U.S. patent application number 15/211899 was filed with the patent office on 2016-11-10 for integrity and quality monitoring and signaling for sounding and reduced feedback.
The applicant listed for this patent is MediaTek Singapore Pte. Ltd.. Invention is credited to Jianhan LIU, Vishakan PONNAMPALAM, Chao-Chun WANG, James June-Ming WANG, Huanchun YE.
Application Number | 20160329940 15/211899 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 45975616 |
Filed Date | 2016-11-10 |
United States Patent
Application |
20160329940 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
WANG; James June-Ming ; et
al. |
November 10, 2016 |
INTEGRITY AND QUALITY MONITORING AND SIGNALING FOR SOUNDING AND
REDUCED FEEDBACK
Abstract
A method of sounding and feedback with channel quality
information and reduced overhead is provided. A receiving station
receives a sounding signal transmitted from an access point over
multiple sub-channels of a wide channel in a wireless network. The
receiving station detects channel quality based on the received
sounding signal for each sub-channel. The receiving station then
performs channel estimation based on the received sounding signal
and thereby determining feedback information. Finally, the
receiving station transmits a feedback message to the access point,
the feedback message contains NULL feedback information, reduced
feedback information, or channel integrity/quality indicators based
on the channel quality information for each sub-channel. Based on
the feedback message, the access point may repeat the sounding
process, narrow the transmission bandwidth, or select only stations
who have indicated uncorrupted channel sounding for MU-MMO
transmission.
Inventors: |
WANG; James June-Ming; (San
Marino, CA) ; LIU; Jianhan; (San Jose, CA) ;
PONNAMPALAM; Vishakan; (San Jose, CA) ; WANG;
Chao-Chun; (Taipei City, TW) ; YE; Huanchun;
(Cupertino, CA) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
MediaTek Singapore Pte. Ltd. |
Singapore |
|
SG |
|
|
Family ID: |
45975616 |
Appl. No.: |
15/211899 |
Filed: |
July 15, 2016 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
13635360 |
Nov 15, 2012 |
|
|
|
PCT/US11/57034 |
Oct 20, 2011 |
|
|
|
15211899 |
|
|
|
|
61405749 |
Oct 22, 2010 |
|
|
|
61405350 |
Oct 21, 2010 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
1/1 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H04B 7/0632 20130101;
H04L 1/0028 20130101; H04B 7/0417 20130101; H04L 25/0228 20130101;
H04L 25/0226 20130101; H04B 7/065 20130101; H04B 7/063 20130101;
H04B 7/0452 20130101; H04B 7/0658 20130101; H04L 1/0026 20130101;
H04B 7/0617 20130101 |
International
Class: |
H04B 7/04 20060101
H04B007/04; H04L 25/02 20060101 H04L025/02; H04B 7/06 20060101
H04B007/06 |
Claims
1. A method for enhancing the robustness of a channel sounding
process comprising: receiving a sounding signal transmitted from an
access point over a wide channel in a wireless network, wherein the
sounding signal is transmitted over at least one sub-channels of
the wide channel, wherein the sounding signal contains a VHT-SIG-B
field corresponding to the at least one sub-channels; verifying
whether a bit pattern of the VHT-SIG-B field equals to a fixed
pattern of the at least one sub-channels; determining whether
interference occurs in a corresponding sub-channel according to the
verified result; transmitting a feedback message, wherein the
feedback message comprises information for indicating whether
interference occurs in the corresponding sub-channel.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one sub-channels
comprises a plurality of sub-channels, the feedback message
comprises quality information, and the quality information have a
plurality of values corresponding to the plurality of sub-channels,
respectively, wherein each value represents a quantitative measure
of the extent that measurement of the corresponding sub-channel is
corrupted by the interference.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one sub-channels
comprises a plurality of sub-channels, the feedback message
comprises integrity information, and the integrity information have
a plurality of values corresponding to the plurality of
sub-channels, respectively, each bit indicates whether interference
occurs in the corresponding sub-channel.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the feedback message comprises
SNR information for indicating whether interference occurs in the
corresponding sub-channel.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the sounding signal and feedback
message are transmitted for MU-MIMO sounding and feedback, or for
beamforming sounding and feedback.
