U.S. patent application number 16/584680 was filed with the patent office on 2020-01-23 for protocol for allocating upstream slots over a link in a point-to-multipoint communication system.
The applicant listed for this patent is Wireless Protocol Innovations, Inc.. Invention is credited to Subir Varma.
Application Number | 20200029219 16/584680 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 37696677 |
Filed Date | 2020-01-23 |
United States Patent
Application |
20200029219 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Varma; Subir |
January 23, 2020 |
PROTOCOL FOR ALLOCATING UPSTREAM SLOTS OVER A LINK IN A
POINT-TO-MULTIPOINT COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
Abstract
A system for controlling a contention state for a communication
link between a base station controller and customer premises
equipment in point-to-multipoint communication. The contention
state is controlled using a state machine, which includes a grant
pending absent state in which a unicast request slot is maintained
open for use by the customer premises equipment. During the grant
pending absent state, the customer premises equipment sends no
upstream data to the base station controller but can use the
unicast request slot to request a data slot for sending upstream
data to the base station controller. In the grant pending state,
the customer premises equipment preferably uses piggybacking to
request grant of a next data slot while sending upstream data to
the base station controller.
Inventors: |
Varma; Subir; (San Jose,
CA) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
Wireless Protocol Innovations, Inc. |
Ottawa |
|
CA |
|
|
Family ID: |
37696677 |
Appl. No.: |
16/584680 |
Filed: |
September 26, 2019 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
15964393 |
Apr 27, 2018 |
10470045 |
|
|
16584680 |
|
|
|
|
14805051 |
Jul 21, 2015 |
9961556 |
|
|
15964393 |
|
|
|
|
14078246 |
Nov 12, 2013 |
9154961 |
|
|
14805051 |
|
|
|
|
14059220 |
Oct 21, 2013 |
9125051 |
|
|
14078246 |
|
|
|
|
13360334 |
Jan 27, 2012 |
8565256 |
|
|
14059220 |
|
|
|
|
11703065 |
Feb 6, 2007 |
8274991 |
|
|
13360334 |
|
|
|
|
09689243 |
Oct 11, 2000 |
7173921 |
|
|
11703065 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
1/1 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H04W 72/0446 20130101;
H04W 74/02 20130101; H04W 28/04 20130101; H04W 72/1284 20130101;
H04W 74/0833 20130101; H04W 72/0413 20130101; H04W 72/14 20130101;
H04L 12/18 20130101; H04W 16/04 20130101; H04J 3/1694 20130101;
H04W 74/06 20130101 |
International
Class: |
H04W 16/04 20060101
H04W016/04; H04L 12/18 20060101 H04L012/18; H04W 72/12 20060101
H04W072/12; H04W 72/04 20060101 H04W072/04; H04W 74/02 20060101
H04W074/02; H04W 72/14 20060101 H04W072/14 |
Claims
1. A customer premises equipment (CPE), comprising: a processor; an
antenna operable to send information using wireless communication
techniques in a point-to-multipoint communication system, the CPE
operable to communicate with a base station controller (BSC) over a
communication link shared with other CPEs; and a memory comprising
instructions, the instructions executable by the processor to:
transition from a grant pending state to a grant pending absent
state once the CPE has transmitted upstream data to the BSC within
a bandwidth specified by a bandwidth grant received from the BSC
during the grant pending state and the CPE has no pending bandwidth
requests; operate the CPE in the grant pending absent state wherein
the CPE awaits arrival of data for transmission to the BSC and
transmits, via the antenna, a non-contention bandwidth request to
the BSC when the CPE receives data for transmission; transition
operation of the CPE from the grant pending absent state to the
grant pending state subsequent to and in consequence of a
subsequent bandwidth grant received at the CPE; and transition
operation of the CPE from the grant pending absent state to an idle
state if the CPE does not transmit any non-contention bandwidth
request to the BSC during a timeout period.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application is a continuation of U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 15/964,393, filed Apr. 27, 2018, in the name
of Subir Varma, titled "Protocol for Allocating Upstream Slots Over
a Link in a Point-to-Multipoint Communication System"; which is a
continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/805,051, filed
Jul. 21, 2015, in the name of Subir Varma, titled "Protocol for
Allocating Upstream Slots Over a Link in a Point-to-Multipoint
Communication System", now U.S. Pat. No. 9,961,556; which is a
continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/078,246, filed
Nov. 12, 2013, in the name of Subir Varma, titled "Protocol for
Allocating Upstream Slots Over a Link in a Point-to-Multipoint
