U.S. patent application number 15/040621 was filed with the patent office on 2016-06-09 for computer implemented methods and apparatus for communicating feed information to one or more recipients.
The applicant listed for this patent is salesforce.com, inc.. Invention is credited to Zachary J. Dunn, Joseph M. Olsen.
Application Number | 20160164821 15/040621 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 47598171 |
Filed Date | 2016-06-09 |
United States Patent
Application |
20160164821 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Olsen; Joseph M. ; et
al. |
June 9, 2016 |
COMPUTER IMPLEMENTED METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR COMMUNICATING FEED
INFORMATION TO ONE OR MORE RECIPIENTS
Abstract
Disclosed are systems, apparatus, methods and computer-readable
media for communicating feed information to one or more recipients.
In some implementations, an instruction to communicate an
information update to one or more identified first recipients is
received. In some instances, an additional recipient indicator is
identified and an identification of one or more second recipients
based on the additional recipient indicator is generated. In some
instances, the one or more second recipients are provided access to
the information update.
Inventors: |
Olsen; Joseph M.; (Mountain
House, CA) ; Dunn; Zachary J.; (San Francisco,
CA) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
salesforce.com, inc. |
San Francisco |
CA |
US |
|
|
Family ID: |
47598171 |
Appl. No.: |
15/040621 |
Filed: |
February 10, 2016 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
14615825 |
Feb 6, 2015 |
9294432 |
|
|
15040621 |
|
|
|
|
13440479 |
Apr 5, 2012 |
8984051 |
|
|
14615825 |
|
|
|
|
61511770 |
Jul 26, 2011 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
709/206 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H04L 51/32 20130101;
H04L 67/306 20130101; G06F 3/0482 20130101; G06F 16/9535 20190101;
H04L 67/26 20130101; H04L 51/14 20130101; G06F 3/04842 20130101;
H04L 51/24 20130101; H04L 51/28 20130101 |
International
Class: |
H04L 12/58 20060101
H04L012/58; G06F 3/0484 20060101 G06F003/0484 |
Claims
1. A system comprising: a database system implemented using a
server system, the database system configurable to cause:
identifying a plurality of profiles associated with a plurality of
contacts of a user, each profile being associated with a respective
contact and being identifiable based on at least one action of the
respective contact; identifying the contacts as suggested
recipients of an unpublished post of the user, the identification
based on the profiles associated with the contacts and based on a
type of content of the unpublished post of the user, the
unpublished post of the user being a post for publication to a
stream of content of at least one other user, the suggest
recipients comprising a group of contacts; providing data capable
of being processed to display: the suggested recipients of the
unpublished post of the user, and an indicator for each suggested
recipient, the indicator being based on a profile associated with a
respective suggested recipient; processing a selection input
selecting at least one of the suggested recipients, the selection
input received via a graphical component of a user interface; and
causing the post to be published for access by the selected at
least one recipient.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the contacts of the group are
linked based on profiles associated with the contacts of the
group.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein the group is
user-established.
4. The system of claim 1, wherein the unpublished post of the user
comprises content associated with a portion of the user interface
capable of sending content for display to another user.
5. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one action of the
respective contact comprises at least one of: an indication of
approval for a piece of content, a re-post of a piece of content, a
number of views of a piece of content, or a comment on a piece of
content.
6. The system of claim 1, wherein the operation of providing for
display is performed responsive to receipt of a request input
through a graphical component of a user interface.
7. The system of claim 1, wherein the unpublished post is capable
of being published to at least one feed of a social network, the at
least one feed being accessible by recipients of the post.
8. The system of claim 1, wherein the identification of the
plurality of contacts as suggested recipients is further based on
at least one of: whether a contact follows an entity, whether an
entity follows a contact, whether an entity and a contact are in a
group, a relationship between a contact and an entity in an
organization, whether profile information of a contact comprises
information associated with an entity, or historical information of
a contact being associated with an entity.
9. A method comprising: identifying a plurality of profiles
associated with a plurality of contacts of a user, each profile
being associated with a respective contact and being identifiable
based on at least one action of the respective contact; identifying
the contacts as suggested recipients of an unpublished post of the
user, the identification based on the profiles associated with the
contacts and based on a type of content of the unpublished post of
the user, the unpublished post of the user being a post for
publication to a stream of content of at least one other user, the
suggest recipients comprising a group of contacts; providing data
capable of being processed to display: the suggested recipients of
the unpublished post of the user, and an indicator for each
suggested recipient, the indicator being based on a profile
associated with a respective suggested recipient; processing a
selection input selecting at least one of the suggested recipients,
the selection input received via a graphical component of a user
interface; and causing the post to be published for access by the
selected at least one recipient.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the contacts of the group are
linked based on profiles associated with the contacts of the
group.
11. The method of claim 9, wherein the at least one action of the
respective contact comprises at least one of: an indication of
approval for a piece of content, a re-post of a piece of content, a
number of views of a piece of content, or a comment on a piece of
content.
12. The method of claim 9, wherein the operation of providing for
display is performed responsive to receipt of a request input
through a graphical component of a user interface.
13. The method of claim 9, wherein the unpublished post is capable
of being published to at least one feed of a social network, the at
least one feed being accessible by recipients of the post.
14. The method of claim 9, wherein the identification of the
plurality of contacts as suggested recipients is further based on
at least one of: whether a contact follows an entity, whether an
entity follows a contact, whether an entity and a contact are in a
group, a relationship between a contact and an entity in an
organization, whether profile information of a contact comprises
information associated with an entity, or historical information of
a contact being associated with an entity.
15. A computer program product comprising program code capable of
being executed by at least one processor when retrieved from a
non-transitory computer-readable medium, the program code
comprising instructions configurable to cause: identifying a
plurality of profiles associated with a plurality of contacts of a
user, each profile being associated with a respective contact and
being identifiable based on at least one action of the respective
contact; identifying the contacts as suggested recipients of an
unpublished post of the user, the identification based on the
profiles associated with the contacts and based on a type of
content of the unpublished post of the user, the unpublished post
of the user being a post for publication to a stream of content of
at least one other user, the suggest recipients comprising a group
of contacts; providing data capable of being processed to display:
the suggested recipients of the unpublished post of the user, and
an indicator for each suggested recipient, the indicator being
based on a profile associated with a respective suggested
recipient; processing a selection input selecting at least one of
the suggested recipients, the selection input received via a
graphical component of a user interface; and causing the post to be
published for access by the selected at least one recipient.
16. The computer program product of claim 15, wherein the contacts
of the group are linked based on profiles associated with the
contacts of the group.
17. The computer program product of claim 15, wherein the at least
one action of the respective contact comprises at least one of: an
indication of approval for a piece of content, a re-post of a piece
of content, a number of views of a piece of content, or a comment
on a piece of content.
18. The computer program product of claim 15, wherein the operation
of providing for display is performed responsive to receipt of a
request input through a graphical component of a user
interface.
19. The computer program product of claim 15, wherein the
unpublished post is capable of being published to at least one feed
of a social network, the at least one feed being accessible by
recipients of the post.
20. The computer program product of claim 15, wherein the
identification of the plurality of contacts as suggested recipients
is further based on at least one of: whether a contact follows an
entity, whether an entity follows a contact, whether an entity and
a contact are in a group, a relationship between a contact and an
entity in an organization, whether profile information of a contact
comprises information associated with an entity, or historical
information of a contact being associated with an entity.
Description
PRIORITY DATA
[0001] This patent document is a continuation of and claims
priority to co-pending and commonly assigned U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 14/615,825, titled "Computer Implemented
Methods and Apparatus for Communicating Feed Information to One or
More Recipients", by Olsen, et al., filed on Feb. 6, 2015 (Attorney
Docket No. SLFCP040C1/713USC1), which is a continuation of and
claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/440,479,
titled "Computer Implemented Methods and Apparatus for
Communicating Feed Information to One or More Recipients", by
Olsen, et al., filed on Apr. 5, 2012 (Attorney Docket No.
SLFCP040/713US), which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent
Application No. 61/511,770, titled "Chatter Add+", by Olsen, et
al., filed on Jul. 26, 2011 (Attorney Docket No. 713PROV). The
entire disclosures of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/615,825,
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/440,479, and U.S. Provisional
Patent Application No. 61/511,770 are hereby incorporated by
reference in their entireties and for all purposes.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
[0002] A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains
material, which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright
owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of
the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the
Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise
reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
TECHNICAL FIELD
[0003] This patent document relates generally to providing
on-demand services in an online social network using a database
system and, more specifically, to techniques for communicating feed
information in an online social network.
BACKGROUND
[0004] "Cloud computing" services provide shared resources,
software, and information to computers and other devices upon
request. In cloud computing environments, software can be
accessible over the Internet rather than installed locally on
in-house computer systems. Cloud computing typically involves
over-the-Internet provision of dynamically scalable and often
virtualized resources. Technological details can be abstracted from
the users, who no longer have need for expertise in, or control
over, the technology infrastructure "in the cloud" that supports
them.
[0005] Database resources can be provided in a cloud computing
context. However, using conventional database management
techniques, it is difficult to know about the activity of other
users of a database system in the cloud or other network. For
example, the actions of a particular user, such as a salesperson,
on a database resource may be important to the user's boss. The
user can create a report about what the user has done and send it
to the boss, but such reports may be inefficient, not timely, and
incomplete. Also, it may be difficult to identify other users who
might benefit from the information in the report.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0006] The included drawings are for illustrative purposes and
serve only to provide examples of possible structures and process
operations for the disclosed inventive systems, apparatus, and
methods for communicating feed information to one or more
recipients. These drawings in no way limit any changes in form and
detail that may be made by one skilled in the art without departing
from the spirit and scope of the disclosed implementations.
[0007] FIG. 1A shows a block diagram of an example of an
environment 10 in which an on-demand database service can be used
in accordance with some implementations.
[0008] FIG. 1B shows a block diagram of an example of some
implementations of elements of FIG. 1A and various possible
interconnections between these elements.
[0009] FIG. 2A shows a system diagram illustrating an example of
architectural components of an on-demand service environment 200
according to some implementations.
[0010] FIG. 2B shows a system diagram further illustrating an
example of architectural components of an on-demand service
environment according to some implementations.
[0011] FIG. 3 shows a flowchart of an example of a method 300 for
tracking updates to a record stored in a database system, performed
in accordance with some implementations.
[0012] FIG. 4 shows a block diagram of an example of components of
a database system configuration 400 performing a method for
tracking an update to a record according to some
implementations.
[0013] FIG. 5 shows a flowchart of an example of a method 500 for
tracking actions of a user of a database system, performed in
accordance with some implementations.
[0014] FIG. 6 shows a flowchart of an example of a method 600 for
creating a news feed from messages created by a user about a record
or another user, performed in accordance with some
implementations.
[0015] FIG. 7 shows an example of a group feed on a group page
according to some implementations.
[0016] FIG. 8 shows an example of a record feed containing a feed
tracked update, post, and comments according to some
implementations.
[0017] FIG. 9A shows an example of a plurality of tables that may
be used in tracking events and creating feeds according to some
implementations.
[0018] FIG. 9B shows a flowchart of an example of a method 900 for
automatically subscribing a user to an object in a database system,
performed in accordance with some implementations.
[0019] FIG. 10 shows a flowchart of an example of a method 1000 for
saving information to feed tracking tables, performed in accordance
with some implementations.
[0020] FIG. 11 shows a flowchart of an example of a method 1100 for
reading a feed item as part of generating a feed for display,
performed in accordance with some implementations.
[0021] FIG. 12 shows a flowchart of an example of a method 1200 for
reading a feed item of a profile feed for display, performed in
accordance with some implementations.
[0022] FIG. 13 shows a flowchart of an example of a method 1300 of
storing event information for efficient generation of feed items to
display in a feed, performed in accordance with some
implementations.
[0023] FIG. 14 shows a flowchart of an example of a method 1400 for
creating a custom feed for users of a database system using
filtering criteria, performed in accordance with some
implementations.
[0024] FIG. 15 shows a flowchart of an example of a method 1500 for
communicating feed information to one or more recipients, performed
in accordance with some implementations.
[0025] FIG. 16 shows a flowchart of an example of a method 1600 for
communicating feed information to one or more recipients, in
accordance with some implementations.
[0026] FIG. 17 shows an example of a method 1700 for generating an
identification of one or more second recipients based on an
additional recipient indicator, in accordance with some
implementations.
[0027] FIG. 18 shows a flowchart of an example of a method 1800 for
communicating feed information to one or more recipients, performed
in accordance with some implementations.
[0028] FIG. 19 show an example of a graphical user interface (GUI)
for communicating feed information to one or more recipients, in
accordance with some implementations.
[0029] FIG. 20 shows an example of a GUI for communicating feed
information to one or more recipients, in accordance with some
implementations.
[0030] FIG. 21 shows an example of a GUI for communicating feed
information to one or more recipients, in accordance with some
implementations.
[0031] FIG. 22 shows an example of a GUI for communicating feed
information to one or more recipients, in accordance with some
implementations.
[0032] FIG. 23 shows an example of a GUI for communicating feed
information to one or more recipients, in accordance with some
implementations.
[0033] FIG. 24 shows an example of a GUI with a publisher for
publishing an information update to an information feed displayed
on a display device, in accordance with some implementations.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0034] Examples of systems, apparatus, and methods according to the
disclosed implementations are described in this section. These
examples are being provided solely to add context and aid in the
understanding of the disclosed implementations. It will thus be
apparent to one skilled in the art that implementations may be
practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other
instances, certain process/method operations, also referred to
herein as "blocks," have not been described in detail in order to
avoid unnecessarily obscuring implementations. Other applications
are possible, such that the following examples should not be taken
as definitive or limiting either in scope or setting.
[0035] In the following detailed description, references are made
to the accompanying drawings, which form a part of the description
and in which are shown, by way of illustration, specific
implementations. Although these implementations are described in
sufficient detail to enable one skilled in the art to practice the
disclosed implementations, it is understood that these examples are
not limiting, such that other implementations may be used and
changes may be made without departing from their spirit and scope.
For example, the blocks of methods shown and described herein are
not necessarily performed in the order indicated. It should also be
understood that the methods may include more or fewer blocks than
are indicated. In some implementations, blocks described herein as
separate blocks may be combined. Conversely, what may be described
herein as a single block may be implemented in multiple blocks.
[0036] Various implementations described or referenced herein are
directed to different methods, apparatus, systems, and computer
program products for providing access to an online social network,
also referred to herein as a social networking system. In some
online social networks, users can access one or more information
feeds, which include information updates presented as feed items,
for instance, in a graphical user interface (GUI) of a display
device. The information updates can include various social network
data from various sources and can be stored in an on-demand
database service environment. In some implementations, the
disclosed methods, apparatus, systems, and computer program
products may be configured or designed for use in a multi-tenant
database environment.
[0037] In some implementations, an online social network may allow
a user to follow data objects in the form of records such as cases,
accounts, or opportunities, in addition to following individual
users and groups of users. One example of an online social network
is Chatter.RTM., provided by salesforce.com, inc. of San Francisco,
Calif. Such online social networks can be implemented in various
settings, including organizations, e.g., enterprises such as
companies or business partnerships, academic institutions, or
groups within such an organization. For instance, Chatter.RTM. can
be used by employee users in a division of a business organization
to share data, communicate, and collaborate with each other for
various purposes.
[0038] The "following" of a record stored in a database, as
described in greater detail below, allows a user to track the
progress of that record. Updates to the record, also referred to
herein as changes to the record, can occur and be noted on an
information feed such as a record feed or a news feed of a user
subscribed to the record. With the disclosed implementations, such
record updates are often presented as an item or entry in the feed.
Such a feed item can include a single update or a collection of
individual updates. Information updates presented as feed items in
an information feed can include updates to a record, as well as
other types of updates such as user actions and events, as
described herein. Examples of record updates include field changes
in the record, as well as the creation of the record itself.
Examples of other types of information updates, which may or may
not be linked with a particular record depending on the specific
use of the information update, include various types of messages.
Examples of messages include posts such as explicit text or
characters submitted by a user, multimedia data sent between or
among users (for instance, included in a post), status updates such
as updates to a user's status or updates to the status of a record,
uploaded files, indications of a user's personal preferences such
as "likes" and "dislikes", and links to other data or records.
Information updates can also be group-related, e.g., a change to
group status information for a group of which the user is one of
several members. A user following, e.g., subscribed to, a record is
capable of viewing record updates on the user's news feed, which
can also include the other various types of information updates
described above. Any number of users can follow a record and thus
view record updates in this fashion.
[0039] Online social networks are increasingly becoming a common
way to facilitate communication between individuals and groups of
individuals, any of whom can be recognized as "users" of a social
networking system. In many social networks, individuals may
establish connections with one other, sometimes referred to as
"friending" one another. By establishing such a connection, one
user may be able to see information generated by or associated with
another user. For instance, a first user may be able to see
information posted by a second user to the first user's personal
social network page. One implementation of such a personal social
network page is a user's profile page, for example, in the form of
a web page representing the user's profile. For example, a post
submitted by the second user about the first user can be presented
on the first user's profile feed, also referred to herein as the
user's "wall," which can be displayed on the first user's profile
page.
[0040] In some implementations, an information feed in the context
of a social network may be a collection of information selected
from the social network for presentation in a user interface. The
information presented in the information feed may include posts to
a user's wall or any other type of information accessible within
the social network. A feed item can include various types of data
including character-based data, audio data and/or video data. For
instance, a post can include text in combination with a JPEG image
or animated image. Feed items in information feeds such as a user's
news feed may include messages, which can take the form of: posts
comprising textual/character-based inputs such as words, phrases,
statements, questions, emotional expressions, and/or symbols;
responses to posts, also referred to herein as "comments", such as
words, phrases, statements, answers, questions, and reactionary
emotional expressions; indications of personal preferences which
can be submitted as responses to posts or comments; status updates;
and hyperlinks. In other examples, messages can be in the form of
file uploads, such as presentations, documents, multimedia files,
and the like.
[0041] In some implementations, a news feed may be specific to an
individual user, a group of users, or a data object. For instance,
a group of users on a social network may publish a news feed.
Members of the group and the larger social network may view and
post to the group news feed in accordance with a permissions
configuration for the news feed and the group.
[0042] In some implementations, when data such as posts or comments
input from one or more users are published to an information feed
for a particular user, group, object, or other construct within a
social network, an e-mail notification or other type of
notification may be transmitted to all users following the user,
group, or object in addition to the posting of the published data
as a feed item in one or more feeds, such as a news feed or a
record feed. In some social networks, the occurrence of such a
notification is limited to the first instance of a published input,
which may form part of a larger conversation. For instance, a
notification may be transmitted for an initial post, but neither
for comments on the post nor for follow-up posts related to the
initial post. In some other implementations, notifications are
transmitted for all such published inputs.
[0043] Some implementations of the disclosed systems, apparatus,
and methods are configured to communicate feed information to one
or more recipients. One of the issues with some social network
information feeds is that to send a feed item, such as an
information update, to multiple recipients, a communication
including the feed item is individually addressed to each
recipient. For example, a user, Chet, may want to email a file
attached to a post in a news feed to members of his sales team
(Mark, John, Tina, Debbie), his boss (Michael), the sales
department (100+ users), upper management (20+ users) and other
relevant recipients. For example, the file could be a recent
article highlighting the sales department's fiscal year
accomplishments. In such a scenario, Chet could compose a
communication including the article and address it to each person
of interest, i.e., "@Mark, @John, @Tina, @Debbie, . . . ." However,
a user composing such a communication often does not want to spend
a lot of time typing tens or hundreds of addressee names, user IDs,
email addresses, etc. to include each addressee in the discussion.
Additionally, in such a scenario, a user may inadvertently forget
to include a relevant recipient to a discussion. As such, a user
may need to compose additional communications to include the
forgotten recipients. As a result, addressing each recipient
individually can be cumbersome, time consuming and inefficient.
[0044] Some of the disclosed implementations are directed to
communicating data of one or more feed items, or portions of one or
more feed items, to one or more recipients. In some
implementations, selectable list or menu of one or more recipients
can be generated and displayed in a user interface when an
additional recipient indicator is detected, for instance, when the
user selects or enters such an indicator when composing an
instruction or other communication to send the feed item data of
interest. The additional recipient indicator may be any
alphanumeric text, such as a "+" symbol, to trigger the
identification of one or more relevant recipients to include in a
discussion. In other implementations, the additional recipient
indicator may be a status or change of status associated with a
user, a group, or a record, or other information. An additional
recipient may be selected by a user, automatically identified
according to various parameters by custom computer programming
language code, or generated in response to the selection of one or
more feed items.
[0045] In some implementations, the list of additional recipients
may be generated based on certain associations between or among
identified recipients. For instance, a user, Brenda, may wish to
send an information update displayed in a record feed to her
program manager, Tom, and to Tom's team. When Brenda composes an
instruction to email or post the information update on Tom's wall,
the instruction may include "@Tom+." When the additional recipient
indicator, "+", is detected, one or more recipients in addition to
Tom can be identified to receive the information update. In this
example, any additional recipients can be automatically identified
based on information associated with the first identified
recipient, Tom. For instance, an address book or a contact list
associated with Tom may include a group called "My Team." The
system may identify the My Team group, including all of the
individual users who are members of My Team, as suggested
additional recipients for Brenda to select and include to receive
the information update. Here, Brenda is able to make one selection
of the My Team group to send the information update to all of the
members of the group. The information update can then be posted to
the My Team group news feed or otherwise communicated to the group
members.
[0046] In another example, the identification of one or more
additional recipients may be based on profile information
associated with the first identified recipient, Tom. For instance,
Tom's status may indicate that Tom is out of the office, and Tom
has designated a proxy, Marina, to receive messages on his behalf.
In this scenario, one or additional recipients can be automatically
identified based on information associated with the proxy, Marina,
instead of Tom. In other scenarios, one or more additional
recipients can be automatically identified based on information
such as contacts appearing in both Tom's and Marina's address
books.
[0047] In some implementations, the identification of one or more
additional recipients may be based on relevance measures calculated
between/among a first identified recipient and one or more
entities. An entity may be a user, a group, a record, or other
construct in the online social network, as described in the
examples herein. Various measures may be applied to determine
whether an entity is relevant to a first identified recipient, as
described in greater detail below. Such relevance measures can be
weighted and compared with numerical thresholds to determine
whether one entity is more or less relevant to a first identified
recipient than another entity. For example, an entity identified as
a first recipient's boss may be determined to have a higher
relevance measure than an entity who is identified as the first
recipient's direct report. As a result, when a list of one or more
additional recipients is generated, the first recipient's boss may
appear closer to the top of the list than the first recipient's
direct report. The selection of relevance measures and weights
applied in association with each relevance measure may be defined
by a user, defined by custom computer programming language code, or
automatically generated as further described herein.
[0048] Some of the disclosed implementations are directed to
excluding one or more recipients from receiving feed item data
communicated to other recipients. In some implementations, a
selectable list of one or more recipients to exclude from a
communication can be generated when an exclude recipient indicator
is detected in a portion of the message. Similar to the additional
recipient indicator, the exclude recipient indicator may be any
alphanumeric text character or string, such as a "-" symbol, to
trigger the identification one or more recipients as candidates to
exclude from receiving a communication. In other implementations,
the exclude recipient indicator may be a status or change in status
associated with a user, a group, or a record, or any other
information. An exclude recipient indicator may be selected by a
user, defined by custom computer programming language code, or
automatically generated as further disclosed herein.
[0049] In some implementations, the list of recipients to exclude
may be generated based on certain associations between or among
identified recipients. For example, a user, Joseph Olsen, may want
to send a communication including a certain feed item of interest
to everyone in the legal group except for Ted Joe. In a publisher
component appearing next to the feed item in a GUI displaying the
information feed, Joseph can enter an instruction to communicate
the feed item, such as "@LEGAL GROUP -." When the exclude recipient
indicator, "-", is detected, one or more recipients to exclude from
receiving the information update can be automatically identified.
