U.S. patent application number 14/309208 was filed with the patent office on 2015-07-02 for crystalline anti-htnfalpha antibodies.
The applicant listed for this patent is ABBVIE BIOTECHNOLOGY LTD.. Invention is credited to David W. Borhani, Wolfgang Fraunhofer, Stefan Gottschalk, Anette Koenigsdorfer, Hans-Juergen Krause, Gerhard Winter.
Application Number | 20150183863 14/309208 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 39364990 |
Filed Date | 2015-07-02 |
United States Patent
Application |
20150183863 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Borhani; David W. ; et
al. |
July 2, 2015 |
CRYSTALLINE ANTI-HTNFALPHA ANTIBODIES
Abstract
The present invention relates to a batch crystallization method
for crystallizing an anti-hTNFalpha antibody which allows the
production of said antibody on an industrial scale; antibody
crystals as obtained according to said method; compositions
containing said crystals as well as methods of use of said crystals
and compositions.
Inventors: |
Borhani; David W.;
(Hartsdale, NY) ; Fraunhofer; Wolfgang; (Gurnee,
IL) ; Krause; Hans-Juergen; (Grunstadt, DE) ;
Koenigsdorfer; Anette; (Ilvesheim, DE) ; Winter;
Gerhard; (Penzberg, DE) ; Gottschalk; Stefan;
(Grunwald, DE) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
ABBVIE BIOTECHNOLOGY LTD. |
Hamilton |
|
BM |
|
|
Family ID: |
39364990 |
Appl. No.: |
14/309208 |
Filed: |
June 19, 2014 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
13774706 |
Feb 22, 2013 |
8772458 |
|
|
14309208 |
|
|
|
|
13225281 |
Sep 2, 2011 |
8436149 |
|
|
13774706 |
|
|
|
|
11977677 |
Oct 25, 2007 |
8034906 |
|
|
13225281 |
|
|
|
|
60855104 |
Oct 27, 2006 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
424/142.1 ;
530/387.3; 530/388.15 |
Current CPC
Class: |
A61P 9/10 20180101; A61P
13/12 20180101; A61P 1/16 20180101; A61P 37/00 20180101; A61P 37/08
20180101; A61P 39/00 20180101; A61P 1/00 20180101; A61P 19/10
20180101; A61P 17/02 20180101; A61P 17/00 20180101; A61P 9/00
20180101; A61P 1/02 20180101; A61P 25/04 20180101; A61P 7/02
20180101; A61P 29/00 20180101; C07K 2299/00 20130101; A61P 31/04
20180101; C07K 16/241 20130101; A61P 13/08 20180101; A61P 19/08
20180101; A61P 3/04 20180101; A61P 31/12 20180101; C07K 2317/92
20130101; A61P 25/00 20180101; A61P 27/16 20180101; A61P 31/14
20180101; C07K 2317/565 20130101; A61P 3/10 20180101; A61P 1/18
20180101; A61P 19/00 20180101; A61P 11/00 20180101; A61P 11/08
20180101; A61P 11/06 20180101; A61P 19/04 20180101; A61P 1/04
20180101; A61P 19/02 20180101; C07K 2317/76 20130101; A61P 31/00
20180101; A61P 25/28 20180101; A61K 9/50 20130101; A61P 35/00
20180101; A61P 17/06 20180101; A61P 37/02 20180101; A61P 7/00
20180101; A61P 3/00 20180101; A61P 27/02 20180101; A61P 7/06
20180101; A61P 15/00 20180101; A61K 39/3955 20130101; A61P 37/06
20180101; A61P 19/06 20180101 |
International
Class: |
C07K 16/24 20060101
C07K016/24 |
Claims
1. A batch crystallization method for crystallizing an
anti-hTNFalpha antibody, comprising the steps of: (a) providing an
aqueous solution of said antibody in admixture with an inorganic
phosphate salt as crystallization agent; and (b) incubating said
aqueous crystallization mixture until crystals of said antibody are
formed.
2. The crystallization method according to claim 1, wherein said
aqueous crystallization mixture a) has a pH in the range of about
pH 3 to 5; or b) comprises a buffer.
3. (canceled)
4. The crystallization method according to claim 2, wherein said
buffer comprises an acetate buffer.
5-8. (canceled)
9. The crystallization method according to claim 1, wherein the
phosphate salt is selected from the group consisting of a) a
hydrogenphosphate salt; b) an alkali metal salt; and c) a mixture
of at least two different alkali metal salts.
10-12. (canceled)
13. The crystallization method according to claim 1, wherein at
least one of the following additional crystallization conditions
are met: a) incubation is performed for between about 1 hour to
about 60 days; b) incubation is performed at a temperature between
about 4.degree. C. and about 37.degree. C.; c) the antibody
concentration is in the range of about 0.5 to about 100 mg/ml.
14. The crystallization method according to claim 13, further
comprising the step of drying said crystals.
15. (canceled)
16. The crystallization method according to claim 13, wherein the
batch volume is in the range of about 1 ml to 20.000 liters.
17. A crystal of an anti-hTNFalpha antibody, obtainable by a
crystallization method according to claim 1.
18. A crystal of an anti-hTNFalpha antibody, with the proviso that
said antibody is not INFLIXIMAB.
19. The crystal of claim 17 having a needle-like morphology with a
maximum length l of about 2-500 .mu.m and an l/d ratio of about 3
to 30.
20. The crystal of claim 18 having a needle-like morphology with a
maximum length l of about 2-500 .mu.m and an l/d ratio of about 3
to 30.
21. The crystal according to claim 17, wherein said antibody is
selected from a group consisting of a) a polyclonal antibody; b) a
monoclonal antibody; c) a human antibody; d) a humanized antibody;
e) a non-glycosylated antibody; and f) a chimeric antibody.
22-25. (canceled)
26. The crystal according to claim 18, wherein the antibody is an
isolated human antibody; selected from the group consisting of a)
an isolated human antibody that dissociates from hTNFalpha with a
Kd of 1.times.10.sup.-8 M or less and a Ka rate constant of
1.times.10.sup.-3 s.sup.-1 or less, both determined by surface
plasmon resonance, and neutralizes hTNFalpha cytotoxicity in a
standard in vitro L929 assay with an IC.sub.50 of 1.times.10.sup.-7
M or less; b) an isolated human antibody with the following
characteristics: i) dissociates from human TNFalpha with a Koff
rate constant of 1.times.10-3 s-1 or less, as determined by surface
plasmon resonance; ii) has a light chain CDR3 domain comprising the
amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 3, or modified from SEQ ID NO: 3
by a single alanine substitution at position 1, 4, 5, 7 or 8 or by
one to five conservative amino acid substitutions at positions 1,
3, 4, 6, 7, 8 and/or 9: iii) has a heavy chain CDR3 domain
comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 4, or modified
from SEQ ID NO: 4 by a single alanine substitution at position 2,
3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10 or 11 or by one to five conservative amino
acid substitutions at positions 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11 and/or
12; c) an isolated human antibody with a light chain variable
region (LCVR) comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1
and a heavy chain variable region (HCVR) comprising the amino acid
sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2; and d) the adalimumab.
27-29. (canceled)
30. A pharmaceutical composition comprising: (a) crystals of an
anti-hTNFalpha antibody according to claim 17, and (b) at least one
pharmaceutical excipient; which composition is provided in as
solid, semisolid or liquid formulation, each formulation containing
said antibody in crystalline form.
31-35. (canceled)
36. An injectable liquid composition comprising anti-hTNFalpha
antibody crystals according to claim 17 and having an antibody
concentration in the range of about 10 to 400 mg/ml.
37. A crystal slurry comprising anti-hTNFalpha antibody crystals
according to claim 17, having a antibody concentration greater than
about 100 mg/ml.
38. A method for treating a mammal comprising the step of
administering to the mammal an effective amount of antibody
anti-hTNFalpha crystals according to claim 17.
39. A method for treating a mammal comprising the step of
administering to the mammal an effective amount of the composition
according to claim 30.
40. (canceled)
41. A method of treating a TNFalpha-related disorder in a subject,
which method comprises administering a therapeutically effective
amount of antibody crystals according to claim 17.
42-44. (canceled)
Description
RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application is a divisional application of U.S.
application Ser. No. 13/225,281, filed Sep. 2, 2011, which is a
continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/977,677,
filed Oct. 25, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,034,906, issued Oct. 11,
2011, which in turn claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application
Ser. No. 60/855,104, filed Oct. 27, 2006. The entire contents of
each of these applications are expressly incorporated herein by
reference.
[0002] The present invention relates to a batch crystallization
method for crystallizing an anti-hTNFalpha antibody which allows
the production of said antibody on an industrial scale; antibody
crystals as obtained according to said method; compositions
containing said crystals as well as methods of use of said crystals
and compositions.
TECHNICAL BACKGROUND
a) Antibody Crystals
[0003] With over 100 monoclonal antibodies currently being
evaluated in clinical study phases 2 or 3, the mAb market can be
considered one of the most promising biopharmaceutical markets. As
these drugs have to be delivered in single doses often exceeding
100 mg, there is an urgent need to find suitable formulation
strategies satisfying stability, safety and patient compliance.
[0004] However, highly concentrated liquid mAb formulations show
increased viscosity, hindering syringe ability through patient
friendly thin needles. Furthermore, the aggregation tendency of mAb
molecules at such high concentrations exponentially increases when
compared to moderately concentrated solutions. This is
unacceptable, in all means, regarding safety and stability
requirements.
[0005] Thus, the delivery of high mAb doses is restrained to large
volumes, which generally have to be delivered via infusion. This
way of dosing is cost intensive and significantly reduces the
patient's compliance.
[0006] Therefore, pharmaceutically applicable low volume mAb
crystal suspensions for subcutaneous injection would be highly
desirable. Theoretically, degradation pathways influencing the mAb
integrity should be significantly decelerated due to the rigidity
of a crystal lattice, where motions in the protein structure are
hindered. Moreover, it can be expected that the increase in
viscosity would be significantly reduced when comparing highly
concentrated crystal suspensions with liquid formulations. With
respect to sustained release, it might be possible to generate or
alter protein crystals in that way that they dissolve slowly when
brought into the patient's body. This would be a very elegant way
to deliver a sustained release formulation, as the extensive use of
excipients and processes harming the mAb structure would be
prevented.
[0007] Despite the great potential in using protein crystals as
drug substance, few attempts have been made to systematically
evaluate this strategy.
[0008] A well-known exemption is insulin, which was successfully
crystallized decades ago. Today, the use of crystal suspensions of
insulin is well described, offering stable and long acting
formulations being well established on the market. The discrepancy
between the development of insulin crystals and crystallization of
all other proteins might be related to the fact that ordered
insulin aggregates are natively formed in the pancreas. Thus,
insulin crystals are easily obtained when insulin is brought in
contact with an excess of zinc ions. Most other proteins tend to
form unordered precipitates rather than crystals, and therefore,
finding crystallization conditions for a protein is a time
consuming, non-trivial task.
[0009] Despite a great interest in harvesting protein crystals for
x-ray diffraction analysis, the quest of finding suitable
crystallization conditions still is an empirical science, as in
principle any protein behaves differently. To date, no general rule
has been found which might reliably predict by reason alone a
successful crystallization condition for a protein of choice. Thus,
obtaining crystals of a given protein always is referred to be the
"bottle neck" of whatever intended application is planned later
on.
[0010] To make things even more challenging, antibodies are
described to be especially hard to crystallize, due to the
flexibility of the molecule.
[0011] Nevertheless, examples of immunoglobulin crystals have been
known for a long time. The first example of immunoglobulin crystals
were described 150 years ago by an English physician, Henry Bence
Jones; the isolated crystals of an abnormal Ig light chain dimer
from the urine of a myeloma patient (Jones 1848). Such abnormal Igs
have been known ever since as Bence Jones proteins. In 1938, the
spontaneous crystallization of a distinct abnormal Ig from the
serum of a myeloma patient was described (von Bonsdorf, Groth et
al. 1938), apparently an Ig heavy chain oligomer (MW 200 kDa).
