U.S. patent application number 16/651595 was filed with the patent office on 2020-08-13 for visibility improving film for display panel and display device comprising same.
This patent application is currently assigned to LG CHEM, LTD.. The applicant listed for this patent is LG CHEM, LTD.. Invention is credited to Jin Seok BYUN, Yeong Rae CHANG, Han Na LEE, Kwangseok SEO, Yun U SHIN.
Application Number | 20200257021 16/651595 |
Document ID | 20200257021 / US20200257021 |
Family ID | 1000004825236 |
Filed Date | 2020-08-13 |
Patent Application | download [pdf] |
United States Patent
Application |
20200257021 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
SEO; Kwangseok ; et
al. |
August 13, 2020 |
VISIBILITY IMPROVING FILM FOR DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
COMPRISING SAME
Abstract
The present invention relates to a visibility improving film for
a display panel and a display device including the same. More
specifically, the present invention relates to a visibility
improving film for a display panel capable of exhibiting excellent
physical and optical properties particularly while improving the
visibility of a laser pointer, by including fine metal particles
dispersed in the photocurable resin layer, and to a display device
including the same.
Inventors: |
SEO; Kwangseok; (Daejeon,
KR) ; LEE; Han Na; (Daejeon, KR) ; CHANG;
Yeong Rae; (Daejeon, KR) ; BYUN; Jin Seok;
(Daejeon, KR) ; SHIN; Yun U; (Daejeon,
KR) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
LG CHEM, LTD. |
Seoul |
|
KR |
|
|
Assignee: |
LG CHEM, LTD.
Seoul
KR
|
Family ID: |
1000004825236 |
Appl. No.: |
16/651595 |
Filed: |
September 28, 2018 |
PCT Filed: |
September 28, 2018 |
PCT NO: |
PCT/KR2018/011566 |
371 Date: |
March 27, 2020 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
1/1 |
Current CPC
Class: |
G02B 1/111 20130101;
G02B 5/20 20130101; G02B 1/04 20130101; B32B 17/10 20130101; G02B
1/18 20150115; B32B 27/08 20130101; B32B 7/02 20130101 |
International
Class: |
G02B 1/04 20060101
G02B001/04; B32B 17/10 20060101 B32B017/10; B32B 27/08 20060101
B32B027/08; B32B 7/02 20060101 B32B007/02; G02B 5/20 20060101
G02B005/20; G02B 1/111 20060101 G02B001/111; G02B 1/18 20060101
G02B001/18 |
Foreign Application Data
Date |
Code |
Application Number |
Sep 29, 2017 |
KR |
10-2017-0128261 |
Sep 27, 2018 |
KR |
10-2018-0115321 |
Claims
1. A visibility improving film for a display panel, comprising: a
substrate; and a photocurable resin layer that is provided on at
least one side of the substrate and in which fine metal particles
with a number average particle diameter of 0.5 to 5 .mu.m and a
flattening ratio of 0.5 or less are dispersed, wherein a relative
visibility evaluation value represented by the following Formula 1
is 3 or more: Visibility Evaluation Value=B1/A1 [Formula 1]
wherein, in the above Formula 1, A1 is a luminance value measured
on the front surface, when a film having a transmittance value of
70 to 100 as measured according to JIS 7136 and a haze value of 20
to 25 as measured according to JIS 7316 is bonded to a glass slide,
then placed on a backlight surface and irradiated with a laser
light at 45.degree. with respect to the normal direction, and B1 is
a luminance value measured from the front side, when the visibility
improving film for a display panel is bonded to a glass slide, then
placed on a backlight surface and irradiated with the same laser
light at 45.degree. with respect to the normal direction.
2. The visibility improving film for a display panel according to
claim 1, wherein a value of luminance ratio represented by the
following Formula 2 is 80% or more: Luminance Ratio=(B2/A2)*100
[Formula 2] wherein, in the above Formula 2, A2 is a luminance
value measured from the front side, when a film having a
transmittance value of 80 to 100 as measured according to JIS 7136
and a haze value of 20 to 25 as measured according to JIS 7316 is
bonded to a glass slide and then placed on a backlight surface, and
B2 is a luminance value measured from the front side, when the
visibility improving film for a display panel is bonded to a glass
slide and then placed on a backlight surface.
3. The visibility improving film for a display panel according to
claim 1, wherein a white turbidity value represented by the
following Formula 3 is 10 or less: White Turbidity=C*100 [Formula
3] wherein, in the above Formula 3, C is a luminance value
(cd/m.sup.2) measured at a height of 7 cm from the front side, when
the visibility improving film for a display panel is bonded to a
glass slide, then placed on a black acrylic plate and kept under
the condition of 9 1.times..
4. The visibility improving film for a display panel according to
claim 1, wherein a color difference value represented by the
following Formula 4 is 2 or less: Color Difference=|a*|+|b*|
[Formula 4] wherein, in the above Formula 4, a* and b* are exponent
values in the CIE 1976 L*a*b* color model, respectively.
5. The visibility improving film for a display panel according to
claim 1, wherein the fine metal particles include at least one
metal selected from aluminum, gold, silver, magnesium, platinum,
copper, titanium, zirconium, nickel, tin, silicon, and
chromium.
6. The visibility improving film for a display panel according to
claim 1, wherein the fine metal particles have a number average
particle diameter of 0.5 to 3 .mu.m and a flattening ratio of 0.3
or less.
7. The visibility improving film for a display panel according to
claim 1, wherein the fine metal particles are contained in an
amount of 0.5 to 15 parts by weight, based on 100 parts by weight
of the photocurable resin.
8. The visibility improving film for a display panel according to
claim 1, wherein the photocurable resin layer has a thickness of 1
to 50 .mu.m.
9. The visibility improving film for a display panel according to
claim 1, wherein the ratio of the number average particle diameter
of the fine metal particles to the thickness of the photocurable
resin layer is 0.5 or less.
10. The visibility improving film for a display panel according to
claim 1, wherein the haze value measured according to JIS 7316 is
20% or less.
11. The visibility improving film for a display panel according to
claim 1, wherein the light transmittance value (Tt) measured
according to JIS 7136 is 70% or more.
12. The visibility improving film for a display panel according to
claim 1, wherein it exhibits pencil hardness of HB or more at a
load of 500 g.