Communication System", now U.S. Pat. No. 9,154,961; which is a
continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/059,220, filed
Oct. 21, 2013, in the name of Subir Varma, titled "Protocol for
Allocating Upstream Slots Over a Link in a Point-to-Multipoint
Communication System", now U.S. Pat. No. 9,125,051; which is a
continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/360,334, filed
Jan. 27, 2012, in the name of Subir Varma, titled "Protocol for
Allocating Upstream Slots Over a Link in a Point-to-Multipoint
Communication System", now U.S. Pat. No. 8,565,256; which is a
continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/703,065, filed
Feb. 6, 2007, in the name of Subir Varma, titled "Protocol for
Allocating Upstream Slots Over a Link in a Point-to-Multipoint
Communication System", now U.S. Pat. No. 8,274,991; which is a
continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/689,243, filed
Oct. 11, 2000, in the name of Subir Varma, titled "Protocol for
Allocating Upstream Slots Over a Link in a Point-to-Multipoint
Communication System", now U.S. Pat. No. 7,173,921, all of which
are hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth
herein.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains
material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright
owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of
the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the
Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise
reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0003] This invention relates to point-to-multipoint communication;
in particular, the invention relates to control of contention for
data slots by customer premises equipment in a wireless
point-to-multipoint communication system.
DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ART
[0004] In a point-to-multipoint network, plural customer provided
equipment (CPEs) communicate bidirectionally with a base station
controller (BSC) in a cell. Several CPEs can share a single channel
for communicating with the BSC. The CPEs and the BSC use time
division duplexing (TDD) to facilitate the bidirectional aspect of
the communication. The CPEs and the BSC use time division multiple
access (TDMA) to facilitate sharing of a channel among plural
CPEs.
[0005] In TDMA, the BSC grants data slots to the CPEs. Because
multiple CPEs share a limited number of data slots, the CPEs and
the BSC must negotiate data slot assignments through a process
called contention.
[0006] In contention, CPEs that have upstream data to send to the
BSC first send a short request (REQ) message to the BSC. The BSC
responds with a grant of a data slot for use by the CPE.
[0007] Problems can arise in contention. First, two CPEs might
simultaneously try to use a single request slot to request data
slots. This situation is called collision. When collisions occur,
neither CPE's request message successfully reaches the BSC. Second,
if many request slots are defined so as to reduce a number of
collisions and so as to facilitate requests by a large number of
CPEs, too much of available bandwidth can be used up by contention
traffic. As a result, data throughput can be unacceptably
decreased.
[0008] One technique used in the prior art to reduce contention
traffic is called piggybacking. In piggybacking, a CPE first
requests a data slot. When the data slot is granted by the BSC, the
CPE sends data packets upstream. The CPE attaches a size of its
current data backlog to a header for one of the data packets. As a
result, whenever the backlog is non-zero, the BSC knows to grant a
data slot to the CPE without the CPE having to send a REQ message.
Thus, contention traffic is reduced.
[0009] Unfortunately, piggybacking is only effective if upstream
traffic from the CPE is of the bursty type, so that the CPE needs
to make only one contention request per burst. However, some
important traffic sources are non-bursty. Examples of non-bursty
traffic include traffic generated by online games and voice
sources. Even ordinary Internet traffic running over TCP becomes
non-bursty when a communication link is in heavy traffic. In the
presence of non-bursty traffic, the piggyback scheme breaks down,
and an excessive number of contention requests are sent
upstream.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0010] In view of the foregoing, further reducing contention
traffic is desirable, especially for non-bursty traffic. The
invention addresses this need by using a new state machine to
control a contention state for a communication link between a base
station controller and customer premises equipment in
point-to-multipoint communication. According to the invention, the
state machine includes a grant pending absent state in which the
customer premises equipment is polled with a unicast request slot.
