U.S. patent application number 14/807773 was filed with the patent office on 2015-11-19 for independent volume control in electro-acoustic stimulation systems.
This patent application is currently assigned to Advanced Bionics AG. The applicant listed for this patent is Advanced Bionics AG. Invention is credited to Volkmar Hamacher, Abhijit Kulkarni, Stefan D. Menzl, Logan P. Palmer, Alexander Reich, Hans-Uelii Roeck, Manish Vaishya.
Application Number | 20150334495 14/807773 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 54539597 |
Filed Date | 2015-11-19 |
United States Patent
Application |
20150334495 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Menzl; Stefan D. ; et
al. |
November 19, 2015 |
INDEPENDENT VOLUME CONTROL IN ELECTRO-ACOUSTIC STIMULATION
SYSTEMS
Abstract
An exemplary system includes 1) a first sound processor included
in a first auditory prosthesis system associated with a first ear
of a patient, the first sound processor including a first volume
control facility, and 2) a second sound processor included in a
second auditory prosthesis system associated with a second ear of
the patient, the second sound processor including a second volume
control facility. The first volume control facility adjusts, in
response to actuation of the first volume control facility, a first
volume level perceived by the patient when electrical stimulation
is applied by either the first auditory prosthesis system or the
second auditory prosthesis system. The second volume control
facility adjusts, in response to actuation of the second volume
control facility, a second volume level perceived by the patient
when acoustic stimulation is applied by either the first auditory
prosthesis system or the second auditory prosthesis system.
Inventors: |
Menzl; Stefan D.; (Jona,
CH) ; Roeck; Hans-Uelii; (Hombrechtikon, CH) ;
Palmer; Logan P.; (Santa Monica, CA) ; Kulkarni;
Abhijit; (Newbury Park, CA) ; Vaishya; Manish;
(Valencia, CA) ; Hamacher; Volkmar; (Hannover,
DE) ; Reich; Alexander; (North Hollywood,
CA) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
Advanced Bionics AG |
Staefa |
|
CH |
|
|
Assignee: |
Advanced Bionics AG
|
Family ID: |
54539597 |
Appl. No.: |
14/807773 |
Filed: |
July 23, 2015 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
14729016 |
Jun 2, 2015 |
|
|
|
14807773 |
|
|
|
|
13994698 |
Sep 5, 2013 |
9061149 |
|
|
PCT/US10/60754 |
Dec 16, 2010 |
|
|
|
14729016 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
607/3 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H04R 25/505 20130101;
H04R 2225/41 20130101; A61N 1/36038 20170801; H04R 2430/01
20130101; H04R 2430/03 20130101; H04R 25/70 20130101 |
International
Class: |
H04R 25/00 20060101
H04R025/00; A61N 1/372 20060101 A61N001/372; A61N 1/36 20060101
A61N001/36 |
Claims
1. A system comprising: a first sound processor included in a first
auditory prosthesis system associated with a first ear of a
patient, the first sound processor including a first volume control
facility; and a second sound processor included in a second
auditory prosthesis system associated with a second ear of the
patient, the second sound processor including a second volume
control facility; wherein the first volume control facility
adjusts, in response to actuation of the first volume control
facility by a user, a first volume level perceived by the patient
when electrical stimulation is applied by either the first auditory
prosthesis system or the second auditory prosthesis system, and the
second volume control facility adjusts, in response to actuation of
the second volume control facility by the user, a second volume
level perceived by the patient when acoustic stimulation is applied
by either the first auditory prosthesis system or the second
auditory prosthesis system.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein: the actuation of the first
volume control facility sets the first volume level to a particular
value; and the first sound processor transmits data representative
of the particular value to the second sound processor by way of a
communication link that interconnects the first and second sound
processors.
3. The system of claim 2, wherein the communication link comprises
a wireless link.
4. The system of claim 1, wherein: the actuation of the second
volume control facility sets the second volume level to a
particular value; and the second sound processor transmits data
representative of the particular value to the first sound processor
by way of a communication link that interconnects the first and
second sound processors.
5. The system of claim 4, wherein the communication link comprises
a wireless link.
6. The system of claim 1, wherein: the first auditory prosthesis
system comprises a first electro-acoustic system configured to
apply both electrical stimulation and acoustic stimulation to the
first ear of the patient; and the second auditory prosthesis system
comprises a second electro-acoustic system configured to apply both
electrical stimulation and acoustic stimulation to the second ear
of the patient.
7. The system of claim 1, wherein: the first auditory prosthesis
system comprises a cochlear implant system configured to apply only
electrical stimulation to the first ear of the patient; and the
second auditory prosthesis system comprises an electro-acoustic
system configured to apply both electrical stimulation and acoustic
stimulation to the second ear of the patient.
8. The system of claim 1, wherein: the first auditory prosthesis
system comprises an electro-acoustic system configured to apply
both electrical stimulation and acoustic stimulation to the first
ear of the patient; and the second auditory prosthesis system
comprises a hearing aid configured to apply only acoustic
stimulation to the second ear of the patient.
9. The system of claim 1, wherein: the first volume control
facility is disposed on a surface of the first sound processor; and
the second volume control facility is disposed on a surface of the
second sound processor.
10. The system of claim 1, wherein at least one of the first and
second volume control facilities comprises a rotatable control
dial.
11. The system of claim 1, wherein the user is the patient.
12. The system of claim 1, wherein the user is a person other than
the patient.
