U.S. patent application number 14/813491 was filed with the patent office on 2017-02-02 for multilayered structure with water-impermeable substrate.
The applicant listed for this patent is Eastman Kodak Company. Invention is credited to Douglas Eugene Bugner, Thomas Joseph Dannhauser, Brian L Lindstrom, David D. Putnam.
Application Number | 20170028688 14/813491 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 56684238 |
Filed Date | 2017-02-02 |
United States Patent
Application |
20170028688 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Dannhauser; Thomas Joseph ;
et al. |
February 2, 2017 |
MULTILAYERED STRUCTURE WITH WATER-IMPERMEABLE SUBSTRATE
Abstract
In accordance with the present invention, there is provided a
multi-layered structure includes: a) a water-impermeable substrate;
b) a first layer on at least one surface of the substrate
comprising a water-based tie-layer composition; c) a second layer
formed over the first layer, wherein the second layer is a
water-based ink-receptive composition includes: i) a multivalent
metal salt; and ii) a hydrophilic binder polymer; d) a third layer
including at least one water-based ink composition deposited in a
single pass by an inkjet printing process, wherein the water-based
ink composition includes an anionically stabilized,
water-dispersible pigment; and e) additional layers deposited over
the one or more ink layers and exposed second layer, the additional
layers selected from one or more of the following compositions: i)
an opaque white layer; ii) a protective layer; and iii) an adhesive
layer, further includes a continuous protective plastic or paper
layer adhered thereto.
Inventors: |
Dannhauser; Thomas Joseph;
(Pittsford, NY) ; Bugner; Douglas Eugene;
(Rochester, NY) ; Putnam; David D.; (Fairport,
NY) ; Lindstrom; Brian L; (Victor, NY) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
Eastman Kodak Company |
Rochester |
NY |
US |
|
|
Family ID: |
56684238 |
Appl. No.: |
14/813491 |
Filed: |
July 30, 2015 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
1/1 |
Current CPC
Class: |
C09D 11/30 20130101;
B41M 5/0047 20130101; B41M 5/0017 20130101; B41M 3/008 20130101;
B32B 2307/41 20130101; B41M 5/5236 20130101; C08L 33/14 20130101;
B32B 2255/26 20130101; B41M 5/5254 20130101; B32B 2307/75 20130101;
B32B 27/08 20130101; B32B 27/32 20130101; B41M 5/5218 20130101;
B41M 7/0054 20130101; B32B 2307/412 20130101; B32B 2307/4026
20130101; B32B 27/40 20130101; B32B 2255/10 20130101; B41M 5/0011
20130101; B41M 5/508 20130101; C09J 175/04 20130101; B32B 7/12
20130101; B32B 27/36 20130101; B41M 7/0027 20130101; B41M 7/0036
20130101; B41M 5/506 20130101; B41M 5/0064 20130101; B41M 5/5245
20130101; B32B 2250/24 20130101; C08L 29/04 20130101; B41M 5/502
20130101; B41M 7/0045 20130101 |
International
Class: |
B32B 27/08 20060101
B32B027/08; C08L 29/04 20060101 C08L029/04; C08L 33/14 20060101
C08L033/14; B32B 7/12 20060101 B32B007/12; B32B 27/32 20060101
B32B027/32; B32B 27/36 20060101 B32B027/36; B32B 27/40 20060101
B32B027/40; C09D 11/30 20060101 C09D011/30; C09J 175/04 20060101
C09J175/04 |
Claims
1. A multilayered structure comprising: a) a water-impermeable
substrate; b) a first layer on at least one surface of the
substrate comprising a water-based tie-layer composition; c) a
second layer formed over the first layer, wherein the second layer
is a water-based ink-receptive composition comprising: i) a
multivalent metal salt; and ii) a hydrophilic binder polymer; d) a
third layer including at least one water-based ink composition
deposited in a single pass by an inkjet printing process, wherein
the water-based ink composition comprises an anionically
stabilized, water-dispersible pigment; and e) additional
water-based layers deposited over the one or more ink layers and
exposed second layer, the additional layers selected from one or
more of the following compositions: i) an opaque white layer; ii) a
protective layer; and iii) an adhesive layer, further comprising a
continuous protective plastic or paper layer adhered thereto,
wherein the dry coverage of the second layer is less than 1.5
g/m.sup.2.
2. The multilayered structure of claim 1, wherein the
water-impermeable substrate is selected from polyesters,
polyimides, polycarbonates, polystyrenes, polyolefins,
polyurethanes, polyvinyl acetates, polyvinyl chlorides,
polyvinylidene chlorides, and copolymers, mixtures, co-extrudates,
or laminates thereof.
3. The multilayered structure of claim 1, wherein the water-based
tie-layer comprises polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl amine, gelatin,
poly(ethyleneimine), epoxy resins, polyurethane, polyacrylamide,
and derivatives, copolymers, and blends thereof.
4. The multilayered structure of claim 1, wherein the water-based
tie-layer comprises a polymer or copolymer comprising 50 to 100
mole percent of glycidyl acrylate or glycidyl methacrylate
monomers.
5. The multilayered structure of claim 1, wherein the water-based
tie-layer comprises two sub layers, the first water-based
tie-sub-layer comprising poly(ethyleneimine) and epoxy resins
modified with an acidified aminoethylated vinyl polymer, and a
second water-based tie-sub-layer, which is applied on top of the
first sub-layer, is a cross-linked poly(vinyl alcohol) polymer.
6. The multilayered structure of claim 1, wherein the multivalent
metal salt is a calcium or magnesium salt and the hydrophilic
polymer binder is a cross-linked poly(vinyl alcohol).
7. The multilayered structure of claim 1, wherein the water-based
ink composition comprises less than 10 wt % water miscible
co-solvent.
8. The multilayered structure of claim 1, wherein the anionically
stabilized, water-dispersible pigment is dispersed with an anionic
polymer comprising carboxylate functionality.
9. The multilayered structure of claim 1, wherein the opaque white
layer composition is a water-based white flexographic ink.
10. The multilayered structure of claim 1, wherein the opaque white
layer composition is a water based white inkjet ink.
11. The multilayered structure of claim 1, wherein the protective
layer composition is a water-based polyurethane.
12. The multilayered structure of claim 1, wherein the adhesive
layer composition is a solventless two-part water-based
polyurethane resin with an epoxy resin cross linker applied in
combination with a second water-impermeable substrate.
13. The multilayered structure of claim 12, wherein the second
water-impermeable substrate is selected from polyesters,
polyimides, polycarbonates, polystyrenes, polyolefins,
polyurethanes, polyvinyl acetates, polyvinyl chlorides,
polyvinylidene chlorides, and copolymers, mixtures, co-extrudates,
or laminates thereof.
14. The multilayered structure of claim 9 further comprising the
protective layer composition wherein the protective layer
composition is a water-based polyurethane.
15. The multilayered structure of claim 9 further comprising the
adhesive layer composition wherein the adhesive layer composition
is a solventless two-part water-based polyurethane resin with an
epoxy resin cross linker applied in combination with a second
water-impermeable substrate.
16. The multilayered structure of claim 12, wherein the lamination
bond strength is >1.0 N/cm.
17. The multilayered structure of claim 12, wherein the lamination
bond strength is >1.5 N/cm.
18. The multilayered structure of claim 1, wherein the second layer
comprises between 0.05 g/m.sup.2 and 1.0 g/m.sup.2 of the
hydrophilic binder polymer, and the weight ratio of the multivalent
metal salt to the hydrophilic binder polymer is between 2.5:1 and
0.75:1.
19. (canceled)
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] Reference is made to commonly-assigned copending U.S. patent
application Ser. No. ______ (Attorney Docket No. K001433US01RLO),
filed herewith, entitled PRINTING ON WATER-IMPERMEABLE SUBSTRATES
WITH WATER-BASED INKS, by Bugner et al.; the disclosure of which is
incorporated herein.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The present invention relates to a method of depositing
water-based inkjet inks on water-impermeable substrates and to
multilayered structures and articles produced therefrom.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0003] High speed digital inkjet printing systems have recently
found much success in competing with traditional analog printing
presses in applications such as commercial printing and publishing.
In particular inkjet printing systems which employ water-based
pigment inks can rival the print quality and productivity of
printing systems which are based on analog impact printing, such as
lithography, gravure, and flexographic printing processes. The
ability of digital inkjet printing systems to cost-effectively
print either short run lengths or continuously variable information
offers distinct advantages over analog impact printing processes
which require the presses to be idled in between print jobs in
order to change over the printing plates or cylinders. More
recently, high productivity inkjet printing systems have targeted
decor and package printing with the same advantages. However, decor
and package printing, unlike commercial printing and publishing,
commonly employ water-impermeable plastic substrates in addition to
paper-based substrates. Plastic substrates are particularly
challenging for water-based inks due to the difficulty in getting
the inks to wet and adhere to such substrates, which are typically
designed and chosen to repel or otherwise present a barrier to
water. Although solvent-based and radiation curable (UV-curable)
inkjet inks have been used with some success on plastic substrates,
they are limited to certain types of inkjet printing systems, such
as piezoelectric drop-on-demand systems, and come with health,
safety, and environmental concerns compared to water-based
inks.
[0004] When water-based inkjet inks useful for high speed digital
inkjet printing, especially inks that comprise more than about 80
wt % water and less than about 10-15 wt % of organic co-solvents,
are deposited on commonly available plastic substrates used for
decor and packaging applications, the ink drops tend to either bead
up or flow across the surface of the substrate, resulting in image
quality artifacts known as mottle, coalescence, and intercolor
bleeding. In addition, water-based inks with levels of co-solvents
greater than about 10-15 wt % are very difficult to completely dry,
resulting in a sticky or tacky ink layer.
[0005] WO 2009/113097 A2 discloses a process for printing on a
plastic film with water-containing inks. However, the
water-containing inks disclosed in this publication are intended
for flexographic or offset printing, and are not suitable for high
speed inkjet printing due to their high viscosities. There is no
teaching as to how these types of inks can be modified for use in a
high speed inkjet deposition system.
[0006] Another approach to printing directly onto hydrophobic
impermeable substrates with water-based inkjet inks is disclosed by
Higgins, et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 8,398,226. This process employs
water-based inks comprising certain stimuli-responsive additives to
permit direct printing onto untreated impermeable plastic. These
inks rely, for example, on a thermal phase-change of an
incorporated microgel, which causes the inks to rapidly viscosify
when a heated ink is deposited onto a relatively cool substrate. In
practice the inks need to be kept at an elevated temperature in a
low viscosity state prior to printing, and the substrate needs to
be held below the phase-change temperature of the water-based ink
containing the microgel additive. This imposes additional and
expensive constraints on the overall printing system.
[0007] Water-based pigment inks suitable for printing directly onto
a vinyl medium for signage or display applications are disclosed in
WO 2011/028201 A1. However, these inks contain mixtures of
dispersed polymer particles that require the printed substrate to
be heated above 50.degree. C. to melt and fuse the inks to the
vinyl medium. The temperatures required for the fusing step are
problematic in that many water-impermeable plastic substrates
useful for packaging and decor applications are prone to wrinkling
or melting at temperatures as low as 50.degree. C.
[0008] Another method for printing on plastic films with
water-based pigment inks is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,500,264
B2. This method involves the steps of depositing water-based inks
onto an untreated plastic film and heating the plastic film surface
to 40.degree. C. or greater. The inks further comprise "a silicone
surfactant, an acetylene glycol surfactant, a pyrrolidone
derivative, and a thermoplastic resin." However, as the examples in
this patent clearly demonstrate, when the inventive inks are
deposited on a representative plastic film at ink coverages greater
than about 60 to 70%, the "bleeding" between colors or the image
non-uniformity of solid areas ("mottling") is judged as "bad". This
severely limits the applicability of this method for most packaging
applications for which much higher ink coverages are desired.
