U.S. patent application number 15/621117 was filed with the patent office on 2017-09-28 for compliant structure design for varying surface contours.
This patent application is currently assigned to FLEXSYS, INC.. The applicant listed for this patent is FLEXSYS, INCL. Invention is credited to Gregory F. Ervin, Joel A. Hetrick, Sridhar Kota.
Application Number | 20170274976 15/621117 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 38832256 |
Filed Date | 2017-09-28 |
United States Patent
Application |
20170274976 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Hetrick; Joel A. ; et
al. |
September 28, 2017 |
COMPLIANT STRUCTURE DESIGN FOR VARYING SURFACE CONTOURS
Abstract
An edge morphing arrangement for an airfoil having upper and
lower control surfaces is provided with an elongated edge portion
that overlies the edge of the airfoil, the edge portion having a
surface element having first and second edges that communicate
with, and form extensions of, respective ones of the upper and
lower control surfaces of the elongated airfoil. The surface
elements are formed of deformable compliant material that extends
cross-sectionally from the first surface element edge to an apex of
the edge portion, and to the second surface element edge. There is
additionally provided a driving link having first and second
driving link ends, the first driving link end being coupled to the
interior of one of the first and second rib portions. The second
end is arranged to receive a morphing force, and the rib element is
deformed in response to the morphing force.
Inventors: |
Hetrick; Joel A.; (Ann
Arbor, MI) ; Kota; Sridhar; (Ann Arbor, MI) ;
Ervin; Gregory F.; (Canton, MI) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
FLEXSYS, INCL |
Ann Arbor |
MI |
US |
|
|
Assignee: |
FLEXSYS, INC.
Ann Arbor
MI
|
Family ID: |
38832256 |
Appl. No.: |
15/621117 |
Filed: |
June 13, 2017 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
14469385 |
Aug 26, 2014 |
9676471 |
|
|
15621117 |
|
|
|
|
13836511 |
Mar 15, 2013 |
8814101 |
|
|
14469385 |
|
|
|
|
12226790 |
May 5, 2009 |
8418966 |
|
|
PCT/US2007/010438 |
Apr 27, 2007 |
|
|
|
13836511 |
|
|
|
|
60795956 |
Apr 27, 2006 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
1/1 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B64C 3/48 20130101; B64C
9/16 20130101; B64C 27/473 20130101; Y02T 50/34 20130101; B64C
2027/7294 20130101; B64C 27/615 20130101; Y10T 74/18056 20150115;
Y10T 74/18288 20150115; B64C 2027/7266 20130101; B64C 3/52
20130101; B64C 9/22 20130101; Y02T 50/30 20130101; B64C 27/72
20130101; B64C 2003/445 20130101; B64C 2027/7222 20130101; B64C
3/50 20130101 |
International
Class: |
B64C 3/52 20060101
B64C003/52; B64C 27/72 20060101 B64C027/72; B64C 3/48 20060101
B64C003/48; B64C 3/50 20060101 B64C003/50 |
Claims
1. An edge morphing arrangement for an elongated airfoil having
upper and lower control surfaces, the elongated airfoil edge
morphing arrangement comprising: a first surface element being
elongated and having a continuous internal structure extending in a
span-wise direction of the airfoil; a second surface element being
elongated and having a continuous internal structure extending in a
span-wise direction of the airfoil; wherein the first and second
surface elements each define interior surfaces, wherein the
interior surfaces of the first and second surface elements face
each other. wherein the first and second surface elements are
arranged to contact and form extensions of respectively associated
ones of the upper and lower control surfaces; wherein the first and
second surfaces elements are formed of a deformable compliant
material; wherein the first and second surface elements extend
cross-sectionally from the associated ones of the upper and lower
control surfaces to an apex defined by the first and second surface
elements; wherein the first and second surface elements have a
span-wise length that is greater than a maximum height between the
first and second surface elements; and an actuator coupled to the
interior surface of one of the first or second surface
elements.
2. The edge morphing arrangement of claim 1, wherein the actuator
is connected to the interior surface at an intermediate location on
the interior surface between a front and rear edge of the one of
the first or second surface elements.
3. The edge morphing arrangement of claim 1, wherein the apex
defines a trailing edge of the elongated airfoil.
4. The edge morphing arrangement of claim 1, wherein the apex
defines a leading edge of the elongated airfoil.
5. The edge morphing arrangement of claim 1, wherein the first
surface element is an upper surface element and the second surface
element is a lower surface element.
6. The edge morphing arrangement of claim 5, wherein the actuation
linkage is coupled to the lower surface element.
7. The edge morphing arrangement of claim 5, wherein the upper
surface element is fixedly attached to the upper control
surface.
8. The edge morphing arrangement of claim 5, wherein the lower
surface element is slidably coupled to the lower control
surface.
9. The edge morphing arrangement of claim 1, wherein at least one
of the first and second surface elements has a monolithic
structure.
10. The edge morphing arrangement of claim 1, wherein at least one
of the first and second surface elements comprises multiple
plys.
11. The edge morphing arrangement of claim 10, wherein the plys are
staggered to define a variable thickness.
12. The edge morphing arrangement of claim 1, wherein at least one
of the first and second surface elements comprises a variable
thickness core.
13. The edge morphing arrangement of claim 1, wherein at least one
web structure extends between the interior surfaces of the first
and second surface elements and further extends in a span-wise
direction.
14. The edge morphing arrangement of claim 1 further comprising a
drive bar associated with the actuator that applies a linear force
against a wing spar of the elongated airfoil by operation of the
actuator, wherein motion of the drive bar is transmitted to the
first or second surface element that is coupled to the
actuator.
15. The edge morphing arrangement of claim 1, wherein in response
to actuation of the actuator, the actuator applies a morphing force
to the first and second surface elements to alter the shape of the
edge morphing arrangement.
16. An edge morphing arrangement for an elongated airfoil having
upper and lower control surfaces, the edge morphing arrangement
comprising: an elongated trailing edge portion disposed at a
trailing edge of the elongated airfoil, said elongated trailing
edge portion having an elongated continuous surface element having
a continuous internal structure extending in a span-wise direction
of the airfoil; wherein the elongated continuous surface element
includes an upper panel and a lower panel, wherein the upper and
lower panels are arranged to communicate with and form extensions
of respectively associated ones of the upper and lower control
surfaces of the elongated airfoil; wherein the continuous surface
element is formed of a deformable compliant material; wherein the
upper and lower panels extend cross-sectionally from the upper and
lower control surfaces to an apex; wherein the elongated continuous
surface element has a span-wise length that is greater than a
maximum height between the upper and lower panels.
17. The edge morphing arrangement of claim 16, further comprising
an actuator coupled to an interior surface of one of the upper and
lower panels.
18. The edge morphing arrangement of claim 17, wherein the actuator
is attached to the interior surface and disposed at an intermediate
location between a front end and a rear end of the interior
surface.