During the grant pending absent state, the customer premises
equipment sends no upstream data to the base station controller but
can use the unicast request slot to request a data slot for sending
upstream data to the base station controller.
[0011] By virtue of the grant pending absent state, the customer
premises equipment can request a data slot without entering into
contention and generating excess contention traffic. After a
suitable delay without more data being received to send upstream,
the state machine can exit the grant pending absent state. This
delay preferably is long enough for receipt of new non-bursty data
for a communication, for example 50 ms.
[0012] The state machine preferably also includes an idle state in
which the customer premises equipment awaits arrival of data
packets to send as upstream data to the base station controller, a
deferring state in which the customer premises equipment requests
grant of a data slot for sending upstream traffic to the base
station controller and if necessary defers contending for the data
slot so as to avoid collisions with other customer premises
equipment, and a grant pending state in which the customer premises
equipment awaits and receives grant of the data slot for sending
upstream data to the base station controller and sends upstream
data to the base station controller after grant of the data
slot.
[0013] In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the customer
premises equipment uses piggybacking to request grant of a next
data slot while sending upstream data to the base station
controller. Use of piggybacking along with the grant pending absent
state has been found to decrease drastically contention
traffic.
[0014] Preferably, the state machine enters the deferring state
upon arrival of data packets to send as upstream data to the base
station controller. In the preferred embodiment, the state machine
enters the grant pending state after the deferring state, returns
to the deferring state if a collision occurs, and remains in the
grant pending state when sending upstream data to the base station
controller with piggybacking. The state machine preferably enters
the grant pending absent state after the customer premises
equipment has sent upstream data to the base station controller in
the grant pending state.
[0015] The state machine according to the invention preferably also
includes an unsolicited grant pending state in which the customer
premises equipment receives grant of the data slot for sending
upstream data to the base station controller and sends upstream
data to the base station controller after grant of the data slot,
without having requested the data slot. The state machine
preferably further includes an unsolicited grant pending absent
state in which the customer premises equipment is polled with the
unicast request slot. During the unsolicited grant pending absent
state, the customer premises equipment sends no upstream data to
the base station controller but can use the unicast request slot to
request the data slot for sending upstream data to the base station
controller. Preferably, the state machine enters the unsolicited
grant pending absent state after the customer premises equipment
has sent upstream data to the base station controller in the
unsolicited grant pending state.
[0016] The invention can be embodied in a method for controlling
communication using the state machine described above, as well as
in software and/or hardware such as a base station controller
and/or customer premises equipment that implements the method, and
in various other embodiments.
[0017] This brief summary has been provided so that the nature of
the invention may be understood quickly. A more complete
understanding of the invention may be obtained by reference to the
following description of the preferred embodiments thereof in
connection with the attached drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0018] FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a wireless communication system
according to the invention in which a base station controller
communicates with one or more customer premises equipment according
to the invention.
[0019] FIG. 2 is a flow chart of a state machine according to the
invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Related Applications
[0020] Inventions described herein can be used in conjunction with
inventions described in the following documents. [0023] U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 09/475,642, Express Mail Mailing No.
EL524780018US, filed Dec. 30, 1999 in the names of Reza Majidi-Ahy,
Subir Varma, Khuong Ngo, Jean Fuentes and Paul Trong, attorney
docket number 164.1002.01, titled "Adaptive Link Layer for Point to
Multipoint Communication System." [0024] U.S. patent application
Ser. No. 09/475,716, Express Mail Mailing No. EL524780021US, filed
Dec. 30, 1999 in the names of Reza Majidi-Ahy, Joseph Hakim, and
Subir Varma, attorney docket number 164.1003.01, titled "Integrated
Self-Optimizing Multi-Parameter and Multi-Variable Point to
Multipoint Communication System." [0025] U.S. patent application
Ser. No. 09/540,674, Express Mail Mailing No. EL524781512US, filed
Mar. 31, 2000, in the name of Reza Majidi-Ahy, attorney docket
number 164.1001.01, titled "Robust Topology Wireless Communication
Using Broadband Access Points." [0026] U.S. patent application Ser.
