U.S. patent application number 15/866554 was filed with the patent office on 2018-05-10 for proppant sand coating for dust reduction.
This patent application is currently assigned to Covestro LLC. The applicant listed for this patent is Covestro LLC. Invention is credited to Yanan Chen, Mark Conner, Derick Henderson, Emery Yuhas, David P. Zielinski.
Application Number | 20180127646 15/866554 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 55442914 |
Filed Date | 2018-05-10 |
United States Patent
Application |
20180127646 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Zielinski; David P. ; et
al. |
May 10, 2018 |
PROPPANT SAND COATING FOR DUST REDUCTION
Abstract
The present invention provides for coating proppants, such as
sand, with a resin-containing dispersion which dramatically reduces
the dust generated during handling, for example in hydraulic
fracturing, by protecting the surface of the particle from abrasion
and degradation. Such resin-containing dispersion coated-sand may
also reduce the wear on metal parts used in transporting such
proppants.
Inventors: |
Zielinski; David P.;
(Cranberry Township, PA) ; Yuhas; Emery;
(Greensburg, PA) ; Chen; Yanan; (Pittsburgh,
PA) ; Henderson; Derick; (Crafton, PA) ;
Conner; Mark; (Kempton, PA) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
Covestro LLC |
Pittsburgh |
PA |
US |
|
|
Assignee: |
Covestro LLC
|
Family ID: |
55442914 |
Appl. No.: |
15/866554 |
Filed: |
January 10, 2018 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
15047108 |
Feb 18, 2016 |
9896620 |
|
|
15866554 |
|
|
|
|
62128085 |
Mar 4, 2015 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
1/1 |
Current CPC
Class: |
E21B 43/267 20130101;
B05D 7/00 20130101; C09K 8/805 20130101 |
International
Class: |
C09K 8/80 20060101
C09K008/80; E21B 43/267 20060101 E21B043/267; B05D 7/00 20060101
B05D007/00 |
Claims
1. A coated proppant comprising: a core; and a polyacrylate
containing dispersion coating disposed over at least a portion of
the core, wherein the coated proppant has at least about a 90%
reduction in dust as compared to a comparable core in an uncoated
state.
2. The coated proppant according to claim 1, wherein the core
comprises one selected from the group consisting of sand, mineral
fiber, a ceramic particle, a bauxite particle, a glass particle, a
metal bead, a walnut hull, a composite particle and coated
sand.
3. The coated proppant according to claim 1, wherein the
resin-containing dispersion is applied at about 0.05 wt. % to about
2.0 wt. % resin solids based on the weight of the proppant.
4-7. (canceled)
8. The coated proppant according to claim 1, wherein the
polyacrylate resin further comprises one or more selected from the
group consisting of polyurethane dispersions and styrene butadiene
rubber ("SBR") latex dispersions.
9. A process for coating a proppant comprising: disposing a
polyacrylate-containing dispersion over at least a portion of a
proppant core, wherein the coated proppant has at least about a 90%
reduction in dust as compared to a comparable core in an uncoated
state.
10. The process according to claim 9, wherein the core comprises
one selected from the group consisting of sand, mineral fiber, a
ceramic particle, a bauxite particle, a glass particle, a metal
bead, a walnut hull, a composite particle and coated sand.
11. The process according to claim 9, wherein the
polyacrylate-containing dispersion is applied at about 0.05 wt. %
to about 2.0 wt. % resin solids based on the weight of the
proppant.
12-15. (canceled)
16. The process according to claim 9, wherein the
polyacrylate-containing dispersion further comprises one or more
selected from the group consisting of polyurethane dispersions and
styrene butadiene rubber ("SBR") latex dispersions.
17. A process for reducing dust from a proppant comprising;
disposing a polyacrylate-containing dispersion over at least a
portion of a proppant core, wherein the coated proppant core has at
least about a 90% reduction in dust as compared to a comparable
core in an uncoated state.
18. The process according to claim 17, wherein the core comprises
one selected from the group consisting of sand, mineral fiber, a
ceramic particle, a bauxite particle, a glass particle, a metal
bead, a walnut hull, a composite particle and coated sand.
19. The process according to claim 17, wherein the
polyacrylate-containing dispersion is applied at about 0.05 wt. %
to about 2.0 wt. % resin solids based on the weight of the
proppant.
20-23. (canceled)
24. The process according to claim 17, wherein the polyacrylate
dispersion further comprises one or more selected from the group
consisting of polyurethane dispersions and styrene butadiene rubber
("SBR") latex dispersions.
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
[0001] This application claims the benefit, under 35 USC .sctn.
119(e), of U.S. provisional patent application No. 62/128,085,
filed Mar. 4, 2015, entitled "PROPPANT SAND COATING FOR DUST
REDUCTION" the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by
reference.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The present invention relates, in general, to oil and gas
drilling and, more specifically, to proppant sand coatings with
resin-containing dispersions to reduce dust.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0003] Coating of hydraulic fracturing (or fracking) sand is not
new. Millions of tons of sand or proppant are used in the oil and
gas industry every year to stimulate wells and thereby improve
productivity. Such sand may be coated to impart specialized
functionality when in use in the down-hole environment. The sand
"props open" the fractures in the well so that fluids and gas can
escape more efficiently. The typical sand coating is either heat or
chemically activated so that the sand will "stick" to itself
forming a discrete "pack" or sponge like formation with open
pathways for the fluid and gas to escape. Once the well is
depleted, the sand pack can be "broken" or dissolved so the sand
can flow back out of the well and be recovered. Uncoated sand is
however, the largest percentage of fracking sand used in the
industry.
[0004] Uncoated sand can fracture during handling operations
creating very fine particles or dust. This dust is primarily
composed of crystalline silica which is a known carcinogen. The
handling of sand from mining, transport and handling can create
large amounts of dust containing crystalline silica, which can be
toxic at low inhalation levels. Reducing the risk to persons
involved in handling hydraulic fracturing sand is a responsible and
sustainable goal.
[0005] A number of references in the art are directed to coating
hydraulic fracturing sand with a variety of materials, such as the
use of thermoplastic coatings.
[0006] U.S. Pat. No. 6,582,819, issued to McDaniel et al., provides
low density composite particles made of a binder and filler
material for use in subterranean formations. The filler includes
low density filler and optionally other filler. The binder includes
a polymer and optionally cement. The binder is said to be at least
one member of the group consisting of epoxy resin, polyurethane
resin, alkaline modified phenolic resole curable with ester,
melamine resin, urea-aldehyde resin, urea-phenol-aldehyde resin,
furans, synthetic rubber, polyester resin, and further comprises
cross-linking agents and conventional additives. The particles are
said to be useful as proppants to prop open subterranean formation
fractures. The particles are also said to be useful for gravel
packing in subterranean formations, water filtration and artificial
turf for sports fields. Methods of making the composite particles
are also disclosed.
[0007] McDaniel et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 6,632,527, disclose
composite particles made of a binder and filler material for use in
subterranean formations. The filler is finely divided mineral and
optional fiber. The binder is said to be at least one member of the
group consisting of inorganic binder, epoxy resin, novolak resin,
resole resin, polyurethane resin, alkaline phenolic resole curable
with ester, melamine resin, urea-aldehyde resin,
urea-phenol-aldehyde resin, furans, synthetic rubber, polyester
resin, and further comprises cross-linking agents and conventional
additives. The particles are proppants said to be useful to prop
open subterranean formation fractures. The particles are also
useful for water filtration and artificial turf for sports fields.
Methods of making the composite particles are also disclosed.
[0008] U.S. Pat. No. 7,153,575, issued to Anderson et al., teaches
coated particulate matter wherein the particles are individually
coated with a first set of one or more layers of a curable resin,
for example, a combination of phenolic/furan resin or furan resin
or phenolic-furan-formaldehyde terpolymer, on a proppant such as
sand, and the first set of layers is coated with a second set of
one or more layers of a curable resin, for example, a novolak resin
with curative. Methods for making and using this coated product as
a proppant, gravel pack and for sand control are also
disclosed.