19. The edge morphing arrangement of claim 16, wherein the upper
panel communicates with the upper control surface via a fixed
connection, and the lower panel communicates with the lower control
surface via a sliding joint or an elastomer panel.
20. A shape morphing arrangement comprising: a first surface
element being elongated in a first direction and having a
continuous internal structure extending in the first direction; a
second surface element being elongated in the first direction and
having a continuous internal structure extending in the first
direction; wherein the first and second surface elements each
define interior surfaces, wherein the interior surfaces of the
first and second surface elements face each other; wherein the
first and second surfaces elements are formed of a deformable
compliant material; wherein the first and second surface elements
extend cross-sectionally, in a second direction that is transverse
to the first direction, to an apex defined by the first and second
surface elements; wherein the first and second surface elements
have a length in the first direction that is greater than a maximum
height between the first and second surface elements; and an
actuator coupled to the first surface element, wherein actuation of
the actuator applies a morphing force to the first surface element
and the morphing force is transmitted to the second surface element
such that the first and second surface elements are deformed.
Description
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application is a continuation of U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 14/469,385 which is a continuation of U.S.
patent application Ser. No. 13/836,511 filed on Mar. 15, 2013, now
U.S. Pat. No. 8,814,101 which is a continuation of U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 12/226,790, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,418,966 which
is a U.S. national stage filing under 35 U.S.C. .sctn.371 of
International Application Serial No. PCT/US2007/010438 filed Apr.
27, 2007, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent
Application Ser. No. 60/795,956, filed Apr. 27, 2006. All of the
foregoing applications are hereby incorporated by reference.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] Field of the Invention
[0003] This invention relates generally to resilient systems, and
more particularly, to a resilient air foil arrangement that has a
variable aerodynamic configuration.
[0004] Description of the Design Challenges
[0005] Designing an adaptive control surface for a rotorcraft poses
significant challenges. The primary challenge is to design an
efficient structure that can distribute local actuation power to
the surface of the airfoil to produce a specified shape change.
This system must provide the appropriate shape control over the
adaptive surface while meeting power, weight, packaging, and
survivability constraints. Due to the challenge of rotorcraft
systems, one must address the following design criteria: [0006]
Shape Morphing [0007] D-Spar location [0008] Required shapes for
stall elimination [0009] Wear strip location (top-bottom % chord)
[0010] Compliant structure topology/geometry to effect shape change
[0011] Power Required to Achieve Deflection: [0012] Pressure
loading [0013] Required deflection (10, 5) [0014] Response time (5
Hz to 7 Hz) [0015] Required compliant structure stiffness
(aeroelastic and dynamic constraints) [0016] Packaging Issues:
[0017] Available actuator power density (ultrasonic rotary,
electromagnetic, inchworm, etc.) [0018] D-Spar location [0019]
Actuator system geometry--must move with flap (maximize available
space) [0020] Functionality: [0021] Structural integrity of LE flap
[0022] Dynamic/Aeroelastic response & fatigue loading
[0023] The process of designing a compliant structure leading edge
flap is a highly interdisciplinary process that involves
aerodynamics, structural mechanics, and kinematics. These
components are all interrelated such that the final compliant
structure design depends heavily on all three (FIG. 1).
Essentially, aerodynamic analysis drives the ideal aerodynamic
shapes and predicts the pressure distributions experienced by these
shapes. Kinematics relates to shapes that are achievable given
design limitations such as restricting elongation of the surface
perimeter and minimizing curvature transitions that relate to
structural stress. Note that the structure may be optimized around
an intermediate target shape (called the medial strain position)
that reduces forces and stresses over the entire shape change
envelope. This places added importance on the target shape design
as the medial strain shape must be able to accurately morph into
the extreme target shapes.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0024] The foregoing and other objects are achieved by this
invention, which provides an edge morphing arrangement for an
airfoil having upper and lower control surfaces. In accordance with
the invention, the airfoil edge morphing arrangement is provided
with a rib element arranged to overlie the edge of the airfoil. The
rib element has first and second rib portions arranged to
communicate with respectively associated ones of the upper and
lower control surfaces of the airfoil. A first compliant linkage
element has first and second ends and is disposed between the first
and second rib portions of the rib element, the first and second
ends are each coupled to the interior of a respectively associated
one of the first and second rib portions. There is additionally
provided a driving link having first and second driving link ends,
the first driving link end being coupled to the interior of a
selectable one of the first and second rib portions in the vicinity
of the coupling of the respectively associated end of the first
compliant linkage element. The second end is arranged to receive a
morphing force, and the rib element is deformed in response to the
morphing force.
[0025] In one embodiment of this apparatus aspect of the invention,
there is further provided a second compliant linkage element having
first and second ends and disposed between the first and second rib
portions of the rib element. The first and second ends are each
coupled to the interior of a respectively associated one of the
first and second rib portions. The first and second compliant
linkage elements are arranged to have a predetermined angular
relationship.
[0026] In an advantageous embodiment, a linear actuator is provided
having a longitudinal axis and a first coupler element angularly
arranged in relation to the longitudinal axis. A rotatory element
having an axis of rotation and a second coupler element is engaged
with the second end of the driving link. The first coupler element
of the linear actuator is provided with a slot arranged in relation
to the longitudinal axis. Additionally, the second coupler element
of the rotatory element is provided with an engagement pin for
engaging with the slot of the first coupler element. A bearing
arrangement couples the engagement pin rotatively to the rotatory
element.
[0027] Preferably, the first rib portion is fixedly coupled to the
upper control surface, and the second rib portion is slidably
coupled to the lower control surface. In this specific illustrative
embodiment of the invention, a rotatory drive element is coupled to
the second end of the driving link for delivering the morphing
force. A longitudinal drive element engages with the rotatory drive
element for urging the rotatory drive element to deliver the
morphing force.
[0028] In a still further embodiment, there is provided a further
rib element, the second rib element is arranged to overlie the edge
of the airfoil, the further rib element having respective first and
second rib portions arranged to communicate with respectively
associated ones of the upper and lower control surfaces of the
airfoil. A further first compliant linkage element has first and
second ends and disposed between the first and second rib portions
of the further rib element, the first and second ends are each
coupled to the interior of a respectively associated one of the
first and second rib portions.
[0029] Additionally, a further driving link having first and second
driving link ends is also provided, the first driving link end
being coupled to the interior of a selectable one of the first and
second rib portions of the further rib element in the vicinity of
the coupling of the respectively associated end of the first
compliant linkage element, and the second end being arranged to
receive a respective morphing force. The further rib element is
deformed in response to the respective morphing force. A rotatory
drive element is coupled to the second end of the driving link of
the rib element and the second end of the further driving link of
the further rib element, for delivering a respective morphing force
to each of the driving link and the further driving link. A
longitudinal drive element engages with the rotatory drive element
for urging the rotatory drive element to deliver the respective
morphing forces. Additionally, an edge cover is arranged to overlie
the rib element and the further rib element on the edge of the
airfoil, the edge cover having first and second cover portions
arranged to communicate with respectively associated ones of the
upper and lower control surfaces of the airfoil.
