U.S. patent application number 14/598312 was filed with the patent office on 2015-07-23 for methods and systems for analysis.
The applicant listed for this patent is Board of Trustees of The University of Alabama. Invention is credited to Caleb M. Hill, Shanlin Pan.
Application Number | 20150204810 14/598312 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 53544545 |
Filed Date | 2015-07-23 |
United States Patent
Application |
20150204810 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Pan; Shanlin ; et
al. |
July 23, 2015 |
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ANALYSIS
Abstract
Provided herein are systems and methods for the detection,
quantification, and/or monitoring of analytes in samples. The
systems and methods can be used, for example, to track the
deposition and electrochemical behavior of individual nanoparticles
and nanoparticles clusters clusters in situ with high spatial and
temporal resolution. The systems and methods can be used to track
the deposition and oxidation of several hundreds to thousands of
nanoparticles simultaneously and reconstruct their voltammetric
curves at the single nanoparticle level.
Inventors: |
Pan; Shanlin; (Tuscaloosa,
AL) ; Hill; Caleb M.; (Northport, AL) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
Board of Trustees of The University of Alabama |
Tuscaloosa |
AL |
US |
|
|
Family ID: |
53544545 |
Appl. No.: |
14/598312 |
Filed: |
January 16, 2015 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
61928455 |
Jan 17, 2014 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
205/775 ;
204/407 |
Current CPC
Class: |
G01N 21/648 20130101;
G01N 21/51 20130101; G01N 21/6408 20130101; G01N 21/69 20130101;
G01N 21/6458 20130101; G01N 21/76 20130101; G01N 27/42
20130101 |
International
Class: |
G01N 27/26 20060101
G01N027/26 |
Goverment Interests
STATEMENT OF GOVERNMENT SUPPORT
[0002] This invention was made with government support under Grant
No. DE-SC0005392 awarded by the Department of Energy. The
government has certain rights in this invention.
Claims
1. A system, comprising: a) an electrochemical cell comprising i) a
working electrode in electrochemical contact with a liquid sample
comprising an analyte; ii) a sample containment vessel comprising a
top end, a bottom end, an exterior surface, and an interior void
defined by an interior surface; wherein the bottom end forms a
liquid tight seal with the working electrode; wherein the liquid
sample is contained in the volume defined by the interior void of
the sample containment vessel and the working electrode; iii) one
or more additional electrodes in electrochemical contact with the
liquid sample; and iv) a power supply electrically coupled to the
working electrode and the one or more additional electrodes; b) a
light source configured to illuminate the liquid sample; and c) an
instrument configured to capture an optical signal from the liquid
sample.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the sample containment vessel
further comprises a channel that punctuates the interior surface
and leads through the sample containment vessel to the top end or
exterior surface of the sample containment vessel, wherein the one
or more additional electrodes can be inserted through the channel
such that the one or more additional electrodes are in
electrochemical contact with the liquid sample; and wherein the one
or more additional electrodes form a liquid tight seal with the
channel.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein the sample containment vessel
further comprises a supporting member comprising a top end, a
bottom end, an exterior surface, and an interior void defined by an
interior surface, wherein the top end forms a liquid tight seal
with the working electrode.
4. The system of claim 1, further comprising a first lens.
5. The system of claim 4, wherein the system is configured such
that the light source and the instrument are below the first lens,
and the electrochemical cell is above the first lens.
6. The system of claim 5, where in the first lens is a microscope
objective.
7. The system of claim 4, further comprising a second lens.
8. The system of claim 7, wherein the system is aligned such that:
the first lens is above the instrument; the electrochemical cell is
above the first lens; the second lens is above the electrochemical
cell; and the light source is above the second lens.
9. The system of claim 8, wherein the first lens is a dark field
microscope objective and the second lens is a dark field microscope
condenser.
10. The system of claim 1, further comprising a computing device
comprising a processor and a memory operably coupled to the
processor, the memory having further computer-executable
instructions stored thereon that, when executed by the processor,
cause the processor to: receive an electrochemical signal from the
power supply; receive an optical signal from the instrument;
process the electrochemical signal to obtain an electrochemical
parameter; process the optical signal to obtain an optical
parameter; optionally correlate the electrochemical parameter to
the optical parameter to obtain an optoelectrochemical parameter;
and output the electrochemical parameter, the optical parameter,
the optoelectrochemical parameter, or combinations thereof.
11. The system of claim 1, wherein the working electrode is
substantially optically transparent.
12. The system of claim 1, wherein the working electrode comprises
an indium tin oxide (ITO) coated coverslip.
13. A method, comprising: a) providing an electrochemical cell
comprising i) a working electrode in electrochemical contact with a
liquid sample comprising an analyte; ii) a sample containment
vessel comprising a top end, a bottom end, an exterior surface, and
an interior void defined by an interior surface; wherein the bottom
end forms a liquid tight seal with the working electrode; wherein
the liquid sample is contained in the volume defined by the
interior void of the sample containment vessel and the working
electrode; iii) one or more additional electrodes in
electrochemical contact with the liquid sample; and iv) a power
supply electrically coupled to the working electrode and the one or
more additional electrodes; b) capturing an electrochemical signal
from the liquid sample; c) capturing an optical signal from the
liquid sample; d) processing the electrochemical signal to obtain
an electrochemical parameter; e) processing the optical signal to
obtain an optical parameter; f) optionally, correlating the optical
parameter to the electrochemical parameter to obtain an
optoelectrochemical parameter.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein the sample containment device
further comprises a supporting member comprising a top end, a
bottom end, an exterior surface, and an interior void defined by an
interior surface, wherein the top end forms a liquid tight seal
with the working electrode.
15. The method of claim 13, wherein the optical signal comprises
dark field scattering, electrogenerated chemiluminescence,
fluorescence or a combination thereof.
16. The method of claim 13, wherein the optical parameter comprises
nanoparticle size.
17. The method of claim 13, wherein the optoelectrochemical
parameter comprises the potential at which individual
nanoparticles, clusters of nanoparticles, or a combination thereof,
of a specific size are formed.
18. A sample containment vessel, comprising a top end, a bottom
end, an exterior surface, and an interior void defined by an
interior surface wherein the sample containment vessel is
configured to receive a working electrode; wherein the bottom end
forms a liquid tight seal with the working electrode; wherein the
volume defined by the interior void of the sample containment
vessel and the working electrode is configured to contain a liquid
sample; and wherein the working electrode can be in electrochemical
contact with the liquid sample.
19. The sample containment vessel of claim 18, further comprising a
channel that punctuates the interior surface of the sample
containment vessel and leads through the sample containment vessel
to the top end or exterior surface of the sample containment
vessel, wherein the channel is configured to receive one or more
additional electrodes such that the one or more additional
electrodes are in electrochemical contact with the liquid sample;
and wherein the one or more additional electrodes form a liquid
tight seal with the channel.
20. The sample containment vessel of claim 18, further comprising a
supporting member comprising a top end, a bottom end, an exterior
surface, and an interior void defined by an interior surface,
wherein the top end forms a liquid tight seal with the working
electrode.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
[0001] This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional
Application No. 61/928,455, filed Jan. 17, 2014, which is hereby
incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
BACKGROUND
[0003] Metallic nanostructures have been thoroughly studied over
the past several decades due to their unrivaled ability to catalyze
redox reactions that are relevant to alternative energy storage and
conversion systems. Some metallic nanoparticles, such as silver and
gold nanoparticles, also have interesting optical properties (e.g.,
surface plasmon resonance (SPR)) in the visible region of the
electromagnetic spectrum. These properties have been most notably
exploited to enhance detection for a litany of optical
spectroscopies (Raman, scattering, fluorescence, sum frequency
generation, etc.) and to improve the efficiency of photovoltaic
devices. Given the importance of such structures, method for
characterizing them, especially in situ methods, are valuable for
studying structure-property relationships. Even better are methods
capable of resolving individual structures, dispelling the
broadening of peaks inherent in ensemble measurements. The methods
and compositions disclosed herein address these and other
needs.
SUMMARY
[0004] Disclosed herein are systems and method for the detection,
quantification, and/or monitoring of analytes, including
nanoparticles, in samples. The disclosed systems and methods can be
used, for example, to track the deposition and electrochemical
behavior of individual nanoparticles and nanoparticle clusters in
situ with high spatial and temporal resolution. The disclosed
systems and methods can even be used to track the deposition and
oxidation of several hundreds to thousands of nanoparticles
simultaneously and reconstruct their voltammetric curves at the
single nanoparticle level, feats not possible through existing
electrochemical techniques.