[0009] U.S. Publication No. 2014/0160211 A1 discloses a method for
printing with water-based ink compositions onto a non-absorptive
medium while simultaneously heating the medium. The water-based
inks further comprise thermoplastic resin particles and first and
second co-solvents with specified boiling points and surface
tension properties. With many water-impermeable plastic substrates,
especially very thin flexible films used for packaging
applications, the application of heat while printing can adversely
affect the dimensional stability of the film, leading to poor
color-to-color registration.
[0010] U.S. Publication No. 2013/0187998 A1 discloses water-based
inkjet inks with improved scratch resistance that comprise polymer
particles and a hydroxyl amine compound that are intended to be
printed directly onto non-absorbent polypropylene substrates, such
as a non-woven fabric. A key limitation of this method is that the
ink drops are between 60 pL and 120 pL, which is much too large to
meet the print quality and resolution requirements for many
applications, and the viscosity of the ink is greater than 4 mPa-s,
which further limits the rate at which ink drops are deposited.
[0011] Yet another approach to printing onto impermeable substrates
is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,076,394. This method utilizes the
combination of a reactive fixing fluid and water-based inks
comprising a specific co-reactive polymer species. When such inks
are deposited on substrates which have been pre-treated with the
reactive fixing fluid, the inks are claimed to rapidly increase in
viscosity, or gel, thereby immobilizing the ink drop. There are
several problems with this approach. First, the fixing fluids
useful in this printing system comprise boric acid, borax, or
copper sulfate, which are problematic in certain food packaging
applications. Second, inks comprising the exemplified co-reactive
polymer species are limited to those which comprise specific
co-solvent humectants, and which require effective levels of the
co-reactive polymer species, the combination of which results in
inks with viscosities greater than about 10 mPa-s, making them
disadvantaged for high speed inkjet depositions systems.
[0012] The use of an adhesion layer between an impermeable
substrate and an ink-printable layer is disclosed in WO 2012/102737
A1. However, these layers are formed using melt extrusion or
co-extrusion processes, and are intended for printing with either
UV-curable or latex inkjet inks. As noted above, UV-curable inks
are undesirable for health and safety reasons, and latex inks
require a secondary heating and fusing step which is problematic
for thin, low-melting substrates.
[0013] EP 2692536 A1 also discloses the use of an
adhesion-promoting layer for use on polyolefin packaging films in
combination with an ink-receptive layer suitable for water-based
inks. An undesirable feature of this solution is that it is limited
to polyolefin substrates to which an adhesion-promoting layer has
been formed by either a co-extrusion or lamination process.
Further, the exemplified ink-receptive layers are each relatively
thick, e.g., 10 micrometers, which can adversely affect the cost
and performance of very thin film structures.
[0014] EP 2617577 A1 discloses a solution to improving the adhesion
of a water-based inkjet ink when printed onto hydrophobic
polyolefin films. One option includes surface treating the
polyolefin film to introduce polar hydrophilic groups, for example
with a corona or plasma treatment discharge process, followed by
depositing a water based inkjet ink onto the surface treated
polyolefin film. Also disclosed is a second surface treatment,
e.g., corona or plasma discharge, after inkjet recording, followed
by the application of a protective over coating which contains a
wax. When the inks contain specific co-solvents the protective
overcoat is not required, and when the protective overcoat is
employed, the first surface treatment is not required. In either
embodiment, a separate ink-receptive layer is neither required nor
disclosed with this system. However, the present inventors have
found that hydrophilic surface treatments, such as corona or plasma
discharge are insufficient to control lateral ink spread on
impermeable films when water-based inkjet inks are deposited
thereon, especially in areas of high ink coverage, as will be
illustrated and disclosed in more detail below.
[0015] A "fixer fluid" comprising a cationic polymer and a high
boiling organic co-solvent for use as a pre-coating for printing
onto vinyl substrates with "anionic aqueous inks" to enable
printing on non-porous substrates is disclosed in WO 2014/042652
A1. However, as disclosed hereinafter, the use of high-boiling
organic co-solvents is undesirable, and ink-receptive fixer layers
comprising cationic polymers are not suitable for high speed
printing with anionically stabilized water-based pigment inks.
[0016] To overcome these problems and limitations of printing onto
water-impermeable substrates with water-based inkjet inks,
particularly those comprising anionically stabilized pigments, the
surface of the substrate is pre-coated with water-based
ink-receptive compositions comprising multivalent metal salts and
hydrophilic binders. Dannhauser and Campbell, in U.S. Publication
No. 2011/0279554 A1, disclose an inkjet receiving medium suitable
for high speed inkjet printing which includes a substrate having a
topmost layer coated thereon comprising a water soluble salt of a
multivalent metal cation and a hydrophilic polymer binder. However,
even the step of applying a water-based layer comprising
multivalent metal cations, such as those disclosed in U.S.
Publication No. 2011/0279554 A1, to an impermeable plastic
substrate can still be problematic due to the poor wetting and
adhesion characteristics of most untreated plastic surfaces by
water-based coating fluids. A further problem that has been
encountered is that non-volatile co-solvents known as humectants
that are commonly added to inkjet inks cannot absorb into the
impermeable substrates, which can lead to a prolonged sticky or
tacky feel to the surface of the dried ink layers. Yet another
problem that is encountered is insufficient layer-to-layer adhesion
or intra-layer cohesion when such printed films are further
post-coated or laminated to produce the final multi-layered package
or article. Thus there is a need for an improved method of forming
multi-layered printed images with water-based inkjet inks on
impermeable substrates which addresses the problems and limitation
listed above.
[0017] In addition to the aforementioned objectives, in view of the
overall health, safety, and environmental considerations of the
manufacturing processes and intended applications of the present
invention, especially for flexible film food packaging and labels,
it is an overarching objective of this invention to use water-based
tie-layers, water-based ink-receptive layers, and water-based
pigment inks, which contain less than 15 wt % of organic
co-solvents and which do not contain radiation curable sensitizers,
initiators, monomers, or oligomers.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0018] It has been found after extensive investigations, that by
the application of the appropriate surface treatments and
water-based pre- and post-print coatings to a water-impermeable
plastic substrate, a printed image and multi-layered article of
high print quality and high durability is produced at high speed
with a water-based inkjet ink comprising more than 80 wt % water
and which contains less than 15 wt % organic co-solvents and does
not contain any radiation curable sensitizers, initiators,
monomers, or oligomers.
[0019] In accordance with the present invention, there is provided
a multi-layered structure includes: [0020] a) a water-impermeable
substrate; [0021] b) a first layer on at least one surface of the
substrate comprising a water-based tie-layer composition; [0022] c)
a second layer formed over the first layer, wherein the second
layer is a water-based ink-receptive composition includes: [0023]
i) a multivalent metal salt; and [0024] ii) a hydrophilic binder
polymer; [0025] d) a third layer including at least one water-based
ink composition deposited in a single pass by an inkjet printing
process, wherein the water-based ink composition includes an
anionically stabilized, water-dispersible pigment; and [0026] e)
additional layers deposited over the one or more ink layers and
exposed second layer, the additional layers selected from one or
more of the following compositions: [0027] i) an opaque white
layer; [0028] ii) a protective layer; and [0029] iii) an adhesive
layer, further includes a continuous protective plastic or paper
layer adhered thereto.
[0030] These and other objects, features, and advantages of the
present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art
upon a reading of the following detailed description when taken in
conjunction with the drawings wherein there is shown and described
an illustrative embodiment of the invention.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0031] FIG. 1 is a schematic of a system for practicing the method
of the present invention.
[0032] FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating the multi-layered structure
of the present invention.
[0033] FIG. 3 shows a comparison of printed PE films, with and
without CDT, which illustrates the differences in ink spreading and
dot structure.
[0034] FIG. 4 shows a comparison of printed white OPP films, with
and without ink receptive layer, which illustrates the differences
in ink spreading and dot structure.
[0035] FIG. 5 is a plot of Sum L*Mottle as a function of polymer
dry coverage in g/m.sup.2.
[0036] FIG. 6 is a plot of % retained visible density (D.sub.vis)
as a function of polymer dry coverage in g/m.sup.2.
[0037] FIG. 7 is a plot of Sum L*mottle as a function of the salt
dry coverage in g/m.sup.2.
[0038] FIG. 8 is a plot of % retained visible density (D.sub.vis)
as a function of salt dry coverage in g/m.sup.2.
[0039] FIG. 9 is a plot of % retained visible density (D.sub.vis)
as a function of the salt-to-polymer weight ratio in the dried
coating.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0040] In accordance with the objectives of the present invention,
FIG. 1 shows a water-impermeable substrate 100, is useful as a
structural component of a packaging or decor article intended to be
printed with a high productivity digital inkjet deposition system
600 comprising water-based pigment inks 500. The water-impermeable
substrate 100 is transparent, translucent, or opaque, and it is
colored or colorless. The water-impermeable substrate 100 includes
cellulose ester derivatives, such as cellulose triacetate,
cellulose diacetate, cellulose acetate propionate, cellulose
acetate butyrate; polyesters, such as poly(ethylene terephthalate),
poly(ethylene naphthalate), poly(1,4-cyclohexanedimethylene
terephthalate), poly(butylene terephthalate; polyimides;
polyamides; polycarbonates; polystyrenes; polyolefins, such as
polyethylene or polypropylene; polysulfones; polyacrylates;
polyetherimides; polyurethanes; vinyls, such as polyvinyl acetate,
polyvinyl chloride and polyvinylidene chloride; and copolymers,
mixtures, co-extrudates, and laminates thereof. The salient
features of a typical water-impermeable substrate 100 are that (a)
the surface energy of the side to be printed upon, as measured by
using a set of "dyne pens" such as those manufactured by Accudyne
Test Marker Pens, Diversified Enterprises, Claremont, N.H., is
often less than about 50 dyn/cm, sometimes less than 40 dyn/cm, as
received, and (b) the surface of the side to be printed upon is a
continuous non-porous surface that does not readily absorb or
transmit water.
[0041] Before a water-based coating fluid or ink is applied to a
water-impermeable substrate 100, the surface should be modified to
increase the surface energy to greater than about 45 dyn/cm in
order to adequately wet the surface by the coating fluid or ink.
The surface energy of the substrate is adjusted by using a surface
modification system 200, such as a corona discharge treatment (CDT)
system, a plasma discharge treatment system, a flame ionization
treatment system, an atomic layer deposition system, or similar
such systems that are designed to increase the surface energy and
thereby the wettability of low-surface energy substrates. A CDT
system is preferred for most common plastic substrates. Corona
treatment is accomplished by exposing the film surface to a high
voltage corona discharge unit while passing the film between two
spaced electrodes. Such systems are readily available in the
coatings industry. For example, see U.S. Pat. No. 8,479,478 for a
discussion of surface treatment processes and methods of
characterizing the surface energy or "wetting tension" of treated
film surfaces. It has been found for water-based coating fluids and
inks, a static surface energy of greater than 50 dyn/cm is required
to achieve adequate wetting. The optimum surface energy of the
substrate will depend on the actual surface tension of the coating
fluid or ink composition, which can vary as a function of the types
and amounts of the ingredients of the composition, as will be
described in more detail below. For the water-based coating fluid
and ink compositions of the present invention, a surface energy in
the range of 50-60 dyn/cm is preferred.