[0012] Crystalline human immunoglobulins of normal structure (two
heavy chains linked to two light chains) were described over the
next thirty years, again mostly isolated from myeloma patients
(Putnam 1955). Davies and co-workers were the first to characterize
the structure of an intact human myeloma antibody, named "Dob",
using x-ray crystallography (Terry, Matthews et al. 1968), and they
determined its three-dimensional structure in 1971 (Sarma,
Silverton et al. 1971). Their pioneering work was followed by that
of others, yielding the crystal structures of the IgG "Kol" (Huber,
Deisenhofer et al. 1976), the IgG "Mcg" (Rajan, Ely et al. 1983),
and a canine lymphoma IgG2a (Harris, Larson et al. 1992).
[0013] Crystals of immunoglobulins retain their distinctive
immunological activities upon re-dissolution. Nisonoff et al.
reported in 1968 on a rabbit anti-p-azobenzoate antibody, "X4",
that was easily crystallized. Antibody X4 was extensively
characterized before crystallization as well as after
re-dissolution of the crystals. [.sup.125I]-p-iodobenzoate was
found to bind specifically and potently to re-dissolved X4; the
re-dissolved crystals also exhibited multiple specific Ouchterlony
immunodiffusion reactions typical of the unpurified rabbit serum
(Nisonoff, Zappacosta et al. 1968). Connell and co-workers
described a human myeloma gamma-immunoglobulin-1 kappa
(IgG-.kappa.), called "Tem", that crystallized spontaneously from
serum at cold temperatures (Connell, Freedman et al. 1973). Tem
crystals were found to be well-formed and possessed rhombohedral
symmetry. Tem-containing serum was extensively characterized by
agarose immunodiffusion techniques. Electrophoresis and
immunodiffusion of a re-dissolved solution of the Tem crystals
showed them to be identical with the material obtained from the
serum by cryoprecipitation, and with the isolated myeloma protein
(Connell, Freedman et al. 1973).
[0014] Mills and co-workers reported in 1983 an unusual
crystallocryoglobulinemia resulting from human monoclonal
antibodies to albumin (Mills, Brettman et al. 1983). Here, very
similar cuboidal crystals were isolated from two patients.
Redissolution of the crystals followed by electrophoresis and
immunoelectrophoresis indicated that the crystals were composed of
two protein components, a monoclonal IgG-lambda and human serum
albumin in a 1:2 ratio (Jentoft, Dearborn et al. 1982). The
components were separated on preparative scale by dissolution of
the original crystals followed by column chromatography. Although
neither separated component crystallized on its own, upon
recombination the original bipartite complex reformed and then
crystallized. Further study of the distinctive sedimentation
characteristics and immunological reactivity of the redissolved,
separated IgG and its Fab fragment with human serum albumin
indicated that reassociation of the two redissolved, separated
components was immunologic in nature, i.e. that the crystalline
antibody once redissolved still possessed its native, highly
specific (for human serum albumin) binding characteristics (Mills,
Brettman et al. 1983).
[0015] Recently. Margolin and co-workers reported on the potential
therapeutic uses of crystalline antibodies (Yang, Shenoy et al.
2003). They found that the therapeutic monoclonal antibody
trastuzumab (Herceptin.RTM.) could be crystallized (Shenoy,
Govardhan et al. 2002). Crystalline trastuzumab suspensions were
therapeutically efficacious in a mouse tumor model, thus
demonstrating retention of biological activity by crystalline
trastuzumab (Yang. Shenoy et al. 2003).
b) Crystallization Techniques
[0016] Unlike some other scientific or engineering endeavors, the
crystallization of diverse proteins cannot be carried out
successfully using defined methods or algorithms. Certainly, there
have been great technical advances in the last 20-30 years, as
noted by the world-renowned expert in protein crystallization, A.
McPherson. McPherson provides extensive details on tactics,
strategies, reagents, and devices for the crystallization of
macromolecules. He does not, however, provide a method to ensure
that any given macromolecule can indeed be crystallized by a
skilled person with reasonable expectation of success. McPherson
states for example: "Whatever the procedure, no effort must be
spared in refining and optimizing the parameters of the system,
both solvent and solute, to encourage and promote specific bonding
interactions between molecules and to stabilize them once they have
formed. This latter aspect of the problem generally depends on the
specific chemical and physical properties of the particular protein
or nucleic acid being crystallized." (McPherson 1999, p. 159)
[0017] It is widely accepted by those skilled in the art of protein
crystallization that no algorithm exists to take a new protein of
interest, apply definite process steps, and thereby obtain the
desired crystals.
[0018] Several screening systems a commercially available (for
example Hampton 1 and 2, Wizzard I and II) which allow, on a
microliter scale, to screen for potentially suitable
crystallization conditions for a specific protein. However,
positive results obtained in such a screening system do not
necessarily allow successful crystallization in a larger,
industrially applicable batch scale. Conversion of microliter-size
crystallization trials into industrial dimensions is described to
be a challenging task (see Jen et al., 2001).
[0019] Baldock et al (1996) reported on a comparison of microbatch
and vapor diffusion for initial screening of crystallization
conditions. Six commercially available proteins were screened using
a set of crystallization solutions. The screens were performed
using the most common vapor diffusion method and three variants of
a microbatch crystallization method, including a novel evaporation
technique. Out of 58 crystallization conditions identified, 43
(74%) were identified by microbatch, while 41 (71%) were identified
by vapor diffusion. Twenty-six conditions were found by both
methods, and 17 (29%) would have been missed if microbatch had not
been used at all. This shows that the vapor diffusion technique,
which is most commonly used in initial crystallization screens does
not guarantee positive results.
c) hTNFalpha Antibody Crystals
[0020] Human TNFalpha (hTNFalpha) is considered as a causative
agent of numerous diseases. There is, therefore, a great need for
suitable methods of treating such hTNFalpha related disorders. One
promising therapeutic approach comprises the administration of
pharmaceutically effective doses of anti-human TNFalpha antibodies.
Recently one such antibody, designated D2E7, or generically
adalimumab, has been put on the market and is commercialised under
the trade name HUMIRA.RTM..
[0021] WO-A-02/072636 disclosed the crystallization of the whole,
intact antibodies Rituximab, Infliximab and Trastuzumab. Most of
the crystallization experiments were performed with chemicals with
unclear toxicity, like imidazole, 2-cyclohexyl-ethanesulfonate
(CHES), methylpentanediol, copper sulphate, and
2-morpholino-ethanesulfonate (MES). Most of the examples used seed
crystals to initiate crystallization.
[0022] WO-A-2004/009776 disclosed crystallization experiments in
the microliter scale using the sitting drop vapor diffusion
technique by mixing equal volumes (1 .mu.l) of different
crystallization buffers and D2E7 F(ab)'.sub.2 or Fab fragments.
While several experimental conditions were reported for each of
said fragments, no successful crystallization of the whole, intact
D2E7 antibody was reported.
[0023] Methods for preparing crystals of any given anti-human
TNFalpha whole antibodies, in particular of D2E7, therefore are not
available.
[0024] The problem to be solved according to the present invention
is, therefore, to develop suitable batch crystallization conditions
for anti-hTNFalpha antibodies, in particular for the human
anti-hTNFalpha antibody D2E7, and to establish crystallization
process conditions applicable to volumes relevant for industrial
antibody crystal production. At the same time a crystallization
process should be established that does not make use of toxic
agents, which might negatively affect the pharmaceutical
applicability of such antibodies.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0025] The above-mentioned problem was, surprisingly, solved by the
finding that it is possible to obtain crystals of a whole
anti-hTNFalpha antibody in batch crystallization volumes above the
microliter scale by applying physiologically acceptable inorganic
phosphate salts as the crystallization-inducing agent.
PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0026] In a first aspect the invention relates to a batch
crystallization method for crystallizing an anti-hTNFalpha
antibody, comprising the steps of: [0027] a) providing an aqueous
solution of said antibody in admixture with an inorganic phosphate
salt as crystallization agent, as for example by mixing an aqueous
solution of said antibody, wherein the antibody preferably is
present in dissolved form, with an aqueous crystallization solution
comprising an inorganic phosphate salt as crystallization agent in
dissolved form, or alternatively by adding said crystallization
agent in solid form; and [0028] b) incubating said aqueous
crystallization mixture until crystals of said antibody are
formed.
[0029] The crystallization method of the invention generally is
performed at a pH of said aqueous crystallization mixture in the
range of about pH 3 to about 5, in particular about 3.5 to about
4.5, or about 3.7 to about 4.2.
[0030] Moreover, said aqueous crystallization mixture may contain
at least one buffer. Said buffer may, in particular, comprise an
acetate component as main component, especially an alkali metal
salt, in particular, sodium acetate. Said salt is adjusted by
addition of an acid, in particular acetic acid, to the required pH.
In a preferred embodiment of the crystallization method, the buffer
concentration (total acetate) in said aqueous crystallization
mixture is 0 to about 0.5 M, or about 0.02 to about 0.5 M, as for
example about 0.05 to about 0.3 M, or about 0.15 to about 0.2
M.
[0031] In a further particular embodiment of the crystallization
method according to the invention, the phosphate salt used as the
precipitating agent is selected from hydrogenphosphate salts, such
as mono- or dihydrogenphosphate salts, in particular an ammonium
salt or an alkali metal salt, for example a salt containing
Na.sup.+ or K.sup.+ ions, or a mixture thereof comprising of at
least two different salts. Suitable examples are:
NaH.sub.2PO.sub.4, Na.sub.2HPO.sub.4, KH.sub.2PO.sub.4,
K.sub.2HPO.sub.4, NH.sub.4H.sub.2PO.sub.4,
(NH.sub.4).sub.2HPO.sub.4, and mixtures thereof.
[0032] In particular, the phosphate salt concentration in the
crystallization mixture is in the range of about 1 to about 6 M,
for example a range of about 1.0 to about 4.0 M, or about 1.0 to
about 3.0 M, or about 1.5 to about 2.8 M, or about 2.0 to about
2.6M.
[0033] In a preferred embodiment of the invention, protein solution
and crystallization solution are combined in a ratio of about 1:1.
Thus, molarities of the buffering agents/crystallization agents in
the original crystallization solution are about double as high as
in the crystallization mixture.
[0034] Typically, the crystallization method is performed in a
batch volume in the range of about 1 ml to about 20000 l, or 1 ml
to about 15000 l, or 1 ml to about 12000 l, or about 1 ml to about
10000 l, or 1 ml to about 6000 l, or 1 ml to about 3000 l, or 1 ml
to about 1000 l, or 1 ml to about 100 l, as for example about 50 ml
to about 8000 ml, or about 100 ml to about 5000 ml, or about 1000
ml to about 3000 ml; or about 1 l to about 1000 l; or about 10 l to
about 500 l.
[0035] In addition, the crystallization method of the invention may
be performed so that at least one of the following additional
crystallization conditions is achieved: [0036] a) incubation is
performed for between about 1 hour to about 60 days, for example
about 1 to about 30 days, or about 2 to 10 days; [0037] b)
incubation is performed at a temperature between about 0.degree. C.
and about 50.degree. C., for example about 4.degree. C. and about
37.degree. C.; [0038] c) the antibody concentration (i.e. protein
concentration) in the crystallization mixture is in the range of
about 1 to 200 mg/ml or 1 to 100 mg/ml, for example 1.5 to 20
mg/ml, in particular in the range of about 2 to 15 mg/ml, or 5 to
10 mg/ml. The protein concentration may be determined according to
standard procedures for protein determination.
