U.S. patent application number 15/438863 was filed with the patent office on 2017-06-08 for collimator and energy degrader.
The applicant listed for this patent is Mevion Medical Systems, Inc.. Invention is credited to Mark R. Jones, Gerrit Townsend Zwart.
Application Number | 20170157425 15/438863 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 52424103 |
Filed Date | 2017-06-08 |
United States Patent
Application |
20170157425 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Zwart; Gerrit Townsend ; et
al. |
June 8, 2017 |
COLLIMATOR AND ENERGY DEGRADER
Abstract
A particle therapy system includes a particle accelerator to
output a particle beam; and a scanning system for the particle
accelerator to scan the particle beam across at least part of an
irradiation target. The scanning system is configured to scan the
particle beam in two dimensions that are at an angle relative to a
direction of the particle beam. A structure defines an edge. The
structure is controllable to move in the two dimensions relative to
the irradiation target such that at least part of the structure is
between at least part of the particle beam and the irradiation
target. The structure includes a material that inhibits
transmission of the particle beam.
Inventors: |
Zwart; Gerrit Townsend;
(Durham, NH) ; Jones; Mark R.; (Reading,
MA) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. |
Littleton |
MA |
US |
|
|
Family ID: |
52424103 |
Appl. No.: |
15/438863 |
Filed: |
February 22, 2017 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
14137854 |
Dec 20, 2013 |
|
|
|
15438863 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
1/1 |
Current CPC
Class: |
A61N 5/1048 20130101;
A61N 5/1077 20130101; H05H 2007/004 20130101; A61N 5/1042 20130101;
A61N 2005/1095 20130101; G21K 1/046 20130101; H05H 13/02 20130101;
G21K 1/10 20130101; A61N 2005/1087 20130101; A61N 5/1081 20130101;
A61N 5/1043 20130101; A61N 5/1083 20130101; H05H 2007/007 20130101;
A61N 5/1045 20130101; H05H 2007/122 20130101 |
International
Class: |
A61N 5/10 20060101
A61N005/10; G21K 1/10 20060101 G21K001/10; H05H 13/02 20060101
H05H013/02; G21K 1/04 20060101 G21K001/04 |
Claims
1-42. (canceled)
43. A device to trim a particle beam, the device comprising: a
structure that is movable in at least a first dimension relative to
the particle beam, the structure comprising elements that are
extendible from the structure along the first dimension and that
are retractable, where positioning of the elements through at least
one of extension or retraction of the elements defines an edge of
the structure between a first part of the particle beam and a
second part of the particle beam such that the structure blocks the
first part of the particle beam while allowing the second part of
the particle beam to pass, the edge at least partly collimating the
second part of the particle beam.
44. The device of claim 42, wherein the structure is a first
structure, the elements are first elements, and the edge is a first
edge; and wherein the device comprises a second structure that is
movable in at least the first dimension relative to the particle
beam, the second structure comprising second elements that are
extendible from the second structure along the first dimension and
that are retractable, where positioning of the second elements
through at least one of extension or retraction of the second
elements defines a second edge of the second structure between a
third part of the particle beam and a fourth part of the particle
beam such that the structure blocks the third part of the particle
beam while allowing the fourth part of the particle beam to pass,
the edge at least partly collimating the fourth part of the
particle beam.
45. The device of claim 44, wherein movement of the second
structure is based on movement of the first structure.
46. The device of claim 42, wherein the elements comprise
fingers.
47. The device of claim 42, wherein the at least one dimension is
defined by two Cartesian X and Y dimensions.
48. The device of claim 42, wherein the structure is rotatable.
49. The device of claim 42, which is controllable to move based on
movement of the particle beam.
50. A particle therapy system comprising: a particle accelerator to
generate a particle beam; at least one scanning magnet to move the
particle beam relative an irradiation target in a patient; and a
collimator, between the at least one scanning magnet and the
patient, to trim the particle beam on a spot-by-spot basis, the
collimator comprising: a structure that is movable in at least a
first dimension relative to the particle beam, the structure
comprising elements that are extendible from the structure along
the first dimension and that are retractable, where positioning of
the elements through at least one of extension or retraction of the
elements defines an edge of the structure between a first part of
the particle beam and a second part of the particle beam such that
the structure blocks the first part of the particle beam from
reaching the patient while allowing the second part of the particle
beam to reach the irradiation target, the edge at least partly
collimating the second part of the particle beam.
51. The particle therapy system of claim 50, wherein the at least
one scanning magnet is controllable to move the particle beam more
quickly for interior sections of the irradiation target than at a
perimeter of the irradiation target.
52. The particle therapy system of claim 50, wherein the at least
one scanning magnet is configurable to move the particle beam from
different incident angles; and wherein the collimator is
controllable to move based on movement of the particle beam as the
particle beam is moved from different incident angles.
53. The particle therapy system of claim 50, wherein the collimator
defines at least part of an aperture, and wherein the edge
comprises an edge of the aperture.
54. The particle therapy system of claim 50, wherein the particle
accelerator comprises a synchrocyclotron comprising: a voltage
source to provide a radio frequency (RF) voltage to a cavity to
accelerate particles from a plasma column, the cavity having a
magnetic field causing particles accelerated from the plasma column
to move orbitally within the cavity; an extraction channel to
receive the particles accelerated from the plasma column and to
output the received particles from the cavity; and a regenerator to
provide a magnetic field bump within the cavity to thereby change
successive orbits of the particles accelerated from the plasma
column so that, eventually, particles output to the extraction
channel; wherein the magnetic field is between 4 Tesla (T) and 20 T
and the magnetic field bump is at most 2 Tesla.
55. The particle therapy system of claim 50, further comprising: a
gantry on which at least the particle accelerator is mounted, the
gantry being configured to move the particle accelerator at least
part-way around the patient.
56. The particle therapy system of claim 50, further comprising: an
energy degrader that is between the at least one scanning magnet
and the patient, the energy degrader to receive the particle beam,
the energy degrader comprising a beam-transmissible material that
allows the particle beam to pass through the energy degrader and
thereby change an energy of the beam; and a control system to
control operation of the energy degrader so that the energy
degrader moves during movement of the particle beam, and to control
operation of the collimator so that the collimator moves based on
the movement of the particle beam.
57. The particle therapy system of claim 50, wherein the elements
comprise fingers.
58. The particle therapy system of claim 50, wherein the at least a
first dimension is defined by Cartesian X and Y dimensions.
59. The particle therapy system of claim 50, wherein the structure
is rotatable.
60. The particle therapy system of claim 50, wherein the collimator
is controllable to move based on movement of the particle beam.
61. The particle therapy system of claim 50, wherein the edge
comprises an edge of an aperture defined, at least in part, by the
structure.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] This disclosure relates generally to elements of a particle
beam scanning system, such as a collimator and an energy
degrader.
BACKGROUND
[0002] Particle therapy systems use an accelerator to generate a
particle beam for treating afflictions, such as tumors. In
operation, particles are accelerated in orbits inside a cavity in
the presence of a magnetic field, and are removed from the cavity
through an extraction channel. A magnetic field regenerator
generates a magnetic field bump near the outside of the cavity to
distort the pitch and angle of some orbits so that they precess
towards, and eventually into, the extraction channel. A beam,
comprised of the particles, exits the extraction channel.
[0003] A scanning system is down-beam of the extraction channel. In
this context, "down-beam" means closer to an irradiation target
(here, relative to the extraction channel). The scanning system
moves the beam across at least part of the irradiation target to
expose various parts of the irradiation target to the beam. For
example, to treat a tumor, the particle beam may be "scanned" over
different cross-sections of the tumor.
SUMMARY
[0004] An example particle therapy system comprises a particle
accelerator to output a particle beam; and a scanning system for
the particle accelerator to scan the particle beam across at least
part of an irradiation target. The scanning system is configured to
scan the particle beam in two dimensions that are at an angle
relative to a direction of the particle beam. A structure defines
an edge. The structure is controllable to move in the two
dimensions relative to the irradiation target such that at least
part of the structure is between at least part of the particle beam
and the irradiation target. The structure comprises a material that
inhibits transmission of the particle beam. The example particle
therapy system may include one or more of the following features,
either alone or in combination.
[0005] The structure may be rotatable at least in the two
dimensions so that the edge can be moved between different parts of
the irradiation target and the particle beam. The edge may comprise
a curve that has a radius that varies on at least one side of the
structure. The curve may be a French curve. The structure may
define an aperture and the edge may comprise an edge of the
aperture. The structure may be movable to track a direction of the
particle beam. The structure may comprise multiple elements that
are adjustable to vary a size of the edge. The multiple elements
may comprise fingers that are individually movable relative to the
irradiation target.
[0006] The structure may be part of a collimator system. The
structure may comprise a first structure in the collimator system
and the edge may comprise a first edge. The collimator system may
comprise a second structure comprising a second edge. The first
edge and the second edge may be controllable to move along
different edges of the irradiation target.
[0007] The scanning system may comprise at least one magnet to
control movement of the particle beam to scan the particle beam.
The at least one magnet may be for generating a magnetic field in
response to applied current. The magnetic field may affect the
movement.
[0008] The scanning system may be configured to scan the particle
beam more quickly in interior sections of the irradiation target
than at edges of the irradiation target. The particle beam may be
movable within an area of a plane at a location of the structure.
The structure may have an area that is less than the area of the
plane. The structure may have an area that is less than half the
area of the plane. The structure may have an area that is less than
a quarter the area of the plane. The structure may have an area
that is less than an eighth the area of the plane. The structure
may have an area that is less than ten times a cross-sectional area
of the particle beam.
[0009] The scanning system may be configured to scan the particle
beam from different incident angles. The structure may be
controllable to move based on movement of the particle beam as the
particle beam is scanned from different incident angles. The
scanning system may comprise: a magnet to affect a direction of the
particle beam to scan the particle beam across at least part of an
irradiation target; and a degrader to change an energy of the beam
prior to output of the particle beam to the irradiation target,
where the degrader is down-beam of the magnet relative to the
particle accelerator. The particle accelerator may be a
variable-energy device.
[0010] The particle accelerator may comprise: a voltage source to
provide a radio frequency (RF) voltage to a cavity to accelerate
particles from a plasma column, where the cavity has a magnetic
field causing particles accelerated from the plasma column to move
orbitally within the cavity; an extraction channel to receive the
particles accelerated from the plasma column and to output the
received particles from the cavity; and a regenerator to provide a
magnetic field bump within the cavity to thereby change successive
orbits of the particles accelerated from the plasma column so that,
eventually, particles output to the extraction channel. The
magnetic field may be between 4 Tesla (T) and 20 T and the magnetic
field bump is at most 2 Tesla.
[0011] An example particle therapy system comprises: a particle
accelerator to output a particle beam; and a scanning system to
receive the particle beam from the particle accelerator and to
perform scanning of at least part of an irradiation target with the
particle beam. The scanning system comprises a structure defining
an edge. The structure is controllable to move in the two
dimensions and to move based on movement of the particle beam so
that the edge is between at least part of the particle beam and the
irradiation target. The structure comprises a material that
inhibits transmission of the particle beam. The example system also
comprises a gantry on which the particle accelerator and the
scanning system are mounted. The gantry may be configured to move
the particle accelerator and the scanning system around the
irradiation target.
[0012] An example particle therapy system comprises: a
synchrocyclotron to output a particle beam; a magnet to affect a
direction of the particle beam to move the particle beam across a
cross-section of an irradiation target; a degrader to change an
energy of the particle beam prior to moving the particle beam
across the cross-section of the irradiation target, where the
degrader is down-beam of the magnet relative to the
synchrocyclotron; and one or more processing devices to control
movement of the degrader so that the degrader at least partly
tracks movement of the particle beam at an irradiation plane. The
example particle therapy system may include one or more of the
following features, either alone or in combination.
[0013] The particle beam may be movable within an area of a plane
at a location of the degrader. The degrader may have an area that
is less than the area of the plane. The degrader may comprise
multiple pieces, with each piece comprised of beam-energy absorbing
material, and with each piece being movable into a path of the
particle beam. The one or more processing devices may be programmed
to receive an energy of the particle beam to apply to the
irradiation target, and to move one or more of the pieces of the
beam-energy absorbing material into the path of the particle beam
so that a resulting energy of the particle beam approximates the
energy of the particle beam to apply to the irradiation target. The
one or more processing devices may be programmed to control
movement of the one or more pieces of the beam-energy absorbing
material to at least partly track movement of the particle
beam.
[0014] The degrader may have an area that is less than half the
area of the plane. The degrader may have an area that is less than
one-quarter the area of the plane. The particle beam has a spot
size at a location of the degrader; and the degrader may have an
area that is less than ten times an area of the spot size. The
degrader may have an area that is less than twice an area of the
spot size.
[0015] The particle therapy system may comprise memory to store a
treatment plan. The treatment plan may comprise information to
define a scanning pattern for the irradiation target. The scanning
pattern may define movement of the particle beam in the two
dimensions and movement of the degrader so that the degrader at
least partly tracks movement of the particle beam.
[0016] The synchrocyclotron may comprise: a voltage source to
provide a radio frequency (RF) voltage to a cavity to accelerate
particles from a plasma column, where the cavity has a magnetic
field causing particles accelerated from the plasma column to move
orbitally within the cavity; an extraction channel to receive the
particles accelerated from the plasma column and to output the
received particles from the cavity as part of the particle beam;
and a regenerator to provide a magnetic field bump within the
cavity to thereby change successive orbits of the particles
accelerated from the plasma column so that, eventually, particles
output to the extraction channel. The magnetic field may be between
4 Tesla (T) and 20 T and the magnetic field bump may be at most 2
Tesla, and the synchrocyclotron may be a variable-energy
device.
[0017] The magnet and the degrader may be part of a scanning
system. The particle therapy system may comprise a gantry on which
the synchrocyclotron and the scanning system are mounted. The
gantry may be configured to move the synchrocyclotron and the
scanning system around the irradiation target.
[0018] The scanning system may be a raster scanning system, a spot
scanning system, or any other type of scanning system
[0019] An example particle therapy system may comprise a particle
accelerator to output a particle beam; and a scanning system to
receive the particle beam from the synchrocyclotron and to perform
scanning of at least part of an irradiation target with the
particle beam. The scanning system may comprise a degrader to
change an energy of the particle beam prior to scanning the at
least part of the irradiation target. The degrader may be down-beam
of the magnet relative to the synchrocyclotron. The example
particle therapy system may comprise one or more processing devices
to control movement of the degrader so that the degrader at least
partly tracks movement of the particle beam during; and a gantry on
which the particle accelerator and the scanning system are mounted.
