U.S. patent application number 14/790767 was filed with the patent office on 2017-01-05 for adaptive plasma cutting system and method.
The applicant listed for this patent is LINCOLN GLOBAL, INC.. Invention is credited to Jackie L. Winn.
Application Number | 20170001255 14/790767 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 57683610 |
Filed Date | 2017-01-05 |
United States Patent
Application |
20170001255 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Winn; Jackie L. |
January 5, 2017 |
ADAPTIVE PLASMA CUTTING SYSTEM AND METHOD
Abstract
A plasma torch system and method is provided, in which the
system utilizes a number of pressure sensors throughout the system
and the torch to detect the flow/pressure of shield and plasma gas
during operation. The detected pressures are used by the system to
dynamically control the system pressures to optimize the cutting
operation.
Inventors: |
Winn; Jackie L.; (Mount
Pleasant, SC) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
LINCOLN GLOBAL, INC. |
City of Industry |
CA |
US |
|
|
Family ID: |
57683610 |
Appl. No.: |
14/790767 |
Filed: |
July 2, 2015 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
1/1 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B23K 10/00 20130101;
H05H 2001/3494 20130101; B23K 10/006 20130101; H05H 1/34 20130101;
H05H 1/3405 20130101 |
International
Class: |
B23K 10/00 20060101
B23K010/00; H05H 1/26 20060101 H05H001/26; H05H 1/34 20060101
H05H001/34 |
Claims
1. A plasma cutting system, comprising: a gas flow control system
having at least one gas flow valve which controls the flow a gas
through said gas flow control system and a first gas pressure
detection device which detects a first location pressure of said
gas downstream of said at least one gas flow valve; a cutting torch
assembly coupled to said gas flow control system to receive said
gas, where said cutting torch assembly comprises a second gas
pressure detection device which detects a second location pressure
of said gas downstream of said first gas pressure detection sensor;
and a controller coupled to each of said first and second gas
pressure detection devices and to said at least one gas flow valve,
where said controller controls an operation of said at least one
gas flow valve based on gas pressure feedback signals from each of
said first and second gas pressure detection devices to provide a
desired pressure level of said gas at or within said cutting torch
assembly, wherein said desired pressure level is determined by said
controller based on at least one of a condition of said plasma
cutting system and a parameter of a cutting operation, and wherein
said gas is either a plasma gas or a shield gas.
2. The plasma cutting system of claim 1, wherein said second
location pressure is a pressure of said gas flow as said gas enters
said torch assembly.
3. The plasma cutting system of claim 1, wherein said second
location pressure is in either a shield cavity pressure or a plasma
chamber pressure of said torch assembly.
4. The plasma cutting system of claim 1, wherein said controller
dynamically changes said desired pressure level during an operation
of said plasma cutting system.
5. The plasma cutting system of claim 1, wherein said controller
dynamically changes said desired pressure level during an operation
of said plasma cutting system based on a detected gas flow profile
for said plasma cutting system.
6. The plasma cutting system of claim 6, wherein said detected gas
flow profile for said system is determined by said controller
during a calibration of said plasma cutting system using said first
and second gas pressure detection devices prior to the initiation
of a cutting operation.
7. The plasma cutting system of claim 1, wherein said controller
detects a type of a consumable coupled to said torch assembly based
on feedback from said first and second gas pressure detection
devices.
8. The plasma cutting system of claim 1, wherein when said
controller detects a pressure differential between said first and
second pressure locations that exceeds a predetermined threshold
said controller interrupts a cutting operation of said plasma
cutting system.
9. The plasma cutting system of claim 1, wherein said controller
determines a pressure differential ratio between said first and
second pressure locations and uses said pressure differential ratio
to control said flow of said gas during a cutting operation.
10. The plasma cutting system of claim 1, wherein said controller
uses said first and second gas pressure detection devices to
determine a gas flow model for said plasma cutting system based on
at least one of a position and orientation of said torch
assembly.
11. The plasma cutting system of claim 1, wherein said second gas
pressure detection device detects a cavity pressure within a cavity
of said torch assembly, and where said second gas pressure
detection device is positioned remotely from said cavity and is
coupled to said cavity with a gas pressure detection channel.
12. A plasma cutting system, comprising: a gas flow control system
having at shield gas flow valve which controls the flow a shield
gas through said gas flow control system, a plasma gas flow valve
which controls the flow of a plasma gas through said gas flow
control system, a first shield gas pressure detection device which
detects a first location pressure of said shield gas downstream of
said shield gas flow valve, and first plasma gas pressure detection
device which detects a first location pressure of said plasma gas
downstream of said plasma gas flow valve; a cutting torch assembly
coupled to said gas flow control system to receive each of said
shield and plasma gas, where said cutting torch assembly comprises
a second shield gas pressure detection device which detects a
second location pressure of said shield gas downstream of said
first shield gas pressure detection sensor, and a second plasma gas
pressure detection device which detects a second location pressure
of said plasma gas downstream of said first plasma gas pressure
detection sensor; and a controller coupled to each of said first
and second shield and plasma gas pressure detection devices and to
said shield and plasma gas flow valves, where said controller
controls an operation of said shield and plasma gas flow valves
based on gas pressure feedback signals from each of said first and
second shield and plasma gas pressure detection devices to provide
a desired shield gas pressure level and a desired plasma gas
pressure level at or within said cutting torch assembly, wherein
said desired plasma and shield gas pressure levels are determined
by said controller based on at least one of a condition of said
plasma cutting system and a parameter of a cutting operation.
13. The plasma cutting system of claim 12, wherein said second
shield and plasma gas location pressures are a pressure of each of
said shield and plasma gas flows as said shield and plasma gases
enter said torch assembly, respectively.
14. The plasma cutting system of claim 12, wherein said second
shield gas location pressure is in a shield cavity of said torch
assembly and said second plasma gas location pressure is in a
plasma chamber of said torch assembly.
15. The plasma cutting system of claim 12, wherein said controller
dynamically changes said desired pressure level for at least one of
said plasma gas and said shield gas during an operation of said
plasma cutting system.
16. The plasma cutting system of claim 12, wherein said controller
dynamically changes said desired pressure level for each of said
shield gas and said plasma gas during an operation of said plasma
cutting system based on a detected shield gas flow profile and a
detected plasma gas flow profile for said plasma cutting
system.
17. The plasma cutting system of claim 16, wherein said detected
plasma gas flow profile is determined by said controller during a
calibration of said plasma cutting system using said first and
second plasma gas pressure detection devices prior to the
initiation of a cutting operation, and said detected shield gas
flow profile is determined by said controller during a calibration
of said plasma cutting system using said first and second shield
gas pressure detection devices prior to the initiation of a cutting
operation.