[0030] In accordance with a highly advantageous embodiment of the
invention, the driving link and the further driving link are
configured to produce respectively different deformations of the
respective rib element and further rib element. More specifically,
for a given extent of actuation, the rib element and the further
rib element are configured to have different operating ratios. This
is useful in designing airfoil loadings, for example, that vary
over the span of the airfoil or rotor blade.
[0031] The cover, or skin, has a thickness that is varied to
accommodate internal structures and also to achieve a predetermined
compliance characteristic.
[0032] In accordance with a second apparatus aspect of the
invention, there is provided an edge morphing arrangement for an
airfoil having upper and lower control surfaces, the airfoil edge
morphing arrangement being provided with a plurality of rib
elements each arranged to overlie the edge of the airfoil. Each of
the rib elements has first and second rib portions arranged to
communicate with respectively associated ones of the upper and
lower control surfaces of the airfoil. In addition, each of the rib
elements has an associated one of:
[0033] a first compliant linkage element having first and second
ends and disposed between the first and second rib portions of the
associated rib element, the first and second ends are each coupled
to the interior of a respectively associated one of the first and
second rib portions; and
[0034] a driving link having first and second driving link ends,
the first driving link end are coupled to the interior of a
selectable one of the first and second rib portions in the vicinity
of the coupling of the respectively associated end of the first
compliant linkage element, and the second end is arranged to
receive a morphing force, the rib element being deformed in
response to the morphing force.
[0035] Additionally. a rotatory drive element is coupled to each of
the second ends of each of the driving links for delivering a
respective morphing force to each of the driving links. Each of the
plurality of rib elements is deformed in response to the
respectively applied morphing force.
[0036] In one embodiment of this further aspect of the invention,
there is additionally provided a longitudinal drive element that is
engaged with the rotatory drive elements for urging the rotatory
drive element to deliver the respective morphing forces.
[0037] In a still further embodiment, there is provided an edge
cover arranged to overlie the plurality of rib elements on the edge
of the airfoil, the edge cover having first and second cover
portions arranged to communicate with respectively associated ones
of the upper and lower control surfaces of the airfoil. Each of the
plurality of rib elements is has a second compliant linkage element
with first and second ends, and is disposed between the first and
second rib portions of the associated rib element. The first and
second ends are each coupled to the interior of a respectively
associated one of the first and second rib portions. The first and
second compliant linkage elements of each of the plurality of rib
elements are arranged to have a predetermined angular
relationship.
[0038] In yet another embodiment of this second apparatus aspect of
the invention, the rotatory drive element is pivotally coupled to
the airfoil. Morphing forces are applied in response to pivotal
rotation of the rotatory drive element.
[0039] In accordance with a third apparatus aspect of the
invention, there is provided an arrangement for converting linear
motion to rotatory motion, the arrangement having a linear actuator
having a longitudinal axis and a first coupler element angularly
arranged in relation to the longitudinal axis. Additionally, a
rotatory element having an axis of rotation and a second coupler
element engages with the first coupler element.
[0040] The linear actuator is, in some embodiments of the
invention, be a push rod, a reciprocating cam, or a linear
motor.
[0041] In accordance with one embodiment of this third aspect of
the invention, there is additionally provided a drive linkage
coupled to the rotatory element for producing a driving force.
[0042] There are additionally provided a rib element having first
and second rib portions; a first compliant linkage element having
first and second ends and disposed between the first and second rib
portions of the rib element, the first and second ends are each
coupled to the interior of a respectively associated one of the
first and second rib portions; and a driving link having first and
second driving link ends, the first driving link end is coupled to
the interior of a selectable one of the first and second rib
portions in the vicinity of the coupling of the respectively
associated end of the first compliant linkage element, and the
second end is arranged to receive the driving force, the rib
element being deformed in response to the driving force.
[0043] A second compliant linkage element has first and second ends
and disposed between the first and second rib portions of the rib
element. The first and second ends are each coupled to the interior
of a respectively associated one of the first and second rib
portions.
[0044] In an advantageous embodiment of this aspect of the
invention, there provided an airfoil having first and second
control surfaces and an edge. A plurality of rib elements are each
arranged to overlie the edge of the airfoil, each of the rib
elements having first and second rib portions arranged to
communicate with respectively associated ones of the upper and
lower control surfaces of the airfoil. Each of the rib elements has
an associated one of: [0045] a first compliant linkage element
having first and second ends and disposed between the first and
second rib portions of the associated rib element, the first and
second ends each are coupled to the interior of a respectively
associated one of the first and second rib portions; and [0046] a
driving link having first and second driving link ends, the first
driving link end is coupled to the interior of a selectable one of
the first and second rib portions in the vicinity of the coupling
of the respectively associated end of the first compliant linkage
element, and the second end is arranged to receive a morphing
force, the rib element is deformed in response to the morphing
force.
[0047] Thus, each of the second ends of each of the driving links
is coupled to the drive linkage for receiving a respective morphing
force responsive to the driving force, whereby each of the
plurality of rib elements is deformed in response to the
respectively applied morphing force.
[0048] In a further embodiment, the first coupler element is
provided with a slot in the linear actuator angularly arranged in
relation to the longitudinal axis. The second coupler element is
provided with a cam shaft engaged with the rotatory element for
engaging in the slot in the linear actuator. Preferably, the cam
shaft is rotatively coupled to the rotatory element via a bearing
arrangement, such as a needle bearing.
[0049] There is additionally provided a variable camber compliant
structure leading edge flap for dynamic stall alleviation. This
flap modifies the baseline high performance rotor blade airfoil to
provide 0 to 10 of flap motion for an 8.5% chord flap. The flap can
be actuated at rates up to (and exceeding) 7 Hz to provide once per
rev flap positioning. At the 10 position, the shape of the flap
allows the airfoil to generate additional lift at higher angles of
attack compared to the baseline (no flap) airfoil. The compliant
leading edge flap provides up to a 35 percent increase in
retreating blade lift with no stall and no negative hysteresis in
lift, pitching moment, and drag. This technology has the capability
to increase the combination of top speed, maximum payload, and
altitude capability of all rotorcraft.