13. A system comprising: a first sound processor included in a
first auditory prosthesis system associated with a first ear of a
patient, the first sound processor including a first volume control
facility; and a second sound processor included in a second
auditory prosthesis system associated with a second ear of the
patient, the second sound processor including a second volume
control facility; wherein the first volume control facility
adjusts, in response to actuation of the first volume control
facility by a user, an overall volume level perceived by the
patient when electrical stimulation or acoustic stimulation is
applied by either the first auditory prosthesis system or the
second auditory prosthesis system, and the second volume control
facility adjusts, in response to actuation of the second volume
control facility by the user, a balance between a first volume
level perceived by the patient when the electrical stimulation is
applied by either the first auditory prosthesis system or the
second auditory prosthesis system, and a second volume level
perceived by the patient when the acoustic stimulation is applied
by either the first auditory prosthesis system or the second
auditory prosthesis system.
14. The system of claim 13, wherein: the actuation of the first
volume control facility sets the overall volume level to a
particular value; and the first sound processor transmits data
representative of the particular value to the second sound
processor by way of a communication link that interconnects the
first and second sound processors.
15. The system of claim 13, wherein: the actuation of the second
volume control facility sets the balance to a particular value; and
the second sound processor transmits data representative of the
particular value to the first sound processor by way of a
communication link that interconnects the first and second sound
processors.
16. The system of claim 13, wherein: the first auditory prosthesis
system comprises a first electro-acoustic system configured to
apply both electrical stimulation and acoustic stimulation to the
first ear of the patient; and the second auditory prosthesis system
comprises a second electro-acoustic system configured to apply both
electrical stimulation and acoustic stimulation to the second ear
of the patient.
17. The system of claim 13, wherein: the first volume control
facility is disposed on a surface of the first sound processor; and
the second volume control facility is disposed on a surface of the
second sound processor.
18. The system of claim 13, wherein at least one of the first and
second volume control facilities comprises a rotatable control
dial.
19. The system of claim 13, wherein the user is the patient.
20. The system of claim 13, wherein the user is a person other than
the patient.
Description
RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] The present application is a continuation-in-part
application of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/729,016, filed Jun. 2,
2015, which application is a continuation application of U.S.
application Ser. No. 13/994,698, filed Jun. 14, 2013 and issued as
U.S. Pat. No. 9,061,149 on Jun. 23, 2015, which application is a
U.S. National Stage Entry of PCT Application No. PCT/US10/60754,
filed Dec. 16, 2010. The contents of these applications are
incorporated herein by reference in their respective
entireties.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
[0002] The natural sense of hearing in human beings involves the
use of hair cells in the cochlea that convert or transduce acoustic
signals into auditory nerve impulses. Hearing loss, which may be
due to many different causes, is generally of two types: conductive
and sensorineural. Conductive hearing loss occurs when the normal
mechanical pathways for sound to reach the cochlea are impeded.
These sound pathways may be impeded, for example, by damage to the
ossicular chain, excessive cerumen, or a malformed tympanic
membrane. Mild conductive hearing losses can be treated with
hearing aids, stronger losses may require a middle ear surgery or a
bone-anchored hearing aid.
[0003] Sensorineural hearing loss, on the other hand, is primarily
caused by the absence or destruction of the outer hair cells on the
basilar membrane. There are rare cases in which sensorineural
hearing loss is caused by a malfunction of the vestibulocochlear
nerve or even the central processing system. To overcome
sensorineural hearing loss, numerous cochlear implant systems--or
cochlear prostheses--have been developed. Cochlear implant systems
bypass the major part of the ear by presenting electrical
stimulation directly to the auditory nerve fibers by way of one or
more channels formed by an array of electrodes implanted in the
cochlea. Direct stimulation of the auditory nerve fibers leads to
the perception of sound in the brain and at least partial
restoration of hearing function. Cochlear implants are typically
capable of providing high-frequency information up to 8 kHz.
[0004] There is a certain group of people that has some degree of
residual hearing in the low frequencies (e.g., below 1 kHz) and a
severe hearing loss in the high frequencies (e.g., above 1 kHz).
These people cannot benefit from traditional amplification because
of the severity of the hearing loss in the high frequencies. Nor
are they classic cochlear implant candidates, because of their
mostly intact low frequency residual hearing.
[0005] For this group of people, various electro-acoustic
stimulation ("EAS") systems have been developed that provide such
patients with the ability to perceive both low and high
frequencies. Electro-acoustic stimulation refers to the use of a
hearing aid and a cochlear implant together in the same ear. The
hearing aid acoustically amplifies the low frequencies while the
cochlear implant electrically stimulates the high frequencies. The
auditory nerve combines the acoustic and electric stimuli to one
auditory signal. Results of various studies have shown a highly
synergistic effect between hearing aid and cochlear implant
technology, particularly evident in speech understanding, pitch
discrimination, and music appreciation.
[0006] However, electro-acoustic stimulation systems suffer from
the problem that the perceptual sensitivity of a patient to
acoustic stimulation is quite different than the perceptual
sensitivity of the patient to electrical stimulation. For example,
sensitivity of a patient to electrical stimulation often changes
throughout the day and in accordance the health state of the
patient while the sensitivity of the patient to acoustic
stimulation is typically more consistent. Hence, it would be
desirable for the patient to be able to independently adjust a
volume associated with the acoustic stimulation and a volume
associated with the electrical stimulation. Unfortunately, current
electro-acoustic stimulation systems balance the two types of
stimulation during the fitting process only and do to provide a
control for the user to change the balance throughout the day.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0007] The accompanying drawings illustrate various embodiments and
are a part of the specification. The illustrated embodiments are
merely examples and do not limit the scope of the disclosure.
Throughout the drawings, identical or similar reference numbers
designate identical or similar elements.
[0008] FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary EAS system according to
principles described herein.