[0042] It has been found that simply adjusting the surface energy
of the water-impermeable substrate 100 to achieve adequate wetting
with a water-based coating fluid or ink is insufficient to produce
acceptable print quality and durability. When a drop of a
water-based ink with a static surface tension of >30 dyn/cm is
deposited directly on a water-impermeable substrate 100 which has
been surface modified to achieve a surface energy of >50 dyn/cm,
effective wetting of the water-based ink is observed, but when a
water-based pigment ink 500 is used, the colorant will also spread,
often concentrating at the edges of the ink spot as it dries,
causing a so-called "coffee ring" artifact. Likewise, when two
drops are placed directly adjacent to each other before either drop
has had a chance to dry, as is often encountered with high-speed,
page-wide, singe-pass inkjet deposition systems (600), the drops
will spread and coalesce into each other, leading to objectionable
levels of grain and mottle. Further, when more than one color of
ink is deposited, intercolor bleeding between ink drops is
observed.
[0043] FIG. 2 shows when a water-based ink-receptive layer 401
comprising a multivalent metal salt and a hydrophilic polymer, such
as those described by Dannhauser and Campbell in U.S. Publication
No. 2011/0279554 A1, is applied to a water-impermeable substrate
100, which has been surface modified to achieve a surface energy of
>50 dyn/cm, a high quality, defect-free coated layer is
achieved. Further, when an anionically stabilized water-based
pigment ink (500) is deposited on the water-based ink-receptive
layer 401, very sharp, circular spots are formed with minimal
colorant spreading, and effective print quality is observed.
However, the adhesion of the water-based ink-receptive layer 401 to
the water-impermeable substrate 100 is weak, and it is readily
removed from the substrate by a simple tape test or by a dry rub
test. Subsequent treatment of such a printed ink-receptive layer
with elevated levels of moisture and heat, as disclosed in
copending U.S. application Ser. No. 14/302,866 will improve both
the cohesive strength of the water-based pigment ink layer 501 as
well as the adhesion of the water-based pigment ink layer 501 to
the water-based ink-receptive layer 401. However, the adhesion of
the water-based ink-receptive layer 401 to the water-impermeable
substrate 100 is not appreciably improved. Therefore, a tie-layer,
also sometimes referred to in the art as a "chemical primer" or
"subbing layer", is required. The tie-layer should form a strong
adhesive bond to both the water-impermeable substrate 100 and the
water-based ink-receptive layer 401.
[0044] In keeping with one of the overarching objectives of the
instant invention, a water based tie-layer 301 is preferred.
Water-based tie-layers 301 useful for improving the adhesion of
ink-receptive layers to hydrophobic photographic substrates, such
as polyester films or polyethylene coated papers, are described in
U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,165,699 and 7,858,161, the disclosures of which
are herein incorporated by reference. Examples of suitable adhesion
promoting tie-layers include, for example, halogenated phenols,
partially hydrolyzed vinyl chloride-co-vinyl acetate polymer,
vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate-itaconic acid terpolymer, a
vinylidene chloride-acrylonitrile-acrylic acid terpolymer, or a
glycidyl(meth)acrylate polymer or copolymer. Other chemical
adhesives, such as polymers, copolymers, reactive polymers or
copolymers, which exhibit effective bonding between the
ink-receptive layer and the support, are also useful. The polymeric
binder in the subbing layer employed in the invention is preferably
a water soluble or water dispersible polymer such as poly(vinyl
alcohol), poly(vinyl pyrrolidone), gelatin, a cellulose ether, a
poly(oxazoline), a poly(vinylacetamide), partially hydrolyzed
poly(vinyl acetate/vinyl alcohol), poly(acrylic acid),
poly(acrylamide), poly(alkylene oxide), a sulfonated or
phosphonated polyester or polystyrene, casein, zein, albumin,
chitin, chitosan, dextran, pectin, a collagen derivative,
collodion, agar-agar, arrowroot, guar, carrageenan, tragacanth,
xanthan, rhamsan and the like, a latex such as
poly(styrene-co-butadiene), a polyurethane latex, a polyester
latex, or a poly(acrylate), poly(methacrylate), poly(acrylamide) or
copolymers thereof. However, the inventors are not aware of any
water-based tie-layers 301 that are have been disclosed which are
intended to work with water-based ink-receptive layers 401
comprising relatively high levels of divalent metal salts, such as
those disclosed by Dannhauser and Campbell in U.S. Publication No.
2011/0279554 A1. It has been found by trial and error that certain
types or classes of water-based tie layers 301 are suitable for use
in combination with water-impermeable substrates 100 and a
water-based ink-receptive layer 401 which contains a divalent metal
salt. Preferred water-based tie-layers 301 employ polyvinyl
alcohol, polyvinyl amine, gelatin, poly(ethyleneimine), epoxy
resins, polyurethane, polyacrylamide, and derivatives, copolymers,
and blends thereof, as a polymeric binder. Especially preferred are
compositions containing a polymer or copolymer comprising 50 to 100
mole percent of glycidyl acrylate or glycidyl methacrylate
monomer.
[0045] Although desirable for the water-based tie-layer 301 to be a
single discrete layer, it can also comprise one or more water-based
sub-layers, in cases where a single layer is less effective or
where additional functionality is desired. Examples where the
tie-layer is comprised of two sub-layers are disclosed in U.S. Pat.
No. 5,380,586. Preferred first water-based tie-sub-layers, which
are applied directly to a CDT-treated film surface, include
poly(ethyleneimine) and epoxy resins modified with an acidified
aminoethylated vinyl polymer, and the preferred second water-based
tie-sub-layer, which is applied on top of the first sub-layer, is a
cross-linked poly(vinyl alcohol) polymer.
[0046] Whether the water-based tie-layer 301 is comprised of a
single layer or one or more sub-layers, the total dry coverage of
the water-based tie-layer 301 is preferably from 0.05 to 12
g/m.sup.2, more preferably from 0.05 to 8 g/m.sup.2, more
preferably from 0.05 to 3 g/m.sup.2, and most preferably from 0.05
to 1.5 g/m.sup.2.
[0047] In one embodiment, the water-based tie-layer 301 and the
water-based ink-receptive layer 401 are applied in-line as part of
the printing operation, wherein such layers are applied to a
water-impermeable substrate 100 by one or more coating systems 300,
400 prior to printing as shown in FIG. 1. In another embodiment,
the water-based tie-layer 301 and the water-based ink-receptive
layer 401 are applied in-line as part of the substrate
manufacturing process. In yet another embodiment, the water-based
tie-layer 301 is applied in-line as part of the substrate
manufacturing process, and the water-based ink-receptive layer 401
is applied in-line as part of the printing operation. In any of the
above embodiments, the surface modification system 200 is
preferably located in-line and just prior to Coating System A 300
used to apply the water-based tie-layer 301. In-line application of
the water-based tie-layer 301 and the water-based ink-receptive
layer 401 are performed by the various available coating
applications methods, including but not limited to spray coating,
rod coating, blade coating, gravure coating (direct, reverse, and
offset), flexographic coating, extrusion hopper coating,
slide-hopper coating, and curtain coating. Particularly preferred
coating application methods for water-impermeable substrates permit
for more than one layer to be deposited simultaneously, such as
slide-hopper and curtain coating methods. With these types of
coating application methods, both the water-based tie-layer 301,
including any sub-layers, and the water-based ink-receptive layer
401 are applied simultaneously, saving both time and the cost of
additional hardware. The curtain coating method has the added
advantage that it is a non-contact application method, and the
coated layer will conform to the surface of the substrate, which
reduces coat weight variations on rough or textured surfaces. In
another embodiment, Coating System A 300 or Coating System B 400
are in the form of a sprayable or jettable fluid deposition system.
When a sprayable or jettable fluid deposition system is used to
apply the water-based tie-layer 301 or the water-based
ink-receptive layer 401, the option exists of covering only the
area under the printed image with the water-based tie-layer 301 and
the water-based ink-receptive layer 401, rather than the entire
area of the water-impermeable substrate 100.
[0048] Regardless of the coating application system and
configuration for Coating System A 300 and Coating System B 400,
the water-based tie-layer 301 and the water-based ink-receptive
layer 401 should be sufficiently dried prior to the deposition of
the water-based pigment inks 500. By sufficiently dried, it is
meant that any residual water after the drying process is within
the normal ranges that are measured when the dried coated layers
are equilibrated at an ambient environment condition of 20.degree.
C. to 30.degree. C. and 20% to 80% relative humidity.
[0049] A key consideration in high speed production printing on a
water-impermeable substrate 100 is the rate at which the ink drops
are applied to the substrate. Ink-receptive layers comprising
multivalent metal ions are particularly advantageous for high speed
printing with page-wide ink jet arrays comprising anionically
stabilized pigment inks, wherein adjacent drops of ink of the same
color are deposited within a few microseconds of each other and
drops of ink of a second color are deposited within a few
milliseconds of the first color. More specifically, for a fixed
array inkjet deposition system 600 depositing print drops on a
substrate moving at 200 meters per minute and at an addressability
of 900 drops per inch in the process direction, the time delay
between successive drops of the same color placed on the substrate
is a mere 8.5 microseconds, and the time delay between a drop of a
second color deposited from a second fixed array inkjet deposition
system 600 displaced 15.2 cm after the first array is 46
milliseconds. Therefore it is critical for optimum dot structure
and minimal drop-to-drop coalescence and intercolor bleeding that
the pigments in the water-based pigment ink 500 are immobilized
almost instantaneously after they come in contact with the
substrate. Because capillary absorption of the water and
co-solvents in the ink is not available on a non-porous
water-impermeable substrate 100, pigment immobilization is most
efficiently be accomplished by employing the combination of an
anionically dispersed pigment particle in the water-based pigment
ink 100 and a multivalent metal salt with a hydrophilic polymer in
the water-based ink-receptive layer 401. Although not desiring to
be bound to a specific hypothesis, it is believed that the
preferred multivalent metal cations, such as calcium and magnesium,
can diffuse from the water-based ink-receptive layer 401 into the
first water-based pigment ink layer 501 on the order of one
microsecond or less, and further into a subsequent water-based
pigment ink layers 601 on the order of 1 millisecond or less,
rapidly forming ionic cross linkages with the anionically
stabilized pigments, thereby immobilizing them.
[0050] The water-based ink-receptive layer 401 of the invention
includes a water-soluble salt of a multivalent metal. Water-soluble
is herein defined as at least 0.5 g of the salt capable of
dissolving in 100 ml water at 20.degree. C. The salt is preferably
colorless and transparent when the water-based ink-receptive layer
is coated and dried. More preferably, the multivalent metal is a
cation selected from Mg.sup.+2, Ca.sup.+2, Ba.sup.+2, Zn.sup.+2,
and Al.sup.+3, and most preferably Ca.sup.+2 or Mg.sup.+2, in
combination with suitable counter ions. Examples of the salt used
in the invention include (but are not limited to) calcium chloride,
calcium acetate, calcium nitrate, magnesium chloride, magnesium
acetate, magnesium nitrate, barium chloride, barium nitrate, zinc
chloride, zinc nitrate, aluminum chloride, aluminum
hydroxychloride, and aluminum nitrate. Similar salts will be
appreciated by the skilled artisan. Particularly preferred salts
are calcium chloride, calcium acetate, calcium nitrate, magnesium
chloride, magnesium acetate, and magnesium nitrate, including
hydrated versions of these salts. Combinations of the salts
described above can also be used.
