U.S. patent application number 16/988930 was filed with the patent office on 2020-11-26 for lip for excavating bucket.
The applicant listed for this patent is ESCO GROUP LLC. Invention is credited to Joel S. Hankland, Charles G. Ollinger, IV, Kevin S. Stangeland.
Application Number | 20200370271 16/988930 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 1000005005041 |
Filed Date | 2020-11-26 |
![](/patent/app/20200370271/US20200370271A1-20201126-D00000.png)
![](/patent/app/20200370271/US20200370271A1-20201126-D00001.png)
![](/patent/app/20200370271/US20200370271A1-20201126-D00002.png)
![](/patent/app/20200370271/US20200370271A1-20201126-D00003.png)
![](/patent/app/20200370271/US20200370271A1-20201126-D00004.png)
![](/patent/app/20200370271/US20200370271A1-20201126-D00005.png)
![](/patent/app/20200370271/US20200370271A1-20201126-D00006.png)
![](/patent/app/20200370271/US20200370271A1-20201126-D00007.png)
![](/patent/app/20200370271/US20200370271A1-20201126-D00008.png)
![](/patent/app/20200370271/US20200370271A1-20201126-D00009.png)
![](/patent/app/20200370271/US20200370271A1-20201126-D00010.png)
View All Diagrams
United States Patent
Application |
20200370271 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Ollinger, IV; Charles G. ;
et al. |
November 26, 2020 |
LIP FOR EXCAVATING BUCKET
Abstract
A lip for an excavating bucket with a front beam and a rear beam
extending along the length of the lip and defining at least one
recess between them. The front beam includes noses extending
forward of the beam for mounting ground engaging tools. Ribs extend
between the front beam and the rear beam. The ribs separate
recesses extending between the beams.
Inventors: |
Ollinger, IV; Charles G.;
(Portland, OR) ; Hankland; Joel S.; (Canby,
OR) ; Stangeland; Kevin S.; (Portland, OR) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
ESCO GROUP LLC |
Portland |
OR |
US |
|
|
Family ID: |
1000005005041 |
Appl. No.: |
16/988930 |
Filed: |
August 10, 2020 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
15834557 |
Dec 7, 2017 |
10774499 |
|
|
16988930 |
|
|
|
|
13906085 |
May 30, 2013 |
9963853 |
|
|
15834557 |
|
|
|
|
61654501 |
Jun 1, 2012 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
1/1 |
Current CPC
Class: |
E02F 3/40 20130101; E02F
3/60 20130101; E02F 9/2816 20130101; E02F 9/2883 20130101 |
International
Class: |
E02F 3/40 20060101
E02F003/40; E02F 3/60 20060101 E02F003/60; E02F 9/28 20060101
E02F009/28 |
Claims
1-23. (canceled)
24. A lip for an excavating bucket having a length extending
between opposite sidewalls of the bucket, the lip comprising a
front beam and a rear beam extending along the length of the lip, a
panel coupling the front and rear beams together, at least one rib
interconnecting and spanning between the front and rear beams, and
recesses extending along the at least one rib and between the front
and rear beams, wherein the lip is thickest at the front beam.
25. The lip of claim 24 including noses extending forward of the
front beam for mounting ground engaging tools.
26. The lip of claim 25 wherein the at least one rib includes one
said rib in general alignment with each of the noses.
27. The lip of claim 24 wherein the thickness of the panel at the
center of the recess is less than 25% of the thickness of the front
beam at its thickest point.
28. The lip of claim 24 wherein the thickness of the panel at the
center of the recess is less than 50% of the thickness of the rear
beam at its thickest point.
29. The lip of claim 24 wherein the front and rear beams each has a
substantially continuous extension along the length of the lip.
30. The lip of claim 24 wherein the front beam has a central
portion between two ends, and the front beam is bowed with the
central portion projecting farther forward than the ends.
31. The lip of claim 24 wherein the total volume of the recesses is
at least 15 percent of the total volume of the lip including the
total collective volume of the recesses.
32. The lip of claim 24 wherein the total volume of the recesses is
at least 18 percent of the total volume of the lip including the
total collective volume of the recesses.
33. An excavating bucket comprising walls defining a cavity for
receiving earthen materials during a digging operation, and a lip
welded to at least one of the walls and having a length extending
between opposite side walls of the bucket, the lip including a
front beam and a rear beam extending along the length of the lip, a
panel coupling the front and rear beams together, at least one rib
interconnecting and spanning between the front and rear beams, and
recesses extending along the at least one rib and between the front
and rear beams, wherein the lip is thickest at the front beam.
