U.S. patent application number 16/185858 was filed with the patent office on 2020-01-23 for compositions promoting the accelerated degradation of metals and composite materials.
The applicant listed for this patent is John L. Lombardi. Invention is credited to John L. Lombardi.
Application Number | 20200023406 16/185858 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 46454328 |
Filed Date | 2020-01-23 |
![](/patent/app/20200023406/US20200023406A1-20200123-C00001.png)
![](/patent/app/20200023406/US20200023406A1-20200123-C00002.png)
![](/patent/app/20200023406/US20200023406A1-20200123-C00003.png)
![](/patent/app/20200023406/US20200023406A1-20200123-C00004.png)
![](/patent/app/20200023406/US20200023406A1-20200123-C00005.png)
![](/patent/app/20200023406/US20200023406A1-20200123-C00006.png)
![](/patent/app/20200023406/US20200023406A1-20200123-C00007.png)
![](/patent/app/20200023406/US20200023406A1-20200123-C00008.png)
![](/patent/app/20200023406/US20200023406A1-20200123-D00001.png)
![](/patent/app/20200023406/US20200023406A1-20200123-D00002.png)
![](/patent/app/20200023406/US20200023406A1-20200123-D00003.png)
View All Diagrams
United States Patent
Application |
20200023406 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Lombardi; John L. |
January 23, 2020 |
COMPOSITIONS PROMOTING THE ACCELERATED DEGRADATION OF METALS AND
COMPOSITE MATERIALS
Abstract
A composition to decommission firearms is presented. The
composition comprises a monomer, a quantity of calcium chloride;
and sulfur-containing compound. The sulfur containing compound
includes sodium persulfate and/or sodium thiosulfate.
Inventors: |
Lombardi; John L.; (Tucson,
AZ) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
Lombardi; John L. |
Tucson |
AZ |
US |
|
|
Family ID: |
46454328 |
Appl. No.: |
16/185858 |
Filed: |
November 9, 2018 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
14716688 |
May 19, 2015 |
10124368 |
|
|
16185858 |
|
|
|
|
13183382 |
Jul 14, 2011 |
9034117 |
|
|
14716688 |
|
|
|
|
61364342 |
Jul 14, 2010 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
1/1 |
Current CPC
Class: |
C23C 8/00 20130101; F41H
13/00 20130101; C08K 3/16 20130101; C09J 4/06 20130101; C08K 5/17
20130101; B05D 3/107 20130101; B05D 7/14 20130101; C09D 7/61
20180101; C08K 2003/3045 20130101; C08G 12/32 20130101; C09K 3/00
20130101 |
International
Class: |
B05D 3/10 20060101
B05D003/10; C09J 4/06 20060101 C09J004/06; C09D 7/61 20060101
C09D007/61; C08G 12/32 20060101 C08G012/32; B05D 7/14 20060101
B05D007/14; C09K 3/00 20060101 C09K003/00; C23C 8/00 20060101
C23C008/00; F41H 13/00 20060101 F41H013/00 |
Goverment Interests
GOVERNMENT LICENSE RIGHTS
[0002] This invention was made with government support under Grant
Number W31P4Q-08-C-0291 awarded by the Defense Advanced Research
Projects Agency. The government has certain rights in the
invention.
Claims
1. A foaming composition to render electrical components
inoperable, comprising: a foaming agent; a corrosion promoter; and
a quantity of sodium persulfate.
2. The composition of claim 1, wherein: the foaming agent comprises
cocamidopropyl betaine; and the corrosion promoter comprises sodium
chloride and methyldiethanol amine.
3. The composition of claim 2, wherein: the sodium chloride at
between about 18 dry weight percent to about 30 dry weight percent
of the composition of claim 2; the methyldiethanol amine at between
about 15 dry weight percent to about 30 dry weight percent of the
composition of claim 2; the cocamidopropyl betaine at between about
10 dry weight percent to about 20 dry weight percent of the
composition of claim 2; and the quantity of sodium persulfate at
between about 35 dry weight percent to about 45 dry weight percent
of the composition of claim 2.
4. The composition of claim 3, further comprising water at about
50-75 weight percent of an aqueous mixture.
5. The foaming composition of claim 1, wherein: the foaming agent
comprises a surfactant selected from the group consisting of
schercotain scab-50 betaine amphoteric, chembetain cas, and
chembetaine 1 hs; and the corrosion promoter comprises sodium
chloride and a component selected from the group consisting of
methyldiethanol amine and sodium thiosulfate.
6. A method to render a firearm inoperable, comprising: combining a
first component with water to create a first aqueous mixture,
wherein the first component comprises: a polymerizable compound; a
corrosion promoter; and sulfur-containing compound to poison the
recombination of atomic hydrogen to molecular hydrogen; and
combining a second component with water to create a second aqueous
mixture, wherein the second component comprises a free radical
polymerization agent; combining the first aqueous mixture with the
second aqueous mixture to create a reaction mixture; and disposing
the reaction mixture on the firearm.
7. The method of claim 6, further comprising polymerizing said
monomer to form a polymeric coating on part or all of said
firearm.
8. The method of claim 7, further comprising: generating atomic
hydrogen; and embrittling metallic portions of said firearm with
said atomic hydrogen.
9. The method of claim 7, further comprising corroding metallic
portions of said firearm.
10. The method of claim 6, wherein said disposing comprises
spraying.
11. The method of claim 6, wherein said polymerizable component
comprises a foaming agent.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application is a Divisional Application claiming
priority from U.S. Divisional Application having Ser. No.
14/716,688, filed Ma. 19, 2015, which claimed priority from U.S.
Nonprovisional Application having Ser. No. 13/138,382 filed Jul.
14, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,034,117, which claimed priority from
U.S. Provisional Application having Ser. No. 61/364,342 filed Jul.
14, 2010, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in
their entirety.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0003] The invention relates to compositions that degrade and
weaken metals, metal alloys, and composite materials.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0004] The effective destruction of small arms is a growing
concern, particularly for military and civilian law enforcement
organizations. Small arms, such as handguns, rifles, and shotguns
are routinely seized by civilian law enforcement organizations,
often as part of criminal investigations. In addition, military
forces often encounter large enemy caches of small arms, including
automatic weapons and other battlefield arms. The continued
existence of these small arms poses a continued threat to the
extent that they may fall back into enemy or criminal hands.
[0005] In order to mitigate the risk posed by confiscated arms
falling back into unwanted hands, many military and law enforcement
operations employ various methods to incapacitate and destroy the
arms to permanently render them inoperable. One method of
destruction involves placing the arms on a hard surface, such as a
concrete road, and driving over the arms with a large vehicle. As
the tires contact the arms, the weight of the vehicle bends and
distorts the barrels of the arms. This method generally works for
rifles, shotguns and other long arms, but is not as effective for
handguns and other smaller arms. Also, while this method
effectively destroys the barrel, the other parts of the weapon are
generally undamaged. Additionally, since the barrels on many types
of arms can be easily replaced, this method is likely to leave some
weapons in operable condition. As such, the effectiveness of this
method is limited.
[0006] Another method, involves plugging the barrel and other
internal cavities of the weapon with a filler material, such as
concrete, thus rendering the weapon inoperative. The filler
material, however, is generally less sturdy as compared to the
weapon itself and can be chipped or burned out to restore the
functionality of the weapon. Yet another method involves inserting
and detonating an explosive in the barrel of the weapon. The
explosion splits and distorts the barrel, rendering the weapon
inoperative. As mentioned above, however, the barrel on many arms
can be easily replaced, thereby restoring the weapon's
functionality. Additionally, this method is very time intensive,
because it must be applied to each weapon individually. It is also
dangerous, as is generally the case when dealing with explosives.
Other methods involve cutting, sawing, smelting, and fully
encapsulating the weapons in concrete. As such, current methods for
incapacitating and destroying small arms are time intensive,
resource intensive, energy intensive, dangerous, or may not be
permanent.
[0007] Accordingly, it would be an advance in the state of the art
to provide a chemical formulation, along with a method and
apparatus for applying such formulation, wherein the formulation is
(i) non-toxic, (ii) made from inexpensive, non-toxic, and readily
available components, (iii) capable of being easily applied to a
cache of small arms or other types of metal, (iv) capable of
rendering small arms inoperable after application, (v) capable of
degrading metal within a short time frame so as to permanently
render small arms inoperable or otherwise structurally weaken metal
such that it will likely fail when used for its intended purpose,
and/or (vi) capable of hardening into a resin that can maintain its
structural integrity at temperatures exceeding that with would
substantially diminish the integrity of metal.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0008] A composition to decommission firearms is presented. The
composition comprises a monomer, a quantity of calcium chloride;
and sulfur-containing compound. The sulfur containing compound
includes sodium persulfate and/or sodium thiosulfate, and
combinations thereof.