[0051] The water-based ink-receptive layer 401 can further include
a hydrophilic polymer alone or in combination with one or more
additional polymers. Such hydrophilic polymers include polymers
capable of adsorbing water, and preferably are capable of forming a
continuous phase solution with the multivalent metal salt.
Non-exclusive examples of such materials include gelatin, starch,
hydroxycelluloses, polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl pyrrolidone,
polyethylene imine, polyvinyl amine, and derivatives of these
materials. A preferred binder is an acetylacetate-modified
polyvinyl alcohol obtained under the trade name Gohsefimer Z-320
from Nippon Gohsei. To provide an enhanced level of abrasion
resistance and cohesiveness, the water-based ink-receptive layer
401 includes at least 0.05 g/m.sup.2 of cross-linked hydrophilic
polymer binder. The identity and amount of crosslinker will depend
on the choice of hydrophilic polymer and its reactivity with the
crosslinker, the number of crosslinking sites available,
compatibility with other solution components, and manufacturing
constraints such as solution pot life and coating drying speed.
Non-exclusive examples of crosslinker materials are glyoxal,
Cartabond TSI (Clariant), Cartabond EPI (Clariant), Sequarez 755
(Omnova), glutaraldehyde sodium bisulfate complex (Aldrich), Sunrez
700M (Omnova), Sunrez 700C (Omnova), CR-5L (Esprix), bis(vinyl)
sulfone, bis(vinyl) sulfone methyl ether, adipoyl dihydrazide,
epichlorohydrin polyamide resins and urea-formaldehyde resins. For
food packaging applications, cross-linkers which do not contain
impermissible levels of components or byproducts are most
preferred. In a particular embodiment, the cross-linked hydrophilic
polymer includes an acetylated polyvinyl alcohol polymer,
cross-linked with a epichlorohydrin polyamide resin compound. In
another preferred embodiment, a polyvinyl alcohol polymer (70-90%
hydrolysis level) is reacted with glyoxal-containing resin.
[0052] Although use of a multivalent metal salt and hydrophilic
polymeric binder in a water-based ink-receptive layer 401 in
accordance with the above specifications itself has been found to
provide advantageous performance, in further embodiments, the
topmost layer can further comprise a polymer latex filler such as
polyurethane latex, vinylacetate-ethylene copolymer latex, and
styrene-acrylic latex polymer dispersions for improved water
resistance and image durability. When present, however, the
fraction of additional latex filler preferably does not exceed 75%
of the total polymer in the topmost layer, to avoid undesired
decrease in maximum density and increase in mottle upon printing
with a water-based pigment ink 500.
[0053] The water-based ink-receptive layer 401 can further comprise
additional optional components, such as inorganic or organic
particles, as long as the coating solid lay down and concentration
requirements of the multivalent metal salt are met. These can
include, but are not limited to, kaolin clay, montmorillonite clay,
delaminated kaolin clay, calcium carbonate, calcined clay, silica
gel, fumed silica, colloidal silica, talc, wollastinite, fumed
alumina, colloidal alumina, titanium dioxide, zeolites, or organic
polymeric particles such as Dow HS3000NA. U.S. Publication No.
2013/0293647 A1 discloses a water-based ink-receptive layer 401
further comprising particles of specific size and hardness to
prevent ink retransfer, the disclosure which is herein incorporated
by reference. Examples of such particles polymer particles
comprising, e.g., polyethylene, poly(tetrafluoroethylene),
polypropylene, ethylene bis-stearamide, synthetic hydrocarbon
waxes, carnauba wax, or a combination thereof. Similarly U.S.
Publication No. 2014/0292951 A1 discloses a transparent water-based
ink-receptive layer 401 further incorporating silica that is less
than 200 nm in size to improve print quality and durability, the
disclosure which is herein incorporated by reference.
[0054] In contrast to the recommendations for paper-based
substrates provided in U.S. Publication No. 2011/0279554 A1, in the
context of evaluating similar water-based ink-receptive layers 401
for use in combination with a water-based tie layer 301, inventors
have discovered that the preferred concentrations, the preferred
divalent metal salts, and the preferred coating coverages are
different. For example, when water-based ink-receptive layers 401
that comprise multivalent metal salt concentrations or dry
coverages in the preferred ranges as disclosed in U.S. Publication
No. 2011/0279554 A1 are used in combination with the other
preferred layers of the present invention to produce a laminated
flexible film package, the final bond strength is adversely
affected compared to water-based ink-receptive layers that comprise
lower levels of salt or lower dry coverages. There is also a
tendency for the water-based ink-receptive layer 401 and the
water-based pigment inks to develop a hazy appearance when the
concentration of the divalent metal salt in the dried coating is in
the center of the preferred ranges as disclosed in U.S. Publication
No. 2001/0279554 A1. Although not wishing to be bound to any
particular hypothesis, the inventors note that unlike paper based
substrates which are known to somewhat permeable to divalent metal
ions such as calcium, magnesium, and the like, impermeable plastic
substrates are essentially impermeable to metal ions. Therefore it
stands to reason that a lower initial concentration of divalent
metal ions are sufficient to immobilize the anionically stabilized
pigment particles, and that higher concentrations of divalent metal
ions can lead to phase-separation or crystallization, resulting in
a hazy appearance and interfering with layer-to-layer adhesion.
Based on further extensive investigation, the preferred dried
water-based ink-receptive layers 401 for use with the other
preferred layers and substrates of the present invention comprise
between 0.05 and 1.0 g/m.sup.2, more preferably between 0.1 and 0.8
g/m.sup.2, most preferably between 0.2 and 0.5 g/m.sup.2, of the
hydrophilic polymer, and the weight ratio of the multivalent metal
salt to the hydrophilic polymer in the water-based ink-receptive
layer 401 is preferably between 2.5:1 and 0.75:1, inclusive.
Further, due to drying limitations, the preferred wet coverage of
the water-based ink-receptive layer 401 is less than 10 g/m.sup.2,
more preferably less than 5 g/m.sup.2, still more preferably less
than 3 g/m.sup.2. Finally, in consideration of the contribution of
the water-based ink-receptive layer 401 to the overall thickness
and cost of the final multilayered structures useful for packaging
and decor applications, the preferred dry coating coverage of the
water-based ink-receptive layer is preferably from 0.05 to 1.5
g/m.sup.2. In general, lower wet and dry coverages are preferred so
long as the requirements for the dry multivalent salt coverage and
hydrophilic binder polymer levels as defined above are met.
[0055] Another aspect of the invention is directed to a printing
method in which the above-described substrate is printed with an
inkjet deposition system 600 employing at least one anionically
stabilized water-based pigment ink 500. The colorant systems of the
water-based pigment ink 500 compositions employed in accordance
with one embodiment of the invention are pigment-based or
combinations of dye and pigment. Compositions incorporating pigment
are particularly useful. Water-based pigment inks 500 are used
because such inks render printed images having higher optical
densities and better resistance to light and ozone as compared to
printed images made from other types of colorants. A wide variety
of organic and inorganic pigments, alone or in combination with
additional pigments or dyes, are useful in the present invention.
Pigments that are useful in the invention include those disclosed
in, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,026,427; 5,141,556; and
5,160,370. The exact choice of pigments will depend upon the
specific application and performance requirements such as color
reproduction and image stability. Especially preferred colorants
are anionically stabilized pigments.
[0056] Pigments suitable for use in the invention include, but are
not limited to, azo pigments, monoazo pigments, di-azo pigments,
azo pigment lakes, Naphthol pigments, Naphthol AS pigments,
benzimidazolone pigments, di-azo condensation pigments, metal
complex pigments, isoindolinone and isoindoline pigments,
polycyclic pigments, phthalocyanine pigments, quinacridone
pigments, perylene and perinone pigments, thioindigo pigments,
anthrapyrimidone pigments, flavanthrone pigments, anthanthrone
pigments, dioxazine pigments, triarylcarbonium pigments,
quinophthalone pigments, diketopyrrolo pyrrole pigments, titanium
dioxide, iron oxide, and carbon black. Carbon black is preferable
as a pigment for black ink. Other black pigments are also
acceptable and be comprised of magnetic particles such as magnetite
or ferrite, or titanium black also be used.
[0057] Typical examples of pigments that are useful include Color
Index (C. I.) Pigment Yellow 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17,
62, 65, 73, 74, 75, 81, 83, 87, 90, 93, 94, 95, 97, 98, 99, 100,
101, 104, 106, 108, 109, 110, 111, 113, 114, 116, 117, 120, 121,
123, 124, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 133, 136, 138, 139, 147, 148,
150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171,
172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185,
187, 188, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194; C. I. Pigment Red 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23, 31, 32,
38, 48:1, 48:2, 48:3, 48:4, 49:1, 49:2, 49:3, 50:1, 51, 52:1, 52:2,
53:1, 57:1, 60:1, 63:1, 66, 67, 68, 81, 95, 112, 114, 119, 122,
136, 144, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 164, 166, 168, 169, 170,
171, 172, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 181, 184, 185, 187, 188, 190,
192, 194, 200, 202, 204, 206, 207, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 216,
220, 222, 237, 238, 239, 240, 242, 243, 245, 247, 248, 251, 252,
253, 254, 255, 256, 258, 261, 264; C.I. Pigment Blue 1, 2, 9, 10,
14, 15:1, 15:2, 15:3, 15:4, 15:6, 15, 16, 18, 19, 24:1, 25, 56, 60,
61, 62, 63, 64, 66, bridged aluminum phthalocyanine pigments; C.I.
Pigment Black 1, 7, 20, 31, 32; C. I. Pigment Orange 1, 2, 5, 6,
13, 15, 16, 17, 17:1, 19, 22, 24, 31, 34, 36, 38, 40, 43, 44, 46,
48, 49, 51, 59, 60, 61, 62, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69; C.I. Pigment
Green 1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 10, 36, 45; C.I. Pigment Violet 1, 2, 3, 5:1,
13, 19, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 32, 37, 39, 42, 44, 50; or C.I. Pigment
Brown 1, 5, 22, 23, 25, 38, 41, 42.
[0058] The water-based pigment inks 500 can comprise
self-dispersing pigments that are dispersible and stable without
the use of a polymeric or molecular dispersant or surfactant.
Pigments of this type are generally those that have been subjected
to a surface treatment such as oxidation/reduction, acid/base
treatment, or functionalization through coupling chemistry so long
as the charge on the surface is predominantly anionic or
negative.
[0059] The pigment particles of the water-based pigment ink 500
preferably have a median particle diameter of less than 150 nm,
more preferably less than 100 nm, and most preferably less than 50
nm as measured by laser light scattering methods. As used herein,
median particle diameter refers to the 50th percentile of the
classified particle size distribution such that 50% of the volume
of the particles is provided by particles having diameters smaller
than the indicated diameter. Particularly desirable pigment
particle sizes are those that satisfy the particle Peclet number
requirements for stable continuous ink jet fluid drop formation
properties, as taught in WO 2009/044096 by Clarke, et al.
[0060] The pigments used in the ink composition of the invention be
present in any effective amount, generally from 0.1 to 10% by
weight, and preferably from 0.5 to 6% by weight. In one embodiment
the weight ratio of the polymeric dispersant to the pigment is 0.15
to 0.9. In accordance with one embodiment of the invention,
colorants comprising cyan, magenta, yellow, and black pigments are
specifically employed.
