U.S. patent application number 16/284828 was filed with the patent office on 2019-06-27 for agricultural system.
The applicant listed for this patent is Dawn Equipment Company. Invention is credited to Joseph D. Bassett.
Application Number | 20190191618 16/284828 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 55909941 |
Filed Date | 2019-06-27 |
![](/patent/app/20190191618/US20190191618A1-20190627-D00000.png)
![](/patent/app/20190191618/US20190191618A1-20190627-D00001.png)
![](/patent/app/20190191618/US20190191618A1-20190627-D00002.png)
![](/patent/app/20190191618/US20190191618A1-20190627-D00003.png)
![](/patent/app/20190191618/US20190191618A1-20190627-D00004.png)
![](/patent/app/20190191618/US20190191618A1-20190627-D00005.png)
![](/patent/app/20190191618/US20190191618A1-20190627-D00006.png)
![](/patent/app/20190191618/US20190191618A1-20190627-D00007.png)
![](/patent/app/20190191618/US20190191618A1-20190627-D00008.png)
![](/patent/app/20190191618/US20190191618A1-20190627-D00009.png)
![](/patent/app/20190191618/US20190191618A1-20190627-D00010.png)
View All Diagrams
United States Patent
Application |
20190191618 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Bassett; Joseph D. |
June 27, 2019 |
Agricultural System
Abstract
A hydraulic control system for controlling the down force on an
agricultural implement comprises a hydraulic cylinder containing a
movable ram, a source of pressurized fluid coupled to the hydraulic
cylinder on a first side of the ram by a first controllable valve,
a fluid sump coupled to the hydraulic cylinder on the first side of
the ram by a second controllable valve, and an electrical
controller coupled to the valves for opening and closing the
valves. The valves may be self-latching valves that remain in an
open or closed position until moved to the other position in
response to a signal from the controller.
Inventors: |
Bassett; Joseph D.;
(Sycamore, IL) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
Dawn Equipment Company |
Sycamore |
IL |
US |
|
|
Family ID: |
55909941 |
Appl. No.: |
16/284828 |
Filed: |
February 25, 2019 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
15659290 |
Jul 25, 2017 |
10251333 |
|
|
16284828 |
|
|
|
|
14858171 |
Sep 18, 2015 |
9723778 |
|
|
15659290 |
|
|
|
|
14593492 |
Jan 9, 2015 |
9681601 |
|
|
14858171 |
|
|
|
|
62085334 |
Nov 28, 2014 |
|
|
|
62076767 |
Nov 7, 2014 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
1/1 |
Current CPC
Class: |
F16F 9/00 20130101; A01C
7/203 20130101; A01C 5/06 20130101; A01C 7/205 20130101 |
International
Class: |
A01C 7/20 20060101
A01C007/20; A01C 5/06 20060101 A01C005/06 |
Claims
1. An agricultural row unit comprising a frame having a gauge wheel
that engages the soil to control the elevation of the frame, a
soil-engaging tool coupled to said frame to permit vertical
movement of said tool relative to said frame, a hydraulic cylinder
having a movable rod and containing a pressurized hydraulic fluid
for applying a down force to said frame or said tool to urge the
tool into the soil, an uplift accumulator housed within said rod
and exposed to said hydraulic fluid to permit upward movement of
said tool in response to increased resistance by the soil to
downward movement of said tool, while applying a force resisting
said upward movement of said tool, and a down pressure accumulator
coupled to said hydraulic cylinder to permit downward movement of
said tool in response to decreased resistance by the soil to
downward movement of said tool, while applying a force resisting
said downward movement of said tool.
2-21. (canceled)
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application is a continuation-in-part of and claims
priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/593,492, filed Jan.
9, 2015 (Attorney Docket No. 250600-000102USPT), U.S. Provisional
Application No. 62/085,334, filed Nov. 28, 2014 (Attorney Docket
No. 250600-000101PL01); and U.S. Provisional Application No.
62/076,767, filed Nov. 7, 2014 (Attorney Docket No.
250600-000100PL01), each of which is hereby incorporated by
reference herein in its entirety.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0002] This invention relates generally to agricultural planters
and, more particularly, to gauge wheel load sensors and down
pressure control systems for agricultural planters.