[0009] FIG. 2 shows a simplified diagram of exemplary components
that may facilitate independent control of a volume associated with
electrical stimulation provided by a cochlear implant and a volume
associated with acoustic stimulation provided by a hearing aid
receiver according to principles described herein.
[0010] FIG. 3 shows an exemplary implementation of the EAS system
of FIG. 1 according to principles described herein.
[0011] FIGS. 4-6 shows perspective views of exemplary EAS devices
according to principles described herein.
[0012] FIG. 7 shows another exemplary implementation of the EAS
system of FIG. 1 according to principles described herein.
[0013] FIGS. 8-11 show various bilateral auditory prosthesis system
configurations according to principles described herein.
[0014] FIG. 12 illustrates an exemplary method of facilitating
independent volume control in an EAS system according to principles
described herein.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0015] Systems and methods for independent volume control in a
bilateral auditory prosthesis system are described herein. As will
be described below, a bilateral auditory prosthesis system may
include a first auditory prosthesis system associated with a first
ear of a patient and a second auditory prosthesis system associated
with a second ear of the patient. The first auditory prosthesis
system may include a first sound processor that includes a first
volume control facility and the second auditory prosthesis system
may include a second sound processor that includes a second volume
control facility. Each volume control facility may be configured to
control a different type of volume level for the entire bilateral
auditory prosthesis system.
[0016] For example, the first volume control facility may be
associated with electrical stimulation and the second volume
control facility may be associated with acoustic stimulation. In
this configuration, the first volume control facility adjusts, in
response to actuation of the first volume control facility by a
user, a first volume level perceived by the patient when electrical
stimulation is applied by either the first auditory prosthesis
system or the second auditory prosthesis system. Likewise, the
second volume control facility adjusts, in response to actuation of
the second volume control facility by the user, a second volume
level perceived by the patient when acoustic stimulation is applied
by either the first auditory prosthesis system or the second
auditory prosthesis system.
[0017] Numerous advantages are associated with the systems and
methods described herein. For example, the systems and methods
described herein may allow a patient to selectively and
independently control a volume associated with electrical
stimulation provided by a bilateral auditory prosthesis system and
a volume associated with acoustic stimulation provided by the
bilateral auditory prosthesis system. This may be beneficial in
many different scenarios. For example, some bilateral patients have
to regularly adjust the electrical stimulation volume throughout
the day due to a fading effect of the electrical stimulation.
However, these patients may not desire to simultaneously adjust the
acoustic stimulation volume, which is less affected by the fading
effect. The systems and methods described herein may allow these
patients to independently adjust the electrical stimulation volume
without affecting the acoustic stimulation volume. Moreover, the
systems and methods described herein may allow independent control
of the electric and acoustic stimulation volume levels utilizing
components (e.g., rotatable control dials) already included in
(e.g., disposed on) sound processors.
[0018] Systems and methods for independent volume control in EAS
systems are also described herein. In some examples, an EAS
subsystem is configured to direct a cochlear implant to apply
electrical stimulation representative of audio content included in
a first frequency band (e.g., a "high" frequency band) to a
patient. The EAS subsystem may be further configured to direct a
receiver to apply acoustic stimulation representative of audio
content included in a second frequency band (e.g., a "low"
frequency band) to the patient. The frequency bands may be selected
based on the hearing loss of the patient or a patient group. A
volume control subsystem may be communicatively coupled to the EAS
subsystem and configured to facilitate independent control of a
volume associated with the electrical stimulation and a volume
associated with the acoustic stimulation.
[0019] For example, the volume control subsystem may include a
first volume control mechanism configured to adjust the volume
associated with the electrical stimulation in response to actuation
of the first volume control mechanism by a user and a second volume
control mechanism configured to adjust the volume associated with
the acoustic stimulation in response to actuation of the second
volume control mechanism by the user. Additional or alternative
implementations of the volume control subsystem will be described
herein.
[0020] FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary EAS system 100. EAS system
100 may include one or more microphones (e.g., microphone 102), an
EAS subsystem 104, a headpiece 106, a receiver 108, a cochlear
implant 110, and a lead 112 having a plurality of electrodes 114
disposed thereon. EAS system 100 may further include a volume
control subsystem 116, which may be selectively and communicatively
coupled to EAS subsystem 104. Each of the components shown in FIG.
1 may include or be implemented by any combination of hardware,
software, and/or firmware as may serve a particular implementation.
For example, volume control subsystem 116 may include or be
implemented by a computing device or processor configured to
perform one or more of the functions described herein. Each of the
components shown in FIG. 1 will now be described in more
detail.
[0021] Microphone 102 may detect an audio signal and input the
audio signal (or an electrical signal representative of the audio
signal) into EAS subsystem 104. Microphone 102 may include any type
of microphone as may serve a particular implementation and may be
located external to the patient, included within headpiece 106,
positioned near or within the ear canal, and/or implanted within
the patient as may serve a particular implementation.
[0022] EAS subsystem 104 may be configured to facilitate
electro-acoustic stimulation of a patient. For example, EAS
subsystem 104 may include any combination of components configured
to direct cochlear implant 110 to apply electrical stimulation to
the patient and to direct receiver 108 to apply acoustic
stimulation to the patient. The electrical stimulation may be
representative of audio content included in a "high" frequency band
(e.g., a frequency band substantially equal to 1 kHz-8 kHz). The
acoustic stimulation may be representative of audio content
included in a "low frequency band (e.g., a frequency band
substantially equal to 100 Hz to 1 kHz). It will be recognized that
the frequency bands associated with both the electrical and
acoustic stimulation may vary as may serve a particular
implementation.
