U.S. patent application number 15/929792 was filed with the patent office on 2020-09-10 for routing mode and point-of-presence selection service.
The applicant listed for this patent is Amazon Technologies, Inc.. Invention is credited to Craig Wesley Howard, Hardeep Singh Uppal.
Application Number | 20200287817 15/929792 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 1000004842771 |
Filed Date | 2020-09-10 |
![](/patent/app/20200287817/US20200287817A1-20200910-D00000.png)
![](/patent/app/20200287817/US20200287817A1-20200910-D00001.png)
![](/patent/app/20200287817/US20200287817A1-20200910-D00002.png)
![](/patent/app/20200287817/US20200287817A1-20200910-D00003.png)
![](/patent/app/20200287817/US20200287817A1-20200910-D00004.png)
![](/patent/app/20200287817/US20200287817A1-20200910-D00005.png)
![](/patent/app/20200287817/US20200287817A1-20200910-D00006.png)
![](/patent/app/20200287817/US20200287817A1-20200910-D00007.png)
![](/patent/app/20200287817/US20200287817A1-20200910-D00008.png)
![](/patent/app/20200287817/US20200287817A1-20200910-D00009.png)
![](/patent/app/20200287817/US20200287817A1-20200910-D00010.png)
United States Patent
Application |
20200287817 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Howard; Craig Wesley ; et
al. |
September 10, 2020 |
ROUTING MODE AND POINT-OF-PRESENCE SELECTION SERVICE
Abstract
Systems and methods for sloppy routing are provided. A client
transmits a DNS query corresponding to a requested resource to a
content delivery network (CDN) service provider. In some
embodiments, the CDN service provider processes the DNS query to
determine whether a threshold content delivery bandwidth has been
exceeded by data links at cache servers. In other embodiments,
additionally or alternatively, the CDN service provider determines
whether a content provider has exceeded a threshold network usage
that indicates a price at which the CDN service provider to provide
content on behalf of the content provider. Using both or either of
these thresholds, the CDN service provider can further process the
DNS query by providing an alternative resource identifier or a
cache IP address, both associated with an alternative POP. In some
embodiments, the CDN service provider determines a routing mode for
the response to the DNS query.
Inventors: |
Howard; Craig Wesley;
(Seattle, WA) ; Uppal; Hardeep Singh; (Seattle,
WA) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
Amazon Technologies, Inc. |
Seattle |
WA |
US |
|
|
Family ID: |
1000004842771 |
Appl. No.: |
15/929792 |
Filed: |
May 21, 2020 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
16154580 |
Oct 8, 2018 |
10728133 |
|
|
15929792 |
|
|
|
|
14575816 |
Dec 18, 2014 |
10097448 |
|
|
16154580 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
1/1 |
Current CPC
Class: |
G06F 16/9566 20190101;
H04L 43/0876 20130101; G06F 16/9574 20190101; H04L 61/1511
20130101; H04L 43/0894 20130101 |
International
Class: |
H04L 12/26 20060101
H04L012/26; G06F 16/957 20060101 G06F016/957; G06F 16/955 20060101
G06F016/955; H04L 29/12 20060101 H04L029/12 |
Claims
1. A computer-implemented method comprising: under control of a
hardware computing device configured with specific computer
executable instructions: obtaining, at a first domain name system
(DNS) server from a client computing device, a DNS query, wherein a
first point of presence (POP) of a content delivery network (CDN)
service provider includes the first DNS server, wherein the DNS
query is associated with a requested resource; dynamically
determining, responsive to the DNS query, a suboptimal computing
device for providing the requested resource; and transmitting, to
the client computing device, an identification of the suboptimal
computing device in response to the DNS query.
2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein determining
the suboptimal computing device is based in part on latency and an
original content provider cost criterion.
3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein determining
the suboptimal computing device is based in part on latency and a
risk susceptibility factor.
4. The computer-implemented of claim 1, wherein the suboptimal
computing device is determined based on one or more criterion.
5. The computer-implemented method of claim 4, wherein the one or
more criterion comprises at least one of a susceptibility factor
associated with an individual one of the plurality of available
routing modes or a latency for providing the requested resource
associated with individual one of the plurality of available
routing modes.
6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the
suboptimal computing device is a second DNS server.
7. The computer-implemented method of claim 6, wherein the second
DNS server is at a second POP of the CDN service provider
8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the
suboptimal computing device is a cache component of the CDN service
provider.
9. The computer-implemented method of claim 8, wherein the cache
component is at a second POP of the CDN service provider.
10. The computer-implemented method of claim 9, wherein the
suboptimal computing device is determined based at least in part on
a threshold content delivery bandwidth associated with one or more
POPs of the CDN service provider.
11. A computer-implemented method comprising: under control of a
hardware computing device configured with specific computer
executable instructions: obtaining, at a first domain name system
(DNS) server from a client computing device, a first DNS query,
wherein a first point of presence (POP) of a content delivery
network (CDN) service provider includes the first DNS server,
wherein the first DNS query is associated with a requested
resource; and responsive to obtaining the DNS query, determining a
routing mode from a plurality of available routing modes for
providing the requested resource based at least in part on a
plurality of susceptibility factors; selecting (a) an alternative
resource identifier associated with a second DNS server at a second
POP of the CDN service provider or (b) an IP address of a cache
component of the CDN service provider based at least in part on the
determined routing mode; and transmitting, to the client computing
device, the alternative resource identifier or the IP address.
12. The computer-implemented method of claim 11, wherein the
routing mode is further determined based on a plurality of latency
factors.
13. The computer-implemented method of claim 11, wherein the
routing mode is further determined based on a latency associated
with the second POP for providing the requested resource.
14. The computer-implemented method of claim 11, wherein the
routing mode is further determined based on a latency for providing
the requested resource using another POP of the CDN service
provider.
15. The computer-implemented method of claim 11, wherein the
routing mode is further determined based at least in part of a
content type of the requested resource.
16. The computer-implemented method of claim 15, wherein the
content type comprises financial content.
17. The computer-implemented method of claim 11, wherein the
alternative resource identifier includes information for causing a
second DNS query to resolve to the second DNS server of the CDN
service provider.
18. The computer-implemented method of claim 11, wherein the cache
component is at the second POP.
19. The computer-implemented method of claim 11, wherein the
plurality of susceptibility factors corresponds to the plurality of
available routing modes.
20. A system comprising: a first point of presence (POP) associated
with a content delivery network (CDN) service provider, wherein the
first POP includes a first domain name system (DNS) server that
receives a DNS query from a client computing device and a cache
server in communication with the first DNS server, wherein the DNS
query is associated with a requested resource, and wherein the
first DNS server is operative to: dynamically determine, responsive
to the DNS query, a suboptimal computing device for providing the
requested resource; and transmit, to the client computing device,
an identification of the suboptimal computing device in response to
the DNS query.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application is a continuation of U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 16/154,580, entitled ROUTING MODE AND
POINT-OF-PRESENCE SELECTION SERVICE and filed on Oct. 8, 2018,
which in turn is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.
14/575,816, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,097,448, entitled ROUTING MODE AND
POINT-OF-PRESENCE SELECTION SERVICE and filed on Dec. 18, 2014, the
disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
BACKGROUND
[0002] Generally described, computing devices and communication
networks can be utilized to exchange information. In a common
application, a computing device can request content from another
computing device via the communication network. For example, a user
at a personal computing device can utilize a software browser
application to request a Web page from a server computing device
via the Internet. In such embodiments, the user computing device
can be referred to as a client computing device ("client") and the
server computing device can be referred to as a content
provider.
[0003] Content providers are generally motivated to provide
requested content to client computing devices often with
consideration of efficient transmission of the requested content to
the client computing device and/or consideration of a cost
associated with the transmission of the content. For larger scale
implementations, a content provider may receive content requests
from a high volume of client computing devices which can place a
strain on the content provider's computing resources. Additionally,
the content requested by the client computing devices may have a
number of components, which can further place additional strain on
the content provider's computing resources.
[0004] With reference to an illustrative example, a requested Web
page, or original content, may be associated with a number of
additional resources, such as images or videos, which are to be
displayed with the Web page. In one specific embodiment, the
additional resources of the Web page are identified by a number of
embedded resource identifiers, such as uniform resource locators
("URLs"). In turn, software on the client computing devices
typically processes embedded resource identifiers to generate
requests for the content. Often, the resource identifiers
associated with the embedded resources reference a computing device
associated with the content provider such that the client computing
device would transmit the request for the additional resources to
the referenced content provider computing device. Accordingly, in
order to satisfy a content request, the content provider would
provide client computing devices data associated with the Web page
as well as the data associated with the embedded resources.
[0005] Some content providers attempt to facilitate the delivery of
requested content, such as Web pages and/or resources identified in
Web pages, through the utilization of a content delivery network
("CDN") service provider. A CDN server provider typically maintains
a number of computing devices in a communication network that can
maintain content from various content providers. In turn, content
providers can instruct, or otherwise suggest to, client computing
devices to request some, or all, of the content provider's content
from the CDN service provider's computing devices.
[0006] As with content providers, CDN service providers are also
generally motivated to provide requested content to client
computing devices often with consideration of efficient
transmission of the requested content to the client computing
device and/or consideration of a cost associated with the
transmission of the content. Accordingly, CDN service providers
often consider factors such as latency of delivery of requested
content in order to meet service level agreements or to generally
improve the quality of delivery service.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0007] The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages
of this invention will become more readily appreciated as the same
become better understood by reference to the following detailed
description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying
drawings, wherein:
[0008] FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrative of content delivery
environment including a number of client computing devices, a
content provider, and a content delivery network (CDN) service
provider;
[0009] FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the content delivery
environment of FIG. 1 illustrating the registration of a content
provider with a CDN service provider;
[0010] FIG. 3 is a block diagram of the content delivery
environment of FIG. 1 illustrating the generation and processing of
a content request from a client computing device to a content
provider;
[0011] FIG. 4 is a block diagram of the content delivery
environment of FIG. 1 illustrating the generation and processing of
a DNS query corresponding to an embedded resource from a client
computing device to a CDN service provider;
[0012] FIG. 5A is a block diagram of the content delivery
environment of FIG. 1 illustrating another embodiment of the
generation and processing of a DNS query corresponding to an
embedded resource from a client computing device to a CDN service
provider;
[0013] FIG. 5B is a block diagram of the content delivery
environment of FIG. 1 illustrating the generation and processing of
a DNS query corresponding to an alternative resource identifier
from a client computing device to another POP of a CDN service
provider;
[0014] FIG. 6 is a block diagram of the content delivery
environment of FIG. 1 illustrating the generation and processing of
embedded resource requests from a client computing device to a CDN
service provider;
[0015] FIG. 7 is a flow diagram illustrative of a POP selection
routine implemented by a CDN service provider;
[0016] FIG. 8 is a flow diagram illustrative of a routing mode
selection routine implemented by a CDN service provider; and
[0017] FIG. 9 is a flow diagram illustrative of an alternative POP
selection routine implemented by a CDN service provider.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0018] Generally described, the present disclosure is directed to
DNS query processing that provides for the use of various routing
modes responsive to receipt of a DNS query corresponding to a
requested resource. More specifically, aspects of the disclosure
will be described with regard to processing resource requests
associated with content providers having a flat-rate pricing for
use of a CDN service provider's computing devices. In some
embodiments, in response to a DNS query corresponding to a
requested resource, a CDN service provider may select a less
optimal POP to service the requested resource based on one or more
criteria and thereby select a "sloppy routing" scheme. For example,
the one or more criteria may correspond to aspects of a flat-rate
pricing model offered to content providers by the CDN service
provider to provide content on their behalf. Continuing with this
example, in such an approach, if a content provider has exceeded a
threshold network usage, which may, for example, be based at least
in part on pricing information for CDN service provider to provide
content on behalf of the content provider, DNS query processing at
a DNS server of the CDN service provider can include routing a
response to the DNS query, in a "sloppy" routing manner and/or
fashion, to a suboptimal POP by determining an alternative resource
identifier or cache IP address at another POP (e.g., located at
another edge server).