BRIEF SUMMARY
[0003] In accordance with one embodiment, a hydraulic control
system for controlling the down force on an agricultural implement
comprising a hydraulic cylinder containing a movable ram, a source
of pressurized fluid coupled to the hydraulic cylinder on a first
side of the ram by a first controllable valve, a fluid sump coupled
to the hydraulic cylinder on the first side of the ram by a second
controllable valve, and an electrical controller coupled to the
valves for opening and closing the valves. The valves are
preferably self-latching valves, such as magnetic latching valves,
that remain in an open or closed position until moved to the other
position in response to a signal from the controller.
Alternatively, the valves may be non-latching valves that are
spring-biased toward their closed positions. A pair of energy
storage devices, such as accumulators, may be coupled to the
cylinder on opposite sides of the ram. A pressure transducer is
preferably coupled to the cylinder on one side of the ram. A pair
of check valves may couple the cylinder to the energy storage
device and to the controllable valves.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0004] FIG. 1 is a vertical longitudinal section through a portion
of an agricultural planter that includes a gauge wheel and an
opener device.
[0005] FIG. 2 is an enlargement of the left side of FIG. 1.
[0006] FIG. 3 is a bottom perspective of the control portion of the
equipment shown in FIG. 1.
[0007] FIG. 4 is an enlarged side elevation of the equipment shown
in FIG. 3.
[0008] FIG. 5 is an enlarged top plan view of the equipment shown
in FIG. 3.
[0009] FIG. 6 is an enlarged vertical longitudinal section through
the equipment shown in FIG. 3.
[0010] FIG. 7 is a plan view of a gauge wheel transducer system for
an agricultural planter that includes a gauge wheel and an opener
device.
[0011] FIG. 8 is a side elevation of the transducer system shown in
FIG. 7.
[0012] FIG. 9 is a sectional view taken along line A-A in FIG.
7.
[0013] FIG. 10 is a side elevation, partially in section, of the
transducer system of FIGS. 7-9 mounted on a gauge wheel and its
supporting structure.
[0014] FIG. 11 is a perspective view of portions of the devices
shown in FIG. 10.
[0015] FIG. 12 is a plan view similar to FIG. 7 but with portions
removed to show the equalizer arm.
[0016] FIG. 13 is a plan view of a modified transducer system.
[0017] FIG. 14 is a longitudinal section taken along line 14-14 in
FIG. 13.
[0018] FIG. 15A is a side elevation of a modified sensing system
for detecting the pressure exerted on a pair of gauge wheels.
[0019] FIG. 15B is an end elevation of the system shown in FIG.
15A.
[0020] FIG. 16 is a schematic diagram of a hydraulic and electrical
control system for controlling a down pressure actuator.
[0021] FIG. 17 is a schematic diagram of a first modified hydraulic
and electrical control system for controlling a down pressure
actuator.
[0022] FIG. 18 is a schematic diagram of a second modified
hydraulic and electrical control system for controlling a down
pressure actuator.
[0023] FIG. 19 is a schematic diagram of a third modified hydraulic
and electrical control system for controlling a down pressure
actuator.
[0024] FIG. 20 is a perspective view of a planting row unit adapted
to be attached to a towing frame.
[0025] FIG. 21 is an enlarged perspective view of the down-pressure
control assembly in the row unit of FIG. 20;
[0026] FIG. 22 is the same perspective view shown in FIG. 16,
rotated 90 degrees in a clockwise direction;
[0027] FIG. 23 is an enlarged side elevation of the control
assembly shown in FIGS. 21 and 22, from the left side of the
assembly as shown in FIG. 21.
[0028] FIG. 24 is a section taken along line 19-19 in FIG. 23.
[0029] FIG. 25 is a side elevation of the right side of the control
assembly shown in FIG. 23.
[0030] FIG. 26 is a side elevation of the right side of the control
assembly shown in FIG. 25.
[0031] FIG. 27 is a section taken along line 22-22 in FIG. 25.
[0032] FIG. 28 is a section taken along line 23-23 in FIG. 25.