6. A method for enhancing the robustness of a channel sounding
process comprising: receiving a sounding signal transmitted from an
access point over a wide channel in a wireless network, wherein the
sounding signal is transmitted over at least one sub-channels of
the wide channel; determining whether interference occurs in a
corresponding sub-channel; transmitting a feedback message, wherein
the feedback message comprises SNR information for indicating
whether interference occurs in the corresponding sub-channel.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the step of determining whether
interference occurs in the corresponding sub-channel comprising:
performing clear channel assessment (CCA) prior to the arrival of
the sounding signal in the at least one sub-channels, and
determining whether interference occurs in a corresponding
sub-channel in the at least one sub-channels according to the
CCA.
8. The method of claim 6, wherein the step of determining whether
interference occurs in the corresponding sub-channel comprising:
checking a cyclic redundancy check (CRC) for each sub-channel of
the at least one sub-channels, and determining whether interference
occurs in a corresponding sub-channel according to the checked
result.
9. The method of claim 6, wherein the sounding signal and feedback
message are transmitted for MU-MIMO sounding and feedback, or for
beamforming sounding and feedback.
10. A device, comprising: a receiver that receives a sounding
signal transmitted from an access point over a wide channel in a
wireless network, wherein the sounding signal is transmitted over
at least one sub-channels of the wide channel, wherein the sounding
signal contains a VHT-SIG-B field corresponding to the at least one
sub-channels; a processor that performs verifying whether a bit
pattern of the VHT-SIG-B field equals to a fixed pattern of the at
least one sub-channels, and determining whether interference occurs
in a corresponding sub-channel according to the verified result;
and a transmitter that transmits a feedback message, wherein the
feedback message comprises information for indicating whether
interference occurs in the corresponding sub-channel.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein the at least one sub-channels
comprises a plurality of sub-channels, the feedback message
comprises quality information, and the quality information have a
plurality of values corresponding to the plurality of sub-channels,
respectively, wherein each value represents a quantitative measure
of the extent that measurement of the corresponding sub-channel is
corrupted by the interference.
12. The method of claim 10, wherein the at least one sub-channels
comprises a plurality of sub-channels, the feedback message
comprises integrity information, and the integrity information have
a plurality of values corresponding to the plurality of
sub-channels, respectively, each bit indicates whether interference
occurs in the corresponding sub-channel.
13. The method of claim 10, wherein the feedback message comprises
SNR information for indicating whether interference occurs in the
corresponding sub-channel.
14. The method of claim 10, wherein the sounding signal and
feedback message are transmitted for MU-MIMO sounding and feedback,
or for beamforming sounding and feedback.
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser.
No. 13/635,360 filed on Oct. 20, 2011, which claims priority under
35 U.S.C. .sctn.119 to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/405,350,
entitled "Integrity and Quality Monitoring and Signaling for
Sounding and Feedback," filed on Oct. 21, 2010; U.S. Provisional
Application No. 61/405,749, entitled "Integrity and Quality
Monitoring Signaling for Sounding and Reduced Feedback," filed on
Oct. 22, 2010. Ser. No. 13/635,360 is also a National Stage
application of PCT Application No. PCT/US11/57034, the subject
matter of which is incorporated herein by reference.
TECHNICAL FIELD
[0002] The disclosed embodiments relate generally to wireless
network communications, and, more particularly, to sounding and
feedback in multi-user multiple-input multiple-output (MU-MIMO)
communications.
