transparent observation
window for microscopy (FIG. 1E). Polycarbonate was chosen as the
cap material due to its low oxygen permeability (polycarbonate:
9.1.times.10.sup.-9 cm.sup.3/(cm.sup.2-sec-atm)).sup.29,35-37 and
excellent optical transparency.sup.34.
[0051] Computer simulations with COMSOL Multiphysics was carried
out to characterize the spatial and temporal profiles of oxygen
expected in the hypoxia device. FIG. 8A demonstrates the
steady-state distribution of oxygen in a microdevice with a 50
.mu.m diffusion gap. The heat-map of oxygen concentration shows a
radial transition of oxygen concentrations from near-zero under the
center of the pillar to a normoxic level at the periphery. Three
points of interest (POIs) were selected immediately above the cell
monolayer: at the center (A), at the intermediate region (B) and at
the edge (C) in relation to the pillar geometry (FIG. 8A). It was
found that oxygen level within the device drops quickly within the
first 10 minutes. Within 30 minutes, the oxygen levels are already
within 92.8%, 93.3%, and 94.5% of the steady-state level at the
locations A, B, and C, respectively. The influence of the diffusion
gap size on the steady-state oxygen profile above the cell layer
was then examined. This parameter is important for the design of
the hypoxia microdevice, as actual oxygen level under the pillar
can be influenced by the micro-milling accuracy of Ah. As shown in
FIG. 8C, the radial oxygen distribution can be fine-tuned with Ah,
where smaller gaps result in steeper oxygen gradients under the
pillar. Oxygen gradient outside the pillar has little dependence on
the gap size, suggesting that the device structure other than the
pillar does not hinder oxygen supply from the bulk media and the
media-air interface. The sensitivity of oxygen concentration to the
pillar radii was further investigated. The oxygen level at the
center in relation to .DELTA.h under pillars of different radii
(FIG. 8D) was simulated. A larger radius increases the distance of
oxygen diffusion, thus lowering the oxygen concentration in the
center. COMSOL simulation showed that in general, oxygen levels
under smaller pillars are more sensitive to the changes in .DELTA.h
(FIG. 8D). 1.5 mm was chosen as the pillar radius in the
experiments to achieve biologically relevant hypoxic
level.sup.38,39, manageable imaging area for microscopy, and
minimal sensitivity to the variation of .DELTA.h in
micromilling.sup.34.
[0052] An integrated sensor layer can monitor the oxygen gradient.
Next, cell culture experiments and characterization of the actual
oxygen gradient by embedding a fluorescence-based oxygen sensor in
the microdevice were performed. Silica microparticles were absorbed
with an oxygen-sensitive luminophore Ru(Ph.sub.2phen.sub.3)Cl.sub.2
(oxygen sensor) mixed with an oxygen-insensitive fluorophore, Nile
blue chloride (control).sup.40. They were then mixed in PDMS and
spread in a thin layer onto the oxygen barrier pillar using a
micro-milled cap (FIG. 9A, left panel). MCF-7 cells, a breast
cancer cell line, were micropatterned on a collagen I coated
coverslip in a circular island to mimic the morphology of cancer
cell nests in a tumor tissue section.sup.41, and assembled into the
hypoxia microdevice (FIG. 9A, right panel). After 24 hours of cell
culture, images of the silica microparticles in the respective
fluorescent channels for the ruthenium compound and Nile blue
chloride were obtained. Enhanced fluorescent signal from the
ruthenium compound was observed near the center of the pillar in a
radial distribution profile. In contrast, the same microdevice
without the cell monolayer showed a relatively uniform, dim
fluorescent signal (under the same imaging settings), which is
consistent with the oxygen-quenching property of the ruthenium
compound (FIG. 9B). Signal from Nile blue chloride, on the
contrary, was insensitive to oxygen concentrations (data not
shown). The normalized fluorescent signal (ruthenium by Nile blue,
Ru/NB) was plotted against the radial distance without or with the
cell layer from a single microdevice (FIG. 9C). Normalized
fluorescence intensity was converted to oxygen concentration (N=3)
and compared against the COMSOL.RTM. prediction, which shows a good
match between the two (Pearson's correlation coefficient r=0.9458)
(FIG. 9D).
[0053] Hypoxic Markers are Upregulated in the Microdevice.
[0054] Immunofluorescent analysis on hypoxic markers was carried
out to confirm that cells can create and respond to the oxygen
gradient in the microdevice. Pimonidazole (also known as
Hypoxyprobe.TM.-1) is a chemical compound that can be reduced in
hypoxic cells to form stable covalent adducts with thiol groups in
proteins, peptides and amino acids, which can then be detected by
immunofluorescent staining.sup.42,43. Elevated pimonidazole
staining was detected under the pillar (FIG. 10A, B). Quantitative
analysis (N=7) showed a signal plateau near the center of the
pillar (in .about.600 .mu.m radius), with gradual decline to a
background level near the edge of the pillar (from 600 to 1,300
.mu.m). The oxygen concentrations corresponding to the two
transition points are 0.028 and 0.08 mol/m.sup.3, respectively,
based on the COMSOL Multiphysics.RTM. simulation.
[0055] Glucose transporter-1 (Glut-1) is a glucose transporter
protein that facilitates glucose supply into cells. It has been
established as an intrinsic cellular marker for hypoxia and
correlated with levels of reduced pimonidazole.sup.44,45. Glut-1 in
the MCF-7 cells incubated for 24 hours in the microdevice were
immunostained with distinct Glut-1 upregulation under the pillar
being observed (FIG. 10C, D). A high degree of correlation was
observed between the radial profiles of Glut-1 and reduced
pimonidazole in the hypoxia device (Pearson's correlation
coefficient r=0.9699), which agrees with previous
findings.sup.42.
[0056] Gene Expressions are Spatially Regulated in the
Microdevice.