[0009] In addition, a foaming composition to render electrical
components inoperable is presented. The composition comprises a
foaming agent, a corrosion promoter; and a quantity of sodium
persulfate.
[0010] In addition, a method of making a composition to
decommission firearms is presented. The method combines a monomer,
a quantity of calcium chloride, and a sulfur-containing compound.
The sulfur-containing compound includes sodium persulfate and/or
sodium thiosulfate. The sulfur-containing compound catalyzes the
polymerization of said monomer.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0011] FIG. 1 is a strain plot for steel samples treated for 24
hours with one embodiment of Applicant's sprayable disarmament
resin;
[0012] FIG. 2 is a strain plot for steel samples treated for 72
hours with one embodiment of Applicant's sprayable disarmament
resin;
[0013] FIGS. 3(a) and 3(b) are bar graphs showing the tensile
strength reduction for steel samples after being treated for 24 or
72 hours with two embodiments of Applicant's sprayable disarmament
resin;
[0014] FIG. 4 contains photographs of steel samples treated with
one embodiment of Applicant's sprayable disarmament resin and
photographs of untreated control samples;
[0015] FIGS. 5(a) and 5(b) are strain plots for Cosmoline-coated
steel samples treated with one embodiment of Applicant's sprayable
disarmament resin for 72 hours;
[0016] FIGS. 6(a) and 6(b) are bar graphs showing the reduction in
tensile strength and elongation-to-break for Cosmoline-coated steel
samples after being treated for 24 or 72 hours with two embodiments
of Applicant's sprayable disarmament resin;
[0017] FIG. 7 contains photographs of Cosmoline-coated steel
samples treated with one embodiment of Applicant's sprayable
disarmament resin for 72 hours and photographs of untreated control
samples;
[0018] FIG. 8 contains photographs of Cosmoline-coated steel
samples treated with one embodiment of Applicant's sprayable
disarmament resin for 144 hours and photographs of untreated
control samples;
[0019] FIG. 9 is a strain plot for steel samples treated with one
embodiment of Applicant's dispensable disarmament resin for 72
hours;
[0020] FIG. 10 contains photographs of steel samples treated with
one embodiment of Applicant's dispensable disarmament resin for 72
hours and photographs of untreated control samples;
[0021] FIG. 11 contains a photograph of copper wires treated with
one embodiment of Applicant's dispensable sprayable resin and a
photograph of untreated copper wires;
[0022] FIG. 12 is a drawing depicting one embodiment of a system to
dispense Applicant's disarmament resin;
[0023] FIG. 13 is a drawing depicting one embodiment of a system to
dispense Applicant's foamable disarmament resin;
[0024] FIG. 14 is a flowchart depicting an exemplary method to
create and use Applicant's disarmament resin;
[0025] FIGS. 15 and 16 show the chemistry involved in creating the
melamine-glyoxal-acrylamide condensate product used in certain
embodiments of Applicant's disarmament resin;
[0026] FIG. 17 is a pneumatic/hydraulic schematic for one
embodiment of an system for applying Applicant's disarmament
resin;
[0027] FIG. 18 is an electrical schematic to be used with the
applicator in FIG. 17;
[0028] FIG. 19 is a pneumatic/hydraulic schematic for another
embodiment of an system for applying Applicant's disarmament resin;
and
[0029] FIG. 20 is an electrical schematic to be used with the
applicator in FIG. 19.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0030] In one embodiment, Applicant's composition comprises a
non-toxic chemical formulation for a more convenient, safe, and
permanent means of weakening and destroying metal (both ferrous and
non-ferrous) and composite materials than those that currently
exist. Applicant's composition, in different embodiments, is
available as a sprayable liquid, a dispensable paste, and a
foamable, formulation. In certain embodiments, Applicant's
composition comprises two components, which cure within a few
minutes after mixing to form a tough, rigid thermoset resin. In
certain embodiments, Applicant's composition comprises two
components, which cure within a few minutes after mixing to form a
flexible resin.
[0031] In one embodiment of Applicant's method, Applicant's
composition is used for incapacitation and destruction of caches of
small arms. Using the dispensable embodiment, a thermoset polymer
immediately cements and binds firearm barrels and actions, as well
as corroding and embrittling metal surfaces to significantly reduce
the strength and ductility of the metal. Applicant's composition is
able to penetrate and effectively degrade firearms even if their
surfaces have been pre-coated with a lubricant/corrosion inhibitor,
such as Cosmoline. Applicant's composition renders the weapons
inoperable by hardening within one or more internal cavities and/or
corroding and weakening metal elements of the weapons.
[0032] In another embodiment of Applicant's method, Applicant's
composition is applied to one or more portions of a suspension
system for a vehicle, such as and without limitation a car, truck
or other military vehicle. After application, Applicant's
composition corrodes and embrittles the affected part, such as for
example and without limitation a coil or leaf spring thereby
causing the spring to fail during use. This embodiment enables
soldiers or law enforcement personal to effectively and discretely
disable vehicles by destroying the suspension system, but without
inflicting significant damage to the other parts of the
vehicle.
[0033] In yet another embodiment of Applicant's method, Applicant's
composition is applied to electronics systems, including circuit
boards, hard disk storage devices, tape storage devices, electronic
storage device, and the like. After application, Applicant's
composition corrodes and embrittles metal and/or ceramic elements
of the contacted device thereby rendering the device
inoperable.
[0034] Applicant's composition degrades metals and other materials
via an electrolytic pitting corrosion mechanism. In addition, in
certain embodiments Applicant's composition comprises sulfurous
compounds which promote hydrogen embrittlement within steel
surfaces. Hydrogen is a byproduct of corrosion and electrochemical
process in an aqueous environment. During an electrochemical
process, hydrogen ions (H+) combine with electrons to form atomic
hydrogen on the surface of a material, such as for example a steel
surface of a firearm component.
[0035] Depending on the environment and interfacial properties, the
atomic hydrogen formed may recombine to form molecular hydrogen.
However, in the presence of sulfur compounds, the hydrogen
recombination to molecular hydrogen process is poisoned, and atomic
hydrogen instead rapidly permeates into the steel surface causing
cracking, embrittlement and ductility loss within the metal. By
virtue of its small size, atomic hydrogen readily permeates through
layers of gun oil, lubricants, or other corrosion prevention
materials, which are commonly used to protect steel from
environmental corrosive.
[0036] In various embodiments, applicant's composition is a
waterborne sprayable liquid, a dispensable gel, or a foamable
liquid. In some embodiments, the composition cures to form a rigid
resin upon application. In some embodiments, the composition cures
to form a flexible resin upon application. The cured resins induce
significant surface pitting and embrittlement in treated steel
leading to delamination, surface cracks, and brittle factures and
causing to rapid reduction in steel tensile strength and
elongation-to-break values.
[0037] In certain embodiments, Applicant's composition comprises a
monomer I that can be polymerized using a chain-growth mechanism to
form oligomers and polymers. In certain embodiments, Applicant's
composition comprises one or more monomers I, wherein R1 is
selected from the group consisting of --N(R3)(R4), --CO--O--R3,
--CO--OH, phenyl, and benzyl, and wherein R2 is selected from the
group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, alkenyl, phenyl, and
benzyl.
##STR00001##
[0038] In certain embodiments, Applicant's composition comprises
one or more substituted acrylamide monomers II, wherein at least
one of the substituted acrylamide monomers is water soluble.
##STR00002##
[0039] In certain embodiments, Applicant's composition comprises
2-Acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid. In certain embodiments,
Applicant's composition comprises 2-Acrylamido-2-methylpropane
sulfonic acid salt III. In certain embodiments, Applicant's
composition comprises 2-Acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid
salt III wherein M.sup.+ is Na.sup.+ or Ca.sup.+.
2-Acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic polymer has a conductivity of
0.02-0.11 s.cm.sup.-1.
##STR00003##
[0040] In certain embodiments, Applicant's composition comprises
one or more substituted N-vinyl pyrrolidones IV.
