U.S. patent application number 15/884637 was filed with the patent office on 2019-03-28 for lower-tier application deployment for higher-tier system data monitoring.
The applicant listed for this patent is Splunk Inc.. Invention is credited to Alok Bhide, Tristan Fletcher, Alan Vincent Hardin, Arun Ramani, Nicholas Matthew Tankersley, Kan Wu.
Application Number | 20190097902 15/884637 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 65808097 |
Filed Date | 2019-03-28 |
![](/patent/app/20190097902/US20190097902A1-20190328-D00000.png)
![](/patent/app/20190097902/US20190097902A1-20190328-D00001.png)
![](/patent/app/20190097902/US20190097902A1-20190328-D00002.png)
![](/patent/app/20190097902/US20190097902A1-20190328-D00003.png)
![](/patent/app/20190097902/US20190097902A1-20190328-D00004.png)
![](/patent/app/20190097902/US20190097902A1-20190328-D00005.png)
![](/patent/app/20190097902/US20190097902A1-20190328-D00006.png)
![](/patent/app/20190097902/US20190097902A1-20190328-D00007.png)
![](/patent/app/20190097902/US20190097902A1-20190328-D00008.png)
![](/patent/app/20190097902/US20190097902A1-20190328-D00009.png)
![](/patent/app/20190097902/US20190097902A1-20190328-D00010.png)
View All Diagrams
United States Patent
Application |
20190097902 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Hardin; Alan Vincent ; et
al. |
March 28, 2019 |
LOWER-TIER APPLICATION DEPLOYMENT FOR HIGHER-TIER SYSTEM DATA
MONITORING
Abstract
One or more lower-tier system monitoring components are
installed and operated prior to installing a higher-tier system
monitoring component. A lower-tier system may be an individual
server, network device, or local area network. A higher-tier system
may include an enterprise or organization wide network or service
that includes at least a part of the lower-tier system. Once the
higher-tier system monitoring component is installed, the
higher-tier and lower-tier system monitoring components use an
interface to operate with one another to form a single larger
instance of an organization wide monitoring system. The combination
of the higher-tier system monitoring component and the one or more
lower-tier system operating components performs monitoring aspects
of the overall information technology environment based at least in
part on machine data produced and made searchable to provide
monitoring results.
Inventors: |
Hardin; Alan Vincent; (San
Francisco, CA) ; Wu; Kan; (San Jose, CA) ;
Ramani; Arun; (Bellevue, WA) ; Tankersley; Nicholas
Matthew; (Seattle, WA) ; Fletcher; Tristan;
(Pacifica, CA) ; Bhide; Alok; (Sunnyvale,
CA) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
Splunk Inc. |
San Francisco |
CA |
US |
|
|
Family ID: |
65808097 |
Appl. No.: |
15/884637 |
Filed: |
January 31, 2018 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
62562773 |
Sep 25, 2017 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
1/1 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H04L 43/04 20130101;
G06F 16/951 20190101; H04L 43/0817 20130101; H04L 43/14 20130101;
G06F 8/61 20130101 |
International
Class: |
H04L 12/26 20060101
H04L012/26; G06F 8/61 20060101 G06F008/61; G06F 17/30 20060101
G06F017/30 |
Claims
1. A method comprising: installing and operating one or more
lower-tier system monitoring components; and installing a
higher-tier system monitoring component after said installing and
operating the one or more lower-tier system monitoring components,
the higher-tier system monitoring component having an interface to
operate with the one or more lower-tier system monitoring
components.
2. The method of claim 1 further comprising: monitoring the one or
more entities of the information technology system with the one or
more lower-tier system monitoring components; and producing
entity-level metrics based on the monitoring of the one or more
entities with the one or more lower-tier system monitoring
components.
3. The method of claim 1 further comprising: monitoring the one or
more entities of the information technology system with the one or
more lower-tier system monitoring components; producing
entity-level metrics based on the monitoring of the one or more
entities with the one or more lower-tier system monitoring
components; interfacing the higher-tier system monitoring component
with the one or more lower-tier system monitoring components
through the interface; and interoperating the higher-tier system
monitoring component with the one or more lower-tier system
monitoring components via the interface to access the entity-level
metrics that are produced based on the monitoring of the one or
more entities with the one or more lower-tier system monitoring
components.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein the higher-tier system monitoring
component and the one or more lower-tier system monitoring
components each perform monitoring aspects of an information
technology environment that is based at least in part on machine
data produced and made searchable to provide monitoring
results.
5. The method of claim 1 further comprising installing the
higher-tier system monitoring component and the one or more
lower-tier system monitoring components of a shared search
head.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein the higher-tier system monitoring
component and the one or more lower-tier system monitoring
components share an indexer.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein the higher-tier system monitoring
component and the one or more lower-tier system monitoring
components share an indexer, and further comprising: publishing
data to the interface with the one or more lower-tier system
monitoring components; and based at least in part on the published
data, accessing the shared indexer with the higher-tier system
monitoring component to retrieve machine data associated with the
lower-tier system monitoring component.
8. The method of claim 1 wherein the interface comprises a message
bus.
9. The method of claim 1 wherein the interface comprises an
independent message bus.
10. The method of claim 1 wherein the interface comprises a message
bus and wherein the higher-tier system monitoring component
comprises the message bus.
11. The method of claim 1 wherein the interface comprises a message
bus and further comprising subscribing to rest endpoints of the
message bus with the higher-tier system monitoring component.
12. The method of claim 1 wherein the interface comprises a message
bus and further comprising: subscribing to rest endpoints of the
message bus with the higher-tier system monitoring component; and
publishing data to the rest endpoints of the message bus with the
one or more lower-tier system monitoring components.
13. The method of claim 1 wherein the interface comprises a message
bus and further comprising: performing authentication and
authorization steps in order to subscribe and publish data to the
message bus; subscribing to rest endpoints of the message bus with
the higher-tier system monitoring component; and publishing data to
the rest endpoints of the message bus with the one or more
lower-tier system monitoring components.
14. The method of claim 1 wherein the interface comprises a message
bus and further comprising: subscribing to rest endpoints of the
message bus with the higher-tier system monitoring component; and
publishing data to the rest endpoints of the message bus with the
one or more lower-tier system monitoring components, wherein the
data comprises one or more of configuration data and alert
data.
15. The method of claim 1 wherein the interface comprises a message
bus and further comprising: subscribing to rest endpoints of the
message bus with the higher-tier system monitoring component; and
publishing data to the rest endpoints of the message bus with the
one or more lower-tier system monitoring components, wherein the
data comprises one or more of configuration data, alert data, and
machine data.
16. The method of claim 1 wherein the interface comprises a message
bus and further comprising: subscribing to rest endpoints of the
message bus with the higher-tier system monitoring component;
publishing data to the rest endpoints of the message bus with the
one or more lower-tier system monitoring components; and operating
the higher-tier system monitoring component to monitor a
higher-tier system based at least in part on the published data
from the one or more lower-tier system monitoring components.
17. The method of claim 1 wherein the interface comprises a message
bus and the one or more lower-tier system monitoring components
push data associated with entities of a lower-tier system to the
message bus and the higher-tier system monitoring component pulls
the data from the message bus to provide system-level metrics that
are based at least in part on the pushed data from the one or more
lower-tier system monitoring components.
18. The method of claim 1 wherein the interface comprises a message
bus and the message bus detects whether published data set is
duplicative of a previously published data set and stops the
higher-tier system monitoring component from receiving a duplicate
data set.
19. The method of claim 1 wherein the interface comprises a message
bus and the message bus filters the published data and the
higher-tier system monitoring component receives the filtered
data.
20. The method of claim 1 wherein the interface comprises a message
bus and the message bus sets a stream rate to control a rate at
which the higher-tier system monitoring component receives the
published data.
21. A system comprising: a data store including computer-executable
instructions; and one or more processors configured to execute the
computer-executable instructions, wherein execution of the
computer-executable instructions causes the system to: install and
operate one or more lower-tier system monitoring components; and
install a higher-tier system monitoring component subsequent to
installing and operating the one or more lower-tier system
monitoring components, the higher-tier system monitoring component
having an interface to operate with the one or more lower-tier
system monitoring components.
22. The system of claim 21 wherein the interface comprises a
message bus.
23. The system of claim 21 wherein the interface comprises a
message bus and execution of the computer-executable instructions
further causes the system to subscribe to rest endpoints of the
message bus with the higher-tier system monitoring component.
24. The system of claim 21 wherein the interface comprises a
message bus, and execution of the computer-executable instructions
further causes the system to: subscribe to rest endpoints of the
message bus with the higher-tier system monitoring component; and
publish data to the rest endpoints of the message bus with the one
or more lower-tier system monitoring components.
25. The system of claim 21 wherein the interface comprises a
message bus, and execution of the computer-executable instructions
further cause the system to: subscribe to rest endpoints of the
message bus with the higher-tier system monitoring component;
publish data to the rest endpoints of the message bus with the one
or more lower-tier system monitoring components; and operate the
higher-tier system monitoring component to monitor a higher-tier
system based at least in part on the published data from the one or
more lower-tier system monitoring components.
26. Non-transitory computer-readable media including
computer-executable instructions that, when executed by a computing
system, cause the computing system to: install and operate one or
more lower-tier system monitoring components; and install a
higher-tier system monitoring component subsequent to installing
and operating the one or more lower-tier system monitoring
components, wherein the higher-tier system monitoring component has
an interface to operate with the one or more lower-tier system
monitoring components.
27. The non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 26, wherein
the interface comprises a message bus.
28. The non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 26, wherein
the interface comprises a message bus and further including the
computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the
computing system, cause the computing system to subscribe to rest
endpoints of the message bus with the higher-tier system monitoring
component.
29. The non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 26, wherein
the interface comprises a message bus and further including the
computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the
computing system, cause the computing system to: subscribe to rest
endpoints of the message bus with the higher-tier system monitoring
component; and publish data to the rest endpoints of the message
bus with the one or more lower-tier system monitoring
components.
30. The non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 26, wherein
the interface comprises a message bus and further including the
computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the
computing system, cause the computing system to: subscribe to rest
endpoints of the message bus with the higher-tier system monitoring
component; publish data to the rest endpoints of the message bus
with the one or more lower-tier system monitoring components; and
operate the higher-tier system monitoring component to monitor a
higher-tier system based at least in part on the published data
from the one or more lower-tier system monitoring components.
Description
BACKGROUND
[0001] Modern data centers often comprise thousands of hosts that
operate collectively to service requests from even larger numbers
of remote clients. During operation, components of these data
centers can produce significant volumes of machine-generated data.
The unstructured nature of much of this data has made it
challenging to perform indexing and searching operations because of
the difficulty of applying semantic meaning to unstructured data.
As the number of hosts and clients associated with a data center
continues to grow, processing large volumes of machine-generated
data in an intelligent manner and effectively presenting the
results of such processing continues to be a priority.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0002] The present disclosure is illustrated by way of example, and
not limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings, in
which like reference numerals indicate similar elements and in
which:
[0003] FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an example networked computer
environment, in accordance with example embodiments;
[0004] FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an example data intake and
query system, in accordance with example embodiments;
[0005] FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an example cloud-based data
intake and query system, in accordance with example
embodiments;
[0006] FIG. 4 is a block diagram of an example data intake and
query system that performs searches across external data systems,
in accordance with example embodiments;
[0007] FIG. 5A is a flowchart of an example method that illustrates
how indexers process, index, and store data received from
forwarders, in accordance with example embodiments;
[0008] FIG. 5B is a block diagram of a data structure in which
time-stamped event data can be stored in a data store, in
accordance with example embodiments;
[0009] FIG. 5C provides a visual representation of the manner in
which a pipelined search language or query operates, in accordance
with example embodiments;
[0010] FIG. 6A is a flow diagram of an example method that
illustrates how a search head and indexers perform a search query,
in accordance with example embodiments;
[0011] FIG. 6B provides a visual representation of an example
manner in which a pipelined command language or query operates, in
accordance with example embodiments;
[0012] FIG. 7A is a diagram of an example scenario where a common
customer identifier is found among log data received from three
disparate data sources, in accordance with example embodiments;
[0013] FIG. 7B illustrates an example of processing keyword
searches and field searches, in accordance with disclosed
embodiments;
[0014] FIG. 7C illustrates an example of creating and using an
inverted index, in accordance with example embodiments;
[0015] FIG. 7D depicts a flowchart of example use of an inverted
index in a pipelined search query, in accordance with example
embodiments;
[0016] FIG. 8A is an interface diagram of an example user interface
for a search screen, in accordance with example embodiments;
[0017] FIG. 8B is an interface diagram of an example user interface
for a data summary dialog that enables a user to select various
data sources, in accordance with example embodiments;
[0018] FIGS. 9-15 are interface diagrams of example report
generation user interfaces, in accordance with example
embodiments;
[0019] FIG. 16 is an example search query received from a client
and executed by search peers, in accordance with example
embodiments;
[0020] FIG. 17A is an interface diagram of an example user
interface of a key indicators view, in accordance with example
embodiments;
[0021] FIG. 17B is an interface diagram of an example user
interface of an incident review dashboard, in accordance with
example embodiments;
[0022] FIG. 17C is a tree diagram of an example a proactive
monitoring tree, in accordance with example embodiments;
[0023] FIG. 17D is an interface diagram of an example a user
interface displaying both log data and performance data, in
accordance with example embodiments;
[0024] FIG. 18 is a block diagram of an example of a data intake
and query system that supports the application level functionality
of a lower-tier system monitoring component, in accordance with
example embodiments;
[0025] FIG. 19 is a flow diagram of an example deployment method
that illustrates the relationship between the lower-tier system
monitoring component and the higher-tier system monitoring
component, in accordance with example embodiments;
[0026] FIG. 20 is a flow diagram of another example deployment
method that illustrates the relationship between the lower-tier
system monitoring component and the higher-tier system monitoring
component, in accordance with example embodiments;
[0027] FIG. 21 is a flow diagram of an example deployment method
that illustrates the relationship between the lower-tier
entity-level monitoring component and the higher-tier system-level
monitoring component, in accordance with example embodiments;
[0028] FIG. 22 is a block diagram of an example data intake and
query system illustrating the migration mode of lower-tier and
higher-tier system monitoring component deployment, in accordance
with example embodiments.
[0029] FIG. 23 is a block diagram illustrating an example messaging
bus between the lower-tier system monitoring component(s) and the
higher-tier system monitoring component, in accordance with example
embodiments.
[0030] FIG. 24 is a block diagram of an example data intake and
query system illustrating the federated mode of lower-tier and the
higher-tier system monitoring component deployment, in accordance
with example embodiments.
[0031] FIG. 25 is a block diagram of an example workflow between
the lower-tier system monitoring component and the higher-level
system monitoring component.
[0032] FIG. 26 is a flowchart of an example method that illustrates
how lower-tier and higher-tier system monitoring components
deployed in a migrated mode communicate machine data and
configuration data, in accordance with example embodiments.
[0033] FIG. 27 is a flowchart of an example method that illustrates
how lower-tier and higher-tier system monitoring components
deployed in a federated mode communicate machine data and
configuration data, in accordance with example embodiments.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0034] Embodiments are described herein according to the following
outline:
1.0. General Overview
2.0. Operating Environment
2.1. Host Devices
2.2. Client Devices
2.3. Client Device Applications
2.4. Data Server System
2.5 Cloud-Based System Overview
2.6 Searching Externally-Archived Data
2.6.1. ERP Process Features
2.7. Data Ingestion
2.7.1. Input
2.7.2. Parsing
2.7.3. Indexing
2.8. Query Processing
2.9. Pipelined Search Language
2.10. Field Extraction
2.11. Example Search Screen
2.12. Data Modeling
2.13. Acceleration Techniques
2.13.1. Aggregation Technique
2.13.2. Keyword Index
2.13.3. High Performance Analytics Store
2.13.3.1 Extracting Event Data Using Posting Values
2.13.4. Accelerating Report Generation
2.14. Security Features
2.15. Data Center Monitoring
2.16. IT Service Monitoring
3.0. Lower-tier System Monitoring Component
3.1. Architecture
4.0. Higher-tier System Monitoring Component
5.0 Deployment
[0035] 6.0. Integration between Higher-Tier and Lower-Tier System
Monitoring Components
7.0. Workflow Between Higher-Tier And Lower-Tier System Monitoring
Components
8.0. Terminology
1.0. General Overview
[0036] Modern data centers and other computing environments can
comprise anywhere from a few host computer systems to thousands of
systems configured to process data, service requests from remote
clients, and perform numerous other computational tasks. During
operation, various components within these computing environments
often generate significant volumes of machine data. Machine data is
any data produced by a machine or component in an information
technology (IT) environment and that reflects activity in the IT
environment. For example, machine data can be raw machine data that
is generated by various components in IT environments, such as
servers, sensors, routers, mobile devices, Internet of Things (IoT)
devices, etc. Machine data can include system logs, network packet
data, sensor data, application program data, error logs, stack
traces, system performance data, etc. In general, machine data can
also include performance data, diagnostic information, and many
other types of data that can be analyzed to diagnose performance
problems, monitor user interactions, and to derive other
insights.
[0037] A number of tools are available to analyze machine data. In
order to reduce the size of the potentially vast amount of machine
data that may be generated, many of these tools typically
pre-process the data based on anticipated data-analysis needs. For
example, pre-specified data items may be extracted from the machine
data and stored in a database to facilitate efficient retrieval and
analysis of those data items at search time. However, the rest of
the machine data typically is not saved and is discarded during
pre-processing. As storage capacity becomes progressively cheaper
and more plentiful, there are fewer incentives to discard these
portions of machine data and many reasons to retain more of the
data.
[0038] This plentiful storage capacity is presently making it
feasible to store massive quantities of minimally processed machine
data for later retrieval and analysis. In general, storing
minimally processed machine data and performing analysis operations
at search time can provide greater flexibility because it enables
an analyst to search all of the machine data, instead of searching
only a pre-specified set of data items. This may enable an analyst
to investigate different aspects of the machine data that
previously were unavailable for analysis.
[0039] However, analyzing and searching massive quantities of
machine data presents a number of challenges. For example, a data
center, servers, or network appliances may generate many different
types and formats of machine data (e.g., system logs, network
packet data (e.g., wire data, etc.), sensor data, application
program data, error logs, stack traces, system performance data,
operating system data, virtualization data, etc.) from thousands of
different components, which can collectively be very time-consuming
to analyze. In another example, mobile devices may generate large
amounts of information relating to data accesses, application
performance, operating system performance, network performance,
etc. There can be millions of mobile devices that report these
types of information.
[0040] These challenges can be addressed by using an event-based
data intake and query system, such as the SPLUNK.RTM. ENTERPRISE
system developed by Splunk Inc. of San Francisco, Calif. The
SPLUNK.RTM. ENTERPRISE system is the leading platform for providing
real-time operational intelligence that enables organizations to
collect, index, and search machine data from various websites,
applications, servers, networks, and mobile devices that power
their businesses. The data intake and query system is particularly
useful for analyzing data which is commonly found in system log
files, network data, and other data input sources. Although many of
the techniques described herein are explained with reference to a
data intake and query system similar to the SPLUNK.RTM. ENTERPRISE
system, these techniques are also applicable to other types of data
systems.
[0041] In the data intake and query system, machine data are
collected and stored as "events". An event comprises a portion of
machine data and is associated with a specific point in time. The
portion of machine data may reflect activity in an IT environment
and may be produced by a component of that IT environment, where
the events may be searched to provide insight into the IT
environment, thereby improving the performance of components in the
IT environment. Events may be derived from "time series data,"
where the time series data comprises a sequence of data points
(e.g., performance measurements from a computer system, etc.) that
are associated with successive points in time. In general, each
event has a portion of machine data that is associated with a
timestamp that is derived from the portion of machine data in the
event. A timestamp of an event may be determined through
interpolation between temporally proximate events having known
timestamps or may be determined based on other configurable rules
for associating timestamps with events.
[0042] In some instances, machine data can have a predefined
format, where data items with specific data formats are stored at
predefined locations in the data. For example, the machine data may
include data associated with fields in a database table. In other
instances, machine data may not have a predefined format (e.g., may
not be at fixed, predefined locations), but may have repeatable
(e.g., non-random) patterns. This means that some machine data can
comprise various data items of different data types that may be
stored at different locations within the data. For example, when
the data source is an operating system log, an event can include
one or more lines from the operating system log containing machine
data that includes different types of performance and diagnostic
information associated with a specific point in time (e.g., a
timestamp).
[0043] Examples of components which may generate machine data from
which events can be derived include, but are not limited to, web
servers, application servers, databases, firewalls, routers,
operating systems, and software applications that execute on
computer systems, mobile devices, sensors, Internet of Things (IoT)
devices, etc. The machine data generated by such data sources can
include, for example and without limitation, server log files,
activity log files, configuration files, messages, network packet
data, performance measurements, sensor measurements, etc.
[0044] The data intake and query system uses a flexible schema to
specify how to extract information from events. A flexible schema
may be developed and redefined as needed. Note that a flexible
schema may be applied to events "on the fly," when it is needed
(e.g., at search time, index time, ingestion time, etc.). When the
schema is not applied to events until search time, the schema may
be referred to as a "late-binding schema."
[0045] During operation, the data intake and query system receives
machine data from any type and number of sources (e.g., one or more
system logs, streams of network packet data, sensor data,
application program data, error logs, stack traces, system
performance data, etc.). The system parses the machine data to
produce events each having a portion of machine data associated
with a timestamp. The system stores the events in a data store. The
system enables users to run queries against the stored events to,
for example, retrieve events that meet criteria specified in a
query, such as criteria indicating certain keywords or having
specific values in defined fields. As used herein, the term "field"
refers to a location in the machine data of an event containing one
or more values for a specific data item. A field may be referenced
by a field name associated with the field. As will be described in
more detail herein, a field is defined by an extraction rule (e.g.,
a regular expression) that derives one or more values or a
sub-portion of text from the portion of machine data in each event
to produce a value for the field for that event. The set of values
produced are semantically-related (such as IP address), even though
the machine data in each event may be in different formats (e.g.,
semantically-related values may be in different positions in the
events derived from different sources).
[0046] As described above, the system stores the events in a data
store. The events stored in the data store are field-searchable,
where field-searchable herein refers to the ability to search the
machine data (e.g., the raw machine data) of an event based on a
field specified in search criteria. For example, a search having
criteria that specifies a field name "UserID" may cause the system
to field-search the machine data of events to identify events that
have the field name "UserID." In another example, a search having
criteria that specifies a field name "UserID" with a corresponding
field value "12345" may cause the system to field-search the
machine data of events to identify events having that field-value
pair (e.g., field name "UserID" with a corresponding field value of
"12345"). Events are field-searchable using one or more
configuration files associated with the events. Each configuration
file includes one or more field names, where each field name is
associated with a corresponding extraction rule and a set of events
to which that extraction rule applies. The set of events to which
an extraction rule applies may be identified by metadata associated
with the set of events. For example, an extraction rule may apply
to a set of events that are each associated with a particular host,
source, or source type. When events are to be searched based on a
particular field name specified in a search, the system uses one or
more configuration files to determine whether there is an
extraction rule for that particular field name that applies to each
event that falls within the criteria of the search. If so, the
event is considered as part of the search results (and additional
processing may be performed on that event based on criteria
specified in the search). If not, the next event is similarly
analyzed, and so on.
[0047] As noted above, the data intake and query system utilizes a
late-binding schema while performing queries on events. One aspect
of a late-binding schema is applying extraction rules to events to
extract values for specific fields during search time. More
specifically, the extraction rule for a field can include one or
more instructions that specify how to extract a value for the field
from an event. An extraction rule can generally include any type of
instruction for extracting values from events. In some cases, an
extraction rule comprises a regular expression, where a sequence of
characters form a search pattern. An extraction rule comprising a
regular expression is referred to herein as a regex rule. The
system applies a regex rule to an event to extract values for a
field associated with the regex rule, where the values are
extracted by searching the event for the sequence of characters
defined in the regex rule.
[0048] In the data intake and query system, a field extractor may
be configured to automatically generate extraction rules for
certain fields in the events when the events are being created,
indexed, or stored, or possibly at a later time. Alternatively, a
user may manually define extraction rules for fields using a
variety of techniques. In contrast to a conventional schema for a
database system, a late-binding schema is not defined at data
ingestion time. Instead, the late-binding schema can be developed
on an ongoing basis until the time a query is actually executed.
This means that extraction rules for the fields specified in a
query may be provided in the query itself, or may be located during
execution of the query. Hence, as a user learns more about the data
in the events, the user can continue to refine the late-binding
schema by adding new fields, deleting fields, or modifying the
field extraction rules for use the next time the schema is used by
the system. Because the data intake and query system maintains the
underlying machine data and uses a late-binding schema for
searching the machine data, it enables a user to continue
investigating and learn valuable insights about the machine
data.
[0049] In some embodiments, a common field name may be used to
reference two or more fields containing equivalent and/or similar
data items, even though the fields may be associated with different
types of events that possibly have different data formats and
different extraction rules. By enabling a common field name to be
used to identify equivalent and/or similar fields from different
types of events generated by disparate data sources, the system
facilitates use of a "common information model" (CIM) across the
disparate data sources (further discussed with respect to FIG.
7A).
2.0. Operating Environment
[0050] FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an example networked computer
environment 100, in accordance with example embodiments. Those
skilled in the art would understand that FIG. 1 represents one
example of a networked computer system and other embodiments may
use different arrangements.
[0051] The networked computer system 100 comprises one or more
computing devices. These one or more computing devices comprise any
combination of hardware and software configured to implement the
various logical components described herein. For example, the one
or more computing devices may include one or more memories that
store instructions for implementing the various components
described herein, one or more hardware processors configured to
execute the instructions stored in the one or more memories, and
various data repositories in the one or more memories for storing
data structures utilized and manipulated by the various
components.