[0057] To investigate a wider range of pathways impacted by hypoxia
in a spatially-resolved manner, the gene expression profiles of
cells from micropattern regions under different oxygen levels in
the device were analyzed. Cells were extracted with laser capture
microdissection (LCM) from pillar center (PC) and pillar edge (PE),
which represent hypoxic and near-normoxic (0.12-0.14 mol/m.sup.3 by
simulation) regions, respectively (FIG. 11A). Gene expression was
compared in two ways: (1) both PC and PE regions in the hypoxia
device were compared to their corresponding regions in the normoxic
samples, and (2) PC was compared to PE in the same samples under
the respective normoxic or hypoxic conditions. Gene targets were
selected to include a diverse range of cellular functions,
including cell proliferation (MKI67).sup.46, apoptosis (BNIP3,
DDIT4).sup.47,48, glycolytic metabolism (SLC2A1, CAIX,
PGK1).sup.45,47,48, and migration/metastasis (SNAI1, VIM,
CXCR4).sup.49,50.
[0058] When normalized to their normoxic counterparts, cells in
hypoxic PC regions have down-regulated proliferation and
up-regulated expression of genes related to apoptosis, glycolysis,
and migration/metastasis (blue bars, p<0.05, Student's t-test,
FIG. 11B). In contrast, the same analysis shows no significant up-
or down-regulation of the same set of genes in the PE regions
(orange bars, p>0.05, Student's t-test, FIG. 11B). When the
differential gene expression between PC and PE in the same samples
was analyzed, it was discovered that the gene expression in the
cells from the hypoxia device are spatially regulated by the oxygen
gradient, with down-regulated proliferation and up-regulated
markers in PC for apoptosis, glycolysis and migration/metastasis
(except SNAI1) (orange bars, p<0.05, Student's t-test, FIG.
11C). Similarly, the same analysis shows that there is no spatially
resolved differences in gene expression in normoxic samples (blue
bars, p>0.05, Student's t-test, FIG. 11C).
[0059] Spatially Resolved Drug Response is Observed in the
Device.
[0060] To assess the response of cancer cells to drug treatment
under a hypoxic gradient, as well as the feasibility of the
microdevice for drug screening assays, cell viability assays with
TPZ treatment in the microdevice were performed. TPZ is an
experimental anticancer prodrug that is 15- to 50-fold more
selective at targeting hypoxic human cancer cells than their
normoxic counterparts.sup.51,52. Cells were pre-conditioned with
hypoxia in the microdevice for 12 hours, which was considered
sufficient to induce cellular adaptations to hypoxia.sup.47, before
being treated with TPZ for 24 hours. The TPZ concentration that
inhibit 50% of the cancer cell growth (IC50).sup.53 and
differentially kill hypoxic cells over normoxic cells in the dosage
test was used. Live-dead staining revealed cytotoxicity caused by
TPZ in both normoxic and hypoxic samples indicated by positive
nuclear propidium iodide (PI) staining (FIG. 12A, tirapazamine
column, and corresponding radial distributions in FIG. 12B).
Non-treated cells under deep hypoxia also showed pronounced cell
death (FIG. 12A, B, lower left panel). Most strikingly, cells under
severe hypoxia (corresponding to 0.03 mol/m.sup.3 oxygen level by
COMSOL.RTM. simulation) in the microdevice were eliminated by TPZ
treatment (FIG. 12A, B, lower right panel). As dead cells can be
washed off in the staining process, the areal fraction of living
cells with positive calcein staining was chosen as the readout for
TPZ cytotoxicity. The live-cell fractions in the micropatterns
inside and outside the 1.5 mm radius were quantified, which
corresponds to the pillar radius. TPZ treatment caused significant
reduction in the live-cell fraction only in the hypoxia
microdevice, while all other conditions were not statistically
different from each other (FIG. 12C, one-way Analysis of Variance,
ANOVA).
[0061] Discussion
[0062] Embodiments of the present invention introduce a novel
microdevice platform to study tumor microenvironment under a
hypoxic gradient. It can accurately generate and control oxygen
gradients, eliminates complex microfluidic fabrication and
handling, allows for incorporation of additional tumor components,
and is compatible with high-content imaging-based analysis and
high-throughput applications. These features have only been
partially achieved by other individual platforms.sup.24,27-33. By
combining cell-driven oxygen consumption and controlled passive
oxygen diffusion, the microfluidic components commonly used by
others.sup.21,54 is eliminated, thus greatly simplifying the design
of the microdevice and cell culture operations. The lateral oxygen
gradient created on a monolayer cell culture also allows for
real-time, high-content investigation of cellular phenotypes and
behaviors with wide-field microscopy-based techniques, as
demonstrated by the LCM-based gene expression analysis. This
simplicity and compatibility will likely facilitate the adoption of
the methods of the invention in biological research laboratories
that usually lack engineering equipment or expertise to handle
microfluidic devices, as well as in pharmaceutical industry that
requires simplicity, scalability, and reproducibility.sup.55,56.
The experiments demonstrated the use of the platform for cell
micropatterns larger than the pillar so that cells outside the
pillar can be referred to as an internal normoxic control, and for
up to 36 hours of cell culture (12 hours of conditioning and 24
hours of TPZ treatment), which is sufficient to induce gene and
protein expressions as well as drug response. Notably, the platform
for a growing "tumor nest" culture was adapted by culturing cell
micropatterns smaller than the pillar, which has a co-evolving
hypoxic gradient with the growing cell island. Cell cultures were
extended to 96 hours to capture additional hypoxic responses.
Moreover, the platform can also be used beyond cancer to study
other biological processes and cell types affected by hypoxia, such
as the differentiation of embryonic stem cells' and induced
pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs).sup.58, wound healing.sup.59, and
immunoediting.sup.60,61.
[0063] Micro-milling was used to fabricate the hypoxia microdevice
as set forth above. The technique allows for materials with desired
(low) oxygen permeability, which is not attainable with PDMS in
conventional soft lithography.sup.62. Importantly, a unique
strength of the device and fabrication is that the diffusion
barrier pillar can be milled with flexible sizes (e.g. lateral or
gap dimensions), arbitrary geometries (e.g. squares, ovals, or
those mimicking real tumor shapes) and topologies (e.g. conical or
spherical shapes) to alter the overall oxygen distribution in the
gap. With the assistance of computer simulation, oxygen
distribution profiles in the microdevices can be designed to
reflect the heterogeneous oxygen landscape in tumors with various
sizes and cancer types, and at different stages.sup.39,63. As a
rapid prototyping technique, micro-milling also allows for quick
iteration of design parameters. On the other hand, once the
parameters are set for a given study or application, alternative
fabrication approaches such as inject molding can be utilized to
fabricate the microdevice in large scales.sup.64.