18. The plasma cutting system of claim 12, wherein said controller
detects a type of a consumable coupled to said torch assembly based
on feedback from at least one grouping of said first and second
shield gas pressure detection devices and first and second plasma
gas pressure detection devices.
19. The plasma cutting system of claim 12, wherein when said
controller detects a shield gas pressure differential between said
first and second shield gas pressure locations that exceeds a first
predetermined threshold or detects a plasma gas differential
between said first and second plasma gas pressure locations that
exceeds a second predetermined threshold said controller interrupts
a cutting operation of said system.
20. The plasma cutting system of claim 12, wherein said controller
determines a shield gas pressure differential ratio between each of
said first and second shield gas pressure locations and a plasma
gas pressure differential ratio between said first and second
plasma gas pressure locations, and said controller uses said shield
and plasma pressure differential ratios to control flows said
plasma and gases during a cutting operation.
21. The plasma cutting system of claim 12, wherein said controller
uses said first and second shield and plasma gas pressure detection
devices to determine a gas flow model for said plasma cutting
system based on at least one of a position and orientation of said
torch assembly.
22. The plasma cutting system of claim 12, wherein said second
shield gas pressure detection device detects a cavity pressure
within a shield cavity of said torch assembly and is positioned
remotely from said shield cavity and is coupled to said shield
cavity with a shield gas pressure detection channel, and wherein
said second plasma gas pressure detection device detects a cavity
pressure of within a plasma gas cavity of said torch assembly and
is positioned remotely from said plasma gas cavity and is coupled
to said plasma gas cavity with a plasma gas pressure detection
channel.
23. A plasma cutting torch, comprising: an electrode which emits a
plasma during a cutting operation; a nozzle which creates a plasma
gas cavity between said nozzle and said electrode; and a shield cap
which creates a shield gas cavity between said shield cap and said
nozzle; wherein said nozzle has a plasma gas pressure channel which
couples said plasma gas cavity to a plasma gas pressure detection
device which measures a pressure of a plasma gas within said plasma
gas cavity, and wherein said shield cap has a shield gas pressure
channel which couples said shield gas cavity to a shield gas
pressure detection device which measures a pressure of a shield gas
within said shield gas cavity.
24. A method of controlling a gas flow in a plasma cutting system,
said method comprising: directing a gas through at least one gas
flow valve which controls the flow of said gas; detecting a first
gas pressure of said gas at a first location downstream of said at
least one gas flow valve; directing said gas from said first
location to a cutting torch assembly; detecting a second gas
pressure of said gas at a second location which is at or within
said cutting torch assembly; directing said detected first gas
pressure and said detected second gas pressure to a controller;
controlling operation of said at least one gas flow valve based on
said first and second gas pressures to provide a desired pressure
level of said gas at or within said cutting torch assembly, wherein
said desired pressure level is determined by said controller based
on at least one of a condition of said plasma cutting system and a
parameter of a cutting operation, and wherein said gas is either a
plasma gas or a shield gas.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0001] Field of the Invention
[0002] Systems and methods of the present invention relate to
plasma cutting, and more specifically to arc plasma cutting using
an adaptive control system which detects and utilizes system
pressures to optimize performance.
[0003] Description of the Related Art
[0004] The use of plasma cutting systems in various industries has
grown, and as a result there is an increasing need to increase the
durability and longevity of torches and their components. This is
particularly true with regarding to some internal torch parts, such
as the nozzle and electrode, and some external torch parts, such as
the shield cap. As is generally known, plasma cutting involves the
use of high current plasma jet which generates a large amount of
heat during cutting and can generate spatter during piercing or arc
starting. Additionally, plasma cutting utilizes gases for the
cutting operation, such as shielding gases and plasma gases. These
gases aid in stabilizing the plasma arc, shielding the arc and
cooling components of the torch. As it is generally understood, for
complex and precise cutting operations the flow and pressure of the
gases should differ at different times during the cutting
operation. Current plasma system are open loop control systems
where a fixed pressure is set at a gas console (or the like) based
on empirical data, where this fixed pressure may not take into
account distances between the gas console and the torch or
degradation of the torch components. These systems represent a
compromise on gas flow control and do not optimize the cutting
process. Further, such a system does not account for system to
system variations, leaks, component wear, valving changes and
anomalies, etc. Therefore, a more dynamic control scheme is desired
to provide a more optimized cutting system and process.
[0005] Further limitations and disadvantages of conventional,
traditional, and proposed approaches will become apparent to one of
skill in the art, through comparison of such approaches with
embodiments of the present invention as set forth in the remainder
of the present application with reference to the drawings.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0006] Embodiments of the present invention include equipment and
methods related to plasma cutting torches and systems which use
dynamic pressure sensing to dynamically control the cutting process
and system. This is done using pressure sensing devices, such as
pressure transducers in various locations within the system and the
torch, and information from these pressure sensors is used to
dynamically control the cutting operation.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0007] The above and/or other aspects of the invention will be more
apparent by describing in detail exemplary embodiments of the
invention with reference to the accompanying drawings, in
which:
[0008] FIG. 1 is a diagrammatical representation of a an exemplary
embodiment of a cutting system of the present invention;
[0009] FIG. 2 is a diagrammatical representation of an exemplary
torch head of the present invention;
[0010] FIG. 3 is a diagrammatical representation of a further view
of the torch head shown in FIG. 2;
[0011] FIG. 4 is a diagrammatical representation of a current and
pressure profile for a cutting operation;
[0012] FIGS. 5A and 5B are diagrammatical representations of
exemplary pressure sensor mounting techniques;
[0013] FIG. 6 is a diagrammatical representation of an exemplary
robotic arc that can be used with embodiments of the present
invention;
[0014] FIG. 7 is a diagrammatical representation of an exemplary
torch assembly;
[0015] FIG. 8 is a process flow chart for an exemplary cutting
process using a system of the present invention;
[0016] FIG. 9 is a diagrammatical representation of a further
exemplary embodiment of the present invention;
[0017] FIG. 10 is a diagrammatical representation further exemplary
embodiment of a torch of the present invention; and
[0018] FIG. 11 is a diagrammatical representation of an additional
exemplary embodiments of a torch of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS
[0019] Exemplary embodiments of the invention will now be described
below by reference to the attached Figures. The described exemplary
embodiments are intended to assist the understanding of the
invention, and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention
in any way. Like reference numerals refer to like elements
throughout.
[0020] It is noted that for purposes of the following discussion,
the system will be discussed as a liquid cooled, mechanized plasma
arc cutting system. However, exemplary embodiments are not limited
to being used in such arc cutting systems, and embodiments can be
used in hand held cutting systems as well as air cooled systems.