34. The excavating bucket of claim 33 wherein the lip includes
noses extending forward of the front beam for mounting ground
engaging tools.
35. The excavating bucket of claim 34 wherein the at least one rib
includes one said rib in general alignment with each of the
noses.
36. The excavating bucket of claim 33 wherein the thickness of the
panel at the center of the recess is less than 25% of the thickness
of the front beam at its thickest point.
37. The excavating bucket of claim 33 wherein the thickness of the
panel at the center of the recess is less than 50% of the thickness
of the rear beam at its thickest point.
38. The excavating bucket of claim 33 wherein the front and rear
beams each has a substantially continuous extension along the
length of the lip.
39. The excavating bucket of claim 33 wherein the front beam has a
central portion between two ends, and the front beam is bowed with
the central portion projecting farther forward than the ends.
40. The excavating bucket of claim 33 wherein the total volume of
the recesses is at least 15 percent of the total volume of the lip
including the total collective volume of the recesses.
41. The excavating bucket of claim 33 wherein the total volume of
the recesses is at least 18 percent of the total volume of the lip
including the total collective volume of the recesses.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention pertains to a lip for an excavating
bucket, and particularly to a cast lip for use with excavating
machines such a dragline machines, cable shovels, face shovels,
hydraulic excavators and the like.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] Excavating machines, such as used in mining and construction
operations, include buckets that are driven into the ground to
gather a load of earthen material. The bucket is generally defined
by a rear wall, a bottom wall and sidewalls to define a cavity with
an open front for receiving the excavated material. The front edge
of the bottom wall is provided with a lip on which ground engaging
tools such as teeth, adapters and/or shrouds are generally attached
to protect the lip against wear and to better break up the ground
during digging. The lips are either formed of plate steel (which
are called plate lips) or by a casting process (which are called
cast lips). Either style of lip is welded into the bucket, i.e., to
the front edge of the bottom wall and to the lower, front corners
of each sidewall.
[0003] Cast lips are generally used on larger excavating machines
such as dragline machines, cable shovels, face shovels, and
hydraulic excavators. These lips are large steel structural members
able to withstand the impact and other heavy loading experienced as
the bucket is driven through the ground, resist undue wearing
caused by the high abrasion environment, and securely support and
hold the ground engagement tools in place for efficient digging.
Accordingly, cast lips tend to be very heavy, which reduces the
load each bucket can gather in each digging cycle. That is,
excavating machines are designed for certain maximum loads, which
include the weight of the excavated material as well as the weight
of the bucket.
[0004] Existing lips typically have a structure that resists the
many loads encountered in a digging operation and tends to carry
the cantilevered tooth loads in torsion. The lips, however, tend to
be massive and heavy to survive the very large loads and high
abrasion environments commonly encountered in a digging operation
and particularly in many mines. Mining and other excavating
machines are constructed to lift loads up to a certain specified
level. The more weight that exists in the lip, wear parts and other
components of the bucket, the smaller the maximum payload that can
be achieved by the bucket. The great size and weight also tends to
increase manufacturing difficulties and cost of cast lips.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0005] The present invention is a lip design of reduced weight that
provides the requisite strength and durability needed for
satisfactory operation.
[0006] In one aspect of the invention, a lip for an excavating
bucket comprises front and rear beams extending across the lip to
provide resistance to heavy loading during use, and recesses
between the beams to reduce the weight of the lip.
[0007] In another aspect of the invention, a lip for an excavating
bucket comprises a pair of spaced beams extending along the length
of the lip, ribs interconnecting the spaced beams, and recesses
between the beams and the ribs.
[0008] In another aspect of the invention, a lip for an excavating
bucket has one or more recesses that comprise a substantial portion
of the entire lip volume for an advantageous weight-savings
construction. In the present invention, the total collective volume
of the recesses is at least about 15%, and preferably at least
about 18% or more, of the total volume of the lip including the
volume of the recesses.
[0009] In another aspect of the invention, an excavator bucket
comprises a plurality of walls defining a cavity into which is
gathered earthen material, and a lip secured to the front of the
bucket to define the leading digging edge. The lip includes a front
beam spanning the lip with noses extending forward of the front
beam for mounting ground engaging tools and a rear beam spanning
the lip and abutting a front portion of the excavator bucket.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0010] FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an excavating bucket with a
lip in accordance with the present invention.
