U.S. patent application number 16/200312 was filed with the patent office on 2019-11-28 for methods and systems for laterally stabilized constraint of spinous processes.
This patent application is currently assigned to Empirical Spine, Inc.. The applicant listed for this patent is Empirical Spine, Inc.. Invention is credited to Todd Alamin, Ian Bennett, Colin Cahill, Louis Fielding, Manish Kothari, Jeffrey Schwardt.
Application Number | 20190357947 16/200312 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 39325266 |
Filed Date | 2019-11-28 |
![](/patent/app/20190357947/US20190357947A1-20191128-D00000.png)
![](/patent/app/20190357947/US20190357947A1-20191128-D00001.png)
![](/patent/app/20190357947/US20190357947A1-20191128-D00002.png)
![](/patent/app/20190357947/US20190357947A1-20191128-D00003.png)
![](/patent/app/20190357947/US20190357947A1-20191128-D00004.png)
![](/patent/app/20190357947/US20190357947A1-20191128-D00005.png)
![](/patent/app/20190357947/US20190357947A1-20191128-D00006.png)
![](/patent/app/20190357947/US20190357947A1-20191128-D00007.png)
United States Patent
Application |
20190357947 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Alamin; Todd ; et
al. |
November 28, 2019 |
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR LATERALLY STABILIZED CONSTRAINT OF SPINOUS
PROCESSES
Abstract
A spinal implant for limiting flexion of the spine includes a
tether structure for encircling adjacent spinal processes. Usually,
a pair of compliance members will be provided as part of the tether
structure for elastically limiting flexion while permitting an
extension. A cross-member is provided between the compliance member
or other portions of the tether structure to stabilize the tether
structure and prevent misalignment after implantation.
Inventors: |
Alamin; Todd; (Woodside,
CA) ; Bennett; Ian; (San Francisco, CA) ;
Cahill; Colin; (Portola Valley, CA) ; Fielding;
Louis; (San Carlos, CA) ; Kothari; Manish;
(San Carlos, CA) ; Schwardt; Jeffrey; (Palo alto,
CA) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
Empirical Spine, Inc. |
Woodside |
CA |
US |
|
|
Assignee: |
Empirical Spine, Inc.
Woodside
CA
|
Family ID: |
39325266 |
Appl. No.: |
16/200312 |
Filed: |
November 26, 2018 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
15805554 |
Nov 7, 2017 |
|
|
|
16200312 |
|
|
|
|
15442503 |
Feb 24, 2017 |
|
|
|
15805554 |
|
|
|
|
15053924 |
Feb 25, 2016 |
|
|
|
15442503 |
|
|
|
|
13889581 |
May 8, 2013 |
9295499 |
|
|
15053924 |
|
|
|
|
13206339 |
Aug 9, 2011 |
8454660 |
|
|
13889581 |
|
|
|
|
11777366 |
Jul 13, 2007 |
8029541 |
|
|
13206339 |
|
|
|
|
13455917 |
Apr 25, 2012 |
|
|
|
13889581 |
|
|
|
|
12426167 |
Apr 17, 2009 |
8187307 |
|
|
13455917 |
|
|
|
|
PCT/US2007/081815 |
Oct 18, 2007 |
|
|
|
12426167 |
|
|
|
|
13427551 |
Mar 22, 2012 |
8790372 |
|
|
13889581 |
|
|
|
|
12426119 |
Apr 17, 2009 |
8162982 |
|
|
13427551 |
|
|
|
|
PCT/US2007/081822 |
Oct 18, 2007 |
|
|
|
12426119 |
|
|
|
|
13274171 |
Oct 14, 2011 |
|
|
|
13889581 |
|
|
|
|
PCT/US2010/031471 |
Apr 16, 2010 |
|
|
|
13274171 |
|
|
|
|
12426119 |
Apr 17, 2009 |
8162982 |
|
|
PCT/US2010/031471 |
|
|
|
|
PCT/US2007/081822 |
Oct 18, 2007 |
|
|
|
12426119 |
|
|
|
|
12106049 |
Apr 18, 2008 |
|
|
|
13889581 |
|
|
|
|
11875674 |
Oct 19, 2007 |
|
|
|
12106049 |
|
|
|
|
60862085 |
Oct 19, 2006 |
|
|
|
60862085 |
Oct 19, 2006 |
|
|
|
60862085 |
Oct 19, 2006 |
|
|
|
61158892 |
Mar 10, 2009 |
|
|
|
60862085 |
Oct 19, 2006 |
|
|
|
61158892 |
Mar 10, 2009 |
|
|
|
60862085 |
Oct 19, 2006 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
1/1 |
Current CPC
Class: |
A61B 17/7055 20130101;
A61B 17/842 20130101; A61B 17/7065 20130101; A61B 17/7062
20130101 |
International
Class: |
A61B 17/70 20060101
A61B017/70; A61B 17/84 20060101 A61B017/84 |
Claims
1. A spinal implant for restricting flexion in a spine, said spinal
implant comprising: a tether structure comprising an upper strap, a
lower strap, and a compliance member coupling the upper strap to
the lower strap, wherein the tether structured is configured to
encircle at least two spinous processes of the spine, and wherein
the compliance member elastically elongates to apply a force on the
spinous processes to resist flexion of the spine.