[0005] Also, disclosed herein are systems that comprise an
electrochemical cell, a light source configured to illuminate the
electrochemical cell, and an instrument configured to capture an
optical signal from the electrochemical cell. The disclosed
electrochemical cell can comprise a working electrode in
electrochemical contact with a liquid sample comprising an analyte,
one or more additional electrodes in electrochemical contact with
the liquid sample, a sample containment vessel, and a power supply.
The sample containment vessel can comprise a top end, a bottom end,
an exterior surface, and an interior void defined by an interior
surface. The sample containment vessel can be configured such that
the bottom end forms a liquid tight seal with the working
electrode, and the liquid sample is contained in the volume defined
by the interior void of the sample containment vessel and the
working electrode.
[0006] Optionally, the sample containment vessel can further
comprise a channel that punctuates the interior surface and leads
through the sample containment vessel to the exterior surface or
top end of the sample containment vessel. The one or more
additional electrodes can be inserted through the channel such that
the one or more additional electrodes are in electrochemical
contact with the liquid sample and the one or more additional
electrodes form a liquid tight seal with the channel.
[0007] In some examples, the sample containment vessel further
comprises a supporting member comprising a top end, a bottom end,
an exterior surface, and an interior void defined by an interior
surface. The supporting member can be configured such that the top
end forms a liquid tight seal with the working electrode, such that
the working electrode is sandwiched within the sample containment
vessel.
[0008] In some examples, the system can further comprise a first
lens. In some examples, the first lens can be configured such that
the light source and instrument are below the first lens and the
electrochemical cell is above the first lens. In some examples, the
system can further comprise a second lens. In some examples, the
system further comprising the first lens and the second lens can be
aligned such that the first lens is above the instrument; the
electrochemical cell is above the first lens; the second lens is
above the electrochemical cell; and the light source is above the
second lens.
[0009] In certain examples, the system can further comprise a
computing device configured to receive an electrochemical signal
from the power supply; receive an optical signal from the
instrument; process the electrochemical signal to obtain an
electrochemical parameter; process the optical signal to obtain an
optical parameter; optionally correlate the electrochemical
parameter to the optical parameter to obtain an optoelectrochemical
parameter; and output the electrochemical parameter, the optical
parameter, the optoelectrochemical parameter, or combinations
thereof.
[0010] Methods for the detection, quantification, and/or monitoring
of analytes, including nanoparticles, in liquid samples are also
disclosed herein. The methods can involve the use of optical signal
and/or electrochemical signal analysis to detect, quantify and/or
monitor analytes, including nanoparticles, in a liquid sample. The
methods can be performed using the systems described herein.
Methods for the detection, quantification, and/or monitoring of
analytes can comprise providing an electrochemical cell comprising
a working electrode in electrochemical contact with a liquid sample
comprising an analyte, a sample containment vessel, one or more
additional electrodes in electrochemical contact with the liquid
sample and a power supply electrically coupled to the working
electrode and the one or more additional electrodes. The sample
containment vessel can comprise a top end, a bottom end, an
exterior surface and an interior void defined by an interior
surface, wherein the bottom end forms a liquid tight seal with the
working electrode and the liquid sample is contained in the volume
defined by the interior void of the sample containment vessel and
the working electrode. The disclosed methods can further comprise
capturing an electrochemical signal from the power supply,
capturing an optical signal from the electrochemical cell,
processing the electrochemical signal to obtain an electrochemical
parameter, processing the optical signal to obtain an optical
parameter, and optionally correlating the optical parameter to the
electrochemical parameter to obtain an optoelectrochemical
parameter.
[0011] Also disclosed herein are sample containment vessels. The
sample containment vessel can comprise a top end, a bottom end, an
exterior surface and an interior void defined by an interior
surface. In some examples, the sample containment vessel is
configured to receive a working electrode such that the bottom end
forms a liquid tight seal with the working electrode. In some
examples, the volume defined by the interior void of the sample
containment vessel and the working electrode is configured to
contain a liquid sample, and the working electrode can be in
electrochemical contact with the liquid sample. In some examples,
the sample containment vessel further comprises a channel that
punctuates the interior surface of the sample containment vessel
and leads through the sample containment vessel to the top end or
exterior surface of the sample containment vessel. In some
examples, the channel is configured to receive one or more
additional electrodes such that the one or more additional
electrodes are in electrochemical contact with the liquid sample
and the one or more additional electrodes form a liquid tight seal
with the channel.
[0012] In some examples, the sample containment vessel can further
comprise a channel that punctuates the interior surface and leads
through the sample containment vessel to the exterior surface or
the top end of the sample containment vessel. The one or more
additional electrodes can be inserted through the channel such that
the one or more additional electrodes are in electrochemical
contact with the liquid sample and the one or more additional
electrodes form a liquid tight seal with the channel. In some
examples, the sample containment vessel comprises multiple channels
through which multiple electrodes or other probes can be
inserted.
[0013] In some examples, the sample containment vessel further
comprises a supporting member comprising a top end, a bottom end,
an exterior surface, and an interior void defined by an interior
surface. The supporting member can be configured such that the top
end forms a liquid tight seal with the working electrode, such that
the working electrode is sandwiched within the sample containment
vessel.
[0014] Additional advantages will be set forth in part in the
description that follows, and in part will be obvious from the
description, or may be learned by practice of the aspects described
below. The advantages described below will be realized and attained
by means of the elements and combinations particularly pointed out
in the appended claims. It is to be understood that both the
foregoing general description and the following detailed
description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not
restrictive.
DESCRIPTION OF FIGURES
[0015] FIG. 1 is a schematic of an exemplary system as disclosed
herein for the detection, quantification and/or monitoring of
samples.
[0016] FIG. 2 is a schematic of an exemplary computing device.
[0017] FIG. 3 is a schematic of an exemplary system as disclosed
herein for the detection, quantification and/or monitoring of
samples with a channel punctuating an interior surface and exterior
surface of a sample containment vessel.
[0018] FIG. 4 is a schematic of an exemplary system as disclosed
herein for the detection, quantification and/or monitoring of
samples with a channel punctuating an interior surface and a top
end of a sample containment vessel.
[0019] FIG. 5 displays (A) a bottom view and (B) a side view of an
example sample containment vessel for an electrochemical cell as
disclosed herein.
[0020] FIG. 6 displays (A) a bottom view and (B) a side view of an
exemplary supporting member for an electrochemical cell as
disclosed herein.
[0021] FIG. 7 is a schematic of an exemplary system as disclosed
herein that includes a light source and a camera below an
electrochemical cell with a lens between the electrochemical cell
and the instrument.
[0022] FIG. 8 is a schematic of an exemplary system as disclosed
herein that includes a light source above an electrochemical cell,
with a lens between the light source and the electrochemical cell,
and a camera below the electrochemical cell with another lens
between the electrochemical cell and the camera to focus and
magnify an optical signal from a sample.
[0023] FIG. 9 is a schematic of an exemplary system as disclosed
herein that combines the systems shown in FIG. 7 and FIG. 8.
[0024] FIG. 10 is a photograph of a working set up of the system
described in FIG. 7.
[0025] FIG. 11 is a graph showing a theoretical scattering
cross-section as a function of particle size.
[0026] FIG. 12 is a graphical depiction of a turn-on potential
calculation.
[0027] FIG. 13 is a schematic of the experimental setup for the
dark field scattering spectroelectrochemistry experiments.
[0028] FIG. 14 is a graph showing the total measured scattering
intensity and bulk current density during a potential sweep. The
insets are scattering images (.about.40 .mu.m.times.40 .mu.m) at
the indicated points along the sweep.
[0029] FIG. 15 shows linear sweep voltammograms and total substrate
scattering intensities for different potential sweep rates.
[0030] FIG. 16 shows example individual particle scattering
transients (A), histograms of the final light scattering intensity
("A.sub.sig", inset of A), and "turn-on" potential obtained from
the data fitting (B).
[0031] FIG. 17 is a plot of final particle radius (determined from
A.sub.sig values) as a function of E.sub.on. The circles indicate
binned (10 mV) averages and the squares represent single particles.
Error bars are two standard deviations.
[0032] FIG. 18 contains a low magnification SEM image of deposited
Ag particles (A), high magnification SEM image of the indicated
particle (B), histogram of particle sizes obtained through SEM
analysis (C), and results of single particle scattering-size
correlations (D). The overlay in (A) is generated from the
corresponding dark field scattering image (FIG. 19).
[0033] FIG. 19 is a dark field scattering image of the deposited Ag
particles depicted in FIG. 18.