[0023] EAS subsystem 104 may be configured to operate in accordance
with one or more control parameters. As used herein, a "control
parameter" may include any parameter governing an operation of EAS
subsystem 104. Exemplary control parameters include, but are not
limited to, volume control parameters, microphone sensitivity
parameters, program selection parameters, noise reduction
parameters, microphone direction parameters, pitch parameters,
timbre parameters, sound quality parameters, most comfortable
current levels ("M levels"), threshold current levels, channel
acoustic gain parameters, front and backend dynamic range
parameters, current steering parameters, pulse rate values, pulse
width values, frequency parameters, amplitude parameters, waveform
parameters, electrode polarity parameters (i.e., anode-cathode
assignment), location parameters (i.e., which electrode pair or
electrode group receives the stimulation current), stimulation type
parameters (i.e., monopolar, bipolar, or tripolar stimulation),
burst pattern parameters (e.g., burst on time and burst off time),
duty cycle parameters, spectral tilt parameters, filter parameters,
and dynamic compression parameters.
[0024] To illustrate, EAS subsystem 104 may process an audio signal
(which may be detected by microphone 102, input by way of an
auxiliary audio input port, etc.) in accordance with one or more
control parameters (e.g., that may be associated with a particular
sound processing strategy). EAS subsystem 104 may then direct
cochlear implant 110 to generate and apply electrical stimulation
representative of audio content included in the audio signal that
is within the high frequency range at a volume level specified by a
volume control parameter associated with the electrical
stimulation. EAS subsystem 104 may additionally or alternatively
direct receiver 108 to apply acoustic stimulation representative of
audio content included in the audio signal that is within the low
frequency range at a volume level specified by a volume control
parameter associated with the acoustic stimulation.
[0025] EAS subsystem 104 may be implemented by any number of
devices or components. For example, as will be described in more
detail below, EAS subsystem 104 may be implemented by a single
device that may be worn behind or on the ear, similar to
conventional hearing aids and/or sound processors used in cochlear
implant systems. Alternatively, EAS subsystem 104 may be
implemented by a single device configured to be worn off the ear
and/or implanted within the patient.
[0026] Headpiece 106 may be configured to be affixed to a patient's
head and positioned such that a coil housed within headpiece is
communicatively coupled to a corresponding coil included within
cochlear implant 110. In this manner, control parameters and power
signals may be wirelessly transmitted between EAS subsystem 104 and
cochlear implant 110.
[0027] Receiver 108 may be positioned inside the ear canal of the
patient (or at any other suitable location) and configured to apply
acoustic stimulation to the patient. For example, receiver 108 may
include a speaker configured to present an amplified version of
audio content included in the low frequency band to the
patient.
[0028] Cochlear implant 110, lead 112, and electrodes 114 may be
partially or fully implanted within a patient and configured to
apply electrical stimulation to one or more stimulation sites
associated with an auditory pathway (e.g., the auditory nerve) of
the patient. Cochlear implant 110 may include any type of
implantable stimulator that may be used in association with the
systems and methods described herein.
[0029] Volume control subsystem 116 may be selectively and
communicatively coupled to EAS subsystem 104 and may be configured
to facilitate independent control of a volume associated with the
electrical stimulation provided by cochlear implant 110 and a
volume associated with the acoustic stimulation provided by
receiver 108.
[0030] To illustrate, FIG. 2 shows a simplified diagram of
exemplary components that may implement volume control subsystem
116 by facilitating independent control of a volume associated with
the electrical stimulation provided by cochlear implant 110 and a
volume associated with the acoustic stimulation provided by
receiver 108. As shown in FIG. 2, an audio signal detected by
microphone 102 may be concurrently passed through a high pass
filter 202 and a low pass filter 204. It will be recognized that in
some implementations, high pass filter 202 and/or low pass filter
204 may include band pass filters. High pass filter 202 may include
any suitable combination of analog and/or digital components
configured to remove low frequency audio content (e.g., less than
about 1 kHz) and pass the remaining high frequency audio content to
variable amplifier 206-1. Variable amplifier 206-1 may be
configured to adjust a volume, or gain, of the high frequency audio
content. For example, variable amplifier 206-1 may direct cochlear
implant 110 to adjust an amplitude of the electrical stimulation
that is applied to the patient to represent the high frequency
audio content.
[0031] Likewise, low pass filter 204 may include any suitable
combination of analog and/or digital components configured to
remove high frequency audio content (e.g., greater or equal to
about 1 kHz) and pass the remaining low frequency audio content to
variable amplifier 206-2. Variable amplifier 206-2 may be
configured to adjust a volume, or gain, of the low frequency audio
content. For example, variable amplifier 206-2 may adjust an
amplitude of the acoustic stimulation that is applied to the
patient by way of receiver 108 to represent the low frequency audio
content.
[0032] In some examples, variable amplifiers 206-1 and 206-2 may be
configured to adjust the volumes associated with the electrical and
acoustic stimuli, respectively, in response to user input provided
by the patient and/or another user. Exemplary user input may
include, as will be described in more detail below, user actuation
of one or more volume control mechanisms.
[0033] Returning to FIG. 1, EAS subsystem 104 and volume control
subsystem 116 may be implemented by any combination of components
as may serve a particular implementation. For example, EAS
subsystem 104 and volume control subsystem 116 may be implemented
by a single device. To illustrate, FIG. 3 shows an exemplary
implementation 300 of EAS system 100 in which a single EAS device
302 is configured to implement EAS subsystem 104 and volume control
subsystem 116. EAS device 302 may be dimensioned to fit behind or
on the ear of a patient. Alternatively, EAS device 302 may be worn
or carried off the ear by the patient.