2. A method for restricting flexion in a spine, said method
comprising: providing a tether structure comprising an upper strap,
a lower strap, and a compliance member coupling the upper strap to
the lower strap; encircling at least two spinous processes of the
spine with the tether structure; and resisting flexion of the at
least two spinous processes.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 15/805,554 (Attorney Docket No. 48626-703.309)
filed Nov. 7, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 15/442,503 (Attorney Docket No. 48626-703.308)
filed Feb. 24, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 15/053,924 (Attorney Docket No. 48626-703.306)
filed on Feb. 25, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 13/889,581 (Attorney Docket No. 48626-703.302
formerly 41564-703.302) filed on May 8, 2013 now U.S. Pat. No.
______ , which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser.
No. 13/206,339 (Attorney Docket No. WSGR 41564-703.401) filed Oct.
14, 2011, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No.
11/777,366 (Attorney Docket No. 41564-703.201, formerly
026398-000110US) filed Jul. 13, 2007 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,029,541,
which is a non-provisional of, and claims the benefit of prior U.S.
Provisional Application No. 60/862,085, (Attorney Docket No.
41564-703.101, formerly 026398-000100), filed on Oct. 19, 2006;
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/889,581 (Attorney Docket No.
48626-703.302 formerly 41564-703.302) filed on May 8, 2013 now U.S.
Pat. No. ______ , is also a continuation in part of U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 13/455,917 (Attorney Docket No. 41564-703.402)
filed Apr. 25, 2012, which is a divisional of U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 12/426,167 (Attorney Docket No.
41564-703.502), filed on Apr. 17, 2009, which is a
continuation-in-part of PCT Application US2007/081815 (Attorney
Docket No. 026398-000130PC), filed on Oct. 18, 2007, which claims
the benefit of Provisional Application No. 60/862,085 (Attorney
Docket No. 026398-000100US), filed on Oct. 19, 2006; U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 13/889,581 (Attorney Docket No. 48626-703.302
formerly 41564-703.302) filed on May 8, 2013 now U.S. Pat. No.
______, is also a continuation in part of U.S. patent application
Ser. No. 13/427,551 (Attorney Docket No. 41564-703.403) filed Mar.
22, 2012, which is a divisional of and claims the benefit of U.S.
patent application Ser. No. 12/426,119 (Attorney Docket No.
41564-703.503) filed Apr. 17, 2009, which is a continuation-in-part
of and claims priority to International PCT Application No.
PCT/US2007/081822 (Attorney Docket No. 41564-703.601) filed Oct.
18, 2007, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent
Application No. 60/862,085 (Attorney Docket No. 41564-703.101)
filed Oct. 19, 2006; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/426,119
(Attorney Docket No. 41564-703.503) also is a non-provisional of,
and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No.
61/158,892 (Attorney Docket No. 41564-713.101) filed Mar. 10, 2009;
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/889,581 (Attorney Docket No.
48626-703.302 formerly 41564-703.302) filed on May 8, 2013 now U.S.
Pat. No. ______, is also a continuation in part of U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 13/274,171 (Attorney Docket No. 41564-703.301)
filed Oct. 14, 2011, which is continuation of International PCT
Application No. PCT/US2010/031471 (Attorney Docket No.
41564-703.606, formerly 026398-000142PC) filed Apr. 16, 2010, which
claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/426,119
(Attorney Docket No. 026398-000141US) filed Apr. 17, 2009, which is
a continuation-in-part of International Patent Application No.