BACKGROUND
[0003] Multi-user multiple-input multiple-output (MU-MIMO)
transmission is becoming a new system technique to enable high
system capacity in both the upcoming IEEE 802.11ac and the LTE
(long-term evolution) standards. As compared to single-user MIMO
(SU-MIMO), MU-MIMO has several key advantages. First, MU-MIMO
allows for a direct gain in multiple access system capacity
proportional to the number of access point antennas. Second,
MU-MIMO allows the higher degree spatial multiplexing gain to be
obtained without the need for higher number of antennas at the
mobile stations by keeping the intelligence and cost at the access
point. Third, MU-MIMO appears immune to most propagation
limitations plaguing SU-MIMO communications because multiuser
diversity can be extracted even in a simple line of sight (LOS)
propagation environment. As a result, the LOS propagation, which
causes degradation in single user spatial multiplexing schemes, is
no longer a problem in the multiuser setting.
[0004] In contrast to the SU-MIMO transmission, where the mobile
station receivers are equipped with sufficient number of antennas
(equal to or greater than the number of spatial streams) and the
capability of the signal processing to estimate the channel and to
separate the spatial streams, it is crucial in a MU-MIMO
transmission for the access points or routers to bear the most of
the burden in the signal processing and hardware complexity to
allow for simpler mobile station implementation. To achieve this
aim, the access point or router should apply transmit beamforming
(precoding), computed from channel information acquired in the
MU-MIMO downlink channel sounding and feedback to achieve an
orthogonal (or near-orthogonal) transmission of multiple streams to
multiple users, i.e., eliminating (or reducing) the amount of
mutual interference between the transmission to multiple mobile
stations. Under this condition, each mobile station only receives
the spatial stream(s) intended for itself and not the interference
from the spatial stream(s) intended for other mobile stations. With
reduced number of spatial streams directed toward individual mobile
stations, all mobile stations only need to be equipped with
sufficient number of antennas for processing the spatial streams
intended for itself and not worrying about eliminating the
interference from other spatial streams.
[0005] FIG. 1 (Prior Art) illustrates a typical SU-MIMO and MU-MIMO
process in a wireless communication system. For SU-MIMO, the
receiver spatial processing occurs during the long training fields
(LTFs) in the preamble before the arrival of the data payload. The
receiver spatial processing is performed on a packet-by-packet
basis. If the receiver spatial processing is not done correctly,
for example due to interference, only that packet (e.g., packet 11
in FIG. 1) is affected and the erroneous transmission can be
corrected by acknowledgement and re-transmission protocol as long
as interference is no longer present in subsequent
re-transmission.
[0006] For MU-MIMO, on the other hand, the channel knowledge and
antenna weights at the transmitter are not updated frequently. The
process of channel sounding and feedback add a significant overhead
to the system processing and it is typically performed at intervals
comparable to the channel coherent time. Note that this sounding
and feedback process for MU-MIMO is identical for that for transmit
beamforming. The same discussion presented here would also apply to
transmit beamforming. If the incorrect channel knowledge, e.g., due
to received sounding signal corrupted by interference, is used at
the transmitter, the sequence of frame exchanges based on the same
transmit antenna weights are affected and the resultant
communication errors are not correctible through the
acknowledgement and re-transmission protocol. In the example of
FIG. 1, when sounding and feedback 21 is corrupted by interference,
the sequence of MU-MIMO frame exchanges 22, 23 . . . are affected.
Additionally, since the transmit beamforming weight is computed
from aggregate channel measurements from multiple receivers, one
incorrect feedback may produce a corrupted transmit (precoding)
weights for all devices involved in the sounding and feedback
process. Thus, it is critical to ensure the integrity and/or
quality of the channel information obtained from the sounding
process.
[0007] Currently, there is no mechanism or protocol in the 802.11ac
system to allow fast recovery from situation that sounding process
is corrupted. Since wideband channel bandwidths are proposed in the
802.11ac, the sounding process is more susceptible to
interferences, especially to sub-channel interferences. Although
there is channel protection mechanism such as RTS and CTS protocol
in the IEEE802.11 standards for improving the channel integrity
and/or quality of the channel sounding and feedback process, such
protection mechanism adds to overhead of the process and is
typically not employed.
SUMMARY
[0008] A method of sounding and feedback with channel quality
information and reduced overhead is provided. A receiving station
receives a sounding signal transmitted from an access point over a
wide channel in a wireless network. The sounding signal is
transmitted over one or multiple sub-channels of the wide channel.