[0039] According to a particularly preferred method,
crystallization is performed under the following conditions of the
crystallization mixture:
Phosphate salt: NaH.sub.2PO.sub.4, 1.5 to 2.5 M buffer: total
acetate, 0 to 0.3 M pH: 3.6 to 4.2 anti-hTNFalpha concentration: 3
to 10 mg/ml
Temperature: 18 to 24.degree. C.
[0040] Batch volume: 1 to 100 l
Agitation: None
[0041] Duration: 4 to 15 days
[0042] The crystallization mixtures as outlined above are usually
obtained by adding a crystallization agent in solution or as solid
to the protein solution. Both solutions may be, but do not have to
be buffered. Crystallization agent molarity and buffer molarity in
the original crystallization solution is usually higher than in the
crystallization mixture as it is "diluted" with the protein
solution.
[0043] In a further embodiment, the crystallization method of the
invention may further comprise the step of drying the obtained
crystals. Suitable drying methods comprise evaporative drying,
spray drying, lyophilization, vacuum drying, fluid bed drying,
spray freeze drying, near critical drying, supercritical drying,
and nitrogen gas drying.
[0044] In a further embodiment, the crystallization method of the
invention may further comprise the step of exchanging the
crystallization mother liquor with a different buffer, e.g. a
buffer containing polyethylene glycol (PEG) with a molar mass in
the range of about 300 to 8000 Daltons or mixtures of PEGs, by
centrifugation, diafiltration, ultrafiltration or other commonly
used buffer exchange techniques.
[0045] The present invention also relates to a crystal of an
anti-hTNFalpha antibody, obtainable by a crystallization method as
defined above and in general to crystals of an anti-hTNFalpha
antibody
[0046] The crystals of the invention are typically characterized by
a needle-like morphology with a maximum length l of about 2-500
.mu.m or about 100-300 .mu.m and an l/d ratio of about 3 to 30, but
may also have other geometrical appearances
[0047] Said crystal may be obtained from a polyclonal antibody or,
preferably, a monoclonal antibody.
[0048] In particular, said antibody is selected from the group
consisting of: non-chimeric or chimeric antibodies, humanized
antibodies, non-glycosylated antibodies, human antibodies and mouse
antibodies. In particular the antibody to be crystallized is a
non-chimeric, human antibody optionally further processed for
improving the antigen-binding.
[0049] Preferably, said crystals are obtained from an IgG antibody
such as, for example, an IgG1, IgG2, IgG3 or IgG4 antibody. In
particular, said antibody is a whole anti-human TNFalpha antibody
of the group IgG1.
[0050] In a preferred embodiment, the crystals are prepared from an
isolated human antibody, that dissociates from hTNFalpha with a Kd
of 1.times.10.sup.-8 M or less, more preferably 1.times.10.sup.-9 M
or less, and even more preferably 5.times.10.sup.-10 M or less, and
a K.sub.a rate constant of 1.times.10.sup.-3 s.sup.-1 or less, both
determined by surface plasmon resonance, and neutralizes hTNFalpha
cytotoxicity in a standard in vitro L929 assay with an IC.sub.50 of
1.times.10.sup.-7 M or less.
[0051] In particular, said crystals may be prepared from an
isolated human antibody with the following characteristics: a)
dissociates from human TNFalpha with a k.sub.off rate constant of
1.times.10.sup.-3 s.sup.-1 or less, as determined by surface
plasmon resonance; b) has a light chain CDR3 domain comprising the
amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 3, or modified from SEQ ID NO: 3
by a single alanine substitution at position 1, 4, 5, 7 or 8, or by
one to five conservative amino acid substitutions at positions 1,
3, 4, 6, 7, 8 and/or 9; c) has a heavy chain CDR3 domain comprising
the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 4, or modified from SEQ ID
NO: 4 by a single alanine substitution at position 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,
8, 9, 10 or 11, or by one to five conservative amino acid
substitutions at positions 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11 and/or
12.
[0052] More preferably, the antibody, or antigen-binding portion
thereof, dissociates from human TNFalpha with a k.sub.off of
5.times.10.sup.-4 s.sup.-1 or less. Even more preferably, the
antibody, or antigen-binding portion thereof, dissociates from
human TNFalpha with a k.sub.off of 1.times.10.sup.-4 s.sup.-1 or
less.
[0053] In a particularly preferred embodiment, said crystals are
prepared from an isolated human antibody with a light chain
variable region (LCVR) comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID
NO: 1 and a heavy chain variable region (HCVR) comprising the amino
acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2.
[0054] Most preferred are crystals prepared from the antibody D2E7,
as disclosed in WO-A-97/29131 or a functional equivalent thereof.
Said antibody is recombinantly produced in Chinese hamster ovary
cells and comprises a heavy chain sequence according to SEQ ID NO:6
and a light chain sequence according to SEQ ID NO: 5.
[0055] In a further embodiment, the invention relates to a solid,
liquid or semi-solid pharmaceutical composition comprising: (a)
crystals of an anti-hTNFalpha antibody as defined in any one of
claims 15 to 26, and (b) at least one pharmaceutically acceptable
excipient stably maintaining the antibody crystals.
[0056] Another aspect of this invention relates to a solid, liquid
or semi-solid pharmaceutical composition comprising: (a) crystals
of an anti-hTNFalpha antibody as defined herein, and (b) at least
one pharmaceutically acceptable excipient encapsulating or
embedding said antibody crystals. The composition may further
comprise (c) at least one pharmaceutically acceptable excipient
stably maintaining the antibody crystals. Moreover, encapsulation
and embedding may be implemented in conjunction.
[0057] In particular, said compositions may have an antibody
crystal concentration higher than about 1 mg/ml, in particular
about 200 mg/ml or more, for example about 200 to about 600 mg/ml,
or about 300 to about 500 mg/ml.
[0058] Said excipients may comprise at least one polymeric,
optionally biodegradable carrier or at least one oil or lipid
carrier.
[0059] Said polymeric carrier may be a polymer selected from one or
more of the group consisting of: poly(acrylic acid),
poly(cyanoacrylates), poly(amino acids), poly(anhydrides),
poly(depsipeptide), poly(esters), poly(lactic acid),
poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) or PLGA,
poly(.beta.-hydroxybutryate), poly(caprolactone), poly(dioxanone);
poly(ethylene glycol), poly(hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide,
poly(organo)phosphazene, poly(ortho esters), poly(vinyl alcohol),
poly(vinylpyrrolidone), maleic anhydride alkyl vinyl ether
copolymers, pluronic polyols, albumin, alginate, cellulose and
cellulose derivatives, collagen, fibrin, gelatin, hyaluronic acid,
oligosaccharides, glycaminoglycans, sulfated polysaccharides,
blends and copolymers thereof.
[0060] Said oil (or oily liquid) may be an oil (or oily liquid)
selected from one or more of the group consisting of: oleaginous
almond oil, corn oil, cottonseed oil, ethyl oleate, isopropyl
myristate, isopropyl palmitate, mineral oil, light mineral oil,
octyldodecanol, olive oil, peanut oil, persic oil, sesame oil,
soybean oil, squalane, liquid triglycerides, liquid waxes, higher
alcohols.
[0061] Said lipid carrier may be a lipid selected from one or more
of the group consisting of: fatty acids and salts of fatty acids,
fatty alcohols, fatty amines, mono-, di-, and triglycerides of
fatty acids, phospholipids, glycolipids, sterols and waxes and
related similar substances. Waxes are further classified in natural
and synthetic products. Natural materials include waxes obtained
from vegetable, animal or minerals sources such as beeswax,
carnauba or montanwax. Chlorinated naphthalenes and ethylenic
polymers are examples for synthetic wax products.
[0062] In a preferred embodiment, said composition is an injectable
composition comprising anti-hTNFalpha antibody crystals as defined
above and having an antibody crystal concentration in the range of
about 10 to about 400 or about 50 to about 300 mg/ml.
[0063] In a further aspect the invention relates to a crystal
slurry comprising anti-hTNFalpha antibody crystals as defined above
having an antibody crystal concentration higher than about 100
mg/ml, for example about 150 to about 600 mg/ml, or about 200 to
about 400 mg/ml.
[0064] The present invention also relates to a method for treating
a mammal comprising the step of administering to the mammal an
effective amount of whole anti-hTNFalpha antibody crystals as
defined above or an effective amount of the composition as defined
above. Preferably, said composition is administered by parenteral
route, oral route, or by injection.
[0065] Furthermore, the present invention relates to a method of
treating a hTNFalpha-related disorder in a subject that comprises
administering a therapeutically effective amount of antibody
crystals as defined above.
[0066] In particular, said hTNFalpha-related disorder is selected
from:
an autoimmune disease, in particular rheumatoid arthritis,
rheumatoid spondylitis, osteoarthritis and gouty arthritis, an
allergy, multiple sclerosis, autoimmune diabetes, autoimmune
uveitis and nephrotic syndrome; an infectious disease, transplant
rejection or graft-versus-host disease, malignancy, pulmonary
disorder, intestinal disorder, cardiac disorder, inflammatory bone
disorders, bone resorption disease, alcoholic hepatitis, viral
hepatitis, fulminant hepatitis, coagulation disturbances, burns,
reperfusion injury, keloid formation, scar tissue formation,
pyrexia, periodontal disease, obesity and radiation toxicity; a
spondyloarthropathy, a pulmonary disorder, a coronary disorder, a
metabolic disorder, anemia, pain, a hepatic disorder, a skin
disorder, a nail disorder, or vasculitis, Behcet's disease,
ankylosing spondylitis, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease (COPD), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), restenosis,
diabetes, anemia, pain, a Crohn's disease-related disorder,
juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA), a hepatitis C virus infection,
psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, chronic plaque psoriasis,
age-related cachexia, Alzheimer's disease, brain edema,
inflammatory brain injury, chronic fatigue syndrome,
dermatomyositis, drug reactions, edema in and/or around the spinal
cord, familial periodic fevers, Felty's syndrome, fibrosis,
glomerulonephritides (e.g. post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis or
IgA nephropathy), loosening of prostheses, microscopic
polyangiitis, mixed connective tissue disorder, multiple myeloma,
cancer and cachexia, multiple organ disorder, myelo dysplastic
syndrome, orchitism osteolysis, pancreatitis, including acute,
chronic, and pancreatic abscess, periodontal disease polymyositis,
progressive renal failure, pseudogout, pyoderma gangrenosum,
relapsing polychondritis, rheumatic heart disease, sarcoidosis,
sclerosing cholangitis, stroke, thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm
repair (TAAA), TNF receptor associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS),
symptoms related to Yellow Fever vaccination, inflammatory diseases
associated with the ear, chronic ear inflammation, or pediatric ear
inflammation, uveitis, sciatica, prostatitis, endometriosis,
choroidal neovascularization, lupus, Sjogren's syndrome, and wet
macular degeneration.
[0067] Moreover, the present invention relates to the use of whole
anti-hTNFalpha antibody crystals as defined above for preparing a
pharmaceutical composition for treating a hTNFalpha-related disease
as defined above.
[0068] Finally, the present invention provides anti-hTNFalpha
antibody crystals as defined above for use in medicine.
DESCRIPTION OF FIGURES
[0069] FIG. 1: D2E7 crystals from Example 37 after 6 days.
[0070] FIG. 2: D2E7 crystals manufactured in 1 mL batch volume,
ambient temperature.
[0071] FIG. 3: D2E7 crystals manufactured in 50 mL batch volume,
ambient temperature.
[0072] FIG. 4: D2E7 crystals manufactured in 10 L batch volume,
ambient temperature.
[0073] FIG. 5: D2E7 crystals manufactured according to the
invention and birefringence thereof. FIG. 5A shows clusters of
Adalimumab needle-like crystals and was photographed under crossed
polarizers. FIG. 5B is taken with plane polars and shows the
particle morphology. FIG. 5C shows birefringence and was taken with
crossed polar and a red compensator or quarter wave plate. FIG. 5D
shows birefringence and was taken with crossed polars.