[0034] FIG. 20 shows an example reconstructed voltammetric curves
for single particles (A), histogram of peak potentials (inset of
A), and a comparison of measured and calculated bulk current
densities obtained through the scattering calculations for all 753
particles (B).
[0035] FIG. 21 shows the bulk current density and total scattering
intensity at the ITO surface during potential cycling.
[0036] FIG. 22 shows the scattering transients for individual
particles deposited and subsequently oxidized during potential
cycling.
[0037] FIG. 23 is a flowchart depicting program flow.
[0038] FIG. 24 contains fluorescence images displaying the effects
of background removal.
[0039] FIG. 25 contains electrogenerated chemiluminescence (ECL)
images of single Au nanoparticles.
[0040] FIG. 26 displays (A) individual luminescent, plasmonic
silver nanoparticles that were investigated using fluorescence
spectroelectrochemistry (B).
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0041] The systems, methods, articles, and devices described herein
may be understood more readily by reference to the following
detailed description of specific aspects of the disclosed subject
matter, figures and the examples included therein.
[0042] Before the present systems, methods, articles, and devices
are disclosed and described, it is to be understood that the
aspects described below are not intended to be limited in scope by
the specific systems, methods, articles, and devices described
herein, which are intended as illustrations. Various modifications
of the systems, methods, articles, and devices in addition to those
shown and described herein are intended to fall within the scope of
that described herein. Further, while only certain representative
systems and method steps disclosed herein are specifically
described, other combinations of the systems and method steps also
are intended to fall within the scope of that described herein,
even if not specifically recited. Thus, a combination of steps,
elements, components, or constituents may be explicitly mentioned
herein or less, however, other combinations of steps, elements,
components, and constituents are included, even though not
explicitly stated.
[0043] The term "comprising" and variations thereof as used herein
is used synonymously with the term "including" and variations
thereof and are open, non-limiting terms. Although the terms
"comprising" and "including" have been used herein to describe
various examples, the terms "consisting essentially of" and
"consisting of" can be used in place of "comprising" and
"including" to provide for more specific examples of the invention
and are also disclosed. Other than in the examples, or where
otherwise noted, all numbers expressing quantities of ingredients,
reaction conditions, and so forth used in the specification and
claims are to be understood at the very least, and not as an
attempt to limit the application of the doctrine of equivalents to
the scope of the claims, to be construed in light of the number of
significant digits and ordinary rounding approaches.
[0044] As used in the description and the appended claims, the
singular forms "a," "an," and "the" include plural referents unless
the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example,
reference to "a composition" includes mixtures of two or more such
compositions, reference to "an agent" includes mixtures of two or
more such agents, reference to "the component" includes mixtures of
two or more such components, and the like.
[0045] "Optional" or "optionally" means that the subsequently
described event or circumstance can or cannot occur, and that the
description includes instances where the event or circumstance
occurs and instances where it does not.
[0046] It is understood that throughout this specification the
identifiers "first" and "second" are used solely to aid in
distinguishing the various components and steps of the disclosed
subject matter. The identifiers "first" and "second" are not
intended to imply any particular order, amount, preference, or
importance to the components or steps modified by these terms.
[0047] Also, throughout this specification, various publications
are referenced. The disclosures of these publications in their
entireties are hereby incorporated by reference into this
application in order to more fully describe the state of the art to
which the disclosed matter pertains. The references disclosed are
also individually and specifically incorporated by reference herein
for the material contained in them that is discussed in the
sentence in which the reference is relied upon.
[0048] Reference will now be made in detail to specific aspects of
the disclosed materials, compounds, compositions, articles, and
methods, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying
examples and figures.
[0049] For any quantitative analytical technique, a single analyte
or single chemical reaction event represents the ultimate
attainable limit of detection. This may come in the form of an
atom, a molecule, a nanoparticle (NP), a defect site on a crystal
surface, or a single molecule undergoing a redox reaction at a bulk
electrode. There are inherent advantages to measurements at this
limit, a primary one being the ability to thoroughly characterize
heterogeneities in structure or reactivity that would only manifest
in ensemble measurements as the broadening of peaks. In the
electrodeposition of NPs, for example, traditional electrochemical
measurements can be used to calculate the total quantity of
material deposited through Faraday's law. If the number and shape
of particles are known, an average size can be obtained. However,
information on the resulting size distribution cannot be directly
obtained through such measurements.
[0050] Methods capable of resolving electrochemical reactions
occurring at individual nanostructures are critical to accurately
determining their structure-function relationships. The direct
electrochemical detection of single NPs has been demonstrated via a
current amplification scheme as they collide at a microelectrode.
More recently, heterogeneities in the catalytic activity of single
metal NPs and the charge transfer performance of individual
conjugated polymer molecules/NPs have been studied using
fluorescence-based single molecule spectroelectrochemical (SMSEC)
methods. Tao et al. have developed a surface plasmon resonance
(SPR)-based imaging technique capable of measuring local
electrochemical currents down to the single nanoparticle level by
exploiting the sensitivity of SPR to the local dielectric
environment. However, disclosed herein is a method that uses dark
field scattering (DFS) spectroelectrochemistry to analyze the
electrochemical formation of individual nanoparticles (NPs) at the
surface of an electrode. Heterogeneities in redox potentials among
NPs not visible in the bulk electrochemical measurements are also
disclosed. Through correlated electron microscopy, single
nanoparticle light scattering intensity can be correlated to
particle size according to Mie theory, permitting the rapid
particle size determination and the construction of voltammetric
curves of individual nanoparticles.
[0051] In the disclosed methods, the change in signal is dominated
by the modification of the metal nanostructure geometry rather than
changes in dielectric environment, which is the case in SPR.
Neither the reported SPR imaging techniques nor the other
aforementioned SMS-EC methods have been employed to directly
observe the synthesis of individual NPs.
[0052] Provided herein are systems and method for the detection,
quantification, and/or monitoring of analytes, including
nanoparticles, in samples. The disclosed systems and methods
utilize a spectroelectrochemical method employing dark field
scattering microscopy and can be used, for example, to track the
deposition of individual nanoparticles and nanoparticles clusters
in situ with high spatial (.about.350 nm) and temporal (ms)
resolution. The systems and methods can be used to track the
deposition of several hundreds to thousands of NPs simultaneously
and reconstruct their voltammetric curves at the single
nanoparticle level, feats not possible through existing
electrochemical techniques.
[0053] Referring now to FIG. 1, example system (100) can comprise
an electrochemical cell (110), a light source (140) configured to
illuminate the electrochemical cell and liquid sample comprising an
analyte (114) contained therein, and an instrument (150) configured
to capture an optical signal from the liquid sample in the
electrochemical cell. The electrochemical cell (110) comprises, a
working electrode (112) in electrochemical contact with a liquid
sample (114), an additional electrode (130) in electrochemical
contact with the liquid sample (114) (though more can be present,
only one is shown for clarity), a sample containment vessel (116),
and a power supply (180). The sample containment vessel (116)
comprises a top end (118), a bottom end (120), an exterior surface
(122), and an interior void (124) defined by an interior surface
(126). The sample containment vessel (116) can be configured such
that the bottom end (120) forms a liquid tight seal with the
working electrode (112), and the liquid sample (114) is contained
in the volume defined by the interior surface (126) of the sample
containment vessel (116) and the working electrode (112).
[0054] The system (100) can further comprise a computing device
(160) configured to receive and process the optical signals from
the instrument (150), as well as receive and process signals from
the electrochemical cell (110), as discussed in more detail
below.
[0055] Optionally, the sample containment vessel can further
comprise a channel. Referring now to FIG. 3, the sample containment
vessel (116) can further comprise a channel (128) that punctuates
the interior surface (126) and leads through the sample containment
vessel (116) to the exterior surface (122) of the sample
containment vessel (116). The one or more additional electrodes
(130) can be inserted through the channel (128) such that the one
or more additional electrodes (130) are in electrochemical contact
with the liquid sample (114) and the one or more additional
electrodes (130) form a liquid tight seal with the channel
(128).
[0056] Referring now to FIG. 4, the sample containment vessel (116)
can further comprise a channel (128) that punctuates the interior
surface (126) and leads through the sample containment vessel (116)
to the top end (118) of the sample containment vessel (116), as
shown in and, respectively. The one or more additional electrodes
(130) can be inserted through the channel (128) such that the one
or more additional electrodes (130) are in electrochemical contact
with the liquid sample (114) and, optionally in this configuration,
the one or more additional electrodes (130) form a liquid tight
seal with the channel (128).