PCT/US2007/081822 (Attorney Docket No. 026398-000140PC) filed Oct.
18, 2007, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent
Application No. 60/862,085 (Attorney Docket No. 026398-000100US)
filed Oct. 19, 2006; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/426,119 is
also a non-provisional of, and claims the benefit of U.S.
Provisional Patent Application No. 61/158,892 (Attorney Docket No.
026398-001300US) filed Mar. 10, 2009; U.S. patent application Ser.
No. 13/889,581 (Attorney Docket No. 48626-703.302 formerly
41564-703.302) filed on May 8, 2013 now U.S. Pat. No. ______, is
also a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No.
12/106,049 (Attorney Docket No. 41564-703.504) filed Apr. 18, 2008,
which is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No.
11/875,674 (Attorney Docket No. 41564-703.205) filed Oct. 19, 2007,
which is a non-provisional of, and claims the benefit of U.S.
Provisional Patent Application No. 60/862,085 (Attorney Docket No.
41564-703.101) filed Oct. 19, 2006; the entire contents of each of
the above is incorporated herein by reference.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
[0002] The present invention relates generally to medical methods
and apparatus. More particularly, the present invention relates to
methods and devices for restricting spinal flexion in patients
having back pain or other spinal conditions.
[0003] A major source of chronic low back pain is discogenic pain,
also known as internal disc disruption. Patients suffering from
discogenic pain tend to be young, otherwise healthy individuals who
present with pain localized to the back. Discogenic pain usually
occurs at the discs located at the L4-L5 or L5-S1 junctions of the
spine (FIG. 1). Pain tends to be exacerbated when patients put
their lumbar spines into flexion (i.e. by sitting or bending
forward) and relieved when they put their lumbar spines into
extension (i.e. arching backwards). Discogenic pain can be quite
disabling, and for some patients, can dramatically affect their
ability to work and otherwise enjoy their lives.
[0004] This pain experienced by patients with discogenic low back
pain can be thought of as flexion instability and is related to
flexion instability that is manifested in other conditions. The
most prevalent of these is spondylolisthesis, a spinal condition in
which abnormal segmental translation is exacerbated by segmental
flexion.
[0005] Current treatment alternatives for patients diagnosed with
chronic discogenic pain are quite limited. Many patients follow a
conservative treatment path, such as physical therapy, massage,
anti-inflammatory and analgesic medications, muscle relaxants, and
epidural steroid injections, but typically continue to suffer with
a significant degree of pain. Other patients elect to undergo
spinal fusion surgery, which commonly requires discectomy (removal
of the disk) together with fusion of adjacent vertebrae. Fusion is
not usually recommended for discogenic pain because it is
irreversible, costly, associated with high morbidity, and of
questionable effectiveness. Despite its drawbacks, however, spinal
fusion for discogenic pain remains common due to the lack of viable
alternatives.
[0006] Recently, a less invasive and potentially more effective
treatment for discogenic pain has been proposed. A spinal implant
has been designed which inhibits spinal flexion while allowing
substantially unrestricted spinal extension. The implant is placed
over one or more adjacent pairs of spinal processes and provides an
elastic restraint to the spreading apart of the spinal processes
which occurs during flexion. Such devices and methods for their use
are described in U.S. Patent Application 2005/02161017A1, published
on Sep. 29, 2005, and having common inventors with the present
application.
[0007] As illustrated in FIG. 2, an implant 10 as described in the
'017 application, typically comprises an upper strap component 12
and a lower strap component 14 joined by a pair of compliant
members 16. The upper strap 12 is shown disposed over the top of
the spinous process SP4 of L4 while the lower strap 14 is shown
extending over the bottom of the spinous process SP5 of L5. The
compliance member 16 will typically include an internal element,
such as a spring of rubber block, which is attached to the straps
12 and 14 in such a way that the straps may be "elastically" or
"compliantly" pulled apart as the spinous processes SP4 and SP5
move apart during flexion. In this way, the implant provides an
elastic tension on the spinal processes which provides a force that
resists flexion. The force increases, typically linearly with a
non-variable spring constant, as the processes move further apart.
Usually, the straps themselves will be essentially non-compliant so
that the degree of elasticity or compliance may be controlled and
provided solely by the compliance members 16.