[0019] Further, aspects of the disclosure will be described with
regard to DNS query processing that can determine a suboptimal, or
sloppy, routing approach to avoid costs associated with data links
of cache servers providing the requested resources. Accordingly,
the one or more criteria used by the CDN service provider may also
correspond to aspects of the CDN service provider cost information.
More specifically, the data links, provisioned by a CDN service
provider, can correspond to a financial cost for the content
delivery bandwidth available on the data links of the cache
servers. This financial cost can be determined in relation to a
threshold content delivery bandwidth. For example, if a current
content delivery bandwidth exceeds the threshold content delivery
bandwidth, the CDN service provider incurs greater costs. In
various embodiments, responses to DNS queries, such as an
alternative resource identifier or a cache IP address, can be
sloppy routed to another POP location with associated data links of
cache servers operating below the threshold content delivery
bandwidth.
[0020] In one embodiment, the one or more criteria for selecting a
"sloppy routing" scheme includes a latency associated with
providing requested resources for the content provider. In various
other embodiments, other criteria that may affect the selection of
sloppy routing for the response to a DNS query can include:
optimizing content accessibility via hashing algorithms, security
concerns, favoring certain content providers (e.g., customers), or
favoring certain content uses.
[0021] Still further, aspects of the disclosure will be described
with regard to DNS query processing for sloppy routing schemes
using one or more criteria. The one or more criteria may include
both the threshold network usage and the threshold content delivery
bandwidth. For example, in such multi-criterion approach, the
latency associated with routing a response of a DNS query to a
suboptimal POP is considered in combination with the marginal cost
to service a content request at a data link operating above the
content delivery bandwidth threshold. Accordingly, a content
provider that has exceeded a threshold network usage can be routed
in a sloppy manner during a peak time, when other available data
links of cache servers located at another POP are available at a
lower cost or no cost because the data links of those cache servers
are operating under the threshold content delivery bandwidth. Thus,
a DNS server can use the one or more criteria to determine whether
to use a suboptimal POP instead of an optimal or original POP.
[0022] Further aspects of the disclosure will be described with
regard to determining an appropriate routing mode for providing a
requested resource. In various embodiments, a spectrum of routing
modes are available to the CDN service provider for use in
responding to DNS queries. The routing modes can include: a default
routing mode, a sloppy routing mode, a regional anycast routing
mode, an anycast routing mode, and a "follow-the-moon" routing
mode. (The "follow-the-moon" routing mode is described in U.S.
patent application Ser. No. 14/229,568, titled "Scaling Computing
Instances" and filed on Mar. 28, 2014, the entirety of which is
incorporated herein by reference). The CDN service provider may
determine a routing mode for providing a requested resource from a
plurality of available routing modes based on one or more criteria.
For example, the one or more criteria may include the network usage
associated with the content provider, the content delivery
bandwidth associated with the CDN service provider, a
susceptibility factor associated with the content provider, or a
latency associated with a POP in providing the requested resource.
Additionally or alternatively, the one or more criteria may include
one or more susceptibility factors and/or one or more latencies.
For example, in one embodiment, the CDN service provider may
determine that an anycast routing mode is appropriate if a
susceptibility factor indicates that the anycast routing mode is a
more appropriate routing mode when providing the requested
resource. In another embodiment, the CDN service provider may
determine that a default routing mode is appropriate if the one or
more criteria indicate that a latency for providing the resource
request is to be minimized. After selection of the routing mode,
the CDN service provider may provide a response to the DNS query in
accordance with the determined routing mode.
[0023] In another example, a regional anycast routing mode can be
determined as the appropriate routing mode when the one or more
criteria indicate that a susceptibility factor (e.g., a security
concern) associated with the plurality of available routing modes
is higher for a default routing mode, than the regional anycast
routing mode. Continuing with this example, the response to the DNS
query may be routed in accordance with the regional anycast routing
mode so that several cache servers could be used to service the
request, thereby enhancing security. In contrast, in the default
routing mode, a cache server can be a single cache server (e.g., an
optimal cache server with minimal latency for providing the
resource request). Thus, the CDN service provider can provide
responses to DNS queries in accordance with one of a plurality of
available routing modes based on a variety of criteria.
[0024] Although various aspects of the disclosure will be described
with regard to illustrative examples and embodiments, one skilled
in the art will appreciate that the disclosed embodiments and
examples should not be construed as limiting.
[0025] FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrative of content delivery
environment 100 for the management and processing of content
requests. As illustrated in FIG. 1, the content delivery
environment 100 includes a number of client computing devices 102
(generally referred to as clients) for requesting content from a
content provider and/or a CDN service provider. In an illustrative
embodiment, the client computing devices 102 can correspond to a
wide variety of computing devices including personal computing
devices, laptop computing devices, hand-held computing devices,
terminal computing devices, mobile devices, wireless devices,
various electronic devices and appliances and the like. In an
illustrative embodiment, the client computing devices 102 include
necessary hardware and software components for establishing
communications over a communication network 108, such as a wide
area network or local area network. For example, the client
computing devices 102 may be equipped with networking equipment and
browser software applications that facilitate communications via
the Internet or an intranet.
[0026] The client computing devices 102 may also include necessary
hardware and software components for requesting content from
network entities in the form of an originally requested resource
that may include identifiers to two or more embedded resources that
need to be requested. Further, the client computing devices 102 may
include or be associated with necessary hardware and software
components, such as browser software applications, plugins,
scripts, etc., for fulfilling the original resource request and
each embedded resource request. In other embodiments, the client
computing devices 102 may be otherwise associated with an external
proxy application or device, as well as any other additional
software applications or software services, used in conjunction
with requests for content.
[0027] Although not illustrated in FIG. 1, each client computing
device 102 utilizes some type of local DNS resolver component, such
as a DNS Name server, that generates the DNS queries attributed to
the client computing device. In one embodiment, the local DNS
resolver component may be provided by an enterprise network to
which the client computing device 102 belongs. In another
embodiment, the local DNS resolver component may be provided by an
Internet Service Provider (ISP) that provides the communication
network connection to the client computing device 102.
[0028] The content delivery environment 100 can also include a
content provider 104 in communication with the client computing
devices 102 via the communication network 108. The content provider
104 illustrated in FIG. 1 corresponds to a logical association of
one or more computing devices associated with a content provider.
Specifically, the content provider 104 can include a web server
component 110 corresponding to one or more server computing devices
for obtaining and processing requests for content (such as Web
pages) from the client computing devices 102. The content provider
104 can further include an origin server component 112 and
associated storage component 114 corresponding to one or more
computing devices for obtaining and processing requests for network
resources from the CDN service provider. One skilled in the
relevant art will appreciate that the content provider 104 can be
associated with various additional computing resources, such
additional computing devices for administration of content and
resources, DNS name servers, and the like. For example, although
not illustrated in FIG. 1, the content provider 104 can be
associated with one or more DNS name server components that would
be authoritative to resolve client computing device DNS queries
corresponding to a domain of the content provider. Although the
content delivery environment 100 is illustrated in a client-server
configuration, one skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that
the content delivery environment 100 may be implemented in a
peer-to-peer configuration as well.
[0029] With continued reference to FIG. 1, the content delivery
environment 100 can further include a CDN service provider 106 in
communication with the client computing devices 102 and the content
providers 104 via the communication network 108. The CDN service
provider 106 illustrated in FIG. 1 corresponds to a logical
association of one or more computing devices associated with a CDN
service provider. Specifically, the CDN service provider 106 can
include a number of point of presence ("POP") locations 116 and 122
that correspond to nodes on the communication network 108. Each POP
116 and 122 includes a DNS server component 118 and 124 made up of
a number of DNS server computing devices for resolving DNS queries
from the client computers 102. Each POP 116 and 122 also includes a
resource cache component 120 and 126 made up of a number of cache
server computing devices for storing resources from content
providers and transmitting various requested resources to various
client computers. The DNS server components 118 and 124 and the
resource cache components 120 and 126 may further include
additional software and/or hardware components that facilitate
communications including, but not limited, load balancing or load
sharing software/hardware components.
[0030] In an illustrative embodiment, the DNS server components 118
and 124 and resource cache component 120 and 126 are considered to
be logically grouped, regardless of whether the components, or
portions of the components, are physically separate. Additionally,
although the POPs 116 and 122 are illustrated in FIG. 1 as
logically associated with the CDN service provider 106, the POPs
can be geographically distributed throughout the communication
network 108 to serve the various demographics of client computing
devices 102. Additionally, one skilled in the relevant art will
appreciate that the CDN service provider 106 can be associated with
various additional computing resources, such additional computing
devices for administration of content and resources, and the
like.
[0031] The CDN service provider 106 can further include a routing
mode and POP selection service 128, pricing data store 130, and
back-end processing service 132. Illustratively, the routing mode
and POP selection service 128 can implement various computational,
statistical, or machine learning methods to route the response
(e.g., an answer) to a DNS query received at the CDN service
provider 106 (e.g., received at DNS server component 118). For
example, the routing mode and POP selection service 128 can
determine an appropriate routing mode for the alternative resource
identifier (e.g., a CNAME) associated with the second DNS server
124 to the second POP 122 of the CDN service provider 106 or fort
the IP address of a cache component in the resource cache 126 of
the second POP 122. The routing mode and POP selection service 128
may include different modules or components, which may facilitate
or implement various methods and processes described herein.
Further, these modules or components may include additional
components, systems, and subsystems for facilitating the methods
and processes. Pricing data store 130 can include pricing
information that indicates a price at which the CDN provider 106
provides content on behalf of the content provider 104. Pricing
data store 130 can, additionally or alternatively, include cost
information indicating a financial cost of content delivery
bandwidth for the CDN service provider 106 (e.g., the costs to
operate provisioned data links at cache servers). For example, in
some embodiments, the pricing information can include a flat-rate
price for monthly service for the content provider 104 by CDN
provider 106.