In this example, the identification of the one or more recipients
to exclude may be based on information associated with the first
identified recipient, LEGAL GROUP. In this example, LEGAL GROUP may
include four users such as, Ted Joe, Shelley Smith, Zach Dunn and
John Griffith. The system may then generate a pick list identifying
each of the four members of the group. When Joseph Olsen selects
Ted Joe's name from the pick list, the selected feed item can be
emailed to every member of LEGAL GROUP except for Ted Joe. In other
implementations, the list of recipients to exclude may be generated
based on other information such as a relevance measure, a user, a
group, a record, or other construct in an online social
network.
[0050] These and other implementations may be embodied in various
types of hardware, software, firmware, and combinations thereof.
For example, some techniques disclosed herein may be implemented,
at least in part, by machine-readable media that include program
instructions, state information, etc., for performing various
services and operations described herein. Examples of program
instructions include both machine code, such as produced by a
compiler, and files containing higher-level code that may be
executed by a computing device such as a server or other data
processing apparatus using an interpreter. Examples of
machine-readable media include, but are not limited to, magnetic
media such as hard disks, floppy disks, and magnetic tape; optical
media such as CD-ROM disks; magneto-optical media; and hardware
devices that are specially configured to store program
instructions, such as read-only memory devices ("ROM") and random
access memory ("RAM") devices. These and other features of the
disclosed implementations will be described in more detail below
with reference to the associated drawings.
[0051] The term "multi-tenant database system" can refer to those
systems in which various elements of hardware and software of a
database system may be shared by one or more customers. For
example, a given application server may simultaneously process
requests for a great number of customers, and a given database
table may store rows for a potentially much greater number of
customers. The term "query plan" generally refers to one or more
operations used to access information in a database system.
[0052] A "user profile" or "user's profile" is generally configured
to store and maintain data about the user of the database system.
The data can include general information, such as title, phone
number, a photo, a biographical summary, and a status (e.g., text
describing what the user is currently doing). As mentioned below,
the data can include messages created by other users. Where there
are multiple tenants, a user is typically associated with a
particular tenant. For example, a user could be a salesperson of a
company, which is a tenant of the database system that provides a
database service.
[0053] The term "record" generally refers to a data entity, such as
an instance of a data object created by a user of the database
service, for example, about a particular (actual or potential)
business relationship or project. The data object can have a data
structure defined by the database service (a standard object) or
defined by a subscriber (custom object). For example, a record can
be for a business partner or potential business partner (e.g., a
client, vendor, distributor, etc.) of the user, and can include an
entire company, subsidiaries, or contacts at the company. As
another example, a record can be a project that the user is working
on, such as an opportunity (e.g., a possible sale) with an existing
partner, or a project that the user is trying to get. In one
implementation of a multi-tenant database, each record for the
tenants has a unique identifier stored in a common table. A record
has data fields that are defined by the structure of the object
(e.g., fields of certain data types and purposes). A record can
also have custom fields defined by a user. A field can be another
record or include links thereto, thereby providing a parent-child
relationship between the records.
[0054] The terms "information feed" and "feed" are used
interchangeably herein and generally refer to a combination (e.g.,
a list) of feed items or entries with various types of information
and data. Such feed items can be stored and maintained in one or
more database tables, e.g., as rows in the table(s), that can be
accessed to retrieve relevant information to be presented as part
of a displayed feed. The term "feed item" (or feed element) refers
to an item of information, which can be presented in the feed such
as a post published by a user. Feed items of information about a
user can be presented in a user's profile feed of the database,
while feed items of information about a record can be presented in
a record feed in the database, by way of example. A profile feed
and a record feed are examples of different information feeds. A
second user following a first user or record can receive the feed
items associated with the first user and the record for display in
the second user's news feed, which is another type of information
feed. In some implementations, the feed items from any number of
followed users and records can be combined into a single
information feed of a particular user.
[0055] As examples, a feed item can be a message, such as a
user-generated post of text data, and a feed tracked update to a
record or profile, such as a change to a field of the record. A
feed can be a combination of messages and feed tracked updates.
Messages include text created by a user, and may include other data
as well. Examples of messages include posts, user status updates,
and comments. Messages can be created for a user's profile or for a
record. Posts can be created by various users, potentially any
user, although some restrictions can be applied. As an example,
posts can be made to a wall section of a user's profile page (which
can include a number of recent posts) or a section of a record that
includes multiple posts. The posts can be organized in
chronological order when displayed in a graphical user interface
(GUI), for instance, on the user's profile page, as part of the
user's profile feed. In contrast to a post, a user status update
changes a status of a user and can be made by that user or an
administrator. Other similar sections of a user's profile can also
include an "About" section. A record can also have a status, the
update of which can be provided by an owner of the record or other
users having suitable write access permissions to the record. The
owner can be a single user, multiple users, or a group. In one
implementation, there is only one status for a record.
[0056] In one implementation, a comment can be made on any feed
item. In another implementation, comments are organized as a list
explicitly tied to a particular feed tracked update, post, or
status update. In this implementation, comments may not be listed
in the first layer (in a hierarchal sense) of feed items, but
listed as a second layer branching from a particular first layer
feed item.
[0057] A "feed tracked update," also referred to herein as a "feed
update," is one type of information update and generally refers to
data representing an event. A feed tracked update can include text
generated by the database system in response to the event, to be
provided as one or more feed items for possible inclusion in one or
more feeds. In one implementation, the data can initially be
stored, and then the database system can later use the data to
create text for describing the event. Both the data and/or the text
can be a feed tracked update, as used herein. In various
implementations, an event can be an update of a record and/or can
be triggered by a specific action by a user. Which actions trigger
an event can be configurable. Which events have feed tracked
updates created and which feed updates are sent to which users can
also be configurable. Messages and feed updates can be stored as a
field or child object of the record. For example, the feed can be
stored as a child object of the record.
[0058] A "group" is generally a collection of users. In some
implementations, the group may be defined as users with a same or
similar attribute, or by membership. In one implementation, a
"group feed" includes any feed item about any user in a group. In
another implementation, the group feed includes feed items that are
about the group as a whole. In one implementation, the feed items
for a group are only posts and comments.
[0059] An "entity feed" or "record feed" generally refers to a feed
of feed items about a particular record in the database, such as
feed tracked updates about changes to the record and posts made by
users about the record. An entity feed can be composed of any type
of feed item. Such a feed can be displayed on a page such as a web
page associated with the record, e.g., a home page of the record.
As used herein, a "profile feed" is a feed of feed items about a
particular user. In one implementation, the feed items for a
profile feed are posts and comments that other users make about or
send to the particular user, and status updates made by the
particular user. Such a profile feed can be displayed on a page
associated with the particular user. In another implementation,
feed items in a profile feed could include posts made by the
particular user and feed tracked updates initiated based on actions
of the particular user.
[0060] I. General Overview
[0061] Systems, apparatus, and methods are provided for
implementing enterprise level social and business information
networking. Such implementations can provide more efficient use of
a database system. For instance, a user of a database system may
not easily know when important information in the database has
changed, e.g., about a project or client. Implementations can
provide feed tracked updates about such changes and other events,
thereby keeping users informed.
[0062] By way of example, a user can update a record (e.g., an
opportunity such as a possible sale of 1000 computers). Once the
record update has been made, a feed tracked update about the record
update can then automatically be sent (e.g., in a feed) to anyone
subscribing to the opportunity or to the user. Thus, the user does
not need to contact a manager regarding the change in the
opportunity, since the feed tracked update about the update is sent
via a feed right to the manager's feed page (or other page).
[0063] Next, mechanisms and methods for providing systems
implementing enterprise level social and business information
networking will be described with reference to example
implementations. First, an overview of an example database system
is described, and then examples of tracking events for a record,
actions of a user, and messages about a user or record are
described. Various implementations about the data structure of
feeds, customizing feeds, user selection of records and users to
follow, generating feeds, and displaying feeds are also
described.
[0064] II. System Overview
[0065] FIG. 1A shows a block diagram of an example of an
environment 10 in which an on-demand database service can be used
in accordance with some implementations. Environment 10 may include
user systems 12, network 14, database system 16, processor system
17, application platform 18, network interface 20, tenant data
storage 22, system data storage 24, program code 26, and process
space 28. In other implementations, environment 10 may not have all
of these components and/or may have other components instead of, or
in addition to, those listed above.
[0066] Environment 10 is an environment in which an on-demand
database service exists. User system 12 may be any machine or
system that is used by a user to access a database system 16. For
example, any of user systems 12 can be a handheld computing device,
a mobile phone, a laptop computer, a work station, and/or a network
of such computing devices. As illustrated in FIG. 1A (and in more
detail in FIG. 1B) user systems 12 might interact via a network 14
with an on-demand database service, which is implemented in the
example of FIG. 1A as database system 16.
[0067] An on-demand database service, such as system 16, is a
database system that is made available to outside users, who do not
need to necessarily be concerned with building and/or maintaining
the database system. Instead, the database system may be available
for their use when the users need the database system, i.e., on the
demand of the users. Some on-demand database services may store
information from one or more tenants into tables of a common
database image to form a multi-tenant database system (MTS). A
database image may include one or more database objects. A
relational database management system (RDBMS) or the equivalent may
execute storage and retrieval of information against the database
object(s). Application platform 18 may be a framework that allows
the applications of system 16 to run, such as the hardware and/or
software, e.g., the operating system. In some implementations,
application platform 18 enables creation, managing and executing
one or more applications developed by the provider of the on-demand
database service, users accessing the on-demand database service
via user systems 12, or third party application developers
accessing the on-demand database service via user systems 12.
[0068] The users of user systems 12 may differ in their respective
capacities, and the capacity of a particular user system 12 might
be entirely determined by permissions (permission levels) for the
current user. For example, where a salesperson is using a
particular user system 12 to interact with system 16, that user
system has the capacities allotted to that salesperson. However,
while an administrator is using that user system to interact with
system 16, that user system has the capacities allotted to that
administrator. In systems with a hierarchical role model, users at
one permission level may have access to applications, data, and
database information accessible by a lower permission level user,
but may not have access to certain applications, database
information, and data accessible by a user at a higher permission
level. Thus, different users will have different capabilities with
regard to accessing and modifying application and database
information, depending on a user's security or permission level,
also called authorization.
[0069] Network 14 is any network or combination of networks of
devices that communicate with one another. For example, network 14
can be any one or any combination of a LAN (local area network),
WAN (wide area network), telephone network, wireless network,
point-to-point network, star network, token ring network, hub
network, or other appropriate configuration. Network 14 can include
a TCP/IP (Transfer Control Protocol and Internet Protocol) network,
such as the global internetwork of networks often referred to as
the "Internet" with a capital "I." The Internet will be used in
many of the examples herein. However, it should be understood that
the networks that the present implementations might use are not so
limited, although TCP/IP is a frequently implemented protocol.
[0070] User systems 12 might communicate with system 16 using
TCP/IP and, at a higher network level, use other common Internet
protocols to communicate, such as HTTP, FTP, AFS, WAP, etc. In an
example where HTTP is used, user system 12 might include an HTTP
client commonly referred to as a "browser" for sending and
receiving HTTP signals to and from an HTTP server at system 16.
Such an HTTP server might be implemented as the sole network
interface 20 between system 16 and network 14, but other techniques
might be used as well or instead. In some implementations, the
network interface 20 between system 16 and network 14 includes load
sharing functionality, such as round-robin HTTP request
distributors to balance loads and distribute incoming HTTP requests
evenly over a plurality of servers. At least for users accessing
system 16, each of the plurality of servers has access to the MTS'
data; however, other alternative configurations may be used
instead.
[0071] In one implementation, system 16, shown in FIG. 1A,
implements a web-based customer relationship management (CRM)
system. For example, in one implementation, system 16 includes
application servers configured to implement and execute CRM
software applications as well as provide related data, code, forms,
web pages and other information to and from user systems 12 and to
store to, and retrieve from, a database system related data,
objects, and Webpage content. With a multi-tenant system, data for
multiple tenants may be stored in the same physical database object
in tenant data storage 22, however, tenant data typically is
arranged in the storage medium(s) of tenant data storage 22 so that
data of one tenant is kept logically separate from that of other
tenants so that one tenant does not have access to another tenant's
data, unless such data is expressly shared. In certain
implementations, system 16 implements applications other than, or
in addition to, a CRM application. For example, system 16 may
provide tenant access to multiple hosted (standard and custom)
applications, including a CRM application. User (or third party
developer) applications, which may or may not include CRM, may be
supported by the application platform 18, which manages creation,
storage of the applications into one or more database objects and
executing of the applications in a virtual machine in the process
space of the system 16.
[0072] One arrangement for elements of system 16 is shown in FIGS.
1A and 1B, including a network interface 20, application platform
18, tenant data storage 22 for tenant data 23, system data storage
24 for system data 25 accessible to system 16 and possibly multiple
tenants, program code 26 for implementing various functions of
system 16, and a process space 28 for executing MTS system
processes and tenant-specific processes, such as running
applications as part of an application hosting service. Additional
processes that may execute on system 16 include database indexing
processes.
[0073] Several elements in the system shown in FIG. 1A include
conventional, well-known elements that are explained only briefly
here. For example, each user system 12 could include a desktop
personal computer, workstation, laptop, PDA, cell phone, or any
wireless access protocol (WAP) enabled device or any other
computing device capable of interfacing directly or indirectly to
the Internet or other network connection. User system 12 typically
runs an HTTP client, e.g., a browsing program, such as Microsoft's
Internet Explorer browser, Netscape's Navigator browser, Opera's
browser, or a WAP-enabled browser in the case of a cell phone, PDA
or other wireless device, or the like, allowing a user (e.g.,
subscriber of the multi-tenant database system) of user system 12
to access, process and view information, pages and applications
available to it from system 16 over network 14. Each user system 12
also typically includes one or more user interface devices, such as
a keyboard, a mouse, trackball, touch pad, touch screen, pen or the
like, for interacting with a graphical user interface (GUI)
provided by the browser on a display (e.g., a monitor screen, LCD
display, etc.) of the computing device in conjunction with pages,
forms, applications and other information provided by system 16 or
other systems or servers. For example, the user interface device
can be used to access data and applications hosted by system 16,
and to perform searches on stored data, and otherwise allow a user
to interact with various GUI pages that may be presented to a user.
As discussed above, implementations are suitable for use with the
Internet, although other networks can be used instead of or in
addition to the Internet, such as an intranet, an extranet, a
virtual private network (VPN), a non-TCP/IP based network, any LAN
or WAN or the like.
[0074] According to one implementation, each user system 12 and all
of its components are operator configurable using applications,
such as a browser, including computer code run using a central
processing unit such as an Intel Pentium.RTM. processor or the
like. Similarly, system 16 (and additional instances of an MTS,
where more than one is present) and all of its components might be
operator configurable using application(s) including computer code
to run using processor system 17, which may be implemented to
include a central processing unit, which may include an Intel
Pentium.RTM. processor or the like, and/or multiple processor
units. A computer program product implementation includes a
non-transitory machine-readable storage medium (media) having
instructions stored thereon/in, which can be used to program a
computer to perform any of the processes/methods of the
implementations described herein. Computer program code 26 for
operating and configuring system 16 to intercommunicate and to
process web pages, applications and other data and media content as
described herein is preferably downloadable and stored on a hard
disk, but the entire program code, or portions thereof, may also be
stored in any other volatile or non-volatile memory medium or
device as is well known, such as a ROM or RAM, or provided on any
media capable of storing program code, such as any type of rotating
media including floppy disks, optical discs, digital versatile disk
(DVD), compact disk (CD), microdrive, and magneto-optical disks,
and magnetic or optical cards, nanosystems (including molecular
memory ICs), or any type of media or device suitable for storing
instructions and/or data. Additionally, the entire program code, or
portions thereof, may be transmitted and downloaded from a software
source over a transmission medium, e.g., over the Internet, or from
another server, as is well known, or transmitted over any other
conventional network connection as is well known (e.g., extranet,
VPN, LAN, etc.) using any communication medium and protocols (e.g.,
TCP/IP, HTTP, HTTPS, Ethernet, etc.) as are well known. It will
also be appreciated that computer code for the disclosed
implementations can be realized in any programming language that
can be executed on a client system and/or server or server system
such as, for example, C, C++, HTML, any other markup language,
Java.TM. JavaScript, ActiveX, any other scripting language, such as
VBScript, and many other programming languages as are well known
may be used. (Java.TM. is a trademark of Sun Microsystems,
Inc.).
[0075] According to some implementations, each system 16 is
configured to provide web pages, forms, applications, data and
media content to user (client) systems 12 to support the access by
user systems 12 as tenants of system 16. As such, system 16
provides security mechanisms to keep each tenant's data separate
unless the data is shared. If more than one MTS is used, they may
be located in close proximity to one another (e.g., in a server
farm located in a single building or campus), or they may be
distributed at locations remote from one another (e.g., one or more
servers located in city A and one or more servers located in city
B). As used herein, each MTS could include one or more logically
and/or physically connected servers distributed locally or across
one or more geographic locations. Additionally, the term "server"
is meant to refer to a computing device or system, including
processing hardware and process space(s), an associated storage
system such as a memory device or database, and, in some instances,
a database application (e.g., OODBMS or RDBMS) as is well known in
the art. It should also be understood that "server system" and
"server" are often used interchangeably herein. Similarly, the
database objects described herein can be implemented as single
databases, a distributed database, a collection of distributed
databases, a database with redundant online or offline backups or
other redundancies, etc., and might include a distributed database
or storage network and associated processing intelligence.
[0076] FIG. 1B shows a block diagram of an example of some
implementations of elements of FIG. 1A and various possible
interconnections between these elements. That is, FIG. 1B also
illustrates environment 10. However, in FIG. 1B elements of system
16 and various interconnections in some implementations are further
illustrated. FIG. 1B shows that user system 12 may include
processor system 12A, memory system 12B, input system 12C, and
output system 12D. FIG. 1B shows network 14 and system 16. FIG. 1B
also shows that system 16 may include tenant data storage 22,
tenant data 23, system data storage 24, system data 25, User
Interface (UI) 30, Application Program Interface (API) 32, PL/SOQL
34, save routines 36, application setup mechanism 38, applications
servers 1001-100N, system process space 102, tenant process spaces
104, tenant management process space 110, tenant storage area 112,
user storage 114, and application metadata 116. In other
implementations, environment 10 may not have the same elements as
those listed above and/or may have other elements instead of, or in
addition to, those listed above.
[0077] User system 12, network 14, system 16, tenant data storage
22, and system data storage 24 were discussed above in FIG. 1A.
Regarding user system 12, processor system 12A may be any
combination of one or more processors. Memory system 12B may be any
combination of one or more memory devices, short term, and/or long
term memory. Input system 12C may be any combination of input
devices, such as one or more keyboards, mice, trackballs, scanners,
cameras, and/or interfaces to networks. Output system 12D may be
any combination of output devices, such as one or more monitors,
printers, and/or interfaces to networks. As shown by FIG. 1B,
system 16 may include a network interface 20 (of FIG. 1A)
implemented as a set of HTTP application servers 100, an
application platform 18, tenant data storage 22, and system data
storage 24. Also shown is system process space 102, including
individual tenant process spaces 104 and a tenant management
process space 110. Each application server 100 may be configured to
communicate with tenant data storage 22 and the tenant data 23
therein, and system data storage 24 and the system data 25 therein
to serve requests of user systems 12. The tenant data 23 might be
divided into individual tenant storage areas 112, which can be
either a physical arrangement and/or a logical arrangement of data.
Within each tenant storage area 112, user storage 114 and
application metadata 116 might be similarly allocated for each
user. For example, a copy of a user's most recently used (MRU)
items might be stored to user storage 114. Similarly, a copy of MRU
items for an entire organization that is a tenant might be stored
to tenant storage area 112. A UI 30 provides a user interface and
an API 32 provides an application programmer interface to system 16
resident processes to users and/or developers at user systems 12.
The tenant data and the system data may be stored in various
databases, such as one or more Oracle| databases.
[0078] Application platform 18 includes an application setup
mechanism 38 that supports application developers' creation and
management of applications, which may be saved as metadata into
tenant data storage 22 by save routines 36 for execution by
subscribers as one or more tenant process spaces 104 managed by
tenant management process 110 for example. Invocations to such
applications may be coded using PL/SOQL 34 that provides a
programming language style interface extension to API 32. A
detailed description of some PL/SOQL language implementations is
discussed in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 7,730,478, titled
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ALLOWING ACCESS TO DEVELOPED APPLICATIONS VIA
A MULTI-TENANT ON-DEMAND DATABASE SERVICE, by Craig Weissman,
issued on Jun. 1, 2010, and hereby incorporated by reference in its
entirety and for all purposes. Invocations to applications may be
detected by one or more system processes, which manage retrieving
application metadata 116 for the subscriber making the invocation
and executing the metadata as an application in a virtual
machine.
[0079] Each application server 100 may be communicably coupled to
database systems, e.g., having access to system data 25 and tenant
data 23, via a different network connection. For example, one
application server 1001 might be coupled via the network 14 (e.g.,
the Internet), another application server 100N-1 might be coupled
via a direct network link, and another application server 100N
might be coupled by yet a different network connection. Transfer
Control Protocol and Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) are typical
protocols for communicating between application servers 100 and the
database system. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the
art that other transport protocols may be used to optimize the
system depending on the network interconnect used.
[0080] In certain implementations, each application server 100 is
configured to handle requests for any user associated with any
organization that is a tenant. Because it is desirable to be able
to add and remove application servers from the server pool at any
time for any reason, there is preferably no server affinity for a
user and/or organization to a specific application server 100. In
one implementation, therefore, an interface system implementing a
load balancing function (e.g., an F5 Big-IP load balancer) is
communicably coupled between the application servers 100 and the
user systems 12 to distribute requests to the application servers
100. In one implementation, the load balancer uses a least
connections algorithm to route user requests to the application
servers 100. Other examples of load balancing algorithms, such as
round robin and observed response time, also can be used. For
example, in certain implementations, three consecutive requests
from the same user could hit three different application servers
100, and three requests from different users could hit the same
application server 100. In this manner, by way of example, system
16 is multi-tenant, wherein system 16 handles storage of, and
access to, different objects, data and applications across
disparate users and organizations.
[0081] As an example of storage, one tenant might be a company that
employs a sales force where each salesperson uses system 16 to
manage their sales process. Thus, a user might maintain contact
data, leads data, customer follow-up data, performance data, goals
and progress data, etc., all applicable to that user's personal
sales process (e.g., in tenant data storage 22). In an example of a
MTS arrangement, since all of the data and the applications to
access, view, modify, report, transmit, calculate, etc., can be
maintained and accessed by a user system having nothing more than
network access, the user can manage his or her sales efforts and
cycles from any of many different user systems. For example, if a
salesperson is visiting a customer and the customer has Internet
access in their lobby, the salesperson can obtain critical updates
as to that customer while waiting for the customer to arrive in the
lobby.
[0082] While each user's data might be separate from other users'
data regardless of the employers of each user, some data might be
organization-wide data shared or accessible by a plurality of users
or all of the users for a given organization that is a tenant.
Thus, there might be some data structures managed by system 16 that
are allocated at the tenant level while other data structures might
be managed at the user level. Because an MTS might support multiple
tenants including possible competitors, the MTS should have
security protocols that keep data, applications, and application
use separate. Also, because many tenants may opt for access to an
MTS rather than maintain their own system, redundancy, up-time, and
backup are additional functions that may be implemented in the MTS.
In addition to user-specific data and tenant-specific data, system
16 might also maintain system level data usable by multiple tenants
or other data. Such system level data might include industry
reports, news, postings, and the like that are sharable among
tenants.