[0008] Ideally, the compliance members 16 will remain horizontally
aligned and spaced generally between the spinous processes SP4 and
SP5, as shown generally in FIG. 3. In some instances, however, the
desired symmetry may be lost if the implant structure 10 becomes
circumferentially displaced about the spinous processes SP4 and
SP5, as shown in FIG. 4. Such displacement can affect the ability
of the implant to provide a uniform, symmetric elastic force to
inhibit flexion of the spinous processes in accordance with the
desired treatment.
[0009] For these reasons, it would be desirable to provide improved
spinal implants and methods for their use in inhibiting flexion in
patients suffering from discogenic pain. It would be particularly
desirable if the improved devices would provide the desired elastic
forces to the spinous processes without displacement or loss of
symmetry of the device over time. At least some of these objectives
will be met by the inventions described hereinbelow.
2. Description of the Background Art
[0010] US 2005/0216017A1 has been described above. Other patents
and published applications of interest include: U.S. Pat. Nos.
4,966,600; 5,011,494; 5,092,866; 5,116,340; 5,282,863; 5,395,374;
5,415,658; 5,415,661; 5,449,361; 5,456,722; 5,462,542; 5,496,318;
5,540,698; 5,609,634; 5,645,599; 5,725,582; 5,902,305; Re. 36,221;
5,928,232; 5,935,133; 5,964,769; 5,989,256; 6,053,921; 6,312,431;
6,364,883; 6,378,289; 6,391,030; 6,468,309; 6,436,099; 6,451,019;
6,582,433; 6,605,091; 6,626,944; 6,629,975; 6,652,527; 6,652,585;
6,656,185; 6,669,729; 6,682,533; 6,689,140; 6,712,819; 6,689,168;
6,695,852; 6,716,245; 6,761,720; 6,835,205; Published U.S. Patent
Application Nos. 2002/0151978; US 2004/0024458; US 2004/0106995; US
2004/0116927; US 2004/0117017; US 2004/0127989; US 2004/0172132; US
2005/0033435; US 2005/0049708; US 2006/0069447; Published PCT
Application Nos. WO 01/28442 A1; WO 02/03882 A2; WO 02/051326 A1;
WO 02/071960 A1; WO 03/045262 A1; WO 2004/052246 A1; WO 2004/073532
A1; and Published Foreign Application Nos. EP 0322334 A1; and FR 2
681 525 A1.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0011] The present invention provides spinal implants and methods
for restricting spinal flexion for the treatment of discogenic pain
and other spinal conditions, such as spondylolisthesis, where the
physician desires to control spinal flexion. The spinal implants
comprise a tether structure adapted to encircle at least two
spinous processes, where at least a portion of the tether structure
is adapted to elastically elongate to apply tension to the spinous
processes as the spine undergoes flexion, i.e. as the spinous
processes move apart as the patient leans forward. The tether
structure may comprise any of the particular structures described
in detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/076,469, filed on
Mar. 9, 2005, and published as US 2005/0216017 A1, the full
disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
[0012] In particular, in the simplest embodiments, the tether
structure may comprise a single, continuous loop of material
wherein all or a portion of the loop is formed of a compliant
material to provide the desired elasticity. More commonly, the
tether structure will comprise one or more band segments joined by
one or more compliance members, where the band(s) are typically
non-distensible and the compliance member(s) provide for the
desired elasticity. In some instances, the compliance members may
comprise spring or other elements which provide an elastic
tensioning force where the band member(s) are attached to opposite
ends of the spring member. In other instances, the compliance
members could include elastomeric or other compression elements,
where the band member(s) are attached to opposed sides of the
compressive elements so that the elasticity is provided by
compression on the compression member.
[0013] In preferred embodiments, the tether structure will comprise
a pair of band members joined by a pair of compliance members,
where an upper band member will be placed over the superior surface
of an upper spinous process and the lower band member will be
placed over an inferior surface of the lower spinous process. The
compliance members will be generally horizontally aligned across
the region between the upper and lower spinous processes.
[0014] In a particular aspect of the present invention, the spinal
implants will include at least one cross-member coupled to opposed
portions of the tether structure, where the cross member is
positioned to lie between the spinous processes when the tether
structure encircles the processes as described above. In specific
embodiments, the cross-member will extend between the horizontally
aligned compliance members, but in other embodiments a cross-member
could be coupled to other portions or components of the tether
structure, including the band or loop elements which are disposed
over the spinous processes.
