U.S. patent application number 14/981623 was filed with the patent office on 2016-07-07 for massively scalable object storage system.
This patent application is currently assigned to Rackspace US, Inc.. The applicant listed for this patent is Rackspace US, Inc.. Invention is credited to Michael Barton, John A. Dickinson, Gregory Holt, Jay B. Payne, Will Reese, Charles B. Thier.
Application Number | 20160197996 14/981623 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 45841167 |
Filed Date | 2016-07-07 |
United States Patent
Application |
20160197996 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Barton; Michael ; et
al. |
July 7, 2016 |
MASSIVELY SCALABLE OBJECT STORAGE SYSTEM
Abstract
Several different embodiments of a massively scalable object
storage system are described. The object storage system is
particularly useful for storage in a cloud computing installation
whereby shared servers provide resources, software, and data to
computers and other devices on demand. In several embodiments, the
object storage system includes a ring implementation used to
associate object storage commands with particular physical servers
such that certain guarantees of consistency, availability, and
performance can be met. In other embodiments, the object storage
system includes a synchronization protocol used to order operations
across a distributed system. In a third set of embodiments, the
object storage system includes a metadata management system. In a
fourth set of embodiments, the object storage system uses a
structured information synchronization system. Features from each
set of embodiments can be used to improve the performance and
scalability of a cloud computing object storage system.
Inventors: |
Barton; Michael; (San
Antonio, TX) ; Reese; Will; (San Antonio, TX)
; Dickinson; John A.; (San Francisco, CA) ; Payne;
Jay B.; (San Antonio, TX) ; Thier; Charles B.;
(San Antonio, TX) ; Holt; Gregory; (Hollywood
Park, TX) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
Rackspace US, Inc. |
San Antonio |
TX |
US |
|
|
Assignee: |
Rackspace US, Inc.
San Antonio
TX
|
Family ID: |
45841167 |
Appl. No.: |
14/981623 |
Filed: |
December 28, 2015 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
14249306 |
Apr 9, 2014 |
9237193 |
|
|
14981623 |
|
|
|
|
13089487 |
Apr 19, 2011 |
8712975 |
|
|
14249306 |
|
|
|
|
61450166 |
Mar 8, 2011 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
707/638 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H04L 67/1097 20130101;
G06F 16/1837 20190101; G06F 16/2322 20190101; G06F 16/23 20190101;
H04L 67/1023 20130101; G06F 16/162 20190101; G06F 16/219
20190101 |
International
Class: |
H04L 29/08 20060101
H04L029/08; G06F 17/30 20060101 G06F017/30 |
Claims
1. A method for managing data items in a distributed storage pool,
comprising: providing a plurality of physical storage pools, each
storage pool including a plurality of storage nodes coupled to a
network, and each storage node further providing a non-transitory
computer readable medium for data storage; storing a first replica
of a data item in a first physical storage pool of the plurality of
physical storage pools; storing a second replica of the data item
in a second physical storage pool of the plurality of physical
storage pools; receiving a modification instruction for the data
item; in response to receiving the modification instruction for the
data item: selectively modifying the first replica of the data
item; creating a first modification sentinel file based on the
modification instruction; and storing the first modification
sentinel file in the first physical storage pool; and in response
to encountering the first modification sentinel file during a data
item replication process: modifying in accordance with the first
modification sentinel file the second replica of the data item
stored in the second physical storage pool; creating a second
modification sentinel file; and storing the second modification
sentinel file in the second physical storage pool.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising: waiting for a
configurable time; and deleting the first modification sentinel
file in the first physical storage pool; and deleting the second
modification sentinel file in the second physical storage pool.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the configurable time is longer
than the worst-case replication propagation time between the first
physical storage pool and the second physical storage pool.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the modification instruction is a
delete instruction, wherein the selective modification of a replica
of the data item is performed by removing each data item from its
physical storage pool; and wherein the modification sentinel file
is a file deletion marker.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the modification instruction is a
purge instruction, wherein the selective modification of a replica
of the data item is performed by deleting and marking as free the
physical drive space associated with each replica of the data item;
and wherein the modification sentinel file is a file purge
marker.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the modification instruction is a
version instruction, wherein the selective modification of a
replica of the data item is performed by saving a copy of the
existing data item in a second location, creating a new copy of
each data item; and wherein the modification sentinel file is a
version marker.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the first replica is stored at a
first location and the second replica is stored at a second
location, and wherein the modification instruction is a
time-to-live (ttl) instruction, wherein the selective modification
of a replica of the data item is performed by selectively checking
a third location for an update if the time since the last update is
greater than the time indicated in the ttl instruction, and copying
the data item from the third location if the data item in the third
location has been changed; and wherein the modification sentinel
file is a ttl marker.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the first modification sentinel
file is a 0 byte file.
9. The method of claim 1, further comprising: applying a hash
function to a name of the first replica of the data item, wherein
the first modification sentinel file includes a first output of the
hash function.
10. A system for managing data items in a distributed storage pool,
the system comprising: a distributed storage system coupled to a
network, the distributed storage system including a first storage
pool and a second storage pool from a plurality of physical storage
pools, the first and second storage pools each including at least
one processor, a computer readable medium, and a communications
interface; an object service that stores a first replica of a data
item in the first storage pool and receives a modification
instruction for the data item, wherein in response to receiving the
modification instruction, the object service selectively modifies
the first replica of the data item, creates a first modification
sentinel file based on the modification instruction, and stores the
first modification sentinel file in the first storage pool; and a
replicator that stores a second replica of the data item in the
second storage pool and encounters the first modification sentinel
file during a data item replication process, wherein in response to
encountering the first modification sentinel file, the replicator
modifies in accordance with the first modification sentinel file
the second replica of the data item stored in the second storage
pool, creates a second modification sentinel file, and stores the
second modification sentinel file in the second storage pool.
11. The system of claim 10, further comprising: a timer triggering
an action at a configurable time; and wherein the replicator
includes a triggerable action that deletes the first modification
sentinel file in the first storage pool and deletes the second
modification sentinel file in the second storage pool.
12. The system of claim 10, wherein the modification instruction is
a delete instruction, wherein the object service modifies the first
replica of the data item and the replicator modifies the second
replica of the data item by removing the respective data items from
their respective storage pools; and wherein the modification
sentinel files are file deletion markers.
13. The system of claim 10, wherein the modification instruction is
a purge instruction, wherein the object service modifies the first
replica of the data item and the replicator modifies the second
replica of the data item by deleting and marking as free the
respective data items from their respective storage pools; and
wherein the modification sentinel files are file purge markers.
14. The system of claim 10, wherein the modification instruction is
a version instruction, wherein the object service modifies the
first replica of the data item and the replicator modifies the
second replica of the data item by saving a copy of the existing
data item in a second location in their respective storage pools;
and wherein the modification sentinel files are version
markers.
15. The system of claim 10, wherein the first replica is stored at
a first location and the second replica is stored at a second
location, and wherein the modification instruction is a
time-to-live (ttl) instruction, wherein the object service modifies
the first replica of the data item and the replicator modifies the
second replica of the data item by checking a third location for an
update if the time since the last update is greater than the time
indicated in the ttl instruction, and copying the data item from
the third location if the data item in the third location has been
changed; and wherein the modification sentinel files are ttl
markers.
16. The system of claim 10, wherein the configurable time is longer
than the worst-case replication propagation time between the first
storage pool and the second storage pool.
17. The system of claim 10, wherein the first modification sentinel
file is a 0 byte file.
18. A machine-readable medium comprising a plurality of
machine-readable instructions that when executed by one or more
processors is adapted to cause the one or more processors to
perform a method comprising: storing a first replica of a data item
in a first physical storage pool; storing a second replica of the
data item in a second physical storage pool; in response to
receiving a modification instruction for the data item, selectively
modifying the first replica of the data item, creating a first
modification sentinel file based on the modification instruction,
and storing the first modification sentinel file in the first
physical storage pool; and in response to encountering the first
modification sentinel file during a data item replication process,
modifying in accordance with the first modification sentinel file
the second replica of the data item stored in the second physical
storage pool, creating a second modification sentinel file, and
storing the second modification sentinel file in the second
physical storage pool.
19. The machine-readable medium of claim 18, the method further
comprising: waiting for a configurable time; and deleting the first
modification sentinel file in the first physical storage pool; and
deleting the second modification sentinel file in the second
physical storage pool.
20. The machine-readable medium of 18, wherein the first
modification sentinel file is a 0 byte file.
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 14/249,306, filed Apr. 9, 2014, which is
itself a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.
13/089,487, filed Apr. 19, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,712,975, which
in turn claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application
61/450,166, filed Mar. 8, 2011, each of which is incorporated
herein by reference. The present application is also related to
non-provisional U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/089,476, filed
Apr. 19, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,554,951; U.S. patent application
Ser. No. 13/089,510, filed Apr. 19, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No.
8,510,267; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/089,442, filed
Apr. 19, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,538,926, each of which is
incorporated herein by reference.
BACKGROUND
[0002] The present disclosure relates generally to cloud computing,
and more particularly to a massively scalable object storage system
to provide storage for a cloud computing environment.