[0083] In certain implementations, user systems 12 (which may be
client systems) communicate with application servers 100 to request
and update system-level and tenant-level data from system 16 that
may require sending one or more queries to tenant data storage 22
and/or system data storage 24. System 16 (e.g., an application
server 100 in system 16) automatically generates one or more SQL
statements (e.g., one or more SQL queries) that are designed to
access the desired information. System data storage 24 may generate
query plans to access the requested data from the database.
[0084] Each database can generally be viewed as a collection of
objects, such as a set of logical tables, containing data fitted
into predefined categories. A "table" is one representation of a
data object, and may be used herein to simplify the conceptual
description of objects and custom objects according to some
implementations. It should be understood that "table" and "object"
may be used interchangeably herein. Each table generally contains
one or more data categories logically arranged as columns or fields
in a viewable schema. Each row or record of a table contains an
instance of data for each category defined by the fields. For
example, a CRM database may include a table that describes a
customer with fields for basic contact information such as name,
address, phone number, fax number, etc. Another table might
describe a purchase order, including fields for information such as
customer, product, sale price, date, etc. In some multi-tenant
database systems, standard entity tables might be provided for use
by all tenants. For CRM database applications, such standard
entities might include tables for case, account, contact, lead, and
opportunity data objects, each containing pre-defined fields. It
should be understood that the word "entity" may also be used
interchangeably herein with "object" and "table".
[0085] In some multi-tenant database systems, tenants may be
allowed to create and store custom objects, or they may be allowed
to customize standard entities or objects, for example by creating
custom fields for standard objects, including custom index fields.
Commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 7,779,039, titled CUSTOM ENTITIES
AND FIELDS IN A MULTI-TENANT DATABASE SYSTEM, by Weissman et al.,
issued on Aug. 17, 2010, and hereby incorporated by reference in
its entirety and for all purposes, teaches systems and methods for
creating custom objects as well as customizing standard objects in
a multi-tenant database system. In certain implementations, for
example, all custom entity data rows are stored in a single
multi-tenant physical table, which may contain multiple logical
tables per organization. It is transparent to customers that their
multiple "tables" are in fact stored in one large table or that
their data may be stored in the same table as the data of other
customers.
[0086] FIG. 2A shows a system diagram illustrating an example of
architectural components of an on-demand service environment 200
according to some implementations. A client machine located in the
cloud 204, generally referring to one or more networks in
combination, as described herein, may communicate with the
on-demand service environment via one or more edge routers 208 and
212. A client machine can be any of the examples of user systems 12
described above. The edge routers may communicate with one or more
core switches 220 and 224 via firewall 216. The core switches may
communicate with a load balancer 228, which may distribute server
load over different pods, such as the pods 240 and 244. The pods
240 and 244, which may each include one or more servers and/or
other computing resources, may perform data processing and other
operations used to provide on-demand services. Communication with
the pods may be conducted via pod switches 232 and 236. Components
of the on-demand service environment may communicate with a
database storage 256 via a database firewall 248 and a database
switch 252.
[0087] As shown in FIGS. 2A and 2B, accessing an on-demand service
environment may involve communications transmitted among a variety
of different hardware and/or software components. Further, the
on-demand service environment 200 is a simplified representation of
an actual on-demand service environment. For example, while only
one or two devices of each type are shown in FIGS. 2A and 2B, some
implementations of an on-demand service environment may include
anywhere from one to many devices of each type. Also, the on-demand
service environment need not include each device shown in FIGS. 2A
and 2B, or may include additional devices not shown in FIGS. 2A and
2B.
[0088] Moreover, one or more of the devices in the on-demand
service environment 200 may be implemented on the same physical
device or on different hardware. Some devices may be implemented
using hardware or a combination of hardware and software. Thus,
terms such as "data processing apparatus," "machine," "server" and
"device" as used herein are not limited to a single hardware
device, but rather include any hardware and software configured to
provide the described functionality.
[0089] The cloud 204 is intended to refer to a data network or
plurality of data networks, often including the Internet. Client
machines located in the cloud 204 may communicate with the
on-demand service environment to access services provided by the
on-demand service environment. For example, client machines may
access the on-demand service environment to retrieve, store, edit,
and/or process information.
[0090] In some implementations, the edge routers 208 and 212 route
packets between the cloud 204 and other components of the on-demand
service environment 200. The edge routers 208 and 212 may employ
the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP). The BGP is the core routing
protocol of the Internet. The edge routers 208 and 212 may maintain
a table of IP networks or `prefixes`, which designate network
reachability among autonomous systems on the Internet.
[0091] In one or more implementations, the firewall 216 may protect
the inner components of the on-demand service environment 200 from
Internet traffic. The firewall 216 may block, permit, or deny
access to the inner components of the on-demand service environment
200 based upon a set of rules and other criteria. The firewall 216
may act as one or more of a packet filter, an application gateway,
a stateful filter, a proxy server, or any other type of
firewall.
[0092] In some implementations, the core switches 220 and 224 are
high-capacity switches that transfer packets within the on-demand
service environment 200. The core switches 220 and 224 may be
configured as network bridges that quickly route data between
different components within the on-demand service environment. In
some implementations, the use of two or more core switches 220 and
224 may provide redundancy and/or reduced latency.
[0093] In some implementations, the pods 240 and 244 may perform
the core data processing and service functions provided by the
on-demand service environment. Each pod may include various types
of hardware and/or software computing resources. An example of the
pod architecture is discussed in greater detail with reference to
FIG. 2B.
[0094] In some implementations, communication between the pods 240
and 244 may be conducted via the pod switches 232 and 236. The pod
switches 232 and 236 may facilitate communication between the pods
240 and 244 and client machines located in the cloud 204, for
example via core switches 220 and 224. Also, the pod switches 232
and 236 may facilitate communication between the pods 240 and 244
and the database storage 256.
[0095] In some implementations, the load balancer 228 may
distribute workload between the pods 240 and 244. Balancing the
on-demand service requests between the pods may assist in improving
the use of resources, increasing throughput, reducing response
times, and/or reducing overhead. The load balancer 228 may include
multilayer switches to analyze and forward traffic.
[0096] In some implementations, access to the database storage 256
may be guarded by a database firewall 248. The database firewall
248 may act as a computer application firewall operating at the
database application layer of a protocol stack. The database
firewall 248 may protect the database storage 256 from application
attacks such as structure query language (SQL) injection, database
rootkits, and unauthorized information disclosure.
[0097] In some implementations, the database firewall 248 may
include a host using one or more forms of reverse proxy services to
proxy traffic before passing it to a gateway router. The database
firewall 248 may inspect the contents of database traffic and block
certain content or database requests. The database firewall 248 may
work on the SQL application level atop the TCP/IP stack, managing
applications' connection to the database or SQL management
interfaces as well as intercepting and enforcing packets traveling
to or from a database network or application interface.
[0098] In some implementations, communication with the database
storage 256 may be conducted via the database switch 252. The
multi-tenant database storage 256 may include more than one
hardware and/or software components for handling database queries.
Accordingly, the database switch 252 may direct database queries
transmitted by other components of the on-demand service
environment (e.g., the pods 240 and 244) to the correct components
within the database storage 256.
[0099] In some implementations, the database storage 256 is an
on-demand database system shared by many different organizations.
The on-demand database system may employ a multi-tenant approach, a
virtualized approach, or any other type of database approach. An
on-demand database system is discussed in greater detail with
reference to FIGS. 1A and 1B.
[0100] FIG. 2B shows a system diagram further illustrating an
example of architectural components of an on-demand service
environment according to some implementations. The pod 244 may be
used to render services to a user of the on-demand service
environment 200. In some implementations, each pod may include a
variety of servers and/or other systems. The pod 244 includes one
or more content batch servers 264, content search servers 268,
query servers 282, file force servers 286, access control system
(ACS) servers 280, batch servers 284, and app servers 288. Also,
the pod 244 includes database instances 290, quick file systems
(QFS) 292, and indexers 294. In one or more implementations, some
or all communication between the servers in the pod 244 may be
transmitted via the switch 236.
[0101] In some implementations, the app servers 288 may include a
hardware and/or software framework dedicated to the execution of
procedures (e.g., programs, routines, scripts) for supporting the
construction of applications provided by the on-demand service
environment 200 via the pod 244. In some implementations, the
hardware and/or software framework of an app server 288 is
configured to execute operations of the services described herein,
including performance of the blocks of methods/processes described
with reference to FIGS. 15-24. In alternative implementations, two
or more app servers 288 may be included and cooperate to perform
such methods, or one or more other servers in FIG. 2B can be
configured to perform the disclosed methods.
[0102] The content batch servers 264 may requests internal to the
pod. These requests may be long-running and/or not tied to a
particular customer. For example, the content batch servers 264 may
handle requests related to log mining, cleanup work, and
maintenance tasks.
[0103] The content search servers 268 may provide query and indexer
functions. For example, the functions provided by the content
search servers 268 may allow users to search through content stored
in the on-demand service environment.
[0104] The file force servers 286 may manage requests information
stored in the Fileforce storage 278. The Fileforce storage 278 may
store information such as documents, images, and basic large
objects (BLOBs). By managing requests for information using the
file force servers 286, the image footprint on the database may be
reduced.
[0105] The query servers 282 may be used to retrieve information
from one or more file systems. For example, the query system 282
may receive requests for information from the app servers 288 and
then transmit information queries to the NFS 296 located outside
the pod.
[0106] The pod 244 may share a database instance 290 configured as
a multi-tenant environment in which different organizations share
access to the same database. Additionally, services rendered by the
pod 244 may require various hardware and/or software resources. In
some implementations, the ACS servers 280 may control access to
data, hardware resources, or software resources.
[0107] In some implementations, the batch servers 284 may process
batch jobs, which are used to run tasks at specified times. Thus,
the batch servers 284 may transmit instructions to other servers,
such as the app servers 288, to trigger the batch jobs.
[0108] In some implementations, the QFS 292 may be an open source
file system available from Sun Microsystems.RTM. of Santa Clara,
Calif. The QFS may serve as a rapid-access file system for storing
and accessing information available within the pod 244. The QFS 292
may support some volume management capabilities, allowing many
disks to be grouped together into a file system. File system
metadata can be kept on a separate set of disks, which may be
useful for streaming applications where long disk seeks cannot be
tolerated. Thus, the QFS system may communicate with one or more
content search servers 268 and/or indexers 294 to identify,
retrieve, move, and/or update data stored in the network file
systems 296 and/or other storage systems.
[0109] In some implementations, one or more query servers 282 may
communicate with the NFS 296 to retrieve and/or update information
stored outside of the pod 244. The NFS 296 may allow servers
located in the pod 244 to access information to access files over a
network in a manner similar to how local storage is accessed.
[0110] In some implementations, queries from the query servers 222
may be transmitted to the NFS 296 via the load balancer 228, which
may distribute resource requests over various resources available
in the on-demand service environment. The NFS 296 may also
communicate with the QFS 292 to update the information stored on
the NFS 296 and/or to provide information to the QFS 292 for use by
servers located within the pod 244.
[0111] In some implementations, the pod may include one or more
database instances 290. The database instance 290 may transmit
information to the QFS 292. When information is transmitted to the
QFS, it may be available for use by servers within the pod 244
without requiring an additional database call.
[0112] In some implementations, database information may be
transmitted to the indexer 294. Indexer 294 may provide an index of
information available in the database 290 and/or QFS 292. The index
information may be provided to file force servers 286 and/or the
QFS 292.
[0113] III. Tracking Updates to a Record Stored in a Database
[0114] As multiple users might be able to change the data of a
record, it can be useful for certain users to be notified when a
record is updated. Also, even if a user does not have authority to
change a record, the user still might want to know when there is an
update to the record. For example, a vendor may negotiate a new
price with a salesperson of company X, where the salesperson is a
user associated with tenant Y. As part of creating a new invoice or
for accounting purposes, the salesperson can change the price saved
in the database. It may be important for co-workers to know that
the price has changed. The salesperson could send an e-mail to
certain people, but this is onerous and the salesperson might not
e-mail all of the people who need to know or want to know.
Accordingly, some implementations of the disclosed techniques can
inform others (e.g., co-workers) who want to know about an update
to a record automatically.
[0115] FIG. 3 shows a flowchart of an example of a method 300 for
tracking updates to a record stored in a database system, performed
in accordance with some implementations. Method 300 (and other
methods described herein) may be implemented at least partially
with multi-tenant database system 16, e.g., by one or more
processors configured to receive or retrieve information, process
the information, store results, and transmit the results. In other
implementations, method 300 may be implemented at least partially
with a single tenant database system. In various implementations,
blocks may be omitted, combined, or split into additional blocks
for method 300, as well as for other methods described herein.
[0116] In block 310, the database system receives a request to
update a first record. In one implementation, the request is
received from a first user. For example, a user may be accessing a
page associated with the first record, and may change a displayed
field and hit save. In another implementation, the database system
can automatically create the request. For instance, the database
system can create the request in response to another event, e.g., a
request to change a field could be sent periodically at a
particular date and/or time of day, or a change to another field or
object. The database system can obtain a new value based on other
fields of a record and/or based on parameters in the system.
[0117] The request for the update of a field of a record is an
example of an event associated with the first record for which a
feed tracked update may be created. In other implementations, the
database system can identify other events besides updates to fields
of a record. For example, an event can be a submission of approval
to change a field. Such an event can also have an associated field
(e.g., a field showing a status of whether a change has been
submitted). Other examples of events can include creation of a
record, deletion of a record, converting a record from one type to
another (e.g., converting a lead to an opportunity), closing a
record (e.g., a case type record), and potentially any other state
change of a record--any of which could include a field change
associated with the state change. Any of these events update the
record whether by changing a field of the record, a state of the
record, or some other characteristic or property of the record. In
one implementation, a list of supported events for creating a feed
tracked update can be maintained within the database system, e.g.,
at a server or in a database.
[0118] In block 320, the database system writes new data to the
first record. In one implementation, the new data may include a new
value that replaces old data. For example, a field is updated with
a new value. In another implementation, the new data can be a value
for a field that did not contain data before. In yet another
implementation, the new data could be a flag, e.g., for a status of
the record, which can be stored as a field of the record.
[0119] In some implementations, a "field" can also include records,
which are child objects of the first record in a parent-child
hierarchy. A field can alternatively include a pointer to a child
record. A child object itself can include further fields. Thus, if
a field of a child object is updated with a new value, the parent
record also can be considered to have a field changed. In one
example, a field could be a list of related child objects, also
called a related list.
[0120] In block 330, a feed tracked update is generated about the
update to the record. In one implementation, the feed tracked
update is created in parts for assembling later into a display
version. For example, event entries can be created and tracked in
one table, and changed field entries can be tracked in another
table that is cross-referenced with the first table. More specifics
of such implementations are provided later, e.g., with respect to
FIG. 9A. In another implementation, the feed tracked update is
automatically generated by the database system. The feed tracked
update can convey in words that the first record has been updated
and provide details about what was updated in the record and who
performed the update. In some implementations, a feed tracked
update is generated for only certain types of event and/or updates
associated with the first record.
[0121] In one implementation, a tenant (e.g., through an
administrator) can configure the database system to create (enable)
feed tracked updates only for certain types of records. For
example, an administrator can specify that records of designated
types such as accounts and opportunities are enabled. When an
update (or other event) is received for the enabled record type,
then a feed tracked update would be generated. In another
implementation, a tenant can also specify the fields of a record
whose changes are to be tracked, and for which feed tracked updates
are created. In one aspect, a maximum number of fields can be
specified for tracking, and may include custom fields. In one
implementation, the type of change can also be specified, for
example, that the value change of a field is required to be larger
than a threshold (e.g., an absolute amount or a percentage change).
In yet another implementation, a tenant can specify which events
are to cause a generation of a feed tracked update. Also, in one
implementation, individual users can specify configurations
specific to them, which can create custom feeds as described in
more detail below.
[0122] In one implementation, changes to fields of a child object
are not tracked to create feed tracked updates for the parent
record. In another implementation, the changes to fields of a child
object can be tracked to create feed tracked updates for the parent
record. For example, a child object of the parent type can be
specified for tracking, and certain fields of the child object can
be specified for tracking. As another example, if the child object
is of a type specified for tracking, then a tracked change for the
child object is propagated to parent records of the child
object.
[0123] In block 340, the feed tracked update is added to a feed for
the first record. In one implementation, adding the feed tracked
update to a feed can include adding events to a table (which may be
specific to a record or be for all or a group of objects), where a
display version of a feed tracked update can be generated
dynamically and presented as an information update when a user
requests a feed for the first record. In another implementation, a
display version of a feed tracked update can be added when a record
feed is stored and maintained for a record. As mentioned above, a
feed may be maintained for only certain records. In one
implementation, the feed of a record can be stored in the database
associated with the record. For example, the feed can be stored as
a field (e.g., as a child object) of the record. Such a field can
store a pointer to the text to be displayed for the feed tracked
update.
[0124] In some implementations, only the current feed tracked
update (or other current feed item) may be kept or temporarily
stored, e.g., in some temporary memory structure. For example, a
feed tracked update for only a most recent change to any particular
field is kept. In other implementations, many previous feed tracked
updates may be kept in the feed. A time and/or date for each feed
tracked update can be tracked. Herein, a feed of a record is also
referred to as an entity feed, as a record is an instance of a
particular entity object of the database.
[0125] In block 350, followers of the first record can be
identified. A follower is a user following the first record, such
as a subscriber to the feed of the first record. In one
implementation, when a user requests a feed of a particular record,
such an identification of block 350 can be omitted. In another
implementation where a record feed is pushed to a user (e.g., as
part of a news feed), then the user can be identified as a follower
of the first record. Accordingly, this block can include the
identification of records and other objects being followed by a
particular user.
[0126] In one implementation, the database system can store a list
of the followers for a particular record. In various
implementations, the list can be stored with the first record or
associated with the record using an identifier (e.g., a pointer) to
retrieve the list. For example, the list can be stored in a field
of the first record. In another implementation, a list of the
records that a user is following is used. In one implementation,
the database system can have a routine that runs for each user,
where the routine polls the records in the list to determine if a
new feed tracked update has been added to a feed of the record. In
another implementation, the routine for the user can be running at
least partially on a user device, which contacts the database to
perform the polling.
[0127] In block 360, in one implementation, the feed tracked update
can be stored in a table, as described in greater detail below.
When the user opens a feed, an appropriate query is sent to one or
more tables to retrieve updates to records, also described in
greater detail below. In some implementations, the feed shows feed
tracked updates in reverse chronological order. In one
implementation, the feed tracked update is pushed to the feed of a
user, e.g., by a routine that determines the followers for the
record from a list associated with the record. In another
implementation, the feed tracked update is pulled to a feed, e.g.,
by a user device. This pulling may occur when a user requests the
feed, as occurs in block 370. Thus, these actions may occur in a
different order. The creation of the feed for a pull may be a
dynamic creation that identifies records being followed by the
requesting user, generates the display version of relevant feed
tracked updates from stored information (e.g., event and field
change), and adds the feed tracked updates into the feed. A feed of
feed tracked updates of records and other objects that a user is
following is also generally referred to herein as a news feed,
which can be a subset of a larger information feed in which other
types of information updates appear, such as posts.
[0128] In yet another implementation, the feed tracked update could
be sent as an e-mail to the follower, instead of in a feed. In one
implementation, e-mail alerts for events can enable people to be
e-mailed when certain events occur. In another implementation,
e-mails can be sent when there are posts on a user profile and
posts on entities to which the user subscribes. In one
implementation, a user can turn on/off email alerts for all or some
events. In an implementation, a user can specify what kind of feed
tracked updates to receive about a record that the user is
following. For example, a user can choose to only receive feed
tracked updates about certain fields of a record that the user is
following, and potentially about what kind of update was performed
(e.g., a new value input into a specified field, or the creation of
a new field).
[0129] In block 370, a follower can access his/her news feed to see
the feed tracked update. In one implementation, the user has just
one news feed for all of the records that the user is following. In
one aspect, a user can access his/her own feed by selecting a
particular tab or other object on a page of an interface to the
database system. Once selected the feed can be provided as a list,
e.g., with an identifier (e.g., a time) or including some or all of
the text of the feed tracked update. In another implementation, the
user can specify how the feed tracked updates are to be displayed
and/or sent to the user. For example, a user can specify a font for
the text, a location of where the feed can be selected and
displayed, amount of text to be displayed, and other text or
symbols to be displayed (e.g., importance flags).
[0130] FIG. 4 shows a block diagram of an example of components of
a database system configuration 400 performing a method for
tracking an update to a record according to some implementations.
Database system configuration 400 can perform implementations of
method 300, as well as implementations of other methods described
herein.
[0131] A first user 405 sends a request 1 to update record 425 in
database system 416. Although an update request is described, other
events that are being tracked are equally applicable. In various
implementations, the request 1 can be sent via a user interface
(e.g., 30 of FIG. 1B) or an application program interface (e.g.,
API 32). An I/O port 420 can accommodate the signals of request 1
via any input interface, and send the signals to one or more
processors 417. The processor 417 can analyze the request and
determine actions to be performed. Herein, any reference to a
processor 417 can refer to a specific processor or any set of
processors in database system 416, which can be collectively
referred to as processor 417.
[0132] Processor 417 can determine an identifier for record 425,
and send commands with the new data 2 of the request to record
database 412 to update record 425. In one implementation, record
database 412 is where tenant data 112 of FIG. 1B is stored. The
request 1 and new data commands 2 can be encapsulated in a single
write transaction sent to record database 412. In one
implementation, multiple changes to records in the database can be
made in a single write transaction.
[0133] Processor 417 can also analyze request 1 to determine
whether a feed tracked update is to be created, which at this point
may include determining whether the event (e.g., a change to a
particular field) is to be tracked. This determination can be based
on an interaction (i.e., an exchange of data) with record database
412 and/or other databases, or based on information stored locally
(e.g., in cache or RAM) at processor 417. In one implementation, a
list of record types that are being tracked can be stored. The list
may be different for each tenant, e.g., as each tenant may
configure the database system to its own specifications. Thus, if
the record 425 is of a type not being tracked, then the
determination of whether to create a feed tracked update can stop
there.
[0134] The same list or a second list (which can be stored in a
same location or a different location) can also include the fields
and/or events that are tracked for the record types in the first
list. This list can be searched to determine if the event is being
tracked. A list may also contain information having the granularity
of listing specific records that are to be tracked (e.g., if a
tenant can specify the particular records to be tracked, as opposed
to just type).
[0135] As an example, processor 417 may obtain an identifier
associated with record 425 (e.g., obtained from request 1 or
database 412), potentially along with a tenant identifier, and
cross-reference the identifier with a list of records for which
feed tracked updates are to be created. Specifically, the record
identifier can be used to determine the record type and a list of
tracked types can be searched for a match. The specific record may
also be checked if such individual record tracking was enabled. The
name of the field to be changed can also be used to search a list
of tracking-enabled fields. Other criteria besides field and events
can be used to determine whether a feed tracked update is created,
e.g., type of change in the field. If a feed tracked update is to
be generated, processor 417 can then generate the feed tracked
update.
[0136] In some implementations, a feed tracked update is created
dynamically when a feed (e.g., the entity feed of record 425) is
requested. Thus, in one implementation, a feed tracked update can
be created when a user requests the entity feed for record 425. In
this implementation, the feed tracked update may be created (e.g.,
assembled), including re-created, each time the entity feed is to
be displayed to any user. In one implementation, one or more hifeed
tracked update tables can keep track of previous events so that the
feed tracked update can be re-created.