The gantry may be configured to move the synchrocyclotron and the
scanning system around the irradiation target. The example particle
therapy system may include one or more of the following features,
either alone or in combination.
[0020] The particle beam may be movable within an area of a plane
at a location of the degrader. The degrader may have an area that
is less than the area of the plane. The degrader may comprise
multiple pieces, with each piece comprised of beam-energy absorbing
material, and with each piece being movable into a path of the
particle beam. The one or more processing devices may be programmed
to receive an energy of the particle beam to apply to the
irradiation target, and to move one or more of the pieces of the
beam-energy absorbing material into the path of the particle beam
so that a resulting energy of the particle beam approximates the
energy of the particle beam to apply to the irradiation target. The
one or more processing devices may be programmed to control
movement of the one or more pieces of the beam-energy absorbing
material to at least partly track movement of the particle
beam.
[0021] The degrader may have an area that is less than half the
area of the plane. The degrader may have an area that is less than
one-quarter the area of the plane. The particle beam has a spot
size at a location of the degrader, and the degrader may have an
area that is less than ten times an area of the spot size. The
degrader may have an area that is less than twice an area of the
spot size. The particle accelerator may be a variable-energy
synchrocyclotron.
[0022] An example proton therapy system may include the foregoing
particle accelerator and scanning system; and a gantry on which the
particle accelerator and scanning system are mounted. The gantry is
rotatable relative to a patient position. Protons are output
essentially directly from the particle accelerator and through the
scanning system to the position of an irradiation target, such as a
patient. The particle accelerator may be a synchrocyclotron.
[0023] Two or more of the features described in this disclosure,
including those described in this summary section, may be combined
to form implementations not specifically described herein.
[0024] Control of the various systems described herein, or portions
thereof, may be implemented via a computer program product that
includes instructions that are stored on one or more non-transitory
machine-readable storage media, and that are executable on one or
more processing devices. The systems described herein, or portions
thereof, may be implemented as an apparatus, method, or electronic
system that may include one or more processing devices and memory
to store executable instructions to implement control of the stated
functions.
[0025] The details of one or more implementations are set forth in
the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other
features, objects, and advantages will be apparent from the
description and drawings, and from the claims.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0026] FIGS. 1 and 2 are a cross-sectional views of an example
synchrocyclotron for use in a particle therapy system.
[0027] FIG. 3 is a side view of an example scanning system.
[0028] FIG. 4 is a perspective view of components of an example
scanning system, excluding scattering material for spot size
variation.
[0029] FIG. 5 is a front view of an example magnet for use in a
scanning system of the type shown in FIGS. 3 and 4.
[0030] FIG. 6 is a perspective view of an example magnet for use in
a scanning system of the type shown in FIGS. 3 and 4.
[0031] FIG. 7 is a perspective view of an example energy degrader
(range modulator) for use in a scanning system of the type shown in
FIGS. 3 and 4.
[0032] FIG. 8 is a perspective view of a process for moving a plate
of an energy degrader in the path of a particle beam
[0033] FIG. 9 is a side view of an example particle beam and
collimator.
[0034] FIG. 10 is a top view show an example cross-section of an
irradiation target, an example collimator that is movable along the
edge of the cross-section, and an example beam scanning path along
an interior of the irradiation target.
[0035] FIG. 11 is a top view of an example collimator.
[0036] FIG. 12 is a top view of components of an example
collimator.
[0037] FIG. 13 is a top view showing the components of FIG. 12
combined to form an example collimator.
[0038] FIG. 14 is a top view show an example cross-section of an
irradiation target, and an example multi-leaf collimator that is
movable along the edge of the cross-section during particle beam
scanning.
[0039] FIG. 15 is a top view show an example cross-section of an
irradiation target, and an example straight-edge collimator that is
movable and rotatable along the edge of the cross-section during
particle beam scanning.
[0040] FIG. 16 is a top view show an example cross-section of an
irradiation target, an example multi-part collimator that is
movable along the edges of the cross-section during particle beam
scanning, and an example beam scanning paths along an interior of
the irradiation target.
[0041] FIG. 17 is a top view of an example curved collimator.
[0042] FIG. 18 is a view show an example cross-section of an
irradiation target, and an example of how intensity-modulated
proton therapy is performed on the irradiation target.
[0043] FIG. 19 is a perspective view of an example irradiation
field of a particle beam scanning system.
[0044] FIG. 20 is a perspective view of multiple pieces of an
example energy degrader in the beam path to an irradiation
target.
[0045] FIG. 21 is a perspective view illustrating movement of
pieces of an energy degrader to track scanning of a particle
beam.
[0046] FIG. 22 is a perspective view illustrating situations where
movement of pieces of an energy degrader is required, and is not
required, to track scanning of a particle beam.
[0047] FIG. 23 is a perspective view of an example therapy
system.
[0048] FIG. 24 is an exploded perspective view of components of an
example synchrocyclotron for use in the particle therapy
system.
[0049] FIG. 25 is a cross-sectional view of the example
synchrocyclotron.
[0050] FIG. 26 is a perspective view of the example
synchrocyclotron.
[0051] FIG. 27 is a cross-sectional view of an example ion source
for use in the synchrocyclotron.
[0052] FIG. 28 is a perspective view of an example dee plate and an
example dummy dee for use in the synchrocyclotron.
[0053] FIG. 29 shows a patient positioned within an example inner
gantry of the example particle therapy system in a treatment
room.
[0054] FIG. 30 is a conceptual view of an example particle therapy
system that may use a variable-energy particle accelerator.
[0055] FIG. 31 is an example graph showing energy and current for
variations in magnetic field and distance in a particle
accelerator.
[0056] FIG. 32 is a side view of an example structure for sweeping
voltage on a dee plate over a frequency range for each energy level
of a particle beam, and for varying the frequency range when the
particle beam energy is varied.
[0057] FIG. 33 is a perspective, exploded view of an example magnet
system that may be used in a variable-energy particle
accelerator.
[0058] Like reference symbols in the various drawings indicate like
elements.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0059] Described herein is an example of a particle accelerator for
use in a system, such as a proton or ion therapy system. The
example particle therapy system includes a particle accelerator--in
this example, a synchrocyclotron--mounted on a gantry. The gantry
enables the accelerator to be rotated around a patient position, as
explained in more detail below. In some implementations, the gantry
is steel and has two legs mounted for rotation on two respective
bearings that lie on opposite sides of a patient. The particle
accelerator is supported by a steel truss that is long enough to
span a treatment area in which the patient lies and that is
attached at both ends to the rotating legs of the gantry. As a
result of rotation of the gantry around the patient, the particle
accelerator also rotates.
[0060] In an example implementation, the particle accelerator
(e.g., the synchrocyclotron) includes a cryostat that holds one or
more superconducting coils, each for conducting a current that
generates a magnetic field (B). In this example, the cryostat uses
liquid helium (He) to maintain each coil at superconducting
temperatures, e.g., 4.degree. Kelvin (K). Magnetic yokes or smaller
magnetic pole pieces are located inside the cryostat, and define a
cavity in which particles are accelerated.
[0061] In this example implementation, the particle accelerator
includes a particle source (e.g., a Penning Ion Gauge--PIG source)
to provide a plasma column to the cavity. Hydrogen gas is ionized
to produce the plasma column. A voltage source provides a radio
frequency (RF) voltage to the cavity to accelerate pulses of
particles from the plasma column.
[0062] As noted, in an example, the particle accelerator is a
synchrocyclotron. Accordingly, the RF voltage is swept across a
range of frequencies to account for relativistic effects on the
particles (e.g., increasing particle mass) when accelerating
particles from the plasma column. The magnetic field produced by
running current through a superconducting coil causes particles
accelerated from the plasma column to accelerate orbitally within
the cavity. In other implementations, a particle accelerator other
than a synchrocyclotron may be used. For example, a cyclotron, a
synchrotron, a linear accelerator, and so forth may be substituted
for the synchrocyclotron described herein.
[0063] In the synchrocyclotron, a magnetic field regenerator
("regenerator") is positioned near the outside of the cavity (e.g.,
at an interior edge thereof) to adjust the existing magnetic field
inside the cavity to thereby change locations (e.g., the pitch and
angle) of successive orbits of the particles accelerated from the
plasma column so that, eventually, the particles output to an
extraction channel that passes through the cryostat. The
regenerator may increase the magnetic field at a point in the
cavity (e.g., it may produce a magnetic field "bump" at an area of
the cavity), thereby causing each successive orbit of particles at
that point to precess outwardly toward the entry point of the
extraction channel until it reaches the extraction channel. The
extraction channel receives particles accelerated from the plasma
column and outputs the received particles from the cavity as a
particle beam.
[0064] The superconducting ("main") coils can produce relatively
high magnetic fields. The magnetic field generated by a main coil
may be within a range of 4 T to 20 T or more. For example, a main
coil may be used to generate magnetic fields at, or that exceed,
one or more of the following magnitudes: 4.0 T, 4.1 T, 4.2 T, 4.3
T, 4.4 T, 4.5 T, 4.6 T, 4.7 T, 4.8 T, 4.9 T, 5.0 T, 5.1 T, 5.2 T,
5.3 T, 5.4 T, 5.5 T, 5.6 T, 5.7 T, 5.8 T, 5.9 T, 6.0 T, 6.1 T, 6.2
T, 6.3 T, 6.4 T, 6.5 T, 6.6 T, 6.7 T, 6.8 T, 6.9 T, 7.0 T, 7.1 T,
7.2 T, 7.3 T, 7.4 T, 7.5 T, 7.6 T, 7.7 T, 7.8 T, 7.9 T, 8.0 T, 8.1
T, 8.2 T, 8.3 T, 8.4 T, 8.5 T, 8.6 T, 8.7 T, 8.8 T, 8.9 T, 9.0 T,
9.1 T, 9.2 T, 9.3 T, 9.4 T, 9.5 T, 9.6 T, 9.7 T, 9.8 T, 9.9 T, 10.0
T, 10.1 T, 10.2 T, 10.3 T, 10.4 T, 10.5 T, 10.6 T, 10.7 T, 10.8 T,
10.9 T, 11.0 T, 11.1 T, 11.2 T, 11.3 T, 11.4 T, 11.5 T, 11.6 T,
11.7 T, 11.8 T, 11.9 T, 12.0 T, 12.1 T, 12.2 T, 12.3 T, 12.4 T,
12.5 T, 12.6 T, 12.7 T, 12.8 T, 12.9 T, 13.0 T, 13.1 T, 13.2 T,
13.3 T, 13.4 T, 13.5 T, 13.6 T, 13.7 T, 13.8 T, 13.9 T, 14.0 T,
14.1 T, 14.2 T, 14.3 T, 14.4 T, 14.5 T, 14.6 T, 14.7 T, 14.8 T,
14.9 T, 15.0 T, 15.1 T, 15.2 T, 15.3 T, 15.4 T, 15.5 T, 15.6 T,
15.7 T, 15.8 T, 15.9 T, 16.0 T, 16.1 T, 16.2 T, 16.3 T, 16.4 T,
16.5 T, 16.6 T, 16.7 T, 16.8 T, 16.9 T, 17.0 T, 17.1 T, 17.2 T,
17.3 T, 17.4 T, 17.5 T, 17.6 T, 17.7 T, 17.8 T, 17.9 T, 18.0 T,
18.1 T, 18.2 T, 18.3 T, 18.4 T, 18.5 T, 18.6 T, 18.7 T, 18.8 T,
18.9 T, 19.0 T, 19.1 T, 19.2 T, 19.3 T, 19.4 T, 19.5 T, 19.6 T,
19.7 T, 19.8 T, 19.9 T, 20.0 T, 20.1 T, 20.2 T, 20.3 T, 20.4 T,
20.5 T, 20.6 T, 20.7 T, 20.8 T, 20.9 T, or more. Furthermore, a
main coil may be used to generate magnetic fields that are within
the range of 4 T to 20 T (or more, or less) that are not
specifically listed above.
[0065] In some implementations, such as the implementation shown in
FIGS. 1 and 2, large ferromagnetic magnetic yokes act as a return
for stray magnetic field produced by the superconducting coils. For
example, in some implementations, the superconducting magnet can
generate a relatively high magnetic field of, e.g., 4 T or more,
resulting in considerable stray magnetic fields. In some systems,
such as that shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, the relatively large
ferromagnetic return yoke 100 are used as a return for the magnetic
field generated by superconducting coils. A magnetic shield
surrounds the yoke. The return yoke and the shield together
dissipated stray magnetic field, thereby reducing the possibility
that stray magnetic fields will adversely affect the operation of
the accelerator.
[0066] In some implementations, the return yoke and shield may be
replaced by, or augmented by, an active return system. An example
active return system includes one or more active return coils that
conduct current in a direction opposite to current through the main
superconducting coils. In some example implementations, there is an
active return coil for each superconducting coil, e.g., two active
return coils--one for each superconducting coil (referred to as a
"main" coil). Each active return coil may also be a superconducting
coil that surrounds the outside of a corresponding main
superconducting coil.
[0067] Current passes through the active return coils in a
direction that is opposite to the direction of current passing
through the main coils. The current passing through the active
return coils thus generates a magnetic field that is opposite in
polarity to the magnetic field generated by the main coils. As a
result, the magnetic field generated by an active return coil is
able to dissipate at least some of the relatively strong stray
magnetic field resulting from the corresponding main coil. In some
implementations, each active return may be used to generate a
magnetic field of between 2.5 T and 12 T or more. An example of an
active return system that may be used is described in U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 13/907,601, filed on May 31, 2013, the
contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
[0068] Referring to FIG. 3, at the output of extraction channel 102
of particle accelerator 105 (which may have the configuration shown
in FIGS. 1 and 2), is an example scanning system 106 that may be
used to scan the particle beam across at least part of an
irradiation target. FIG. 4 shows examples of components of the
scanning system. These include, but are not limited to, a scanning
magnet 108, an ion chamber 109, and an energy degrader 110. Other
components that may be incorporated into the scanning system are
not shown in FIG. 4, including, e.g., one or more scatterers for
changing beam spot size.