[0061] Water-based pigment inks 500 employing non-self-dispersed
pigments that are useful in the invention are prepared by any
method known in the art of inkjet printing. Useful methods commonly
involve two steps: (a) a dispersing or milling step to break up the
pigment aggregate into primary particles, where primary particle is
defined as the smallest identifiable subdivision in a particulate
system, and (b) a dilution step in which the pigment dispersion
from step (a) is diluted with the remaining ink components to give
a working strength ink. The pigment milling step (a) be carried out
using any type of grinding mill such as a stirred media mill, a
ball mill, a two-roll mill, a three-roll mill, a bead mill, and
air-jet mill, an attritor, a high speed disperser, a horizontal
mill, or a liquid interaction chamber. In the milling step (a),
pigments are optionally suspended in a medium, which is typically
the same as, or similar to, the medium used to dilute the pigment
dispersion in step (b). Inert milling media are optionally present
in the milling step (a) in order to facilitate breakup of the
pigments to primary particles. Inert milling media include such
materials as polymeric beads, glasses, ceramics, metals and
plastics as described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,891,231.
Milling media are removed from either the pigment dispersion
obtained in step (a) or from the ink composition obtained in step
(b). Related milling, dispersing, grinding or comminution processes
that are highly suitable to the practice of the invention are
described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,478,705; 5,513,805; 5,662,279;
5,679,138; 5,862,999; 5,985,071; and 6,600,559. A particularly
preferred milling process is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,441,717,
and its disclosure is herein incorporated by reference.
[0062] A dispersant is preferably present in the milling step (a)
in order to facilitate breakup of the pigment agglomerate into
primary particles. For the pigment dispersion obtained in step (a)
or the ink composition obtained in step (b), the dispersant is
present in order to maintain particle stability and to prevent
particle aggregation followed by settling; the dispersant either be
an amphiphilic molecular surfactant or a polymer. In addition to
the dispersant, there be, optionally, additional dispersants or
polymers present for use in the invention such as those commonly
used in the art of ink jet printing. Anionic dispersants suitable
for use in the invention in preparing stable pigment dispersions
include, but are not limited to, those commonly used in the art of
inkjet printing. For water-based pigment inks 500, particularly
useful dispersants include anionic surfactants such as sodium
dodecylsulfate, potassium oleylmethyltaurate, or sodium
oleylmethyltaurate as described in, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos.
5,679,138; 5,651,813; and 5,985,017.
[0063] Polymeric dispersants are also known and useful in
water-based pigment inks 500. Polymeric dispersants include
polymers such as homopolymers and copolymers; anionic, cationic or
nonionic polymers; or random, block, branched or graft polymers.
The copolymers are designed to act as dispersants for the pigment
by virtue of the arrangement and proportions of hydrophobic and
hydrophilic monomers. The pigment particles are colloidally
stabilized by the dispersant and are referred to as polymer
stabilized pigment dispersions. Polymeric dispersants have the
additional advantage of offering improve print durability over
non-polymeric dispersants once the water-based pigment inks 500 are
dried down. In combination with preferred water-based ink-receptive
layer 401, anionic polymeric dispersants are required. Preferred
anionic copolymer dispersants are those where the hydrophilic
monomer is selected from carboxylated monomers. Preferred anionic
polymeric dispersants are copolymers prepared from at least one
hydrophilic monomer that is an acrylic acid or methacrylic acid
monomer, or combinations thereof. Preferably, the hydrophilic
monomer is methacrylic acid. Particularly useful polymeric pigment
dispersants are further described in U.S. Publication Nos.
2006/0012654 A1 and U.S. 2007/0043144 A1, the disclosures of which
are incorporated herein by reference.
[0064] Pigment particles that are dispersed and stabilized by the
preferred dispersants described above are considered anionically
stabilized pigments, and water-based pigment inks 500 that comprise
such pigments exhibit a negative zeta potential. Anionically
stabilized water-based pigment inks 500 exhibit a zeta potential
that is preferably less than (more negative than) -30 mV, more
preferably less than -40 mV, most preferably less than -50 mV.
[0065] Water-based pigment inks 500 can contain further addenda as
is conventional in the inkjet printing art. In addition to water as
the principal vehicle or carrier medium and the anionically
stabilized pigment particles, an inkjet ink composition for use in
a continuous inkjet printer minimally contains humectant, biocide,
and surfactant. The ink can further contain one or more types of
other components, including and not limited to a film-forming
binder, a solubilizing agent, a co-solvent, a base, an acid, a pH
buffer, a wetting agent, a chelating agent, a corrosion inhibitor,
a viscosity modifier, a penetrant, a wetting agent, an antifoamant,
a defoamer, an antifungal or antibacterial agent, a jetting aid, a
filament length modifier, a trace of multivalent cationic
flocculating salt, a solution conductivity control agent, or a
compound for suppressing electrostatic deflection charge shorts
when ink dries on the charge ribbon electrodes, if that mode of
drop deflection is to be employed.
[0066] Preferred as film forming finders for applications requiring
enhanced durability are aqueous dispersible acrylic latex polymers
and aqueous dispersible or aqueous soluble polyurethane polymers of
the types described in U.S. Publication No. 2012/0274685 A1,
incorporated herein by reference. Depending on the specific
application, other types of polymeric addenda are also useful, such
as those described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,455,570, incorporated herein
by reference. Particularly preferred polymeric addenda are
polyurethanes of the types disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,434,857,
incorporated herein by reference.
[0067] Water-based pigment inks 500 suitable for use in particular
embodiments of the present invention include those described, e.g.,
in co-pending, commonly assigned U.S. Publication No. 2011/0123714
A1, and in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,173,215; 8,398,191; 8,419,176; and
8,455,570, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference
herein in their entireties.
[0068] Inkjet printing is a non-impact method for producing printed
images by the deposition of ink drops in a pixel-by-pixel manner to
an image-recording element in response to digital data signals.
There are various methods that are useful to control the deposition
of ink drops on the image-recording element to yield the desired
printed image. In one process, known as drop-on-demand inkjet,
individual ink drops are projected as needed onto the
image-recording element to form the desired printed image. Common
methods of controlling the projection of ink drops in
drop-on-demand printing include piezoelectric transducers and
thermal bubble formation. Drop-on-demand (DOD) drop generating
devices have been known as inkjet deposition systems for many
years. Early devices were based on piezoelectric actuators such as
are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,946,398 and 3,747,120. A
currently popular form of inkjet printing, thermal inkjet (or
"thermal bubble jet"), uses electrically resistive heaters to
produce vapor bubbles which cause drop emission, as is discussed in
U.S. Pat. No. 4,296,421.
[0069] In another process, known as continuous inkjet, a continuous
stream of drops is produced, and then individual drops are selected
in an image-wise manner to be deposited onto the surface of the
image-recording element, while un-imaged drops are caught and
returned to an ink sump. Various schemes for generating and
selecting ink drops are known in the art. Continuous inkjet
deposition systems 600, which use a thermal pulse to produce ink
drops of different sizes, and a stream of air to select drops to be
printed from drops to be caught and recirculated, are especially
preferred in view of their ability to print at speeds up to 900
meters per minute or greater. Suitable continuous inkjet deposition
systems 600 are disclosed, e.g., in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,588,888;
6,554,410; 6,682,182; 6,793,328; 6,863,385; 6,866,370; 6,575,566;
and 6,517,197, herein incorporated by reference. As discussed in
more detail below, a further benefit of continuous inkjet
deposition systems in which the inks are continuously jetted and
recirculated is that the water-based inks used in such systems
require lower levels of organic co-solvents, such as a humectant,
for reliable jetting as for similar inks used in DOD deposition
systems.
[0070] Inkjet deposition systems 600 useful in the invention
comprise a printer system capable of precisely depositing ink drops
at predetermined locations on a moving substrate, at least one
anionically stabilized water-based pigment ink 500 in accordance
with the invention, and a surface-treated and coated
water-impermeable substrate 100 suitable for receiving water-based
pigment ink 500 from an inkjet deposition system 600. The printing
method can employ a continuous high-speed commercial inkjet
deposition system 600, for example, in which the printer applies
different color inks from at least two different print heads,
preferably full-width arrays with respect to the substrate, in
sequence in which the different colored parts of the images are
registered. In accordance with an embodiment of the invention,
after the anionically stabilized water-based pigment inks 500 are
deposited with an inkjet deposition system 600 on a
water-impermeable substrate 100 having a water-based tie-layer 301
and a water-based ink-receptive layer 401 coated successively
thereupon, the one or more deposited water-based pigment ink layers
501 are dried by using a drying system 700. For the purpose of this
invention, drying means the removal of the water from the deposited
water-based pigment ink layer 501 to a point where the water-based
pigment ink 500 no longer tracks off on any facing rollers or
surfaces downstream from the final drier. Care should be taken not
to heat the substrate above the temperature at which it begins to
stretch and distort, including both the printed and unprinted
areas. For thin, flexible films, such as those based on oriented
polypropylene (OPP) or polyethylene (PE) used for packaging
applications, the temperature of the film should be kept below
about 60.degree. C., preferably below about 50.degree. C. When
printing at high speeds, rapid evaporative drying, enhanced by
application of heated, forced air flow across the surface of the
print, is preferred. In that way, relatively heat sensitive
substrates are printed and dried at high printing speeds without
wrinkling or distortion.
[0071] As discussed briefly above, additional general
considerations for drying of water-based inkjet inks on temperature
sensitive water-impermeable substrates 100, are the types and
amounts of any co-solvents used in the water-based pigment inks
500. On the one hand volatile, lower boiling co-solvents, which are
readily and rapidly evaporated, are undesirable from a health and
safety perspective, and also present problems with the reliability
of the most inkjet deposition systems related to the drying out and
crusting of ink around the jetting nozzles and other surfaces
within the fluid delivery system. On the other hand, the inclusion
of some amount of higher boiling water-miscible co-solvents, also
known as "humectants," is well-known in the art, and desirable to
enhance the reliability of the inkjet deposition systems by
preventing the premature ink drying around the jetting nozzles as
mentioned above. However, since higher boiling co-solvents are even
more difficult to remove from the ink layer by evaporation than
water, and since the water-impermeable substrate 100, the
water-based tie layer 301, and the water-based ink-receptive layer
as disclosed above have a limited capacity to absorb any residual
higher boiling co-solvent, it is also desirable to keep the
concentrations of higher boiling co-solvents as low as possible
while not compromising the reliability of the inkjet deposition
system. In the context of the present invention, "lower boiling
co-solvent" refers to any water-miscible co-solvent that has a
boiling point lower that 100.degree. C., and "higher boiling
co-solvent" refers to any water-miscible co-solvent that has a
boiling point higher than 100.degree. C.
[0072] The water-based pigment inks 500 of the invention further
can include one or more water-soluble or polar organic compounds to
serve as a humectant if desired in order to provide useful
properties to the inkjet ink. Typical useful properties of
humectant and co-solvent additives include, but are not limited to,
preventing the ink composition from drying out or crusting in the
nozzles of the printhead by reducing the rate of water evaporation
and plasticizing the pigment cake as the ink dries; aiding the
solubility of the components in the ink composition; facilitating
redispersion of concentrated or dried ink in ink or CIJ cleaning
fluid; modifying the fluid surface tension either directly (e.g.,
by reducing the chemical activity of water and surface energy at
the liquid-solid or liquid-gas interface) or indirectly (e.g., by
modifying the availability of surfactant in an aqueous phase);
altering the fluid viscosity; aiding firing properties of the ink
from an ejector; facilitating penetration of the ink composition
into the image-recording element after printing; aiding gloss; and
suppressing mechanical artifacts such as paper cockle and curl
during and after printing.
