U.S. patent application number 16/541445 was filed with the patent office on 2019-12-05 for wireless mesh network health determination.
This patent application is currently assigned to OSRAM SYLVANIA Inc.. The applicant listed for this patent is OSRAM SYLVANIA Inc.. Invention is credited to Bruce A.C. Douglas, David Ko, Stefan Warner.
Application Number | 20190373494 16/541445 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 58409331 |
Filed Date | 2019-12-05 |
![](/patent/app/20190373494/US20190373494A1-20191205-D00000.png)
![](/patent/app/20190373494/US20190373494A1-20191205-D00001.png)
![](/patent/app/20190373494/US20190373494A1-20191205-D00002.png)
![](/patent/app/20190373494/US20190373494A1-20191205-D00003.png)
![](/patent/app/20190373494/US20190373494A1-20191205-D00004.png)
![](/patent/app/20190373494/US20190373494A1-20191205-D00005.png)
![](/patent/app/20190373494/US20190373494A1-20191205-D00006.png)
United States Patent
Application |
20190373494 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Douglas; Bruce A.C. ; et
al. |
December 5, 2019 |
WIRELESS MESH NETWORK HEALTH DETERMINATION
Abstract
Methods and system to determine the health of wireless mesh
networks are provided. Each radio node of a wireless mesh network
transmits Link Quantification Messages (LQMs) interPAN at maximum
power to enable adjacent nodes to determine the Received Signal
Strength Indication (RSSI) on the wireless link to that radio node.
Each radio node also transmits LQMs at successively lower power
levels. The adjacent nodes detect a power level at measurable
packet error rate to determine a noise floor for the wireless link.
An aggregator collects link quantification information from the
radio nodes and forms an intercommunication matrix for the wireless
network. The RSSI and power level at measurable packet error rate
information is used to remove unreliable links from the
intercommunication matrix. Nodes are ranked and the reliability and
dependability of the nodes is calculated to show the network
health.
Inventors: |
Douglas; Bruce A.C.;
(Fayetteville, GA) ; Warner; Stefan; (Keswick,
CA) ; Ko; David; (Scarborough, CA) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
OSRAM SYLVANIA Inc. |
Wilmington |
MA |
US |
|
|
Assignee: |
OSRAM SYLVANIA Inc.
Wilmington
MA
|
Family ID: |
58409331 |
Appl. No.: |
16/541445 |
Filed: |
August 15, 2019 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
15058218 |
Mar 2, 2016 |
10390241 |
|
|
16541445 |
|
|
|
|
62232773 |
Sep 25, 2015 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
1/1 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H04W 24/08 20130101;
Y02D 70/22 20180101; Y02D 70/122 20180101; H04W 84/18 20130101;
Y02D 70/144 20180101; Y02D 70/162 20180101; H04L 41/142 20130101;
H04L 41/12 20130101; H04L 43/0847 20130101; Y02D 30/70
20200801 |
International
Class: |
H04W 24/08 20060101
H04W024/08; H04L 12/24 20060101 H04L012/24 |
Claims
1. A method, comprising: receiving, by a receiving radio node in a
wireless mesh network, a first set of link quantification messages
that were transmitted at a maximum transmit power level by a
transmitting radio node in the wireless mesh network; receiving, by
the receiving radio node in the wireless mesh network, at least
portions of a subsequent sets of link quantification messages that
were transmitted at lower power levels below the maximum transmit
power level by the transmitting radio node in the wireless mesh
network; detecting, by the receiving radio node from the subsequent
sets of link quantification messages, one of the lower power levels
at which the receiving radio node experiences measurable packet
error rate; storing the power level at which the receiving radio
node experiences measurable packet error rate as an indication of
noise on a link between the receiving node and the transmitting
node; and receiving subsequent sets of link quantification messages
in which each subsequent set of link quantification messages was
transmitted at a unique discrete lower power level.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 15/058,218, now U.S. Pat. No. ______, entitled
"WIRELESS MESH NETWORK HEALTH DETERMINATION" and filed Mar. 2,
2016, which claims the benefit of, and priority to, U.S.
Provisional Application No. 62/232,773, entitled "NETWORK HEALTH
DETERMINATION" and filed Sep. 25, 2015, the entire contents of both
of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
TECHNICAL FIELD
[0002] The present invention relates to networks, and more
specifically, to determining the health of a localized wireless
mesh network having a large number of wirelessly connected network
devices.
BACKGROUND
[0003] A wireless mesh network is a communication network made up
of radio nodes organized in a mesh topography. Wireless mesh
networks often include wireless mesh clients, which are end point
devices, wireless mesh routers (referred to throughout as "radio
nodes"), and gateways that interconnect the wireless mesh networks
with external networks. The radio nodes use a routing strategy to
relay radio frequency (RF) messages from wireless mesh clients
through the wireless mesh network to their final destination, which
may be another wireless mesh client, one of the radio nodes on the
wireless mesh network, or the gateway.
SUMMARY
[0004] A wireless mesh network is typically quite reliable, in that
there are potential multiple redundant paths of the meshing links.
However, each wireless mesh network is unique and time varying, and
the level of redundancy and reliability depends on the RF
topography and the quality of the meshing links. Each RF link
between a pair of adjacent radio nodes in the wireless mesh network
may be considered a separate channel with its own unique signal and
noise characteristics that vary over time. For example, a link may
be degraded by increased attenuation due to insertion of a new
obstacle into the environment, which may cause increased noise due
to signal diffraction and signal reflections. Likewise, a link in
the wireless mesh network may experience ephemeral noise, such as
from a leaky microwave oven or other source of interference to the
RF signals being used to transmit information between the radio
nodes.
[0005] Embodiments are based, at least in part, on the realization
that it would be advantageous to provide a network health
determination process to enable the health of a wireless mesh
network to be determined prior to failure on the wireless mesh
network. In some embodiments, each radio node of a wireless mesh
network transmits Link Quantification Messages (LQMs) interPAN at
maximum power to enable adjacent nodes to determine received signal
strength indication (RSSI) on the wireless link to that radio node.
Each radio node also transmits LQMs at successively lower power
levels. The adjacent nodes detect a power level at a measurable
packet error rate to determine a noise floor for the wireless link.
An aggregator collects link quantification information from the
radio nodes and forms an intercommunication matrix for the wireless
network. The RSSI and power level at measurable packet error rate
information is used to remove unreliable links from the
intercommunication matrix. Nodes are ranked, and the reliability
and dependability of the nodes is calculated to show the network
health.
[0006] In an embodiment, there is provided a method. The method
includes: receiving, by a receiving radio node in a wireless mesh
network, a first set of link quantification messages that were
transmitted at a maximum transmit power level by a transmitting
radio node in the wireless mesh network; receiving, by the
receiving radio node in the wireless mesh network, at least
portions of a subsequent sets of link quantification messages that
were transmitted at lower power levels below the maximum transmit
power level by the transmitting radio node in the wireless mesh
network; detecting, by the receiving radio node from the subsequent
sets of link quantification messages, one of the lower power levels
at which the receiving radio node experiences measurable packet
error rate; and storing the power level at which the receiving
radio node experiences measurable packet error rate as an
indication of noise on a link between the receiving node and the
transmitting node.
[0007] In a related embodiment, receiving may include receiving
subsequent sets of link quantification messages in which each
subsequent set of link quantification messages was transmitted at a
unique discrete lower power level. In another related embodiment,
storing the power level at which the receiving radio node
experiences measurable packet error rate may include storing the
power level at which the receiving radio node experiences
measurable packet error rate as an indication of transient noise on
the link between the receiving node and the transmitting node.
[0008] In yet another related embodiment, the method may further
include calculating an approximation of a signal to noise ratio for
the link between the receiving node and the transmitting node using
the maximum transmit power level and the power level at which the
receiving radio node experiences measurable packet error rate. In
still another related embodiment, the method may further include:
determining, from the first set of link quantification messages, a
received signal strength indication for the link between the
receiving node and the transmitting node to quantify a noise level
for the link between the receiving node and the transmitting node.
In a further related embodiment, determining the received signal
strength indication may include: calculating individual received
signal strength indications for each of the messages of the first
set of link quantification messages; and determining an average
received signal strength indication from the calculated individual
received signal strength indications.
[0009] In another further related embodiment, the method may
further include transmitting link quantification information to an
aggregator, the link quantification information comprising a node
identifier of the transmitting radio node, a node identifier of the
receiving radio node, the determined received signal strength
indication for the link between the receiving node and the
transmitting node, and the lower power level at which the receiving
radio node experiences measurable packet error rate for the link
between the receiving node and the transmitting node.