[0009] McCrary et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 7,624,802, teach free
flowing coated particles and low temperature methods of making the
same. Each particle has a curable coating disposed upon a
substrate. The substrate is a particulate substrate including an
inorganic material, a particulate substrate including an organic
material, a composite substantially homogeneous formed particle
including a first portion of an at least partly cured binder and
filler particles, or a hybrid particle having an inorganic particle
as a core and a composite coating including at least partially
cured resin and filler. The curable coating includes a continuous
phase including resole resin and reactive powder particles embedded
or adhered to the continuous phase. The reactive powder particles
typically include resole resin, novolak resin, polyester, acrylic
and/or urethane. A method including applying a coating including
the continuous phase including resole resin and reactive or
non-reactive powder particles embedded or adhered to the continuous
phase.
[0010] U.S. Pat. No. 8,133,587, issued to Rediger et al., discloses
thermoplastic coated proppants and methods for preparing the
thermoplastic coated proppants. Methods for using these proppants
in subterranean well formations and hydraulic fracturing
operations, for example, are also disclosed. The thermoplastics are
selected from a polyethylene, a polypropylene, an ethylene vinyl
acetate, an ethylene ethyl acrylate, a styrene-isoprene-styrene, an
acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene, a styrene-butadiene-styrene, a
polystyrene, a polyurethane, an acrylic polymer, a polyvinyl
chloride, a fluoroplastic, a pine rosin (e.g., tall oil rosin, wood
rosin, and gum rosin), a modified rosin (e.g., disproportionated
rosins, hydrogenated rosins, polymerized or oligomerized rosins,
Diels-Alder rosin adducts), a rosin ester (e.g., hydrogenated rosin
esters, polymerized rosin esters, phenolic-modified rosin esters,
dibasic acid-modified rosin esters; the rosin esters can be derived
from tall oil rosin, wood rosin, and/or gum rosin), a polysulfide,
a styrene-acrylonitrile, a nylon, a phenol-formaldehyde novolak
resin, or a combination thereof.
[0011] U.S. Pat. No. 8,763,700, issued to McDaniel et al.,
discloses proppants for use in fractured or gravel packed/frac
packed oil and gas wells with a contaminant removal component to
remove one or more of the contaminants found in subterranean
water/hydrocarbon from a production well. The water/hydrocarbon
cleaning proppant solids may be used as discrete particles in a
proppant formulation, as a coating on proppant solids in pores of a
porous proppant solid or as part of the proppant's internal
structure. The contaminant removal component removes contaminants,
especially dissolved contaminants, in the subterranean water or
hydrocarbon before the water/hydrocarbon leaves the well. For those
contaminant removal components that can be regenerated, such as ion
exchange resins, a measured quantity of an acidic regeneration
solution can be injected into the fractured stratum for
regeneration and recovered when the well resumes production.
[0012] U.S. Published Patent Application No. 2013/0065800, in the
of McDaniel et al., discloses solid proppants coated with a coating
that exhibits the handling characteristics of a pre-cured coating
while also exhibiting the ability to form particle-to-particle
bonds at the elevated temperatures and pressures within a wellbore.
The coating includes a substantially homogeneous mixture of (i) at
least one isocyanate component having at least 2 isocyanate groups,
and (ii) a curing agent comprising a monofunctional alcohol, amine
or amide. The coating process can be performed with short cycle
times, e.g., less than about 4 min, and still produce a dry,
free-flowing, coated proppant that exhibits low dust
characteristics during pneumatic handling but also proppant
consolidation down-hole for reduced washout and good conductivity.
Such proppants are said to form good unconfined compressive
strength without use of an bond activator, are substantially
unaffected in bond formation characteristics under down-hole
conditions despite prior heat exposure, and are said to be
resistant to leaching with hot water.
[0013] McCrary et al., in U.S. Published Patent Application No.
2013/0186624, discuss solid proppants coated in a process that
includes the steps of: (a) coating free-flowing proppant solids
with a first component of either a polyol or an isocyanate in
mixer; (b) adding a second component of either an isocyanate or a
polyol that is different from the first component at a controlled
rate or volume sufficient to form a polyurethane coating on the
proppant solids; and (c) adding water at a rate and volume
sufficient to retain the free-flowing characteristics of the
proppant solids.
[0014] U.S. Published Patent Application No. 2014/0274819, in the
name of McCrary et al., discloses proppants for hydraulic
fracturing of oil and gas wells coated with a polyurea-type
coating. In a preferred embodiment, the polyurea-type coating is
formed by contacting a polymeric isocyanate with an amount of water
and a blowing catalyst at a rate and quantity sufficient to
generate a reactive amine in situ on the outer surface of the
proppant which thereby reacts with unconverted polymeric isocyanate
to form a thin polyurea-type surface coating that is substantially
solid and lacks foam or substantial porosity. Alternatively, the
polyurea-type can be produced by selecting reactive amine compounds
and isocyanates to develop the coated proppant. The coated
proppants retain the discrete, free-flowing character of the
original core solids but with the beneficial effects of the
polyurea-type coating of the present invention.
[0015] McDaniel et al., in U.S. Published Patent Application No.
2014/0309149, provide proppants for use in fractured or gravel
packed/frac packed oil and gas wells with a contaminant removal
component to remove one or more of the contaminants found in
subterranean water/hydrocarbon from a production well. The
water/hydrocarbon cleaning proppant solids may be used as discrete
particles in a proppant formulation, as a coating on proppant
solids in pores of a porous proppant solid or as part of the
proppant's internal structure. The contaminant removal component
removes contaminants, especially dissolved contaminants, in the
subterranean water or hydrocarbon before the water/hydrocarbon
leaves the well. For those contaminant removal components that can
be regenerated, such as ion exchange resins, a measured quantity of
an acidic regeneration solution can be injected into the fractured
stratum for regeneration and recovered when the well resumes
production.
[0016] U.S. Published Patent Application No. 2014/0338906, in the
name of Monastiriotis et al., discloses polymer-coated proppants
for hydraulic fracturing of oil and gas wells have an outer layer
portion that comprises an organofunctional coupling agent,
preferably an organofunctional silane coupling agent. The use of an
organofunctional silane coupling agent in the outer layer portion
of the proppant coating is preferably chosen to expose
functionalities that will be reactive towards similar
functionalities of adjacent and similarly coated proppants so that,
when introduced down-hole, these proppants form interparticle bonds
at the temperatures and crack closure pressures found down-hole in
fractured strata. Such enhanced interparticle bonding helps keep
the proppant in the fracture and maintains conductivity with
reduced flow-back. The invention also helps proppants designed for
low temperature well to bond more firmly and allows proppants
designed for high temperature wells to bond well even at lower
down-hole temperatures, thereby extending their useful range.
[0017] Hudson et al., in U.S. Published Patent Application No.
2015/0034314 describe coated particles, such as proppants,
processes for their preparation and methods for using such
particles, such as in a hydraulic fracturing process. The coated
particles are said to include a coating that includes a crystalline
or semicrystalline polyester/polyurethane having a
decrystallization temperature of at least 35.degree. C. Hudson et
al. make no mention of reducing dust on their proppants.
[0018] A need continues to exist in the art for a way to reduce or
eliminate dust generated during sand handling for hydraulic
fracturing operations.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0019] Accordingly, the present invention helps dramatically reduce
dust generated during particle handling, for example in hydraulic
fracturing, by coating particles with a resin-containing
dispersion. This coating protects the surface of the proppant from
abrasion and degradation. Such resin-containing dispersion
coated-particles may also reduce the wear on metal parts used in
transporting the sand.