[0137] In another implementation, a feed tracked update can be
created at the time the event occurs, and the feed tracked update
can be added to a list of feed items. The list of feed items may be
specific to record 425, or may be an aggregate of feed items
including feed items for many records. Such an aggregate list can
include a record identifier so that the feed items for the entity
feed of record 425 can be easily retrieved. For example, after the
feed tracked update has been generated, processor 417 can add the
new feed tracked update 3 to a feed of record 425. As mentioned
above, in one implementation, the feed can be stored in a field
(e.g., as a child object) of record 425. In another implementation,
the feed can be stored in another location or in another database,
but with a link (e.g., a connecting identifier) to record 425. The
feed can be organized in various ways, e.g., as a linked list, an
array, or other data structure.
[0138] A second user 430 can access the new feed tracked update 3
in various ways. In one implementation, second user 430 can send a
request 4 for the record feed. For example, second user 430 can
access a home page (detail page) of the record 425 (e.g., with a
query or by browsing), and the feed can be obtained through a tab,
button, or other activation object on the page. The feed can be
displayed on the screen or downloaded.
[0139] In another implementation, processor 417 can add the new
feed tracked update 5 to a feed (e.g., news feed) of a user that is
following record 425. In one implementation, processor 417 can
determine each of the followers of record 425 by accessing a list
of the users that have been registered as followers. This
determination can be done for each new event (e.g., update 1). In
another implementation, processor 417 can poll (e.g., with a query)
the records that second user 430 is following to determine when new
feed tracked updates (or other feed items) are available. Processor
417 can use a follower profile 435 of second user 430 that can
contain a list of the records that the second user 430 is
following. Such a list can be contained in other parts of the
database as well. Second user 430 can then send a request 6 to
his/her profile 435 to obtain a feed, which contains the new feed
tracked update. The user's profile 435 can be stored in a profile
database 414, which can be the same or different than database
412.
[0140] In some implementations, a user can define a news feed to
include new feed tracked updates from various records, which may be
limited to a maximum number. In one implementation, each user has
one news feed. In another implementation, the follower profile 435
can include the specifications of each of the records to be
followed (with the criteria for what feed tracked updates are to be
provided and how they are displayed), as well as the feed.
[0141] Some implementations can provide various types of record
(entity) feeds. Entity Feeds can exist for record types like
account, opportunity, case, and contact. An entity feed can tell a
user about the actions that people have taken on that particular
record or on one its related records. The entity feed can include
who made the action, which field was changed, and the old and new
values. In one implementation, entity feeds can exist on all
supported records as a list that is linked to the specific record.
For example, a feed could be stored in a field that allows lists
(e.g., linked lists) or as a child object.
[0142] IV. Tracking Actions of a User
[0143] In addition to knowing about events associated with a
particular record, it can be helpful for a user to know what a
particular user is doing. In particular, it might be nice to know
what the user is doing without the user having to generate the feed
tracked update (e.g., a user submitting a synopsis of what the user
has done). Accordingly, implementations can automatically track
actions of a user that trigger events, and feed tracked updates can
be generated for certain events.
[0144] FIG. 5 shows a flowchart of an example of a method 500 for
tracking actions of a user of a database system, performed in
accordance with some implementations. Method 500 may be performed
in addition to method 300. The operations of method 300, including
order of blocks, can be performed in conjunction with method 500
and other methods described herein. Thus, a feed can be composed of
changes to a record and actions of users.
[0145] In block 510, a database system (e.g., 16 of FIGS. 1A and
1B) identifies an action of a first user. In one implementation,
the action triggers an event, and the event is identified. For
example, the action of a user requesting an update to a record can
be identified, where the event is receiving a request or is the
resulting update of a record. The action may thus be defined by the
resulting event. In another implementation, only certain types of
actions (events) are identified. Which actions are identified can
be set as a default or can be configurable by a tenant, or even
configurable at a user level. In this way, processing effort can be
reduced since only some actions are identified.
[0146] In block 520, it is determined whether the event qualifies
for a feed tracked update. In one implementation, a predefined list
of events (e.g., as mentioned herein) can be created so that only
certain actions are identified. In one implementation, an
administrator (or other user) of a tenant can specify the type of
actions (events) for which a feed tracked update is to be
generated. This block may also be performed for method 300.
[0147] In block 530, a feed tracked update is generated about the
action. In an example where the action is an update of a record,
the feed tracked update can be similar or the same as the feed
tracked update created for the record. The description can be
altered though to focus on the user as opposed to the record. For
example, "John D. has closed a new opportunity for account XYZ" as
opposed to "an opportunity has been closed for account XYZ."
[0148] In block 540, the feed tracked update is added to a profile
feed of the first user when, e.g., the user clicks on a tab to open
a page in a browser program displaying the feed. In one
implementation, a feed for a particular user can be accessed on a
page of the user's profile, in a similar manner as a record feed
can be accessed on a detail page of the record. In another
implementation, the first user may not have a profile feed and the
feed tracked update may just be stored temporarily before
proceeding. A profile feed of a user can be stored associated with
the user's profile. This profile feed can be added to a news feed
of another user.
[0149] In block 550, followers of the first user are identified. In
one implementation, a user can specify which type of actions other
users can follow. Similarly, in one implementation, a follower can
select what actions by a user the follower wants to follow. In an
implementation where different followers follow different types of
actions, which users are followers of that user and the particular
action can be identified, e.g., using various lists that track what
actions and criteria are being followed by a particular user. In
various implementations, the followers of the first user can be
identified in a similar manner as followers of a record, as
described above for block 350.
[0150] In block 560, the feed tracked update is added to a news
feed of each follower of the first user when, e.g., the follower
clicks on a tab to open a page displaying the news feed. The feed
tracked update can be added in a similar manner as the feed items
for a record feed. The news feed can contain feed tracked updates
both about users and records. In another implementation, a user can
specify what kind of feed tracked updates to receive about a user
that the user is following. For example, a user could specify feed
tracked updates with particular keywords, of certain types of
records, of records owned or created by certain users, particular
fields, and other criteria as mentioned herein.
[0151] In block 570, a follower accesses the news feed and sees the
feed tracked update. In one implementation, the user has just one
news feed for all of the records that the user is following. In
another implementation, a user can access his/her own feed (i.e.
feed about his/her own actions) by selecting a particular tab or
other object on a page of an interface to the database system.
Thus, a feed can include feed tracked updates about what other
users are doing in the database system. When a user becomes aware
of a relevant action of another user, the user can contact the
co-worker, thereby fostering teamwork.
[0152] V. Generation of a Feed Tracked Update
[0153] As described above, some implementations can generate text
describing events (e.g., updates) that have occurred for a record
and actions by a user that trigger an event. A database system can
be configured to generate the feed tracked updates for various
events in various ways.
[0154] A. Which Events to Generate a Feed Tracked Update
[0155] In a database system, there are various events that can be
detected. However, the operator of the database system and/or a
tenant may not want to detect every possible event as this could be
costly with regards to performance. Accordingly, the operator
and/or the tenant can configure the database system to only detect
certain events. For example, an update of a record may be an event
that is to be detected.
[0156] Out of the events that are detected, a tenant (including a
specific user of the tenant) may not want a feed tracked update
about each detected event. For example, all updates to a record may
be identified at a first level. Then, based on specifications of an
administrator and/or a specific user of a tenant, another level of
inquiry can be made as to whether a feed tracked update is to be
generated about the detected event. For example, the events that
qualify for a feed tracked update can be restricted to changes for
only certain fields of the record, and can differ depending on
which user is receiving the feed. In one implementation, a database
system can track whether an event qualifies for a feed tracked
update for any user, and once the feed tracked update is generated,
it can be determined who is to receive the feed tracked update.
[0157] Supported events (events for which a feed tracked update is
generated) can include actions for standard fields, custom fields,
and standard related lists. Regarding standard fields, for the
entity feed and the profile feed, a standard field update can
trigger a feed tracked update to be published to that feed. In one
implementation, which standard field can create a feed tracked
update can be set by an administrator to be the same for every
user. In another implementation, a user can set which standard
fields create a feed tracked update for that user's news feed.
Custom fields can be treated the same or differently than standard
fields.
[0158] The generation of a feed item can also depend on a
relationship of an object to other objects (e.g., parent-child
relationships). For example, if a child object is updated, a feed
tracked update may be written to a feed of a parent of the child
object. The level of relationship can be configured, e.g., only 1
level of separation (i.e. no grandparent-grandchild relationship).
Also, in one implementation, a feed tracked update is generated
only for objects above the objects being updated, i.e., a feed
tracked update is not written for a child when the parent is
updated.
[0159] In some implementations, for related lists of a record, a
feed tracked update is written to its parent record (1 level only)
when the related list item is added, and not when the list item is
changed or deleted. For example: user A added a new opportunity XYZ
for account ABC. In this manner, entity feeds can be controlled so
as not to be cluttered with feed tracked updates about changes to
their related items. Any changes to the related list item can be
tracked on their own entity feed, if that related list item has a
feed on it. In this implementation, if a user wants to see a feed
of the related list item then the user can subscribe to it. Such a
subscription might be when a user cares about a specific
opportunity related to a specific account. A user can also browse
to that object's entity feed. Other implementations can create a
feed tracked update when a related entity is changed or
deleted.
[0160] In one implementation, an administrator (of the system or of
a specific tenant) can define which events of which related objects
are to have feed tracked updates written about them in a parent
record. In another implementation, a user can define which related
object events to show. In one implementation, there are two types
of related lists of related objects: first class lookup and second
class lookup. Each of the records in the related lists can have a
different rule for whether a feed tracked update is generated for a
parent record. Each of these related lists can be composed as
custom related lists. In various implementations, a custom related
list can be composed of custom objects; the lists can contain a
variety of records or items (e.g., not restricted to a particular
type of record or item), and can be displayed in a customized
manner.
[0161] In one implementation, a first class lookup contains records
of a child record that can exist by itself. For example, the
contacts on an account exist as a separate record and also as a
child record of the account. In another implementation, a record in
a first class lookup can have its own feed, which can be displayed
on its detail page.
[0162] In one implementation, a second class lookup can have line
items existing only in the context of their parent record (e.g.,
activities on an opportunity, contact roles on
opportunity/contact). In one implementation, the line items are not
objects themselves, and thus there is no detail page, and no place
to put a feed. In another implementation, a change in a second
class lookup can be reported on the feed of the parent.
[0163] Some implementations can also create feed tracked updates
for dependent field changes. A dependent field change is a field
that changes value when another field changes, and thus the field
has a value that is dependent on the value of the other field. For
example, a dependent field might be a sum (or other formula) that
totals values in other fields, and thus the dependent field would
change when one of the fields being summed changes. Accordingly, in
one implementation, a change in one field could create feed tracked
updates for multiple fields. In other implementations, feed tracked
updates are not created for dependent fields.
[0164] B. How the Feed Tracked Update is Generated
[0165] After it is determined that a feed tracked update is going
to be generated, some implementations can also determine how the
feed tracked update is generated. In one implementation, different
methods can be used for different events, e.g., in a similar
fashion as for the configurability of which events feed tracked
updates are generated. A feed tracked update can also include a
description of multiple events (e.g., john changed the account
status and amount).
[0166] In one implementation, the feed tracked update is a
grammatical sentence, thereby being easily understandable by a
person. In another implementation, the feed tracked update provides
detailed information about the update. In various examples, an old
value and new value for a field may be included in the feed tracked
update, an action for the update may be provided (e.g., submitted
for approval), and the names of particular users that are
responsible for replying or acting on the feed tracked update may
be also provided. The feed tracked update can also have a level of
importance based on settings chosen by the administrator, a
particular user requesting an update, or by a following user who is
to receive the feed tracked update, which fields is updated, a
percentage of the change in a field, the type of event, or any
combination of these factors.
[0167] The system may have a set of heuristics for creating a feed
tracked update from the event (e.g., a request to update). For
example, the subject may be the user, the record, or a field being
added or changed. The verb can be based on the action requested by
the user, which can be selected from a list of verbs (which may be
provided as defaults or input by an administrator of a tenant). In
one implementation, feed tracked updates can be generic containers
with formatting restrictions,
[0168] As an example of a feed tracked update for a creation of a
new record, "Mark Abramowitz created a new Opportunity for
IBM--20,000 laptops with Amount as $3.5 M and Sam Palmisano as
Decision Maker." This event can be posted to the profile feed for
Mark Abramowitz and the entity feed for record of Opportunity for
IBM--20,000 laptops. The pattern can be given by (AgentFullName)
created a new (ObjectName)(RecordName) with [(FieldName) as
(FieldValue) [,/and]]*[[added/changed/removed]
(RelatedListRecordName) [as/to/as] (RelatedListRecordValue) [,/and]
]*. Similar patterns can be formed for a changed field (standard or
custom) and an added child record to a related list.
[0169] VI. Tracking Commentary from or about a User
[0170] Some implementations can also have a user submit text,
instead of the database system generating a feed tracked update. As
the text is submitted as part or all of a message by a user, the
text can be about any topic. Thus, more information than just
actions of a user and events of a record can be conveyed. In one
implementation, the messages can be used to ask a question about a
particular record, and users following the record can provide
comments and responses.
[0171] FIG. 6 shows a flowchart of an example of a method 600 for
creating a news feed from messages created by a user about a record
or another user, performed in accordance with some implementations.
In one implementation, method 600 can be combined with methods 300
and 500. In one aspect, a message can be associated with the first
user when the first user creates the message (e.g., a post or
comment about a record or another user). In another aspect, a
message can be associated with the first user when the message is
about the first user (e.g., posted by another user on the first
user's profile feed).
[0172] In block 610, the database system receives a message (e.g.,
a post or status update) associated with a first user. The message
(e.g., a post or status update) can contain text and/or multimedia
content submitted by another user or by the first user. In one
implementation, a post is for a section of the first user's profile
page where any user can add a post, and where multiple posts can
exist. Thus, a post can appear on the first user's profile page and
can be viewed when the first user's profile is visited. For a
message about a record, the post can appear on a detail page of a
record. Note the message can appear in other feeds as well. In
another implementation, a status update about the first user can
only be added by the first user. In one implementation, a user can
only have one status message.
[0173] In block 620, the message is added to a table, as described
in greater detail below. When the feed is opened, a query filters
one or more tables to identify the first user, identify other
persons that the user is following, and retrieve the message.
Messages and record updates are presented in a combined list as the
feed. In this way, in one implementation, the message can be added
to a profile feed of the first user, which is associated (e.g., as
a related list) with the first user's profile. In one
implementation, the posts are listed indefinitely. In another
implementation, only the most recent posts (e.g., last 50) are kept
in the profile feed. Such implementations can also be employed with
feed tracked updates. In yet another implementation, the message
can be added to a profile of the user adding the message.
[0174] In block 630, the database system identifies followers of
the first user. In one implementation, the database system can
identify the followers as described above for method 500. In
various implementations, a follower can select to follow a feed
about the actions of the first user, messages about the first user,
or both (potentially in a same feed).
[0175] In block 640, the message is added to a news feed of each
follower. In one implementation, the message is only added to a
news feed of a particular follower if the message matches some
criteria, e.g., the message includes a particular keyword or other
criteria. In another implementation, a message can be deleted by
the user who created the message. In one implementation, once
deleted by the author, the message is deleted from all feeds to
which the message had been added.
[0176] In block 650, the follower accesses a news feed and sees the
message. For example, the follower can access a news feed on the
follower's own profile page. As another example, the follower can
have a news feed sent to his/her own desktop without having to
first go to a home page.
[0177] In block 660, the database system receives a comment about
the message. The database system can add the comment to a feed of
the same first user, much as the original message was added. In one
implementation, the comment can also be added to a feed of a second
user who added the comment. In one implementation, users can also
reply to the comment. In another implementation, users can add
comments to a feed tracked update, and further comments can be
associated with the feed tracked update. In yet another
implementation, making a comment or message is not an action to
which a feed tracked update is created. Thus, the message may be
the only feed item created from such an action.
[0178] In one implementation, if a feed tracked update or post is
deleted, its corresponding comments are deleted as well. In another
implementation, new comments on a feed tracked update or post do
not update the feed tracked update timestamp. Also, the feed
tracked update or post can continue to be shown in a feed (profile
feed, record feed, or news feed) if it has had a comment within a
specified timeframe (e.g., within the last week). Otherwise, the
feed tracked update or post can be removed in an
implementation.
[0179] In some implementations, all or most feed tracked updates
can be commented on. In other implementations, feed tracked updates
for certain records (e.g., cases or ideas) are not commentable. In
various implementations, comments can be made for any one or more
records of opportunities, accounts, contacts, leads, and custom
objects.
[0180] In block 670, the comment is added to a news feed of each
follower. In one implementation, a user can make the comment within
the user's news feed. Such a comment can propagate to the
appropriate profile feed or record feed, and then to the news feeds
of the following users. Thus, feeds can include what people are
saying, as well as what they are doing. In one aspect, feeds are a
way to stay up-to-date (e.g., on users, opportunities, etc.) as
well as an opportunity to reach out to co-workers/partners and
engage them around common goals.
[0181] In some implementations, users can rate feed tracked updates
or messages (including comments). A user can choose to prioritize a
display of a feed so that higher rated feed items show up higher on
a display. For example, in an implementation where comments are
answers to a specific question, users can rate the different status
posts so that a best answer can be identified. As another example,
users are able to quickly identify feed items that are most
important as those feed items can be displayed at a top of a list.
The order of the feed items can be based on an importance level
(which can be determined by the database system using various
factors, some of which are mentioned herein) and based on a rating
from users. In one implementation, the rating is on a scale that
includes at least 3 values. In another implementation, the rating
is based on a binary scale.
[0182] Besides a profile for a user, a group can also be created.
In various implementations, the group can be created based on
certain criteria that are common to the users, can be created by
inviting users, or can be created by receiving requests to join
from a user. In one implementation, a group feed can be created,
with messages being added to the group feed when someone adds a
message to the group as a whole. For example, a group page may have
a section for posts. In another implementation, a message can be
added to a group feed when a message is added about any one of the
members. In yet another implementation, a group feed can include
feed tracked updates about actions of the group as a whole (e.g.,
when an administrator changes data in a group profile or a record
owned by the group), or about actions of an individual member.
[0183] FIG. 7 shows an example of a group feed on a group page
according to some implementations. As shown, a feed item 710 shows
that a user has posted a document to the group object. The text
"Bill Bauer has posted the document Competitive Insights" can be
generated by the database system in a similar manner as feed
tracked updates about a record being changed. A feed item 720 shows
a post to the group, along with comments 730 from Ella Johnson,
James Saxon, Mary Moore and Bill Bauer.
[0184] FIG. 8 shows an example of a record feed containing a feed
tracked update, post, and comments according to some
implementations. Feed item 810 shows a feed tracked update based on
the event of submitting a discount for approval. Other feed items
show posts, e.g., from Bill Bauer, that are made to the record and
comments, e.g., from Erica Law and Jake Rapp, that are made on the
posts.
[0185] VII. Infrastructure for a Feed
[0186] A. Tables Used to Create a Feed
[0187] FIG. 9A shows an example of a plurality of tables that may
be used in tracking events and creating feeds according to some
implementations. The tables of FIG. 9A may have entries added, or
potentially removed, as part of tracking events in the database
from which feed items are creates or that correspond to feed items.
In one implementation, each tenant has its own set of tables that
are created based on criteria provided by the tenant.
[0188] An event hifeed tracked update table 910 can provide a
hifeed tracked update of events from which feed items are created.
In one aspect, the events are for objects that are being tracked.
Thus, table 910 can store and change hifeed tracked updates for
feeds, and the changes can be persisted. In various
implementations, event hifeed tracked update table 910 can have
columns of event ID 911, object ID 912 (also called parent ID), and
created by ID 913. The event ID 911 can uniquely identify a
particular event and can start at 1 (or other number or value).
[0189] Each new event can be added chronologically with a new event
ID, which may be incremented in order. An object ID 912 can be used
to track which record or user's profile is being changed. For
example, the object ID can correspond to the record whose field is
being changed or the user whose feed is receiving a post. The
created by ID 913 can track the user who is performing the action
that results in the event, e.g., the user that is changing the
field or that is posting a message to the profile of another
user.
[0190] In some other implementations, event hifeed tracked update
table 910 can have one or more of the following variables with
certain attributes: ORGANIZATION_ID being CHAR(15 BYTE),
FEEDS_ENTITY_HIFEED TRACKED UPDATE_ID being CHAR(15 BYTE),
PARENT_ID being CHAR(15 BYTE), CREATED_BY being CHAR(15 BYTE),
CREATED_DATE being a variable of type DATE, DIVISION being a
NUMBER, KEY_PREFIX being CHAR(3 BYTE), and DELETED being CHAR(1
BYTE). The parent ID can provide an ID of a parent object in case
the change is promulgated to the parent. The key prefix can provide
a key that is unique to a group of records, e.g., custom records
(objects). The deleted variable can indicate that the feed items
for the event are deleted, and thus the feed items are not
generated. In one implementation, the variables for each event
entry or any entry in any of the tables may not be nullable. In
another implementation, all entries in the event hifeed tracked
update table 910 are used to create feed items for only one object,
as specified by the object ID 912. For example, one feed tracked
update cannot communicate updates on two records, such as updates
of an account field and an opportunity field.
[0191] In one implementation, a name of an event can also be stored
in table 910. In one implementation, a tenant can specify events
that they want tracked. In an implementation, event hifeed tracked
update table 910 can include the name of the field that changed
(e.g., old and new values). In another implementation, the name of
the field, and the values, are stored in a separate table. Other
information about an event (e.g., text of comment, feed tracked
update, post or status update) can be stored in event hifeed
tracked update table 910, or in other tables, as is now
described.
[0192] A field change table 920 can provide a hifeed tracked update
of the changes to the fields. The columns of table 920 can include
an event ID 921 (which correlates to the event ID 911), an old
value 922 for the field, and the new value 923 for the field. In
one implementation, if an event changes more than one field value,
then there can be an entry for each field changed. As shown, event
ID 921 has two entries for event E37.
[0193] In some other implementations, field change table 920 can
have one or more of the following variables with certain
attributes: ORGANIZATION_ID being CHAR(15 BYTE),
FEEDS_ENTITY_HIFEED TRACKED UPDATE_FIELDS ID being CHAR(15 BYTE)
and identifying each entry, FEEDS_ENTITY_HIFEED TRACKED UPDATE_ID
being CHAR(15 BYTE), FIELD_KEY being VARCHAR2(120 BYTE), DATA_TYPE
being CHAR(1 BYTE), OLDVAL_STRING VARCHAR2 being (765 BYTE),
NEWVAL_STRING being VARCHAR2(765 BYTE), OLDVAL_FIRST_NAME being
VARCHAR2(765 BYTE), NEWVAL_FIRST_NAME being VARCHAR2(765 BYTE),
OLDVAL_LAST_NAME being VARCHAR2(765 BYTE), NEWVAL_LAST_NAME being
VARCHAR2(765 BYTE), OLDVAL_NUMBER being NUMBER, NEWVAL_NUMBER being
NUMBER, OLDVAL DATE being DATE, NEWVAL_DATE being DATE, and DELETED
being CHAR(1 BYTE). In one implementation, one or more of the
variables for each entry in any of the tables may be nullable.
[0194] In one implementation, the data type variable (and/or other
variables) is a non-api-insertable field. In another
implementation, variable values can be derived from the record
whose field is being changed. Certain values can be transferred
into typed columns old/new value string, old/new value number or
old/new value date depending upon the derived values. In another
implementation, there can exist a data type for capturing
add/deletes for child objects. The child ID can be tracked in the
foreign-key column of the record. In yet another implementation, if
the field name is pointing to a field in the parent entity, a field
level security (FLS) can be used when a user attempts to a view a
relevant feed item. Herein, security levels for objects and fields
are also called access checks and determinations of authorization.
In one aspect, the access can be for create, read, write, update,
or delete of objects.
[0195] In one implementation, the field name (or key) can be either
a field name of the entity or one of the values in a separate list.