##STR00004##
[0041] In certain embodiments, Applicant's composition comprises a
2-alkyl-oxazoline V (wherein alkyl is ethyl). Using Applicant's
method, monomer V is polymerized to form a plurality of substituted
polyethyleneimine oligomers/polymers VI.
##STR00005##
[0042] In certain embodiments, Applicant's composition comprises a
cross-linking agent, such as and without limitation, N,
N'-methylene bis-acrylamide VII.
##STR00006##
[0043] In certain embodiments, applicant's dispensable gel
composition is a non-Newtonian fluid with a shear thinning paste
rheology. This gel composition can be dispensed and disposed into
firearms barrels and actions. The resin formed comprises a
condensate between melamine VIII, glyoxal, IX, and acrylamide X.
This formulation polymerizes to a very hard thermoset product
exhibiting high compressive strength. This formulation is well
suited for plugging the firing action and barrels of seized small
arms.
##STR00007##
[0044] The following Examples are presented to further illustrate
to persons skilled in the art how to make and use the invention.
These Examples are not intended as a limitation, however, upon the
scope of Applicant's invention.
EXAMPLE 1
[0045] In one embodiment, Applicant's composition having an about
64/1 weight percentage ratio monomer/cross-linking agent is
prepared using the components in Table 1.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Concentration Part Component Function (wt %)
A Monomer III, Resin Monomer 14.13 Sodium Salt N-N' Resin
Crosslinking 0.22 methylenebisacrylamide Agent CaCl.sub.2
Corrosion/Pitting 8.26 (Calcium Chloride) Promoter
Na.sub.2S.sub.2O.sub.3 Redox Free Radical 3.59 (Sodium Thiosulfate)
Promoter, Corrosion/Hydrogen Embrittlement Promoter B
Na.sub.2S.sub.2O.sub.8 Free Radical 5.22 (Sodium Persulfate)
Polymerization agent- Resin Gelation Initiator, Corrosion Promoter
-- H.sub.2O Resin Solvent 68.58 (water) TOTAL 100.00
[0046] Part A is an aqueous solution prepared by combining a
portion of the water, 2-Acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic
acid/sodium salt monomer (sold in commerce by Lubrizol as
AMPS-2405), N-N' methylenebisacrylamide crosslinking agent (sold in
commerce by Alfa Aesar), calcium chloride prills (sold in commerce
by Hill Brothers Chemical Co.), and anhydrous sodium thiosulfate
(photo grade quality sold in commerce by CCI).
[0047] Part B is an aqueous solution prepared by combining a
portion of the water with sodium persulfate (sold in commerce by
FMC Industrial Chemicals).
[0048] Just prior to application, the Part A and Part B components
are combined to form a low viscosity liquid (less than 20 cP),
which is broadcast onto a target cache of weapons, vehicle
suspension system, electronic circuitry, or other suitable target.
The liquid will cure to a flexible resin within a short period of
time.
EXAMPLE 2
[0049] In one embodiment, Applicant's composition having an about
33/1 weight percentage ratio monomer/cross-linking agent is
prepared using the components in Table 2. This embodiment results
in a flexible resin when cured. The resin of Example 2 is somewhat
softer than the resin of Example 1 due to higher ratio of
monomer/cross-linker in the Example 1 formulation.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Concentration Part Component Function (wt %)
A Monomer III, Sodium Resin Monomer 8.24 Salt N-N' Resin
Crosslinking 0.25 methylenebisacrylamide Agent CaCl.sub.2
Corrosion/Pitting 15.12 Promoter Na.sub.2S.sub.2O.sub.3 Redox Free
Radical 4.53 (Sodium Thiosulfate) Promoter, Corrosion/Hydrogen
Embrittlement Promoter B Na.sub.2S.sub.2O.sub.8 Free Radical 6.52
(Sodium Persulfate) Polymerization agent- Resin Gelation Initiator,
Corrosion Promoter -- H.sub.2O Resin Solvent 65.34 (water) TOTAL
100.00
[0050] Part A is an aqueous solution prepared by combining a
portion of the water, the 2-Acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic
acid/sodium salt monomer (sold in commerce by Lubrizol as
AMPS-2405), the N-N' methylenebisacrylamide crosslinking agent
(sold in commerce by Alfa Aesar), calcium chloride prills (sold in
commerce by Hill Brothers Chemical Co.), and the anhydrous sodium
thiosulfate (photo grade quality sold in commerce by CCI).
[0051] Part B is an aqueous solution prepared by combining a
portion of the water with sodium persulfate (sold in commerce by
FMC Industrial Chemicals).
[0052] Just prior to application, the Part A and Part B components
are combined to form a low viscosity liquid (less than 20 cP),
which is broadcast onto a target cache of weapons, vehicle
suspension system, electronic circuitry, or other suitable target.
The liquid will cure to a flexible resin within a short period of
time.
EXAMPLE 3
[0053] In one embodiment, Applicant's dispensable gel disarmament
resin composition is prepared using the components in Table 3. This
embodiment results in a rigid resin when cured.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Concentration Part Component Function (wt %)
A Melamine VIII- Resin Oligomer 19.70 glyoxal IX- acrylamide X
Condensate Product CaCl.sub.2 Corrosion/Pitting Promoter 6.42
Na.sub.2S.sub.2O.sub.3 Redox Free Radical 4.93 (Sodium Promoter,
Thiosulfate) Corrosion/Hydrogen Embrittlement Promoter B
Na.sub.2S.sub.2O.sub.8 Free Radical Polymerization 9.13 (Sodium
agent - Resin Gelation Persulfate) Initiator, Corrosion Promoter --
H.sub.2O Resin Solvent 59.82 (water) TOTAL 100.00
[0054] The melamine-glyoxal-acrylamide condensation product is
synthesized from 322.14 g of glyoxal (40%), sold in commerce by
Alfa Aeser, weighed into a 1000 mL polyethylene bottle with large
stir bar and then about 85% of the total water amount
(144.88*0.85=123.12 g) is added into the bottle. The glyoxal
solution is heated to 40.degree. C. Approximately 4-5 g of
melamine, sold in commerce by Sigma-Aldrich, is added into the
glyoxal solution every two minutes over a period of 20 minutes. The
final amount of melamine in the solution is 50.00 g. The reaction
is allowed to proceed for 3 hours at 40.degree. C. Referring to
FIG. 15, the reaction between melamine 1502 and glyoxal 1504 to
form product 1506. The melamine-glyoxal-acrylamide condensation
product is then copolymerized with 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane
sulfonic acid salt via radical chain polymerization to form a
highly crosslinked polymer.
[0055] Next, 263.01 g of 60% acrylamide solution, sold in commerce
by Alfa Aesar, is added to the reaction mixture while stirring. The
pH is then adjusted to 8.00 using 10% sodium carbonate solution.
The reaction is allowed to proceed for another 2 hours at
40.degree. C., then the pH is adjusted to pH 7.5 if necessary using
10% sodium carbonate solution. Referring to FIG. 16, the reaction
between the melamine/glyoxal product 1602 and acrylamide 1604 to
form the condensate product 1606.
[0056] The remaining 15% of the total water amount is then added
into the reaction. Finally, the heat is removed and the solution
stirred for another 4-5 days. The solid content, from such prepared
melamine-glyoxal-acrylamide condensate solution, will be
approximately 43.2% weight percent.
[0057] Part A is an aqueous solution prepared by combining a
portion of the water, the melamine-glyoxal-acrylamide condensation
product, calcium chloride prills and the sodium thiosulfate.
[0058] Part B is an aqueous solution prepared by combining a
portion of the water with sodium persulfate.
[0059] Just prior to application, the Part A and Part B components
are combined to form gel, which is applied onto a target cache of
weapons, vehicle suspension system, electronic circuitry, or other
suitable target. The gel will cure to a rigid resin within a short
period of time.
[0060] In some embodiments, the quantity of the
melamine-glyoxal-acrylamide condensation product is between about
40 dry weight percent and about 60 dry weight percent of the
combined Part A and Part B components in Table 3. In some
embodiments, the quantity of sodium chloride is between about 10
dry weight percent and about 20 dry weight percent of the combined
Part A and Part B components in Table 3. In some embodiments, the
quantity of the sodium thiosulfate is between about 5 dry weight
percent and about 15 dry weight percent of the combined Part A and
Part B components in Table 3. In some embodiments, the quantity of
the sodium persulfate is between about 20 dry weight percent and
about 30 weight percent of the combined Part A and Part B
components in Table 3. In some embodiments, the total quantity of
water used to create the aqueous Part A component and the aqueous
Part B component is between about 50 weight percent and about 75
weight percent of the total components in Table 3.