Thus, the following discussions are intended to be exemplary and
informative. Further, discussions below will use terminology such
as "distal" and "downstream". In the context of this application it
is understood that these terms mean closer to the end of the torch
from which the plasma is emitted. For example, the distal end of
the torch is the end of the torch from which the plasma jet is
emitted to perform cutting. Further, is something is "downstream"
of another component, it is closer to the distal end of the torch.
Similarly, the use of the term "upstream" will generally indicate
that something is further away from the distal end of the
torch.
[0021] Because the manufacture, assembly and use of arc cutting
torches is generally known to those of skill in the art, the
details of their assembly and components thereof will not be set
forth herein.
[0022] Turning now to FIG. 1, an exemplary dynamically controlled
cutting system 100 is depicted. Consisted with many well-known
cutting systems, the exemplary system 100 shown in FIG. 1 includes
a computer numerical control (CNC) device 101 which can control the
overall operation of the cutting process and system. The CNC 101 is
configured, utilized and constructed in accordance with known
automated systems and need not be described in detail herein.
Further, the system 100 includes a power supply 103 which provides
the cutting current to the torch 200 to generate the plasma arc for
cutting. As generally known, the CNC 101 can control the power
supply 103 to provide the desired output at the desired time in the
cutting operation. Embodiments of the present invention are not
limited by the design and construction of the power supply 103,
which can be constructed consistent with known power supplies.
Further, the system 100 includes a gas console 105 which can be
generally constructed similar to known gas consoles, includes gas
lines and valves to deliver the needed gasses to the cutting torch
200. In the shown embodiment, the console has 4 gas lines feeding
into it from sources (not shown) such as tanks. As shown, there is
an air line 109, a nitrogen line 111, an oxygen line 113 and a
cutting gas line 115. These gases can be used to create the cutting
plasma, and the air, nitrogen and oxygen can be used for shielding.
These gases are used, and combined, to provide a shielding gas and
a plasma gas to the torch. The mixture and use of these gases are
generally known, and need not be discussed in detail herein. As
shown, the has lines feed into a manifold 117 which can contain a
plurality of valves (not shown) which control the flow of and
mixture of the gases. Each of these valves can be electronically
controlled valves such that they can be controlled via a
controller, such as a digital signal processor DSP 107. The DSP
receives control signals from the controller/CNC 101, and thus the
flow of the respective gases can be controlled. In some exemplary
embodiments, the controller/CNC 101 can be used to select the gas
types needed and the flow control is controlled by the DSP. As
shown, as an output of the manifold 117 there is a shield gas line
212 and a plasma gas line 123 which feeds each of these respective
gas mixtures to the torch 200. Further, as shown in FIG. 1, in some
exemplary embodiments, there are a plurality of pressure sensors
(such as pressure transducers) positioned on and/or within the
manifold 117 such that the respective pressures of each of the
lines (incoming and outgoing) can be detected and signaled to the
DSP 107, and ultimately to the controller 101.
[0023] For example, in some exemplary embodiments, the incoming gas
lines 109, 111, 113 and 115, each have a pressure sensing device
110, 112, 114 and 116, respectively, which detects the pressure of
the incoming gas to the console and/or manifold. This pressure data
can be used by the CNC/controller 101 to ensure that an adequate
incoming pressure is achieved. For example, a particular cutting
operation may require a certain amount of pressure/flow from each
of the respective gas sources, and the controller 101 uses the
sensed pressure from each of these sensors to ensure that adequate
pressure/flow from the gas sources is available.
[0024] Further, as shown, in exemplary embodiments of the present
invention, each of the upstream ends of the shield and plasma gas
lines (121 and 123, respectively) can have pressure sensors 119 and
120 to detect the beginning pressure in each of these lines. This
pressure data is also sent via the DSP 107 to the controller 101,
where the controller 101 can, again, use this detected pressure
data to ensure that a proper flow of gas is being provided to the
torch. That is, the controller 101 can use this pressure data to
control each of the respective flow control valves (not shown) to
ensure that the proper flow/pressure of gas is achieved for any
given cutting operation. Thus, rather than using an open loop
control methodology or a closed loop feedback limited to only
feedback from the gas console, embodiments of the present invention
can use a closed loop feedback control methodology, where the
sensed pressure is used by the controller to ensure a desired
amount of gas pressure and/or gas flow is being provided to the gas
lines 121 and 123. The controller 101 would control the valves to
achieve the desired gas flow for a given cutting operation and/or a
given state in a cutting operation (e.g., purge, pierce, cutting,
tail out, etc.).
[0025] As shown, each of the shield and plasma gases are directed
to a cutting torch assembly 200. The torch assembly 200 can be
constructed similar to known plasma cutting torches, including
liquid cooled plasma cutting torches used, for example, in
mechanized plasma cutting operations. Because the construction of
such torches are generally known, a detailed discussion of their
function and construction is not included herein. However, unlike
known torches, torch assemblies of the present invention include
pressure sensors which detect the pressures of the gases at
different locations within the torch 200. These detected pressures
are, again, used by the DSP and/or controller 101 to control the
flow of gas to the torch 200.
[0026] For example, as shown, in an exemplary embodiment of the
present invention, pressure sensors 221 (shield gas) and 223
(plasma gas) can be used to detect the pressure of gas flowing into
the torch assembly. For example, these sensors 221/223 can be
located at the upstream end of the torch assembly 200 to detect the
pressure of the gases as they enter the torch 200. The sensors can
be located at the gas connections from the gas lines to the torch
body assembly, or can be located between the torch body assembly
and the torch head assembly. The pressure sensors should be of a
type that can fit within the gas lines and/or connections and not
obstruct the flow of the gas such that the flow or operation of the
torch is compromised. These sensors, can then be used by the
controller 101 to detect a pressure drop, if any, from the console
105 to the torch 200. FIG. 7 depicts an exemplary torch 200 with a
torch head portion 200' and a torch body portion 200''. As shown,
the sensors 221/223 can be located in the gas connections to the
torch body 200'. Alternatively, the sensors can be located in the
gas lines between the torch body 200'' and the torch head 200'. In
further exemplary embodiments, a manifold connection (not shown)
can be coupled to the upstream end of the torch body 200'', where
the manifold connection contains the pressure sensors 221/223. In
such an embodiment, the sensors 221/223 would detect the line
pressure just as the gases enter the torch assembly 200.
[0027] Further, as shown, in FIG. 1, the torch assembly includes at
least a shield cap 201, a nozzle 203 and an electrode 205. Of
course, the torch assembly can contain other components as well,
such as a swirl ring, retaining cap, etc. As shown, the torch
assembly 200 contains additional pressure sensors (e.g.,
transducers) to sense the pressure of the torch gases at different
locations within the torch 200. For example, as shown, a sensor 202
is located on an inner surface of the shield cap so as to detect
the pressure of the shield gas during operation, and a plasma
chamber pressure gauge 204 is located in the cavity formed between
the nozzle 203 and the electrode 205 to detect the pressure of the
plasma gas within the plasma gas chamber. Again, these sensors
202/204 provide sensed pressure data to the DSP 107 and/or the
controller 101 such that the controller 101 can use the sensed
pressure to monitor the operation of the cutting process/torch and
provide dynamic control of the cutting operation based on the
detected pressures.