[0010] In yet still another related embodiment, detecting one of
the lower power levels at which the receiving radio node
experiences measurable packet error rate may include: determining,
by the receiving radio node, that one or more link quantification
messages of one of the sets of link quantification messages was not
received; and associating a transmit power level of the one of the
sets of link quantification messages as the lower power level at
which the receiving radio node experiences measurable packet error
rate. In still yet another related embodiment, the method may
further include: receiving, by the receiving radio node, proximity
check messages from endpoint devices; and storing endpoint device
identifiers. In a further related embodiment, the method may
further include transmitting the endpoint device identifiers to an
aggregator.
[0011] In an embodiment, there is provided a method of determining
a health of a wireless mesh network. The method includes:
aggregating link quantification information from a plurality of
radio nodes implementing the wireless mesh network, the link
quantification information from each radio node including radio
node identifiers of adjacent radio nodes, received signal strength
indication for links between the radio node and the adjacent radio
nodes, and transmit power at measurable packet error rate on the
links between the radio node and the adjacent radio nodes; forming
an intercommunication matrix from the aggregated link
quantification information, the intercommunication matrix excluding
links with received signal strength indication below a threshold
and excluding links in which the transmit power at measurable
packet error rate is above a threshold; and ranking each of the
nodes in the intercommunication matrix.
[0012] In a related embodiment, aggregating link quantification
information may include aggregating received signal strength
indication for links between the radio node and the adjacent radio
nodes calculated based on transmissions from the adjacent radio
nodes when the adjacent radio nodes are transmitting link
quantification messages at maximum transmit power. In another
related embodiment, ranking may include determining a lowest number
of reliable hops on the wireless mesh network to a concentrator
gateway on the wireless mesh network. In still another related
embodiment, the method may further include determining a
reliability of each node in the intercommunication matrix. In a
further related embodiment, determining the reliability of each
node may include determining a number of edges between the node and
nodes of lower rank.
[0013] In yet another related embodiment, the method may further
include determining a dependability of each node in the
intercommunication matrix. In a further related embodiment,
determining the dependability may include determining a number of
edges between the node and nodes of higher rank.
[0014] In still yet another related embodiment, the method may
further include: determining a reliability of each node in the
intercommunication matrix by determining a number of edges between
the node and nodes of lower rank; determining a dependability of
each node in the intercommunication matrix by determining a number
of edges between the node and nodes of higher rank; and identifying
nodes having a higher dependability than reliability.
[0015] In yet still another related embodiment, the method may
further include aggregating edge device identification information
from the plurality of radio nodes implementing the wireless mesh
network, the edge device identification information from each radio
node including edge device identifiers of edge devices in periodic
communication with the respective radio nodes.
[0016] In another embodiment, there is provided a computer program
product, stored on a non-transitory computer readable medium,
including instructions that, when executed on a processor of a
radio node in a wireless mesh network, where the processor is in
communication with the non-transitory computer readable medium,
cause the processor to perform operations of: receiving, by a
receiving radio node in the wireless mesh network, a first set of
link quantification messages that were transmitted at a maximum
transmit power level by a transmitting radio node in the wireless
mesh network; receiving, by the receiving radio node in the
wireless mesh network, at least portions of a subsequent sets of
link quantification messages that were transmitted at lower power
levels below the maximum transmit power level by the transmitting
radio node in the wireless mesh network; detecting, by the
receiving radio node from the subsequent sets of link
quantification messages, one of the lower power levels at which the
receiving radio node experiences measurable packet error rate; and
storing the power level at which the receiving radio node
experiences measurable packet error rate as an indication of noise
on a link between the receiving node and the transmitting node.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0017] The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages
disclosed herein will be apparent from the following description of
particular embodiments disclosed herein, as illustrated in the
accompanying drawings in which like reference characters refer to
the same parts throughout the different views. The drawings are not
necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon
illustrating the principles disclosed herein.
[0018] FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a wireless mesh network
according to embodiments disclosed herein.
[0019] FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram of a radio node
according to embodiments disclosed herein.
[0020] FIGS. 3 and 4 are flow diagrams of link health
quantification processes implemented by the radio nodes of a
wireless mesh network according to embodiments disclosed
herein.
[0021] FIG. 5 is a functional block diagram of an aggregator
associated with the network of FIG. 1 according to embodiments
disclosed herein.
[0022] FIG. 6 is a flow diagram of a network health determination
process implemented by the aggregator of FIG. 5 according to
embodiments disclosed herein.
[0023] FIG. 7 is a graphical representation of the output of the
health determination process showing the network health of a
wireless mesh network according to embodiments disclosed
herein.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0024] FIG. 1 shows a wireless mesh network 100. As shown in FIG.
1, the wireless mesh network 100 includes radio nodes 110, which
are labeled with the numbers 1-17 in FIG. 1. The radio nodes 110
are wirelessly connected to each other and to a concentrator
gateway 120, which is labeled C in FIG. 1. The radio nodes 110 that
are able to wirelessly communicate with each other are shown in the
wireless mesh network 100 as being interconnected by links 130. An
aggregator 140 is connected to the wireless mesh network 100 either
directly or via a network 150. In some embodiments, the aggregator
140 is connected via a wireless connection, and in some
embodiments, via a wired connection. The links 130 may be, and in
some embodiments are, implemented using a wireless communication
protocol, such as but not limited to IEEE 802.15.4. IEEE 802.15.4
is a standard which specifies the physical layer and media access
control for low-rate wireless personal area networks (PANs). IEEE
802.15.4 is the basis for several other specifications, such as the
ZigBee specification, which further extends the standard by
developing the upper layers which are not defined in IEEE 802.15.4.
Other higher layer protocols may likewise be used to specify the
higher layers (layers 2-7) of the protocol stack.
[0025] In the wireless mesh network 100 of FIG. 1, the radio nodes
110 implement a routing protocol to coordinate forwarding of
messages across the wireless mesh network 100. The routing protocol
in use on the wireless mesh network 100 enables messages to be
transmitted across the wireless mesh network 100. There are more
than fifty routing protocols that have been proposed for routing
messages across wireless mesh networks, such as the wireless mesh
network 100 of FIG. 1. Since the concepts described herein are
independent of the routing protocol and operate outside of the
protocol stack, further description of the routing aspects will be
omitted for brevity. When a message is transmitted on one of the
links 130 on the wireless mesh network 100, receipt of the message
is acknowledged to ensure the message is delivered across the link
130. Thus, as a message propagates through the wireless mesh
network 100, it is passed from one of the radio nodes 110 to
another of the radio nodes 110, where the transmission across each
link 130 between the pair of radio nodes 110 is acknowledged by the
recipient. If a radio node 110 does not receive an acknowledgment
message, the radio node 110 will presume that the message was not
received by the neighbor radio node 110 and will retransmit the
message. When one of the radio nodes 110 does not receive
confirmation of receipt of its transmission across one of the links
130 after multiple retries, it will broadcast a failure
notification throughout the wireless mesh network 100. The message
originator may then initiate a route discovery to the destination
in order to find an alternate path through the wireless mesh
network 100. The process of retransmitting the message, computing a
new route for the message through the wireless mesh network 100,
and sending the message on the new path through the wireless mesh
network 100 takes time and consumes bandwidth on the wireless mesh
network 100. Additionally, an alternative path may not always
exist.
[0026] Accordingly, it would be preferable to determine the health
of the wireless mesh network 100 before a failure occurs or before
the link conditions degrade to the point where transmission of
messages on the wireless mesh network 100 is impaired. Embodiments
define an automated process whereby the health and reliability of
the wireless mesh network 100 are estimated before a failure
occurs. The process uses distributed evaluation of the links 130 of
each radio node 110, using both signal strength and noise
estimates, to implement a link quantification process. The link
quantification information is collected and used to implement a
network health determination process.
[0027] FIG. 2 shows a block diagram of a radio node 110, which in
some embodiments is one of the radio nodes 110 in the wireless mesh
network 100 of FIG. 1. FIG. 2 illustrates an example architecture
of a radio node 110 that executes, runs, interprets, operates, or
otherwise performs a routing application 200-1 and a routing
process 200-2, and a link qualification application 240-1 and a
link qualification process 204-2, suitable for use in explaining
example configurations disclosed herein. As shown in FIG. 2, the
radio node 110 includes an interconnection mechanism 205, such as
but not limited to a data bus or other circuitry that couples a
memory 201, a processor 202, an optional input/output interface I/O
203, a PHY 220, and an RF transceiver 230, which functions as a
communications interface. The RF transceiver 230 enables the radio
node 110 to communicate with other devices (i.e., other radio
nodes, an aggregator, etc.) on a network, such as but limited to
the wireless mesh network 100 shown in FIG. 1.