[0020] These and other advantages and benefits of the present
invention will be apparent from the Detailed Description of the
Invention herein below.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
[0021] The present invention will now be described for purposes of
illustration and not limitation in conjunction with the figures,
wherein:
[0022] FIGS. 1-4 illustrate a pre-screening of candidate
resin-containing dispersions on a hot glass plate;
[0023] FIG. 1 shows neat resin-fresh samples of the candidate
resin-containing dispersions;
[0024] FIG. 2 shows neat resin-dry samples of the candidate
resin-containing dispersions;
[0025] FIG. 3 shows neat resin+1% Surfactant, freshly applied
samples of the candidate resin-containing dispersions;
[0026] FIG. 4 shows neat resin+1% Surfactant, dried samples of the
candidate resin-containing dispersions;
[0027] FIG. 5 shows 10% solid resin solutions+1% Surfactant (on
neat resin) samples of the successful candidate resin-containing
dispersions from FIGS. 1-4;
[0028] FIG. 6 shows a comparison of the turbidity measurements of
water from bare sand and from sand coated with a resin-containing
dispersion;
[0029] FIG. 7 shows a comparison of dust reduction for several
resin-containing dispersion coatings based on turbidity
measurements;
[0030] FIG. 8 shows a comparison of dust reduction for several
resin-containing dispersion coatings based on turbidity
measurements using a shaker;
[0031] FIG. 9 shows a comparison of dust reduction based on
turbidity measurements for a fresh sample of dispersion and a one
week aged sample of resin-containing dispersion;
[0032] FIG. 10 shows a comparison based on turbidity measurements
several resin-containing dispersions on sand aged for approximately
six months;
[0033] FIG. 11 shows a comparison of dust reduction based on
turbidity measurements for various ratios of resin-containing
dispersion coatings made from a blend of an acrylic dispersion and
a polyurethane dispersion;
[0034] FIG. 12 shows a comparison of dust reduction based on
turbidity measurements for various ratios of resin-containing
dispersion coatings made from a blend of another acrylic dispersion
and the same polyurethane dispersion as depicted in FIG. 11;
and
[0035] FIG. 13 shows a comparison of coated sand abuse based on
turbidity measurements at various concentrations of a polyurethane
dispersion.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0036] The present invention will now be described for purposes of
illustration and not limitation. Except in the operating examples,
or where otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing quantities,
percentages, and so forth in the specification are to be understood
as being modified in all instances by the term "about."
[0037] Any numerical range recited in this specification is
intended to include all sub-ranges of the same numerical precision
subsumed within the recited range. For example, a range of "1.0 to
10.0" is intended to include all sub-ranges between (and including)
the recited minimum value of 1.0 and the recited maximum value of
10.0, that is, having a minimum value equal to or greater than 1.0
and a maximum value equal to or less than 10.0, such as, for
example, 2.4 to 7.6. Any maximum numerical limitation recited in
this specification is intended to include all lower numerical
limitations subsumed therein and any minimum numerical limitation
recited in this specification is intended to include all higher
numerical limitations subsumed therein. Accordingly, Applicants
reserve the right to amend this specification, including the
claims, to expressly recite any sub-range subsumed within the
ranges expressly recited herein. All such ranges are intended to be
inherently described in this specification such that amending to
expressly recite any such sub-ranges would comply with the
requirements of 35 U.S.C. .sctn. 112(a), and 35 U.S.C. .sctn.
132(a).
[0038] Applicants reserve the right to proviso out or exclude any
individual members of any such group, including any sub-ranges or
combinations of sub-ranges within the group, that can be claimed
according to a range or in any similar manner, if for any reason
Applicants choose to claim less than the full measure of the
disclosure, for example, to account for a reference that Applicants
may be unaware of at the time of the filing of the application.
Further, Applicants reserve the right to proviso out or exclude any
individual resin-containing dispersion coating, or any members of a
claimed group, if for any reason Applicants choose to claim less
than the full measure of the disclosure, for example, to account
for a reference that Applicants may be unaware of at the time of
the filing of the application.
[0039] Any patent, publication, or other disclosure material
identified herein is incorporated by reference into this
specification in its entirety unless otherwise indicated, but only
to the extent that the incorporated material does not conflict with
existing definitions, statements, or other disclosure material
expressly set forth in this specification. As such, and to the
extent necessary, the express disclosure as set forth in this
specification supersedes any conflicting material incorporated by
reference herein. Any material, or portion thereof, that is said to
be incorporated by reference into this specification, but which
conflicts with existing definitions, statements, or other
disclosure material set forth herein, is only incorporated to the
extent that no conflict arises between that incorporated material
and the existing disclosure material. Applicants reserve the right
to amend this specification to expressly recite any subject matter,
or portion thereof, incorporated by reference herein.
[0040] Reference throughout this specification to "various
non-limiting embodiments", "certain embodiments", or the like,
means that a particular feature or characteristic may be included
in an embodiment. Thus, use of the phrase "in various non-limiting
embodiments", "in certain embodiments," or the like, in this
specification does not necessarily refer to a common embodiment,
and may refer to different embodiments. Further, the particular
features or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner
in one or more embodiments. Thus, the particular features or
characteristics illustrated or described in connection with various
or certain embodiments may be combined, in whole or in part, with
the features or characteristics of one or more other embodiments
without limitation. Such modifications and variations are intended
to be included within the scope of the present specification.
[0041] The present invention is directed generally to
resin-containing dispersion-coated proppants, methods for preparing
the dispersion-coated proppants, and methods for using these
proppants in, for example, subterranean well formations and
hydraulic fracturing operations. Resin-containing dispersion-coated
proppants of the present invention produce significantly less dust
during handling and transport operations. This improves the ease in
handling the proppants prior to and during their use. For example,
these coated proppants do not need to be transported to a well site
in slurry or suspension form, but can be distributed in bulk
quantities as free-flowing solids.
[0042] To define more clearly the terms and concepts disclosed
herein, the following definitions are provided. To the extent that
any definition or usage provided by any document incorporated
herein by reference conflicts with the definition or usage provided
herein, the definition or usage provided herein controls.
[0043] The terms "particle", "particulate", "particulate material"
and the like, when unmodified, are used herein to indicate the base
material which, when coated, forms a "proppant." For example,
hydraulic fracturing (fracking) sand is a material that is often
referred to in the art as a "proppant", but in this disclosure, it
is referred to as a "particle." The terms "proppant", "proppant
particle", "coated proppant", and the like, are reserved for
resin-containing dispersion-coated particles in accordance with the
teachings of this invention.
[0044] The term "free-flowing" is used herein to mean that the
proppant particles do not agglomerate appreciably, and generally
remain as discrete, individual proppant particles. Proppants of the
present invention are "free-flowing" at ambient conditions, i.e.,
at a temperature of about 20-25.degree. C. and at atmospheric
pressure. The flowability of the solid particles can be measured
using a test method such as the American Foundrymen's Society
Procedure 227-87-S, entitled "Moldability of Molding Sand Mixtures"
as found in the Mold & Core Test Handbook, 2nd edition (1989),
which is incorporated herein by reference. Briefly, the test
procedure involves placing a 200 g sample of solid particles in a
cylindrical 8-mesh screen of a rotary screen device driven by a 57
rpm motor. The screen was rotated for 10 sec. In accordance with
this test, the moldability index is equal to the weight of the
product passing through the screen divided by the original weight
charged to the screen chamber (i.e., 200 g). If all of the material
passes through the screen, the moldability index is 100%. In
accordance with the present invention, free-flowing proppants have
a moldability index of greater than about 80% at ambient
conditions. For instance, the proppants disclosed herein can have a
moldability index greater than about 85%, or greater than about
90%. In some aspects of this invention, the coated proppants have a
moldability index of greater than about 95%, or alternatively,
greater than about 98%. Generally, solid materials that are not
free-flowing have a moldability index of less than about 50%. Such
materials can, in some cases, have a moldability index of less than
about 40%, or less than about 25%.