[0050] The addition of the flap necessitates that the D-spar be
moved rearward 8.5% to make room for the compliant structure and
actuator hardware. The total peak power consumed by the flap (under
aerodynamic loading and 6 Hz actuation rate) is estimated to be 885
Watts for a 7 foot span flap. The total weight of this 7 foot flap
is estimated to be 13.8 lb excluding the linear electromagnetic
actuator. The total weight including the linear electromagnetic
actuator is estimated to be 33.8 lb with the majority of the system
mass located at the base of the rotor--away from high centrifugal
loads.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
[0051] Comprehension of the invention is facilitated by reading the
following detailed description, in conjunction with the annexed
drawing, in which:
[0052] FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional representation of a rotor blade
having a deformable leading edge constructed in accordance with the
principles of the invention;
[0053] FIG. 2 is a is a cross-sectional representation of the
deformation arrangement of the rotor blade of FIG. 1 without the
overlying deformable cover;
[0054] FIG. 3 is an isometric representation of a portion of the
deformation arrangement of the rotor blade of FIG. 1 without the
overlying deformable cover that is useful to illustrate the manner
by which longitudinal motion is converted to rotational
displacement;
[0055] FIG. 4 is an isometric representation of a portion of the
deformation arrangement of the rotor blade of FIG. 1 without the
overlying deformable cover that is useful to illustrate the manner
by which longitudinal motion is converted to rotational
displacement;
[0056] FIG. 5 is a is a cross-sectional representation of the
deformation arrangement of the rotor blade of FIG. 1 showing the
deformable portion of the rotor blade in substantially neutral
orientation;
[0057] FIG. 6 is a is a cross-sectional representation of the
deformation arrangement of the rotor blade of FIG. 1 showing the
deformable portion of the rotor blade in a slightly upward
orientation;
[0058] FIG. 7 is a is a cross-sectional representation of the
deformation arrangement of the rotor blade of FIG. 1 showing the
deformable portion of the rotor blade in a slightly downward
orientation;
[0059] FIG. 8 is a perspective representation of the the
deformation arrangement of the rotor blade of FIG. 1 in
disassembled condition;
[0060] FIG. 9 is a diagram that illustrates the three-dimensional,
time-varying loading that is experienced by the leading edge
flap;
[0061] FIG. 10 is a representation of a CAD model of leading edge
flap and D-spar;
[0062] FIG. 11 is a simplified schematic representation of the cam
wedge system;
[0063] FIG. 12 illustrates the actuator layout and representative
length scale with respect to the rotor blade span;
[0064] FIG. 13 is a schematic representation of a modified
flap-actuator;
[0065] FIG. 14 is a CAD model of an improved leading edge flap cam
wedge system and D-spar;
[0066] FIG. 15 is a representation of a sample wire EDM titanium
rib;
[0067] FIGS. 16(a) and 16(b) show the prototype model in 0 and 10
positions, respectively;
[0068] FIG. 17 is a block diagram of the design optimization
procedure of the present invention;
[0069] FIGS. 18(a), 18(b), and 18(c) are simplified schematic
representations of a layered structure arrangement that is provided
with web-like structures and is formed of a variable thickness core
(FIG. 18(b)) or a composite laminate (FIG. 18(c));
[0070] FIG. 19 is a simplified schematic representation of the
layered structure arrangement without the web-like structures;
[0071] FIG. 20 is a simplified schematic representation of the
layered structure arrangement with a tailored" core structure,
illustratively formed of a cellular material;
[0072] FIG. 21 is a simplified schematic representation of an
arrangement having a split flap with a core that joins the top and
bottom elements;
[0073] FIG. 22 is a simplified schematic representation of a
fixed-fixed arrangement wherein inward motion of the lower surface
effects a change in the shape of the flap;
[0074] FIG. 23 is a simplified schematic representation of a
standard airfoil having a variable thickness surface perimeter to
permit "tailoring" of the perimeter stiffness to achieve a best
match for a desired contour;
[0075] FIG. 24 is a simplified schematic representation of a
thinned airfoil having a variable thickness surface perimeter to
permit "tailoring" of the perimeter stiffness to achieve a best
match for a desired contour;
[0076] FIG. 25 is a simplified schematic representation of a
standard airfoil having actuators that urge a thickening of the
airfoil;
[0077] FIG. 26 is a simplified schematic representation of the
standard airfoil of FIG. 25, showing the airfoil in thickened
condition; and
[0078] FIG. 27 is a ssr of a variable thickness airfoil that is
actuated by a compliant mechanism.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0079] FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional representation of the rotor
blade 10 having a deformable leading edge 20. As shown in this
figure, rotor blade 10 is additionally provided with a central
supporting D-spar 12 and a trailing edge 14. The deformable leading
edge has an overlying compliant cover having an upper portion 22, a
lower portion 23, the upper and lower portions being joined at a
central forward portion 25.
[0080] FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional representation of deformation
arrangement 20 of rotor blade 10, the deformation arrangement being
enlarged to show structural details. The overlying deformable cover
has been removed in this figure.
[0081] As shown in FIG. 2, D-spar 12 has attached thereto a support
30 having a pivot 32 to which is attached a rotatory element 40
that it is rotatable about pivot 32 in the direction arrows 41 and
42. Rotatory element to 40 has integrally form therewith an arm
portion 44 to which it is attached a coupler portion 45. Rotatory
element 40 it is rotatable in response to the longitudinal motion
of a cam bar 60. The cam bar is supported by a cam system support
50 having a cam bar support portion 52. In this figure, cam bar 60
is movable longitudinally in and out of the plane of the
drawing.
[0082] FIG. 3 is an isometric representation of a portion of the
deformation arrangement 20 of rotor blade 10 of FIG. 1. Elements of
structure that have previously been described are similarly
designated. In this figure, the overlying deformable cover is not
shown for sake of clarity. In addition, rotatable element 40 is not
shown, but there are shown cams 47a and 47b that are attached to
the rotatable element via needle bearings 48a and 48b that
facilitate the rotation of the cams. Cams 47a and 47b are shown to
be engaged in a slot 62 of cam bar 60. The cams, as will
hereinafter be described, are fixed longitudinally in longitudinal
relation to longitudinal axis 11 of rotor blade 10, and therefore,
as cam bar 60 is displaced in the direction of arrow 61, the cams
are displaced transversely in the direction of arrow 49.
[0083] FIG. 4 is an isometric representation of a portion of the
deformation arrangement of rotor blade 10 of FIG. 1 with the
overlying deformable cover having been removed. Elements of
structure that have previously been described are similarly
designated. This figure shows that as cam bar 60 is urged in the
direction of arrow 61, rotatory element 40 is rotated about pivot
32 in the direction of arrow 42. Thus, arm portion 44 and coupler
portion 45 are moved downward. Conversely, when cam bar 60 is urged
in a direction opposite to that indicated by arrow 61, rotatory
element 40 is rotated in a direction opposite to that indicated by
arrow 42, and coupler portion 45 is correspondingly urged
upward.