13. The visibility improving film for a display panel according to
claim 1, wherein the substrate includes at least one selected from
the glass, polyethylene terephthalate (PET), ethylene vinyl acetate
(EVA), a cyclic olefin polymer (COP), a cyclic olefin copolymer
(COC), polyacrylate (PAC), polycarbonate (PC), polyethylene (PE),
polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), polyetherether ketone (PEEK),
polyethylene naphthalate (PEN), polyetherimide (PEI), polyimide
(PI), MMA (methyl methacrylate), a fluorocarbon resin, and
triacetylcellulose (TAC).
14. A display device comprising a display panel and the visibility
improving film for a display panel of claim 1.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION(S)
[0001] This application is a 35 U.S.C. 371 National Phase Entry
Application from PCT/KR2018/011566, filed on Sep. 28, 2018,
designating the United States and which claims the benefits of
filing dates of Korean Patent Application No. 10-2017-0128261 filed
with Korean Intellectual Property Office on Sep. 29, 2017, and
Korean Patent Application No. 10-2018-0115321 filed with Korean
Intellectual Property Office on Sep. 27, 2018, the entire contents
of which are incorporated herein by reference.
[0002] The present invention relates to a visibility improving film
for a display panel and a display device including the same.
[0003] More specifically, the present invention relates to a
visibility improving film for a display panel capable of exhibiting
excellent optical properties such as luminance and contrast ratio
particularly while improving the visibility of a laser pointer, by
including fine metal particles having a specific size and shape,
and to a display device including the visibility improving film for
the display panel.
TECHNICAL FIELD
Background of the Invention
[0004] For a presentation in, for example, lectures, conferences,
or announcements, it is common for material images to be reproduced
using a display device and for the presenter to give a presentation
while pointing to a screen or the like using a laser pointer at a
certain position on a presentation image.
[0005] Conventionally, the presentation is often performed by
projecting material images on a screen or wall using a beam
projector. However, in the case of the projector system, there are
disadvantages in that the contrast ratio and image quality are not
good. Recently, a high number of large-sized display panels with
various driving methods such as LCDs, PDPs, and OLEDs have been
supplied, and thereby it is becoming possible o make presentations
by displaying images directly on the displays.
[0006] However, the display device has light emission
characteristics, and there is no factor that can scatter the laser
light in addition to specular reflection at a specific angle. This
causes a problem in that the visibility of the laser pointer is
remarkably deteriorated.
[0007] Therefore, there is still a need to develop a method for
improving the visibility of a laser pointer in a display device
without requiring excessive additional steps.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0008] The present invention provides a visibility improving film
for a display panel capable of exhibiting excellent physical and
optical properties while improving the visibility of a laser
pointer at a low cost in a display panel such as an LCD, a PDP, and
an OLED, and a display device including the same.
[0009] The present invention provides a visibility improving film
for a display panel, including:
[0010] a substrate; and
[0011] a photocurable resin layer that is provided on at least one
side of the substrate and in which fine metal particles with a
number average particle diameter of 0.5 to 5 .mu.m and a flattening
ratio of 0.5 or less are dispersed,
[0012] wherein a relative visibility evaluation value represented
by the following Formula 1 is 3 or more:
Visibility Evaluation Value=B1/A1 [Formula 1]
[0013] wherein, in the above Formula 1,
[0014] A1 is a luminance value measured from the front side, when a
film having a transmittance value of 70 to 100 as measured
according to JIS K 7361 and a haze value of 20 to 25 as measured
according to JIS K 7136 is bonded to a glass slide, then placed on
a backlight surface and irradiated with laser light at 45.degree.
with respect to the normal direction, and
[0015] B1 is a luminance value measured from the front side, when
the visibility improving film for a display panel is bonded to a
slide, then placed on a backlight surface and irradiated with the
same laser light at 45.degree. with respect to the normal
direction.
Advantageous Effects
[0016] The visibility improving film for a display panel according
to the present invention can remarkably improve the visibility of a
laser pointer, which is deteriorated on a display device.
[0017] Such an effect can be obtained by applying it in the form of
a film to the outside of the display panel without changing the
display driving method, the color filter inside the panel, the
laminated structure, or the like, and therefore production costs
can be reduced since excessive process modification or cost
increases are not required.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0018] The visibility improving film for a display panel according
to the present invention includes:
[0019] a substrate; and
[0020] a photocurable resin that is provided on at least one side
of the substrate and in which fine metal particles with a number
average particle diameter of 0.5 to 5 .mu.m and a flattening ratio
of 0.5 or less are dispersed,
[0021] wherein a relative visibility evaluation value represented
by the following Formula 1 is 3 or more:
Visibility Evaluation Value=B1/A1 [Formula 1]
[0022] wherein, in the above Formula 1,
[0023] A1 is a luminance value measured on the front surface, when
a film having a transmittance value of 70 to 100 as measured
according to JIS K 7361 and a haze value of 20 to 25 as measured
according to JIS K 7136 is bonded to a glass slide, then placed on
a backlight surface and irradiated with a laser light at 45.degree.
with respect to the normal direction, and
[0024] B1 is a luminance value measured from the front side, when
the visibility improving film for a display panel is bonded to a
glass slide, then placed on a backlight surface and irradiated with
the same laser light at 45.degree. with respect to the normal
direction.
[0025] In addition, the display device of the present invention
includes the display panel and the visibility improving film for
the display panel mounted on the display panel.
[0026] In the present invention, the term "upper surface" means a
surface arranged to face a viewer when the film is mounted on a
display panel, and the term "upper" means the direction directed
toward the viewer. Conversely, the term "lower surface" or "lower"
means a surface or a direction arranged to face a side opposite to
a viewer when the film is mounted on a display panel.
[0027] In the present invention, simply, the haze value or the
total haze value means a haze value (Ht) measured with respect to
the film itself without any further treatment on the film. The
total haze value (Ht) represents the sum of the haze value due to
the surface unevenness of the film and the haze value due to the
particles or the like contained in the film.
[0028] In the present invention, the transparent film is a film
including a transparent substrate and a transparent photocurable
layer, and means a transparent film having a total haze value (Ht)
described above of about 1% or less, or about 0 to 1% or less, and
preferably about 0 to about 0.5% or less. Specifically, the
transparent photocurable layer contained in the transparent film
does not contain fine particles therein, and has high transparency
and a very low haze value (Ht) as described above, and thus it may
be used to measure a relative luminance for the evaluation of the
visibility. Specifically, for example, it may be a concept
including a film corresponding to Comparative Example 13 of the
present invention.