The receiving station detects channel quality based on the received
sounding signal for each sub-channel. The receiving station then
performs channel estimation based on the received sounding signal
and thereby determining feedback information. Finally, the
receiving station transmits a feedback message to the access point,
the feedback message contains NULL feedback information, reduced
feedback information, or channel integrity/quality indicators based
on the channel quality information for each sub-channel. Based on
the feedback message, the access point may repeat the sounding
process, narrow the transmission bandwidth, or select only stations
who have indicated uncorrupted channel sounding for MU-MIMO
transmission.
[0009] In one embodiment, the feedback message contains an
integrity/quality indicator that indicates the detected channel
quality for each sub-channel. The integrity is a binary measure of
whether or not the channel measurement as described is corrupted.
The quality indicator, on the other hand, is a quantitative measure
of the extent the channel measurement is corrupted. In a first
example, a conventional technique of checking CRC of the sounding
packet is utilized for all sub-channels. In a second example, a
technique of CCA (Clear Channel Assessment) prior to the arrival of
the sounding packet is utilized. In a third example, the fixed
pattern in the sounding signal is verified for monitoring the
integrity and/or quality of the sounding signal.
[0010] In another embodiment, a primary sub-channel suffers
significant channel degradation. To reduce overhead, the receiver
does not transmit any beamforming report in the feedback by
transmitting a NULL feedback message, which may be indicated by a
NULL feedback indicator in the MIMO control subfield.
[0011] In yet another embodiment, a secondary sub-channel suffers
significant channel degradation. To reduce overhead, the receiver
transmits reduced feedback information, which may be indicated by
an integrity/quality indicator in the MIMO control subfield. The
reduced feedback information includes only beamforming report for
non-corrupted primary sub-channels, while beamforming report for
corrupted sub-channels are not included in the feedback
message.
[0012] The sounding and feedback process for MU-MIMO channel
sounding and feedback (with multiple stations receiving sounding
signal from the AP) is identical for that for transmit beamforming
sounding and feedback (with a single station receiving sounding
signal from the AP). The same discussion presented here would also
apply to transmit beamforming.
[0013] Other embodiments and advantages are described in the
detailed description below. This summary does not purport to define
the invention. The invention is defined by the claims.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0014] FIG. 1 (prior art) illustrates typical SU-MIMO and MU-MIMO
processes in a wireless system.
[0015] FIG. 2 illustrates a MU-MIMO scheme in a wireless system in
accordance with one novel aspect.
[0016] FIG. 3 illustrates simplified block diagrams of an access
point and two stations in a wireless system in accordance with one
novel aspect.
[0017] FIG. 4 illustrates a channel sounding and feedback process
in a wireless system in accordance with one novel aspect.
[0018] FIG. 5 illustrates a MU-MIMO sounding and feedback process
in a wireless system in accordance with one novel aspect.
[0019] FIG. 6 illustrates a novel feedback frame format in an IEEE
802.11ac wireless system.
[0020] FIG. 7 illustrates a first embodiment of a novel feedback
mechanism in an MU-MIMO wireless system.
[0021] FIG. 8 illustrates a second embodiment of a novel feedback
mechanism in an MU-MIMO wireless system.
[0022] FIG. 9 illustrates a third embodiment of a novel feedback
mechanism in an MU-MIMO wireless system.
[0023] FIG. 10 is a flow chart of a method of sounding and reduced
feedback from station perspective in accordance with one novel
aspect.
[0024] FIG. 11 is a flow chart of a method of sounding and reduced
feedback from access point perspective in accordance with one novel
aspect.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0025] Reference will now be made in detail to some embodiments of
the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the
accompanying drawings.
[0026] A multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) wireless system
employs multiple (N.sub.T) transmit antennas and multiple (N.sub.R)
receive antennas for data transmission. A MIMO channel formed by
the N.sub.T transmit and N.sub.R receive antennas may be decomposed
into N.sub.S spatial channels, where N.sub.S<=min{N.sub.T,
N.sub.R}. The N.sub.S spatial channels are used to transmit N.sub.S
independent data streams to achieve greater overall throughput.