[0028] Because pressure sensors are placed within the torch
assembly 200 and/or at other locations in the gas system, pressures
can be measured at specific points in the system and provide real
time feedback to allow for dynamic control of the cutting process.
That is, torch input pressures, shield cavity pressures and/or
plasma chamber pressures can be sensed and used to monitor and
control the cutting process. As discussed above, these sensors are
in direct communication with the DSP 107 (or any similar processing
device) and a controller 101, to allow the sensed pressure data to
be used in controlling the operation of the cutting process. It is
noted, that while the DSP 107 and controller 101 are shown as
separate components in FIG. 1, these components can be located in a
single unit, such as the power supply 103, a single controller,
etc. Their relative location as shown in FIG. 1 is not intended to
be limiting.
[0029] In exemplary embodiments, each of the gas console 105 (via
the DSP 107), power supply 103 and controller 101 are
interconnected via a real time, deterministic communication
protocol so that real time information can be exchanged between the
respective system components regarding pressures, voltage, current
and motion profiles of the process can be monitored and controlled
to provide an optimized cutting operation. For example, pressures
within the torch and/or the console can be used in conjunction with
voltage and current feedback information to develop control
profiles for different torch consumables (e.g., electrode, nozzle,
shield cap, etc.) to optimize performance for a given set of
consumables and allow for gas flow changes as consumables wear, or
the set-up of the cutting operation changes.
[0030] For example, in one exemplary embodiment of the present
invention the controller 101 can use the sensed pressure within the
torch 200 to determine whether or not the proper electrode, nozzle
and/or shield cap is being used for a given operation. In practice,
a user would enter the desired cutting parameters into the
controller 101, including for example a current setting. Prior to
cutting, the controller 101 can initiate a gas purge process in
which a gas is passed through the torch assembly 200. The pressure
sensors 221, 223, 202 and/or 204 sense a pressure of the gas during
the purge process and the detected gas pressure(s) is compared to
threshold values stored within the controller 101, so that a
determination can be made if the proper consumables are
installed.
[0031] As an example, for high current cutting operations, high
current rated consumables are to be used for optimized performance.
However, due to user error, there can be times where a low current
consumable is left within the torch 200 without replacement, and
the process is started--which could damage the consumable and/or
result in poor cuts. With embodiments of the present invention,
this event could be avoided. With embodiments, of the present
invention, the controller 101 contains pressure threshold values
for the different consumables that can be used with the torch 200.
For example, the controller 101 can have preset plasma chamber
pressure values for different electrodes that can be used--e.g., a
first pressure value for low current electrodes, a second pressure
value for mid-current electrodes, and a third pressure value for
high current electrodes. Prior to cutting, a user enters the
desired cutting amperage of 100 amps (low current). Then, prior to
beginning the cutting operation, the controller 101 causes a purge
gas to be passed through the gas console and through the torch 200.
The controller 101 ensures that the gas flow to the torch 200 is at
a desired purge flow pressure--which can be done via the gas
console sensors 110, 112, 114, and 116 and/or sensors 119, 120.
Further embodiments can use the sensors 221 and 223 at the torch as
well to ensure the proper purge pressure is being supplied to the
torch 200. The controller 101 then uses the feedback from the
internal torch sensors 202/204 and compares the detected pressures
to predetermined thresholds to determine if the internal torch
pressures are at the predetermined thresholds. If the detected
pressures are at the thresholds, the controller 101 determines that
the proper consumables are in place within the torch 200. However,
if the detected pressures are not at the desired thresholds and
error message can be displayed and/or the operation can be stopped,
with an indication that the consumables are not appropriate for the
desired cutting operation. As a more specific example, with a
desired cutting amperage of 200 amps, the controller 101 can use
look up tables, state tables, etc., to determine that a pressure
within the plasma chamber (between the electrode and the nozzle)
should be within the range of 14 to 16 psi when the pressure at the
sensor 120 is in the range of 10 to 12 psi, during a purge process
(for example). The controller 101 then initiates the purge process
such that the detected pressure at the sensor 120 is within the
range of 10 to 12 psi. If the detected pressure in the plasma
chamber is within the range of 14 to 16 psi, the controller 101
determines that the proper consumables are in place. However, if
the detected pressure is below or above the threshold the
controller 101 provides an indication that the consumables in the
torch 200 are not correct. This would allow the user to change the
consumables prior to the operation beginning and could reduce
errors and damage to the consumables and the torch 200. Of course,
it should be noted that the above description is intended to be
exemplary, and embodiments are not limited to the specifics
above.
[0032] In further exemplary embodiments, the pressure sensors can
be used to determine if there are any leaks or blockages between
the gas console 105 (or any other gas metering device) and the
torch 200. In certain situations, a leak can develop between the
console 105 and the torch 200, or the gas lines can develop
blockages or kinks. In previous systems, these issues would go
undetected and could adversely affect the cutting operation because
of the open loop control methodology with respect to pressures at
the torch. In embodiments of the present invention, the sensors
119/120 and 21/223 can be used to detect if any of these issues are
present. That is, the controller 101 can monitor the pressure
differential between the sensors and if that differential exceeds a
threshold differential value, the controller 101 can indicate that
an issue exists in the lines 121/123. This can occur when a gas
lines 121/123 are replaced or increased in length. In such
situations, the system 100 can detect of the installation of new
lines is not acceptable. Further, during operation, the controller
101 can use the detected differential to determine if the lines
121/123 kink during the cutting operation. For example, a robotic
arm or gantry mechanism can move the lines 121/123 into a
compromising situation, where a kink develops. The system 100 can
detect the presence of the kinks/blockages and either adjust
pressure to provide the desired pressure to the torch and/or
provide an error message to the user indicating a blockage has been
detected. An exemplary robot system 10 is shown in FIG. 6, where
the torch assembly 200 is secured to the robot 10.
[0033] In additional exemplary embodiments, the system 100 can be
used to determine model the gas flow profile of the system 100 and
the torch 200 so that the controller 101 can develop optimized gas
pressure control parameters. That is, it is understood that ever
cutting system 100 has a pressure profile, where pressure
drops/rises occur as the gases transition from the console 105 to
the torch 200, and ultimately to the internal chambers of the torch
200 (e.g., shield gas chamber, plasma chamber, etc.). That is, when
a torch 200 is assembled with the desired cutting consumables, this
configuration will combine to create a gas flow profile with
certain pressure drops/rises as gas passes from one region to the
next within the torch 200. This can be referred to as the system
gas pressure profile. Embodiments of the present invention can
create a gas pressure system model based on the detected gas
pressure profile and use this model to optimize gas flow during
cutting, which optimizes the cutting performance.