[0015] The cross-member(s) functions to stabilize the tether
structure after the tether structure has been implanted over the
spinous processes. In particular, the cross-member(s) will help
maintain the symmetry of the device so that it does not
circumferentially rotate or migrate over the spinous processes,
which is a potential problem when the tether includes one or more
compliance members. In addition, the cross-member(s) may optionally
maintain the lateral spacing between the two sides of the device,
such as between a pair of horizontally aligned compliance members.
The cross-member(s) may further prevent or inhibit vibration or
sinusoidal movement of the device which may result from dynamic
and/or cyclic loading.
[0016] In addition to the stabilization functions, a cross-member
may help in initial placement and positioning of the tether
structure. For example, a tether structure including a pair of
horizontally aligned compliance members may be introduced and
assembled in situ, where the cross-member helps establish the
initial horizontal alignment between the compliance members.
Alternatively, when no compliance members are to be used, the
cross-member could itself provide for connection points for
attaching upper and lower band segments. Additionally, the
cross-member(s) can create pivot points to allow rotation or
pivoting of the band relative to the cross-member(s) as well as the
other band segments.
[0017] The cross-member(s) may have a wide variety of particular
configurations. The most common cross-member(s) will have generally
rigid structures, e.g. in the form of a rod, bar, beam, or the
like. In other instances, however, the cross-member(s) may be
relatively flexible, in some cases being in the form of a wire,
ribbon, string, spring, suture, or the like. In still other
configurations, the cross-member(s) may be linearly compressible,
but not extensible, in order to allow for a controlled degree of
inward motion of the tether structure after it has been placed. In
still other configurations, the cross-member(s) may be linearly
non-compressible, but allow for a small degree of axial extension
in order to prevent inward motion or intrusion of the tether
structure into the region between the spinous processes.
[0018] There are also a variety of ways in which the
cross-member(s) may be attached to the tether structure. Typically,
the cross-member(s) will be attached to opposed compliance members
(usually to housings of the compliance member subassemblies as
shown in the '017 application previously incorporated by
reference), where the attachment can be rigid, semi-rigid, pivotal,
or the like. In a first exemplary embodiment, the cross-member is
rigidly attached to a pair of compliance members in a generally
H-shaped configuration. In other instances, the connections may be
pivotal or non-rigid, as mentioned above. Still further, the
cross-member can be completely flexible which would allow for a
small degree of motion between the compliance members after
implantation.
[0019] While most embodiments of the present invention will employ
only a single cross-member, in other embodiments two or more
cross-members may be used. For example, a pair of cross-members may
be positioned between opposed portions of the tether structure,
where an upper cross-member is located immediately below the
inferior surface of the upper spinal process, while the lower
cross-member is positioned immediately adjacent to a superior
surface of the lower spinal process. Alternatively, such
cross-member pairs may be positioned more closely to the compliance
members, e.g. where they lie immediately above and below the
compliance members. In still other embodiments, the cross-members
may be slidably attached to the bands or other portions of the
tether structure so that the cross members may move in response to
a force applied by the spinous processes or otherwise.
[0020] In all the embodiments of the present invention, it will be
desirable that the cross-member(s) provide little or no resistance
to extension, i.e. motion of the adjacent spinous processes toward
one another. When the cross-member consists of a single rod, bar,
structure, or other flexible element extending between exposed
portions of the tether structure, the cross-member will usually
have a very small vertical height (typically less than 6 mm,
usually in the range from 1 mm to 3 mm), and it is unlikely that
the cross-member would contact either spinous process even in an
extreme degree of extension, so long as the cross-member is located
at a position which is equally spaced apart from the two spinous
processes. In other instances, however, the cross-member could have
a larger cross-sectional profile which might contact either or both
spinous processes as the spine undergoes extension. In such cases,
it is desirable that the cross-member be collapsible or otherwise
provide minimum force against either or both processes.
[0021] Usually, the cross-member will be implanted through the
interspinous ligament which extends between the upper and lower
spinous processes. In such instances, it is desirable that the
cross-member itself have a relatively low profile to permit passage
through the ligament with minimum trauma. Often, it will be
desirable to have the cross-member detachable from at least one of
the opposed tether structure components so that the cross-members
or other portions of the tether structure do not need to be passed
through the interspinous ligament.