[0029] Further, the terms used herein are used only to explain
illustrative examples, and are not intended to limit the invention.
A singular expression includes a plural expression unless clearly
meaning otherwise. It should be understood that the terms
"comprise", "include", and "have" as used herein are intended to
designate the presence of stated features, numbers, steps,
constitutional elements, or combinations thereof, but it should be
understood that they do not preclude the possibility of existence
or adding of one or more other features, numbers, steps,
constitutional, or combinations thereof.
[0030] Further, in the present invention, in case a layer or an
element is mentioned to be formed "on" or "above" another layer or
element, it means that the layer or element is directly formed on
the other layer or element, or it means that another layer or
element may be additionally formed between layers or on a subject
or substrate.
[0031] Since a variety of modification may be made to the present
invention and there may be various forms of the present invention,
specific examples are illustrated and will be described in detail
below. However, it should be understood that this is not intended
to limit the present invention to particular forms disclosed
herein, and the invention compasses all modifications, equivalents,
or alternatives falling within the spirit and technical scope of
the present invention.
[0032] Hereinafter, the visibility improving film for a display
panel and the display device including the same according to
embodiments of the present invention will be described in more
detail.
[0033] According to embodiments of the present invention, a
visibility improving film for a display panel is provided,
including:
[0034] a substrate; and
[0035] a photocurable resin layer that is provided on at least one
side of the substrate and in which fine metal particles with a
number average particle diameter of 0.5 to 5 .mu.m and a flattening
ratio of 0.5 or less are dispersed,
[0036] wherein a relative visibility evaluation value represented
by the following Formula 1 is 3 or more:
Visibility Evaluation Value=B1/A1 [Formula 1]
[0037] wherein, in the above Formula 1,
[0038] A1 is a luminance value measured on the front surface, when
a film having a transmittance value of 70 to 100 as measured
according to JIS K 7361 and a haze value of 20 to 25 as measured
according to JIS K 7136 is bonded to a glass slide, then placed on
a backlight surface and irradiated with a laser light at 45.degree.
with respect to the normal direction, and
[0039] B1 is a Luminance value measured from the front side, when
the visibility improving film for a display panel is bonded to a
glass slide, then placed on a backlight surface and irradiated with
the same laser light at 45.degree. with respect to the normal
direction.
[0040] The visibility improving film for a display panel formed by
using the coating composition according to the present invention
can exhibit characteristic refraction properties with respect to
light in a wavelength range used for a laser pointer, and thus can
contribute to improvement of the visibility of the laser
pointer.
[0041] Such a visibility improving film for a display panel
includes a cured product of a binder containing a photocurable
functional group and fine metal particles dispersed in the
photocurable binder.
[0042] Commonly used films for display panels include at least one
substrate selected from the group consisting of glass, a polyester
such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET), a polyethylene such as
ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA), a cyclic olefin polymer (COP), a
cyclic olefin copolymer (COC), polyacrylate (PAC), polycarbonate
(PC), polyethylene (PE), polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA),
polyetherether ketone (PEEK), polyethylene naphthalate (PEN),
polyetherimide (PEI), polyimide (PI), MMA (methyl methacrylate), a
fluorocarbon resin, triacetylcellulose (TAC), and the like.
[0043] Among these substrates, triacetylcellulose (TAC) films are
particularly excellent in optical properties and thus are
frequently used.
[0044] According to one embodiment of the invention, the
photocurable resin layer may be formed on one side or both sides of
the substrate. In particular, when the resin layer is formed so as
to be on the side of the upper portion of the substrate, that is,
in the direction of the viewer, the resin layer can also serve as a
hard coating layer.
[0045] According to one embodiment of the invention, a photocurable
resin layer is formed by coating and ultraviolet-curing on a
substrate, and a coating composition laminated on at least one side
of a display panel, which can be used for a visibility improving
film for a display panel, is used.
[0046] The coating composition for producing the visibility
improving film for a display panel of the present invention may
include: a binder containing a photocurable functional group; fine
metal particles dispersed in the binder and having a size of 0.5 to
5 .mu.m and a flattening ratio of 0.5 or less; a
photo-polymerization initiator; solvents; etc.
[0047] The binder containing the photo-curable functional group is
not particularly limited as long as it is a compound containing an
unsaturated functional group capable of causing a polymerization
reaction by ultraviolet rays, but it may be a compound containing a
(meth)acrylate group, an allyl group, an acryloyl group, or a vinyl
group as the photo-curable functional group. According to one
embodiment of the invention, the binder containing the
photo-curable functional group may be at least one selected from
the group consisting of a multifunctional acrylate-based monomer, a
multifunctional acrylate-based oligomer, and a multifunctional
acrylate-based elastic polymer.
[0048] In the present invention, the acrylate-based means not only
acrylates, but also methacrylates, or derivatives of acrylates or
methacrylates having substituents introduced therein.
[0049] The multifunctional acrylate-based monomer means a monomer
containing two or more acrylate-based functional groups. More
specific examples thereof may include hexanediol diacrylate (HDDA),
tripropylene glycol diacrylate (TPGDA), ethylene glycol diacrylate
(EGDA), trimethylolpropane triacrylate (TMPTA), trimethylolpropane
ethoxy triacrylate (TMPEOTA), glycerin propoxylated triacrylate
(GPTA), pentaerythritol tri(tetra)acrylate (PETA),
dipentaerythritol hexaacrylate (DPHA), or the like, but the coating
composition of the present invention is not limited thereto. The
multifunctional acrylate-based monomer performs a role of providing
certain pencil strength and abrasion resistance to the film by
being cross-linked.
[0050] The multifunctional acrylate-based monomer may be used
either alone or as a combination of different types.
[0051] The multifunctional acrylate-based oligomer is an oligomer
having two or more acrylate functional groups, and may have a
weight average molecular weight in a range of about 1000 to about
10,000 g/mol about 1000 to about 5000 g/mol, or about 1000 to about
3000 g/mol.
[0052] Further, according to one embodiment of the present
invention, the multifunctional acrylate-based oligomer may be an
acrylate-based oligomer modified with one or more types of
urethane, ethylene oxide, propylene oxide, or caprolactone. When
using the modified multifunctional acrylate-based oligomer,
flexibility is further imparted to the multifunctional
acrylate-based oligomer due to modification and thus a curl
property and flexibility of a protective film can be increased.