[0003] Cloud computing is location-independent computing, whereby
shared servers provide resources, software, and data to computers
and other devices on demand. As a term, "cloud computing" describes
a consumption and delivery model for FT services based on the
Internet, and it typically involves over-the-Internet provisioning
of dynamically scalable and often virtualized resources. This
frequently takes the form of web-based tools or applications that
users can access and use through a web browser as if it were a
program installed locally on their own computer. Details are
abstracted from consumers, who no longer have need for expertise
in, or control over, the technology infrastructure "in the cloud"
that supports them. Most cloud computing infrastructures consist of
services delivered through common centers and built on servers.
Clouds often appear as single points of access for consumers'
computing needs.
[0004] As the use of cloud computing has grown, cloud service
providers such as Rackspace Hosting Inc. of San Antonio, Tex., have
been confronted with the need to greatly expand file storage
capabilities rapidly while making such expansions seamless to their
users. Conventional file storage systems and methods to expand such
systems suffer from several limitations that can jeopardize data
stored in the object storage system. In addition, known techniques
use up substantial resources of the object storage system to
accomplish expansion while also ensuring data safety. Finally, the
centralization of data storage brings with it issues of scale. A
typical local storage system (such as the hard drive in a computer)
may store thousands or millions of individual files for a single
user. A cloud-computing-based storage manipulation functionality
such that the object service 208 is operable to, for example,
store, retrieve and delete stored objects in the storage pools 214.
In one embodiment, a object service 208 is provided for each
storage pool that holds object data. For example, an object service
system is designed to address the needs of thousands or millions of
different users simultaneously, with corresponding increases in the
number of files stored.
[0005] Accordingly, it would be desirable to provide an improved
scalable object storage system.
SUMMARY
[0006] According to one embodiment, the improved scalable object
storage system includes a method for storing data, comprising
providing a plurality of physical storage pools, each storage pool
including a plurality of storage nodes coupled to a network, each
storage node further providing a, non-transient computer readable
medium for data storage; classifying a plurality of availability
zones, wherein the storage nodes within an availability zone are
subject to a correlated loss of access to stored data; defining a
plurality of abstract partitions, wherein each possible input data
management request deterministically corresponds to one of the
plurality of abstract partitions; mapping the plurality of abstract
partitions to the plurality of physical storage pools such that
each mapped physical storage pool includes a replica of the data
associated with the associated mapped abstract partition, and each
replica for a particular abstract partition is mapped to a physical
storage pool in a different availability zone; receiving a data
management request over the network, the data management request
associated with a data object; identifying a first partition
corresponding to the received data management request; and
manipulating the data object in the physical storage pools mapped
to the first partition in accordance with the data management
request.
[0007] According to another embodiment, the improved scalable
object storage system includes a distributed storage coupled to a
network, the distributed storage including a first storage pool and
a second storage pool from a plurality of storage pools, the first
storage pool in a first availability zone and the second storage
pool in a second availability zone, each storage pool including at
least one processor, a computer readable medium, and a
communications interface; a director coupled to the network, the
director including a processor, a computer readable medium, and a
communications interface; a ring structure associated with the
director, wherein the ring structure is adapted to associate a
storage request with a first abstract partition from a plurality of
abstract partitions, and wherein the ring structure is further
adapted to selectively associate a first abstract partition with a
first fault-tolerant multi-master replication target, the first
replication target including the first storage pool and the second
storage pool; wherein the director is adapted to route inbound
storage requests to the replication target and outbound storage
responses from the replication target.
[0008] According to another embodiment, the improved scalable
object storage system includes a non-transient computer readable
medium containing executable instructions, which when executed on a
processor at a first time, initialize a ring by retrieving a set of
ring parameters, the ring parameters including a number of abstract
partitions, a number of physical storage pools, and a set of
performance constraints; performing a consistent hashing function
associating a first range of inputs with a first abstract partition
and a second range of inputs with a second abstract partition; and
allocating the available physical storage pools by mapping each
abstract partition to one or more storage pools in accordance with
the set of performance constraints; at a second time, opaquely
route an input request to a correct storage pool in accordance with
the initialized ring; and at a third time, rebalance the ring by
retrieving the set of ring parameters, performing a consistent
hashing function associating the range of inputs with the first
abstract partition and the second range of inputs with the second
abstract partition; and allocating the available storage pools
mapping each abstract partition to one or more storage pools in
accordance with the set of performance constraints such that each
abstract partition has zero or one changes in the physical storage
pools allocated thereto.
[0009] According to another embodiment, the improved scalable
object storage system includes a system for coordinating events in
a distributed system, comprising a plurality of subsidiary nodes
coupled to a network, each subsidiary node including at least one
processor, a computer-readable medium, and a communications
interface, wherein information in a first subsidiary node needs to
be synchronized with the information in a second subsidiary node in
response to a time-varying series of requests; a first gateway,
including a first processor, a first local clock, and a first
communications interface; a second gateway, including a second
processor, a second local clock, and a second communications
interface; a timekeeping node coupled to the network, including a
master clock; and a synchronization rectifier coupled to the first
and second subsidiary nodes; wherein the timekeeping node is
operationally coupled to the first and second gateways to reduce
clock skew between the master clock, the first local clock and the
second local clock below a configurable threshold; wherein the
first gateway uses the first processor to timestamp a first request
received over the first communications interface according to the
time of the first local clock with a granularity at least equal to
the configurable threshold; wherein the second gateway uses the
second processor to timestamp a second request received over the
second communications interface according to the time of the second
local clock with a granularity at least equal to the configurable
threshold; wherein synchronization between the first subsidiary
node and the second subsidiary node is controlled by the
later-occurring request if the first request and the second request
are separated by a time greater than the configurable threshold;
and wherein synchronization between the first subsidiary node and
the second subsidiary node is controlled by the synchronization
rectifier if the first request and the second request are separated
by a time smaller than the configurable threshold.
[0010] According to another embodiment, the improved scalable
object storage system includes a method for coordinating events in
a distributed system, comprising synchronizing a master clock to
coordinated universal time within a master skew threshold;
synchronizing a first local clock at a first gateway with the
master clock within a system skew threshold, and synchronizing a
second local clock at a second gateway with the master clock within
the system skew threshold; receiving, at the first gateway, a first
request to manipulate a non-volatile data storage, and marking the
first request with the time of reception according to the first
local clock, with a granularity at least equal to the system skew
threshold; receiving, at the second gateway, a second request to
manipulate the non-volatile data storage, and marking the second
request with the time of reception according to the second local
clock, with a granularity at least equal to the system skew
threshold; evaluate the first request and the second request to
determine if they are unambiguously ordered by determining if the
first request and the second request are temporally ordered with a
granularity greater than the system skew threshold; if the first
request and the second request are unambiguously ordered, modifying
the non-volatile data storage as directed in the later request; and
if the first request and the second request are not unambiguously
ordered, modifying the non-volatile data storage as directed by a
deterministic tiebreaker.
[0011] According to another embodiment, the improved scalable
object storage system includes a non-transient computer readable
medium containing executable instructions, which when executed on a
processor synchronize a first local clock with a second local clock
within a system skew threshold; receive a first request to
manipulate a system resource and marks the first request with the
time of reception according to the first local clock, with a
granularity at least equal to the system skew threshold; receive a
second request to manipulate the system resource and marks the
second request with the time of reception according to the second
local clock, with a granularity at least equal to the system skew
threshold; evaluate the first request and the second request to
determine if they are unambiguously ordered by determining if the
first request and the second request are temporally ordered with a
granularity greater than the system skew threshold; if the first
request and the second request are unambiguously ordered,
manipulates the system resource as directed in the later request;
and if the first request and the second request are not
unambiguously ordered, executes tiebreaker instructions controlling
the system resource; and returns a success or error depending on
the outcome of the tiebreaker instructions.
[0012] According to another embodiment, the improved scalable
object storage system includes a method for managing data items in
a distributed storage pool, comprising providing a plurality of
physical storage pools, each storage pool including a plurality of
storage nodes coupled to a network, each storage node further
providing a non-transient computer readable medium for data
storage; storing a first replica of a data item in a first physical
storage pools, and storing a second replica of the data item in a
second physical storage pool; in response to receiving a
modification instruction for the data item, selectively modifying
the first replica of the data item, creating a first modification
sentinel file, and storing the first modification sentinel file in
the first physical storage pool; in response to encountering the
first modification sentinel file during a data item replication
process, modifying the second replica of the data item and creating
a second modification sentinel file in the second physical storage
pool.
[0013] According to another embodiment, the improved scalable
object storage system includes a system for out-of-band
communication of object storage metadata, the system comprising a
distributed storage system coupled to a network, the distributed
storage including a first storage pool and a second storage pool
from a plurality of storage pools, the first and second storage
pools each including at least one processor, a computer readable
medium, and a communications interface; wherein the first storage
pool includes a first replica of a data item, and the second
storage pool includes a second replica of the data; an object
service responsive to modification instructions; and a replicator
adapted to create a second replica of the data item in the second
storage pool; wherein the object service responds to an out-of-band
instruction by selectively modifying the first replica of the data
item, creating a first modification sentinel file, and storing the
first modification sentinel file in the first physical storage
pool; and wherein the replicator responds to encountering the first
modification sentinel file during a data item replication process
by modifying the second replica of the data item and creating a
second modification sentinel file in the second physical storage
pool.