[0074] FIG. 6: D2E7 crystal suspensions at different concentrations
injected via different gauge needles.
[0075] FIG. 7: FT-IR analysis of D2E7 crystal suspension.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
A. Definitions
[0076] A "batch method of crystallization" comprises the step of
adding the crystallization solution comprising the crystallization
agent, preferably in dissolved form, to the solution of the
antibody to be crystallized.
[0077] A "micro scale crystallization method", which may for
example be based upon vapor diffusion, comprises the steps of
admixing a small volume of antibody solution in the microliter
range with a reservoir buffer containing a crystallization agent;
placing a droplet of said mixture in a sealed container adjacent to
an aliquot of said reservoir buffer; allowing exchange of solvent
between the droplet and the reservoir by vapor diffusion, during
which the solvent content in said droplet changes and
crystallization may be observed if suitable crystallization
conditions are reached.
[0078] A "crystallization agent", in the present case a phosphate
salt, favors crystal formation of the antibody to be
crystallized.
[0079] A "crystallization solution" contains said crystallization
agent in dissolved form. Preferably said solution is an aqueous
system, i.e. the liquid constituents thereof predominantly, consist
of water. As for example, 80 to 100 wt.-% or 95 to 100 wt.-% or 98
to 100 wt.-% may be water.
[0080] Antibody "crystals" are one form of the solid state of
matter of said protein, which is distinct from a second solid form,
i.e. the amorphous state, which exists essentially as an
unorganized, heterogeneous solid. Crystals have a regular
three-dimensional structure, typically referred to as a lattice. An
antibody crystal comprises a regular three-dimensional array of
antibody molecules. See Giege, R. and Ducruix, A. Barrett,
Crystallization of Nucleic Acids and Proteins, a Practical
Approach, 2nd ed., pp. 1-16, Oxford University Press, New York
(1999).
[0081] A "whole" or "intact" anti-hTNFalpha antibody as
crystallized according to this invention, is a functional antibody
that is able to recognize and bind to its antigen human TNFalpha in
vitro and/or in vivo. The antibody may initiate subsequent immune
system reactions of a patient associated with antibody-binding to
its antigen, in particular Direct Cytotoxicity,
Complement-Dependent Cytotoxicity (CDC), and Antibody-Dependent
Cytotoxicity (ADCC). The antibody molecule has a structure composed
of two identical heavy chains (MW each about 50 kDa) covalently
bound to each other, and two identical light chains (MW each about
25 kDa), each covalently bound to one of the heavy chains. The four
chains are arranged in a classic "Y" motif. Each heavy chain is
comprised of a heavy chain variable region (abbreviated herein as
HCVR or VH) and a heavy chain constant region. The heavy chain
constant region is comprised of three domains, CH1, CH2 and CH3.
Each light chain is comprised of a light chain variable region
(abbreviated herein as LCVR or VL) and a light chain constant
region. The light chain constant region is comprised of one domain,
CL. The VH and VL regions can be further subdivided into regions of
hypervariability, termed complementarity determining regions (CDR),
interspersed with regions that are more conserved, termed framework
regions (FR). Each VH and VL is composed of three CDRs and four
FRs, arranged from amino-terminus to carboxy-terminus in the
following order: FR1, CDR1, FR2, CDR2, FR3, CDR3, FR4. The complete
antibody molecule has two antigen binding sites, i.e. is
"bivalent". The two antigen binding sites are specific for one
hTNFalpha antigen, i.e. the antibody is "mono-specific".
[0082] "Monoclonal antibodies" are antibodies that are derived from
a single clone of B lymphocytes (B cells), and recognize the same
antigenic determinant. Whole monoclonal antibodies are those that
have the above-mentioned classic molecular structure that includes
two complete heavy chains and two complete light chains. Monoclonal
antibodies are routinely produced by fusing the antibody-producing
B cell with an immortal myeloma cell to generate B cell hybridomas,
which continually produce monoclonal antibodies in cell culture.
Other production methods are available, as for example expression
of monoclonal antibodies in bacterial, yeast, insect, or mammalian
cell culture using phage-display technology; in vivo production in
genetically modified animals, such as cows, goats, pigs, rabbits,
chickens, or in transgenic mice which have been modified to contain
and express the entire human B cell genome; or production in
genetically modified plants, such as tobacco and corn.
Anti-hTNFalpha antibodies from all such sources may be crystallized
according to this invention.
[0083] The monoclonal antibodies to be crystallized according to
the invention include "chimeric" anti-hTNFalpha antibodies in which
a portion of the heavy and/or light chain is identical with or
homologous to corresponding sequences in antibodies derived from a
particular species or belonging to a particular antibody class or
subclass, while the remainder of the chain(s) is identical with or
homologous to corresponding sequences in antibodies derived from
another species or belonging to another antibody class or subclass.
As an example there may be mentioned a mouse/human chimera
containing variable antigen-binding portions of a murine antibody
and constant portions derived from a human antibody.
[0084] "Humanized" forms of non-human (e.g. murine) anti-hTNFalpha
antibodies are also encompassed. These are chimeric antibodies that
contain minimal sequence derived from a non-human immunoglobulin.
For the most part, humanized antibodies are human immunoglobulins
in which residues from a complementarity determining region (CDR)
or hypervariable loop (HVL) of the human immunoglobulin are
replaced by residues from a CDR or HVL of a non-human species, such
as mouse, rat, rabbit or non-human primate, having the desired
functionality. Framework region (FR) residues of the human
immunoglobulin may replaced by corresponding non-human residues to
improve antigen binding affinity. Furthermore, humanized antibodies
may comprise residues that are found neither in the corresponding
human or non-human antibody portions. These modifications may be
necessary to further improve antibody efficacy.
[0085] A "human antibody" or "fully human antibody" is one, which
has an amino acid sequence which corresponds to that of an antibody
produced by a human or which is recombinantly produced. The term
"human antibody", as used herein, is intended to include antibodies
having variable and constant regions derived from human germline
immunoglobulin sequences. The human antibodies of the invention may
include amino acid residues not encoded by human germline
immunoglobulin sequences (e.g. mutations introduced by random or
site-specific mutagenesis in vitro or by somatic mutation in vivo),
for example in the CDRs and in particular CDR3. However, the term
"human antibody", as used herein, is not intended to include
antibodies in which CDR sequences derived from the germline of
another mammalian species, such as a mouse, have been grafted onto
human framework sequences.
[0086] The term "recombinant human antibody", as used herein, is
intended to include all human antibodies that are prepared,
expressed, created or isolated by recombinant means, such as
antibodies expressed using a recombinant expression vector
transfected into a host cell, antibodies isolated from a
recombinant, combinatorial human antibody library, antibodies
isolated from an animal (e.g. a mouse) that is transgenic for human
immunoglobulin genes (see e.g. Taylor, L. D., et al. (1992) Nucl.
Acids Res. 20:6287-6295) or antibodies prepared, expressed, created
or isolated by any other means that involves splicing of human
immunoglobulin gene sequences to other DNA sequences. Such
recombinant human antibodies have variable and constant regions
derived from human germline immunoglobulin sequences. In certain
embodiments, however, such recombinant human antibodies are
subjected to in vitro mutagenesis (or, when an animal transgenic
for human Ig sequences is used, in vivo somatic mutagenesis) and
thus the amino acid sequences of the VH and VL regions of the
recombinant antibodies are sequences that, while derived from and
related to human germline VH and VL sequences, may not naturally
exist within the human antibody germline repertoire in vivo.
[0087] A "neutralizing antibody", as used herein (or an "antibody
that neutralized hTNFalpha .quadrature.activity"), is intended to
refer to an antibody whose binding to hTNFalpha results in
inhibition of the biological activity of hTNFalpha. This inhibition
of the biological activity of hTNFalpha can be assessed by
measuring one or more indicators of hTNFalpha biological activity,
such as hTNFalpha-induced cytotoxicity (either in vitro or in
vivo), hTNFalpha-induced cellular activation and hTNFalpha binding
to hTNFalpha receptors. These indicators of hTNFalpha biological
activity can be assessed by one or more of several standard in
vitro or in vivo assays known in the art. Preferably, the ability
of an antibody to neutralize hTNFalpha activity is assessed by
inhibition of hTNFalpha-induced cytotoxicity of L929 cells. As an
additional or alternative parameter of hTNFalpha activity, the
ability of an antibody to inhibit hTNFalpha-induced expression of
ELAM-1 on HUVEC, as a measure of hTNFalpha-induced cellular
activation, can be assessed.
[0088] An "affinity matured" anti-hTNFalpha antibody is one with
one or more alterations in one or more hypervariable regions, which
result in an improvement in the affinity of the antibody for
antigen, compared to a parent antibody. Affinity matured antibodies
will have nanomolar or even picomolar affinities values for the
target antigen. Affinity matured antibodies are produced by
procedures known in the art. Marks et al., Bio/Technology
10:779-783 (1992) describes affinity maturation by VH and VL domain
shuffling. Random mutagenesis of CDR and/or framework residues is
described by: Barbas et al., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 91:3809-3813
(1994); Scier et al., Gene 169:147-155 (1995); Yelton et al., J.
Immunol. 155:1994-2004 (1995): Jackson et al., J. Immunol.
154(7):3310-9 (1995); and Hawkins et al., J. Mol Biol. 226:889-896
(1992).
[0089] An "isolated antibody", as used herein, is intended to refer
to an antibody that is substantially free of other antibodies
having different antigenic specificities (e.g. an isolated antibody
that specifically binds hTNFalpha is substantially free of
antibodies that specifically bind antigens other than hTNFalpha).
An isolated antibody that specifically binds hTNFalpha may,
however, have cross-reactivity to other antigens, such as hTNFalpha
molecules from other species. Moreover, an isolated antibody may be
substantially free of other cellular material and/or chemicals.
[0090] The term "human TNFalpha" (abbreviated herein as hTNFalpha,
or simply hTNF), as used herein, is intended to refer to a human
cytokine that exists as a 17 kDa secreted form and a 26 kDa
membrane-associated form, the biologically active form of which is
composed of a trimer of noncovalently bound molecules. The
structure of hTNFalpha is described further in, for example,
Pennica, D., et al. (1984) Nature 312:724-729; Davis, J. M., et al.
(1987) Biochemistry 26:1322-1326; and Jones, E. Y., et al. (1989)
Nature 338:225-228. The term human TNFalpha is intended to include
recombinant human TNFalpha (rhTNFalpha), which can be prepared by
standard recombinant expression methods or purchased commercially
(R & D Systems, Catalog No. 210-TA, Minneapolis, Minn.).
[0091] The term "k.sub.off", as used herein, is intended to refer
to the off rate constant for dissociation of an antibody from the
antibody/antigen complex.
[0092] The term "K.sub.d", as used herein, is intended to refer to
the dissociation constant of a particular antibody-antigen
interaction.
[0093] A "functional equivalent" of a specific "parent"
anti-hTNFalpha antibody as crystallized according to the invention
is one which shows the same antigen-specificity, differs however
with respect to the molecular composition of the "parent" antibody
on the amino acid level or glycosylation level. Said differences,
however, may be merely such that the crystallization conditions do
not deviate from the parameter ranges as disclosed herein.
[0094] "Encapsulation" of antibody crystals refers to a formulation
where the incorporated crystals are individually coated by at least
one layer of a coating material. In a preferred embodiment, such
coated crystals may have a sustained dissolution rate.
[0095] "Embedding" of antibody crystals refers to a formulation
where the crystals, which might be encapsulated or not, are
incorporated into a solid, liquid or semi-solid carrier in a
disperse manner. Such embedded crystallized antibody molecules may
be released or dissolved in a controlled, sustained manner from the
carrier.
B. Method of Crystallization
[0096] The crystallization method of the invention is in principle
applicable to any anti-hTNFalpha antibody. Said antibody may be a
polyclonal antibody or, preferably, a monoclonal antibody. Said
antibody may be chimeric antibodies, humanized antibodies, human
antibodies or non-human, as for example mouse antibodies, each in
glycosylated or non-glycosylated form. In particular the method is
applicable to D2E7 and functional equivalents thereof.