[0028] The memory 201 is any type of computer readable medium, and
in this example, is encoded with a routing application 200-1 and a
link qualification application 240-1, as well as other information,
as explained herein. The routing application 200-1 and the link
qualification application 240-1 may be embodied as software code
such as data and/or logic instructions (e.g., code stored in the
memory or on another computer readable medium such as a removable
disk) that supports processing functionality according to different
embodiments described herein. During operation of the radio node
110, the processor 202 accesses the memory 201 via the
interconnection mechanism 205 in order to launch, run, execute,
interpret, or otherwise perform the logic instructions of the
routing application 200-1 and/or the link qualification application
240-1. Execution of the routing application 200-1 and/or the link
qualification application 240-1 in this manner produces processing
functionality in the routing process 200-2 and/or the link
qualification process 240-2. In other words, the routing process
200-2 represents one or more portions or runtime instances of a
routing application 200-1 (or the entire routing application 200-1)
performing or executing within or upon the processor 202 in the
radio node 110 at runtime. Similarly, the link qualification
process 240-2 represents one or more portions or runtime instances
of a link qualification application 240-1 (or the entire link
qualification application 240-1) performing or executing within or
upon the processor 202 in the radio node 110 at runtime.
[0029] It is noted that example configurations disclosed herein
include the routing application 200-1 itself and/or the link
qualification application 240-1 itself (i.e., in the form of
un-executed or non-performing logic instructions and/or data). The
routing application 200-1 and/or the link qualification application
240-1 may be, and in some embodiments is/are, stored on a computer
readable medium such as a disk, hard drive, electronic, magnetic,
optical, or other computer readable medium. The routing application
200-1 and/or the link qualification application 240-1 may also be,
and in some embodiments is/are, stored in a memory 201, such as in
firmware, read only memory (ROM), or as executable code in, for
example, Random Access Memory (RAM). In addition to these
embodiments, it should also be noted that other embodiments herein
include the execution of the routing application 200-1 in the
processor 202 as the routing process 200-2, and/or the execution of
the link qualification application 240-1 in the processor 202 as
the link qualification process 240-2. Those skilled in the art will
understand that the radio node 110 may, and in some embodiments
does, include other processes and/or software and hardware
components, such as an operating system that controls allocation
and use of hardware resources associated with the radio node 110,
not shown in this example.
[0030] As seen in FIG. 2, the radio node 110 also includes neighbor
and routing tables 210 and proximity tables 250, stored in the
memory 201. The PHY 220 manages the RF transceiver 230 and performs
channel selection and energy and signal management functions. The
RF transceiver 230, under the control of the PHY 220, transmits and
receives RF signals on a wireless mesh network, such as but not
limited to the wireless mesh network 100 of FIG. 1, to enable
messages to be exchanged with other radio nodes on the wireless
mesh network. The routing process 200-2 exchanges link status and
routing messages with neighboring radio nodes 110. Information
learned by the routing process 200-2 about the neighboring radio
nodes 110 is stored in the neighbor and routing tables 210. The
particular information exchanged by the routing processes 200-2 of
the radio node 110 and the neighboring radio nodes 110 will depend
on the routing protocol in use on the wireless mesh network. The
routing process 200-2 of each radio node 110 therefore collects
information about its neighboring radio nodes 110 in order to
establish routes through the wireless mesh network. This routing
information, which includes information about a subset of the radio
nodes in its proximity along with their link quality and age, are
stored in the neighbor and routing tables 210 maintained by the
routing process 200-2 in the memory 201. These tables are built up
from periodic link status and routing messages that the radio nodes
110 transmit on the wireless mesh network.
[0031] While the neighbor and routing tables 210 provide a ready
source of link quality information, this information is tightly
coupled with the communication stack, which limits its general
usage. For example, due to resource limitations, the neighbor and
routing tables 210 in some embodiments only have between eight and
sixteen entries, where each entry remains quasi-static due to the
dependency of the neighbor and routing tables 210 and the network
join process. Thus, for example, the radio node 110 may not have
information about one of the neighbor radio nodes 110 in its
neighbor and routing tables 210, if the radio node 110 does not
have a routing adjacency with that neighbor radio node. In a dense
network having many radio nodes 110 located within radio
communication of each other, one of the radio nodes 110 may have
many more neighbor radio nodes 110 in its vicinity then are able to
be accommodated in the neighbor and routing tables 210. Thus, the
information contained in the neighbor and routing tables 210 may
only provide a sparse subset of information related to neighboring
radio nodes 110 and the links, such as the links 130 of FIG. 1,
which may be used to transmit information in the wireless mesh
network, such as the wireless mesh network 100 of FIG. 1.
[0032] Embodiments specify a method to generate distributed link
quality information that incorporates the received signal strength
indication (also referred to throughout as RSSI) as well as an
estimate of the transient noise floor. The received signal strength
indication provides an estimate of the link budget between the
received energy and the radio received sensitivity, whereas the
packet error rate will indicate where the noise floor and
interference start affecting communication throughput. The
combination of received signal strength indication and noise floor
provides a good estimate of the link reliability. Embodiments also
specify how the link quality information, once aggregated, is
evaluated to determine the network health.
[0033] As shown in FIG. 2, the radio node 110 also includes the
link quantification process 240-2 and the proximity table 250. The
link quantification process 240-2 instructs the PHY 220 to transmit
link quantification messages, which are used to determine both the
received signal strength indication and to evaluate the noise floor
of the links 130 shown in FIG. 1, for example between a
transmitting radio node 110T and a neighboring radio node that
receives a link quantification messages 110R. The link
quantification messages are sent as interPAN messages, or messages
external to the current network, which limit the stack handling of
the data. The process of transmitting link quantification messages
is described in greater detail below in connection with FIG. 3.
[0034] The link quantification process 240-2 also listens for link
quantification messages from other radio nodes 110 on the wireless
mesh network 100 of FIG. 1 and uses the received link
quantification messages to update entries in its proximity table
250. The process of receiving link quantification messages and
updating entries in the proximity table 250 is described in greater
detail below in connection with FIG. 4. Use of the proximity table
250, which is separate and independent of the neighbor and routing
tables 210, decouples link quantification from the protocol stack
in use on the radio nodes 110, so that link quantification is not
limited to the set of nodes contained in the neighbor and routing
tables 210. This also enables the link quantification process 240-2
to cycle new radio nodes through the proximity table 250 without
impacting network routing.
[0035] Embodiments include the methods described throughout as
software or firmware in each of the radio nodes 110 that determines
the link quality at the respective radio node 110 and includes the
process used by the aggregator to determine the network health,
such as network redundancy. Each radio node 110 within the wireless
mesh network 100 will maintain its proximity table 250 that often
will include more entries than are contained in the neighbor and
routing tables 210 of the radio node 110. Each entry in the
proximity table 250 will include at least the radio node ID of a
neighboring radio, a received signal strength indication at max
transmit power characterizing the link 130 to the neighboring radio
node, a transmit power level at measurable packet error rate
characterizing the noise on the link 130, and the age of the
entry.
[0036] During link quantification, a transmitting radio node 110T
will transmit link quantification messages and each of the radio
nodes that are able to receive the link quantification messages,
given the transmission characteristics of the wireless mesh network
100, will collect link quantification information from the
transmitted link quantification messages. The radio nodes 110 that
receive link quantification messages will be referred to as
receiving radio nodes 110R. FIG. 1 shows an example in which node 1
is a transmitting radio node 110T and nodes C, 2, 4, 7, 9, and 10
are receiving radio nodes 110R. A dashed line 160 shows the
effective physical communication distance of RF transmission of
link quantification messages at full power. Nodes outside the
dashed line 160 may, and in some embodiments do, receive
communications from node 1 when node 1 is transmitting at full
power, however the link quality may be lower than a threshold and
subsequently dropped from the analysis. Each radio node 110 will
individually assume the role of transmitting radio node 110T and
each radio node 110 within physical communication distance of the
transmitting radio node 110T will assume the role of receiving
radio node 110R for the duration of the transmitting radio node's
link quantification process.
[0037] Flow diagrams of various methods are respectively depicted
in FIGS. 3, 4, and 6. The rectangular elements are herein denoted
"processing blocks" and represent computer software instructions or
groups of instructions. The diamond shaped elements, are herein
denoted "decision blocks," represent computer software
instructions, or groups of instructions which affect the execution
of the computer software instructions represented by the processing
blocks. Alternatively, the processing and decision blocks represent
steps performed by functionally equivalent circuits such as a
digital signal processor circuit or an application specific
integrated circuit (ASIC). The flow diagrams do not depict the
syntax of any particular programming language. Rather, the flow
diagrams illustrate the functional information one of ordinary
skill in the art requires to fabricate circuits or to generate
computer software to perform the processing required in accordance
with the present invention. It should be noted that many routine
program elements, such as initialization of loops and variables and
the use of temporary variables, are not shown. It will be
appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that unless
otherwise indicated herein, the particular sequence of steps
described is illustrative only and can be varied without departing
from the spirit of the invention. Thus, unless otherwise stated the
steps described below are unordered meaning that, when possible,
the steps can be performed in any convenient or desirable
order.