EXAMPLE 4
[0061] In one embodiment, Applicant's dispensable liquid
disarmament resin composition is prepared using the components in
Table 4. This embodiment results in a rigid resin when cured.
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Concentration Part Component Function (wt %)
A Melamine VIII- Resin Oligomer 9.45 glyoxal IX- acrylamide X
Condensate Product Monomer III, Resin Co-monomer 5.50 Sodium Salt
CaCl.sub.2 Corrosion/Pitting Promoter 13.56 Na.sub.2S.sub.2O.sub.3
Redox Free Radical 4.53 (Sodium Promoter, Thiosulfate)
Corrosion/Hydrogen Embrittlement Promoter B Na.sub.2S.sub.2O.sub.8
Free Radical Polymerization 6.53 (Sodium agent - Resin Gelation
Persulfate) Initiator, Corrosion Promoter -- H.sub.2O Resin Solvent
60.43 (water) TOTAL 100.00
[0062] The melamine-glyoxal-acrylamide condensation product is
synthesized in the same manner as in Example 3 above.
[0063] Part A is an aqueous solution prepared by combining a
portion of the water, the melamine-glyoxal-acrylamide condensation
product, the 2-Acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid/sodium salt
monomer, calcium chloride prills and the sodium thiosulfate.
[0064] Part B is an aqueous solution prepared by combining a
portion of the water with sodium persulfate.
[0065] Just prior to application, the Part A and Part B components
are combined to form a low viscosity liquid (less than 20 cP),
which is broadcast onto a target cache of weapons, vehicle
suspension system, electronic circuitry, or other suitable target.
The liquid will cure to a rigid resin within a short period of
time.
Other Embodiments
[0066] In different embodiments, Applicant's composition comprises
copper or graphite powder to further promote corrosion induced by
galvanic current (i.e., a galvanic current enhancer). In different
embodiments, the copper powder is grade 161 or 301-E, sold in
commerce by ACuPowder. In one embodiment, the graphite powder is
grade A60 synthetic graphite, sold in commerce by Asbury Carbons.
In different embodiments, Applicant's composition comprises less
than 1 weight percent copper or graphite powder, between about 1
weight percent and about 2 weight percent copper or graphite
powder, between about 2 weight percent and about 5 weight percent
copper or graphite powder, or greater than about 5 weight
percent.
[0067] In certain embodiments, the formulations in Examples 1-4
utilize ammonium persulfate and/or potassium persulfate in place of
sodium persulfate. In these embodiments, the amounts of sodium
persulfate/ammonium persulfate/potassium persulfate are adjusted to
give the same molar equivalents of total persulfate as recited in
Tables 1-4, respectively.
[0068] In certain embodiments, the Part A mixture of Examples 1-4
is prepared without water (i.e., only the dry components are
combined) and the Part B component of Examples 1-4 is also prepared
without water. The dry and light weight Part A and Part B
components can be easily shipped or otherwise transported as
necessary. Water is then added on-site to form the aqueous Part A
and Part B components. In one embodiment, 25 mL of water is added
to the dry Part A mixture to form the aqueous Part A component and
43 mL of water is added to the dry Part B component to form the
aqueous Part B component. Just prior to application, the aqueous
Part A component and aqueous Part B component are mixed together,
and the mixture broadcast onto a target cache of weapons, vehicle
suspension system, electronic circuitry, and the like.
[0069] The mixing may occur in an applicator device. In one
embodiment of the applicator, the applicator contains a chamber for
the Part A component and a separate chamber for the Part B
component. Liquid streams of the Part A and Part B components are
forced together in a manner to allow sufficient mixing before
exiting the device.
[0070] The only regulated component of Tables 1-4 is sodium
persulfate (Na.sub.2S.sub.2O.sub.8), which is regulated by the US
Department of Transportation for transportation. The embodiments in
Examples 1-4 do not contain any acidic components. Acid is instead
generated in-situ via steel/persulfate corrosion reactions.
Test Results
[0071] Test samples comprising 4130 steel wire rod, cut into 4 inch
lengths with a prepared gauge length of 1.25 inches including a
diminished diameter cross-section in the center of the rod were
used to evaluate the formulations of Tables 1 and 2. The prepared
gauge length diminished/reduced diameter section has a diameter of
0.06 (+/-0.001) inches and is produced by rotational milling of the
rod at approx. 3000 rpm with 200 grit Emery Cloth and finished with
a 440 grit silicon carbide abrasive (as per ASTM E 8/E 8M -08,
Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials).
The surface area to volume ratio (S/V) of the 4140 wire is 67
inches.sup.-1.
[0072] The formulations of Example 1-4 were applied to 4130 steel
wire rod. The treated specimens were then allowed to age for 3-5
days. Stress/strain tests were then preformed on test specimens and
controls.
[0073] Referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, two representative stress-strain
plots for 4340 steel rods after being treated with the Example 2
formulation are shown. FIG. 1 depicts a strain plot 200 for a steel
sample treated with Example 2 formulation and aged for 24 hours (1
day). The vertical axis 202 represents the force applied to the
sample. The horizontal axis 204 represents time. The stress-strain
curve 206 represents the control sample, which was not treated with
the Example 2 formulation. The stress-strain curve 208 represents
the sample treated with the Example 2 formulation for 24 hours.
[0074] The control sample and treated sample were exposed to
steadily-increasing force. The stress-strain curves 206 and 208
show steadily increasing force over time at 210. The yield point of
each sample is reached at 212 where each stress-strain curve 206
and 208 begin to flatten as the samples begin to deform. The break
point of each sample is reached at 214 and 216 where the samples
fail under the applied force.
[0075] The treated sample, represented by curve 208, showed a
reduced yield point and break point compared to the control sample,
represented by curve 206.
[0076] FIG. 2 depicts a strain plot 220 for a steel sample treated
with cured Table 2 formulation for 72 hours (3 days). The vertical
axis 222 represents the force applied to the sample. The horizontal
axis 224 represents time. The stress-strain curve 226 represents
the control sample, which was not treated with the Example 2
formulation. The stress-strain curve 228 represents the sample
treated with the Example 2 formulation for 72 hours.
[0077] The control sample and treated sample were exposed to
steadily-increasing force. The stress-strain curves 226 and 228
show steadily increasing force over time at 230. The yield point of
each sample is reached at 232 and 234 where each stress-strain
curve 226 and 228 begin to flatten as the samples begin to deform.
The break point of each sample is reached at 236 and 238 where the
samples fail under the applied force.
[0078] The treated sample, represented by curve 228, showed a
significant reduction in both yield point and break point compared
to the control sample, represented by curve 226.
[0079] Referring to FIGS. 3(a) and 3(b), two representative bar
graphs are shown depicting the reduction in tensile strength and
elongation for steel samples treated with the Table 1 formulation
and the Example 2 formulation. FIG. 3(a) shows a bar graph 300
depicting the tensile strength reduction for steel samples after
being treated for 1 or 3 days with either the Table 1 formulation
or the Example 2 formulation. The vertical axis 302 represents the
percent reduction in tensile strength over control samples that
have not been treated with either formulation.
[0080] Bar 304 represents a sample treated with the Table 1
formulation for 24 hours (1 day). Bar 306 represents a sample
treated with the Table 1 formulation for 72 hours (3 day). Bar 308
represents a sample treated with the Example 2 formulation for 24
hours (1 day). Bar 310 represents a sample treated with the Example
2 formulation for 72 hours (3 day). Increase treatment time results
in a reduction in tensile strength for both formulations.
Additionally, the samples treated with the AMP-5 formulation 120,
represented by 304 and 306, show increased reduction in tensile
strength as compared to the sample treated with the Table 1
formulation, represented by bars 308 and 310. In general, the
reduction in tensile strength indicates the damage caused by
corrosion.
[0081] FIG. 3(b) shows a bar graph 320 depicting the
elongation-to-break reduction for steel samples after being treated
for 1 or 3 days with either the Table 1 formulation or the Example
2 formulation. Elongation-to-break is the distance a sample will
elongate (i.e. stretch) until it fails (i.e. breaks). The vertical
axis 302 represents the percent reduction in elongation-to-break
over control samples that have not been treated with either
formulation.