[0032] Illustratively, back-end processing service 132 can include
a number of hardware and software components. More specifically,
the back-end processing service 132 may include hardware, software,
configuration data, data structures, computer-readable code, or any
type of information that can be loaded into memory and processed by
back-end processing service 132. Aspects of the back-end processing
service 132 will be described in further detail below with respect
to FIG. 4 that illustrates the processing and storing service
provided by back-end processing service 132. In various
embodiments, reference to the routing mode and POP selection
service 128 and back-end processing service 132 within the present
disclosure may include multiple computing devices working in
conjunction to facilitate the selecting of alternative resource
identifiers or cached IP addresses at alternative POP locations to
service content requests. For example, in various embodiments, the
routing mode and POP selection service 128 may be distributed
through a network or implemented by one or more virtual machine
instances. Additionally or alternatively, it can be appreciated by
one skilled in the art that the routing mode and POP selection
service 128 and back-end processing service 132 may correspond to a
combination thereof and/or include any other services, be
centralized in one computing device, and/or be distributed across
several computing devices.
[0033] With reference now to FIGS. 2-6, the interaction between
various components of the content delivery environment 100 of FIG.
1 will be illustrated. For purposes of the example, however, the
illustration has been simplified such that many of the components
utilized to facilitate communications are not shown. One skilled in
the relevant art will appreciate that such components can be
utilized and that additional interactions would accordingly occur
without departing from the spirit and scope of the present
disclosure.
[0034] With reference to FIG. 2, an illustrative interaction for
registration of a content provider 104 with the CDN service
provider 106 will be described. As illustrated in FIG. 2, the CDN
content registration process begins with registration of the
content provider 104 with the CDN service provider 106. In an
illustrative embodiment, the content provider 104 utilizes a
registration application program interface ("API") to register with
the CDN service provider 106 such that the CDN service provider 106
can provide content on behalf of the content provider 104. The
registration API includes the identification of the origin server
112 of the content provider 104 that will provide requested
resources to the CDN service provider 106.
[0035] One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that upon
identification of appropriate origin servers 112, the content
provider 104 can begin to direct requests for content from client
computing devices 102 to the CDN service provider 106.
Specifically, in accordance with DNS routing principles, a client
computing device request corresponding to a resource identifier
would eventually be directed toward a POP 116 and 122 associated
with the CDN service provider 106. In the event that the resource
cache component 120 and 126 of a selected POP does not have a copy
of a resource requested by a client computing device 102, the
resource cache component will request the resource from the origin
server 112 previously registered by the content provider 104.
[0036] With continued reference to FIG. 2, upon receiving the
registration API, the CDN service provider 106 obtains and
processes the registration information. In an illustrative
embodiment, the CDN service provider 106 can then generate
additional information that will be used by the client computing
devices 102 as part of the content requests. The additional
information can include, without limitation, client identifiers,
such as client identification codes, content provider identifiers,
such as content provider identification codes, executable code for
processing resource identifiers, such as script-based instructions,
the like. One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that
various types of additional information may be generated by the CDN
service provider 106 and that the additional information may be
embodied in any one of a variety of formats.
[0037] The CDN service provider 106 returns an identification of
applicable domains for the CDN service provider (unless it has been
previously provided) and any additional information to the content
provider 104. In turn, the content provider 104 can then process
the stored content with content provider specific information. In
one example, as illustrated in FIG. 2, the content provider 104
translates resource identifiers originally directed toward a domain
of the origin server 112 to a domain corresponding to the CDN
service provider. The translated URLs are embedded into requested
content in a manner such that DNS queries for the translated URLs
will resolve to a DNS server corresponding to the CDN service
provider 106 and not a DNS server corresponding to the content
provider 104. Although the translation process is illustrated in
FIG. 2, in some embodiments, the translation process may be omitted
in a manner described in greater detail below.
[0038] Generally, the identification of the resources originally
directed to the content provider 104 will be in the form of a
resource identifier that can be processed by the client computing
device 102, such as through a browser software application. In an
illustrative embodiment, the resource identifiers can be in the
form of a uniform resource locator ("URL"). Because the resource
identifiers are included in the requested content directed to the
content provider 104, the resource identifiers can be referred to
generally as "content provider URLs." For purposes of an
illustrative example, a content provider URL can identify a domain
of the content provider 104 (e.g., contentprovider.com), a name of
the resource to be requested (e.g., "resource.xxx") and a path
where the resource will be found (e.g., "path"). In this
illustrative example, the content provider URL has the form of:
[0039] http://www.contentprovider.com/path/resource.xxx
[0040] During an illustrative translation process, the content
provider URL is modified such that requests for the resources
associated with the translated URLs resolve to a POP associated
with the CDN service provider 106. In one embodiment, the
translated URL identifies the domain of the CDN service provider
106 (e.g., "cdnprovider.com"), the same name of the resource to be
requested (e.g., "resource.xxx") and the same path where the
resource will be found (e.g., "path"). Additionally, the translated
URL can include additional processing information (e.g.,
"additional information"). The translated URL would have the form
of: [0041] http://additional
information.cdnprovider.com/path/resources.xxx
[0042] In another embodiment, the information associated with the
CDN service provider 106 is included the modified URL, such as
through prepending or other techniques, such that the translated
URL can maintain all of the information associated with the
original URL. In this embodiment, the translated URL would have the
form of: [0043]
http://additional_information.cdnprovider.com/www.contentprovider.com/pat-
h/resource.xxx
[0044] With reference now to FIG. 3, after completion of the
registration and translation processes illustrated in FIG. 2, a
client computing device 102 subsequently generates a content
request that is received and processed by the content provider 104,
such as through the Web server 110. In accordance with an
illustrative embodiment, the request for content can be in
accordance with common network protocols, such as the hypertext
transfer protocol ("HTTP"). Upon receipt of the content request,
the content provider 104 identifies the appropriate responsive
content. In an illustrative embodiment, the requested content can
correspond to a Web page that is displayed on the client computing
device 102 via the processing of information, such as hypertext
markup language ("HTML"), extensible markup language ("XML"), and
the like. The requested content can also include a number of
embedded resource identifiers, described above, that corresponds to
resource objects that should be obtained by the client computing
device 102 as part of the processing of the requested content. The
embedded resource identifiers can be generally referred to as
original resource identifiers or original URLs.
[0045] Upon receipt of the requested content, the client computing
device 102, such as through a browser software application, begins
processing any of the markup code included in the content and
attempts to acquire the resources identified by the embedded
resource identifiers. Accordingly, the first step in acquiring the
content corresponds to the issuance, by the client computing device
102 (through its local DNS resolver), of a DNS query for the
original URL resource identifier that results in the identification
of a DNS server authoritative to the "." and the "com" portions of
the translated URL. After resolving the "." and "com" portions of
the embedded URL, the client computing device 102 then issues a DNS
query for the resource URL that results in the identification of a
DNS server authoritative to the ".cdnprovider" portion of the
embedded URL. The issuance of DNS queries corresponding to the "."
and the "com" portions of a URL are well known and have not been
illustrated.
[0046] With reference now to FIG. 4, in an illustrative embodiment,
after completion of the registration and translation processes
illustrated in FIG. 2, the successful resolution of the
"cdnprovider" portion of the original URL identifies a network
address, such as an IP address, of a DNS server component 118
associated with the CDN service provider 106. In one embodiment,
the IP address is a specific network address unique to a DNS server
component 118 of POP 116. In another embodiment, the IP address can
be shared by one or more POPs 116, 122. In this embodiment, a DNS
query to the shared IP address utilizes a one-to-many network
routing schema, such as anycast, such that a specific POP, POP 118,
will receive the request as a function of network topology. For
example, in an anycast implementation, a DNS query issued by a
client computing device 102 to a shared IP address will arrive at a
DNS server component logically having the shortest network topology
distance, often referred to as network hops, from the client
computing device. The network topology distance does not
necessarily correspond to geographic distance. However, in some
embodiments, the network topology distance can be inferred to be
the shortest network distance between a client computing device 102
and a POP.
[0047] With continued reference to FIG. 4, in either of the
above-identified embodiments (or any other embodiment), a specific
DNS server in the DNS component 118 of a POP 116 receives the DNS
query corresponding to the original URL from the client computing
device 102. Once one of the DNS servers in the DNS component 118
receives the request, the specific DNS server attempts to resolve
the request. In an illustrative embodiment, a specific DNS server
can resolve the DNS query by selecting an IP address of a resource
cache component that will process the request for the requested
resource. Alternatively, in another embodiment, as will be
described further below in reference to FIGS. 5A and 5B, an
alternative resource identifier (e.g., a CNAME) associated with
another DNS server component of the CDN service provider 106 may be
selected and returned to the client computing device 102. In either
case, as will also be further described below, the CDN service
provider 106, can implement various methods and systems to select a
routing mode for an IP address of a cache server component of the
CDN service provider 106 or an alternative resource identifier
associated with another DNS server component of the CDN service
provider 106, such as via the routing mode and POP selection
service 128 as generally discussed above.
[0048] Returning to the embodiment of FIG. 4 specifically, the DNS
server component 118 processes the DNS query in part by selecting
an IP address of a resource cache component of the CDN service
provider 106 based at least in part on one or more criteria. The
one or more criteria can include aspects of a flat-rate pricing
model offered by the CDN service provider 106 and aspects of a CDN
service provider cost information. Accordingly, a threshold network
usage and a threshold content delivery bandwidth can be used as one
or more criteria during DNS query processing to select an IP
address of the resource cache component. To evaluate these
thresholds, the data links of the resource cache components 120 and
126 are associated with a throughput capability that can be
measured. For example, the throughput capability of one data link
at a single cache server of resource cache component 120 (or
collectively as several data links at resource cache components 120
and 126) can include a measurement of the available bandwidth, used
bandwidth (e.g., network usage), or other metrics that may evaluate
the performance of networked components such as data links
associated with resource cache components. In some instances, these
measurements of bandwidth can be evaluated as a percentile (e.g., a
95th percentile metric) with reference to other data links at a
specific resource cache component or several resource cache
components, aggregated to use as a statistical metric. With these
metrics, the DNS server component 118 then processes the DNS query
in part with reference to these metrics and determines whether a
sloppy routing scheme may be used if a certain metric falls above
or below a certain threshold (e.g., a threshold network usage of
content provider 104). Accordingly, various one or more criteria
corresponding to metrics of the data links at the resource cache
components 120 and 126 may be used to determine whether a sloppy
routing scheme should be used.
[0049] In one embodiment of sloppy routing using the CDN service
provider cost information as the one or more criteria, the routing
mode and POP selection service 128 of the CDN service provider 106
can determine to route the response to a DNS query (e.g., a content
request) to a different DNS server associated with an alternative
resource identifier or a cache IP address that, in this example, is
not the optimal service location for that DNS query. In various
embodiments, the CDN service provider 106 can determine a
suboptimal routing approach to avoid costs associated with data
links of the resource cache components 120 and 126 servicing the
content requests. In this approach, the CDN service provider 106
can provision the data links (e.g., hardware) necessary at the
resource cache components 120 and 126 based on the available
content delivery bandwidths of the resource cache components 120
and 126 or the DNS query processing of DNS server components 118
and 124 for servicing the requested resources. These data links,
not illustratively depicted in FIG. 3, operating via network 108
cost the CDN service provider 106, in various embodiments, on a per
data link basis. The costs of these data links may vary in various
scenarios. In some embodiments, the cost of the data links can be
determined based on the DNS query processing of the DNS server
components 118 and 124 or the available content delivery bandwidth
at resource cache components 120 and 126. The DNS server components
118 and 124 and resource cache components 120 and 126 can be
located on edge servers at the POPs 116 and 122 located within
network 108.