[0052] In some embodiments, one or more client devices 102 are
coupled to one or more host devices 106 and a data intake and query
system 108 via one or more networks 104. Networks 104 broadly
represent one or more LANs, WANs, cellular networks (e.g., LTE,
HSPA, 3G, and other cellular technologies), and/or networks using
any of wired, wireless, terrestrial microwave, or satellite links,
and may include the public Internet.
2.1. Host Devices
[0053] In the illustrated embodiment, a system 100 includes one or
more host devices 106. Host devices 106 may broadly include any
number of computers, virtual machine instances, and/or data centers
that are configured to host or execute one or more instances of
host applications 114. In general, a host device 106 may be
involved, directly or indirectly, in processing requests received
from client devices 102. Each host device 106 may comprise, for
example, one or more of a network device, a web server, an
application server, a database server, etc. A collection of host
devices 106 may be configured to implement a network-based service.
For example, a provider of a network-based service may configure
one or more host devices 106 and host applications 114 (e.g., one
or more web servers, application servers, database servers, etc.)
to collectively implement the network-based application.
[0054] In general, client devices 102 communicate with one or more
host applications 114 to exchange information. The communication
between a client device 102 and a host application 114 may, for
example, be based on the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) or any
other network protocol. Content delivered from the host application
114 to a client device 102 may include, for example, HTML
documents, media content, etc. The communication between a client
device 102 and host application 114 may include sending various
requests and receiving data packets. For example, in general, a
client device 102 or application running on a client device may
initiate communication with a host application 114 by making a
request for a specific resource (e.g., based on an HTTP request),
and the application server may respond with the requested content
stored in one or more response packets.
[0055] In the illustrated embodiment, one or more of host
applications 114 may generate various types of performance data
during operation, including event logs, network data, sensor data,
and other types of machine data. For example, a host application
114 comprising a web server may generate one or more web server
logs in which details of interactions between the web server and
any number of client devices 102 is recorded. As another example, a
host device 106 comprising a router may generate one or more router
logs that record information related to network traffic managed by
the router. As yet another example, a host application 114
comprising a database server may generate one or more logs that
record information related to requests sent from other host
applications 114 (e.g., web servers or application servers) for
data managed by the database server.
2.2. Client Devices
[0056] Client devices 102 of FIG. 1 represent any computing device
capable of interacting with one or more host devices 106 via a
network 104. Examples of client devices 102 may include, without
limitation, smart phones, tablet computers, handheld computers,
wearable devices, laptop computers, desktop computers, servers,
portable media players, gaming devices, and so forth. In general, a
client device 102 can provide access to different content, for
instance, content provided by one or more host devices 106, etc.
Each client device 102 may comprise one or more client applications
110, described in more detail in a separate section
hereinafter.
2.3. Client Device Applications
[0057] In some embodiments, each client device 102 may host or
execute one or more client applications 110 that are capable of
interacting with one or more host devices 106 via one or more
networks 104. For instance, a client application 110 may be or
comprise a web browser that a user may use to navigate to one or
more websites or other resources provided by one or more host
devices 106. As another example, a client application 110 may
comprise a mobile application or "app." For example, an operator of
a network-based service hosted by one or more host devices 106 may
make available one or more mobile apps that enable users of client
devices 102 to access various resources of the network-based
service. As yet another example, client applications 110 may
include background processes that perform various operations
without direct interaction from a user. A client application 110
may include a "plug-in" or "extension" to another application, such
as a web browser plug-in or extension.
[0058] In some embodiments, a client application 110 may include a
monitoring component 112. At a high level, the monitoring component
112 comprises a software component or other logic that facilitates
generating performance data related to a client device's operating
state, including monitoring network traffic sent and received from
the client device and collecting other device and/or
application-specific information. Monitoring component 112 may be
an integrated component of a client application 110, a plug-in, an
extension, or any other type of add-on component. Monitoring
component 112 may also be a stand-alone process.
[0059] In some embodiments, a monitoring component 112 may be
created when a client application 110 is developed, for example, by
an application developer using a software development kit (SDK).
The SDK may include custom monitoring code that can be incorporated
into the code implementing a client application 110. When the code
is converted to an executable application, the custom code
implementing the monitoring functionality can become part of the
application itself.
[0060] In some embodiments, an SDK or other code for implementing
the monitoring functionality may be offered by a provider of a data
intake and query system, such as a system 108. In such cases, the
provider of the system 108 can implement the custom code so that
performance data generated by the monitoring functionality is sent
to the system 108 to facilitate analysis of the performance data by
a developer of the client application or other users.
[0061] In some embodiments, the custom monitoring code may be
incorporated into the code of a client application 110 in a number
of different ways, such as the insertion of one or more lines in
the client application code that call or otherwise invoke the
monitoring component 112. As such, a developer of a client
application 110 can add one or more lines of code into the client
application 110 to trigger the monitoring component 112 at desired
points during execution of the application. Code that triggers the
monitoring component may be referred to as a monitor trigger. For
instance, a monitor trigger may be included at or near the
beginning of the executable code of the client application 110 such
that the monitoring component 112 is initiated or triggered as the
application is launched, or included at other points in the code
that correspond to various actions of the client application, such
as sending a network request or displaying a particular
interface.
[0062] In some embodiments, the monitoring component 112 may
monitor one or more aspects of network traffic sent and/or received
by a client application 110. For example, the monitoring component
112 may be configured to monitor data packets transmitted to and/or
from one or more host applications 114. Incoming and/or outgoing
data packets can be read or examined to identify network data
contained within the packets, for example, and other aspects of
data packets can be analyzed to determine a number of network
performance statistics. Monitoring network traffic may enable
information to be gathered particular to the network performance
associated with a client application 110 or set of
applications.
[0063] In some embodiments, network performance data refers to any
type of data that indicates information about the network and/or
network performance. Network performance data may include, for
instance, a URL requested, a connection type (e.g., HTTP, HTTPS,
etc.), a connection start time, a connection end time, an HTTP
status code, request length, response length, request headers,
response headers, connection status (e.g., completion, response
time(s), failure, etc.), and the like. Upon obtaining network
performance data indicating performance of the network, the network
performance data can be transmitted to a data intake and query
system 108 for analysis.
[0064] Upon developing a client application 110 that incorporates a
monitoring component 112, the client application 110 can be
distributed to client devices 102. Applications generally can be
distributed to client devices 102 in any manner, or they can be
pre-loaded. In some cases, the application may be distributed to a
client device 102 via an application marketplace or other
application distribution system. For instance, an application
marketplace or other application distribution system might
distribute the application to a client device based on a request
from the client device to download the application.
[0065] Examples of functionality that enables monitoring
performance of a client device are described in U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 14/524,748, entitled "UTILIZING PACKET HEADERS
TO MONITOR NETWORK TRAFFIC IN ASSOCIATION WITH A CLIENT DEVICE",
filed on 27 Oct. 2014, and which is hereby incorporated by
reference in its entirety for all purposes.
[0066] In some embodiments, the monitoring component 112 may also
monitor and collect performance data related to one or more aspects
of the operational state of a client application 110 and/or client
device 102. For example, a monitoring component 112 may be
configured to collect device performance information by monitoring
one or more client device operations, or by making calls to an
operating system and/or one or more other applications executing on
a client device 102 for performance information. Device performance
information may include, for instance, a current wireless signal
strength of the device, a current connection type and network
carrier, current memory performance information, a geographic
location of the device, a device orientation, and any other
information related to the operational state of the client
device.
[0067] In some embodiments, the monitoring component 112 may also
monitor and collect other device profile information including, for
example, a type of client device, a manufacturer and model of the
device, versions of various software applications installed on the
device, and so forth.
[0068] In general, a monitoring component 112 may be configured to
generate performance data in response to a monitor trigger in the
code of a client application 110 or other triggering application
event, as described above, and to store the performance data in one
or more data records. Each data record, for example, may include a
collection of field-value pairs, each field-value pair storing a
particular item of performance data in association with a field for
the item. For example, a data record generated by a monitoring
component 112 may include a "networkLatency" field (not shown in
the Figure) in which a value is stored. This field indicates a
network latency measurement associated with one or more network
requests. The data record may include a "state" field to store a
value indicating a state of a network connection, and so forth for
any number of aspects of collected performance data.
2.4. Data Server System
[0069] FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an example data intake and
query system 108, in accordance with example embodiments. System
108 includes one or more forwarders 204 that receive data from a
variety of input data sources 202, and one or more indexers 206
that process and store the data in one or more data stores 208.
These forwarders 204 and indexers 208 can comprise separate
computer systems, or may alternatively comprise separate processes
executing on one or more computer systems.
[0070] Each data source 202 broadly represents a distinct source of
data that can be consumed by system 108. Examples of a data sources
202 include, without limitation, data files, directories of files,
data sent over a network, event logs, registries, etc.
[0071] During operation, the forwarders 204 identify which indexers
206 receive data collected from a data source 202 and forward the
data to the appropriate indexers. Forwarders 204 can also perform
operations on the data before forwarding, including removing
extraneous data, detecting timestamps in the data, parsing data,
indexing data, routing data based on criteria relating to the data
being routed, and/or performing other data transformations.
[0072] In some embodiments, a forwarder 204 may comprise a service
accessible to client devices 102 and host devices 106 via a network
104. For example, one type of forwarder 204 may be capable of
consuming vast amounts of real-time data from a potentially large
number of client devices 102 and/or host devices 106. The forwarder
204 may, for example, comprise a computing device which implements
multiple data pipelines or "queues" to handle forwarding of network
data to indexers 206. A forwarder 204 may also perform many of the
functions that are performed by an indexer. For example, a
forwarder 204 may perform keyword extractions on raw data or parse
raw data to create events. A forwarder 204 may generate time stamps
for events. Additionally or alternatively, a forwarder 204 may
perform routing of events to indexers 206. Data store 208 may
contain events derived from machine data from a variety of sources
all pertaining to the same component in an IT environment, and this
data may be produced by the machine in question or by other
components in the IT environment.
2.5. Cloud-Based System Overview
[0073] The example data intake and query system 108 described in
reference to FIG. 2 comprises several system components, including
one or more forwarders, indexers, and search heads. In some
environments, a user of a data intake and query system 108 may
install and configure, on computing devices owned and operated by
the user, one or more software applications that implement some or
all of these system components. For example, a user may install a
software application on server computers owned by the user and
configure each server to operate as one or more of a forwarder, an
indexer, a search head, etc. This arrangement generally may be
referred to as an "on-premises" solution. That is, the system 108
is installed and operates on computing devices directly controlled
by the user of the system. Some users may prefer an on-premises
solution because it may provide a greater level of control over the
configuration of certain aspects of the system (e.g., security,
privacy, standards, controls, etc.). However, other users may
instead prefer an arrangement in which the user is not directly
responsible for providing and managing the computing devices upon
which various components of system 108 operate.
[0074] In one embodiment, to provide an alternative to an entirely
on-premises environment for system 108, one or more of the
components of a data intake and query system instead may be
provided as a cloud-based service. In this context, a cloud-based
service refers to a service hosted by one more computing resources
that are accessible to end users over a network, for example, by
using a web browser or other application on a client device to
interface with the remote computing resources. For example, a
service provider may provide a cloud-based data intake and query
system by managing computing resources configured to implement
various aspects of the system (e.g., forwarders, indexers, search
heads, etc.) and by providing access to the system to end users via
a network. Typically, a user may pay a subscription or other fee to
use such a service. Each subscribing user of the cloud-based
service may be provided with an account that enables the user to
configure a customized cloud-based system based on the user's
preferences.
[0075] FIG. 3 illustrates a block diagram of an example cloud-based
data intake and query system. Similar to the system of FIG. 2, the
networked computer system 300 includes input data sources 202 and
forwarders 204. These input data sources and forwarders may be in a
subscriber's private computing environment. Alternatively, they
might be directly managed by the service provider as part of the
cloud service. In the example system 300, one or more forwarders
204 and client devices 302 are coupled to a cloud-based data intake
and query system 306 via one or more networks 304. Network 304
broadly represents one or more LANs, WANs, cellular networks,
intranetworks, internetworks, etc., using any of wired, wireless,
terrestrial microwave, satellite links, etc., and may include the
public Internet, and is used by client devices 302 and forwarders
204 to access the system 306. Similar to the system of 108, each of
the forwarders 204 may be configured to receive data from an input
source and to forward the data to other components of the system
306 for further processing.
[0076] In some embodiments, a cloud-based data intake and query
system 306 may comprise a plurality of system instances 308. In
general, each system instance 308 may include one or more computing
resources managed by a provider of the cloud-based system 306 made
available to a particular subscriber. The computing resources
comprising a system instance 308 may, for example, include one or
more servers or other devices configured to implement one or more
forwarders, indexers, search heads, and other components of a data
intake and query system, similar to system 108. As indicated above,
a subscriber may use a web browser or other application of a client
device 302 to access a web portal or other interface that enables
the subscriber to configure an instance 308.
[0077] Providing a data intake and query system as described in
reference to system 108 as a cloud-based service presents a number
of challenges. Each of the components of a system 108 (e.g.,
forwarders, indexers, and search heads) may at times refer to
various configuration files stored locally at each component. These
configuration files typically may involve some level of user
configuration to accommodate particular types of data a user
desires to analyze and to account for other user preferences.
However, in a cloud-based service context, users typically may not
have direct access to the underlying computing resources
implementing the various system components (e.g., the computing
resources comprising each system instance 308) and may desire to
make such configurations indirectly, for example, using one or more
web-based interfaces. Thus, the techniques and systems described
herein for providing user interfaces that enable a user to
configure source type definitions are applicable to both
on-premises and cloud-based service contexts, or some combination
thereof (e.g., a hybrid system where both an on-premises
environment, such as SPLUNK.RTM. ENTERPRISE, and a cloud-based
environment, such as SPLUNK CLOUD.TM., are centrally visible).
2.6. Searching Externally-Archived Data
[0078] FIG. 4 shows a block diagram of an example of a data intake
and query system 108 that provides transparent search facilities
for data systems that are external to the data intake and query
system. Such facilities are available in the Splunk.RTM. Analytics
for Hadoop.RTM. system provided by Splunk Inc. of San Francisco,
Calif. Splunk.RTM. Analytics for Hadoop.RTM. represents an
analytics platform that enables business and IT teams to rapidly
explore, analyze, and visualize data in Hadoop.RTM. and NoSQL data
stores.
[0079] The search head 210 of the data intake and query system
receives search requests from one or more client devices 404 over
network connections 420. As discussed above, the data intake and
query system 108 may reside in an enterprise location, in the
cloud, etc. FIG. 4 illustrates that multiple client devices 404a,
404b, . . . , 404n may communicate with the data intake and query
system 108. The client devices 404 may communicate with the data
intake and query system using a variety of connections. For
example, one client device in FIG. 4 is illustrated as
communicating over an Internet (Web) protocol, another client
device is illustrated as communicating via a command line
interface, and another client device is illustrated as
communicating via a software developer kit (SDK).
[0080] The search head 210 analyzes the received search request to
identify request parameters. If a search request received from one
of the client devices 404 references an index maintained by the
data intake and query system, then the search head 210 connects to
one or more indexers 206 of the data intake and query system for
the index referenced in the request parameters. That is, if the
request parameters of the search request reference an index, then
the search head accesses the data in the index via the indexer. The
data intake and query system 108 may include one or more indexers
206, depending on system access resources and requirements. As
described further below, the indexers 206 retrieve data from their
respective local data stores 208 as specified in the search
request. The indexers and their respective data stores can comprise
one or more storage devices and typically reside on the same
system, though they may be connected via a local network
connection.
[0081] If the request parameters of the received search request
reference an external data collection, which is not accessible to
the indexers 206 or under the management of the data intake and
query system, then the search head 210 can access the external data
collection through an External Result Provider (ERP) process 410.
An external data collection may be referred to as a "virtual index"
(plural, "virtual indices"). An ERP process provides an interface
through which the search head 210 may access virtual indices.
[0082] Thus, a search reference to an index of the system relates
to a locally stored and managed data collection. In contrast, a
search reference to a virtual index relates to an externally stored
and managed data collection, which the search head may access
through one or more ERP processes 410, 412. FIG. 4 shows two ERP
processes 410, 412 that connect to respective remote (external)
virtual indices, which are indicated as a Hadoop or another system
414 (e.g., Amazon S3, Amazon EMR, other Hadoop.RTM. Compatible File
Systems (HCFS), etc.) and a relational database management system
(RDBMS) 416. Other virtual indices may include other file
organizations and protocols, such as Structured Query Language
(SQL) and the like. The ellipses between the ERP processes 410, 412
indicate optional additional ERP processes of the data intake and
query system 108. An ERP process may be a computer process that is
initiated or spawned by the search head 210 and is executed by the
search data intake and query system 108. Alternatively or
additionally, an ERP process may be a process spawned by the search
head 210 on the same or different host system as the search head
210 resides.
[0083] The search head 210 may spawn a single ERP process in
response to multiple virtual indices referenced in a search
request, or the search head may spawn different ERP processes for
different virtual indices. Generally, virtual indices that share
common data configurations or protocols may share ERP processes.
For example, all search query references to a Hadoop file system
may be processed by the same ERP process, if the ERP process is
suitably configured. Likewise, all search query references to a SQL
database may be processed by the same ERP process. In addition, the
search head may provide a common ERP process for common external
data source types (e.g., a common vendor may utilize a common ERP
process, even if the vendor includes different data storage system
types, such as Hadoop and SQL). Common indexing schemes also may be
handled by common ERP processes, such as flat text files or Weblog
files.
[0084] The search head 210 determines the number of ERP processes
to be initiated via the use of configuration parameters that are
included in a search request message. Generally, there is a
one-to-many relationship between an external results provider
"family" and ERP processes. There is also a one-to-many
relationship between an ERP process and corresponding virtual
indices that are referred to in a search request. For example,
using RDBMS, assume two independent instances of such a system by
one vendor, such as one RDBMS for production and another RDBMS used
for development. In such a situation, it is likely preferable (but
optional) to use two ERP processes to maintain the independent
operation as between production and development data. Both of the
ERPs, however, will belong to the same family, because the two
RDBMS system types are from the same vendor.
[0085] The ERP processes 410, 412 receive a search request from the
search head 210. The search head may optimize the received search
request for execution at the respective external virtual index.
Alternatively, the ERP process may receive a search request as a
result of analysis performed by the search head or by a different
system process. The ERP processes 410, 412 can communicate with the
search head 210 via conventional input/output routines (e.g.,
standard in/standard out, etc.). In this way, the ERP process
receives the search request from a client device such that the
search request may be efficiently executed at the corresponding
external virtual index.
[0086] The ERP processes 410, 412 may be implemented as a process
of the data intake and query system. Each ERP process may be
provided by the data intake and query system, or may be provided by
process or application providers who are independent of the data
intake and query system. Each respective ERP process may include an
interface application installed at a computer of the external
result provider that ensures proper communication between the
search support system and the external result provider. The ERP
processes 410, 412 generate appropriate search requests in the
protocol and syntax of the respective virtual indices 414, 416,
each of which corresponds to the search request received by the
search head 210. Upon receiving search results from their
corresponding virtual indices, the respective ERP process passes
the result to the search head 210, which may return or display the
results or a processed set of results based on the returned results
to the respective client device.
[0087] Client devices 404 may communicate with the data intake and
query system 108 through a network interface 420, e.g., one or more
LANs, WANs, cellular networks, intranetworks, and/or internetworks
using any of wired, wireless, terrestrial microwave, satellite
links, etc., and may include the public Internet.
[0088] The analytics platform utilizing the External Result
Provider process is described in more detail in U.S. Pat. No.
8,738,629, entitled "External Result Provided Process For
RetriEving Data Stored Using A Different Configuration Or
Protocol", issued on 27 May 2014, U.S. Pat. No. 8,738,587, entitled
"PROCESSING A SYSTEM SEARCH REQUEST BY RETRIEVING RESULTS FROM BOTH
A NATIVE INDEX AND A VIRTUAL INDEX", issued on 25 Jul. 2013, U.S.
patent application Ser. No. 14/266,832, entitled "PROCESSING A
SYSTEM SEARCH REQUEST ACROSS DISPARATE DATA COLLECTION SYSTEMS",
filed on 1 May 2014, and U.S. Pat. No. 9,514,189, entitled
"PROCESSING A SYSTEM SEARCH REQUEST INCLUDING EXTERNAL DATA
SOURCES", issued on 6 Dec. 2016, each of which is hereby
incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
2.6.1. Erp Process Features
[0089] The ERP processes described above may include two operation
modes: a streaming mode and a reporting mode. The ERP processes can
operate in streaming mode only, in reporting mode only, or in both
modes simultaneously. Operating in both modes simultaneously is
referred to as mixed mode operation. In a mixed mode operation, the
ERP at some point can stop providing the search head with streaming
results and only provide reporting results thereafter, or the
search head at some point may start ignoring streaming results it
has been using and only use reporting results thereafter.
[0090] The streaming mode returns search results in real time, with
minimal processing, in response to the search request. The
reporting mode provides results of a search request with processing
of the search results prior to providing them to the requesting
search head, which in turn provides results to the requesting
client device. ERP operation with such multiple modes provides
greater performance flexibility with regard to report time, search
latency, and resource utilization.
[0091] In a mixed mode operation, both streaming mode and reporting
mode are operating simultaneously. The streaming mode results
(e.g., the machine data obtained from the external data source) are
provided to the search head, which can then process the results
data (e.g., break the machine data into events, timestamp it,
filter it, etc.) and integrate the results data with the results
data from other external data sources, and/or from data stores of
the search head. The search head performs such processing and can
immediately start returning interim (streaming mode) results to the
user at the requesting client device; simultaneously, the search
head is waiting for the ERP process to process the data it is
retrieving from the external data source as a result of the
concurrently executing reporting mode.
[0092] In some instances, the ERP process initially operates in a
mixed mode, such that the streaming mode operates to enable the ERP
quickly to return interim results (e.g., some of the machined data
or unprocessed data necessary to respond to a search request) to
the search head, enabling the search head to process the interim
results and begin providing to the client or search requester
interim results that are responsive to the query. Meanwhile, in
this mixed mode, the ERP also operates concurrently in reporting
mode, processing portions of machine data in a manner responsive to
the search query. Upon determining that it has results from the
reporting mode available to return to the search head, the ERP may
halt processing in the mixed mode at that time (or some later time)
by stopping the return of data in streaming mode to the search head
and switching to reporting mode only. The ERP at this point starts
sending interim results in reporting mode to the search head, which
in turn may then present this processed data responsive to the
search request to the client or search requester. Typically the
search head switches from using results from the ERP's streaming
mode of operation to results from the ERP's reporting mode of
operation when the higher bandwidth results from the reporting mode
outstrip the amount of data processed by the search head in the
streaming mode of ERP operation.
[0093] A reporting mode may have a higher bandwidth because the ERP
does not have to spend time transferring data to the search head
for processing all the machine data. In addition, the ERP may
optionally direct another processor to do the processing.
[0094] The streaming mode of operation does not need to be stopped
to gain the higher bandwidth benefits of a reporting mode; the
search head could simply stop using the streaming mode results--and
start using the reporting mode results--when the bandwidth of the
reporting mode has caught up with or exceeded the amount of
bandwidth provided by the streaming mode. Thus, a variety of
triggers and ways to accomplish a search head's switch from using
streaming mode results to using reporting mode results may be
appreciated by one skilled in the art.
[0095] The reporting mode can involve the ERP process (or an
external system) performing event breaking, time stamping,
filtering of events to match the search query request, and
calculating statistics on the results. The user can request
particular types of data, such as if the search query itself
involves types of events, or the search request may ask for
statistics on data, such as on events that meet the search request.
In either case, the search head understands the query language used
in the received query request, which may be a proprietary language.
One exemplary query language is Splunk Processing Language (SPL)
developed by the assignee of the application, Splunk Inc. The
search head typically understands how to use that language to
obtain data from the indexers, which store data in a format used by
the SPLUNK.RTM. Enterprise system.
[0096] The ERP processes support the search head, as the search
head is not ordinarily configured to understand the format in which
data is stored in external data sources such as Hadoop or SQL data
systems. Rather, the ERP process performs that translation from the
query submitted in the search support system's native format (e.g.,
SPL if SPLUNK.RTM. ENTERPRISE is used as the search support system)
to a search query request format that will be accepted by the
corresponding external data system. The external data system
typically stores data in a different format from that of the search
support system's native index format, and it utilizes a different
query language (e.g., SQL or MapReduce, rather than SPL or the
like).
[0097] As noted, the ERP process can operate in the streaming mode
alone. After the ERP process has performed the translation of the
query request and received raw results from the streaming mode, the
search head can integrate the returned data with any data obtained
from local data sources (e.g., native to the search support
system), other external data sources, and other ERP processes (if
such operations were required to satisfy the terms of the search
query). An advantage of mixed mode operation is that, in addition
to streaming mode, the ERP process is also executing concurrently
in reporting mode. Thus, the ERP process (rather than the search
head) is processing query results (e.g., performing event breaking,
timestamping, filtering, possibly calculating statistics if
required to be responsive to the search query request, etc.). It
should be apparent to those skilled in the art that additional time
is needed for the ERP process to perform the processing in such a
configuration. Therefore, the streaming mode will allow the search
head to start returning interim results to the user at the client
device before the ERP process can complete sufficient processing to
start returning any search results. The switchover between
streaming and reporting mode happens when the ERP process
determines that the switchover is appropriate, such as when the ERP
process determines it can begin returning meaningful results from
its reporting mode.
[0098] The operation described above illustrates the source of
operational latency: streaming mode has low latency (immediate
results) and usually has relatively low bandwidth (fewer results
can be returned per unit of time). In contrast, the concurrently
running reporting mode has relatively high latency (it has to
perform a lot more processing before returning any results) and
usually has relatively high bandwidth (more results can be
processed per unit of time). For example, when the ERP process does
begin returning report results, it returns more processed results
than in the streaming mode, because, e.g., statistics only need to
be calculated to be responsive to the search request. That is, the
ERP process doesn't have to take time to first return machine data
to the search head. As noted, the ERP process could be configured
to operate in streaming mode alone and return just the machine data
for the search head to process in a way that is responsive to the
search request. Alternatively, the ERP process can be configured to
operate in the reporting mode only. Also, the ERP process can be
configured to operate in streaming mode and reporting mode
concurrently, as described, with the ERP process stopping the
transmission of streaming results to the search head when the
concurrently running reporting mode has caught up and started
providing results. The reporting mode does not require the
processing of all machine data that is responsive to the search
query request before the ERP process starts returning results;
rather, the reporting mode usually performs processing of chunks of
events and returns the processing results to the search head for
each chunk.