[0045] Although any methods, devices, and materials similar or
equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or
testing of the invention, the typical methods, devices and
materials are herein described.
[0046] Although compositions and methods are described in terms of
"comprising" various components or steps, the compositions and
methods can also "consist essentially of" or "consist of" the
various components or steps.
[0047] The present invention is directed to resin-containing
dispersion-coated proppants, methods for preparing the coated
proppants, and methods for using these proppant particles in
subterranean well formations and hydraulic fracturing operations,
for example. A coated proppant in accordance with one aspect of the
present invention comprises (i) a particle, and (ii) a
resin-containing dispersion-coating on the particle.
[0048] The coated particles of certain embodiments of the present
invention can be prepared by any of a variety of processes,
including batch, semi-continuous, or continuous processes. Batch,
continuous mixers or in-line where the sand is effectively agitated
sufficient to spread coating onto the sand surface may be used to
prepare the coated particles of some embodiments of the invention.
Suitable methods of coating the particles include, but are not
limited to, spraying, slurrying, flooding, and simply adding
solution to bulk proppant and stirring. Application temperatures
may be from about 4.4.degree. C. (40.degree. F.)--the coating
solution must be flowable but protected from freezing-up to as high
as approximately 232.22.degree. C. (450.degree. F.). At
temperatures above 100.degree. C. (212.degree. F.), i.e., the
boiling point of water, the required contact time of the solution
should be limited due to the rapid evolution of water from the
mixture. At lower application temperatures, the coated sand mixture
requires longer drying times or the addition of heat to speed the
drying process.
[0049] In a sand processing plant, there are several application
points including a wash step, drying step, during other transport
processes or in-line or off-line with an additional mixing step
where the present invention may find applicability. A separate
coating process of the sand may occur at an off-site location. In
the case of coating done separately from the sand manufacturing,
any of several batch or continuous coating methods may be employed,
including those used to prepare resin-coated proppant designed for
flowback control, for example. Large scale mixers from Robert
Sintos (sold by DelSol Industrial Services) and WEBAC Corp. may be
used. Both companies provide resin coating plant design that may be
used in some embodiments of the invention. In one aspect of the
invention, the most preferred location for coating is at the site
of the sand processing, either in-line with the sand processing
flow or nearby so as to minimize the handling and transport of
large quantities of sand and adding additional cost. Suitable
process equipment for coating the sand includes, but is not limited
to, twin screw mixers, fluidized beds, modified single screw
mixers, batch tanks with mixing blades, and single or multiple head
sprayers.
[0050] The present invention is not limited to any specific type of
particulate material for use as the proppant substrate (before
providing the particle or particulate with the coating containing a
resin-containing dispersion material in accordance with the present
invention), so long as the particle has sufficient strength to
withstand the stresses, such as elevated temperature and pressure,
often encountered in oil and gas recovery applications. In one
aspect of the present invention, the particle of the coated
proppant is a sand, a naturally occurring mineral fiber, a ceramic,
a bauxite, a glass, a metal bead, a walnut hull, a composite
particle, and the like. For instance, the sand can be graded sand
or a resin-coated sand. Such resin-coated sands include sand
particles coated with a curable thermosetting resin, for example,
as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,837,656, the disclosure of which is
incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. These
resin-coated sands can serve as particles in the present invention.
A ceramic can include both porous and non-porous ceramic materials,
while a bauxite can include sintered bauxite materials. Composite
particles are an agglomeration of smaller, fine particles held
together by a binder, and such composite particles can be the
particulate material in the present invention. Compositions
containing coated proppants can employ mixtures or combinations of
more than one type of particle, for instance, both a sand and a
ceramic can be coated and then mixed to form a composition of
coated proppants. It is contemplated that any particulate material
suitable for use in proppant applications can be used in the
present invention, regardless of the specific gravity of the
particle, although it can be beneficial in certain applications to
have a lower specific gravity to increase the distance that the
proppants can be carried into a formation prior to settling.
[0051] In another aspect, the particle is either a porous ceramic
or porous polymer particle. Such particles are described in, for
example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,426,961 and 7,713,918, the disclosures of
which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. These
porous ceramic or porous polymer materials can be of natural origin
or can be produced synthetically. Although the use of such
materials is not limited by specific gravity, the specific gravity
of these materials is generally less than about 3 g/cc, or less
than about 2.7 g/cc. In another aspect, the specific gravity of the
porous particle is less than about 2.5 g/cc, for example, less than
about 2.2 g/cc.
[0052] The particle size of the particle used to produce the coated
proppant of the present invention generally falls within a range
from about 100 .mu.m to about 3000 .mu.m (about 3 mm). In another
aspect, the particle size is from about 125 .mu.m to about 2500
.mu.m, from about 150 .mu.m to about 2000 .mu.m, or from about 175
.mu.m to about 1500 .mu.m. Yet, in another aspect, the particle of
the coated proppant of the present invention has a particle size
that falls within a narrower range of about 200 .mu.m to about 1000
.mu.m, for example, about 250 .mu.m to about 800 .mu.m, or from
about 300 .mu.m to about 700 .mu.m.
[0053] In another aspect of this invention, the particles generally
have a mesh size from about 8 and about 100, based on the U.S.
Standard Sieve Series. For example, in a distribution of such
particles which can be added to a treating fluid for use in a
subterranean formation, at least about 90% by weight of the
particles have a particle size falling within the range from about
8 to about 100 mesh. In accordance with another aspect of the
present invention, at least about 95% by weight of the particles in
a resin-containing dispersion-coated proppant composition have a
size within the range from about 8 to about 100 mesh. Further, 90%
by weight or more (e.g., 95% or more) of the particles in a
resin-containing dispersion-coated proppant composition can have a
size within the 20 to 40 mesh range in another aspect of this
invention.
[0054] In a different aspect, the particle in the resin-containing
dispersion-coated proppant has a size in the range from about 8 to
about 140 mesh, from 10 to about 120 mesh, from about 10 to about
100 mesh, or from about 14 to about 80 mesh. In other aspects of
this invention, the particle is in a range from about 18 to about
60 mesh, or from about 20 mesh to about 40 mesh. In another aspect,
there is less than about 10% by weight, for example, 5% by weight
of less, of particles in a coated proppant composition having a
size of less than about 20 mesh or greater than about 50 mesh.
[0055] The proppants of the present invention generally comprise
particles which are not limited to any particular material or
size.
[0056] The coated particles described herein can be used in a
variety of applications including, for example, use as a component
of a coating, adhesive, or sealant composition, in which the coated
particles are dispersed in a binder resin, such as any binder resin
known to those skilled in the art of such compositions.
[0057] In certain embodiments, however, the coated particles of the
present invention are thought to be particularly suitable for use
in hydraulic fracturing a geologic formation. In these embodiments,
the coated particles may be combined with a carrier fluid, such as
water and/or a hydrocarbon, and the mixture injected at elevated
pressure into a well bore to an underground geologic formation.
When the pressure in the formation resulting from the injection
exceeds the strength of the formation, a fracture is formed and the
coated particles, i.e., proppant, are placed in the formation in an
effort to maintain the fracture in a propped position when the
injection pressure is released. Upon ceasing the injection of
fluid, it is desired that the proppant forms a pack that serves to
hold open the fractures, thereby providing a highly conductive
channel through which a desired material, such as water, oil, or
gas (including natural gas) can flow to the well bore for
retrieval.
[0058] In certain embodiments, therefore, the coated particles are
used in a method of forming a proppant composition that includes
suspending the coated particles described herein in a carrier fluid
to form a suspension and injecting the suspension into an
underground geologic formation.
[0059] The coated particles described herein can be injected as the
sole proppant or as a partial replacement for an existing proppant.