[0014] According to another embodiment, the improved scalable
object storage system includes a non-transient computer readable
medium containing executable instructions, which when executed on a
processor at a first time, run a replication procedure that takes a
first copy of a data item in a first location and makes an
identical second copy of the data item in a second location; at a
second time, run an out-of-band modification procedure to
selectively modify the first copy of the data item, create a first
modification sentinel file, and store the first modification
sentinel file in the first location; and at a third time, change
the execution of the replication procedure to modify a the second
copy of the data item and create a second modification sentinel
file in the second location.
[0015] According to another embodiment, the improved scalable
object storage system includes a non-transient computer readable
medium containing executable instructions, which when executed on a
processor at a first time, run a replication procedure that takes a
first copy of a data item in a first location and makes an
identical second copy of the data item in a second location; at a
second time, run an out-of-band modification procedure to
selectively modify the first copy of the data item, create a first
modification sentinel file, and store the first modification
sentinel file in the first location; and at a third time, change
the execution of the replication procedure to modify a the second
copy of the data item and create a second modification sentinel
file in the second location.
[0016] According to another embodiment, the improved scalable
object storage system includes a distributed information
synchronization system, comprising a first subsidiary node coupled
to a network, the first subsidiary node including a first
non-transitory computer-readable medium wherein the first
computer-readable medium includes a first structured information
repository, and wherein information in the first structured
information repository is subject to internal consistency
constraints; a second subsidiary node coupled to a network, the
second subsidiary node including a second non-transitory
computer-readable medium wherein the second computer-readable
medium includes a second structured information repository, and
wherein information in the second structured information repository
is subject to internal consistency constraints; a repository
synchronizer coupled to the first and second structured information
repositories; the repository synchronizer further including a
consistency evaluation module adapted to evaluate the differences
between the first structured information repository and the second
structured information repository; an internal modification module
adapted to modify the internal structures of a structured
information repository; an external replication module adapted to
delete a target structured information repository and replace it
with a replicated copy of a source structured information
repository; and a threshold comparator; wherein the repository
synchronizer is adapted to evaluate the first and second structured
information repositories and determine a level of difference and
compare the level of difference to a configurable threshold using
the threshold comparator; if the level of difference is above the
configurable threshold, modify the internal structures of a
selected structured information repository using the internal
modification module; and if the level of difference is below the
configurable threshold, delete the selected structured information
repository and replace it with a replicated copy of a consistent
structured information repository using the external replication
module.
[0017] According to another embodiment, the improved scalable
object storage system includes a method for synchronizing
structured information in a distributed system, comprising storing
a first structured information repository on a first non-transitory
computer-readable medium, wherein information in the first
structured information repository is subject to internal
consistency constraints; storing a second structured information
repository on a second non-transitory computer-readable medium,
wherein information in the second structured information repository
is subject to internal consistency constraints; evaluating the
differences between the first structured information repository and
the second structured information repository to determine a
preferred state and a difference measurement quantifying a
difference from the preferred state; determining whether the
difference measurement exceeds a configurable threshold; modifying
a selected structured information repository if the difference
measurement for the selected structured information repository is
less than the configurable threshold, wherein the modification of
the selected structured information repository is subject to the
internal consistency constraints of the selected structured
information repository, deleting the selected structured
information repository if the difference measurement for the
selected structured information repository is greater than the
configurable threshold, and replacing the selected structured
information repository with a replica of a structured information
repository in the preferred state, wherein either modifying the
selected structured information repository or deleting and
replacing the structured information repository changes the
non-transitory computer-readable medium storing the selected
structured information repository such that the selected structured
information repository is both compliant with its internal
consistency constraints and in the preferred state. The method may
also include determining that both the first structured information
repository and the second structured information repository are not
in the preferred state; pre-selecting the structured information
repository that is closer to the preferred state and modifying the
pre-selected structured information repository to bring the
pre-selected structured information repository to the preferred
state, subject to the internal consistency requirements of the
pre-selected structured information repository, regardless of the
configurable threshold.
[0018] According to another embodiment, the improved scalable
object storage system includes a non-transient computer readable
medium containing executable instructions, which when executed on a
processor update a first structured information repository on a
first non-transitory computer-readable medium, subject to internal
consistency constraints; update a second structured information
repository on a second non-transitory computer-readable medium,
subject to internal consistency constraints; evaluate the
differences between the first structured information repository and
the second structured information repository to determine a
preferred state and a difference measurement quantifying a
difference from the preferred state; determine whether the
difference measurement exceeds a configurable threshold; modify a
selected structured information repository if the difference
measurement for the selected structured information repository is
less than the configurable threshold, subject to the internal
consistency constraints of the selected structured information
repository, delete the selected structured information repository
if the difference measurement for the selected structured
information repository is greater than the configurable threshold,
and replace the selected structured information repository with a
replica of a structured information repository in the preferred
state.
[0019] According to another embodiment, the improved scalable
object storage system includes a non-transient computer readable
medium containing executable instructions, which when executed on a
processor update a first structured information repository on a
first non-transitory computer-readable medium, subject to internal
consistency constraints; update a second structured information
repository on a second non-transitory computer-readable medium,
subject to internal consistency constraints; evaluate the
differences between the first structured information repository and
the second structured information repository to determine a
preferred state and a difference measurement quantifying a
difference from the preferred state; determine whether the
difference measurement exceeds a configurable threshold; modify a
selected structured information repository if the difference
measurement for the selected structured information repository is
less than the configurable threshold, subject to the internal
consistency constraints of the selected structured information
repository, delete the selected structured information repository
if the difference measurement for the selected structured
information repository is greater than the configurable threshold,
and replace the selected structured information repository with a
replica of a structured information repository in the preferred
state.
[0020] The specifics of these embodiments as well as other
embodiments are described with particularity below.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0021] FIG. 1a is a schematic view illustrating an embodiment of a
file storage system.
[0022] FIG. 1b is a schematic view illustrating an embodiment of an
information handling system used in the file storage system of FIG.
1a.
[0023] FIG. 2 is a schematic view illustrating an embodiment of a
logical structure provided by the file storage system of FIG.
1a.
[0024] FIG. 3 is a schematic view illustrating an embodiment of a
user account.
[0025] FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating an embodiment of a
method for storing an object.
[0026] FIG. 5 is a flow chart illustrating an embodiment of a
method for creating a ring
[0027] FIG. 6 flow chart illustrating an embodiment of a method for
reassigning partitions in a ring.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0028] Referring now to FIG. 1a, an embodiment of a file storage
system 100 is illustrated. The file storage system 100 includes a
user device 102 connected to a network 104 such as, for example, a
Transport Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) network
(e.g., the Internet.) A storage management server 106 is connected
to the network 104 and to a plurality of storage servers 108. While
only one user device has been illustrated as connected to the
network 104 for clarity of discussion, one of skill in the art will
recognize that a plurality of user devices may, and typically will,
be connected to the network 104. While only one storage management
server coupled to a plurality of storage servers has been
illustrated as connected to the network 104 for clarity of
discussion, one of skill in the art will recognize that a plurality
of storage management servers, each connected to a plurality of
storage servers may, and typically will, be connected to the
network 104. Each of the user device 102 and the storage management
server 106 includes a respective network interface for
communicating with the network 104 (e.g., outputting information
to, and receiving information from, the network 104).
[0029] Each of the user device 102, storage management server 106,
and the plurality of storage servers 108 may include a respective
information processing system, a subsystem, or a part of a
subsystem for executing processes and performing operations (e.g.,
processing or communicating information). An information processing
system is an electronic device capable of processing, executing or
otherwise handling information. Examples of information processing
systems include a server computer, a personal computer (e.g., a
desktop computer or a portable computer such as, for example, a
laptop computer), a handheld computer, and/or a variety of other
information handling systems know in the art.
[0030] Referring now to FIG. 1b, an information processing system
110 which is representative of one of, or a portion of, the
information processing systems described above, is illustrated. The
information processing system 110 may include any or all of the
following: (a) a processor 112 for executing and otherwise
processing instructions, (b) a plurality of input devices 116,
which are operably coupled to the processor 112, for inputting
information, (c) an optional display device 116, which is operably
coupled to the processor 112, for displaying information, (d) an
optional print device 118, which is operably coupled to the
processor 112, for printing visual images, scanning visual images,
and/or faxing visual images, (e) a computer-readable medium 120,
which is operably coupled to the processor 114, for storing
information, as discussed further below, and (f) various other
electronic circuitry for performing other operations of the
information processing system 110 known in the art. For example,
the information processing system 110 may include (a) a network
interface (e.g., circuitry) for communicating between the processor
110 and the network 104 and/or other devices, and (b) a memory
device (e.g., FLASH memory, a random access memory (RAM) device or
a read-only memory (ROM) device for storing information (e.g.,
instructions executed by processor 112 and data operated upon by
processor 112 in response to such instructions)).