While single-user MIMO (SU-MIMO) considers access to the multiple
antennas that are physically connected to each individual terminal
(e.g., user), multi-user MIMO (MU-MIMO) allows a terminal to
transmit (or receive) signals to (or from) multiple users
simultaneously. The typical MU-MIMO usage scenario in IEEE 802.11ac
involves an access point (AP) or router first acquiring the MIMO
channel state information (CSI) through channel sounding, computing
and applying transmit beamforming (precoding) weights, and then
simultaneously transmitting multiple spatial streams to more than
one mobile stations (STAs). With proper transmit beamforming
(precoding), partial spatial processing is done at the access point
to separate the spatial streams among the multiple users, and the
remaining spatial processing is done at the receivers to decode the
multiple spatial streams received.
[0027] FIG. 2 illustrates a MU-MIMO scheme in a wireless system 200
in accordance with one novel aspect. Wireless system 200 comprises
an access point AP 201 (TX), a first mobile station STA 202 (user 1
or RX1), and a second mobile station STA 203 (user 2 or RX2). In
the example of FIG. 2, four spatial streams are transmitted by the
TX antennas with two spatial streams intended for each receiver.
The complex coefficients h.sub.11, h.sub.12, h.sub.13, and h.sub.14
represent the transmission from x.sub.1 antenna arriving at
y.sub.1, y.sub.2, y.sub.3, and y.sub.4 antennas. The complex
coefficients h.sub.21, h.sub.22, h.sub.23, and h.sub.22 represent
the transmission from x.sub.2 antenna arriving at y.sub.1, y.sub.2,
y.sub.3, and y.sub.4 antennas. The complex coefficients h.sub.31,
h.sub.32, h.sub.33, and h.sub.32 represent the transmission from
x.sub.3 antenna arriving at y.sub.1, y.sub.2, y.sub.3, and y.sub.4
antennas. Finally, the complex coefficients h.sub.41, h.sub.42,
h.sub.43, and h.sub.42 represent the transmission from x.sub.4
antenna arriving at y.sub.1, y.sub.2, y.sub.3, and y.sub.4
antennas. The transmission from each of the four TX antennas
arrives at each of the four RX antennas. The input-output
relationship can be described as:
x=Vs (1)
y=Hx+n (2)
where
[0028] s is a vector of input data symbols
[0029] x is a vector to be sent from transmit antennas after
applying precoding matrix V
[0030] V is the precoder matrix, which can be derived from channel
response matrix H
[0031] H is the channel response matrix
[0032] n is the noise
[0033] y is a vector to be received by receive antennas
[0034] The goal of the transmit beamforming (precoding) is to
generate desired transmit array antenna patterns such that two
spatial streams are beamed toward the first receiver (RX1) while
nulled toward the second receiver (RX2) and that the other two
spatial streams are beamed toward the second receiver (RX2) while
nulled toward the first receiver (RX1). In other words, if precoder
matrix V is applied properly, then RX1 will only see the first two
spatial streams and RX2 will only see the other two spatial
streams. As a result, RX1 only needs two antennas to resolve the
first two spatial streams while RX2 also only needs two antennas to
resolve the other two spatial streams. With the proper transmit
beamforming at the transmitter (TX), the overall receive antennas
can be reduced from eight to four and a simpler system
configuration can be achieved.
[0035] In order to apply MU-MIMO beamforming (precoding), the
transmitting station is required to have the knowledge of the
channel response matrix H. This requires the receiving stations to
measure and estimate the channel response matrix H and then
feedback the channel response matrix H to the transmitting station
via sounding and feedback process. If the channel measurement is
corrupted by, say interference, the transmit beamforming
(precoding) matrix V derived from the feedback will lead to
subsequent corrupted MU-MIMO frame exchange. The sequence of
corrupted MU-MIMO frame exchange is not correctible via the
protocol of acknowledgement and re-transmission. Because the
process of sounding and feedback imposes significant overhead,
especially for MIMO-OFDM systems where multiple receiving stations
are involved, it is desirable to perform the sounding and feedback
procedure as infrequently as possible based on the coherent time of
the channel. As a result, a corrupted transmit beamforming
(precoding) matrix V will tend to be used for the duration until
the next sounding and feedback.