[0053] The multifunctional acrylate-based oligomer may be used
either alone or as a combination of different types.
[0054] The multifunctional acrylate-based elastic polymer is
excellent in flexibility and elasticity, and is a polymer
containing two or more acrylate functional groups, which may have a
weight average molecular weight ranging from about 100,000 to about
800,000 g/mol from about 150,000 to about 700,000 g/mol, or from
about 180,000 to about 650,000 g/mol.
[0055] A protective film formed by using a coating composition
including the multifunctional acrylate-based elastic polymer may
secure high elasticity or flexibility while securing mechanical
properties, and may minimize curl or crack occurrences.
[0056] Another example of the multifunctional acrylate-based
elastic polymer may include a urethane-based acrylate polymer. The
urethane-based acrylate polymer has a form of a urethane-based
acrylate oligomer being linked to an acrylic polymer main chain as
a side branch.
[0057] Meanwhile, according to one embodiment of the present
invention, the coating composition can exhibit light scattering
properties of a laser pointer by including fine metal particles.
When the coating composition includes fine metal particles, the
photocurable resin layer cured by using this can effectively
scatter a laser light used for the laser pointer, thereby improving
the visibility.
[0058] Generally, when producing a film or the like for a display
panel, inorganic fine particles such as organic particles or metal
oxides are often used in the coating composition or the like. This
is because the corresponding particles have high transmittance.
[0059] Such transmissive particles and the like cause light
scattering mainly by refraction and diffraction, while the metal
particles reflect light. More specifically, in the case of the
transmissive particles, light scattering due to diffraction and
refraction occurs consecutively along the path along which the
light travels. Consequently, the light spreads and cloudy light
appears. However, in the case of metal particles, since light
scattering occurs due to reflection without transmitting light,
light scattering does not occur consecutively along the path along
which the light travels, and the light spreading phenomenon does
not occur.
[0060] In particular, when metal oxide-based inorganic particles
such as titanium dioxide (TiO.sub.2) particles having a different
refractive index from that of the binder are used, a high light
scattering effect can be obtained, but there is a disadvantage that
the contrast ratio is greatly lowered due to high transmittance of
the particles.
[0061] The contrast ratio of the display device is caused by the
difference between the brightness of the image coming from the
display panel and the brightness difference due to the film. In the
case of using the transmissive particles, the brightness in the
film is increased by the particles, and eventually, the difference
in brightness between the panel and film becomes low and thus the
contrast ratio is lowered.
[0062] Therefore, the film for a display panel according to the
embodiment of the present invention can improve the visibility of
laser pointer light by using the fine metal particles, and at the
same time, realize a high contrast ratio.
[0063] The number average particle diameter of the fine metal
particles may be about 0.5 .mu.m or more from the viewpoint of
optimizing the light scattering effect, and in order to make haze
and coating thickness appropriate, it can be a particle with a size
of 5 .mu.m or less, more preferably about 0.5 to about 3 .mu.m, or
about 1 to about 3 .mu.m.
[0064] When the particle size of the fine metal particles is too
small, the effect of improving the visibility of a laser pointer
light due to scattering of light may be insignificant, and when the
particle diameter of the fine metal particles is too large, a
protrusion is formed on the surface of the film, which may cause a
decrease in optical properties such as transparency and
transmittance.
[0065] More specific examples of metals satisfying these conditions
include at least one metal selected from the group consisting of
aluminum, gold, silver, magnesium, platinum, copper, titanium,
zirconium, nickel, tin, silicon, and chromium, or an alloy thereof,
but the present invention is not necessarily limited thereto.
[0066] According to one embodiment of the present invention, when
the total weight of the binder containing a photocurable functional
group is taken as 100 parts by weight, the fine metal particles may
be contained in an amount of about 0.5 to about 15 parts by weight,
preferably about 1 to about 15 parts by weight, or about 1 to about
10 parts by weight.
[0067] When the fine metal particles are contained in an
excessively small amount, the light reflection effect at the
corresponding wavelength is insignificant and thus the effect of
improving the visibility of the laser pointer may not be
sufficient. When the fine metal particles are contained in an
excessively large amount, color reproducibility and luminance of
the display device may be lowered, and other physical properties of
the coating composition may be deteriorated. In this respect, it is
preferable to be included in the above range.
[0068] In this case, the fine metal particles are spherical
particles having a number average particle size of 0.5 to 5 .mu.m
and a flattening ratio of 0.5 or less.
[0069] The "flattening ratio" is referred to as ellipticity, and is
the amount indicating the degree of flatness of a three-dimensional
rotating ellipsoid. It is a value represented by (a-b)/a when the
long diameter is a and the short radius is b. The flattening ratio
of a sphere is 0, and the flattening ratio of a plane is 1.
[0070] When the value of the flattening ratio is too large (in the
case of plate-like particles), the light reflection/scattering due
to the metal particles inside the film excessively occurs, and it
cannot be suitable for display film applications due to the
sparkling appearance and this may cause a problem that the white
turbidity increases and thus contrast ratio is lowered.
[0071] In this respect, it is more preferable that the value of the
flattening ratio of the fine metal particles used in the present
invention is about 0.3 or less.
[0072] Meanwhile, these fine metal particles may be used alone, but
when mixed in the photocurable resin layer, it may be more
preferable to use them in a form in which they are previously
dispersed in the dispersion in terms of enhancing the
dispersibility.
[0073] Examples of the photo-polymerization initiator contained in
the coating composition of the present invention may include, but
are not limited to, 1-hydroxy-cyclohexyl-phenyl ketone,
2-hydroxy-2-methyl-1-phenyl-1-propanone,
2-hydroxy-1-[4-(2-hydroxyethoxy)phenyl]-2-methyl-1-propanone,
methyl benzoylformate,
.alpha.,.alpha.-dimethoxy-.alpha.-phenylacetophenone,
2-benzoyl-2-(dimethylamino)-1-[4-(4-morpholinyl)phenyl]-1-butanone,
2-methyl-1-[4-(methylthio)phenyl]-2-(4-morpholinyl)-1-propanone
diphenyl(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl)-phosphine oxide, and
bis(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl)-phenylphosphine oxide, and the like. In
addition, examples of products now commercially available may
include Irgacure 184, Irgacure 500, Irgacure 651, Irgacure 369,
Irgacure 907, Darocur 1173, Darocur MBF, Irgacure 819, Darocur TPO,
Irgacure 907, Esacure KIP 100F, or the like. These
photo-polymerization initiators may be used alone or in combination
of two or more kinds.