[0082] Bar 324 represents a sample treated with the Table 1
formulation for 24 hours (1 day). Bar 326 represents a sample
treated with the Table 1 formulation for 72 hours (3 day).
[0083] Bar 328 represents a sample treated with the Example 2
formulation for 24 hours (1 day). Bar 330 represents a sample
treated with the Example 2 formulation for 72 hours (3 day).
Increase treatment time results in a reduction in
elongation-to-break for both formulations. Additionally, the
samples treated with the Example 2 formulation, represented by bars
324 and 326, show increased reduction in elongation-to-break as
compared to the sample treated with the Table 1 formulation,
represented by bars 328 and 330. In general, the reduction in
elongation-to-break indicates the damage resulted from hydrogen
embrittlement.
[0084] Referring to FIG. 4, photographs of steel samples treated
with the Example 2 formulation and untreated control samples are
shown. Photograph 400 shows an untreated control sample. Photograph
402 shows a sample after being treated with the Example 2
formulation for 24 hours (1 day). Photograph 404 shows a magnified
view of the untreated control sample in photograph 400. Photograph
406 shows a magnified view of the sample treated with the Example 2
formulation for 24 hours in photograph 402.
[0085] Photograph 408 shows the untreated control sample after
being exposed to sufficient force to reach the break point. The
sample in photograph 408 shows normal elongation and necking. The
normal "cup and cone" failure can be seen at the break point
410.
[0086] Photograph 412 shows the sample treated with the Example 2
formulation for 24 hours after being exposed to sufficient force to
reach the break point. The sample in photograph 412 shows a
non-symmetrical break at the break point 414.
[0087] Small arms in the field are often lubricated with Cosmoline
to protect them from corrosion. Cosmoline is a trade name for a
class of rust preventatives substances that is frequently applied
to firearms to inhibit rust. Cosmoline is a homogeneous mixture of
oily and waxy long-chain, non-polar hydrocarbons. A suitable
disarmament resin formulations should be able to penetrate through
the Cosmoline layer and readily degrade the underlying steel
firearm surfaces.
[0088] Steel samples were treated with a Cosmoline layer having a
thickness of 10 mils (1 inch=1000 mils). The Cosmoline layer
thickness recommended by the manufacturers for corrosion protection
is 1.5 mils. The Cosmoline layer applied to the samples, therefore,
was well in excess of the manufacturer's recommendation
thickness.
[0089] Referring to FIG. 5, two representative stress-strain plots
for 4340 steel rods after being treated with cured Example 2
formulation are shown. FIG. 5(a) depicts a strain plot 500 for a
steel sample treated with cured Example 2 formulation for 72 hours
(3 days). The vertical axis 502 represents the force applied to the
sample. The horizontal axis 504 represents time. The stress-strain
curve 506 represents the control sample, which was not treated with
the Example 2 formulation. The stress-strain curve 508 represents
the sample treated with the Example 2 formulation for 72 hours.
[0090] The control sample and treated sample were exposed to
steadily-increasing force. The stress-strain curves 506 and 508
show steadily increasing force over time at 510. The yield point of
each sample is reached at 512 where each stress-strain curve 506
and 508 begin to flatten as the samples begin to deform. The break
point of each sample is reached at 514 and 516 where the samples
fail under the applied force.
[0091] Despite the presence of the 10-mil thick Cosmoline layer,
the treated sample, represented by curve 508, showed a reduced
yield point and a significant reduction in break point compared to
the control sample, represented by curve 506.
[0092] FIG. 5(b) depicts a strain plot 520 for a steel sample
treated with cured Example 2 formulation for 144 hours (6 days).
The vertical axis 522 represents the force applied to the sample.
The horizontal axis 524 represents time. The stress-strain curve
526 represents the control sample, which was not treated with the
Example 2 formulation. The stress-strain curve 528 represents the
sample treated with the Example 2 formulation for 144 hours.
[0093] The control sample and treated sample were exposed to
steadily-increasing force. The stress-strain curves 526 and 528
show steadily increasing force over time at 530. The yield point of
each sample is reached at 532 where each stress-strain curve 526
and 528 begin to flatten as the samples begin to deform. The break
point of each sample is reached at 534 and 536 where the samples
fail under the applied force.
[0094] Despite the presence of the 10-mil thick Cosmoline layer,
the treated sample, represented by curve 528, showed a considerable
reduction in both yield point and break point compared to the
control sample, represented by curve 226.
[0095] Referring to FIG. 6, two representative bar graphs are shown
depicting the reduction in tensile strength and elongation for
steel samples coated with a Cosmoline layer of varying thicknesses
(1.5 mil, 5 mil, and 10 mil) and treated with the Example 2
formulation. FIG. 6(a) shows a bar graph 600 depicting the tensile
strength reduction for steel samples having a Cosmoline layer of
1.5 mils, 5 mils, or 10 mils and after being treated for 72 hours
or 144 hours (3 or 6 days) with the Example 2 formulation. The
vertical axis 602 represents the percent reduction in tensile
strength over control samples that have not been treated with
either formulation.
[0096] 1.5 mil Cosmoline Coating. Bar 604 represents a sample
coated with a 1.5 mil layer of Cosmoline layer and treated with the
Example 2 formulation for 72 hours (3 days). Bar 606 represents a
sample coated with a 1.5 mil layer of Cosmoline layer and treated
with the Example 2 formulation for 144 hours (6 days).
[0097] 5 mil Cosmoline Coating. Bar 608 represents a sample coated
with a 5 mil layer of Cosmoline layer and treated with the Example
2 formulation for 72 hours (3 days). Bar 610 represents a sample
coated with a 5 mil layer of Cosmoline layer and treated with the
Example 2 formulation for 144 hours (6 days).
[0098] 10 mil Cosmoline Coating. Bar 612 represents a sample coated
with a 10 mil layer of Cosmoline layer and treated with the Example
2 formulation for 72 hours (3 days). Bar 614 represents a sample
coated with a 10 mil layer of Cosmoline layer and treated with the
Example 2 formulation for 144 hours (6 days).
[0099] FIG. 6(b) shows a bar graph 620 depicting the
elongation-to-break reduction for steel samples having a Cosmoline
layer of 1.5 mils, 5 mils, or 10 mils and after being treated for
72 hours or 144 hours (3 or 6 days) with the Example 2 formulation.
The vertical axis 622 represents the percent reduction in
elongation-to-break over control samples that have not been treated
with either formulation.
[0100] 1.5 mil Cosmoline Coating. Bar 624 represents a sample
coated with a 1.5 mil layer of Cosmoline layer and treated with the
Example 2 formulation for 72 hours (3 days). Bar 626 represents a
sample coated with a 1.5 mil layer of Cosmoline layer and treated
with the Example 2 formulation for 144 hours (6 days).
[0101] 5 mil Cosmoline Coating. Bar 628 represents a sample coated
with a 5 mil layer of Cosmoline layer and treated with the Example
2 formulation for 72 hours (3 days). Bar 630 represents a sample
coated with a 5 mil layer of Cosmoline layer and treated with the
Example 2 formulation for 144 hours (6 days).
[0102] 10 mil Cosmoline Coating. Bar 632 represents a sample coated
with a 10 mil layer of Cosmoline layer and treated with the Example
2 formulation for 72 hours (3 days). Bar 634 represents a sample
coated with a 10 mil layer of Cosmoline layer and treated with the
Example 2 formulation for 144 hours (6 days).
[0103] Compared to the samples that were not coated with Cosmoline,
FIGS. 3(a) and 3(b), the rate by which the steel corroded and
became hydrogen embrittled, as shown in FIGS. 6(a) and 6(b),
decreased as the Cosmoline thickness increased. All Cosmoline
samples treated with the Example 2 formulation, however, were
ultimately degraded as a result of the treatment.
[0104] Referring to FIG. 7, photographs of steel samples with a 10
mil Cosmoline coating are shown. Photographs 700, 704, and 708 are
photographs of untreated control samples. Photographs 702, 706, and
712 are photographs of samples treated with the Example 2
formulation for 72 hours (3 days).
[0105] Photograph 700 shows an untreated control sample. Photograph
702 shows a sample coated with a 10 mil Cosmoline layer after being
treated with the Example 2 formulation for 72 hours (3 days).
Photograph 704 shows a magnified view of the untreated control
sample in photograph 700. Photograph 706 shows a magnified view of
the sample coated with a 10 mil Cosmoline layer after being treated
with the Example 2 formulation for 72 hours in photograph 702.