[0033] FIG. 29 is an enlarged exploded perspective of the central
portion of the left side of the control assembly shown in FIG.
21.
[0034] FIG. 30 is a horizontal section taken through the two ports
shown in FIG. 29, with all the parts assembled.
[0035] FIG. 31 is a vertical section taken through the middle of
the control assembly shown in FIG. 7, with the rod of the hydraulic
cylinder in its fully extended position.
[0036] FIG. 32 is the same vertical section shown in FIG. 21, with
the rod of the hydraulic cylinder in an intermediate position.
[0037] FIG. 33 is the same vertical section shown in FIG. 21, with
the rod of the hydraulic cylinder in its fully retracted
position.
[0038] FIG. 34A is a schematic diagram of a hydraulic and
electrical control system for use in the device of FIGS. 20-33 to
provide rebound damping.
[0039] FIG. 34B is a schematic diagram of a modified hydraulic and
electrical control system for use in the device of FIGS. 20-33 to
provide both rebound and compression damping.
[0040] FIG. 35A is a schematic diagram of a modified hydraulic and
electrical control system for use in the device of FIGS. 14-33 to
provide rebound damping.
[0041] FIG. 35B is a schematic diagram of another modified
hydraulic and electrical control system for use in the device of
FIGS. 14-33 to provide both rebound and compression damping.
[0042] FIG. 36 is a waveform diagram illustrating different modes
of operation provided by a PWM control system for the hydraulic
valves in the system of FIG. 34B.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0043] An agricultural planter typically includes a number of
individual row units, each of which includes its own row cleaner
device, row opener device and row closing device. The down pressure
is typically controlled separately for each row unit or each of
several groups of row units, and is preferably controlled
separately for one or more of the individual devices in each row
unit, as described in more detail in pending U.S. application Ser.
No. 14/146,822 filed Jan. 3, 2014, which is incorporated by
reference herein in its entirety.
[0044] FIGS. 1-6 illustrate an improved gauge wheel load sensor
that takes the upward force from a pivoting planter gauge wheel
support, such as the pivoting support arms 10 in the row unit
equipment shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, and translates that force into a
fluid pressure in a fluid chamber 11. The gauge wheel support arms
push against an equalizer support 12, which is connected via a
pivot 13 with a rocker/cam 14. The force on the gauge wheel due to
the weight of the row unit and applied down force causes the
rocker/cam 14 to pivot around a pivot bolt 15 and push against a
hydraulic ram 16. This force on the ram 16 causes the fluid in the
chamber 11 to pressurize. The pressure is proportional to the
amount of gauge wheel load. A pressure transducer 18 reads the
amount of pressure and sends a signal to a row unit down pressure
controller via signal line 19. This signal allows the planter row
unit down pressure to be controlled to a desired level.
[0045] Depth adjustment is accomplished in the conventional sense
by pivoting the assembly around a pivot 20, and locking a handle 21
into the desired position with a mechanism 22. With this design it
is imperative that that there is no air trapped in the fluid
chamber 11. For this reason the mechanism includes a bleed valve
23. The process for removal of air is to extend the ram to the
maximum extent with calibration/travel limiter plates 24 (FIG. 4)
removed. The system is then filled completely with fluid with the
bleed valve 23 closed. Then the bleed valve 23 is opened, and the
rocker arm 14 is pushed against the ram 16 to move the ram to the
exact place where the calibration/travel limit plates 24 allow a
calibration plate retaining screw 25 to fit into a hole. This
ensures that each assembly is set the same so all the row units of
the planter are at the same depth. At this point the bleed valve 23
is closed. With all air removed, the mechanical/fluid system will
act as a rigid member against forces in compression. The travel
limiter plate 24 keeps a cam pivot weldment 27 from falling down
when the planter is lifted off the ground.