[0011] FIG. 2 is a perspective view of an inventive lip.
[0012] FIG. 3 is a bottom perspective view of the inventive
lip.
[0013] FIG. 4 is a top view of the inventive lip.
[0014] FIG. 4A is a top view of another embodiment of an inventive
lip.
[0015] FIG. 5 is a bottom view of the inventive lip.
[0016] FIG. 6 is a cross sectional view along line 6-6 in FIG.
5.
[0017] FIG. 7 is a front view of the inventive lip.
[0018] FIG. 8 is a cross sectional view along line 8-8 in FIG. 7,
with the background features omitted.
[0019] FIG. 9 is a cross sectional view along line 9-9 in FIG.
7.
[0020] FIG. 10 is a cross sectional view along line 10-10 in FIG.
7.
[0021] FIG. 11 is a cross sectional view along line 11-11 in FIG.
7.
[0022] FIG. 12 is a cross sectional view along line 12-12 in FIG.
7.
[0023] FIG. 13 is a rear view of the inventive lip.
[0024] FIG. 14 is a side view of the inventive lip.
[0025] FIG. 15 is a top view of the inventive lip.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0026] The present invention pertains to a lip for excavating
buckets such as used with dragline machines, cable shovels, face
shovels, hydraulic excavators and the like. The lip includes a dual
beam construction and recessed portions to reduce the lip weight
while maintaining the needed strength and resistance to bending and
twisting.
[0027] A lip 10 in FIG. 1 in accordance with the present invention
is welded at a back face 44 and along wings or ears 45 to bucket
body 8. Lip 10 has an elongate construction extending between the
opposite sidewalls of the bucket body 8. In this application, due
to the elongated nature of the lip, the length of the lip is
considered the long dimension that extends between the sidewalls of
the bucket, even though this dimension is sometimes referred in the
industry as the bucket or lip width. The lip includes a set of
noses 26 spaced along the lip length and extending forward of the
main lip structure for mounting ground engaging tools. Lip 10 is
more fully illustrated in FIGS. 2-15.
[0028] Lip 10 includes a rear side 16 with rear face 44, a front
side 20, and opposite ends 22, 24. Front side 20 defines a mounting
portion 25. Mounting portion 25 forward of beam 32 comprises a
series of spaced apart noses 26. Noses 26 receive ground engaging
tools such as intermediate adapters or points (not shown) that
separate material and direct the material into the bucket while
protecting the lip. Noses on the mounting portion are separated by
mounting areas 30 for attaching additional ground engaging tools
such as shrouds (not shown). Lip 10 is preferably a cast lip,
though it could be formed of parts (preferably cast parts) welded
58 together (FIG. 4A).
[0029] In the illustrated embodiment, lip 10 is a stepped lip such
that the front side 20 is stepped forward toward the center so that
the noses 26 closer to the center of the lip are farther forward
than those closer to ends 22, 24 with portions between the noses
extending generally along the length of the lip. A lip in
accordance with the present invention, though, could have a spade
configuration with intermediate portions between the noses inclined
to the length of the lip, or reversed step or reverse spade
configurations. Further, although lip 10 is shown as linear in
front view, it could be bowed or angled vertically across its
length, and/or include ends that curve upward.
[0030] A support structure 28 of the lip is rearward of and
supports mounting portion 25. Support structure 28 is formed to
resist all kinds of loads and turning and bending forces
encountered during a digging operation. In the present invention,
members forming the support structure include a front beam 32 and a
rear beam 34 extending along the length of the lip with at least
one recess between the two beams. Conventional lips are formed with
a single beam structure to resist the very high loads in a digging
operation, particularly the large mining machines. While the single
beam structure provides adequate strength and support, the lips
tend to be massive and heavy. Some existing lips have recesses, but
the weight savings is limited due to the mass that has been
required to adequately counter the high loads.
[0031] Ribs 35 preferably extend between beams 32, 34 to better
couple the beams and transfer loads from the noses 26 to the
bucket. The ribs subdivide the space between the beams to define a
set of recesses 36 between beams 32, 34. Beams 32, 34 and ribs 35
are of a substantial depth or thickness relative to the lip along
recesses 36. Recesses are defined by rear surface 40 of front beam
32 and front surface 42 of rear beam 34, and the side surfaces of
ribs 35.