[0069] In an example operation, scanning magnet 108 is controllable
in two dimensions (e.g., Cartesian XY dimensions) to direct the
particle beam across a part (e.g., a cross-section) of an
irradiation target. Ion chamber 109 detects the dosage of the beam
and feeds-back that information to a control system to adjust beam
movement. Energy degrader 110 is controllable to move material
into, and out of, the path of the particle beam to change the
energy of the particle beam and therefore the depth to which the
particle beam will penetrate the irradiation target.
[0070] FIGS. 5 and 6 shows views of an example scanning magnet 108.
Scanning magnet 108 includes two coils 111, which control particle
beam movement in the X direction, and two coils 112, which control
particle beam movement in the Y direction. Control is achieved, in
some implementations, by varying current through one or both sets
of coils to thereby vary the magnetic field(s) produced thereby. By
varying the magnetic field(s) appropriately, the particle beam can
be moved in the X and/or Y direction across the irradiation target.
In some implementations, the scanning magnet is not movable
physically relative to the particle accelerator. In other
implementations, the scanning magnet may be movable relative to the
accelerator (e.g., in addition to the movement provided by the
gantry). In some implementations, the scanning magnets may be
controllable to move the particle beam continuously. In other
implementations, the scanning magnets are controllable at intervals
or specific times. In some implementations, there may be different
scanning magnets to control movement of the beam in the X and/or Y
directions. In some implementations, there may be different
scanning magnets to control partial movement of the beam in either
the X and/or Y direction.
[0071] In some implementations, ion chamber 109 detects dosage
applied by the particle beam by detecting the numbers of ion pairs
created within a gas caused by incident radiation. The numbers of
ion pairs correspond to the dosage provided by the particle beam.
That information is fed-back to a computer system that controls
operation of the particle therapy system. The computer system (not
shown), which may include memory and one or more processing
devices, determines if the dosage detected by ion chamber is the
intended dose. If the dosage is not as intended, the computer
system may control the accelerator to interrupt production and/or
output of the particle beam, and/or control the scanning magnet to
prevent output of the particle beam to the irradiation target. For
example, to prevent or modify output of the particle beam, the
computer system may turn the ion source off/on, change the
frequency of the RF sweep, activate one or more mechanisms (such as
a fast kicker magnet (not shown)) to divert the beam to an absorber
material and thereby prevent the beam output, and so forth.
[0072] FIG. 7 shows a range modulator 115, which is an example
implementation of energy degrader 110. In some implementations,
such as that shown in FIG. 7, range modulator includes a series of
plates 116. The plates may be made of one or more of the following
example materials: carbon, beryllium or other material of low
atomic number. Other materials, however, may be used in place of,
or in addition to, these example materials.
[0073] One or more of the plates is movable into, or out of, the
beam path to thereby affect the energy of the particle beam and,
thus, the depth of penetration of the particle beam within the
irradiation target. For example, the more plates that are moved
into the path of the particle beam, the more energy that will be
absorbed by the plates, and the less energy the particle beam will
have. Conversely, the fewer plates that are moved into the path of
the particle beam, the less energy that will be absorbed by the
plates, and the more energy the particle beam will have. Higher
energy particle beams penetrate deeper into the irradiation target
than do lower energy particle beams. In this context, "higher" and
"lower" are meant as relative terms, and do not have any specific
numeric connotations.
[0074] Plates are moved physically into, and out of, the path of
the particle beam. For example, as shown in FIG. 8, a plate 116a
moves along the direction of arrow 117 between positions in the
path of the particle beam and outside the path of the particle
beam. The plates are computer-controlled. Generally, the number of
plates that are moved into the path of the particle beam
corresponds to the depth at which scanning of an irradiation target
is to take place. For example, the irradiation target can be
divided into cross-sections, each of which corresponds to an
irradiation depth. One or more plates of the range modulator can be
moved into, or out of, the beam path to the irradiation target in
order to achieve the appropriate energy to irradiate each of these
cross-sections of the irradiation target. Traditionally, the range
modulator was stationary relative to the particle beam during
scanning of a part of (e.g., cross-section of) an irradiation
target, except for its plates moving in and out of the path of the
particle beam.
[0075] In some implementations, the range modulator of FIGS. 7 and
8 may be replaced with a range modulator that, at least some of the
time, tracks movement of the particle beam. This type of energy
degrader is described in more detail below.
[0076] In some implementations, the particle accelerator may be a
variable-energy particle accelerator, such as the example particle
accelerator described in U.S. patent application Ser. No.
13/916,401, filed on Jun. 12, 2013, the contents of which are
incorporated herein by reference. In example systems where a
variable-energy particle accelerator is used, there may be less
need for an energy degrader of the type described herein, as the
energy level of the particle beam may be controlled by the particle
accelerator. For example, in some systems that employ a
variable-energy particle accelerator, an energy degrader may not be
needed. In some systems that employ a variable-energy particle
accelerator, an energy degrader may still be used to change beam
energy levels.
[0077] In some implementations, a treatment plan is established
prior to treating the irradiation target. The treatment plan may
specify how scanning is to be performed for a particular
irradiation target. In some implementations, the treatment plan
specifies the following information: a type of scanning (e.g., spot
scanning or raster scanning); scan locations (e.g., locations of
spots to be scanned); magnet current per scan location;
dosage-per-spot, spot size; locations (e.g., depths) of irradiation
target cross-sections; particle beam energy per cross-section;
plates or other types of pieces to move into the beam path for each
particle beam energy; and so forth. Generally, spot scanning
involves applying irradiation at discrete spots on an irradiation
target and raster scanning involves moving a radiation spot across
the radiation target. The concept of spot size therefore applies
for both raster and spot scanning.
[0078] In some implementations, the overall treatment plan of an
irradiation target includes different treatment plans for different
cross-sections of the irradiation target. The treatment plans for
different cross-sections may contain the same information or
different information, such as that provided above.
[0079] In some implementations, the scanning system may include a
collimator 120 (FIG. 3) to collimate the particle bean, which may
include an aperture that is placeable relative to the irradiation
target to limit the extent of the particle beam and thereby alter
the shape of the spot applied to the irradiation target. For
example, the collimator may be placed in the beam path down-beam of
the energy degrader and before the particle beam hits the
irradiation target. The collimator may contain an area (e.g., a
hole or a transmissive material) through which the particle beam
passes and another material (e.g., brass) around the hole that
inhibits or prevents passage of the particle beam.
[0080] In some implementations, the collimator may include a
structure defining an edge. The structure may include a material,
such as brass, that inhibits transmission of the particle beam. The
structure may be controllable to move in two dimensions relative to
the irradiation target so that at least part of the structure is
between at least part of the particle beam and the irradiation
target. For example, the structure may be movable in the X and Y
directions of a plane that intersects the particle beam and that is
parallel, or substantially parallel to, a cross-section of the
irradiation target that is being treated. Use of a collimator in
this manner may be beneficial in that it can be used to customize
the cross-sectional shape of the particle beam that reaches the
patient, thereby limiting the amount of particle beam that extends
beyond the radiation target. For example, as shown in FIG. 9, a
structure 220 in a collimator prevents portion 221 of particle beam
222 from reaching a target 224, thereby limiting the beam to the
irradiation target and reducing exposure of healthy tissue 225 to
radiation. By placing a structure with an edge between part of the
particle beam and the patient, the example collimator also provides
a defined, or sharp, edge to the particle beam portion that reaches
the patient, thereby promoting more precise dose applications.
[0081] Positioning and movement of the collimator may be controlled
by a control computer system that controls other features of the
particle therapy system described herein. For example, the
collimator may be controlled in accordance with the treatment plan
to track (e.g., follow) motion of the particle beam across at least
part of the irradiation target. In some implementations, the
collimator track is controlled to track all motion of the particle
beam relative to the irradiation target. For example, in some
implementations, the collimator may be controlled to track motion
of the particle beam throughout the entirety of the irradiation
target, e.g., both at edges of the irradiation target and at
interiors of the irradiation target. In some implementations, the
collimator is controlled to track only some motion of the particle
beam relative to the irradiation target. For example, the
collimator may be controlled to track movement of the particle beam
only along the edges of the irradiation target relative to when the
particle beam reaches those edges.
[0082] Referring to FIG. 10, for instance, a particle beam may
follow a path in an irradiation target 229 shown by arrowed lines
230. Collimator 231 may not track motion of the particle beam on
the interior 233 of irradiation target 229. But, collimator 231 may
track motion of the particle beam along only the edges of the
irradiation target (e.g., roughly along arrow 232). For example,
each time the particle beam reaches an edge 234 of the irradiation
target, the collimator may move, or may have previously moved, to
intercept the particle beam at the edge, and thereby limit exposure
of surrounding tissue 235 to the beam. When, and by how much, the
collimator moves may depend on the size of the particle beam
cross-section (spot) and the speed at which the particle beam
scans. In this example, there is no need to limit exposure to the
particle beam at the interior of the irradiation target; hence, the
collimator need not track the beam at the interior.
[0083] The movement of a collimator may be controlled in various
ways. For example, the current through magnet 108 may correspond to
the deflection of the particle beam by the magnet and, thus, the
location of the particle beam spot on the irradiation target. So,
for example, knowing the current through the magnet and the
location of the irradiation target relative to the magnet, a
computer system controlling operation of the scanning system can
determine the projected location of the irradiation spot. And,
knowing the location of the radiation spot, the computer system can
control the scanning system, in particular the collimator, to track
movement of the irradiation spot along all or part of its motion,
as described herein. In some implementations, the computer system
can control the scanning system, in particular the collimator, so
that the collimator arrives at a location before the particle beam
spot arrives at that location, as described in more detail
below.
[0084] Use of a collimator, such as is described above, can have
advantages. For example, in some cases, goals of particle beam
scanning may include achieving accuracy at the edges of an
irradiation target and uniformity of dosage or coverage in the
interior of the irradiation target. The use of a collimator can
help to further these goals by enabling use of a relatively large
particle beam spot for scanning. In this context, a spot size may
be considered "large" if it has an area that is within a specified
percentage of the area of the irradiation target. This percentage
might typically be 2.5%, but values between, e.g., 0.25% and 25%,
could also be used. Scanning using a relative large spot size
increases the fractional areal coverage of the irradiation target
for each beam pulse. Typically, the larger the size of this spot,
the less adversely affected the target uniformity will be due to
target (patient) motion. At the edges, however, the collimator
reduces the chances that radiation from the large spot will impact
tissue (e.g., healthy tissue) outside the radiation target by
reducing the lateral penumbra. Traditionally, smaller spot sizes
were preferred, since they enabled more precise dosage at the edges
as compared to a larger spot size. But, compared to a collimated
edge, those smaller spot sizes could result in slower treatment
times for a given treatment volume, and reduced edge conformality
due to reduced edge resolution and increased penumbra.
[0085] The collimator may have any number of different shapes or
configurations and may, or may not, include one or more moving
parts. In an example implementation, the collimator is comprised of
brass and/or other radiation-blocking material, and has a thickness
on the order of several centimeters. However, different collimators
may have different compositions and thicknesses.
[0086] In example implementation, the collimator is a structure
that has one or more defined edges. For example, the collimator may
be a structure containing an aperture, or hole. FIG. 11 shows an
example of this type of collimator 239. Collimator 239 may have any
appropriate shape, with an aperture therein. The edges of the
aperture may be used to limit application of the particle beam, as
shown in FIG. 9 for example, thereby allowing application of beam
222 to the irradiation target 224 but not to tissue covered by
collimator 220 that is otherwise in the beam path. As explained
above, the aperture may track (e.g., follow) the particle beam
throughout all or part of the scanning operation. For example, the
aperture may track movement of the particle beam only at edges of
the irradiation target or throughout the entire motion of the beam.
That is, the collimator itself may move along the edge of the
irradiation target to track movement of the particle beam (e.g., so
that the location of the collimator coincides with the particle
beam when the particle beam reaches the irradiation target
edge).
[0087] In some implementations, the collimator may include two or
more apertures that are controlled to overlap and thereby achieve a
specific size. For example, as shown in FIG. 12, apertures 244 and
245 are part of respective structures 246 and 247. The structures
move relative to each other, as shown in FIG. 13, thereby causing
the apertures 244, 245 to overlap and change the size and, in some
cases, the shape of resulting hole 248 through which the particle
beam is allowed to pass. Shapes other than those shown may be
used.
[0088] In some implementations, the collimator may track the
movement of the particle beam during the particle beam's motion in
the interior of the irradiation target. For example, in some
implementations, the aperture may have a diameter that is less than
the diameter of the particle beam spot. In some systems, it may be
desirable to use a spot having a specific diameter at all
irradiation positions (including those on the interior of the
irradiation target). In these systems, therefore, the aperture may
track all movement of the particle beam spot so as to achieve the
appropriate particle beam spot diameter for treatment. In some
implementations, the aperture of the collimator may vary in size
and/or shape. For example, the collimator may have one or more
moving parts to vary the size and shape of the aperture (e.g., to
reduce its diameter, surface area, or the like).
[0089] In example implementations, the collimator may be a
structure having one or more straight edges. For example, the
collimator may include square, rectangular, or substantially linear
structures, each having at least one edge that can be placed in the
path of the particle beam.
[0090] In an example implementation that employs straight edges,
the collimator may have a multi-leaf structure, as in FIG. 14. In
FIG. 14, collimator 250 tracks movement along the edge of
irradiation target 251. Fingers 252 move up or down, or towards or
away from the irradiation target, in order to achieve an edge shape
253 that substantially matches the edge shape of the irradiation
target and that blocks the particle beam from reaching healthy
tissue (or tissue that should not be irradiated). For example, each
finger can be moved up or down, or extended and retracted, or a
combination of such movements to substantially match the edge
shape. Collimator 250 itself may move along the edge of the
irradiation target 251 (e.g., roughly in the direction of arrow
255) to track movement of the particle beam (e.g., so that the
location of the collimator coincides with the particle beam when
the particle beam reaches the irradiation target edge). In some
implementations, collimator 250 may, or may not, move into the
interior of the irradiation target during scanning operations.