[0034] As shown in FIG. 3, EAS device 302 may include a sound
processor 304 and a volume control facility 306 communicatively
coupled one to another. Sound processor 304 may include any
combination of components configured to process an audio signal and
direct cochlear implant 110 to apply electrical stimulation
representative of high frequency content included in the audio
signal to the patient and to direct receiver 108 to apply acoustic
stimulation representative of low frequency content included in the
audio signal to the patient.
[0035] Volume control facility 306 may include any combination of
components configured to facilitate independent control of a volume
associated with the electrical stimulation provided by cochlear
implant 110 and a volume associated with the acoustic stimulation
provided by receiver 108. For example, volume control facility 306
may include separate volume control mechanisms associated with each
of the electrical stimulation and the acoustic stimulation,
respectively.
[0036] To illustrate, FIG. 4 shows a perspective view of an
exemplary EAS device 302 that includes a first volume control
mechanism 402-1 and a second volume control mechanism 402-2
(collectively referred to herein as "volume control mechanisms
402") disposed on an outer surface of EAS device 302. Volume
control mechanisms 402 may include rotatable control dials, as
shown in FIG. 4, or any other type of control mechanism that may be
actuated by a user.
[0037] First volume control mechanism 402-1 may be configured to
adjust the volume associated with the electrical stimulation
provided by cochlear implant 110 in response to actuation of first
volume control mechanism 402-1 by a user and second volume control
mechanism 402-2 may be configured to adjust the volume associated
with the acoustic stimulation provided by receiver 108 in response
to actuation of second volume control mechanism 402-2 by the user.
Hence, the user may increase or decrease the volume associated with
the electrical stimulation provided by cochlear implant 110 by
actuating (e.g., rotating clockwise or counter-clockwise) first
volume control mechanism 402-1. Likewise, the user may increase or
decrease the volume associated with the acoustic stimulation
provided by receiver 108 by actuating (e.g., rotating clockwise or
counter-clockwise) second volume control mechanism 402-2.
[0038] FIG. 4 also shows that EAS device 302 may include a program
selection switch 404 configured to facilitate selection by a user
of one or more programs (i.e., sound processing strategies) by
which EAS device 302 may operate. To illustrate, program selection
switch 404 may be selectively positioned in one of two positions.
Each position corresponds to a particular program. For example, the
first position may correspond to a "normal" program wherein EAS
device 302 may operate in accordance with one or more default
control parameters. The second position may correspond to a "noise
reduction" program, wherein EAS device 302 may operate in
accordance with one or more noise reduction parameters. In some
examples, the volume associated with the electrical stimulation
provided by cochlear implant 110 and the volume associated with the
acoustic stimulation provided by receiver 108 may be automatically
adjusted in accordance with a positioning of program selection
switch 404.
[0039] In some alternative embodiments, first volume control
mechanism 402-1 may serve as an overall volume control mechanism
configured to adjust an overall volume associated with both the
electrical stimulation and the acoustic stimulation in response to
actuation of first volume control mechanism 402-1 by a user. Second
volume control mechanism 402-2 may serve as a balance control
mechanism configured to adjust the volume associated with the
electrical stimulation relative to the volume associated with the
acoustic stimulation in response to actuation of second volume
control mechanism 402-2 by the user. For example, the user may
rotate second volume control mechanism 402-2 in a clockwise
direction to increase the volume associated with the electrical
stimulation relative to the volume associated with the acoustic
stimulation. Likewise, the user may rotate second volume control
mechanism 402-2 in a counter-clockwise direction to decrease the
volume associated with the electrical stimulation relative to the
volume associated with the acoustic stimulation.
[0040] FIG. 5 illustrates an alternative implementation of volume
control facility 306. As shown in FIG. 5, EAS device 302 may
alternatively include an overall volume control mechanism 502, a
treble control mechanism 504, and a bass control mechanism 506
disposed on an outer surface of EAS device 302. Overall volume
control mechanism 502 may include a rotatable control dial or the
like and may be configured to adjust an overall volume associated
with both the electrical stimulation and the acoustic stimulation
in response to actuation of overall volume control mechanism 502 by
a user. Treble control mechanism 504 and bass control mechanism 506
may include slideable levers, as shown in FIG. 5, or any other
suitable type of mechanism and may facilitate tone balance control.
For example, the user may actuate treble control mechanism 504 to
fine tune or otherwise adjust the volume associated with the
electrical stimulation provided by cochlear implant 110.
Additionally or alternatively, the user may actuate bass control
mechanism 506 to fine tune or otherwise adjust the volume
associated with the acoustic stimulation provided by receiver
108.
[0041] FIG. 6 illustrates another alternative implementation of
volume control facility 306. As shown in FIG. 6, EAS device 302 may
alternatively include a single volume control mechanism 602 and a
selection mechanism 604 communicatively coupled to volume control
mechanism 602. Selection mechanism 604 may include a button,
switch, or any other type of selection mechanism and may be used by
a user to selectively associate volume control mechanism 602 with
either the electrical stimulation provided by cochlear implant 110
or the acoustic stimulation provided by receiver 108.
[0042] For example, a user may actuate (e.g., press) selection
mechanism 604 to selectively associate volume control mechanism 602
with the electrical stimulation provided by cochlear implant 110.
The user may then actuate (e.g., rotate) volume control mechanism
602 to adjust the volume associated with the electrical stimulation
provided by cochlear implant 110. The user may subsequently actuate
(e.g., press) selection mechanism 604 again to selectively
associate volume control mechanism 602 with the acoustic
stimulation provided by receiver 108. The user may then actuate
(e.g., rotate) volume control mechanism 602 to adjust the volume
associated with the acoustic stimulation provided by receiver 108.
In this or a similar manner, the electrical stimulation volume and
the acoustic stimulation volume may be independently controlled
using a single volume control mechanism.