[0036] In one novel aspect, a sounding and feedback process with
enhanced robustness is utilized between transmitting and receiving
stations. The integrity and/or quality of the channel sounding
process is monitored, an integrity and/or quality indicator is
provided in the feedback, and null or reduced feedback information
is provided in the case of corruption. Note that this sounding and
feedback process for MU-MIMO is identical for that for transmit
beamforming. The same discussion presented here would also apply to
transmit beamforming.
[0037] FIG. 3 illustrates simplified block diagrams of an access
point AP 301 and two mobile stations STA 321 and STA 341 in a
wireless system 300 in accordance with one novel aspect. AP 301
comprises memory 302, a processor 303, a scheduler 304, a MIMO
encoder 305, a beamformer/precoder 306, a channel estimation module
307, and a plurality of transceivers 311-314 coupled to a plurality
of antennas 315-318, respectively. STA 321 comprises memory 322, a
processor 323, a MIMO decoder 325, a detection module 326, a
channel estimation module 327, and a plurality of transceivers
331-332 coupled to a plurality of antennas 335-336, respectively.
Similarly, STA 341 comprises memory 342, a processor 343, a MIMO
decoder 345, a detection module 346, a channel estimation module
347, and a plurality of transceivers 351-352 coupled to a plurality
of antennas 355-356, respectively.
[0038] FIG. 4 illustrates a channel sounding and feedback process
in a wireless system 400 in accordance with one novel aspect.
Wireless system 400 comprises a transmitting device 401 and a
receiving device 402. During the channel sounding and feedback
process, transmitting device 401 sends a sounding announcement
(e.g., null data packet announcement (NDPA) 403) followed by a
sounding packet (e.g., null data packet (NPD) 404,) to receiving
device 402. NPDA 403 is transmitted first to inform the intended
receiving device (e.g., via STA INFO fields) and NDP 404 is then
transmitted for the intended receiving device to estimate the
channel. Receiving device 402 then transmits a feedback packet 405
back to transmitting device 401. The feedback information includes
estimated CSI (beamforming report) and SNR information.
[0039] NPD 404 is used for channel sounding and measurement. The
L-STF, L-LTF, L-SIG fields are used for setting up the protection
field against legacy devices. The signaling information for the NDP
signal is carrier in the VHT-SIG-A 406 and the channel estimation
is performed on the VHT-LTFS (Long Training Fields) 408. The
wideband VHT signal uses duplicate signal format that replicates
the 20 MHz waveform in each of the 20 MHz sub-channels that is
being used. The signal content in VHT-SIG-A 406 is protected with a
binary convolution code and an eight-bit CRC (Cyclic Redundancy
Code). The VHT-SIG-B symbol 409 carriers a fixed pattern and is
binary convolution code encoded. The VHT-STF 407 and VHT-LTFs 408
also carry fixed patterns but have no CRC protection.
[0040] There are various ways to monitor the integrity and/or
quality of the sounding process by checking the sounding packet NDP
404. The integrity is a binary measure of whether or not the
channel measurement as described is corrupted by external
interfering signal from other devices or other external radiator to
the extent that it can affect the MU-MIMO transmission and
reception. The quality indicator, on the other hand, is a
quantitative measure of the extent the channel measurement is
corrupted by external interfering signal from other devices or
other external radiators. The specific method for integrity and/or
quality monitoring (or interference detection) is not an essential
part of the invention.