[0091] Traditional multi-leaf collimators are stationary relative
to the irradiation target and include two sets of fingers that face
each other and that move relative to each other to attain the
appropriate collimation. There may be tens, hundreds, or even
thousands of fingers used in such collimators, and their size may
be as large as the irradiation field itself. In some
implementations, the irradiation field may be defined by a plane,
which is at an angle to the beam, and which defines the maximum
extent that a particle beam can move in the X and Y directions
relative to the irradiation target. However, in the example
implementations described herein, the collimator moves relative to
(e.g., tracks or moves along the edge of) the irradiation target,
and need only provide a defined edge at the point of the
irradiation target where and when the spot hits that point.
Accordingly, the multi-leaf collimator (in addition to being only a
single set of fingers) may be made considerably smaller than its
conventional counterparts. For example, the multi-leaf collimators
described herein may include ten or less (e.g., two, three, four,
five, six, seven, eight or nine) fingers (or more, if desired).
[0092] In an example implementation that employs straight edges, as
shown in FIG. 15, collimator 260 may be rectangular in shape, and
move along the edge of irradiation target 261. Collimator 260 may
move along the edge of the irradiation target to track movement of
the particle beam (e.g., so that the location of the collimator
coincides with the particle beam when the particle beam reaches the
irradiation target edge). During motion along the edge of the
irradiation target, collimator 260 may also rotate in two or three
dimensions, e.g., in the XY dimensions of arrow 262 and also in the
Z dimension. This rotation allows at least a portion of an edge of
collimator 260 to match the edge of the irradiation target relative
closely. Thus, collimator 260 may be appropriately positioned so
that, when the particle beam reaches the edge of the irradiation
target, the collimator blocks the tissue extending beyond the edge.
As a result, the collimator provides a defined radiation edge
relative to the irradiation target and protects adjacent tissue
from the particle beam. Movement of the collimator to the
appropriate point on the edge of the irradiation target may
coincide with movement of the particle beam or precede movement of
the particle beam.
[0093] In some implementations, the collimator may include a single
structure with one or more straight edges, as shown in FIG. 15. In
other implementations, the collimator may include two or more such
structures at different (e.g., opposing) edges of the irradiation
target, as shown in FIG. 16. There, the collimator includes two
structures 265, 266. Each of structures 265 and 266 tracks movement
of the particle beam. That is, structure 265 moves so that the
location of structure 265 coincides with the particle beam when the
particle beam reaches edge 269 of the irradiation target, and
structure 266 moves so that the location of structure 266 coincides
with the particle beam when the particle beam reaches edge 270 of
the irradiation target. Movement of each structure to the
appropriate point on the edge of the irradiation target may
coincide with movement of the particle beam or precede movement of
the particle beam. For example, structure 266 can be moved as the
spot is scanned in the direction of arrow 271, so that structure
266 is in the appropriate location when the spot returns to edge
270; and structure 265 can be moved as the spot is scanned in the
direction of arrow 272, so that structure 265 is in the appropriate
location when the spot returns to edge 269. Structures 265 and 266
may move at the same times, at different times, or there may be
overlap in the times of their movement. An arrangement of this type
enables the particle beam to be moved from edge to edge of the
irradiation target, with the collimator enabling a defined
irradiation field at both edges. And, since the collimator is
comprised of multiple structures, scanning need not be
significantly slowed waiting for movement of the collimator. In
some implementations, the collimator may include more than two
(e.g., three, four, etc.) structures of the type and operation
shown in FIG. 16. In some implementations, the two or more
structures that make up the collimator may be structures that
include holes, such as that shown in FIG. 11. The operation of the
two-structure collimator is otherwise as described above.
[0094] In some implementations, the collimator need not have a
straight edge, but rather its edge(s) may be curved, as shown in
FIG. 17. A collimator may include only one such structure or two or
more such structures. In some implementations, the two or more
structures that make up the collimator may be structures that
include curved edges. For example, two structures of the type shown
in FIG. 17 may replace the two structures of FIG. 16. The operation
of the two-structure collimator is otherwise as described
above.
[0095] In this regard, in example implementations, the collimator
may be a structure having a curved shape having a radius of
curvature that varies continuously along its edge, thereby enabling
at least part of the edge to closely match the edge of an
irradiation target, either directly or by rotating the edge at an
appropriate angle. In this example, collimator 275 is a French
curve that can be moved to track the beam, either partly or fully,
and that can be rotated in two or three dimensions relative to the
irradiation target to control application of the particle beam. Any
appropriately curved structure may be include in the collimator. As
was the case above, collimator 275 may only move along the edge of
the irradiation target to track movement of the particle beam
(e.g., so that the location of the collimator coincides with the
particle beam when the particle beam reaches the irradiation target
edge). As was the case above, the collimator may, or may not, track
movement of the particle beam at the interior of the irradiation
target.
[0096] A collimator may include only one structure of the type
shown in FIG. 17 or the collimator may include two or more such
structures. For example, two structures of the type shown in FIG.
17 may replace the two structures of FIG. 16. The operation of the
two-structure collimator is otherwise as described above.
[0097] In some implementations, the treatment planning system may
be designed so that the scanning speed (e.g., the rate at which the
particle beam spot traverses the irradiation target) is different
in the interior of the irradiation target than at the edges of the
irradiation target. For example, the scanning speed may be faster
at the interior of the irradiation target than at the edges of the
irradiation target. This arrangement allows for higher precision
scanning at the edges of the irradiation target than at the
interior of the irradiation target. This type of variable-speed
scanning may be implemented using any appropriate type of
collimator, including those described herein, or this type of
variable-speed scanning may be implemented without using any
collimator. In either case, the slower speed at the irradiation
target edge may enable more precise scanning there, which may
reduce the chances that the particle beam will impact outside the
irradiation target.
[0098] In some implementations, the collimator described herein may
be used in an intensity-modulated proton therapy process. In such
as process, the proton beam is projected at the radiation target
from different directions so that a percentage of the overall dose
is delivered from each direction. As a result, the amount of dose
delivered to volumes outside of the irradiation target can be
reduced. For example, FIG. 18 shows a particle beam 280 applied to
the irradiation target 281 from three different angles. In this
example, 1/3 of the total dose may be applied from one angle; 1/3
of the total dose may be applied from another angle; and 1/3 of the
total dose may be applied from yet another angle. That is, the
particle beam may be scanned at angle 282 relative to horizontal
285 to apply 1/3 of the dose; the particle beam may be scanned at
angle 283 to apply 1/3 of the dose; and the particle beam may be
scanned at angle 284 to apply 1/3 of the dose. As a result, the
amount of radiation applied to surrounding tissue 287 is spread out
at the appropriate angles, thereby reducing the chances that
surrounding tissue will be exposed to harmful amounts of radiation.
Any appropriate number of angles and appropriate dosage per angle
may be employed.
[0099] Irradiation targets, such as tumors, typically are not
symmetric. Accordingly, different beam collimation is typically
required for the different angles of application of the particle
beam. The example collimators described herein can be positioned at
the appropriate locations along the irradiation target's edge (as
described above) to provide appropriate collimation given the angle
of irradiation. In some implementations, the example collimators
can track motion of the particle beam, either only at the
irradiation target's edge or throughout some portion (e.g., all) of
the motion of the particle beam at all angles of application.
[0100] In some implementations, the example collimators described
herein prevent transmission of the particle beam to surrounding
tissue by blocking the particle beam. In some implementations, the
example collimators may enable partial transmission of the particle
beam, thereby resulting in application of lower-levels of radiation
to the surrounding tissue than to the irradiation target. Any of
the example collimators described herein may be produced in this
manner.
[0101] The example collimators described herein may be mounted to
one or more computer-controlled robotic arms or other structures to
control their movement relative to the irradiation target. A
collimator may be mounted to the scanning system itself as well.
Typically, the collimator is mounted closest to the patent relative
to other elements of the particle beam scanning system (e.g.,
down-beam of other elements of the scanning system). In
implementations where the collimator includes more than one piece
(e.g., FIG. 16), there may be more than one robotic arm or other
structure to independently control the different pieces of the
collimator in accordance with the treatment plan. In some
implementations, a single robotic arm may be configured to control
the different pieces of the collimator independently or to control
a combination of pre-assembled pieces.
[0102] In some implementations, the energy degrader may also
configured to track motion of the particle beam. In this regard, in
some implementations, such as the example implementation described
with respect to FIGS. 7 and 8, the energy degrader may include
multiple plates that are movable into the path of the particle beam
to control the amount of energy in the beam and thereby control the
depth to which the particle beam penetrates the irradiation target.
In this way, the energy degrader is used to perform depth (the
direction of the particle beam or Z-direction) scanning in the
irradiation target. Typically, each plate absorbs an amount of
energy in the particle beam. Accordingly, the more plates that are
placed in front of the particle beam, the less energy the beam has,
and the less deep the beam will penetrate into the irradiation
target. Conversely, the fewer plates that are placed in front of
the particle beam, the more energy the beam has (since less energy
is absorbed by the plate(s)), and the more deep the beam will
penetrate into the irradiation target. In some implementations,
each plate has about the same thickness, and therefore absorbs
about the same amount of beam energy. In other implementations,
different plates may have different thicknesses, with the thickness
of a plate corresponding to the amount of energy that the plate
absorbs.
[0103] In some implementations, the plates each have a surface area
that is about the size of the irradiation field. In this context,
the irradiation field may be defined by a plane that defines the
maximum extent that a particle beam can move in the X and Y
directions relative to the irradiation target. For example, FIG. 19
shows an irradiation field 290 in front of an irradiation target
291. Due to physical system limitations, a particle beam is movable
across, but not beyond, the plane defining the irradiation field.
Accordingly, to ensure that the energy degrader can be applied to
any location within the irradiation field, in some implementations
the plates in the energy degrader each have a surface are that is
at least as big as, and in some cases that exceeds, the size of the
irradiation field. This configuration, however, can result in
plates that are large (e.g., possibly a square meter or square
meters), and thus that can be heavy and relative slow to move. Slow
movement of the plates can result in slower treatment.
[0104] In some implementations, the energy degraders may be smaller
than the size of the irradiation field, and track at least part of
the motion of the particle beam. As a result, the energy degrader
may be lighter, which can reduce the amount of time that it takes
to position the energy degrader plates in the path of the particle
beam and thus reduce the treatment time. The energy degrader may
track the particle beam in two directions (e.g., XY) or in three
directions (e.g., XYZ). That is, the energy degrader may move in a
plane perpendicular to the particle beam, or the energy degrader
may move in a plane perpendicular to the particle beam and along a
longitudinal direction of the particle beam. In this regard, any of
the collimators described herein may also move in a plane
perpendicular to the particle beam, or any of the collimators
described herein may also move in a plane perpendicular to the
particle beam and along a longitudinal direction of the particle
beam. Movement of the collimator(s) and energy degrader(s) may be
independent or coordinated.
[0105] For example, an energy degrader may be comprised of multiple
pieces, which may be plates or other structures constructed to
absorb particle beam energy during treatment. Each piece may have
the same area (XY) and thickness (Z) or different pieces may have
different areas and thicknesses. Referring to FIG. 20, two or more
pieces 294 having the same or different thicknesses may be placed
in front an irradiation target 295 in the particle beam 293 path to
achieve a particular amount of energy absorption. Alternatively, a
single piece having a specified thickness may be placed in front of
the beam to achieve a particular amount of energy absorption. For
example, if a particular energy absorption is needed, the control
computer may select a piece with the appropriate thickness to
achieve that absorption.
[0106] In examples where two or more pieces are placed in front of
the beam, those pieces may be assembled prior to placement or
assembled dynamically during placement. For example, the control
computer may select two pieces, arrange them, and then move the
combination of the two pieces into the beam path. Alternatively,
the control computer may select two pieces and then move the
combination of the two pieces into the beam path simultaneously but
not in combination (e.g., each may be moved with a separate robotic
arm).
[0107] The energy degrader, or pieces thereof, may track movement
of the particle beam across at least part of the irradiation field
so as to achieve appropriate energy absorption, and thus beam depth
penetration, at various points on the irradiation target. The
treatment plan may dictate where the energy degrader needs to be at
any particular time during treatment, and feedback from the
ionization chamber may be used for positioning and position
correction, if necessary. In some implementations, the precision
with which the energy degrader needs to track the particle beam is
based on the size of the degrader and the spot size of the particle
beam at the point where the particle beam intersects the energy
degrader.
[0108] More specifically, in some examples, the smaller that the
surface area of the energy degrader is, the more closely movement
of the energy degrader should track movement of the particle beam.
Conversely, in other examples, the larger that the surface area of
the energy degrader is, the less closely movement of the energy
degrader needs to track movement of the particle beam. For example
referring to FIG. 21, if the energy degrader 299 has a surface area
that is close to a surface area of spot 300 at the point where the
particle beam intersects the energy degrader, the energy degrader
should track motion of the particle beam rather closely in order to
ensure that the energy degrader is in front of the particle beam
relative to irradiation target 301 at appropriate times during
treatment. For example, motion of particle beam 304 from location
302 to location 303 would also require energy degrader 299 to move
in the direction of arrow 305 to remain in the beam path, since the
areas of the spot and the degrader are relatively close in size. As
indicated, motion of the particle beam may be dictated by the
treatment plan and detected through use of the ionization chamber
and feedback to the control computer. This information may also be
used to control movement of the energy degrader.
[0109] In some implementations, the moveable energy degrader may be
considerably larger than the particle beam spot. In these cases,
the energy degrader need not track motion of the particle beam as
closely in order to ensure that the energy degrader is in front of
the particle beam at appropriate times during treatment. In fact,
depending upon the size of the energy degrader, the energy degrader
need not move at all in some cases where the particle beam moves.
That is, for some motion of the particle beam, the energy degrader
may remain stationary, but for other motion of the particle beam,
the energy degrader also moves to intercept the particle beam. For
example, FIG. 22 shows a case where the energy degrader 310 is
considerably larger than particle beam spot 311 at the point where
the particle beam intersects the energy degrader. As the particle
beam spot moves from point 314a to point 314b, the energy degrader
remains in the beam path even though the energy degrader has not
moved. The control computer system, knowing the size of the
degrader and the two spot positions, does not move the energy
degrader in this case. Accordingly, in this case, the energy
degrader need not track movement of the particle beam spot.