[0038] Further, while FIGS. 3, 4, and 6 each illustrates various
operations, it is to be understood that not all of the operations
depicted in FIGS. 3, 4, and 6 are necessary for other embodiments
to function. Indeed, it is fully contemplated herein that in other
embodiments of the present disclosure, the operations depicted in
FIGS. 3, 4, and 6, and/or other operations described herein, may be
combined in a manner not specifically shown in any of the drawings,
but still fully consistent with the present disclosure. Thus,
claims directed to features and/or operations that are not exactly
shown in one drawing are deemed within the scope and content of the
present disclosure.
[0039] FIG. 3 shows a method of transmitting a series of link
quantification messages to enable the noise floor on links
associated with the transmitting radio node 110T to be sensed by
receiving radio nodes 110R. Thus, the method of FIG. 3 is, in some
embodiments, the link quantification process 240-2 of FIG. 2, and
is alternatively referred to as such. As shown in FIG. 3, during
the link quantification process 240-2, the transmitting radio node
110T issues a defined number of link quantification messages in a
predetermined pattern, which are detected by receiving radio nodes
110R and used by the receiving radio nodes 110R to update their
proximity tables 250. In some embodiments, the link quantification
messages are always of the same length. In some embodiments, the
message length of the link quantification messages transmitted
between the radio nodes 110 is sixty-four bytes. In some
embodiments, link quantification messages having a message length
other than sixty-four bytes are used. The format of the messages,
e.g., which bytes are used to carry information about the node ID,
the sequence number, the power level, and the other message content
fields described herein, depends on the implementation.
[0040] In some embodiments, as shown in FIG. 3, the transmitting
radio node 110T will transmit a first set of link quantification
messages at a first power, power level 1, 300. In FIG. 3, the power
level 1 is a maximum transmit power level. For example, the first
set of link quantification messages include, in some embodiments, a
set number of link quantification messages, e.g. twenty to two
hundred messages, periodically transmitted at full transmit power,
e.g., every five hundred to fifteen hundred milliseconds. Each link
quantification message includes the transmitting node ID, a
sequence number, and an indication of the power level used by the
transmitting radio node 110T to transmit the message. The link
quantification messages may also include an indication of the
number of link quantification messages that will be transmitted by
the transmitting node 110T at the current power level. Other fields
may be, and in some embodiments are, included in the link
quantification messages as well, for example to enable additional
information to be exchanged between the radio nodes 110. In some
embodiments, the link quantification messages are sent as interPAN
messages, which are not addressed and are not routed/forwarded by
receiving radio nodes 110R on the wireless mesh network 100. In
some embodiments, the link quantification messages are transmitted
at the physical layer and detected by any receiving radio nodes
110R within physical communication distance of the transmitting
radio node 110T. The link quantification messages have no relevance
to the radio nodes 110 above the physical layer, e.g. at higher
layers of the seven layer network stack, and, hence are not
processed by the protocol stacks of the receiving radio nodes
110R.
[0041] The transmitting radio node 110T will also transmit a second
set of link quantification messages at a second transmit power
level, power level 2, 310. In some embodiments, the transmit power
level used to transmit the second set of link quantification
messages (i.e., power level 2) is lower than the maximum transmit
power level used to transmit the first set of link quantification
messages (i.e., power level 1). The link quantification messages in
the second set includes the transmitting radio node ID, a reset
sequence number, an indication of the number of messages in the
second set, and updated power setting information. The transmitting
radio node 110T, in some embodiments, will also transmit a third
set of link quantification messages at a third transmit power
level, power level 3, 320. The link quantification messages in the
third set include the transmitting radio node ID, a reset sequence
number, an indication of the number of messages in the third set,
and updated power setting information. This process iterates at
successively lower transmit power levels until the transmitting
radio node 110T has transmitted a final set of link quantification
messages, where the transmit power level of the final set of link
quantification messages is reduced significantly from the maximum
transmit power level (i.e., power level 1), 330.
[0042] FIG. 4 shows a process of receiving the transmitted series
of link quantification messages by receiving radio nodes 110R to
quantify the link 130 from the transmit radio node 110T to the
receiving radio node 110R. Specifically, the process shown in FIG.
4 enables the receiving radio nodes 110R to determine the average
received signal strength indication of the link 130 at the maximum
transmit power level, and to determine the transmit power level
where the packet error rate on the link 130 exceeds a threshold. As
shown in FIG. 4, during the link quantification process, each
receiving radio node 110R will receive the first set of link
quantification messages that were transmitted by the transmitting
radio node 110T at the maximum transmit power level, 400. The
receiving radio node 110R will detect power levels associated with
this received first set of link quantification messages and
calculate parameters associated with a received signal strength
indication for the link 130 to the transmitting radio node 110T,
440. The receiving radio node 110R may, and in some embodiments do,
calculate the parameters associated with the received signal
strength indication coincident with receiving the first set of link
quantification messages or may, and in some embodiments do, perform
the calculation at a later point in time, e.g. after receipt of all
link quantification messages of the first set of link
quantification messages. In some embodiments, the receiving radio
nodes 110R calculate the average received signal strength
indication for the set of messages transmitted at the maximum power
level and store this average received signal strength indication as
a component of the link quantification information for the link
130. Each receiving radio node 110R also knows how many link
quantification messages the transmitting radio node 110T will
transmit during the link quantification process at each successive
power level. In some embodiments, the number of link quantification
messages to be transmitted by the transmitting radio node 110T is
specified in the link quantification messages transmitted by the
transmitting radio node 110T. In some embodiments, the number of
link quantification messages to be transmitted by the transmitting
radio node 110T is set in advance. For example, in some
embodiments, both the transmitting radio node 110T and the
receiving radio node 110R will know in advance that each set of
messages will include a predefined specified number of link
quantification messages. Accordingly, each receiving radio node
110R will listen for receipt of an expected number of link
quantification messages at the transmit power level 2, 410, at
transmit power level 3, 420, and at successive lower transmit power
levels up to the final expected transmit power level, 430. Since
each receiving radio node 110R knows how many link quantification
messages are expected at each transmit power level, each receiving
radio node 110R compares the number of link quantification messages
expected at each transmit power level with the number of link
quantification messages received at each power level to determine a
packet error rate at each transmit power level. In some
embodiments, the link quantification sequence numbers enable the
receiving radio node 110R to determine whether one or more link
quantification messages have not been received at a particular
transmit power level.
[0043] In some embodiments, the receiving radio nodes implement a
timeout process to cause the link quantification process at the
receiving radio node to terminate after a predetermined period of
time. In some embodiments, the predetermined period of time
corresponds with an approximation of how long it will take a
transmitting radio node 110T to complete transmission of the sets
of link quantification messages at all transmit power levels. Each
receiving radio node 110R that receives the link quantification
messages from the transmitting radio node 110T updates an entry in
its proximity table 250 for the corresponding transmitting radio
node ID. Each receiving radio node 110R counts the number of link
quantification messages that it receives from the transmitting
radio node 110T at each power level. Each receiving radio node 110R
also looks for link quantification messages that were not received,
and when the packet error rate exceeds a threshold, the transmit
power level associated with the link quantification messages that
exhibited a measurable packet error rate is stored and used as an
estimate of the noise floor for the link 130 between the
transmitting radio node 110T and the receiving radio node 110R.
[0044] The receiving radio node 110R knows how many link
quantification messages the transmitting radio node 110T will
transmit at each power level, as discussed above, and therefore
knows how many messages should be received. This expected number of
link quantification messages is compared with the actual number of
received link quantification messages to determine if any link
quantification messages did not arrive. This enables the receiving
radio node 110R to estimate the Packet Error Rate (PER) as: (the
number of expected link quantification messages (Tx) minus the
number of received link quantification messages (Rx)), divided by
the number of expected link quantification messages (Tx), expressed
as a percentage. Formulaically, this is expressed as:
PER=(Tx-Rx)/Tx [%]
[0045] The proximity table entry for the transmitting radio node
110T is updated at the receiving radio node 110T to include the
transmit power level at measurable packet error rate, i.e. where
the number of missed link quantification messages results in a
packet error rate above the threshold. In some embodiments, the
packet error rate threshold is one missed message, and in some
embodiments the packet error rate threshold is a number of missed
messages in excess of one percent (PER>1%).