[0064] Another important feature of the tumor microdevice platform
is in its ability to incorporate additional components and features
of tumor microenvironment. For example, the collagen I coating can
be replaced with other ECM types (e.g. collagen IV, fibronectin,
hyaluronic acid, etc.) that play unique roles in cancer progression
and therapeutic resistance.sup.65,66. The glass substrate can be
supplemented with a layer of elastic material (e.g. acrylamide
gel.sup.67 or PDMS micropillar array.sup.68) to understand the
interplay of cellular mechanics with hypoxia. Additional cell
types, such as immune cells and fibroblasts can be incorporated to
reveal their crosstalk with cancer cells in an oxygen
gradient.sup.41. While the experiments focused on 2D monolayer
cultures, integrating scaffold biomaterials and bioprinting
techniques to create thin-layer 3D cultures in the platform to
further recapitulate cellular behaviors unique to 3D cultures can
also be implemented.sup.69.
[0065] Finite element analysis through COMSOL Multiphysics.RTM. was
extensively used to simulate oxygen levels and distributions in the
microdevice, to confirm the concept and adjust the design in the
experiments set forth above. It is noteworthy that the fidelity of
the simulation to reality is dependent on the physical parameters
used in the model.sup.70. One of the key parameters is the oxygen
consumption behavior of the cells. An oxygen consumption rate of
MCF-7 cells reported by others.sup.63 was used. For hypoxic
conditions, previous reports.sup.70,71 were followed to assume that
the cells have a Michaelis-Menten-type consumption rate depending
on the actual oxygen levels (above a critical value), which drops
to zero when oxygen level falls below the critical value.sup.70. To
mimic a more realistic spatiotemporal oxygen profile, commercial
assays (such as the Seahorse assay.sup.72) can be used to further
validate or replace the concentration-dependent oxygen consumption
equation for given cells of interest.
[0066] To complement the numerical simulation, the oxygen
distribution in the microdevice was measured with
microparticle-based oxygen sensors embedded under the pillar. It
should be noted that the oxygen sensor particles showed highly
variable fluorescent signals near the center of the pillar where
deep hypoxia is induced by the cell micropattern (FIG. 9C, orange
curve). There was also high variability of fluorescence intensity,
calibration curves, and oxygen measurement from different devices
(seen as high standard deviation, SD in FIG. 9D). Therefore, in its
current form, the oxygen sensor layer method is still only a
semi-quantitative analysis. The model also did not consider the
photobleaching of the luminophore and the distribution of the
ruthenium material in the silica and silicone phases of the sensor
layer, which have been suggested to influence the linearity and
sensitivity of the measurement.sup.73. In the future, the
measurement may be improved by adopting a two-site oxygen binding
model for the multi-phase sensor layer.sup.40,73. On the other
hand, the fluorescence lifetime of the ruthenium-based oxygen
sensors is also dependent on oxygen levels dictated by a similar
Stern-Volmer model.sup.40,73. Since the lifetime of fluorescence is
an intrinsic property of a fluorophore and independent of
fluorescent intensity.sup.74, fluorescence lifetime imaging
microscopy (FLIM) can be used to more accurately measure the oxygen
levels.sup.75. It is important to note that a gradient of nutrients
and soluble factors can be similarly induced by cellular metabolism
and biological activities. Moreover, chemical and optical sensors
to measure other microenvironmental factors such as glucose.sup.76,
cytokines.sup.77, metabolites.sup.78, and pH.sup.79 can be
integrated into the microdevice.
[0067] The microdevice set forth herein can capture the spatial
heterogeneity of cellular phenotypes induced by a hypoxic gradient.
Molecules and proteins regulated by hypoxia can be immunostained
and correlated with the oxygen gradient, as seen in the
Hypoxyprobe-1.TM. and Glut-1 staining (FIG. 10). As a
proof-of-concept, the platform was interfaced with LCM, another
microscopy-based technique, to analyze the spatial profile of gene
expressions related to a wide range of biological behaviors (FIG.
11). With next-generation sequencing and proteomic
technologies.sup.80,81, it will allow for transcriptome- and
proteome-level analysis of the hypoxic tumor microenvironment on a
single-cell level, and reveal signaling network and crosstalk
linked to cancer progression and therapeutic response. These
include, but are not limited to, cellular metabolism.sup.82,
CSCs.sup.83, EMT.sup.84, radioresistance.sup.82, as well as
biomarkers related to disease prognosis.sup.45,82.
[0068] The cytotoxic effects of TPZ were confirmed in an
experimental drug that is preferentially activated in hypoxic
environments.sup.85, on cancer cells experiencing a hypoxic
gradient (FIG. 12). A striking "death zone" near the center of the
pillar under TPZ treatment was observed, with a sharp boundary
between the dead and live cell area. The result suggests the highly
selective nature of TPZ treatment on cells below a hypoxic
threshold. Notably, increased cell deaths in untreated hypoxic
samples was observed (FIG. 12A, B, lower left panel) in agreement
with the gene expression data that indicate enhanced apoptosis in
the PC region against the PE region and the normoxic control (FIG.
11B, C). TPZ-induced cytotoxicity in the normoxic samples under the
50 .mu.M TPZ treatment condition (FIG. 12A, B, upper right panel)
was also observed, which is consistent with the TPZ-mediated cell
killing in normoxic cultures in the dose-response measurement.
Interestingly, calcein signal in the live-dead staining was
preferentially enhanced in the central hypoxic areas, at the edges
of the "death zone", and at the periphery of micropatterns. It may
be attributed to reduced self-quenching of calcein dye in more
extended cells.sup.86 as a result of increased growth areas due to
micropattern edge effect or dead neighboring cells, or reduced
expression of multidrug transporter.sup.87. To minimize the
influence of calcein fluorescence intensity in the quantification,
areal fraction of positive calcein staining, instead of the total
intensity, was thus calculated for FIG. 12C. Future experiments on
TPZ dosage and its relation to the radii of the "death zone" can
further reveal the adaptability of the drug to different hypoxic
levels. The microdevice can also be used as a drug
testing/screening platform to assess the efficacy of combinatorial
treatments with chemo-, targeted- and immuno-therapeutic drugs to
eradicate heterogeneous cancer populations in the hypoxic
tumor.sup.88, to accelerate the discovery of more effective cancer
drug regimens.