[0034] The gas flow and timing and up slope/down slope of the
current relative to gas pressures (flow) at the torch 200 is an
important factor to maximize consumable life. In known systems, the
timing of gas flow and current slope rates are empirically
determined based on laboratory test conditions and are fixed within
the controller 101. Often these fixed values represent a compromise
between parameters and are set based on a specific system set up
and configuration. However, because all industrial applications of
cutting systems are different, using different torches, and other
components, these compromise parameters are not optimal for most
cutting operations. For example, changes in hose lengths and/or
variations in system components (valve delays, CV constants) will
impact the timing of gas switching and associated current slope
rates resulting in less than optimal consumable life. Because
exemplary embodiments of the present invention directly measure the
pressures (flows) at, or in, the torch 200, the power supply
upslope/downslope rates can be dynamically controlled relative to
the torch pressures which can provide optimal performance. That is,
knowing the pressure at the torch 200 and/or within the torch
chambers, in conjunction with the developed system model, the gas
profiles during cutting can be dynamically controlled utilizing
controlling of the valves in the gas console 105 and the vent valve
at the torch 200 (not shown).
[0035] To accomplish the above, in exemplary embodiments of the
present invention, static pressure differences can be measured
throughout gas system of the system 100 prior to a cutting
operation. These static pressure differences can be detected using
the sensors described above an shown in FIG. 1, and detect the
pressures at different locations. By measuring and recording the
static pressure differences of the different gas flow locations in
the system, the controller 101 can determine relative pressure
drops/rises through the system 100 and use these ratios to adjust
its gas flow control methodology to optimize the gas flow synergies
with the cutting current and operation. Further, pressure rise and
fall ratios and times (that is, the time lag between pressure
increases/decreases) throughout the system 100 can be detected and
recorded during a flow of gas through the system 100 (e.g., during
an initial gas purge stage). For example, the system 100 can use
the processes described above to determine that it will take 1.5
seconds for a pressure rise in the gas console 105 to reach the
torch 200. Using this information, the controller 101 can now know
that a time lag of 1.5 seconds exist from the initiation of a
pressure increase at the gas console. These pressure
drops/increases during gas flow can be similarly utilized by the
controller 101 to determine the gas flow profile of the system, and
thus develop a gas flow model for a given cutting operation. That
is, the controller 101 will use the developed gas flow model and
the anticipated current/voltage profiles for a cutting operation to
optimize the control of the gas flow. For example, the controller
101 may initiate a pressure rise or pressure drop in the gas flow
(e.g., via control of the valves on the gas console) so as to
coordinate pressure increases/decreases to accurately coincide with
current changes. That is, with the gas system model, the controller
101 can now dynamically control and synchronize changes in the gas
flow rate (increase or decrease) so as to optimize the cutting.
This capability is not possible with known systems.
[0036] As an example, FIG. 4 depicts an exemplary current waveform
410 and pressure profile 420 for a cutting operation. As can be
seen, at different stages of the cutting process the pressure
requirements are different. That is, in the beginning of the
process the pressure will need to be increased from a beginning
pressure P1 to P2 and then ultimately the peak pressure P3. With
exemplary embodiments of the present invention, the controller 101
can use the developed gas system model for the system 100 so as to
determine the optimal times to initiate changes between pressure
levels. For example, using programming and logic in the controller
101, the controller 101 may determine that when the current reaches
point B in the cutting process, the gas pressure will need to be at
pressure level P2. Using the developed gas system model stored in
the controller 101, the controller 101 can calculate and determine
the time needed, or time lag T1 to get from the first pressure
level P1 to the second pressure level P2, and using this
information will initiate the pressure increase beginning at point
A so that the pressure will reach P2 at the proper time, relative
to the current (at point B). Similarly, the time lag T2 can be
determined to get from the pressure P2 to pressure P3. Similarly,
the pressure change rates or slope can be determined for pressure
changes from one level to another. As shown in FIG. 4, there are
pressure change slopes (S1, S2, S3 and S4) for a given system as
pressure changes from one level to another. The system 100 detects
and records these slopes (e.g., via a calibration process, or other
similar process) and uses these slope profiles to develop the gas
model discussed herein. Thus, systems of the present invention can
use determined time lags and/or slopes to develop a gas model to be
used with a gas profile to provide optimized gas flow control
during a cutting operation, and to ensure that the gas pressure
profile is synchronized in an optimal fashion with a cutting
operation. This cannot be achieved with known systems.
[0037] Using the above described methodology, embodiments of the
present invention can develop a gas system model for a given
grouping of torch components so that the model can be used to more
accurately and dynamically control the pressure. Not only will this
greatly improve cutting techniques, but will also result in
increased torch component life.
[0038] In further exemplary embodiments, not only can the system
100 be used to develop a gas system model for a given grouping of
torch components, but it can also be used to determine gas flow
characteristics based on relative positioning and/or motion of the
torch 200. Many known cutting systems either use a robot arm or a
gantry type structure to move the cutting torch 200 around during
the cutting operation. Because of this movement, and its effect on
the gas lines 121 and 123, the gas flow/pressure can be different
at different torch orientations or locations during a cutting
operation, even though the supplied gas pressure remains constant.
For example, even though the gas console is providing a constant
gas pressure of 15 psi, at a first location on a cutting table the
torch receives the full 15 psi, while at a second, more distant
location, the torch only receives 13.5 psi. This, again, can
adversely affect the cutting operation and the usable life of the
torch components. Thus, exemplary embodiments of the present
invention can develop a gas system model based on torch orientation
and/or positioning in an automatic or semi-automatic cutting
system. For example, prior to cutting, the controller 101 can
initiate a calibration operation, where a fixed gas pressure is
provided to the torch 200 (e.g., 15 psi at the gas console 105),
and then the torch is moved to different locations within its
cutting area, and if on a robotic arm moved to different locations
at different orientations. The calibration can be done either
during a calibration process or dynamically while during a cutting
operation. For example, if correct pressure is not measured at the
torch the pressure at the console can be adjusted to compensate for
the pressure differential or the system can initiate a fault. As
this is done, the sensors will constantly monitor the line and/or
torch pressure to identify and record changes in the torch pressure
as the torch is moved. For example, the system 100 can determine
that when the torch 200 is within a first area of the work surface
the pressure is at the expected 15 psi, but when the torch 200
transitions to a second area on the table, the pressure drops to
13.5 psi. The controller 101 then uses this information to develop
the gas system model such that during cutting, when the torch is
moved to the second area the controller 101 adjusts the system
pressure (via the console 105) to ensure that the torch pressure is
the needed 15 psi. This cannot be achieved with known systems.