[0099] For example, an ERP process can be configured to merely
return the contents of a search result file verbatim, with little
or no processing of results. That way, the search head performs all
processing (such as parsing byte streams into events, filtering,
etc.). The ERP process can be configured to perform additional
intelligence, such as analyzing the search request and handling all
the computation that a native search indexer process would
otherwise perform. In this way, the configured ERP process provides
greater flexibility in features while operating according to
desired preferences, such as response latency and resource
requirements.
2.7. Data Ingestion
[0100] FIG. 5A is a flow chart of an example method that
illustrates how indexers process, index, and store data received
from forwarders, in accordance with example embodiments. The data
flow illustrated in FIG. 5A is provided for illustrative purposes
only; those skilled in the art would understand that one or more of
the steps of the processes illustrated in FIG. 5A may be removed or
that the ordering of the steps may be changed. Furthermore, for the
purposes of illustrating a clear example, one or more particular
system components are described in the context of performing
various operations during each of the data flow stages. For
example, a forwarder is described as receiving and processing
machine data during an input phase; an indexer is described as
parsing and indexing machine data during parsing and indexing
phases; and a search head is described as performing a search query
during a search phase. However, other system arrangements and
distributions of the processing steps across system components may
be used.
2.7.1. Input
[0101] At block 502, a forwarder receives data from an input
source, such as a data source 202 shown in FIG. 2. A forwarder
initially may receive the data as a raw data stream generated by
the input source. For example, a forwarder may receive a data
stream from a log file generated by an application server, from a
stream of network data from a network device, or from any other
source of data. In some embodiments, a forwarder receives the raw
data and may segment the data stream into "blocks", possibly of a
uniform data size, to facilitate subsequent processing steps.
[0102] At block 504, a forwarder or other system component
annotates each block generated from the raw data with one or more
metadata fields. These metadata fields may, for example, provide
information related to the data block as a whole and may apply to
each event that is subsequently derived from the data in the data
block. For example, the metadata fields may include separate fields
specifying each of a host, a source, and a source type related to
the data block. A host field may contain a value identifying a host
name or IP address of a device that generated the data. A source
field may contain a value identifying a source of the data, such as
a pathname of a file or a protocol and port related to received
network data. A source type field may contain a value specifying a
particular source type label for the data. Additional metadata
fields may also be included during the input phase, such as a
character encoding of the data, if known, and possibly other values
that provide information relevant to later processing steps. In
some embodiments, a forwarder forwards the annotated data blocks to
another system component (typically an indexer) for further
processing.
[0103] The data intake and query system allows forwarding of data
from one data intake and query instance to another, or even to a
third-party system. The data intake and query system can employ
different types of forwarders in a configuration.
[0104] In some embodiments, a forwarder may contain the essential
components needed to forward data. A forwarder can gather data from
a variety of inputs and forward the data to an indexer for indexing
and searching. A forwarder can also tag metadata (e.g., source,
source type, host, etc.).
[0105] In some embodiments, a forwarder has the capabilities of the
aforementioned forwarder as well as additional capabilities. The
forwarder can parse data before forwarding the data (e.g., can
associate a time stamp with a portion of data and create an event,
etc.) and can route data based on criteria such as source or type
of event. The forwarder can also index data locally while
forwarding the data to another indexer.
2.7.2. Parsing
[0106] At block 506, an indexer receives data blocks from a
forwarder and parses the data to organize the data into events. In
some embodiments, to organize the data into events, an indexer may
determine a source type associated with each data block (e.g., by
extracting a source type label from the metadata fields associated
with the data block, etc.) and refer to a source type configuration
corresponding to the identified source type. The source type
definition may include one or more properties that indicate to the
indexer to automatically determine the boundaries within the
received data that indicate the portions of machine data for
events. In general, these properties may include regular
expression-based rules or delimiter rules where, for example, event
boundaries may be indicated by predefined characters or character
strings. These predefined characters may include punctuation marks
or other special characters including, for example, carriage
returns, tabs, spaces, line breaks, etc. If a source type for the
data is unknown to the indexer, an indexer may infer a source type
for the data by examining the structure of the data. Then, the
indexer can apply an inferred source type definition to the data to
create the events.
[0107] At block 508, the indexer determines a timestamp for each
event. Similar to the process for parsing machine data, an indexer
may again refer to a source type definition associated with the
data to locate one or more properties that indicate instructions
for determining a timestamp for each event. The properties may, for
example, instruct an indexer to extract a time value from a portion
of data for the event, to interpolate time values based on
timestamps associated with temporally proximate events, to create a
timestamp based on a time the portion of machine data was received
or generated, to use the timestamp of a previous event, or use any
other rules for determining timestamps.
[0108] At block 510, the indexer associates with each event one or
more metadata fields including a field containing the timestamp
determined for the event. In some embodiments, a timestamp may be
included in the metadata fields. These metadata fields may include
any number of "default fields" that are associated with all events,
and may also include one more custom fields as defined by a user.
Similar to the metadata fields associated with the data blocks at
block 504, the default metadata fields associated with each event
may include a host, source, and source type field including or in
addition to a field storing the timestamp.
[0109] At block 512, an indexer may optionally apply one or more
transformations to data included in the events created at block
506. For example, such transformations can include removing a
portion of an event (e.g., a portion used to define event
boundaries, extraneous characters from the event, other extraneous
text, etc.), masking a portion of an event (e.g., masking a credit
card number), removing redundant portions of an event, etc. The
transformations applied to events may, for example, be specified in
one or more configuration files and referenced by one or more
source type definitions.
[0110] FIG. 5C illustrates an illustrative example of machine data
can be stored in a data store in accordance with various disclosed
embodiments. In other embodiments, machine data can be stored in a
flat file in a corresponding bucket with an associated index file,
such as a time series index or "TSIDX." As such, the depiction of
machine data and associated metadata as rows and columns in the
table of FIG. 5C is merely illustrative and is not intended to
limit the data format in which the machine data and metadata is
stored in various embodiments described herein. In one particular
embodiment, machine data can be stored in a compressed or encrypted
formatted. In such embodiments, the machine data can be stored with
or be associated with data that describes the compression or
encryption scheme with which the machine data is stored. The
information about the compression or encryption scheme can be used
to decompress or decrypt the machine data, and any metadata with
which it is stored, at search time.
[0111] As mentioned above, certain metadata, e.g., host 536, source
537, source type 538 and timestamps 535 can be generated for each
event, and associated with a corresponding portion of machine data
539 when storing the event data in a data store, e.g., data store
208. Any of the metadata can be extracted from the corresponding
machine data, or supplied or defined by an entity, such as a user
or computer system. The metadata fields can become part of or
stored with the event. Note that while the time-stamp metadata
field can be extracted from the raw data of each event, the values
for the other metadata fields may be determined by the indexer
based on information it receives pertaining to the source of the
data separate from the machine data.
[0112] While certain default or user-defined metadata fields can be
extracted from the machine data for indexing purposes, all the
machine data within an event can be maintained in its original
condition. As such, in embodiments in which the portion of machine
data included in an event is unprocessed or otherwise unaltered, it
is referred to herein as a portion of raw machine data. In other
embodiments, the port of machine data in an event can be processed
or otherwise altered. As such, unless certain information needs to
be removed for some reasons (e.g. extraneous information,
confidential information), all the raw machine data contained in an
event can be preserved and saved in its original form. Accordingly,
the data store in which the event records are stored is sometimes
referred to as a "raw record data store." The raw record data store
contains a record of the raw event data tagged with the various
default fields.
[0113] In FIG. 5C, the first three rows of the table represent
events 531, 532, and 533 and are related to a server access log
that records requests from multiple clients processed by a server,
as indicated by entry of "access.log" in the source column 536.
[0114] In the example shown in FIG. 5C, each of the events 531-534
is associated with a discrete request made from a client device.
The raw machine data generated by the server and extracted from a
server access log can include the IP address of the client 540, the
user id of the person requesting the document 541, the time the
server finished processing the request 542, the request line from
the client 543, the status code returned by the server to the
client 545, the size of the object returned to the client (in this
case, the gif file requested by the client) 546 and the time spent
to serve the request in microseconds 544. As seen in FIG. 5C, all
the raw machine data retrieved from the server access log is
retained and stored as part of the corresponding events, 1221,
1222, and 1223 in the data store.
[0115] Event 534 is associated with an entry in a server error log,
as indicated by "error.log" in the source column 537, that records
errors that the server encountered when processing a client
request. Similar to the events related to the server access log,
all the raw machine data in the error log file pertaining to event
534 can be preserved and stored as part of the event 534.
[0116] Saving minimally processed or unprocessed machine data in a
data store associated with metadata fields in the manner similar to
that shown in FIG. 5C is advantageous because it allows search of
all the machine data at search time instead of searching only
previously specified and identified fields or field-value pairs. As
mentioned above, because data structures used by various
embodiments of the present disclosure maintain the underlying raw
machine data and use a late-binding schema for searching the raw
machines data, it enables a user to continue investigating and
learn valuable insights about the raw data. In other words, the
user is not compelled to know about all the fields of information
that will be needed at data ingestion time. As a user learns more
about the data in the events, the user can continue to refine the
late-binding schema by defining new extraction rules, or modifying
or deleting existing extraction rules used by the system.
2.7.3. Indexing
[0117] At blocks 514 and 516, an indexer can optionally generate a
keyword index to facilitate fast keyword searching for events. To
build a keyword index, at block 514, the indexer identifies a set
of keywords in each event. At block 516, the indexer includes the
identified keywords in an index, which associates each stored
keyword with reference pointers to events containing that keyword
(or to locations within events where that keyword is located, other
location identifiers, etc.). When an indexer subsequently receives
a keyword-based query, the indexer can access the keyword index to
quickly identify events containing the keyword.
[0118] In some embodiments, the keyword index may include entries
for field name-value pairs found in events, where a field
name-value pair can include a pair of keywords connected by a
symbol, such as an equals sign or colon. This way, events
containing these field name-value pairs can be quickly located. In
some embodiments, fields can automatically be generated for some or
all of the field names of the field name-value pairs at the time of
indexing. For example, if the string "dest=10.0.1.2" is found in an
event, a field named "dest" may be created for the event, and
assigned a value of "10.0.1.2".
[0119] At block 518, the indexer stores the events with an
associated timestamp in a data store 208. Timestamps enable a user
to search for events based on a time range. In some embodiments,
the stored events are organized into "buckets," where each bucket
stores events associated with a specific time range based on the
timestamps associated with each event. This improves time-based
searching, as well as allows for events with recent timestamps,
which may have a higher likelihood of being accessed, to be stored
in a faster memory to facilitate faster retrieval. For example,
buckets containing the most recent events can be stored in flash
memory rather than on a hard disk. In some embodiments, each bucket
may be associated with an identifier, a time range, and a size
constraint.
[0120] Each indexer 206 may be responsible for storing and
searching a subset of the events contained in a corresponding data
store 208. By distributing events among the indexers and data
stores, the indexers can analyze events for a query in parallel.
For example, using map-reduce techniques, each indexer returns
partial responses for a subset of events to a search head that
combines the results to produce an answer for the query. By storing
events in buckets for specific time ranges, an indexer may further
optimize the data retrieval process by searching buckets
corresponding to time ranges that are relevant to a query.
[0121] In some embodiments, each indexer has a home directory and a
cold directory. The home directory of an indexer stores hot buckets
and warm buckets, and the cold directory of an indexer stores cold
buckets. A hot bucket is a bucket that is capable of receiving and
storing events. A warm bucket is a bucket that can no longer
receive events for storage but has not yet been moved to the cold
directory. A cold bucket is a bucket that can no longer receive
events and may be a bucket that was previously stored in the home
directory. The home directory may be stored in faster memory, such
as flash memory, as events may be actively written to the home
directory, and the home directory may typically store events that
are more frequently searched and thus are accessed more frequently.
The cold directory may be stored in slower and/or larger memory,
such as a hard disk, as events are no longer being written to the
cold directory, and the cold directory may typically store events
that are not as frequently searched and thus are accessed less
frequently. In some embodiments, an indexer may also have a
quarantine bucket that contains events having potentially
inaccurate information, such as an incorrect time stamp associated
with the event or a time stamp that appears to be an unreasonable
time stamp for the corresponding event. The quarantine bucket may
have events from any time range; as such, the quarantine bucket may
always be searched at search time. Additionally, an indexer may
store old, archived data in a frozen bucket that is not capable of
being searched at search time. In some embodiments, a frozen bucket
may be stored in slower and/or larger memory, such as a hard disk,
and may be stored in offline and/or remote storage.
[0122] Moreover, events and buckets can also be replicated across
different indexers and data stores to facilitate high availability
and disaster recovery as described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,130,971,
entitled "Site-Based Search Affinity", issued on 8 Sep. 2015, and
in U.S. patent Ser. No. 14/266,817, entitled "Multi-Site
Clustering", issued on 1 Sep. 2015, each of which is hereby
incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
[0123] FIG. 5B is a block diagram of an example data store 501 that
includes a directory for each index (or partition) that contains a
portion of data managed by an indexer. FIG. 5B further illustrates
details of an embodiment of an inverted index 507B and an event
reference array 515 associated with inverted index 507B.
[0124] The data store 501 can correspond to a data store 208 that
stores events managed by an indexer 206 or can correspond to a
different data store associated with an indexer 206. In the
illustrated embodiment, the data store 501 includes a _main
directory 503 associated with a _main index and a _test directory
505 associated with a _test index. However, the data store 501 can
include fewer or more directories. In some embodiments, multiple
indexes can share a single directory or all indexes can share a
common directory. Additionally, although illustrated as a single
data store 501, it will be understood that the data store 501 can
be implemented as multiple data stores storing different portions
of the information shown in FIG. 5B. For example, a single index or
partition can span multiple directories or multiple data stores,
and can be indexed or searched by multiple corresponding
indexers.
[0125] In the illustrated embodiment of FIG. 5B, the index-specific
directories 503 and 505 include inverted indexes 507A, 507B and
509A, 509B, respectively. The inverted indexes 507A . . . 507B, and
509A . . . 509B can be keyword indexes or field-value pair indexes
described herein and can include less or more information that
depicted in FIG. 5B.
[0126] In some embodiments, the inverted index 507A . . . 507B, and
509A . . . 509B can correspond to a distinct time-series bucket
that is managed by the indexer 206 and that contains events
corresponding to the relevant index (e.g., _main index, _test
index). As such, each inverted index can correspond to a particular
range of time for an index. Additional files, such as high
performance indexes for each time-series bucket of an index, can
also be stored in the same directory as the inverted indexes 507A .
. . 507B, and 509A . . . 509B. In some embodiments inverted index
507A . . . 507B, and 509A . . . 509B can correspond to multiple
time-series buckets or inverted indexes 507A . . . 507B, and 509A .
. . 509B can correspond to a single time-series bucket.
[0127] Each inverted index 507A . . . 507B, and 509A . . . 509B can
include one or more entries, such as keyword (or token) entries or
field-value pair entries. Furthermore, in certain embodiments, the
inverted indexes 507A . . . 507B, and 509A . . . 509B can include
additional information, such as a time range 523 associated with
the inverted index or an index identifier 525 identifying the index
associated with the inverted index 507A . . . 507B, and 509A . . .
509B. However, each inverted index 507A . . . 507B, and 509A . . .
509B can include less or more information than depicted.
[0128] Token entries, such as token entries 511 illustrated in
inverted index 507B, can include a token 511A (e.g., "error,"
"itemID," etc.) and event references 511B indicative of events that
include the token. For example, for the token "error," the
corresponding token entry includes the token "error" and an event
reference, or unique identifier, for each event stored in the
corresponding time-series bucket that includes the token "error."
In the illustrated embodiment of FIG. 5B, the error token entry
includes the identifiers 3, 5, 6, 8, 11, and 12 corresponding to
events managed by the indexer 206 and associated with the index
_main 503 that are located in the time-series bucket associated
with the inverted index 507B.
[0129] In some cases, some token entries can be default entries,
automatically determined entries, or user specified entries. In
some embodiments, the indexer 206 can identify each word or string
in an event as a distinct token and generate a token entry for it.
In some cases, the indexer 206 can identify the beginning and
ending of tokens based on punctuation, spaces, as described in
greater detail herein. In certain cases, the indexer 206 can rely
on user input or a configuration file to identify tokens for token
entries 511, etc. It will be understood that any combination of
token entries can be included as a default, automatically
determined, a or included based on user-specified criteria.
[0130] Similarly, field-value pair entries, such as field-value
pair entries 513 shown in inverted index 507B, can include a
field-value pair 513A and event references 513B indicative of
events that include a field value that corresponds to the
field-value pair. For example, for a field-value pair
sourcetype::sendmail, a field-value pair entry would include the
field-value pair sourcetype::sendmail and a unique identifier, or
event reference, for each event stored in the corresponding
time-series bucket that includes a sendmail sourcetype.
[0131] In some cases, the field-value pair entries 513 can be
default entries, automatically determined entries, or user
specified entries. As a non-limiting example, the field-value pair
entries for the fields host, source, sourcetype can be included in
the inverted indexes 507A . . . 507B, and 509A . . . 509B as a
default. As such, all of the inverted indexes 507A . . . 507B, and
509A . . . 509B can include field-value pair entries for the fields
host, source, sourcetype. As yet another non-limiting example, the
field-value pair entries for the IP_address field can be user
specified and may only appear in the inverted index 507B based on
user-specified criteria. As another non-limiting example, as the
indexer indexes the events, it can automatically identify
field-value pairs and create field-value pair entries. For example,
based on the indexers review of events, it can identify IP_address
as a field in each event and add the IP_address field-value pair
entries to the inverted index 507B. It will be understood that any
combination of field-value pair entries can be included as a
default, automatically determined, or included based on
user-specified criteria.
[0132] Each unique identifier 517, or event reference, can
correspond to a unique event located in the time series bucket.
However, the same event reference can be located in multiple
entries. For example if an event has a sourcetype splunkd, host
www1 and token "warning," then the unique identifier for the event
will appear in the field-value pair entries sourcetype::splunkd and
host::www1, as well as the token entry "warning." With reference to
the illustrated embodiment of FIG. 5B and the event that
corresponds to the event reference 3, the event reference 3 is
found in the field-value pair entries 513 host::hostA,
source::sourceB, sourcetype::sourcetypeA, and
IP_address::91.205.189.15 indicating that the event corresponding
to the event references is from hostA, sourceB, of sourcetypeA, and
includes 91.205.189.15 in the event data.
[0133] For some fields, the unique identifier is located in only
one field-value pair entry for a particular field. For example, the
inverted index may include four sourcetype field-value pair entries
corresponding to four different sourcetypes of the events stored in
a bucket (e.g., sourcetypes: sendmail, splunkd, web_access, and
web_service). Within those four sourcetype field-value pair
entries, an identifier for a particular event may appear in only
one of the field-value pair entries. With continued reference to
the example illustrated embodiment of FIG. 5B, since the event
reference 7 appears in the field-value pair entry
sourcetype::sourcetypeA, then it does not appear in the other
field-value pair entries for the sourcetype field, including
sourcetype::sourcetypeB, sourcetype::sourcetypeC, and
sourcetype::sourcetypeD.
[0134] The event references 517 can be used to locate the events in
the corresponding bucket. For example, the inverted index can
include, or be associated with, an event reference array 515. The
event reference array 515 can include an array entry 517 for each
event reference in the inverted index 507B. Each array entry 517
can include location information 519 of the event corresponding to
the unique identifier (non-limiting example: seek address of the
event), a timestamp 521 associated with the event, or additional
information regarding the event associated with the event
reference, etc.
[0135] For each token entry 511 or field-value pair entry 513, the
event reference 501B or unique identifiers can be listed in
chronological order or the value of the event reference can be
assigned based on chronological data, such as a timestamp
associated with the event referenced by the event reference. For
example, the event reference 1 in the illustrated embodiment of
FIG. 5B can correspond to the first-in-time event for the bucket,
and the event reference 12 can correspond to the last-in-time event
for the bucket. However, the event references can be listed in any
order, such as reverse chronological order, ascending order,
descending order, or some other order, etc. Further, the entries
can be sorted. For example, the entries can be sorted
alphabetically (collectively or within a particular group), by
entry origin (e.g., default, automatically generated,
user-specified, etc.), by entry type (e.g., field-value pair entry,
token entry, etc.), or chronologically by when added to the
inverted index, etc. In the illustrated embodiment of FIG. 5B, the
entries are sorted first by entry type and then alphabetically.
[0136] As a non-limiting example of how the inverted indexes 507A .
. . 507B, and 509A . . . 509B can be used during a data
categorization request command, the indexers can receive filter
criteria indicating data that is to be categorized and
categorization criteria indicating how the data is to be
categorized. Example filter criteria can include, but is not
limited to, indexes (or partitions), hosts, sources, sourcetypes,
time ranges, field identifier, keywords, etc.
[0137] Using the filter criteria, the indexer identifies relevant
inverted indexes to be searched. For example, if the filter
criteria includes a set of partitions, the indexer can identify the
inverted indexes stored in the directory corresponding to the
particular partition as relevant inverted indexes. Other means can
be used to identify inverted indexes associated with a partition of
interest. For example, in some embodiments, the indexer can review
an entry in the inverted indexes, such as an index-value pair entry
513 to determine if a particular inverted index is relevant. If the
filter criteria does not identify any partition, then the indexer
can identify all inverted indexes managed by the indexer as
relevant inverted indexes.
[0138] Similarly, if the filter criteria includes a time range, the
indexer can identify inverted indexes corresponding to buckets that
satisfy at least a portion of the time range as relevant inverted
indexes. For example, if the time range is last hour then the
indexer can identify all inverted indexes that correspond to
buckets storing events associated with timestamps within the last
hour as relevant inverted indexes.
[0139] When used in combination, an index filter criterion
specifying one or more partitions and a time range filter criterion
specifying a particular time range can be used to identify a subset
of inverted indexes within a particular directory (or otherwise
associated with a particular partition) as relevant inverted
indexes. As such, the indexer can focus the processing to only a
subset of the total number of inverted indexes that the indexer
manages.
[0140] Once the relevant inverted indexes are identified, the
indexer can review them using any additional filter criteria to
identify events that satisfy the filter criteria. In some cases,
using the known location of the directory in which the relevant
inverted indexes are located, the indexer can determine that any
events identified using the relevant inverted indexes satisfy an
index filter criterion. For example, if the filter criteria
includes a partition main, then the indexer can determine that any
events identified using inverted indexes within the partition main
directory (or otherwise associated with the partition main) satisfy
the index filter criterion.
[0141] Furthermore, based on the time range associated with each
inverted index, the indexer can determine that that any events
identified using a particular inverted index satisfies a time range
filter criterion. For example, if a time range filter criterion is
for the last hour and a particular inverted index corresponds to
events within a time range of 50 minutes ago to 35 minutes ago, the
indexer can determine that any events identified using the
particular inverted index satisfy the time range filter criterion.
Conversely, if the particular inverted index corresponds to events
within a time range of 59 minutes ago to 62 minutes ago, the
indexer can determine that some events identified using the
particular inverted index may not satisfy the time range filter
criterion.
[0142] Using the inverted indexes, the indexer can identify event
references (and therefore events) that satisfy the filter criteria.
For example, if the token "error" is a filter criterion, the
indexer can track all event references within the token entry
"error." Similarly, the indexer can identify other event references
located in other token entries or field-value pair entries that
match the filter criteria. The system can identify event references
located in all of the entries identified by the filter criteria.
For example, if the filter criteria include the token "error" and
field-value pair sourcetype::web_ui, the indexer can track the
event references found in both the token entry "error" and the
field-value pair entry sourcetype::web_ui. As mentioned previously,
in some cases, such as when multiple values are identified for a
particular filter criterion (e.g., multiple sources for a source
filter criterion), the system can identify event references located
in at least one of the entries corresponding to the multiple values
and in all other entries identified by the filter criteria. The
indexer can determine that the events associated with the
identified event references satisfy the filter criteria.
[0143] In some cases, the indexer can further consult a timestamp
associated with the event reference to determine whether an event
satisfies the filter criteria. For example, if an inverted index
corresponds to a time range that is partially outside of a time
range filter criterion, then the indexer can consult a timestamp
associated with the event reference to determine whether the
corresponding event satisfies the time range criterion. In some
embodiments, to identify events that satisfy a time range, the
indexer can review an array, such as the event reference array 515
that identifies the time associated with the events. Furthermore,
as mentioned above using the known location of the directory in
which the relevant inverted indexes are located (or other index
identifier), the indexer can determine that any events identified
using the relevant inverted indexes satisfy the index filter
criterion.
[0144] In some cases, based on the filter criteria, the indexer
reviews an extraction rule. In certain embodiments, if the filter
criteria includes a field name that does not correspond to a
field-value pair entry in an inverted index, the indexer can review
an extraction rule, which may be located in a configuration file,
to identify a field that corresponds to a field-value pair entry in
the inverted index.
[0145] For example, the filter criteria includes a field name
"sessionID" and the indexer determines that at least one relevant
inverted index does not include a field-value pair entry
corresponding to the field name sessionID, the indexer can review
an extraction rule that identifies how the sessionID field is to be
extracted from a particular host, source, or sourcetype (implicitly
identifying the particular host, source, or sourcetype that
includes a sessionID field). The indexer can replace the field name
"sessionID" in the filter criteria with the identified host,
source, or sourcetype. In some cases, the field name "sessionID"
may be associated with multiples hosts, sources, or sourcetypes, in
which case, all identified hosts, sources, and sourcetypes can be
added as filter criteria. In some cases, the identified host,
source, or sourcetype can replace or be appended to a filter
criterion, or be excluded. For example, if the filter criteria
includes a criterion for source S1 and the "sessionID" field is
found in source S2, the source S2 can replace S1 in the filter
criteria, be appended such that the filter criteria includes source
S1 and source S2, or be excluded based on the presence of the
filter criterion source S1. If the identified host, source, or
sourcetype is included in the filter criteria, the indexer can then
identify a field-value pair entry in the inverted index that
includes a field value corresponding to the identity of the
particular host, source, or sourcetype identified using the
extraction rule.