For example, if desired, the coated particles described herein may
comprises 1 to 99 percent by weight, such as 10 to 90 percent by
weight, or, in some cases, 10 to 50 percent by weight, based on the
total weight of the proppant present in the composition that is
injected into the well bore. In some embodiments, an uncoated
proppant is first placed in a well, and thereafter a proppant of
the coated particles described herein is placed in the fracture
nearest to the wellbore or fracture openings.
[0060] The coated particles of the present invention are presently
thought to provide several advantages, particularly in the context
of hydraulic fracturing. For example, the coated particles tend to
drastically reduce the abrasion and degradation of the particles
and therefore greatly reduce the formation of dust from the
particles. Such resin-containing dispersion coated-particles may
also reduce the wear on metal parts used in transporting the
particles.
[0061] As used herein, the term "coating" refers to a set of
chemical components that may be mixed to form an active coating
composition that may be applied and cured to form a coating. As
used herein, the term "coating composition" refers to a mixture of
chemical components that will dry by eliminating water and/or
co-solvent. Accordingly, a coating composition may be formed from a
coating system by mixing the chemical components comprising the
coating system. Furthermore, when a list of constituents is
provided herein that are individually suitable for forming the
components of the coating system or coating composition discussed
herein, it should be understood that various combinations of two or
more of those constituents, combined in a manner that would be
known to those of ordinary skill in the art reading the present
specification, may be employed and is contemplated.
[0062] As used herein, the term "polyurethane" refers to polymeric
or oligomeric materials comprising urethane groups, urea groups, or
both. Accordingly, as used herein, the term "polyurethane" is
synonymous with the terms polyurea, poly(urethane/urea), and
modifications thereof. The term "polyurethane" also refers to
crosslinked polymer networks in which the crosslinks comprise
urethane and/or urea linkages, and/or the constituent polymer
chains comprise urethane and/or urea linkages. Carbodiimide
crosslinking as is known to those skilled in the art is also
contemplated in the coated proppants of the invention.
[0063] As used herein, the term "dispersion" refers to a
composition comprising a discontinuous phase distributed throughout
a continuous phase. For example, "waterborne dispersion" and
"aqueous dispersion" refer to compositions comprising particles or
solutes distributed throughout liquid water. Waterborne dispersions
and aqueous dispersions may also include one or more co-solvents in
addition to the particles or solutes and water. As used herein, the
term "dispersion" includes, for example, colloids, emulsions,
suspensions, sols, solutions (i.e., molecular or ionic
dispersions), and the like. The resin-containing dispersion in the
present invention may be applied at about 0.05 wt. % to about 2.0
wt. % resin solids based on the weight of the proppant.
[0064] As used herein, the term "polyisocyanate" refers to
compounds comprising at least two free isocyanate groups.
Polyisocyanates include diisocyanates and diisocyanate reaction
products comprising, for example, biuret, isocyanurate, uretdione,
urethane, urea, iminooxadiazine dione, oxadiazine trione,
carbodiimide, acyl urea, and/or allophanate groups. As used herein,
the term "polyol" refers to compounds comprising at least two free
hydroxy groups. Polyols include polymers comprising pendant and/or
terminal hydroxy groups. As used herein, the term "polyamine"
refers to compounds comprising at least two free amine groups.
Polyamines include polymer comprising pendant and/or terminal amine
groups.
[0065] Water-dispersible polyisocyanates include polyisocyanates
that may form an aqueous dispersion with the aid of organic
co-solvents, protective colloids, and/or external emulsifiers under
high shear conditions. Water-dispersible polyisocyanates also
include polyisocyanates that are hydrophilically-modified with
covalently linked internal emulsifiers.
[0066] The polyisocyanate may comprise any organic polyisocyanates
having aliphatically, cycloaliphatically, araliphatically, and/or
aromatically bound free isocyanate groups, which are liquid at room
temperature or are dispersed in a solvent or solvent mixture at
room temperature. In various embodiments, the polyisocyanate may
have a viscosity of from 10-15000 mPas at 23.degree. C., 10-5000
mPas at 23.degree. C., or 50-1000 mPas at 23.degree. C. In various
embodiments, the polyisocyanate may comprise polyisocyanates or
polyisocyanate mixtures having exclusively aliphatically and/or
cycloaliphatically bound isocyanate groups with an (average) NCO
functionality of 2.0-5.0 and a viscosity of from 10-5000 mPas at
23.degree. C., 50-1000 mPas at 23.degree. C., or 100-1000 mPas at
23.degree. C.
[0067] In various embodiments, the polyisocyanate may comprise
polyisocyanates or polyisocyanate mixtures based on one or more
aliphatic or cycloaliphatic diisocyanates, such as, for example,
ethylene diisocyanate; 1,4-tetramethylene diisocyanate;
1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI);
2,2,4-trimethyl-1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate;
1,12-dodecamethylene diisocyanate;
1-isocyanato-3-isocyanatomethyl-3,5,5-trimethyl-cyclohexane
(isophorone diisocyanate or IPDI);
bis-(4-isocyanatocyclohexyl)methane (H.sub.12MDI); cyclohexane
1,4-diisocyanate; bis-(4-isocyanato-3-methyl-cyclohexyl)methane;
PDI (pentane diisocyanate--bio-based) isomers of any thereof; or
combinations of any thereof. In various embodiments, the
polyisocyanate component may comprise polyisocyanates or
polyisocyanate mixtures based on one or more aromatic
diisocyanates, such as, for example, benzene diisocyanate; toluene
diisocyanate (TDI); diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI); isomers of
any thereof; or combinations of any thereof. In various
embodiments, the polyisocyanate component may comprise a
triisocyanate, such as, for example, 4-isocyanatomethyl-1,8-octane
diisocyanate (triisocyanatononane or TIN); isomers thereof; or
derivatives thereof.
[0068] Additional polyisocyanates (including various diisocyanates)
that may also find utility in the polyurethane coating useful in
the present invention may include the polyisocyanates described in
U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,075,370; 5,304,400; 5,252,696; 5,750,613; and
7,205,356, each of which is incorporated by reference herein.
Combinations of any of the above-identified and incorporated
polyisocyanates may also be used to form a polyurethane dispersion
useful herein.
[0069] The di- and tri-isocyanates indicated may be used as such,
or as derivative polyisocyanates comprising biuret, isocyanurate,
uretdione, urethane, urea, iminooxadiazine dione, oxadiazine
trione, carbodiimide, acyl urea, and/or allophanate groups. In
various embodiments, derivative polyisocyanates comprising biuret,
isocyanurate, uretdione, urethane, iminooxadiazine dione,
oxadiazine trione, carbodiimide, acyl urea, and/or allophanate
groups are included in the polyisocyanate coating. In various
embodiments, the polyisocyanate component comprises one or more of
the above-identified structural groups prepared from IPDI, HDI,
H.sub.12MDI, and/or cyclohexane 1,4-diisocyanate.
[0070] The polyisocyanate may be hydrophilically-modified to be
water-dispersible. Hydrophilically-modified water-dispersible
polyisocyanates are obtainable, for example, by covalent
modification with an internal emulsifier comprising anionic,
cationic, or nonionic groups.
[0071] Polyether urethane type water-dispersible polyisocyanates
may be formed, for example, from a reaction between polyisocyanates
and less than stoichiometric amounts of monohydric polyalkylene
oxide polyether alcohols. The preparation of such
hydrophilically-modified polyisocyanates is described, for example,
in U.S. Pat. No. 5,252,696, which is incorporated by reference
herein. Polyether allophanate type water-dispersible
polyisocyanates may be formed, for example, from a reaction between
a polyalkylene oxide polyether alcohol and two polyisocyanate
molecules under allophanation conditions. The preparation of such
hydrophilically-modified polyisocyanates is described, for example,
in U.S. Pat. No. 6,426,414, which is incorporated by reference
herein. The polyalkylene oxide polyether alcohol used to prepare
polyether type hydrophilically-modified water-dispersible
polyisocyanates may comprise, for example, polyethylene oxide
residues and/or polypropylene oxide residues.