[0097] Preferably said anti-hTNFalpha antibody is an IgG antibody,
in particular an anti human TNFalpha antibody of the group
IgG1.
[0098] Unless otherwise stated the crystallization method of the
invention makes use of technical equipment, chemicals and
methodologies well known in the art. However, as explained above,
the present invention is based on the surprising finding that the
selection of specific crystallization conditions, in particular,
the selection of specific crystallization agents, optionally
further combined with specific pH conditions and/or concentration
ranges of the corresponding agents (buffer, antibody,
crystallization agent), allows for the first time to prepare
reproducibly and in a large scale stable crystals of antibodies, in
particular non-chimeric, human antibodies, directed against hTNF
alpha, which can be further processed to form an active ingredient
of a superior, highly advantageous pharmaceutical composition.
[0099] The starting material for performing the crystallization
method normally comprises a concentrated solution of the antibody
to be crystallized. The protein concentration may, for example, be
in the range of about 5 to 75 mg/ml. Said solution may contain
additives stabilizing said dissolved antibody, and it may be
advisable to remove said additives in advance. This can be achieved
by performing a buffer exchange step.
[0100] Preferably said starting material for performing the
crystallization contains the antibody in an aqueous solution,
having a pH adjusted in the range of about 3.2 to 8.2, or about 4.0
to 8.0, in particular about 4.5 to 6.5, preferably around 5.0 to
5.5. The pH may be adjusted by means of a suitable buffer applied
in a final concentration of about 1 to 50 mM, in particular about 1
to 10 mM. The solution may contain additives, as for example in a
proportion of about 0.01 to 15, or 0.1 to 5, or 0.1 to 2 wt.-%
based on the total weight of the solution, like salts, sugars,
sugar alcohols and surfactants, in order to further stabilize the
solution. The excipients should preferably be selected from
physiologically acceptable compounds, routinely applied in
pharmaceutical preparations. As non-limiting examples there may be
mentioned salts, like NaCl; surfactants, like polysorbate 80 (Tween
80), polysorbate 20 (Tween 20); sugars, like sucrose, trehalose;
sugar alcohols, like mannitol, sorbitol; and buffer agents, like
phosphate-based buffer systems, as sodium and potassium hydrogen
phosphate buffers as defined above, acetate buffer, phosphate
buffer, citrate buffer, TRIS buffer, maleate buffer or succinate
buffer, histidine buffer; amino acids, like histidine, arginine and
glycine.
[0101] The buffer exchange may be performed by means of routine
methods, for example dialysis or ultrafiltration.
[0102] The initial protein concentration of the aqueous solution
used as starting material should be in the range of about 0.5 to
about 200 or about 1 to about 50 mg/ml.
[0103] Depending on the intended final batch size (which may be in
the range of 1 ml to 20000 (twenty thousand) litres) an initial
volume of said aqueous antibody solution is placed in an
appropriate container (as for example a vessel, bottle or tank)
made of inert material, as for example glass, polymer or metal. The
initial volume of said aqueous solution may correspond to about 30
to 80%, normally about 50% of the final batch size.
[0104] If necessary the solution after having been filled into said
container will be brought to standardized conditions. In
particular, the temperature will be adjusted in the range of about
4.degree. C. and about 37.degree. C.
[0105] Then the crystallization solution, containing the
crystallization agent in an appropriate concentration, optionally
pre-conditioned in the same way as the antibody solution, is added
to the antibody solution.
[0106] The addition of the crystallization solution is performed
continuously or discontinuously optionally under gentle agitation
in order to facilitate mixing of the two liquids. Preferably the
addition is performed under conditions where the protein solution
is provided under agitation and the crystallization solution (or
agents in its solid from) is/are added in a controlled manner.
[0107] The formation of the antibody crystals is initiated by
applying a phosphate salt, in particular a hydrogen phosphate salt,
and preferably an alkali metal salt, or a mixture of at least two
different alkali metal salts as defined above as the
crystallization agent. The crystallization solution contains the
agent in a concentration which is sufficient to afford a final
concentration of the phosphate salt in said crystallization mixture
in the range of about 1 to 6 M.
[0108] Preferably, the crystallization solution additionally
contains an acidic buffer, i.e. different from that of the antibody
solution, in a concentration suitable to allow the adjustment of
the pH of the crystallization mixture in the range of about 3 to
5.
[0109] After having finished the addition of said crystallization
solution, the thus obtained mixture may be further incubated for
about 1 hour to about 60 days in order to obtain a maximum yield of
antibody crystals. If appropriate, the mixture may, for example, be
agitated, gently stirred, rolled or moved in a manner known per
se.
[0110] Finally, the crystals obtained may be separated by known
methods, for example filtration or centrifugation, as for example
by centrifugation at about 200-20000 rpm, preferably 500-2000 rpm,
at room temperature or 4.degree. C. The remaining mother liquor may
be discarded or further processed.
[0111] If necessary, the thus isolated crystals may be washed and
subsequently dried, or the mother liquor can be exchanged by a
different solvent system suitable for storage and/or final use of
the antibodies suspended therein.
[0112] Antibody crystals formed according to the present invention
may vary in their shape. Shapes typically may include needles,
cone-like, spherical and sea urchin like shapes. The size of the
crystals can be on the order of higher nm to mm size (as for
example length). In some embodiments, the crystals are at least
about 10 .mu.m in size, and may be visible to the naked eye. For
therapeutic administration, the size of the crystals will vary
depending on the route of administration, for example, for
subcutaneous administration the size of the crystals may be larger
than for intravenous administration.
[0113] The shape of the crystals may be altered by adding specific
additional additives to the crystallization mixture, as has been
previously described for both protein crystals and crystals of low
molecular weight organic and inorganic molecules.
[0114] If necessary, it may be verified that the crystals are in
fact crystals of said antibody. Crystals of an antibody can be
analyzed microscopically for birefringence. In general, crystals,
unless of cubic internal symmetry, will rotate the plane of
polarization of polarized light. In yet another method, crystals
can be isolated, washed, resolubilized and analyzed by SDS-PAGE
and, optionally, stained with an anti-Fc receptor antibody.
Optionally, the resolubilized antibody can also be tested for
binding to its hTNFalpha utilizing standard assays.
[0115] Crystals as obtained according to the invention may also be
crosslinked to one another. Such crosslinking may enhance stability
of the crystals. Methods for crosslinking crystals described, for
example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,849,296. Crystals can be crosslinked
using a bifunctional reagent such as glutaraldehyde. Once
crosslinked, crystals can be lyophilized and stored for use, for
example, in diagnostic or therapeutic applications.
[0116] In some cases, it may be desirable to dry the crystal.
Crystals may be dried by means of inert gases, like nitrogen gas,
vacuum oven drying, lyophilization, evaporation, tray drying, fluid
bed drying, spray drying, vacuum drying or roller drying. Suitable
methods are well known.
[0117] Crystals formed according to the invention can be maintained
in the original crystallization solution, or they can be washed and
combined with other substances, like inert carriers or ingredients
to form compositions or formulations comprising crystals of the
invention. Such compositions or formulations can be used, for
example, in therapeutic and diagnostic applications.
[0118] A preferred embodiment is to combine a suitable carrier or
ingredient with crystals of the invention in that way that crystals
of the formulation are embedded or encapsulated by an excipient.
Suitable carriers may be taken from the non limiting group of:
poly(acrylic acid), poly(cyanoacrylates), poly(amino acids),
poly(anhydrides), poly(depsipeptide), poly(esters), poly(lactic
acid), poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) or PLGA,
poly(.beta.-hydroxybutryate), poly(caprolactone), poly(dioxanone);
poly(ethylene glycol), poly(hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide,
poly(organo)phosphazene, poly(ortho esters), poly(vinyl alcohol),
poly(vinylpyrrolidone), maleic anhydride alkyl vinyl ether
copolymers, pluronic polyols, albumin, alginate, cellulose and
cellulose derivatives, collagen, fibrin, gelatin, hyaluronic acid,
oligosaccharides, glycaminoglycans, sulfated polysaccharides,
blends and copolymers thereof, SAIB, fatty acids and salts of fatty
acids, fatty alcohols, fatty amines, mono-, di-, and triglycerides
of fatty acids, phospholipids, glycolipids, sterols and waxes and
related similar substances. Waxes are further classified in natural
and synthetic products. Natural materials include waxes obtained
from vegetable, animal or minerals sources such as beeswax,
carnauba or montanwax. Chlorinated naphthalenes and ethylenic
polymers are examples for synthetic wax products.
C. Compositions
[0119] Another aspect of the invention relates to
compositions/formulations comprising anti-hTNFalpha antibody
crystals in combination with at least one carrier/excipient.
[0120] The formulations may be solid, semisolid or liquid.
[0121] Formulations of the invention are prepared, in a form
suitable for storage and/or for use, by mixing the antibody having
the necessary degree of purity with a physiologically acceptable
additive, like carrier, excipient and/or stabilizer (see for
example Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 16th Edn., Osol, A.
Ed. (1980)), in the form of suspensions, lyophilized or dried in
another way. Optionally further active ingredients, as for example
different antibodies, biomolecules, chemically or enzymatically
synthesized low-molecular weight molecules may be incorporated as
well.
[0122] Acceptable additives are non-toxic to recipients at the
dosages and concentrations employed. Nonlimiting examples thereof
include: [0123] Acidifying agents, like acetic acid, citric acid,
fumaric acid, hydrochloric acid, malic acid, nitric acid,
phosphoric acid, diluted phosphoric acid, sulfuric acid, tartaric
acid. [0124] Aerosol propellants, like butane,
dichlorodifluoromethane, dichlorotetrafluoroethane, isobutane,
propane, trichloromonofluormethane. [0125] Air displacements, like
carbon dioxide, nitrogen; [0126] Alcohol denaturants, like methyl
isobutyl ketone, sucrose octacetate; [0127] Alkalizing agents, like
ammonia solution, ammonium carbonate, diethanolamine,
diisopropanolamine, potassium hydroxide, sodium bicarbonate, sodium
borate, sodium carbonate, sodium hydroxide, trolamine; [0128]
Antifoaming agents, like dimethicone, simethicone. [0129]
Antimicrobial preservatives, like benzalkonium chloride,
benzalkonium chloride solution, benzethonium chloride, benzoic
acid, benzyl alcohol, butylparaben, cetylpyridinium chloride,
chlorobutanol, chlorocresol, cresol, dehydroacetic acid,
ethylparaben, methylparaben, methylparaben sodium, phenol,
phenylethyl alcohol, phenylmercuric acetate, phenylmercuric
nitrate, potassium benzoate, potassium sorbate, propylparaben,
propylparaben sodium, sodium benzoate, sodium dehydroacetate,
sodium propionate, sorbic acid, thimerosal, thymol. [0130]
Antioxidants, like ascorbic acid, acorbyl palmitate, butylated
hydroxyanisole, butylated hydroxytoluene, hypophosphorous acid,
monothioglycerol, propyl gallate, sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate,
sodium metabisulfite, sodium thiosulfate, sulfur dioxide,
tocopherol, tocopherols excipient; [0131] Buffering agents, like
acetic acid, ammonium carbonate, ammonium phosphate, boric acid,
citric acid, lactic acid, phosphoric acid, potassium citrate,
potassium metaphosphate, potassium phosphate monobasic, sodium
acetate, sodium citrate, sodium lactate solution, dibasic sodium
phosphate, monobasic sodium phosphate, histidine. [0132] Chelating
agents, like edetate disodium, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and
salts, edetic acid; [0133] Coating agents, like sodium
carboxymethylcellulose, cellulose acetate, cellulose acetate
phthalate, ethylcellulose, gelatin, pharmaceutical glaze,
hydroxypropyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose,
hydroxypropyl methylcellulose phthalate, methacrylic acid
copolymer, methylcellulose, polyethylene glycol, polyvinyl acetate
phthalate, shellac, sucrose, titanium dioxide, carnauba wax,
microcrystalline wax, zein, poly amino acids, other polymers like
PLGA etc., and SAIB. [0134] Coloring agent, like ferric oxide.