[0031] The computer-readable medium 120 and the processor 110 are
structurally and functionally interrelated with one another as
described below in further detail, and information processing
system of the illustrative embodiment is structurally and
functionally interrelated with a respective computer-readable
medium similar to the manner in which the processor 110 is
structurally and functionally interrelated with the
computer-readable medium 120. As discussed above, the
computer-readable medium 120 may include a hard disk drive, a
memory device, and/or a variety of other computer-readable media
known in the art, and when including functional descriptive
material, data structures are created that define structural and
functional interrelationships between such data structures and the
computer-readable medium 120 (and other aspects of the system 100).
Such interrelationships permit the data structures' functionality
to be realized. For example, the processor 112 reads (e.g.,
accesses or copies) such functional descriptive material from the
computer-readable medium 120 onto the memory device of the
information processing system 110, and the information processing
system 110 (more particularly, the processor 112) performs its
operations, as described elsewhere herein, in response to such
material stored in the memory device of the information processing
system 110. In addition to reading such functional descriptive
material from the computer-readable medium 120, the processor 112
is capable of reading such functional descriptive material from (or
through) the network 104. In one embodiment, the computer-readable
medium is non-transitory.
[0032] Referring now to FIGS. 1a and 2, the file storage system of
FIGS. 1a and 1b creates a logical structure 200. The logical
structure 200 includes a user 202 connected to a proxy 204. In one
embodiment, the user 202 may be provided by the user device 102,
the proxy 204 may be provided by the storage management server 106,
and the user 202/proxy 204 connection may be created by the
coupling of the user device 102 to the storage management server
106 through the network 104. The proxy 204 is connected to one or
more rings 206 such as an object ring 206a, a container ring 206b,
and an account ring 206c, described in further detail below, that
are connected to an object service 208, container service 210, and
an account service 212, respectively, described in further detail
below. In other embodiments, there are other types of objects
managed by rings, such as a structured data ring, a graph storage
ring, or another type of ring (not pictured). In such embodiments,
each ring would be connected to an appropriate service, such as a
structured data service, a graph service, or another service (not
pictured).
[0033] Each of object service 208, the container service 210, and
the account service 212 are connected to a plurality of storage
pools 214. In one embodiment, the rings 206 may include software
that is stored on a computer-readable medium location in the
storage management server 106 and/or the storage servers 108. In
one embodiment, the object service 208, the container service 210,
and the account service 212 may include software that is stored on
a computer-readable medium located in the storage management server
106 and/or the storage servers 108. In one embodiment, the storage
pools 208 may be provided by the storage servers 108. In one
embodiment, the proxy 204/rings 206/object service 208/container
service 210/account service 212/storage pool 214 connections may be
created by the connection of the storage management server 106 with
the storage servers 108. In a further embodiment, the rings are
implemented at least in part using electrical circuits on a
semiconductor chip to achieve better speed and latency.
[0034] In one embodiment, each storage pool 214 is provided by a
separate storage server 108 or includes a virtual server that is
included in a portion of one of the storage servers 108 or across a
plurality of the storage servers 108. For example, the storage
servers 108 may be physically located in one or more data centers,
and the resources of the storage servers 108 may be virtualized
according to the requirements of a plurality of users (e.g., the
user 202) such that the plurality of storage pools 214 are provided
to the plurality of users in order to store files and/or data
objects. Thus, resources for a particular virtual server or storage
pool may span across multiple storage servers 108.
[0035] Referring now to FIG. 3, the user 202, which is exemplary of
a plurality of users that use the file storage system 100, has a
user account 300 with the file storage system 100 to store and
receive data objects, and that user 202 may create a plurality of
containers 302 in the user account 300 and store a plurality of
data objects 304 in each of the containers 302 for retrieval. In
the discussion below, a user account is referred to as an
"account", a container is referred to as a "container", and a data
object us referred to as an "object" for clarity of discussion. One
of skill in the art will recognize that the terms "account",
"container" and "object" are generic forms of data naming that are
used to direct the file storage system 100 to a specific data
object. When other types of rings and services are used, an
appropriate name may be substituted. For clarity, discussion of
alternative rings and services will be limited to the "account",
"container" and "object" rings and services.
[0036] The components of the file storage system 100 and some of
their functions will now be described in detail.
[0037] The Rings 206
[0038] As discussed above, the rings 206 are implemented in a
tailored electrical circuit or as software instructions to be used
in conjunction with a processor to create a hardware-software
combination that implements the specific functionality described
herein. To the extent that software is used to implement the rings,
it may include software that is stored on a computer-readable
medium location in the storage management server 106 and/or the
storage servers 108. Referring back to FIG. 2, the rings 206
include semiconductor circuits and/or computer-executable
instructions that, when executed by a processor, provide subsystems
of the file storage system 100 that provide a mapping between the
entities stored in the file storage system 100 and the locations of
those entities in the storage pools 214. In the illustrated
embodiment, the file storage system 100 includes a separate object
ring 206a, container ring 206b, and account ring 206c, and when
components of the file storage system 100 need to perform any
operation on an object, container, or account, those components
interact with the object ring 206a, container ring 206b, and
account ring 206c, respectively, to determine the location of that
stored entity in the storage pools 214. However, one of skill in
the art will recognize that different ring structures may be
provided (e.g., a single ring for the objects, containers, and
accounts, more than one ring for each of the objects, containers,
and account, etc.) without departing from the scope of the present
disclosure. The rings 206 maintains the availability and safety of
data in the file storage system 100 through the use of zones,
partitions, replicas, and the storage pools 214, as described
below.
[0039] A zone is defined as one or more of the storage pools 214
that are subject to a correlated loss of access or data as a result
of a particular event. For example, each storage server 108 in the
file storage system 100 may be defined as a storage pool in a
separate zone, as each storage server 108 is subject to loss of
access to its stored objects as a result of a storage device
failure, a catastrophic event at the location where the storage
server resides, and/or a variety of other object access-loss
scenarios known in the art. For the same reasons, a drive in a
storage server 108 may be defined as a storage pool in a separate
zone, a plurality of storage servers 108 in a given storage rack or
cabinet as a storage pool in a separate zone, a plurality of
storage servers 108 coupled to the same switch as a storage pool in
a separate zone, a plurality of storage servers 108 in a given
datacenter as a storage pool in a separate zone, a plurality of
storage servers 108 connected to a common power system as a storage
pool in a separate zone, etc. One of skill in the art will
recognize that the examples of zones provided above are not
limiting, and a variety of zones known in the art will fall into
the scope of the present disclosure.
[0040] Logically, a partition is an abstract storage bucket. As
discussed in further detail below, the file storage system 100 maps
each partition to a plurality of storage pools 214 that are in
different zones, and stores data using those partitions. The
mapping of a given partition to a plurality of storage pools 214
creates a plurality of partition replicas of that partition (e.g.,
equal to the number of storage pools 214 the partition is mapped
to.) For example, when a given partition is mapped to 3 storage
pools 214 that are in different zones, 3 partition replicas of that
partition are created.
[0041] The object ring 206a for the management of objects will be
described in detail below. However, one of skill in the art will
recognize how the discussion may be applied to the container ring
206b, the account ring 206c, and/or a ring for any other stored
entity, without departing from the scope of the present
disclosure.
[0042] In various replicated, network-based file storage systems,
an object from a user is received by a proxy. To determine where
the object should be stored, some attribute of the object or the
object data itself is hashed. If necessary, some attribute of the
object is modified so that three different results are returned
from the hashing function. The object is then replicated and stored
in the storage pool corresponding to the number returned by the
hash function.
[0043] Under typical circumstances, a consistent hashing function
is used as the hash function. The use of the consistent hashing
function ensures that there will be minimal changes to the assigned
storage pools given a change in membership due to adding or
removing new storage pools.
[0044] Although the consistent hashing function results in minimal
changes to the storage location, sometimes the assignments made by
the consistent hashing function or the rearrangements needed due to
a change in membership may have undesirable storage
characteristics. For example, such methods have been found to
result in multiple object replicas for the same object being stored
in one or more storage pools that are in the same zone. As
discussed above, this is undesirable because then multiple (and
possibly all) object replicas for the same object are subject to
being lost as a result of a particular event. Alternatively,
rebalancing the replicas due to a change in membership has been
found to require the movement to two of the replicas 4% of the
time, and the movement of all three replicas 1% of the time. It is
desirable to never have to move more than one replica at a
time.
[0045] In one embodiment, the file storage system 100 solves the
problem of multiple object replicas for the same object being
stored in storage pools that are in the same zone through the use
of the rings 206. Referring now to FIG. 4, a method 400 for storing
stored entities is illustrated. At block 402, an object us received
by a user. In one embodiment, an object is received from the user
202 by the proxy 204. The method 400 then proceeds to block 404
where a partition identification is generated. In one embodiment, a
consistent hash function is applied to the object received in block
402, and the hash function returns a partition identification that
corresponds to a partition. The method 400 then proceeds to block
406 where the partition associated with the partition
identification is mapped to storage pools that are in different
zones. This mapping function is constrained so that the physical
location of the storage pools is required to have one or more
desirable properties, such as having each partition replica in a
separate zone.