[0074] According to one embodiment of the present invention, the
content of the photo-polymerization initiator is not particularly
limited, but it may be used in an amount of about 0.1 to 10 parts
by weight, based on 100 parts by weight of the total weight of the
binder containing the photocurable functional group, without
deteriorating physical properties of the total coating
composition.
[0075] The organic solvent contained in the coating composition of
the present invention may be an alcohol solvent such as methanol,
ethanol, isopropyl alcohol, and butanol; an alkoxy alcohol solvent
such as 2-methoxyethanol, 2-ethoxyethanol, and
1-methoxy-2-propanol; a ketone solvent such as acetone,
methylethylketone, methylisobutyl ketone, methylpropyl ketone, and
cyclohexanone; an ether solvent such as propylene glycol
monopropylether, propylene glycol monomethyl ether, ethylene glycol
monethylether, ethylene glycol monopropylether, ethylene glycol
monobutylether, diethylene glycol monomethylether,
diethylglycolmonoethylether, diethylglycolmonopropylether,
diethylglycolmonobutylether, diethylene glycol-2-ethylhexyl ether;
an aromatic solvent such as benzene, toluene, and xylene; and they
may be used alone or in combination thereof.
[0076] According to one embodiment of the present invention, the
content of the organic solvent may be variously adjusted within a
range that does not deteriorate the physical properties of the
coating composition, but the organic solvent may be used in an
amount of about 50 to about 200 parts by weight, preferably about
100 to about 200 parts by weight, based on 100 parts by weight of
the binder containing the photocurable functional group. When the
amount of organic solvent is within the above ranges, it may exert
appropriate fluidity and coatability.
[0077] Meanwhile, the coating composition of the present invention
may further include an additive commonly used in the art to which
the present invention pertains, such as a surfactant, an
antioxidant, a UV stabilizer, a leveling agent, or an antifouling
agent, in addition to the above-described components. Here, the
content thereof may be variously adjusted within a range that does
not deteriorate the physical properties of the coating composition
of the present invention. Thus, there is no particular limitation
thereto, but for example, it may be included in an amount of about
0.1 to about 10 parts by weight based on 100 parts by weight of the
total coating composition.
[0078] According to one embodiment of the present invention, the
photocurable resin layer formed by using the coating composition
may have a thickness of at least about 1 .mu.m, for example, about
1 to about 50 .mu.m, about 5 to about 30 .mu.m, or about 5 to about
20 .mu.m, after drying and curing. Appropriate optical and physical
properties can be exhibited within the thickness range as
above.
[0079] Accordingly, the ratio of the number average particle
diameter of the fine metal particles to the thickness of the
photocurable resin layer may preferably be about 0.5 or less.
[0080] The visibility improving film for a display panel of the
present invention as described above can be formed by coating a
coating composition onto a transparent plastic substrate and
photo-curing the coating composition.
[0081] Specific descriptions and examples of the coating
composition and each component constituting the composition are the
same as described above.
[0082] The method of coating the coating composition is not
particularly limited as long as it may be used in the art to which
the present technology belongs. For example, a bar coating method,
a knife coating method, a roll coating method, a blade coating
method, a die coating method, a microgravure coating method, a
comma coating method, a slot die coating method, a lip coating
method, a solution casting method, or the like may be used.
[0083] Next, a protective film may be formed by carrying out a
photocuring reaction through irradiating ultraviolet rays on the
coated composition. The coated surface of the composition is
flattened before irradiating the ultraviolet rays, and a drying
step for volatizing a solvent included in the composition may be
further carried out.
[0084] The amount of the ultraviolet irradiation may be, for
example, from about 20 to about 600 mJ/cm.sup.2. The light source
of the ultraviolet irradiation is not particularly limited as long
as it is capable of being used in the art, and examples thereof may
include a high pressure mercury lamp, a metal halide lamp, a black
light fluorescent lamp, and the like.
[0085] The visibility improving film for a display panel of the
present invention includes fine metal particles having a specific
shape as described above, and can effectively reflect a laser light
made incident on the liquid crystal display by means of a laser
pointer. Therefore, it is possible to provide a display device
capable of realizing excellent image quality with high luminance
and contrast ratio, while improving the visibility of a laser
pointer.
[0086] Specifically, the visibility improving film for a display
panel has a relative visibility evaluation value represented by the
following Formula 1 of 3 or more:
Visibility Evaluation Value=B1/A1 [Formula 1]
[0087] wherein, in the above Formula 1,
[0088] A1 is a luminance value measured from the front side, when a
film having a transmittance value of 70 to 100 as measured
according to JIS K 7361 and a haze value of 20 to 25 as measured
according to JIS K 7136, more preferably a film having a
transmittance value of 90 to 95 and a haze value of 22 to 25, most
preferably a film having a transmittance value of 90.4 and a haze
value of 23.8, is bonded to a glass slide, then placed on a
backlight surface and irradiated with a laser light at 45.degree.
with respect to the normal direction, and
[0089] B1 is a luminance value measured from the front side, when
the visibility improving film for a display panel is bonded to a
glass slide, then placed on a backlight surface and irradiated with
the same laser light at 45.degree. with respect to the normal
direction.
[0090] As described above, the visibility improving film for a
display panel of the present invention can realize an effect of
increasing the luminance by about 50% or more, preferably about 60%
or more, relative to the luminance before irradiation, due to the
scattering/reflection light by fine metal particles, as compared
with the case of using a general UV curable coating layer, and
thereby the visibility of the laser pointer can be remarkably
improved.
[0091] In addition, the visibility improving film for a display
panel may have excellent optical properties, for example, may have
a value of luminance ratio represented by the following Formula 2
of about 80% or more, and preferably about 80 to about 95%.
Luminance Ratio=(B2/A2)*100 [Formula 2]
[0092] In the above formula 2,
[0093] A2 is a luminance value measured from the front side, when a
film having a transmittance value of 80 to 100 as measured
according to JIS K 7361 and a haze value of 20 to 25 as measured
according to JIS K 7136, more preferably a film having a
transmittance value of 90 to 95 and a haze value of 22 to 25 as
measured according to JIS K 7136, is bonded to a glass slide and
then placed on a backlight surface, and
[0094] B2 is a luminance value measured from the front side, when
the visibility improving film for a display panel is bonded to a
glass slide and then placed on a backlight surface.