[0072] Polyisocyanates may also be covalently modified with ionic
or potentially ionic internal emulsifying groups to form
hydrophilically-modified water-dispersible polyisocyanates. The
ionic or potentially ionic groups may be cationic or anionic. As
used herein, the term "ionic or potentially ionic group" refers to
a chemical group that is nonionic under certain conditions and
ionic under certain other conditions. For example, in various
embodiments, the ionic group or potentially ionic group may
comprise a carboxylic acid group; a carboxylate group; a sulfonic
acid group; a sulfonate group; a phosphonic acid group; a
phosphonate group; or combinations of any thereof. In this regard,
for example, carboxylic acid groups, sulfonic acid groups, and
phosphonic acid groups are potentially ionic groups, whereas,
carboxylate groups, sulfonate groups, and phosphonate groups are
ionic groups in the form of a salt, such as, for example, a sodium
salt.
[0073] For example, carboxylate (carboxylic acid) groups, sulfonate
(sulfonic acid) groups, or phosphonate (phosphonic acid) groups may
be covalently introduced into polyisocyanates to form
hydrophilically-modified water-dispersible polyisocyanates. The
ionic or potentially ionic groups may be introduced through a
reaction between the isocyanate groups of the polyisocyanate and
less than stoichiometric amounts of amino-functional or
hydroxy-functional carboxylic acids, sulfonic acids, phosphonic
acids, or salts thereof. Examples include, but are not limited to
dimethylolpropionic acid (DMPA), N-(2-aminoethyl)-2-aminoethane
sulfonic acid (AAS); N-(2-aminoethyl)-2-aminopropionic acid;
2-(cyclohexyl-amino)-ethane sulfonic acid;
3-(cyclohexyl-amino)-1-propane sulfonic acid (CAPS);
2-aminoethylphosphonic acid; or the salts thereof.
[0074] If free carboxylic acids, sulfonic acids, or phosphonic
acids are incorporated in the polyisocyanate, then the acids may be
neutralized with a neutralizing agent, such as, for example,
tertiary amines, including, but not limited to,
trialkyl-substituted tertiary amines. The preparation of
hydrophilically-modified water-dispersible polyisocyanates is
described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,767,958, which is
incorporated by reference herein. Water-dispersible polyisocyanate
mixtures based on triisocyanatononane (TIN) are described in
International Patent Application Publication No. WO-01/62819, which
is incorporated by reference herein
[0075] The NCO content of nonionic type hydrophilically-modified
water-dispersible polyisocyanates may be from 5 to 25 weight
percent of the polyisocyanate molecule. The NCO content of ionic
type hydrophilically-modified water-dispersible polyisocyanates may
be from 4 to 26 weight percent of the polyisocyanate molecule.
[0076] The polyisocyanates may also be partially blocked with
compounds that are reversibly reactive with isocyanate groups.
Suitable blocking agents for polyisocyanates include, for example,
monohydric alcohols such as methanol, ethanol, butanol, hexanol,
cyclohexanol, benzyl alcohol, oximes such as acetoxime, methyl
ethyl ketoxime, cyclohexanone oxime, lactams such as
.epsilon.-caprolactam, phenols, amines such as diisopropylamine or
dibutylamine, dimethylpyrazole or triazole, as well as malonic acid
dimethyl ester, malonic acid diethyl ester or malonic acid dibutyl
ester.
[0077] In addition to the dispersion, the coating composition may
include any desired additives or auxiliaries. Suitable additives
and auxiliaries include, but are not limited to, fillers, wetting
agents, thickeners, fungicides, surfactants, and colorants.
[0078] Although primarily exemplified herein in connection with
polyurethane dispersions and blends containing polyurethane
dispersions, the invention is not intended to be so limited. The
present invention encompasses acrylate dispersions and styrene
butadiene rubber ("SBR") latex dispersions as the resin-containing
dispersion, either alone or in combination with one or more
polyurethane dispersions.
[0079] It should be noted that the invention is not meant to have
an impact on well productivity. It is primarily aimed at preventing
dust from being generated during handling and transport of
proppants such as sand.
EXAMPLES
[0080] The non-limiting and non-exhaustive examples that follow are
intended to further describe various non-limiting and
non-exhaustive embodiments without restricting the scope of the
embodiments described in this specification. All quantities given
in "parts" and "percents" are understood to be by weight, unless
otherwise indicated. The following materials were used in the
Examples described herein: [0081] SURFACTANT--a silicone surfactant
for aqueous coatings commercially available as BYK 346 from
BYK-Chemie GmbH; [0082] RESIN A--an anionic dispersion of an
aliphatic polyester urethane resin in water/n-methyl-2-pyrrolidone
commercially available as BAYHYDROL 110 from Bayer MaterialScience;
[0083] RESIN B--a core-shell styrene acrylate dispersion
commercially available as BAYHYDROL AH XP 2797 from Bayer
MaterialScience; [0084] RESIN C--an aqueous styrene acrylate
dispersion commercially available as BAYHYDROL AH XP 2754 from
Bayer MaterialScience; [0085] RESIN D--an aqueous self-crosslinking
polyacrylate dispersion commercially available as BAYHYDROL AH XP
2814 from Bayer MaterialScience; [0086] RESIN E--an aqueous
core-shell styrene acrylate dispersion commercially available as
BAYHYDROL AH XP 2741 from Bayer MaterialScience; [0087] RESIN F--an
anionic aromatic urethane acrylic copolymer dispersion commercially
available from DSM as NEOPAC E-106; [0088] RESIN G--a
self-crosslinking acrylic dispersion commercially available as AC
2360 from Alberdingk Boley, Inc.; [0089] RESIN H--an acrylic
polymer commercially available as RHOPLEX EC-1791 from Dow Chemical
Company; [0090] RESIN I--an anionic dispersion of an aliphatic
polyester urethane resin in water/toluene commercially available as
BAYHYDROL 140 AQ from Bayer MaterialScience; [0091] RESIN J--an
aqueous colloidal dispersion of a polymer of 2-chloro-butadiene
commercially available as DISPERCOL C84 from Bayer
MaterialScience;
[0092] Several resin-containing dispersions were evaluated
including polyurethane, polyacrylate, and a styrene butadiene
rubber ("SBR") latex. Using very low levels of a polyurethane
dispersion coating (0.2% solid coating on sand solids) a greater
than 90% reduction in dust was observed. The sand was coated and
allowed to dry as unconsolidated particles. A quantity of coated,
loose sand was then placed in a jar with a quantity of water and
agitated to allow the water to remove any dust from the sand
particles. The dust was visible as turbidity in the water. A
turbidity reading was made of the water to assess the effectiveness
of the coating. Although many coatings showed a small improvement
in turbidity, the polyurethane dispersions were especially
effective even against additional agitation in an "abuse" type
simulation. Critical to the effectiveness of the coating is the use
of a wetting agent (SURFACTANT) in the formula. This wetting agent
allowed the present inventors to minimize the coating thickness and
promoted uniformity of the coating on the particle.
Examples 0-7
[0093] TABLE I summarizes the results of hot glass plate
prescreening tests using the above-detailed materials. For each
RESIN above, a one percent SURFACTANT solution was prepared by
combining 20 g RESIN solution+0.2 g SURFACTANT. The glass plate was
heated in oven to 122.degree. C. and the materials were dropped
onto the glass (at an angle). The flow of the materials was
observed. Example 0 was a control. As can be appreciated by
reference to FIGS. 1-4, Examples 1, 2, 3 and 4 exhibited cracking
and were eliminated from further testing. Examples 5, 6 and 7
exhibited good flow and were tested further. The surface of Example
7 was sticky after overnight drying so the formulation may cause
problems when applied to sand.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE I Ex. % 10% solution with 1% SURFACTANT No.
