U.S. patent application number 16/035532 was filed with the patent office on 2020-01-16 for methods, systems, and computer redable media for optimized short message service (sms)-based internet of things (iot) device tri.
The applicant listed for this patent is Oracle International Corporation. Invention is credited to Shashikiran Bhalachandra Mahalank.
Application Number | 20200021953 16/035532 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 69138589 |
Filed Date | 2020-01-16 |
![](/patent/app/20200021953/US20200021953A1-20200116-D00000.png)
![](/patent/app/20200021953/US20200021953A1-20200116-D00001.png)
![](/patent/app/20200021953/US20200021953A1-20200116-D00002.png)
![](/patent/app/20200021953/US20200021953A1-20200116-D00003.png)
![](/patent/app/20200021953/US20200021953A1-20200116-D00004.png)
![](/patent/app/20200021953/US20200021953A1-20200116-D00005.png)
![](/patent/app/20200021953/US20200021953A1-20200116-D00006.png)
![](/patent/app/20200021953/US20200021953A1-20200116-D00007.png)
![](/patent/app/20200021953/US20200021953A1-20200116-D00008.png)
United States Patent
Application |
20200021953 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Mahalank; Shashikiran
Bhalachandra |
January 16, 2020 |
METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND COMPUTER REDABLE MEDIA FOR OPTIMIZED SHORT
MESSAGE SERVICE (SMS)-BASED INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT) DEVICE
TRIGGERING
Abstract
A method for optimized short message service (SMS)-based
Internet of things (IoT) device triggering. One method includes
receiving, at a machine type communications interworking function
(MTC-IWF), a request for sending a trigger message to an IoT
device. The method further includes generating, at the MTC-IWF, an
SMS message for triggering the IoT device. The method further
includes identifying a serving node for the IoT device. The method
further includes transmitting, by the MTC-IWF, the SMS message to
the serving node for the IoT device and thereby bypassing an
SMS-service center. The method further includes receiving, by the
MTC-IWF, from the serving node, and in response to successful
delivery of the SMS message to the IoT device, confirmation of
delivery of the SMS message.
Inventors: |
Mahalank; Shashikiran
Bhalachandra; (Bangalore, IN) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
Oracle International Corporation |
Redwood Shores |
CA |
US |
|
|
Family ID: |
69138589 |
Appl. No.: |
16/035532 |
Filed: |
July 13, 2018 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
1/1 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H04W 4/14 20130101; H04W
12/1204 20190101; H04W 8/005 20130101; H04W 4/70 20180201 |
International
Class: |
H04W 4/14 20060101
H04W004/14; H04W 4/70 20060101 H04W004/70; H04W 8/00 20060101
H04W008/00 |
Claims
1. A method for optimized short message service (SMS)-based
Internet of things (IoT) device triggering, the method comprising:
receiving, at a machine type communications interworking function
(MTC-IWF), a request for sending a trigger message to an IoT
device; generating, at the MTC-IWF, an SMS message for triggering
the IoT device; identifying a serving node for the IoT device;
transmitting, by the MTC-IWF, the SMS message directly from the
MTC-IWF to the serving node for the IoT device using an S6a/d or
mobile application part (MAP) interface and without using any short
message service centers; receiving, by the MTC-IWF, from the
serving node, and in response to successful delivery of the SMS
message to the IoT device, confirmation of delivery of the SMS
message; and in response to failure of delivery of the SMS message:
buffering, by the MTC-IWF, the SMS message; subscribing, by the
MTC-IWF, to receive notification of availability of the IoT device;
and receiving, by the MTC-IWF, an indication of availability of the
IoT device, and, in response, re-attempting, by the MTC-IWF,
delivery of the SMS message.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein generating the SMS message
includes generating, by the MTC-IWF, a mobile application part
(MAP) forward short message (FSM) and transmitting the MAP FSM
message to the serving node for delivery to the IoT device.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein generating the SMS message
includes generating a Diameter message and transmitting the
Diameter message to the serving node for delivery to the IoT
device.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein the IoT device is a mobile device
and wherein identifying the serving node includes querying a home
location register (HLR) or a home subscriber server with an
identifier for the IoT device to determine an address or other
identifier for the serving node.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein the IoT device is a stationary
device and wherein the identifying the serving node includes
accessing a database maintained by the MTC-IWF with an identifier
for the IoT device to determine an address or other identifier for
the serving node.
6. (canceled)
7. The method of claim 1 wherein the serving node comprises a
mobile switching center (MSC).
8. The method of claim 1 wherein the serving node comprises a
mobility management entity (MME).
9. The method of claim 1 wherein the MTC-IWF is a stand alone
device.
10. The method of claim 1 wherein the MTC-IWF is a component of a
service capabilities exposure function (SCEF).