Similarly, in systems using a robotic arm with a multi-axis range
of motion, the controller 101 can determine that when the torch 200
is at a first orientation no adjustment to the pressure is needed,
but when the torch reaches a second orientation (e.g., torch up,
torch horizontal, etc.) the pressure level needs to be adjusted to
ensure the proper pressure is at the torch 200. Of course, in all
of these embodiments, the pressure can be adjusted via the
controller 101, DSP 107 and valves on the gas console 105.
[0039] In embodiments of the invention, the controller 101 can use
the pressure sensors, and a calibration function to determine time
delays for pressure increases and decreases from the gas console to
the torch 200 and/or slope rates for pressure increases and
decreases from the gas console to the torch 200. As described
above, this information can be used by the system 100 to
dynamically control and/or synchronize the gas pressure with the
cutting operation to achieve an optimized process.
[0040] In addition to the foregoing, embodiments of the present
invention can also be used to detect the formation of defects in
torch consumables during cutting. As is known, torch consumables,
such as shield caps, nozzles, electrodes, etc. degrade over time.
Once these consumables reach a certain degradation level they do
not function properly, thus compromising the cutting operation.
Exemplary systems of the present invention can use the developed
gas system model to watch for and/or predict consumable failures.
As explained above, sensors 204/202 can be located within the torch
assembly such that they monitor gas pressures in the torch 200
during cutting. That is, the controller 101 can determine, or be
preprogrammed with, an optimal gas pressure range for at least one
of the plasma chamber and the shield cavity, and when the pressures
within these regions fall outside the acceptable ranges a warning
can be displayed or the cutting operation can be stopped. For
example, during calibration the controller 101 determines that for
a given torch assembly/configuration when the console pressure is
at 15 psi, the shield cavity pressure should be within the range of
13 to 14 psi. (It is noted that this determination can be made via
using state tables, look up tables, algorithms, or any other known
methods for programming system controllers.) If during a cutting
operation, the pressure in the shield cavity falls outside of the
acceptable range (or a determined threshold value) the controller
101 determines that the shield cap is failing or has failed and
either shuts off the cutting operation, or displays a warning to a
user. For example, if the end orifice of the shield cap is
compromised such that the hole in the cap has been made larger, the
pressure in the shield cavity could drop to an unacceptable level.
This drop can be detected by the controller 101 and the system 100
can react appropriately. In some embodiments, not only will the
system provide a warning, but the system 100 can also adjust the
shield gas pressure (via the gas console 105) to ensure that proper
shield gas pressure is achieved during cutting. For example, if the
controller 101 determines that there was an unacceptable drop in
shield gas pressure, the controller 101 can cause the gas console
to increase the gas flow/pressure of the shield gas until the
shield cavity pressure reaches the proper level. In fact, in some
embodiments, multiple thresholds or operational ranges can be used
to allow cutting to continue before the system is turned off. For
example, for a given cutting operation and torch configuration, the
controller 101 determines an acceptable shield gas pressure range
of 13 to 14 psi, and so long as the detected pressure is in this
range no pressure change is initiated. However, if the shield
cavity pressure falls outside of this threshold/range, but remains
within a second determined range, the controller 101 maintains the
cutting operation, but adjust the pressure appropriately via the
gas console 105. For example, the second acceptable ranges can be
12 to 13 psi and 14 to 15 psi, where if the detected pressure falls
within these ranges the controller 101 will simply adjust the
supplied pressure via the gas console 105. These smaller
increases/decreases can be cause by small blockages, diameter
changes of the shield cap opening which do not require stoppage of
the cutting operation. In such a situation, the controller 101 can
display a warning that a gas flow issue has been detected for the
shield gas, but maintains cutting. However, if the detected
pressure falls outside of the second acceptable range, the
controller 101 can initiate a stop to the cutting operation,
because this would indicate a more significant failure that cannot,
or should not, be mitigated with gas pressure adjustments. For
example, if the shield cavity pressure drops below 12 psi, this can
indicate a significant failure or hole in the cap. It should be
noted that the above discussion, is only intended to be exemplary
and can be equally applied to the plasma chamber pressure, etc.
[0041] As discussed above, the system 100 can use a calibration
process to develop a gas system model for a give torch/system set
up. The controller 101 can use this model, along with user input
information, to control the gas pressure during a cutting
operation. For example, the controller 101 can use data inputs such
as, material thickness, cutting current, material type, gas type,
etc. to develop the optimal gas pressure waveform (42) for a given
cutting operation. Further, during cutting, the system 100 can use
the above described process and sensors to dynamically make the
needed adjustments to the gas pressure to achieve the desired.
[0042] In further exemplary embodiments, the controller 101
contains a look up table for different consumable types and torch
configurations, such that a user can enter consumable/torch
information into the system and the controller 101 uses this
information (in conjunction with look up tables, etc.) to develop a
gas system model for the configuration. For example, a user can
enter a part number or part type for the electrode, shield cap,
nozzle, swirl ring, etc. and the controller 101 uses this
information to develop a gas system model. Further, as explained
above, the system 100 can then a run a pre-cutting diagnostic check
or calibration step to verify that the consumables in the torch 200
perform as predicted. If the calibration results in a detected
pressure outside of the anticipated ranges/thresholds, a warning
message can be displayed to require check of the consumables for
verification. Of course, other advantages can be achieved and
contemplated with the systems 100 described herein, and uses of the
embodiments described herein are not limited to the express
descriptions above.
[0043] Turning now to FIG. 2, the distal end of an exemplary torch
200 is shown. Because the general construction of torches is known,
those details will not be discussed herein. As shown, the torch 200
has a shield cap 201, a nozzle 203, an electrode 205, a swirl ring
255, and an inner retaining cap 209. It is noted that the
configuration depicted in FIG. 2 is intended to be exemplary and
torches that can be used with embodiments of the present invention
are not limited to this configuration. As shown, the shield cap 201
and the inner retaining cap 209 create a shield gas cavity 260
through which the shield gas passes. As explained above, a pressure
sensor 202 is located within this cavity to detect the shield gas
pressure during calibration/cutting. As explained above, the
sensors described herein can be any type of pressure transducer,
sensor, etc. which is capable of detecting the desired pressures
and handle the heat loads experienced during cutting. Such sensors
are generally known and need not be described herein. As shown in
FIG. 2, the sensor 202 is coupled to an inner wall of the shield
cap 201. In other embodiments, the sensor 202 can also be installed
on an outer surface of the inner retaining cap 209. So long as the
sensor 202 can detect the shield gas pressure, its location is not
limiting.