[0057] In some examples, the sample containment vessel comprises
multiple channels through which multiple electrodes or other probes
can be inserted.
[0058] In some examples, the sample containment vessel further
comprises a supporting member comprising a top end, a bottom end,
an exterior surface, and an interior void defined by an interior
surface. The supporting member can be configured such that the top
end forms a liquid tight seal with the working electrode, such that
the working electrode is sandwiched within the sample containment
vessel.
[0059] The sample containment vessel, as well as the components
thereof, can be fabricated form any suitable material or
combination of materials compatible with the methods described
herein. Examples of suitable materials include polymers, silicones,
glasses, ceramics, inorganic materials and combinations thereof. In
some examples, the interior surface of the sample containment
vessel is substantially non-conducting. In some examples, the
sample containment vessel comprises a cylindrical piece of a
nonconducting material, as shown in FIG. 5. In some examples, the
supporting member comprises a cylindrical piece of a nonconducting
material, as shown in FIG. 6. In some examples, the nonconducting
material is Teflon.
[0060] The working electrode and one or more additional electrodes
can be fabricated from any suitable material or combination of
materials compatible with the methods described herein. In some
examples, the working electrode is substantially optically
transparent. In some examples, the working electrode comprises an
indium tin oxide (ITO) coated microscope coverslip.
[0061] The power supply (180) can comprise any additional features
suitable for an electrochemical cell. Examples of additional
features include, but are not limited to, a voltmeter, an ammeter,
a multimeter, an ohmmeter, a signal generator, a pulse generator,
an oscilloscope, a frequency counter, a potentiostat, or a
capacitance meter. In some examples the power supply (180) is
configured to apply a potential to the liquid sample (114).
[0062] In some examples, the system further comprises a first lens.
In some examples, the system further comprises a second lens. The
lenses may independently be any type of lens, such as a simple
lens, a compound lens, a spherical lens, a toric lens, a biconvex
lens, a plano-convex lens, a plano-concave lens, a negative
meniscus lens, a positive meniscus lens, a biconcave lens, a
converging lens, a diverging lens, a cylindrical lens, a Fresnel
lens, a lenticular lens, or a gradient index lens.
[0063] In some examples, the system further comprising a first lens
can be configured as shown schematically in FIG. 7. Referring now
to FIG. 7, the system (100) is configured such that the light
source (140) and instrument (150) are below the first lens (195)
and the electrochemical cell (110) is above the first lens (195).
In some examples, the first lens is a microscope objective.
[0064] In some examples, the system further comprising a first lens
and a second lens can be configured as shown schematically in FIG.
8. Referring now to FIG. 8, the system (100) is aligned such that
the first lens (195) is above the instrument (150); the
electrochemical cell (110) is above the first lens (195); the
second lens (190) is above the electrochemical cell (110); and the
light source (140) is above the second lens (190). In some
examples, the first lens is a dark field microscope objective and
the second lens is a dark field microscope condenser.
[0065] The system can further comprise any other suitable optical
components. Examples of additional optical components include, but
are not limited to, mirrors, beam splitters, filters, lenses,
optical fibers, beam expanders, or collimators.
[0066] The working electrode can comprise any suitable material. In
some examples, the working electrode is substantially optically
transparent. In some examples, the working electrode comprises an
indium tin oxide (ITO) coated coverslip.
[0067] The system (100) can further comprise a first computing
device (160) configured to receive and process electrochemical
signals from the electrochemical cell, as well as receive and
process optical signals from the instrument (150).
[0068] FIG. 2 illustrates an example computing device upon which
examples disclosed herein may be implemented. The computing device
(160) can include a bus or other communication mechanism for
communicating information among various components of the computing
device (160). In its most basic configuration, computing device
(160) typically includes at least one processing unit (212) (a
processor) and system memory (214). Depending on the exact
configuration and type of computing device, system memory (214) may
be volatile (such as random access memory (RAM)), non-volatile
(such as read-only memory (ROM), flash memory, etc.), or some
combination of the two. This most basic configuration is
illustrated in FIG. 2 by a dashed line (210). The processing unit
(212) may be a standard programmable processor that performs
arithmetic and logic operations necessary for operation of the
computing device (160).
[0069] The computing device (160) can have additional
features/functionality. For example, computing device (160) may
include additional storage such as removable storage (216) and
non-removable storage (218) including, but not limited to, magnetic
or optical disks or tapes. The computing device (160) can also
contain network connection(s) (224) that allow the device to
communicate with other devices. The computing device (160) can also
have input device(s) (222) such as a keyboard, mouse, touch screen,
antenna or other systems configured to communicate with the camera
in the system described above, etc. Output device(s) (220) such as
a display, speakers, printer, etc. may also be included. The
additional devices can be connected to the bus in order to
facilitate communication of data among the components of the
computing device (160).
[0070] The processing unit (212) can be configured to execute
program code encoded in tangible, computer-readable media.
Computer-readable media refers to any media that is capable of
providing data that causes the computing device (160) (i.e., a
machine) to operate in a particular fashion. Various
computer-readable media can be utilized to provide instructions to
the processing unit (212) for execution. Common forms of
computer-readable media include, for example, magnetic media,
optical media, physical media, memory chips or cartridges, a
carrier wave, or any other medium from which a computer can read.
Example computer-readable media can include, but is not limited to,
volatile media, non-volatile media and transmission media. Volatile
and non-volatile media can be implemented in any method or
technology for storage of information such as computer readable
instructions, data structures, program modules or other data and
common forms are discussed in detail below. Transmission media can
include coaxial cables, copper wires and/or fiber optic cables, as
well as acoustic or light waves, such as those generated during
radio-wave and infra-red data communication. Example tangible,
computer-readable recording media include, but are not limited to,
an integrated circuit (e.g., field-programmable gate array or
application-specific IC), a hard disk, an optical disk, a
magneto-optical disk, a floppy disk, a magnetic tape, a holographic
storage medium, a solid-state device, RAM, ROM, electrically
erasable program read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other
memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other
optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk
storage or other magnetic storage devices.
[0071] In an example implementation, the processing unit (212) can
execute program code stored in the system memory (214). For
example, the bus can carry data to the system memory (214), from
which the processing unit (212) receives and executes instructions.
The data received by the system memory (214) can optionally be
stored on the removable storage (216) or the non-removable storage
(218) before or after execution by the processing unit (212).
[0072] The computing device (160) typically includes a variety of
computer-readable media. Computer-readable media can be any
available media that can be accessed by device (160) and includes
both volatile and non-volatile media, removable and non-removable
media. Computer storage media include volatile and non-volatile,
and removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or
technology for storage of information such as computer readable
instructions, data structures, program modules or other data.
System memory (214), removable storage (216), and non-removable
storage (218) are all examples of computer storage media. Computer
storage media include, but are not limited to, RAM, ROM,
electrically erasable program read-only memory (EEPROM), flash
memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks
(DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape,
magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any
other medium which can be used to store the desired information and
which can be accessed by computing device (160). Any such computer
storage media can be part of computing device (160).
[0073] It should be understood that the various techniques
described herein can be implemented in connection with hardware or
software or, where appropriate, with a combination thereof. Thus,
the methods, systems, and associated signal processing of the
presently disclosed subject matter, or certain aspects or portions
thereof, can take the form of program code (i.e., instructions)
embodied in tangible media, such as floppy diskettes, CD-ROMs, hard
drives, or any other machine-readable storage medium wherein, when
the program code is loaded into and executed by a machine, such as
a computing device, the machine becomes an apparatus for practicing
the presently disclosed subject matter. In the case of program code
execution on programmable computers, the computing device generally
includes a processor, a storage medium readable by the processor
(including volatile and non-volatile memory and/or storage
elements), at least one input device, and at least one output
device. One or more programs can implement or utilize the processes
described in connection with the presently disclosed subject
matter, e.g., through the use of an application programming
interface (API), reusable controls, or the like. Such programs can
be implemented in a high level procedural or object-oriented
programming language to communicate with a computer system.
However, the program(s) can be implemented in assembly or machine
language, if desired. In any case, the language can be a compiled
or interpreted language and it may be combined with hardware
implementations.
[0074] In certain examples, system memory (214) comprises
computer-executable instructions stored thereon that, when executed
by the processor (212), provide for analysis of signals captured by
the instrument (150) and the power supply (180) to obtain
information about the liquid sample and/or one or more analytes
present in the liquid sample (i.e., one or more sample
characteristics, as discussed in more detail below). To implement
analysis of this type, system memory (214) can comprise
computer-executable instructions stored thereon that, when executed
by the processor (212), cause the processor to: receive an
electrochemical signal from the power supply; receive an optical
signal from the instrument; process the electrochemical signal to
obtain an electrochemical parameter; process the optical signal to
obtain an optical parameter; optionally correlate the
electrochemical parameter to the optical parameter to obtain an
optoelectrochemical parameter; and output the electrochemical
parameter, the optical parameter, the optoelectrochemical
parameter, or combinations thereof.