[0046] Standard industry practice is to use a strain gauge to
directly measure the planter gauge wheel load. The design shown in
FIGS. 1-6 is an improvement over the state of the art because it
allows the sensor to measure only the down force on the gauge
wheels. In typical designs using strain gauge type sensors, the
mechanical linkage that allows the gauge wheels to oscillate causes
the measured wheel force to have substantial noise due to changes
in the force being applied. For this reason it can be difficult to
determine which parts of the signal correspond to actual changes in
down force on the gauge wheels, versus signal changes that are due
to movement of components of the gauge wheel support mechanism. The
reason for this is that strain gauge sensors will only measure the
force that is being applied in a single plane. Because of the
linkage and pivot assembly that is used on typical planters, the
force being applied to the strain gauge type designs can change
based on the depth setting or whether the planter gauge wheels are
oscillating over terrain. In this way they will tend to falsely
register changes in gauge wheel down force and make it difficult to
have a closed loop down pressure response remain consistent.
[0047] Additionally, the fluid seal of the pressure sensor creates
friction in the system which has the effect of damping out high
frequency noise. Agricultural fields have very small scale
variations in the surface which causes noise to be produced in the
typical down force sensor apparatus. By using fluid pressure this
invention decouples the sensor from the mechanical linkage and
allows the true gauge wheel force to be more accurately measured.
Lowering the amount of systematic noise in the gauge wheel load
output sensor makes it easier to produce an automatic control
system that accurately responds to true changes in the hardness of
the soil as opposed to perceived changes in soil hardness due to
noise induced on the sensor.
[0048] FIGS. 7-12 illustrate a modified gauge wheel load sensor
that includes an integrated accumulator 125. The purpose of the
accumulator 125 is to damp pressure spikes in the sensor when the
planter is operating at low gauge wheel loads. When the forces that
the gauge wheel support arms 110 are exerting on the hydraulic ram
117 are near zero, it is more common for the surface of the soil or
plant residue to create pressure spikes that are large in relation
to the desired system sensor pressure. As the target gauge wheel
down force increases, and consequently the pressure in the fluid
chamber 111 and the transducer output voltage from sensor 118, the
small spikes of pressure due to variation in the soil surface or
plant residue decreases proportionally.
[0049] In the present system, rather than have a perfectly rigid
fluid coupling between the ram 117 and the pressure transducer 118,
as load increases on the ram 117, the fluid first pushes against an
accumulator 122 that is threaded into a side cavity 123 in the same
housing that forms the main cavity for the ram 117, compressing an
accumulator spring 126 until the piston 125 rests fully against a
shoulder on the interior wall of the accumulator housing 127, thus
limiting the retracting movement of the accumulator piston 125. At
this point, the system becomes perfectly rigid. The amount of
motion permitted for the accumulator piston 125 must be very small
so that it does not allow the depth of the gauge wheel setting to
fluctuate substantially. The piston accumulator (or other energy
storage device) allows the amount of high frequency noise in the
system to be reduced at low gauge-wheel loads. Ideally an automatic
down pressure control system for an agricultural planter should
maintain a down pressure that is as low as possible to avoid over
compaction of soil around the area of the seed, which can inhibit
plant growth. However, the performance of most systems degrades as
the gauge wheel load becomes close to zero, because the amount of
latent noise produced from variation in the field surface is large
in relation to the desired gauge wheel load.
[0050] Planter row units typically have a gauge wheel equalizer arm
130 that is a single unitary piece. It has been observed that the
friction between the equalizer arm 130 and the gauge wheel support
arms 110, as the gauge wheel 115 oscillates up and down, can
generate a substantial amount of noise in the sensor. At different
adjustment positions, the edges of the equalizer arm 130 contact
the support arms 10 at different orientations and can bite into the
surface and prevent forces from being smoothly transferred as they
increase and decrease. When the equalizer arm 130 is a single
unitary piece, there is necessarily a high amount of friction that
manifests itself as signal noise in the sensor. This signal noise
makes it difficult to control the down pressure system, especially
at low levels of gauge wheel load.
[0051] To alleviate this situation, the equalizer arm 130
illustrated in FIG. 13 has a pair of contact rollers 131 and 132
are mounted on opposite ends of the equalizer arm. These rollers
131 and 132 become the interface between the equalizer arm and the
support arms 110, allowing forces to be smoothly transferred
between the support arms 110 and the equalizer arm 130. The roller
system allows the gauge wheel support arms 110 to oscillate
relative to each other without producing any sliding friction
between the support arms 110 and the equalizer arm 130. This
significantly reduces the friction that manifests itself as signal
noise in the sensor output, which makes it difficult to control the
down pressure control system, especially at low levels of gauge
wheel load.