No. 09/604,784, Express Mail Mailing No. EL524781225US, filed Jun.
26, 2000 in the name of Reza Majidi-Ahy, attorney docket number
164.1010.01, titled "High-Capacity Scalable Integrated Wireless
Backhaul for Broadband Access Networks." and [0027] U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 09/475,716, Express Mail Mailing No.
EL524780021 US, filed Dec. 30, 1999 in the names of Reza
Majidi-Ahy, Joseph Hakim, and Subir Varma, attorney docket number
164.1003.01, titled "Integrated, Self-Optimizing,
Multi-Parameter/Multi-Variable Point-to-Multipoint Communication
System [II]."
[0021] Each of these documents is hereby incorporated by reference
as if fully set forth herein. This application claims priority of
each of these documents. These documents are collectively referred
to as the "Incorporated Disclosures."
Lexicography
[0022] The following terms refer or relate to aspects of the
invention as described below. The descriptions of general meanings
of these terms are intended to be illustrative, not limiting.
[0023] base station controller (BSC)--in general, a device for
performing coordination and control for a wireless communication
cell. There is no particular requirement that the base station
controller must be a single device; in alternative embodiments, the
base station controller can include a portion of a single device, a
combination of multiple devices, or some hybrid thereof.
[0024] communication link--in general, an element for sending
information from a sender to a recipient. Although in a preferred
embodiment the communication links referred to are generally
wireless line of sight point to point communication links, there is
no particular requirement that they are so restricted.
[0025] customer premises equipment (CPE)--in general, a device for
performing communication processes and tasks at a customer
location, and operating in conjunction with the base station
controller within a wireless communication cell. There is no
particular requirement that the customer premises equipment must be
a single device; in alternative embodiments, the customer premises
equipment can include a portion of a single device, a combination
of multiple devices, or some hybrid thereof.
[0026] As noted above, these descriptions of general meanings of
these terms are not intended to be limiting, only illustrative.
Other and further applications of the invention, including
extensions of these terms and concepts, would be clear to those of
ordinary skill in the art after perusing this application. These
other and further applications are part of the scope and spirit of
the invention, and would be clear to those of ordinary skill in the
art, without further invention or undue experimentation.
System Context
[0027] The context of the invention is similar to that of the
Incorporated Disclosures.
[0028] A system using point-to-multipoint communication in a
wireless communication system operates as part of a system in which
devices coupled to a network (such as a computer network) send
messages, route and switch messages, and receive messages. In a
preferred embodiment, devices coupled to (and integrated with) the
network send, route, and receive these messages as sequences of
packets, each of which has a header including delivery information
and a payload including data. In a preferred embodiment, packet
format conforms to the OSI model, in which an application protocol
(layer 5, such as FTP) uses a transport protocol (layer 4, such as
TCP), which uses a network protocol (layer 3, such as IP), which
uses a media access control (MAC) protocol (layer 2), which uses a
physical transport technique (layer 1).
System Elements
[0029] FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a wireless communication system
according to the invention in which a base station controller
communicates with one or more customer premises equipment according
to the invention.
[0030] System 10 includes wireless communication cell 11 (or a
portion thereof), base station controller (BSC) 12, and one or more
customer premises equipment (CPE) 13.
[0031] Wireless communication cell 11 preferably includes a
generally hexagon-shaped region of local surface area, such as
might be found in a metropolitan region. Use of generally
hexagon-shaped regions is known in the art of wireless
communication because hexagonal regions are able to tile a local
region with substantially no gaps. Although in a preferred
embodiment wireless communication cell 11 includes a generally
hexagon-shaped region, no particular requirement exists for using
that particular shape; in alternative embodiments, another shape or
tiling of the local surface area may be useful.