[0075] The electrochemical parameter can be, for example, how the
electrochemical signal progresses over time. For example, if the
electrochemical signal comprises voltage or current, the
electrochemical parameter can be voltage over time or current over
time. Similarly, the optical parameter can be, for example, how the
optical signal progresses overtime. The optical signal can be, for
example, intensity, brightness, scattering, fluorescence,
frequency/wavelength, or electrogenerated chemiluminescence. Then,
the optical parameter can be, for example, intensity over time,
brightness over time, scattering over time, fluorescence over time,
frequency/wavelength, or electrogenerated chemiluminescence over
time. The optoelectrochemical parameter is a correlation between
the optical parameter and the electrochemical parameter. For
example, the optoelectrochemical parameter instead of being of a
signal progresses over time, can be an expression of how one signal
or parameter progresses with relation to the other. For example,
how the optical signal or optical parameter progresses in terms of
the electrochemical signal or parameter, or vice-versa. For
example, the optoelectrochemical parameter can be scattering over
voltage, scattering over current, fluorescence over voltage, or
fluorescence over current.
[0076] The analysis of signals captured by the instrument and power
supply can be carried out in whole or in part on one or more
computing device. For example, the system may comprise one or more
additional computing device.
[0077] In certain examples, the instrument comprises a camera. In
certain examples, the optical signal comprises an image.
[0078] In certain examples, system memory (214) comprises
computer-executable instructions stored thereon that, when executed
by the processor (212), provide for analysis of images captured by
the camera (150) to obtain information about the liquid sample
and/or one or more analytes present in the liquid sample. Image
analysis can involve fluorescence image analysis, dark field
scattering image analysis, electrogenerated chemiluminescence image
analysis, or combinations thereof. For example, the analysis can be
dark field scattering image analysis. The data can be saved as a
series of image files, or "frames". The first frame can be
subtracted from each subsequent frame to correct for any static
defects. Next, all the frames can be summed together to yield an
image depicting total scattering intensity throughout the
experiment. Gradient filtering methods can be used to enhance the
contrast within the image. A threshold can be set to differentiate
between "active" (scattering) and "inactive" (not scattering)
pixels. Adjacent pixels can be grouped together to form "spots".
The scattering intensity can then be extracted on a frame-by-frame
basis by taking the maximum of the individual pixel intensities for
each spot. In some examples, the scattering intensity can be
further processed to obtain a different characteristic from the
sample. For example, if the liquid sample comprises metal ions that
can form nanoparticles upon the application of sufficient voltage,
the scattering intensity from the particles can be processed using
appropriate theoretical models (i.e. Mie theory) to ultimately give
nanoparticle size.
[0079] The light source present in the systems described above can
be any type of light source. In some examples, the system can
include a single light source. In other examples, more than one
light source can be included in the system. Examples of suitable
light sources include natural light sources (e.g., sunlight) and
artificial light sources (e.g., incandescent light bulbs, light
emitting diodes, gas discharge lamps, arc lamps, lasers etc.). In
some examples, the light source is an arc lamp. In some examples,
the light source is a laser.
[0080] Methods for the detection, quantification, and/or monitoring
of analytes, including nanoparticles, in liquid samples are also
provided. The methods can involve the use of optical signal and/or
electrochemical signal analysis to detect, quantify and/or monitor
analytes, including nanoparticles, in a liquid sample. The methods
can be performed using the systems described above. Methods for the
detection, quantification, and/or monitoring of analytes can
comprise providing an electrochemical cell comprising a working
electrode in electrochemical contact with a liquid sample
comprising an analyte, a sample containment vessel, one or more
additional electrodes in electrochemical contact with the liquid
sample and a power supply electrically coupled to the working
electrode and the one or more additional electrodes. The sample
containment vessel can comprise a top end, a bottom end, an
exterior surface and an interior void defined by an interior
surface, wherein the bottom end forms a liquid tight seal with the
working electrode and the liquid sample is contained in the volume
defined by the interior void of the sample containment vessel and
the working electrode. Methods can further comprise capturing an
electrochemical signal from the power supply, capturing an optical
signal from the electrochemical cell, processing the
electrochemical signal to obtain an electrochemical parameter,
processing the optical signal to obtain an optical parameter, and
optionally correlating the optical parameter to the electrochemical
parameter to obtain an optoelectrochemical parameter.
[0081] In some examples, the sample containment vessel can further
comprise a channel that punctuates the interior surface and leads
through the sample containment vessel to the exterior surface or
the top end of the sample containment vessel. The one or more
additional electrodes can be inserted through the channel such that
the one or more additional electrodes are in electrochemical
contact with the liquid sample and the one or more additional
electrodes form a liquid tight seal with the channel. In some
examples, the sample containment vessel comprises multiple channels
through which multiple electrodes or other probes may be
inserted.
[0082] In some examples, the sample containment vessel further
comprises a supporting member comprising a top end, a bottom end,
an exterior surface, and an interior void defined by an interior
surface. The supporting member can be configured such that the top
end forms a liquid tight seal with the working electrode, such that
the working electrode is sandwiched within the sample containment
vessel.
[0083] The sample containment vessel, as well as the components
thereof, can be fabricated form any suitable material or
combination of materials compatible with the methods described
herein. Examples of suitable materials include polymers, silicones,
glasses, ceramics, inorganic materials and combinations thereof. In
some examples, the interior surface of the sample containment
vessel is substantially non-conducting. In some examples, the
sample containment vessel comprises a cylindrical piece of a
nonconducting material, as shown in FIG. 5. In some examples, the
supporting member comprises a cylindrical piece of a nonconducting
material, as shown in FIG. 6. In some examples, the nonconducting
material is Teflon.
[0084] The working electrode and second electrode can be fabricated
from any suitable material or combination of materials compatible
with the methods described herein. In some examples, the working
electrode is substantially optically transparent. In some examples,
the working electrode comprises an indium tin oxide (ITO) coated
microscope coverslip.
[0085] In certain examples, the optical signal can comprise dark
field scattering images. Methods for processing the dark field
scattering images can comprise saving the images as a series of
image files, or "frames". The first frame is subtracted from each
subsequent frame to correct for any static defects. Next, all the
frames are summed together to yield an image depicting total
scattering intensity throughout the experiment. Gradient filtering
methods can be used to enhance the contrast within the image. A
threshold can be set to differentiate between "active" (scattering)
and "inactive" (not scattering) pixels. Adjacent pixels can be
grouped together to form "spots". The scattering intensity can then
be extracted on a frame-by-frame basis by taking the maximum of the
individual pixel intensities for each spot. In some examples, the
scattering intensity can be further processed to obtain a different
characteristic from the sample. For example, if the liquid sample
comprises metal ions that can form nanoparticles upon the
application of sufficient voltage, the scattering intensity from
the particles can be processed using appropriate theoretical models
(i.e. Mie theory) to ultimately give nanoparticle size.
[0086] In some examples, the analyte can include nanoparticles. In
some examples, the optical signal comprises dark field scattering,
which can be processed using theoretical methods (i.e., Mie theory)
to determine nanoparticles size. In some examples, the
optoelectrochemical parameter comprises the potential at which
individual nanoparticles, clusters of nanoparticles, or a
combination thereof, of a specific size are formed.
[0087] Also disclosed herein are sample containment vessels. The
sample containment vessel can comprise a top end, a bottom end, an
exterior surface and an interior void defined by an interior
surface. In some examples, the sample containment vessel is
configured to receive a working electrode such that the bottom end
forms a liquid tight seal with the working electrode. In some
examples, the volume defined by the interior void of the sample
containment vessel and the working electrode is configured to
contain a liquid sample, and the working electrode can be in
electrochemical contact with the liquid sample. In some examples,
the sample containment vessel further comprises a channel that
punctuates the interior surface of the sample containment vessel
and leads through the sample containment vessel to the top end or
exterior surface of the sample containment vessel. In some
examples, the channel is configured to receive one or more
additional electrodes such that the one or more additional
electrodes are in electrochemical contact with the liquid sample
and the one or more additional electrodes form a liquid tight seal
with the channel.