[0106] Photograph 708 shows the untreated control sample after
being exposed to sufficient force to reach the break point. The
sample in photograph 708 shows normal elongation and necking. The
normal "cup and cone" formation can be seen at the break point
710.
[0107] Photograph 712 shows the sample coated with a 10 mil
Cosmoline layer after being treated with the Example 2 formulation
for 72 hours and after being exposed to sufficient force to reach
the break point. The sample in photograph 712 shows a
non-symmetrical break at the break point 714.
[0108] Referring to FIG. 8, photographs of steel samples with a 10
mil Cosmoline coating are shown. Photographs 800, 804, and 808 are
photographs of untreated control samples. Photographs 802, 806, and
812 are photographs of samples treated with the Example 2
formulation for 144 hours (6 days).
[0109] Photograph 800 shows an untreated control sample. Photograph
802 shows a sample after being treated with the Example 2
formulation for 144 hours (6 days). Photograph 804 shows a
magnified view of the untreated control sample in photograph 800.
Photograph 806 shows a magnified view of the sample treated with
the Example 2 formulation for 144 hours in photograph 802.
[0110] Photograph 808 shows the untreated control sample after
being exposed to sufficient force to reach the break point. The
sample in photograph 808 shows normal elongation and necking. The
normal "cup and cone" failure can be seen at the break point
810.
[0111] Photograph 812 shows the sample coated with a 10 mil
Cosmoline layer after being treated with the Example 2 formulation
for 144 hours and after being exposed to sufficient force to reach
the break point. The sample in photograph 812 shows a
non-symmetrical break at the break point 814.
[0112] Significant pitting can be observed in the resin treated
specimen as shown in photographs 702, 706, 712 (72 hour treatment)
and 802, 806, 812 (144 hour exposure). In comparison, there was no
pitting observed in the Cosmoline treated control specimens, as
shown in the photographs 700, 704, 708 and 800, 804, 808. This
shows that the cured Example 2 formulation was able to permeate
through the Cosmoline and induce localized pitting corrosion within
the steel specimens.
[0113] FIG. 9 depicts a strain plot 900 for a steel sample treated
with Table 3 formulation for 72 hours (3 days). The vertical axis
902 represents the force applied to the sample. The horizontal axis
904 represents time. The stress-strain curve 906 represents the
control sample, which was not treated with the Table 3 formulation.
The stress-strain curve 908 represents the sample treated with the
Table 3 formulation for 72 hours.
[0114] The control sample and treated sample were exposed to
steadily-increasing force. The stress-strain curves 906 and 908
show steadily increasing force over time at 910. The yield point of
each sample is reached at 912 where each stress-strain curve 906
and 908 begin to flatten as the samples begin to deform. The break
point of each sample is reached at 914 and 916 where the samples
fail under the applied force.
[0115] The treated sample, represented by curve 908, showed a
reduced break point compared to the control sample, represented by
curve 906. The average tensile strength reduction is 6.6% for resin
treated steel versus control, while its reduction in
elongation-to-break is 54%.
[0116] Referring to FIG. 10, photographs of steel samples treated
with the Table 3 formulation and an untreated control samples are
shown. Photograph 1000 shows an untreated control sample.
Photograph 1002 shows a sample after being treated with the Table 3
formulation for 72 hours (3 days). Photograph 1004 shows a
magnified view of the untreated control sample in photograph 1000.
Photograph 1006 shows a magnified view of the sample treated with
the Table 3 formulation for 72 hours in photograph 1002.
[0117] Photograph 1008 shows the untreated control sample after
being exposed to sufficient force to reach the break point. The
sample in photograph 1008 shows normal elongation and necking. The
normal "cup and cone" failure can be seen at the break point
1010.
[0118] Photograph 1012 shows the sample treated with the Table 3
formulation for 72 hours after being exposed to sufficient force to
reach the break point. The sample in photograph 1012 shows a
non-symmetrical break at the break point 1014.
[0119] Equivalent structural tests were also performed on SAE 1020
grade threaded steel rods, SAE 1025 grade threaded steel rods, SAE
1045 grade tempered steel rods, SAE 4140 grade tempered steel rods,
AK-47 Rifle Barrel Sections, and AK-47 springs, all with similar
results. Applicant's composition also proved to be effective in
degrading metal coated with a chrome layer, as is the case with the
interior surface of AK-47 and other firearm barrels.
Corrosive Foam Embodiments
[0120] Applicant's composition is also useful to corrode and
otherwise render inoperable electronics systems, including circuit
boards, and other systems containing exposed wires or other
microelectronics. The cured resin of Applicant's composition is
highly conductive, with a measured conductivity value of 7500
.mu.S.cm.sup.-1, which is approximately twice as conductive as a
2000 ppm solution of NaCl in water (3860 .mu.S.cm.sup.-1). In
addition, the resin has been shown to be effective in degrading the
copper and other conductive components of the electronic
device.
[0121] Referring to FIG. 11, a photograph 1100 of copper wires
treated with the Example 2 formulation and an untreated control
sample is shown. Two copper wires 1102 and 1104 are shown in a
container 1106. No other material is added to the container 1108.
The resistance between copper wire 1102 and copper wire 1104,
measured with a digital multimeter, shows no electrical connection
(i.e. infinite resistance between the wires).
[0122] Two copper wires 1110 and 1112 are shown in a second
container 1114. The Example 2 formulation was added to the
container 1114 as shown at 1116. The resistance between the copper
wire 1102 and copper wire 1104, measured with a digital multimeter,
showed a resistance of .about.200 .OMEGA.. This resistance value
equates to a conductivity value of 7500 .mu.S.cm.sup.-1,
approximately twice as conductive as a 2000 ppm solution of NaCl in
water (3860 .mu.S.cm.sup.-1). Additionally, the corrosion of the
copper wire is indicated by the darkened areas surrounding the
portion of each wire 1110 and 1112 covered by the Example 2
formulation. The corrosion area for wire 1112 is indicated at
1118.
[0123] As such, two degradation modes exist for the Applicant's
composition when applied to electrical circuitry. Applicant's
composition corrodes any exposed metal and composite materials.
Applicant's composition also forms low resistance electrical
connections between all exposed electrically active portions of the
circuit, rendering the circuit instantly inoperative. In addition,
the cured resin, resulting from application of Applicant's
composition, encases the circuit in a tough, intractable thermoset
polymer that cannot be easily removed. As the resin cures, the
resistance between copper wires 1110 and 1112 will increase over
time due to loss of water and the build up of corrosive material.
By that point, however, significant corrosion of the electrically
active circuit components is expected to further render the circuit
inoperative.
[0124] Tables 5 through 8 recite foamable embodiments of
Applicant's composition. In certain embodiments, Applicant's
foamable composition comprises Cocamidopropyl betaine (CAB) XI
##STR00008##
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Concentra- Part Component Function tion (wt
%) A NaCl Corrosion/Pitting Promoter 8.4 Methyldiethanolamine
Corrosion/pitting Promoter, 8.14 Stress Corrosion Cracking Promoter
Cocamidopropyl Foaming Agent 6.56 betaine B Na.sub.2S.sub.2O.sub.8
Corrosion/Pitting Promoter 15.59 (Sodium Persulfate) -- H.sub.2O
Solvent 61.31 (water) TOTAL 100.00
TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Concentra- Part Component Function tion (wt
%) A CaCl.sub.2 Corrosion/Pitting Promoter 8.79
Methyldiethanolamine Corrosion/pitting Promoter, 7.92 Stress
Corrosion Cracking Promoter Surfactant Foaming Agent 9.07 B
Na.sub.2S.sub.2O.sub.8 Corrosion/Pitting Promoter 15.17 (Sodium
Persulfate) -- H.sub.2O Solvent 59.05 (water) TOTAL 100.00
[0125] Stable, thick foams (maintaining height >1 day) were
produced from the compositions of Table 6, wherein the Surfactant
is selected from the group consisting of SCHERCOTAIN SCAB-50
Betaine Amphoteric (INCI Name: Cocamidopropyl Hydroxysultaine,
Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio), CHEMBETAIN CAS (INCI Name:
Cocamidopropyl Hydroxysultaine, Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe,
Ohio), and CHEMBETAINE LHS (INCI Name: Lauryl Hydroxy Sultaine,
Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio).
TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Concentration Part Component Function (wt %)
A CaCl.sub.2 Corrosion/Pitting Promoter 6.96 Na.sub.2S.sub.2O.sub.3
Corrosion/pitting Promoter, 8.35 (Sodium Stress Corrosion Cracking
Thiosulfate) Promoter Surfactant Foaming Agent 8.91 B
Na.sub.2S.sub.2O.sub.8 Corrosion/Pitting Promoter 12.02 (Sodium
Persulfate) -- H.sub.2O Solvent 63.76 (water) TOTAL 100.00
[0126] The formulation of Table 7 gives a stable foam comprising a
lower density than the foams of Table 6. The foams of Table 7
utilized a Surfactant selected from the group consisting of
SCHERCOTAIN SCAB-50 Betaine Amphoteric (INCI Name: Cocamidopropyl
Hydroxysultaine, Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio), CHEMBETAIN
CAS (INCI Name: Cocamidopropyl Hydroxysultaine, Lubrizol
Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio), and CHEMBETAINE LHS (INCI Name:
Lauryl Hydroxy Sultaine, Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe,
Ohio).
TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Concentration Part Component Function (wt %)
A NaCl Corrosion/Pitting Promoter 8.17 Methyldiethanol
Corrosion/pitting Promoter, 7.92 amine Stress Corrosion, Cracking
Promoter Surfactant Foaming Agent 9.07 B Na.sub.2S.sub.2O.sub.8
Corrosion/Pitting Promoter 15.17 (Sodium Persulfate) -- H.sub.2O
Solvent 59.67 (water) TOTAL 100.00
[0127] The formulation of Table 8 gives a thick foam, wherein the
Surfactant comprises CHEMOXIDE CAW (INCI Name: Cocamidopropylamine
Oxide, Lubrizol Corporation Wickliffe, Ohio).
[0128] In certain embodiments, Applicant's composition comprises
Monomer III and N, N'-methylene bis-acrylamide, compound VII, in
the amounts of Table 1 or Example 2, in combination with the
formulations of Tables 5, 6, 7, or 8. The resulting foam shows
enhanced stabilization with respect to drainage and settling.
[0129] The Table 5, 6, 7, and 8, formulations produce a foam when
agitated or aerated, such as with a aeration nozzle. In one
embodiment, when applied to a circuit or other electrical
equipment, the foam corrodes exposed metal circuitry and
electrically connects all circuits that it contacts, thereby
shorting the circuit. Application of a Table 5, 6, 7, and/or 8,
formulation thereby renders the circuit inoperable by initially
electrically shorting the circuit and, over time, corroding the
metal portions of the circuit.
[0130] In certain embodiments, a Table 5, 6, 7, and/or 8,
formulation can be prepared by combining the first four listed
components in powdered form. When deployed, the final component,
water, is added to the mixture, aerated to create a foam, and
applied to the target. A suitable applicator, such as described in
FIG. 12, may be used to hydrate, aerate, and dispense the Table 5
formulation on the target.
[0131] The methyldiethanol amine component recited in Tables 5, 6,
7, and 8, can be replaced using a substitute amine selected from
the group consisting of hexamethylenetetramine, ethanolamine,
diethanolamine, triethanolamine, monoisopropanolamine,
diisopropanolamine, triisopropanolamine, polyethyleneimine,
Bis-(hydroxyethyl) methylamine, and 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol.
The substituted amine replaces methyldiethanol amine in equivalent
molar quantities.
[0132] Applicant's composition can be transported in the form of
two dry and relatively safe precursor components in powder form. In
one embodiment, an applicator device for either the sprayable
embodiment or the dispensable gel embodiment may contain three
chambers: a first chamber for holding the first hydrated precursor,
a second chamber for holding the second hydrated precursor, and a
third chamber for allowing the first and second precursors to
combine and mix, thereby commencing the polymerization reaction.
The powdered precursor may be hydrated before being added to the
applicator device, or alternately, may be hydrated directly in
their respective chambers in the device. A pumping means is added
to the application device to drive the hydrated subcomponents into
the mixing chamber. The pumping means also drives the combined
hydrated precursor mixture out through a spray head (for the
sprayable embodiment) or a nozzle (for the dispensable gel
embodiment) and onto the target. In another embodiment, the
hydrated precursors are mixed manually in a container and applied
to the target with a brush or poured over the target.
[0133] Referring to FIG. 12, a Part A component of a sprayable
formulation, such as and without limitation the Example 1-3
formulations, or an Part A component of a dispensable gel
formulation, such as and without limitation the Example 3
formulation, is added to chamber 1202. The Part A component
comprises a resin monomer, a resin crosslinking agent, a corrosion
promoter, and a free radial initiator. In one embodiment, the Part
A component is added in powder form and a sufficient amount of
water is subsequently added to chamber 1202. In another embodiment,
the Part A component is hydrated before being added to chamber
1202.
[0134] In these embodiments, a Part B component for either the
sprayable or dispensable gel formulations is added to chamber 1204.
The Part B component comprises a polymerization initiator. In one
embodiment, the Part B component is added in powder form and a
sufficient amount of water is subsequently added to chamber 1204.
In another embodiment, the Part B component is hydrated before
being added to chamber 1204.
[0135] The contents of chamber 1202 and chamber 1204 are directed
into chamber 1206. This can occur by a pumping means or physical
mixing. Chamber 1206 allows polymerization of the mixture to
commence. The mixed contents of chamber 1206 are subsequently
directed outwardly through a nozzle, a spray head, or an aerator,
depending on whether Applicant's composition is dispensable,
sprayable, or foamable, respectively, and onto the target.
[0136] Referring to FIG. 13, a block diagram 1300 represents an
applicator to dispense the Table 4 formulation. The first four
listed components of the Table 5 formulation (NaCl, Methyldiethanol
amine, MAFO CAB CG Betaine, Sodium Persulfate) are combined and
added to chamber 1302 to form a Part A mixture. In one embodiment,
water is added to hydrate the mixture. In another embodiment, the
mixture is hydrated before being added to chamber 1302. In one
embodiment, a force is applied to the hydrated mixture in chamber
1302, though a pumping means or though direct pressure, to force
the mixture though an aeration nozzle 1304.
[0137] Referring to FIG. 14, a flowchart 1400 shows an exemplary
embodiment of a method to create and use the disarmament resin. A
resin monomer, a resin crosslinking agent, a corrosion promoter, a
free radial promoter, and a resin solvent are provided at step
1402. In one embodiment, the resin monomer is AMPS 2405, the resin
crosslinking agent is N-N' methylenebisacrylamide, the corrosion
promoter is calcium chloride, the free radial promoter is sodium
thiosulfate, and the resin solvent is water. In another embodiment,
the resin monomer is melamine-glyoxal-acrylamide, the corrosion
promoter is calcium chloride, the free radial promoter is sodium
thiosulfate, and the resin solvent is water.
[0138] The resin monomer, resin crosslinking agent, corrosion
promoter, and free radial promoter are combined at 1404 to create a
powdered mixture. The resin solvent is added to the mixture at step
1406. The mixture is dissolved in the resin solvent to form
Precursor A.
[0139] A polymerization initiator and a resin solvent are provided
at step 1408. In one embodiment, the polymerization initiator is
sodium persulfate and the resin solvent is water. The resin solvent
is added to the polymerization initiator at step 1410. The mixture
is dissolved in the resin solvent to form Precursor B.
[0140] The Precursor A and the Precursor B are mixed at step 1412.
Polymerization begins immediately upon mixing as the polymerization
initiator as the free radical promoter and polymerization initiator
initiate a free radical polymerization of the resin monomer. In one
embodiment, mixing step 1412 may occur in an applicator device
where Precursor A and Precursor B are forced into a common chamber.
In another embodiment, mixing step 1412 may occur in a container by
manual stirring. The mixture of Precursor A and Precursor B is
applied to the target at step 1414. In one embodiment, the mixture
is a sprayable liquid that is forced through a spray head and onto
a target. In another embodiment, the target is a metal or composite
material intended to be degraded. In yet another embodiment, the
mixture is a dispensable gel that is forced through an applicator
head and onto a target. In yet another embodiment, the mixture is a
foamable liquid that is forced through an applicator head and onto
a target. The method ends at step 1416.
[0141] Referring to FIG. 17, a pneumatic/hydraulic schematic 1700
of one embodiment of an applicator for dispensing Applicant's
sprayable composition is shown. This embodiment is particularly
useful for a backpack-sized applicator. A Part A tank 1702 is in
fluid communication with a fill/cut-off valve 1704, a mechanically
operated toggle switch 1706, and a pressure relief valve 1708. The
mechanically operated toggle switch 1706 is in fluid communication
with a check valve 1710, which is in fluid communication with a
first static mixing chamber 1712. The Part A tank 1702 contains an
aqueous Part A solution. The Part B tank 1716 contains an aqueous
Part B solution.