For example, changes that do not involve the update of an existing
field (e.g., a close or open) can have a field name specified in an
enumerated list. This enumerated list can store "special" field
name sentinel values for non-update actions that a tenant wants to
track. In one aspect, the API just surfaces these values and the
caller has to check the enumerated values to see if it is a special
field name.
[0196] A comment table 930 can provide a hifeed tracked update of
the comments made regarding an event, e.g., a comment on a post or
a change of a field value. The columns of table 930 can include an
event ID 921 (which correlates to the event ID 911), the comment
column 932 that stores the text of the comment, and the time/date
933 of the comment. In one implementation, there can be multiple
comments for each event. As shown, event ID 921 has two entries for
event E37.
[0197] In some other implementations, comment table 930 can have
one or more of the following variables with certain attributes:
ORGANIZATION_ID being CHAR(15 BYTE), FEEDS_COMMENTS_ID being
CHAR(15 BYTE) and uniquely identifying each comment, PARENT_ID
being CHAR(15 BYTE), CREATED_BY being CHAR(15 BYTE), CREATED_DATE
being DATE, COMMENTS being VARCHAR2(420 BYTE), and DELETED being
CHAR(1 BYTE).
[0198] A user subscription table 940 can provide a list of the
objects being followed (subscribed to) by a user. In one
implementation, each entry has a user ID 941 of the user doing the
following and one object ID 942 corresponding to the object being
followed. In one implementation, the object being followed can be a
record or a user. As shown, the user with ID U819 is following
object IDs O615 and O489. If user U819 is following other objects,
then additional entries may exist for user U819. Also as shown,
user U719 is also following object O615. The user subscription
table 940 can be updated when a user adds or deletes an object that
is being followed.
[0199] In some other implementations, comment table 940 can be
composed of two tables (one for records being followed and one for
users being followed). One table can have one or more of the
following variables with certain attributes: ORGANIZATION_ID being
CHAR(15 BYTE), ENTITY SUBSCRIPTION_ID being CHAR(15 BYTE),
PARENT_ID being CHAR(15 BYTE), CREATED_BY being CHAR(15 BYTE),
CREATED_DATE being DATE, and DELETED being CHAR(1 BYTE). Another
table can have one or more of the following variables with certain
attributes: ORGANIZATION_ID being CHAR(15 BYTE), USER
SUBSCRIPTIONS_ID being CHAR(15 BYTE), USER_ID being CHAR(15 BYTE),
CREATED_BY being CHAR(15 BYTE), and CREATED_DATE being DATE.
[0200] In one implementation, regarding a profile feed and a news
feed, these are read-only views on the event hifeed tracked update
table 910 specialized for these feed types. Conceptually the news
feed can be a semi-join between the entity subscriptions table 940
and the event hifeed tracked update table 910 on the object IDs 912
and 942 for the user. In one aspect, these entities can have
polymorphic parents and can be subject to a number of restrictions
detailed herein, e.g., to limit the cost of sharing checks.
[0201] In one implementation, entity feeds are modeled in the API
as a feed associate entity (e.g., AccountFeed, CaseFeed, etc). A
feed associate entity includes information composed of events
(e.g., event IDs) for only one particular record type. Such a list
can limit the query (and sharing checks) to a specific record type.
In one aspect, this structuring of the entity feeds can make the
query run faster. For example, a request for a feed of a particular
account can include the record type of account. In one
implementation, an account feed table can then be searched, where
the table has account record IDs and corresponding event IDs or
pointers to particular event entries in event hifeed tracked update
table 910. Since the account feed table only contains some of the
records (not all), the query can run faster.
[0202] In one implementation, there may be objects with no events
listed in the event hifeed tracked update table 910, even though
the record is being tracked. In this case, the database service can
return a result indicating that no feed items exist.
[0203] In another implementation, tables can also exist for audit
tracking, e.g., to examine that operations of the system (e.g.,
access checks) are performing accurately. In one implementation,
audit change-hifeed tracked update tables can be persisted (e.g.,
in bulk) synchronously in the same transaction as feed events are
added to event hifeed tracked update table 910. In another
implementation, entries to the two sets of table can be persisted
in asynchronous manner (e.g., by forking a bulk update into a
separate java thread). In one aspect, some updates to any of the
tables can get lost if the instance of the table goes down while
the update has not yet finished. This asynchronous manner can limit
an impact performance on save operations. In some implementations,
a field "persistence type" (tri state: AUDIT, FEEDS or BOTH) can be
added to capture user preferences, as opposed to being hard
coded.
[0204] B. Feed Item
[0205] A feed item can represent an individual field change of a
record, creation and deletion of a record, or other events being
tracked for a record or a user. In one implementation, all of the
feed items in a single transaction (event) can be grouped together
and have the same event ID. A single transaction relates to the
operations that can be performed in a single communication with the
database. In another implementation where a feed is an object of
the database, a feed item can be a child of a profile feed, news
feed, or entity feed. If a feed item is added to multiple feeds,
the feed item can be replicated as a child of each feed to which
the feed item is added.
[0206] In one implementation, a feed item is visible only when its
parent feed is visible, which can be the same as needing read
access on the feed's parent (which can be by the type of record or
by a specific record). The feed item's field may be only visible
when allowed under field-level security (FLS). Unfortunately, this
can mean that the parent feed may be visible, but the child may not
be because of FLS. Such access rules are described in more detail
below. In one implementation, a feed item can be read-only. In this
implementation, after being created, the feed item cannot be
changed.
[0207] In multi-currency organizations, a feed item can have an
extra currency code field. This field can give the currency code
for the currency value in this field. In one aspect, the value is
undefined when the data type is anything other than currency.
[0208] C. Feed Comment
[0209] In some implementations, a comment exists as an item that
depends from feed tracked updates, posts, status updates, and other
items that are independent of each other. Thus, a feed comment
object can exist as a child object of a feed item object. For
example, comment table 930 can be considered a child table of event
hifeed tracked update table 910. In one implementation, a feed
comment can be a child of a profile feed, news feed, or entity feed
that is separate from other feed items.
[0210] In various implementations, a feed comment can have various
permissions for the following actions. For read permission, a feed
comment can be visible if the parent feed is visible. For create
permission, if a user has access to the feed (which can be tracked
by the ID of the parent feed), the user can add a comment. For
delete, only a user with modify all data permission or a user who
added the comment can delete the comment. Also delete permission
can require access on the parent feed. An update of a comment can
be restricted, and thus not be allowed.
[0211] In one implementation, regarding a query restriction, a feed
comment cannot be queried directly, but can be queried only via the
parent feed. An example is "select id, parentid, (select . . . from
feedcomment) from entityfeed". In another implementation, a feed
comment can be directly queries, e.g., by querying comment table
930. A query could include the text of a comment or any other
column of the table.
[0212] In another implementation, regarding soft delete behavior, a
feed comment table does not have a soft delete column. A soft
delete allows an undelete action. In one implementation, a record
can have a soft delete. Thus, when the record is deleted, the feed
(and its children) can be soft deleted. Therefore, in one aspect, a
feed comment cannot be retrieved via the "query" verb (which would
retrieve only the comment), but can be retrieved via "queryAll"
verb though. An example is queryAll("select id, (select id,
commentbody from feedcomments) from accountfeed where
parentid=`001x000xxx3MkADAA0`"); // where `001 x000xxx3MkADAA0` has
been soft deleted. When a hard delete (a physical delete) happens,
the comment can be hard deleted from the database.
[0213] In one implementation, regarding an implicit delete, feeds
with comments are not deleted by a reaper (a routine that performs
deletion). In another implementation, a user cannot delete a feed.
In yet another implementation, upon lead convert (e.g., to an
opportunity or contact), the feed items of the lead can be hard
deleted. This implementation can be configured to perform such a
deletion for any change in record type. In various implementations,
only the comments are hard deleted upon a lead convert, other
convert, or when the object is deleted (as mentioned above).
[0214] In one implementation, viewing a feed pulls up the most
recent messages or feed tracked updates (e.g., 25) and searches the
most recent (e.g., 4) comments for each feed item. The comments can
be identified via the comment table 930. In one implementation, a
user can request to see more comments, e.g., by selecting a see
more link.
[0215] In some implementations, user feeds and/or entity feeds have
a last comment date field. In various implementations, the last
comment date field is stored as a field of a record or a user
profile. For feeds with no comments, this can be the same as the
created date. Whenever a new comment is created, the associated
feed's last comment date can be updated with the created date of
the comment. The last comment date is unchanged if a feed comment
is deleted. A use case is to allow people to order their queries to
see the feeds, which have been most recently commented on.
[0216] D. Creating Custom Feeds by Customizing the Event Hifeed
Tracked Update Table
[0217] In some implementations, a tenant (e.g., through an
administrator) or a specific user of a tenant can specify the types
of events for which feed items are created. A user can add more
events or remove events from a list of events that get added to the
event hifeed tracked update table 910. In one implementation, a
trigger can be added as a piece of code, rule, or item on a list
for adding a custom event to the event hifeed tracked update table
910. These custom events can provide customers the ability to
create their own custom feeds and custom feed items to augment or
replace implicitly generated feeds via event hifeed tracked update
table 910. Implicitly generated feed data can be created when
feed-tracking is enabled for certain entities/field-names. In one
implementation, in order to override implicit feeds, feed tracking
can be turned off and then triggers can be defined by the user to
add events to the event hifeed tracked update table 910. In other
implementations, users are not allowed to override the default list
of events that are added to table 910, and thus cannot define their
own triggers for having events tracked.
[0218] For example, upon lead convert or case close, a default
action to be taken by the system may be to add multiple events to
event hifeed tracked update table 910. If a customer (e.g., a
tenant or a specific user) does not want each of these events to
show up as feed items, the customer can turn off tracking for the
entities and generate custom feeds by defining customized triggers
(e.g., by using an API) upon the events. As another example,
although data is not changed, a customer may still want to track an
action on a record (e.g., status changes if not already being
tracked, views by certain people, retrieval of data, etc.).
[0219] In one implementation, if a user does not want a feed item
to be generated upon every change on a given field, but only if the
change exceeds a certain threshold or range, then such custom feeds
can be conditionally generated with the customized triggers. In one
implementation, the default tracking for the record or user may be
turned off for this customization so that the events are only
conditionally tracked. In another implementation, a trigger can be
defined that deletes events that are not desired, so that default
tracking can still be turned on for a particular object type. Such
conditional tracking can be used for other events as well.
[0220] In some implementations, defining triggers to track certain
events can be done as follows. A user can define an object type to
track. This object type can be added to a list of objects that can
be tracked for a particular tenant. The tenant can remove object
types from this list as well. Custom objects and standard objects
can be on the list, which may, for example, be stored in cache or
RAM of a server or in the database. Generally only one such list
exists for a tenant, and users do not have individual lists for
themselves, although in some implementations, they may particularly
when the number of users in a tenant is small.
[0221] In one implementation, a tenant can select which records of
an object type are to be tracked. In another implementation, once
an object type is added to the tracking list of object types, then
all records of that type are tracked. The tenant can then specify
the particulars of how the tracking is to be performed. For
example, the tenant can specify triggers as described above, fields
to be tracked, or any of the customizations mentioned herein.
[0222] In some implementations, when a feed is defined as an object
in the database (e.g., as a child object of entity records that can
be tracked), a particular instance of the feed object (e.g., for a
particular record) can be create-able and delete-able. In one
implementation, if a user has access to a record then the user can
customize the feed for the record. In one implementation, a record
may be locked to prevent customization of its feed.
[0223] One method of creating a custom feed for users of a database
system according to implementations is now described. Any of the
following blocks can be performed wholly or partially with the
database system, and in particular by one or more processor of the
database system.
[0224] In block A, one or more criteria specifying which events are
to be tracked for possible inclusion into a feed to be displayed
are received from a tenant. In block B, data indicative of an event
is received. In block C, the event is analyzed to determine if the
criteria are satisfied. In block D, if the criteria are satisfied,
at least a portion of the data is added to a table (e.g., one or
more of the tables in FIG. 9A) that tracks events for inclusion
into at least one feed for a user of the tenant. The feed in which
feed items of an event may ultimately be displayed can be a news
feed, record feed, or a profile feed.
[0225] E. Creating Custom Feeds with Filtering
[0226] After feed items have been generated, they can be filtered
so that only certain feed items are displayed, which may be
tailored to a specific tenant and/or user. In one implementation, a
user can specify changes to a field that meet certain criteria for
the feed item to show up in a feed displayed to the user, e.g., a
news feed or even an entity feed displayed directly to the user. In
one implementation, the criteria can be combined with other factors
(e.g., number of feed items in the feed) to determine which feed
items to display. For instance, if a small number of feed items
exist (e.g., below a threshold), then all of the feed items may be
displayed.
[0227] In one implementation, a user can specify the criteria via a
query on the feed items in his/her new feed, and thus a feed may
only return objects of a certain type, certain types of events,
feed tracked updates about certain fields, and other criteria
mentioned herein. Messages can also be filtered according to some
criteria, which may be specified in a query. Such an added query
can be added onto a standard query that is used to create the news
feed for a user. A first user could specify the users and records
that the first user is following in this manner, as well as
identify the specific feed items that the first user wants to
follow. The query could be created through a graphical interface or
added by a user directly in a query language. Other criteria could
include receiving only posts directed to a particular user or
record, as opposed to other feed items.
[0228] In one implementation, the filters can be run by defining
code triggers, which run when an event, specific or otherwise,
occurs. The trigger could then run to perform the filtering at the
time the event occurs or when a user (who has certain defined
triggers, that is configured for a particular user) requests a
display of the feed. A trigger could search for certain terms
(e.g., vulgar language) and then remove such terms or not create
the feed item. A trigger can also be used to send the feed item to
a particular person (e.g., an administrator) who does not normally
receive the feed item were it not for the feed item containing the
flagged terms.
[0229] F. Access Checks
[0230] In one implementation, a user can access a feed of a record
if the user can access the record. The security rules for
determining whether a user has access to a record can be performed
in a variety of ways, some of which are described in commonly
assigned U.S. Pat. No. 8,095,531, titled METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR
CONTROLLING ACCESS TO CUSTOM OBJECTS IN A DATABASE, by Weissman et
al., issued on Jan. 10, 2012, and hereby incorporated by reference
in its entirety and for all purposes. For example, a security level
table can specify whether a user can see a particular type of
record and/or particular records. In one implementation, a
hierarchy of positions within a tenant is used. For example, a
manager can inherit the access levels of employees that the manager
supervises. Field level security (FLS) can also be used to
determine whether a particular feed tracked update about an update
to a field can be seen by the user. The field change table 920 can
be used to identify a field name or field ID, and then whether the
user has read access to that field can be determined from an FLS
table. For example, if a user could not see a field of a social
security number, the feed of the user provided to the user would
not include any feed items related to the social security number
field.
[0231] In one implementation, a user can edit a feed of a record if
the user has access to the record, e.g., deleting or editing a feed
item. In another implementation, a user (besides an administrator)
cannot edit a feed item, except for performing an action from which
a feed item can be created. In one implementation, a user is
required to have access to a particular record and field for a feed
item to be created based on an action of the user. In this case, an
administrator can be considered to be a user with MODIFY-ALL-DATA
security level. In yet another implementation, a user who created
the record can edit the feed.
[0232] G. Posts
[0233] In one implementation, the text of posts are stored in a
child table (post table 950), which can be cross-referenced with
event hifeed tracked update table 910. Post table 950 can include
event ID 951 (to cross-reference with event ID 911), post text 952
to store the text of the post, and time/date 953. An entry in post
table 950 can be considered a feed post object. Posts for a record
can also be subject to access checks. In one implementation, if a
user can view a record then all of the posts can be seen, i.e.
there is not an additional level of security check as there is for
FLS. In another implementation, an additional security check could
be done, e.g., by checking on whether certain keywords (or phrases)
exist in the post. For instance, a post may not be not provided to
specified users if a certain keyword exists, or only provided to
specified users if a keyword exists. In another implementation, a
table can exist for status updates.
[0234] VIII. Subscribing to Users and Records to Follow
[0235] As described above, a user can follow users, groups, and
records. Implementations can provide mechanisms for a user to
manage which users, groups, and records that the user is currently
following. In one implementation, a user can be limited to the
number of users and records (collectively or separately) that the
user can follow. For example, a user may be restricted to only
following 10 users and 15 records, or as another example, 25 total.
Alternatively, the user may be permitted to follow more or less
users.
[0236] In one implementation, a user can go to a page of a record
and then select to follow that object (e.g., with a button marked
"follow" or "join"). In another implementation, a user can search
for a record and have the matching records show up in a list. The
search can include criteria of records that the user might want to
follow. Such criteria can include the owner, the creation date,
last comment date, and numerical values of particular fields (e.g.,
an opportunity with a value of more than $10,000).
[0237] A follow button (or other activation object) can then reside
next to each record in the resulting list, and the follow button
can be selected to start following the record. Similarly, a user
can go to a profile page of a user and select to follow the user,
or a search for users can provide a list, where one or more users
can be selected for following from the list. The selections of
subscribing and unsubscribing can add and delete rows in table
920.
[0238] In some implementations, a subscription center acts as a
centralized place in a database application (e.g., application
platform 18) to manage which records a user subscribes to, and
which field updates the user wants to see in feed tracked updates.
The subscription center can use a subscription table to keep track
of the subscriptions of various users. In one implementation, the
subscription center shows a list of all the items (users and
records) a user is subscribed to. In another implementation, a user
can unsubscribe to subscribed objects from the subscription
center.
[0239] A. Automatic Subscription
[0240] In one implementation, an automatic subscription feature can
ensure that a user is receiving certain feeds. In this manner, a
user does not have to actively select certain objects to follow.
Also, a tenant can ensure that a user is following objects that the
user needs to be following.
[0241] In various implementations for automatically following
users, a default for small organizations can be to follow everyone.
For big organizations, the default can be to follow a manager and
peers. If a user is a manager, the default can be to follow the
manager's supervisor, peers, and people that the manager supervises
(subordinates). In other implementations for automatically
following records, records that the user owns may be automatically
followed and/or records recently viewed (or changed) may be
automatically followed.
[0242] In one example, a new record is created. The owner (not
necessarily the user who created the entity) is subscribed to the
entity. If ownership is changed, the new owner may automatically be
subscribed to follow the entity. Also, after a lead convert, the
user doing the lead convert may be automatically subscribed to the
new account, opportunity, or contact resulting from the lead
convert. In one implementation, the auto subscription is controlled
by user preference. That is a user or tenant can have the auto
subscribe feature enabled or not. In one aspect, the default is to
have the auto-subscribe turned on.
[0243] FIG. 9B shows a flowchart of an example of a method 900 for
automatically subscribing a user to an object in a database system,
performed in accordance with some implementations. Any of the
following blocks can be performed wholly or partially with the
database system, and in particular by one or more processor of the
database system.
[0244] In block 901, one or more properties of an object stored in
the database system are received. The properties can be received
from administrators of the database system, or from users of the
database system (which may be an administrator of a customer
organization). The properties can be records or users, and can
include any of the fields of the object that are stored in the
database system. Examples of properties of a record include: an
owner of the record, a user that converted the record from one
record type to another record type, whether the first user has
viewed the record, and a time the first user viewed the record.
Examples of properties of a user include: which organization
(tenant) the user is associated with, the second user's position in
the same organization, and which other users the user had e-mailed
or worked with on projects.
[0245] In block 902, the database system receives one or more
criteria about which users are to automatically follow the object.
The criteria can be received from administrators of the database
system, or from one or more users of the database system. The users
may be an administrator of a customer organization, which can set
tenant-wide criteria or criteria for specific users (who may also
set the criteria themselves). Examples of the criteria can include:
an owner or creator of a record is to follow the record,
subordinates of an owner or creator of a record are to follow the
record, a user is to follow records recently viewed (potentially
after a specific number of views), records that a user has changed
values (potentially with a date requirement), records created by
others in a same business group as the user. Examples of the
criteria can also include: a user is to follow his/her manager, the
user's peers, other users in the same business group as the user,
and other users that the user has e-mailed or worked with on a
project. The criteria can be specific to a user or group of users
(e.g., users of a tenant).
[0246] In block 903, the database system determines whether the one
or more properties of the object satisfy the one or more criteria
for a first user. In one implementation, this determination can
occur by first obtaining the criteria and then determining objects
that satisfy the criteria. The determination can occur
periodically, at time of creation of an object, or at other times.
If different users have different criteria, then the criteria for a
particular user or group could be searched at the same time. Since
users of different tenants normally cannot view objects of another
tenant, certain criteria does not have to be checked. In another
implementation, this determination can occur by looking at certain
properties and then identifying any criteria that are met. In yet
another implementation, the criteria and properties can be used to
find users that satisfy the criteria.
[0247] In block 904, if the criteria are satisfied, the object is
associated with the first user. The association can be in a list
that stores information as to what objects are being followed by
the first user. User subscription table 940 is an example of such a
list. In one implementation, the one or more criteria are satisfied
if one property satisfies at least one criterion. Thus, if the
criteria are that a user follows his/her manager and the object is
the user's manager, then the first user will follow the object.
[0248] In one implementation, a user can also be automatically
unsubscribed, e.g., if a certain action happens. The action could
be a change in the user's position within the organization, e.g., a
demotion or becoming a contractor. As another example, if a case
gets closed, then users following the case may be automatically
unsubscribed.
[0249] B. Feed and Subscription API
[0250] In one implementation, a feed and subscription center API
can enable tenants to provide mechanisms for tracking and creating
feed items, e.g., as described above for creating custom feeds by
allowing users to add custom events for tracking. For example,
after some initial feed items are created (e.g., by administrators
of the database system), outside groups (e.g., tenants or software
providers selling software to the tenants) can `enable objects` for
feeds through a standard API. The groups can then integrate into
the subscription center and the feed tracked update feeds on their
own. In one implementation, the feed and subscription center API
can use a graphical user interface implemented for the default feed
tracking. In one implementation, API examples include subscribing
to an entity by creating a new entity subscription object for a
particular user ID, or for all users of a tenant (e.g., user
subscription table 940). In one implementation, obtaining all
subscriptions for a given user can be performed by using a query,
such as "select . . . from EntitySubscription where userid=` . . .
.`".
[0251] Some implementations have restriction on non-admin users,
e.g., those without view all data permissions (VAD). One
restriction can be a limit clause on entity subscription queries
(e.g., queries on user subscription table 940), e.g., where the
limit of the number of operations is less than 100. In one
implementation, users are not required to specify an order-by, but
if an order-by is specified they can only order on fields on the
entity subscription entity. In one implementation, filters on
entity subscription can likewise only specify fields on the entity
subscription entity. In one aspect, the object ID being followed
can be sorted or filtered, but not the object name.
[0252] In one implementation, one or more restrictions can also be
placed on the identification of feed items in a feed that a user
can access. For example, if a low-level user (i.e. user can access
few objects) is attempting to see a profile feed of a high level
user, a maximum number of checks (e.g., 500) for access rights may
be allowed. Such a restriction can minimize a cost of a feed
request. In some implementations, there are restriction on the type
of queries (e.g., fields for filtering) allowed to construct on
feeds (e.g., on tables in FIG. 9A).
[0253] C. Sharing
[0254] As mentioned above, users may be restricted from seeing
records from other tenants, as well as certain records from the
tenant to which the user belongs (e.g., the user's employer).
Sharing rules can refer to the access rules that restrict a user
from seeing records that the user is not authorized to see or
access. Additionally, in one implementation, a user may be
restricted to only seeing certain fields of a record, field-level
security (FLS).