RESIN solid (on neat resin) 0 A 35 100 g A + 1 g SURFACTANT + 250 g
DI water 1 B 43 100 g B + 1 g SURFACTANT + 330 g DI water 2 C 40
100 g C + 1 g SURFACTANT + 300 g DI water 3 D 45.5 100 g D + 1 g
SURFACTANT + 355 g DI water 4 E 40 100 g E + 1 g SURFACTANT + 300 g
DI water 5 F 33 100 g F + 1 g SURFACTANT + 230 g DI water 6 G 47
100 g G + 1 g SURFACTANT + 370 g DI water 7 H 55 100 g H + 1 g
SURFACTANT + 450 g DI water
[0094] A subsequent test was conducted on the promising
resin-containing dispersion candidates from the pre-screening test.
10% solid RESIN solutions+1% SURFACTANT (on neat resin) with the
results depicted in FIG. 5. As can be appreciated by reference to
FIG. 5, RESINS 0, 5, 6, 7 all showed good flow; with RESIN 5 having
the best result.
[0095] The RESINS were used to coat sand particles and the
resultant materials were assessed for dust reduction by measuring
turbidity of water solutions containing the coated sand particles
after being agitated. The 10% solutions of each RESIN were prepared
according to TABLE II below.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE II RESIN % solid 10% solution with 1%
SURFACTANT (on neat resin) A 35 100 g A + 1 g SURFACTANT + 250 g DI
water B 43 100 g B + 1 g SURFACTANT + 330 g DI water C 40 100 g C +
1 g SURFACTANT + 300 g DI water D 45.5 100 g D + 1 g SURFACTANT +
355 g DI water E 40 100 g E + 1 g SURFACTANT + 300 g DI water F 33
100 g F + 1 g SURFACTANT + 230 g DI water G 47 100 g G + 1 g
SURFACTANT + 370 g DI water H 55 100 g H + 1 g SURFACTANT + 450 g
DI water I 40 100 g I + 1 g SURFACTANT + 300 g DI water J 55 100 g
J + 1 g SURFACTANT + 450 g DI water
[0096] Fresh, bare sand and fresh, bare sand coated with RESIN A
were measured as controls for dust reduction as follows:
[0097] 1. 500 g bare sand (ASTM 20/40 mesh from Carbo Ceramics) was
weighed in mixing bowl and heated to 122.degree. C. in an oven.
[0098] 2. 10 g of the 10% solid solution of RESIN A was added under
agitation in a mixer (KITCHENAID) until the sand cooled
(approximately 6-8 minutes). Note: the sand was quickly mixed for
10 sec., the agitation stopped, the mix head lifted, the solution
poured in, the mix head was put down and the mixture was agitated
at a 4-6 setting).
[0099] 3. The resulting material was allowed to cool further for
about 5 min and 50 g of the material was mixed with 50 g tap water.
The resultant materials were spin mixed for 10 sec.
[0100] 4. The water was transferred into a glass vial and the
turbidity measured using a turbidimeter for a turbidity rating in
NTU units according to ASTM D7726.
[0101] Water from bare sand had a turbidity of 730 NTU whereas
water from the bare sand+RESIN A solution had a turbidity of 54
NTU. Thus, coating the sand with RESIN A resulted in a greater than
90% reduction in dust. These results are graphically presented in
FIG. 6.
[0102] The process described in paragraphs [0095] to [0098] was
repeated except pre-coated sand (phenolic resin coated sand from
Carbo Ceramics) was further coated with the RESINS noted below in
TABLE III. Turbidity measurements are given below and the data is
presented graphically in FIG. 7.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE III Ex. No. RESIN Turbidity (NTU) 8 Control
(phenolic resin) 2938 9 RESIN A 56.4 10 RESIN F 272 11 RESIN G 13.6
12 RESIN I 245
[0103] A shaker test was conducted on pre-coated sand (phenolic
resin coated sand from Carbo Ceramics) further coated with the
RESINS A or G as follows. Briefly, 200 g of each sand sample was
placed in a quart metal paint can and shaken for 30 min. on a paint
shaker. The turbidity of the water was measured, as before, using a
turbidimeter for a turbidity rating in NTU units according to ASTM
D7726. The control (phenolic resin coated sand) water had a
turbidity of 1654 NTU; water from the RESIN A coated sand had a
turbidity of 10.9 NTU; and water from the RESIN G coated sand had a
turbidity of 2.9 NTU. These data are presented graphically in FIG.
8.
[0104] A second shaker test (as described in in the preceding
paragraph [0102]) was conducted to determine the effect of ageing
of RESIN A on pre-coated sand (phenolic resin coated sand from
Carbo Ceramics). The turbidity of water from fresh sample of RESIN
A-coated sand and water from a sample of sand coated with RESIN A
which had been aged for one week were both measured as described
above. Water from the fresh sample of RESIN A-coated sand had a
turbidity of 56.4 NTU, whereas that from a one week aged sample of
RESIN A had a turbidity of 8.98 NTU. These results are graphically
shown in FIG. 9.
[0105] The process described in paragraphs [0096] to [0099] was
repeated except approximately six month old coated sand (phenolic
resin coated sand from Carbo Ceramics) further coated with the
RESINS noted below in TABLE IV were used. The turbidity
measurements were made as described elsewhere herein and are given
below in TABLE IV with the data presented graphically in FIG. 10.
Both RESIN A and RESIN G coated sand showed a greater than 90%
reduction in dust. The sand coated with RESIN H had a clumpy
appearance.
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE IV Sample Turbidity (NTU) Control Coated Sand
4000 RESIN A 320 RESIN G 300 RESIN H 69
[0106] The process described in paragraphs [0096] to [0099] was
repeated except 40/70 mesh sand (exceptionally dusty--the sand not
fully processed to render it "clean") was coated with the blends of
RESINS H and A noted below in TABLE V. The turbidity measurements
were made as described herein and are given below in TABLE V with
the data presented graphically in FIG. 11. As can be appreciated by
reference to FIG. 11, an acceptable level of dust reduction
occurred with a 50:50 blend of two resin-containing
dispersions.
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE V SAMPLE RESIN H:RESIN A Turbidity (NTU) None
None 1355 RESIN H 100% 100:0 1336 RESIN H 75% + RESIN A 25% 75:25
410 RESIN H 50% + RESIN A 50% 50:50 24.3 RESIN H 25% + RESIN A 75%
25:75 14.6 RESIN A 100% 0:100 5.9
[0107] The process described in paragraphs [0096] to [0099] was
repeated except 40/70 sand (exceptionally dusty as in the previous
examples) was coated with the blends of RESINS B and A noted below
in TABLE VI. The turbidity measurements were made as described
herein and are given below in TABLE VI with the data presented
graphically in FIG. 12. As can be appreciated by reference to FIG.
12, an acceptable level of dust reduction was achieved with a 50:50
blend.
TABLE-US-00006 TABLE VI SAMPLE RESIN B:RESIN A Turbidity (NTU) None
None 1355 RESIN B 100% 100:0 1075 RESIN B 75% + RESIN A 25% 75:25
1065 RESIN B 50% + RESIN A 50% 50:50 62.3 RESIN B 25% + RESIN A 75%
25:75 25.7 RESIN A 100% 0:100 5.9
[0108] FIG. 13 shows a comparison of coated sand abuse based on
turbidity measurements at various concentrations of polyurethane
dispersion (RESIN A). The shaker test described in paragraph [0106]
was repeated with 40/70 mesh sand (exceptionally dusty as in the
previous examples) coated with the percent weight of RESIN A
specified in TABLE VII. The turbidity of the water was measured, as
before, using a turbidimeter for a turbidity rating in NTU units
according to ASTM D7726.