[0046] There are various embodiments of the constrained mapping
function. In one embodiment, the constrained mapping function is
the output of a constraint satisfaction solver, in which the
desired storage characteristics (such as the requirement that each
replica of a partition be in a different availability zone) are
inputs to the solving function. The solver then uses one or more
search methodologies within the solution space to find a storage
layout that maps partitions to storage pools in a desirable
manner.
[0047] In a second embodiment, a constrained mapping function is
applied to portions of the partition identification (e.g., the
portions of the partition identification that the constrained
mapping function is applied to) may be bits of the output of the
original hashing function is applied to the object. For example,
the number of bits to which the constrained mapping function is
applied may be known as the partition power, and 2 to the partition
power may indicate the partition count. The constrained mapping
function is designed to return a storage pool location for each
portion of the partition identification to which it is applied, and
the storage pool locations returned for a given partition
identification will each correspond to storage pools 214 in
different zones. These storage pool locations are then associated
with the partition identification. Thus, the partition
corresponding to the partition identification is replicated
multiple times in the file storage system 100 (i.e., a partition
replica is included in each storage pool corresponding to the
storage pool locations determined from the constrained mapping
function.) The method 400 then proceeds to block 408 where the
object is stored according to the partition. The object received by
the user 202 in block 402 of the method 400 may then be stored
according to the partition corresponding to the partition
identification, which results in multiple object replicas for the
object being stored in storage pools that are in different zones in
the file storage system 100. In another embodiment, the constrained
mapping function is used to determined storage pool locations that
are in different zones for each partition prior to the object being
received by the user 202, discussed in further detail below.
[0048] The output of the constrained mapping function signifies a
particular storage pool where a replica of the partition should be
stored. An example of this output is as follows: When an object is
received from the user 202 at block 402 of the method 400, and at
block 404 of the method 400, a hash function is applied to the
object. In one exemplary embodiment, the user 202 provides data
including an account/container/object name to the proxy 2004, and a
hash function is applied to the account/container/object name as
follows:
Hash function (account/container/object name)==123456789 Where
123456789 is the partition identification that is returned by the
hash function. At block 406 of the method 400, the partition
mapping number may then be divided into 3 parts (e.g., the first
three digits, the second three digits, and the third three digits
of the partition identification,) and the constrained mapping
function is applied to each of those parts: Constrained mapping
function (123)==storage pool location (zone 1) Constrained mapping
function (456)==storage pool location (zone 7) Constrained mapping
function (789)==storage pool location (zone 3) As discussed above,
the constrained mapping function is designed to return the storage
pool location (zone 1), storage pool location (zone 7), and storage
pool location (zone 3) that correspond to storage pools that are in
different zones (e.g., zones 1, 3, and 7). The storage pools
locations are then associated with the partition identification:
Partition identification: (storage pool location (zone 1)), storage
pool location (zone 7), storage pool location (zone 3)) Thus, the
partition corresponding to the partition identification is
replicated across storage pools that are in different zones (here,
zones 1, 3, and 7.) At block 408 of the method 400, the object
received from the user 202 is then stored, using the partition
corresponding to the partition identification, in each of the
storage pools corresponding to the storage pool locations returned
by the application of the constrained mapping function to portions
of the partition identification. Thus, 3 replicas of the object
received from the user 202 are stored in the file storage system
100 in storage pools that are located in different zones (zones 1,
3, and 7.) In one embodiment, each of the storage pool locations
are IP addresses, i.e., when each of the storage pools are separate
storage servers. In one embodiment, the constrained mapping
function is a hash function. However, one of skill in the art will
recognize that a variety of functions may be used to ensure that
each partition is mapped to storage pools that are in different
zones without departing from the scope of the present
disclosure.
[0049] In another embodiment, the constrained mapping function is
applied to the file storage system 100 before the object is
received by the user 202 at block 402 in order to accomplish the
mapping of the partitions to storage pools described above with
reference to block 406 of the method 400. For example, the total
number of partitions and the total number of storage
servers/storage pools in the file storage system 100 may (and
typically will) be known. With that knowledge, the constrained
mapping function is used to map each partition in the file storage
system 100 to a plurality of storage pools that are in different
zones, and that information is stored in a constrained mapping
database. For example, a constrained mapping database may include
partitions mapped to storage pools such as:
Partition 1: (storage pool location (zone 1)), storage pool
location (zone 2), storage pool location (zone 3)) Partition 2:
(storage pool location (zone 4)), storage pool location (zone 5),
storage pool location (zone 6)) Partition 3: (storage pool location
(zone 7)), storage pool location (zone 8), storage pool location
(zone 9)) In one embodiment, the output of the constrained mapping
function can be saved for optimized lookup. For example, the saved
output may be embodied in a file provided to each of the storage
pools 214, or stored in a database that is available for the
appropriate systems to query. If the saved output is contained
within a file, the storage pools 214 may then periodically check
the modification time of this file and reload their in-memory
copies of the ring structure as needed.
[0050] Thus, when an object is received from a user 202 at block
402, the hash function is applied to that object to get the
partition identification (e.g., partition 1, 2, or 3 in the example
above) at block 404, and then at block 406, the partition
identification may then be used with the constrained mapping
database to determine the corresponding partition and its
associated storage pool locations. This embodiment allows the
processing necessary to map partitions to multiple storage pools in
different zones to be conducted before objects are received from
users so that such processing does not have to be conducted each
time an object is received from a user.
[0051] For example, referring now to FIG. 5, a method for building
a ring 206 is illustrated. At block 502, an ideal number of
partitions for each storage pool in the file storage system is
determined. In one embodiment, the number of partitions that should
ideally be assigned to each storage pool 214 is calculated based
the weight (e.g., storage capacity) of each storage pool 214. For
example, if the partition power is 20, the ring 206 will have
1,048,576 (2.sup.20) partitions. If there are 1,000 storage pools
214 of equal weight, each storage pool 214 will ideally be assigned
1,048.576 partitions. This may be referred to as an ideal partition
count, and in the example, each storage pool 214 starts off empty
with a 1,048.576 ideal partition count. The method 500 then
proceeds to block 504 where the storage pools are placed in a
sorting order. In one embodiment, the storage pools 214 are placed
in a sorting order based on their ideal partition count (e.g.,
highest to lowest), and this sorting order is maintained throughout
the method 500 as partitions are assigned storage pools 214. The
method 500 then proceeds to block 506 where partitions are assigned
to storage pools based on their sorting order but with a zone
restriction. In one embodiment, the partitions are assigned to the
storage pool 214 with the highest ideal partition count, but
subject to the restriction that the storage pool 214 to which a
partition is being assigned is not in the same zone as any other
storage pool 214 that includes a partition replica for that same
partition. The method 500 then proceeds to block 508 where the
sorting order of the storage pools is adjusted. In one embodiment,
once a partition is assigned to a storage pool 214, that storage
pool 214 will have its ideal partition count decremented and thus
that storage pool 214 is moved to a lower position in the sorting
order, and the method 500 then returns to block 506 to continue to
assign partitions to storage pools based on their sorting order but
with the zone restriction. In such a manner, each partition is
assigned multiple storage pools 214 in different zones, and thus
objects received from users may have multiple object replicas
stored in storage pools in different zones simply by associating
those objects with the partitions.
[0052] As mentioned above, another problem relates to the
rebalancing of object replicas stored in the file storage system
due to changing membership (i.e., adding or subtracting storage
servers or storage pools from the file storage system.) Such
methods have been found to require the moving of multiple object
replicas of the same object in response to a membership change,
which is undesirable.
[0053] In one embodiment, the mapping of partitions to multiple
storage pools in different zones in the file storage system 100
described above solves these problems. The use of the constrained
mapping function to ensure that each partition is mapped to storage
pools in different zones ensures that object replicas for the same
object are never located in storage pools 214 that are in the same
zone (i.e., because any given object received from a user is stored
in a partition that is replicated in storage pools that are in
different zones.) For example, with each storage server 108 defined
as a separate zone, the addition or subtraction of a given storage
server 108 from the file storage system 100 thus can only effect
one partition replica, and hence one object replica of a given
object (i.e., because only one of the partition replica will ever
be located on a storage server that is defined as a separate zone.)
In similar fashion, the rebalancing associated with changing the
zone membership can be accomplished without affecting more than one
replica because each zone is guaranteed to only contain one replica
of a given partition.
[0054] Periodically, partitions may need to be reassigned to
different storage pools 214, and the reassignment of partitions
will result in the building of a new ring from an old ring. Such an
event may occur due to the removal and/or addition of a storage
pool 214 from the file storage system 100 (e.g., a membership
change.) Referring now to FIG. 6, a method 600 for reassigning
partitions in response to the removal of a storage pool is
illustrated. The method 600 begins at block 602 where the ideal
number of partitions for each storage pool is recalculated. In one
embodiment, the ideal partition count for the storage pools 214
remaining in the file storage system 100 (subsequent to the removal
of a storage pool) are recalculated. The method 600 then proceeds
to block 604 where the storage pools are placed in a sorting order
as described above with reference to block 504 of the method 500.