[0069] In summary, a tumor microdevice platform that recapitulates
the hypoxic gradient in tumor microenvironment for high-content and
high-throughput applications is provided. The establishment of the
oxygen profile through multiphysics simulation was demonstrated by
optical sensor measurement, immunostaining, spatially-resolved gene
expression analysis, and hypoxia-targeted drug treatment. It is
compatible with high content imaging, live-cell tracking, and
single-cell analyses. It is also adaptable with additional
microenvironmental components and biosensors. The invention's
flexible and scalable platform will allow for extensive
investigation of tumor biology and other hypoxia-related
biosystems, and also serve as a powerful tool for therapeutic
discoveries.
[0070] II. Materials and Methods
[0071] Cell Culture and Micropatterning.
[0072] MCF-7 human breast cancer cells were purchased from ATCC and
maintained in Dulbecco's Minimum Essential Medium (DMEM; Thermo
Fisher) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Omega
Scientific), 100 U mL.sup.-1 penicillin, and 100 .mu.g mL.sup.-1
streptomycin (Thermo Fisher), in a humidified incubator maintained
at 37.degree. C. and 5% CO.sub.2. Round glass coverslips (12 mm in
diameter; Fisher Scientific) were immersed in hot commercial
detergent, rinsed with deionized water, and dried with air. The
coverslips were then treated with plasma (Harrick Plasma, Model
PDC-001-HP) and silanized with 1% aminopropyltriathoxysilane
(Fisher Scientific) for 15 minutes. Upon extensive rinsing,
coverslips were dried with air and cured at 100.degree. C. for 1
hour. Next, silanized coverslips were coated with 0.1 mg mL.sup.-1
rat tail collagen type I (Corning) in 4.degree. C. for 3 hours
under shaking conditions. Micropattern designs were modeled in
CorelDrawX7 (Corel Corporation) and fabricated into 250 .mu.m thick
PDMS stencils (Rogers Corporation) by a laser engraver (Epilog).
Stencil design was a circular feature of 5 mm diameter cut into a
13 mm circle. Stencils were then thoroughly rinsed in 70%
isopropanol and deionized water, air-dried, and aligned onto the
collagen-coated coverslips. The whole substrate was blocked with
0.2% w/v pluronic F-127 (Sigma) diluted in 1.times.PBS, rinsed with
PBS, then with DMEM. Next, 300,000 MCF-7 human breast cancer cells
(ATCC) were seeded. After cells adhered, PDMS stencils were peeled
off and the glass coverslips with micropatterned cancer cells were
briefly rinsed.sup.41.
[0073] Fabrication of Hypoxia Device.
[0074] The design and toolpaths for the hypoxia microdevice were
created using Autodesk Fusion360 (Autodesk, Inc.). The design
consists of a base structure to immobilize the coverslip and a cap
structure with a diffusion barrier pillar. Subsequently, the design
was converted into a g-code, imported into a commercial software
(Otherplan, Other Machine Co.), and milled with a computer
numerical control machine (Othermill V2, Other Machine Co.). The
base and cap structures were milled in DELRIN.RTM. and
polycarbonate, respectively. Upon mechanical polishing using 1000
grit sandpaper (3 M), microdevices were autoclaved before use. For
drug assays, the polycarbonate cap was vapor polished with
methylene chloride inside a fume hood to achieve optical
transparency.sup.34.
[0075] Substrates with micropatterned cells were set into
autoclaved microdevices and incubated for specified times. Samples
were then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA; Electron Microscopy
Sciences) for 10 minutes or ice-cold 100% ethanol for
immunostaining and LCM, respectively.
[0076] COMSOL Multiphysics.RTM. Modeling.
[0077] The transient diffusion of oxygen in the microdevice was
modeled using finite element methods (COMSOL Multiphysics.RTM.
software, COMSOL Inc.). Passive oxygen diffusion within the media
was assumed to be governed by the generic diffusion equation of gas
in water.sup.70, with a diffusion coefficient of 3.times.10.sup.-9
m.sup.2 s.sup.-1. Boundary conditions were approximated so that the
microdevice was impermeable to oxygen and the media surface in
direct contact with atmospheric media had a fixed concentration of
oxygen corresponding to normoxic levels (0.2 mol m.sup.-3).
Cellular oxygen consumption was assumed to follow Michaelis-Menten
kinetics with a logistic function constraining consumption below a
critical oxygen level:
R O 2 = R max ( c c + k MM , O 2 ) .delta. ( C > C cr ) ( 1 )
##EQU00001##
where R.sub.max is the maximum oxygen consumption rate of MCF-7
cells adjusted for their average cell volume (0.034 mol s.sup.-1
m.sup.-3).sup.63,70,89, k.sub.MM,O2 is the Michaelis-Menten
constant corresponding to the oxygen concentration where
consumption is half maximal, C.sub.cr is the critical oxygen
concentration below which necrosis is assumed to happen and cells
cease oxygen consumption, and .delta. is the step-down function
accounting for the termination of oxygen consumption.sup.70. The
step-down function was COMSOL's smoothed Heaviside function with a
continuous first derivative and no overshoot (flc1hs in COMSOL
Multiphysics.RTM.). All geometries in the model were defined with
an extremely fine mesh in COMSOL Multiphysics.RTM.. The model was
then solved as a time-dependent study up to 1,440 minutes (time
step=1 minute), where the device and the media were assumed to be
equilibrated to normoxia at t=0.
[0078] Physiological Oxygen Concentration Measurement.
[0079] Oxygen levels were measured using fluorophore-based
microparticle sensors.sup.40. Briefly, 2 g of 10-14 .mu.m grade 7
silica gel (Sigma Aldrich) were stirred with 40 mL of 0.1 N NaOH
for 30 minutes; then with 10 mL ethanol solutions of 0.5 mM
tris(4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline) ruthenium(II) dichloride
(Thermo Fisher) and 0.5 mM Nile blue chloride (Sigma Aldrich),
respectively, for 30 minutes. The solution was then centrifuged for
20 minutes at 1900.times.g. The pellet was washed and centrifuged
with the same settings thrice with deionized water, and once with
ethanol. The fluorophore-immobilized silica gel pellet was then
dried in a 70.degree. C. oven overnight. Simultaneously, a lid
structure that fits the diffusion barrier pillar was milled with
polycarbonate and silanized with
trichloro(1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorooctyle)silane (Sigma Aldrich)
overnight. The following day, fluorophore-immobilized silica gel
was mixed with PDMS of 1:10 base to curing agent (Sylgard 184
elastomer kit; Dow Corning) at a 1:20 ratio in an AR-100 Thinky
mixer (Thinky U.S.A., Inc.). The mixture was then poured onto the
microdevice's pillar, covered with the lid, and cured overnight.