[0095] Further, the visibility improving film for a display panel
may have a white turbidity value represented by the following
Formula 3 of 10 or less, preferably about 9 or less.
White Turbidity=C*100 [Formula 3]
[0096] In the above Formula 3,
[0097] C is a luminance value (cd/m.sup.2) measured at a height of
7 cm from the front side, when the visibility improving film for a
display panel is bonded to a glass slide, then placed on a black
acrylic plate and kept under the condition of 9 1.times..
[0098] Further, the visibility improving film for a display panel
may have a transmittance value (Tt) measured according to JIS K
7361 of about 70 to 90%, which represents high light
transmittance.
[0099] Further, the visibility improving film for a display panel
may have a haze value of about 20% or less, or about 10% to about
20%, as measured according to JIS K 7136.
[0100] In an optical film or the like, the transmittance and the
haze properties change depending on the introduced particles
contained in the film. Generally, the greater the amount of the
light scattering particles having similar optical properties, the
greater the tendency of the transmittance value is of being lowered
and the haze being increased.
[0101] However, depending on the type of particles used, it is
possible to have a characteristic relationship between
transmittance and haze. In particular, when the fine metal
particles are contained in the resin layer, they have the
reflection characteristics as described above, and thus can show a
lower haze value than that of the organic fine particles or the
inorganic oxide fine particles commonly used in the art, while
decreasing light transmittance. In particular, when compared with
the case of using the transmissive light scattering particles, even
if they show the same transmittance value, there is a feature that
they can have a relatively low haze value.
[0102] In particular, the light transmittance value varies
depending on the content of particles. When the transmittance is
too high, there is a problem that the amount of particles for
scattering or reflecting light is absolutely deficient, thereby
failing to realize appropriate visibility. When the transmittance
is too low, the visibility is good, but the contrast ratio and
luminance are lowered, which may cause a problem that the image
quality of the image to be mounted on the display deteriorates.
[0103] Therefore, by limiting the range of the above-described
transmittance (Tt) and the characteristic haze value attributable
to the use of the fine metal particles, it can exhibit excellent
visibility in the use of the laser pointer and at the same time
realize an excellent contrast ratio.
[0104] According to one embodiment of the present invention, the
visibility improvement film for a display panel of the present
invention may have a color difference value represented by the
following Formula 4 of about 2 or less:
Color Difference=|a*|+|b*| [Formula 4]
[0105] wherein, in the above Formula 4,
[0106] a* and b* are exponent values in the CIE 1976 L*a*b* color
model, respectively.
[0107] As described above, the visibility improving film for a
display panel according to the present invention can remarkably
improve the visibility of a laser pointer and at the same time
realize an excellent contrast ratio.
[0108] In the visibility improving film for a display panel
according to the present invention, the substrate on which the
resin layer is formed may be glass or a transparent plastic resin
which is commonly used for a display panel. More specifically,
according to one embodiment of the present invention, the substrate
may include a polyester such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET), a
polyethylene such as ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA), a cyclic olefin
polymer (COP), a cyclic olefin copolymer (COC), polyacrylate (PAC),
polycarbonate (PC), polyethylene (PE), polymethylmethacrylate
(PMMA), polyetherether ketone (PEEK), polyethylene naphthalate
(PEN), polyetherimide (PEI), polyimide (PI), MMA (methyl
methacrylate), a fluorocarbon resin, triacetylcellulose (TAC), or
the like.
[0109] Preferably, the substrate may be a film including triacetyl
cellulose (TAC).
[0110] The thickness of the substrate is not particularly limited,
but it is possible to use a substrate having a thickness of about
20 to about 100 .mu.m, or about 20 to about 60 .mu.m, which is
within a range capable satisfying the hardness and other physical
properties of the film.
[0111] The visibility improving film for a display panel according
to the present invention may have pencil hardness of HB or more, 1H
or more, or 2H or more at a load of 500 g.
[0112] In addition, when steel wool #0 is attached to a friction
tester and then reciprocated 10 times with a load of 200 g, a load
of 300 g, or a load of 400 g, it can exhibit wear resistance such
that scratches do not occur.
[0113] According to one embodiment of the present invention, the
visibility improvement film for a display panel may be in a form
further including: a substrate; a resin layer provided on the
substrate; and at least one functional coating layer of the
antireflection layer and the antiglare layer, which are formed on
the resin layer.
[0114] In addition to the antireflection effect in the existing
display panel film, by preventing specular reflection when using a
laser pointer, the laser pointer light is specularly reflected,
thereby effectively preventing it from directly entering the eye of
the operator viewing the image. As such antireflection layer, a
general antireflection layer which is used in a film for an
existing display device or an optical film for a polarizing plate,
specifically, for example, an antireflection layer or an
antireflection coating (AR) that utilizes interference of light by
forming a plurality of layers having different refractive indexes,
may be used without particular limitation.
[0115] Further, the anti-glare layer allows the laser pointer light
to diffusely reflect due to the surface unevenness when using a
laser pointer, and thereby it can effectively prevent the
reflection light from directly entering the eye of the operator
viewing the image. In such anti-glare layer, a method of dispersing
a filler such as inorganic fine particles in a resin and imparting
unevenness to the surface (anti-glare, AG) and the like can be used
without particular limitation.
[0116] When the antireflection layer and the anti-glare layer are
provided, such a functional coating layer may be preferably located
at the top of the film.
[0117] Meanwhile, according to another embodiment of the present
invention, a display device including a display panel and the
above-mentioned visibility improving film for the display panel is
provided.
[0118] In this case, the display panel is not particularly limited
to a driving method or structure, and it can be applied to all of
LCD panels, PDP panels, and OLED panels.
[0119] The visibility improving film for a display panel and the
display panel may be adhered through lamination using a separate
adhesive and the like. The adhesive capable of being used herein is
not particularly limited as long as it is known in the art.
Examples thereof may include water-based adhesives, one component
or two component polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)-based adhesives,
polyurethane-based adhesives, epoxy-based adhesives, styrene
butadiene rubber (SBR)-based adhesives, hot melt-type adhesives, or
the like, but the present disclosure is not limited to these
examples.
[0120] Further, the fact that the resin layer may also serve as an
adhesive layer is as described above. When the resin layer does not
serve as the adhesive layer, the substrate surface on which the
resin layer is not formed adheres to the display panel side, and
the resin layer is laminated so as to be located toward the
outside, and thereby it may be preferable to form a structure for
directly facing the surface to which the laser pointer is made
incident.