[0088] In some examples, the sample containment vessel can further
comprise a channel that punctuates the interior surface and leads
through the sample containment vessel to the exterior surface or
the top end of the sample containment vessel. The one or more
additional electrodes can be inserted through the channel such that
the one or more additional electrodes are in electrochemical
contact with the liquid sample and the one or more additional
electrodes form a liquid tight seal with the channel. In some
examples, the sample containment vessel comprises multiple channels
through which multiple electrodes or other probes may be
inserted.
[0089] In some examples, the sample containment vessel further
comprises a supporting member comprising a top end, a bottom end,
an exterior surface, and an interior void defined by an interior
surface. The supporting member can be configured such that the top
end forms a liquid tight seal with the working electrode, such that
the working electrode can be sandwiched within the sample
containment vessel.
[0090] The sample containment vessel, as well as the components
thereof, can be fabricated form any suitable material or
combination of materials compatible with the methods described
herein. Examples of suitable materials include polymers, silicones,
glasses, ceramics, inorganic materials and combinations thereof. In
some examples, the interior surface of the sample containment
vessel is substantially non-conducting. In some examples, the
sample containment vessel comprises a cylindrical piece of a
nonconducting material, as shown in FIG. 5. In some examples, the
supporting member comprises a cylindrical piece of a nonconducting
material, as shown in FIG. 6. In some examples, the nonconducting
material is Teflon.
[0091] The volume defined by the interior void of the sample
containment vessel can vary based on the particular application. In
some examples, the volume defined by the interior void of the
sample containment vessel can be 1 mL or less (e.g., 900 .mu.L or
less, 800 .mu.L or less, 700 .mu.L or less, 600 .mu.L or less, 500
.mu.L or less, 400 .mu.L or less, 300 .mu.L or less, 200 .mu.L or
less, 100 .mu.L or less, 90 .mu.L or less, 80 .mu.L or less, 70
.mu.L or less, 60 .mu.L or less, 50 .mu.L or less, 40 .mu.L or
less, 30 .mu.L or less, 20 .mu.L or less, or 10 .mu.L or less). In
some examples, the volume defined by the interior void of the
sample containment vessel can be 1 .mu.L or more (e.g., 10 .mu.L or
more, 20 .mu.L or more, 30 .mu.L or more, 40 .mu.L or more, 50
.mu.L or more, 60 .mu.L or more, 70 .mu.L or more, 80 .mu.L or
more, 90 .mu.L or more, 100 .mu.L or more, 200 .mu.L or more, 300
.mu.L or more, 400 .mu.L or more, 500 .mu.L or more, 600 .mu.L or
more, 700 .mu.L or more, 800 .mu.L or more, or 900 .mu.L or more).
The volume defined by the interior void of the sample containment
vessel can range from any of the minimum values described above to
any of the maximum values described above, for example from 1 .mu.L
to 1 mL (e.g., from 1 .mu.L to 500 .mu.L, from 500 .mu.L to 1 mL,
from 1 .mu.L to 200 .mu.L, from 200 .mu.L to 500 .mu.L, from 500
.mu.L to 700 .mu.L, from 700 .mu.L to 1 mL, or from 300 .mu.L to 1
mL).
[0092] In some examples, the sample containment vessel is
configured to reside in a microscope.
EXAMPLES
[0093] The following examples are set forth below to illustrate the
methods and results according to the disclosed subject matter.
These examples are not intended to be inclusive of all aspects of
the subject matter disclosed herein, but rather to illustrate
representative methods and results. These examples are not intended
to exclude equivalents and variations of the present invention
which are apparent to one skilled in the art.
[0094] Efforts have been made to ensure accuracy with respect to
numbers (e.g., amounts, temperature, etc.) but some errors and
deviations should be accounted for. Unless indicated otherwise,
parts are parts by weight, temperature is in .degree. C. or is at
ambient temperature, and pressure is at or near atmospheric. There
are numerous variations and combinations of reaction conditions,
e.g., component concentrations, temperatures, pressures and other
reaction ranges and conditions that can be used to optimize the
product purity and yield obtained from the described process. Only
reasonable and routine experimentation will be required to optimize
such process conditions.
Example 1
[0095] Indium-Tin-Oxide (ITO)-coated coverglass substrates (0.15 mm
thick, 15-30 .OMEGA./sq, SPI) were cleaned by sequential sonication
for 10 min each in a mild detergent solution, DI H.sub.2O,
isopropanol, and DI H.sub.2O followed by drying under a stream of
N.sub.2. A Ni TEM grid (SPI) was attached to the substrate using
standard laboratory labeling tape. Al (.about.100 nm) was then
thermally deposited through the TEM grid at a pressure of
.about.10.sup.-6 torr. The tape and TEM grid were carefully taken
off and the substrates were swabbed with CHCl.sub.3 to remove the
residual adhesive. The sonication procedure was repeated before
using the substrates for the electrodeposition experiments.
[0096] The electrochemical cell used for these experiments was
machined from Teflon. It was designed to use a 0.15 mm thick
working electrode and wire counter/reference electrodes while being
thin enough to fit within the optical path of a dark field
microscope. The previously described ITO substrates were used as
working electrodes, along with a Pt wire and a Ag wire as counter
and quasi-reference electrodes, respectively. The electrolyte
solution for depositions comprised 300 .mu.M Ag Acetate (99%, Acros
Organics) and 0.1 M LiClO.sub.4 (99.99%, Aldrich) in MeCN (HPLC
Grade, EMD). An electrolyte solution containing 1 mM Ferrocene MeOH
(97%, Aldrich) and 0.1 M LiClO.sub.4 was used for calibration of
the QRE.
[0097] Light from an Hg arc lamp (X-Cite 120 PC Q) was focused onto
the substrate surface by a dark field condenser (0.8-0.92 NA,
Olympus). Scattered light was collected through a 40.times., 0.75
NA objective and imaged using an electron multiplying charge
coupled device (EM-CCD) camera (Andor iXon). No EM Gain was used
for these measurements. Each pixel of the CCD represented an actual
sample area of about 380.times.380 nm. Scattering images of the
substrate surface during electrodeposition were recorded at a time
resolution of 50 ms. The start of data collection was controlled by
a triggering pulse from the potentiostat.
[0098] The electrode current was measured as the potential of the
ITO electrode was swept at 100 mV/s from 0 V to -0.3 V vs. the Ag
QRE using a potentiostat (760C, CH Instruments). The Ag QRE
electrode was calibrated by cyclic voltammetry in the Ferrocene
MeOH reference solution described previously. All potentials were
subsequently reported against the standard hydrogen electrode
(SHE). For the cyclic voltammetry experiment, the potential was
ramped from .about.0 V to -0.5 V to .about.1 V vs. the Ag QRE at
100 mV/s.
[0099] SEM analysis of the deposited Ag was carried out at a 20 keV
accelerating voltage on a JEOL 7000 FE-SEM. The area imaged
optically via electrodeposition was first located with the aid of
the deposited Al index and imaged at low magnification. After
correlating individual spots in the SEM and scattering images, the
sample was imaged again at high magnifications to obtain particle
sizes for about 40 scattering centers on the substrate.
[0100] Custom MATLAB software was used to extract particle
scattering transients. An outline of the process is given below.
[0101] The data was initially saved as a TIFF stack (series of
tagged image file format images, or "frames"). [0102] The first
frame was subtracted from each subsequent frame. This corrected for
any static defects/particles on the sample surface that may scatter
light. [0103] All frames were summed together to yield an image
depicting total scattering intensity throughout the experiments.
[0104] Simple gradient filtering methods were used to enhance
contrast within the image, if necessary. [0105] A threshold was set
to differentiate between "active" (scattering) and "inactive" (no
scattering) pixels. [0106] Adjacent pixels were grouped together to
form "spots". [0107] Scattering intensity was then extracted on a
frame-by-frame basis by taking the maximum of the individual pixel
intensities for each spot, resulting in single particle
"transients".
[0108] Calculations for theoretical scattering-size curves were
carried out according to the Mie solution for scattering from a
homogeneous sphere. The cross-section representing the scattered
light between polar angles .theta..sub.i.+-.1/2.DELTA..theta. was
calculated as:
.sigma. i ( k , r , .theta. i , .DELTA. .theta. ) = 2 .pi. k 2
.intg. .theta. i - 1 2 .DELTA. .theta. .theta. i + 1 2 .DELTA.