[0044] Similarly, the nozzle 203 and the electrode 205 also create
a cavity, the plasma chamber 265. The pressure sensor 204 detects
the plasma gas pressure within this cavity 265, which is used as
discussed above. Again, while the sensor 204 is shown on the inner
wall of the nozzle 203, it can also be placed on an outer surface
of the electrode 205, or at any other location allowing the senor
204 to accurately detect the pressure in the chamber 265.
[0045] As shown in FIG. 2, in other exemplary embodiments, the
torch 200 can include additional pressure sensors that can be used
to detect gas flows at different locations, which can be used to
control the gas flow during cutting to achieve optimal cutting
results, increase usable life of the torch 200 and detect issues
during cutting. As shown, a sensor 252 can be placed within the
swirl ring cavity 250 which exists between the swirl ring 255 and
the nozzle 203. Another sensor 232 can be placed upstream of the
shield gas swirler 237. This sensor allows for the detection of
shield gas pressure both upstream of the swirler 237 and within the
shield gas cavity 260 (sensor 202). This is shown in more detail in
FIG. 3, where the sensors 232/202, are upstream and downstream of
the swirler 237, respectively. As shown in FIG. 2, in other
exemplary embodiments, a sensor 208 can be placed in the region
formed between the inner retaining cap 209 and the nozzle 203. Of
course, it should be understood that embodiments can use any number
and/or combination of the above torch sensors without departing
from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
[0046] Turning now to FIGS. 5A and 5B, different mounting
configurations for the sensors is shown. FIG. 5A depicts a surface
mounting configuration of the sensor 202 on the inner wall of the
shield cap 201. When using a surface mounting configuration, the
sensor 202 should be positioned such that it does not adversely
affect the flow of the gas through the cavity. FIG. 5B depicts a
recessed mounting configuration, where the a recess cavity 201' is
created on the component (in this case the shield cap 201) so that
the sensor 202 provides less of an obstruction for the gas flow.
Various embodiments can use these, and other mounting
configurations. Further, any given torch 200 can use a combination
of flush and recessed sensor mountings as needed. The sensors can
be secured by any known means, including adhesives or structural
connections.
[0047] Turning now to FIG. 8, an exemplary flow chart is depicted
which generally shows a process which utilizes exemplary
embodiments of the system 100 described herein. The flow chart can
be used with the following discussion which is a general
description of an exemplary process or method of using exemplary
embodiments described herein. In step 810 a user would enter input
parameters for a cutting operation into the system 100. This can be
done via any know user interface, which is coupled to the
controller 101. Input parameters can include: material type,
material thickness, cut current, a cut pattern or load file for the
cutting operation, torch type information, consumable
identification information, etc. Based on this information, the
controller 101--which can be coupled to any memory device--will use
the input parameters to develop a current and pressure profile for
the cutting operation (see e.g., FIG. 4). This is the
current/pressure profile that will be used for the desired cutting
operation. In step 830, the system 100 can perform a calibration
and/or a pressure check. For example, the system can institute a
gas purge, in which each of the shield gas and plasma gas is purged
through the system 100 without any cutting operation being
performed. During this calibration, the gas pressure provided to
the torch 200 via the gas console 105 at a desired fixed pressure
from the console 105. For example, the fixed pressure can be 15 psi
at the sensors 119 and 120, and the controller 101, DSP 107 and
valves in the console 105 will be controlled to obtain the desired
15 psi. As the gases flow through the system 100 the pressures can
be detected at the different sensor locations at torch 221/223
(which can be at the end of the torch body, or the torch head, or
both) and the sensors 202, 204, etc. within the torch 200. During
the calibration, the DSP 107 and/or controller 101 receives the
feedback signals from the various sensors and can determine that
there are no line leaks, there are no line blockages, and detect
the consumables in the torch 200. This detection process can
include using the detected pressures to detect the type of
consumables within the torch 200 and detect whether or not the
consumables are appropriate for the given cutting operation and/or
can include detecting whether or not the gas pressure profile
detected is consistent with the type of consumables entered via a
user in step 810. If the detected consumables are not accurate, a
warning message can be displayed. The controller 101 can also use
the detected pressures to provide a warning to the user that there
may be an issue with one or more of the consumables in the torch
200. For example, the controller 101 can detect if a consumable is
damaged or not performing consistent with its anticipated
performance and a warning message can be displayed requiring the
user to inspect/replace the consumables. Not only can this
calibration be done with the torch 200 stationary but it can also
be done as the torch is moved around the work area via a gantry (on
a table system) or via a robot, so that different pressure readings
are taken at different torch positions and orientations.
Additionally, a static pressure calibration can also be done as
part of the calibration test. In some embodiments, the static test
can be accomplished by blocking the exit of the torch 200, or any
other acceptable means.
[0048] After the system 100 calibrates itself and the all of the
detections conclude that the appropriate consumables are in the
torch 200 and are in acceptable working order, the controller 101
creates a gas system model to be used by the controller 101 for the
cutting operation. As described above, the gas system model will be
used by the controller 101 in conjunction with the desired pressure
profile for the cutting operation to allow the controller to
provide the gas flow to the cutting operation as desired to achieve
a highly optimized cutting operation. The model will take into
account the detected pressure ratios between components, and within
the torch 200, and pressure drop/increase lags, slopes and/or
rates, relative to pressure changes from the gas console 105. That
is, by using the model and desired profile, the controller 101 can
control the gas console 105 such that the desired gas pressures are
achieved exactly when needed at the cutting operation. This cannot
be achieved with known systems.
[0049] In step 850 the cutting operation is performed using the
desired profile and the model to control the current, voltage,
torch movement, gas pressure, etc. During the cutting operation,
the gas pressures at the sensors are monitored and real time
feedback is provided to the controller 101, so that a determination
is made that the desired gas pressures are being provided.
Additionally, during cutting the gas pressures are dynamically
controlled to match the desired gas profiles, and the gas
pressures/flows are changed at the gas console 105 based on
feedback from the sensors so that the desired gas profiles are
maintained.
[0050] In step 860, because the pressures are constantly being
monitored, if a pressure anomaly is detected, and it is determined
that the pressure anomaly (e.g., a detected pressure different from
a desired pressure profile) cannot be addressed by a simple
pressure change via the gas console 105, then a warning notice can
be provided to the user, or the cutting operation can be stopped,
based on the severity and type of pressure divergence detected.
[0051] FIG. 9 depicts a further exemplary embodiment of the present
invention. Specifically, the embodiment shown in FIG. 9 is similar
to that shown in FIG. 3. However, in this exemplary embodiment the
pressure sensors 202' and 232' are located outside of the
respective cavities for which they are to measure pressure. Unlike
the embodiments discussed previously, pressure ports/channels are
used to allow the pressure sensors to sense the respective
pressures. Such an embodiment can allow for easier placement of the
sensors and coupling of the sensors to the DSP. As shown in FIG. 9,
the sensor 202' (which detects shield gas pressure) is positioned
on an outer surface of the shield cap 201 and is coupled to the
shield gas cavity via a pressure channel 911, which couples the
sensor 202' to an inner surface 910 of the shield cap 201. The
channel 910 is configured such that it allows the sensor 202' to
accurately detect the pressure within the shield gas cavity, but
does not interfere with the desired flow of the shield gas.