[0041] In a first embodiment, a conventional technique of checking
CRC is utilized. Because replicated 20 MHz waveform is used in each
20 MHz sub-channel within the signal transmission bandwidth, the
receiver typically only checks the CRC in the primary sub-channel,
which leads to insufficient integrity and/or quality monitoring. A
more thorough approach is to check CRC for VHT-SIG-A 406 in all 20
MHz sub-channels. In a second embodiment, a technique of CCA (Clear
Channel Assessment) prior to the arrival of the sounding packet is
utilized. In a third embodiment, the fixed pattern in VHT-SIG-B
symbol 409 is verified for monitoring the integrity and/or quality
of the sounding signal. Note that checking the VHT-SIG-B pattern
provides detection of corruption of the sounding signal if
interference occurs after VHT-SIG-A.
[0042] FIG. 5 illustrates a MU-MIMO sounding and feedback process
in a wireless system 500 in accordance with one novel aspect.
Wireless system 500 comprises a transmitting access point AP501 and
three receiving stations STA502-504. For downlink transmission,
AP501 (initiator) first broadcasts a sounding announcement NDPA 511
to inform the intended stations (responders) and a sounding signal
NDP 512 is then transmitted for the intended responders. Based on
the received sounding signal, each station measures the downlink
channel and estimates CSI and SNR. For uplink transmission, STA502
transmits feedback message 513 after receiving NDP 512 (with
SIFS/RIFS), STA503 transmits feedback packet 515 after receiving
polling message 514, and STA504 transmits feedback message 517
after receiving polling message 516.
[0043] Depending on the monitoring result of the integrity and/or
quality of the sounding process, each station can provide feedback
information accordingly. In one preferred embodiment, the feedback
information contains an integrity indicator having a plurality of
bits, and each bit represents the integrity of the channel
measurement of a valid sub-channel. In another preferred
embodiment, the feedback information contains a quality indicator
having a plurality of values, and each value represents the quality
of channel measurement of a valid sub-channel. In yet another
embodiment, the feedback information contains both integrity and
quality indicators for each valid sub-channel. Furthermore, for
wide channel bandwidth frame exchange, it is preferred to have
integrity and/or quality indicators for each of the valid
sub-channels within the transmission bandwidth.
[0044] FIG. 6 illustrates a novel feedback frame format in an IEEE
802.11ac wireless system. In the example of FIG. 6, the CSI
feedback information (beamforming report) is carried by a MIMO
management frame 600, which includes a MIMO control subfield 610,
and a beamforming report subfield 620. In a first embodiment, a
primary sub-channel suffers significant channel degradation. To
reduce overhead, the receiver does not transmit any beamforming
report in the feedback by transmitting a NULL feedback 630, which
may be indicated by a NULL feedback indicator 640 in the MIMO
control subfield. In a second embodiment, a secondary sub-channel
suffers significant channel degradation. To reduce overhead, the
receiver transmits reduced feedback 650, which may be indicated by
an integrity indicator 660 in the MIMO control subfield. The
reduced feedback includes only beamforming report for non-corrupted
primary sub-channels, while beamforming report for corrupted
sub-channels are not included in the feedback message. For example,
for an 80 MHz channel, the integrity indicator 660 contains four
bits 1100 indicating that the first two 20 MHz sub-channels are
good, while the next two 20 MHz sub-channels are degraded, and
reduced feedback 650 includes beamforming report only for the first
two 20 MHz sub-channels.
[0045] FIG. 7 illustrates the first embodiment of a novel feedback
mechanism in an MU-MIMO wireless system 700. Wireless system 700
comprises an AP701 and three mobile stations including a first user
1, a second user 2, and a third user 3. AP701 communicates with the
mobile stations over an 80 MHz BSS (basic service set) having a
primary 40 MHz sub-channel and a secondary 40 MHz sub-channel.
After channel sounding, all three users detect that the sounding
signal is interfered over the primary 40 MHz sub-channel, and
conclude that the primary 40 MHz sub-channel is significantly
degraded. Based on the detected channel quality information, each
user may transmit a NULL feedback (e.g., 630 in FIG. 6) to inform
AP701 that the primary sub-channel measurement is corrupted and no
beamforming report is provided to reduce feedback overhead. Based
on the NULL feedback, AP701 may decide to repeat the sounding
process to obtain a clean uncorrupted channel measurement and
feedback.