11. A system for optimized short message service (SMS)-based
Internet of things (IoT) device triggering, the system comprising:
a machine type communications interworking function (MTC-IWF)
device including at least one processor; and an IoT device trigger
message generator comprising a component of the MTC-IWF implemented
by the at least one processor for receiving a request for sending a
trigger message to an IoT device, generating an SMS message for
triggering the IoT device, identifying a serving node for the IoT
device, transmitting the SMS message directly from the MTC-IWF to
the serving node for the IoT device using an S6a/d or mobile
application part (MAP) interface and without using any short
message service centers, and receiving, from the serving node and
in response to successful delivery of the SMS message to the IoT
device, confirmation of delivery of the SMS message, wherein the
MTC-IWF is configured to, in response to failure of delivery of the
SMS message: buffer the SMS message; subscribe to receive
notification of availability of the IoT device; and receive an
indication of availability of the IoT device, and, in response,
re-attempt delivery of the SMS message.
12. The system of claim 11 wherein the IoT device trigger message
generator is configured to generate a mobile application part (MAP)
forward short message (FSM) and transmit the MAP FSM message to the
serving node for delivery to the IoT device.
13. The system of claim 11 wherein the IoT device trigger message
generator is configured to generate a Diameter message and transmit
the Diameter message to the serving node for delivery to the IoT
device.
14. The system of claim 11 wherein the IoT device is a mobile
device and wherein MTC-IWF is configured to query a home location
register (HLR) or a home subscriber server with an identifier for
the IoT device to determine an address or other identifier for the
serving node.
15. The system of claim 11, wherein the IoT device is a stationary
device and wherein the MTC-IWF is configured to access a database
maintained by the MTC-IWF with an identifier for the IoT device to
determine an address or other identifier for the serving node.
16. (canceled)
17. The system of claim 11 wherein the serving node comprises a
mobile switching center (MSC) or a mobility management entity
(MME).
18. The system of claim 11 wherein the MTC-IWF is a stand alone
device.
19. The system of claim 11 wherein the MTC-IWF is a component of a
service capabilities exposure function (SCEF).
20. A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon
executable instructions that when executed by a processor of a
computer control the computer to perform steps comprising:
receiving, at a machine type communications interworking function
(MTC-IWF), a request for sending a trigger message to an IoT
device; generating, at the MTC-IWF, an SMS message for triggering
the IoT device; identifying a serving node for the IoT device;
transmitting, by the MTC-IWF, the SMS message directly from the
MTC-IWF to the serving node for the IoT device using an S6a/d or
mobile application part (MAP) interface and without contacting or
passing through any short message service centers; receiving, by
the MTC-IWF, from the serving node, and in response to successful
delivery of the SMS message to the IoT device, confirmation of
delivery of the SMS message; and in response to failure of delivery
of the SMS message: buffering, by the MTC-IWF, the SMS message;
subscribing, by the MTC-IWF, to receive notification of
availability of the IoT device; and receiving, by the MTC-IWF, an
indication of availability of the IoT device, and, in response,
re-attempting, by the MTC-IWF, delivery of the SMS message.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The subject matter described herein relates to triggering
IoT devices. More particularly, the subject matter described herein
relates to optimized SMS-based IoT device triggering.
BACKGROUND
[0002] IoT devices, such as sensors, often operate on battery power
in a sleep mode until triggered by an external signal to provide
measurement or other data. One type of signal used to trigger IoT
devices is an SMS message. In one implementation, a machine type
communications interworking function (MTC-IWF) contacts a short
message service center (SMSC), which sends an SMS message to the
IoT device to trigger the device to perform an application-specific
function, such as waking up.
[0003] One problem with the above-described IoT device triggering
method is that the SMSC is an expensive piece of network equipment.
Requiring an SMSC to perform IoT device triggering may be cost
prohibitive, especially as the number of IoT devices increases.
Another problem with using an SMSC for IoT device triggering is
that extra messaging between the MTC-IWF and the SMSC is required
for SMS message delivery and delivery confirmation. This messaging
increases with the number of IoT devices and thus can consume a
significant amount of bandwidth in a network operator's network
where SMS message traffic is carried. The use of an SMSC for IoT
device triggering also introduces latency in IoT device triggering
transactions.
[0004] Yet another problem with using an SMSC for IoT device
triggering is that the SMSC is vulnerable to security attacks. For
example, an SMSC performs SMS forwarding transactions for IoT
device transactions and non-IoT device transactions. If an attacker
inserts attack code in an SMS message, the SMSC may inadvertently
receive and store the message, execute the attack code, and perform
a malicious operation specified by the attack code. Such an attack
could prevent triggering of IoT devices or allow unauthorized
access to IoT devices.
[0005] Accordingly, in light of these and other difficulties, there
exists a need for methods, systems and computer readable media for
optimized IoT device triggering.
SUMMARY
[0006] The subject matter described herein includes methods,
systems, and computer readable media for optimized short message
service (SMS)-based Internet of things (IoT) device triggering. One
method includes receiving, at a machine type communications
interworking function (MTC-IWF), a request for sending a trigger
message to an IoT device. The method further includes generating,
at the MTC-IWF, an SMS message for triggering the IoT device. The
method further includes identifying a serving node for the IoT
device. The method further includes transmitting, by the MTC-IWF,
the SMS message to the serving node for the IoT device and thereby
bypassing a SMS service center. The method further includes
receiving, by the MTC-IWF, from the serving node, and in response
to successful delivery of the SMS message to the IoT device,
confirmation of delivery of the SMS message.