[0135] Complexing agents, like ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and
salts (EDTA), edetic acid, gentisic acid ethanolamide, oxyquinoline
sulfate. [0136] Desiccants, like calcium chloride, calcium sulfate,
silicon dioxide. [0137] Emulsifying and/or solubilizing agents,
like acacia, cholesterol, diethanolamine (adjunct), glyceryl
monostearate, lanolin alcohols, lecithin, mono- and di-glycerides,
monoethanolamine (adjunct), oleic acid (adjunct), oleyl alcohol
(stabilizer), poloxamer, polyoxyethylene 50 stearate, polyoxyl 35
caster oil, polyoxyl 40 hydrogenated castor oil, polyoxyl 10 oleyl
ether, polyoxyl 20 cetostearyl ether, polyoxyl 40 stearate,
polysorbate 20, polysorbate 40, polysorbate 60, polysorbate 80,
propylene glycol diacetate, propylene glycol monostearate, sodium
lauryl sulfate, sodium stearate, sorbitan monolaurate, soritan
monooleate, sorbitan monopalmitate, sorbitan monostearate, stearic
acid, trolamine, emulsifying wax. [0138] Filtering aids, like
powdered cellulose, purified siliceous earth. [0139] Flavors and
perfumes, like anethole, benzaldehyde, ethyl vanillin, menthol,
methyl salicylate, monosodium glutamate, orange flower oil,
peppermint, peppermint oil, peppermint spirit, rose oil, stronger
rose water, thymol, tolu balsam tincture, vanilla, vanilla
tincture, vanillin. [0140] Glidant and/or anticaking agents, like
calcium silicate, magnesium silicate, colloidal silicon dioxide,
talc. [0141] Humectants, like glycerin, hexylene glycol, propylene
glycol, sorbitol; [0142] Ointment bases, like lanolin, anhydrous
lanolin, hydrophilic ointment, white ointment, yellow ointment,
polyethylene glycol ointment, petrolatum, hydrophilic petrolatum,
white petrolatum, rose water ointment, squalane. [0143]
Plasticizers, like castor oil, lanolin, mineral oil, petrolatum,
benzyl benyl formate, chlorobutanol, diethyl pthalate, sorbitol,
diacetylated monoglycerides, diethyl phthalate, glycerin, glycerol,
mono- and di-acetylated monoglycerides, polyethylene glycol,
propylene glycol, triacetin, triethyl citrate, ethanol. [0144]
Polypeptides, like low molecular weight (less than about 10
residues); Proteins, such as serum albumin, gelatin, or
immunoglobulins; [0145] Polymer membranes, like cellulose acetate
membranes. [0146] Solvents, like acetone, alcohol, diluted alcohol,
amylene hydrate, benzyl benzoate, butyl alcohol, carbon
tetrachloride, chloroform, corn oil, cottonseed oil, ethyl acetate,
glycerin, hexylene glycol, isopropyl alcohol, methyl alcohol,
methylene chloride, methyl isobutyl ketone, mineral oil, peanut
oil, polyethylene glycol, propylene carbonate, propylene glycol,
sesame oil, water for injection, sterile water for injection,
sterile water for irrigation, purified water, liquid triglycerides,
liquid waxes, higher alcohols. [0147] Sorbents, like powdered
cellulose, charcoal, purified siliceous earth, Carbon dioxide
sorbents, barium hydroxide lime, soda lime. [0148] Stiffening
agents, like hydrogenated castor oil, cetostearyl alcohol, cetyl
alcohol, cetyl esters wax, hard fat, paraffin, polyethylene
excipient, stearyl alcohol, emulsifying wax, white wax, yellow wax.
[0149] Suppository bases, like cocoa butter, hard fat, polyethylene
glycol; [0150] Suspending and/or viscosity-increasing agents, like
acacia, agar, alginic acid, aluminum monostearate, bentonite,
purified bentonite, magma bentonite, carbomer 934p,
carboxymethylcellulose calcium, carboxymethylcellulose sodium,
carboxymethycellulose sodium 12, carrageenan, microcrystalline and
carboxymethylcellulose sodium cellulose, dextrin, gelatin, guar
gum, hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl
methylcellulose, magnesium aluminum silicate, methylcellulose,
pectin, polyethylene oxide, polyvinyl alcohol, povidone, propylene
glycol alginate, silicon dioxide, colloidal silicon dioxide, sodium
alginate, tragacanth, xanthan gum; [0151] Sweetening agents, like
aspartame, dextrates, dextrose, excipient dextrose, fructose,
mannitol, saccharin, calcium saccharin, sodium saccharin, sorbitol,
solution sorbitol, sucrose, compressible sugar, confectioner's
sugar, syrup; [0152] Tablet binders, like acacia, alginic acid,
sodium carboxymethylcellulose, microcrystalline cellulose, dextrin,
ethylcellulose, gelatin, liquid glucose, guar gum, hydroxypropyl
methylcellulose, methycellulose, polyethylene oxide, povidone,
pregelatinized starch, syrup. [0153] Tablet and/or capsule
diluents, like calcium carbonate, dibasic calcium phosphate,
tribasic calcium phosphate, calcium sulfate, microcrystalline
cellulose, powdered cellulose, dextrates, dextrin, dextrose
excipient, fructose, kaolin, lactose, mannitol, sorbitol, starch,
pregelatinized starch, sucrose, compressible sugar, confectioner's
sugar; [0154] Tablet disintegrants, like alginic acid,
microcrystalline cellulose, croscarmellose sodium, corspovidone,
polacrilin potassium, sodium starch glycolate, starch,
pregelatinized starch. [0155] Tablet and/or capsule lubricants,
like calcium stearate, glyceryl behenate, magnesium stearate, light
mineral oil, polyethylene glycol, sodium stearyl fumarate, stearic
acid, purified stearic acid, talc, hydrogenated vegetable oil, zinc
stearate; [0156] Tonicity agent, like dextrose, glycerin, mannitol,
potassium chloride, sodium chloride Vehicle: flavored and/or
sweetened aromatic elixir, compound benzaldehyde elixir,
iso-alcoholic elixir, peppermint water, sorbitol solution, syrup,
tolu balsam syrup. [0157] Vehicles, like oleaginous almond oil,
corn oil, cottonseed oil, ethyl oleate, isopropyl myristate,
isopropyl palmitate, mineral oil, light mineral oil, myristyl
alcohol, octyldodecanol, olive oil, peanut oil, persic oil, sesame
oil, soybean oil, squalane; solid carrier sugar spheres; sterile
bacteriostatic water for injection, bacteriostatic sodium chloride
injection, liquid triglycerides, liquid waxes, higher alcohols
[0158] Water repelling agents, like cyclomethicone, dimethicone,
simethicone; [0159] Wetting and/or solubilizing agents, like
benzalkonium chloride, benzethonium chloride, cetylpyridinium
chloride, docusate sodium, nonoxynol 9, nonoxynol 10, octoxynol 9,
poloxamer, polyoxyl 35 castor oil, polyoxyl 40, hydrogenated castor
oil, polyoxyl 50 stearate, polyoxyl 10 oleyl ether, polyoxyl 20,
cetostearyl ether, polyoxyl 40 stearate, polysorbate 20,
polysorbate 40, polysorbate 60, polysorbate 80, sodium lauryl
sulfate, sorbitan monolaureate, sorbitan monooleate, sorbitan
monopalmitate, sorbitan monostearate, tyloxapol;
[0160] The crystals may be combined with a polymeric carrier to
provide for stability and/or sustained release. Such polymers
include biocompatible and biodegradable polymers.
[0161] A polymeric carrier may be a single polymer type or it may
be composed of a mixture of polymer types. Nonlimiting examples of
polymeric carriers have already been stated above.
[0162] Examples of preferred ingredients or excipients include:
[0163] salts of amino acids such as glycine, arginine, aspartic
acid, glutamic acid, lysine, asparagine, glutamine, proline,
histidine; [0164] monosaccharides, such as glucose, fructose,
galactose, mannose, arabinose, xylose, ribose; [0165]
disaccharides, such as lactose, trehalose, maltose, sucrose; [0166]
polysaccharides, such as maltodextrins, dextrans, starch, glycogen;
[0167] alditols, such as mannitol, xylitol, lactitol, sorbitol;
[0168] glucuronic acid, galacturonic acid; [0169] cyclodextrins,
such as methyl cyclodextrin, hydroxypropyl-(3-cyclodextrin) [0170]
inorganic salts, such as sodium chloride, potassium chloride,
magnesium chloride, phosphates of sodium and potassium, boric acid
ammonium carbonate and ammonium phosphate; [0171] organic salts,
such as acetates, citrate, ascorbate, lactate; [0172] emulsifying
or solubilizing agents like acacia, diethanolamine, glyceryl
monostearate, lecithin, monoethanolamine, oleic acid, oleyl
alcohol, poloxamer, polysorbates, sodium lauryl sulfate, stearic
acid, sorbitan monolaurate, sorbitan monostearate, and other
sorbitan derivatives, polyoxyl derivatives, wax, polyoxyethylene
derivatives, sorbitan derivatives; and [0173] viscosity increasing
reagents like, agar, alginic acid and its salts, guar gum, pectin,
polyvinyl alcohol, polyethylene oxide, cellulose and its
derivatives propylene carbonate, polyethylene glycol, hexylene
glycol and tyloxapol.
[0174] Formulations described herein also comprise an effective
amount of crystalline antibody. In particular, the formulations of
the invention may include a "therapeutically effective amount" or a
"prophylactically effective amount" of antibody crystals of the
invention. A "therapeutically effective amount" refers to an amount
effective, at dosages and for periods of time necessary, to achieve
the desired therapeutic result. A "therapeutically effective
amount" of the antibody crystals may vary according to factors such
as the disease state, age, sex, and weight of the individual, and
the ability of the antibody to elicit a desired response in the
individual. A therapeutically effective amount is also one in which
any toxic or detrimental effects of the antibody are outweighed by
the therapeutically beneficial effects. A "prophylactically
effective amount" refers to an amount effective, at dosages and for
periods of time necessary, to achieve the desired prophylactic
result. Typically, since a prophylactic dose is used in subjects
prior to or at an earlier stage of disease, the prophylactically
effective amount will be less than the therapeutically effective
amount.
[0175] Suitable dosages can readily be determined using standard
methodology. The antibody is suitably administered to the patient
at one time or over a series of treatments. Depending on the above
mentioned factors, about 1 .mu.g/kg to about 50 mg/kg, as for
example 0.1-20 mg/kg of antibody is an initial candidate dosage for
administration to the patient, whether, for example, by one or more
separate administrations, or by continuous infusion. A typical
daily or weekly dosage might range from about 1 .mu.g/kg to about
20 mg/kg or more, depending on the condition, the treatment is
repeated until a desired suppression of disease symptoms occurs.
However, other dosage regimens may be useful. In some cases,
formulations comprise a concentration of antibody of at least about
1 g/L or greater when resolubilized. In other embodiments, the
antibody concentration is at least about 1 g/L to about 100 g/L
when resolubilized.
[0176] Crystals of an antibody, or formulations comprising such
crystals, may be administered alone or as part of a pharmaceutical
preparation. They may be administered by parenteral, oral or
topical routes. For example, they may be administered by oral,
pulmonary, nasal, aural, anal, dermal, ocular, intravenous,
intramuscular, intraarterial, intraperitoneal, mucosal, sublingual,
subcutaneous, transdermal, topical or intracranial routes, or into
the buccal cavity. Specific examples of administration techniques
comprise pulmonary inhalation, intralesional application, needle
injection, dry powder inhalation, skin electroporation, aerosol
delivery, and needle-free injection technologies, including
needle-free subcutaneous administration.