[0073] Any water-soluble humectant or co-solvent known in the
inkjet art and compatible with the other requirements of the
invention are useful. By water-soluble is meant that a mixture of
the employed humectant(s) or co-solvent(s) and water is adequately
homogeneous and not subject to spontaneous phase separation.
Although an individual humectant or co-solvent is useful, inkjet
ink compositions can employ mixtures of two, three or more
humectants and co-solvents, each of which imparts a useful property
to the inkjet ink. As used herein in reference to inkjet ink
compositions for use in a continuous ink jet printer, particularly
desirable ingredients serving primarily as a humectant to retard
ink drying and aid ink redispersability include glycerol, ethylene
glycol, related polyols, and the polyhydric alcohol derivatives
thereof, which are preferred; glycerol is especially preferred. The
polyhydric alcohol derivatives of glycerol include the glycerol
ethoxides, glycerol propoxides and glyceryths. It is recognized
that the effectiveness of the humectant in accomplishing water
retention and wetting will depend on its chemical structure.
[0074] Although any quantity of water soluble humectants and polar
co-solvents either singly or in combination with dynamic surface
tension reducing co-solvents and surfactants are useful, the total
humectant and co-solvent level of the ink jet ink composition for
continuous ink jet printing is desirably from about 1 to about 15%
by weight and more preferably less than 10% by weight. The total
humectant and co-solvent level of the ink is the sum of the
individual contributions of humectant or miscible polar organic
co-solvent, DST-modifying co-solvent (solvosurfactant), and any
other co-solvent ingredients, which include humectant or organic
co-solvent added directly or incidentally during the totality of
ink formulation (for example, co-solvent associated with a
commercial biocide preparation as a supplemental ingredient, or
with a commercial pigment dispersion preparation that be present to
prevent so-called "paint-flakes" of dried pigment cake forming
around a bottle cap, as described in U.S. Publication No.
2005/0075415). More desirably, the total humectant and co-solvent
level is less than or equal to about 10% by weight and yet more
desirably less than or equal to about 8% by weight, in order to
facilitate drying of the deposited ink layers in a high speed
printer, and at least about 2%, and more preferably at least about
4% by weight, to encourage higher equilibrium moisture content in
partially dried inks on printing system hardware to make them
easier to redisperse and clean-up by fresh ink, by maintenance
fluids, or by a printhead storage fluid.
[0075] In consideration of these constraints, the continuous inkjet
depositions systems disclosed by reference above, which produce a
continuous stream of drops and deflect the drops in an image-wise
manner onto the surface of the image-recording element, while
un-imaged drops are caught and recirculated back to an ink sump
have been shown to operate reliably using water-based pigment inks
500 with levels of organic co-solvents less than 10 wt %, and in
other cases less than 5 wt %. Therefore the preferred water-based
pigment inks 500 of the invention contain less than 10 wt %
co-solvents, even more preferably less than 8 wt % co-solvents, and
most preferably less than 5 wt % co-solvents. Especially preferred
water-based pigment ink 500 compositions and continuous inkjet
deposition systems 600 are disclosed in more detail in U.S. Pat.
No. 8,455,570, the disclosures of which are herein incorporated by
reference.
[0076] As a reference, the water-based inks that are used in common
thermal DOD inkjet writing systems, such as those manufactured by
Eastman Kodak and included in the 10-series color cartridge for a
range of desktop inkjet printers comprise 12 wt % water or more of
miscible co-solvents. Other manufacturer's thermal DOD inkjet inks
comprise as much as 20 wt % or more of water miscible co-solvents.
Some water-based piezo DOD inks comprise greater than 50 wt % water
miscible co-solvents. As will be shown in the Examples below, DOD
inks with co-solvent levels even as low as 12 wt % remain tacky for
extended periods of time when printed on water impermeable
substrates that have been treated and pre-coated with the preferred
materials and methods of the present invention. In view of the
above considerations, it was surprising and unexpected that the
preferred method of printing with water-based inks on
water-impermeable substrates would in fact favor inks with higher,
rather than lower levels of water compared to co-solvents.
[0077] After the water-based pigment inks 500 have been deposited
onto the treated and coated water-impermeable substrate 100 to form
a dried water-based pigment ink layer 501, the multi-layered
article is optionally conditioned with moisture and heat using a
conditioning chamber or oven 800. The application of moisture and
heat has been found to greatly improve both the cohesive strength
of the water-based pigment ink layer 501, and in combination with
the water-based ink-receptive layer 401 of the current invention,
the overall adhesion to the underlying substrate. Methods for
conditioning anionically stabilized water-based pigment ink layers
501 that are deposited on water-based ink-receptive layers 401
comprising multivalent metal ions are disclosed in copending U.S.
application Ser. No. 14/302,866 the details of which are herein
incorporated by reference.
[0078] In a further embodiment of the present invention, the
treated, coated, and printed water-impermeable substrate 100 is
passed through a post-print application system 900 which applies
either a solventless or water-based post-print functional layer
901. By "post-print functional layer" it is meant a layer which
provides one of more of the following functions: (A) opacity, for
example, when the water-impermeable substrate 100 is transparent;
(B) protection of the treated, coated, and printed layers against
environmental and physical stresses, such as wet and dry abrasion
resistance, fade resistance, delamination resistance, and the like;
and (C) adhesion, in applications such as flexible laminated
packaging, wherein it is desired to bond a separate film or paper
layer to the treated, coated, and printed layers. In keeping with
the objectives of the present invention, the post-print functional
layers should be free of organic solvents and UV-curable
sensitizers, initiators, monomers, and oligomers. Not only are
water-based post-print functional layers 901 preferred from an
environmental perspective, inventors have found quite unexpectedly
that compared to functionally analogous solventless and
solvent-based formulations, the overall bond strengths of the final
multi-layered structures are superior when certain combinations of
water-based post-print functional layers are used. The post-print
functions and compositions disclosed herein are intended to be
illustrative but not limiting.
[0079] When opacity is a required function, such as when
water-based pigment inks 500 are deposited on a treated and coated
water-impermeable substrate 100 that is transparent or translucent,
a white layer is preferred, although for certain applications,
black or colored opaque layers can also be used. Any known opaque
water-based ink, coating fluid, or paint composition are useful to
provide opacity. Examples of water-based post-print opacifying
layers include water-based white flexographic ink compositions, for
example water-based white flexographic inks sold under the trade
names WB Msquared and Bianco Base 100 by Sun Chemical Corporation,
and Flint Group Water HMJ 90104. In another embodiment, any of the
commercially available water-based latex paints can also be used to
provide an opacifying layer. Especially preferred is the WB
Msquared water-based white ink which contains a polyurethane
binder.
[0080] When print protection is the required function, any of the
available water-based overprint varnishes are flood coated over the
printed multilayer structure. Preferred examples include
water-based varnishes such as Haut Brilliant 17-6040327-7
(Siegwerk) and Michael Huber Munchen 877801 Varnish Anitcurling.
Examples of water-based adhesives useful for laminated packaging
applications are the Dow Robond acrylic adhesives L90M, L-148, and
L330, use in combination with CR 9-101 cross linker. Especially
preferred is the Dow Aqualam polyurethane water-based adhesive, in
combination with CR7-103 cross linker.
[0081] Although the post-print functional layers are cited
separately above, for certain applications it is advantageous to
combine the functions into a single layer, or to combine the
post-print functional layer 901 with other structural layers. For
example, an opaque adhesive layer is useful to adhere a treated,
coated, and printed substrate to another water-impermeable
transparent film to create a final multi-layered package or label.
Alternatively, a clear adhesive layer is used to adhere a treated,
coated, and printed water-impermeable substrate to an opaque film
or paper layer to create a final multi-layered package or label.
Opaque water-based protective overprint varnishes or opaque
solventless laminates are another embodiment which combines two
functions into one layer.
[0082] When the post-print functional layer 901 is water-based, it
is applied using any of the same methods listed above in the
context of the water-based tie-layer 301 and the water-based
ink-receptive layer 401, including conventional analog coating
processes and digital deposition systems. The layer is applied as a
flood coating across the entire surface of the treated, coated, and
printed substrate, or it is applied in a pattern-wise or image-wise
fashion. When the post-print functional layer 901 is solventless,
it is applied using a melt extrusion process wherein the molten or
viscous solventless composition is extruded as a continuous layer
over the surface of the dried water-based pigment ink layer 501 and
any exposed water-based ink-receptive layer 401. Following the
melt-extrusion process the post-print function layer 901 is further
processed with heat and pressure to improve the adhesion followed
by cooling to solidify the layer. In some cases the solventless
composition is a two-part reactive composition intended to serve as
an adhesive to which a continuous protective layer of paper or
plastic is laminated with heat or pressure.
[0083] The following examples illustrate, but do not limit, the
utility of the present invention.
EXAMPLES
[0084] 1. Comparative. A range of commercially available, un-primed
impermeable polyolefin film substrates were obtained from several
suppliers. The surface energies of these films were estimated by
using a set of "dyne pens" (Accudyne Test Marker Pens, Diversified
Enterprises, Claremont, N.H.). These films were printed with an
anionically stabilized water-based pigment ink (KODAK PROSPER Press
packaging black ink) using a KODAK STREAM continuous inkjet
printing apparatus. This ink has a static surface tension of 38
dyn/cm, and contains 8.5 wt % glycerol as a co-solvent/humectant. A
test image containing patches from 0 to 100% ink coverage in 10%
increments was printed ("step wedge"). Another set of these same
films were surface treated with a corona discharge treatment
apparatus, the surface energies were re-measured, and the films
were printed in the same manner. The films were air-dried
overnight, but remained slightly tacky for several days. A final
dry at 60.degree. C. for 2 hour was done, leaving only the higher
tint levels (>70% coverage) still somewhat tacky.
[0085] The printed samples were evaluated for print quality and
adhesion as a function of surface energy, with and without CDT.
Print quality was evaluated visually and by measuring the optical
densities and the diameters of individual ink spots on the printed
samples in the 10% coverage patch of each sample. Spot size was
measured using a handheld image analyzer (QEA PIAS) with a
specified 50% threshold. The non-CDT'ed samples in general show
very little ink spread, and they exhibit smaller dot diameters and
lower optical densities as result of poor wetting and spreading of
the ink. On the other hand, the CDT'ed samples show much improved
ink wetting and spreading; however, at the higher ink coverages
excessive ink spreading leads to drops merging into one another,
resulting in high levels of grain and mottle. A comparison of the
printed PE films with and without CDT, which illustrates the
difference in ink spreading and dot structure is shown in FIG. 3.
Adhesion was assessed using a tape test designed to assess both the
adhesion of the ink to the substrate as well as the cohesive
strength of the dried ink layer. A 63.5 mm by 12.7 mm strip of
Scotch Transparent Tape, Cat. 600, (3M Corporation), was applied to
a test print resting on a solid counter top using 4-6 passes of
firm pressure applied to the tape with one's thumb in a white
cotton glove. The tape was then peeled slowly away from the
specimen over 6-8 seconds at a 90.degree. angle. Both the tape and
print surface were visually inspected for evidence of transfer of
ink from the print surface to the tape, and the results were ranked
using the following 0-3 scale: [0086] 0 Less than or equal to 10%
ink removal [0087] 1 Greater than 10% but less than 50% ink removal
[0088] 2 Greater than 50% but less than 75% ink removal [0089] 3
Greater than 75% ink removal
[0090] The results are summarized in the following table.