[0007] According to one aspect of the subject matter described
herein generating the SMS message includes generating, by the
MTC-IWF, a mobile application part (MAP) forward short message
(FSM) and transmitting the MAP FSM message to the serving node for
delivery to the IoT device.
[0008] According to another aspect of the subject matter described
herein, generating the SMS message includes generating a Diameter
message and transmitting the Diameter message to the serving node
for delivery to the IoT device.
[0009] According to another aspect of the subject matter described
herein, the IoT device is a mobile device and identifying the
serving node includes querying a home location register (HLR) or a
home subscriber server (HSS) with an identifier for the IoT device
to determine an address or other identifier for the serving
node.
[0010] According to another aspect of the subject matter described
herein, the IoT device is a stationary device and wherein the
identifying the serving node includes accessing a database
maintained by the MTC-IWF with an identifier for the IoT device to
determine an address or other identifier for the serving node.
[0011] According to another aspect of the subject matter described
herein, in response to failure of delivery of the SMS message, a
method for optimized delivery of an IoT device trigger message
includes buffering the SMS message, subscribing to receive
notification of availability of the IoT device, receiving an
indication of availability of the IoT device, and, in response,
re-attempting delivery of the SMS message.
[0012] In one exemplary implementation of the subject matter
described herein, the serving node for an IoT device is a mobile
switching center (MSC).
[0013] In an alternate implementation of the subject matter
described herein, the serving node comprises a mobility management
entity (MME).
[0014] In one exemplary implementation of the subject matter
described herein, the MTC-IWF is a stand alone device.
[0015] In an alternate implementation of the subject matter
described herein, the MTC-IWF is a component of a service
capabilities exposure function (SCEF).
[0016] According to another aspect of the subject matter described
herein, a system for optimized short message service (SMS)-based
Internet of things (IoT) device triggering includes a machine type
communications interworking function (MTC-IWF) device including at
least one processor. The system further includes an IoT device
triggering module implemented by the at least one processor for
receiving a request for triggering an IoT device, generating, an
SMS message for triggering the IoT device, identifying a serving
node for the IoT device, transmitting, the SMS message to the
serving node for the IoT device, and receiving, from the serving
node, and in response to successful delivery of the SMS message to
the IoT device, confirmation of delivery of the SMS message.
[0017] Computer readable media suitable for implementing the
subject matter described herein include non-transitory
computer-readable media, such as disk memory devices, chip memory
devices, programmable logic devices, random access memory (RAM),
read only memory (ROM), optical read/write memory, cache memory,
magnetic read/write memory, flash memory, and application specific
integrated circuits. In addition, a computer readable medium that
implements the subject matter described herein may be located on a
single device or computing platform or may be distributed across
multiple devices or computing platforms.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0018] FIG. 1 is a diagram of a network architecture for delivering
trigger messages to IoT devices;
[0019] FIG. 2 is a message flow diagram illustrating conventional
triggering of an IoT device using an SMS-SC;
[0020] FIG. 3 is message flow diagram illustrating optimized
SMS-based triggering of an IoT device using an MTC-IWF to generate
and send the trigger message to the serving node of a mobile IoT
device and thereby bypass the SMS-SC;
[0021] FIG. 4 is message flow diagram illustrating the use of an
MTC-IWF for delivering trigger message to stationary IoT devices
using preconfigured serving node identification information;
[0022] FIG. 5 is message flow diagram illustrating the use of an
MTC-IWF for attempting delivery of a trigger message to an IoT
device when the IoT device is initially unavailable;
[0023] FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary
architecture of a stand-alone MTC-IWF configured to generate and
send SMS-based trigger messages to IoT devices;
[0024] FIG. 7 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary
architecture of an MTC-IWF that is a component of a service
capability exposure function (SCEF), where the combined node is
configured to generate and send SMS-based trigger messages to IoT
devices; and
[0025] FIG. 8 is a flow chart illustrating an exemplary process for
using an MTC-IWF to generate and send trigger messages to IoT
devices.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0026] FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary
architecture defined in Third Generation Partnership Project 3GPP
TS 23.682, V15.5.0, June 2018, for delivering trigger messages to
IoT devices. Referring to FIG. 1, the architecture includes a
service capability server (SCS) 100 that hosts one or more
application servers (ASs) 102 that deliver trigger messages to a UE
104 with a machine type communications (MTC) UE application. The
MTC UE application enables UE 104 to function as an IoT device,
such as a sensor, and communicate sensor data to the network.
Hereinafter, UE 104 with the MTC application will be referred to as
IoT device 104. The architecture where application servers deliver
trigger messages to UEs via an SCS is referred to in 3GPP TS 23.682
as the indirect delivery model. In an alternate architecture, an
application server 102 may deliver trigger messages to IoT device
104 via a gateway general packet radio service (GPRS) support node
(GGSN) or packet gateway (PGW) 106 without going through a service
capability server. This method is referred to in 3GPP TS 23.682 as
the direct model.