[0052] FIG. 14 is a longitudinal section through the device of FIG.
13, with the addition of a rocker arm 150 that engages a ram 151
that controls the fluid pressure within a cylinder 152. A fluid
chamber 153 adjacent the inner end of the ram 151 opens into a
lateral cavity that contains a pressure transducer 154 that
produces an electrical output signal representing the magnitude of
the fluid pressure in the fluid chamber 153. The opposite end of
the cylinder 152 includes an accumulator 155 similar to the
accumulator 125 included in the device of FIG. 9 described above.
Between the fluid chamber 153 and the accumulator 155, a pair of
valves 156 and 157 are provided in parallel passages 158 and 159
extending between the chamber 153 and the accumulator 155. The
valve 156 is a relief valve that allows the pressurized fluid to
flow from the chamber 153 to the accumulator 155 when the ram 151
advances farther into the chamber 153. The valve 157 is a check
valve that allows pressurized fluid to flow from the accumulator
155 to the chamber 153 when the ram 151 moves outwardly to enlarge
the chamber 153. The valves 156 and 157 provide overload protection
(e.g., when one of the gauge wheels hits a rock) and to ensure that
the gauge wheels retain their elevation setting.
[0053] FIGS. 15A and 15B illustrate a modified sensor arrangement
for a pair of gauge wheels 160 and 161 rolling on opposite sides of
a furrow 162. The two gauge wheels are independently mounted on
support arms 163 and 164 connected to respective rams 165 and 166
that control the fluid pressure in a pair of cylinders 167 and 168.
A hydraulic hose 169 connects the fluid chambers of the respective
cylinders 167 and 168 to each other and to a common pressure
transducer 170, which produces an electrical output signal
corresponding to the fluid pressure in the hose 169. The output
signal is supplied to an electrical controller that uses that
signal to control the down forces applied to the two gauge wheels
160 and 161. It will be noted that the two gauge wheels can move up
and down independently of each other, so the fluid pressure sensed
by the transducer 170 will be changed by vertical movement of
either or both of the gauge wheels 160 and 161.
[0054] FIGS. 16-19 illustrate electrical/hydraulic control systems
that can be used to control a down-pressure actuator 180 in
response to the electrical signal provided to a controller 181 by a
pressure transducer 182. In each system the transducer 182 produces
an output signal that changes in proportion to changes in the fluid
pressure in a cylinder 183 as the position of a ram 184 changes
inside the cylinder 183. In FIG. 16, the pressurized fluid chamber
in the cylinder 183 is coupled to an accumulator 185 by a relief
valve 186 to allow pressurized fluid to flow to the accumulator,
and by a check valve 187 to allow return flow of pressurized fluid
from the accumulator to the cylinder 183. In FIG. 17, the
accumulator 185 is replaced with a pressurized fluid source 188
connected to the check valve 187, and a sump 189 connected to the
relief valve 186. In FIG. 18, the accumulator 185 is connected
directly to the pressurized fluid chamber in the cylinder 183,
without any intervening valves. In the system of FIG. 19, the
pressure sensor 182 is connected directly to the pressurized fluid
chamber in the cylinder 183.
[0055] FIG. 20 illustrates a planting row unit 210 that includes a
furrow-opening device 211 for the purpose of planting seed or
injecting fertilizer into the soil. A conventional elongated hollow
towing frame (typically hitched to a tractor by a draw bar) is
rigidly attached to the front frame 212 of a conventional four-bar
linkage assembly 213 that is part of the row unit 210. The four-bar
(sometimes referred to as "parallel-bar") linkage assembly 213 is a
conventional and well known linkage used in agricultural implements
to permit the raising and lowering of tools attached thereto.