[0032] Beams 32 and 34 are free of substantial or sudden changes in
dimension, and are generally continuous between ends 22 and 24;
though they may terminate prior to the actual ends. Superficial
changes in the beam structure are possible so long as the primary
bulk of each beam as a generally continuous and uninterrupted
extension along the length of the lip. The beam can incorporate
curves in extending across the lip. Curves in the beam preferably
coincide with the intersection of a rib to compensate for stress
concentrations induced by the curve. This generally continuous and
uninterrupted construction gives the lip a dual beam construction
to resist heaving loads and twisting despite the presence of
recesses 36. Various changes in beam configuration are possible
without departing from the invention. For example, the depth of
beam 32 may taper out before the ends. Alternatively, the beams may
taper from the ends 22, 24 towards the center of the lip. In the
illustrated embodiment ends 22, 24 have wings 45 for welding to
sidewalls 12 of the bucket at upper surface 47 and rear surface 49.
Wings 45, in this embodiment, extend above the main portion of the
lip.
[0033] Preferably, lip 10 is generally smooth and continuous along
its upper surface 46 for unobstructed loading of the earthen
material into the bucket. The lower surface 50 of the lip is
structured for weight savings with the beams 32, 34, recesses 36,
and ribs 35. Nevertheless, upper surface 46 and lower surface 50
could have other configurations. For example, recesses 36 are
preferably open, but they could be enclosed by a plate welded over
the bottom, e.g., between beams 32, 34.
[0034] The top surface 46 of lip 10 can be considered as a panel
support structure 28A that couples front beam 32 to rear beam 34.
Ribs 35 also preferably join the beams and resist axial and
twisting forces as the bucket moves forward through the excavated
material. Additionally, one or more panels 56 can be secured to and
connect ribs 35 and beams 32, 34 along the underside of the lip to
enclose recesses 36 (FIG. 15). The panel or panels provide
additional stiffness and support to the lip, and absorb side forces
applied to the front of the structure as torsion and warping. The
lip structure can be considered a honeycomb with square cells and
one side of the cells covered by a structural sheet. The structure
also resembles a semi-monocoque construction as compared to the
massive single beam constructions of existing lips.
[0035] In a preferred embodiment, front beam 32 is oriented forward
in the lip 10, i.e., just rearward of mounting portion 25 to
provide greater strength and stability to the wear parts. Front
surface 38 of front beam 32 slopes upward from supporting structure
25 to define a smooth transition between beam 32 and ground
engaging tool mounts. The beam 32 generally has a greater depth
than mounting portion 25. Rear surface 40 of front beam 32
transitions to recessed portion 36. The bottom surface 54 of beam
32 also preferably slopes rearward to reduce wearing during
digging, but could have different orientations.
[0036] Since the illustrated embodiment is a stepped lip, front
beam 32 is preferably laterally bowed such that the central section
52 is farther forward than end sections 22, 24 (FIG. 5). With this
construction, the front beam could have a generally continual
forward bowing as shown in FIG. 5. Alternatively, the front beam
could have a pair of broad S-shaped bends to define the central
forward bowing of the front beam (not shown). In this variation,
the bends are preferably generally in line with the noses and the
ribs. Front beam 32 can be linear with a straight lip, or bowed in
the opposite direction with a reverse spade lip. Front beam 32
could have a curved configuration with the ends higher than the
center of the lip when viewed from the front. The lip can take on
various shapes as desired regardless of the particular kind of lip
involved.
[0037] Rear beam 34 preferably has a reduced depth compared to
front beam 32 for enhanced weight savings, improved penetration,
reduced wearing, and to match the front of the bucket bottom wall.
Rear beam 34 has a front surface 42 that slopes upward to recessed
portion 36. Rear surface 44 is generally vertical to match the
front of the bucket bottom wall to which it is welded along with
the rear face 49 of wings 45 but can include features such as
bevels to receive weld material for attaching the lip to the
bucket. Rear beam 34 is preferably linear to accommodate the
welding to bottom wall, but could be non-linear to facilitate
attachments to other bottom wall configurations.
[0038] Ribs 35 extend laterally (i.e., front to back) between front
beam 32 and rear beam 34 for increased strength and stiffness of
the lip. Ribs 35 are relatively thin supports that intersect rear
surface 40 of front beam 32 and front surface 42 of rear beam 34.