[0027] In either case, according to 3GPP TS 23.682, SMS messages
are delivered by a message service center, which is illustrated in
FIG. 1 as short message service-service center/gateway message
service center/inter-working message service center
(SMS-SC/GMSC/IWMSC) 108 (hereinafter, SMS-SC 108). SMS-SC 108 is
the node responsible for delivering SMS messages to IoT devices. An
Internet protocol short message gateway (IP-SM-GW) 110 may support
delivery of SMS messages via an Internet protocol network. A short
message entity (SME) 112 may communicate with SMS-SC 108 over a
T.sub.SMS interface.
[0028] In order to deliver SMS messages to IoT device 104, SMS-SC
108 communicates with either a mobility management entity (MME) 114
or mobile switching center (MSC) 116. MME 114 or MSC 116
communicates with IoT device 104 via the radio access network (RAN)
118.
[0029] Also illustrated in FIG. 1 is the machine type
communications-interworking function (MTC-IWF) 120 and service
capability exposure function (SCEF) 122. MTC-IWF 120 performs
interworking functions to allow applications, such as applications
hosted on application servers 102 to communicate with IoT devices.
SCEF 122 likewise facilitates communication between applications
and IoT devices, such as IoT device 104. MTC-IWF 120 and SCEF 122
communicate with home subscriber server (HSS) 124 to obtain serving
identity identification information for IoT devices. MTC-IWF 120
may also communicate with a charging data function (CDF) 126 to
obtain charging information for IoT devices. HSS 124 may
communicate with a machine type communication authentication,
authorization, and accounting (MTC-AAA) function 128 to
authenticate IoT devices and perform accounting for transactions
involving IoT devices. A serving gateway (S-GW) 130 and a serving
general packet radio service support node (SGSN) 131 facilitate
packet communications with IoT devices.
[0030] In the architecture illustrated in FIG. 1, IoT devices are
triggered using SMS message generated by SMS-SC 108. Such
triggering involves messaging between MTC-IWF 120 and SMS-SC 108
over the T4 interface. FIG. 2 is a message flow diagram
illustrating an example of such messaging. Referring to FIG. 2, in
line 1, to initiate IoT device triggering, SCS/AS 100 sends a
device trigger request to a MTC-IWF 120 either through a T8
interface or Tsp interface for triggering an IoT device 104 to
perform an application-specific function, such as waking up. The
communication illustrated in FIG. 2 follows the indirect model
because the device trigger request originates from the SCS function
of SCS/AS 100. If the device trigger request had originated from an
AS without utilizing an SCS, the communication would follow the
direct method.
[0031] The device trigger request identifies IoT device 104 using
an identifier, such as a mobile subscriber integrated services
digital network (MSISDN) number or other identifier. Device
triggering may be subscription based. Subscription information may
be stored by IoT device 104 that indicates whether or not SCS/AS
100 is allowed to trigger IoT device 104. In this example, it is
assumed that SCS/AS 100 is allowed to trigger IoT device 104.
[0032] In line 2 of the message flow diagram, MTC-IWF 120 sends a
subscriber information request through the S6m interface to HSS/HLR
124 to resolve the external identifier or MSISDN to an
international mobile station identifier (IMSI) and retrieve the
related HSS stored routing information including the identities of
the IoT device's serving core network (CN) node(s). In this case,
it is assumed that the serving CN node is MME 114.
[0033] In line 3 of the message flow diagram, HSS/HLR 124 sends a
subscriber information response to MTC-IWF 120. The IMSI of IoT
device 104 and the serving CN node identifier (i.e., MSC address or
MME identity) are included in this message.
[0034] After receiving the IMSI and the MSC or MME identity,
MTC-IWF 120 selects, based on configured information, a suitable
SMS-SC for generating and sending the SMS message to trigger IoT
device 104. In line 4a of the message flow diagram, MTC-IWF 120
generates and sends a submit trigger message to SMS-SC 108 using
the T4 interface. The submit trigger message may include an
external identifier or MSISDN, an IMSI, and a serving node ID,
which is either an MSC or MME identity.
[0035] In line 5, SMS-SC 108, in response to the submit trigger
message, uses either a mobile application part (MAP) mobile
terminated forward short message (MT-FSM) or a Diameter message to
send the SMS message to the MME over the MAP-E or SGd
interface.
[0036] In line 6, MME 114 delivers the trigger message to IoT
device 104 using the SMS over SGS procedure.
[0037] In line 7, MME 114 sends back a positive acknowledgement to
the MT-FSM from line 5.
[0038] In line 8, if delivery is not successful, SMS-SC 108 sends a
delivery report to HSS/HLR 124 requesting that HSS/HLR 124 add the
SMS-SC address to the message waiting list for a redelivery
attempt.
[0039] In lines 9-12, SMS-SC 108 sends a delivery report to MTC-IWF
120 to allow MTC-IWF to indicate the delivery status to SCS/AS 100.
In line 9, SMS-SC 108 sends a delivery report to MTC-IWF 120. In
line 10, MTC-IWF 120 sends a device trigger report to SCS 100 over
the Tsp or T8 interface. In line 11, SCS 100 acknowledges the
device trigger report. In line 12, MTC-IWF 120 sends a message
delivery report acknowledgement message to SMS-SC 108.