[0056] As the planting row unit 210 is advanced by the tractor, the
opening device 211 penetrates the soil to form a furrow or seed
slot. Other portions of the row unit 210 then deposit seed in the
seed slot and fertilizer adjacent to the seed slot, and close the
seed slot by distributing loosened soil into the seed slot with a
pair of closing wheels. A gauge wheel 214 determines the planting
depth for the seed and the height of introduction of fertilizer,
etc. Bins 215 on the row unit carry the chemicals and seed which
are directed into the soil. The planting row unit 210 is urged
downwardly against the soil by its own weight, and, in addition, a
hydraulic cylinder 216 is coupled between the front frame 212 and
the linkage assembly 213 to urge the row unit 210 downwardly with a
controllable force that can be adjusted for different soil
conditions. The hydraulic cylinder 216 may also be used to lift the
row unit off the ground for transport by a heavier, stronger,
fixed-height frame that is also used to transport large quantities
of fertilizer for application via multiple row units.
[0057] The hydraulic cylinder 216 is shown in more detail in FIGS.
21-33. Pressurized hydraulic fluid from the tractor is supplied by
a hose 301 to a port 304 that leads into a matching port of a
unitary housing 223 that forms a cavity 224 of a hydraulic cylinder
containing a hollow rod 225. The housing 223 also forms a side port
226 that leads into a second cavity 227 that contains hydraulic
fluid that can be used to control the down pressure on the row
unit, as described in more detail below.
[0058] The hydraulic control system includes a pair of controllable
2-way hydraulic lines 301 and 302 leading to the hydraulic cylinder
in the unitary housing 223, which includes an integrated electronic
controller 303. The hydraulic lines 301 and 302 are coupled to a
pressure/inlet valve and a return outlet valve which are controlled
by signals from the controller 303. The controller 303 receives
input signals from a pressure transducer 304 that senses the
pressure in the cavity 224, and a gauge wheel sensor that monitors
the elevation of a tool relative to the elevation of the gauge
wheel.
[0059] Slidably mounted within the hollow interior of the rod 225
is a down-pressure accumulator piston 230, which forms one end of a
sealed chamber 231 containing pressurized gas that is part of the
down-pressure accumulator. The lower end of the chamber 231 is
sealed by a rod end cap 232 that contains a valve 233 for use in
filling the chamber 231 with pressurized gas. Thus, the
down-pressure accumulator is formed entirely within the hollow rod
225
[0060] The hydraulic pressure exerted by the hydraulic fluid on the
end surface of the rod 225 and the accumulator piston 230 urges the
rod 225 downwardly, with a force determined by the pressure of the
hydraulic fluid and the area of the exposed end surfaces of the rod
225 and the piston 230. The hydraulic fluid thus urges the rod 225,
and thus the row unit, in a downward direction, toward the
soil.
[0061] When an upward force is exerted on the rod 225, such as when
a rock or increased soil hardness is encountered, the rod 225 is
moved upwardly within the cavity 224, as depicted in FIGS. 32 and
33. Because the cavity 224 is filled with pressurized hydraulic
fluid in the cavity 224, the accumulator piston 230 does not move
upwardly with the rod 225, as depicted in FIGS. 32 and 33. Thus,
the pressurized gas between the accumulator piston 230 and the cap
232 at the lower end of the rod 225 is further compressed. This
process continues as the rod 25 moves upwardly within the cavity
224, until the upper end of the rod engages the housing 216, as
depicted in FIG. 33. In this fully retracted position of the rod
225, the accumulator piston 230 engages the end cap 232 on the
lower end of the rod 225.
[0062] During upward movement of the rod 225 and downward movement
of the accumulator piston 230, hydraulic fluid flows from the
second cavity 227 through the conduit 226 into the space between
the outer surface of the rod 225 and the wall of the cavity 224.
The hydraulic fluid if urged in this direction by a second
accumulator formed by a piston 240 and a charge of pressurized gas
between the piston 240 and an end cap 241 that seals the top of the
cavity 227. As can be seen in FIGS. 32 and 33, the compressed gas
urges the piston 240 downwardly as the rod 225 moves upwardly, thus
forcing hydraulic fluid from the cavity 227 through a check valve
228 into the increasing space between the outer surface of the rod
225 and the wall of the cavity 224. In FIG. 33, the rod 225 has
been withdrawn to its most retracted position, and the accumulator
piston 240 has moved to its lowermost position where it engages the
bottom end wall of the cavity 227. At this point, the row unit is
in its uppermost position.