[0043] Additionally or alternatively, volume control facility 306
may include a sensor communicatively coupled to volume control
mechanism 602. The sensor may be configured to detect a volume
control factor and automatically associate volume control mechanism
602 with either the electrical stimulation provided by cochlear
implant 110 or the acoustic stimulation provided by receiver 108
based on the detected volume control factor. The volume control
factor may include any factor associated with EAS device 302 as may
serve a particular implementation. For example, the volume control
factor may include a time of day, an acoustic environment of the
patient, and/or any other suitable factor.
[0044] To illustrate, the user may typically adjust the volume
associated with acoustic stimulation provided by receiver 108 in
the morning immediately after waking up and the volume associated
with the electrical stimulation provided by cochlear implant 110
throughout the day. Sensor may therefore detect the time of day and
cause volume control mechanism 602 to be associated with the
acoustic stimulation provided by receiver 108 during a
predetermined time period in the morning and with the electrical
stimulation provided by cochlear implant 110 during the remainder
of the day. In this manner, the user does not have to manually
associate volume control mechanism 602 with the desired type of
stimulation each time he or she desires to adjust one of the volume
levels.
[0045] To further illustrate, volume control mechanism 602 may be
automatically associated with either the electrical stimulation
provided by cochlear implant 110 or the acoustic stimulation
provided by receiver 108 based on a detected acoustic environment
of the patient. For example, the sensor may detect that the patient
has entered an environment where it is desirable for the user to
hear speech. Sensor may accordingly cause volume control mechanism
602 to be associated with electrical stimulation provided by
cochlear implant 110 so that the patient may increase the volume
associated with the electrical stimulation as desired in order to
better perceive the speech.
[0046] In some alternative embodiments, selection mechanism 604 may
be used by a user to selectively associate volume control mechanism
602 with an overall volume level associated with both the
electrical stimulation and the acoustic stimulation or with a
balance between a volume level associated with the electrical
stimulation and a volume level associated with the acoustic
stimulation. For example, a user may actuate (e.g., press)
selection mechanism 604 to selectively associate volume control
mechanism 602 with an overall volume associated with both the
electrical stimulation and the acoustic stimulation. The user may
then actuate (e.g., rotate) volume control mechanism 602 to adjust
the overall volume level. The user may subsequently actuate (e.g.,
press) selection mechanism 604 again to selectively associate
volume control mechanism 602 with a balance between the electrical
and acoustic stimulation volumes. The user may then actuate (e.g.,
rotate) volume control mechanism 602 to adjust the volume
associated with the electrical stimulation relative to the volume
associated with the acoustic stimulation. For example, rotating
volume control mechanism 602 in a clockwise direction may
simultaneously increase the electrical stimulation volume and
decrease the acoustic stimulation volume. Rotating volume control
mechanism 602 in a counter-clockwise may simultaneously decrease
the electrical stimulation volume and increase the acoustic
stimulation volume.
[0047] In some alternative embodiments, volume control mechanism
602 may include an intelligent volume control mechanism configured
to be selectively associated with the electrical stimulation or the
acoustic stimulation in accordance with one or more features
extracted from an audio signal. For example, the signal energy in
the low and high frequency bands may be detected and used to
selectively associated volume control mechanism 602 with the
electrical stimulation or the acoustic stimulation. In this manner,
volume control mechanism 602 may change the volume where it makes
most sense.
[0048] Returning to FIG. 1, EAS subsystem 104 and volume control
subsystem 116 may alternatively be implemented by separate devices.
To illustrate, FIG. 7 shows an exemplary implementation 700 of EAS
system 100 in which EAS device 302 is configured to implement EAS
subsystem 104 and remote control device 702 is configured to
implement volume control subsystem 116. Remote control device 702
may include any type of computing device selectively and
communicatively coupled to EAS device 302 and may include a volume
control facility 704, which may be similar to volume control
facility 306. For example, volume control facility 704 may include
one or more volume control mechanisms similar to those described
herein that are configured to facilitate independent control of the
volume associated with the electrical stimulation provided by
cochlear implant 110 and the volume associated with the acoustic
stimulation provided by receiver 108.
[0049] Volume control subsystem 116 may be configured to perform
one or more operations in addition to facilitating independent
control of the volume associated with the electrical stimulation
provided by cochlear implant 110 and the volume associated with the
acoustic stimulation provided by receiver 108. Examples of such
operations will now be provided.
[0050] In some examples, volume control subsystem 116 may be
configured to log one or more adjustments to the volume associated
with the electrical stimulation and with the volume associated with
the acoustic stimulation during a specified time period. For
example, volume control subsystem 116 may be configured to store
data representative of the adjustments in a storage device that may
be a part of or otherwise associated with EAS device 302, remote
control device 702, and/or any other device. Based on the logged
one or more adjustments, volume control subsystem 116 may calculate
an average volume level associated with the electrical stimulation
and an average volume level associated with the acoustic
stimulation. Volume control subsystem 116 may then detect a
predetermined event associated with EAS subsystem 104 and
automatically set, in response to the predetermined event, the
electrical stimulation volume to the calculated average electrical
stimulation volume level and the acoustic stimulation volume to the
calculated average acoustic stimulation volume level.
[0051] For example, volume control subsystem 116 may detect a
rebooting of EAS device 302. In response, volume control subsystem
116 may automatically set the electrical stimulation volume to the
calculated average electrical stimulation volume level and the
acoustic stimulation volume to the calculated average acoustic
stimulation volume level. In this manner, the user may only have to
make minimal adjustments to the respective volumes levels in order
to achieve desired volume levels after EAS device 302 reboots.