The method then proceeds to block 606 where partitions to be
reassigned are grouped. In one embodiment, a partition list for the
partitions to be reassigned is created. For example, any storage
pools 214 that have been removed from the file system 100 may have
all their assigned partitions unassigned and added to the partition
list, and any storage pools 214 that have more partitions than
their ideal partition count may have random partitions unassigned
from them and added to the partition list (i.e., such that those
storage pools have a number of partitions that is within a
predetermined amount of their ideal partition count.) The
partitions on the partition list may then be reassigned to the
storage pool 214 in blocks 608 and 610 of the method 600
substantially as discussed above with reference to blocks 506 and
508 of the method 500. In one embodiment, at block 608 of the
method 600, whenever a partition is reassigned to a storage pool
214, the time of the reassignment is recorded. Reassignment times
may be used when gathering partitions to reassign to storage pools
214, such that no partition replica for a given partition is moved
twice in a predetermined amount of time. However, such reassignment
restrictions based on reassignment times may be ignored for
partition replicas on storage pools 214 that have been removed from
the file storage system 100, as removing a storage pool 214 only
happens upon storage pool 214/storage server 108 failure and thus
requires the reassignment of the partitions.
[0055] In one embodiment, the method 600 is conducted periodically
to help balance the amount of data stored by storage pools 214 in
the file storage system 100. For example, the partition
reassignment method 600 discussed above may repeated until each
storage pool 214 is within a predetermined threshold of a
predetermined storage capacity (e.g., within 1% of 60% storage
capacity for that storage pool) or when it is determined that
partition reassignment will not improve the balance of data stored
by the file storage system 100 by more than a predetermined amount.
For example, if a first storage server 108 includes 2 TB of
storage, a second storage server 108 includes 4 TB of storage, and
a third storage server 108 includes 6 TB of storage, data balancing
may be conducted to ensure that each of the storage servers 108
holds the same percentage of its storage capacity (i.e., the first
storage server 108 holds 0.66 TB of data, the second storage server
108 holds 1.33 TB of data, and the third storage server 108 holds 2
TB of data such that each of the storage servers 108 is at 33% of
its storage capacity.) Weights may be applied to storage servers
108 to balance the distribution of data on the storage servers 108
in the file storage system 100 to account for different storage
capacities.
[0056] Object Service 208
[0057] As discussed above, the object service 208 is implemented in
a tailored electrical circuit or as software instructions to be
used in conjunction with a processor to create a hardware-software
combination that implements the specific functionality described
herein. To the extent that one embodiment includes
computer-executable instructions, those instructions may include
software that is stored on a computer-readable medium located in
the storage management server 106 and/or the storage servers 108.
The object service 208 may include instructions that, when executed
by a processor, provide object storage and objection manipulation
functionality such that the object service 208 is operable to, for
example, store, retrieve and delete stored objects in the storage
pools 214. In one embodiment, a object service 208 is provided for
each storage pool that holds object data. For example, an object
service 208 may be included on a server that further includes one
or more storage drives that provide a storage pool for objects. In
one embodiment, the objects are stored as binary files with
metadata stored as extended attributes of the file in the file
system used by the object storage service. In such an embodiment,
the object service 208 will uses the extended attributes of the
filesystem to manage the metadata. In a second embodiment, the
metadata is stored in a machine-readable format next to the data
itself. For example, the metadata for a file is stored in a text
file or single file database.
[0058] In one embodiment, objects are stored by the object service
208 using a path derived by applying a hash function to the name of
the object along with a timestamp. For example, an incoming object
for a user account to be written to a container will have a hash
applied to its account/container/object name and the path generated
for the object is:
/objects/<partition>/<storage pool
location>/objectname_hash.15673.data where "objects" indicate
that the object data is stored in an object storage pool 214,
<partition> is the partition identification that maps the
object to a partition, <storage pool location> is the storage
pool location that maps the partition replica to a storage pool 214
in a different zone than its related partition replicas,
objectname_hash is the hash of the account/container/object name,
and 15672 is the timestamp.
[0059] When there is a request for an object, the file storage
system 100 will find all the object replicas in the file storage
system 100 that include the objectname_hash and return the object
data that has the most recent timestamp value. Special care is
needed to record updates that should be persisted as the new
canonical value. For example, when an object replica is deleted, a
modification sentinel (e.g., a 0 byte "tombstone" file or ".ts"
file) is written to the storage pool 214 where the deleted object
replica was located and that includes the same objectname_hash as
the deleted object replica (i.e., /objectname_hash.15784.ts,) and
that tombstone file stays in the file storage system 100 for a
predetermined amount of time (e.g., 7 days.) During object
replication, discussed in further detail below, when the file
storage system 100 encounters a tombstone file, the file storage
system 100 checks whether the tombstone file has been in the system
for 7 days. If not, the file storage system 100 searches for and
deletes any object replicas that it finds related to that tombstone
file (e.g., replicas that same objectname_hash as the tombstone
file) to ensure that objects that were meant to be deleted from the
file storage system 100 are removed and older versions of object
replicas of a given object do not appear in the file storage system
100 due to, for example, the temporary failure of a storage server
108 or storage pool 214 that might have prevented the deletion of
that object replica previously. If the file storage system 100
determines that a tombstone file has been in the file storage
system 100 for longer than the predetermined time, that tombstone
file is deleted.
[0060] The mechanism used for recording file deletion is also used
to record other types of updates. For example, a "purge" marker
indicates that the system should overwrite all copies of the object
and set the space to free; a "version" marker indicates that the
system should create a copy and mark the copy with a version
number; and a "ttl" (time-to-live) marker indicates that the system
should check an authoritative source for updates after the expiry
of a set time period. Other types of out-of-band changes to the
file are also contemplated.
[0061] Container Service 210
[0062] As discussed above, the container service 210 is implemented
in a tailored electrical circuit or as software instructions to be
used in conjunction with a processor to create a hardware-software
combination that implements the specific functionality described
herein. To the extent that one embodiment includes
computer-executable instructions, those instructions may include
software that is stored on a computer-readable medium located in
the storage management server 106 and/or the storage servers 108.
The container service 210 may include instructions that, when
executed by a processor, provide container storage and container
manipulation functionality such that the container service 210 is
operable to store, retrieve and delete stored containers in the
storage pools 214. In one embodiment, an container service 210 is
provided for each storage pool that holds container data. For
example, a container service 210 may be included on a server that
further includes one or more storage drives that provide a storage
pool for containers, and the container service 210 may include the
names of containers and objects in those containers. Thus, In one
embodiment, the container service 210 handles the listing of
containers, and does not hold the location where the objects are
stored (e.g., the storage pool where a given object replica
resides), but rather the locations of containers that hold the
objects. The listings for the container locations may be stored as
database files, and those listings may be replicated across the
storage pools 214 in a manner that is similar to the replication of
objects (i.e., through their association with partitions,)
discussed above. Container storage statistics for the container
service(s) 210 may be tracked by the file storage system 100 and
may include total number of objects stored by one or more
containers, the total storage provided by any given container,
and/or a variety of other statistics known in the art.
[0063] Account Service 212
[0064] As discussed above, the account service 212 is implemented
in a tailored electrical circuit or as software instructions to be
used in conjunction with a processor to create a hardware-software
combination that implements the specific functionality described
herein. To the extent that one embodiment includes
computer-executable instructions, those instructions may include
software that is stored on a computer-readable medium located in
the storage management server 106 and/or the storage servers 108.
The account service 212 may include instructions that, when
executed by a processor, provide account storage and account
manipulation functionality such that the account service 212 is
operable to store, retrieve and delete stored accounts in the
storage pools 214. In one embodiment, an account service 212 is
provided for each storage pool that holds account data. For
example, a account service 212 may be implemented by a server that
includes storage drives that provide a storage pool for accounts,
and the account service 212 may include the names of accounts and
containers in those accounts. Thus, the account service 212 is very
similar to the container service 210, discussed above, with the
exception that account storage 212 handles the listings of
accounts.
[0065] Other Services
[0066] As discussed above, other types of services may be
implemented in similar fashion to the object, container, and
account services described above. For example, one implementation
includes an authorization service. The authorization service may
include instructions that, when executed by a processor, handle the
storage and manipulation of authorization metadata so that the
authorization service is operable to store, retrieve, delete, and
query stored credentials from in the storage pools 214. In one
embodiment, an authorization service provides an ACL-based
authorization. In a second embodiment, the authorization service
provides posix-compatible authorization. In a third embodiment, the
authorization service provides tree or graph-based authorization,
such as would be provided with an LDAP-based authorization
service.
[0067] A second implementation includes a structured data service.
The structured data service may include instructions that, when
executed by a processor, provide handle the storage and
manipulation of structured data such that the structured data
service is operable to store, retrieve, delete, and query tabular,
graph, or tree-based data from in the storage pools 214. In one
embodiment, an structured data service provides a JSON-based
output. In a second embodiment, the structured data service
provides XML-based output. In a third embodiment, the structured
data service provides HTML output.
[0068] Proxy 204
[0069] The proxy 204 is implemented in a tailored electrical
circuit or as software instructions to be used in conjunction with
a processor to create a hardware-software combination that
implements the specific functionality described herein. The proxy
204 is responsible for tying together the file storage system 100.