[0121] Hereinafter, actions and effects of the present invention
will be described in more detail through specific examples, but
these examples are given to merely illustrate the invention and are
not intended to limit the scope of the invention thereto.
EXAMPLE
[0122] 21 parts by weight of pentaerythritol tri(tetra)acrylate
(hereinafter referred to as PETA), 21 parts by weight of
hexafunctional urethane acrylate (hereinafter referred to as 6 UA),
3.2. parts by weight of Irgacure 184 as a photopolymerization
initiator (hereinafter referred to as the initiator), 0.5 parts by
weight of an additive Megaface F-477 (manufacturer: DIC
Corporation) (hereinafter referred to as the additive), 22.18 parts
by weight of 2-BuOH, 23 parts by weight of methyl ethyl ketone
(hereinafter referred to as MEK) as an organic solvent, and 9.12
parts by weight of an aluminum particle solution (number average
particle diameter: about 1.5 .mu.m; average flattening ratio: 0.3;
solid content 20 wt %; dispersion solvent: toluene) (hereinafter
referred to as S-A1/T) were mixed to prepare a resin composition.
The resin composition was coated on a substrate TAC (thickness: 80
.mu.m) using a #8 bar, dried at 90.degree. C. for 2 minutes and 30
seconds, and cured with a mercury lamp (at about 200 mJ/cm.sup.2)
to produce a visibility improving film for a display panel having
an average dry thickness of 5 .mu.m).
[0123] A visibility improving film for a display panel was produced
by the same method by using each of the above-mentioned components
with the compositions summarized in Table 1 below.
[0124] In the case of Examples 1 and 2 and Comparative Example 1,
the above-mentioned spherical aluminum particle solution (number
average particle diameter: about 1.5 .mu.m; average flattening
ratio: 0.3; solid content: 20 wt %; dispersion solvent: toluene)
(hereinafter referred to as S-A1/T) was used as the fine metal
particles.
[0125] In the case of Comparative Examples 2 to 4, a plate-like
aluminum particle solution (number average particle diameter: about
5 .mu.m; average flattening ratio: 0.8; solid content: 20 wt %;
dispersion solvent: toluene) (hereinafter referred to as P-A1/T)
was used as the fine metal particles.
[0126] In the case of Comparative Examples 5 to 7, organic fine
particles 77BQ (Sekisui Chem) (number average particle diameter:
about 3 .mu.m; refractive index: 1.595; solid content: 11.6 wt %;
dispersion solvent: propylene glycol methylether acetate)
(hereinafter referred to as S--O) were used in place of the fine
metal particles.
[0127] In the case of Comparative Examples 8 and 9, a plate-like
aluminum particle solution (number average particle diameter: about
0.25 .mu.m; solid content: 10 wt %; dispersion solvent: toluene)
(hereinafter referred to as P-A1) was used as the fine metal
particles.
[0128] In the case of Comparative Examples 10 and 11, TiO.sub.2
fine particles (number average particle diameter: about 0.39 .mu.m;
solid content: 6.3 wt %; dispersion solvent: butyl cellosolve)
(hereinafter referred to as S--TiO.sub.2) were used in place of the
fine metal particles.
[0129] The above compositions are summarized in Table 1 below.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Component (parts by Comparative Comparative
Comparative Comparative Comparative weight) Example 1 Example 2
Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Example 4 Example 5 PETA 21 20 23 23
21 20 23 6UA 21 20 23 23 21 20 23 Initiator 3.2 3 3.5 3.5 3.2 3 3.5
Additive 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 2-BuOH 22.18 21 23 23 22.18
20.97 21 MEK 23 21.37 25.37 25.37 23 21.4 24.25 Fine particle
S--Al/T S--Al/T S--Al/T P--Al/T P--Al/T P--Al/T S--O component
Content of 9.12 14.23 1.63 1.63 9.12 14.23 4.75 fine particle
dispersion Content of (1.824) (2.846) (0.326) (0.326) (1.824)
(2.846) (0.551) fine particle Sum 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Component (parts by Comparative Comparative Comparative Comparative
Comparative Comparative Comparative weight) Example 6 Example 7
Example 8 Example 9 Example 10 Example 11 Example 12 PETA 20 17 23
20 23 20 21 6UA 20 17 23 20 23 20 21 Initiator 3 2.5 3.5 3 3.5 3
3.2 Additive 0.4 0.35 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 2-BuOH 19 16.54 23 20
23.36 20.3 22.18 MEK 21 18 25.36 22.33 25 22 23 Fine particle S--O
S--O P--Al/T P--Al/T S--TiO.sub.2 S--TiO.sub.2 -- component Content
of 16.6 28.61 1.64 14.27 1.64 14.3 fine particle dispersion Content
of (1.926) (3.319) (0.164) (1.427) (0.103) (0.901) (0) fine
particle Sum 100 100 100 100 100 100 90.88
[0130] Comparative Example 13: A25 film (LG Chem), which is an
anti-glare film having a JIS K 7361 standard transmittance value of
90.4 and a haze value of 23.8 as measured by JIS K 7136 was
prepared as a comparative example.
[0131] Measurement of Tt Value
[0132] The transmittance values (Tt) of the visibility improving
films for display panels produced in the examples and comparative
examples above were measured by a method according to JIS K 7361
using a haze meter HM-150 (Murakami).
[0133] Measurement of Haze Value
[0134] The haze values of the visibility improving films for
display panels produced in the examples and comparative examples
were measured by a method according to JIS K 7136 using a haze
meter HM-150 (Murakami).
[0135] Measurement of Luminance Ratio
[0136] The visibility improving film for a display panel of
Comparative Example 13 was bonded to a glass slide (0.7 mm) using a
release film and placed on top of the LCD panel which was powered,
and the luminance value measured at a height of 5.5 cm from the
front side was obtained (A2),
[0137] the visibility improving films for display panels of
examples and comparative examples were bonded to a glass slide by
the same method, and the luminance value measured under the same
conditions was obtained (B2), and then the luminance values
measured in the respective examples and comparative examples were
snatched to calculate the luminance ratio (Measuring equipment:
Konica Minolta, CA-210, LCD panel: 4.7 inches, Gray scale 255,
297.2 cd/m.sup.2).
[0138] Measurements were carried out in a dark room below 3.5
1.times..