[0084] FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional representation of the
deformation arrangement of rotor blade 10 of FIG. 1. Elements of
structure that have previously been described are similarly
designated. In this figure, the deformable cover is installed to
form the leading edge of rotor blade 10. The deformable cover
consists of an upper portion 22 and a lower portion 23 that are
joined together at a frontal portion 25. Upper portion 22 is a
fixedly coupled to D-spar 12 at coupling juncture 77. Lower portion
23, however, is slidably coupled to D-spar 12 at sliding juncture
78. There are additionally shown in this figure web structures 71
and 72 (shown in cross-section) that are coupled at respective
upper ends to upper portion 22 of the deformable cover, and at
lower ends of thereof to lower portion 23 at a juncture 75 of a
drive link 74. Drive link 74 is shown to be coupled to coupler
portion 45 of rotatory element 40. As cam bar 60 is urged a
longitudinally along cam bar support portion 52, rotatory element
40 it is rotated, as hereinabove described, whereupon coupler
portion 45 of the rotatory element urges drive link 74 upward and
downward.
[0085] FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional representation of the
deformation arrangement of rotor blade 10 of FIG. 1 showing the
deformable portion of rotor blade 10 in a slightly upward
orientation. In this representation, cam bar 60 has been urged into
the plane of the figure (i.e., opposite to the direction indicated
by arrow 61 of FIG. 3) whereby arm portion 44 and coupler portion
45 are urged upward. This results in forward portion 25 of the
overlying compliant cover to be raised in the direction of arrow
65.
[0086] FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional representation of the
deformation arrangement of rotor blade 10 of FIG. 1 showing the
deformable portion of rotor blade 10 in a slightly downward
orientation. Elements of structure that have previously been
discussed are similarly designated. In the orientation of elements
indicated by this figure, cam bar 60 has been urged out of the
plane of the figure (i.e., in the direction indicated by arrow 61
of FIG. 3) whereby arm portion 44 and coupler portion 45 are urged
downward. This results in forward portion 25 of the overlying
compliant cover to be lowered in the direction of arrow 66. With
reference to FIGS. 6 and 7, it is seen that deformation arrangement
20 is deformable in relation to the motion of cam bar 60 to achieve
a compliant structure leading edge for the rotor blade of a
helicopter (not shown). More specifically, and as noted herein,
deformation arrangement 20 modifies the baseline air foil aspects
of high performance rotor blade 10 airfoil to provide 0 to 10 of
flap motion for an 8.5% chord flap. The flap can be actuated at
rates exceeding 7 Hz to provide flap positioning once during each
revolution. At the 10 position, the shape of the flap allows the
airfoil to generate additional lift at higher angles of attack
compared to the baseline (no flap) airfoil. In the practice of the
invention, the compliant leading edge flap provides up to a 35%
increase in retreating blade lift with no stall and no negative
hysteresis in lift, pitching moment, and drag. This technology has
the capability to increase the combination of top speed, maximum
payload, and altitude capability of all rotorcraft.
[0087] FIG. 8 is a perspective representation of a model segment
the deformation arrangement of rotor blade 10 of FIG. 1, in
disassembled condition. Elements of structure that have previously
been discussed are similarly designated, and the overlying
compliant cover is not shown in this figure. As can readily be seen
in this figure, rotatory element 40 is, in this specific
illustrative embodiment of the invention, longitudinally elongated
and continuous. Similarly, arm portion 44 and coupler portion 45
are coextensive therewith in this embodiment. Also in this figure,
cams 47a and 47b are shown to depend from the underside of rotatory
element 40 and are coupled thereto via respectively associated ones
of needle bearings 48a and 48b. The cams 47a and 47b are arranged
to engage with slots 62 of cam bar 60, which is disassembled from
D-spar 12 in this figure so that the structure of cam bar 60 within
cam bar support portion 52 of cam system support 50 can be
illustrated.
[0088] FIG. 9 is a diagram that illustrates the three-dimensional,
time-varying loading that is experienced by leading edge flap 70.
As shown in this figure, the leading edge flap system consists of a
suitable actuation system (not shown), an optional actuator
transmission (not shown) (to convert push-pull motion appropriate
for the flap mechanism) via actuator push rod 72, and a compliant
structure flap 74 that must undergo the required shape change while
resisting pressure loads and acceleration forces and accommodating
flex in primary D-spar 76. The flexure of D-spar 76 is represented
in the drawing by outline 77. This requirement to change shape
occurs at moderate speed (7 Hz) and thus the loads and boundary
conditions will change in at least this rate (higher harmonics are
possible). Note that mechanism dynamics will also need to be
considered when actuation occurs at these speeds.
[0089] Centrifugal force in this specific illustrative embodiment
of the invention, is directed as indicated by arrow 78.
Material Selection--Strength and Fatigue Considerations
[0090] High performance materials for compliant structures
primarily include materials with a high modulus and high strain
capacity that directly translates to materials with high strength
limits, and particularly fatigue strength. High strength titanium
alloys and carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP) represent
preferred high performance materials, especially in embodiments of
the invention wherein weight is a factor. Given the 4500 hour blade
operating requirement of a commercial helicopter rotorcraft, if the
flap runs continuously at 7 Hz, the flap will be subjected to just
over 110 million cycles over its lifetime. Applying a fatigue
safety factor of 2 would require the structure to survive roughly
220 million cycles. A readily available titanium alloy, Ti-6A1-4V,
has a yield strength of 880 MPa and a 10.sup.7 fatigue cycle
strength of 510 MPa.
[0091] Additionally, other titanium alloys that might increase
static and fatigue strength include a Ti-I OV-2Fe-3A1 that is
possessed of superior static and fatigue strength. This alloy has a
yield strength of 174 ksi (1200 MPa) and a 145 ksi (1000 MPa) 1E6
cycle fatigue strength that extrapolates to a 75 ksi (517 MPa)
fatigue strength at 220 million cycles.
Fixed-Free Medial Strain Design
[0092] Topology Optimization Fixed-Free Design Conclusions
[0093] At a 7 Hz sinusoidal operation, the lower translating joint
topology optimized design requires a maximum of 0.127 HP/fl (310
Watts/m) peak power per unit length. If 6.7 ft (2 m) of the rotor
blade has an adaptive structure leading edge flap, the compliant
leading edge requires 0.85 HP or 621 Watts peak power to drive the
entire flap (the average cyclic power would be much lower). This
required peak power is only 5% below the maximum rated power output
capability of the Aerotech BLUMUC-79 linear electromagnetic motor,
which achieves a maximum of 0.87 hp or 650 Watts for a 6.22 in (158
mm) long actuator. Note that the power analysis is conservative (no
frictional forces) such that the average total power is zero if one
integrates over one complete cycle. Frictional forces will cause
power losses during operation of the flap, so a slightly larger
(longer, more powerful stator) may be required to provide
additional actuator power.