[0255] In an implementation, access rule checks are done upon
subscription. For example, a user is not allowed to subscribe to a
record or type of record that the user cannot access. In one
aspect, this can minimize (but not necessarily eliminate) cases
where a user subscribes to entities they cannot access. Such cases
can slow down news feed queries, when an access check is performed
(which can end up removing much of the feed items). Thus, a
minimization of access checks can speed up operation. In another
implementation, when feed items are created dynamically, access
rule checks may be done dynamically at the time of subsequent
access, and not upon subscription or in addition to at time of
subscription.
[0256] An example case where access checks are still performed is
when a first user follows a second user, but the second user
performs some actions on records or is following records that the
first user is not allowed to see. The first user may be allowed to
follow the second user, and thus the subscription is valid even
though the first user may not be able to see all of the feed items.
Before a feed tracked update is provided to a news feed of the
first user, a security check may be performed to validate whether
the first user has access rights to the feed item. If not, the feed
item is not displayed to the first user. In one implementation,
users can be blocked from feed items that contain certain terms,
symbols, account numbers, etc. In one implementation, any user can
follow another user. In another implementation, users may be
restricted as to which users, objects, and/or records he/she can
follow.
[0257] Regarding viewing privileges of a feed, in one
implementation, a user can always see all of his own subscriptions
(even if he's lost read access to a record). For example, a user
can become a contractor, and then the user may lose access to some
records. But, the user may still see that he/she is following the
object. This can help if there is a limit to the number of objects
that can be followed. To unsubscribe a user may need to know what
they are following so they can unsubscribe and subscribe to objects
the user can see. In another implementation, for access to other
people's subscriptions, a user can be required to need read-access
on the record-id to see the subscription. In some implementations,
users with authorization to modify all data can create/delete any
subscription. In other implementations, a user can create/delete
subscriptions only for that user, and not anyone else.
[0258] D. Configuration of which Field to Follow
[0259] There can be various feed settings for which feed items get
added to profile and record feeds, and which get added to news
feeds. In one implementation, for profile feeds and entity feeds,
feed tracked updates can be written for all standard and custom
fields on the supported objects. In one implementation, feed
settings can be set to limit how many and which fields of a record
are tracked for determining whether a feed tracked update is to be
generated. For example, a user or administrator can choose specific
fields to track and/or certain ones not to track. In another
implementation, there is a separate limit for the number of
trackable fields (e.g., 20) for a record. Thus, only certain
changes may be tracked in an entity hifeed tracked update and show
up in the feed. In yet another implementation, default fields may
be chosen for tracking, where the defaults can be exposed in the
subscriptions center.
[0260] IX. Adding Items to a Feed
[0261] As described above, a feed includes feed items, which
include feed tracked updates and messages, as defined herein.
Various feeds can be generated. For example, a feed can be
generated about a record or about a user. Then, users can view
these feeds. A user can separately view a feed of a record or user,
e.g., by going to a home page for the user or the record. As
described above, a user can also follow another user or record and
receive the feed items of those feeds through a separate feed
application (e.g., in a page or window), which is termed "chatter"
in certain examples. The feed application can provide each of the
feeds that a user is following and, in some examples, can combine
various feeds in a single information feed.
[0262] A feed generator can refer to any software program running
on a processor or a dedicated processor (or combination thereof)
that can generate feed items (e.g., feed tracked updates or
messages) and combine them into a feed. In one implementation, the
feed generator can generate a feed item by receiving a feed tracked
update or message, identifying what feeds the item should be added
to, and adding the feed. Adding the feed can include adding
additional information (metadata) to the feed tracked update or
message (e.g., adding a document, sender of message, a determined
importance, etc.). The feed generator can also check to make sure
that no one sees feed tracked updates for data that they don't have
access to see (e.g., according to sharing rules). A feed generator
can run at various times to pre-compute feeds or to compute them
dynamically, or combinations thereof.
[0263] In one implementation, the feed generator can de-dupe events
(i.e. prevent duplicates) that may come in from numerous records
(and users). For example, since a feed tracked update can be
published to multiple feeds (e.g., John Choe changed the Starbucks
Account Status) and a person can be subscribed to both the
Starbucks account and John Choe, implementations can filter out
duplicates before adding or displaying the items in a news feed.
Thus, the Feed Generator can collapse events with multiple records
and users for a single transaction into a single feed tracked
update and ensure the right number of feed tracked updates for the
particular feed. In some implementations, an action by a user does
not create a feed item for that user (e.g., for a profile feed of
that user), and it is only the feed of the object being acted upon
(e.g., updated) for which a feed item is created. Thus, there
should not be duplicates. For example, if someone updates the
status of a record, the feed item is only for the record and not
the user.
[0264] In one implementation, processor 417 in FIG. 4 can identify
an event that meets criteria for a feed tracked update, and then
generate the feed tracked update. Processor 417 can also identify a
message. For example, an application interface can have certain
mechanisms for submitting a message (e.g., "submit" buttons on a
profile page, detail page of a record, "comment" button on post),
and use of these mechanisms can be used to identify a message to be
added to a table used to create a feed or added directly to a list
of feed items ready for display.
[0265] A. Adding Items To A Pre-Computed Feed
[0266] In some implementations, a feed of feed items is created
before a user requests the feed. Such an implementation can run
fast, but have high overall costs for storage. In one
implementation, once a profile feed or a record feed has been
created, a feed item (messages and feed tracked updates) can be
added to the feed. The feed can exist in the database system in a
variety of ways, such as a related list. The feed can include
mechanisms to remove items as well as add them.
[0267] As described above, a news feed can be an aggregated feed of
all the record feeds and profile feeds to which a user has
subscribed. The news feed can be provided on the home page of the
subscribing user. Therefore, a news feed can be created by and
exist for a particular user. For example, a user can subscribe to
receive entity feeds of certain records that are of interest to the
user, and to receive profile feeds of people that are of interest
(e.g., people on a same team, that work for the user, are a boss of
the user, etc.). A news feed can tell a user about all the actions
across all the records (and people) whom have explicitly (or
implicitly) been subscribed to via the subscriptions center
(described above).
[0268] In one implementation, only one instance of each feed
tracked update is shown on a user's news feed, even if the feed
tracked update is published in multiple entities to which the user
is subscribed. In one aspect, there may be delays in publishing
news articles. For example, the delay may be due to queued up
messages for asynchronous entity hifeed tracked update persistence.
Different feeds may have different delays (e.g., delay for new
feeds, but none of profile and entity feeds). In another
implementation, certain feed tracked updates regarding a subscribed
profile feed or an entity feed are not shown because the user is
not allowed access, e.g., due to sharing rules (which restrict
which users can see which data). Also, in one implementation, data
of the record that has been updated (which includes creation) can
be provided in the feed (e.g., a file or updated value of a feed
can be added as a flash rendition).
[0269] Examples are provided below as how it can be determined
which feed items to add to which news feeds. In one implementation,
the addition of items to a news feed is driven by the following
user. For example, the user's profile can be checked to determine
objects the user is following, and the database may be queried to
determine updates to these objects. In another implementation, the
users and records being followed drive the addition of items to a
news feed. Implementations can also combine these and other
aspects. In one implementation, a database system can be
follower-driven if the number of subscriptions (users and records
the user is following) is small. For example, since the number
subscriptions are small, then changes to a small number of objects
need to be checked for the follower.
[0270] Regarding implementations that are follower-driven, one
implementation can have a routine run for a particular user. The
routine knows the users and records that the user is following. The
routine can poll the database system for new feed tracked updates
and messages about the users and records that are being followed.
In one implementation, the polling can be implemented as queries.
In one implementation, the routine can run at least partially (even
wholly) on a user device.
[0271] Regarding implementations where a news feed is driven by the
record (or user) being followed, processor 417 can identify
followers of the record after a feed item is added to the record
feed. Processor 417 can retrieve a list of the followers from the
database system. The list can be associated with the record, and
can be stored as a related list or other object that is a field or
child of the record.
[0272] In one implementation, profile and record feeds can be
updated immediately with a new feed item after an action is taken
or an event occurs. A news feed can also be updated immediately. In
another implementation, a news feed can be updated in batch jobs,
which can run at periodic times.
[0273] B. Dynamically Generating Feeds
[0274] In some implementations, a feed generator can generate the
feed items dynamically when a user requests to see a particular
feed, e.g., a profile feed, entity feed, or the user's news feed.
In one implementation, the most recent feed items (e.g., top 50)
are generated first. In one aspect, the other feed items can be
generated as a background process, e.g., not synchronously with the
request to view the feed. However, since the background process is
likely to complete before a user gets to the next 50 feed items,
the feed generation may appear synchronous. In another aspect, the
most recent feed items may or may not include comments, e.g., that
are tied to feed tracked updates or posts.
[0275] In one implementation, the feed generator can query the
appropriate subset of tables shown in FIG. 9A and/or other tables
as necessary, to generate the feed items for display. For example,
the feed generator can query the event hifeed tracked update table
910 for the updates that occurred for a particular record. The ID
of the particular record can be matched against the ID of the
record. In one implementation, changes to a whole set of records
can be stored in one table. The feed generator can also query for
status updates, posts, and comments, each of which can be stored in
different parts of a record or in separate tables, as shown in FIG.
9A. What gets recorded in the entity hifeed tracked update table
(as well as what is displayed) can be controlled by a feed settings
page in setup, which can be configurable by an administrator and
can be the same for the entire organization, as is described above
for custom feeds.
[0276] In one implementation, there can be two feed generators. For
example, one generator can generate the record and profile feeds
and another generator can generate news feeds. For the former, the
feed generator can query identifiers of the record or the user
profile. For the latter, the news feed generator can query the
subscribed profile feeds and record feeds, e.g., user subscription
table 940. In one implementation, the feed generator looks at a
person's subscription center to decide which feeds to query for and
return a list of feed items for the user. The list can be de-duped,
e.g., by looking at the event number and values for the respective
table, such as field name or ID, comment ID, or other
information.
[0277] C. Adding Information to Feed Hifeed Tracked Update
Tables
[0278] FIG. 10 shows a flowchart of an example of a method 1000 for
saving information to feed tracking tables, performed in accordance
with some implementations. In one implementation, some of the
blocks may be performed regardless of whether a specific event or
part of an event (e.g., only one field of an update is being
tracked) is being tracked. In various implementations, a processor
or set of processors (hardwired or programmed) can perform method
1000 and any other method described herein.
[0279] In block 1010, data indicative of an event is received. The
data may have a particular identifier that specifies the event. For
example, there may be a particular identifier for a field update.
In another implementation, the transaction may be investigated for
keywords identifying the event (e.g., terms in a query indicating a
close, change field, or create operations).
[0280] In block 1020, it is determined whether the event is being
tracked for inclusion into feed tables. The determination of what
is being tracked can be based on a tenant's configuration as
described above. In one aspect, the event has an actor (person
performing an event), and an object of the event (e.g., record or
user profile being changed).
[0281] In block 1030, the event is written to an event hifeed
tracked update table (e.g., table 910). In one implementation, this
feed tracking operation can be performed in the same transaction
that performs a save operation for updating a record. In another
implementation, a transaction includes at least two roundtrip
database operations, with one roundtrip being the database save
(write), and the second database operation being the saving of the
update in the hifeed tracked update table. In one implementation,
the event hifeed tracked update table is chronological. In another
implementation, if user A posts on user B's profile, then user A is
under the "created by" 913 and user B is under the object ID
912.
[0282] In block 1040, a field change table (e.g., field change
table 920) can be updated with an entry having the event identifier
and fields that were changed in the update. In one implementation,
the field change table is a child table of the event hifeed tracked
update table. This table can include information about each of the
fields that are changed. For example, for an event that changes the
name and balance for an account record, an entry can have the event
identifier, the old and new name, and the old and new balance.
Alternatively, each field change can be in a different row with the
same event identifier. The field name or ID can also be included to
determine which field the values are associated.
[0283] In block 1050, when the event is a post, a post table (e.g.,
post table 950) can be updated with an entry having the event
identifier and text of the post. In one implementation, the field
change table is a child table of the event hifeed tracked update
table. In another implementation, the text can be identified in the
transaction (e.g., a query command), stripped out, and put into the
entry at the appropriate column. The various tables described
herein can be combined or separated in various ways. For example,
the post table and the field change table may be part of the same
table or distinct tables, or may include overlapping portions of
data.
[0284] In block 1060, a comment is received for an event and the
comment is added to a comment table (e.g., comment table 930). The
comment could be for a post or an update of a record, from which a
feed tracked update can be generated for display. In one
implementation, the text can be identified in the transaction
(e.g., a query command), stripped out, and put into the entry at
the appropriate column.
[0285] D. Reading Information from Feed Hifeed Tracked Update
Tables
[0286] FIG. 11 shows a flowchart of an example of a method 1100 for
reading a feed item as part of generating a feed for display,
performed in accordance with some implementations. In one
implementation, the feed item may be read as part of creating a
feed for a record.
[0287] In block 1110, a query is received for an events history
table (e.g., event hifeed tracked update table 910) for events
related to a particular record. In one implementation, the query
includes an identifier of the record for which the feed is being
requested. In various implementations, the query may be initiated
from a detail page of the record, a home page of a user requesting
the record feed, or from a listing of different records (e.g.,
obtained from a search or from browsing).
[0288] In block 1120, the user's security level can be checked to
determine if the user can view the record feed. Typically, a user
can view a record feed, if the user can access the record. This
security check can be performed in various ways. In one
implementation, a first table is checked to see if the user has a
classification (e.g., a security level that allows him to view
records of the given type). In another implementation, a second
table is checked to see if the user is allowed to see the specific
record. The first table can be checked before the second table, and
both tables can be different sections of a same table. If the user
has requested the feed from the detail page of the record, one
implementation can skip the security level check for the record
since the check was already done when the user requested to view
the detail page.
[0289] In one implementation, a security check is determined upon
each request to view the record feed. Thus, whether or not a feed
item is displayed to a user is determined based on access rights,
e.g., when the user requests to see a feed of a record or a news
feed of all the objects the user is following. In this manner, if a
user's security changes, a feed automatically adapts to the user's
security level when it is changed. In another implementation, a
feed can be computed before being requested and a subsequent
security check can be made to determine whether the person still
has access right to view the feed items. The security (access)
check may be at the field level, as well as at the record
level.
[0290] In block 1130, if the user can access the record, a field
level security table can be checked to determine whether the user
can see particular fields. In one implementation, only those fields
are displayed to the user. Alternatively, a subset of those the
user has access to is displayed. The field level security check may
optionally be performed at the same time and even using the same
operation as the record level check. In addition, the record type
check may also be performed at this time. If the user can only see
certain fields, then any feed items related to those fields (e.g.,
as determined from field change table 920) can be removed from the
feed being displayed.
[0291] In block 1140, the feed items that the user has access to
are displayed. In one implementation, a predetermined number (e.g.,
20) of feed items are displayed at a time. The method can display
the first 20 feed items that are found to be readable, and then
determine others while the user is viewing the first 20. In another
implementation, the other feed items are not determined until the
user requests to see them, e.g., by activating a see more link.
[0292] FIG. 12 shows a flowchart of an example of a method 1200 for
reading a feed item of a profile feed for display, performed in
accordance with some implementations. In one implementation, the
query includes an identifier of the user profile feed that is being
requested. Certain blocks may be optional, as is also true for
other methods described herein. For example, security checks may
not be performed.
[0293] In block 1210, a query is directed to an event hifeed
tracked update table (e.g., event hifeed tracked update table 910)
for events having a first user as the actor of the event (e.g.,
creation of an account) or on which the event occurred (e.g., a
post to the user's profile). In various implementations, the query
may be initiated by a second user from the user's profile page, a
home page of a user requesting the profile feed (e.g., from a list
of users being followed), or from a listing of different users
(e.g., obtained from a search or from browsing). Various mechanisms
for determining aspects of events and obtaining information from
tables can be the same across any of the methods described
herein.
[0294] In block 1220, a security check may also be performed on
whether the second user can see the first user's profile. In one
implementation any user can see the profile of another user of the
same tenant, and block 1220 is optional.
[0295] In block 1230, a security (access) check can be performed
for the feed tracked updates based on record types, records, and/or
fields, as well security checks for messages. In one
implementation, only the feed tracked updates related to records
that the person has updated are the ones that need security check
as the feed items about the user are readable by any user of the
same tenant. Users of other tenants are not navigable, and thus
security can be enforced at a tenant level. In another
implementation, messages can be checked for keywords or links to a
record or field that the second user does not have access.
[0296] As users can have different security classifications, it is
important that a user with a low-level security cannot see changes
to records that have been performed by a user with high-level
security. In one implementation, each feed item can be checked and
then the viewable results displayed, but this can be inefficient.
For example, such a security check may take a long time, and the
second user would like to get some results sooner rather than
later. The following blocks illustrate one implementation of how
security might be checked for a first user that has a lot of feed
items, but the second user cannot see most of them. This
implementation can be used for all situations, but can be effective
in the above situation.
[0297] In block 1231, a predetermined number of entries are
retrieved from the event hifeed tracked update table (e.g.,
starting from the most recent, which may be determined from the
event identifier). The retrieved entries may just be ones that
match the user ID of the query. In one implementation, entries are
checked to find the entries that are associated with the user and
with a record (i.e. not just posts to the user account). In another
implementation, those entries associated with the user are allowed
to be viewed, e.g., because the second user can see the profile of
the first user as determined in block 1220.
[0298] In block 1232, the record identifiers are organized by type
and the type is checked on whether the second user can see the
record types. Other checks such as whether a record was manually
shared (e.g., by the owner) can also be performed. In one
implementation, the queries for the different types can be done in
parallel.
[0299] In block 1233, if a user can see the record type, then a
check can be performed on the specific record. In one
implementation, if a user can see a record type, then the user can
see all of the records of that type, and so this block can be
skipped. In another implementation, the sharing model can account
for whether a user below the second user (e.g., the second user is
a manager) can see the record. In such an implementation, the
second user may see such a record. In one implementation, if a user
cannot see a specific record, then comments on that record are also
not viewable.
[0300] In block 1234, field level sharing rules can be used to
determine whether the second user can see information about an
update or value of certain fields. In one implementation, messages
can be analyzed to determine if reference to a particular field
name is made. If so, then field level security can be applied to
the messages.
[0301] In block 1280, blocks 1231-1234 are repeated until a
stopping criterion is met. In one implementation, the stopping
criteria may be when a maximum number (e.g., 100) of entries that
are viewable have been identified. In another implementation, the
stopping criteria can be that a maximum number (e.g., 500) of
entries from the entity hifeed tracked update table have been
analyzed, regardless of whether the entries are viewable or
not.
[0302] In one implementation, a news feed can be generated as a
combination of the profile feeds and the entity feeds, e.g., as
described above. In one implementation, a list of records and user
profiles for the queries in blocks 1110 and 1210 can be obtained
from user subscription table 940. In one implementation, there is a
maximum number of objects that can be followed.
[0303] In various implementations, the entity hifeed tracked update
table can be queried for any one or more of the following matching
variables as part of determining items for a feed: CreatedDate,
CreatedById, CreatedBy.FirstName, CreatedBy.LastName, ParentId, and
Parent.Name. The child tables can also be queried for any one or
more of the following matching variables as part of determining
items for a feed: DataType, FieldName, OldValue, and NewValue. A
query can also specify how the resulting feed items can be sorted
for display, e.g., by event number, date, importance, etc. The
query can also include a number of items to be returned, which can
be enforced at the server.
[0304] The two examples provided above can be done periodically to
create the feeds ahead of time or done dynamically at the time the
display of a feed is requested. Such a dynamic calculation can be
computationally intensive for a news feed, particularly if many
users and records are being followed, although there can be a low
demand for storage. Accordingly, one implementation performs some
calculations ahead of time and stores the results in order to
create a news feed.
[0305] E. Partial Pre-Computing of Items for a Feed
[0306] FIG. 13 shows a flowchart of an example of a method 1300 of
storing event information for efficient generation of feed items to
display in a feed, performed in accordance with some
implementations. In various implementations, method 1300 can be
performed each time an event is written to the events hifeed
tracked update table, or periodically based on some other criteria
(e.g., every minute, after five updates have been made, etc.).
[0307] In block 1310, data indicative of an event is received. The
data may be the same and identified in the same way as described
for block 1010. The event may be written to an event hifeed tracked
update table (e.g., table 910).
[0308] In block 1320, the object(s) associated with the event are
identified. In various implementations, the object may be
identified by according to various criteria, such as the record
being changed, the user changing the record, a user posting a
message, and a user whose profile the message is being posted
to.
[0309] In block 1330, the users following the event are determined.
In one implementation, one or more objects that are associated with
the event are used to determine the users following the event. In
one implementation, a subscription table (e.g., table 940) can be
used to find the identified objects. The entries of the identified
objects can contain an identifier (e.g., user ID 941) of each the
users following the object
[0310] In block 1340, the event and the source of the event, e.g.,
a record (for a record update) or a posting user (for a
user-generated post) are written to a news feed table along with an
event identifier. In one implementation, such information is added
as a separate entry into the news feed table along with the event
ID. In another implementation, each of the events for a user is
added as a new column for the row of the user. In yet another
implementation, more columns (e.g., columns from the other tables)
can be added.
[0311] News feed table 960 shows an example of such a table with
user ID 961 and event ID or pointer 962. The table can be organized
in any manner. One difference from event hifeed tracked update
table 910 is that one event can have multiple entries (one for each
subscriber) in the news feed table 960. In one implementation, all
of the entries for a same user are grouped together, e.g., as
shown. The user U819 is shown as following events E37 and E90, and
thus any of the individual feed items resulting from those events.
In another implementation, any new entries are added at the end of
the table. Thus, all of the followers for a new event can be added
as a group. In such an implementation, the event IDs would
generally be grouped together in the table. Of course, the table
can be sorted in any suitable manner.
[0312] In an implementation, if the number of users is small, then
the feed items in one or more of the tables may be written as part
of the same write transaction. In one implementation, the
determination of small depends on the number of updates performed
for the event (e.g., a maximum number of update operations may be
allowed), and if more operations are performed, then the addition
of the feed items is performed. In one aspect, the number of
operations can be counted by the number of rows to be updated,
including the rows of the record (which depends on the update
event), and the rows of the hifeed tracked update tables, which can
depend on the number of followers. In another implementation, if
the number of users is large, the rest of the feed items can be
created by batch. In one implementation, the feed items are always
written as part of a different transaction, i.e., by batch job.
[0313] In one implementation, security checks can be performed
before an entry is added to the news feed table 960. In this
manner, security checks can be performed during batch jobs and may
not have to be performed at the time of requesting a news feed. In
one implementation, the event can be analyzed and if access is not
allowed to a feed item of the event, then an entry is not added. In
one aspect, multiple feed items for a same user may not result from
a same event (e.g., by how an event is defined in table 910), and
thus there is no concern about a user missing a feed item that
he/she should be able to view.
[0314] In block 1350, a request for a news feed is received from a
user. In one implementation, the request is obtained when a user
navigates to the user's home page. In another implementation, the
user selects a table, link, or other page item that causes the
request to be sent.
[0315] In block 1360, the news feed table and other tables are
accessed to provide displayable feed items of the news feed. The
news feed can then be displayed. In one implementation, the news
feed table can then be joined with the event hifeed tracked update
table to determine the feed items. For example, the news feed table
960 can be searched for entries with a particular user ID. These
entries can be used to identify event entries in event hifeed
tracked update table 910, and the proper information from any child
tables can be retrieved. The feed items (e.g., feed tracked updates
and messages) can then be generated for display.
[0316] In one implementation, the most recent feed items (e.g., 100
most recent) are determined first. The other feed items may then be
determined in a batch process. Thus, the feed item that a user is
most likely to view can come up first, and the user may not
recognize that the other feed items are being done in batch. In one
implementation, the most recent feed items can be gauged by the
event identifiers. In another implementation, the feed items with a
highest importance level can be displayed first. The highest
importance being determined by one or more criteria, such as, who
posted the feed item, how recently, how related to other feed
items, etc.