[0146] Once the events that satisfy the filter criteria are
identified, the system, such as the indexer 206 can categorize the
results based on the categorization criteria. The categorization
criteria can include categories for grouping the results, such as
any combination of partition, source, sourcetype, or host, or other
categories or fields as desired.
[0147] The indexer can use the categorization criteria to identify
categorization criteria-value pairs or categorization criteria
values by which to categorize or group the results. The
categorization criteria-value pairs can correspond to one or more
field-value pair entries stored in a relevant inverted index, one
or more index-value pairs based on a directory in which the
inverted index is located or an entry in the inverted index (or
other means by which an inverted index can be associated with a
partition), or other criteria-value pair that identifies a general
category and a particular value for that category. The
categorization criteria values can correspond to the value portion
of the categorization criteria-value pair.
[0148] As mentioned, in some cases, the categorization
criteria-value pairs can correspond to one or more field-value pair
entries stored in the relevant inverted indexes. For example, the
categorization criteria-value pairs can correspond to field-value
pair entries of host, source, and sourcetype (or other field-value
pair entry as desired). For instance, if there are ten different
hosts, four different sources, and five different sourcetypes for
an inverted index, then the inverted index can include ten host
field-value pair entries, four source field-value pair entries, and
five sourcetype field-value pair entries. The indexer can use the
nineteen distinct field-value pair entries as categorization
criteria-value pairs to group the results.
[0149] Specifically, the indexer can identify the location of the
event references associated with the events that satisfy the filter
criteria within the field-value pairs, and group the event
references based on their location. As such, the indexer can
identify the particular field value associated with the event
corresponding to the event reference. For example, if the
categorization criteria include host and sourcetype, the host
field-value pair entries and sourcetype field-value pair entries
can be used as categorization criteria-value pairs to identify the
specific host and sourcetype associated with the events that
satisfy the filter criteria.
[0150] In addition, as mentioned, categorization criteria-value
pairs can correspond to data other than the field-value pair
entries in the relevant inverted indexes. For example, if partition
or index is used as a categorization criterion, the inverted
indexes may not include partition field-value pair entries. Rather,
the indexer can identify the categorization criteria-value pair
associated with the partition based on the directory in which an
inverted index is located, information in the inverted index, or
other information that associates the inverted index with the
partition, etc. As such a variety of methods can be used to
identify the categorization criteria-value pairs from the
categorization criteria.
[0151] Accordingly based on the categorization criteria (and
categorization criteria-value pairs), the indexer can generate
groupings based on the events that satisfy the filter criteria. As
a non-limiting example, if the categorization criteria includes a
partition and sourcetype, then the groupings can correspond to
events that are associated with each unique combination of
partition and sourcetype. For instance, if there are three
different partitions and two different sourcetypes associated with
the identified events, then the six different groups can be formed,
each with a unique partition value-sourcetype value combination.
Similarly, if the categorization criteria includes partition,
sourcetype, and host and there are two different partitions, three
sourcetypes, and five hosts associated with the identified events,
then the indexer can generate up to thirty groups for the results
that satisfy the filter criteria. Each group can be associated with
a unique combination of categorization criteria-value pairs (e.g.,
unique combinations of partition value sourcetype value, and host
value).
[0152] In addition, the indexer can count the number of events
associated with each group based on the number of events that meet
the unique combination of categorization criteria for a particular
group (or match the categorization criteria-value pairs for the
particular group). With continued reference to the example above,
the indexer can count the number of events that meet the unique
combination of partition, sourcetype, and host for a particular
group.
[0153] Each indexer communicates the groupings to the search head.
The search head can aggregate the groupings from the indexers and
provide the groupings for display. In some cases, the groups are
displayed based on at least one of the host, source, sourcetype, or
partition associated with the groupings. In some embodiments, the
search head can further display the groups based on display
criteria, such as a display order or a sort order as described in
greater detail above.
[0154] As a non-limiting example and with reference to FIG. 5B,
consider a request received by an indexer 206 that includes the
following filter criteria: keyword=error, partition=_main, time
range=3/1/17 16:22.00.000-16:28.00.000, sourcetype=sourcetypeC,
host=hostB, and the following categorization criteria: source.
[0155] Based on the above criteria, the indexer 206 identifies
_main directory 503 and can ignore _test directory 505 and any
other partition-specific directories. The indexer determines that
inverted partition 507B is a relevant partition based on its
location within the _main directory 503 and the time range
associated with it. For sake of simplicity in this example, the
indexer 206 determines that no other inverted indexes in the _main
directory 503, such as inverted index 507A satisfy the time range
criterion.
[0156] Having identified the relevant inverted index 507B, the
indexer reviews the token entries 511 and the field-value pair
entries 513 to identify event references, or events, that satisfy
all of the filter criteria.
[0157] With respect to the token entries 511, the indexer can
review the error token entry and identify event references 3, 5, 6,
8, 11, 12, indicating that the term "error" is found in the
corresponding events. Similarly, the indexer can identify event
references 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11 in the field-value pair entry
sourcetype::sourcetypeC and event references 2, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11 in
the field-value pair entry host::hostB. As the filter criteria did
not include a source or an IP_address field-value pair, the indexer
can ignore those field-value pair entries.
[0158] In addition to identifying event references found in at
least one token entry or field-value pair entry (e.g., event
references 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12), the indexer can identify
events (and corresponding event references) that satisfy the time
range criterion using the event reference array 515 (e.g., event
references 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10). Using the information
obtained from the inverted index 507B (including the event
reference array 515), the indexer 206 can identify the event
references that satisfy all of the filter criteria (e.g., event
references 5, 6, 8).
[0159] Having identified the events (and event references) that
satisfy all of the filter criteria, the indexer 206 can group the
event references using the received categorization criteria
(source). In doing so, the indexer can determine that event
references 5 and 6 are located in the field-value pair entry
source::sourceD (or have matching categorization criteria-value
pairs) and event reference 8 is located in the field-value pair
entry source::sourceC. Accordingly, the indexer can generate a
sourceC group having a count of one corresponding to reference 8
and a sourceD group having a count of two corresponding to
references 5 and 6. This information can be communicated to the
search head. In turn the search head can aggregate the results from
the various indexers and display the groupings. As mentioned above,
in some embodiments, the groupings can be displayed based at least
in part on the categorization criteria, including at least one of
host, source, sourcetype, or partition.
[0160] It will be understood that a change to any of the filter
criteria or categorization criteria can result in different
groupings. As a one non-limiting example, a request received by an
indexer 206 that includes the following filter criteria:
partition=_main, time range=3/1/17 3/1/17
16:21:20.000-16:28:17.000, and the following categorization
criteria: host, source, sourcetype would result in the indexer
identifying event references 1-12 as satisfying the filter
criteria. The indexer would then generate up to 24 groupings
corresponding to the 24 different combinations of the
categorization criteria-value pairs, including host (hostA, hostB),
source (sourceA, sourceB, sourceC, sourceD), and sourcetype
(sourcetypeA, sourcetypeB, sourcetypeC). However, as there are only
twelve events identifiers in the illustrated embodiment and some
fall into the same grouping, the indexer generates eight groups and
counts as follows:
[0161] Group 1 (hostA, sourceA, sourcetypeA): 1 (event reference
7)
[0162] Group 2 (hostA, sourceA, sourcetypeB): 2 (event references
1, 12)
[0163] Group 3 (hostA, sourceA, sourcetypeC): 1 (event reference
4)
[0164] Group 4 (hostA, sourceB, sourcetypeA): 1 (event reference
3)
[0165] Group 5 (hostA, sourceB, sourcetypeC): 1 (event reference
9)
[0166] Group 6 (hostB, sourceC, sourcetypeA): 1 (event reference
2)
[0167] Group 7 (hostB, sourceC, sourcetypeC): 2 (event references
8, 11)
[0168] Group 8 (hostB, sourceD, sourcetypeC): 3 (event references
5, 6, 10)
[0169] As noted, each group has a unique combination of
categorization criteria-value pairs or categorization criteria
values. The indexer communicates the groups to the search head for
aggregation with results received from other indexers. In
communicating the groups to the search head, the indexer can
include the categorization criteria-value pairs for each group and
the count. In some embodiments, the indexer can include more or
less information. For example, the indexer can include the event
references associated with each group and other identifying
information, such as the indexer or inverted index used to identify
the groups.
[0170] As another non-limiting examples, a request received by an
indexer 206 that includes the following filter criteria:
partition=_main, time range=3/1/17 3/1/17
16:21:20.000-16:28:17.000, source=sourceA, sourceD, and
keyword=itemID and the following categorization criteria: host,
source, sourcetype would result in the indexer identifying event
references 4, 7, and 10 as satisfying the filter criteria, and
generate the following groups:
[0171] Group 1 (hostA, sourceA, sourcetypeC): 1 (event reference
4)
[0172] Group 2 (hostA, sourceA, sourcetypeA): 1 (event reference
7)
[0173] Group 3 (hostB, sourceD, sourcetypeC): 1 (event references
10)
[0174] The indexer communicates the groups to the search head for
aggregation with results received from other indexers. As will be
understand there are myriad ways for filtering and categorizing the
events and event references. For example, the indexer can review
multiple inverted indexes associated with an partition or review
the inverted indexes of multiple partitions, and categorize the
data using any one or any combination of partition, host, source,
sourcetype, or other category, as desired.
[0175] Further, if a user interacts with a particular group, the
indexer can provide additional information regarding the group. For
example, the indexer can perform a targeted search or sampling of
the events that satisfy the filter criteria and the categorization
criteria for the selected group, also referred to as the filter
criteria corresponding to the group or filter criteria associated
with the group.
[0176] In some cases, to provide the additional information, the
indexer relies on the inverted index. For example, the indexer can
identify the event references associated with the events that
satisfy the filter criteria and the categorization criteria for the
selected group and then use the event reference array 515 to access
some or all of the identified events. In some cases, the
categorization criteria values or categorization criteria-value
pairs associated with the group become part of the filter criteria
for the review.
[0177] With reference to FIG. 5B for instance, suppose a group is
displayed with a count of six corresponding to event references 4,
5, 6, 8, 10, 11 (i.e., event references 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11 satisfy
the filter criteria and are associated with matching categorization
criteria values or categorization criteria-value pairs) and a user
interacts with the group (e.g., selecting the group, clicking on
the group, etc.). In response, the search head communicates with
the indexer to provide additional information regarding the
group.
[0178] In some embodiments, the indexer identifies the event
references associated with the group using the filter criteria and
the categorization criteria for the group (e.g., categorization
criteria values or categorization criteria-value pairs unique to
the group). Together, the filter criteria and the categorization
criteria for the group can be referred to as the filter criteria
associated with the group. Using the filter criteria associated
with the group, the indexer identifies event references 4, 5, 6, 8,
10, 11.
[0179] Based on a sampling criteria, discussed in greater detail
above, the indexer can determine that it will analyze a sample of
the events associated with the event references 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11.
For example, the sample can include analyzing event data associated
with the event references 5, 8, 10. In some embodiments, the
indexer can use the event reference array 515 to access the event
data associated with the event references 5, 8, 10. Once accessed,
the indexer can compile the relevant information and provide it to
the search head for aggregation with results from other indexers.
By identifying events and sampling event data using the inverted
indexes, the indexer can reduce the amount of actual data this is
analyzed and the number of events that are accessed in order to
generate the summary of the group and provide a response in less
time.
2.8. Query Processing
[0180] FIG. 6A is a flow diagram of an example method that
illustrates how a search head and indexers perform a search query,
in accordance with example embodiments. At block 602, a search head
receives a search query from a client. At block 604, the search
head analyzes the search query to determine what portion(s) of the
query can be delegated to indexers and what portions of the query
can be executed locally by the search head. At block 606, the
search head distributes the determined portions of the query to the
appropriate indexers. In some embodiments, a search head cluster
may take the place of an independent search head where each search
head in the search head cluster coordinates with peer search heads
in the search head cluster to schedule jobs, replicate search
results, update configurations, fulfill search requests, etc. In
some embodiments, the search head (or each search head)
communicates with a master node (also known as a cluster master,
not shown in FIG. 2) that provides the search head with a list of
indexers to which the search head can distribute the determined
portions of the query. The master node maintains a list of active
indexers and can also designate which indexers may have
responsibility for responding to queries over certain sets of
events. A search head may communicate with the master node before
the search head distributes queries to indexers to discover the
addresses of active indexers.
[0181] At block 608, the indexers to which the query was
distributed, search data stores associated with them for events
that are responsive to the query. To determine which events are
responsive to the query, the indexer searches for events that match
the criteria specified in the query. These criteria can include
matching keywords or specific values for certain fields. The
searching operations at block 608 may use the late-binding schema
to extract values for specified fields from events at the time the
query is processed. In some embodiments, one or more rules for
extracting field values may be specified as part of a source type
definition in a configuration file. The indexers may then either
send the relevant events back to the search head, or use the events
to determine a partial result, and send the partial result back to
the search head.
[0182] At block 610, the search head combines the partial results
and/or events received from the indexers to produce a final result
for the query. In some examples, the results of the query are
indicative of performance or security of the IT environment and may
help improve the performance of components in the IT environment.
This final result may comprise different types of data depending on
what the query requested. For example, the results can include a
listing of matching events returned by the query, or some type of
visualization of the data from the returned events. In another
example, the final result can include one or more calculated values
derived from the matching events.
[0183] The results generated by the system 108 can be returned to a
client using different techniques. For example, one technique
streams results or relevant events back to a client in real-time as
they are identified. Another technique waits to report the results
to the client until a complete set of results (which may include a
set of relevant events or a result based on relevant events) is
ready to return to the client. Yet another technique streams
interim results or relevant events back to the client in real-time
until a complete set of results is ready, and then returns the
complete set of results to the client. In another technique,
certain results are stored as "search jobs" and the client may
retrieve the results by referring the search jobs.
[0184] The search head can also perform various operations to make
the search more efficient. For example, before the search head
begins execution of a query, the search head can determine a time
range for the query and a set of common keywords that all matching
events include. The search head may then use these parameters to
query the indexers to obtain a superset of the eventual results.
Then, during a filtering stage, the search head can perform
field-extraction operations on the superset to produce a reduced
set of search results. This speeds up queries, which may be
particularly helpful for queries that are performed on a periodic
basis.
2.9. Pipelined Search Language
[0185] Various embodiments of the present disclosure can be
implemented using, or in conjunction with, a pipelined command
language. A pipelined command language is a language in which a set
of inputs or data is operated on by a first command in a sequence
of commands, and then subsequent commands in the order they are
arranged in the sequence. Such commands can include any type of
functionality for operating on data, such as retrieving, searching,
filtering, aggregating, processing, transmitting, and the like. As
described herein, a query can thus be formulated in a pipelined
command language and include any number of ordered or unordered
commands for operating on data.
[0186] Splunk Processing Language (SPL) is an example of a
pipelined command language in which a set of inputs or data is
operated on by any number of commands in a particular sequence. A
sequence of commands, or command sequence, can be formulated such
that the order in which the commands are arranged defines the order
in which the commands are applied to a set of data or the results
of an earlier executed command. For example, a first command in a
command sequence can operate to search or filter for specific data
in particular set of data. The results of the first command can
then be passed to another command listed later in the command
sequence for further processing.
[0187] In various embodiments, a query can be formulated as a
command sequence defined in a command line of a search UI. In some
embodiments, a query can be formulated as a sequence of SPL
commands. Some or all of the SPL commands in the sequence of SPL
commands can be separated from one another by a pipe symbol "I". In
such embodiments, a set of data, such as a set of events, can be
operated on by a first SPL command in the sequence, and then a
subsequent SPL command following a pipe symbol "I" after the first
SPL command operates on the results produced by the first SPL
command or other set of data, and so on for any additional SPL
commands in the sequence. As such, a query formulated using SPL
comprises a series of consecutive commands that are delimited by
pipe "I" characters. The pipe character indicates to the system
that the output or result of one command (to the left of the pipe)
should be used as the input for one of the subsequent commands (to
the right of the pipe). This enables formulation of queries defined
by a pipeline of sequenced commands that refines or enhances the
data at each step along the pipeline until the desired results are
attained. Accordingly, various embodiments described herein can be
implemented with Splunk Processing Language (SPL) used in
conjunction with the SPLUNK.RTM. ENTERPRISE system.
[0188] While a query can be formulated in many ways, a query can
start with a search command and one or more corresponding search
terms at the beginning of the pipeline. Such search terms can
include any combination of keywords, phrases, times, dates, Boolean
expressions, fieldname-field value pairs, etc. that specify which
results should be obtained from an index. The results can then be
passed as inputs into subsequent commands in a sequence of commands
by using, for example, a pipe character. The subsequent commands in
a sequence can include directives for additional processing of the
results once it has been obtained from one or more indexes. For
example, commands may be used to filter unwanted information out of
the results, extract more information, evaluate field values,
calculate statistics, reorder the results, create an alert, create
summary of the results, or perform some type of aggregation
function. In some embodiments, the summary can include a graph,
chart, metric, or other visualization of the data. An aggregation
function can include analysis or calculations to return an
aggregate value, such as an average value, a sum, a maximum value,
a root mean square, statistical values, and the like.
[0189] Due to its flexible nature, use of a pipelined command
language in various embodiments is advantageous because it can
perform "filtering" as well as "processing" functions. In other
words, a single query can include a search command and search term
expressions, as well as data-analysis expressions. For example, a
command at the beginning of a query can perform a "filtering" step
by retrieving a set of data based on a condition (e.g., records
associated with server response times of less than 1 microsecond).
The results of the filtering step can then be passed to a
subsequent command in the pipeline that performs a "processing"
step (e.g. calculation of an aggregate value related to the
filtered events such as the average response time of servers with
response times of less than 1 microsecond). Furthermore, the search
command can allow events to be filtered by keyword as well as field
value criteria. For example, a search command can filter out all
events containing the word "warning" or filter out all events where
a field value associated with a field "clientip" is "10.0.1.2."
[0190] The results obtained or generated in response to a command
in a query can be considered a set of results data. The set of
results data can be passed from one command to another in any data
format. In one embodiment, the set of result data can be in the
form of a dynamically created table. Each command in a particular
query can redefine the shape of the table. In some implementations,
an event retrieved from an index in response to a query can be
considered a row with a column for each field value. Columns
contain basic information about the data and also may contain data
that has been dynamically extracted at search time.
[0191] FIG. 6B provides a visual representation of the manner in
which a pipelined command language or query operates in accordance
with the disclosed embodiments. The query 630 can be inputted by
the user into a search. The query comprises a search, the results
of which are piped to two commands (namely, command 1 and command
2) that follow the search step.
[0192] Disk 622 represents the event data in the raw record data
store.
[0193] When a user query is processed, a search step will precede
other queries in the pipeline in order to generate a set of events
at block 640. For example, the query can comprise search terms
"sourcetype=syslog ERROR" at the front of the pipeline as shown in
FIG. 6B. Intermediate results table 624 shows fewer rows because it
represents the subset of events retrieved from the index that
matched the search terms "sourcetype=syslog ERROR" from search
command 630. By way of further example, instead of a search step,
the set of events at the head of the pipeline may be generating by
a call to a pre-existing inverted index (as will be explained
later).
[0194] At block 642, the set of events generated in the first part
of the query may be piped to a query that searches the set of
events for field-value pairs or for keywords. For example, the
second intermediate results table 626 shows fewer columns,
representing the result of the top command, "top user" which
summarizes the events into a list of the top 10 users and displays
the user, count, and percentage.
[0195] Finally, at block 644, the results of the prior stage can be
pipelined to another stage where further filtering or processing of
the data can be performed, e.g., preparing the data for display
purposes, filtering the data based on a condition, performing a
mathematical calculation with the data, etc. As shown in FIG. 6B,
the "fields-percent" part of command 630 removes the column that
shows the percentage, thereby, leaving a final results table 628
without a percentage column. In different embodiments, other query
languages, such as the Structured Query Language ("SQL"), can be
used to create a query.
2.10. Field Extraction
[0196] The search head 210 allows users to search and visualize
events generated from machine data received from homogenous data
sources. The search head 210 also allows users to search and
visualize events generated from machine data received from
heterogeneous data sources. The search head 210 includes various
mechanisms, which may additionally reside in an indexer 206, for
processing a query. A query language may be used to create a query,
such as any suitable pipelined query language. For example, Splunk
Processing Language (SPL) can be utilized to make a query. SPL is a
pipelined search language in which a set of inputs is operated on
by a first command in a command line, and then a subsequent command
following the pipe symbol "I" operates on the results produced by
the first command, and so on for additional commands. Other query
languages, such as the Structured Query Language ("SQL"), can be
used to create a query.
[0197] In response to receiving the search query, search head 210
uses extraction rules to extract values for fields in the events
being searched. The search head 210 obtains extraction rules that
specify how to extract a value for fields from an event. Extraction
rules can comprise regex rules that specify how to extract values
for the fields corresponding to the extraction rules. In addition
to specifying how to extract field values, the extraction rules may
also include instructions for deriving a field value by performing
a function on a character string or value retrieved by the
extraction rule. For example, an extraction rule may truncate a
character string or convert the character string into a different
data format. In some cases, the query itself can specify one or
more extraction rules.
[0198] The search head 210 can apply the extraction rules to events
that it receives from indexers 206. Indexers 206 may apply the
extraction rules to events in an associated data store 208.
Extraction rules can be applied to all the events in a data store
or to a subset of the events that have been filtered based on some
criteria (e.g., event time stamp values, etc.). Extraction rules
can be used to extract one or more values for a field from events
by parsing the portions of machine data in the events and examining
the data for one or more patterns of characters, numbers,
delimiters, etc., that indicate where the field begins and,
optionally, ends.
[0199] FIG. 7A is a diagram of an example scenario where a common
customer identifier is found among log data received from three
disparate data sources, in accordance with example embodiments. In
this example, a user submits an order for merchandise using a
vendor's shopping application program 701 running on the user's
system. In this example, the order was not delivered to the
vendor's server due to a resource exception at the destination
server that is detected by the middleware code 702. The user then
sends a message to the customer support server 703 to complain
about the order failing to complete. The three systems 701, 702,
and 703 are disparate systems that do not have a common logging
format. The order application 701 sends log data 704 to the data
intake and query system in one format, the middleware code 702
sends error log data 705 in a second format, and the support server
703 sends log data 706 in a third format.
[0200] Using the log data received at one or more indexers 206 from
the three systems, the vendor can uniquely obtain an insight into
user activity, user experience, and system behavior. The search
head 210 allows the vendor's administrator to search the log data
from the three systems that one or more indexers 206 are
responsible for searching, thereby obtaining correlated
information, such as the order number and corresponding customer ID
number of the person placing the order. The system also allows the
administrator to see a visualization of related events via a user
interface. The administrator can query the search head 210 for
customer ID field value matches across the log data from the three
systems that are stored at the one or more indexers 206. The
customer ID field value exists in the data gathered from the three
systems, but the customer ID field value may be located in
different areas of the data given differences in the architecture
of the systems. There is a semantic relationship between the
customer ID field values generated by the three systems. The search
head 210 requests events from the one or more indexers 206 to
gather relevant events from the three systems. The search head 210
then applies extraction rules to the events in order to extract
field values that it can correlate. The search head may apply a
different extraction rule to each set of events from each system
when the event format differs among systems. In this example, the
user interface can display to the administrator the events
corresponding to the common customer ID field values 707, 708, and
709, thereby providing the administrator with insight into a
customer's experience.
[0201] Note that query results can be returned to a client, a
search head, or any other system component for further processing.
In general, query results may include a set of one or more events,
a set of one or more values obtained from the events, a subset of
the values, statistics calculated based on the values, a report
containing the values, a visualization (e.g., a graph or chart)
generated from the values, and the like.
[0202] The search system enables users to run queries against the
stored data to retrieve events that meet criteria specified in a
query, such as containing certain keywords or having specific
values in defined fields. FIG. 7B illustrates the manner in which
keyword searches and field searches are processed in accordance
with disclosed embodiments.
[0203] If a user inputs a search query into search bar 1401 that
includes only keywords (also known as "tokens"), e.g., the keyword
"error" or "warning", the query search engine of the data intake
and query system searches for those keywords directly in the event
data 722 stored in the raw record data store. Note that while FIG.
7B only illustrates four events, the raw record data store
(corresponding to data store 208 in FIG. 2) may contain records for
millions of events.
[0204] As disclosed above, an indexer can optionally generate a
keyword index to facilitate fast keyword searching for event data.
The indexer includes the identified keywords in an index, which
associates each stored keyword with reference pointers to events
containing that keyword (or to locations within events where that
keyword is located, other location identifiers, etc.). When an
indexer subsequently receives a keyword-based query, the indexer
can access the keyword index to quickly identify events containing
the keyword. For example, if the keyword "HTTP" was indexed by the
indexer at index time, and the user searches for the keyword
"HTTP", events 713 to 715 will be identified based on the results
returned from the keyword index. As noted above, the index contains
reference pointers to the events containing the keyword, which
allows for efficient retrieval of the relevant events from the raw
record data store.
[0205] If a user searches for a keyword that has not been indexed
by the indexer, the data intake and query system would nevertheless
be able to retrieve the events by searching the event data for the
keyword in the raw record data store directly as shown in FIG. 7B.