Structural Analysis
[0094] Lateral Acceleration Loading
[0095] The 1000 G loading was originally estimated from a 20 ft
blade radius spinning at 7 Hz rotation rate. In order to develop a
more accurate acceleration value, the rotor diameter and tip speeds
for a range of military helicopters are shown in Table 1, which
illustrates three different helicopter models that encompass a
range of lift and speed performance.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Listinq of Various Helicopter Specifications
Hover Blade Tip Blade Tip Rotation Lateral Radius Speed Rate
Acceleration Helicopter (ft) (ft/sec) (Hz) (G) Blackhawk UH-60A
26.75 725 4.31 612 Cobra AH-1S 22.0 746 5.41 789 Super Stallion
CH-53E 39.5 732 2.95 422
[0096] Based on the data for a range of high speed transport,
fighter (ground support) and heavy lift helicopters, the inventors
herein have determined that the maximum tip acceleration should be
reduced slightly to 800Gs to represent a more maneuverable, higher
disk loading helicopter like the Cobra.
Three-Dimensional Simulation
[0097] Detailed (continuum) three-dimensional simulation of the
leading edge structure was reexamined to assess the
stresses/strains in an individual compliant rib due to pressure
loading and centrifugal loading. An equivalent stress plot is shown
in FIG. 9 of the model in the 0 and 10 flap position, with maximum
pressure load and 800 G lateral acceleration.
Actuator Selection
[0098] One method of actuating the leading edge flap is to provide
longitudinal motion along the rotor blade span using a push rod (or
a rod in constant tension). This method allows an actuator to be
located inboard away from high centrifugal force locations. While
investigating various actuation strategies, the motion of the
actuator (linear, rotary, or other) along with the system packaging
must be considered in order to develop an appropriate method for
coupling the motion of the actuator together with the compliant
structure. Ideally, the location of the actuator helps leverage (or
increase the stiffness of) the leading edge system as much as
possible. This may be required in order to maintain a high
structural stiffness and integrity (with respect to any undesirable
aero-elastic phenomenon such as a critical divergence or shape
change due to aerodynamic pressure loads). The actuator
characteristics can then be input into the compliant mechanism
design algorithms to optimize the system performance.
[0099] Information and data of (a) rotary actuators, (b) linear
actuators, (c) with or without a speed reduction transmission, (d)
embedded actuation concept, and (e) alternative actuation schemes
has been compiled. The ultimate actuator choice depends on many
factors including: reliability/durability, force/displacement
required to drive the compliant LE, need for a transmission system,
packaging, weight (including drive electronics) and power
capability. Different solutions may exist due to the specific
consideration (criterion) and trade-offs.
[0100] Power density (power per weight, power per volume, power per
span) is one important factor for selecting actuators. But other
factors must be considered to determine whether an actuator is
feasible for the application. All actuators studied are subjected
to dimension restrictions necessitated by the small space available
at the leading edge. According to the power density data, the
ultrasonic rotary motor and linear inchworm actuator can be ruled
out because with required size, they cannot generate enough power
to actuate the leading edge system. Moreover, the life of
ultrasonic rotary motors is typically less than 2000 hours and is
much too short for deformable rotor blade applications. Also, the
operating temperature of linear inchworm actuators is very limited
(due to thermal expansion and tolerancing issues) and could not
cover the possible temperature ranges of the helicopters.
[0101] Linear electromagnetic actuators, voice coil actuators and
piezoelectric actuators all generate linear output motion; however,
output forces and output displacements of these actuators are
dramatically different. Piezoelectric actuators are compact and
generate very large forces, but the output displacement is on the
order of microns. Efficient amplification mechanisms are needed to
enlarge the output motion and trade force for displacement (power
losses will be created due to the amplification mechanism). Voice
coil actuators can generate significantly larger displacement than
piezoelectric actuators; however, the output force is much smaller.
Linear electromagnetic actuators can generate moderate output
forces and large output displacements. However, the size of the
linear electromagnetic actuators may be prohibitive for use in the
leading edge flap application (slightly smaller motors may be
fabricated). Rotary DC motors are compact and powerful enough to
meet the application needs. Small brushless DC motors and their
accessories are commercially available, and proven to operate
continuously for up to 20,000 hours. Because of continuous
rotational motion, they generate less vibration and are easy to
control.
Actuator Linear to Rotational Transmission System
[0102] The space available within the leading edge is extremely
tight, such that careful system packaging and component selection
will be necessary to develop a compact enough transmission that
enables high power efficiency and capacity to handle the roughly
700 Watts of power (at 7 Hz). In addition, the shape change
performed by the flap further reduces the available space for
actuation components.
[0103] FIG. 10 is a representation of a CAD model of leading edge
flap and D-spar. The transmission system must transform the linear
actuation motion to rotary motion to drive the flap position. The
preferred method is to develop a cam and wedge system to perform
the linear to rotational transformation. Tight space constraints
and high power requirements dictate careful selection of components
to develop a durable system.
[0104] Bearings are selected to maintain compact and high load
carrying capacity (static and dynamic). Bending, shear, and contact
stresses for the cam-roller system are estimated using strength of
materials and Hertzian stress calculation approaches. All highly
loaded components are fabricated from precision-ground, hardened
steel to meet static and cyclic strength requirements.
[0105] The cam-wedge system is tailored to provide the correct
mechanical advantage given the actuation system characteristics to
optimize the force/velocity operating conditions of the linear
actuation system. Currently, the wedge system is designed with a 4
slope, which requires a 943 N (212 Ib) maximum force requirement
from the actuation system for a 2 meter span flap (static force
calculation at 10 deflection and maximum pressure loading). The
linear actuation travel to move the flap 0 to 10 is 3.0 inches
(.+-.1.5 inches) requiring a maximum actuation velocity of 1.68 m/s
(66.0 mis)--assuming a sinusoidal displacement profile. This peak
velocity of 1.68 mis is well within the terminal velocity
capability of the linear motor system, which is approximately 17.8
mis (700 mis).
[0106] FIG. 11 is a simplified schematic representation of cam
wedge system 80 that is designed so that only one of dual cam
rollers 82 is loaded for a particular flap moment loading (positive
or negative). The cam system is also designed to provide smooth,
low friction motion of the tension rod (linear actuation system)
and flap rotary motion by avoiding sliding surfaces and providing
pure rolling motion, via linear slide bearings 84 for flap
movement. As shown, rotary flap motion is, in this illustration,
shown to be rotationally displaced by a wedge angle 86 having a
value e. Linear motion is, in this embodiment, directed as
indicated by arrow 88, and rotary flap motion is indicated by
arrows 89.
[0107] Currently the bearing-shaft system has been sized to handle
the flap maximum moment loading of i6 in-lb per inch span of flap
(1260 in-lb for a 79 inch flap span) and the wedge system is
designed to provide the total 0.38 radians of rotational motion
(21.77) at the base of the arm (not shown) that drives the
compliant structure.
[0108] FIG. 12 is a simplified schematic representation of a rotor
blade 100, that illustrates the layout of actuator 104 and
representative length scale with respect to the rotor blade span.