[0177] The present invention will now be explained in more detail
by means of the following, non-limiting, illustrative examples.
Guided by the general part of the description and on the basis of
his general knowledge a skilled reader will be enabled to provide
further embodiments to the invention without undue
experimentation.
Experimental Part
A. Materials
a) Protein
[0178] Frozen monoclonal antibody (mAb) D2E7 was obtained from
Abbott Laboratories. All experiments were performed from a drug
product lot where the original mAb concentration was 50 mg/ml.
b) Fine Chemicals
[0179] Sodium acetate was obtained from Grussing GmbH, Filsum.
Polyethyleneglycols of different polymerization grades were
obtained from Clariant GmbH, Sulzbach. Furthermore, commercial
crystallization screens and reagents (Hampton Research, Nextal
Biotechnologies) were used for certain microscale experiments. All
other chemicals were from Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, or Merck,
Darmstadt.
B. General Methods
a) Thawing of D2E7 Drug Substance
[0180] D2E7 was thawed at 25.degree. C. in agitated water
baths.
b) Buffer Exchange--Method A
[0181] An aliquot of D2E7 solution was pipetted into a 30 KDa MWCO
Vivaspin 20 concentrator (Vivascience). The protein sample was
diluted with the new buffer in a ratio of 1:10, and by
centrifugation at 5,000.times.g at 4.degree. C. (Sigma 4 K 15 lab
centrifuge) the sample volume was brought back to the original
sample volume. The dilution/centrifugation steps were repeated
once, resulting in a dilution of 1:100 of the original sample
buffer. After adjustment of protein concentration, the solution was
sterile filtered through a 0.2 .mu.m syringe driven filter
unit.
b) Buffer Exchange--Method B
[0182] An aliquot of D2E7 solution was placed into a SLIDE-A-LYZER
dialysis cassette (Pierce Biotechnology Inc.). The dialysis
cassette was placed into a beaker containing the buffer of choice,
and the buffer exchange was performed at 4.degree. C. overnight
with stirring. After adjustment of protein concentration, the
solution was sterile filtered through a 0.2 .mu.m syringe driven
filter unit.
c) OD280--Protein Concentration Measurements
[0183] A ThermoSpectronics UV1 device was used to assess protein
concentration at a wavelength of 280 nm, applying an extinction
coefficient of 1.39 cm.sup.2 mg.sup.-1. For this purpose, aliquots
of crystallization slurries were centrifuged at 14,000 rpm, and
residual protein concentration was determined in the
supernatant.
d) pH Measurements
[0184] pH measurements were conducted by using a Mettler Toledo
MP220 pH meter. Inlab 413 electrodes and Inlab 423 microelectrodes
were utilized.
e) Crystallization Methods
[0185] e1) Microscale Crystallization--Sitting Drop Vapor Diffusion
Hydra II
[0186] Initial crystallization screens were performed using a Hydra
II crystallization robot and Greiner 96 well plates (three drop
wells, Hampton Research). After setting up the plates, the wells
were sealed with Clearseal film (Hampton Research).
e2) Microscale Crystallization--Hanging Drop Vapor Diffusion
[0187] Hanging drop vapor diffusion experiments were conducted
using VDX plates (with sealant, Hampton Research) and OptiClear
plastic cover slides (squares, Hampton Research) or siliconized
glass cover slides (circle, Hampton Research), respectively. After
preparation of reservoir solutions, one drop of reservoir solution
was admixed with one drop of the protein solution on a cover slide,
and the well was sealed with the inverted cover slide in such a way
that the drop was hanging above the reservoir.
e3) Batch Crystallization--Method A (24 Well Plate)
[0188] Batch crystallization was performed by admixing the protein
solution with an equal amount of crystallization buffer (500 .mu.l)
in a well. The well was subsequently sealed with adhesive tape to
prevent water evaporation.
e4) Batch Crystallization--Method B (Eppendorff Reaction Tube)
[0189] Batch crystallization was performed by admixing the protein
solution with an equal amount of crystallization buffer in a 1.5 mL
or a 2 mL Eppendorff reaction tube.
e5) Batch Crystallization--Method C (Falcon Tubes, Agitation)
[0190] Batch crystallization was performed by admixing the protein
solution with an equal amount of crystallization buffer in a 50 mL
Falcon tube. Right after closing, the tube was put on a laboratory
shaker (GFL 3013 or GFL 3015) or was alternatively agitated by
tumbling. By application of these methods, introduction of stirrers
into the sample was avoided.
e6) Batch Crystallization--Method D (1 Liter Polypropylene
Container)
[0191] Batch crystallization was performed by admixing the protein
solution with an equal amount of crystallization buffer in a
sterilized 1 liter polypropylene bottle. Right after closing, the
container was stored at ambient temperature without agitation. By
application of this method, introduction of stirrers into the
sample was avoided.
f) SDS-PAGE
[0192] Samples were prepared by adjusting protein concentration to
8 .mu.g/20 .mu.L. The samples were diluted with an
SDS/Tris/Glycerine buffer containing bromphenolblue.
[0193] Qualitative SDS PAGE analysis was performed using Invitrogen
NuPage 10% Bis-Tris Gels, NuPage MES SDS Running Buffer and Mark12
Wide Range Protein Standards. 20 .mu.L of sample was pipetted into
a gel pocket. After running the gel and fixation with acetic
acid/methanol reagent, staining was performed using the Novex
Colloidal Blue Stain Kit. Gels were dried using Invitogen Gel-Dry
drying solution.
g) Light Microscopy
[0194] Crystals were observed using a Zeiss Axiovert 25 or a Nikon
Labophot microscope. The latter was equipped with a polarization
filter set and a JVC TK C1380 color video camera.
h) SE-HPLC
[0195] Aggregation levels of D2E7 samples were assessed by SE-HPLC.
A Dionex P680 pump, ASI-100 autosampler and UVD170U detector device
were used. Aggregated species were separated from the monomer by an
Amersham Bioscience Superose 6 10/300 GL gel filtration column,
applying a validated Abbott standard protocol (CL16-PS-02,
Adalimumab purity).
C. Vapor Diffusion Crystallization Experiments
[0196] Concentration values given in the following examples are
initial values referring to the antibody solution and the reservoir
solution before mixing of the two solutions.
[0197] All pH values, if not described otherwise, refer to the pH
of an acetate buffer stock before it was combined with other
substances, like the crystallization agent.
[0198] All buffer molarities, if not described otherwise, refer to
sodium acetate concentrations in a stock solution before pH
adjustment, typically performed using acetic acid glacial.
Example 1
PEG 4,000/Sodium Acetate Grid Screen in Hanging Drop Vapor
Diffusion Mode
[0199] D2E7 was buffered into a buffer containing around 0.1 M
sodium acetate at a pH of around 5.2. The protein concentration was
adjusted to 10 mg/mL.
[0200] A greased VDX plate and square OptiClear plastic cover
slides were used. 500 .mu.L of a particular reservoir solution was
prepared by admixing acetate buffer, 50% w/v PEG 4,000 solution and
Milli Q water (fully desalted and optionally pre-destilled) in each
well. In this example, the acetate buffer molarity was kept
constant at around 0.1 M, and PEG 4,000 was varied from around 6%
w/v to around 28% w/v in 2% steps. The pH was around 5.2
throughout. Each condition was assessed in duplicate. Around 1
.mu.L of protein solution was admixed with around 1 .mu.L of a
particular reservoir solution on a square OptiClear plastic cover
slide, and the well was sealed with the inverted slide, generating
a hanging drop experiment. The plates were stored at ambient
temperature. Microscopy of the drops was performed multiple times
during the following thirty days. The conditions were classified
into clear drops, drops containing random precipitation, drops
containing crystals and drops containing mixtures of precipitated
species and crystals.
Results:
[0201] From the 24 wells assessed, no crystals were observed.
Example 2
PEG 4,000/Sodium Acetate Grid Screen in Hanging Drop Vapor
Diffusion Mode, Different Protein Concentration
[0202] D2E7 was buffered into a buffer containing around 0.1 M
sodium acetate at a pH of around 5.2. The protein concentration was
adjusted to 50 mg/mL. Except for the protein concentration the
process conditions were identical with those of Example 1.
Results:
[0203] From the 24 wells assessed, no crystals were observed.
Example 3
PEG 400/Sodium Acetate Grid Screen in Hanging Drop Vapor Diffusion
Mode
[0204] D2E7 was buffered into a buffer containing around 0.1 M
sodium acetate at a pH of around 5.2. The protein concentration was
adjusted to 10 mg/mL.
[0205] A greased VDX plate and square OptiClear plastic cover
slides were used. 500 .mu.L of a particular reservoir solution was
prepared by admixing acetate buffer, 50% w/v PEG solution and Milli
Q water in each well. In this example, the acetate buffer molarity
was kept constant at around 0.1 M, and PEG 400 was varied from
around 30% w/v to around 40% w/v in 2% steps. The pH was around 5.2
throughout. Each condition was assessed in duplicate. Around 1
.mu.L of protein solution was admixed with around 1 .mu.L of a
particular reservoir solution on a square OptiClear plastic cover
slide, and the well was sealed with the inverted slide, generating
a hanging drop experiment. The plates were stored at ambient
temperature. Microscopy of the drops was performed multiple times
during the following thirty days. The conditions were classified
into clear drops, drops containing random precipitation, drops
containing crystals and drops containing mixtures of precipitated
species and crystals.
Results:
[0206] From the 12 wells assessed, no crystals were observed.
Example 4
PEG 400/Sodium Acetate Grid Screen in Hanging Drop Vapor Diffusion
Mode, Different Protein Concentration
[0207] D2E7 was buffered into a buffer containing around 0.1 M
sodium acetate at a pH of around 5.2. The protein concentration was
adjusted to 50 mg/mL. Except for the protein concentration the
process conditions were identical with those of Example 3.
Results:
[0208] From the 12 wells assessed, no crystals were observed.
Example 5
PEG 10,000/Sodium Acetate Grid Screen in Hanging Drop Vapor
Diffusion Mode
[0209] D2E7 was buffered into a buffer containing around 0.1 M
sodium acetate at a pH of around 5.2. The protein concentration was
adjusted to 10 mg/mL.
[0210] A greased VDX plate and square OptiClear plastic cover
slides were used. 500 .mu.L of a particular reservoir solution was
prepared by admixing acetate buffer, 50% w/v PEG solution and Milli
Q water in each well. In this example, the acetate buffer molarity
was kept constant at around 0.1 M, and PEG 10,000 was varied from
around 4% w/v to around 14% w/v in 2% steps. The pH was around 5.2
throughout. Each condition was assessed in duplicate. Around 1
.mu.L of protein solution was admixed with around 1 .mu.L of a
particular reservoir solution on a square OptiClear plastic cover
slide, and the well was sealed with the inverted slide, generating
a hanging drop experiment. The plates were stored at ambient
temperature. Microscopy of the drops was performed multiple times
during the following thirty days. The conditions were classified
into clear drops, drops containing random precipitation, drops
containing crystals and drops containing mixtures of precipitated
species and crystals.
Results:
[0211] From the 12 wells assessed, no crystals were observed.
Example 6
PEG 10,000/Sodium Acetate Grid Screen in Hanging Drop Vapor
Diffusion Mode, Different Protein Concentration
[0212] D2E7 was buffered into a buffer containing around 0.1 M
sodium acetate at a pH of around 5.2. The protein concentration was
adjusted to 45 to 55 mg/mL, preferably 50 mg/mL. Except for the
protein concentration the process conditions were identical with
those of Example 5.
Results:
[0213] From the 12 wells assessed, no crystals were observed.