[0050] More specifically, the cost of these data links at resource
cache components 120 and 126 can correspond to a threshold content
delivery bandwidth for a particular data link (or all of the data
links). In an illustrative example, the CDN service provider 106
may incur an additional cost when a data link at the DNS server
component 118 is used at a 95th percentile capacity of request
handling at one or more cache servers of resource cache component
120 for a certain period of time corresponding to a time bucket.
Time buckets may be used to determine the cost of operating the
cache server above the threshold content delivery bandwidth. For
example, a five-minute time bucket of operating above the threshold
content delivery bandwidth can correspond to a certain cost; a
thirty-minute time bucket, an even higher cost. If, on the other
hand, the request handling at one or more cache servers of resource
cache component 120 operates below that percentile, the CDN service
provider 106 may incur no cost or a lesser cost. Thus the CDN
service provider 106 can route various content requests to
different data links of alternative cache servers (e.g., cache
servers at resource cache component 126) based on the request
handling capacity at cache servers of resource cache component 120
operating below or above that cost percentile. In another
illustrative example, if the data link at resource cache component
120 is operating at the 98th percentile, the CDN service provider
106 can determine that another resource cache component 126,
operating only at a 50th percentile, may be include alternative
cache servers to handle the content requests because even this
rerouted content request only raises the request handling at the
cache servers of resource cache component 126 to the 55th
percentile. With this rerouting approach, eventually, the
overloaded 98 percentile data link at resource cache component 120
may fall below the threshold, for example, now operating at the
90th percentile. With this approach, the CDN service provider 106
has now lowered its cost operating below the threshold content
delivery bandwidth at both data links of resource cache components
120 and 126. This can be referred to as a sloppy routing mode. In
this continued example, the CDN service provider 106 can determine
an alternative DNS server associated with an alternative resource
identifier (as depicted in FIGS. 5A and 5B) or a cache IP address
(as depicted in FIG. 4), both at an alternative POP, where the
responses to the DNS queries can be routed. In some embodiments,
the threshold content delivery bandwidth (e.g., the cost percentile
at which the CDN service provider 106 incurs costs) can be stored
in the pricing data store 130. The corresponding time buckets at
which the CDN service provider 106 incurs costs operating above the
threshold content delivery bandwidth can also be stored in the
pricing data store 130. The threshold content delivery bandwidth of
data links at cache servers can correspond to peak request handling
for resource cache components (e.g., cache servers).
[0051] In various embodiments, the CDN service provider 106 can use
the back-end processing service 132 to process stored historical
data to determine whether a particular POP exceeds the threshold
content delivery bandwidth during regular daily intervals,
seasonally, or on a monthly basis. Back-end processing service 132
may use various methods associated with DNS query processing to
track the DNS query at DNS servers or the content delivery
bandwidth of data links associated with the resource cache
components, located at various POPs (e.g., on edge servers)
connected via the network 108.
[0052] In another illustrative example of sloppy routing, the CDN
service provider 106 can determine to route the response of a DNS
query (e.g., a content request) to a cache IP address that is not
the optimal location for that content request because the content
provider 104 has exceeded a threshold network usage. The CDN
service provider 106 can determine a pricing structure for the
content provider 104; for example, the content provider 104 can be
charged a flat-rate price for network usage. This may allow the
content provider 104 to determine that the CDN service provider 106
is cost efficient because a flat rate price is charged for network
bandwidth. However with this predictability, the content service
provider 106 can determine that some content providers exceed their
threshold network usage that has been predicted corresponding to a
determined flat-rate price. When the content provider 104 has
exceeded the flat-rate price, the CDN service provider 106 can use
a sloppy routing approach to reroute content requests to a
suboptimal location. In some embodiments, this approach provides a
balanced or reasonable latency: not the optimal latency in a
default routing approach that determines the optimal cache IP
address to service a DNS query, but also not the worst latency that
a content provider 104 might find using an anycast routing
approach. Thus the sloppy routing mode, in these embodiments,
balances the latency for the content provider 104 (e.g., a
customer) with the flat-rate price that the content provider 104
has paid for a corresponding network usage at that flat-rate price.
In one embodiment, the content provider 104 can be on a monthly
network usage plan: The content provider 104 is routed to the
optimal location in the default routing approach; but, once the
customer has exceeded the threshold network usage for the month,
the routing mode and POP selection service 128 determines that the
sloppy routing mode can be used to route a response to an
alternative DNS server (which may be identified with an alternative
resource identifier as depicted in FIG. 5A) or an IP address of a
resource cache component at another POP location (e.g., the
resource cache 126 at the second POP 122 as depicted in FIG. 3). In
another embodiment, once the content provider 104 has exceeded the
threshold network usage, the content provider 104 may be rerouted
automatically for a specific time of day to an alternative DNS
server (e.g., the DNS server 124) or an IP address of a cache
component at another POP location. For example, multiple content
requests for movies at 8 p.m. on Friday night can be rerouted to a
suboptimal location, if that specific content provider 104 has
already exceeded their threshold network usage for that month.
[0053] In various embodiments, the back-end processing service 132
can retrieve from pricing data store 130 various prices for the
content provider 104 and costs of the CDN service provider 106.
With this data, the back-end processing service 132 can process the
tracked behavior of the network usage for the content provider 104
with various monitoring mechanisms and/or approaches used by the
CDN service provider 106. For example, the CDN service provider 106
may keep records of the network usage of various content providers
104 on a daily basis. In various other approaches, the CDN service
provider 106 can store the pricing structure for various content
providers 104 in the pricing data store 130. For example, the
pricing structure can include a graduated pricing structure for a
new customer (e.g., another content provider 104) or a discounted
pricing structure for a loyal customer (e.g., another content
provider 104). Using both the pricing data store 130 and the
back-end processing service 132, the CDN service provider 106 can
determine the network usage of various content providers 104.
[0054] In another illustrative example, the DNS server component
118 may use a combination of the one or more criteria to determine
a sloppy routing scheme; for example, using both the threshold
content delivery bandwidth and the threshold network usage for the
content provider 104. Continuing in this illustrative example, the
CDN service provider 106 can determine that a flat-rate price
corresponds to a marginal increase in cost for a particular data
link because that data link corresponds to an optimal routing
approach using DNS. Thus if a content provider 104 has exceeded
their monthly network usage, the CDN service provider 106 can use
sloppy routing to reroute the DNS query to another POP (e.g.,
either via an alternative resource identifier or via a resource
cache component operated by that POP) that is operating under the
cost percentile for that data link, which corresponds to a
threshold content delivery bandwidth. In this combined approach,
the CDN service provider 106 balances the cost of provisioning
subsequent data links against the latency introduced to the content
provider 104 for the use of servicing DNS queries.
[0055] In an additional illustrative example of the sloppy routing
mode not depicted in FIG. 4, the DNS server component 118 may keep
a list of available IP addresses in the resource cache component
120 corresponding to data links that the CDN service provider 106
is operating. If a request for content of the content provider 104
is received when content provider 104 has exceeded their threshold
network usage for a month, DNS server component 118 can use the
list of available IP addresses with their corresponding content
delivery bandwidth percentiles at that particular time. For
example, the data link at the first IP address may be operating at
the 98th percentile because, in this example, it is the optimal IP
address, the data link at the second IP address may be operating at
the 94th percentile, and the data link at the third IP address may
be operating at the 57th percentile. Because, in this example,
content provider 104 has exceeded their threshold network usage,
the routing mode and POP selection service 128 and back-end
processing service 132 can determine that the third IP address can
be used to service a DNS query; thereby minimizing the cost to
operate the data links of CDN service provider 106. This avoids
using the second IP address when a marginal increase in DNS queries
could push the data link at the second IP address to operate over
the threshold content delivery bandwidth (e.g., the 95th
percentile). Additionally, some traffic on the data link at the
second IP address can be routed to the third IP address if CDN
service provider 106 determines that the incremental latency
experienced is minimal or if the another content provider 104
operating their content requests on the data link at the second IP
address suddenly exceeds their threshold network usage for the
month.
[0056] Further in various sloppy routing schemes using a
combination of the one or more criteria, the CDN service provider
106 can determine various permutations of the sloppy routing mode
based on information regarding the pricing structure of a content
provider 104 stored in the pricing data store 130. In the same
continued example from above, the latency incurred by a flat-rate
price on the data link at the third IP address may be a greater
cost in terms of latency for the content provider 104 when compared
to the marginal cost incurred by the CDN service provider 106 when
servicing that DNS query on the data link at the second IP address,
which would have resulted in exceeding the threshold content
delivery bandwidth for the CDN service provider 106. Thus the
routing mode and POPs selection service 128 can include a
determination that balances the latency for the content provider
104 operating above a threshold network usage with the cost
incurred by operating a data link above the content delivery
bandwidth threshold. With this approach in view, various
embodiments are possible balancing the latency incurred for the
content provider 104 for a particular cost incurred by CDN service
provider 106. Thus CDN service provider 106 can use a pricing
structure stored in pricing data store 130 for content provider 104
that is based primarily on the latency that content provider 104 is
willing to incur.
[0057] Further still, this latency criterion can be related to the
use case of the content request for that the content provider 104.
For example, CDN service provider 106 can have a pricing structure
for content provider 104 that charges more for HD video than for
public information or text-based file formats. In some instances,
as one of skill in the art can appreciate, HD video may incur
greater latency than files with text-based formats or emails.
[0058] In various embodiments, as one of skill in the art can
appreciate, data can be collected by CDN service provider 106
regarding the content requests of the content provider 104
according to time of day, or month, or based on certain content
requests. This data can be processed in the back-end processing
service 132. All of these factors can be used as the one or more
criteria to determine a sloppy routing approach for the response of
a particular DNS query. Various factors can be processed by
back-end processing service 132 as will now be described herein.
For example, in various embodiments, latency may not be the
criterion to be optimized for sloppy routing, but instead, content
accessibility for the content provider 104 may be the
criterion.
[0059] In this sloppy routing approach using content accessibility
as one of the one or more criteria, the CDN service provider 106
can additionally use hashing algorithms to determine a POP location
with the lowest latency to service a particular DNS query. With
hashing algorithms, the CDN the service provider 106 can use the
routing mode and POP and selection service 128 to divide a certain
number of POP into stripes to be used in computing likelihoods of
content availability. Then, a hashing algorithm can use the name of
the content provider 104 with the DNS query to determine the
likelihood that content is stored for that content provider 104 at
a particular POP that would service the resource request with the
lowest latency. In this approach, content requests are more likely
to be serviced with less latency by using that POP having a higher
likelihood of content stored at the resource cache component of
that POP than others. In some embodiments, if the content provider
104 includes several requests for the same content, feedback can be
used to indicate that any of the POPs may have an equal likelihood
of having the content stored and thus offer nearly equivalent low
latencies.