[0317] In one implementation where the user subscription table 940
is used to dynamically create a news feed, the query would search
the subscription table, and then use the object IDs to search the
event hifeed tracked update table (one search for each object the
user is following). Thus, the query for the news feed can be
proportional to the number of objects that one was subscribing to.
The news feed table allows the intermediate block of determining
the object IDs to be done at an earlier stage so that the relevant
events are already known. Thus, the determination of the feed is no
longer proportional to the number of object being followed.
[0318] In some implementations, a news feed table can include a
pointer (as opposed to an event identifier) to the event hifeed
tracked update table for each event that is being followed by the
user. In this manner, the event entries can immediately be
retrieved without having to perform a search on the event hifeed
tracked update table. Security checks can be made at this time, and
the text for the feed tracked updates can be generated.
[0319] X. Display of a Feed
[0320] Feeds include messages and feed tracked updates and can show
up in many places in an application interface with the database
system. In one implementation, feeds can be scoped to the context
of the page on which they are being displayed. For example, how a
feed tracked update is presented can vary depending on which page
it is being displayed (e.g., in news feeds, on a detail page of a
record, and even based on how the user ended up at a particular
page). In another implementation, only a finite number of feed
items are displayed (e.g., 50). In one implementation, there can be
a limit specifically on the number of feed tracked updates or
messages displayed. Alternatively, the limit can be applied to
particular types of feed tracked updates or messages. For example,
only the most recent changes (e.g., 5 most recent) for a field may
be displayed. Also, the number of fields for which changes are
displayed can also be limited. Such limits can also be placed on
profile feeds and news feeds. In one implementation, feed items may
also be subject to certain filtering criteria before being
displayed, e.g., as described below.
[0321] A. Sharing Rules for Feeds
[0322] As mentioned above, a user may not be allowed to see all of
the records in the database, and not even all of the records of the
organization to which the user belongs. A user can also be
restricted from viewing certain fields of a record that the user is
otherwise authorized to view. Accordingly, certain implementations
use access rules (also called sharing rules and field-level
security FLS) to ensure that a user does not view a feed tracked
update or message that the user is not authorized to see. A feed of
a record can be subject to the same access rules as the parent
record.
[0323] In one implementation, access rules can be used to prevent
subscription to a record that the user cannot see. In one
implementation, a user can see a record, but only some of the
fields. In such instances, only items about fields that the user
can access may be displayed. In another implementation, sharing
rules and FLS are applied before a feed item is being added to a
feed. In another implementation, sharing rules and FLS are applied
after a feed item has been added and when the feed is being
displayed. When a restriction of display is mentioned, the
enforcement of access rules may occur at any stage before
display.
[0324] In some implementations, the access rules can be enforced
when a query is provided to a record or a user's profile to obtain
feed items for a news feed of a user. The access rules can be
checked and cross-references with the feed items that are in the
feed. Then, the query can only return feed items for which the user
has access.
[0325] In other implementations, the access rules can be enforced
when a user selects a specific profile feed or record feed. For
example, when a user arrives on a home page (or selects a tab to
see the record feed), the database system can check to see which
feed items the user can see. In such an implementation, each feed
item can be associated with metadata that identifies which field
the feed item is about. Thus, in one implementation, a feed tracked
update is not visible unless the associated record and/or field are
visible to the user.
[0326] In one example, when a user accesses a feed of a record, an
access check can be performed to identify whether the user can
access the object type of the record. In one implementation, users
are assigned a profile type, and the profile type is
cross-referenced (e.g., by checking a table) to determine whether
the profile type of the user can see the object type of the
record.
[0327] In some implementations, access to specific records can be
checked, e.g., after it has been determined that the user can
access the record type. Rules can be used to determine the records
viewable by a user. Such rules can determine the viewable records
as a combination of those viewable by profile type, viewable due to
a profile hierarchy (e.g., a boss can view records of profile types
lower in the hierarchy), and viewable by manual sharing (e.g., as
may be done by an owner of a record). In one implementation, the
records viewable by a user can be determined beforehand and stored
in a table. In one implementation, the table can be
cross-referenced by user (or profile type of a user) to provide a
list of the records that the user can see, and the list can be
searched to determine if the record at issue is among the list. In
another implementation, the table can be cross-referenced by record
to determine a list of the profile types that can access the
record, and the list can be searched to find out if the requesting
user is in the list. In another implementation, the records
viewable by a user can be determined dynamically at the time of the
access check, e.g., by applying rules to data (such as user profile
and hierarchy information) obtained from querying one or more
tables.
[0328] In other implementations, checks can be made as to whether a
user has access to certain fields of a record, e.g., after it has
been determined that the user can access the record. In one aspect,
the access check on fields can be performed on results already
obtained from the database, to filter out fields that the user
cannot see. In one implementation, the fields associated with
retrieved feed items are determined, and these fields are
cross-referenced with an access table that contains the fields
accessible by the user (e.g., using the profile type of the user).
Such an access table could also be a negative access table by
specifying fields that the user cannot see, as can other access
tables mentioned herein. In one implementation, the field level
access table is stored in cache at a server.
[0329] In one implementation, a user can see the same fields across
all records of a certain type (e.g., as long as the user can see
the record). In one implementation, there is a field level access
table for each object type. The access table can be
cross-referenced by user (e.g., via profile type) or field. For
example, a field can be identified along with the profile types
that can see the field, and it can be determined whether the user's
profile type is listed. In another example, the user can be found
and the fields to which the user has access can be obtained. In
another implementation, the accessible fields could be specified
for each record.
[0330] Regarding profile feeds and news feeds, a first user may
perform an action on a record, and a feed tracked update may be
generated and added to the first user's profile feed. A second user
who is allowed to follow the first user may not have access rights
to the record. Thus, the feed tracked update can be excluded from a
news feed of the second user, or when the second user views the
first user's profile feed directly. In one implementation, if a
user is already on the detail page, then another access check (at
least at the record level) may optionally not be performed since a
check was already done in order to view the detail page.
[0331] In some implementations, for profile feeds and news feeds,
the feed items can be organized by object type. IT can then be
determined whether the requesting user can access to those object
types. Other access checks can be done independently or in
conjunction with these access checks, as is described above.
[0332] B. API Implementation
[0333] Various implementations can implement the access rules in
various ways. In one implementation, all recent feed items (or more
generally events) are retrieved from a feed that is ready for
display (e.g., after a feed generator performs formatting) or a
table. Then, bulk sharing checks can be applied on the retrieved
items. The viewable feed items of the most recent set can then be
displayed.
[0334] In another implementation regarding a profile feed, for
non-VAD (view all data) users, i.e. users who can see everything,
certain functions can be overridden. In one implementation, a FROM
clause in a query can be overridden to be a pipelined function,
e.g., with different parts of the query being operated on at the
same time, but with different operations of a pipeline. This
pipeline function can be given a row limit and the maximum number
of sharing checks to run. It can loop, selecting the next batch of
rows, run sharing checks against them in bulk, and pipe back any
IDs which are accessible. In one aspect, in nearly all cases, the
user feed can contain accessible
[0335] IDs so the sharing checks can pass on the first loop.
However, it is possible the sharing may have changed such that this
user's access is greatly reduced. In one worst case,
implementations can run sharing checks on up to the maximum number
of sharing check rows (e.g., a default 500) and then terminate the
function with the IDs which passed so far, possibly zero. Such an
example includes a low level person viewing profile feed of
CEO.
[0336] In some implementations, if the user has a small number of
subscriptions (e.g., <25), then implementations can first run
sharing checks on those IDs and then drive the main query from
those accessible IDs, as opposed to a semi-join against the
subscription and running sharing checks on the resulting rows. In
other implementations, FLS is enforced by building up a TABLE CAST
of the accessible field IDs from the cached values. A main query
can then join against this table to filter only accessible
fields.
[0337] XI. Filtering and Searching Feeds
[0338] It can be possible that a user subscribes to many users and
records, which can cause a user's news feed to be very long and
include many feed items. In such instances, it can be difficult for
the user to read every feed item, and thus some important or
interesting feed items may not be read. In some implementations,
filters may be used to determine which feed items are added to a
feed or displayed in the feed, even though a user may be authorized
to see more than what is displayed. Section VII.E also provides a
description of filtering based on criteria.
[0339] In one implementation, an "interestingness" filter can
function as a module for controlling/recommending which feed
tracked updates make it to the news feed when the number of items
that a user subscribes to is large. In one such implementation, a
user can specify a filter, which is applied to a user's news feed
or to record and profile feeds that the user requests. Different
filters can be used for each. For example, processing can be done
on the news feed to figure out which feed tracked updates are the
most relevant to the user. One implementation can use an importance
weight and level/ranking, as described herein. Other
implementations can include a user specifying keywords for a
message and specifying which records or users are most
important.
[0340] In one implementation, a filter can be used that only allows
certain feed items to be added to a feed and/or to be displayed as
part of a feed. A filter can be used such that the removal or
non-addition of certain feed items automatically occur for any new
feed items after the filter criteria are entered. The filter
criteria can also be added retroactively. The criteria of such a
filter can be applied via a query mechanism as part of adding a
feed item to a table or displaying a feed, as described in sections
above. In various implementations, a user can directly write a
query or create the query through a graphical user interface.
[0341] FIG. 14 shows a flowchart of an example of a method 1400 for
creating a custom feed for users of a database system using
filtering criteria, performed in accordance with some
implementations. Any of the following blocks can be performed
wholly or partially with the database system, and in particular by
one or more processor of the database system.
[0342] In block 1410, one or more criteria specifying which feed
items are to be displayed to a first user are received from a
tenant. In one implementation, the criteria specifies which items
to add to the custom feed. For example, the criteria could specify
to only include feed items for certain fields of a record, messages
including certain keywords, and other criteria mentioned herein. In
another implementation, the criteria specifies which items to
remove from the custom feed. For example, the criteria could
specify not to include feed items about certain fields or including
certain keywords.
[0343] In block 1420, the database system identifies feed items of
one or more selected objects that match the criteria. The feed
items can be stored in the database, e.g., in one or more of the
tables of FIG. 9A. In one implementation, the one or more selected
objects are the objects that the first user is following. In
another implementation, the one or more selected objects is a
single record whose record feed the first user is requesting.
[0344] In block 1430, the feed items that match the criteria are
displayed to the first user in the custom feed. The generation of
text for a feed tracked update can occur after the identification
of the feed items (e.g., data for a field change) and before the
display of the final version of the feed item.
[0345] In one implementation, the criteria are received before a
feed item is created. In another implementation, the criteria are
received from the first user. In one aspect, the criteria may only
used for determining feeds to display to the first user. In yet
another implementation, the criteria are received from a first
tenant and applies to all of the users of the first tenant. Also,
in an implementation where a plurality of criteria are specified,
the criteria may be satisfied for a feed item if one criterion is
satisfied.
[0346] Some implementations can provide mechanisms to search for
feed items of interest. For example, the feed items can be searched
by keyword, e.g., as entered by a user. As another example, a tab
(or other selection device) can show feed items about or from a
particular user. In one implementation, only messages (or even just
comments) from a particular user can be selected.
[0347] In another implementation, a user can enter search criteria
so that the feed items currently displayed are searched and a new
list of matching feed items is displayed. A search box can be used
to enter keywords. Picklists, menus, or other mechanisms can be
used to select search criteria. In yet another implementation, feed
comments are text-indexed and searchable. Feed comments
accessibility and visibility can apply on the search operation
too.
[0348] In one implementation, when a user performs a search of
feeds, there can be an implicit filter of the user (e.g., by user
ID). This can restrict the search to only the news feed of the
user, and thus to only record feeds and profile feeds that the user
is subscribed. In another implementation, searches can also be done
across feeds of users and records that are not being
subscribed.
[0349] Besides searching for feed items that match a criteria, one
also could search for a particular feed item. However, in one
implementation, a user cannot directly query a feed item or feed
comment. In such an implementation, a user can query to obtain a
particular profile or record feed, and then navigate to the feed
item (e.g., as child of the parent feed). In another
implementation, the relationship from a feed to its parent entity
(e.g., a record or user profile) is uni-directional. That is a user
can navigate from the feed to the parent but not vice versa.
[0350] In one implementation, a user can directly query the child
tables, e.g., comment table 930. Thus, a user could search for
comments only that user has made, or comments that contain certain
words. In another implementation, a user can search for a profile
feed of only one user. In yet another implementation, a user can
search for profile feeds of multiple users (e.g., by specifying
multiple user names or IDs), which can be combined into a single
feed.
[0351] XII. Maintaining Records for Follower's Feeds
[0352] If every feed item is stored and maintained on a follower's
feed or even in the profile and/or record feeds, the amount of data
to be stored could be massive, enough to cause storage issues in
the system. In one implementation, the N (e.g., 50) most recent
feed items for each feed are kept. However, there can be a need to
keep certain older feed items. Thus, implementations can remove
certain feed items, while keeping others. In other implementations,
old feed tracked updates may be archived in a data store separate
from where recent feed items are stored.
[0353] In some implementations, feeds are purged by a routine (also
called a reaper) that can remove items deemed not worthy to keep
(e.g., old items). Any underlying data structures from which feed
items are created can also be purged. In one implementation, the
reaper can remove certain items when new items are added (e.g.,
after every 5th item added). As another example, feed items may be
deleted synchronously during the save operation itself. However,
this may slow down each save operation. In one implementation,
however, this may be better than incurring a larger cost when the
items are removed at longer intervals. In another implementation,
the reaper can run periodically as a batch process. Such routines
can ensure that a table size does not become too large. In one
aspect, a reaper routine can keep the event hifeed tracked update
table relatively small so the sharing checks are not extremely
expensive.
[0354] In various implementations, the reaper can maintain a
minimum number (e.g., 50 or 100) of feed items per record, maintain
a minimum number of records per user (e.g., per user ID), and not
deleting feed items (or entire records), which have comments
against it. Such implementations can ensure that the detail page
and profile page have sufficient data to display in a feed. Note
that the sharing checks for feed queries can cut down the number of
records further for users with less access. Thus, the number of
records finally displayed for specific users can be significantly
less than a minimum number for a specific profile or record feed.
In one implementation, a reaper deletes data that is older than a
specified time (e.g., 6 months or a year).
[0355] In one implementation, the reaper can perform the deletion
of feed items (purging) as a batch up deletion. This can avoid
deletion of large number of records that may lead to locking
issues. In another implementation, the reaper can be run often so
that the table does not become difficult to manage (e.g.,
size-wise). In this way the reaper can work on a limited set of
records. In one implementation, the reaper may have logic that
deletes certain items (e.g., by an identification) from tables
(e.g., those in FIG. 9A), or sections of the tables.
[0356] XIII. Communicating Feed Information to One or More
Recipients
[0357] Some implementations disclosed herein provide mechanisms to
communicate feed information to multiple recipients when an
indication to include additional recipients is detected. Such feed
information may be communicated to various users, groups, records,
and other data objects in an online social network such as
Chatter.RTM.. The feed information may be communicated via an
information update, an email, or other form to communicate a
message to multiple recipients.
[0358] In some implementations, when an additional recipient
indicator is detected, a server configured to perform the methods
described herein can be configured to identify one or more
additional recipients to receive the feed item. In some instances,
the additional recipient indicator may be detected in the content
of an information update and any/or associated information. In some
instances, the additional recipient indicator may be specified by a
user in a menu selection, by custom code, or by other
mechanisms.
[0359] In some implementations, the one or more additional
recipients may be identified based on various associations between
the additional recipient indicator and an entity in an online
social network. The entity may be a user, a group or a record by
way of example. The associations may be based on various types of
information, such as a user's profile information, status
information, or historical information, to establish a relationship
between the additional recipient indicator and an entity. In some
instances, the application of different associations between the
additional recipient indicator and an entity may be specified by a
menu selection, by custom code, or by any other mechanism.
[0360] FIG. 15 shows a flowchart of an example of a method 1500 for
communicating feed information to one or more recipients, performed
in accordance with some implementations. In some implementations,
the method 1500 may be performed at least in part at one or more
servers or other computing devices configured to provide computing
services associated with an online social network, as described
above.
[0361] At 1502, an information update to communicate to one or more
first recipients is identified. In some implementations, this
information update may be identified in various ways. For instance,
the creation of an information update may trigger a process to
determine whether to communicate the update to one or more first
recipients. In this example, one or more computing devices
described herein may be programmed with instructions to compare the
text or other content of an information update with user names,
group names and records stored in a database system as described
above. When the text string matches the name of such an entity,
then the information update may be identified as an update to
communicate to one or more first recipients.
[0362] At 1502, in some instances, an information update may be
identified when a communication indicator is detected. For example,
a communication indicator may be any alphanumeric character or
string, such as the "@" symbol. FIG. 19 shows an example of a GUI
for communicating feed information to one or more recipients, in
accordance with some implementations. For example, the GUI of FIG.
19 can be displayed on a display of a user system 12 as described
above with respect to FIG. 1A. In FIG. 19, a publisher component
1902 includes the text "@" 1904 and an associated identified
recipient, "Joseph Olsen" 1906. When the "@" and an associated
recipient is detected, the system identifies the remainder of the
content in publisher component 1902 excluding the "+" symbol, as an
information update to communicate to Joseph Olsen. Thus, Joseph
will be notified by a post to his profile feed or email that the
"America Invents Act Discussion is in Room 202." In another
example, the communication indicator may be a text string, such as
"first recipient", "To," or any other designated character or
string.
[0363] At 1502, in other instances, an information update may be
identified when a specific triggering event is detected. For
example, if the system detects a user selecting a recipient from a
contact list, then an information update may be identified as an
update to communicate to the selected recipient. In another
example, the system may be configured to monitor information
updates for certain keywords, such as "Dear" or "Hello" to identify
selected information updates to communicate to one or more first
recipients.
[0364] At 1502, in some implementations, other forms of feed items
in addition to information updates may be identified to communicate
to one or more recipients. For example, the system may be
configured to identify user status updates or comments to posts in
an information feed. FIG. 20 shows an example of a GUI for
communicating feed information to one or more recipients, in
accordance with some implementations. In FIG. 20, a user, Joseph
Olsen, composes a comment in publisher component 2002 in reply to
Zach Dunn's post 2004, "Do you know where and when we are having
the Patents 101 meeting?". In this example, Joseph Olsen would like
Zach Dunn and other recipients, such as Ted Joe 2006 and the rest
of the Legal Group 2008, to receive his comment, namely "The
Meeting is Today at noon in room 400." When the system detects the
communication indicator 2010, @, in association with a recipient
name, Ted Joe 2006, then the comment is identified to communicate
to at least the first identified recipient, Ted Joe.
[0365] In another example, at 1502, the system may be configured to
identify other communications, such as an e-mail, as an item to
communicate to one or more first recipients. FIG. 21 shows an
example of a GUI for communicating emails to one or more
recipients, in accordance with some implementations. For example,
the GUI of FIG. 21 can be generated in conjunction with an email
application in conjunction with the online social network. In FIG.
21, a user has composed an e-mail 2102 regarding Ted Joe's surprise
birthday party. When a recipient, Zach Dunn 2104, is the first
entity named in the "To:" text box 2106, then the e-mail 2102 is
identified as a message to be communicated to at least a first
recipient, Zach Dunn.
[0366] In some implementations, at 1502, the information update,
feed item, email, or other communication may be addressed to
various types of first recipients. For example, a first recipient
may be a user, such as Joseph Olsen 1906 in FIG. 19. In another
example, a first recipient may be a group. FIG. 22 shows an example
of a GUI for communicating feed information to one or more
recipients, in accordance with some implementations. In FIG. 22,
the first recipient of the information update is a user group,
"HAPPY HOUR GROUP" 2204. In yet another example, a first recipient
may be a record. FIG. 23 shows an example of a GUI for
communicating feed information to one or more recipients, in
accordance with some implementations. In FIG. 23, the first
recipient of the information update, "Discount approved for 100
tablets", is a record 2304, "Opportunity ABC."
[0367] Although FIGS. 19-23 show examples of communicating feed
information to a single first recipient, a feed item may be
addressed to more than one first recipient. For example, in FIG.
19, the information update in publisher component 1902 may be
addressed to multiple first recipients when the information update
includes multiple communication indicators 1904. For instance, the
information update could be addressed to "@Joseph Olsen @Tim Wallis
@Jennifer Johnson." In another example, any users following Joseph
Olsen in the online social network are automatically identified as
first recipients when brackets are placed around Joseph's name, as
shown in FIG. 19. In another example, in FIG. 21, the e-mail 2102
may be addressed to one or more first recipients when the
recipients' names are separated by a comma or a semi-colon.
[0368] Referring to FIG. 15, an additional recipient indicator can
be identified at 1504. An additional recipient indicator indicates
that other users, groups and/or records in addition to the first
recipient(s) will receive the information update or other data
identified at 1502, as described above. For example, an additional
recipient indicator may be included in an information update or may
be a status associated with an information update, or a status
associated with a user, group or a record. The additional recipient
indicator may be selected by a user, defined by custom computer
programming language code, or automatically generated as described
herein.
[0369] In some implementations, one or more computing devices may
include programming instructions for determining whether an
information update or data associated with the update includes an
additional recipient indicator. For example, the programming
instructions may include code that includes operations for
analyzing a string in an information update and determining if the
string matches a predefined additional recipient indicator. These
operations may include instructions for regular expression
analysis. For instance, the predefined additional recipient
indicator may be any alphanumeric text defined to trigger the
generation of a list of one or more second recipients at block
1506. For example, referring to FIG. 19, the "+" symbol 1908
entered by the user in publisher component 1902 may be a designated
additional recipient indicator. In this example, when the "+"
symbol is detected, then a server may determine executable code to
generate a list of one or more second recipients at block 1506.
[0370] In other implementations, the additional recipient indicator
may be designated at least in part by a user. For example, an
information feed may include a GUI button with a "+" symbol that a
user may select from a number of other characters to indicate that
the "+" symbol is to be used to trigger the addition of more
recipients of an information update.
[0371] In some implementations, the presence of an additional
recipient indicator may be determined by the system. For example,
an automatic process may identify and make statistical associations
between common conditions. This process may designate the detection
of a certain condition as the detection of an additional recipient
indicator. In a more specific example, the system may determine
that any time a user, Chet, composes an information update or an
e-mail including information about a "sale" or "Opportunity-123,"
Chet always includes Brenda, John and Chad in the discussion. In
such a scenario, the system may automatically designate conditions
associated with Chet in the form of identifying keywords (e.g.,
"sale" and "Opportunity-123") as an additional recipient
indicator.
[0372] At 1506, an identification of one or more second recipients
based on the additional recipient indicator is generated. A second
recipient may be a user, a group, a record, or other entity in the
online social network. In some implementations, a second recipient
may be any entity identified as relevant to a feed item, such as a
user, a group or a record somehow related to a feed item. For
instance, the second recipient(s) can be members of a group having
a group feed in which the feed item is published, or a user
following a record to which the feed item relates.
[0373] In some implementations, the additional recipient indicator
may be associated with a default list of one or more second
recipients. For example, in a corporate environment, the default
second recipient may always be a user's boss. In another example,
the system may automatically establish a default or a minimum
number of second recipients associated with an additional recipient
indicator that is based on a user profile, an organization
associated with the user profile, a data record, or some
combination of parameters.
[0374] In some implementations, the additional recipient indicator
may be associated with custom computer programming language code to
identify one or more second recipients. When the additional
recipient indicator is detected at block 1504, then the
determination 1506 may be made by executing the custom programming
language code stored on one or more servers.
[0375] In some implementations, the identification of one or more
second recipients may be generated based on the one or more first
recipients identified in block 1502. For example, profile
information associated with the one or more first recipients may be
used to determine a relevant second recipient. For instance, in a
corporate environment it may be useful to add an identified first
recipient's co-workers, bosses, direct reports, groups and records
associated with the first recipient to a discussion. In such a
scenario, the first recipient's profile information may include
information about his colleagues. The system may extract this
information from the first recipient's profile and identify the
first recipient's boss and co-workers as a second recipient.