[0032] In FIG. 1, a portion of cell 11 includes a generally
triangular-shaped region of local surface area, herein called a
"sector." Sectors 14 preferably are disposed so that a set of six
sectors 14 combine to form single cell 11. Thus, BSC 12 preferably
is disposed at or near one corner of one of sectors 14, while CPEs
13 are disposed within the sectors.
[0033] Although the invention is primarily described with regard to
interactions that occur between BSC 12 and a single CPE 13 in a
single sector 14, substantial applications of the invention exist
for interactions across multiple sectors within a cell, and to
interaction across sectors in multiple cells. Substantial
applications of the invention with regard to multiple sectors, both
within single cell and among multiple cells, would be clear to
those skilled in the art of wireless communication after perusal of
this application, and would not require undue experimentation or
further invention.
[0034] BSC 12 preferably includes a processor, program and data
memory, mass storage, and one or more antennas for sending or
receiving information using wireless communication techniques.
[0035] Similar to BSC 12, each CPE 13 preferably includes a
processor, program and data memory, mass storage, and one or more
antennas for sending or receiving information using wireless
communication techniques.
[0036] In system 10, plural CPEs 13 communicate bidirectionally
with BSC 12. Several CPEs 13 can share a single channel for
communicating with BSC 12. BSC 12 and CPEs 13 preferably use time
division duplexing (TDD) to facilitate the bidirectional aspect of
the communication. BSC 12 and CPEs 13 preferably use time division
multiple access (TDMA) to facilitate sharing of a channel among
plural CPEs 13.
[0037] In TDMA, BSC 12 grants data slots to CPEs 13. Because
multiple CPEs 13 share a limited number of data slots, CPEs 13 and
BSC 12 must negotiate data slot assignments through a process
called contention.
[0038] In contention, CPEs 13 that have upstream data to send to
BSC 12 first send a short request (REQ) message to BSC 12. The BSC
responds with a grant of a data slot for use by the CPE.
[0039] Problems can arise in contention. Plural CPEs 13 might
simultaneously try to use a single request slot to request data
slots. This situation is called collision. When collisions occur,
none of the CPE's request messages successfully reach BSC 12. Those
CPEs 13 have to re-send their REQ messages. In order to try to
allow REQ traffic to clear, CPEs 13 according to the invention can
defer re-sending REQ messages for some period of time when
collisions occur.
[0040] If many request slots are defined so as to reduce a number
of collisions and so as to facilitate requests by a large number of
CPEs 13, or if too many REQ messages have to be re-sent, too much
of available bandwidth can be used up by contention traffic. As a
result, data throughput can be unacceptably decreased.
[0041] One technique used in the prior art to reduce contention
traffic is called piggybacking. In piggybacking, CPE 13 first
requests a data slot. When the data slot is granted by BSC 12, CPE
13 sends data packets upstream. CPE 13 attaches a size of its
current data backlog to a header for one of the data packets. As a
result, whenever the backlog is non-zero, BSC 12 knows to grant a
data slot to CPE 13 without CPE 13 having to send a REQ message.
Thus, contention traffic is reduced.
[0042] Unfortunately, piggybacking is only effective if upstream
traffic from CPE 13 is of the bursty type, so that CPE 13 needs to
make only one contention request per burst. However, some important
traffic sources are non-bursty. Examples of non-bursty traffic
include traffic generated by online games and voice sources. Even
ordinary Internet traffic running over TCP becomes non-bursty when
a communication link is in heavy traffic. In the presence of
non-bursty traffic, the piggyback scheme breaks down, and an
excessive number of contention requests are sent upstream.
[0043] The invention attempts to reduce contention traffic by using
a new state machine to control a contention state for a
communication link between a base station controller and customer
premises equipment in point-to-multipoint communication. The state
can be controlled by the CPE, the BSC, or both.
[0044] FIG. 2 is a flow chart of a state machine according to the
invention.