TABLE-US-00007 TABLE VII % weight RESIN A Turbidity (NTU) 0.20 1645
0.40 1033 0.80 210 1.60 7.56
[0109] This specification has been written with reference to
various non-limiting and non-exhaustive embodiments. However, it
will be recognized by persons having ordinary skill in the art that
various substitutions, modifications, or combinations of any of the
disclosed embodiments (or portions thereof) may be made within the
scope of this specification. Thus, it is contemplated and
understood that this specification supports additional embodiments
not expressly set forth herein. Such embodiments may be obtained,
for example, by combining, modifying, or reorganizing any of the
disclosed steps, components, elements, features, aspects,
characteristics, limitations, and the like, of the various
non-limiting embodiments described in this specification. In this
manner, Applicant(s) reserve the right to amend the claims during
prosecution to add features as variously described in this
specification, and such amendments comply with the requirements of
35 U.S.C. .sctn. 112(a), and 35 U.S.C. .sctn. 132(a).
[0110] Various aspects of the subject matter described herein are
set out in the following numbered clauses:
[0111] 1. A coated proppant comprising: a core; and a
resin-containing dispersion coating surrounding the core, wherein
the coated proppant has at least about a 90% reduction in dust as
compared to a comparable core in an uncoated state.
[0112] 2. The coated proppant according to clause 1, wherein the
core comprises one selected from the group consisting of sand,
mineral fiber, a ceramic particle, a bauxite particle, a glass
particle, a metal bead, a walnut hull, a composite particle and
coated sand.
[0113] 3. The coated proppant according to one of clauses 1 and 2,
wherein the resin-containing dispersion is applied at about 0.05
wt. % to about 2.0 wt. % resin solids based on the weight of the
proppant.
[0114] 4. The coated proppant according to any one of clauses 1 to
3, wherein the resin-containing dispersion comprises the reaction
product of an isocyanate and an isocyanate reactive compound.
[0115] 5. The coated proppant according to clause 4, wherein the
isocyanate is one selected from the group consisting of aliphatic
or cycloaliphatic diisocyanates, aromatic diisocyanates and
triisocyanates.
[0116] 6. The coated proppant according to clause 4, wherein the
isocyanate is selected from the group consisting of ethylene
diisocyanate, 1,4-tetramethylene diisocyanate, 1,6-hexamethylene
diisocyanate (HDI), 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate,
1,12-dodecamethylene diisocyanate,
1-isocyanato-3-isocyanatomethyl-3,5,5-trimethyl-cyclohexane
(isophorone diisocyanate or IPDI),
bis-(4-isocyanatocyclohexyl)methane (H.sub.12MDI), cyclohexane
1,4-diisocyanate, bis-(4-isocyanato-3-methyl-cyclohexyl)methane,
pentane diisocyanate (PDI), benzene diisocyanate, toluene
diisocyanate (TDI), diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI) and
4-isocyanatomethyl-1,8-octane diisocyanate (triisocyanatononane or
TIN).
[0117] 7. The coated proppant according to any one of clauses 1 to
6, wherein the resin-containing dispersion comprises a blend of
dispersions.
[0118] 8. The coated proppant according to clause 7, wherein the
blend comprises one or more selected from the group consisting of
polyurethane dispersions, polyacrylate dispersions and styrene
butadiene rubber ("SBR") latex dispersions.
[0119] 9. A process for coating a proppant comprising disposing a
resin-containing dispersion over at least a portion of a proppant
core, wherein the coated proppant has at least about a 90%
reduction in dust as compared to a comparable core in an uncoated
state.
[0120] 10. The process according to clause 9, wherein the core
comprises one selected from the group consisting of sand, mineral
fiber, a ceramic particle, a bauxite particle, a glass particle, a
metal bead, a walnut hull, a composite particle and coated
sand.
[0121] 11. The process according to one of clauses 9 and 10,
wherein the resin-containing dispersion is applied at about 0.05
wt. % to about 2.0 wt. % resin solids based on the weight of the
proppant.
[0122] 12. The process according to any one of clauses 9 to 11,
wherein the resin-containing dispersion comprises the reaction
product of an isocyanate and an isocyanate reactive compound.
[0123] 13. The process according to clause 12, wherein the
isocyanate is one selected from the group consisting of aliphatic
or cycloaliphatic diisocyanates, aromatic diisocyanates and
triisocyanates.
[0124] 14. The process according to clause 12, wherein the
isocyanate is selected from the group consisting of ethylene
diisocyanate, 1,4-tetramethylene diisocyanate, 1,6-hexamethylene
diisocyanate (HDI), 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate,
1,12-dodecamethylene diisocyanate,
1-isocyanato-3-isocyanatomethyl-3,5,5-trimethyl-cyclohexane
(isophorone diisocyanate or IPDI),
bis-(4-isocyanatocyclohexyl)methane (H.sub.12MDI), cyclohexane
1,4-diisocyanate, bis-(4-isocyanato-3-methyl-cyclohexyl)methane,
pentane diisocyanate (PDI), benzene diisocyanate, toluene
diisocyanate (TDI), diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI) and
4-isocyanatomethyl-1,8-octane diisocyanate (triisocyanatononane or
TIN).
[0125] 15. The process according to any one of clauses 9 to 14,
wherein the resin-containing dispersion comprises a blend of
dispersions.
[0126] 16. The process according to clause 15, wherein the blend
comprises one or more selected from the group consisting of
polyurethane dispersions, polyacrylate dispersions and styrene
butadiene rubber ("SBR") latex dispersions.
[0127] 17. A process for reducing dust from a proppant comprising
disposing a resin-containing dispersion over at least a portion of
a proppant core, wherein the coated proppant core has at least
about a 90% reduction in dust as compared to a comparable core in
an uncoated state.
[0128] 18. The process according to clause 17, wherein the core
comprises one selected from the group consisting of sand, mineral
fiber, a ceramic particle, a bauxite particle, a glass particle, a
metal bead, a walnut hull, a composite particle and coated
sand.
[0129] 19. The process according to one of clauses 17 and 18,
wherein the resin-containing dispersion is applied at about 0.05
wt. % to about 2.0 wt. % resin solids based on the weight of the
proppant.
[0130] 20. The process according to any one of clauses 17 to 19,
wherein the resin-containing dispersion comprises the reaction
product of an isocyanate and an isocyanate reactive compound.
[0131] 21. The process according to clause 20, wherein the
isocyanate is one selected from the group consisting of aliphatic
or cycloaliphatic diisocyanates, aromatic diisocyanates and
triisocyanates.
[0132] 22. The process according to clause 20, wherein the
isocyanate is selected from the group consisting of ethylene
diisocyanate, 1,4-tetramethylene diisocyanate, 1,6-hexamethylene
diisocyanate (HDI), 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate,
1,12-dodecamethylene diisocyanate,
1-isocyanato-3-isocyanatomethyl-3,5,5-trimethyl-cyclohexane
(isophorone diisocyanate or IPDI),
bis-(4-isocyanatocyclohexyl)methane (H.sub.12MDI), cyclohexane
1,4-diisocyanate, bis-(4-isocyanato-3-methyl-cyclohexyl)methane,
pentane diisocyanate (PDI), benzene diisocyanate, toluene
diisocyanate (TDI), diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI) and
4-isocyanatomethyl-1,8-octane diisocyanate (triisocyanatononane or
TIN).
[0133] 23. The process according to any one of clauses 17 to 22,
wherein the resin-containing dispersion comprises a blend of
dispersions.
[0134] 24. The process according to any one of clauses 17 to 23,
wherein the blend comprises one or more selected from the group
consisting of polyurethane dispersions, polyacrylate dispersions
and styrene butadiene rubber ("SBR") latex dispersions.
* * * * *