However, when the spot moves to point 314c, the energy degrader (or
piece(s) thereof) will move to track and intercept the beam so as
to remain in the beam path. Accordingly, the size of the energy
degrader relative to the beam spot is a factor in determining when,
and by how much, the energy degrader is required to move during
scanning.
[0110] In some implementations, the energy degrader may include
multiple parts or pieces. For example, one part or piece may be
used to track movement of the particle beam across part of an
irradiation target (e.g., irradiation applied from the top of the
irradiation target) and another part or piece may be used to track
movement of the particle beam across another part of an irradiation
target (e.g., irradiation applied from the bottom of the
target).
[0111] The energy degrader (or pieces thereof) may have any shape,
e.g., square, rectangular, circular, oval, irregular, regular,
polygonal, spherical, cubical, tetrahedral, and so forth. The
energy degrader (or pieces thereof) may have any appropriate size.
For example, the energy degrader (or pieces thereof) may have a
surface area this less than the area of the irradiation field, that
is less than 3/4 the area of the irradiation field, that is less
than 1/2 the area of the irradiation field, that is less than 1/3
the area of the irradiation field, that is less than 1/4 the area
of the irradiation field, that is less than 1/5 the area of the
irradiation field, or so forth. The energy degrader (or pieces
thereof) may have a surface area that is less than twenty times the
area of the particle beam spot at the irradiation field, that is
less than fifteen times the area of the particle beam spot at the
irradiation field, that is less than ten times the area of the
particle beam spot at the irradiation field, that is less than nine
times the area of the particle beam spot at the irradiation field,
that is less than eight times the area of the particle beam spot at
the irradiation field, that is less than seven times the area of
the particle beam spot at the irradiation field, that is less than
six times the area of the particle beam spot at the irradiation
field, that is less than five times the area of the particle beam
spot at the irradiation field, that is less than four times the
area of the particle beam spot at the irradiation field, that is
less than three times the area of the particle beam spot at the
irradiation field, or that is less than two times the area of the
particle beam spot at the irradiation field. In some
implementations, the energy degrader (or pieces thereof) may have a
surface area that is a multiple of the spot size, e.g., two times
the spot size, three times the spot size, five times the spot size,
ten times the spot size, and so forth.
[0112] In some implementations, each piece (e.g., layer of multiple
layers) has a same size, shape, thickness and composition. In other
implementations, different pieces may have different sizes, shapes
thicknesses and compositions.
[0113] The movement of the example energy degraders described
herein may be controlled in various ways. For example, the current
through magnet 108 may correspond to the deflection of the particle
beam by the magnet and, thus, the location of the particle beam
spot on the irradiation target. So, for example, knowing the
current through the magnet and the location of the irradiation
target relative to the magnet, a computer system controlling
operation of the scanning system can determine the projected
location of the irradiation spot. And, knowing the location of the
radiation spot, and the size of the energy degrader relative to the
spot size, the computer system can control the energy degrader, to
track (if necessary) movement of the irradiation spot along all or
part of its motion, as described herein.
[0114] The example movable energy degraders described herein may be
mounted to one or more computer-controlled robotic arms or other
structures that also contain elements of the scanning system to
control movement relative to the irradiation target. In
implementations where the energy degrader includes more than one
piece (e.g., multiple pieces or plates), there may be more than one
robotic arm to independently control the different pieces of the
energy degrader in accordance with the treatment plan. In some
implementations, a single robotic arm may be configured to control
the different pieces independently.
[0115] Different cross-sections of the irradiation target may be
scanned according to different treatment plans. As described above,
an energy degrader is used to control the scanning depth. In some
implementations, the particle beam may be interrupted or redirected
during configuration of the energy degrader. In other
implementations, this need not be the case.
[0116] Described herein are examples of treating cross-sections of
an irradiation target. These may be cross-sections that are roughly
perpendicular to the direction of the particle beam. However, the
concepts described herein are equally applicable to treating other
portions of an irradiation target that are not cross-sections
perpendicular to the direction of the particle beam. For example,
an irradiation target may be segmented into spherical, cubical or
other shaped volumes, and those volumes may be treated using the
example processes, systems, and/or devices described herein.
[0117] The processes described herein may be used with a single
particle accelerator, and any two or more of the features thereof
described herein may be used with the single particle accelerator.
The particle accelerator may be used in any type of medical or
non-medical application. An example of a particle therapy system
that may be used is provided below. Notably, the concepts described
herein may be used in other systems not specifically described.
[0118] Referring to FIG. 23, an example implementation of a charged
particle radiation therapy system 400 includes a beam-producing
particle accelerator 402 having a weight and size small enough to
permit it to be mounted on a rotating gantry 404 with its output
directed straight (that is, essentially directly) from the
accelerator housing toward a patient 406. Particle accelerator 402
also includes a scanning system of a type described herein (e.g.,
FIGS. 3 to 22).
[0119] In some implementations, the steel gantry has two legs 408,
410 mounted for rotation on two respective bearings 412, 414 that
lie on opposite sides of the patient. The accelerator is supported
by a steel truss 416 that is long enough to span a treatment area
418 in which the patient lies (e.g., twice as long as a tall
person, to permit the person to be rotated fully within the space
with any desired target area of the patient remaining in the line
of the beam) and is attached stably at both ends to the rotating
legs of the gantry.
[0120] In some examples, the rotation of the gantry is limited to a
range 420 of less than 360 degrees, e.g., about 180 degrees, to
permit a floor 422 to extend from a wall of the vault 424 that
houses the therapy system into the patient treatment area. The
limited rotation range of the gantry also reduces the required
thickness of some of the walls (which are not directly aligned with
the beam, e.g., wall 430), which provide radiation shielding of
people outside the treatment area. A range of 180 degrees of gantry
rotation is enough to cover all treatment approach angles, but
providing a larger range of travel can be useful. For example the
range of rotation may be between 180 and 330 degrees and still
provide clearance for the therapy floor space. In other
implementations, rotation is not limited as described above.
[0121] The horizontal rotational axis 432 of the gantry is located
nominally one meter above the floor where the patient and therapist
interact with the therapy system. This floor is positioned about 3
meters above the bottom floor of the therapy system shielded vault.
The accelerator can swing under the raised floor for delivery of
treatment beams from below the rotational axis. The patient couch
moves and rotates in a substantially horizontal plane parallel to
the rotational axis of the gantry. The couch can rotate through a
range 434 of about 270 degrees in the horizontal plane with this
configuration. This combination of gantry and patient rotational
ranges and degrees of freedom allow the therapist to select
virtually any approach angle for the beam. If needed, the patient
can be placed on the couch in the opposite orientation and then all
possible angles can be used.
[0122] In some implementations, the accelerator uses a
synchrocyclotron configuration having a high magnetic field
superconducting electromagnetic structure. Because the bend radius
of a charged particle of a given kinetic energy is reduced in
direct proportion to an increase in the magnetic field applied to
it, the high magnetic field superconducting magnetic structure
permits the accelerator to be made smaller and lighter. The
synchrocyclotron uses a magnetic field that is uniform in rotation
angle and falls off in strength with increasing radius. Such a
field shape can be achieved regardless of the magnitude of the
magnetic field, so in theory there is no upper limit to the
magnetic field strength (and therefore the resulting particle
energy at a fixed radius) that can be used in a
synchrocyclotron.
[0123] The synchrocyclotron is supported on the gantry so that the
beam is generated directly in line with the patient. The gantry
permits rotation of the synchrocyclotron about a horizontal
rotational axis that contains a point (isocenter 440) within, or
near, the patient. The split truss that is parallel to the
rotational axis, supports the synchrocyclotron on both sides.
[0124] Because the rotational range of the gantry is limited in
some example implementations, a patient support area can be
accommodated in a wide area around the isocenter. Because the floor
can be extended broadly around the isocenter, a patient support
table can be positioned to move relative to and to rotate about a
vertical axis 442 through the isocenter so that, by a combination
of gantry rotation and table motion and rotation, any angle of beam
direction into any part of the patient can be achieved. In some
implementations, the two gantry arms are separated by more than
twice the height of a tall patient, allowing the couch with patient
to rotate and translate in a horizontal plane above the raised
floor.
[0125] Limiting the gantry rotation angle allows for a reduction in
the thickness of at least one of the walls surrounding the
treatment room. Thick walls, typically constructed of concrete,
provide radiation protection to individuals outside the treatment
room. A wall downstream of a stopping proton beam may be about
twice as thick as a wall at the opposite end of the room to provide
an equivalent level of protection. Limiting the range of gantry
rotation enables the treatment room to be sited below earth grade
on three sides, while allowing an occupied area adjacent to the
thinnest wall reducing the cost of constructing the treatment
room.
[0126] In the example implementation shown in FIG. 23, the
superconducting synchrocyclotron 402 operates with a peak magnetic
field in a pole gap of the synchrocyclotron of 8.8 Tesla. The
synchrocyclotron produces a beam of protons having an energy of 250
MeV. In some implementations, the synchrocyclotron is a
variable-energy machine, and is capable of outputting proton beams
having different energies. In some implementations, the
synchrocyclotron may produce a beam having a fixed energy. In some
implementations the field strength could be in the range of 4 T to
20 T and the proton energy could be in the range of 150 to 300
MeV.
[0127] The radiation therapy system described in this example is
used for proton radiation therapy, but the same principles and
details can be applied in analogous systems for use in heavy ion
(ion) treatment systems.
[0128] As shown in FIGS. 1, 2, 24, 25, and 26, an example
synchrocyclotron 10 (e.g., 402 in FIG. 23) includes a magnet system
122 that contains a particle source 190, a radiofrequency drive
system 191, and a beam extraction system 318. In this example, the
magnetic field established by the magnet system has a shape
appropriate to maintain focus of a contained proton beam using a
combination of a split pair of annular superconducting coils 140,
142 and a pair of shaped ferromagnetic (e.g., low carbon steel)
pole faces 144, 146.
[0129] The two superconducting magnet coils are centered on a
common axis 147 and are spaced apart along the axis. The coils may
be formed by of Nb.sub.3Sn-based superconducting 0.8 mm diameter
strands (that initially comprise a niobium-tin core surrounded by a
copper sheath) deployed in a twisted cable-in-channel conductor
geometry. After seven individual strands are cabled together, they
are heated to cause a reaction that forms the final (brittle)
superconducting material of the wire. After the material has been
reacted, the wires are soldered into the copper channel (outer
dimensions 3.18.times.2.54 mm and inner dimensions 2.08.times.2.08
mm) and covered with insulation (in this example, a woven
fiberglass material). The copper channel containing the wires is
then wound in a coil having a rectangular cross-section. The wound
coil is then vacuum impregnated with an epoxy compound. The
finished coils are mounted on an annular stainless steel reverse
bobbin. Heater blankets may be placed at intervals in the layers of
the windings to protect the assembly in the event of a magnet
quench.
[0130] The entire coil can then be covered with copper sheets to
provide thermal conductivity and mechanical stability and then
contained in an additional layer of epoxy. The precompression of
the coil can be provided by heating the stainless steel reverse
bobbin and fitting the coils within the reverse bobbin. The reverse
bobbin inner diameter is chosen so that when the entire mass is
cooled to 4 K, the reverse bobbin stays in contact with the coil
and provides some compression. Heating the stainless steel reverse
bobbin to approximately 50 degrees C. and fitting coils at a
temperature of 100 degrees Kelvin can achieve this.
[0131] The geometry of the coil is maintained by mounting the coils
in a "reverse" rectangular bobbin to exert a restorative force that
works against the distorting force produced when the coils are
energized. As shown in FIG. 25, in some implementations, coil
position is maintained relative to corresponding magnet pole pieces
and the cryostat using a set of warm-to-cold support straps 402,
404, 406. Supporting the cold mass with thin straps reduces the
heat leakage imparted to the cold mass by the rigid support system.
The straps are arranged to withstand the varying gravitational
force on the coil as the magnet rotates on board the gantry. They
withstand the combined effects of gravity and the large
de-centering force realized by the coil when it is perturbed from a
perfectly symmetric position relative to the magnet yoke.
Additionally the links act to reduce dynamic forces imparted on the
coil as the gantry accelerates and decelerates when its position is
changed. Each warm-to-cold support may include one S2 fiberglass
link and one carbon fiber link. The carbon fiber link is supported
across pins between the warm yoke and an intermediate temperature
(50-70 K), and the S2 fiberglass link 408 is supported across the
intermediate temperature pin and a pin attached to the cold mass.
Each pin may be made of high strength stainless steel.
[0132] Referring to FIG. 1, the field strength profile as a
function of radius is determined largely by choice of coil geometry
and pole face shape; the pole faces 144, 146 of the permeable yoke
material can be contoured to fine tune the shape of the magnetic
field to ensure that the particle beam remains focused during
acceleration.
[0133] The superconducting coils are maintained at temperatures
near absolute zero (e.g., about 4 degrees Kelvin) by enclosing the
coil assembly (the coils and the bobbin) inside an evacuated
annular aluminum or stainless steel cryostatic chamber 170 (the
cryostat) that provides a free space around the coil structure,
except at a limited set of support points 171, 173. In an alternate
version (e.g., FIG. 2) the outer wall of the cryostat may be made
of low carbon steel to provide an additional return flux path for
the magnetic field.
[0134] In some implementations, the temperature near absolute zero
is achieved and maintained using one single-stage Gifford-McMahon
cryo-cooler and three two-stage Gifford McMahon cryo-coolers. Each
two stage cryo-cooler has a second stage cold end attached to a
condenser that recondenses Helium vapor into liquid Helium. In some
implementations, the temperature near absolute zero is achieved and
maintained using a cooling channel (not shown) containing liquid
helium, which is formed inside a superconducting coil support
structure (e.g., the reverse bobbin), and which contains a thermal
connection between the liquid helium in the channel and the
corresponding superconducting coil. An example of a liquid helium
cooling system of the type described above, and that may be used is
described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/148,000 (Begg et
al.).
[0135] In some implementations, the coil assembly and cryostatic
chambers are mounted within and fully enclosed by two halves 181,
183 of a pillbox-shaped magnet yoke 100. The yoke 100 provides a
path for the return magnetic field flux 184 and magnetically
shields the volume 186 between the pole faces 144, 146 to prevent
external magnetic influences from perturbing the shape of the
magnetic field within that volume. The yoke also serves to decrease
the stray magnetic field in the vicinity of the accelerator. In
other implementations, the coil assembly and cryostatic chambers
are mounted within and fully enclosed by a non-magnetic enclosure,
and the path for return magnetic field flux is implemented using an
active return system, an example of which is described above.