.theta. S 11 ( k , r , .theta. ) .theta. ( 1 ) ##EQU00001##
where k is the wavenumber of the scattered radiation and r the
particle radius. The scattering matrix element S.sub.11 was
calculated via MATLAB programs, which followed a well-established
algorithm (Bohren, C F; Huffman, D R. Absorption and Scattering of
Light by Small particles. 1983). Values for the complex refractive
index of Ag (Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids, Palik, 1985),
MeCN (n=1.3442, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, Lide, 2008),
and ITO (Sopra Materials Database) were obtained from the indicated
sources. The Ag and ITO refractive indices were functions of
scattering wavelength, which were interpolated as necessary to
yield values at wavelengths matching those at which the lamp
intensity was measured. The medium refractive index used for these
calculations was taken to be an average of the MeCN and ITO values,
and an angular resolution of 1 degree was used. The observed
scattering intensity at the detector was modeled as:
I.sub.i(r,.theta..sub.i,.DELTA..theta.)=.chi..intg..sigma..sub.i(k,r,.th-
eta..sub.i,.DELTA..theta.)I.sub.lamp(k).eta..sub.CCD(k).eta..sub.coll(.the-
ta..sub.i)dk
I.sub.obs(r)=.SIGMA..sub.iI.sub.i(r,.theta..sub.i,.DELTA..theta.)
(2)
where I.sub.lamp is the lamp intensity, .eta..sub.CCD is the
detector quantum efficiency, and .eta..sub.coll is the optical
collection efficiency. .chi. is an empirical factor used to account
for variations in lamp intensity/optical collection efficiency;
this is the factor allowed to vary in the data fitting process. The
lamp intensity/CCD efficiency factors are straightforward to
obtain. The collection efficiency term was defined as:
.eta. coll ( .theta. i ) = 1 2 .pi. .intg. 0 2 .pi. M coll (
.theta. i , .PHI. ) .PHI. M coll ( .theta. , .PHI. ) = { 1 if
.theta. obj < 48.6 .degree. 0 otherwise .theta. obj = arc sin (
n med sin ( arc cos ( sin .theta. cos .PHI. sin .theta. ' + cos
.theta. cos .theta. ' ) ) n air ) ( 3 ) ##EQU00002##
where .theta.' is the angle between the incident light path and the
objective axis)(59.3.degree.). This expression makes the geometric
assumption that all scattered light which leaves the sample at an
angle smaller than the acceptance defined by the objective lens
(NA=0.75) will be collected. Here, again, n.sub.med was taken to be
an average of ITO and MeCN values. This resulting scattering cross
section-size curve for the calculations presented here is given in
FIG. 11.
[0109] All data fitting was carried out using the "fminsearch"
function (which follows the Nelder-Mead algorithm) in MATLAB.
First, the extracted single particle transients were fit to
sigmoidal functions:
I ( E ) = I bg + A sig 1 + k ( E - E 1 / 2 ) ( 4 ) ##EQU00003##
The average R.sup.2 value for single NP transient fits was about
0.994. The amplitudes (A.sub.sig) were used as the values for the
final particle scattering intensity. The "turn-on" potential,
E.sub.on, was defined as:
E.sub.on=E.sub.1/2+2k.sup.-1 (5)
[0110] E.sub.on is illustrated graphically in FIG. 12. Fitting of
the experimental single particle scattering-size curve (generated
by plotting sigmoid amplitude, A.sub.sig, as a function of particle
size obtained via SEM) to the theoretical curve was used to
generate a value for .chi. which effectively correlated the
observed scattering intensity with particle size. From this point,
the scattering intensity for individual particles was interpolated
to obtain radius-potential curves. Single particle currents were
generated according to:
i ( t ) = Q dep ( t ) t Q dep ( t ) = .rho. Ag F M Ag V NP ( t ) i
( t ) = .rho. Ag F M Ag V NP ( t ) t = .rho. Ag F M Ag t ( 4 3 .pi.
r ( t ) 3 ) i ( t ) = ( 4 .pi. .rho. Ag F M Ag ) r ( t ) 2 r ( t )
t ( 6 ) ##EQU00004##
These relations make the assumption of uniform spherical growth of
the particles. Here, Q.sub.dep represents the total charge passed
due to the reduction of Ag.sup.+. .rho..sub.Ag, F, and M.sub.Ag are
the density of silver, Faraday's constant, and atomic weight of Ag,
respectively. r is the nanoparticle's radius.
[0111] The experimental setup can be seen in FIG. 13. Ag particles
were deposited from MeCN containing Ag acetate and LiClO.sub.4 by
ramping the ITO electrode potential cathodically (.about.0.1 V to
-0.2 V vs. SHE). Simultaneously, light scattering at the electrode
surface was imaged over a .about.100.times.100 .mu.m sample area.
Upon the application of sufficiently cathodic potentials, light
scattering due to the presence of deposited AgNPs on the ITO
electrode becomes detectable. This can be seen visually in the
inset images in FIG. 14, given at the indicated points along the
sweep. The total measured scattering intensity and measured
electrode current are included for reference. This total scattering
intensity across the electrode surface exhibits shifts towards more
negative potentials as one would expect with increasing sweep rates
(FIG. 15), due to the slow kinetics of Ag.sup.+ reduction at
ITO.
[0112] Individual diffraction limited spots (FWHM=.about.350 nm)
were resolved in the scattering images. For data analysis, spot
location was carried out through custom MATLAB programs and
resulted in several hundreds to thousands being detected per
sample. For the sample depicted in FIG. 14, 770 spots were
detected, resulting in an apparent surface density of
7.55.times.10.sup.6 spotscm.sup.-2. The average distance between a
given spot and its nearest neighbor is about 2.8 .mu.m. This
resulting density can be rationalized by considering the growth of
spherical diffusion layers originating from nucleation sites on the
electrode surface; the diffusion layer overlapping resulting from
the deposition of individual particles would control the effective
final particle sizes and density. Due to this well documented
behavior, and the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) data to be
discussed later, the diffraction limited spots in the final
scattering images correspond to either "lone" or a few closely
"grouped" particles, though it's likely the observed particles
result from several nucleation sites early in the deposition
process.
[0113] Some example scattering-potential transients for individual
spots are given in FIG. 16A. The individual scattering transients
were fit to obtain distributions of final scattering intensities
(A.sub.sig), as shown as inset of FIG. 16, and light scattering
"turn-on" potentials (E.sub.on) as shown in FIG. 16. Detailed data
fitting procedures are described above. The distribution of final
scattering intensities is correlated with the final shape and size
of the particles. E.sub.on physically represents the electrode
potential at which the scattering of light by the particle becomes
detectable, which is dependent on the experimental configuration.
For the configuration employed herein, the limit of detection in
terms of particle diameter is about 46 nm (using a definition of 3
times the detection noise). The distribution in Eon values reflects
a combination of several factors, including (1) variations in the
required overpotential to drive Ag.sup.+ reduction at different
sites on the ITO surface, (2) the proximity/overpotential of
neighboring sites on the surface, and (3) variations in particle
geometry and/or orientation with respect to the substrate. The
observed E.sub.on values span a 60 mV range. Variations in the
local overpotential could be due to inherent variations in the
defect sites on the ITO surface at which deposition occurs or to
local variations in contact area with or conductivity of the ITO
electrode. The E.sub.on and A.sub.sig parameter values for
individual NPs were found to be weakly correlated, with a more
negative turn-on potential corresponding to a smaller final
scattering intensity (FIG. 17). The observed weak correlation can
be due to several competing factors that affect the final deposited
particle size: variations in the local ITO conductivity, distance
from neighboring particles, and the potential at which those
particles began to grow.
[0114] While these results provide qualitative insight into the
heterogeneity in the reduction of Ag.sup.+ at ITO, quantitative
information on fundamental electrochemical parameters (reaction
half potentials, kinetic parameters, etc.), rather than the
empirical analysis discussed thus far, can also be provided. This
can be done by correlating the observed scattering signal with the
actual particle size.
[0115] The measured scattering intensity can be expressed as
Equation 2, as discussed above. .chi. is a factor which accounts
for the absolute lamp intensity at the sample surface, and is the
quantity varied to perform the data fitting. While the calculation
of .sigma..sub.i for spherical, homogeneous metal particles can be
carried out directly using Mie theory; not knowing explicit values
for all of the other quantities prevents one from obtaining a
direct relationship between scattering intensity and particle size.