[0040] Rather than using the SMS-SC to deliver trigger messages to
IoT devices, the subject matter described herein eliminates the
need to use the SMS-SC in the trigger message delivery process and
instead allows SMS-based trigger messages to be sent directly from
the MTC-IWF. FIG. 3 illustrates such an architecture. Referring to
FIG. 3, SMS-SC 108 is eliminated from the IoT device triggering
architecture. In line 1 of the message flow diagram, SCS 100 sends
a device trigger request to MTC-IWF 120. The device trigger request
may identify the IoT device being triggered by an external
identifier, such as an MSISDN number. The delivery model
illustrated in FIG. 3 is the indirect model sine the trigger
message is being sent from SCS 100. In an alternate implementation,
the trigger message may be sent from an AS, such as AS 102, to
MTC-IWF 120.
[0041] In line 2 of the message flow diagram illustrated in FIG. 3,
MTC-IWF 120 sends a subscriber information request message to
HSS/HLR 124. The subscriber information request message requests
information concerning IoT device 104, such as an IMSI and a
serving entity identifier. In line 3A of the message flow diagram,
HSS/HLR 124 responds to the subscriber information request message
with the requested subscriber information. In line 3B, MTC-IWF 120
sends a device trigger acknowledgement message to SCS 100.
[0042] In line 4 of the message flow diagram, rather than
communicating via an SMS-SC, MTC-IWF 120 sends a trigger message
directly to the serving entity identified in the subscriber
information response message. In the illustrated example, the
serving entity is MME 114. In line 5, MME 114 delivers the trigger
message to IoT device 104 via RAN 118. In line 6, MME 114 sends a
delivery acknowledgement message to MTC-IWF 120. In line 7, MTC-IWF
sends a MAP delivery report status information to HSS/HLR 124. In
lines 8 and 9, MTC-IWF 120 and SCS 100 exchange device trigger
status information. Thus, using the architecture illustrated in
FIG. 3, an IoT device is triggered without using an SMSC.
[0043] If the IoT device is stationary, it is not necessary to
contact an HSS or HLR to obtain serving entity identification
information. Instead, SCS 100 may be configured with contact
information for the device. For stationary IoT devices, such as
water meters, power meters, and home appliances, the serving public
land mobile network (PLMN) node can be preconfigured at MTC-IWF
120. This configuration can include device identifiers, such as the
MSISDN and/or IMSI of the stationary IoT devices and the
corresponding and serving PLMN node id of SS7 service switching
point (SSP), MME, or MSC serving the stationary IoT devices. For
example, MTC-IWF 120 may be configured with MSISDN X, IMSI X and
MME X identifiers can be configured for water meter device X. Such
pre-configuration of the MTC-IWF eliminates the need for HSS
interrogation. When an application server instructs MTC-IWF 120 to
generate and send an IoT device trigger message to a stationary IoT
device, MTC-IWF 120 accesses its internal stationary IoT device
database using the MSISDN number of the stationary IoT device,
locates the corresponding record, and extracts the IMSI and the
serving node identifier or address. MTC-IWF 120 uses the
information extracted from the record to generate and send an
SMS-based IoT device trigger message to the serving node identified
in the record.
[0044] FIG. 4 is a message flow diagram illustrating the delivery
of an IoT device trigger message to a stationary IoT device without
interrogating HSS/HLR 124. Referring to FIG. 4, in line 1 of the
message flow diagram, SCS 100 sends a device trigger request to
MTC-IWF 120. Lines 2 and 3A, which are the interrogation of HLR/HSS
124 and the corresponding response, are eliminated from the message
flow diagram. In line 3B, MTC-IWF 120 acknowledges the trigger
request message to SCS 100. In line 4 of the message flow diagram,
MTC-IWF 120 sends the trigger message to MME 114, which delivers
the trigger message in line 5 to IoT device 104. In line 6, MME 114
reports delivery of the trigger message to MTC-IWF 120. In line 7,
MTC-IWF sends a MAP-C SM delivery report message to HSS/HLR 124. In
lines 8 and 9, MTC-IWF 120 and SCS 100 exchange device trigger
report information. Thus, for stationary IoT devices, delivery of
trigger messages can be achieved without an SMS-SC and without
querying an HSS or HLR for serving entity identification
information.
[0045] According to yet another aspect of the subject matter
described herein, an MTC-IWF may be capable of supporting
additional delivery attempts of a trigger message to an IoT device
when the IoT device is not available. FIG. 5 is a message flow
diagram illustrating multiple delivery attempts of a trigger
message to an IoT device when the IoT device is initially
unavailable. Referring to FIG. 5, in line 1, to initiate IoT device
triggering, a SCS/AS 100 sends a device trigger request to a
MTC-IWF 120 either through a T8 interface or Tsp interface for
triggering IoT device 104 to perform an application-specific
function, such as waking up. The communication illustrated in FIG.
5 follows the indirect model because the device trigger request
originates from the SCS function of SCS/AS 100. If the device
trigger request had originated from an AS without passing through
an SCS, the communication would follow the direct method.
[0046] The device trigger request identifies IoT device 104 using
an identifier, such as a mobile subscriber integrated services
digital network (MSISDN) number or other suitable identifier.