[0136] As shown in FIGS. 1 and 27, the synchrocyclotron includes a
particle source 190 of a Penning ion gauge geometry located near
the geometric center 192 of the magnet structure 182. The particle
source may be as described below, or the particle source may be of
the type described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/948,662
incorporated herein by reference.
[0137] Particle source 190 is fed from a supply 399 of hydrogen
through a gas line 393 and tube 394 that delivers gaseous hydrogen.
Electric cables 294 carry an electric current from a current source
to stimulate electron discharge from cathodes 392, 390 that are
aligned with the magnetic field 400.
[0138] In this example, the discharged electrons ionize the gas
exiting through a small hole from tube 394 to create a supply of
positive ions (protons) for acceleration by one semicircular
(dee-shaped) radio-frequency plate that spans half of the space
enclosed by the magnet structure and one dummy dee plate. In the
case of an interrupted particle source (an example of which is
described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/948,662), all (or
a substantial part, e.g., a majority) of the tube containing plasma
is removed at the acceleration region.
[0139] As shown in FIG. 28, the dee plate 500 is a hollow metal
structure that has two semicircular surfaces 503, 505 that enclose
a space 507 in which the protons are accelerated during half of
their rotation around the space enclosed by the magnet structure. A
duct 509 opening into the space 507 extends through the enclosure
(e.g., the yoke or pole piece(s)) to an external location from
which a vacuum pump can be attached to evacuate the space 507 and
the rest of the space within a vacuum chamber in which the
acceleration takes place. The dummy dee 502 comprises a rectangular
metal ring that is spaced near to the exposed rim of the dee plate.
The dummy dee is grounded to the vacuum chamber and magnet yoke.
The dee plate 500 is driven by a radio-frequency signal that is
applied at the end of a radio-frequency transmission line to impart
an electric field in the space 507. The radio frequency electric
field is made to vary in time as the accelerated particle beam
increases in distance from the geometric center. The radio
frequency electric field may be controlled in the manner described
in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/948,359, entitled "Matching
A Resonant Frequency Of A Resonant Cavity To A Frequency Of An
Input Voltage", the contents of which are incorporated herein by
reference.
[0140] For the beam emerging from the centrally located particle
source to clear the particle source structure as it begins to
spiral outward, a large voltage difference may be applied across
the radio frequency plates. 20,000 Volts is applied across the
radio frequency plates. In some versions from 8,000 to 20,000 Volts
may be applied across the radio frequency plates. To reduce the
power required to drive this large voltage, the magnet structure is
arranged to reduce the capacitance between the radio frequency
plates and ground. This may be done by forming holes with
sufficient clearance from the radio frequency structures through
the outer yoke and the cryostat housing and making sufficient space
between the magnet pole faces.
[0141] The high voltage alternating potential that drives the dee
plate has a frequency that is swept downward during the
accelerating cycle to account for the increasing relativistic mass
of the protons and the decreasing magnetic field. The dummy dee
does not require a hollow semi-cylindrical structure as it is at
ground potential along with the vacuum chamber walls. Other plate
arrangements could be used such as more than one pair of
accelerating electrodes driven with different electrical phases or
multiples of the fundamental frequency. The RF structure can be
tuned to keep the Q high during the required frequency sweep by
using, for example, a rotating capacitor having intermeshing
rotating and stationary blades. During each meshing of the blades,
the capacitance increases, thus lowering the resonant frequency of
the RF structure. The blades can be shaped to create a precise
frequency sweep required. A drive motor for the rotating condenser
can be phase locked to the RF generator for precise control. One
bunch of particles may be accelerated during each meshing of the
blades of the rotating condenser.
[0142] The vacuum chamber in which the acceleration occurs is a
generally cylindrical container that is thinner in the center and
thicker at the rim. The vacuum chamber encloses the RF plates and
the particle source and is evacuated by a vacuum pump. Maintaining
a high vacuum reduces the chances that accelerating ions are not
lost to collisions with gas molecules and enables the RF voltage to
be kept at a higher level without arcing to ground.
[0143] Protons (or other ions) traverse a generally spiral orbital
path beginning at the particle source. In half of each loop of the
spiral path, the protons gain energy as they pass through the RF
electric field. As the protons gain energy, the radius of the
central orbit of each successive loop of their spiral path is
larger than the prior loop until the loop radius reaches the
maximum radius of the pole face. At that location a magnetic and
electric field perturbation directs protons into an area where the
magnetic field rapidly decreases, and the protons depart the area
of the high magnetic field and are directed through an evacuated
tube, referred to herein as the extraction channel, to exit the
synchrocyclotron. A magnetic regenerator may be used to change the
magnetic field perturbation to direct the protons. The protons
exiting will tend to disperse as they enter an area of markedly
decreased magnetic field that exists in the room around the
synchrocyclotron. Beam shaping elements 507, 509 in the extraction
channel 138 (FIG. 25) redirect the protons so that they stay in a
straight beam of limited spatial extent.
[0144] As the beam exits the extraction channel it is passed
through a beam formation system 525 (FIG. 25), which may include a
scanning system of the type described herein. Beam formation system
525 may be used in conjunction with an inner gantry that controls
application of the beam.
[0145] Stray magnetic fields exiting from the synchrocyclotron may
be limited by both a magnet yoke (which also serves as a shield)
and a separate magnetic shield 514 (e.g., FIG. 1). The separate
magnetic shield includes of a layer 517 of ferromagnetic material
(e.g., steel or iron) that encloses the pillbox yoke, separated by
a space 516. This configuration that includes a sandwich of a yoke,
a space, and a shield achieves adequate shielding for a given
leakage magnetic field at lower weight. As described above, in some
implementations, an active return system may be used in place of,
or to augment, the operation of the magnetic yoke and shield.
[0146] Referring to FIG. 23, the gantry allows the synchrocyclotron
to be rotated about a horizontal rotational axis 432. The truss
structure 416 has two generally parallel spans 480, 482. The
synchrocyclotron is cradled between the spans about midway between
the legs. The gantry is balanced for rotation about the bearings
using counterweights 622, 624 mounted on ends of the legs opposite
the truss.
[0147] The gantry is driven to rotate by an electric motor mounted
to one or both of the gantry legs and connected to the bearing
housings by drive gears. The rotational position of the gantry is
derived from signals provided by shaft angle encoders incorporated
into the gantry drive motors and the drive gears.
[0148] At the location at which the ion beam exits the
synchrocyclotron, the beam formation system 525 acts on the ion
beam to give it properties suitable for patient treatment. For
example, the beam may be spread and its depth of penetration varied
to provide uniform radiation across a given target volume. The beam
formation system may include active scanning elements as described
herein.
[0149] All of the active systems of the synchrocyclotron (the
current driven superconducting coils, the RF-driven plates, the
vacuum pumps for the vacuum acceleration chamber and for the
superconducting coil cooling chamber, the current driven particle
source, the hydrogen gas source, and the RF plate coolers, for
example), may be controlled by appropriate synchrocyclotron control
electronics (not shown), which may include, e.g., one or more
processing devices executing instructions from memory to effect
control.
[0150] As explained above, referring to system 602 of FIG. 29, a
beam-producing particle accelerator, in this case synchrocyclotron
604 (which may include any and all features described herein), may
be mounted on rotating gantry 605. Rotating gantry 605 is of the
type described herein, and can angularly rotate around patient
support 606. This feature enables synchrocyclotron 604 to provide a
particle beam essentially directly to the patient from various
angles. For example, as in FIG. 29, if synchrocyclotron 604 is
above patient support 606, the particle beam may be directed
downwards toward the patient. Alternatively, if synchrocyclotron
604 is below patient support 606, the particle beam may be directed
upwards toward the patient. The particle beam is applied
essentially directly to the patient in the sense that an
intermediary beam routing mechanism is not required. A routing
mechanism, in this context, is different from a shaping or sizing
mechanism in that a shaping or sizing mechanism does not re-route
the beam, but rather sizes and/or shapes the beam while maintaining
the same general trajectory of the beam.
[0151] Further details regarding an example implementation of the
foregoing system may be found in U.S. Pat. No. 7,728,311, filed on
Nov. 16, 2006 and entitled "Charged Particle Radiation Therapy",
and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/275,103, filed on Nov.
20, 2008 and entitled "Inner Gantry". The contents of U.S. Pat. No.
7,728,311 and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/275,103 are
hereby incorporated by reference into this disclosure. In some
implementations, the synchrocyclotron may be a variable-energy
device, such as that described in U.S. patent application Ser. No.
13/916,401, filed on Jun. 12, 2013, the contents of which are
incorporated herein by reference.
Variable-Energy Particle Accelerator
[0152] The particle accelerator used in the example particle
therapy systems and example scanning systems described herein may
be a variable-energy particle accelerator, an example of which is
described below
[0153] The energy of an extracted particle beam (the particle beam
output from the accelerator) can affect the use of the particle
beam during treatment. In some machines, the energy of the particle
beam (or particles in the particle beam) does not increase after
extraction. However, the energy may be reduced based on treatment
needs after the extraction and before the treatment. Referring to
FIG. 30, an example treatment system 910 includes an accelerator
912, e.g., a synchrocyclotron, from which a particle (e.g., proton)
beam 914 having a variable energy is extracted to irradiate a
target volume 924 of a body 922. Optionally, one or more additional
devices, such as a scanning unit 916 or a scattering unit 916, one
or more monitoring units 918, and an energy degrader 920, are
placed along the irradiation direction 928. The devices intercept
the cross-section of the extracted beam 914 and alter one or more
properties of the extracted beam for the treatment.
[0154] A target volume to be irradiated (an irradiation target) by
a particle beam for treatment typically has a three-dimensional
configuration. In some examples, to carry-out the treatment, the
target volume is divided into layers along the irradiation
direction of the particle beam so that the irradiation can be done
on a layer-by-layer basis. For certain types of particles, such as
protons, the penetration depth (or which layer the beam reaches)
within the target volume is largely determined by the energy of the
particle beam. A particle beam of a given energy does not reach
substantially beyond a corresponding penetration depth for that
energy. To move the beam irradiation from one layer to another
layer of the target volume, the energy of the particle beam is
changed.
[0155] In the example shown in FIG. 30, the target volume 924 is
divided into nine layers 926a-926i along the irradiation direction
928. In an example process, the irradiation starts from the deepest
layer 926i, one layer at a time, gradually to the shallower layers
and finishes with the shallowest layer 926a. Before application to
the body 922, the energy of the particle beam 914 is controlled to
be at a level to allow the particle beam to stop at a desired
layer, e.g., the layer 926d, without substantially penetrating
further into the body or the target volume, e.g., the layers
926e-926i or deeper into the body. In some examples, the desired
energy of the particle beam 914 decreases as the treatment layer
becomes shallower relative to the particle acceleration. In some
examples, the beam energy difference for treating adjacent layers
of the target volume 924 is about 3 MeV to about 100 MeV, e.g.,
about 10 MeV to about 80 MeV, although other differences may also
be possible, depending on, e.g., the thickness of the layers and
the properties of the beam.
[0156] The energy variation for treating different layers of the
target volume 924 can be performed at the accelerator 912 (e.g.,
the accelerator can vary the energy) so that, in some
implementations, no additional energy variation is required after
the particle beam is extracted from the accelerator 912. So, the
optional energy degrader 920 in the treatment system 10 may be
eliminated from the system. In some implementations, the
accelerator 912 can output particle beams having an energy that
varies between about 100 MeV and about 300 MeV, e.g., between about
115 MeV and about 250 MeV. The variation can be continuous or
non-continuous, e.g., one step at a time. In some implementations,
the variation, continuous or non-continuous, can take place at a
relatively high rate, e.g., up to about 50 MeV per second or up to
about 20 MeV per second. Non-continuous variation can take place
one step at a time with a step size of about 10 MeV to about 90
MeV.
[0157] When irradiation is complete in one layer, the accelerator
912 can vary the energy of the particle beam for irradiating a next
layer, e.g., within several seconds or within less than one second.
In some implementations, the treatment of the target volume 924 can
be continued without substantial interruption or even without any
interruption. In some situations, the step size of the
non-continuous energy variation is selected to correspond to the
energy difference needed for irradiating two adjacent layers of the
target volume 924. For example, the step size can be the same as,
or a fraction of, the energy difference.
[0158] In some implementations, the accelerator 912 and the
degrader 920 collectively vary the energy of the beam 914. For
example, the accelerator 912 provides a coarse adjustment and the
degrader 920 provides a fine adjustment or vice versa. In this
example, the accelerator 912 can output the particle beam that
varies energy with a variation step of about 10-80 MeV, and the
degrader 920 adjusts (e.g., reduces) the energy of the beam at a
variation step of about 2-10 MeV.
[0159] The reduced use (or absence) of the energy degrader, such as
a range modulator, may help to maintain properties and quality of
the output beam from the accelerator, e.g., beam intensity. The
control of the particle beam can be performed at the accelerator.
Side effects, e.g., from neutrons generated when the particle beam
passes the degrader 920 can be reduced or eliminated.
[0160] The energy of the particle beam 914 may be adjusted to treat
another target volume 930 in another body or body part 922' after
completing treatment in target volume 924. The target volumes 924,
930 may be in the same body (or patient), or in different patients.
It is possible that the depth D of the target volume 930 from a
surface of body 922' is different from that of the target volume
924. Although some energy adjustment may be performed by the
degrader 920, the degrader 912 may only reduce the beam energy and
not increase the beam energy.
[0161] In this regard, in some cases, the beam energy required for
treating target volume 930 is greater than the beam energy required
to treat target volume 924. In such cases, the accelerator 912 may
increase the output beam energy after treating the target volume
924 and before treating the target volume 930. In other cases, the
beam energy required for treating target volume 930 is less than
the beam energy required to treat target volume 924. Although the
degrader 920 can reduce the energy, the accelerator 912 can be
adjusted to output a lower beam energy to reduce or eliminate the
use of the degrader 920. The division of the target volumes 924,
930 into layers can be different or the same. The target volume 930
can be treated similarly on a layer by layer basis to the treatment
of the target volume 924.