For each request received from a user, the proxy 204 determines the
location of the account, container, or object in the appropriate
ring 206 (e.g., the object ring 206a, the container ring 206b, or
the account ring 206c,) and routes the request accordingly. A
public Application Programming Interface (API) may be exposed to
users through the proxy 204. A large number of failures may be
handled by the proxy 204. For example, if a storage server 108
and/or storage pool 214 is unavailable for a object PUT, the proxy
204 may use the rings 206 to determine an appropriate storage
server 108 and/or storage pool 214 for that object and route the
object there instead. In one embodiment, when objects are streamed
to or from a storage server 108, they are streamed directly through
the proxy 204 and proxy server. 106 to or from the user 202 and/or
user device 102, and are not spooled by the proxy 204 and the proxy
server 106.
[0070] In another embodiment, there are multiple proxies associated
with a file storage service. The existence of multiple proxies may
be ascertainable from outside the file storage service, or it may
be transparent. Different proxies may be used for different
purposes. For example, in one embodiment different proxies are used
for different types of files. In another embodiment, different
proxies are used for different types of requests. In a third
embodiment, an appropriate proxy is chosen to minimize latency,
geographic, or network distance between the proxy and the system
making the request.
[0071] In one embodiment, one of the functions performed by the
proxy is time-stamping or logging all requests into the storage
system. The timestamps on the incoming requests are stored as
metadata and are used in part to determine the most recent version
of a file.
[0072] In an embodiment with more than one proxy, it is possible
for more than one request to come in within a short period of time.
In that case, it is important to resolve any conflicts associated
with multiple simultaneous accesses to the file storage system. In
one embodiment, an algorithmic approach for ordering the actions of
different independent actors is used, such as the use of a vector
clock. In a second embodiment, an independent arbiter is used to
resolve conflicts, using an implementation of the Paxos algorithm
or the Byzantine Generals algorithm.
[0073] A third embodiment may also be used to simplify and increase
the speed of the system by reducing the applicable error window and
then algorithmically picking a "winner" in the case of multiple
conflicting accesses within the error window. For example, an
embodiment may use a time synchronization server and time
synchronization code to reduce the clock skew between different
computers in a pool, in a zone, or across zones to within a
specified E, for example one millisecond or one microsecond. The
applicable .epsilon. can be determined by analyzing the pattern of
accesses over time, and it may be different for different accounts,
different types of services, or at different times. In this case,
the algorithmic complexity of absolutely ordering the actions
across the cluster is traded for the operational complexity of
handling time synchronization across the system.
[0074] Given the clock synchronization across the pools or zones
within E, the previously-discussed timestamp will be sufficient to
absolutely order the actions of other systems interacting with the
file storage system if there are not multiple conflicting accesses
to the same stored value within .epsilon.. In that case, the
timestamping is used to order the actions and pick the most recent
version of any information or data.
[0075] If there are multiple conflicting accesses within .epsilon.,
then the system includes a synchronization rectifier that
algorithmically breaks the tie and chooses a winner. In one
embodiment, this is handled by asserting that the first copy to
replicate (as further discussed below) wins. In a second
embodiment, the inconsistency is handled by throwing an error for
manual intervention. In a third embodiment, the inconsistency is
handled by examining one or more additional types of metadata, such
as latency to the originating user (given identical arrival times,
the originating server with lower latency issued second), internal
file modification or creation times, or an arbitrary ordering on an
unrelated value. A fourth embodiment uses geolocation on the
requesting IP address and allowing the request that is
geographically closer to the timestamping gateway. A fifth
embodiment detects the attempted simultaneous access and does not
allow any write, instead returning an error in response to both
requests. A sixth embodiment evaluates the requests to see if they
can be merged and both accesses granted,
[0076] Replicators
[0077] Replicators are implemented in a tailored electrical circuit
or as software instructions to be used in conjunction with a
processor to create a hardware-software combination that implements
the specific functionality described herein. To the extent that one
embodiment includes computer-executable instructions, those
instructions may be implemented as an software that is stored on a
computer-readable medium located in the storage management server
106 and/or the storage servers 108, and may include instructions
that, when executed by a processor, keep the file storage system
100 in a consistent state in the face of temporary error conditions
like network outages, storage pool 214 failure, and/or storage
server 108 failure. For example, an object replicator may be
provided for each storage pool 214 (e.g., a storage server 108 that
provides a storage pool) that holds object data. The replicators
compare stored entities in their storage pool 214 with each replica
of that stored entity in other storage pools 214 in the file
storage system 100 to ensure that all related replicas contain the
latest version of the stored entity. In one embodiment, object
replicators may use a hash list to quickly compare subsections of
partitions, while container replicators and account replicators may
use a combination of hashes and shared storage account metadata. In
one embodiment, replicator updates of stored entities are push
based. For example, replicators may compare the replica stored
entities in their storage pools 214 with related replica stored
entities in other storage pools in the file storage system 100, and
if the replicator determines there is a difference between the
replicas (e.g., by applying an order independent check sum to the
related replicas), the replicator may then push the data that
related replica stored entities in other storage pools need in
order to be up to date. In one embodiment, the pushed updates
include rsyncing replicas to efficiently provide only the data
needed by the out-of-date replica. Account and container
replicators may either push missing data over HTTP or rsync whole
database files in the event it is determined that a push update
will be inefficient. The push-based updates discussed above results
in replicas being updated generally only from "local" storage pools
214 to "remote" storage pools 214. In one embodiment, this provides
a benefit as data in a storage pool 214 may not belong there (as in
the case of handoffs and ring changes), and a replicator can't know
what data exists elsewhere in the file storage system 100 that it
should pull in. Thus, it's the duty of any replicator associated
with a given a storage pool 214 that contains data to ensure that
data gets to other storage pools where it belongs. As discussed
above, replicators may also ensure that data is removed from the
system by creating the tombstone files as the latest version of a
replica when that replica is deleted, and then search out and
removing all replicas related to that tombstone file from the file
storage system 100.
[0078] Database Replicators
[0079] Database replicators are a type of replicator, discussed
above, that operate on storage pools 214 that contain accounts or
containers (i.e., there may be account replicators and container
replicators.) To perform the replication discussed above, the first
step that a database replicator may perform may be a low-cost hash
comparison to find out whether or not two replicas (e.g., a replica
on the database replicators local storage pool 214 and a related
replica on a "remote" storage pool 214) already match. Under normal
operation, the hash comparison allows relatively quick verification
that databases in the file storage system 100 are already
synchronized. If the hashes differ, the database replicator may
bring the databases in sync by sharing records added since the most
recent previous sync point. This most recent previous sync point
notes the last record at which two databases were known to be in
sync. After all new records have been pushed to the remote
database, the sync table (which lists which remote databases a
local database is in sync with) of the local database is pushed to
the remote database, so the remote database knows it's now in sync
with database that the local database has previously synchronized
with. If a database replica (e.g., an account replica or container
replica) is found to be missing entirely from a storage pool 214
that it should exist in, the entire local database file may be
recreated on that storage pool 214 using rsync techniques known in
the art. In one embodiment, when an entire local database file is
be recreated on a storage pool 214 using rsync, that database may
be vested with a new unique id.
[0080] Object Replicator
[0081] Object replicators are a type of replicator, discussed
above, that operate on storage pools 214 that contain objects. In
one embodiment, object replicators associated with a storage pool
214 may performed rsync techniques known in the art on remote
storage pools to determine appropriate data to push data to remote
storage pools. However, as object replication times may increase
using this method when the file storage system 100 gets
sufficiently large, a hash of the contents for each suffix
directory may instead be saved to a per-partition hashes file, and
the hash for a given suffix directory is then invalidated when the
contents of that suffix directory are modified. The object
replicator may then read these hash files, calculate any
invalidated hashes, and transmit the hashes to each remote storage
pool 214 that should hold the partition, and only suffix
directories with differing hashes on the remote server are then
rsynced. After pushing data to the remote storage pools 214, each
rsynced suffix directory has its hashes recalculated. Object
replicator performance is generally bound by the number of uncached
directories it has to traverse, usually as a result of invalidated
suffix directory hashes. In one embodiment, the file storage system
100 is designed so that around 2% of the hash space on a normal
storage pool 214 will be invalidated per day.
[0082] Updaters
[0083] Updaters are implemented in a tailored electrical circuit or
as software instructions to be used in conjunction with a processor
to create a hardware-software combination that implements the
specific functionality described herein. To the extent that one
embodiment includes computer-executable instructions, those
instructions may include software that is stored on a
computer-readable medium located in the storage management server
106 and/or the storage servers 108, and may include instructions
that, when executed by a processor, process updates that may have
failed. An updater may be provided with each storage pool (e.g., on
a server that includes the storage pool) to process failed updates.
For example, there may be times when container or account data will
not be immediately updated. Such incidents may occur during failure
scenarios or periods of high load. If an update of a stored entity
fails, the update is queued in a storage pool 214 on the file
storage system 100, and the updater that is associated with that
storage pool 214 will process the failed updates. In such
situations, a consistency window is used. For example, suppose the
container service 210 is under load and a new object is put in to
the file storage system 100. The object will be immediately
available for reads as soon as the proxy 204 responds to the user
202 that the object has been successfully added to the file storage
system 100. However, due to the heavy load, a container service 210
may not have been able to update its object listing, and so that
update would be queued for a later update. Container listings,
therefore, may not immediately contain the object, although the
object has been saved and replicated within the applicable object
storage pool area. In one embodiment, the consistency window needs
only to be as large as the frequency at which the updater runs.