TABLE-US-00001 Surface Dot Surface Dot Energy Diameter Ink Energy
Diameter Ink Film (as received) (no CDT) Adhesion (with CDT) (with
CDT) Adhesion Example type* Supplier (dyn/cm) (um) Ranking (dyn/cm)
(um) Ranking 1A Clear Taghleef 44 55 0 60 58 0 BOPP 1B Clear
Taghleef 42 42 0 58 62 0 BOPP 1C White Taghleef 42 42 1 48 59 0
BOPP 1D Clear Superpac 30 31 3 38 51 1 PE *BOPP = biaxially
oriented polypropylene; PE = polyethylene.
[0091] The results of Example 1 indicate that improved wetting,
adhesion, and optical density are obtained when an anionically
stabilized water-based pigment ink is printed on a
water-impermeable substrate for which the surface energy of the
water-impermeable substrate is increased by use of a corona
discharge treatment process. However, as shown in FIG. 3, the
overall image quality suffers from the fact that the colorant is
sufficiently mobile after printing but before drying that
neighboring drops tend to merge and coalesce. Furthermore, areas of
the CDT'ed and printed films that are greater than about 70%
coverage remain tacky and do not completely dry to the touch.
[0092] 2. Comparative. To this same set of films was applied a
water-based ink-receptive layer. A solution comprising 50 parts
polyvinyl alcohol polymer (Gohsenol GH17, Nippon Gohsei), 20 parts
anhydrous CaCl.sub.2, 2.5 parts Cartabond TSI cross linker
(Clariant), and 2 parts Lanco PTFE wax particles (Lubrizol) was
prepared in water containing 0.08% Dynol 604 surfactant (Air
Products) and Surfynol DF178 anti-foamant (Air Products) at 7.43%
total solids content. The solution was applied using the drawdown
method and dried to give a dry coverage of 0.5 g/m.sup.2. Prior to
the coating station, the films were treated with a corona
discharge. In every case, the CDT'ed films samples showed effective
wetting resulting in a continuous and uniform coating when dried.
The CDT'ed and coated films were printed in the same manner as
described above. The printed films were permited to dry on the
bench top overnight, and were found to be dry to the touch the
following day. The resulting step wedges were observed to be
uniform and artifact-free across the entire tone scale, as shown in
FIG. 4. However, when the adhesion of the coated and printed films
was evaluated using the tape test described in Example 1, the
printed image was readily removed from the surface of each of the
different films. This shows that water-impermeable substrates that
have been CDT'ed and coated with a water-based ink-receptive layer
can enable tack- and artifact-free images, but still suffer from
poor adhesion to the underlying water-impermeable substrate.
[0093] 3. This example shows that a water-based tie-layer greatly
improves the adhesion of a water-based ink-receptive layer when
coated over a corona discharge treated impermeable plastic
substrate comprising uncoated, clear, oriented polypropylene.
Comparative Example 3A
No Tie-Layer
[0094] The ink-receptive layer used in Example 2 was applied to a
2-mil thick, clear, oriented polypropylene film (ExxonMobil) using
a reverse gravure coating technique. Prior to the coating station,
the film was treated with a corona discharge such that effective
wetting of the coating fluid to the film was achieved. After
drying, the resulting coating was smooth and uniform with a coat
weight of approximately 0.85 g/m.sup.2. For this example, the dry
coat weight of CaCl.sub.2, was approximately 220 mg/m.sup.2, and
the ratio of CaCl.sub.2 to cross-linked hydrophilic polymer is
0.38.
[0095] The coated film was printed with anionically stabilized
pigment inks identical to those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No.
8,455,570 using Kodak Stream continuous inkjet print heads. A test
image containing patches from 0 to 100% ink coverage in 10%
increments was printed with cyan ink. The test image was air-dried
under ambient conditions for 24 hours and all color patches were
found to be dry to the touch. This was analyzed for density and
uniformity (ISO 13660 grain and mottle using 37-um and 411-um tile
sizes, respectively) using a handheld image analyzer (QEA PIAS).
The durability and integrity of the prints was tested by the tape
test described in Example 1 over solid color patches of cyan,
magenta, yellow, red (magenta plus yellow), green (cyan plus
yellow), blue (cyan plus magenta), and neutral (cyan plus magenta
plus yellow). The transfer of ink and coating to the tape was
evaluated as a measure of the cohesive and adhesive strength of the
printed film assembly.
Inventive Example 3B
Water-Based Tie-Layer
[0096] The same materials and procedures of Example 3A were used,
except for the use of Bicor 84AOH OPP film (ExxonMobil) instead of
the plain, uncoated 2-mil OPP film. The Bicor OPP film is 0.84 mil
(21 um) thick, and comprises a water-based tie-layer, approximately
0.4-um thick, on one surface. The water-based tie-layer composition
further comprises two sub-layers as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No.
5,380,586, with the outermost layer comprising a cross-linked
polyvinyl alcohol. The water-based ink-receptive layer described
above in Example 3A was coated over this layer and dried. The
resulting ink-receptive layer was again smooth and uniform with a
similar coat weight as Example 3A.
[0097] The inventive example 3B was printed and tested as described
above for Example 3A. The test image was air-dried under ambient
conditions for 24 hours and all color patches were found to be dry
to the touch. The results are summarized in the following
table.
TABLE-US-00002 Film Cyan Cyan Cyan Example support D.sub.max Grain
Mottle Tape peel test 3A OPP 1.36 8.9 5.4 Complete adhesive
failure: coating and ink removed from film base. 3B OPP + 1.42 9.3
5.1 Slight cohesive failure water- of ink only. based tie-
layer
[0098] Both samples exhibit similar print density and uniformity,
and are much improved over Examples 1 and 2 above. Despite corona
treatment of the OPP film, the adhesive strength of the water-based
ink-receptive coating applied to Example 3A was insufficient to
withstand the forces produced by the tape peel test. In contrast,
the inventive Example 3B print shows dramatically improved tape
peel durability.
[0099] 4. This example shows that when water-based anionically
stabilized pigment inks contain more than about 10 wt % of water
miscible co-solvents, they become increasingly more difficult to
dry.
[0100] A water-impermeable substrate comprising a water-based
tie-layer and a water-based ink-receptive layer similar to that
described in Examples 3B was used for this experiment. For this
example, MgCl.sub.2 was used as the divalent metal salt in the
water-based ink-receptive layer. These coated films were printed
with the following water-based anionically stabilized pigment ink
sets and printing systems: [0101] A. Kodak PROSPER Press pigment
inks using a Kodak Stream continuous inkjet printing fixture as
described above. [0102] B. Kodak thermal DOD pigment inks (10
Series cartridge) using a Kodak EasyShare 5500 inkjet printer.
[0103] C. Epson piezo DOD pigment inks (220 cartridge) using an
Epson XP-420 inkjet printer.
[0104] Test images containing patches from 0 to 100% ink coverage
in 10% increments with cyan, magenta, yellow and black pigment inks
as well as secondary colors red, green and blue comprising the
appropriate combinations of primary cyan, magenta, and yellow inks,
and a 3-color neutral comprising equal amounts of all three primary
inks. Each print was tested for dryness by testing for ink transfer
to bond paper pressed against the surface of the print using a
weighted metal roller. When there was very faint or no transfer to
the bond paper, the dry time was recorded, and the samples were
further evaluated for smudge/smear of the image by periodically
rubbing the print with a gloved finger and evaluated the degree of
the ink smear (1=none, 3=poor). The ratings for all 8 colors were
summed, and the results are summarized in the following table.
TABLE-US-00003 Co-solvent Level* Dry Time Smudge/Smear Example Type
(wt %) (minutes) Rating** 4A Inventive 6.0 3.0 9.5 4B Comparative
12 60 12.3 4C Comparative 23 1440 15.4 *Wt % of all co-solvents
averaged across the cyan, magenta, yellow, and black inks.
**Measured four hours after printing.
[0105] 5. This example shows that a non-porous, pigment-free
water-based ink-receptive layer can provide comparable image
quality at one-tenth of the coverage of a porous ink-receptive
layer.
Comparative Example 5A
Porous Ink-Receptive Layer
[0106] A solution was made by adding 400 parts boehmite alumina
(Dispal 18N4-80, Evonik), 50 parts polyvinyl alcohol (Gohsenol
GH-23, Nippon Gohsei), 16 parts anhydrous CaCl.sub.2 (Dow
Chemical), and 0.75 parts 2,3-dihydroxy-1,4-dioxane to water
containing 0.2% 10G surfactant (p-isononylphenoxypoly(glycidol)) to
yield a solution containing 10% total solids content. This solution
was coated using a reverse gravure technique on Bicor 84AOH OPP
film (Exxon Mobil) over the side coated with polyvinylalcohol as
described for Example 3B above at a wet coverage of approximately
50 g/m.sup.2. After drying, the resulting coating has a dry
coverage of approximately 5 g/m.sup.2 and is transparent and
colorless.
Inventive Example 5B
Non-Porous Ink-Receptive Layer
[0107] A solution comprising 50 parts acetylacetonate-modified
polyvinyl alcohol (Gohsfimer Z320, Nippon Gohsei), 10 parts
anhydrous CaCl.sub.2 (Dow Chemical), 0.25 parts Cartabond TSI
(Clariant), and 1 part Lanco 1799 PTFE wax particles (Lubrizol) was
prepared in water containing 10G surfactant
(p-isononylphenoxypoly(glycidol)) to yield a solution containing
10% total solids content. This solution was coated using a reverse
gravure technique on Bicor 84AOH OPP film (Exxon Mobil) over the
side coated with polyvinylalcohol, but used a gravure cylinder with
a fluid capacity .about. 1/10th that used for sample 4a. After
drying, the resulting coating has a dry coverage of approximately
0.5 g/m.sup.2 and is transparent and colorless.
[0108] The comparative and inventive coated films were printed with
water-based anionically stabilized pigment ink in the same manner
as described in Examples 3A and 3B. The test image containing
patches from 0 to 100% ink coverage in 10% increments with cyan,
magenta, yellow and black pigment inks. The test image was
air-dried under ambient conditions for 24 hours and all color
patches were found to be dry to the touch. This test image was
analyzed for density and uniformity (ISO 13660 grain and mottle
using 37-um and 411-um tile sizes, respectively) using a handheld
image analyzer (QEA PIAS).
[0109] The table below summarizes the density, grain, and mottle
measurements made on the cyan step wedge printed on Examples 5A and
5B. For this example, grain and mottle values were summed over the
ten different ink coverage patches.
TABLE-US-00004 Wet Dry Sum Sum Exam- Coverage Coverage Cyan L(CIE)
L(CIE) ple Type (g/m.sup.2) (g/m.sup.2) D.sub.max Grain Mottle 5A
Comparative 50 5 1.43 11.8 5.5 5B Inventive 5 0.5 1.46 11.8 4.8
[0110] Despite the inventive sample 5B having a dry coverage that
is only 1/10.sup.th that of the comparative porous coating 5A, the
prints made on the two coated films have comparable print densities
and uniformity (grain, mottle). Similar results were obtained for
test prints made with magenta, yellow, and black anionically
stabilized water-based pigment inks. Inventive Example 5B is
advantaged over comparative Example 5A by the dramatically reduced
wet and dry coverages, which in turn reduce the time and energy
required to dry it as well as the resultant cost of the
coating.