[0142] A Part B tank 1716 is in fluid communication with a
fill/cut-off valve 1722, a mechanically operated toggle switch
1718, and a pressure relief valve 1724. The mechanically operated
toggle switch 1718 is in fluid communication with a check valve
1720, which is in fluid communication with a first static mixing
chamber 1712.
[0143] The first static mixing chamber 1712 is in fluid
communication with a second static mixing chamber 1714. The static
mixing chambers 1712 and 1714 ensure thorough mixing of the Part A
and Part B components before being broadcast from nozzle 1726. In
one embodiment, the second mixing chamber 1714 is omitted and a
single mixing chamber 1712 is used.
[0144] A source of compressed gas 1728 is in fluid communication
with a cut-off valve 1730. In one embodiment, the source of
compressed gas 1728 is a compressed air tank containing 48 cubic
inches of 3000 psi compressed air. The cut-off value 1730 is in
fluid communication with a first pressure regulator 1732. In one
embodiment, the first pressure regulator 1732 reduces the pressure
from the source of 3000 psi to 100 psi at the outlet of the first
pressure regulator 1732. The first pressure regulator 1732 is in
fluid communication with a second pressure regulator 1734. In one
embodiment, the second pressure regulator 1734 reduces the pressure
from the 100 psi to 70 psi at the outlet of the second pressure
regulator 1734. The second pressure regulator 1734 is in fluid
communication with a third pressure regulator 1736. In one
embodiment, the third pressure regulator 1736 reduces the pressure
from the 70 psi to 43 psi at the outlet of the third pressure
regulator 1736.
[0145] The outlet of the second pressure regulator 1734, at a
pressure in one embodiment of 70 psi, is in fluid communication
with a manually operated valve 1738 and a solenoid operated valve
1740. The manually operated valve 1738 and a solenoid operated
valve 1740 are each in fluid communication with both lines entering
the first static mixing chamber 1712.
[0146] During operation, the valves 1706 and 1718 are opened,
allowing the liquid contents of the Part A tank 1702 and the Part B
tank 1716 to flow to the first static mixing chamber 1712. The
contents of the Part A tank 1702 and the Part B tank 1716 are
forced under pressure (about 45 psi, in one embodiment) from the
source of compressed gas 1728. The Part A and Part B components are
volumetrically mixed in the first static mixing chamber 1712 and
further mixed in the second static mixing chamber 1714 before
existing the system under pressure at 1726.
[0147] Once the valves 1706 and 1718 are closed, stopping the flow
of the Part A and Part B components through the static mixing
chambers 1712 and 1714, the solenoid value 1740 is electronically
triggered allowing a flow of high pressure gas (about 70 psi, in
one embodiment) to flush the static mixing heads 1712 and 1714 and
the outlet nozzle 1726. The flush can also be manually triggered by
the manually operated valve 1738.
[0148] In one embodiment, all materials wetted in the system before
the mixing of the Part A and Part B components (i.e., upstream from
the first mixing chamber 1712, are constructed from polypropylene,
nylon 6, high density polyethylene, PVC, PFA or 316 L stainless
steel. All components wetted at or after the mixing of the Part A
and Part B components are constructed from non-metallic
materials.
[0149] Referring to FIG. 18, one embodiment of an electrical
schematic 1800 for the system presented in FIG. 17 is shown. As
will be appreciated by one having ordinary skill in the art, the
electrical schematic 1800 is a standard electrical schematic
containing standard electronic components.
[0150] Referring to FIG. 19, a pneumatic/hydraulic schematic 1900
of another embodiment of an applicator for dispensing Applicant's
sprayable composition is shown. This embodiment is particularly
useful for a vehicle-mounted applicator.
[0151] A Part A reservoir 1902 is in fluid communication with a
displacement pump 1904. The outlet of the displacement pump 1904 is
in fluid communication with pressure relief valve 1906 and liquid
pressure regulator valve 1908. The pressure relief value 1906 is in
fluid communication with the Part A reservoir 1902. The liquid
pressure regulator valve 1908 is in fluid communication with a
needle valve 1910. The needle value 1910 is in fluid communication
with a solenoid operated valve 1912. The solenoid operated value
1912 is in fluid communication with a check valve 1914. The check
valve 1914 is in fluid communication with a first static mixing
chamber 1916.
[0152] A Part B reservoir 1918 is in fluid communication with a
displacement pump 1920. The outlet of the displacement pump 1904 is
in fluid communication with pressure relief valve 1922 and liquid
pressure regulator valve 1924. The pressure relief value 1922 is in
fluid communication with the Part B reservoir 1918. The liquid
pressure regulator valve 1924 is in fluid communication with a
needle valve 1926. The needle value 1926 is in fluid communication
with a solenoid operated valve 1928. The solenoid operated value
1928 is in fluid communication with a check valve 1930. The check
valve 1930 is in fluid communication with a first with a first
static mixing chamber 1916.
[0153] A source of compressed gas 1940 is in fluid communication
with an adjustable gas pressure regulator valve 1942. In one
embodiment, the source of compressed gas 1940 is a gas-powered air
compressor providing compressed air at 70 psi. The adjustable gas
pressure regulator valve 1942 is in fluid communication with a
check valve 1944. The check valve 1944 is in fluid communication
with the first static mixing chamber 1934.
[0154] The first static mixing chamber 1916 is in fluid
communication with a second static mixing chamber 1932. The static
mixing chambers 1916 and 1932 ensure thorough mixing of the Part A
and Part B components before being broadcast from nozzle 1934. In
one embodiment, the second mixing chamber 1932 is omitted and a
single mixing chamber 1916 is used.
[0155] During operation of a system implementing the schematic
1900, the pump 1904 drives aqueous Part A solution from the Part A
reservoir 1902 into the first static mixing chamber 1916 once the
valve 1912 is activated Likewise, the pump 1920 drives the aqueous
Part B solution from the Part B reservoir 1918 into the first
static mixing chamber 1916 once the valve 1912 is activated. In one
embodiment, an electrical switch is used to simultaneously activate
valves 1912 and 1928. Once the valves 1912 and 1928 are deactivated
and closed, the regulator valve 1942 is activated, allowing
pressurized gas from the source of pressurized gas 1940 to flow
through the static mixing chambers 1916 and 1932. This flushes and
clears the mixing chambers 1916 and 1932 and the outlet nozzle 1934
of all residual Part A/Part B solution.
[0156] In one embodiment, all materials wetted in the system before
the mixing of the Part A and Part B components (i.e., upstream from
the first mixing chamber 1916, are constructed from polypropylene,
nylon 6, high density polyethylene, PVC, PFA or 316 L stainless
steel. All components wetted at or after the mixing of the Part A
and Part B components are constructed from non-metallic
materials.
[0157] Referring to FIG. 20, one embodiment of an electrical
schematic 2000 for the system presented in FIG. 19 is shown. As
will be appreciated by one having ordinary skill in the art, the
electrical schematic 2000 is a standard electrical schematic
containing standard electronic components.
[0158] While specific values have been recited for the various
embodiments recited herein, it is to be understood that, within the
scope of the invention, the values of all parameters, including
amounts and ratios, may vary over wide ranges to suit different
applications.
[0159] While the invention is described through the above-described
exemplary embodiments, it will be understood by those of ordinary
skill in the art that modifications to, and variations of, the
illustrated embodiments may be made without departing from the
inventive concepts disclosed herein. For example, although some
aspects have been described with reference to a flowchart, those
skilled in the art should readily appreciate that functions,
operations, decisions, etc. of all or a portion of each block, or a
combination of blocks, of the flowchart may be combined, separated
into separate operations or performed in other orders. In addition,
although a composition for promoting the accelerated degradation
has been described in relation to small arms, electronics, and
vehicles, the disclosed methods and formulations may be used for
other purposes, including the production of hydrogen for use in,
for example, fuel cells. Similarly, although a system and method
for applying Applicant's composition has been described, the
disclosed system and method may be used for other purposes.
Furthermore, disclosed aspects, or portions of these aspects, may
be combined in ways not listed above. Accordingly, the invention
should not be viewed as being limited to the disclosed
embodiment(s).
* * * * *