For example, if a user searches for the keyword "frank", and the
name "frank" has not been indexed at index time, the DATA INTAKE
AND QUERY system will search the event data directly and return the
first event 713. Note that whether the keyword has been indexed at
index time or not, in both cases the raw data with the events 712
is accessed from the raw data record store to service the keyword
search. In the case where the keyword has been indexed, the index
will contain a reference pointer that will allow for a more
efficient retrieval of the event data from the data store. If the
keyword has not been indexed, the search engine will need to search
through all the records in the data store to service the
search.
[0206] In most cases, however, in addition to keywords, a user's
search will also include fields. The term "field" refers to a
location in the event data containing one or more values for a
specific data item. Often, a field is a value with a fixed,
delimited position on a line, or a name and value pair, where there
is a single value to each field name. A field can also be
multivalued, that is, it can appear more than once in an event and
have a different value for each appearance, e.g., email address
fields. Fields are searchable by the field name or field name-value
pairs. Some examples of fields are "clientip" for IP addresses
accessing a web server, or the "From" and "To" fields in email
addresses.
[0207] By way of further example, consider the search,
"status=404". This search query finds events with "status" fields
that have a value of "404." When the search is run, the search
engine does not look for events with any other "status" value. It
also does not look for events containing other fields that share
"404" as a value. As a result, the search returns a set of results
that are more focused than if "404" had been used in the search
string as part of a keyword search. Note also that fields can
appear in events as "key=value" pairs such as "user_name=Bob." But
in most cases, field values appear in fixed, delimited positions
without identifying keys. For example, the data store may contain
events where the "user_name" value always appears by itself after
the timestamp as illustrated by the following string: "Nov. 15
09:33:22 johnmedlock."
[0208] The data intake and query system advantageously allows for
search time field extraction. In other words, fields can be
extracted from the event data at search time using late-binding
schema as opposed to at data ingestion time, which was a major
limitation of the prior art systems.
[0209] In response to receiving the search query, search head 210
uses extraction rules to extract values for the fields associated
with a field or fields in the event data being searched. The search
head 210 obtains extraction rules that specify how to extract a
value for certain fields from an event. Extraction rules can
comprise regex rules that specify how to extract values for the
relevant fields. In addition to specifying how to extract field
values, the extraction rules may also include instructions for
deriving a field value by performing a function on a character
string or value retrieved by the extraction rule. For example, a
transformation rule may truncate a character string, or convert the
character string into a different data format. In some cases, the
query itself can specify one or more extraction rules.
[0210] FIG. 7B illustrates the manner in which configuration files
may be used to configure custom fields at search time in accordance
with the disclosed embodiments. In response to receiving a search
query, the data intake and query system determines if the query
references a "field." For example, a query may request a list of
events where the "clientip" field equals "127.0.0.1." If the query
itself does not specify an extraction rule and if the field is not
a metadata field, e.g., time, host, source, source type, etc., then
in order to determine an extraction rule, the search engine may, in
one or more embodiments, need to locate configuration file 712
during the execution of the search as shown in FIG. 7B.
[0211] Configuration file 712 may contain extraction rules for all
the various fields that are not metadata fields, e.g., the
"clientip" field. The extraction rules may be inserted into the
configuration file in a variety of ways. In some embodiments, the
extraction rules can comprise regular expression rules that are
manually entered in by the user. Regular expressions match patterns
of characters in text and are used for extracting custom fields in
text.
[0212] In one or more embodiments, as noted above, a field
extractor may be configured to automatically generate extraction
rules for certain field values in the events when the events are
being created, indexed, or stored, or possibly at a later time. In
one embodiment, a user may be able to dynamically create custom
fields by highlighting portions of a sample event that should be
extracted as fields using a graphical user interface. The system
would then generate a regular expression that extracts those fields
from similar events and store the regular expression as an
extraction rule for the associated field in the configuration file
712.
[0213] In some embodiments, the indexers may automatically discover
certain custom fields at index time and the regular expressions for
those fields will be automatically generated at index time and
stored as part of extraction rules in configuration file 712. For
example, fields that appear in the event data as "key=value" pairs
may be automatically extracted as part of an automatic field
discovery process. Note that there may be several other ways of
adding field definitions to configuration files in addition to the
methods discussed herein.
[0214] The search head 210 can apply the extraction rules derived
from configuration file 1402 to event data that it receives from
indexers 206. Indexers 206 may apply the extraction rules from the
configuration file to events in an associated data store 208.
Extraction rules can be applied to all the events in a data store,
or to a subset of the events that have been filtered based on some
criteria (e.g., event time stamp values, etc.). Extraction rules
can be used to extract one or more values for a field from events
by parsing the event data and examining the event data for one or
more patterns of characters, numbers, delimiters, etc., that
indicate where the field begins and, optionally, ends.
[0215] In one more embodiments, the extraction rule in
configuration file 712 will also need to define the type or set of
events that the rule applies to. Because the raw record data store
will contain events from multiple heterogeneous sources, multiple
events may contain the same fields in different locations because
of discrepancies in the format of the data generated by the various
sources. Furthermore, certain events may not contain a particular
field at all. For example, event 719 also contains "clientip"
field, however, the "clientip" field is in a different format from
events 713-715. To address the discrepancies in the format and
content of the different types of events, the configuration file
will also need to specify the set of events that an extraction rule
applies to, e.g., extraction rule 716 specifies a rule for
filtering by the type of event and contains a regular expression
for parsing out the field value. Accordingly, each extraction rule
will pertain to only a particular type of event. If a particular
field, e.g., "clientip" occurs in multiple events, each of those
types of events would need its own corresponding extraction rule in
the configuration file 712 and each of the extraction rules would
comprise a different regular expression to parse out the associated
field value. The most common way to categorize events is by source
type because events generated by a particular source can have the
same format.
[0216] The field extraction rules stored in configuration file 712
perform search-time field extractions. For example, for a query
that requests a list of events with source type "access_combined"
where the "clientip" field equals "127.0.0.1," the query search
engine would first locate the configuration file 712 to retrieve
extraction rule 716 that would allow it to extract values
associated with the "clientip" field from the event data 720 "where
the source type is "access_combined. After the "clientip" field has
been extracted from all the events comprising the "clientip" field
where the source type is "access_combined," the query search engine
can then execute the field criteria by performing the compare
operation to filter out the events where the "clientip" field
equals "127.0.0.1." In the example shown in FIG. 7B, events 713-715
would be returned in response to the user query. In this manner,
the search engine can service queries containing field criteria in
addition to queries containing keyword criteria (as explained
above).
[0217] The configuration file can be created during indexing. It
may either be manually created by the user or automatically
generated with certain predetermined field extraction rules. As
discussed above, the events may be distributed across several
indexers, wherein each indexer may be responsible for storing and
searching a subset of the events contained in a corresponding data
store. In a distributed indexer system, each indexer would need to
maintain a local copy of the configuration file that is
synchronized periodically across the various indexers.
[0218] The ability to add schema to the configuration file at
search time results in increased efficiency. A user can create new
fields at search time and simply add field definitions to the
configuration file. As a user learns more about the data in the
events, the user can continue to refine the late-binding schema by
adding new fields, deleting fields, or modifying the field
extraction rules in the configuration file for use the next time
the schema is used by the system. Because the data intake and query
system maintains the underlying raw data and uses late-binding
schema for searching the raw data, it enables a user to continue
investigating and learn valuable insights about the raw data long
after data ingestion time.
[0219] The ability to add multiple field definitions to the
configuration file at search time also results in increased
flexibility. For example, multiple field definitions can be added
to the configuration file to capture the same field across events
generated by different source types. This allows the data intake
and query system to search and correlate data across heterogeneous
sources flexibly and efficiently.
[0220] Further, by providing the field definitions for the queried
fields at search time, the configuration file 712 allows the record
data store 712 to be field searchable. In other words, the raw
record data store 712 can be searched using keywords as well as
fields, wherein the fields are searchable name/value pairings that
distinguish one event from another and can be defined in
configuration file 1402 using extraction rules. In comparison to a
search containing field names, a keyword search does not need the
configuration file and can search the event data directly as shown
in FIG. 7B.
[0221] It should also be noted that any events filtered out by
performing a search-time field extraction using a configuration
file can be further processed by directing the results of the
filtering step to a processing step using a pipelined search
language. Using the prior example, a user could pipeline the
results of the compare step to an aggregate function by asking the
query search engine to count the number of events where the
"clientip" field equals "127.0.0.1."
2.11. Example Search Screen
[0222] FIG. 8A is an interface diagram of an example user interface
for a search screen 800, in accordance with example embodiments.
Search screen 800 includes a search bar 802 that accepts user input
in the form of a search string. It also includes a time range
picker 812 that enables the user to specify a time range for the
search. For historical searches (e.g., searches based on a
particular historical time range), the user can select a specific
time range, or alternatively a relative time range, such as
"today," "yesterday" or "last week." For real-time searches (e.g.,
searches whose results are based on data received in real-time),
the user can select the size of a preceding time window to search
for real-time events. Search screen 800 also initially displays a
"data summary" dialog as is illustrated in FIG. 8B that enables the
user to select different sources for the events, such as by
selecting specific hosts and log files.
[0223] After the search is executed, the search screen 800 in FIG.
8A can display the results through search results tabs 804, wherein
search results tabs 804 includes: an "events tab" that displays
various information about events returned by the search; a
"statistics tab" that displays statistics about the search results;
and a "visualization tab" that displays various visualizations of
the search results. The events tab illustrated in FIG. 8A displays
a timeline graph 805 that graphically illustrates the number of
events that occurred in one-hour intervals over the selected time
range. The events tab also displays an events list 808 that enables
a user to view the machine data in each of the returned events.
[0224] The events tab additionally displays a sidebar that is an
interactive field picker 806. The field picker 806 may be displayed
to a user in response to the search being executed and allows the
user to further analyze the search results based on the fields in
the events of the search results. The field picker 806 includes
field names that reference fields present in the events in the
search results. The field picker may display any Selected Fields
820 that a user has pre-selected for display (e.g., host, source,
sourcetype) and may also display any Interesting Fields 822 that
the system determines may be interesting to the user based on
pre-specified criteria (e.g., action, bytes, categoryid, clientip,
date_hour, date_mday, date_minute, etc.). The field picker also
provides an option to display field names for all the fields
present in the events of the search results using the All Fields
control 824.
[0225] Each field name in the field picker 806 has a value type
identifier to the left of the field name, such as value type
identifier 826. A value type identifier identifies the type of
value for the respective field, such as an "a" for fields that
include literal values or a "#" for fields that include numerical
values.
[0226] Each field name in the field picker also has a unique value
count to the right of the field name, such as unique value count
828. The unique value count indicates the number of unique values
for the respective field in the events of the search results.
[0227] Each field name is selectable to view the events in the
search results that have the field referenced by that field name.
For example, a user can select the "host" field name, and the
events shown in the events list 808 will be updated with events in
the search results that have the field that is reference by the
field name "host."
2.12. Data Models
[0228] A data model is a hierarchically structured search-time
mapping of semantic knowledge about one or more datasets. It
encodes the domain knowledge used to build a variety of specialized
searches of those datasets. Those searches, in turn, can be used to
generate reports.
[0229] A data model is composed of one or more "objects" (or "data
model objects") that define or otherwise correspond to a specific
set of data. An object is defined by constraints and attributes. An
object's contraints are search criteria that define the set of
events to be operated on by running a search having that search
criteria at the time the data model is selected. An object's
attributes are the set of fields to be exposed for operating on
that set of events generated by the search criteria.
[0230] Objects in data models can be arranged hierarchically in
parent/child relationships. Each child object represents a subset
of the dataset covered by its parent object. The top-level objects
in data models are collectively referred to as "root objects."
[0231] Child objects have inheritance. Child objects inherit
constraints and attributes from their parent objects and may have
additional constraints and attributes of their own. Child objects
provide a way of filtering events from parent objects. Because a
child object may provide an additional constraint in addition to
the constraints it has inherited from its parent object, the
dataset it represents may be a subset of the dataset that its
parent represents. For example, a first data model object may
define a broad set of data pertaining to e-mail activity generally,
and another data model object may define specific datasets within
the broad dataset, such as a subset of the e-mail data pertaining
specifically to e-mails sent. For example, a user can simply select
an "e-mail activity" data model object to access a dataset relating
to e-mails generally (e.g., sent or received), or select an
"e-mails sent" data model object (or data sub-model object) to
access a dataset relating to e-mails sent.
[0232] Because a data model object is defined by its constraints
(e.g., a set of search criteria) and attributes (e.g., a set of
fields), a data model object can be used to quickly search data to
identify a set of events and to identify a set of fields to be
associated with the set of events. For example, an "e-mails sent"
data model object may specify a search for events relating to
e-mails that have been sent, and specify a set of fields that are
associated with the events. Thus, a user can retrieve and use the
"e-mails sent" data model object to quickly search source data for
events relating to sent e-mails, and may be provided with a listing
of the set of fields relevant to the events in a user interface
screen.
[0233] Examples of data models can include electronic mail,
authentication, databases, intrusion detection, malware,
application state, alerts, compute inventory, network sessions,
network traffic, performance, audits, updates, vulnerabilities,
etc. Data models and their objects can be designed by knowledge
managers in an organization, and they can enable downstream users
to quickly focus on a specific set of data. A user iteratively
applies a model development tool (not shown in FIG. 8A) to prepare
a query that defines a subset of events and assigns an object name
to that subset. A child subset is created by further limiting a
query that generated a parent subset.
[0234] Data definitions in associated schemas can be taken from the
common information model (CIM) or can be devised for a particular
schema and optionally added to the CIM. Child objects inherit
fields from parents and can include fields not present in parents.
A model developer can select fewer extraction rules than are
available for the sources returned by the query that defines events
belonging to a model. Selecting a limited set of extraction rules
can be a tool for simplifying and focusing the data model, while
allowing a user flexibility to explore the data subset. Development
of a data model is further explained in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,788,525
and 8,788,526, both entitled "DATA MODEL FOR MACHINE DATA FOR
SEMANTIC SEARCH", both issued on 22 Jul. 2014, U.S. Pat. No.
8,983,994, entitled "GENERATION OF A DATA MODEL FOR SEARCHING
MACHINE DATA", issued on 17 Mar. 2015, U.S. Pat. No. 9,128,980,
entitled "GENERATION OF A DATA MODEL APPLIED TO QUERIES", issued on
8 Sep. 2015, and U.S. Pat. No. 9,589,012, entitled "GENERATION OF A
DATA MODEL APPLIED TO OBJECT QUERIES", issued on 7 Mar. 2017, each
of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for
all purposes.
[0235] A data model can also include reports. One or more report
formats can be associated with a particular data model and be made
available to run against the data model. A user can use child
objects to design reports with object datasets that already have
extraneous data pre-filtered out. In some embodiments, the data
intake and query system 108 provides the user with the ability to
produce reports (e.g., a table, chart, visualization, etc.) without
having to enter SPL, SQL, or other query language terms into a
search screen. Data models are used as the basis for the search
feature.
[0236] Data models may be selected in a report generation
interface. The report generator supports drag-and-drop organization
of fields to be summarized in a report. When a model is selected,
the fields with available extraction rules are made available for
use in the report. The user may refine and/or filter search results
to produce more precise reports. The user may select some fields
for organizing the report and select other fields for providing
detail according to the report organization. For example, "region"
and "salesperson" are fields used for organizing the report and
sales data can be summarized (subtotaled and totaled) within this
organization. The report generator allows the user to specify one
or more fields within events and apply statistical analysis on
values extracted from the specified one or more fields. The report
generator may aggregate search results across sets of events and
generate statistics based on aggregated search results. Building
reports using the report generation interface is further explained
in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/503,335, entitled
"GENERATING REPORTS FROM UNSTRUCTURED DATA", filed on 30 Sep. 2014,
and which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for
all purposes. Data visualizations also can be generated in a
variety of formats, by reference to the data model. Reports, data
visualizations, and data model objects can be saved and associated
with the data model for future use. The data model object may be
used to perform searches of other data.
[0237] FIGS. 9-15 are interface diagrams of example report
generation user interfaces, in accordance with example embodiments.
The report generation process may be driven by a predefined data
model object, such as a data model object defined and/or saved via
a reporting application or a data model object obtained from
another source. A user can load a saved data model object using a
report editor. For example, the initial search query and fields
used to drive the report editor may be obtained from a data model
object. The data model object that is used to drive a report
generation process may define a search and a set of fields. Upon
loading of the data model object, the report generation process may
enable a user to use the fields (e.g., the fields defined by the
data model object) to define criteria for a report (e.g., filters,
split rows/columns, aggregates, etc.) and the search may be used to
identify events (e.g., to identify events responsive to the search)
used to generate the report. That is, for example, if a data model
object is selected to drive a report editor, the graphical user
interface of the report editor may enable a user to define
reporting criteria for the report using the fields associated with
the selected data model object, and the events used to generate the
report may be constrained to the events that match, or otherwise
satisfy, the search constraints of the selected data model
object.
[0238] The selection of a data model object for use in driving a
report generation may be facilitated by a data model object
selection interface. FIG. 9 illustrates an example interactive data
model selection graphical user interface 900 of a report editor
that displays a listing of available data models 901. The user may
select one of the data models 902.
[0239] FIG. 10 illustrates an example data model object selection
graphical user interface 1000 that displays available data objects
1001 for the selected data object model 902. The user may select
one of the displayed data model objects 1002 for use in driving the
report generation process.
[0240] Once a data model object is selected by the user, a user
interface screen 1100 shown in FIG. 11A may display an interactive
listing of automatic field identification options 1101 based on the
selected data model object. For example, a user may select one of
the three illustrated options (e.g., the "All Fields" option 1102,
the "Selected Fields" option 1103, or the "Coverage" option (e.g.,
fields with at least a specified % of coverage) 1104). If the user
selects the "All Fields" option 1102, all of the fields identified
from the events that were returned in response to an initial search
query may be selected. That is, for example, all of the fields of
the identified data model object fields may be selected. If the
user selects the "Selected Fields" option 1103, only the fields
from the fields of the identified data model object fields that are
selected by the user may be used. If the user selects the
"Coverage" option 1104, only the fields of the identified data
model object fields meeting a specified coverage criteria may be
selected. A percent coverage may refer to the percentage of events
returned by the initial search query that a given field appears in.
Thus, for example, if an object dataset includes 10,000 events
returned in response to an initial search query, and the "avg_age"
field appears in 854 of those 10,000 events, then the "avg_age"
field would have a coverage of 8.54% for that object dataset. If,
for example, the user selects the "Coverage" option and specifies a
coverage value of 2%, only fields having a coverage value equal to
or greater than 2% may be selected. The number of fields
corresponding to each selectable option may be displayed in
association with each option. For example, "97" displayed next to
the "All Fields" option 1102 indicates that 97 fields will be
selected if the "All Fields" option is selected. The "3" displayed
next to the "Selected Fields" option 1103 indicates that 3 of the
97 fields will be selected if the "Selected Fields" option is
selected. The "49" displayed next to the "Coverage" option 1104
indicates that 49 of the 97 fields (e.g., the 49 fields having a
coverage of 2% or greater) will be selected if the "Coverage"
option is selected. The number of fields corresponding to the
"Coverage" option may be dynamically updated based on the specified
percent of coverage.
[0241] FIG. 11B illustrates an example graphical user interface
screen 1105 displaying the reporting application's "Report Editor"
page. The screen may display interactive elements for defining
various elements of a report. For example, the page includes a
"Filters" element 1106, a "Split Rows" element 1107, a "Split
Columns" element 1108, and a "Column Values" element 1109. The page
may include a list of search results 1111. In this example, the
Split Rows element 1107 is expanded, revealing a listing of fields
1110 that can be used to define additional criteria (e.g.,
reporting criteria). The listing of fields 1110 may correspond to
the selected fields. That is, the listing of fields 1110 may list
only the fields previously selected, either automatically and/or
manually by a user. FIG. 11C illustrates a formatting dialogue 1112
that may be displayed upon selecting a field from the listing of
fields 1110. The dialogue can be used to format the display of the
results of the selection (e.g., label the column for the selected
field to be displayed as "component").
[0242] FIG. 11D illustrates an example graphical user interface
screen 1105 including a table of results 1113 based on the selected
criteria including splitting the rows by the "component" field. A
column 1114 having an associated count for each component listed in
the table may be displayed that indicates an aggregate count of the
number of times that the particular field-value pair (e.g., the
value in a row for a particular field, such as the value
"BucketMover" for the field "component") occurs in the set of
events responsive to the initial search query.
[0243] FIG. 12 illustrates an example graphical user interface
screen 1200 that allows the user to filter search results and to
perform statistical analysis on values extracted from specific
fields in the set of events. In this example, the top ten product
names ranked by price are selected as a filter 1201 that causes the
display of the ten most popular products sorted by price. Each row
is displayed by product name and price 1202. This results in each
product displayed in a column labeled "product name" along with an
associated price in a column labeled "price" 1206. Statistical
analysis of other fields in the events associated with the ten most
popular products have been specified as column values 1203. A count
of the number of successful purchases for each product is displayed
in column 1204. These statistics may be produced by filtering the
search results by the product name, finding all occurrences of a
successful purchase in a field within the events and generating a
total of the number of occurrences. A sum of the total sales is
displayed in column 1205, which is a result of the multiplication
of the price and the number of successful purchases for each
product.
[0244] The reporting application allows the user to create
graphical visualizations of the statistics generated for a report.
For example, FIG. 13 illustrates an example graphical user
interface 1300 that displays a set of components and associated
statistics 1301. The reporting application allows the user to
select a visualization of the statistics in a graph (e.g., bar
chart, scatter plot, area chart, line chart, pie chart, radial
gauge, marker gauge, filler gauge, etc.), where the format of the
graph may be selected using the user interface controls 1302 along
the left panel of the user interface 1300. FIG. 14 illustrates an
example of a bar chart visualization 1400 of an aspect of the
statistical data 1301. FIG. 15 illustrates a scatter plot
visualization 1500 of an aspect of the statistical data 1301.
2.13. Acceleration Technique
[0245] The above-described system provides significant flexibility
by enabling a user to analyze massive quantities of
minimally-processed data "on the fly" at search time using a
late-binding schema, instead of storing pre-specified portions of
the data in a database at ingestion time. This flexibility enables
a user to see valuable insights, correlate data, and perform
subsequent queries to examine interesting aspects of the data that
may not have been apparent at ingestion time.
[0246] However, performing extraction and analysis operations at
search time can involve a large amount of data and require a large
number of computational operations, which can cause delays in
processing the queries. Advantageously, the data intake and query
system also employs a number of unique acceleration techniques that
have been developed to speed up analysis operations performed at
search time. These techniques include: (1) performing search
operations in parallel across multiple indexers; (2) using a
keyword index; (3) using a high performance analytics store; and
(4) accelerating the process of generating reports. These novel
techniques are described in more detail below.
2.13.1. Aggregation Technique
[0247] To facilitate faster query processing, a query can be
structured such that multiple indexers perform the query in
parallel, while aggregation of search results from the multiple
indexers is performed locally at the search head. For example, FIG.
16 is an example search query received from a client and executed
by search peers, in accordance with example embodiments. FIG. 16
illustrates how a search query 1602 received from a client at a
search head 210 can split into two phases, including: (1) subtasks
1604 (e.g., data retrieval or simple filtering) that may be
performed in parallel by indexers 206 for execution, and (2) a
search results aggregation operation 1606 to be executed by the
search head when the results are ultimately collected from the
indexers.
[0248] During operation, upon receiving search query 1602, a search
head 210 determines that a portion of the operations involved with
the search query may be performed locally by the search head. The
search head modifies search query 1602 by substituting "stats"
(create aggregate statistics over results sets received from the
indexers at the search head) with "prestats" (create statistics by
the indexer from local results set) to produce search query 1604,
and then distributes search query 1604 to distributed indexers,
which are also referred to as "search peers" or "peer indexers."
Note that search queries may generally specify search criteria or
operations to be performed on events that meet the search criteria.
Search queries may also specify field names, as well as search
criteria for the values in the fields or operations to be performed
on the values in the fields. Moreover, the search head may
distribute the full search query to the search peers as illustrated
in FIG. 6A, or may alternatively distribute a modified version
(e.g., a more restricted version) of the search query to the search
peers. In this example, the indexers are responsible for producing
the results and sending them to the search head. After the indexers
return the results to the search head, the search head aggregates
the received results 1606 to form a single search result set. By
executing the query in this manner, the system effectively
distributes the computational operations across the indexers while
minimizing data transfers.
2.13.2. Keyword Index
[0249] As described above with reference to the flow charts in FIG.
5A and FIG. 6A, data intake and query system 108 can construct and
maintain one or more keyword indices to quickly identify events
containing specific keywords. This technique can greatly speed up
the processing of queries involving specific keywords. As mentioned
above, to build a keyword index, an indexer first identifies a set
of keywords. Then, the indexer includes the identified keywords in
an index, which associates each stored keyword with references to
events containing that keyword, or to locations within events where
that keyword is located. When an indexer subsequently receives a
keyword-based query, the indexer can access the keyword index to
quickly identify events containing the keyword.
2.13.3. High Performance Analytics Store
[0250] To speed up certain types of queries, some embodiments of
system 108 create a high performance analytics store, which is
referred to as a "summarization table," that contains entries for
specific field-value pairs. Each of these entries keeps track of
instances of a specific value in a specific field in the events and
includes references to events containing the specific value in the
specific field. For example, an example entry in a summarization
table can keep track of occurrences of the value "94107" in a "ZIP
code" field of a set of events and the entry includes references to
all of the events that contain the value "94107" in the ZIP code
field. This optimization technique enables the system to quickly
process queries that seek to determine how many events have a
particular value for a particular field. To this end, the system
can examine the entry in the summarization table to count instances
of the specific value in the field without having to go through the
individual events or perform data extractions at search time. Also,
if the system needs to process all events that have a specific
field-value combination, the system can use the references in the
summarization table entry to directly access the events to extract
further information without having to search all of the events to
find the specific field-value combination at search time.
[0251] In some embodiments, the system maintains a separate
summarization table for each of the above-described time-specific
buckets that stores events for a specific time range. A
bucket-specific summarization table includes entries for specific
field-value combinations that occur in events in the specific
bucket. Alternatively, the system can maintain a separate
summarization table for each indexer. The indexer-specific
summarization table includes entries for the events in a data store
that are managed by the specific indexer. Indexer-specific
summarization tables may also be bucket-specific.