[0060] Additional criteria can be used by routing mode and POP
selection service 128 during DNS query processing to determine
which POP locations or IP addresses to sloppy route for the
response of a particular DNS query.
[0061] Another one or more criteria of sloppy routing include
determining POP locations that can enhance security. In this
approach, routing mode and POP selection service 128 can determine
that the second POP 122 is less secure so that the list of
available IP addresses at the resource cache component 120 no
longer includes cache IP addresses associated with the second POP
122 or moves the cache IP addresses associated with the second POP
122 to the bottom of the list for servicing DNS queries. More
specifically, routing mode and POP selection service 128 can use
information that CDN service provider 106 receives from a look-up
table of IP addresses that have security concerns. With this
look-up table of IP addresses, routing mode and POP selection
service 128 can compare that list with the list available of cache
IP address for sloppy routing at DNS server component 118 to
determine whether a particular IP address should be avoided for the
content provider 104 that has an increased security concerns (e.g.,
an increased susceptibility factor). In some embodiments, this may
be additionally addressed by changing the routing mode. For
example, the routing mode at routing mode and POP selection service
128 can be changed to a regional anycast routing mode or anycast
routing mode for enhanced security. In some embodiments, CDN
service provider 106 can financially charge the content provider
104 more to provide this enhanced security, especially if the
content provider 104 requests secure connection for content
requests (e.g., because content provider 104 is servicing DNS
queries that include secure or financial transactions).
[0062] Another one or more criteria of sloppy routing include using
a favored or biased approach for a particular content provider 104:
the CDN service provider 106 can determine that a certain content
provider 104 is favored because it has been a customer of CDN
service provider 106 for a long period of time (or pays CDN service
provider 106 more than other content providers). In one embodiment
then, even though this favored or loyal customer has exceeded their
threshold network usage, the routing mode and POP selection service
128 can determine that content provider 104 is not sloppy routed,
but, instead, content provider is provided the optimal IP address
at DNS server 118. In contrast, this favored approach may also be
used for new customers. For example, a new customer that has only
exceeded their threshold at work usage on day 20 of the month could
still be provided the optimal IP address if the CDN service
provider 106 determines that the marginal cost of servicing new
customers with a lower latency, even though it incurs a greater
cost for the data link, is less than the likelihood that new
customer may drop coverage or choose another CDN service
provider.
[0063] With this description, as one of skill in the art can
appreciate, various approaches are possible to favor certain
content provider 104 over another based on preferences determined
and processed by back-end processing service 132. In some
embodiments this may include using historical data to analyze
content provider 104 behavior based on: latency, price, security
concerns, content accessibility, whether a content provider 104 is
primarily downloading bulk data, whether a particular POP is a peer
of CDN service provider 106 network, or any other relevant factors
that affect servicing a particular DNS query. Further, a
combination of factors may be used to determine the alternative
resource identifier associated with another POP location or cache
IP address to be used when routing a DNS query. For example, CDN
service provider 106 may determine that latency and susceptibility
factors should be the only factors to be used when selecting a
cache IP address from the list of available addresses at DNS server
118.
[0064] With further reference to FIG. 4, upon selection of a
specific cache server computing device (or a resource cache
component 120, 126), the DNS server component 118 provides an IP
address of the cache server computing device, resource cache
component, or load balancer/load share device associated with a
resource cache component. As will be described further below in
reference to FIG. 6, the client computing device 102 can then
utilize Internet communication protocols to request the resource
from a specific cache server computing device identified by the IP
address. The cache server computing device then processes the
request, as will also be described in greater detail below, to
provide the resource to the client computing device 102.
[0065] With reference now to FIG. 5A, in another embodiment, after
completion of the registration and translation processes
illustrated in FIG. 2, a specific DNS server in the DNS server
component 118 of the POP 116 receives the DNS query corresponding
to the original URL from the client computing device 102. Once one
of the DNS servers in the DNS server component 118 receives the
request, the specific DNS server attempts to resolve the request.
In one illustrative embodiment, as described above and shown in
reference to FIG. 4, a specific DNS server resolves the DNS query
by identifying an IP address of a cache server component that will
process the request for the requested resource. As described above
and as will be described further below in reference to FIG. 6, a
selected resource cache component can process the request by either
providing the requested resource if it is available or attempt to
obtain the requested resource from another source, such as a peer
cache server computing device or the origin server 112 of the
content provider 104.
[0066] Returning to FIG. 5A, as an alternative to selecting a
resource cache component upon receipt of a DNS query as described
in reference to FIG. 4, the CDN service provider 106 can process
the DNS query to select another POP for further processing a
subsequent DNS query associated with the originally requested
resource. The selection of another POP can also be based, at least
in part, on the same one or more criteria detailed above with
respect the selection of a resource cache component in FIG. 4. In
this embodiment, the CDN service provider 106 can maintain sets of
various alternative resource identifiers. The alternative resource
identifiers can be provided by the CDN service provider 106 to the
client computing device 102 such that a subsequent DNS query on the
alternative resource identifier will be processed by a different
DNS server component within the CDN service provider's network. In
an illustrative embodiment, the alternative resource identifiers
are in the form of one or more canonical name ("CNAME") records. In
one embodiment, each CNAME record identifies a domain of the CDN
service provider 106 (e.g., "cdnprovider.com" or
"cdnprovider-1.com"). As will be explained in greater detail below,
the domain in the CNAME does not need to be the same domain found
in original URL or in a previous CNAME record. Additionally, each
CNAME record includes additional information, such as request
routing information, (e.g., "request routing information"). An
illustrative CNAME record can have the form of: [0067]
http://request_routing_information.cdnprovider.com/path/resource.xxx
CNAME_request_routing_information.cdnprovider.com
[0068] In an illustrative embodiment, the CNAME records are
generated and provided by the DNS servers to direct a more
appropriate DNS server of the CDN service provider 106. As used in
accordance with the present disclosure, appropriateness can be
defined in any manner by the CDN service provider 106 for a variety
of purposes. In an illustrative embodiment, as will be described in
greater detail below in reference to FIG. 7, in addition to the one
or more criteria noted above, the CDN service provider 106 can
utilize domain information associated with the content provider
104, at least in part, to identify the more appropriate DNS server
of the CDN service provider 106. In particular, the CDN service
provider 106 can use the domain information in the DNS query to
identify the content provider 104, and in turn, identify a current
and threshold network usage for the identified content provider
104. As noted above, the threshold network usage for a content
provider can be determined based, at least in part, on pricing
information for the CDN service provider to provide content on
behalf of the content provider 104. Specifically, as one example, a
content provider may pay a flat fee for unlimited network usage of
the CDN service provider's network. However, the CDN service
provider 106 may manage its resources by determining a threshold
network usage for the content provider based on its flat fee at or
below which the CDN service provider 106 will process requests at
an optimal POP or route requests to an optimal POP. Alternatively,
if the current network usage for servicing domains corresponding to
the content provider 104 is above the threshold network usage, the
CDN service provider 106 can select a less optimal POP to process
the request.
[0069] In another embodiment, building on the foregoing example,
the CDN service provider 106 can utilize client location
information associated with the client computing device 102 or its
local DNS resolver, at least in part, to identify the more
appropriate DNS server of the CDN service provider 106. In
particular, the CDN service provider 106 can utilize an IP address
associated with a client computing device DNS query to identify a
best sub-optimal POP to process the request. Based on the client
location information, the CDN service provider 106 can then select
a POP 116, 122 from a set of sub-optimal POPs that are identified
as being available to service resource requests under the
circumstances. In one example, if more than one POP is identified
in the set of sub-optimal POPs, the CDN service provider 106 can
utilize a distribution allocation for selecting a specific POP
associated with the client location information. In another
example, once a POP is selected, the CDN service provider 106 can
further use health information to determine whether the selected
POP is available to service requests before providing the client
computing device with a CNAME corresponding to the selected POP.
This health information may in one embodiment correspond to a
threshold content delivery bandwidth available at the POP as also
described above. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the
above functionality is illustrative in nature and accordingly
should not be construed as limiting.
[0070] As described above, in addition to the consideration of
client location information (either of the end-client or its
associated local DNS resolver component), the CDN service provider
106 can utilize the additional information (e.g., the "additional
information") included in the translated URL to select a more
appropriate DNS server. In one aspect, the CDN service provider 106
can utilize the additional information to select from a set of DNS
servers identified as satisfying criteria associated with the
client location information or from a set of DNS services
identified as satisfying any other criterion or combination of
criteria, such as those described in other example embodiments
herein. In another aspect, the CDN service provider 106 can utilize
the additional information to validate the DNS server selected in
accordance with the client location information or to select an
alternative DNS server previously selected in accordance with the
client location information. In one example, the CDN service
provider 106 can attempt to direct a DNS query to DNS servers
according to additional geographic criteria. The additional
geographic criteria can correspond to geographic-based regional
service plans contracted between the CDN service-provider 106 and
the content provider 104 in which various CDN service provider 106
POPs are grouped into geographic regions. Accordingly, a client
computing device 102 DNS query received in a region not
corresponding to the content provider's regional plan may be better
processed by a DNS server in region corresponding to the content
provider's regional plan. In another example, the CDN service
provider 106 can attempt to direct a DNS query to DNS servers
according to service level criteria. The service level criteria can
correspond to service or performance metrics contracted between the
CDN service provider 106 and the content provider 104. Examples of
performance metrics can include latencies of data transmission
between the CDN service provider POPs and the client computing
devices 102, total data provided on behalf of the content provider
104 by the CDN service provider POPs, error rates for data
transmissions, and the like.
[0071] In still a further example, the CDN service provider 106 can
attempt to direct a DNS query to DNS servers according to network
performance criteria. The network performance criteria can
correspond to measurements of network performance for transmitting
data from the CDN service provider POPs to the client computing
device 102. Examples of network performance metrics can include
network data transfer latencies (measured by the client computing
device or the CDN service provider 106, network data error rates,
and the like).
[0072] In accordance with an illustrative embodiment, the DNS
server maintains a data store that defines CNAME records for
various original URLs. If a DNS query corresponding to a particular
original URL matches an entry in the data store, the DNS server
component 118 returns a CNAME record as defined in the data store.
In an illustrative embodiment, the data store can include multiple
CNAME records corresponding to a particular original URL. The
multiple CNAME records would define a set of potential candidates
that can be returned to the client computing device 102. In such an
embodiment, the DNS server component 118, either directly or via a
network-based service, can implement additional logic in selecting
an appropriate CNAME from a set of possible of CNAMEs. In an
illustrative embodiment, each DNS server component 118, 124
maintains the same data stores that define CNAME records, which can
be managed centrally by the CDN service provider 106.
Alternatively, each DNS server component 118 and 124 can have POP
specific data stores that define CNAME records, which can be
managed centrally by the CDN service provider 106 or locally at the
POP 116, 122.
[0073] Returning to FIG. 5A, one skilled in the relevant art will
appreciate that DNS server component 118 may select (or otherwise
obtain) a CNAME record that is intended resolve to a more
appropriate DNS server of the CDN service provider 106 based one or
more criteria, as described above. Then, the CDN service provider
106 returns the CNAME record to the client computing device
102.