Upon detaching the lid, the coated cap was imaged in 1.times.PBS
equilibrated with normoxic air and then incubated with
micropatterned cells. After 24 hours, fluorescence from the pillar
surface was imaged.
[0080] Immunostaining.
[0081] After 24 hours of hypoxia or normoxia incubation, 4%
PFA-fixed samples were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 (Fisher
Scientific), blocked with 4% bovine serum albumin (GE Healthcare
Bio-Sciences), incubated in primary and secondary antibody, and
mounted with FluoroGel II containing DAPI (Electron Microscopy
Sciences) onto glass slides. Primary antibodies used were
monoclonal anti-pimonidazole antibody (9.7.11, 1:50) (Hypoxyprobe,
Inc.) and anti-Glucose Transporter 1 (Glut-1) antibody (ab15309,
1:200) (Abcam). In the case of pimonidazole staining, cells were
incubated with 200 .mu.M pimonidazole 2 hours before fixation.
Pimonidazole and Glut-1 were detected with Alexa Fluor fluorescent
dye-conjugated secondary antibodies (Life Technologies). A Nikon
inverted fluorescent microscope was used to image immunostained
samples.
[0082] Gene Expression Assay.
[0083] Additionally, cells were laser capture microdissected
(Arcturus XT Laser Capture Microdissection System) at locations
corresponding to the pillar center and pillar edge after 24 hours
of hypoxia or normoxia treatment. RNA was extracted from these
cells (Arcturus PicoPure RNA Isolation Kit) and the quality was
evaluated with a Varioskan LUX multimode microplate reader (Thermo
Fisher Scientific). RNA samples were then reverse transcribed into
cDNA with a T100.TM. Thermal Cycler (BIO-RAD) and amplified with
the T100 CFX384 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (BIO-RAD) to
assess expression of selected gene candidates.sup.45,47-50,90-92.
Data were normalized against .beta.-actin, a housekeeping gene that
was confirmed to have relatively stable expression regardless of
normoxic or hypoxic conditions.sup.93, and an internal sample
control (.DELTA..DELTA.Ct method). These .DELTA..DELTA.Ct values
were plotted in log 2 scale and used to assess gene expression
control.
[0084] Hypoxia-Activated Drug Assays.
[0085] Micropatterned cells were pre-conditioned in normoxic
conditions (no microdevice) or hypoxic conditions (microdevice) for
12 hours. Next, media was replaced with 50 .mu.M TPZ (Sigma
Aldrich), a hypoxia-activated anticancer prodrug, for 24 hours.
Cells were rinsed with fresh media and stained for calcein-AM
(Sigma Aldrich) and propidium iodide (PI) (Thermo Fisher
Scientific) for 30 minutes at room temperature. Cell survival was
quantified by the fraction of cells expressing positive calcein
signal.
[0086] Image Analysis.
[0087] Images were analyzed using the ImageJ and MATLAB software.
For oxygen measurements, fluorescent intensity from identified
sensor microparticles was quantified independently in each
fluorophore's corresponding fluorescence channel (Acridine Orange
for ruthenium compound and Cy5 for Nile blue chloride). Raw,
pixel-by-pixel fluorescence from
tris(4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline) ruthenium(II) dichloride was
divided by those from Nile blue chloride to obtain a ratio of
differential quenching in the oxygen-sensitive and -insensitive
fluorophores depending on oxygen levels. This data was then binned
into concentric circles with fixed step size (13.5 .mu.m) from the
measured centroid of each pillar and related to "sensed" oxygen
concentration following a conventional Stern-Volmer
model.sup.40,73:
I R , O I R - 1 = K SV [ O 2 ] ( 2 ) ##EQU00002##
where I.sub.R,O and I.sub.R are the fluorescence ratio of the two
fluorophores in the absence and presence of oxygen, respectively,
and K.sub.SV is the Stern-Volmer quenching constant. Derived oxygen
concentrations for each bin were plotted against pillar radii.
[0088] For immunostained samples, the fraction of micropattern area
with fluorescence above a pre-defined threshold value was measured.
This fraction was also binned into 100 radially evolving concentric
circles and plotted against micropattern radii.
[0089] For the drug assay, the fraction of calcein positive cells
(live cells) within (corresponding to hypoxia-induced cells under
the pillar) and outside (corresponding to near-normoxic cells
outside the pillar) the 1.5 mm radius was quantified. The fraction
of PI positive cells (dead cells) was also quantified. The
respective fractions were plotted against micropattern radii,
similarly to previous image analyses. All data are plotted using
Prism (GraphPad Software, Inc.).
[0090] Statistical Analysis.
[0091] All data are presented in mean.+-.S.D. Pearson's correlation
coefficient (r) was used to depict correlation between readings
from the oxygen sensors and the COMSOL simulation, as well as
pimonidazole and Glut-1 staining. Statistics for gene expression
was generated using Student's t-test. Statistics for drug treatment
study was assessed using the one-way ANOVA. In all statistical
analysis, p<0.05 was considered significant.
[0092] While exemplary embodiments are described above, it is not
intended that these embodiments describe all possible forms of the
invention. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of
description rather than limitation, and it is understood that
various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and
scope of the invention. Additionally, the features of various
implementing embodiments may be combined to form further
embodiments of the invention.
REFERENCES
[0093] 1. Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D. & Jemal, A. Cancer
statistics, 2017. CA. Cancer J. Clin. 67, 7-30 (2017). [0094] 2.