[0022] In another aspect of the present invention, methods for
stabilizing spinal flexion comprise positioning a continuous tether
structure over a pair of adjacent spinous processes on adjacent
vertebrae to elastically restrict flexion. The tether structure
will be positioned and have mechanical properties which will
elastically tension the processes when the processes are in
flexion. In accordance with the principles of the present
invention, opposed portions of the tether structure are
mechanically coupled, usually through the interspinous ligament, in
order to stabilize the structure, particularly to inhibit
circumferential displacement of the tether structure over time.
[0023] In the exemplary embodiments, the opposed portions of the
tether structure will comprise compliance members, and it will be
the compliance members which are mechanically coupled to stabilize
the structure in situ. Typically, the compliance members will be
connected by at least one cross-member wherein said at least one
cross-member is fixably or non-fixably attached to the compliance
members. In some embodiments, one end of the cross-member may be
fixably attached to one compliance member while the other member is
non-fixably attached to the other compliance member. The
cross-member itself may be rigid, semi-rigid, or non-rigid, and in
all instances the cross-member will provide no significant
inhibition of spinal extension. Preferably, the cross-member will
pass through the interspinous ligament without significant damage
or compromise to its integrity.
[0024] Optionally, one or more additional tether structures may be
implanted around other pair(s) of spinous processes in the manner
described above.
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
[0025] All publications, patents, and patent applications mentioned
in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the
same extent as if each individual publication, patent, or patent
application was specifically and individually indicated to be
incorporated by reference.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0026] The novel features of the invention are set forth with
particularity in the appended claims. A better understanding of the
features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained
by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth
illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention
are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:
[0027] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating the lumbar region
of the spine including the spinal processes (SP), facet joints
(FJ), lamina (L), transverse processes (TP), and sacrum (S).
[0028] FIG. 2 illustrates a spinal implant of the type described in
US 2005/0216017A1.
[0029] FIGS. 3 and 4 illustrate how the spinal implant of FIG. 2
can become misaligned over time.
[0030] FIG. 5 illustrates a first embodiment of a spinal implant
having a cross-member in accordance with the principles of the
present invention.
[0031] FIGS. 6A and 6B illustrate the spinal implant of FIG. 5
having a rigid cross-member.
[0032] FIGS. 7A and 7B illustrate the spinal implant of FIG. 5
having a semi-rigid cross-member.
[0033] FIGS. 8A and 8B illustrate the cross-member of FIG. 5 having
an elastic cross-member.
[0034] FIG. 9 illustrates a specific embodiment of a cross-member
useful in the apparatus and methods of the present invention.
[0035] FIG. 10 illustrates the cross-member of FIG. 9 in an
implant.
[0036] FIG. 11 illustrates an embodiment of the present invention
having a pair of cross-members.
[0037] FIG. 12 illustrates the spinal implant of FIG. 11 in an
implant.
[0038] FIG. 13 illustrates an additional continuous tether
structure over a spinous process on another pair of adjacent
vertebrae.
[0039] FIG. 14A and 14B illustrate use of a reinforcement member on
a single connector which does not include a compliance member,
while FIGS. 15A and 15B illustrate use of a reinforcement member on
a single connector which includes a compliance member.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0040] Referring now to FIG. 5, a spinal implant 20 constructed in
accordance with the principles of the present invention comprises
an upper strap 22, a lower strap 24, and a pair of compliance
members 26 joining the upper and lower straps. Typically, the upper
and lower straps 22 and 24 will be non-distensible but will be
joined to the compliance members 26 so that they can be expanded
from a constricted configuration, as shown in broken line, when the
patient's spine is in a neutral position between flexion and
extension, to an expanded configuration (shown in full line) when
the patient's spine is in flexion. The compliance members 26 will
provide a force which acts against the extension of the spinous
processes, as generally described in prior patent application U.S.
2005/0216017, which has been previously incorporated herein by
reference. In particular accordance with the present invention, a
cross-member 30 extends between and joins the compliance members
26. The cross-member 30 passes through the interspinous ligament
ISL.
[0041] As shown in FIGS. 6A and 6B, the cross-member 30 may be
rigid and be rigidly attached to the compliance members 26 in a
generally H-shaped configuration so that the compliance members do
not shift relative to each other even when the upper and lower
bands 22 and 24 are pulled apart, as shown in FIG. 6B.