[0162] The treatment of the different target volumes 924, 930 on
the same patient may be substantially continuous, e.g., with the
stop time between the two volumes being no longer than about 30
minutes or less, e.g., 25 minutes or less, 20 minutes or less, 15
minutes or less, 10 minutes or less, 5 minutes or less, or 1 minute
or less. As explained herein, the accelerator 912 can be mounted on
a movable gantry and the movement of the gantry can move the
accelerator to aim at different target volumes. In some situations,
the accelerator 912 can complete the energy adjustment of the
output beam 914 during the time the treatment system makes
adjustment (such as moving the gantry) after completing the
treatment of the target volume 924 and before starting treating the
target volume 930. After the alignment of the accelerator and the
target volume 930, the treatment can begin with the adjusted,
desired beam energy. Beam energy adjustment for different patients
can also be completed relatively efficiently. In some examples, all
adjustments, including increasing/reducing beam energy and/or
moving the gantry are done within about 30 minutes, e.g., within
about 25 minutes, within about 20 minutes, within about 15 minutes,
within about 10 minutes or within about 5 minutes.
[0163] In the same layer of a target volume, an irradiation dose
may be applied by moving the beam across the two-dimensional
surface of the layer (which is sometimes called scanning beam)
using a scanning unit 916. Alternatively, the layer can be
irradiated by passing the extracted beam through one or more
scatterers of the scattering unit 16 (which is sometimes called
scattering beam).
[0164] Beam properties, such as energy and intensity, can be
selected before a treatment or can be adjusted during the treatment
by controlling the accelerator 912 and/or other devices, such as
the scanning unit/scatterer(s) 916, the degrader 920, and others
not shown in the figures. In example implementations, system 910
includes a controller 932, such as a computer, in communication
with one or more devices in the system. Control can be based on
results of the monitoring performed by the one or more monitors
918, e.g., monitoring of the beam intensity, dose, beam location in
the target volume, etc. Although the monitors 918 are shown to be
between the device 916 and the degrader 920, one or more monitors
can be placed at other appropriate locations along the beam
irradiation path. Controller 932 can also store a treatment plan
for one or more target volumes (for the same patient and/or
different patients). The treatment plan can be determined before
the treatment starts and can include parameters, such as the shape
of the target volume, the number of irradiation layers, the
irradiation dose for each layer, the number of times each layer is
irradiated, etc. The adjustment of a beam property within the
system 910 can be performed based on the treatment plan. Additional
adjustment can be made during the treatment, e.g., when deviation
from the treatment plan is detected.
[0165] In some implementations, the accelerator 912 is configured
to vary the energy of the output particle beam by varying the
magnetic field in which the particle beam is accelerated. In an
example implementation, one or more sets of coils receives variable
electrical current to produce a variable magnetic field in the
cavity. In some examples, one set of coils receives a fixed
electrical current, while one or more other sets of coils receives
a variable current so that the total current received by the coil
sets varies. In some implementations, all sets of coils are
superconducting. In other implementations, some sets of coils, such
as the set for the fixed electrical current, are superconducting,
while other sets of coils, such as the one or more sets for the
variable current, are non-superconducting. In some examples, all
sets of coils are non-superconducting.
[0166] Generally, the magnitude of the magnetic field is scalable
with the magnitude of the electrical current. Adjusting the total
electric current of the coils in a predetermined range can generate
a magnetic field that varies in a corresponding, predetermined
range. In some examples, a continuous adjustment of the electrical
current can lead to a continuous variation of the magnetic field
and a continuous variation of the output beam energy.
Alternatively, when the electrical current applied to the coils is
adjusted in a non-continuous, step-wise manner, the magnetic field
and the output beam energy also varies accordingly in a
non-continuous (step-wise) manner. The scaling of the magnetic
field to the current can allow the variation of the beam energy to
be carried out relatively precisely, although sometimes minor
adjustment other than the input current may be performed.
[0167] In some implementations, to output particle beams having a
variable energy, the accelerator 912 is configured to apply RF
voltages that sweep over different ranges of frequencies, with each
range corresponding to a different output beam energy. For example,
if the accelerator 912 is configured to produce three different
output beam energies, the RF voltage is capable of sweeping over
three different ranges of frequencies. In another example,
corresponding to continuous beam energy variations, the RF voltage
sweeps over frequency ranges that continuously change. The
different frequency ranges may have different lower frequency
and/or upper frequency boundaries.
[0168] The extraction channel may be configured to accommodate the
range of different energies produced by the variable-energy
particle accelerator. For example the extraction channel may be
large enough to support the highest and lowest energies produced by
the particle accelerator. That is, the extraction channel may be
sized or otherwise configured to receive and to transmit particles
within that range of energies. Particle beams having different
energies can be extracted from the accelerator 912 without altering
the features of the regenerator that is used for extracting
particle beams having a single energy. In other implementations, to
accommodate the variable particle energy, the regenerator can be
moved to disturb (e.g., change) different particle orbits in the
manner described above and/or iron rods (magnetic shims) can be
added or removed to change the magnetic field bump provided by the
regenerator. More specifically, different particle energies will
typically be at different particle orbits within the cavity. By
moving the regenerator, it is possible to intercept a particle
orbit at a specified energy and thereby provide the correct
perturbation of that orbit so that particles at the specified
energy reach the extraction channel. In some implementations,
movement of the regenerator (and/or addition/removal of magnetic
shims) is performed in real-time to match real-time changes in the
particle beam energy output by the accelerator. In other
implementations, particle energy is adjusted on a per-treatment
basis, and movement of the regenerator (and/or addition/removal of
magnetic shims) is performed in advance of the treatment. In either
case, movement of the regenerator (and/or addition/removal of
magnetic shims) may be computer controlled. For example, a computer
may control one or more motors that effect movement of the
regenerator and/or magnetic shims.
[0169] In some implementations, the regenerator is implemented
using one or more magnetic shims that are controllable to move to
the appropriate location(s).
[0170] As an example, table 1 shows three example energy levels at
which example accelerator 912 can output particle beams. The
corresponding parameters for producing the three energy levels are
also listed. In this regard, the magnet current refers to the total
electrical current applied to the one or more coil sets in the
accelerator 912; the maximum and minimum frequencies define the
ranges in which the RF voltage sweeps; and "r" is the radial
distance of a location to a center of the cavity in which the
particles are accelerated.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Examples of beam energies and respective
parameters. Magnetic Magnetic Beam Magnet Maximum Minimum Field at
Field at Energy Current Frequency Frequency r = 0 mm r = 298 mm
(MeV) (Amps) (MHz) (MHz) (Tesla) (Tesla) 250 1990 132 99 8.7 8.2
235 1920 128 97 8.4 8.0 211 1760 120 93 7.9 7.5
[0171] Details that may be included in an example particle
accelerator that produces charged particles having variable
energies are described below. The accelerator can be a
synchrocyclotron and the particles may be protons. The particles
may be output as pulsed beams. The energy of the beam output from
the particle accelerator can be varied during the treatment of one
target volume in a patient, or between treatments of different
target volumes of the same patient or different patients. In some
implementations, settings of the accelerator are changed to vary
the beam energy when no beam (or particles) is output from the
accelerator. The energy variation can be continuous or
non-continuous over a desired range.
[0172] Referring to the example shown in FIG. 1, the particle
accelerator (e.g., synchrocyclotron 502), which may be a
variable-energy particle accelerator like accelerator 912 described
above, may be configured to output particle beams that have a
variable energy. The range of the variable energy can have an upper
boundary that is about 200 MeV to about 300 MeV or higher, e.g.,
200 MeV, about 205 MeV, about 210 MeV, about 215 MeV, about 220
MeV, about 225 MeV, about 230 MeV, about 235 MeV, about 240 MeV,
about 245 MeV, about 250 MeV, about 255 MeV, about 260 MeV, about
265 MeV, about 270 MeV, about 275 MeV, about 280 MeV, about 285
MeV, about 290 MeV, about 295 MeV, or about 300 MeV or higher. The
range can also have a lower boundary that is about 100 MeV or lower
to about 200 MeV, e.g., about 100 MeV or lower, about 105 MeV,
about 110 MeV, about 115 MeV, about 120 MeV, about 125 MeV, about
130 MeV, about 135 MeV, about 140 MeV, about 145 MeV, about 150
MeV, about 155 MeV, about 160 MeV, about 165 MeV, about 170 MeV,
about 175 MeV, about 180 MeV, about 185 MeV, about 190 MeV, about
195 MeV, about 200 MeV.
[0173] In some examples, the variation is non-continuous and the
variation step can have a size of about 10 MeV or lower, about 15
MeV, about 20 MeV, about 25 MeV, about 30 MeV, about 35 MeV, about
40 MeV, about 45 MeV, about 50 MeV, about 55 MeV, about 60 MeV,
about 65 MeV, about 70 MeV, about 75 MeV, or about 80 MeV or
higher. Varying the energy by one step size can take no more than
30 minutes, e.g., about 25 minutes or less, about 20 minutes or
less, about 15 minutes or less, about 10 minutes or less, about 5
minutes or less, about 1 minute or less, or about 30 seconds or
less. In other examples, the variation is continuous and the
accelerator can adjust the energy of the particle beam at a
relatively high rate, e.g., up to about 50 MeV per second, up to
about 45 MeV per second, up to about 40 MeV per second, up to about
35 MeV per second, up to about 30 MeV per second, up to about 25
MeV per second, up to about 20 MeV per second, up to about 15 MeV
per second, or up to about 10 MeV per second. The accelerator can
be configured to adjust the particle energy both continuously and
non-continuously. For example, a combination of the continuous and
non-continuous variation can be used in a treatment of one target
volume or in treatments of different target volumes. Flexible
treatment planning and flexible treatment can be achieved.
[0174] A particle accelerator that outputs a particle beam having a
variable energy can provide accuracy in irradiation treatment and
reduce the number of additional devices (other than the
accelerator) used for the treatment. For example, the use of
degraders for changing the energy of an output particle beam may be
reduced or eliminated for all or part of the treatment. The
properties of the particle beam, such as intensity, focus, etc. can
be controlled at the particle accelerator and the particle beam can
reach the target volume without substantial disturbance from the
additional devices. The relatively high variation rate of the beam
energy can reduce treatment time and allow for efficient use of the
treatment system.
[0175] In some implementations, the accelerator, such as the
synchrocyclotron 502 of FIG. 1, accelerates particles or particle
beams to variable energy levels by varying the magnetic field in
the accelerator, which can be achieved by varying the electrical
current applied to coils for generating the magnetic field. As
explained above, an example synchrocyclotron (e.g., 502 in FIG. 1)
includes a magnet system that contains a particle source, a
radiofrequency drive system, and a beam extraction system. FIG. 33
shows an example of a magnet system that may be used in a
variable-energy accelerator. In this example implementation, the
magnetic field established by the magnet system 1012 can vary by
about 5% to about 35% of a maximum value of the magnetic field that
two sets of coils 40a and 40b, and 42a and 42b are capable of
generating. The magnetic field established by the magnet system has
a shape appropriate to maintain focus of a contained proton beam
using a combination of the two sets of coils and a pair of shaped
ferromagnetic (e.g., low carbon steel) structures, examples of
which are provided above.
[0176] Each set of coils may be a split pair of annular coils to
receive electrical current. In some situations, both sets of coils
are superconducting. In other situations, only one set of the coils
is superconducting and the other set is non-superconducting or
normal conducting (also discussed further below). It is also
possible that both sets of coils are non-superconducting. Suitable
superconducting materials for use in the coils include niobium-3
tin (Nb3Sn) and/or niobium-titanium. Other normal conducting
materials can include copper. Examples of the coil set
constructions are described further below.
[0177] The two sets of coils can be electrically connected serially
or in parallel. In some implementations, the total electrical
current received by the two sets of coils can include about 2
million ampere turns to about 10 million ampere turns, e.g., about
2.5 to about 7.5 million ampere turns or about 3.75 million ampere
turns to about 5 million ampere turns. In some examples, one set of
coils is configured to receive a fixed (or constant) portion of the
total variable electrical current, while the other set of coils is
configured to receive a variable portion of the total electrical
current. The total electrical current of the two coil sets varies
with the variation of the current in one coil set. In other
situations, the electrical current applied to both sets of coils
can vary. The variable total current in the two sets of coils can
generate a magnetic field having a variable magnitude, which in
turn varies the acceleration pathways of the particles and produces
particles having variable energies.
[0178] Generally, the magnitude of the magnetic field generated by
the coil(s) is scalable to the magnitude of the total electrical
current applied to the coil(s). Based on the scalability, in some
implementations, linear variation of the magnetic field strength
can be achieved by linearly changing the total current of the coil
sets. The total current can be adjusted at a relatively high rate
that leads to a relatively high-rate adjustment of the magnetic
field and the beam energy.
[0179] In the example reflected in Table 1 above, the ratio between
values of the current and the magnetic field at the geometric
center of the coil rings is: 1990:8.7 (approximately 228.7:1);
1920:8.4 (approximately 228.6:1); 1760:7.9 (approximately 222.8:1).
Accordingly, adjusting the magnitude of the total current applied
to a superconducting coil(s) can proportionally (based on the
ratio) adjust the magnitude of the magnetic field.
[0180] The scalability of the magnetic field to the total
electrical current in the example of Table 1 is also shown in the
plot of FIG. 31, where BZ is the magnetic field along the Z
direction; and R is the radial distance measured from a geometric
center of the coil rings along a direction perpendicular to the Z
direction. The magnetic field has the highest value at the
geometric center, and decreases as the distance R increases. The
curves 1035, 1037 represent the magnetic field generated by the
same coil sets receiving different total electrical current: 1760
Amperes and 1990 Amperes, respectively. The corresponding energies
of the extracted particles are 211 MeV and 250 MeV, respectively.
The two curves 1035, 1037 have substantially the same shape and the
different parts of the curves 1035, 1037 are substantially
parallel. As a result, either the curve 1035 or the curve 1037 can
be linearly shifted to substantially match the other curve,
indicating that the magnetic field is scalable to the total
electrical current applied to the coil sets.
[0181] In some implementations, the scalability of the magnetic
field to the total electrical current may not be perfect. For
example, the ratio between the magnetic field and the current
calculated based on the example shown in table 1 is not constant.