[0074] With reference now to FIG. 5B, upon receipt of the CNAME
from the DNS server component 118, the client computing device 102
generates a subsequent DNS query corresponding to the CNAME. As
previously discussed with regard to FIG. 5A, the DNS query process
could first start with DNS queries for the "." and "com" portions,
followed by a query for the "cdnprovider" portion of the CNAME. To
the extent, however, that the results of a previous DNS queries can
be cached (and remain valid), the client computing device 102 can
utilize the cached information and does not need to repeat the
entire process. However, at some point, depending on whether the
CNAME provided by DNS server component 118 (FIG. 5A) and the
previous URL or CNAME share common CDN service provider domains,
the current CNAME DNS query will be processed by a different POP
provided by the CDN service provider 106. As illustrated in FIG.
5B, the DNS server component 124 of POP 122 receives the current
CNAME based on the different information in the current CNAME
previously provided by the DNS server component 118. As previously
described, the DNS server component 124 can then determine whether
to resolve the DNS query on the CNAME with an IP address of a cache
component that will process the content request or whether to
provide another alternative resource identifier selected in the
manners described above.
[0075] For purposes of illustration, assume that the DNS server
component 124 processes the content request by returning an IP
address of a resource cache component. In an illustrative
embodiment, the DNS server component 124 can utilize a variety of
information in selecting a resource cache component. In one
example, the DNS server component 124 can default to a selection of
a resource cache component of the same POP. In another example, the
DNS server components can select a resource cache component based
on various load balancing or load sharing algorithms. Still
further, the DNS server components can utilize network performance
metrics or measurements to assign specific resource cache
components. The IP address selected by a DNS server component may
correspond to a specific caching server in the resource cache.
Alternatively, the IP address can correspond to a hardware/software
selection component (such as a load balancer).
[0076] With reference now to FIG. 6, continuing with an
illustrative embodiment corresponding to FIGS. 5A and 5B, assume
that the DNS server component 124 shown in FIG. 5B has selected the
default resource cache component 126 of the POP 122. Upon receipt
of the IP address for the resource cache component 126, the client
computing device 102 transmits, as shown in FIG. 6, a request for
the requested content to the resource cache component 126. The
resource cache component 126 processes the request in a manner
described above and the requested content is transmitted to the
client computing device 102.
[0077] Alternatively, in another embodiment corresponding to FIG.
4, assume that the DNS server component 118 has selected a specific
resource cache component of another POP, such as POP 122 based on
the one or more criteria as described above. Upon receipt of the IP
address for the resource cache component 126 of the POP 122, the
client computing device 102 transmits, as shown in FIG. 6, a
request for the requested content to the resource cache component
126. The resource cache component 126 processes the request in a
manner described above and the requested content is transmitted to
the client computing device 102.
[0078] A selected resource cache component (either selected
directly by a POP receiving a DNS query as shown in FIG. 4 or as a
default upon selection of an alternative POP via an alternative
resource identifier as shown in FIGS. 5A and 5B) can process the
request by either providing the requested resource if it is
available or obtaining the requested resource from another source,
such as a peer cache server computing device or the origin server
112 of the content provider 104.
[0079] With reference now to FIG. 7, one embodiment of a POP
selection routine 702 implemented by the CDN provider 106 will be
described. One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that
actions/steps outlined for routine 702 may be implemented by one or
many computing devices/components that are associated with the CDN
service provider 106. Accordingly, routine 702 has been logically
associated as being generally performed by the CDN service provider
106, and thus the following illustrative embodiments should not be
construed as limiting.
[0080] At block 704, a DNS server component 118 at a first POP 116
of the CDN service provider 106 receives a DNS query corresponding
to a resource identifier from a client computing device 102. As
previously discussed, the resource identifier can be a URL that has
been embedded in content requested by the client computing device
102 and previously provided by the content provider 104.
Alternatively, the resource identifier can also correspond to a
CNAME provided by a content provider DNS server in response to a
DNS query previously received from the client computing device 102.
While not illustrated, the receiving DNS server also obtains, in
some embodiments, an IP address associated with the DNS query from
the requesting client computing device 102 ("query IP address").
The query IP address can correspond to an IP address of the client
computing device or any local DNS resolver component associated
with the client computing device.
[0081] Next, at decision block 706, the CDN service provider 106
determines whether it has exceeded a threshold content delivery
bandwidth at the first POP. As discussed above, the threshold
content delivery bandwidth is determined based, at least in part,
on CDN service provider cost information, which corresponds to a
financial cost to the CDN service provider 106 for content delivery
bandwidth. In particular, in one embodiment, assuming that the
first POP, or more specifically the DNS server component at the
first POP, receiving the DNS query is the optimal POP or DNS server
component for processing the DNS query, this determination at block
706 corresponds to a determination of whether the resource cache
component at the POP receiving the DNS query (which can correspond
to either a single cache server or a bank of cache servers at the
POP) is operating above a threshold content delivery bandwidth.
Continuing with this embodiment, the resource cache component at
the first POP can also be referred to as the default or optimal
resource cache component. In a further illustrative embodiment, the
threshold content delivery bandwidth is lower than a maximum
available content delivery bandwidth for the first POP or resource
cache component.
[0082] If the first POP or resource cache component has not
exceeded its threshold content delivery bandwidth, the CDN service
provider 106 responsively provides the client computing device 102
with an IP address of the default or optimal resource cache
component at the first POP at block 708. Thereafter, at block 716,
routine 702 ends. Alternatively, if at decision block 706, the
first POP or resource cache component has exceeded its threshold
content delivery bandwidth (which may be indicative, for example,
of the CDN service provider 106 incurring additional financial
costs to provide the requested content from the first POP or its
default resource cache component), the CDN service provider 106
determines whether a content provider corresponding to a domain
associated with the DNS query has exceeded a threshold network
usage at block 710.
[0083] If the content provider has not exceeded its threshold
network usage, the CDN service provider 106 responsively provides
the client computing device 102 with an IP address of the default
or optimal resource cache component of the first POP at block 710.
Thereafter, at block 716, routine 702 ends. Alternatively, if at
decision block 710, the content provider has exceeded its threshold
network usage (which may be indicative, for example, of the CDN
service provider incurring the burden of additional financial costs
above a pricing structure, such as a flat fee structure, offered to
the content provider), processing continues at block 712. As
described above, in an illustrative embodiment, the threshold
network usage is determined based, at least in part, on pricing
information for the CDN provider to provide content on behalf of
the content provider.
[0084] While the routine 702 illustrates making both determinations
at blocks 706 and 710, in another embodiment, the determination at
block 706 may be optional, while in a yet further alternative
embodiment, the determination at block 710 may be optional.
[0085] Continuing at block 712, if either or both of the
determinations at blocks 706 and 710 result in a "YES"
determination, the CDN service provider 106 selects an alternative
resource identifier associated with an alternative POP of the CDN
service provider 106 or an alternative cache IP address associated
with an alternative POP. In particular, in one illustrative
embodiment, where an alternative resource identifier is selected,
the CDN service provider 106 more specifically selects an
alternative resource identifier which would resolve to a particular
alternative DNS server at the alternative POP. In another
illustrative embodiment, where an alternative cache IP address is
selected, the CDN service provider 106 may select an alternative
cache IP address for a particular cache server of a resource cache
component at the alternative POP or generally for a group of cache
servers at the alternative POP. In this way, the CDN service
provider 106 directs further processing of the request to an
alternative POP of the CDN service provider.
[0086] Next, at block 714, the selected alternative resource
identifier or alternative cache IP address is transmitted to the
client in response to the obtained DNS query for further
processing. Thereafter, at block 716, routine 702 ends. In various
embodiments, routine 702 may be performed by the CDN service
provider 106 generally, or by DNS server components 118, 124 or
individual DNS servers associated with the DNS server components
118,124. The CDN service provider 106, DNS server components 118,
124, or individual DNS servers associated with the DNS server
component 118, 124 may themselves include or otherwise access a
service to implement the routine 702, such as the routing mode and
POP selection service 128 of FIG. 1. In other embodiments, a
physical computing device with computer executable instructions may
cause the computing device to perform routine 702. In some
embodiments of the routine 702, elements may occur in sequences
other than as described above. In addition, as noted above, some
elements of the routine may be optional, such as the determinations
at either block 706 or 710. One skilled in the art will appreciate
that additional variations are possible and within the scope of the
present disclosure.
[0087] With reference now to FIG. 8, one embodiment of a routing
mode selection routine 802 will be described. One skilled in the
relevant art will appreciate that actions/steps outlined for
routine 802 may be implemented by one or many computing
devices/components that are associated with the CDN service
provider 106. Accordingly, routine 802 has been logically
associated as being generally performed by the CDN service provider
106, and thus the following illustrative embodiments should not be
construed as limiting.
[0088] At block 804, a DNS server component 118 at a first POP 116
of the CDN service provider 106 receives a DNS query corresponding
to a resource identifier from a client computing device 102. As
previously discussed, the resource identifier can be a URL that has
been embedded in content requested by the client computing device
102 and previously provided by the content provider 104.
Alternatively, the resource identifier can also correspond to a
CNAME provided by a content provider DNS server in response to a
DNS query previously received from the client computing device 102.
While not illustrated, the receiving DNS server also obtains, in
some embodiments, an IP address associated with the DNS query from
the requesting client computing device 102 ("query IP address").
The query IP address can correspond to an IP address of the client
computing device or any local DNS resolver component associated
with the client computing device.
[0089] Next, at block 806, the CDN service provider 106
responsively determines a routing mode for the response to the DNS
query obtained at block 804. In some embodiments, this
determination can be made during DNS query processing as described
above with reference to FIGS. 4-5B. In various embodiments, a
spectrum of routing modes can exist that the CDN service provider
106 may determine during DNS query processing (e.g., at the DNS
server when the DNS query is obtained). A plurality of available
routing modes can include: a default routing mode, a sloppy routing
mode, a regional anycast routing mode, and an anycast routing mode.
The one or more criteria used in DNS query processing can be used
to determine the routing mode for providing the requested resource.
Accordingly, the response to the DNS query can be transmitted
and/or provided to the client 102 in accordance with the determined
routing mode.
[0090] With continuing reference to block 806, the CDN service
provider can determine an appropriate routing mode for providing
the requested resource. As discussed previously with reference to
FIG. 4 and in accordance with the present disclosure,
appropriateness can be defined in any manner by the CDN service
provider 106 for a variety of purposes. Illustratively, the one or
more criteria used to determine the routing mode can include a
susceptibility factor (also referred to as security factor) and the
latency criteria discussed above with reference to FIG. 4. In
various embodiments, the determination of an appropriate routing
mode from a spectrum of routing modes can be based at least in part
on a tradeoff between a susceptibility factor of a routing mode and
the latency for providing the requested resource with the routing
mode. For example, in one embodiment, the default routing mode can
be determined as the appropriate routing mode. The determination of
the optimal cache server may be a default based on the DNS query
already being routed to the optimal POP and received at the DNS
server component 118. The DNS server component 118, then, simply
provides an IP address of an associated cache server at that POP.