Rotor blade 100 is shown in this figure to have actuator 104
coupled via a balancing spring 106 and a tension rod 108 to a cam
system 110 that converts linear to rotary motion, which is applied
to compliant flap 109. The actuator is configured in this
embodiment to produce motion in accordance with arrow 111.
Centrifugal force is shown to be in the direction of arrow 112,
toward rotor blade tip 114. The hub of the rotor blade is
designated as 116.
[0109] Given the CAD and finite element models, one can extract the
key mass and stiffness values for the flap system. The table below
outlines key values for the features present in the flap model.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Volume, Mass, and Moment of Inertia Values
for the Current Generation CAD Leading Edge Flap Model. Moment of
Volume Mass Inertia Component Material (IN.sup.3) (IB.sub.M)
(Ibm-IN.sup.2) Rotating Components Compliant Titanium + 18.8331
2.5984 0.0233 Leading GFRP Edge Crank Arm Titanium 23.794 3.8072
0.7691 Radial Steel 0.136 0.0386 Bearings Thrust Steel 0.47 0.1316
Bearings Linear Motion Components Linear Steel 11.6780 1.1496 NA
Wedge Linear Steel 0.42 0.1241 NA Needle Bearings Tension Rod CFRP
31.667 2.0584 NA Actuator Iron TBD NA Stator Fixed Components Crank
Arm Titanium 3.5535 0.5686 NA Mount Linear Titanium 11.6780 1.8685
NA Raceway
System 2 Results
[0110] FIG. 13 is a simplified schematic representation of a
modified flap-actuator 130. Elements of structure that have
previously been discussed are similarly designated in this figure.
Actuator 104 is coupled via a tuning spring 132 to tension rod 133.
As compared to the embodiment of FIG. 12, the embodiment of FIG. 13
has a redirection pulley 134 that is coupled to a second tension
rod 136. Tension rod 136 has, in this embodiment, a balancing
weight 138 affixed thereto distal from redirection pulley 134.
[0111] The modification represented in FIG. 13 is generates a
steady offset of the centrifugal force without requiring a heavy
and stiff balancing spring. Since the no-flap zone in the last 10%
of the rotor blade span and because of the high G loading here, a
relatively small mass can be used to generate a balancing force to
compensate for the centrifugal force, which is reversed in part by
redirection pulley 134, which in some embodiments is configured as
a rack and pinion (not shown) or as a pulley system. The linear
tuning spring of the present embodiment has much more freedom to be
"stiffness tuned" to minimize the impedance of the system at the
desired operational frequency. In this manner, actuator force
amplitude is reduced. Also, since the tuning linear spring is
softer than a balancing spring, the actuator offset force can be
significantly reduced. Analysis of the packaging space within the
leading edge reveals that there is room to place the second thin
tension rod 136, which may be configured in some embodiments to
have .about.1/8 cross-sectional diameter, and yet will have
adequate strength and stiffness to support the balancing mass 138
located at rotor tip 114. Of course, balancing mass 138 adds
additional weight and complexity to the system, but this additional
weight is likely to be significantly less than the added mass of
some 12 heavy-duty helical tension balancing springs.
[0112] As shown in FIG. 13, the linear actuator is located near hub
116 of the rotor blade, thereby isolating the actuator from high
centrifugal loading. The linear actuator will transmit power to the
leading edge flap using a tension rod where maximum stiffness of
the transmission is obtained using a carbon fiber rod in
tension/compression rather than torsion or bending (higher
structural efficiency). A balancing spring will compensate for
centrifugal loading acting on the tension rod.
[0113] The linear actuator motion will be transferred to rotary
motion to drive the main rotary link using a cam-type system
designed to be very compact, lightweight and stiff in the rotary
direction. Along the flap span, there will be cam stations at
intervals. Spacing should be determined based on component space,
the mechanical advantage of the cam system (stroke of the tension
rod versus rotation of the drive link), and the stiffness and
allowable drag (damping) of the cam system.
[0114] It is an important aspect of the tension rod approach of the
present invention that the actuation rod is always in tension. As
such, therefore, the actuation force constitutes but a reduction in
the tension in such an embodiment. This approach to the design of
the system avoids buckling of the actuation rod, as would be the
case with compression.
[0115] For the modified flap system, the instantaneous peak
actuator power is reduced to 885 Watts compared to the previous
design that had a peak actuator power of 2250 Watts. It is to be
noted that the actuator force offset is negative (-120.25 lb)
illustrating the need to apply negative (inward) actuator force in
order for the flap to sit at a +5 offset (neutral position).
Because of the frictional characteristic of the bearings and due to
the proximity of the forced frequency to the first natural
frequency, the force tends to spike and shift between sinusoidal
amplitudes. The linearized friction characteristic has the effect
of slightly changing the natural frequency of the system as the
velocity vector changes.
Actuator Selection
[0116] Given the actuator force and power requirements, a linear
electromagnetic motor from Anorad (Rockwell Automation) LC-50-300
and AeroTech LMX-382 linear actuator will satisfy the force
requirements. The LC-50-300 motor has a theoretical peak power of
4420 Watts and the LMX-282 motor has a theoretical peak power of
2263 Watts. These actuators are larger than the originally
specified AeroTech BLMU-79 that has a peak power output of 660
Watts but its force limited for this application (peak force is
29.2 lb). In this particular case, the force requirement of 150 lb
peak force dictates the actuator size. A much smaller actuator
could be utilized if the safety feature--providing 0 flap position
when the actuator is disabled--is not needed (dictates the -120.25
lb steady state force to pull the flap to the 5 position). The
Anorad linear motor displays a more compact, lighter design that
can satisfy the force requirements (higher power density than a
comparable AeroTech actuator). The dimensions and weight of this
actuator are: 2.12''.times.3.15''.times.15'' and would weigh 15.5
lb (9.8 lbm is included in the dynamic analysis as the stator
mass). Inboard mounting of the actuator would require a local bulge
in the airfoil to accommodate the added volume forward of the
D-spar. For further study, an electro-mechanical system analysis of
the linear actuator could be used to detail the required operating
voltages and currents.
CAD Design of Full-scale Compliant Leading Edge Flap System
[0117] CAD Model and Rapid Prototype
[0118] Given the tight space constraints, high power requirements,
and the limitations associated with selecting off-the-shelf
bearings, shafting, etc. the leading edge spar was moved backward
an additional 0.097 inches pushing the D-spar back to 9.0%.
Bearings were selected to support the cam-wedge loads while
operating (rolling) for the 220E6 cycles. Bending, shear, and
contact stresses for the cam-roller system are estimated using
strength of materials and Hertzian stress calculation approaches.
Currently, the maximum contact stress is 301,511 psi (.about.2 GPa)
for the cams at the 10 flap position with maximum pressure loading.