[0052] Additionally or alternatively, volume control subsystem 116
may be configured to automatically adjust at least one of the
volume associated with the electrical stimulation provided by
cochlear implant 110 and the volume associated with the acoustic
stimulation provided by receiver 108 to result in substantially
consistent timbre perception for broadband input signals of
different amplitudes. This may be performed during a fitting
process, for example, and may result in an optimized listening
experience for the patient.
[0053] In some examples, a patient may be fitted with a bilateral
auditory prosthesis system. For example, the patient may have a
distinct cochlear implant and a distinct receiver for each ear.
Volume control subsystem 116 may be configured to facilitate
independent control of the electrical and acoustic stimulation
volumes for each ear. Alternatively, any adjustments made to a
volume level associated with the electrical or acoustic stimulation
corresponding to one ear may be automatically applied to the
electrical or acoustic stimulation associated with the other ear.
Volume control subsystem 116 may be implemented by one or more
volume control mechanisms on one side or both sides of the
bilateral auditory prosthesis system. To illustrate, an electrical
stimulation volume control mechanism may be located on the left
side while an acoustic stimulation volume control mechanism may be
located on the right side (or vice versa). Alternatively, an
overall volume control mechanism may be located on the left side
while a balance control mechanism may be located on the right side
(or vice versa). Alternatively, all of the volume control
mechanisms may be located on a single side (e.g., the left
side).
[0054] FIG. 8 shows an exemplary bilateral auditory prosthesis
system 800 that may be fitted to a patient. As shown, bilateral
auditory prosthesis system 800 includes a first auditory prosthesis
system 802-1 associated with a first ear of the patient and a
second auditory prosthesis system 802-2 associated with a second
ear of the patient. Each auditory prosthesis system 802-1 and 802-2
may detect an audio signal and provide electrical and/or acoustic
stimulation representative of the audio signal to its respective
ear. As shown, auditory prosthesis systems 802-1 and 802-2 may
communicate one with another by way of a communication link 804
that interconnects auditory prosthesis systems 802-1 and 802-2.
Communication link 804 may include any suitable wired and/or
wireless link as may serve a particular implementation.
[0055] Auditory prosthesis systems 802-1 and 802-2 may each be
implemented by any suitable type of auditory prosthesis system. For
example, auditory prosthesis systems 802-1 and 802-2 may each be
implemented by an EAS system configured to apply both electrical
and acoustic stimulation to an ear of the patient, a cochlear
implant system configured to apply only electrical stimulation to
an ear of the patient, or a hearing aid configured to apply only
acoustic stimulation to the patient. Various bilateral auditory
prosthesis system configurations will now be described in
connection with FIGS. 9-11.
[0056] FIG. 9 illustrates an exemplary configuration 900 in which
first and second auditory prosthesis systems 802-1 and 802-2 are
both implemented by an EAS system. For example, as shown in FIG. 9,
first auditory prosthesis system 802-1 includes a sound processor
902-1 that includes a volume control facility 904-1, a microphone
906-1, a headpiece 908-1, a cochlear implant 910-1, a lead 912-1
having a plurality of electrodes 914-1 disposed thereon, and a
receiver 916-1. Likewise, second auditory prosthesis system 802-2
includes a sound processor 902-2 that includes a volume control
facility 904-2, a microphone 906-2, a headpiece 908-2, a cochlear
implant 910-2, a lead 912-2 having a plurality of electrodes 914-2
disposed thereon, and a receiver 916-2.
[0057] Volume control facilities 904-1 and 904-2 may each be
implemented in any of the ways described herein. For example,
volume control facility 904-1 may be implemented by a rotatable
control dial disposed on a surface of sound processor 902-1 and
volume control facility 904-2 may be implemented by a rotatable
control dial disposed on a surface of sound processor 902-2.
[0058] To facilitate independent volume control, volume control
facility 904-1 may be associated with electrical stimulation and
volume control facility 904-2 may be associated with acoustic
stimulation. Each volume control facility 904-1 and 904-2 may be
selectively associated with its respective type of stimulation in
any of the ways described herein. In this configuration, volume
control facility 904-1 adjusts, in response to actuation of volume
control facility 904-1 by a user (e.g., the patient or a person
other than the patient), a first volume level perceived by the
patient when electrical stimulation is applied by either the first
auditory prosthesis system 802-1 or the second auditory prosthesis
system 802-2. Likewise, volume control facility 904-2 adjusts, in
response to actuation of volume control facility 904-2 by the user,
a second volume level perceived by the patient when acoustic
stimulation is applied by either the first auditory prosthesis
system 802-1 or the second auditory prosthesis system 802-2. In
this manner, the electrical and acoustic stimulation volumes for
both auditory prosthesis systems 802-1 and 802-2 may be
independently controlled without the need for a separate remote
control.
[0059] As shown in FIG. 9, sound processors 902-1 and 902-2 may
communicate with each other by way of communication link 804. For
example, actuation of volume control facility 904-1 may set the
first volume level to a particular value. In response, sound
processor 902-1 may transmit data representative of the particular
value to sound processor 902-2 by way of communication link 804. In
this manner, sound processor 902-2 may adjust the volume level of
electrical stimulation applied by auditory prosthesis system 802-2
based on the actuation of volume control facility 904-1. Likewise,
actuation of volume control facility 904-2 may set the second
volume level to a particular value. In response, sound processor
902-2 may transmit data representative of the particular value to
sound processor 902-1 by way of communication link 804. In this
manner, sound processor 902-1 may adjust the volume level of
acoustic stimulation applied by auditory prosthesis system 802-1
based on the actuation of volume control facility 904-2.