Device triggering may be subscription based. Subscription
information may be stored by IoT device 104. The subscription
information may indicate whether or not SCS/AS 100 is allowed to
trigger IoT device 104. In this example, it is assumed that SCS/AS
100 is allowed to trigger IoT device 104.
[0047] In line 2 of the message flow diagram, MTC-IWF 120 sends a
subscriber information request through the S6m interface to HSS/HLR
124 to resolve the external identifier or MSISDN to an IMSI and
retrieve the related HSS stored routing information including the
identities of the IoT device's serving CN node(s). In this case, it
is assumed that the serving CN node is MME 114.
[0048] In line 3a of the message flow diagram, HSS/HLR 124 sends a
subscriber information response to MTC-IWF 120. The IMSI and the
serving CN node identifier (i.e., MSC address or MME identity) are
included in this message. In line 3b, MTC-IWF 120 sends a device
trigger acknowledgement to SCS/AS 100
[0049] After receiving the MSC or MME identity, MTC-IWF 120
selects, based on configured information, a suitable SMS-SC for
generating and sending the SMS message to trigger IoT device
104.
[0050] In line 4 of the message flow diagram, MTC-IWF 120 sends a
message including the trigger message to MME 114 over the MAP-E or
SGd interface. In line 5, MME 114 attempts to deliver the trigger
message to IoT device 104 and determines that IoT device 104 is not
reachable. In line 6, MME 114 responds to MTC-IWF 120 indicating
that IoT device 104 is not reachable. In response, MTC-IWF 120
buffers the SMS message including the trigger message for a
redelivery attempt. In line 7, MTC-IWF 120 subscribes with HSS/HLR
124 to receive updates regarding status information of IoT device
104. The subscription message is a configuration information
request (CIR) message sent over the S6t interface. The S6t
interface is a Diameter interface between the SCEF and the HSS for
the configuration of monitoring events and reachability of IoT
device 104. The CIR message includes an identifier, such as an IMSI
or MSISDN identifying IoT device 104. Here, MTC-IWF 120 is
leveraging or using the SCEF monitoring configuration report
procedure to be advised of changes in state of IoT device 104.
[0051] In line 8, in response to the CIR message, HSS/HLR 124 sends
a Diameter insert subscriber data request (IDR) message to MME 114
over the S6a/d interface. The IDR message requests information
concerning the change in state of IoT device 104. In line 9, MME
114 responds to the IDR message by sending a Diameter insert
subscriber data answer (IDA) message to HSS/HLR 124 confirming
successful establishment of the subscription to receive
notification of changes in state of IoT device 104. In line 10,
HSS/HLR 124 sends a configuration information answer (CIA) message
to HSS/HLR 124 confirming successful subscription to receive
notifications of changes in state of IoT device 104
[0052] When IoT device 104 becomes available to receive SMS
messages, MME 114 detects the change in state. In line 11 of the
message flow diagram, MME 114 generates and sends to MTC-IWF 120 a
reachability report on the T6a interface indicating that IoT device
104 is available to receive SMS messages. The message carrying the
report is a reporting information request (RIR) command. The RIR
command is a Diameter message used to carry monitoring event
reporting information to the SCEF, and in this case, to MTC-IWF
120. MTC-IWF 120 receives the RIR command and generates and, in
line 12 sends a reporting information answer (RIA) command to MME
114. The RIA command is a Diameter message sent from the MME to the
SCEF, or in this case to MTC-IWF 120, that carries a result code
indicating successful receipt of the RIR command.
[0053] After receiving notification of the change in state of IoT
device 104, the process for delivering the trigger message to IoT
device is the same as steps 4-9 illustrated in FIG. 4. Briefly,
MTC-IWF 120 re-sends the trigger message to MME 114. MME 114
delivers the trigger message to IoT device 104 using the SMS over
SGS procedure. MME 114 sends a delivery report to MTC-IWF 120
indicating successful delivery of the SMS message. MTC-IWF 120
sends a device trigger report to SCS 100, and SCS 100 acknowledges
to device trigger report.
[0054] Accordingly, using the steps illustrated in FIG. 5, MTC-IWF
120 delivers a trigger message to IoT device 104 when IoT device
104 is initially unavailable. Such functionality avoids the need
for an SMS-SC to act as a store and forward element for IoT device
trigger message when IoT devices are initially unavailable.
[0055] FIG. 6 is a block diagram of an exemplary architecture for
MTC-IWF 120. Referring to FIG. 6, MTC-IWF 120 includes at least one
processor 200 and a memory 202. MTC-IWF 120 includes an IoT trigger
message generator 204 executable by processor 200 for generating
IoT trigger message and sending the trigger messages to an MME or
MSC without sending the trigger messages to an SMS-SC, using the
steps illustrated in FIG. 3. IoT trigger message generator 204 may
deliver trigger messages to mobile IoT devices using the steps
illustrated in FIG. 3 or to stationary IoT devices using the steps
illustrated in FIG. 4 and serving node identification information
stored in a stationary IoT device serving node identification
database 206. When an IoT device is not available to receive a
trigger message, IoT trigger message generator 204 may also store
the trigger message, subscribe to receive updates in IoT device
state, and re-attempt delivery of the trigger message when the IoT
device is determined to be available, using the steps illustrated
in FIG. 5. IoT trigger message generator 204 may utilize SS7 or
Diameter messages to deliver the trigger messages to the MSC or
MME. For example, IoT trigger message generator 204 may utilize an
SS7 MAP FSM message to deliver an IoT device trigger message to an
MSC or a Diameter S6a message to deliver an IoT device trigger
message to an MME.