Alternatively, the DNS server component, upon receiving the DNS
query, may be associated with a cache server component, and then
selects from one of the cache servers of resource cache component
120 that may be the logically closest. Accordingly, in various
embodiments, the default routing mode can also be referred to as a
latency-based routing mode (e.g., a routing mode that provides an
optimal cache server, minimizing latency when providing the
requested resource). Still further, in another embodiment, this
latency-based routing mode can be referred to as a minimal
latency-based routing mode that minimizes the latency when
providing the requested resources on behalf of the content provider
104. As one of skill in the art can appreciate, these examples
illustrate how the default routing mode can offer an optimal cache
server at the POP location receiving the DNS query or route the
response to a DNS query using a cache IP address associated with an
optimal cache server. While this optimal cache server minimizes
latency, this default routing mode may, however, provide less
security. But, at the same time, this default routing mode may
provide less security because a single specific cache server is
typically the optimal cache server and thus may have a higher
susceptibility factor given those security concerns. For example,
in one embodiment, because the optimal cache server is associated
with a pre-specified IP address, the specific IP address could be
leaked or easily discernible to outside parties, which raises the
security concerns associated with that optimal cache server.
[0091] In contrast, the anycast routing mode uses a selected
anycast IP address (e.g., a cache IP address or destination IP
address) to process resource requests. An anycast IP address (e.g.,
a global IP address that may be randomly assigned to available
cache servers) can be associated or shared by several cache servers
that can provide the requested resource. Because several cache
servers can service the requested resource, the susceptibility
factor of the anycast routing mode is lower than the default
routing mode. For example, by providing a DNS server component at
the CDN service provider with an option to determine an appropriate
routing mode in which to respond to a DNS query, the DNS server
component may select the anycast routing mode to provide enhanced
security, as compared to the default routing mode. Such a
determination offers enhanced security because an original cache
server that would service the resource request in a default routing
mode can be quickly changed to a secondary cache server (e.g.,
another cache server) associated with a shared anycast IP address
(e.g., a randomly assigned global IP address), if a security
concern is discovered to be associated with the POP or DNS server
component receiving the DNS query, and hence the original default
cache server corresponding to that POP. But, at the same time, such
a secondary cache server can be more geographically distant (e.g.,
traveling through intercontinental optical cables) from the client
102, and thus incurring a higher latency, especially when compared
with the default routing mode that uses the optimal cache server.
In one embodiment, the anycast routing mode, as discussed herein,
may correspond to traditional anycast routing as known to those of
skill in the art.
[0092] In another embodiment of determining the appropriate routing
mode at block 806, a content provider can be assigned a
susceptibility factor that relates to the security concerns of each
available routing mode. For example, a content provider 104 (e.g.,
a customer of the CDN service provider 106) that has its content
typically served by the CDN service provider 106 in a geographical
location (e.g., region with less security) can have an increased
susceptibility factor in a default routing mode. Instead, the
anycast routing mode can be determined as the appropriate routing
mode to offer enhanced security as an anycast IP address is
associated with several cache servers via randomly assigned global
IP address. Thus, in contrast to a specific optimal cache server
associated with a pre-specified IP address that may be leaked,
there are many available cache servers in the anycast routing mode
for providing responsive content which are not individually
designated and hence specifically targeted. Accordingly, the
susceptibility factors may bias the determination of the
appropriate routing mode in favor of the anycast routing mode
because the anycast routing mode can provide enhanced security. In
contrast, a default cache IP address stored at a DNS server may be
more easily discernible as it is individually pre-designated.
[0093] In another example, a regional anycast routing mode can be
determined as the appropriate routing mode, at block 806. In some
embodiments, the CDN service provider 106 may consider the security
factor like the anycast routing mode, but additionally consider the
latency factor. This can be undertaken when the one or more
criteria indicate that a susceptibility factor is to be associated
with the plurality of available routing modes, but also the latency
factor associated with the plurality of available routing modes.
Continuing in this example, the regional anycast routing mode can
be used to route the response to the DNS query so that several
cache servers are available with a regional IP address (e.g., a
regional IP address can be randomly assigned and associated with
several cache servers in a region) used to service the request,
thereby enhancing security. This determination can be made
dynamically at the DNS server component 118 or it can have been
considered by a central computing component of the CDN service
provider 106, which, in turn, provides a list of available cache
servers from which the DNS server component 118 can select from.
Thus, the one or more criteria can in part dictate, or de facto,
determine a routing mode for providing the requested resource.
[0094] In another example, a particular DNS resolver may service a
diverse set of client computing devices 102, such as clients that
are located in multiple different geographic regions. Such a
resolver is hereinafter referred to as a diverse DNS resolver. In
this example, since the clients are geographically diverse, some
clients' resource requests may experience more latency than others
being serviced by the same DNS resolver. With this information, the
CDN service provider 106 may determine that a regional anycast
routing mode may be the appropriate routing mode for providing the
requested resource at block 806. The regional anycast routing mode
corresponds to a modified version of an anycast routing mode which
utilizes a one-to-many network routing schema, but in this instance
the one-to-many network routing schema is limited by region, such
as a geographic region. In particular, a regional one-to-many
network routing schema provides that a specific POP, DNS server
component 118, or resource cache component in a particular region
will receive the request as a function of network topology in that
region. For example, in a regional anycast implementation, a
request issued by a client computing device 102 to a shared IP
address will arrive at a POP, DNS server component 118, or resource
cache component logically having the shortest network topology
distance, often referred to as network hops, from the client
computing device. The network topology distance does not
necessarily correspond to geographic distance. However, in some
embodiments, the network topology distance can be inferred to be
the shortest network distance between a client computing device 102
and a POP, DNS server component, or resource cache component.
[0095] As a further specific example, the regional anycast routing
mode can involve the selection of a cache IP address from a
grouping or list of cache IP addresses or anycast node locations
that are located within a certain geographical and/or regional
location of the nodes (e.g., U.S. East Coast, U.S. West Coast,
Canada, or Southeast Asia). In other embodiments, the CDN service
provider 106 can select a cache IP address from a list of IP
addresses that are associated with a location of nodes in a region
specified by the CDN service provider 106. Accordingly, the CDN
service provider 106 can specify certain nodes located in one
geographical area (e.g., U.S. West Coast). In some embodiments,
such a list may not include an IP address that is deemed unsecure
(e.g., an IP address corresponding to a cache server that, due to
security concerns, cannot provide requested resources). For
example, in some embodiments, financial content such as credit card
information may need to be routed with a routing mode offering
higher security. In other embodiments, an unsecure IP address may
be an anycast IP address that has been leaked, thereby making
security a concern for that particular IP address.
[0096] In yet another example of determining the appropriate
routing mode at block 806, the CDN service provider 106 may select
a sloppy routing mode. As further described above, a sloppy routing
mode can be used to service content requests from a suboptimal POP
if, for example, if the original provider of the specifically
requested content (e.g., the original content provider for that
content) has exceeded a threshold network usage or if the CDN
service provider 106 has exceeded a threshold content delivery
bandwidth at data links of cache servers servicing requests for
content originally provided by the content provider 104.
Accordingly, in various embodiments, the determined routing mode
can be the sloppy routing mode.
[0097] In one embodiment, as described above, the response to a DNS
query utilizing this sloppy routing approach can be either: an
alternative resource identifier (e.g., a CNAME) associated with an
alternative DNS component at an alternative POP of the CDN service
provider or an IP address of a resource cache component (e.g., a
cache server) at the alternative POP (e.g., second POP 122). In
this approach, the response to the DNS query may be routed to one
of several cache servers that may be available at the alternative
POP (or even several alternative POPs). In addition, in this
embodiment, because the response to the DNS query may be routed to
one of several cache servers at the alternative POP, the sloppy
routing mode can enhance security because several cache servers are
available, rather than one cache server (e.g., the optimal cache
server that minimizes latency). In contrast to a default routing
mode that may only route the response to a DNS query to one cache
server (e.g., a default and/or optimal cache server that can
minimize the latency in providing the requested resource) at the
POP that received the DNS query, the slopping routing mode can
provide enhanced security by routing the response to the DNS query
to an alternative cache server at an alternative POP. Further, the
sloppy routing mode selection allows the CDN service provider 106
to allocate or direct the response of the DNS query within the
network of the CDN service provider 106, for example, to an
alternative POP (e.g., second POP 122), which may minimize latency
in servicing the resource request when compared to an anycast
routing mode. Thus, the CDN service provider 106 can minimize
latency by analyzing the request handling capacity of alternative
POPs available to provide the requested resource. Accordingly, a
sloppy routing mode selection can take into account both minimizing
the latency when providing the requested resource and a
susceptibility factor by providing enhanced security when providing
the requested resource.
[0098] In various embodiments, information stored in pricing data
store 130 can also be used as the one or more criteria to determine
an appropriate routing mode. For example, one pricing structure may
dictate that a flat-rate price is available for the default routing
mode, a flat-rate price is available for the sloppy routing mode,
and another flat-rate price is available for the regional anycast
routing mode. Using this data from pricing data store 130 and the
network usage, the back-end processing service 132 can determine
whether a content provider 104 has exceeded their threshold network
usage for a particular routing mode at a particular pricing
structure. As one of skill in the art can appreciate, various
routing modes are available when the one or more criteria are used
in combination with a pricing structure (e.g., a price at which the
CDN service provider 106 provides content on behalf of the content
provider 104). For example, a content provider 104 can pay more for
the CDN service provider 106 to determine whether a more secure
routing mode is available for certain resource requests (e.g.,
resource requests with financial information). In this example, the
back-end processing service 132 can determine that a regional
anycast routing mode is available with less latency than an anycast
routing mode, but also with more security than a default routing
mode because the susceptibility factor of the DNS cache server
servicing a particular content provider 104 is high.
[0099] In addition to the example criteria noted above, the one or
more criteria can also include utilizing information obtained from
the DNS query, at least in part, to identify the more appropriate
routing mode. This information may include a domain associated with
the content provider 104. This information may also include client
subnet information associated with content provider 104. This
information can be used to determine the routing mode.
[0100] Next, at block 808, in response to the obtained DNS query,
the selected alternative resource identifier or selected cache IP
address is transmitted to the client in accordance with the
determined routing mode. For example, if the determined routing
mode is the regional anycast routing mode, the selected IP cache
address (e.g., selected from a list of IP addresses associated with
a location of nodes in a region specified by the CDN service
provider 106) can be provided and/or transmitted to the client 102
in accordance with the regional anycast routing mode. Thus, an IP
address can be selected that is associated with a location of nodes
on the US West Coast for example. Thereafter, at block 810, routine
802 ends.
[0101] In various embodiments, routine 802 may be performed by the
CDN service provider 106 generally, or by DNS server components
118, 124 or individual DNS servers associated with the DNS server
components 118,124. The CDN service provider 106, DNS server
components 118, 124, or individual DNS servers associated with the
DNS server component 118, 124 may themselves include or otherwise
access a service to implement the routine 802, such as the routing
mode and POP selection service 128 of FIG. 1. In other embodiments,
a physical computing device with computer executable instructions
may cause the computing device to perform routine 802. In some
embodiments of the routine 802, elements may occur in sequences
other than as described above. One skilled in the art will
appreciate that additional variations are possible and within the
scope of the present disclosure.