[0060] FIG. 10 illustrates an exemplary configuration 1000 in which
first auditory prosthesis system 802-1 is implemented by a cochlear
implant system and second auditory prosthesis system 802-2 is
implemented by an EAS system. As shown, configuration 1000 is
similar to configuration 900, except that in configuration 1000,
first auditory prosthesis system 802-1 is configured to apply only
electrical stimulation to the first ear of the patient. As
described above, actuation of volume control facility 904-1 shown
in FIG. 10 may adjust the volume level of electrical stimulation
applied by either first auditory prosthesis system 802-1 or second
auditory prosthesis system 802-2. However, actuation of volume
control facility 904-2 shown in FIG. 10 adjusts the volume level of
acoustic stimulation applied by second auditory prosthesis system
802-2 only. This is because first auditory prosthesis system 802-1
is not configured to provide acoustic stimulation in configuration
1000.
[0061] FIG. 11 illustrates an exemplary configuration 1100 in which
first auditory prosthesis system 802-1 is implemented by an EAS
system and second auditory prosthesis system 802-2 is implemented
by a hearing aid. As shown, configuration 1100 is similar to
configuration 900, except that in configuration 1100, second
auditory prosthesis system 802-2 is configured to apply only
acoustic stimulation to the second ear of the patient. As described
above, actuation of volume control facility 904-2 shown in FIG. 11
may adjust the volume level of acoustic stimulation applied by
either first auditory prosthesis system 802-1 or second auditory
prosthesis system 802-2. However, actuation of volume control
facility 904-2 shown in FIG. 11 adjusts the volume level of
electrical stimulation applied by first auditory prosthesis system
802-1 only. This is because second auditory prosthesis system 802-2
is not configured to provide electrical stimulation in
configuration 1100.
[0062] Returning to FIG. 9, in some alternative configurations,
volume control facility 904-1 is configured to adjust, in response
to actuation of volume control facility 904-1, an overall volume
level perceived by the patient when electrical stimulation or
acoustic stimulation is applied by either the first auditory
prosthesis system 802-1 or the second auditory prosthesis system
802-2. In these configurations, volume control facility 904-2 is
configured to adjust, in response to actuation of volume control
facility 904-2, a balance between 1) a first volume level perceived
by the patient when electrical stimulation is applied by either the
first auditory prosthesis system 802-1 or the second auditory
prosthesis system 802-2, and 2) a second volume level perceived by
the patient when acoustic stimulation is applied by either the
first auditory prosthesis system 802-1 or the second auditory
prosthesis system 802-2.
[0063] Adjustment of the overall volume level and the balance may
be facilitated by communication link 918. For example, actuation of
volume control facility 904-1 may set the overall volume level to a
particular value. In response, sound processor 902-1 may transmit
data representative of the particular value to sound processor
902-2 by way of communication link 918. Sound processor 902-2 may
adjust the overall volume level in accordance with transmitted
data.
[0064] Likewise, actuation of volume control facility 904-2 may set
the balance to a particular value. In response, sound processor
902-2 may transmit data representative of the particular value to
sound processor 902-1 by way of communication link 918. Sound
processor 902-1 may adjust the balance in accordance with
transmitted data.
[0065] FIG. 12 illustrates an exemplary method 1200 of facilitating
independent volume control in an EAS system. While FIG. 12
illustrates exemplary steps according to one embodiment, other
embodiments may omit, add to, reorder, and/or modify any of the
steps shown in FIG. 12. One or more of the steps shown in FIG. 12
may be performed by any component or combination of components of
EAS subsystem 104, volume control subsystem 116, EAS device 116,
and/or remote control device 702.
[0066] In step 1202, electrical stimulation representative of audio
content included in a first frequency band is applied to a patient.
Step 1202 may be performed in any of the ways described herein.
[0067] In step 1204, acoustic stimulation representative of audio
content included in second frequency band is applied to the
patient. Step 1204 may be performed in any of the ways described
herein.
[0068] In step 1206, independent control of a volume parameter
associated with the electrical stimulation and a volume parameter
associated with the acoustic stimulation is facilitated. Step 1206
may be performed in any of the ways described herein.
[0069] In certain embodiments, one or more of the processes
described herein may be implemented at least in part as
instructions executable by one or more computing devices. In
general, a processor (e.g., a microprocessor) receives
instructions, from a tangible computer-readable medium, (e.g., a
memory, etc.), and executes those instructions, thereby performing
one or more processes, including one or more of the processes
described herein. Such instructions may be stored and/or
transmitted using any of a variety of known non-transitory
computer-readable media.
[0070] A non-transitory computer-readable medium (also referred to
as a processor-readable medium) includes any non-transitory medium
that participates in providing data (e.g., instructions) that may
be read by a computer (e.g., by a processor of a computer). Such a
non-transitory medium may take many forms, including, but not
limited to, non-volatile media and/or volatile media. Non-volatile
media may include, for example, optical or magnetic disks and other
persistent memory. Volatile media may include, for example, dynamic
random access memory ("DRAM"), which typically constitutes a main
memory. Common forms of non-transitory computer-readable media
include, for example, a floppy disk, flexible disk, hard disk,
magnetic tape, any other magnetic medium, a CD-ROM, DVD, any other
optical medium, a RAM, a PROM, an EPROM, a FLASH-EEPROM, any other
memory chip or cartridge, or any other non-transitory medium from
which a computer can read.
[0071] In the preceding description, various exemplary embodiments
have been described with reference to the accompanying drawings. It
will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes
may be made thereto, and additional embodiments may be implemented,
without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in
the claims that follow. For example, certain features of one
embodiment described herein may be combined with or substituted for
features of another embodiment described herein. The description
and drawings are accordingly to be regarded in an illustrative
rather than a restrictive sense.
* * * * *