[0056] In FIG. 6, IoT trigger message generator 204 is a component
of standalone MTC-IWF 120. In an alternate implementation, IoT
trigger message generator 204 may be a component of a combined
MTC-IWF and SCEF. FIG. 7 illustrates such an implementation. In
FIG. 7, a SCEF platform 300 includes a processor 302 and a memory
304. SCEF platform further includes a cellular device connectivity
(CDC) module 306 that provides SCEF functionality and MTC-IWF 120,
including trigger message generator 204 that generates and sends
SMS-based IoT trigger messages in the manner described above with
respect to FIGS. 3-5. In FIG. 7, CDC module 306 performs SCEF
functionality as specified by 3GPP TS 23.682. Providing SCEF
functionality includes providing access to 3GPP services for non-IP
devices, such as IoT devices that do not implement an IP stack due
to complexity and power conservation requirements. A typical IoT
device that might require SCEF services is a sensor that transmits
its data to a network periodically and then sleeps between
transmissions to conserve energy. In the case of mobile devices,
SCEF functionality provided by CDC module 306 may include
determining the location and connectivity of the mobile devices
(including location and connectivity of non-IP devices) using
network resources, such as HSS/HLR 124 and MME 114, to avoid the
need for the mobile devices to have built in location determining
capabilities, such as GPS capabilities. CDC module 306 may also,
for non-IP traffic from IoT device 104, determine whether to invoke
IoT service handling based on the access point name or other
attributes of a received message. IoT service handling is a
function typically performed by SCS 100. Thus, the architecture
illustrated in FIG. 7 combines SMS-based IoT device triggering,
MTC-IWF functionality, SCEF functionality, and SCS functionality in
a single platform.
[0057] FIG. 8 is a flow chart illustrating exemplary steps for
SMS-based IoT device triggering using an MTC-IWF to generate and
send SMS-based IoT device trigger messages. Referring to FIG. 8, in
step 400, MTC-IWF 120 receives an IoT device trigger request. If
IoT device triggering follows the direct model, the IoT device
trigger request message may be send to MTC-IWF 120 from an
application server. If IoT device triggering follows the indirect
model, the IoT device trigger request may be sent by a service
capability server to MTC-IWF 120 in response to a trigger request
from an application server.
[0058] In step 401, it is determined whether the IoT device is
mobile or stationary. To make this determination, MTC-IWF 120 may
access its internal stationary IoT device database using the MSISDN
or other identifier of the IoT device sought to be triggered. If
MTC-IWF 120 locates a record in the database corresponding to the
IoT device, MTC-IWF 120 may determine that the IoT device is
stationary and may use information from the record to identify the
serving node for the IoT device. If MTC-IWF 120 fails to locate a
record for the IoT device in the stationary IoT device database,
MTC-IWF 120 may determine that the IoT device is mobile. If the IoT
device is stationary, control proceeds to step 402, where the
MTC-IWF generates and sends an SMS-based IoT trigger message to the
serving node for the stationary IoT device. For stationary IoT
devices, such as utility meters, MTC-IWF 120 may be configured with
the IoT device identity and, the address of the serving MME, MSC,
SSP, or other serving node.
[0059] If the IoT device is mobile, control proceeds to step 404
where MTC-IWF 120 queries the HLR or HSS for the serving node
address and any needed IoT device identifiers. For example, MTC-IWF
120 may query the HLR or HSS with the MSISDN number of the IoT
device. The HLR or HSS may respond with the address or identifier
of the serving MSC or MME and the IMSI of the IoT device. Once
MTC-IWF 120 obtains the serving node identifier or address and the
IoT device identifier, control proceeds to step 405 where the
MTC-IWF generates and sends an IoT device trigger message to the
serving node.
[0060] In step 406, MTC-IWF 120 determines whether delivery of the
IoT device trigger message was successful. MTC-IWF 120 may
determine whether or not delivery of the IoT device trigger message
is successful based on whether or not an acknowledgement message is
received from the serving node indicating successful delivery of
the IoT device trigger message.
[0061] If delivery of the IoT device trigger message is successful,
control proceeds to step 408 where MTC-IWF 120 sends an
acknowledgement message to the node that requested the IoT device
trigger message. For example, MTC-IWF 120 may send the
acknowledgement message to the application server or service
capability server that requested the IoT device trigger
message.
[0062] If delivery of the IoT device trigger message is not
successful, control proceeds to steps 410 and 412 where the MTC-IWF
120 buffers the IoT device trigger message and subscribes to
receive notifications of changes in IoT device state. The
subscription may be made to an HLR or HSS, which subscribes with
the serving MME or MSC to receive notifications of changes in IoT
device state.