Preferably, ribs 35 taper in depth rearward to gradually slope from
the greater depth of front beam 32 to the lesser depth of rear beam
34. This taper of the ribs reduces weight, improves penetration and
lessens wearing. As seen in FIG. 4, ribs 35 are preferably centered
behind noses 26 to best transfer the bending moment to the rear
beam 34, but they could have other positions or additional ribs in
other positions could be provided. Ribs 35 can diverge outward
toward the lip ends 22, 24 as they extend from the front beam to
the rear beam, but they could be parallel to each other or
converging in a rearward direction. The diverging ribs reduce the
stress in the lip as the ribs distribute the applied loads out to
the bucket. A transverse axis TA extends from the lip front to the
rear of the lip perpendicular to the rear beam 44 and the ribs
define a longitudinal rib axis RA. In the illustrated embodiment he
rib axis inclined to the lip axis at an angle .alpha. of at least 5
degrees. In an alternative embodiment, a subset of ribs 35 diverge
outward as they extend from the front beam to the rear beam and the
balance of the ribs do not diverge.
[0039] The configuration of support structure 28 also allows ribs
35 to be narrower than the width of the nose 26 of mounting portion
25. Conventional lips have substantial ribs with widths exceeding
that of the noses they support. Using a narrow rib that can provide
adequate support and coupling of the front and rear beams in a way
that significantly reduces the mass of the lip. Nevertheless, the
ribs could have other orientations (e.g., parallel to the axes of
the noses, inclined in opposite directions, and the like) and could
have other configurations besides generally linear. Also, in this
embodiment, wings 45 also extend between beams 32, 34 at ends 22,
24 and function in part similarly to ribs 35. The wings and ribs
are collectively referred to as lateral supports.
[0040] Recessed portions 36 between beams 32 and 34 are thinner
than adjacent support members and comprise a large portion of the
lip. In the illustrated example, the recesses define the entire
portion between beams 32, 34 except for ribs 35 and wings 45. As
can be seen, the lip has a substantially reduced thickness (or
depth) than either of the beams 32, 34. In this example, the
centers of the recesses have depths that are less than 25% of the
depth at the center of the front beam 32. Similarly, the thickness
(or depth) at the center of the recesses is about 50% of the
thickness at the center of the rear beam 34. Of course, other
relative thicknesses could be used. Recesses 36 can be domed so
that they taper in thickness from the edges to the center.
[0041] The recesses of support structure 28 make up a significant
portion of the lip in order to achieve the desired weight savings.
In certain preferred embodiments of the present invention, the
weight-savings can be maximized beyond prior lips. For example, in
these certain preferred embodiments, the total collective volume of
the recesses in the lip is at least about 15% of the total volume
of the lip including the volume of the recesses. In one preferred
embodiment, the volume of the recesses is about 22% of the total
volume of the lip. For example, the total volume of the lip is
about 0.731 cubic meters, and the total collective volume of the
recesses is about 0.163 cubic meters. The inventive lip can, of
course, be used in lips of many different sizes and types. As a
comparison, in one prior lip of comparable size, the volume of the
recesses is about 12% of the total volume of the lip (including the
volume of the recesses). For example, the prior lip volume of 0.80
cubic meters, and the volume of the recesses is about 0.099 cubic
meters. In other prior lips, the volume of the recesses range from
7.3% to 14.1%. The prior lips lack the maximized weight-savings
construction of the present invention and requires more mass and
less recesses to maintain the desired strength. The invention,
though, is not dependent on having a total collective volume of the
recesses being at least 15% of the total volume of the lip
(including the volume of the recesses). In some uses and sizes, a
lip in accordance with the present invention (e.g., a lip with
front and rear beams separated by one or more recesses) can have a
construction where the total collective volume of the recesses is
much less than 15% of the total volume of the lip (including the
volume of the recesses).
[0042] This advantageous construction of using a pair of spaced
apart beams 32, 34 on opposite sides of a recessed portion 36
defined largely by a substantially reduced thickness saves
considerable weight in the lip. In one example, the weight savings
for a lip of 15,000 pounds is about 1200 pounds. In general, weight
savings are anticipated to be around 2-12%, but could be more over
a conventional lip. Greater or lesser weight savings will be
possible depending on the size of the lip and the type of
machine.
* * * * *