[0046] The average received signal strength indication at maximum
transmit power provides an estimate of the channel attenuation,
which is influenced by the distance between the radio nodes 110,
attenuating obstacles, and multipath interference, among other
things. This value generally remains consistent if the physical
environment in which the wireless mesh network 100 is deployed
remains static. The transmit power level at which the packet error
rate is measurable estimates the transient noise floor where
interference and other radio frequency energy sources have an
impact the reliability of the link 130. The difference between the
maximum transmit power (Pmax) and the power level at measurable
packet error rate (Ploss) provides an approximation of the signal
to noise ratio on the link 130:
SNR=Pmax-Ploss
[0047] The average Received Signal Strength Indication (RSSI)
detected at maximum transmit power level provides an approximation
of an absolute value of the noise level on the link 130.
[0048] The entries stored in the proximity table 250 will be
referred to herein as link quantification information. As noted
above, in some embodiments the link quantification information for
each proximity table entry includes: a node ID, RSSI, Ploss, and
age. In other embodiments, the link quantification information for
each proximity table entry includes: a node ID, SNR, and age. The
age of each valid entry in the proximity table is incremented
periodically, and it is reset whenever the receiving radio node
110R detects that the transmitting radio node 110T is performing
the link quantification process.
[0049] Although FIGS. 3 and 4 show embodiments in which sets of
link quantification messages are transmitted at decreasing power
levels, other embodiments may and do use other transmission
patterns of link quantification messages. For example, during the
link quantification process, the transmitting radio node 110T in
some embodiments transmits link quantification messages initially
at a low power level and then increases the transmit power in
connection with transmission of successive sets of link
quantification messages, such that transmission of the last set of
link quantification messages occurs at the maximum transmit power
level. Likewise, while the embodiments shown in FIG. 3 describe an
example power level sequence, other power level sequences may be
and are used as well, as long as the receiving radio nodes 110R
know how many link quantification messages will be transmitted at
each power level, and what transmit power levels will be used. By
knowing how many link quantification messages will be transmitted,
and the power levels of the messages that will be transmitted, the
receiving radio nodes 110R are able to detect non-receipt of a link
quantification message and correlate the non-receipt of a link
quantification message with an expected transmit power level for
message that was not received.
[0050] Accordingly, some embodiments utilize different link
quantification message transmit patterns. In connection with
describing a few possible embodiments, the following nomenclature
will be used: [0051] LQMP1=link quantification message at maximum
transmit power (level 1) [0052] LQMP2=link quantification message
at first reduced power (level 2) [0053] LQMP3=link quantification
message at second reduce power (level 3) [0054] LQMP4=link
quantification message at third reduced power (level 4) [0055]
LQMP5=link quantification message at fourth reduced power (level 5)
Although five power levels are described in these embodiments, in
other embodiments different numbers of power levels are used.
Likewise, although these embodiments will assume the transmission
of twenty messages at each power level, other embodiments use other
numbers of link quantification messages at each power level.
[0056] In some embodiments, link quantification is implemented by
transmitting link quantification messages initially at the maximum
power level and then at gradually reduced power levels. FIG. 3
shows an example of such embodiments. Using the nomenclature
described above, this link quantification process may be described
as: [0057] Phase 1--transmit LQMP1 (messages 1-20) at max power
level (level 1); [0058] Phase 2--transmit LQMP2 (messages 1-20) at
first reduced power (level 2); [0059] Phase 3--transmit LQMP3
(messages 1-20) at second reduced power (level 3); [0060] Phase
4--transmit LQMP4 (messages 1-20) at third reduced power (level 4);
[0061] Phase 5--transmit LQMP5 (messages 1-20) at fourth reduced
power (level 5)
[0062] In some embodiments, link quantification is implemented by
transmitting link quantification messages initially at a lower
power and then at gradually increased power levels. Using the
nomenclature described above, this link quantification process may
be described as: [0063] Phase 1--transmit LQMP5 (messages 1-20) at
fourth reduced power (level 5); [0064] Phase 2--transmit LQMP4
(messages 1-20) at third reduced power (level 4); [0065] Phase
3--transmit LQMP3 (messages 1-20) at second reduced power (level
3); [0066] Phase 4--transmit LQMP2 (messages 1-20) at first reduced
power (level 2); [0067] Phase 5--transmit LQMP1 (messages 1-20) at
max power level (level 1)
[0068] In some embodiments, link quantification is implemented by
transmitting link quantification messages at varying transmit power
levels and cycling through the transmit power levels multiple
times. Using the nomenclature described above, this link
quantification process may be described as: [0069] Phase
1--transmit LQMP1 (messages 1-10) at max power level (level 1);
[0070] Phase 2--transmit LQMP2 (messages 1-10) at first reduced
power (level 2); [0071] Phase 3--transmit LQMP3 (messages 1-10) at
second reduced power (level 3); [0072] Phase 4--transmit LQMP4
(messages 1-10) at third reduced power (level 4); [0073] Phase
5--transmit LQMP5 (messages 1-10) at fourth reduced power (level 5)
[0074] Phase 6--transmit LQMP1 (messages 11-20) at max power level
(level 1); [0075] Phase 7--transmit LQMP2 (messages 11-20) at first
reduced power (level 2); [0076] Phase 8--transmit LQMP3 (messages
11-20) at second reduced power (level 3); [0077] Phase 9--transmit
LQMP4 (messages 11-20) at third reduced power (level 4); [0078]
Phase 10--transmit LQMP5 (messages 11-20) at fourth reduced power
(level 5)
[0079] In some embodiments, link quantification is implemented by
continuously varying the power level with successive transmissions
of link quantification messages and cycling through the transmit
power levels more than once. Using the nomenclature described
above, this link quantification process may be described as: [0080]
Phase 1--transmit LQMP1 (message 1) at max power level (level 1);
[0081] Phase 2--transmit LQMP2 (message 1) at first reduced power
(level 2); [0082] Phase 3--transmit LQMP3 (message 1) at second
reduced power (level 3); [0083] Phase 4--transmit LQMP4 (message 1)
at third reduced power (level 4); [0084] Phase 5--transmit LQMP5
(message 1) at fourth reduced power (level 5) [0085] Phase
6--transmit LQMP1 (message 2) at max power level (level 1); [0086]
Phase 7--transmit LQMP2 (message 2) at first reduced power (level
2); [0087] Phase 8--transmit LQMP3 (message 2) at second reduced
power (level 3); [0088] Phase 9--transmit LQMP4 (message 2) at
third reduced power (level 4); [0089] Phase 10--transmit LQMP5
(message 2) at fourth reduced power (level 5) [0090] Phase
96--transmit LQMP1 (message 20) at max power level (level 1);
[0091] Phase 97--transmit LQMP2 (message 20) at first reduced power
(level 2); [0092] Phase 98--transmit LQMP3 (message 20) at second
reduced power (level 3); [0093] Phase 99--transmit LQMP4 (message
20) at third reduced power (level 4); [0094] Phase 100--transmit
LQMP5 (message 20) at fourth reduced power (level 5)
[0095] In some embodiments, this sequence iterates until all
messages have been transmitted at each of the power levels.
[0096] As is clear, there are multiple potential transmission
patterns that may be used in connection with link quantification
using link quantification messages with varying transmit power
levels. Whichever transmission pattern is selected, the receiving
radio nodes 110R need to know the selected transmission pattern so
that the receiving radio nodes 110R may detect non-receipt of one
or more of the link quantification messages and correlate the lack
of receipt of the one or more of the link quantification messages
with expected transmission power of those non-received link
quantification messages. This enables the receiving radio nodes
110R to determine the transmit power level at measurable packet
error rate to characterize the noise on the link 130. Each radio
node 110 in the wireless mesh network 100 will therefore
participate in the link quantification process in two ways: (1) as
a transmitting radio node 110T, and (2) as a receiving radio node
110R. Each radio node 110 will periodically assume the role of
transmitting radio node 110T and will transmit a series of link
quantification messages as described above. Each radio node 110
will also periodically assume the role of receiving radio node 110R
whenever the radio node 110 starts to receive link quantification
messages from another radio node 110 on the wireless mesh network
100. Optionally, the transmitting radio node 110T may transmit an
initial message to notify adjacent nodes that the transmitting
radio node 110T is about to start the link quantification
process.
[0097] Since transmission of link quantification messages will
consume bandwidth on the wireless mesh network, in some embodiments
an external evaluation of network traffic is implemented prior to
initiation of the link quantification process to cause the link
quantification process to occur during times of lower network
traffic. In some embodiments, an aggregator will evaluate the
current and estimated traffic load on the wireless mesh network 100
to determine when the radio nodes should perform link
quantification and when the link quantification data should be
retrieved to the aggregator. The proximity table 250 in each radio
node 110 contains detailed information about links 130 from that
radio node 110 to other radio nodes within physical communication
distance of the radio node 110 within the mesh network 100. Since
the messages are transmitted interPAN (not routed), the proximity
table will contain link quantification information for all radio
nodes 110 in the mesh network 100 that the radio node 110 is able
to communicate with at the physical level regardless of the routing
topography of the network. In some embodiments, link quantification
information is retrieved from multiple radio nodes and processed to
enable the health of the network to be determined. In some
embodiments, the process of retrieving link quantification
information from the radio nodes 110 and using the link
quantification information to determine network health is performed
by an aggregator.