Similarly, the sensor 232' is also located on an outer surface of
the torch assembly (the shield cap retainer 920) and has a pressure
channel which couples the sensor 232' to the shield gas cavity
upstream of the component 237. However, in this case the pressure
channel has two portions--a first portion 913 which passes through
the shield cap 201 and a second portion 914 which passes through
the shield cap retainer 920. Of course, these channels connect with
each other such that the sensor 232' can accurately detect the
pressure of the shield gas as needed. The pressure channels can be
positioned and configured as needed so that the pressure sensors
can be positioned on the torch assembly so as to allow for easy
electrical coupling of the sensors to the DSP or any other
controller used by the system. Moreover, in other exemplary
embodiments a combination of sensors on the outside of the torch
assembly (as shown in FIG. 9) and a sensors positioned within the
cavities (as shown in FIGS. 2 and 3) can be used. For example, the
use of pressure channels can also be used on other torch
components, such as the nozzle 203, the swirl ring 255, and the
retaining cap 209. Thus, like that shown in FIG. 9, each one of, or
a combination of, these components (along with those shown in FIG.
9) can use pressure channels in their respective wall surfaces to
direct pressure to a remotely positioned pressure sensor to detect
the respective desired pressure. That is, the actual sensors can be
positioned on the outside of the torch assembly or can be
positioned in other remote positions within the torch, where the
pressure channels direct allow the sensors to detect the respective
pressures. For example, the sensor 204 (in FIG. 3) can be
positioned on an outer surface of the nozzle 203 and a pressure
channel extends from the sensor to an inner wall surface of the
nozzle to detect the pressure within the cavity 265. This can aid
in keeping the sensors out of a gas flow and away from high heat
conditions. In such embodiments, the pressure sensors can be
positioned anywhere on the torch assembly where they can provide
the desired feedback/electrical signals to the DSP/controller and
be able to read the desired pressures--whether through pressure
channels or directly within the cavities.
[0052] FIG. 10 depicts an exemplary embodiment of a torch body
where the nozzle 203 uses a pressure channel 204' to provide the
plasma gas pressure to the sensor 204 and the shield cap 201 has a
channel 202'' to provide the shield gas pressure to the sensor
202'. As shown, the torch also includes a PCB 1000 to which each of
the sensors are electrically coupled. The PCB 1000 can be any type
of circuit board or device which receives the signals from the
sensors and passes them on to the DSP/controller as needed for the
desired control. The PCB 1000 can use any type of known electrical
connection to couple the PCB 1000 to the system.
[0053] FIG. 11 is yet a further exemplary embodiment of the present
invention, which operates similar to what is shown in FIG. 10. In
this embodiment the torch head 200''' has an upstream end 1020
which couples with a torch body or other connection piece to secure
the torch head 200''' as needed. On this end 1020 is a transducer
PCB 1000 which has each of the sensors 202' and 204 coupled to it.
This configuration can place the sensors away from the cutting
operation and protect them from the environment. In exemplary
embodiments, these sensors and the PCB will be located in a cavity
created by the torch head 200'' and the torch body (see item 200''
in FIG. 7). Unlike the embodiment shown in FIG. 10, in this
embodiment the pressure channels 202'' and 204' run along a length
of the torch head 200''' and extend to the upstream end 1020. Of
course, the channels 202'' and 204' should be obstruction free and
provide a sealed conduit to the sensors, to ensure an accurate
pressure reading for each of the shield and plasma gases.
Embodiments of the present invention are not limited to the
physical routing of the channels 204' and 202'' through the head
200'' so long as an accurate chamber pressure reading can be
achieved by the sensors. Also, coupled to the PCB 1000 is a
communication device 1010, which can be a serial communication
device or a device to send analog signals. Embodiments are not
limited in this regard. The communication device 1010 sends signals
to the DSP which represent the detected pressures, and this
information is used to control the operation of the systems as
described herein. Of course, as with FIG. 10, other exemplary
embodiments are not limited to positioning the sensors/pressure
channels as shown. Other locations and configurations can be used
without departing from the spirit or scope of the present
invention.
[0054] Of course, it should be noted that the above methods and
processes are intended to be exemplary, and other exemplary
embodiments can use different processes and procedures, and will
not depart from the spirit or scope of the present invention.
[0055] The controller 101 can be any known type of
computer/processor, or CNC controller device which is capable of
controlling an automated or semi-automated cutting system. Further,
the controller 101 can be coupled to a memory device which stores
information necessary to implement embodiments of the present
invention, including pressure profiles for different torches,
consumables etc. This information can be set and determined by the
system manufactured and/or tailored by a user based on historical
data and operations. Moreover, the controller 101, and any memory
device, can record and store gas system models and/or gas profiles
for any given operation and/or torch assembly. In such embodiments,
a user can use a user input device and the controller 101 to select
a torch assembly (having a specific identifier in the system)
and/or a specific process, and the controller 101 can recall or
recover a gas model for the specific selection. In such
embodiments, the calibration process can be used to verify that the
stored model matches the actual torch installed.
[0056] In further exemplary embodiments, the torch assembly 200 can
have an identifier that is automatically read and recognized by the
controller 101, such that the model for that torch 200 is
immediately called up, without user input. For example, the torch
200 can have an RFID type, or other electronically readable
identifier, which is individual for that torch assembly 200 such
that when the torch is installed in the system the controller 200
recognizes the torch and selects the appropriate gas model for that
torch.
[0057] It should be noted that multiple different types of control
methodologies can be used to control the system described herein.
For example, the controller/CNC 101 can be used to exclusively
control the gas flow, while in other embodiments the DSP 107 can be
used to control the gas flow, to ensure the proper pressures are
achieved. For example, in an exemplary embodiment the
CNC/controller 101 (or any other type of control system) can
provide the process set parameters (e.g., gas type, gas
pressures/flows, current rating, consumable type, etc.) based on
user inputs, and the gas control DSP 107 interfaces with the
pressure sensors and performs the overall pressure control to
maintain the desired pressure set points provided by the controller
101. Of course other control methodologies and ideologies can be
used without departing from spirit or scope of the present
invention.
[0058] While the invention has been particularly shown and
described with reference to exemplary embodiments thereof, the
invention is not limited to these embodiments. It will be
understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that various
changes in form and details may be made therein without departing
from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the
following claims.
* * * * *