[0252] The summarization table can be populated by running a
periodic query that scans a set of events to find instances of a
specific field-value combination, or alternatively instances of all
field-value combinations for a specific field. A periodic query can
be initiated by a user, or can be scheduled to occur automatically
at specific time intervals. A periodic query can also be
automatically launched in response to a query that asks for a
specific field-value combination.
[0253] In some cases, when the summarization tables may not cover
all of the events that are relevant to a query, the system can use
the summarization tables to obtain partial results for the events
that are covered by summarization tables, but may also have to
search through other events that are not covered by the
summarization tables to produce additional results. These
additional results can then be combined with the partial results to
produce a final set of results for the query. The summarization
table and associated techniques are described in more detail in
U.S. Pat. No. 8,682,925, entitled "Distributed High Performance
Analytics Store", issued on 25 Mar. 2014, U.S. Pat. No. 9,128,985,
entitled "SUPPLEMENTING A HIGH PERFORMANCE ANALYTICS STORE WITH
EVALUATION OF INDIVIDUAL EVENTS TO RESPOND TO AN EVENT QUERY",
issued on 8 Sep. 2015, and U.S. patent application Ser. No.
14/815,973, entitled "GENERATING AND STORING SUMMARIZATION TABLES
FOR SETS OF SEARCHABLE EVENTS", filed on 1 Aug. 2015, each of which
is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all
purposes.
[0254] To speed up certain types of queries, e.g., frequently
encountered queries or computationally intensive queries, some
embodiments of system 108 create a high performance analytics
store, which is referred to as a "summarization table," (also
referred to as a "lexicon" or "inverted index") that contains
entries for specific field-value pairs. Each of these entries keeps
track of instances of a specific value in a specific field in the
event data and includes references to events containing the
specific value in the specific field. For example, an example entry
in an inverted index can keep track of occurrences of the value
"94107" in a "ZIP code" field of a set of events and the entry
includes references to all of the events that contain the value
"94107" in the ZIP code field. Creating the inverted index data
structure avoids needing to incur the computational overhead each
time a statistical query needs to be run on a frequently
encountered field-value pair. In order to expedite queries, in most
embodiments, the search engine will employ the inverted index
separate from the raw record data store to generate responses to
the received queries.
[0255] Note that the term "summarization table" or "inverted index"
as used herein is a data structure that may be generated by an
indexer that includes at least field names and field values that
have been extracted and/or indexed from event records. An inverted
index may also include reference values that point to the
location(s) in the field searchable data store where the event
records that include the field may be found. Also, an inverted
index may be stored using well-know compression techniques to
reduce its storage size.
[0256] Further, note that the term "reference value" (also referred
to as a "posting value") as used herein is a value that references
the location of a source record in the field searchable data store.
In some embodiments, the reference value may include additional
information about each record, such as timestamps, record size,
meta-data, or the like. Each reference value may be a unique
identifier which may be used to access the event data directly in
the field searchable data store. In some embodiments, the reference
values may be ordered based on each event record's timestamp. For
example, if numbers are used as identifiers, they may be sorted so
event records having a later timestamp always have a lower valued
identifier than event records with an earlier timestamp, or
vice-versa. Reference values are often included in inverted indexes
for retrieving and/or identifying event records.
[0257] In one or more embodiments, an inverted index is generated
in response to a user-initiated collection query. The term
"collection query" as used herein refers to queries that include
commands that generate summarization information and inverted
indexes (or summarization tables) from event records stored in the
field searchable data store.
[0258] Note that a collection query is a special type of query that
can be user-generated and is used to create an inverted index. A
collection query is not the same as a query that is used to call up
or invoke a pre-existing inverted index. In one or more embodiment,
a query can comprise an initial step that calls up a pre-generated
inverted index on which further filtering and processing can be
performed. For example, referring back to FIG. 13, a set of events
generated at block 1320 by either using a "collection" query to
create a new inverted index or by calling up a pre-generated
inverted index. A query with several pipelined steps will start
with a pre-generated index to accelerate the query.
[0259] FIG. 7C illustrates the manner in which an inverted index is
created and used in accordance with the disclosed embodiments. As
shown in FIG. 7C, an inverted index 722 can be created in response
to a user-initiated collection query using the event data 723
stored in the raw record data store. For example, a non-limiting
example of a collection query may include "collect
clientip=127.0.0.1" which may result in an inverted index 722 being
generated from the event data 723 as shown in FIG. 7C. Each entry
in invertex index 722 includes an event reference value that
references the location of a source record in the field searchable
data store. The reference value may be used to access the original
event record directly from the field searchable data store.
[0260] In one or more embodiments, if one or more of the queries is
a collection query, the responsive indexers may generate
summarization information based on the fields of the event records
located in the field searchable data store. In at least one of the
various embodiments, one or more of the fields used in the
summarization information may be listed in the collection query
and/or they may be determined based on terms included in the
collection query. For example, a collection query may include an
explicit list of fields to summarize. Or, in at least one of the
various embodiments, a collection query may include terms or
expressions that explicitly define the fields, e.g., using regex
rules. In FIG. 7C, prior to running the collection query that
generates the inverted index 722, the field name "clientip" may
need to be defined in a configuration file by specifying the
"access_combined" source type and a regular expression rule to
parse out the client IP address. Alternatively, the collection
query may contain an explicit definition for the field name
"clientip" which may obviate the need to reference the
configuration file at search time.
[0261] In one or more embodiments, collection queries may be saved
and scheduled to run periodically. These scheduled collection
queries may periodically update the summarization information
corresponding to the query. For example, if the collection query
that generates inverted index 722 is scheduled to run periodically,
one or more indexers would periodically search through the relevant
buckets to update inverted index 722 with event data for any new
events with the "clientip" value of "127.0.0.1."
[0262] In some embodiments, the inverted indexes that include
fields, values, and reference value (e.g., inverted index 722) for
event records may be included in the summarization information
provided to the user. In other embodiments, a user may not be
interested in specific fields and values contained in the inverted
index, but may need to perform a statistical query on the data in
the inverted index. For example, referencing the example of FIG. 7C
rather than viewing the fields within summarization table 722, a
user may want to generate a count of all client requests from IP
address "127.0.0.1." In this case, the search engine would simply
return a result of "4" rather than including details about the
inverted index 722 in the information provided to the user.
[0263] The pipelined search language, e.g., SPL of the SPLUNK.RTM.
ENTERPRISE system can be used to pipe the contents of an inverted
index to a statistical query using the "stats" command for example.
A "stats" query refers to queries that generate result sets that
may produce aggregate and statistical results from event records,
e.g., average, mean, max, min, rms, etc. Where sufficient
information is available in an inverted index, a "stats" query may
generate their result sets rapidly from the summarization
information available in the inverted index rather than directly
scanning event records. For example, the contents of inverted index
722 can be pipelined to a stats query, e.g., a "count" function
that counts the number of entries in the inverted index and returns
a value of "4." In this way, inverted indexes may enable various
stats queries to be performed absent scanning or search the event
records. Accordingly, this optimization technique enables the
system to quickly process queries that seek to determine how many
events have a particular value for a particular field. To this end,
the system can examine the entry in the inverted index to count
instances of the specific value in the field without having to go
through the individual events or perform data extractions at search
time.
[0264] In some embodiments, the system maintains a separate
inverted index for each of the above-described time-specific
buckets that stores events for a specific time range. A
bucket-specific inverted index includes entries for specific
field-value combinations that occur in events in the specific
bucket. Alternatively, the system can maintain a separate inverted
index for each indexer. The indexer-specific inverted index
includes entries for the events in a data store that are managed by
the specific indexer. Indexer-specific inverted indexes may also be
bucket-specific. In at least one or more embodiments, if one or
more of the queries is a stats query, each indexer may generate a
partial result set from previously generated summarization
information. The partial result sets may be returned to the search
head that received the query and combined into a single result set
for the query
[0265] As mentioned above, the inverted index can be populated by
running a periodic query that scans a set of events to find
instances of a specific field-value combination, or alternatively
instances of all field-value combinations for a specific field. A
periodic query can be initiated by a user, or can be scheduled to
occur automatically at specific time intervals. A periodic query
can also be automatically launched in response to a query that asks
for a specific field-value combination. In some embodiments, if
summarization information is absent from an indexer that includes
responsive event records, further actions may be taken, such as,
the summarization information may generated on the fly, warnings
may be provided the user, the collection query operation may be
halted, the absence of summarization information may be ignored, or
the like, or combination thereof.
[0266] In one or more embodiments, an inverted index may be set up
to update continually. For example, the query may ask for the
inverted index to update its result periodically, e.g., every hour.
In such instances, the inverted index may be a dynamic data
structure that is regularly updated to include information
regarding incoming events.
[0267] In some cases, e.g., where a query is executed before an
inverted index updates, when the inverted index may not cover all
of the events that are relevant to a query, the system can use the
inverted index to obtain partial results for the events that are
covered by inverted index, but may also have to search through
other events that are not covered by the inverted index to produce
additional results on the fly. In other words, an indexer would
need to search through event data on the data store to supplement
the partial results. These additional results can then be combined
with the partial results to produce a final set of results for the
query. Note that in typical instances where an inverted index is
not completely up to date, the number of events that an indexer
would need to search through to supplement the results from the
inverted index would be relatively small. In other words, the
search to get the most recent results can be quick and efficient
because only a small number of event records will be searched
through to supplement the information from the inverted index. The
inverted index and associated techniques are described in more
detail in U.S. Pat. No. 8,682,925, entitled "Distributed High
Performance Analytics Store", issued on 25 Mar. 2014, U.S. Pat. No.
9,128,985, entitled "SUPPLEMENTING A HIGH PERFORMANCE ANALYTICS
STORE WITH EVALUATION OF INDIVIDUAL EVENTS TO RESPOND TO AN EVENT
QUERY", filed on 31 Jan. 2014, and U.S. patent application Ser. No.
14/815,973, entitled "STORAGE MEDIUM AND CONTROL DEVICE", filed on
21 Feb. 2014, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in
its entirety.
2.13.3.1 Extracting Event Data Using Posting
[0268] In one or more embodiments, if the system needs to process
all events that have a specific field-value combination, the system
can use the references in the inverted index entry to directly
access the events to extract further information without having to
search all of the events to find the specific field-value
combination at search time. In other words, the system can use the
reference values to locate the associated event data in the field
searchable data store and extract further information from those
events, e.g., extract further field values from the events for
purposes of filtering or processing or both.
[0269] The information extracted from the event data using the
reference values can be directed for further filtering or
processing in a query using the pipeline search language. The
pipelined search language will, in one embodiment, include syntax
that can direct the initial filtering step in a query to an
inverted index. In one embodiment, a user would include syntax in
the query that explicitly directs the initial searching or
filtering step to the inverted index.
[0270] Referencing the example in FIG. 15, if the user determines
that she needs the user id fields associated with the client
requests from IP address "127.0.0.1," instead of incurring the
computational overhead of performing a brand new search or
re-generating the inverted index with an additional field, the user
can generate a query that explicitly directs or pipes the contents
of the already generated inverted index 1502 to another filtering
step requesting the user ids for the entries in inverted index 1502
where the server response time is greater than "0.0900"
microseconds. The search engine would use the reference values
stored in inverted index 722 to retrieve the event data from the
field searchable data store, filter the results based on the
"response time" field values and, further, extract the user id
field from the resulting event data to return to the user. In the
present instance, the user ids "frank" and "carlos" would be
returned to the user from the generated results table 722.
[0271] In one embodiment, the same methodology can be used to pipe
the contents of the inverted index to a processing step. In other
words, the user is able to use the inverted index to efficiently
and quickly perform aggregate functions on field values that were
not part of the initially generated inverted index. For example, a
user may want to determine an average object size (size of the
requested gif) requested by clients from IP address "127.0.0.1." In
this case, the search engine would again use the reference values
stored in inverted index 722 to retrieve the event data from the
field searchable data store and, further, extract the object size
field values from the associated events 731, 732, 733 and 734.
Once, the corresponding object sizes have been extracted (i.e.
2326, 2900, 2920, and 5000), the average can be computed and
returned to the user.
[0272] In one embodiment, instead of explicitly invoking the
inverted index in a user-generated query, e.g., by the use of
special commands or syntax, the SPLUNK.RTM. ENTERPRISE system can
be configured to automatically determine if any prior-generated
inverted index can be used to expedite a user query. For example,
the user's query may request the average object size (size of the
requested gif) requested by clients from IP address "127.0.0.1."
without any reference to or use of inverted index 722. The search
engine, in this case, would automatically determine that an
inverted index 722 already exists in the system that could expedite
this query. In one embodiment, prior to running any search
comprising a field-value pair, for example, a search engine may
search though all the existing inverted indexes to determine if a
pre-generated inverted index could be used to expedite the search
comprising the field-value pair. Accordingly, the search engine
would automatically use the pre-generated inverted index, e.g.,
index 722 to generate the results without any user-involvement that
directs the use of the index.
[0273] Using the reference values in an inverted index to be able
to directly access the event data in the field searchable data
store and extract further information from the associated event
data for further filtering and processing is highly advantageous
because it avoids incurring the computation overhead of
regenerating the inverted index with additional fields or
performing a new search.
[0274] The data intake and query system includes one or more
forwarders that receive raw machine data from a variety of input
data sources, and one or more indexers that process and store the
data in one or more data stores. By distributing events among the
indexers and data stores, the indexers can analyze events for a
query in parallel. In one or more embodiments, a multiple indexer
implementation of the search system would maintain a separate and
respective inverted index for each of the above-described
time-specific buckets that stores events for a specific time range.
A bucket-specific inverted index includes entries for specific
field-value combinations that occur in events in the specific
bucket. As explained above, a search head would be able to
correlate and synthesize data from across the various buckets and
indexers.
[0275] This feature advantageously expedites searches because
instead of performing a computationally intensive search in a
centrally located inverted index that catalogues all the relevant
events, an indexer is able to directly search an inverted index
stored in a bucket associated with the time-range specified in the
query. This allows the search to be performed in parallel across
the various indexers. Further, if the query requests further
filtering or processing to be conducted on the event data
referenced by the locally stored bucket-specific inverted index,
the indexer is able to simply access the event records stored in
the associated bucket for further filtering and processing instead
of needing to access a central repository of event records, which
would dramatically add to the computational overhead.
[0276] In one embodiment, there may be multiple buckets associated
with the time-range specified in a query. If the query is directed
to an inverted index, or if the search engine automatically
determines that using an inverted index would expedite the
processing of the query, the indexers will search through each of
the inverted indexes associated with the buckets for the specified
time-range. This feature allows the High Performance Analytics
Store to be scaled easily.
[0277] In certain instances, where a query is executed before a
bucket-specific inverted index updates, when the bucket-specific
inverted index may not cover all of the events that are relevant to
a query, the system can use the bucket-specific inverted index to
obtain partial results for the events that are covered by
bucket-specific inverted index, but may also have to search through
the event data in the bucket associated with the bucket-specific
inverted index to produce additional results on the fly. In other
words, an indexer would need to search through event data stored in
the bucket (that was not yet processed by the indexer for the
corresponding inverted index) to supplement the partial results
from the bucket-specific inverted index.
[0278] FIG. 7D presents a flowchart illustrating how an inverted
index in a pipelined search query can be used to determine a set of
event data that can be further limited by filtering or processing
in accordance with the disclosed embodiments.
[0279] At block 742, a query is received by a data intake and query
system. In some embodiments, the query can be receive as a user
generated query entered into into search bar of a graphical user
search interface. The search interface also includes a time range
control element that enables specification of a time range for the
query.
[0280] At block 744, an inverted index is retrieved. Note, that the
inverted index can be retrieved in response to an explicit user
search command inputted as part of the user generated query.
Alternatively, the search engine can be configured to automatically
use an inverted index if it determines that using the inverted
index would expedite the servicing of the user generated query.
Each of the entries in an inverted index keeps track of instances
of a specific value in a specific field in the event data and
includes references to events containing the specific value in the
specific field. In order to expedite queries, in most embodiments,
the search engine will employ the inverted index separate from the
raw record data store to generate responses to the received
queries.
[0281] At block 746, the query engine determines if the query
contains further filtering and processing steps. If the query
contains no further commands, then, in one embodiment,
summarization information can be provided to the user at block
754.
[0282] If, however, the query does contain further filtering and
processing commands, then at block 750, the query engine determines
if the commands relate to further filtering or processing of the
data extracted as part of the inverted index or whether the
commands are directed to using the inverted index as an initial
filtering step to further filter and process event data referenced
by the entries in the inverted index. If the query can be completed
using data already in the generated inverted index, then the
further filtering or processing steps, e.g., a "count" number of
records function, "average" number of records per hour etc. are
performed and the results are provided to the user at block
752.
[0283] If, however, the query references fields that are not
extracted in the inverted index, then the indexers will access
event data pointed to by the reference values in the inverted index
to retrieve any further information required at block 756.
Subsequently, any further filtering or processing steps are
performed on the fields extracted directly from the event data and
the results are provided to the user at step 758.
2.13.4. Accelerating Report Generation
[0284] In some embodiments, a data server system such as the data
intake and query system can accelerate the process of periodically
generating updated reports based on query results. To accelerate
this process, a summarization engine automatically examines the
query to determine whether generation of updated reports can be
accelerated by creating intermediate summaries. If reports can be
accelerated, the summarization engine periodically generates a
summary covering data obtained during a latest non-overlapping time
period. For example, where the query seeks events meeting a
specified criteria, a summary for the time period includes only
events within the time period that meet the specified criteria.
Similarly, if the query seeks statistics calculated from the
events, such as the number of events that match the specified
criteria, then the summary for the time period includes the number
of events in the period that match the specified criteria.
[0285] In addition to the creation of the summaries, the
summarization engine schedules the periodic updating of the report
associated with the query. During each scheduled report update, the
query engine determines whether intermediate summaries have been
generated covering portions of the time period covered by the
report update. If so, then the report is generated based on the
information contained in the summaries. Also, if additional event
data has been received and has not yet been summarized, and is
required to generate the complete report, the query can be run on
these additional events. Then, the results returned by this query
on the additional events, along with the partial results obtained
from the intermediate summaries, can be combined to generate the
updated report. This process is repeated each time the report is
updated. Alternatively, if the system stores events in buckets
covering specific time ranges, then the summaries can be generated
on a bucket-by-bucket basis. Note that producing intermediate
summaries can save the work involved in re-running the query for
previous time periods, so advantageously only the newer events
needs to be processed while generating an updated report. These
report acceleration techniques are described in more detail in U.S.
Pat. No. 8,589,403, entitled "Compressed Journaling In Event
Tracking Files For Metadata Recovery And Replication", issued on 19
Nov. 2013, U.S. Pat. No. 8,412,696, entitled "Real Time Searching
And Reporting", issued on 2 Apr. 2011, and U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,589,375
and 8,589,432, both also entitled "REAL TIME SEARCHING AND
REPORTING", both issued on 19 Nov. 2013, each of which is hereby
incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
2.14. Security Features
[0286] The data intake and query system provides various schemas,
dashboards, and visualizations that simplify developers' tasks to
create applications with additional capabilities. One such
application is the an enterprise security application, such as
SPLUNK.RTM. ENTERPRISE SECURITY, which performs monitoring and
alerting operations and includes analytics to facilitate
identifying both known and unknown security threats based on large
volumes of data stored by the data intake and query system. The
enterprise security application provides the security practitioner
with visibility into security-relevant threats found in the
enterprise infrastructure by capturing, monitoring, and reporting
on data from enterprise security devices, systems, and
applications. Through the use of the data intake and query system
searching and reporting capabilities, the enterprise security
application provides a top-down and bottom-up view of an
organization's security posture.
[0287] The enterprise security application leverages the data
intake and query system search-time normalization techniques, saved
searches, and correlation searches to provide visibility into
security-relevant threats and activity and generate notable events
for tracking. The enterprise security application enables the
security practitioner to investigate and explore the data to find
new or unknown threats that do not follow signature-based
patterns.
[0288] Conventional Security Information and Event Management
(SIEM) systems lack the infrastructure to effectively store and
analyze large volumes of security-related data. Traditional SIEM
systems typically use fixed schemas to extract data from
pre-defined security-related fields at data ingestion time and
store the extracted data in a relational database. This traditional
data extraction process (and associated reduction in data size)
that occurs at data ingestion time inevitably hampers future
incident investigations that may need original data to determine
the root cause of a security issue, or to detect the onset of an
impending security threat.
[0289] In contrast, the enterprise security application system
stores large volumes of minimally-processed security-related data
at ingestion time for later retrieval and analysis at search time
when a live security threat is being investigated. To facilitate
this data retrieval process, the enterprise security application
provides pre-specified schemas for extracting relevant values from
the different types of security-related events and enables a user
to define such schemas.
[0290] The enterprise security application can process many types
of security-related information. In general, this security-related
information can include any information that can be used to
identify security threats. For example, the security-related
information can include network-related information, such as IP
addresses, domain names, asset identifiers, network traffic volume,
uniform resource locator strings, and source addresses. The process
of detecting security threats for network-related information is
further described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,826,434, entitled "SECURITY
THREAT DETECTION BASED ON INDICATIONS IN BIG DATA OF ACCESS TO
NEWLY REGISTERED DOMAINS", issued on 2 Sep. 2014, U.S. Pat. No.
9,215,240, entitled "INVESTIGATIVE AND DYNAMIC DETECTION OF
POTENTIAL SECURITY-THREAT INDICATORS FROM EVENTS IN BIG DATA",
issued on 15 Dec. 2015, U.S. Pat. No. 9,173,801, entitled "GRAPHIC
DISPLAY OF SECURITY THREATS BASED ON INDICATIONS OF ACCESS TO NEWLY
REGISTERED DOMAINS", issued on 3 Nov. 2015, U.S. Pat. No.
9,248,068, entitled "SECURITY THREAT DETECTION OF NEWLY REGISTERED
DOMAINS", issued on 2 Feb. 2016, U.S. Pat. No. 9,426,172, entitled
"SECURITY THREAT DETECTION USING DOMAIN NAME ACCESSES", issued on
23 Aug. 2016, and U.S. Pat. No. 9,432,396, entitled "SECURITY
THREAT DETECTION USING DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATIONS", issued on 30
Aug. 2016, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its
entirety for all purposes. Security-related information can also
include malware infection data and system configuration
information, as well as access control information, such as
login/logout information and access failure notifications. The
security-related information can originate from various sources
within a data center, such as hosts, virtual machines, storage
devices and sensors. The security-related information can also
originate from various sources in a network, such as routers,
switches, email servers, proxy servers, gateways, firewalls and
intrusion-detection systems.
[0291] During operation, the enterprise security application
facilitates detecting "notable events" that are likely to indicate
a security threat. A notable event represents one or more anomalous
incidents, the occurrence of which can be identified based on one
or more events (e.g., time stamped portions of raw machine data)
fulfilling pre-specified and/or dynamically-determined (e.g., based
on machine-learning) criteria defined for that notable event.
Examples of notable events include the repeated occurrence of an
abnormal spike in network usage over a period of time, a single
occurrence of unauthorized access to system, a host communicating
with a server on a known threat list, and the like. These notable
events can be detected in a number of ways, such as: (1) a user can
notice a correlation in events and can manually identify that a
corresponding group of one or more events amounts to a notable
event; or (2) a user can define a "correlation search" specifying
criteria for a notable event, and every time one or more events
satisfy the criteria, the application can indicate that the one or
more events correspond to a notable event; and the like. A user can
alternatively select a pre-defined correlation search provided by
the application. Note that correlation searches can be run
continuously or at regular intervals (e.g., every hour) to search
for notable events. Upon detection, notable events can be stored in
a dedicated "notable events index," which can be subsequently
accessed to generate various visualizations containing
security-related information. Also, alerts can be generated to
notify system operators when important notable events are
discovered.
[0292] The enterprise security application provides various
visualizations to aid in discovering security threats, such as a
"key indicators view" that enables a user to view security metrics,
such as counts of different types of notable events. For example,
FIG. 17A illustrates an example key indicators view 1700 that
comprises a dashboard, which can display a value 1701, for various
security-related metrics, such as malware infections 1702. It can
also display a change in a metric value 1703, which indicates that
the number of malware infections increased by 63 during the
preceding interval. Key indicators view 1700 additionally displays
a histogram panel 1704 that displays a histogram of notable events
organized by urgency values, and a histogram of notable events
organized by time intervals. This key indicators view is described
in further detail in pending U.S. patent application Ser. No.
13/956,338, entitled "KEY INDICATORS VIEW", filed on 31 Jul. 2013,
and which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for
all purposes.
[0293] These visualizations can also include an "incident review
dashboard" that enables a user to view and act on "notable events."
These notable events can include: (1) a single event of high
importance, such as any activity from a known web attacker; or (2)
multiple events that collectively warrant review, such as a large
number of authentication failures on a host followed by a
successful authentication. For example, FIG. 17B illustrates an
example incident review dashboard 1710 that includes a set of
incident attribute fields 1711 that, for example, enables a user to
specify a time range field 1712 for the displayed events. It also
includes a timeline 1713 that graphically illustrates the number of
incidents that occurred in time intervals over the selected time
range. It additionally displays an events list 1714 that enables a
user to view a list of all of the notable events that match the
criteria in the incident attributes fields 1711. To facilitate
identifying patterns among the notable events, each notable event
can be associated with an urgency value (e.g., low, medium, high,
critical), which is indicated in the incident review dashboard. The
urgency value for a detected event can be determined based on the
severity of the event and the priority of the system component
associated with the event.
2.15. Data Center Monitoring
[0294] As mentioned above, the data intake and query platform
provides various features that simplify the developer's task to
create various applications. One such application is a virtual
machine monitoring application, such as SPLUNK.RTM. APP FOR
VMWARE.RTM. that provides operational visibility into granular
performance metrics, logs, tasks and events, and topology from
hosts, virtual machines and virtual centers. It empowers
administrators with an accurate real-time picture of the health of
the environment, proactively identifying performance and capacity
bottlenecks.