[0098] FIG. 5 shows a block diagram of an aggregator 140. FIG. 5
illustrates an example architecture of the aggregator 140 that
executes, runs, interprets, operates, or otherwise performs a
network health determination application 500-1 and a network health
determination process 500-2, and a link assessment application
520-1 and a link assessment process 520-2, suitable for use in
explaining example configurations disclosed herein. As shown in
FIG. 5, the aggregator 140 includes an interconnection mechanism
505, such as but not limited to a data bus or other circuitry that
couples a memory 501, a processor 502, an optional input/output
interface I/O 503, and a communications interface 504. The
communications interface 504 enables the aggregator 140 to
communicate with other devices (i.e., other radio nodes, end
devices, etc.) on a network, such as but limited to the wireless
mesh network 100 shown in FIG. 1.
[0099] The memory 501 is any type of computer readable medium, and
in this example, is encoded with a network health determination
application 500-1 and a link assessment application 520-1, as well
as other information, as explained herein. The network health
determination application 500-1 and the link assessment application
520-1 may be embodied as software code such as data and/or logic
instructions (e.g., code stored in the memory or on another
computer readable medium such as a removable disk) that supports
processing functionality according to different embodiments
described herein. During operation of the aggregator 140, the
processor 502 accesses the memory 501 via the interconnection
mechanism 505 in order to launch, run, execute, interpret, or
otherwise perform the logic instructions of the network health
determination application 500-1 and/or the link assessment
application 520-1. Execution of the network health determination
application 500-1 and/or the link assessment application 520-1 in
this manner produces processing functionality in the network health
determination process 500-2 and/or the link assessment process
520-2. In other words, the network health determination process
500-2 represents one or more portions or runtime instances of a
network health determination application 500-1 (or the entire
network health determination application 500-1) performing or
executing within or upon the processor 502 in the aggregator 140 at
runtime. Similarly, the link assessment process 520-2 represents
one or more portions or runtime instances of a link assessment
application 520-1 (or the entire link assessment application 520-1)
performing or executing within or upon the processor 502 in the
aggregator 140 at runtime.
[0100] It is noted that example configurations disclosed herein
include the network health determination application 500-1 itself
and/or the link assessment application 520-1 itself (i.e., in the
form of un-executed or non-performing logic instructions and/or
data). The network health determination application 500-1 and/or
the link assessment application 520-1 may be, and in some
embodiments is/are, stored on a computer readable medium such as a
disk, hard drive, electronic, magnetic, optical, or other computer
readable medium. The network health determination application 500-1
and/or the link assessment application 520-1 may also be, and in
some embodiments is/are, stored in the memory 501, such as in
firmware, read only memory (ROM), or as executable code in, for
example, Random Access Memory (RAM). In addition to these
embodiments, it should also be noted that other embodiments herein
include the execution of the network health determination
application 500-1 in the processor 502 as the network health
determination process 500-2, and/or the execution of the link
assessment application 520-1 in the processor 502 as the link
assessment process 520-2. Those skilled in the art will understand
that the aggregator 140 may, and in some embodiments does, include
other processes and/or software and hardware components, such as an
operating system that controls allocation and use of hardware
resources associated with the aggregator 140, not shown in this
example.
[0101] As shown in FIG. 5, the aggregator also includes aggregated
proximity tables 510, network topography tables 530, and an
intercommunication matrix 540, all stored in the memory 501. In
FIG. 1, the aggregator 140 is shown as connected to the wireless
mesh network via the network 150, though as described above in
regards to FIG. 1, this is not necessary. The aggregator 140, in
some embodiments, is implemented as one or more processes
instantiated on a separate processor/computer/server external to
the wireless mesh network 100 as shown in FIG. 1, and in some
embodiments is implemented as one or more processes instantiated in
the concentrator gateway 120, and in some embodiments is
implemented as one or more processes instantiated in one of the
radio nodes 110, or as one or more processes instantiated in an
endpoint device connected to the wireless mesh network 100.
[0102] FIG. 6 shows a method implemented by the aggregator 140
according to some embodiments. As shown in FIG. 6, a network health
determination process 500-2 collects link quantification
information, 600, from a set of radio nodes 110. In some
embodiments, the network health determination process 500-2
collects link qualification information from the proximity tables
250 of each of the radio nodes 110. In some embodiments, the link
quantification information includes the radio node ID of the radio
node 110 from which the proximity table information is obtained,
and the entries of the proximity table 250 on that radio node
quantifying the link metrics described above for the links between
that radio node and its neighboring radio nodes. As link
quantification information is collected from each of the radio
nodes 110, the link quantification information is stored in the
aggregated proximity tables 510. In some embodiments, as the link
quantification information is obtained from the radio nodes 110,
the radio nodes 110 delete the information from their proximity
tables 250. The link quantification information may be, and in some
embodiments is, collected using Simple Network Management Protocol
or another protocol designed to extract data from the proximity
tables 250 of the radio nodes 110.
[0103] The aggregator 140 uses the link quantification information
to determine the topography of the wireless mesh network 100, 610.
The network topography is stored in the network topography tables
530. Once the aggregator has amassed link quantification
information from all the radio nodes 110 in the wireless mesh
network 100, the network health determination process 500-2 is able
to construct an N.times.N intercommunication matrix 540, where N is
the number of radio nodes 110 in the network, and the entries are
signal to noise ratio link quality indexes derived from the signal
to noise ratio on the links 130. Since the link quantification
information retrieved by the network health determination process
500-2 includes both the average received signal strength indication
for each edge, and information about the power level at which the
packet error rate exceeded a threshold reliability metric for the
respective edge, the network health determination process 500-2 is
able to determine the approximate absolute noise level on the link
and to approximate the signal to noise ratio for each of the edges
interconnecting the radio nodes 110. This information is included
in the N.times.N intercommunication matrix. Edges with a noise
level above a threshold and/or a signal to noise ratio below a
predetermined threshold may be, and in some embodiments are, set to
zero or otherwise determined to not be reliable and ignored when
processing the network health. For example, in some embodiments the
signal to noise ratio information in the intercommunication matrix
is used in connection with ranking the radio nodes 110 by excluding
edges that do not meet predetermined signal to noise threshold
criteria. In some embodiments, the intercommunication matrix 540 is
part of the network topography 530. In some embodiments, the
intercommunication matrix 540 is separate from the network
topography 530, as shown in FIG. 5.
[0104] The network health determination process 500-2 evaluates
each of the radio nodes in the intercommunication matrix to assign
ranks to the radio nodes, 620, calculates dependency and
reliability metrics for the radio nodes 630, and uses the rank,
reliability, and dependency metrics to quantify the health of the
wireless mesh network 100, 640. Optionally, indications associated
with the health of the wireless mesh network 100 in some
embodiments are visualized as described in connection with FIG.
7.
[0105] The link assessment process 520-2 evaluates the radio nodes
110 of the intercommunication matrix 540 to assign ranks to the
radio nodes. Each radio node 110 in the wireless mesh network 100
will be assigned a rank, which is defined as the number of reliable
hops that the radio node 110 must travel to reach the concentrator
gateway 120. In some embodiments, if the received signal strength
indication indicates that the overall noise on a link is too high,
or if the signal to noise ratio indicates that the link between two
nodes is sufficiently weak, the edge will be excluded and not used
to rank the radio nodes. The concentrator gateway 120 is rank 0 and
the radio nodes 110 that communicate directly with the concentrator
gateway 120 and at least one other radio node 110 that also
communicates with the concentrator gateway 120 are rank 1. Radio
nodes 110 that do not have an edge with the concentrator gateway
120 but communicate directly with at least two rank 1 radio nodes
110 are considered rank 2. Radio nodes 110 that have less than two
edges to rank 0 and rank 1 radio nodes 110, but communicate with at
least two rank 2 or lower ranking radio nodes 110, are considered
rank 3 radio nodes. The ranking of the radio nodes is performed in
this manner, where a radio node 110 of rank X must communicate with
at least two radio nodes of a lower rank (X-1). Ranking continues
until all the radio nodes 110 in the wireless mesh network 100 are
evaluated. The number of edges that a ranked radio node 110 has
with radio nodes 110 of a lower rank specifies its level of
redundancy. A radio node 110 that is not ranked represents a single
point of failure, since it has no redundancy. Once the rank of all
eligible radio nodes has been determined, the network health
determination process 500-2 evaluates each radio node 110 for its
reliability and dependency. Reliability is defined as the number of
edges that a radio node 110 has with lower rank radio nodes. In the
case of rank 1 radio nodes, reliability is the number of edges that
a radio node has with the concentrator gateway 120 and other rank 1
radio nodes. The reliability indicates how many orthogonal paths to
the concentrator gateway 120 exist. The dependency is defined as
the number of edges the radio node has with higher rank radio
nodes. This metric indicates how many radio nodes depend on this
particular radio node for its reliability.