Tafe, L. J. Molecular mechanisms of therapy resistance in solid
tumors: chasing `moving` targets. Virchows Arch. Int. J. Pathol.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-017-2101-7 (2017). [0095] 3. Muz,
B., de la Puente, P., Azab, F. & Azab, A. K. The role of
hypoxia in cancer progression, angiogenesis, metastasis, and
resistance to therapy. Hypoxia Auckl. NZ 3, 83-92 (2015). [0096] 4.
Balkwill, F. R., Capasso, M. & Hagemann, T. The tumor
microenvironment at a glance. J Cell Sci 125, 5591-5596 (2012).
[0097] 5. Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. Hallmarks of Cancer:
The Next Generation. Cell 144, 646-674 (2011). [0098] 6. Wigerup,
C., Pahlman, S. & Bexell, D. Therapeutic targeting of hypoxia
and hypoxia-inducible factors in cancer. Pharmacol. Ther. 164,
152-169 (2016). [0099] 7. Brown, J. M. & Wilson, W. R.
Exploiting tumour hypoxia in cancer treatment. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4,
437-447 (2004). [0100] 8. McKeown, S. R. Defining normoxia,
physoxia and hypoxia in tumours--implications for treatment
response. Br. J. Radiol. 87 (2014). [0101] 9. Harris, A. L.
Hypoxia--a key regulatory factor in tumour growth. Nat. Rev. Cancer
2, 38-47 (2002). [0102] 10. Eales, K. L., Hollinshead, K. E. R.
& Tennant, D. A. Hypoxia and metabolic adaptation of cancer
cells. Oncogenesis 5, e190 (2016). [0103] 11. Marusyk, A.,
Almendro, V. & Polyak, K. Intra-tumour heterogeneity: a looking
glass for cancer? Nat. Rev. Cancer 12, 323-334 (2012). [0104] 12.
Yamada, K. M. & Cukierman, E. Modeling Tissue Morphogenesis and
Cancer in 3D. Cell 130, 601-610 (2007). [0105] 13. Gerling, M. et
al. Real-Time Assessment of Tissue Hypoxia In vivo with Combined
Photoacoustics and High-Frequency Ultrasound. Theranostics 4,
604-613 (2014). [0106] 14. Bauer, N., Liu, L., Aleksandrowicz, E.
& Herr, I. Establishment of hypoxia induction in an in vivo
animal replacement model for experimental evaluation of pancreatic
cancer. Oncol. Rep. 32, 153-158 (2014). [0107] 15. Mak, I. W.,
Evaniew, N. & Ghert, M. Lost in translation: animal models and
clinical trials in cancer treatment. Am. J. Transl. Res. 6, 114-118
(2014). [0108] 16. Katt, M. E., Placone, A. L., Wong, A. D., Xu, Z.
S. & Searson, P. C. In Vitro Tumor Models: Advantages,
Disadvantages, Variables, and Selecting the Right Platform. Front.
Bioeng. Biotechnol. 4 (2016). [0109] 17. Condeelis, J. &
Weissleder, R. In vivo Imaging in Cancer. Cold Spring Harb.
Perspect. Biol. 2 (2010). [0110] 18. Wu, D. & Yotnda, P.
Induction and Testing of Hypoxia in Cell Culture. JOVE I Vis. Exp.
e2899-e2899, https://doi.org/10.3791/2899 (2011). [0111] 19. Wang,
R., Jin, F. & Zhong, H. A novel experimental hypoxia chamber
for cell culture. Am. I Cancer Res. 4, 53-60 (2014). [0112] 20.
Grimes, D. R., Kelly, C., Bloch, K. & Partridge, M. A method
for estimating the oxygen consumption rate in multicellular tumour
spheroids. J. R. Soc. Interface 11, 20131124 (2014). [0113] 21.
Thomas, P. C., Raghavan, S. R. & Forry, S. P. Regulating Oxygen
Levels in a Microfluidic Device. Anal. Chem. 83, 8821-8824 (2011).
[0114] 22. Sheta, E. A., Trout, H., Gildea, J. J., Harding, M. A.
& Theodorescu, D. Cell density mediated pericellular hypoxia
leads to induction of HIF-lalpha via nitric oxide and Ras/MAP
kinase mediated signaling pathways. Oncogene 20, 7624-7634 (2001).
[0115] 23. Walsh, J. C. et al. The Clinical Importance of Assessing
Tumor Hypoxia: Relationship of Tumor Hypoxia to Prognosis and
Therapeutic Opportunities. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 21, 1516-1554
(2014). [0116] 24. Fischbach, C. et al. Engineering tumors with 3D
scaffolds. Nat. Methods 4, 855-860 (2007). [0117] 25. Lorenzo, C.
et al. Live cell division dynamics monitoring in 3D large spheroid
tumor models using light sheet microscopy. Cell Div. 6, 22 (2011).
[0118] 26. Ivanov, D. P. & Grabowska, A. M. Spheroid arrays for
high-throughput single-cell analysis of spatial patterns and
biomarker expression in 3D. Sci. Rep. 7 (2017). [0119] 27. Derda,
R. et al. Paper-supported 3D cell culture for tissue-based
bioassays. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106, 18457-18462 (2009). [0120]
28. Peng, C.-C., Liao, W.-H., Chen, Y.-H., Wu, C.-Y. & Tung,
Y.-C. A microfluidic cell culture array with various oxygen
tensions. Lab. Chip 13, 3239-3245 (2013). [0121] 29. Chang, C.-W.
et al. A polydimethylsiloxane-polycarbonate hybrid microfluidic
device capable of generating perpendicular chemical and oxygen
gradients for cell culture studies. Lab. Chip 14, 3762-3772 (2014).
[0122] 30. Brennan, M. D., Rexius-Hall, M. L. & Eddington, D.
T. A 3D-Printed Oxygen Control Insert for a 24-Well Plate. PLOS ONE
10, e0137631 (2015). [0123] 31. Ayuso, J. M. et al. Development and
characterization of a microfluidic model of the tumour
microenvironment. Sci. Rep. 6, srep36086 (2016). [0124] 32. Li, Y.
et al. A microfluidic chip of multiple-channel array with various
oxygen tensions for drug screening. Microfluid. Nanofluidics 20, 97
(2016). [0125] 33. Rexius-Hall, M. L., Mauleon, G., Malik, A. B.,
Rehman, J. & Eddington, D. T. Microfluidic platform generates
oxygen landscapes for localized hypoxic activation. Lab. Chip 14,
4688-4695 (2014). [0126] 34. Yen, D. P., Ando, Y. & Shen, K. A
cost-effective micromilling platform for rapid prototyping of
microdevices. Technology 04, 234-239 (2016). [0127] 35. Moon, S.