Also, as shown in FIG. 31, the linear shift of one curve may not
perfectly match the other curve. In some implementations, the total
current is applied to the coil sets under the assumption of perfect
scalability. The target magnetic field (under the assumption of
perfect scalability) can be generated by additionally altering the
features, e.g., geometry, of the coils to counteract the
imperfection in the scalability. As one example, ferromagnetic
(e.g., iron) rods (magnetic shims) can be inserted or removed from
one or both of the magnetic structures (e.g., yokes, pole pieces,
and the like). The features of the coils can be altered at a
relatively high rate so that the rate of the magnetic field
adjustment is not substantially affected as compared to the
situation in which the scalability is perfect and only the
electrical current needs to be adjusted. In the example of iron
rods, the rods can be added or removed at the time scale of seconds
or minutes, e.g., within 5 minutes, within 1 minute, less than 30
seconds, or less than 1 second.
[0182] In some implementations, settings of the accelerator, such
as the current applied to the coil sets, can be chosen based on the
substantial scalability of the magnetic field to the total
electrical current in the coil sets.
[0183] Generally, to produce the total current that varies within a
desired range, any appropriate combination of current applied to
the two coil sets can be used. In an example, the coil set 42a, 42b
can be configured to receive a fixed electrical current
corresponding to a lower boundary of a desired range of the
magnetic field. In the example shown in table 1, the fixed
electrical current is 1760 Amperes. In addition, the coil set 40a,
40b can be configured to receive a variable electrical current
having an upper boundary corresponding to a difference between an
upper boundary and a lower boundary of the desired range of the
magnetic field. In the example shown in table 1, the coil set 40a,
40b is configured to receive electrical current that varies between
0 Ampere and 230 Amperes.
[0184] In another example, the coil set 42a, 42b can be configured
to receive a fixed electrical current corresponding to an upper
boundary of a desired range of the magnetic field. In the example
shown in table 1, the fixed current is 1990 Amperes. In addition,
the coil set 40a, 40b can be configured to receive a variable
electrical current having an upper boundary corresponding to a
difference between a lower boundary and an upper boundary of the
desired range of the magnetic field. In the example shown in table
1, the coil set 40a, 40b is configured to receive electrical
current that varies between -230 Ampere and 0 Ampere.
[0185] The total variable magnetic field generated by the variable
total current for accelerating the particles can have a maximum
magnitude greater than 4 Tesla, e.g., greater than 5 Tesla, greater
than 6 Tesla, greater than 7 Tesla, greater than 8 Tesla, greater
than 9 Tesla, or greater than 10 Tesla, and up to about 20 Tesla or
higher, e.g., up to about 18 Tesla, up to about 15 Tesla, or up to
about 12 Tesla. In some implementations, variation of the total
current in the coil sets can vary the magnetic field by about 0.2
Tesla to about 4.2 Tesla or more, e.g., about 0.2 Tesla to about
1.4 Tesla or about 0.6 Tesla to about 4.2 Tesla. In some
situations, the amount of variation of the magnetic field can be
proportional to the maximum magnitude.
[0186] FIG. 32 shows an example RF structure for sweeping the
voltage on the dee plate 500 over an RF frequency range for each
energy level of the particle beam, and for varying the frequency
range when the particle beam energy is varied. The semicircular
surfaces 503, 505 of the dee plate 500 are connected to an inner
conductor 1300 and housed in an outer conductor 1302. The high
voltage is applied to the dee plate 500 from a power source (not
shown, e.g., an oscillating voltage input) through a power coupling
device 1304 that couples the power source to the inner conductor.
In some implementations, the coupling device 1304 is positioned on
the inner conductor 1300 to provide power transfer from the power
source to the dee plate 500. In addition, the dee plate 500 is
coupled to variable reactive elements 1306, 1308 to perform the RF
frequency sweep for each particle energy level, and to change the
RF frequency range for different particle energy levels.
[0187] The variable reactive element 1306 can be a rotating
capacitor that has multiple blades 1310 rotatable by a motor (not
shown). By meshing or unmeshing the blades 1310 during each cycle
of RF sweeping, the capacitance of the RF structure changes, which
in turn changes the resonant frequency of the RF structure. In some
implementations, during each quarter cycle of the motor, the blades
1310 mesh with the each other. The capacitance of the RF structure
increases and the resonant frequency decreases. The process
reverses as the blades 1310 unmesh. As a result, the power required
to generate the high voltage applied to the dee plate 103 and
necessary to accelerate the beam can be reduced by a large factor.
In some implementations, the shape of the blades 1310 is machined
to form the required dependence of resonant frequency on time.
[0188] The RF frequency generation is synchronized with the blade
rotation by sensing the phase of the RF voltage in the resonator,
keeping the alternating voltage on the dee plates close to the
resonant frequency of the RF cavity. (The dummy dee is grounded and
is not shown in FIG. 32).
[0189] The variable reactive element 1308 can be a capacitor formed
by a plate 1312 and a surface 1316 of the inner conductor 1300. The
plate 1312 is movable along a direction 1314 towards or away from
the surface 1316. The capacitance of the capacitor changes as the
distance D between the plate 1312 and the surface 1316 changes. For
each frequency range to be swept for one particle energy, the
distance D is at a set value, and to change the frequency range,
the plate 1312 is moved corresponding to the change in the energy
of the output beam.
[0190] In some implementations, the inner and outer conductors
1300, 1302 are formed of a metallic material, such as copper,
aluminum, or silver. The blades 1310 and the plate 1312 can also be
formed of the same or different metallic materials as the
conductors 1300, 1302. The coupling device 1304 can be an
electrical conductor. The variable reactive elements 1306, 1308 can
have other forms and can couple to the dee plate 100 in other ways
to perform the RF frequency sweep and the frequency range
alteration. In some implementations, a single variable reactive
element can be configured to perform the functions of both the
variable reactive elements 1306, 1308. In other implementations,
more than two variable reactive elements can be used.
[0191] The control of the gantry, the patient support, the active
beam shaping elements, and the synchrocyclotron to perform a
therapy session is achieved by appropriate therapy control
electronics (not shown).
[0192] Control of the particle therapy system described herein and
its various features may be implemented using hardware or a
combination of hardware and software. For example, a system like
the ones described herein may include various controllers and/or
processing devices located at various points. A central computer
may coordinate operation among the various controllers or
processing devices. The central computer, controllers, and
processing devices may execute various software routines to effect
control and coordination of testing and calibration.
[0193] System operation can be controlled, at least in part, using
one or more computer program products, e.g., one or more computer
program tangibly embodied in one or more non-transitory
machine-readable media, for execution by, or to control the
operation of, one or more data processing apparatus, e.g., a
programmable processor, a computer, multiple computers, and/or
programmable logic components.
[0194] A computer program can be written in any form of programming
language, including compiled or interpreted languages, and it can
be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a
module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a
computing environment. A computer program can be deployed to be
executed on one computer or on multiple computers at one site or
distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a
network.
[0195] Actions associated with implementing all or part of the
operations of the particle therapy system described herein can be
performed by one or more programmable processors executing one or
more computer programs to perform the functions described herein.
All or part of the operations can be implemented using special
purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate
array) and/or an ASIC (application-specific integrated
circuit).
[0196] Processors suitable for the execution of a computer program
include, by way of example, both general and special purpose
microprocessors, and any one or more processors of any kind of
digital computer. Generally, a processor will receive instructions
and data from a read-only storage area or a random access storage
area or both. Elements of a computer (including a server) include
one or more processors for executing instructions and one or more
storage area devices for storing instructions and data. Generally,
a computer will also include, or be operatively coupled to receive
data from, or transfer data to, or both, one or more
machine-readable storage media, such as mass PCBs for storing data,
e.g., magnetic, magneto-optical disks, or optical disks.
Non-transitory machine-readable storage media suitable for
embodying computer program instructions and data include all forms
of non-volatile storage area, including by way of example,
semiconductor storage area devices, e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash
storage area devices; magnetic disks, e.g., internal hard disks or
removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and CD-ROM and DVD-ROM
disks.
[0197] Any "electrical connection" as used herein may imply a
direct physical connection or a connection that includes
intervening components but that nevertheless allows electrical
signals to flow between connected components. Any "connection"
involving electrical circuitry mentioned herein, unless stated
otherwise, is an electrical connection and not necessarily a direct
physical connection regardless of whether the word "electrical" is
used to modify "connection".
[0198] Any two more of the foregoing implementations may be used in
an appropriate combination in an appropriate particle accelerator
(e.g., a synchrocyclotron). Likewise, individual features of any
two more of the foregoing implementations may be used in an
appropriate combination.
[0199] Elements of different implementations described herein may
be combined to form other implementations not specifically set
forth above. Elements may be left out of the processes, systems,
apparatus, etc., described herein without adversely affecting their
operation. Various separate elements may be combined into one or
more individual elements to perform the functions described
herein.
[0200] The example implementations described herein are not limited
to use with a particle therapy system or to use with the example
particle therapy systems described herein. Rather, the example
implementations can be used in any appropriate system that directs
accelerated particles to an output.
[0201] Additional information concerning the design of an example
implementation of a particle accelerator that may be used in a
system as described herein can be found in U.S. Provisional
Application No. 60/760,788, entitled "High-Field Superconducting
Synchrocyclotron" and filed Jan. 20, 2006; U.S. patent application
Ser. No. 11/463,402, entitled "Magnet Structure For Particle
Acceleration" and filed Aug. 9, 2006; and U.S. Provisional
Application No. 60/850,565, entitled "Cryogenic Vacuum Break
Pneumatic Thermal Coupler" and filed Oct. 10, 2006, all of which
are incorporated herein by reference.
[0202] The following applications are incorporated by reference
into the subject application: the U.S. Provisional Application
entitled "CONTROLLING INTENSITY OF A PARTICLE BEAM" (Application
No. 61/707,466), the U.S. Provisional Application entitled
"ADJUSTING ENERGY OF A PARTICLE BEAM" (Application No. 61/707,515),
the U.S. Provisional Application entitled "ADJUSTING COIL POSITION"
(Application No. 61/707,548), the U.S. Provisional Application
entitled "FOCUSING A PARTICLE BEAM USING MAGNETIC FIELD FLUTTER"
(Application No. 61/707,572), the U.S. Provisional Application
entitled "MAGNETIC FIELD REGENERATOR" (Application No. 61/707,590),
the U.S. Provisional Application entitled "FOCUSING A PARTICLE
BEAM" (Application No. 61/707,704), the U.S. Provisional
Application entitled "CONTROLLING PARTICLE THERAPY (Application No.
61/707,624), and the U.S. Provisional Application entitled "CONTROL
SYSTEM FOR A PARTICLE ACCELERATOR" (Application No.
61/707,645).
[0203] The following are also incorporated by reference into the
subject application: U.S. Pat. No. 7,728,311 which issued on Jun.
1, 2010, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/948,359 which was
filed on Nov. 30, 2007, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/275,103
which was filed on Nov. 20, 2008, U.S. patent application Ser. No.
11/948,662 which was filed on Nov. 30, 2007, U.S. Provisional
Application No. 60/991,454 which was filed on Nov. 30, 2007, U.S.
Pat. No. 8,003,964 which issued on Aug. 23, 2011, U.S. Pat. No.
7,208,748 which issued on Apr. 24, 2007, U.S. Pat. No. 7,402,963
which issued on Jul. 22, 2008, U.S. patent application Ser. No.
13/148,000 filed Feb. 9, 2010, U.S. patent application Ser. No.
11/937,573 filed on Nov. 9, 2007, U.S. patent application Ser. No.
11/187,633, titled "A Programmable Radio Frequency Waveform
Generator for a Synchrocyclotron," filed Jul. 21, 2005, U.S.
Provisional Application No. 60/590,089, filed on Jul. 21, 2004,
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/949,734, titled "A Programmable
Particle Scatterer for Radiation Therapy Beam Formation", filed
Sep. 24, 2004, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/590,088,
filed Jul. 21, 2005.
[0204] Any features of the subject application may be combined with
one or more appropriate features of the following: the U.S.
Provisional Application entitled "CONTROLLING INTENSITY OF A
PARTICLE BEAM" (Application No. 61/707,466), the U.S. Provisional
Application entitled "ADJUSTING ENERGY OF A PARTICLE BEAM"
(Application No. 61/707,515), the U.S. Provisional Application
entitled "ADJUSTING COIL POSITION" (Application No. 61/707,548),
the U.S. Provisional Application entitled "FOCUSING A PARTICLE BEAM
USING MAGNETIC FIELD FLUTTER" (Application No. 61/707,572), the
U.S. Provisional Application entitled "MAGNETIC FIELD REGENERATOR"
(Application No. 61/707,590), the U.S. Provisional Application
entitled "FOCUSING A PARTICLE BEAM" (Application No. 61/707,704),
the U.S. Provisional Application entitled "CONTROLLING PARTICLE
THERAPY (Application No. 61/707,624), and the U.S. Provisional
Application entitled "CONTROL SYSTEM FOR A PARTICLE ACCELERATOR"
(Application No. 61/707,645), U.S. Pat. No. 7,728,311 which issued
on Jun. 1, 2010, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/948,359 which
was filed on Nov. 30, 2007, U.S. patent application Ser. No.
12/275,103 which was filed on Nov. 20, 2008, U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 11/948,662 which was filed on Nov. 30, 2007,
U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/991,454 which was filed on Nov.
30, 2007, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/907,601, which was
filed on May 31, 2013, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/916,401,
filed on Jun. 12, 2013, U.S. Pat. No. 8,003,964 which issued on
Aug. 23, 2011, U.S. Pat. No. 7,208,748 which issued on Apr. 24,
2007, U.S. Pat. No. 7,402,963 which issued on Jul. 22, 2008, U.S.
patent application Ser. No. 13/148,000 filed Feb. 9, 2010, U.S.
patent application Ser. No. 11/937,573 filed on Nov. 9, 2007, U.S.
patent application Ser. No. 11/187,633, titled "A Programmable
Radio Frequency Waveform Generator for a Synchrocyclotron," filed
Jul. 21, 2005, U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/590,089, filed
on Jul. 21, 2004, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/949,734,
titled "A Programmable Particle Scatterer for Radiation Therapy
Beam Formation", filed Sep. 24, 2004, and U.S. Provisional
Application No. 60/590,088, filed Jul. 21, 2005.
[0205] Other implementations not specifically described herein are
also within the scope of the following claims.
* * * * *