[0106] The following table, Table 1, provides information about the
rank, reliability, and dependency of the radio nodes 110 shown in
the sample wireless mesh network 100 of FIG. 1.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Radio Node Rank Reliability Dependency 1 1 3
3 2 1 3 3 3 1 2 2 4 1 3 2 5 1 2 1 6 2 2 1 7 2 2 0 8 2 2 3 9 2 2 2
10 3 2 0 11 N/A 0 0 12 3 2 2 13 4 2 0 14 3 2 1 15 4 3 0 16 3 2 1 17
4 2 0 C 0 N/A N/A
[0107] Ranking the radio nodes 110, evaluating radio node
reliability, and radio node dependency, enables the overall health
of the network to be quantified, 640. For example, radio nodes 110
with high dependency and low reliability may indicate areas of the
mesh network 100 that present potential regions of failure that
should be redesigned. Optionally, the network health may be output,
650, in visible, tangible, or any other format.
[0108] The manner in which the data provided by the network health
determination process 500-2 is interpreted and actions taken in
response to the network health determination may, and in some
embodiments do, vary depending on the implementation. Example
outputs from the network health determination process 500-2 may,
and in some embodiments do, include graphical displays showing the
network health and identifying regions of the wireless mesh network
100 that present potential points of failure. The radio nodes/links
in such embodiments may be, and in some embodiments are, color
coded to visually depict the health of the various components of
the network. Many ways of providing output regarding the determined
health of the wireless mesh network 100 may be, and in some
embodiments are, implemented.
[0109] FIG. 7 shows an example output from the network health
determination process 500-2 of FIG. 5 identifying two areas of the
wireless mesh network 100 where the dependency exceeds the
reliability, which might indicate possible areas of the network
that could be problematic at a future point in time. As shown in
FIG. 7, a radio node 11 has been highlighted as a single point of
failure since it has no reliability, e.g. the radio node 11 is only
connected to the other lower ranked radio nodes via a single link
130 and, as such, failure of the single link 130 between an
adjacent radio node 10 and the radio node 11, or failure of the
adjacent radio node 10, would render the radio node 11 unreachable
on the wireless mesh network 100.
[0110] A radio node 8 has been highlighted as well, since it has a
dependency of three, indicating that three other nodes depend on
it, while it has a reliability of two, meaning that it only has
only two paths to lower ranked nodes. This indicates that multiple
other radio nodes depend on the radio node 8, while the radio node
8 only has limited reliability and, hence, a failure in that region
of the wireless mesh network 100 is both more likely and, if a
failure were to occur, the failure would affect a larger number of
other radio nodes and potentially routes through the wireless mesh
network 100.
[0111] Endpoint devices connect to the radio nodes 110 of the
wireless mesh network. In some embodiments, the radio nodes 110
maintain a list of endpoint devices that are visible to the radio
node. For example, in some embodiments, endpoint devices will
periodically transmit a proximity check message to detect whether
the endpoint device is within communication distance of any radio
node 110. In some embodiments, all radio nodes 110 that receive a
proximity check message from an endpoint device will record the
node ID of the endpoint device and include the list of visible
endpoint devices in their proximity tables. The aggregator 140 will
collect the list of visible endpoint devices and determine, from
the lists of visible endpoint devices, which endpoint devices are
visible to only one radio node 110 and which endpoint devices are
visible to more than one radio node 110. Devices that are visible
to only one radio node 110 on the wireless mesh network 100 may be,
and in some embodiments are, identified as potential points of
failure on the wireless mesh network 100, since they have only one
potential parent on the wireless mesh network 100. This enables the
network health determination process 500-2 to determine whether
endpoint devices have potential redundant paths through multiple
potential parent radio nodes.
[0112] Application of the network health determination process
500-2 to an example ZigBee wireless mesh network will now be
described. In this example, the ZigBee wireless mesh network
includes a coordinator, a plurality of routers, and end devices
(not shown). The coordinator forms the wireless mesh network and
performs routing. Routers join the wireless mesh network and
perform routing. End devices join the wireless mesh network, do not
partake in routing, communicate only with a parent router (a
selected one of the routers or coordinator), and usually have their
RF transceiver turned off between check in periods. In the example
ZigBee network, the coordinator also functions as the aggregator
140. The ZigBee network includes a large number of low memory
distributed devices that report sensor information to the
coordinator. Each radio node will have eight to sixteen entries in
its neighbor and routing tables 210, and will have thirty-two to
sixty-four entries in its proximity table 250. ZigBee routers and
the coordinator function as routers in the ZigBee network, and thus
are the devices that will fully participate in the link
quantification process. ZigBee end devices whose receivers remain
off for the majority of the time do not maintain a proximity table
or participate in the link quantification process, however they
periodically issue a proximity check message once an hour. The
complete link quantification process is initiated within a given
time period, for example but not limited to twenty-four hours of a
significant network change, while a localized link quantification
process is performed more frequently. For example, a significant
network change may include the addition and removal of more than
five percent of the radio nodes in the network. In some
embodiments, for example, in a network with one hundred radio
nodes, replacing three radio nodes (removal of three
percent+addition of three percent) would constitute a significant
network change.
[0113] The coordinator is responsible for detecting significant
changes in the network and for detecting periods of low network
activity. When a significant network change is detected, the
coordinator initiates the link quantification process for each
radio node in turn, thus it controls the progression of the link
quantification process. When there are lulls in network activity,
the coordinator will allow the radio nodes to periodically
self-initiate the link quantification process. For example, in the
middle of the night there will be very low activity on a lighting
control network, thus the coordinator will allow radio nodes to
perform network diagnostics such as link quantification during this
time.
[0114] A radio node that is scheduled to self-initiate a link
quantification process will delay the operation by at least ten
seconds if it detects a link quantification message being
transmitted by another radio node. Each radio node that
participates in the link quantification process will issue, for
example, twenty to two hundred link quantification messages through
interPAN at each of five transmit power level settings. The first
set of link quantification messages will be sent out at full
transmit power, and each subsequent set of link quantification
messages will have the transmit power reduced by six dB. The
transit power is adjusted by the PHY to cause the RF transceiver to
transmit link quantification messages at the desired power levels,
and then the PHY resets the power level to maximum power upon the
completion of the transmission of the link quantification messages.
This ensures that the reduced power has limited impact on other
networking operations. Each link quantification message is sent out
at an interval of five hundred to fifteen hundred milliseconds,
such that the link quantification process for a single radio node
should be completed in less than five minutes. If all radio nodes
sequentially perform the link quantification process during unique
time intervals (if the radio nodes perform link quantification one
at a time), a wireless mesh network with one hundred radio nodes
may take up to nine hours to fully quantify the edges. In some
embodiments, once the aggregator has knowledge of the network, the
aggregator may instruct radio nodes in different areas of the
network to perform link quantification processes simultaneously to
reduce the overall time required to fully quantify the edges.
[0115] Radio nodes that receive the link quantification messages
with a sequence number of 0 from a remote radio node add or update
an entry in the local proximity table, which includes the
transmitting radio node ID, received signal strength indicator,
lowest acceptable transmit power level, current transmit power
level, message count at the current transmit power level, and the
age of the entry. The proximity table keeps track of the average
received signal strength indicator for messages that were
transmitted at full power, and it tracks the lowest transmit power
level for which the radio node has received all messages (0%
PER).
[0116] The aggregator (instantiated in coordinator in this example
ZigBee network) queries each radio node for link quantification
information from the radio node's proximity table. The link
quantification information may be, and in some embodiments is,
retrieved upon the completion of the full link quantification
process, and periodically while devices are self-initiating
localized link quantification processes. Once a radio node
transmits a portion of the proximity table information to the
aggregator, the corresponding entries are deleted from the
proximity table on that radio node, which frees up space in the
proximity table for other entries related to other radio nodes on
the wireless mesh network. Over multiple iterations, causing
entries to be deleted from the proximity table allows the
sixty-four entries in the proximity table to report information on
a larger set of radio nodes.
[0117] ZigBee endpoint devices are generally radio silent for
longer intervals and they communicate through a single parent even
though they are within range of a number of potential parents. The
endpoint device will readily search for a new parent if a message
is not acknowledged, however the inherent ZigBee structure makes it
difficult to determine whether an endpoint device has potential
redundant paths through other parents. Endpoint devices send out a
proximity check interPAN message once an hour. Radio nodes that
receive this message add the corresponding endpoint device radio
node ID to the proximity table, as well as include the received
signal strength indicator, and specify that the entry is associated
with an endpoint device rather than another radio node.