I., Monson, L. & Extrand, C. W. Outgassing of Oxygen from
Polycarbonate. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 1, (1539-1543 (2009).
[0128] 36. Kim, M.-C., Lam, R. H. W., Thorsen, T. & Asada, H.
H. Mathematical analysis of oxygen transfer through
polydimethylsiloxane membrane between double layers of cell culture
channel and gas chamber in microfluidic oxygenator. Microfluid.
Nanofluidics 15, 285-296 (2013). [0129] 37. Houston, K. S.,
Weinkauf, D. H. & Stewart, F. F. Gas transport characteristics
of plasma treated poly(dimethylsiloxane) and polyphosphazene
membrane materials. J. Membr. Sci. 205, 103-112 (2002). [0130] 38.
Hammond, E. M. et al. The Meaning, Measurement and Modification of
Hypoxia in the Laboratory and the Clinic. Clin. Oncol. 26, 277-288
(2014). [0131] 39. Hockel, M. & Vaupel, P. Tumor Hypoxia:
Definitions and Current Clinical, Biologic, and Molecular Aspects.
INCI J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 93, 266-276 (2001). [0132] 40. Acosta,
M. A., Ymele-Leki, P., Kostov, Y. V. & Leach, J. B. Fluorescent
microparticles for sensing cell microenvironment oxygen levels
within 3D scaffolds. Biomaterials 30, 3068-3074 (2009). [0133] 41.
Shen, K. et al. Resolving cancer-stroma interfacial signalling and
interventions with micropatterned tumour-stromal assays. Nat.
Commun. 5, 5662 (2014). [0134] 42. Gulliksrud, K., Vestvik, I. K.,
Galappathi, K., Mathiesen, B. & Rofstad, E. K. Detection of
Different Hypoxic Cell Subpopulations in Human Melanoma Xenografts
by Pimonidazole Immunohistochemistry. Radiat. Res. 170, 638-650
(2008). [0135] 43. Ragnum, H. B. et al. The tumour hypoxia marker
pimonidazole reflects a transcriptional programme associated with
aggressive prostate cancer. Br. J. Cancer 112, 382-390 (2015).
[0136] 44. Deng, D. et al. Crystal structure of the human glucose
transporter GLUT1. Nature 510, 121-125 (2014). [0137] 45. Airley,
R. E. et al. GLUT-1 and CAIX as intrinsic markers of hypoxia in
carcinoma of the cervix: Relationship to pimonidazole binding. Int.
J. Cancer 104, 85-91 (2003). [0138] 46. Dowsett, M. et al.
Assessment of Ki67 in Breast Cancer: Recommendations from the
International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group. JNCI J. Natl.
Cancer Inst. 103, 1656-1664 (2011). [0139] 47. Bando, H., Toi, M.,
Kitada, K. & Koike, M. Genes commonly upregulated by hypoxia in
human breast cancer cells MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231. Biomed.
Pharmacother. 57, 333-340 (2003). [0140] 48. Hamdan, F. H. &
Zihlif, M. A. Gene expression alterations in chronic hypoxic MCF7
breast cancer cell line. Genomics 104, 477-481 (2014). [0141] 49.
Zhang, L. et al. Hypoxia induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition
via activation of SNAI1 by hypoxia-inducible factor-1a in
hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer 13, 108 (2013). [0142] 50.
Azab, A. K. et al. Hypoxia promotes dissemination of multiple
myeloma through acquisition of epithelial to mesenchymal
transitionlike features. Blood 119, 5782-5794 (2012). [0143] 51.
Johnson, C. A. et al. Phase I trial of tirapazamine in combination
with cisplatin in a single dose every 3 weeks in patients with
solid tumors. J. Clin. Oncol. 15, 773-780 (1997). [0144] 52. Zeman,
E. M., Brown, J. M., Lemmon, M. J., Hirst, V. K. & Lee, W. W.
SR-4233: a new bioreductive agent with high selective toxicity for
hypoxic mammalian cells. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 12,
1239-1242 (1986). [0145] 53. Lee, C.-I., Huang, C.-M., Huang, W.-H.
& Lee, A.-R. Synthesis, Preferentially Hypoxic Apoptosis and
Anti-Angiogenic Activity of 3-Amino-1,2,4-Benzotriazine-1,4-Dioxide
Bearing Alkyl Linkers with a 3-Amino-1,2,4-Benzotriazine-l-Oxide
Moiety. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 14, 1428-1446 (2014). [0146]
54. Wang, Z., Liu, Z., Li, L. & Liang, Q. Investigation into
the hypoxia-dependent cytotoxicity of anticancer drugs under oxygen
gradient in a microfluidic device. Microfluid. Nanofluidics 19,
1271-1279 (2015). [0147] 55. Smith, A. Screening for drug
discovery: The leading question. Nature 418, 453-459 (2002). [0148]
56. Hughes, J., Rees, S., Kalindjian, S. & Philpott, K.
Principles of early drug discovery. Br. J. Pharmacol. 162,
1239-1249 (2011). [0149] 57. Rosowski, K. A., Mertz, A. F.,
Norcross, S., Dufresne, E. R. & Horsley, V. Edges of human
embryonic stem cell colonies display distinct mechanical properties
and differentiation potential. Sci. Rep. 5, 14218 (2015). [0150]
58. Yoshida, Y., Takahashi, K., Okita, K., Ichisaka, T. &
Yamanaka, S. Hypoxia enhances the generation of induced pluripotent
stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 5, 237-241 (2009). [0151] 59. Castilla,
D. M., Liu, Z.-J. & Velazquez, 0. C. Oxygen: Implications for
Wound Healing. Adv. Wound Care 1, 225-230 (2012). [0152] 60.
Colmone, A. Hypoxic conditioning of immune cells. Science 355,
706-706 (2017). [0153] 61. Palazon, A., Aragones, J.,
Morales-Kastresana, A., Landazuri, M. Ode & Melero, I.