[0111] 6. A series of aqueous solutions were prepared comprising
CaCl.sub.2 salt, polyvinyl alcohol polymer (Gohsenol GH-17, Nippon
Gohsei), and Cartabond TSI crosslinker (Clariant). These were
coated on a corona-treated polyester film (Transpet CT1-F,
Transilwrap). The film does not adsorb water or the above
solutions, and is thus defined as impermeable. The coatings were
made on a MiniLabo (Mirwec) reverse gravure coating machine at a
wet coverage of approximately 8 g/m.sup.2. By varying
concentrations of CaCl.sub.2 and polymer in solution, coatings were
obtained with dry coverages summarized in the following table.
[0112] The coated films were printed were printed with water-based
anionically stabilized pigment ink in the same manner as described
in Examples 3A and 3B. A target including patches of sequentially
increasing laydowns (increments of 10% maximum cyan ink laydown)
was printed and air-dried before being analyzed for density and
uniformity in the same manner as described in Examples 5A and 5B.
The mottle values measured for the ten steps of each print were
summed and are listed in following table. These summed values are
consistent with the visually observed uniformity of the prints.
[0113] A second target including patches of black ink printed over
cyan, magenta, and yellow patches was also produced. After air
drying for .about.3-4 hours, the ink was dry to the touch, and
these printed patches were tested for dry rub abrasion resistance
using a Sutherland rub tester (ISO 18947; 4-lb weight, 10 cycles,
bond paper receptor. The densitometry of the patches was measured
before and after rub testing; the % retained visual density after
the rub test was calculated for the black over yellow, black over
magenta, and black over cyan prints on each coating. These three
measurements were then averaged and are reported in the following
table as the dry rub for that coating.
TABLE-US-00005 CaCl.sub.2 GH-17 Sum L* % D.sub.vis Example
(g/m.sup.2) (g/m.sup.2) Mottle Retained 6A 0.38 0.11 6.44 11% 6B
0.22 0.22 5.37 37% 6C 0.54 0.22 4.90 65% 6D 0.11 0.38 4.78 39% 6E
0.38 0.38 4.63 64% 6F 0.65 0.38 4.53 86% 6G 0.54 0.54 4.47 69% 6H
0.38 0.65 4.45 75%
[0114] Print quality improves (Sum L*mottle decreases) as the dry
coverage of GH-17 polymer increases, as seen in FIG. 5.
Furthermore, as the dry coverage of GH-17 polymer increases, the
resistance of the print to dry rub abrasion also improves, as
indicated by higher values of visual density retained after the
Sutherland rub test described above. This trend is visible FIG. 6.
Therefore, based on print quality and print dry rub resistance, it
is preferred that the polymer dry coverage in the ink-receptive
coating layer on a water-impermeable substrate be greater than 0.22
g/m.sup.2, and more preferably greater than 0.38 g/m.sup.2. The
maximum polymer dry coverage should not exceed 0.65 g/m.sup.2.
[0115] FIG. 7 demonstrates that increasing dry coverages of salt in
the ink-receptive coating layer applied to a water-impermeable
substrate results in only slightly improved print quality
(decreased mottle). In contrast to paper substrates, the divalent
metal ions are unable to diffuse away from the ink-receptive layer
into the impermeable substrate; therefore, relatively low salt
laydowns (0.1-0.2 g/m.sup.2) can produce acceptable image
quality.
[0116] Independent of the polymer dry coverage, it was unexpectedly
found that increasing the dry coverage of CaCl.sub.2 improves print
dry rub resistance, as illustrated in FIG. 8. However, the dry rub
performance for a given salt coverage is also strongly dependent on
the polymer content of that coating, as shown in FIG. 9, in which
the dry rub response is plotted as a function of the ratio of salt
to polymer in the dry coating. In particular, coatings with
salt-to-polymer ratios greater than 3.0 have decreased dry rub
resistance. Therefore, the level of salt incorporated in the
treatment coating preferably is such that on a weight basis the
ratio of salt to polymer in the dried coating is less than 3.0, and
more preferably in the range of 0.75 to 2.5, inclusive.
[0117] 7. A clear OPP film comprising a water-based tie-layer and a
water-based ink-receptive layer exactly as described in Example 3b
above was printed with anionically stabilized pigment inks
identical to those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,455,570 using Kodak
Stream continuous inkjet print heads. Multiple test images
containing patches from 0 to 100% ink coverage in 10% increments
with cyan, magenta, yellow and black pigment inks as well as
secondary colors red, green and blue by using the appropriate
combinations of cyan, magenta, and yellow inks, and a 3-color
neutral comprising equal amounts of all three primary inks. The
printed test images were air-dried under ambient conditions for 24
hours and all color patches were found to be dry to the touch. The
test images exhibited low levels of grain and mottle across the
entire tone scale.
[0118] Three commercially water-based white flexographic inks (Sun
Chemical Bianco Base 100, Sun Chemical SunStrato WB Msquared, and
Flint Group Water HMJ 90104) were flood-coated over a subset of the
printed test images at nominal dry coverages of 2 g/m.sup.2 and
permitted to air-dry. Each of these test images, along with a
control that was not flood-coated with a white flexographic ink,
were subsequently laminated to an unprimed transparent
corona-treated 18-um OPP film. Aqueous adhesives that were used
included Dow Acrylic Robond L-148 with isocyanate CR 9-101 cross
linker and Aqualam 444A polyurethane with epoxy cross linker CR
7-103. After CDT the adhesives were applied using the drawdown
method and IR-dried to give a dry coat weight of 2 g/m.sup.2. The
printed film sheet was placed on a metal plate. A separator sheet
was placed on top of the print and followed by the adhesive coated
clear OPP. The lead edges of the top and bottom films were taped
together and to the metal plate. The bench top laminator nip
(heated to the desired temperature) was briefly opened to insert
the lead edge of the plate. The top film was then pulled up to
quickly remove the separator sheet and the nip immediately closed.
The top film was continued to be pulled upward by hand to maintain
some tension on the top film to reduce the formation of wrinkles or
bubbles in the laminated film. Laminations were done the same day
as the adhesive was applied. The laminations were carried out at 10
inches/min under 16 psi pressure with a nip temperature of
50.degree. C.
[0119] The laminated test images were evaluated for adhesive
failure using a peel force measurement device (MTS Sintech 1/g)
operating at a pull rate of 100 mm/min in the lamination direction.
The laminated samples were cut to a width of 15 mm, and backing
tape was used on both sides of the laminated test images to prevent
stretching of the OPP films. All combinations of adhesive to white
ink, adhesive to the various inkjet color patches, and adhesive to
the water-based ink-receptive layer were found to exhibit peel
strengths of 0.4 N/cm or greater. The optimum results were obtained
with the laminated samples comprising the flood coating of Sun
Chemical SunStrato WB Msquared and the Aqualam 444A/CR 7-103
two-part adhesive, which exhibited a peel force of 2.2 N/cm. Test
samples without the white flood coat using this same adhesive
exhibited peel forces ranging from 1.0-1.8 N/cm across the
unprinted ink-receptive layer and the printed color patches.
Analysis of the Sun Chemical SunStrato WB Msquared water-based
white ink by the pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy
method indicates the presence of a polyester-polyurethane and
styrene-maleic anhydride polymer binders. The Dow Chemical Aqualam
444A/CR7-103A water-based adhesive resin is as a two-part
polyurethane-epoxy resin system.
[0120] This example illustrates that a water-impermeable substrate
useful for flexible packaging applications, that has been coated
with the combination of a water-based tie-layer and a water-based
ink-receptive layer, can be successfully printed with water-based
anionically stabilized pigment inks to produce test images that are
dry to the touch and exhibit excellent image quality, and that
these test images can be optionally post-coated with water-based
white flood coats followed by adhesive lamination to a second water
impermeable flexible film substrate using water-based adhesives to
produce a multi-layered laminated package structure that shows
excellent durability and adhesive strength. Water-based functional
post-coatings comprising polyurethanes as at least part of their
polymer binder systems gave the optimum results.
[0121] 8. A clear OPP film comprising a water-based tie-layer and a
water-based ink-receptive layer exactly as described in Example 3B
above was again printed with anionically stabilized pigment inks
identical to those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,455,570 using a
print stand equipped with Kodak Stream continuous inkjet print
heads. Each of the color ink layers was printed at a line speed of
200 m/min, with approximately a 30-sec delay between the color
layers. No active drying was applied in between the color layers. A
test image containing patches from 0 to 100% ink coverage in 10%
increments with cyan, magenta, yellow and black pigment inks as
well as secondary colors red, green and blue comprising the
appropriate combinations of primary cyan, magenta, and yellow inks,
and a 3-color neutral comprising equal amounts of all three primary
inks. The printed test images were air-dried under ambient
conditions for 24 hours and all color patches were found to be dry
to the touch. The test images exhibited low levels of grain and
mottle across the entire tone scale. An aqueous overprint varnish
(Siegwerk Haut Brilliant 17-6040327-7) was applied to these test
images using the drawdown method. Initial drying was done using a
mid-IR heat lamp. To ensure all moisture was removed, a final
convection oven dry was at 60 C for 5 minutes. Varnish dry coverage
was approximately 2.9 g/m.sup.2. The 60.degree. gloss of the dried,
varnished prints ranged from 72-89.
[0122] A tape test as described in Examples 1, 3A, and 3B was
performed on the varnished test samples. The tape was removed
cleanly, with no evidence of transfer of the varnish, the inks, the
ink-receptive layer, or the water-based tie-layer, demonstrating
that the final multi-layered article exhibits excellent adhesive
and cohesive strength and resists delamination.
[0123] Dry rub tests were done with a Sutherland Rub Tester in
accordance with ISO 18947. The receptor used to rub the test prints
was DataSpeed.RTM. Laser MOCR paper from International Paper. A
1.8-kg test load was used and the test was run for 10 cycles at a
rate of 42 cycles/min. This test is applied to 100% coverage
("Dmax") patches of cyan, magenta, yellow, and black inks, as well
as Dmax patches of red (yellow over magenta), green (yellow over
cyan), and blue (magenta over cyan). After the dry rub test, %
Density Removal=100.times.(1-(Density after Rubbing/Initial
Density)) was measured. Density loss was less than 5% in all
cases.
[0124] Wet rub tests were done by placing one drop of water in the
center of a Dmax ink patch and waiting ten seconds before rubbing.
The load during rubbing was 250 to 300 grams over an 2
approximately 0.5 cm.sup.2 area. The drop is rubbed back and forth
ten times and then removed by dabbing with a paper wipe. This test
is applied to 100% coverage ("Dmax") patches of cyan, magenta,
yellow, and black inks, as well as Dmax patches of red (yellow over
magenta), green (yellow over cyan), and blue (magenta over cyan).
In all areas the density loss was less than 1%.
[0125] This example shows that a water-impermeable substrate that
has been coated with a water-based tie layer and a water-based
ink-receptive layer comprising a water-soluble multivalent metal
salt and a hydrophilic polymer binder, in that order, followed by
printing with water-based inks containing an anionically stabilized
pigment colorant, and then flood-coating the entire surface with a
water-based protective layer, excellent print quality and
durability can be achieved.
[0126] The invention has been described in detail with particular
reference to certain preferred embodiments thereof, but it will be
understood that variations and modifications can be effected within
the scope of the invention.
PARTS LIST
[0127] 100 water-impermeable substrate [0128] 200 surface
modification system [0129] 300 Coating System A [0130] 301
water-based tie-layer [0131] 400 Coating System B [0132] 401
water-based ink-receptive layer [0133] 500 water-based pigment ink
[0134] 501 one or more water-based pigment ink layers [0135] 600
ink deposition system [0136] 700 drying system [0137] 800 condition
chamber or oven [0138] 900 post-print application system [0139] 901
post-print functional layer
* * * * *