[0063] The process is reversed when the rod 225 returns to its
extended position, with the accumulators providing dynamic
"rebound" damping during this return movement. As the rod 225 moves
downwardly, hydraulic fluid is returned to the cavity 227 through a
restriction 229 to damp the downward movement of the rod. The
restriction 229 can be adjusted by turning the screw formed by the
outer end portion of the tapered pin 229a that forms the
restriction 229. The return flow rate of the hydraulic fluid is
also affected by the pressure of the gas in the space above the
accumulator piston 240, which must be overcome by the returning
hydraulic fluid to move the piston 40 upwardly.
[0064] It will be appreciated that the system described above does
not require any hydraulic fluid to flow into or out of the housing
223 during advancing and retracting movement of the rod 225 that
controls the vertical position of the row unit relative to the
soil. Thus, there is no need to open or close any valves to control
the flow of hydraulic fluid in and out of the tractor reservoir of
hydraulic fluid. This is not only more efficient than moving
hydraulic fluid to and from the main reservoir, but also makes the
operation of the row unit much smoother, which in turn improves the
delivery of seed and/or fertilizer to the desired locations in the
soil. The actuator assembly is normally closed with no fluid
entering or leaving the actuator/accumulator assembly unless one or
more valves are opened. There is also an advantage in using two
valves because a 2-position, 1-way valve can be made fast-acting
more readily that a 3-position, 2-way valve. Moreover, the computer
controller can be directly integrated into the actuator assembly.
The single double-acting actuator with two accumulators, one acting
in the downward direction and one acting in the upward direction,
can be mounted in the same location as previous actuators used on
row units.
[0065] The present system has an accumulator on both sides of the
actuator, with valves that control flow, not pressure, so that the
actuator can become a totally closed system with no oil entering or
leaving. The compensator design is linear because the piston
accumulator is packaged within the inner diameter of the ram of a
larger cylinder, which reduces the number of parts as well as the
size of the actuator unit. The linear compensator design allows
perfectly open and unrestricted flow of oil in the compression
direction, which is advantageous because of the need to rapidly
absorb energy when the row unit hits a rock or obstacle.
[0066] When the valves have a "latching" feature, the spools of the
valves can be rapidly magnetized and demagnetized. This allows the
valve to latch magnetically in either the open or closed condition
so that the valve does not consume power continuously, as a typical
proportional coil valve does. Moreover, the latching valve design
takes advantage of the ability of the accumulators to allow the
planter linkage to float up and down without requiring any gain or
loss of fluid. Rather, the down pressure on the planter may be
changed by holding either the pressure or return valve open for
varying pulse width modulated durations to achieve a rise or drop
in down pressure. These valves may have a very fast rate of change
between open and closed conditions. If the valve changes state very
quickly, typically less than 10 milliseconds, and requires no power
to remain either open or closed, it is possible to achieve
negligible power consumption system because the probability that
any two valves will be in the process of opening or closing at the
exact same time is very low.
[0067] Planter row units have varying unsprung weights (the portion
of the planter row unit weight that is carried by the gauge wheels
and not the frame). In some tillage and soil conditions which are
very soft or prone to compaction, it can be advantageous to suspend
some or all of this weight by pushing upward against it.
[0068] By pressurizing the uplift accumulator by filling gas
through the gas valve, the gas pressure increases, pushing the
piston accumulator against the fluid which is connected to the main
cylinder by a fluid passageway. This pressure exerts an upward
force on the smaller cross sectional area of the rod side of the
main piston seals, and the gas pressure can be adjusted to change
the amount of uplift force. It is also possible to have a gas
pressure system that allows remote adjustment of the gas pressure.
The fluid in the uplift circuit forms a closed system, and a manual
or automatic flow control valve can be added between the main
cylinder and the uplift accumulator to restrict flow, causing
damping of the rebound cycle of the suspension cylinder.
[0069] Fluid is introduced into the cylinder by opening the
pressure valve for some duration of time, allowing high-pressure
fluid from the tractor to flow into the fluid chamber. This
high-pressure fluid pushes against the linear compensator
accumulator piston, which in turn compresses the gas to equalize
the pressures on opposite sides of the piston. The accumulator
piston will move back and forth inside the hollow rod when the down
pressure is changing, even if the rod is not moving up and down.