Molecular Pathways: Hypoxia Response in Immune Cells Fighting or
Promoting Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 18, 1207-1213 (2012). [0154]
62. Charati, S. G. & Stern, S. A. Diffusion of Gases in
Silicone Polymers: Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Macromolecules
31, 5529-5535 (1998). [0155] 63. Wagner, B. A., Venkataraman, S.
& Buettner, G. R. The Rate of Oxygen Utilization by Cells. Free
Radic. Biol. Med. 51, 700-712 (2011). [0156] 64. Chen, Z. &
Turng, L.-S. A review of current developments in process and
quality control for injection molding. Adv. Polym. Technol. 24,
165-182 (2005). [0157] 65. Oskarsson, T. Extracellular matrix
components in breast cancer progression and metastasis. Breast
Edinb. Scott. 22(Suppl 2), S66-72 (2013). [0158] 66. Harisi, R.
& Jeney, A. Extracellular matrix as target for antitumor
therapy. OncoTargets Ther. 8, 1387-1398 (2015). [0159] 67. Zhu, J.
& Marchant, R. E. Design properties of hydrogel
tissue-engineering scaffolds. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 8, 607-626
(2011). [0160] 68. Polacheck, W. J. & Chen, C. S. Measuring
cell-generated forces: a guide to the available tools. Nat. Methods
13, 415-423 (2016). [0161] 69. Ma, X. et al. Deterministically
patterned biomimetic human iPSC-derived hepatic model via rapid 3D
bioprinting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, 2206-2211 (2016). [0162]
70. Buchwald, P. FEM-based oxygen consumption and cell viability
models for avascular pancreatic islets. Theor. Biol. Med. Model. 6,
5 (2009). [0163] 71. Bassom, A. P., Ilchmann, A. & VoB, H.
Oxygen Diffusion in Tissue Preparations with Michaelis-Menten
Kinetics. J. Theor. Biol. 185, 119-127 (1997). [0164] 72. Winer, L.
S. P. & Wu, M. Rapid Analysis of Glycolytic and Oxidative
Substrate Flux of Cancer Cells in a Microplate. PLOS ONE 9, e109916
(2014). [0165] 73. Wang, X. & Wolfbeis, S. O. Optical methods
for sensing and imaging oxygen: materials, spectroscopies and
applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 3666-3761 (2014). [0166] 74.
Becker, W. Fluorescence lifetime imaging-techniques and
applications. J. Microsc. 247, 119-136 (2012). [0167] 75. Sud, D.
& Mycek, M.-A. Calibration and validation of an optical sensor
for intracellular oxygen measurements. J. Biomed. Opt. 14,
020506-020506-3 (2009). [0168] 76. Wang, J. Electrochemical Glucose
Biosensors. Chem. Rev. 108, 814-825 (2008). [0169] 77. Usuba, R. et
al. Photonic Lab-on-a-Chip for Rapid Cytokine Detection. ACS Sens.
1, 979-986 (2016). [0170] 78. Ellis, J. M. & Wolfgang, M. J. A
genetically encoded metabolite sensor for malonyl-CoA. Chem. Biol.
19, 1333-1339 (2012). [0171] 79. Kubon, M. et al. A microsensor
system to probe physiological environments and tissue response. In
2010 IEEE Sensors 2607-2611,
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSENS.2010.5690200 (2010). [0172] 80.
Behjati, S. & Tarpey, P. S. What is next generation sequencing?
Arch. Dis. Child. Educ. Pract. Ed. 98, 236-238 (2013). [0173] 81.
Brewis, I. A. & Brennan, P. Proteomics technologies for the
global identification and quantification of proteins. Adv. Protein
Chem. Struct. Biol. 80, 1-44 (2010). [0174] 82. Semenza, G. L.
Targeting HIF-1 for cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 3, 721-732
(2003). [0175] 83. Pang, M.-F. et al. Tissue Stiffness and Hypoxia
Modulate the Integrin-Linked Kinase ILK to Control Breast Cancer
Stem-like Cells. Cancer Res. 76, 5277-5287 (2016). [0176] 84.
Misra, A., Pandey, C., Sze, S. K. & Thanabalu, T. Hypoxia
Activated EGFR Signaling Induces Epithelial to Mesenchymal
Transition (EMT). PLOS ONE 7, e49766 (2012). [0177] 85. Reddy, S.
B. & Williamson, S. K. Tirapazamine: a novel agent targeting
hypoxic tumor cells. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 18, 77-87 (2009).
[0178] 86. Hamann, S. et al. Measurement of Cell Volume Changes by
Fluorescence Self-Quenching. J. Fluoresc. 12, 139-145 (2002).
[0179] 87. Iannetti, E. F., Smeitink, J. A. M., Beyrath, J.,
Willems, P. H. G. M. & Koopman, W. J. H. Multiplexed
high-content analysis of mitochondrial morphofunction using
live-cell microscopy. Nat. Protoc. 11, 1693-1710 (2016). [0180] 88.
Al-Lazikani, B., Banerji, U. & Workman, P. Combinatorial drug
therapy for cancer in the post-genomic era. Nat. Biotechnol. 30,
679-692 (2012). [0181] 89. Moreno-Flores, S., Benitez, R. &
Vivanco, M. dM & Toca-Herrera, J. L. Stress relaxation
microscopy: Imaging local stress in cells. J. Biomech. 43, 349-354
(2010). [0182] 90. DeYoung, M. P., Horak, P., Sofer, A., Sgroi, D.
& Ellisen, L. W. Hypoxia regulates TSC1/2-mTOR signaling and
tumor suppression through REDD1-mediated 14-3-3 shuttling. Genes
Dev. 22, 239-251 (2008). [0183] 91. Pistollato, F. et al.
Interaction of hypoxia-inducible factor-1a and Notch signaling
regulates medulloblastoma precursor proliferation and fate. Stem
Cells Dayt. Ohio 28, 1918-1929 (2010). [0184] 92. Jundt, F. et al.
Activated Notchl signaling promotes tumor cell proliferation and
survival in Hodgkin and anaplastic large cell lymphoma.
Blood 99, 3398-3403 (2002). [0185] 93. Caradec, J. et al.
`Desperate house genes`: the dramatic example of hypoxia. Br. J.
Cancer 102, 1037-1043 (2010).
* * * * *
References