[0046] FIG. 8 illustrates the second embodiment of a novel feedback
mechanism in an MU-MIMO wireless system 800. Wireless system 800
comprises an AP801 and three mobile stations including a first user
1, a second user 2, and a third user 3. AP801 communicates with the
mobile stations over an 80 MHz BSS (basic service set) having a
primary 40 MHz sub-channel and a secondary 40 MHz sub-channel.
After channel sounding, all three users detect that the sounding
signal is interfered over the secondary 40 MHz sub-channel, and
conclude that the secondary 40 MHz sub-channel is significantly
degraded. Based on the detected channel quality information, each
user may transmit reduced feedback (e.g., 650 in FIG. 6) to inform
AP801 that the secondary 40 MHz sub-channel measurement is
corrupted and its beamforming report is not provided. Based on the
reduced feedback, AP801 may decide to narrow the transmission
bandwidth to allow MU-MIMO transmission only in the uncorrupted
primary 40 MHz sub-channel.
[0047] In MU-MIMO, because the transmit beamforming weight is
computed from aggregate channel measurements from multiple
receivers (users), one incorrect feedback may produce a corrupted
transmit precoding weights for all receivers involved in the
sounding and feedback process. FIG. 9 illustrates a third
embodiment of a novel feedback mechanism in an MU-MIMO wireless
system 900. Wireless system 900 comprises an access point AP901 and
three mobile stations including a first user 1, a second user 2,
and a third user 3. After channel sounding, user 1 and user 3 do
not detect channel measurement corruption and thus provide good
integrity indicator and CSI feedback (beamforming report) to AP901.
User 2, on the other hand, detects channel measurement corruption
and provides a NULL feedback to AP901. Based on the feedback from
the users, AP901 may select only the responders (user 1 and user 3)
who have indicated uncorrupted channel sounding for MU-MIMO
transmission, and not transmitting to the responder (user2) whose
channel sounding is corrupted. If the MU-MIMO transmission requires
transmitting radio signals to all responders, then transmitting
NDPs can be regarded as no transmission.
[0048] FIG. 10 is a flow chart of a method of sounding and reduced
feedback from mobile station perspective in accordance with one
novel aspect. In step 1001, a receiving station receives a sounding
signal transmitted from an access point over a wide channel in a
wireless network. The sounding signal is transmitted over multiple
sub-channels of the wide channel. In step 1002, the receiving
station detects channel quality information based on the received
sounding signal for each sub-channel. In step 1003, the receiving
station performs channel estimation and determining feedback
information for each sub- channel. In step 1004, the receiving
station transmits a feedback message to the access point. The
feedback message contains NULL feedback information, reduced
feedback information, and/or integrity/quality indicators based on
the detected channel quality information for each sub-channel.
[0049] FIG. 11 is a flow chart of a method of sounding and reduced
feedback from access point perspective in accordance with one novel
aspect. In step 1101, an access point transmits a sounding signal
to a plurality of mobile stations over a wide channel in the
wireless network. The sounding signal is transmitted over multiple
sub-channels of the wide channel. In step 1102, the access point
receives feedback messages from the plurality of stations. One or
more feedback messages contain NULL feedback information, reduced
feedback information, and/or integrity indicators that indicate
channel quality information for each sub-channel of a corresponding
station. In step 1003, the access point retransmits a sounding
signal to a station if the corresponding feedback message indicates
channel measurement corruption. In step 1004, the access point
transmits MU-MIMO streams to a selected subset of the plurality of
stations based on the channel quality information. In step 1005,
the access point transmits MU-MIMO streams over a selected subset
of the multiple sub-channels based on the channel quality
information. In step 1006, the access point makes dynamic
transmission bandwidth adjustment decision based on the channel
quality information in the feedback messages.
[0050] Although the present invention has been described in
connection with certain specific embodiments for instructional
purposes, the present invention is not limited thereto.
Accordingly, various modifications, adaptations, and combinations
of various features of the described embodiments can be practiced
without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in
the claims.
* * * * *