[0045] Briefly, according to the invention, the state machine
includes a grant pending absent state in which the customer
premises equipment is polled with a unicast request slot. During
the grant pending absent state, the customer premises equipment
sends no upstream data to the base station controller but can use
the unicast request slot to request a data slot for sending
upstream data to the base station controller.
[0046] By virtue of the grant pending absent state, the customer
premises equipment can request a data slot without entering into
contention and generating excess contention traffic. After a
suitable delay without more data being received to send upstream,
the state machine can exit the grant pending absent state. This
delay preferably is long enough for receipt of new non-bursty data
for a communication, for example 50 ms.
[0047] In more detail, FIG. 2 shows a state machine that includes
idle state 20, deferring state 21, grant pending state 22, grant
pending absent state 23, unsolicited grant pending state 24, and
unsolicited grant pending absent state 25. While the particular
states shown in FIG. 2 are representative of a preferred embodiment
of the invention, the invention also can utilize state machines
that do not include all of these states and/or that include
additional states.
[0048] Idle state 20 is a waiting state in which the customer
premises equipment awaits arrival of data packets to send as
upstream data to the base station controller.
[0049] Upon arrival of data to be sent as upstream data, the state
machine transitions to deferring state 21. The state machine also
can transition to unsolicited grant pending state 24 upon receipt
of an unsolicited grant of a data slot from BSC 24, as discussed
below.
[0050] In deferring state 21, CPE 13 sends a REQ message to BSC 12.
The state machine then transitions to grant pending state 22.
However, if no grant is received from BSC 12 in grant pending state
22 before a timeout, the state machine returns to deferring state
21, as discussed below.
[0051] One possible reason for non-receipt of a grant is a
collision with another CPE 13. Thus, deferral is needed, and CPE 13
defers sending a new REQ message for a period of time. The CPE then
sends the new REQ message. In a preferred embodiment, if another
collision occurs, CPE 13 again defers sending another REQ message.
This process preferably continues until the REQ messages gets
through to BSC 12 (as evidenced by receipt of a grant) or until an
error is generated (not shown).
[0052] Preferably, each time CPE 13 defers sending a REQ message,
the period of deferral roughly doubles, with a random factor
included to try to avoid deferring in synch with another CPE. Thus,
in deferring state 21, CPE 13 defers contending for a data slot so
as to avoid collisions with other customer premises equipment.
[0053] In grant pending state 22, CPE 13 awaits and receives grant
of the data slot for sending upstream data to the base station
controller and sends upstream data to the base station controller
after grant of the data slot. However, if a grant is not received
before a timeout, the CPE concludes that a collision or some other
error has occurred, and the state machine returns to deferring
state 21.
[0054] Preferably, in grant pending state 22, CPE 13 uses
piggybacking to request grant of a next data slot while sending
upstream data to BSC 12. When CPE 13 sends the last data in its
backlog, that data preferably is sent without piggybacking. The
state machine then transitions to grant pending absent state 23
according to the invention.
[0055] During grant pending absent state 23, CPE 13 sends no
upstream data to BSC 12. No grant is pending because piggybacking
was not used in the previous transmission of data to BSC 12 (hence
the name of the state). Rather, CPE 13 is periodically (e.g., every
10 ms) polled by BSC 12 with a unicast request slot. CPE 13 can use
this unicast request slot to request a data slot for sending
upstream data to the base station controller. Thus, if more data is
received by is CPE 13 to send upstream to BSC 12, CPE 13 can
request a data slot without going through contention, thereby
reducing contention traffic.
[0056] In some circumstances, the reduction in contention traffic
can be drastic, for example by an order of magnitude. Of course,
the invention is not limited to such circumstances and is not
limited to such drastic reductions in contention traffic.
[0057] Upon grant of a data slot for sending new data to BSC 12,
CPE 13 returns to grant pending state 22.
[0058] If no new data is received by CPE 13 before a timeout in
grant pending absent state 23, the state machine returns to idle
state 20. A timeout of 50 ms has been found to work well.