[0063] In steps 414 and 416, MTC-IWF 120 waits for the notification
of change in IoT device state. Once a message indicating that the
IoT device is available is received, control proceeds to step 418
where MTC-IWF 120 re-attempts delivery of the IoT device trigger
message. Delivery may be re-attempted a configurable number of
times before the delivery process fails. In step 420, MTC-IWF 120
determines whether delivery of the IoT trigger message is
successful. If delivery is successful, control proceeds to step 408
where a positive acknowledgement is sent to the requesting node. If
delivery is not successful, control proceeds to step 422 where
MTC-IWF 120 sends a message to the requesting node indicating
failed delivery of the IoT device trigger message.
[0064] The subject matter described herein provides at least the
following advantages to mobile network operators.
[0065] There is no need for a mobile network operator to have a
dedicated SMS-SC network element in the core network to support SMS
based device triggering. The mobile network operator may still have
an SMS-SC to support delivery of non-IoT device SMS messages, e.g.,
SMS messages between mobile subscribers. However, the mobile
network operator is not required to have a dedicated SMS-SC or
additional SMS-SC capacity for delivering IoT device trigger
messages. This reduction in required SMS-SC capacity can reduce
operating and capital expenditures for the mobile network
operator.
[0066] IoT trigger message delivery without an SMS-SC eliminates
the need for T4 submit trigger messages and trigger delivery report
messages between the MTC-IWF and the SMS-SC. For every device
trigger request, there the following four Diameter messages are
eliminated: [0067] T4 submit trigger request [0068] T4 submit
trigger answer [0069] T4 message delivery report request [0070] T4
message delivery report acknowledgement answer
[0071] For stationary IoT devices, configuring the MTC-IWF with
contact information for the devices eliminates the need for HSS
interrogation to obtain device contact information. The following
messages are eliminated by static configuration of the MTC-IWF:
[0072] subscriber information request (S6m) [0073] subscriber
information answer (S6m)
[0074] The user of the MTC-IWF for IoT device trigger message
delivery causes an overall reduction in signaling. Due to the large
numbers of IoT devices that have and are expected to come online.
The elimination of the T4 message exchange and the subscriber
information request and answer messages for stationary devices
greatly reduces signaling traffic caused by IoT device trigger
messages.
[0075] The elimination of SMS-SC between MTC-IWF and MME decreases
device trigger message latency. The removal of the SMS-SC from the
trigger message path allows trigger messages to be delivered
without the additional message exchanges described above and
without an additional hop in the network between the MTC-IWF and
the IoT device.
[0076] The use of the MTC-IWF to send trigger messages directly to
the MME or the MSC also reduces the message processing burden on
the SMS-SC. The SMS-SC delivers SMS messages between subscriber
devices that are unrelated to IoT device triggering. If messages
relating to IoT device triggering are offloaded from the SMS-SC,
the processing burden on the SMS-SC is reduced, and the non-IoT SMS
messages can be delivered more efficiently.
[0077] The MTC-IWF described herein allows trigger messages to be
delivered to IoT devices even when the devices are not available.
The MTC-IWF described herein buffers the trigger message payload
when the device is not reachable and delivers the trigger when the
device becomes reachable. The MTC-IWF uses the monitoring event
configuration and report procedure to determine IoT device
reachability.
[0078] Moving IoT device triggering functionality from the SMS-SC
to the MTC-IWF reduces the security vulnerability of the IoT device
triggering functionality. For example, SS7 security attacks that
attack the SMS-SC using SMS messages will not affect IoT device
triggering, because the MTC-IWF does not handle SMS messages that
are not related to IoT device triggering. In one exemplary
implementation, the MTC-IWF will be dedicated for IoT related
traffic and will not process non-IoT SMS traffic.
[0079] An MTC-IWF for optimized SMS-based IoT device triggering as
described herein can be implemented as an on-premises device
located in a mobile network operator's network and managed by the
mobile network operator. In an alternate implementation, the
MTC-IWF for optimized SMS-based IoT device triggering may be
provided as a cloud service accessible by mobile network operator
for triggering IoT devices in the mobile network operator's
network.
[0080] The disclosure of each of the following references is hereby
incorporated herein by reference in its entirety:
[0081] 3GPP TS 23.682 3GPP Architecture enhancements to facilitate
communications with packet data networks and applications; Release
15, June 2018;
[0082] 3GPP TS 29.336 Home Subscriber Server (HSS) diameter
interface for interworking with packet data networks and
applications, Release 15, June 2018;
[0083] 3GPP TS 29.337 Diameter-based T4 interface for
communications with package data networks and applications Release
15, June 2018;
[0084] 3GPP TS 29.122 T8 reference point for northbound APIs,
Release 15, June 2018
[0085] 3GPP TS 29.338 3GPP Diameter based protocols to support
Short Message Service (SMS) capable Mobile Management Entities
(MMEs), Release 15, September 2017;
[0086] 3GPP TS 29.128 3GPP Mobility Management Entity (MME) and
Serving GPRS Support Node (SGSN) interfaces for interworking with
packet data networks and applications, Release 15, June 2018
[0087] It will be understood that various details of the presently
disclosed subject matter may be changed without departing from the
scope of the presently disclosed subject matter. Furthermore, the
foregoing description is for the purpose of illustration only, and
not for the purpose of limitation.
* * * * *