[0376] In another example, the system may identify one or more
second recipients based on a relevance measure. The relevance
measure may indicate a degree of association between the identified
one or more first recipients and an entity, such as a user, group
or record. Such a relevance measure can be stored as a numerical
value. For instance, a relevance measure value can be used to order
the list of the identified one or more second recipients. In such a
scenario, a first recipient's boss may have a higher relevance
measure value compared to a first recipient's follower. As such,
when a list of one or more second recipients is generated, the
first recipient's boss may appear first on the list and a first
recipient's follower may appear last on the list.
[0377] In some implementations, the one or more second recipients
may be defined by the one or more first recipients. For example, in
reference to FIG. 19, the first recipient Joseph Olsen's 1906
profile information may be used to determine whether Joseph has
created a predefined list of one or more second recipients. Joseph
Olsen's profile information may include a contact list of users,
groups, records and other contact information. In this example,
Joseph Olsen's contact list may include a group named "My team"
that Joseph may have selected as his default list of second
recipients. The system may automatically identify and include "My
team" as one or more second recipients when an additional recipient
indicator is detected.
[0378] In some other implementations, the one or more second
recipient may be defined by a user authoring the information
update. For instance, a user, such as Ted Joe in FIG. 19, may
define a group, Legal Group, as a default second recipient. As
such, when the recipient indicator 1908 is detected, then the
system will automatically include Legal Group as a recipient.
[0379] At 1508, the information update or other communication is
stored for access by one or more second recipients. For example,
the information update may be stored as a feed item in one or more
tables, as described above with reference to FIG. 9A. For instance,
tenant data storage 22 and/or system data storage 24 of FIGS. 1A
and 1B can serve as such a storage medium, as well as any of the
various databases and/or memory devices described herein. Returning
to block 1506, in some alternative implementations, rather than
store the information update at block 1508, the information update
is immediately communicated to the first and second recipients as
an email or other appropriate communication in the online social
network.
[0380] FIG. 16 shows a flowchart of an example of a method 1600 for
communicating feed information to one or more recipients, performed
in accordance with some implementations. At 1602, an information
update or other form of communication to communicate to one or more
first recipients is identified as described with respect to block
1502 of method 1500.
[0381] At 1604, a determination is made whether the one or more
identified first recipients at block 1602 are unavailable. Such
information of a recipient's availability may be especially useful
in a corporate setting. Generally, when an employee is unavailable
or is out of the office, the employee will designate a backup or
proxy to handle matters while the employee is out. It may be useful
to know whether the employee is available before sending him a
message. If the employee is unavailable, then the message may be
sent to the employee's backup instead. As a result, a user may
avoid sending a message to the employee when the employee is
unavailable and save time by directly contacting a backup who is
available to respond to his message.
[0382] In some implementations, at block 1604, the determination
may be made based on information associated with an identified
first recipient. For example, Susan's, an employee at ABC
Corporation, status information may indicate that Susan is out of
the office when Susan's status is "000," "Unavailable" or
"Offline." In another example, the status information of a record,
such as Opportunity ABC in FIG. 22, may be "closed" indicating that
the opportunity is no longer available or is inactive. In another
example, an information update associated with a user may include a
message indicating that a user is unavailable. For instance,
Susan's profile feed may include the message "#where Starting this
afternoon, I'll be on PTO until August 10." In this example, the
system may be configured to detect keywords such as, "#where" and
"PTO" to determine that the first recipient is unavailable.
[0383] In some instances, a first recipient's historical
information may be used to determine whether the recipient is
unavailable. For example, a first recipient's historical
information may indicate a first recipient's activity level. If the
first recipient's activity level is below a certain threshold, the
system may automatically tag the first recipient as unavailable or
an inactive recipient. In another example, a first recipient's
historical information may include information regarding how often
a recipient replies to a feed item or an email. If the identified
first recipient does not reply more than a designated amount, then
the system may designate the first recipient as unavailable.
[0384] In some implementations, at block 1604, the determination
may be made in part by user input. For example, the system may
receive a request to determine whether a first recipient is
available when a user authoring an information update selects a GUI
button, such as a GUI button labeled "Check Availability."
[0385] If it is determined that one or more first recipients are
unavailable, then method 1600 proceeds to block 1606. Otherwise,
method 1600 proceeds to block 1608.
[0386] At block 1606, a determination is made whether one or more
first recipients designated an alternative first recipient at 1606.
An alternative first recipient may be an entity such as a user, a
group or a record. An alternative first recipient may be a
designated proxy to receive a first recipient's information updates
and other communications when the first recipient is
unavailable.
[0387] In some implementations, the determination of a designated
first recipient may be based on information associated with the
first recipient. For example, a first recipient's profile
information may include proxy information, such as the name of an
alternative recipient. When the system determines that proxy
information includes an alternative recipient, the system may
automatically reroute an information update to the designated
alternative recipient.
[0388] In another example, in a corporate environment, the
determination may be based in part on a first recipient's role in
an organization. For instance, the system may automatically
designate a first recipient's boss as an alternative recipient when
the first recipient is unavailable. In some instances, the system
may designate an alternative recipient based on whether the
alternative recipient is part of the same organization as the
unavailable first recipient.
[0389] In some implementations, the determination may be made in
part by a user input. For example, when it is determined at block
1604 that one or more first recipients are unavailable, then a user
may be provided with a GUI form including drop down menus and text
boxes. A drop down menu may provide a selection of alternative
recipients. Once the user makes a selection, the system may
automatically reroute the information update from the first
recipient to the selected alternative recipient.
[0390] In some implementations, when it is determined that a first
recipient designated an alternative recipient, the system may
automatically highlight, emphasize, enhance or use some insignia to
indicate that the identified first recipient is not available. For
example, a first recipient's name may be in a bold font, or the
first recipient's name may be highlighted in a specific color, such
as red. FIG. 24 shows an example of a GUI with a publisher as
displayed on a display device, in accordance with some
implementations. In FIG. 24, a user has entered the name of a first
recipient, Zach Dunn 2404 in publisher 2402. However, Zach Dunn's
name is displayed with a "*" symbol 2206 indicating that Zach is
unavailable, for instance, based on the status of his user profile.
Thus, in this example, Zach's designated proxy, Paul Luango, will
receive the information update. In some other instances, the system
may automatically replace Zach's name in publisher 2402 with Paul's
name, and reroute the information update to Paul.
[0391] At 1608, a determination is made as to whether the
information update includes an additional recipient indicator as
described above with respect to block 1504 of method 1500.
[0392] At 1610, an identification of one or more second recipients
based on the additional recipient indicator is generated as
generally described above with respect to block 1506 of method
1500. In some implementations, as described in greater detail
below, one or more second recipients may be identified based on a
relevance measure. The relevance measure may be based on one or
more operations to determine whether there is a relationship or an
association between an entity and a first recipient. For example,
the relevance measure may be based on whether an entity follows the
first recipient. If the entity follows the first recipient, then
the entity may be identified as a second recipient. In another
example, the relevance measure may be based on an entity's
relationship with a first recipient in a corporate organization.
For instance, if an entity is a direct report of the first
recipient, then the entity may be identified as a second
recipient.
[0393] At 1612, a selection of one or more second recipients to
receive the information update is received, for instance, from a
user selecting the particular recipients from a pick list or
drop-down menu. In some other instances, the one or more second
recipients are identified as described above with respect to block
1506. In some implementations, the selection may be received and
processed by any of the servers described above with references to
FIG. 2B or by any other computing devices described herein.
[0394] In one example of block 1612, in FIG. 19, the one or more
second recipients may be selected from a list that is organized
into different categories. In FIG. 19, the second recipients are
categorized based on a type of the second recipient, such as groups
1910 and records 1914. The other recipients are categorized based
on a relationship between the first recipient, Joseph Olsen 1906,
and the second recipients, such as followers 1912 and direct
reports 1916. In this example, Ted Joe may select all of the
recipients of a certain category, such as all of the second
recipients listed in the groups 1910 category. Alternatively, Ted
Joe may select a few second recipients from each category of
recipients displayed. In other implementations, the categorization
may be based on other information, such as a user's profile
information, a group's profile information or a record's
information. In other implementations, the categorization may be
based on a relevance measure, as described in greater detail below.
For example, each category may be associated with a numerical value
representing a degree of relevance of each category of recipients.
For instance, in FIG. 19, groups 1910 category may have a greater
relevance measure compared to followers 1912. As such, the groups
1910 category is displayed at the top of the list of
categories.
[0395] In another example, in FIG. 22, one or more second
recipients may be selected from a list 2206. In this example,
Joseph Olsen is addressing an information update to a first
recipient, [HAPPY HOUR GROUP] 2204. When the system detects the
additional recipient indicator, "+" 2208, the system generates a
list of one or more second recipients 2206. Joseph Olsen may select
one or more of the second recipients in the list. In this example,
Joseph Olsen selected Zach Dunn 2210 from the list 2206. As a
result, Zach Dunn 2210 is included after the additional recipient
indicator 2208 in field 2202 as an additional recipient to receive
the information update.
[0396] In yet another example, in FIG. 23, one or more second
recipients may be represented as selectable pictures 2306, 2308 and
2310. The pictures may be selected by using a drag and drop action.
For instance, William Smith selects Richard Charles 2310 by
dragging the picture to field 2302. Once William Smith drops
Richard Charles's picture 2310 in field 2302, Richard Charles will
be included as a recipient of the information update, "Discount
approved for 100 tablets". As FIG. 23 illustrates, more than one
second recipient may be selected. Here, William Smith selected the
Sales Team group, the Accounting department and Richard Charles to
receive the information update.
[0397] In another example, in FIG. 24, one or more second
recipients may be selected from a pick list 2408. In this example,
Joseph Olsen may select a second recipient such as Legal Group 2410
by checking a box associated with Legal Group 2410. As a result of
the selection, the system may automatically include Legal Group as
a recipient of the information update. As FIGS. 19-24 illustrate,
there are various ways to select one or more second recipients.
[0398] In some implementations, the system may automatically select
one or more second recipients of an information update. For
example, the system may select one or more second recipients based
on the content of the information update. For instance, the system
may associate certain keywords included in the information update
to specific recipients. When the keywords are detected, the system
automatically selects the recipients to receive the information
update. In another example, the selection may be defined via a
custom computer programming language code, and the selection 1612
may be made by executing the custom programming language code.
[0399] At 1614, the information update is stored for access by
and/or communicated to the one or more second recipients, as
described above with respect to block 1508.
[0400] FIG. 17 shows an example of a method 1700 for generating an
identification of one or more second recipients based on an
additional recipient indicator, in accordance with some
implementations. In FIG. 17, one or more operations described in
blocks 1702-1710, or a combination of operations can be applied to
identify one or more second recipients. In some implementations,
the identification of one or more second recipients may be based on
the additional recipient indicator, information associated with a
user, a group, or a record, information associated with an
identified first recipient, or a relevance measure, as described
above in blocks 1506 and 1610 of methods 1500 and 1600,
respectively.
[0401] At 1702, a determination is made whether an entity satisfies
a relevance measure associated with the additional indicator. In
some implementations, a relevance measure may be the result of one
or more operations that may be applied to determine whether to
identify an entity as a second recipient as depicted in block
1704.
[0402] In some implementations, at block 1704, the one or more
operations may be used to determine a relationship between an
entity and an identified first recipient. For example, if an entity
follows a first recipient, then the entity may be determined to be
a relevant second recipient. In another example, if the first
recipient follows an entity, then the entity may be determined to
be a relevant second recipient. In yet another example, an entity
may be identified as a second recipient when it is determined an
entity and a first recipient are members of the same group. For
instance, referring to FIG. 7, when Bill Bauer addresses an
information update to Parker Harris, the system may automatically
identify Ella Johnson, James Saxon and Mary Moore as second
recipients when an additional recipient indicator is detect. Ella
Johnson, James Saxon and Mary Moore are identified as second
recipients because Parker Harris and the identified second
recipients are members of the XYZ Competitive Group.
[0403] In another example, in a corporate setting, an entity may be
identified as a second recipient based on an entity's role in an
organization. For instance, the relevance measure may be defined to
identify any entities who are directors in a corporation as a
second recipient. In some other instances, a relationship between
an entity and a first recipient may be based on a professional
relationship between the entity and the first recipient in an
organization. If the entity is a boss, a co-worker or a direct
report of the first recipient, then the entity may be identified as
a first recipient. In other instances, an entity may be identified
as a second recipient if the entity and the first recipient are
part of the same organization.
[0404] In yet another example, the relevance measure may include an
operation to identify a second recipient based on information
associated with a first recipient. For instance, a contact list
associated with a first recipient may include the name of an
entity. The system may automatically identify the entity as a
second recipient. In some other instances, Ted, a sales team
leader, may define a group called "New Purchase Orders." The New
Purchase Order group may be a group of users who gather and discuss
information related to new purchase orders. In this example, when
an information update is addressed to Ted about a recent purchase
order, the system may identify the New Purchase Order group as a
second recipient when the information update includes an additional
recipient indicator. When Ted receives the information update, the
members of the group "New Purchase Order" will automatically be
updated.
[0405] In another example, the relevance measure may include an
operation to identify a second recipient based on information of
the user authoring the feed item. For instance, a user, Tina, is
addressing an email to Bob. Tina may create a group called "Bob's
team" that includes names of users who are part of Bob's team. When
Tina addresses the email to Bob and includes the additional
recipient indicator, "+", the system may identify the group "Bob's
team" as a second recipient and present "Bob's team" as an option
that Tina may select. In some other instances, a user may define
labels for users and/or records that may be identified as a second
recipient.
[0406] In yet another example, the relevance measure may include an
operation to identify a second recipient based on historical
information associated with a first entity. For instance, one or
more servers may store information of recent search activity of a
first recipient. The recent search activity may reveal that a first
recipient was searching a specific user, group or record. As such,
the user, group or record may be identified as a relevant second
recipient. In this example, a time frame may be defined to analyze
a certain amount of historical information associated with a first
recipient. For instance, the time frame may include searches
performed in the past two days, past week or past year.
Additionally, an entity may be identified as a second recipient
based on the frequency the entity was searched for by the first
recipient. In another example, the relevance measure may identify a
second recipient based on historical information associated with an
entity. For instance, a user, Brenda, may have performed several
searches regarding information associated with Opportunity-123K of
FIG. 8 in the past week. As such, when an information update is
addressed to the record, Opportunity-123K, Brenda may be identified
as a relevant second recipient based on Brenda's search
history.
[0407] In another example, the relevance measure may include an
operation to identify a second recipient based on the content of a
feed item. For instance, when an information update includes
keywords, such as "I.T.," "help with" or "Problem with," then the
system may automatically identify members of the I.T. group as a
second recipient when an additional recipient indicator is
detected.
[0408] In some implementations, numerical weights can be applied to
any one or more of the various operations, based on importance of
the particular operation in the implementation. The weighting
information may be used to indicate a degree of relevance between
an entity and a first identified recipient. For example, weighted
values can be summed to determine whether the weighted sum meets,
exceeds, or is less than a designated threshold value. If an entity
meets the threshold value, then the entity is identified as a
second recipient at block 1710. Otherwise, the entity may not be
identified as a second recipient. In another example, the
presentation of the identified one or more second recipients may be
based on a weighted sum of the operations. As such, an identified
second recipient associated with a higher weighted sum may appear
in the beginning of a selectable list, whereas an identified second
recipient associated with a lower weighted sum may appear in the
middle or at the end of the list of second recipients.
[0409] In some implementations, various GUIs can be constructed and
made available to users to personalize and customize the relevance
measures to identify one or more second recipients. For example, a
system administrator or other user can personally select the one or
more operations to apply and thus define parameters to determine a
relevance measure or other association between a first recipient
and an entity. In one example, a pre-defined set of operations
exists, and a user selects one or more of the pre-defined set. In
other examples, a user inputs and customizes the user's own
operations. In one implementation, a user interface provides
graphical slide bars to set weights applied to the selected
operations. A list of operations can be presented in a GUI with a
check box beside each operation for the user to select. The user
can then select whether the user wants to apply weights and, if so,
a pane with the slide bar mentioned above appears. In some
instances, a user has a custom box in which the user defines his or
her own operations. Such interfaces can be operated by the author
of a post, system administrator, or other user.
[0410] If an entity satisfies a relevance measure at blocks 1702
and 1704, then method 1700 proceeds to block 1706. Otherwise,
method 1700 ends. In some other implementations, the method 1700
may proceed back to 1702 to evaluate whether another entity
satisfies the relevance measure.
[0411] At 1706, it is determined whether an entity is available as
described with respect to determining the availability of a first
recipient at block 1604 of FIG. 16. If the entity is available,
then method 1700 proceeds to block 1710 and the entity is
identified as second recipient. Otherwise, method 1700 proceeds to
block 1708.
[0412] At 1708, it is determined whether the entity designated an
alternative recipient as described at block 1606 of FIG. 16. If the
entity has designated an alternative recipient, the system may
automatically re-route feed items, such as information updates,
from the entity to the designated alternative recipients. In some
implementations, if the entity did not designate an alternative
recipient, then method 1700 may end. In some other implementations,
if the entity did not designate an alternative recipient, then the
system may automatically determine and designate an alternative
recipient based on information associated with the entity.
[0413] At 1710, the entity is identified as a second recipient when
the entity satisfies the relevance measure at block 1702. The
identified one or more second recipients may be stored on one or
more storage mediums or storage devices. For instance, the
identified one or more second recipients may be stored in a
database, such as a multitenant database. In some implementations,
the stored one or more second recipients may be presented in a
selectable list, as shown for example in FIGS. 19 and 22-24.
[0414] FIG. 18 shows a flowchart of an example of a method 1800 for
communicating feed information to one or more recipients, performed
in accordance with some implementations. In some implementations,
one or more entities may be excluded from receiving a feed item.
For instance, when an exclude recipient indicator is detected, the
system may generate a selectable list of recipients to exclude from
receiving a feed item.
[0415] Blocks 1802-1808 provide a method to communicate a feed item
to one or more second recipient when an additional recipient
indicator is detected as described in blocks 1502-1508 in FIG.
15.
[0416] At 1810, it is determined whether the information update
includes an exclude recipient indicator. Similar to the additional
recipient indicator described in blocks 1504 and 1608 of methods
1500 and 1600 respectively, the exclude recipient indicator may be
any designated alphanumeric text character or string, such as a "-"
symbol, to trigger the identification one or more entities to
exclude from receiving the information update. FIG. 21 illustrates
an example of excluding a recipient from receiving an email message
2102. A user, Joseph Olsen, addresses an email 2102 to a first
recipient 2104, Zach Dunn, about Ted's surprise birthday party. In
this example, when the additional recipient indicator 2108, "+" is
detected, LEGAL GROUP 2110 and Marc Benioff 2112 are identified and
selected as second recipients to receive the surprise birthday
invitation 2102. Here, Joseph may not want to include Ted Joe in
the invitation to ensure that the birthday party remains a
surprise. When the exclude recipient indicator, "-", is detected,
the system may generate a list of entities to exclude from
receiving the email 2102. Here, Ted Joe is excluded from receiving
the email 2102.
[0417] In other implementations, the exclude recipient indicator
may be a status or any other information that may be used to
trigger the identification of one or more entities to exclude at
block 1812. An exclude recipient indicator may be selected by a
user, defined by custom computer programming language code, or
automatically generated as described herein.
[0418] If the information update does not include an exclude
recipient indicator, then method 1800 proceeds to store the
information update at block 1816. Otherwise, method 1800 proceeds
to block 1812.
[0419] At 1812, an identification of one or more third recipients
based on the exclude recipient indicator is generated. The one or
more third recipients may be a user, group or record to exclude
from receiving a feed item, such as an information update. One or
more third recipients may be identified as described in blocks 1506
and 1610 of methods 1500 and 1600, respectively. For example, an
entity may be identified as a third recipient if the entity and a
first recipient are part of the same organization. Referring to
FIG. 21, for example, the system may identify Ted Joe 2116 as a
recipient to exclude because Zach Dunn 2104 and Ted Joe are members
of the Legal Department at ABC Corporation. In another example, an
entity may be identified as a third recipient because the entity
and the first recipient are not part of the same organization. In
yet another example, an entity may be identified as a third
recipient based on whether the entity follows or does not follow
the first recipient.
[0420] In some implementations, the list of recipients to exclude
may be generated based on a relevance measure as described in
method 1700. For example, if an entity does not satisfy the
relevance measure at block 1702, the system may automatically
identify the entity as a recipient to exclude. In another example,
numerical weights may be applied to one or more operations
described in block 1704. As described above, the weighting
information may be used to indicate a degree of relevance between
an entity and a first recipient. If, for example, the weighted sum
falls below a designated threshold, the entity may be identified as
a recipient to exclude. Here, the entity is determined to not be a
relevant recipient and, thus, identified as a third recipient. In
some implementations, the identification of one or more third
recipients may be based on user input. For instance, a user may
designate a default group of users to always exclude from receiving
a feed item. In other implementations, the identification of one or
more third recipients may be defined by custom computer programming
language code or automatically generated as described herein.
[0421] At 1814, a selection of one or more third recipients to
exclude from receiving the information update is received, in
similar fashion as the selection of second recipients as described
in block 1612. For example, the system may generate a selection
list of third recipients as depicted in FIG. 19 and FIGS.
22-24.
[0422] At 1816, the information update is stored as described in
block 1614. In some implementations, the system may block access to
the information update from the selected one or more third
recipients at block 1814, such that the information update may not
be presented in an information feed accessible by the one or more
third recipients.
[0423] The specific details of the specific aspects of
implementations disclosed herein may be combined in any suitable
manner without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosed
implementations. However, other implementations may be directed to
specific implementations relating to each individual aspect, or
specific combinations of these individual aspects.
[0424] While the disclosed examples are often described herein with
reference to an implementation in which an on-demand enterprise
services environment is implemented in a system having an
application server providing a front end for an on-demand database
service capable of supporting multiple tenants, the present
invention is not limited to multi-tenant databases nor deployment
on application servers. Implementations may be practiced using
other database architectures, i.e., ORACLE.RTM., DB2.RTM. by IBM
and the like without departing from the scope of the
implementations claimed.
[0425] It should be understood that some of the disclosed
implementations can be embodied in the form of control logic using
hardware and/or using computer software in a modular or integrated
manner. Other ways and/or methods are possible using hardware and a
combination of hardware and software.
[0426] Any of the software components or functions described in
this application may be implemented as software code to be executed
by a processor using any suitable computer language such as, for
example, Java, C++ or Perl using, for example, conventional or
object-oriented techniques. The software code may be stored as a
series of instructions or commands on a computer readable medium
for storage and/or transmission, suitable media include random
access memory (RAM), a read only memory (ROM), a magnetic medium
such as a hard-drive or a floppy disk, or an optical medium such as
a compact disk (CD) or DVD (digital versatile disk), flash memory,
and the like. The computer readable medium may be any combination
of such storage or transmission devices. Computer readable media
encoded with the software/program code may be packaged with a
compatible device or provided separately from other devices (e.g.,
via Internet download). Any such computer readable medium may
reside on or within a single computer program product (e.g., a hard
drive or an entire computer system), and may be present on or
within different computer program products within a system or
network. A computer system, or other computing device, may include
a monitor, printer, or other suitable display for providing any of
the results mentioned herein to a user.
[0427] While various implementations have been described herein, it
should be understood that they have been presented by way of
example only, and not limitation. Thus, the breadth and scope of
the present application should not be limited by any of the
implementations described herein, but should be defined only in
accordance with the following and later-submitted claims and their
equivalents.
* * * * *