[0102] With reference now to FIG. 9, an alternative embodiment of a
POP selection routine 902 will be described. One skilled in the
relevant art will appreciate that actions/steps outlined for
routine 902 may be implemented by one or many computing
devices/components that are associated with the CDN service
provider 106. Accordingly, routine 902 has been logically
associated as being generally performed by the CDN service provider
106, and thus the following illustrative embodiments should not be
construed as limiting.
[0103] At block 904, a DNS server component 118 at a first POP 116
of the CDN service provider 106 receives a DNS query corresponding
to a resource identifier from a client computing device 102. As
previously discussed, the resource identifier can be a URL that has
been embedded in content requested by the client computing device
102 and previously provided by the content provider 104.
Alternatively, the resource identifier can also correspond to a
CNAME provided by a content provider DNS server in response to a
DNS query previously received from the client computing device 102.
While not illustrated, the receiving DNS server also obtains, in
some embodiments, an IP address associated with the DNS query from
the requesting client computing device 102 ("query IP address").
The query IP address can correspond to an IP address of the client
computing device or any local DNS resolver component associated
with the client computing device.
[0104] Next, at decision block 906, the CDN service provider 106
determines whether a content provider 104 corresponding to a domain
associated with the DNS query is available. For example, the
content provider 104 may be available if the content provider 104
has available network usage (e.g., network usage not exceeding a
threshold network usage) or if no security concerns exist with
providing content of the content provider. However, the content
provider 104 may not be available if the content provider 104 has
exceeded a threshold network usage or if security concerns exist
regarding the provision of content originally provided by the
content provider 104. For example, a cache server at the resource
cache component 120 that is providing requested resources in
accordance with a default routing mode for the content provider 104
may be unavailable due to security concerns associated with
providing content of the content provider 104. In other
embodiments, a content provider 104 may be physically located in a
region or location more susceptible to security concerns and thus
can have an increased susceptibility factor associated with the
default routing mode. Accordingly, the optimal cache server,
physically located in that same region or location, that is
providing requested resources in accordance with a default routing
mode for a particular content provider 104 may be unavailable due
to security concerns associated with providing content of that
particular content provider 104. In one embodiment, the CDN service
provider 106 can determine the susceptibility factor for the
content provider 104 associated with each available routing mode of
a plurality of routing modes. In the depicted alternative
embodiment of the POP selection routine 902, the available routing
modes are: the default routing mode, the sloppy routing mode, and
the anycast routing mode.
[0105] If the content provider 104 is available (i.e., the CDN
service provider determines that content originally provided by the
content provider 104 is available to be provided based on one or
more criteria), the CDN service provider 106, responsive to the DNS
query, provides and transmits to the client computing device 102 an
IP address of the default or optimal resource cache component of
the first POP at block 908in accordance with the default routing
mode. In this embodiment, the resource cache component at the first
POP can also be referred to as the default or optimal resource
cache component. Thereafter, at block 918, routine 902 ends.
Alternatively, if at decision block 906, the content provider is
not available, processing continues at decision block 910.
[0106] At decision block 910, the CDN service provider 106
determines whether an alternative POP is available. This decision
can include determining an appropriate routing mode from the
remaining available routing modes: the sloppy routing mode and the
anycast routing mode. For example, as described above with
reference to FIG. 8, an alternative POP may be available if a list
of IP addresses at the DNS server 118 includes alternative cache IP
addresses associated with alternative POPs. If an alternative POP
is not available (e.g., because the list of IP addresses does not
include alternative POP locations or cache IP addresses associated
with alternative POPs), at block 912, the CDN service provider 106
responsively provides and transmits to the client computing device
102 an IP address in accordance with the anycast routing mode. In
another embodiment not depicted in FIG. 9, the CDN service provider
106 responsively provides and transmits to the client computing
device 102 an IP address in accordance with the regional anycast
routing mode. In this embodiment, the IP address can be selected in
accordance with the determined routing mode as described above with
reference to FIG. 8. Thereafter, at block 918, routine 902
ends.
[0107] While the routine 902 illustrates making both determinations
at blocks 906 and 910, in another embodiment, the determination at
block 906 may be optional; while in a yet further alternative
embodiment, the determination at block 910 may be optional. For
example, in various embodiments, routine 902 can proceed from
decision block 906, if the content provider is not available, to
block 912, where the CDN service provider 106 responsively provides
and transmits to the client computing device 102 an IP address in
accordance with the anycast routing mode. Or, in another optional
embodiment not depicted in FIG. 9, the CDN service provider 106 can
responsively provide and transmit to the client computing device
102 an IP address in accordance with the regional anycast routing
mode.
[0108] Continuing at block 914, if the content provider is not
available at decision block 906 and an alternative POP is available
at block 910, the CDN service provider 106 selects an alternative
resource identifier associated with an alternative POP of the CDN
service provider 106 or an alternative cache IP address associated
with an alternative POP. In particular, in one illustrative
embodiment, where an alternative resource identifier is selected,
the CDN service provider 106 more specifically selects an
alternative resource identifier which would resolve to a particular
alternative DNS server at the alternative POP. In another
illustrative embodiment, where an alternative cache IP address is
selected, the CDN service provider 106 may select an alternative
cache IP address for a particular cache server of a resource cache
component at the alternative POP or generally for a group of cache
servers at the alternative POP. In this way, the CDN service
provider 106 directs further processing of the request to an
alternative POP of the CDN service provider.
[0109] Next, at block 916, in response to selecting either an
alternative resource identifier or an alternative cache IP address
at block 914, the selected alternative resource identifier or
alternative cache IP address is transmitted to the client in
response to the obtained DNS query for further processing in
accordance with the sloppy routing mode. Thereafter, at block 918,
routine 902 ends.
[0110] In various embodiments, routine 902 may be performed by the
CDN service provider 106 generally, or by DNS server components
118, 124 or individual DNS servers associated with the DNS server
components 118,124. The CDN service provider 106, DNS server
components 118, 124, or individual DNS servers associated with the
DNS server component 118, 124 may themselves include or otherwise
access a service to implement the routine 902, such as the routing
mode and POP selection service 128 of FIG. 1. In other embodiments,
a physical computing device with computer executable instructions
may cause the computing device to perform routine 902. In some
embodiments of the routine 902, elements may occur in sequences
other than as described above. In addition, as noted above, some
elements of the routine may be optional, such as the determinations
at either block 906 or 910. One skilled in the art will appreciate
that additional variations are possible and within the scope of the
present disclosure.
[0111] Depending on the embodiment, certain acts, events, or
functions of any of the methods described herein can be performed
in a different sequence, can be added, merged, or left out
altogether (e.g., not all described acts or events are necessary
for the practice of the algorithm). Moreover, in certain
embodiments, acts or events can be performed concurrently, e.g.,
through multi-threaded processing, interrupt processing, or
multiple processors or processor cores or on other parallel
architectures, rather than sequentially.
[0112] The various illustrative logical blocks, modules, and method
elements described in connection with the embodiments disclosed
herein can be implemented as electronic hardware, computer
software, or combinations of both. To clearly illustrate this
interchangeability of hardware and software, various illustrative
components, blocks, modules, and steps have been described above
generally in terms of their functionality. Whether such
functionality is implemented as hardware or software depends upon
the particular application and design constraints imposed on the
overall system. The described functionality can be implemented in
varying ways for each particular application, but such
implementation decisions should not be interpreted as causing a
departure from the scope of the disclosure.
[0113] The various illustrative logical blocks and modules
described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein can
be implemented or performed by a machine, such as a general purpose
processor, a digital signal processor (DSP), an application
specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field programmable gate array
(FPGA) or other programmable logic device, discrete gate or
transistor logic, discrete hardware components, or any combination
thereof designed to perform the functions described herein. A
general purpose processor can be a microprocessor, but in the
alternative, the processor can be a controller, microcontroller, or
state machine, combinations of the same, or the like. A processor
can also be implemented as a combination of computing devices,
e.g., a combination of a DSP and a microprocessor, a plurality of
microprocessors, one or more microprocessors in conjunction with a
DSP core, or any other such configuration.
[0114] The elements of a method, process, or algorithm described in
connection with the embodiments disclosed herein can be embodied
directly in hardware, in a software module executed by a processor,
or in a combination of the two. A software module can reside in RAM
memory, flash memory, ROM memory, EPROM memory, EEPROM memory,
registers, hard disk, a removable disk, a CD-ROM, or any other form
of computer-readable storage medium known in the art. A storage
medium can be coupled to the processor such that the processor can
read information from, and write information to, the storage
medium. In the alternative, the storage medium can be integral to
the processor. The processor and the storage medium can reside in
an ASIC. The ASIC can reside in a user terminal. In the
alternative, the processor and the storage medium can reside as
discrete components in a user terminal.
[0115] Conditional language used herein, such as, among others,
"can," "might," "may," "e.g." and the like, unless specifically
stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as
used, is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments
include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features,
elements and/or states. Thus, such conditional language is not
generally intended to imply that features, elements and/or states
are in any way required for one or more embodiments or that one or
more embodiments necessarily include logic for deciding, with or
without author input or prompting, whether these features, elements
and/or states are included or are to be performed in any particular
embodiment. The terms "comprising," "including," "having,"
"involving" and the like are synonymous and are used inclusively,
in an open-ended fashion, and do not exclude additional elements,
features, acts, operations and so forth. Also, the term "or" is
used in its inclusive sense (and not in its exclusive sense) so
that when used, for example, to connect a list of elements, the
term "or" means one, some, or all of the elements in the list.
[0116] Disjunctive language such as the phrase "at least one of X,
Y, or Z," unless specifically stated otherwise, is otherwise
understood with the context as used in general to present that an
item, term, etc., may be either X, Y, or Z, or any combination
thereof (e.g., X, Y and/or Z). Thus, such disjunctive language is
not generally intended to, and should not, imply that certain
embodiments require at least one of X, at least one of Y or at
least one of Z to each be present.
[0117] Unless otherwise explicitly stated, articles such as "a" or
"an" should generally be interpreted to include one or more
described items. Accordingly, phrases such as "a device configured
to" are intended to include one or more recited devices. Such one
or more recited devices can also be collectively configured to
carry out the stated recitations. For example, "a processor
configured to carry out recitations A, B, and C" can include a
first processor configured to carry out recitation A working in
conjunction with a second processor configured to carry out
recitations B and C.
[0118] While the above detailed description has shown, described,
and pointed out novel features as applied to various embodiments,
it will be understood that various omissions, substitutions, and
changes in the form and details of the devices or algorithms
illustrated can be made without departing from the spirit of the
disclosure. As will be recognized, certain embodiments described
herein can be embodied within a form that does not provide all of
the features and benefits set forth herein, as some features can be
used or practiced separately from others. All changes which come
within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be
embraced within their scope.
* * * * *
References