[0059] In some circumstances, BSC 12 can grant a data slot to CPE
13 without the CPE having requested the data slot. For example, if
the communication between BSC 12 and CPE 13 is a voice
communication, BSC 12 can predict that CPE 13 will need data slots.
BSC 12 can grant those data slots to CPE 13 without CPE 13 having
to request them. Such a grant is an unsolicited grant.
[0060] Accordingly, the preferred embodiment of the state machine
according to the invention also includes unsolicited grant pending
state 24 and unsolicited grant pending absent state 25. These
states correspond to grant pending state 22 and grant pending
absent state 23, respectively, with the exception that they are
entered when an unsolicited grant occurs.
[0061] Thus, in unsolicited grant pending state 24, CPE 13 receives
grant of the data slot for sending upstream data to the base
station controller and sends upstream data to the base station
controller after grant of the data slot, without having requested
the data slot.
[0062] In unsolicited grant pending absent state 25, CPE 13 is
polled with the unicast request slot. During unsolicited grant
pending absent state 25, CPE 13 sends no upstream data to BSC 12
but can use the unicast request slot to request the data slot for
sending upstream data to BSC 12. The state machine enters
unsolicited grant pending absent state 25 after CPE 12 has sent
upstream data to BSC 12 in unsolicited grant pending state 24.
[0063] Pseudo-code for implementing the preferred embodiment of the
invention substantially as discussed above is included in a
technical appendix to this application.
Alternative Embodiments
[0064] The invention can be embodied in a method for controlling
communication using the state machine described above, as well as
in software and/or hardware such as a BSC and/or a CPE that
implements the method, and in various other embodiments.
[0065] In the preceding description, a preferred embodiment of the
invention is described with regard to preferred process steps and
data structures. However, those skilled in the art would recognize,
after perusal of this application, that embodiments of the
invention may be implemented using one or more general purpose
processors or special purpose processors adapted to particular
process steps and data structures operating under program control,
that such process steps and data structures can be embodied as
information stored in or transmitted to and from memories (e.g.,
fixed memories such as DRAMs, SRAMs, hard disks, caches, etc., and
removable memories such as floppy disks, CD-ROMs, data tapes, etc.)
including instructions executable by such processors (e.g., object
code that is directly executable, source code that is executable
after compilation, code that is executable through interpretation,
etc.), and that implementation of the preferred process steps and
data structures described herein using such equipment would not
require undue experimentation or further invention.
[0066] Furthermore, although preferred embodiments of the invention
are disclosed herein, many variations are possible which remain
within the content, scope and spirit of the invention, and these
variations would become clear to those skilled in the art after
perusal of this application.
TABLE-US-00001 TECHNICAL APPENDIX Pseudo-code copyright 2000 Aperto
Networks, Inc. 4.1 State: Idle TABLE-US-00001 ContentionWindow = 0;
Wait for !QueueEmpty; /* The CPE may get an unicast REQ slot in the
idle state. */ /* In this case it returns the current reqWin value
*/ if (unicast REQ SID == mySID) /* Polling case */ { Transmit REQ
in reservation; Tx_slot = slot; PrevREQ = NonContREQ; } if
(NormalGrantId == mySID) Utilize Normal Grant( ); else if
(UnsolicitedGrantId == mySID) { Utilize Unsolicited Grant( ); Go to