There are a few specialty carburized and hardened steels that can
meet these very high contact stress values.
[0119] FIG. 14 is a CAD model of an improved leading edge flap cam
wedge system and D-spar.
[0120] FIG. 15 is a representation of a sample wire EDM titanium
rib 160 depicted in relation to a measuring ruler (not specifically
designated). As shown, titanium rib 160 has a cross-sectional
length of approximately 3.
[0121] FIGS. 16(a) and 16(b) show a prototype model 170 of the
present invention in 0 and 10 positions, respectively.
[0122] FIG. 17 is a block diagram of the design optimization
procedure of the present invention. As shown in this figure, the
content of a function block 471 is used to commence the design
process. This includes determination of the Design Specifications,
which include determination of the:
[0123] (1) Desired set of shapes;
[0124] (2) Available space to fit the mechanism and the
actuators;
[0125] (3) Preferred location of actuator(s);
[0126] (4) External loads (external aerodynamic loads);
[0127] (5) Choice of materials (if any);
[0128] (6) Lower and upper bounds on dimensions of beams (depending
on the choice of manufacturing method); and
[0129] (7) Preferred actuator type (including maximum force, and
displacement).
[0130] At function block 473, the following determinations are
made:
[0131] (1) Create a network of beam elements to fit within the
available space with certain nominal cross sectional
dimensions;
[0132] (2) Design Variable--Beam cross-section; and
[0133] (3) Define boundary conditions--that is, identify nodes that
should remain fixed to the ground, nodes where the actuator exerts
input force and nodes on the boundary representing the outer
surface of the shape to be morphed.
[0134] The figure shows function blocks 471 and 473 to direct the
process to function block 475. At function block 475, there is
performed the Optimization Procedure Objective function,
specifically:
[0135] (1) Minimize the shape error (between the shape obtained and
shape desired);
[0136] (2) Minimize the actuator force required to cause desired
shape change against external resistive load; and
[0137] (3) Minimize the overall weight of the system Subject to
various constraints such as Maximum allowable stress, buckling
load, fatigue stress, minimum and maximum dimensions of the beam
elements, etc.
[0138] The process of design optimization then flows from function
block 475 to function block 477, wherein, when the optimization
process converges, cross-sections of certain beams approach zero
leaving on a sub-set of beam elements necessary to meet the design
specifications. This establishes the topology, size arid geometry
of the compliant mechanism.
[0139] FIGS. 18(a), 18(b), and 18(c) are simplified schematic
representations of a layered structure arrangement 200 that is
provided with web-like structures 202 that are, in this specific
illustrative embodiment of the invention, bonded to compliant skin
210, which will be described in greater detail in connection with
FIGS. 18(b) and 18(c), below. Referring to FIG. 18(a), layered
structure arrangement 200 is shown to be provided with a drive bar
204 that applies a linear force against rear wing spar 206 by
operation of an actuator 208. The motion of drive bar 204 is
transmitted to a compliant skin 210, the motion of the compliant
skin being accommodated by a sliding joint 214 that in some
embodiments of the invention may be configured as an elastomer
panel (not shown).
[0140] FIG. 18(b) is a representation of compliant skin 210 that is
formed, in this specific illustrative embodiment of the invention,
of a variable thickness core 210(a). Alternatively, FIG. 18(c)
shows compliant skin 210 to be a multiple-ply composite laminate
210(b) wherein the plies are staggered to facilitate control over
thickness. As shown, the composite laminate plies are bonded to
each other with a laminating adhesive 211. The composite layers are
configured from the standpoint of ply orientation, fiber weave,
selection of adhesive, etc. the achieve a desired compliant
structure stiffness and strength.
[0141] FIG. 19 is a simplified schematic representation of layered
structure arrangement 230, without the web-like structures
described in FIG. 18(a). Elements of structure that have previously
been discussed are similarly designated in this figure.
[0142] FIG. 20 is a simplified schematic representation of the
layered structure arrangement 250 with a tailored" core structure
252, illustratively formed of a cellular material. Core structure
252 is, in this specific illustrative embodiment of the invention,
configured to have a high stiffness characteristic in the
substantially vertical direction indicated by arrow 256, and a low
stiffness characteristic in the substantially horizontal direction
indicated by arrows 258.
[0143] FIG. 21 is a simplified schematic representation of a
fixed-fixed arrangement 270 wherein inward motion of lower surface
272 effects a change in the shape of the flap. In this embodiment,
two actuators 276 and 278 are coupled by respectively associated
ones of antagonistic drive cables 277 and 279, to respectively
associated ones of trailing edge tip spars 281 and 282. In some
embodiments, drive cables 277 and 279 may be replaced with rods
(not shown). Tip spars 281 and 282 are configured to slip against
each other at sliding joint 285.
[0144] FIG. 22 is a simplified schematic representation of a
standard airfoil 300 having a variable thickness surface perimeter
302 to permit "tailoring" of the perimeter stiffness to achieve a
best match for a desired contour. When actuator 305 is operated
toward inward motion as indicated by the direction of arrow 307,
the contour of variable thickness surface perimeter 302 is urged
into the configuration represented in phantom and designated as
309. In this embodiment, there is no sliding joint or elastomer
surface on either the top or bottom surface, thus it is termed a
"fixed-fixed" configuration.
[0145] FIG. 23 is a simplified schematic representation of a
standard airfoil 320 having a variable thickness surface perimeter
322 that permits "tailoring" of the perimeter stiffness to achieve
a best match for a desired contour. That is, the varying wing
thickness allows the perimeter stiffness to be "tailored" to
facilitate the design of an advantageous contour characteristic.
Thinning of the airfoil is effected by causing actuators 326 and
328 to pull inward in the direction of the arrows.
[0146] FIG. 24 is a simplified schematic representation of airfoil
320 that has been "thinned" by operation of the actuators, as
discussed hereinabove in relation to FIG. 23.
[0147] FIG. 25 is a simplified schematic representation of a
standard airfoil 320 wherein the actuators 326 and 328 urge a
thickening of the airfoil, in the direction of the arrows.
[0148] FIG. 26 is a simplified schematic representation of the
standard airfoil of FIG. 25, showing the airfoil in thickened
condition.
[0149] FIG. 27 is a simplified schematic representation of a
variable thickness airfoil 350 that is actuated, in this specific
illustrative embodiment of the invention, by compliant mechanisms
352 and 354. By operation of actuators 356 and 358, the airfoil is
either thickened, as represented by contour 360, or thinned, as
represented by contour 362.
[0150] Although the invention has been described in terms of
specific embodiments and applications, persons skilled in the art
can, in light of this teaching, generate additional embodiments
without exceeding the scope or departing from the spirit of the
invention herein described and claimed. Accordingly, it is to be
understood that the drawing and description in this disclosure are
proffered to facilitate comprehension of the invention, and should
not be construed to limit the scope thereof.
* * * * *