[0084] Auditors
[0085] Auditors are implemented in a tailored electrical circuit or
as software instructions to be used in conjunction with a processor
to create a hardware-software combination that implements the
specific functionality described herein. To the extent that one
embodiment includes computer-executable instructions, those
instructions may include software that is stored on a
computer-readable medium located in the storage management server
106 and/or the storage servers 108, and may include instructions
that, when executed by a processor, check the integrity of the
objects, containers, and accounts stored in the storage pools 214.
If corruption is found (in the case of bit rot, for example),
auditors may quarantine the file, and then replication (discussed
above) is used to replace the bad file from another replica. If
other errors are found they may be logged (for example, an object's
listing can't be found on any container storage that it should be
on).
[0086] Large Object Support
[0087] The file storage system 100 may include a limit on the size
of a single uploaded object (e.g., 5 GB.) However, the download
size of a single object may be made virtually unlimited with the
concept of segmentation. Segments of a larger object are uploaded
and a special manifest file is created that, when downloaded, sends
all the segments, concatenated in order, to emulate a single
object. This also offers much greater upload speed by enabling the
parallel upload of different segments. For example, a user may
specify the segment size to use when splitting a large file (e.g.,
1 GB.) The file storage system 100 would then split the large file
into 1G segments and begin uploading those segments in parallel.
Once all the segments have been uploaded, a manifest file may
created so the segments can be downloaded as one. In one
embodiment, all the segments may be uploaded into a second
container with names like
large_file/1290206778.25/21474836480/00000000,
large_file/1290206778.25/21474836480/00000001, etc. In one
embodiment, the use of a separate container provides a benefit that
the main container listings will not be polluted with all the
segment names. The use of a segment name format of
<name>/<timestamp>/<size>/<segment>
provides that an upload of a new file with the same name won't
overwrite the contents of the first until the last moment when the
manifest file is updated.
[0088] The primary factor driving the limitation of object size in
the file storage system 100 is maintaining balance among the
partitions of the ring. To maintain an even dispersion of disk
usage throughout the file storage system 100, larger objects are
split into smaller segments which are then glued together during a
read. This design allows the user to support backup and archiving
of large data sets, and improves performance and/or reduces errors
due to network interruption. The major disadvantage of this method
is that knowledge of the original partitioning scheme is required
to properly reassemble the object, which is not practical for some
use cases, such as CDN origination. In order to eliminate any
barrier to entry for clients wanting to store objects larger than 5
GB, a fully transparent support for large object uploads may be
provided. A fully transparent implementation supports a larger max
size by automatically splitting objects into segments during upload
within the proxy without any changes to the client API. All
segments are completely hidden from the client API. The "user
manifest" design discussed above provides a transparent download of
large objects to the client and still provide the uploading client
a clean API to support segmented uploads. Alternative "explicit"
user manifest options may be provided that include a pre-defined
format for listing the segments to "finalize" the segmented
upload.
[0089] Account Reapers
[0090] An account reaper is implemented in a tailored electrical
circuit or as software instructions to be used in conjunction with
a processor to create a hardware-software combination that
implements the specific functionality described herein. To the
extent that one embodiment includes computer-executable
instructions, those instructions may include software that is
stored on a computer-readable medium located in the storage
management server 106 and/or the storage servers 108, and may
include instructions that, when executed by a processor, remove
data from deleted accounts in the background of the file storage
system 100. An account may be marked for deletion by a user which
may put a value of DELETED into the status column in the account
service 212 on a storage pool 214 that includes accounts,
indicating the data for the account should be deleted later. In one
embodiment, there may be no set retention time and no undelete, as
it may be assumed the user will implement such features once it is
truly desired that the account's data be removed. The account
reaper runs on each account service and storage pool 214 and scans
the storage pool 214 occasionally for accounts that are marked for
deletion. In one embodiment, the account reaper may only trigger on
accounts that storage pool 214 is designated as a "primary" storage
pool for so that multiple account services aren't trying to do the
same work at the same time. The deletion process works as follows:
for each container in the account, each object is deleted and then
the container is deleted. Any deletion requests that fail won't
stop the overall process, but may cause the overall process to fail
eventually (for example, if an object delete times out, the
container won't be able to be deleted later and therefore the
account won't be deleted either). The overall process continues
even on a failure so that it doesn't get hung up reclaiming file
storage system space because of one troublesome spot. The account
reaper will keep trying to delete an account until it eventually
becomes empty, at which point the database replicator will
eventually remove the database files.
[0091] In one embodiment, deleting an account is accomplished
through completely external calls and requires no changes to the
file storage system 100. All data is simply deleted in the same way
a user would, through the public ReST API. However, this uses proxy
resources and logs everything when such actions aren't necessary,
and may require a dedicated system for issuing the delete requests.
In one embodiment, a completely bottom-up approach may be used
where the object and container servers occasionally scan the data
they hold, check if the account has been deleted, and removing the
data if the account has been deleted. This provides for the quick
reclamation of storage space with no impact on the proxies or
logging, but a vast majority of the scanning results in no action
while creating a relatively high I/O load with no benefit. In one
embodiment, the account server marks all the containers for
deletion and the container storage deletes the objects in each
container and then themselves. This also provides for quick
reclamation of storage space for accounts with a lot of containers,
but results in a relatively large load spike. In one embodiment,
the load spike may be reduced by slowing down the process, but then
the benefit of quick reclamation of storage space is lost while
providing a more complex process. In one embodiment, a database
replicator scans all the containers for those marked for deletion
while performing a replication scan.
[0092] Ring Data Structure
[0093] The list of available areas in the storage pool 214 is known
internally to the Ring. In one embodiment, each item in the list of
storage pool 214 is a dictionary with the following keys:
TABLE-US-00001 id integer The index into the list storage pools
214. zone integer The zone the storage pool 214 resides in. weight
float The relative weight of the storage pool 214 in comparison to
other storage pools 214. This usually corresponds directly to the
amount of disk space the storage pool 214 has compared to other
storage pools 214. For instance a storage pool 214 with 1 terabyte
of space might have a weight of 100.0 and another storage pool 214
with 2 terabytes of space might have a weight of 200.0. This weight
can also be used to bring back into balance a storage pool 214 that
has ended up with more or less data than desired over time. A good
average weight of 100.0 allows flexibility in lowering the weight
later if necessary. ip string The IP address(es) of the storage
server(s) 108 providing the storage pool 214. port int The TCP port
the listening storage server process uses that serves requests for
the storage pool 214. device string The on disk name of the storage
pool 214 on the storage server(s). For example: sdb1 meta string A
general-use field for storing additional information for the
storage pool 214. This information isn't used directly by the
storage server processes, but can be useful in debugging. For
example, the date and time of installation and hardware
manufacturer could be stored here.
[0094] In one embodiment, the list of storage pools 214 contains
holes, or indexes set to None, for storage pools 214 that have been
removed from the cluster. Generally, storage pool ids are not
reused. Also, some storage pools 214 may be temporarily disabled by
setting their weight to 0.0.
[0095] Partition Assignment List
[0096] This is a list of array(`I`) of storage pool ids. The
outermost list contains an array(`I`) for each replica. Each
array(`I`) has a length equal to the partition count for the ring.
Each integer in the array(`I`) is an index into the above list of
storage pool 214.
[0097] Partition Shift Value
[0098] The partition shift value is known internally to the Ring.
This value used to shift an MD5 hash to calculate the partition on
which the data for that hash should reside. Only the top four bytes
of the hash is used in this process.
[0099] In one embodiment, a "live ring" option may be used where
each storage server 108 maintains its own copy of the ring and the
storage servers 108 use a gossip protocol to communicate when
changes made. In one embodiment, all ring lookups are done by
calling a service on a separate server or set of servers. In one
embodiment, servers submit change requests to a ring server to have
a new ring built and shipped back out to the servers. The ring 206
described above has each replica of a partition independently
assigned to a storage pool 214. In one embodiment, a ring may be
created that uses a third of the memory of the ring 206 by
assigning the first replica of a partition directly while
determining the other two replicas by "walking" the ring until
additional storage pools 214 are found in other zones. In another
embodiment, partition to storage pool 214 assignments are not
stored in a big list in memory but rather each storage pool 214 is
assigned a set of hashes or anchors. The partition is then
determined from the data item's hash and the nearest storage pool
214 anchors determine where the replicas should be stored.
[0100] Various hashing algorithms may be used in different
embodiments. The Secure Hash Algorithm (SHA) offers relatively good
security but may be slower. MurmurHash may be used as a relatively
faster option as compared to SHA. MD5 Hash is desirable for its
general availability, good distribution, and adequate speed.
[0101] Although illustrative embodiments have been shown and
described, a wide range of modification, change and substitution is
contemplated in the foregoing disclosure and in some instances,
some features of the embodiments may be employed without a
corresponding use of other features. Accordingly, it is appropriate
that the appended claims be construed broadly and in a manner
consistent with the scope of the embodiments disclosed herein.
* * * * *