To address this issue, correlated SEM measurements were carried out
on the deposited particles. The particles corresponding to spots in
the scattering image were identified via SEM and sized. Example SEM
images can be seen in FIGS. 18A and B. The image in FIG. 18A is
overlaid with the scattering image obtained during the deposition
process (FIG. 19) Immediately evident is that there are particles
on the ITO surface not visible in the scattering image. These
particles are a combination of stray Al particles created during
the deposition of the Al index and deposited Ag particles too small
to be detected via scattering. The Al particles (and any other
static defect) are ignored in the scattering analysis through a
background correction procedure. The SEM analysis made it possible
to unambiguously attribute the spots in the scattering image to
scattering from lone or closely grouped particles. Of the .about.40
correlated areas for the sample discussed here, roughly one-third
could be unambiguously assigned to individual particles. More
careful control over deposition parameters (e.g., employing a dual
potential step instead of a sweep) can eliminate this issue by
lowering the particle surface density further. The morphology of
the deposited particles was found to be roughly spherical in
nature. A histogram of obtained particle sizes is given in FIG.
18C. The relationship between the scattering intensity and particle
size for the lone particles can be observed in FIG. 18D (squares).
The proper value of .chi. is obtained by a numerical fitting
procedure using the scattering intensity values for the lone
particles. The result of this fitting procedure is given as the
curve in FIG. 18D. For the spots found to correspond to small
groups of particles, individual particle intensities can be
extracted from the measured intensity according to the theoretical
curve profile. The result of this process for the "grouped" spots
in the SEM analysis is the triangles in FIG. 18D. This illustrates
that even in cases where a given diffraction limited spot does not
correlate to an individual particle, the Mie theory approximation
used in this analysis can still accurately agree with the measured
intensity.
[0116] Once the final scattering intensities have been "calibrated"
against the SEM data, it becomes possible to convert single NP
scattering transients into corresponding size transients. This
process was carried out blindly for all 770 spots imaged optically.
Once radius potential curves are in hand, it is then possible to
estimate the Faradaic current for Ag.sup.+ reduction contributing
to a given particle's growth according to equation 6. Example
single particle voltammograms can be seen in FIG. 20A along with
the distribution of peak potentials. Using the resulting single
particle currents and the observed particle surface density, the
bulk faradaic current density was then estimated from the
scattering data and compared to the current density measured by the
potentiostat (FIG. 20B). The agreement between the calculated and
measured current densities is impressive and supports the validity
of the single NP scattering analysis. The discrepancy at more
cathodic potentials can be due to the presence of undetected Ag
particles, differing particle size distributions between the entire
working electrode (.about.2 cm.sup.2) and 100.times.100 .mu.m
imaged area, or to non-Faradaic processes occurring at the working
electrode which are effectively ignored in the scattering analysis.
Disagreement due to non-Faradaic processes actually highlights an
important inherent advantage to this technique: the only processes
which contribute to scattering signal are those considerably
altering either the morphology of the nanoparticle or its
surrounding dielectric environment.
[0117] In order to obtain single particle i-E curves such as those
given in FIG. 20, no assumptions about the electrochemical behavior
of the system (diffusion behavior, electrode kinetics, etc.) is
required. This is due to the direct correlation between particle
size and scattering intensity established through the SEM
measurements. However, because the scattering analysis provides no
information about the NPs' growth until it reaches a detectable
size, fitting the data to a theoretical model has value because it
can help infer information about the behavior before this point. To
this end, a model is disclosed for fitting the single NP scattering
data in terms of the local Ag.sup.+ reduction potential and
effective electrode area the NP occupies.
[0118] This technique has also been applied to observe the
subsequent oxidation of the electrodeposited Ag particles. The
results are given in FIG. 21 and FIG. 22. Oxidation of the Ag NPs
is visible in the cyclic voltammogram at .about.0.2 V vs. SHE. This
correlates with a drop in total scattering intensity for the
ensemble of deposited particles of about 10%. The relative
reduction in scattering intensity for single particles upon
oxidation varies from particle to particle, not being visible at
all in some cases (e.g., FIG. 22).
Example 2
[0119] A MATLAB program was developed to help analyze single silver
nanoparticle spectroscopic data obtained with a standard inverted
optical microscope. The described software has provisions to
mitigate the effects of high background signals present in such
data sets and greatly streamlines their analysis. Efficient single
nanoparticle image analysis is provided with these programs to
support single nanoparticle imaging in an inverted
configuration.
[0120] Dark field scattering was collected through an .times.40
objective using a CCD camera (Andor iXon). Light scattering movies
were recorded as a function of working electrode potential, as
described earlier, at 50 ms resolution and saved as a Tagged Image
File Format (TIFF) image stack.
[0121] Single molecule video files were analyzed using a MATLAB
program that follows the process outlined in FIG. 23. Typically,
the data was input as TIFF image stack.
[0122] Every frame of the image stack was first summed to create a
"raw" image. This can be seen in FIG. 24. Due to the relatively low
signal-to-noise ratio for these measurements, a large,
inhomogeneous background signal was often present. This made
locating active sites within the image by setting a simple
intensity threshold difficult. To combat this, the discrete
gradient norm (G.sub.ij) and Laplacian (L.sub.ij) for the image
were then computed from the RAW image as:
G ij = [ ( f i + 1 , j - f ij ) + ( f ij - f i - 1 , j ) ] 2 + [ (
f i , j + 1 - f ij ) + ( f ij - f i , j - 1 ) ] 2 L ij = 1 4 ( f i
+ 1 , j + f i - 1 , j + f i , j + 1 + f i , j - 1 ) - f ij ( 7 )
##EQU00005##
The Raw, Gradient, and Laplacian images were visually mixed to
generate a composite image which best resolves individual
molecules/particles and effectively "flattens" the background. Upon
setting an appropriate intensity threshold, the active pixels
adjacent to one another were grouped together into "spots", each
representing a single nanoparticle. Dark field scattering
trajectories for single nanoparticles were then extracted by adding
the intensities for each pixel in a given spot and subtracting a
background value on a frame-by-frame basis.
[0123] For a given spot, the bordering pixels' intensities were
averaged together to generate a suitable background value and
subtracted according to:
S = f a - N a N b f b ( 8 ) ##EQU00006##
where S is the intensity corresponding to a single
molecule/particle, f.sub.a are the intensities for the active
pixels, and f.sub.b are the intensities for the background pixels.
The effects of the background separation can be seen in FIG.
24.
Example 3
[0124] The methods and systems described herein can also be used
for imaging electrodeposited Au nanoparticles (NPs) using
electrogenerated chemiluminescence (ECL). For example, ECL
catalyzed by Au NPs with diameters from a few nanometers to a few
hundred nanometers was investigated as shown in FIG. 25. Au NPs can
catalyze the oxidation of tripropylamine (TrPA) when deposited onto
an indium tin oxide (ITO) surface, which exhibits sluggish kinetics
for this reaction. This large difference in kinetic facility
enabled the detection of ECL of Ru(bpy).sub.3.sup.2+ at single Au
NPs in aqueous solution. The ECL at individual Au NPs can be
correlated to their size to directly resolve heterogeneities in
local charge transfer events. Using this technique, intermittent
ECL ("blinking") at single Au NPs was observed and can be
attributed to surface oxidation and regeneration of small Au
clusters during the ECL generation process. Quantitative
relationships between Au NP size and local ECL intensity have been
obtained and compared to theoretical predictions.
Example 4
[0125] The methods and systems described herein can be used to
track the redox properties of metallic nanoparticles using
fluorescence microscopy. For example, the spectroelectrochemical
properties of individual luminescent, plasmonic silver
nanoparticles (FIG. 26A) were investigated using fluorescence
spectroelectrochemistry (FIG. 26B). Fluorescence intensities from
individual nanoparticles were measured while the substrate's
electrochemical potential was controlled to produce and oxidize the
Ag nanoparticles. The spectroelectrochemical responses of
individual nanoparticles were used to study heterogeneities in
their redox properties not visible in bulk voltammetric
measurements. The Ag nanoparticles exhibited a range of redox
potentials and their statistical distribution was dependent on the
electrolyte system used. No variations in the spectral profile of
bulk nanoparticle samples were observed, implying no correlation
between the redox potentials of individual nanoparticles and the
energy of emitted photons from fluorescent sites on Ag
nanoparticles. This can be due to a negligible difference in the
redox potentials for individual emissive sites on a given Ag
nanoparticle and/or the shrinking of the polarizable bulk of the Ag
nanoparticles.
[0126] Other advantages which are obvious and which are inherent to
the invention will be evident to one skilled in the art. It will be
understood that certain features and sub-combinations are of
utility and may be employed without reference to other features and
sub-combinations. This is contemplated by and is within the scope
of the claims. Since many possible examples may be made of the
invention without departing from the scope thereof, it is to be
understood that all matter herein set forth or shown in the
accompanying drawings is to be interpreted as illustrative and not
in a limiting sense.
* * * * *