The length of time the pressure valve remains open corresponds to
the size of the adjustment needed. Control is being accomplished in
a closed loop fashion based on the planter gauge wheel load. Once
the required pressure is achieved, the valve closes so that the
actuator is a closed system again. The actuator can then allow the
row unit to float up and down, compressing and decompressing the
gas in the down-pressure and up-pressure accumulators. This will
generate heat in the process--the heat is energy that is being
damped from the system. To facilitate the removal of this heat from
the system, the portion of the housing 223 that forms the cavity
227 forms multiple cooling fins 242 around its exterior
surface.
[0070] FIG. 34A is a schematic diagram of a hydraulic control
system that uses a single hydraulic cylinder 1601, two two-position
control valves 1602, 1603 and a pair of accumulators 1604, 1605.
The valves are both latching type valves with a single actuator
1602a or 1603a for each valve, for moving the valve to either the
open or closed position when the valve is unlatched. When valve
1602 is in the open position, it connects a source 1606 of
pressurized hydraulic fluid to the hydraulic cylinder 1601 via pump
1607. When valve 1603 is open, it connects cylinder 1601 to a sump
1607. Electrical signals for energizing the actuators 1602a and
1603a are supplied to the respective actuators via lines 1607 and
1608 from a controller 1609, which in turn may be controlled by a
central processor, if desired. The controller 1609 receives input
signals from a pressure transducer 1610 coupled to the hydraulic
cylinder 1601 via line 1611. The accumulator 1604 is coupled to the
hydraulic cylinder 1601 through a valve 1612, as described in more
detail below.
[0071] FIG. 34B is a schematic diagram of a modified version of the
system of FIG. 34A to provide both rebound damping and compression
damping. The only difference is that the system of FIG. 34B
includes a valve 1613 between the accumulator 1603 and the
compression side of the hydraulic cylinder 1601, so that the
accumulator 1603 provides compression damping when the rod of the
cylinder 1601 is moved from right to left in FIG. 34A.
[0072] FIGS. 35A and 35B illustrate systems that are identical to
those of FIGS. 34A and 15B, except that the latching valves are
replaced with non-latching valves 1702 and 1703. These non-latching
valves are biased toward their closed positions by respective
springs 102a and 1703a, and can be moved to their open positions by
energizing their respective actuators 1702b and 1703b.
[0073] In the control system of FIG. 34B, a PWM control system may
be used to supply short-duration pulses P to the actuators 1602a or
1603a of the control valves 1602 or 1603 to move the selected valve
to its open position for short intervals corresponding to the
widths of the PWM pulses. This significantly reduces the energy
required to increase or decrease the pressure in the hydraulic
cylinder 1601 for adjusting the down pressure on the soil-engaging
implement. As depicted in FIG. 36, pulses P1-P3, having a voltage
level V1, are supplied to the actuator 1602a when it is desired to
increase the hydraulic pressure supplied to the hydraulic cylinder
1601. The first pulse P1 has a width T1 which is shorter than the
width of pulses P2 and P3, so that the pressure increase is smaller
than the increase that would be produced if P1 had the same width
as pulses P2 and P3. Pulses P4-P6, which have a voltage level V2,
are supplied to the actuator 1602a when it is desired to decrease
the hydraulic pressure supplied to the hydraulic cylinder 1601. The
first pulse P4 has a width that is shorter than the width T2 of
pulses P2 and P3, so that the pressure decrease is smaller than the
decrease that would be produced if P4 had the same width as pulses
P5 and P6. When no pulses are supplied to either of the two
actuators 1602a and 1603a, as in the "no change" interval in FIG.
36, the hydraulic pressure remains substantially constant in the
hydraulic cylinder 1601.
[0074] While particular embodiments and applications of the present
invention have been illustrated and described, it is to be
understood that the invention is not limited to the precise
construction and compositions disclosed herein and that various
modifications, changes, and variations can be apparent from the
foregoing descriptions without departing from the spirit and scope
of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
* * * * *