[0118] Once the proximity table information is relayed to the
aggregator, the redundancy for the endpoint device is determined by
looking for edges connecting the endpoint device to radio nodes. To
implement this, table entries for endpoint devices are separated
and the number of potential parents, defined as the number of
unique endpoint device proximity table entries for each endpoint
device are calculated. Proximity table information for radio nodes
are compiled into an N.times.N interconnect matrix, where the row
and columns are the radio nodes in the network, and the entries are
the directed link quality from the column radio node to the row
radio node. Each entry is a zero if there is no link between the
radio nodes, if the average received signal strength indication is
<-75 decibel milliwatts (dBm), or if the lowest acceptable power
reduction is <six dB, i.e. the link quantification information
indicates that a power reduction of six dB or less generated
measurable packet error rate. Otherwise, the entry is deemed a
reliable link and the value of link is set as the lowest acceptable
power reduction, as derived from the link quantification
information. Once the intercommunication matrix has been updated by
the link assessment process, the rank of each radio node is reset,
and a new rank is calculated based on the information contained in
the intercommunication matrix. The coordinator is assigned the rank
of 0, and every radio node that communicates directly with the
coordinator is initially assigned the rank of 1'. The rank 1' radio
nodes are then reassessed such that if a rank 1' radio node has an
edge with at least one other rank 1 or 1' radio node, then it is
assigned the rank 1 with the reliability factor equal to the number
of the edges. If the rank 1' radio node does not have at least one
more edge, then it returns to being unranked. Unranked radio nodes
will then be assessed by the number of edges that it has with rank
0 and rank 1 radio nodes. If the number of edges exceeds two, then
the radio node is rank 2 with a reliability equal to the number of
edges. This process is repeated until a rank is empty i.e. no radio
nodes were ranked during an iteration. Any radio nodes that remain
unranked are flagged as having a single point of failure.
[0119] Upon completion of the ranking, the reliability and
dependency of each radio node is evaluated. A radio node with a
dependency of 0 is an outlying radio node that is expected to have
little pass-through traffic. The effect of noise transients on
these radio nodes will have minor impact on the network. A radio
node with a high reliability and high dependency is a high traffic
radio node that is expected to have high pass-through traffic.
Noise transients around these devices may have a big impact on the
performance of the wireless mesh network. A radio node with a
dependency that is significantly higher than the reliability is a
feeder radio node, and it has the potential of being a single point
of failure if a noise transient significantly degrades the upstream
links to the coordinator.
[0120] The coordinator is a single point of failure since it is the
focal point for traffic flowing into and out of the wireless mesh
network. Most of the radio nodes that communicate directly with
coordinator are considered rank 1 radio nodes, however in the
example network shown in FIG. 1, a radio node 17 is rank 4 even
though it is directly connected to the coordinator C, since its
second independent route must pass through a rank 3 radio node (a
radio node 16). In FIG. 1, a radio node 11 has a single point of
failure, thus it is flagged as an unreliable radio node. Radio
nodes 1 and 2 have the highest dependency and reliability, thus
these radio nodes are expected to have the highest traffic
throughput and must be evaluated more often to detect changes in
network health.
[0121] Interference and noise sources may be band limited, and they
may be dependent on the wavelength, thus noise floors and multipath
losses will vary depending on the chosen communication channel
frequency. Performing the link quantification process and radio
node ranking on multiple channels enables the system to identify
which channel is the most conducive for network health.
[0122] Endpoint devices that appear to have at most one parent may
likewise be identified to determine a lack of redundancy at the
edge of the wireless mesh network 100.
[0123] The methods and systems described herein are not limited to
a particular hardware or software configuration, and may find
applicability in many computing or processing environments. The
methods and systems may be implemented in hardware or software, or
a combination of hardware and software. The methods and systems may
be implemented in one or more computer programs, where a computer
program may be understood to include one or more processor
executable instructions. The computer program(s) may execute on one
or more programmable processors, and may be stored on one or more
storage medium readable by the processor (including volatile and
non-volatile memory and/or storage elements), one or more input
devices, and/or one or more output devices. The processor thus may
access one or more input devices to obtain input data, and may
access one or more output devices to communicate output data. The
input and/or output devices may include one or more of the
following: Random Access Memory (RAM), Redundant Array of
Independent Disks (RAID), floppy drive, CD, DVD, magnetic disk,
internal hard drive, external hard drive, memory stick, flash
memory, solid state drive, or other storage device capable of being
accessed by a processor as provided herein, where such
aforementioned examples are not exhaustive, and are for
illustration and not limitation.
[0124] The computer program(s) may be implemented using one or more
high level procedural or object-oriented programming languages to
communicate with a computer system; however, the program(s) may be
implemented in assembly or machine language, if desired. The
language may be compiled or interpreted.
[0125] As provided herein, the processor(s) may thus be embedded in
one or more devices that may be operated independently or together
in a networked environment, where the network may include, for
example, a Local Area Network (LAN), wide area network (WAN),
personal area network (PAN), and/or may include an intranet and/or
the internet and/or another network. The network(s) may be wired or
wireless or a combination thereof and may use one or more
communications protocols to facilitate communications between the
different processors. The processors may be configured for
distributed processing and may utilize, in some embodiments, a
client-server model as needed. Accordingly, the methods and systems
may utilize multiple processors and/or processor devices, and the
processor instructions may be divided amongst such single- or
multiple-processor/devices.
[0126] The device(s) or computer systems that integrate with the
processor(s) may include, for example, a personal computer(s),
workstation(s) (e.g., Sun, HP), personal digital assistant(s)
(PDA(s)), handheld device(s) such as cellular telephone(s) or smart
cellphone(s), tablet(s), laptop(s), handheld computer(s), or
another device(s) capable of being integrated with a processor(s)
that may operate as provided herein. Accordingly, the devices
provided herein are not exhaustive and are provided for
illustration and not limitation.
[0127] References to "a microprocessor" and "a processor", or "the
microprocessor" and "the processor," may be understood to include
one or more microprocessors that may communicate in a stand-alone
and/or a distributed environment(s), and may thus be configured to
communicate via wired or wireless communications with other
processors, where such one or more processor may be configured to
operate on one or more processor-controlled devices that may be
similar or different devices. Use of such "microprocessor" or
"processor" terminology may thus also be understood to include a
central processing unit, an arithmetic logic unit, an
application-specific integrated circuit (IC), and/or a task engine,
with such examples provided for illustration and not
limitation.
[0128] Furthermore, references to memory, unless otherwise
specified, may include one or more processor-readable and
accessible memory elements and/or components that may be internal
to the processor-controlled device, external to the
processor-controlled device, and/or may be accessed via a wired or
wireless network using a variety of communications protocols, and
unless otherwise specified, may be arranged to include a
combination of external and internal memory devices, where such
memory may be contiguous and/or partitioned based on the
application. Accordingly, references to a database may be
understood to include one or more memory associations, where such
references may include commercially available database products
(e.g., SQL, Informix, Oracle) and also proprietary databases, and
may also include other structures for associating memory such as
links, queues, graphs, trees, with such structures provided for
illustration and not limitation.
[0129] References to a network, unless provided otherwise, may
include one or more intranets and/or the internet. References
herein to microprocessor instructions or microprocessor-executable
instructions, in accordance with the above, may be understood to
include programmable hardware.
[0130] Unless otherwise stated, use of the word "substantially" may
be construed to include a precise relationship, condition,
arrangement, orientation, and/or other characteristic, and
deviations thereof as understood by one of ordinary skill in the
art, to the extent that such deviations do not materially affect
the disclosed methods and systems.
[0131] Throughout the entirety of the present disclosure, use of
the articles "a" and/or "an" and/or "the" to modify a noun may be
understood to be used for convenience and to include one, or more
than one, of the modified noun, unless otherwise specifically
stated. The terms "comprising", "including" and "having" are
intended to be inclusive and mean that there may be additional
elements other than the listed elements.
[0132] Elements, components, modules, and/or parts thereof that are
described and/or otherwise portrayed through the figures to
communicate with, be associated with, and/or be based on, something
else, may be understood to so communicate, be associated with, and
or be based on in a direct and/or indirect manner, unless otherwise
stipulated herein.
[0133] Although the methods and systems have been described
relative to a specific embodiment thereof, they are not so limited.
Obviously many modifications and variations may become apparent in
light of the above teachings. Many additional changes in the
details, materials, and arrangement of parts, herein described and
illustrated, may be made by those skilled in the art.
* * * * *