[0139] Evaluation of Laser Pointer Visibility
[0140] When the visibility improving film for a display panel of
Comparative Example 13 was bonded to a glass slide (0.7 mm) using a
release film, placed on a black acrylic plate, and then irradiated
with a 535-nm laser at 45.degree. with respect to the normal line,
the luminance value measured from the front side was obtained
(A1),
[0141] the visibility improving films for display panels of the
examples and comparative examples were bonded to a glass slide by
the same method, and the luminance value measured under the same
conditions was obtained (B1), and then
[0142] the luminance values measured in the respective examples and
comparative examples were matched to calculate the visibility
evaluation value (Measuring equipment: Konica Minolta, CA-210,
laser pointer: 3M, LP-7000).
[0143] Measurements were carried out in a dark room below 3.5
1.times..
[0144] Measurement of White Turbidity
[0145] The visibility improving film for a display panel of
Comparative Example 13 was bonded to a glass slide (0.7 mm) using a
release film, placed on a black acrylic plate, and then the
luminance value was measured from the front side (Measuring
equipment: Konica Minolta, CA-210).
[0146] Measurements were carried out under the condition of 9
1.times..
[0147] Measurement of Color Index
[0148] The visibility improving films for display panels of the
examples and comparative examples were bonded to a black PET sheet
(manufacturer: TOMOEGAWA, trade name: KUKKIRIMIERU) and then
exponent values of a* and b* were measured using a KONICA MINOLTA
CM-2600d colorimeter.
[0149] The measurement results are summarized in Table 2 below.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Physical Comparative Comparative Comparative
properties Example 1 Example 2 Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Tt
84.1 79.6 90.7 90.2 75.8 Haze 11.4 17.6 2.4 2.2 15.4 Luminance
90.38 84.59 99.93 99.08 80.57 ratio Visibility 4.64 7.48 0.81 1.82
15.67 White 6 9 2 2 13 turbidity a* -0.18 -0.21 -0.22 -0.3 -0.25 b*
0.98 0.83 1.08 1.07 0.23 |a*| + |b*| 1.16 1.04 1.3 1.37 0.48
Component Comparative Comparative Comparative Comparative
Comparative (parts by weight) Example 4 Example 5 Example 6 Example
7 Example 8 Tt 68.2 92.2 91.7 91.4 89 Haze 22 4.1 13.7 26.6 2.7
Luminance 72.71 101.36 100.85 100.11 97.53 ratio Visibility 20.9
0.17 0.22 0.55 1.43 White 19 1 1 2 2 turbidity a* -0.28 0.04 -0.26
-0.2 -0.38 b* 0.15 0.47 0.98 0.77 0.97 |a*| + |b*| 0.43 0.51 1.24
0.97 1.35 Component Comparative Comparative Comparative Comparative
Comparative (parts by weight) Example 9 Example 10 Example 11
Example 12 Example 13 Tt 63.2 91.2 86.4 92.5 90.4 Haze 19.8 2.6
19.2 0.3 23.8 Luminance 61.65 100.07 86.47 101.14 100 ratio
Visibility 11.19 1.29 14.19 0.14 1 White 11 2 16 0 3 turbidity a*
-0.68 -0.17 -0.3 0.09 -0.15 b* 0.27 0 -6.4 0.52 -0.35 |a*| + |b*|
0.95 0.17 6.7 0.61 0.5
[0150] Meanwhile, in the visibility improving films for display
panels of the examples and comparative examples, in order to
compare the unevenness of the surface, that is, a surface roughness
value, a haze value, and visibility of a laser pointer, the
arithmetic average surface roughness value, Ra, (.mu.m) according
to JIS 0601 was measured, and the results are summarized in Table 3
below.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Example Example Comparative Comparative 1 2
Example 12 Example 13 Ra 0.0501 0.0463 0.02 0.372
[0151] Referring to Table 1 above, it can be confirmed that in the
case of Examples 1 and 2, by using fine metal particles having a
number average particle size value and a flattening ratio value in
a specific range, the visibility of the laser pointer is very high
while having excellent optical properties.
[0152] Specifically, it can be confirmed that in the case of the
visibility improving film for a display panel according to the
examples of the present invention, the visibility evaluation value
is 4.64 and 7.48, all of this is 3 or more, or 4 or more. In
particular, it can be clearly confirmed that as compared with
Comparative Examples 12 and 13 not using aluminum particles, or
Comparative Examples 5 to 7 using organic fine particles and the
like, the luminance ratio increases by a minimum of five times, at
most a few tens of times, and thus the visibility of a laser
pointer light is greatly improved.
[0153] In addition, it can be confirmed that in the case of the
comparative examples using the plate-like aluminum particles in
excess or using titanium dioxide particles or the like in place of
the aluminum particles of the examples of the present invention,
the laser pointer light scattering occurs due to the corresponding
particles in the film, and thus the visibility of the laser pointer
can be improved to a certain extent, but the white turbidity value
also greatly increases. In particular, in the case of Comparative
Examples 3, 4, 9, and 11, the visibility evaluation value is about
10 or more and shows satisfactory physical properties for laser
pointer light scattering, but the white turbidity value is measured
to be 10 or more, or a value at which a and b change due to the Lab
color index greatly appears, and the other optical property values
of the film are largely lowered.
[0154] In contrast, in the case of Examples 1 and 2, the white
turbidity value is less than about 10, and the value at which a and
b change is also about 1, which confirms that the visibility of a
laser pointer light can be greatly improved without largely
degrading the other optical property values of the film.
[0155] Referring to Table 1 above, it can be confirmed that in the
case of Examples 1 and 2, although the arithmetic average surface
roughness value is not relatively high, the visibility of the laser
pointer is very high. Specifically, in the case of the examples of
the present invention, the arithmetic average surface roughness
value is about 0.05, which shows that the unevenness is not large,
but the visibility of a laser pointer light is excellent. In
contrast, in the case of Comparative Example 12, it can be seen
that the arithmetic average surface roughness value is relatively
small, the haze value is small, and the effect of improving the
visibility of the laser pointer light is not large. In the case of
Comparative Example 13, it can be seen that the arithmetic average
surface roughness value is relatively large and the haze value is
large, whereas the effect of improving the visibility of the laser
pointer light is not large. These results are considered to be
attributable to the characteristic coating composition and the use
of fine metal particles in the examples of the present
invention.
* * * * *