Alternatively, the cross-member 30 may be semi-rigid (or
semi-compliant) so that it will undergo compression when the upper
band 22 is pulled away from the lower band 24, as shown in FIG. 7B.
In a third embodiment, the cross-member 30 may be entirely elastic,
as shown in FIGS. 8A and 8B. In such instances, the cross-member 30
will allow the compliance members 26 to vertically displaced
relative to each other by a controlled amount, as shown in FIG.
8B.
[0042] FIG. 9 illustrates an exemplary cross-member 50 which can be
coupled to compliance members 26, as shown in FIG. 10. The
cross-member 50 is a rigid structure which may be attached (and
optionally detached) from the compliance member during implantation
of the spinal implant. End portions 52 of the cross-member are
shaped and adapted to be attached to the cylindrical bodies of the
compliance members. Other shapes and structures for selective
attachment and detachment of the cross-member are, of course,
readily available.
[0043] A pair of cross-members 60 are illustrated in FIG. 11. The
cross-members 60 have endpieces 62, each having a slot 64 which
receives the corresponding band 22 or 24. Cross-members 60 can thus
be disposed directly over the upper and lower surfaces of the
compliance members 26, as shown in FIG. 12. Usually, cross-members
60 will themselves be compliant in order to avoid inhibiting of
extension of the spinal processes SP4 and SP5, as shown in broken
line in FIG. 12. FIG. 13 illustrates positioning at least one
additional continuous tether structure over a spinous process on
another pair of adjacent vertebrae, and mechanically coupling
opposed portions of the at least one additional tether structure
through the interspinous space.
[0044] Referring now to FIG. 14, yet another spinous process
constraint system 1460 comprises first and second hook-like
attachment members 1462 and 1464. The hook members 1462 and 1464
are connected in a C-shaped pattern, as shown in FIG. 14.
[0045] The spinous process constraint 1460 of FIG. 14 will have a
tendency to deform when placed under an axial load as the spinous
processes undergo a flexion causing movement in the direction of
arrow 1465. Typically, a region 1466 of the constraint will tend to
bow inwardly which causes the superior and inferior hook members
1462 and 1464 to displace laterally, increasing the risk that they
will shift from their intended positions on the spinous processes.
In order to alleviate this condition, a reinforcement member 1467
can be placed over a portion of the single connector 1463 between
the hooks 1462 and 1464. The reinforcement member may be a simple
sleeve constructed from a relatively rigid material, such as a
metal or rigid polymer, having a central passage which is placed
over the single connector. Other reinforcement structures would
also be possible. Additionally, the sleeve embodiment shown in FIG.
14B could be modified to be used with constraint embodiments
including compliance members as described elsewhere in this
application.
[0046] Similarly, as shown in FIG. 15, a spinous process constraint
system 1570 comprises first and second hook-like attachment members
1572 and 1574 arranged in C-shaped pattern, generally as shown in
FIG. 14, and further comprises compliance member 1578 attached to
superior and inferior segments of the single connector 1576 (which
is preferably non-compliant).
[0047] The spinous process constraint 1570 of FIG. 15 can also
undergo deformation when subjected to an axial load, as shown in
FIG. 15A. A reinforcement assembly 1573 specifically adapted for
constraints having compliance members 1578 is illustrated in FIG.
15B. The reinforcement assembly 1573 connects to a superior segment
1575 of the single connector 1576 and includes a slide rod 1571
extending toward an inferior segment 1577 of the single connector
1576. The slide rod 1571 is received in a bearing structure 1579
attached to the interior segment 1577 which allows the rod to
translate as the segments 1573 and 1577 move toward and away from
each other as the spine undergoes extension and flexion. The
reinforcement assembly 1571 helps maintain the proper alignment
between the superior and inferior segments 1575 and 1577 to prevent
the bowing and deformation illustrated in FIG. 15A
[0048] Further details and alternative embodiments of flexion
limiting devices, their use, and associated instruments are
disclosed in the patent applications previously incorporated herein
by reference.
[0049] While preferred embodiments of the present invention have
been shown and described herein, it will be obvious to those
skilled in the art that such embodiments are provided by way of
example only. Numerous variations, changes, and substitutions will
now occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the
invention. It should be understood that various alternatives to the
embodiments of the invention described herein may be employed in
practicing the invention. It is intended that the following claims
define the scope of the invention and that methods and structures
within the scope of these claims and their equivalents be covered
thereby.
* * * * *