[0295] Conventional data-center-monitoring systems lack the
infrastructure to effectively store and analyze large volumes of
machine-generated data, such as performance information and log
data obtained from the data center. In conventional
data-center-monitoring systems, machine-generated data is typically
pre-processed prior to being stored, for example, by extracting
pre-specified data items and storing them in a database to
facilitate subsequent retrieval and analysis at search time.
However, the rest of the data is not saved and discarded during
pre-processing.
[0296] In contrast, the virtual machine monitoring application
stores large volumes of minimally processed machine data, such as
performance information and log data, at ingestion time for later
retrieval and analysis at search time when a live performance issue
is being investigated. In addition to data obtained from various
log files, this performance-related information can include values
for performance metrics obtained through an application programming
interface (API) provided as part of the vSphere Hypervisor.TM.
system distributed by VMware, Inc. of Palo Alto, Calif. For
example, these performance metrics can include: (1) CPU-related
performance metrics; (2) disk-related performance metrics; (3)
memory-related performance metrics; (4) network-related performance
metrics; (5) energy-usage statistics; (6) data-traffic-related
performance metrics; (7) overall system availability performance
metrics; (8) cluster-related performance metrics; and (9) virtual
machine performance statistics. Such performance metrics are
described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/167,316, entitled
"CORRELATION FOR USER-SELECTED TIME RANGES OF VALUES FOR
PERFORMANCE METRICS OF COMPONENTS IN AN INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY
ENVIRONMENT WITH LOG DATA FROM THAT INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY
ENVIRONMENT", filed on 29 Jan. 2014, and which is hereby
incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
[0297] To facilitate retrieving information of interest from
performance data and log files, the virtual machine monitoring
application provides pre-specified schemas for extracting relevant
values from different types of performance-related events, and also
enables a user to define such schemas.
[0298] The virtual machine monitoring application additionally
provides various visualizations to facilitate detecting and
diagnosing the root cause of performance problems. For example, one
such visualization is a "proactive monitoring tree" that enables a
user to easily view and understand relationships among various
factors that affect the performance of a hierarchically structured
computing system. This proactive monitoring tree enables a user to
easily navigate the hierarchy by selectively expanding nodes
representing various entities (e.g., virtual centers or computing
clusters) to view performance information for lower-level nodes
associated with lower-level entities (e.g., virtual machines or
host systems). Example node-expansion operations are illustrated in
FIG. 17C, wherein nodes 1733 and 1734 are selectively expanded.
Note that nodes 1731-1739 can be displayed using different patterns
or colors to represent different performance states, such as a
critical state, a warning state, a normal state or an
unknown/offline state. The ease of navigation provided by selective
expansion in combination with the associated performance-state
information enables a user to quickly diagnose the root cause of a
performance problem. The proactive monitoring tree is described in
further detail in U.S. Pat. No. 9,185,007, entitled "PROACTIVE
MONITORING TREE WITH SEVERITY STATE SORTING", issued on 10 Nov.
2015, and U.S. Pat. No. 9,426,045, also entitled "PROACTIVE
MONITORING TREE WITH SEVERITY STATE SORTING", issued on 23 Aug.
2016, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its
entirety for all purposes.
[0299] The virtual machine monitoring application also provides a
user interface that enables a user to select a specific time range
and then view heterogeneous data comprising events, log data, and
associated performance metrics for the selected time range. For
example, the screen illustrated in FIG. 17D displays a listing of
recent "tasks and events" and a listing of recent "log entries" for
a selected time range above a performance-metric graph for "average
CPU core utilization" for the selected time range. Note that a user
is able to operate pull-down menus 1742 to selectively display
different performance metric graphs for the selected time range.
This enables the user to correlate trends in the performance-metric
graph with corresponding event and log data to quickly determine
the root cause of a performance problem. This user interface is
described in more detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No.
14/167,316, entitled "CORRELATION FOR USER-SELECTED TIME RANGES OF
VALUES FOR PERFORMANCE METRICS OF COMPONENTS IN AN
INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY ENVIRONMENT WITH LOG DATA FROM THAT
INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY ENVIRONMENT", filed on 29 Jan. 2014, and
which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all
purposes.
2.16. It Service Monitoring
[0300] As previously mentioned, the data intake and query platform
provides various schemas, dashboards and visualizations that make
it easy for developers to create applications to provide additional
capabilities. One such application is an IT monitoring application,
such as SPLUNK.RTM. IT SERVICE INTELLIGENCE.TM., which performs
monitoring and alerting operations. The IT monitoring application
also includes analytics to help an analyst diagnose the root cause
of performance problems based on large volumes of data stored by
the data intake and query system as correlated to the various
services an IT organization provides (a service-centric view). This
differs significantly from conventional IT monitoring systems that
lack the infrastructure to effectively store and analyze large
volumes of service-related events. Traditional service monitoring
systems typically use fixed schemas to extract data from
pre-defined fields at data ingestion time, wherein the extracted
data is typically stored in a relational database. This data
extraction process and associated reduction in data content that
occurs at data ingestion time inevitably hampers future
investigations, when all of the original data may be needed to
determine the root cause of or contributing factors to a service
issue.
[0301] In contrast, an IT monitoring application system stores
large volumes of minimally-processed service-related data at
ingestion time for later retrieval and analysis at search time, to
perform regular monitoring, or to investigate a service issue. To
facilitate this data retrieval process, the IT monitoring
application enables a user to define an IT operations
infrastructure from the perspective of the services it provides. In
this service-centric approach, a service such as corporate e-mail
may be defined in terms of the entities employed to provide the
service, such as host machines and network devices. Each entity is
defined to include information for identifying all of the events
that pertains to the entity, whether produced by the entity itself
or by another machine, and considering the many various ways the
entity may be identified in machine data (such as by a URL, an IP
address, or machine name). The service and entity definitions can
organize events around a service so that all of the events
pertaining to that service can be easily identified. This
capability provides a foundation for the implementation of Key
Performance Indicators.
[0302] One or more Key Performance Indicators (KPI's) are defined
for a service within the IT monitoring application. Each KPI
measures an aspect of service performance at a point in time or
over a period of time (aspect KPI's). Each KPI is defined by a
search query that derives a KPI value from the machine data of
events associated with the entities that provide the service.
Information in the entity definitions may be used to identify the
appropriate events at the time a KPI is defined or whenever a KPI
value is being determined. The KPI values derived over time may be
stored to build a valuable repository of current and historical
performance information for the service, and the repository,
itself, may be subject to search query processing. Aggregate KPIs
may be defined to provide a measure of service performance
calculated from a set of service aspect KPI values; this aggregate
may even be taken across defined timeframes and/or across multiple
services. A particular service may have an aggregate KPI derived
from substantially all of the aspect KPI's of the service to
indicate an overall health score for the service.
[0303] The IT monitoring application facilitates the production of
meaningful aggregate KPI's through a system of KPI thresholds and
state values. Different KPI definitions may produce values in
different ranges, and so the same value may mean something very
different from one KPI definition to another. To address this, the
IT monitoring application implements a translation of individual
KPI values to a common domain of "state" values. For example, a KPI
range of values may be 1-100, or 50-275, while values in the state
domain may be `critical,` `warning,` `normal,` and `informational`.
Thresholds associated with a particular KPI definition determine
ranges of values for that KPI that correspond to the various state
values. In one case, KPI values 95-100 may be set to correspond to
`critical` in the state domain. KPI values from disparate KPI's can
be processed uniformly once they are translated into the common
state values using the thresholds. For example, "normal 80% of the
time" can be applied across various KPI's. To provide meaningful
aggregate KPI's, a weighting value can be assigned to each KPI so
that its influence on the calculated aggregate KPI value is
increased or decreased relative to the other KPI's.
[0304] One service in an IT environment often impacts, or is
impacted by, another service. The IT monitoring application can
reflect these dependencies. For example, a dependency relationship
between a corporate e-mail service and a centralized authentication
service can be reflected by recording an association between their
respective service definitions. The recorded associations establish
a service dependency topology that informs the data or selection
options presented in a GUI, for example. (The service dependency
topology is like a "map" showing how services are connected based
on their dependencies.) The service topology may itself be depicted
in a GUI and may be interactive to allow navigation among related
services.
[0305] Entity definitions in the IT monitoring application can
include informational fields that can serve as metadata, implied
data fields, or attributed data fields for the events identified by
other aspects of the entity definition. Entity definitions in the
IT monitoring application can also be created and updated by an
import of tabular data (as represented in a CSV, another delimited
file, or a search query result set). The import may be GUI-mediated
or processed using import parameters from a GUI-based import
definition process. Entity definitions in the IT monitoring
application can also be associated with a service by means of a
service definition rule. Processing the rule results in the
matching entity definitions being associated with the service
definition. The rule can be processed at creation time, and
thereafter on a scheduled or on-demand basis. This allows dynamic,
rule-based updates to the service definition. During operation, the
IT monitoring application can recognize notable events that may
indicate a service performance problem or other situation of
interest. These notable events can be recognized by a "correlation
search" specifying trigger criteria for a notable event: every time
KPI values satisfy the criteria, the application indicates a
notable event. A severity level for the notable event may also be
specified. Furthermore, when trigger criteria are satisfied, the
correlation search may additionally or alternatively cause a
service ticket to be created in an IT service management (ITSM)
system, such as a systems available from ServiceNow, Inc., of Santa
Clara, Calif.
[0306] SPLUNK.RTM. IT SERVICE INTELLIGENCE.TM. provides various
visualizations built on its service-centric organization of events
and the KPI values generated and collected. Visualizations can be
particularly useful for monitoring or investigating service
performance. The IT monitoring application provides a service
monitoring interface suitable as the home page for ongoing IT
service monitoring. The interface is appropriate for settings such
as desktop use or for a wall-mounted display in a network
operations center (NOC). The interface may prominently display a
services health section with tiles for the aggregate KPI's
indicating overall health for defined services and a general KPI
section with tiles for KPI's related to individual service aspects.
These tiles may display KPI information in a variety of ways, such
as by being colored and ordered according to factors like the KPI
state value. They also can be interactive and navigate to
visualizations of more detailed KPI information.
[0307] The IT monitoring application provides a service-monitoring
dashboard visualization based on a user-defined template. The
template can include user-selectable widgets of varying types and
styles to display KPI information. The content and the appearance
of widgets can respond dynamically to changing KPI information. The
KPI widgets can appear in conjunction with a background image, user
drawing objects, or other visual elements, that depict the IT
operations environment, for example. The KPI widgets or other GUI
elements can be interactive so as to provide navigation to
visualizations of more detailed KPI information.
[0308] The IT monitoring application provides a visualization
showing detailed time-series information for multiple KPI's in
parallel graph lanes. The length of each lane can correspond to a
uniform time range, while the width of each lane may be
automatically adjusted to fit the displayed KPI data. Data within
each lane may be displayed in a user selectable style, such as a
line, area, or bar chart. During operation a user may select a
position in the time range of the graph lanes to activate lane
inspection at that point in time. Lane inspection may display an
indicator for the selected time across the graph lanes and display
the KPI value associated with that point in time for each of the
graph lanes. The visualization may also provide navigation to an
interface for defining a correlation search, using information from
the visualization to pre-populate the definition.
[0309] The IT monitoring application provides a visualization for
incident review showing detailed information for notable events.
The incident review visualization may also show summary information
for the notable events over a time frame, such as an indication of
the number of notable events at each of a number of severity
levels. The severity level display may be presented as a rainbow
chart with the warmest color associated with the highest severity
classification. The incident review visualization may also show
summary information for the notable events over a time frame, such
as the number of notable events occurring within segments of the
time frame. The incident review visualization may display a list of
notable events within the time frame ordered by any number of
factors, such as time or severity. The selection of a particular
notable event from the list may display detailed information about
that notable event, including an identification of the correlation
search that generated the notable event.
[0310] The IT monitoring application provides pre-specified schemas
for extracting relevant values from the different types of
service-related events. It also enables a user to define such
schemas.
3.0. Lower-Tier System Monitoring Component
[0311] Users, such as system administrators and site reliability
engineers, for example, are tasked with maintaining the overall
health, availability, reliability and performance of one or more
entities within an enterprise system in an information technology
(IT) environment. Typically, these users monitor approximately 800
to 1,000 entities. Each entity may be a computing device, a virtual
computing device, a group of computing devices, a group of virtual
computing devices, an individual server, a network device, or a
local area network at a specific site or multiple sites within the
enterprise system. This grouping of entities within the enterprise
system may be referred to as a lower-tier system and the enterprise
system may be referred to as the higher-tier system.
[0312] Lower-tier system monitoring components, applications,
programs, or solutions of an event-based data intake and query
system provide an analytics driven tool for infrastructure
monitoring and troubleshooting of the entities in the lower-tier
system that that represent a subset of the higher-tier or
enterprise system. While a higher-tier system monitoring component
or application of an event-based data intake and query system, such
as the SPLUNK.RTM. ENTERPRISE system developed by Splunk Inc. of
San Francisco, Calif. can analyze machine data across the
enterprise system, the lower-tier system monitoring component
searches the machine data from the entities in the lower-tier
system and provides entity-level metrics related to the performance
of the entities within the enterprise system that form the
lower-tier system.
[0313] Embodiments of the lower-tier system monitoring component
are directed to monitoring performance of an entity at an
entity-level using key performance indicators derived from machine
data from the entity. Implementations of the lower-tier system
monitoring component provide users with metrics related to the
performance of a monitored entity within an enterprise system in an
information technology environment. The lower-tier-tier system
monitoring component allows users to monitor entities of the
lower-tier system from a bottom-up perspective and provides
visualization to trouble shoot entity-related issues.
Advantageously, the lower-tier system monitoring component allows
smaller systems or groups of entities within the enterprise system
in the information technology environment to be monitored without
having to monitor the all of the entities within the enterprise
system. Once the user decides to monitor the enterprise, the
lower-tier system monitoring components can interface with the
higher-tier system monitoring component to utilize the lower-tier
system monitoring that is already in place, which uses less
computer resources and speeds up the entity monitoring process for
the enterprise system. In addition, advantageously, the users of
the lower-tier system monitoring component are able to continue to
monitor the lower-tier system without interference from the users
of the higher-tier system and the users of the higher-tier system
can off load monitoring of the lower-tier systems within the
enterprise to the lower-tier system monitoring components.
[0314] The lower-tier system monitoring components may provide an
analytic-driven IT operations tool that unifies metrics and logs
for trouble shooting and monitoring hybrid IT infrastructure.
[0315] In an embodiment, the lower-tier system monitoring
components are single team focused and provide simple tagging and
grouping, reliability scoring on entities, and grouping of anomaly
detection and adaptive thresholding for easy tuning; 24 hours of
alerts and notifications with the ability to mute alerts; metrics
analysis; in-application collection guidance; self-service; and
easy deployment.
[0316] One or more lower-tier system monitoring components and the
higher-tier system monitoring component may interface to provide
one or more of map groupings of entities to the higher-tier
services, both automatically and manually; business-level metrics
which can be tied to data from the lower-tier system monitoring
component to create an end-to-end analysis of infrastructure impact
on business outcomes; multiple lower-tier system monitoring
component instances together with other tools and custom data in
the higher-tier system monitoring component; identification of
anomalous entities in the higher-tier system monitoring component
for correlation across the enterprise, improved interface at the
higher-tier system monitoring component for management of entities;
and end-to-end navigation for monitoring and troubleshooting issues
(service to entity).
[0317] In an embodiment, lower-tier system monitoring components
integrate natively with the higher-tier system monitoring component
to provide one or more of entity sharing, transition from services
to entity metrics analysis, management and actions on alerts from
entities in a Notable Events framework, and application of advanced
machine language available in the higher-level system monitoring
component to entities for clustering and reliability
forecasting.
[0318] In some embodiments, the lower-tier system monitoring
component does not permit clustering. Further, the user may not be
permitted to write applications that use the search engine, but may
be provided with graphic user interfaces for visualization of the
entity-level metrics. The lower-tier system monitoring components
or applications comprise a single use, single channel solution.
3.1. Architecture
[0319] FIG. 18 shows a block diagram of an example of a data intake
and query system 108 that supports the application level
functionality of a lower-tier system monitoring component in one
embodiment. FIG. 18 represents an adaptation of the data input and
query system 108 of FIG. 4 and like elements have common numbering
as between the two figures, and the descriptions thereof are not
repeated here. Notable differences for the example embodiment
illustrated in FIG. 18 are described now. Client devices 404a,
404b, and 404n, of FIG. 4 are replaced in FIG. 18 by lower tier
system monitoring component or application 401 which acts as the
client in relation to the underlying data intake and query system
(DIQS) 108. High functionality, direct user access to the
underlying DIQS may generally not be provided. The DIQS may be
adapted, supplied, configured, and provisioned to effect support
for requests presented by the lower tier system monitoring
component, in an embodiment. As one example, DIQS 108 of FIG. 18
may exclude support for External Result Provider (ERP) processing
as indicated by the dashed lines around and connecting ERP
processes 410, 412, RDBMS ERP 416, and Hadoop ERP 414. In one
embodiment, a developer or provider of the lower-tier system
monitoring component may configure the DIQS functionality to only
include what is required by the lower-tier system monitoring
component, perhaps through a user interface directed to building a
customized DIQS configuration instance. In one embodiment, a
customized DIQS instance may be able to be shared by a number of
lower-tier system monitoring components such as 401.
[0320] In comparison to the DIQS 108 of FIG. 4, the DIQS 108 of
FIG. 18 is shown to also include indexer instance 436 having data
store 438. Indexer 436 and data store 438 operate just as described
for indexers 206 and data stores 208 of FIG. 4--and any indexer 206
and data store 208 may comport with the details next described for
indexer 436 and data store 438 of FIG. 18. Indexer 436 of FIG. 18
when processing the data of its associated data store 438 may
distinguish and discriminate between different types or classes of
data in its data store. Data store 438 is shown to include Event
Data 430a storing data of an event data type and Metric Data 430b
storing data of a metric data type. Event type data is already
described in detail elsewhere in this written description. Metric
type data may be data that is characteristically small per
occurrence, high in volume, primarily numeric, and perhaps highly
structured. An example of data with those characteristics may be
performance or parameter measurements being constantly reported by
networked devices such as computing machines in information
technology environments, automated machinery on the shop floor of a
factory, or sensors on the windmills of an energy farm. An indexer
such as 436 having multiple data type capability may use functional
processing specialized to the data type when responding to requests
from search head 210 or receiving data from a forwarder 204. For
example, indexer 436 may use different processing to effect the
formatting, storage, indexing, retrieval, consolidation,
aggregation, and such, of metric type data than it does for event
type data in order to maximize or optimize the processing of each
type of data to improve overall DIQS performance and functionality.
Lower tier system monitoring component 401 may invoke the
processing of DIQS 108 for multiple types of data and, in one
embodiment, the types of data supported by the indexers (206, 436)
may be configurable for an instance of DIQS 108 customized to the
lower tier system monitoring component. These and other embodiments
are possible.
[0321] SPLUNK.RTM. INSIGHTS FOR RANSOMWARE and SPLUNK.RTM. INSIGHTS
FOR AWS CLOUD MONITORING are examples of lower-tier system
monitoring components or applications.
4.0. Higher-Tier System Monitoring Component
[0322] Embodiments of the higher-tier system monitoring component
or application are directed to monitoring performance of an
enterprise-level system at a service-level using key performance
indicators derived from machine data. For example, machine data can
be raw machine data that is generated by various components in IT
environments, such as servers, sensors, routers, mobile devices,
Internet of Things (IoT) devices, etc. Machine data can include
system logs, network packet data, sensor data, application program
data, error logs, stack traces, system performance data, etc. In
general, machine data can also include performance data, diagnostic
information, and many other types of data that can be analyzed to
diagnose performance problems, monitor user interactions, and to
derive other insights. Implementations of the higher-tier system
monitoring component provide users with metrics related to the
performance of a monitored service, such as services pertaining to
an information technology environment. The higher-tier system
monitoring component allows users to monitor services from a
top-down perspective and provide through customizable graphic user
interfaces visualization to trouble shoot service related issues.
Higher-tier system monitoring components permit clustering and
users are permitted to create custom applications that use the
search engine.
[0323] The SPLUNK.RTM. ENTERPRISE system, described herein, is one
example of a higher-tier system monitoring component or
application. SPLUNK.RTM. IT Service Intelligence application is
another example of a higher-tier system monitoring component or
application.
5.0 Deployment
[0324] Embodiments disclosed herein are directed to a monitoring
component deployment model. One or more bottom-up, lower-tier
system monitoring components monitor the performance of individual
computing machines or groups of computing machines in one or more
lower-tier systems, respectively, of an information technology
environment of an enterprise. The lower-tier system monitoring
components have limited functionality and are directed to a subset
of the computing machines in the enterprise.
[0325] Once the one or more lower-tier system monitoring components
are deployed in the enterprise, the top-down, higher-tier system
monitoring component can be deployed to monitor the performance of
the enterprise. The functionality of the larger, higher functional
higher-tier system monitoring component is supported by the limited
functionality of the lower-tier system monitoring components. The
higher-tier system monitoring component and the lower-tier system
monitoring components are interfaced so that the lower-tier system
monitoring components can provide the support to the higher-tier
application.
[0326] FIG. 19 is a flow chart 1900 of an example method that
illustrates the deployment of the lower-tier and higher-tier system
monitoring applications in the enterprise. At event 1902, one or
more lower-tier system monitoring components are installed and
operated. In an embodiment, the lower-tier system monitoring
component is installed over a host application that includes enough
of the infrastructure of the higher-tier system monitoring
component to permit the lower-tier system monitoring component to
run. For example, the host application provides one or more of
licensing, authentication, search, reporting, alerting, and
framework for the lower-tier system monitoring component. In
another embodiment, the host application comprises the higher-tier
system monitoring component where advanced features are hidden. The
lower-tier system monitoring components monitor entities of the
lower-tier system within the enterprise and provide entity-level
metrics associated with the entities of the lower-tier system.
[0327] At event 1904, a higher-tier system monitoring component is
installed after the installation and operation of the one or more
lower-tier system monitoring components. The higher-tier system
monitoring component is configured to monitor aspects of the
enterprise.
[0328] FIG. 20 is a flow chart 2000 of another example method that
illustrates the deployment of the lower-tier and higher-tier system
monitoring components in the enterprise or information technology
environment. At event 2002, one or more lower-tier system
monitoring components are installed and operated. The lower-tier
system monitoring components monitor entities of the lower-tier
system within the enterprise and provide entity-level metrics
associated with the entities of the lower-tier system to the
user.
[0329] At event 2004, a higher-tier system monitoring component is
installed after the installation and operation of the one or more
lower-tier system monitoring components. The higher-tier system
monitoring component is configured to monitor aspects of the
enterprise.
[0330] At event 2006, the higher-tier system monitoring component
and the lower-tier system monitoring component are interfaced. The
interface is configured to pass metrics and data between the
higher-tier system monitoring component and the one or more lower
tier-system monitoring components. In an embodiment, the interface
is configured to pass machine data between the higher-tier system
monitoring component and the one or more lower tier-system
monitoring components. In another embodiment, the interface is
configured to allow the higher-tier system monitoring component to
access the stored machine data associated with the monitored
entities of the lower-tier system.
[0331] At event 2008, the higher-tier system monitoring component
operates to monitor the enterprise and provide
service-level/enterprise-level metrics to the user.
[0332] At event 2010, the higher-tier system monitoring component
and the one or more lower-tier system monitoring components
interoperate via the interface.
[0333] FIG. 21 is a flow chart 2100 of another example method that
illustrates the deployment of the lower-tier and higher-tier system
monitoring components within the enterprise or particular
information technology environment. At event 2102, one or more
lower-tier system monitoring components are installed. At event
2104, the one or more lower-tier system monitoring components
monitor one or more entities of a lower-tier system of an
information technology system. At event 2106, the one or more
lower-tier system monitoring components produce entity-level
metrics of entities of the lower-tier system. For example, the
entity-level metrics are provided to the user on a dashboard to
display indications of entity performance. In an embodiment, the
entity-level metrics comprise CPU, memory, network and storage data
for the entities of the lower-tier systems.
[0334] At event 2108, a higher-tier system monitoring component is
installed after the installation and operation of the one or more
lower-tier system monitoring components. At event 2110, the
high-tier system monitoring component and the one or more
lower-tier system monitoring components are interfaced via an
interface to permit information sharing. At event 2112, the
higher-tier system monitoring component can pull the entity-level
metrics from the lower-tier system monitoring components and/or the
lower-tier system monitoring components can push the entity-level
metrics to the higher-tier system monitoring component via the
interface.
[0335] At event 2114, the higher-tier system monitoring component
monitors aspects of the information technology system and utilizes
at least some of the entity-level metrics from the one or more
lower-tier system monitoring components. At event 2116, the
higher-tier system monitoring component provides the user
system-level metrics for the information technology system based at
least in part on the entity-level metrics provided via the
interface from the lower-tier system monitoring components.
Operating the higher-tier system monitoring component along with
one or more lower-tier system monitoring component(s) allows users
to correlate across data from the one or more lower-tier system
monitoring component(s) in the higher-tier system. The higher-tier
system monitoring component may correlate across at least metric,
log, and event data from the one or more lower-tier system
monitoring component(s). For example, the system-level metrics are
provided to the user on a user-configured dashboard to display
indications of system performance. In an embodiment, the
system-level metrics comprise CPU, memory, network and storage data
for the information technology system. 6.0 INTERFACE BETWEEN
HIGHER-TIER AND LOWER-TIER SYSTEM MONITORING COMPONENTS
[0336] FIG. 18, described above, illustrates a data intake and
query system 108 for a lower-tier system having the lower-tier
system monitoring component 401. As shown in FIG. 18, forwarders
204 receive data from the data sources 202 associated with the
lower-tier system and forward the data to the indexer 436, where
the data is indexed and stored in data store 438 as event data 430a
and metric data 430b. After the lower-tier system monitoring
component is installed and operated, users monitoring the entities
of the lower-tier system with the lower-tier system monitoring
component may want to upgrade by installing the higher-tier system
monitoring component of the data intake and query system in order
to monitor entities across the enterprise. One or more lower-tier
system monitoring components and the higher-tier system monitoring
component of the data intake and query system can interface in
various embodiments.