State Unsolicited Grant Pending; } /* EPDU Arrives */ Enqueue( );
CalculateDefer( ); Go to State Deferring 4.2 State: Deferring
TABLE-US-00002 if (UnsolicitedGrantId == mySID) /* Unsolicited
Grant Service */ { Utilize Unsolicited Grant( ); Go to State
Unsolicited Grant Pending; } else if (NormalGrantId == mySID)
Utilize Normal Grant( ); else if (unicast REQ SID == mySID) /*
Polling case */ { Transmit REQ in reservation; Tx_slot = slot; Go
to Grant Pending; PrevREQ = NonContREQ; } else { for (REQ Transmit
Opportunity) /* Contention based REQ transmission */ { if (Defer !=
0) Defer = Defer - 1; else /* Defer = 0 */ { if (Number of SIDs in
CPE, with Defer = 0 is greater than 1) choose one SID at random; if
(my SID chosen) { Transmit REQ in contention; Tx_slot = slot;
RTxTime = time_now; PrevREQ = ContREQ; Go to Grant Pending; } } } }
.3 State: Grant Pending TABLE-US-00003 Wait for next MAP; Move ACK
pointer as per ACK field in MAP; The next byte to transmit is set
as per ACK/NACK flag and Sequence Number in the ACK if (Flush EPDU
field set) { Flush HOL EPDU; Go to Idle; } if (unicast REQ SID ==
mySID) /* Polling case */ { Transmit REQ in reservation; Tx_slot =
slot; PrevREQ = NonContREQ; } if (Normal GrantId == mySID) Utilize
Normal Grant( ); else if (Unsolicited GrantId == mySID) { Utilize
Unsolicited Grant( ); Go to State Unsolicited Grant Pending; } else
if (implicit collision indication received) Retry( ); else /* Error
Condition: BSC did not give grant that CPE is expecting */ Go to
Idle; 4.4 State: Grant Pending Absent TABLE-US-00004 if (First Time
Entering State) Count = GrantPendingWait; else --Count; if (unicast
REQ SID == mySID) /* Polling case */ { Transmit REQ in reservation;
Tx_slot = slot; PrevREQ = NonContREQ; } 4.5 State: Unsolicited
Grant Pending TABLE-US-00005 if (unicast REQ SID == mySID) /*
Polling case */ { Transmit REQ in reservation; Tx_slot = slot;
PrevREQ = NonContREQ; } if (Unsolicited GrantId == mySID) { Utilize
Unsolicited Grant( ); Remain in State Unsolicited Grant Pending; }
if (Last Unsolicited Grant) Go to state Idle; 4.6 State:
Unsolicited Grant Absent TABLE-US-00006 if (First Time Entering
State) Count = UnsolicitedGrantPendingWait; else --Count; if
(unicast REQ SID == mySID) /* Polling case */ { Transmit REQ in
reservation; Tx_slot = slot; PrevREQ = NonContREQ; } 4.7 Function:
CalculateDefer( ) TABLE-US-00007 if (ContentionWindow < Start)
Window = Start; if (ContentionWindow > End) Window = End; Defer
= Random[2{circumflex over ( )}ContentionWindow]; 4.8 Function:
Utilize Normal Grant( ) TABLE-US-00008 if (Grant Size == 0) /*
Scheduler not able to make grant during this frame */ Go to Grant
Pending; else /* Grant Size > 0 */ { while (GrantSID == mySID)
/* Multiple Grants in MAP */ { Extract Indicated number of bytes
from SID queue; Confirm that these bytes fit in the tick space
allocated; piggyback size = RequestWindow; Transmit WPDU with
Sequence Number Field set as per MAP and Piggyback field set as
above; } if (piggyback size > 0) { Go to Grant Pending; RTxTime
= time_now; PrevREQ = NonCOntREQ; } else /* No more bytes left in
SID queue */ Go to GrantPendingWait; } 4.9 Function: Utilize
Unsolicited Grant( ) TABLE-US-00009 while (GrantSID == mySID) /*
Multiple Grants in MAP */ { Extract Indicated number of bytes from
SID queue; if (#bytes == 0) Tx only WPDU header; else { Confirm
that these bytes fit in the tick space allocated; piggyback size =
RequestWindow; Transmit WPDU with Sequence Number Field set as per
MAC and Piggyback field set as above; } } 4.10 Function: Retry( )
TABLE-US-00010 Retries = Retries + 1; if (Retries > 16) {
Discard HOL EPDU; Go to Idle; } ContentionWindow = ContentionWindow
+ 1; CalcDefer( ); Go to Deferring; 4.11 Function: Enqueue( )
Enqueue EPDU to tail of queue; RequestWindow=RequestWIndow+Size of
EPDU.
* * * * *