[0337] In an embodiment, the lower-tier system monitoring
component(s) are fully migrated or consolidated with the
higher-tier system monitoring component. For example, the
lower-tier system monitoring component(s) and the higher-tier
system monitoring component occupy a unified or native environment,
where the lower-tier and higher-tier system monitoring components
and the dependencies lie within a single deployment after upgrade
and full migration. In an embodiment, the higher-tier system
monitoring component subsumes the lower-tier system monitoring
component(s). The data and settings of the lower-tier system
monitoring component(s) migrate into the higher-tier system
monitoring component and the lower tier and higher-tier system
monitoring components merge indices and objects. Such a native
deployment scenario comprises, for example, using the lower-tier
system monitoring component(s) and the higher-tier system
monitoring component as a bundle on new installations of the
higher-tier system monitoring component.
[0338] FIG. 22 is a block diagram of an example data intake and
query system 108 illustrating the full migration or consolidation
mode of lower-tier system monitoring component and the higher-tier
system monitoring component deployment. FIG. 22 illustrates a
shared search head or shared search head cluster 2210 and a shared
indexer or shared indexer cluster 2206. In a full migration
embodiment, the higher-tier system monitoring component is
installed in a new environment in the data intake and query system
108. The lower-tier system monitoring component(s) are forwarded to
or installed on the search head cluster associated with the
higher-tier application. The lower-tier system monitoring
component(s) and the higher-tier system monitoring component share
the shared search head cluster 2210.
[0339] The lower-tier indexes remain in the data intake and query
system 108 and are indexes in the consolidated environment. For
example, the indexer associated with the lower-tier system
monitoring component, indexer 436 in FIG. 18, becomes part of the
shared indexer 2206. The lower-tier system monitoring component(s)
retain presence within the shared search head cluster 2210 and
perform the data collection and indexing for the entities
associated with the lower-tier systems(s). In an embodiment, the
lower-tier system monitoring component(s) as originally installed
may be decommissioned.
[0340] The higher-tier system monitoring component has access to
its indexes as well as the indexes associated with the lower-tier
system monitoring component(s). The higher-tier system monitoring
component monitors additional entities associated with higher-tier
system and accesses the event data and the metric data from the
entities monitored by the lower-tier system monitoring component to
provide system-level metrics to the user. Users are able to access
the data and metrics for the entities associated with the
lower-tier system(s), as well as the data and metrics for at least
a portion of the enterprise entities being monitored by the
higher-tier system monitoring component.
[0341] In an embodiment, the data intake and query system 108
provides a message bus between the lower-tier system monitoring
component(s) and the higher-tier system monitoring component to
facilitate the communications between the lower-tier system
monitoring component(s) and the higher-tier system monitoring
component. FIG. 23 is a block diagram illustrating an example
messaging bus 2306 between lower-tier system monitoring
component(s) 2302 and a higher-tier system monitoring component
2304. Lower-tier system monitoring component 2302 is associated
with an entity identification module 2308 and an entity store 2310
and the higher-tier system monitoring component 2304 is associated
with an entity store 2312. Message bus 2306 is associated with an
intelligent module 2314, which controls the message bus 2306, and
non-persistent storage 2316. Message bus 2306 may be independent of
both the lower-tier system monitoring component(s) 2302 and the
higher-tier system monitoring component 2304. In an embodiment, the
message bus 2306 is a Java.RTM.-based daemon or process. In another
embodiment, the higher-tier system monitoring component 2304
comprises the message bus 2306.
[0342] Message bus 2306 comprises network accessible endpoints,
such as, but not limited to REST endpoints. To share data, the
lower-tier system monitoring component 2302 publishes information
to be shared with the higher-tier system monitoring component 2304
to the REST endpoints of the message bus 2306. If the higher-tier
system monitoring component 2304 is interested in the information
published to the REST endpoints, the higher-tier system monitoring
component 2304 subscribes to the REST endpoints and receives the
published information from the REST endpoints. In an embodiment,
the higher-tier system monitoring component 2304 does not publish
information to the message bus 2306 and the lower-tier system
component 2302 does not subscribe. In other words, in this
scenario, the information flows only from the lower-tier system
monitoring component to the higher-tier system monitoring
component, such that the lower-tier system monitoring component
2302 determine which information to share with the higher-tier
system monitoring component.
[0343] In other embodiments, the higher-tier system monitoring
component 2304 publishes information to share to the REST endpoints
of the message bus 2306 and the lower-tier system component 2302
subscribes to the REST endpoints to receive the published
information from the higher-tier system monitoring component.
[0344] For example, the data identification module 2308 discovers
data associated with the lower-tier application 2302. The
lower-tier system monitoring component 2302 saves the discovered
data to the data store 2310. In an embodiment, the discovered data
is saved as a batch save. The lower-tier system monitoring
component 2302 further publishes the discovered data to the REST
endpoints of the message bus 2306. In an embodiment, the data
comprises alerts and other configuration objects. For example, the
lower-tier system monitoring component 2302 may immediately publish
updates or changes in the entities of the lower-tier system to the
message bus 2306 to ensure that the higher-tier system monitoring
component is informed of any changes associated with the entities
of the lower-tier system quickly. The higher-tier system monitoring
component 2304 subscribes to the message bus 2306. Once subscribed
to the message bus 2306, the higher-tier system monitoring
component 2304 receives data published to the message bus 2306 and
saves the data to the entity store 2312. The higher-tier system
monitoring component 2304 maps the data. In an embodiment, the
data, such as one or more of the discovered entities and associated
REST endpoints, the alerts, and the other configurations is mapped
into the native objects associated with the higher-tier system
monitoring component 2304.
[0345] In another example, when the lower-tier system monitoring
component 2302 acquires a new entity to monitor, the lower-tier
system monitoring component 2302 performs the onboarding and
monitoring of the new entity, acquiring machine data from the new
entity, indexing the data, and the like. The higher-tier system
monitoring component 2304 receives notification of the new entity
through publish and subscribe processes of the message bus 2306.
The new entity is available for the higher-tier system monitoring
component 2304 to monitor and/or visualize through the data
acquired and published by the lower-tier system monitoring
component 2302. In an embodiment, the higher-tier system monitoring
component 2304 does not have authority to delete the new entity
from the lower-tier system monitoring component's environment.
[0346] In an embodiment, the data published by the lower-tier
system monitoring component 2302 comprises configuration data
associated with the monitored entities of the lower-tier system.
The higher-tier system monitoring component accesses the machine
data associated with the monitored entities of the lower-tier
system through the shared indexers, such as shared indexer cluster
2206. In another embodiment, the data published by the lower-tier
system monitoring component 2302 further comprises alert data
associated with the monitored entities of the lower-tier system. In
a further embodiment, the data published by the lower-tier system
monitoring component 2302 comprises one or more of configuration
data, alert data, and machine data associated with the monitored
entities of the lower-tier system.
[0347] Message bus 2306 may include additional functionalities
beyond publish and subscribe features. Intelligent module 2314 may
provide, but not limited to one or more of change set detection,
entity filtering, and stream rate functionalities to the message
bus 2306. The change set detection functionality detects changes in
the data set. For example, the lower-tier system monitoring
component 2302 publishes 5,000 entities to REST endpoints of the
message bus 2306. The higher-tier system monitoring component 2304
subscribes to the rest endpoint of the message bus 2306. Before the
5,000 entities are pushed to the higher-tier system monitoring
component 2304, the change set detection function determines that
the 5,000 entities published to the message bus 2306 are the same
as or duplicative of the last batch of entities published to the
message bus 2306 and stops the higher-tier system monitoring
component 2304 from receiving the 5,000 published entities a second
time (i.e. from receiving a duplicate data set).
[0348] The entity filtering functionality filters the data. For
example, the lower-tier system monitoring component 2302 again
publishes 5,000 entities to REST endpoints of the message bus 2306.
The higher-tier system monitoring component 2304 subscribes to the
rest endpoint of the message bus 2306 and wants a subset of the
5,000 published entities. The entity filtering functionality
filters the published entities to filter out the unwanted entities
and the higher-tier system monitoring component 2304 receives the
desired subset of the published entities.
[0349] The stream rate functionality defines the rate the
higher-tier system monitoring component can receive the published
data from the message bus 2306. For example, when the lower-tier
system monitoring component 2302 sends continuous streams of data
to the messaging bus 2306, the stream rate defines the rate at
which the when the higher-tier system monitoring component 2304 can
consume the data.
[0350] In another embodiment, the higher-tier system monitoring
component is deployed in an environment separate from the
lower-tier system monitoring component(s) and each lower-tier
system monitoring component is deployed in an environment that is
separate from other lower-tier system monitoring components. For
example, the lower-tier system monitoring component(s) and the
higher-tier system monitoring component occupy a federated
environment, where the infrastructure components are not shared. In
an embodiment, the data from the lower-tier system is mapped into
the data store of the higher-tier system. In an embodiment, the
lower-tier system monitoring component(s) and the higher-tier
application system monitoring component form a peer
relationship.
[0351] In one embodiment of federated deployment, the higher-tier
system monitoring component may be configured to communicate with
the lower-tier system monitoring component(s), such as through
API's, for example. In response to the API calls from the
higher-tier system monitoring component, the lower-tier system
monitoring component(s) returns machine data and/or metrics to the
higher-tier system monitoring component. In an embodiment, the
higher-tier system monitoring component pulls the machine data
and/or metrics from the indexer associated with the lower-tier
system monitoring component(s). An API layer may be used to
communicate between the lower-tier system monitoring component(s)
and the higher-tier system monitoring component.
[0352] In another embodiment of federated deployment, the
forwarders associated with the lower-tier system monitoring
components(s) may forward copies of the machine data, index data,
and log data from the monitored entities of the lower-tier system
to the indexers associated with the higher-tier system monitoring
component. The local copies of the data are maintained in the
indexers associated with the lower-tier system monitoring
components(s), such that the lower-tier system monitoring
component's environment remains. In addition, the higher-tier
system monitoring component may pull configuration objects, such as
thresholds, settings, entities, alerts, that are managed externally
via APIs on a rolling basis. The higher-tier system monitoring
component may be configured to pull the data and metrics on a
chronological schedule, a pulling schedule, or the like. In other
words, in the federated mode of deployment, the data intake and
query system 108 duplicates the machine data from the lower-tier
system monitoring components(s) for monitoring and troubleshooting
in the higher-tier system monitoring component and maps the
configuration data from the lower-tier system monitoring
component(s) to the higher-tier system monitoring component for
configuration management in the higher-tier system monitoring
component.
[0353] FIG. 24 is a block diagram of an example data intake and
query system 108 illustrating the federated mode of lower-tier
system monitoring component and the higher-tier system monitoring
component deployment. For example, the data intake and query system
108 of FIG. 24 includes two lower-tier system monitoring
components, illustrated as boxes 2416A and 2416B. Each of the
lower-tier system monitoring components comprises a separate search
head and indexer. The data intake and query system of FIG. 24
further comprises a higher-tier system monitoring component 2414
having a higher-tier search head cluster 2410 and a higher-tier
indexer cluster 2406. The notable difference between the DIQS 108
of FIG. 22 illustrating migration deployment and the DIQS 108 of
FIG. 24 illustrating federated deployment is that the lower-tier
and higher-tier system monitoring components of FIG. 22 share a
server and the lower-tier and higher-tier system monitoring
components of FIG. 24 are found on separate servers. In the
federated deployment, typically, the lower-tier system monitoring
component 2416A, 2416B will have been installed and operated to
monitor the lower-tier systems before the higher-tier system
monitoring component 2414 is installed. The higher-tier system
monitoring component 2414 may be installed on at least one of the
servers running the search head and indexer associated with the
lower-tier system monitoring component(s) 2416A, 2416B. In other
federated deployment implementations, the higher-tier system
monitoring component 2414 may be installed on a server that is
different from any of the servers running the search head and
indexer associated with the lower-tier system monitoring
component(s) 2416A, 2416B. The servers may be physical machines,
virtual machines, part of a distributed computing environment, or
any combination of physical machines, virtual machines, and
distributed computing.
[0354] Referring to FIG. 23, the lower-tier system monitoring
component(s) 2416A, 2416B and the higher-tier system monitoring
components 2414, in the federated deployment, can publish and
subscribe entities, configuration data, and alert data through the
message bus 2306. However, because the lower-tier system monitoring
component(s) 2416A, 2416B and the higher-tier system monitoring
components 2424 exist on separate search heads, the messages may
need additional authentication and authorization to proceed. For
example, the lower-tier system monitoring component 2416A, 2416B
and the higher-tier system monitoring component 2414 may provide
passwords and pass tokens before and during the publish and
subscribe processes.
[0355] Further, the lower-tier system monitoring component(s)
2416A, 2416B and the higher-tier system monitoring components 2414
do not share an indexer in the federated deployment mode. The
higher-tier system monitoring component 2414 may communicate using
HTTP over a network, such as the Internet to the lower-tier system
monitoring components 2416A, 2416B. The higher-tier system
monitoring component 2414 reaches out to the lower-tier system
monitoring component to access the machine data of the lower-tier
system monitoring component 2416A, 2416B. Arrows 2408A, 2408B in
FIG. 24 illustrate machine data access requests from the
higher-tier system monitoring component 2414 to the lower-tier
system monitoring components 2416A, 2416B, respectively.
[0356] Other embodiments comprise various combinations of the
native environment and the federated environment to form partial
unification. One example of a hybrid scenario with a higher-tier
system monitoring component and a plurality of lower-tier system
monitoring components may be deploying the higher-tier system
monitoring component and ones of the plurality of lower-tier system
monitoring components in a unified environment and deploying others
of the plurality of lower-tier system monitoring components in
separate, federated environments.
[0357] In another embodiment, the higher-tier system monitoring
component and the lower-tier system monitoring component(s) are
partially unified. For example, the higher-tier system monitoring
component is deployed on a first search head or search head cluster
and the lower-tier system monitoring component(s) are deployed on a
second search head or search head cluster, where the higher-tier
system monitoring component and the lower-tier system monitoring
component(s) share an indexer. The higher-tier system monitoring
component and the lower-tier system monitoring component(s) may
share one or more of entities, alerts, alerting conditions,
metrics, KPIs, workspaces, thresholds, groups, and the like.
7.0 Workflow Between Higher-Tier and Lower-Tier Systm Monitoring
Components
[0358] FIG. 25 is a block diagram 2500 of an example workflow
between the lower-tier system monitoring component and the
higher-level system monitoring component and illustrates multiple
embodiments of the interaction between the higher-tier and
lower-tier system monitoring components. The interactions between
the higher-tier and lower-tier system monitoring components provide
the higher-tier system monitoring component with machine data
and/or entity metric data from the lower-tier system monitoring
components to be used in the service-level monitoring of the
enterprise. Although FIG. 25 illustrates the higher-tier system
monitoring component interfacing with a single lower-tier system
monitoring component, the higher-tier system monitoring component
can interface with multiple lower-tier system monitoring
components.
[0359] Initially, the connection between the lower-tier system
monitoring component(s) and the higher-tier system monitoring
component is established. In an embodiment, the lower-tier system
monitoring component sends an instance registration to the
higher-tier system monitoring component. The higher-tier system
monitoring component sends an HTTP event collector (HEC) token to
the lower-tier system monitoring component to authenticate the user
in order to be able to send data to the HEC high-performance data
input. For example, a peer connection is established between the
lower-tier system monitoring component and the higher-tier system
monitoring component. The communication between the lower-tier
system monitoring component and the higher-tier system monitoring
component may occur over the message bus 2306 illustrated in FIG.
23.
[0360] In an embodiment, the higher-tier system monitoring
component may pull entity meta data, such as, but not limited to
keywords, title, abstract, and author, for example, which may be
described as descriptive meta data; types, versions, and
relationships, for example, which may be described as structural
meta data; and creation data, file type, and access authorization,
for example, which may be described as administrative meta data,
from the lower-tier system monitoring component. In an embodiment,
the entity meta data may be configuration data. The configuration
data may comprise one or more of descriptive meta data, structural
meta data, and administrative meta data. The lower-tier system
monitoring component can provide data to network accessible
endpoints, such as, but not limited to REST endpoints and the
higher-tier system monitoring component pulls the entity meta data
via the network accessible endpoints, such as, but not limited to
REST endpoints. If needed, the higher-tier system monitoring
component translates the entity meta data for use in the
higher-tier system monitoring component. For example, the
translation may involve merging data, tagging data, and resolving
conflicts. Visualization of the data is performed in the
higher-tier system monitoring component.
[0361] In another embodiment, the lower-tier system monitoring
component may push entity meta data, such as, but not limited to
keywords, title, abstract, and author, for example, which may be
described as descriptive meta data; types, versions, and
relationships, for example, which may be described as structural
meta data; and creation data, file type, and access authorization,
for example, which may be described as administrative meta data to
the higher-tier system monitoring component. In an embodiment, the
entity meta data may be configuration data. The configuration data
may comprise one or more of descriptive meta data, structural meta
data, and administrative meta data. Again, if needed, the
higher-tier system monitoring component translates the entity meta
data for use in the higher-tier system monitoring component.
Visualization of the data is performed in the higher-tier system
monitoring component.
[0362] By pushing/pulling the entity meta data, the higher-tier
system monitoring component can access in depth the lower-tier
system monitoring component's entity-level investigate
view/dashboard within the higher-tier system monitoring component.
The lower-tier system monitoring component may provide the machine
data continuously in the background to the higher-tier system
monitoring component. The higher-tier system monitoring component
performs the analysis and visualization. The user can configure a
schedule to push the real-time data from the lower-tier system
monitoring component to the higher-tier system monitoring
component.
[0363] In another embodiment, the user can prompt an entity-level
metric to a key performance indicator (KPI). The higher-tier system
monitoring component generates the KPI and searches the metrics
store/indexer associated with the lower-tier system monitoring
component directly. For example, the higher-tier system monitoring
component searches the metrics store/indexer as a peer.
[0364] FIG. 26 is a flowchart of an example method 2600 that
illustrates how lower-tier and higher-tier system monitoring
components deployed in a migrated or consolidated mode interface.
At event 2602, user or system administrator installs the lower-tier
system monitoring component(s) and the higher-tier system
monitoring component on a shared search head or shared search head
cluster. The original installation of the lower-tier system
monitoring components may be decommissioned. At event 2604, the
DIQS 108 forwards the machine data associated with the monitored
entities of the lower-tier system(s) to indexers that are shared
with the higher-tier system monitoring component.
[0365] At event 2606, the higher-tier system messaging component
subscribes to network accessible endpoints, such as, but not
limited to REST endpoints of a message bus, such as message bus
2306 in FIG. 23. At event 2608, the lower-tier system monitoring
component publishes data associated with the monitored entities of
the lower-tier system to the REST endpoints of the message bus,
such as message bus 2306 in FIG. 23. The data comprises one or more
of configuration data, alert data, metric data, and machine data.
The higher-tier system monitoring component, which has subscribed
to the REST endpoints of the message bus, receives the data.
[0366] At event 2610, the higher-tier system monitoring component
operates to monitor entities of the higher-tier system based at
least in part the received data from the lower-tier-monitoring
system(s). At event 2612, the lower-tier system monitoring
component operates to monitor the entities of the lower-tier
system.
[0367] FIG. 27 is a flowchart of an example method 2700 that
illustrates how lower-tier and higher-tier system monitoring
components deployed in a federated mode communicate data. At event
2702, the user or system administrator installs the higher-tier
system monitoring component. The lower-tier system monitoring
component(s) have already been installed and operating. Unlike the
migration deployment, the higher-tier system monitoring component
and the lower-tier system monitoring component(s) are installed in
separate environments, such that they do not share search heads or
indexers.
[0368] At event 2704, the higher-tier system monitoring component
subscribes to network accessible endpoints, such as, but not
limited to REST endpoints of a message bus, such as message bus
2306 of FIG. 23. In an embodiment, the higher-tier system
monitoring component provides authentication and/or authorization
to subscribe to the message bus.
[0369] At event 2706, the lower-tier system monitoring component(s)
publish data to the REST endpoints of the message bus, such as
message bus 2306 in FIG. 23. In an embodiment, the lower-tier
system monitoring component(s) provide authentication and/or
authorization to publish to the message bus. The data comprises one
or more of configuration data and alert data. The higher-tier
system monitoring component, which has subscribed to the REST
endpoints of the message bus, receives the data. In an embodiment,
the subscribe and publish process includes handshaking and/or token
passing between the higher-tier and lower-tier system monitoring
components.
[0370] At event 2708, the higher-tier system monitoring component
sends queries to the indexer(s) associated with the lower-tier
system monitoring component(s) to access machine data and metrics
associated with the monitored entities of the lower-tier
application(s). In an embodiment, the locations within the indexers
are determined from the published data.
[0371] At event 2710, the higher-tier system monitoring component
operates to monitor entities of the higher-tier system based at
least in part the received data from the lower-tier-monitoring
system(s), where the received data may come at least in part from
the published data and where the received data may come from a
response to the query sent to the indexer(s) of the lower-tier
application(s). At event 2612, the lower-tier system monitoring
component operates to monitor the entities of the lower-tier
system.
8.0 Terminology
[0372] Depending on the embodiment, certain acts, events, or
functions of any of the algorithms described herein can be
performed in a different sequence, can be added, merged, or left
out altogether (e.g., not all described acts or events are
necessary for the practice of the algorithm). Moreover, in certain
embodiments, acts or events can be performed concurrently, e.g.,
through multi-threaded processing, interrupt processing, or
multiple processors or processor cores or on other parallel
architectures, rather than sequentially.
[0373] All of the processes and steps described above as being
implemented by the identification and marketing service may be
performed and fully automated by a computer system. The computer
system may include multiple distinct computers or computing devices
(e.g., physical servers, workstations, storage arrays, etc.) that
communicate and interoperate over a network to perform the
described functions. Each such computing device typically includes
a processor (or multiple processors) that executes program
instructions or modules stored in a memory or other non-transitory
computer-readable storage medium or device. The various
identification and marketing service functions disclosed herein may
be embodied in such program instructions, although some or all of
the disclosed functions may alternatively be implemented in
application-specific circuitry (e.g., ASICs or FPGAs) of the
computer system. Where the computer system includes multiple
computing devices, these devices may, but need not, be co-located.
The results of the disclosed methods and tasks may be persistently
stored by transforming physical storage devices, such as
solid-state memory chips and/or magnetic disks, into a different
state.
[0374] Conditional language, such as, among others, "can," "could,"
"might," or "may," unless specifically stated otherwise, or
otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally
intended to convey that certain embodiments include, while other
embodiments do not include, certain features, elements and/or
steps. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to
imply that features, elements and/or steps are in any way required
for one or more embodiments or that one or more embodiments
necessarily include logic for deciding, with or without user input
or prompting, whether these features, elements and/or steps are
included or are to be performed in any particular embodiment.
[0375] Depending on the embodiment, certain acts, events, or
functions of any of the algorithms described herein can be
performed in a different sequence, can be added, merged, or left
out altogether (e.g., not all described acts or events are
necessary for the practice of the algorithms). Moreover, in certain
embodiments, acts or events can be performed concurrently, e.g.,
through multi-threaded processing, interrupt processing, or
multiple processors or processor cores or on other parallel
architectures, rather than sequentially.
[0376] Systems and modules described herein may comprise software,
firmware, hardware, or any combinations of software, firmware, or
hardware suitable for the purposes described herein. Software and
other modules may reside on servers, workstations, personal
computers, computerized tablets, PDAs, and other devices suitable
for the purposes described herein. Software and other modules may
be accessible via local memory, via a network, via a browser, or
via other means suitable for the purposes described herein. Data
structures described herein may comprise computer files, variables,
programming arrays, programming structures, or any electronic
information storage schemes or methods, or any combinations
thereof, suitable for the purposes described herein. User interface
elements described herein may comprise elements from graphical user
interfaces, command line interfaces, and other suitable
interfaces.
[0377] Further, the processing of the various components of the
illustrated systems can be distributed across multiple machines,
networks, and other computing resources. In addition, two or more
components of a system can be combined into fewer components.
Various components of the illustrated systems can be implemented in
one or more virtual machines, rather than in dedicated computer
hardware systems. Likewise, the data repositories shown can
represent physical and/or logical data storage, including, for
example, storage area networks or other distributed storage
systems. Moreover, in some embodiments the connections between the
components shown represent possible paths of data flow, rather than
actual connections between hardware. While some examples of
possible connections are shown, any of the subset of the components
shown can communicate with any other subset of components in
various implementations.
[0378] Embodiments are also described above with reference to flow
chart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus
(systems) and computer program products. Each block of the flow
chart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of
blocks in the flow chart illustrations and/or block diagrams, may
be implemented by computer program instructions. Such instructions
may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer,
special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing
apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which
execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable
data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the acts
specified in the flow chart and/or block diagram block or
blocks.
[0379] These computer program instructions may also be stored in a
computer-readable memory that can direct a computer or other
programmable data processing apparatus to operate in a particular
manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable
memory produce an article of manufacture including instruction
means which implement the acts specified in the flow chart and/or
block diagram block or blocks. The computer program instructions
may also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data
processing apparatus to cause a series of operations to be
performed on the computer or other programmable apparatus to
produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions
which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus
provide steps for implementing the acts specified in the flow chart
and/or block diagram block or blocks.
[0380] While certain embodiments have been described, these
embodiments have been presented by way of example only, and are not
intended to limit the scope of the disclosure. Indeed, the novel
methods and systems described herein may be embodied in a variety
of other forms; furthermore, various omissions, substitutions and
changes in the form of the described methods and systems may be
made without departing from the spirit of the disclosure.
* * * * *