Example 7
PEG 400/Sodium Acetate Grid Screen in Hanging Drop Vapor Diffusion
Mode, Different Set Up
[0214] D2E7 was buffered into a buffer containing around 0.1 M
sodium acetate at a pH of around 5.2. The protein concentration was
adjusted to 10 mg/mL.
[0215] A greased VDX plate and square OptiClear plastic cover
slides were used. 500 .mu.L of a particular reservoir solution was
prepared by admixing acetate buffer, 50% w/v PEG 10,000 solution
and Milli Q water in each well. In this example, the acetate buffer
molarity was kept constant at around 0.1 M, and PEG 400 was around
32% w/v and around 34% w/v. The pH was around 4.2, 4.7, 5.2, 5.7,
6.2 or 6.7. Each condition was assessed in duplicate. Around 1
.mu.L of protein solution was admixed with around 1 .mu.L of a
particular reservoir solution on a square OptiClear plastic cover
slide, and the well was sealed with the inverted slide, generating
a hanging drop experiment. The plates were stored at ambient
temperature. Microscopy of the drops was performed multiple times
during the following thirty days. The conditions were classified
into clear drops, drops containing random precipitation, drops
containing crystals and drops containing mixtures of precipitated
species and crystals.
Results:
[0216] From the 24 wells assessed, no crystals were observed.
Example 8
PEG 400/Sodium Acetate Grid Screen in Hanging Drop Vapor Diffusion
Mode, Different Protein Concentration and Set Up
[0217] D2E7 was buffered into a buffer containing around 0.1 M
sodium acetate at a pH of around 5.2. The protein concentration was
adjusted to 50 mg/mL. Except for the protein concentration the
process conditions were identical with those of Example 7.
Results:
[0218] From the 24 wells assessed, no crystals were observed.
Example 9
PEG 400/Sodium Acetate Grid Screen in Hanging Drop Vapor Diffusion
Mode, Different Set Up
[0219] D2E7 was buffered into a buffer containing around 0.1 M
sodium acetate at a pH of around 5.2. The protein concentration was
adjusted to 10 mg/mL.
[0220] A greased VDX plate and square OptiClear plastic cover
slides were used. 500 .mu.L of a particular reservoir solution was
prepared by admixing acetate buffer, 50% w/v PEG solution and Milli
Q water in each well. In this example, the acetate buffer molarity
was used at around 0.025 M, 0.05 M, 0.075 M, 0.15 M, 0.2 M or 0.25
M. PEG 400 was varied from around 32% w/v to around 34% w/v. The pH
was around 5.7 or 4.2. Each condition was assessed in duplicate.
Around 1 .mu.L of protein solution was admixed with around 1 .mu.L
of a particular reservoir solution on a square OptiClear plastic
cover slide, and the well was sealed with the inverted slide,
generating a hanging drop experiment. The plates were stored at
ambient temperature. Microscopy of the drops was performed multiple
times during the following thirty days. The conditions were
classified into clear drops, drops containing random precipitation,
drops containing crystals and drops containing mixtures of
precipitated species and crystals.
Results:
[0221] From the 48 wells assessed, no crystals were observed.
Example 10
PEG 400/Sodium Acetate Grid Screen in Hanging Drop Vapor Diffusion
Mode, Different Set Up
[0222] D2E7 was buffered into a buffer containing around 0.1 M
sodium acetate at a pH of around 5.2. The protein concentration was
adjusted to 10 mg/mL.
[0223] A greased VDX plate and square OptiClear plastic cover
slides were used. 500 .mu.L of a particular reservoir solution was
prepared by admixing acetate buffer, 50% w/v PEG 400 solution and
Milli Q water in each well. In this example, the acetate buffer
molarity was used at around 0.025 M, 0.05 M or 0.1 M. PEG 400 was
around 28% w/v or around 30% w/v. The pH was around 5.2, 5.7, 6.2
or 6.7. Each condition was assessed in duplicate. Around 1 .mu.L of
protein solution was admixed with around 1 .mu.L of a particular
reservoir solution on a square OptiClear plastic cover slide, and
the well was sealed with the inverted slide, generating a hanging
drop experiment. The plates were stored at ambient temperature.
Microscopy of the drops was performed multiple times during the
following thirty days. The conditions were classified into clear
drops, drops containing random precipitation, drops containing
crystals and drops containing mixtures of precipitated species and
crystals.
Results:
[0224] From the 48 wells assessed, no crystals were observed.
Example 11
PEG 400 Combined with PEG 4,000/Sodium Acetate Grid Screen in
Hanging Drop Vapor Diffusion Mode
[0225] D2E7 was buffered into a buffer containing around 0.1 M
sodium acetate at a pH of around 5.2. The protein concentration was
adjusted to 10 mg/mL.
[0226] A greased VDX plate and square OptiClear plastic cover
slides were used. 500 .mu.L of a particular reservoir solution was
prepared by admixing acetate buffer, 50% w/v PEG 4,000 solution and
Milli Q water in each well. In this example, the acetate buffer
molarity was kept constant at around 0.1 M, and PEG 4,000 was
varied from around 4% w/v to around 8% w/v in 2% steps.
Simultaneously, PEG 400 was added to the PEG 4,000/acetate
solutions at concentrations of around 24% w/v, 26% w/v, 28% w/v or
30% w/v. The pH was around 5.2 throughout. Each condition was
assessed in duplicate. Around 1 .mu.L of protein solution was
admixed with around 1 .mu.L of a particular reservoir solution on a
square OptiClear plastic cover slide, and the well was sealed with
the inverted slide, generating a hanging drop experiment. The
plates were stored at ambient temperature. Microscopy of the drops
was performed multiple times during the following thirty days. The
conditions were classified into clear drops, drops containing
random precipitation, drops containing crystals and drops
containing mixtures of precipitated species and crystals.
Results:
[0227] From the 24 wells assessed, no crystals were observed.
Example 12
PEG 400 Combined with PEG 4,000/Sodium Acetate Grid Screen in
Hanging Drop Vapor Diffusion Mode, Different Set Up
[0228] D2E7 was buffered into a buffer containing around 0.1 M
sodium acetate at a pH of around 5.2. The protein concentration was
adjusted to 10 mg/mL.
[0229] A greased VDX plate and square OptiClear plastic cover
slides were used. 500 .mu.L of a particular reservoir solution was
prepared by admixing acetate buffer, 50% w/v PEG 4,000 solution and
Milli Q water in each well. In this example, the acetate buffer
molarity was kept constant at around 0.1 M, and PEG 4,000 was
varied from around 4% w/v to around 8% w/v in 2% steps.
Simultaneously, PEG 400 was added to the PEG 4,000/acetate
solutions at concentrations of around 30% w/v, 32% w/v, 34% w/v or
36% w/v. The pH was around 4.2 throughout. Each condition was
assessed in duplicate. Around 1 .mu.L of protein solution was
admixed with around 1 .mu.L of a particular reservoir solution on a
square OptiClear plastic cover slide, and the well was sealed with
the inverted slide, generating a hanging drop experiment. The
plates were stored at ambient temperature. Microscopy of the drops
was performed multiple times during the following thirty days. The
conditions were classified into clear drops, drops containing
random precipitation, drops containing crystals and drops
containing mixtures of precipitated species and crystals.
Results:
[0230] From the 24 wells assessed, no crystals were observed.
Example 13
PEG 4,000/Sodium Acetate Grid Screen in Hanging Drop Vapor
Diffusion Mode, Different Set Up
[0231] D2E7 was buffered into a buffer containing around 0.1 M
sodium acetate at a pH of around 6.5, 6.0, 5.5, 5.0, 4.5 or 4.0.
The protein concentration was adjusted to 10 mg/mL.
[0232] A greased VDX plate and square OptiClear plastic cover
slides were used. 500 .mu.L of a particular reservoir solution was
prepared by admixing acetate buffer, 50% w/v PEG 4,000 solution and
Milli Q water in each well. In this example, the acetate buffer
molarity was kept constant at around 0.1 M, and PEG 4,000 was
varied from around 4% w/v to around 26% w/v in 2% steps. The pH of
the acetate buffer used was the same as the corresponding protein
buffer. Each condition was assessed in duplicate. Around 1 .mu.L of
protein solution was admixed with around 1 .mu.L of a particular
reservoir solution on a square OptiClear plastic cover slide, and
the well was sealed with the inverted slide, generating a hanging
drop experiment. The plates were stored at ambient temperature.
Microscopy of the drops was performed multiple times during the
following thirty days. The conditions were classified into clear
drops, drops containing random precipitation, drops containing
crystals and drops containing mixtures of precipitated species and
crystals.
Results:
[0233] From the 144 wells assessed, no crystals were observed.
Example 14
PEG 4,000/Sodium Acetate Grid Screen in Hanging Drop Vapor
Diffusion Mode, Different Set Up
[0234] The experimental conditions were identical to Example 13,
except for the acetate buffer molarity, which was kept constant at
around 0.2 M (molarity of precipitation buffer).
Results:
[0235] From the 144 wells assessed, no crystals were observed.
Example 15
PEG 4,000/Sodium Acetate Grid Screen in Hanging Drop Vapor
Diffusion Mode, Different Set Up
[0236] The experimental conditions were identical to Example 13,
except for the acetate buffer molarity which was kept constant at
0.1 M (molarity of precipitation buffer).
Results:
[0237] From the 144 wells assessed, no crystals were observed.
Example 16
PEG 4,000/Sodium Acetate Grid Screen in Hanging Drop Vapor
Diffusion Mode, Different Set Up
[0238] The experimental conditions were identical to Example 13,
except for the acetate buffer molarity which was kept constant at
around 0.4 M (molarity of precipitation buffer).
Results:
[0239] From the 144 wells assessed, no crystals were observed.
Example 17
PEG 4,000/Sodium Acetate Bulk Experiments
[0240] D2E7 was buffered into a buffer containing around 0.1 M
sodium acetate at a pH of around 5.5. The protein concentration was
adjusted to 10 mg/mL.
[0241] Four aliquots of 500 .mu.L each were pipetted into four
Eppendorff reaction tubes. A 24% PEG 4,000 in 0.1 M sodium acetate
buffer at pH 5.5 solution was titrated to the protein solutions
until the solution became slightly opaque. Subsequently, water was
pipetted to the solutions just until the solutions became clear
again. This method is referred to as bulk crystallization.
Titration was performed at ambient temperature for two samples and
at 4.degree. C. for the two other samples. Subsequently, one of
each pair of samples was stored at ambient temperature or at
4.degree. C., respectively. Microscopy of 1 .mu.L aliquots of the
samples was performed multiple times during the following week
Results:
[0242] From the four samples, none rendered crystals.
Example 18
PEG 4,000/Sodium Acetate Grid Screen in Hanging Drop Vapor
Diffusion Mode, Different Temperature
[0243] The experimental conditions were identical to Example 13.
However, the tubes were set up and stored at 4.degree. C.
Results:
[0244] From the 144 wells assessed, no crystals were observed.
Example 19
PEG 4,000/Sodium Acetate Grid Screen in Hanging Drop Vapor
Diffusion Mode, Different Protein Concentration
[0245] Except for the protein concentration, which was adjusted to
5 mg/mL the experimental conditions were identical to Example
13.
Results:
[0246] From the 144 wells assessed, no crystals were observed.
Example 20
Ammonium Sulfate/Sodium Acetate Grid Screen in Hanging Drop Vapor
Diffusion Mode
[0247] D2E7 was buffered into a buffer containing around 0.1 M
sodium acetate at a pH of around 5.5. The protein concentration was
adjusted to 10 mg/mL.
[0248] A greased VDX plate and square OptiClear plastic cover
slides were used. 500 .mu.L of a particular reservoir solution was
prepared by admixing acetate buffer, ammonium sulfate stock
solution and Milli Q water in each well. In this example, the
acetate buffer molarity was kept constant at around 0.1 M, and the
ammonium sulfate concentration was varied from 0.5 M to 2.5 M in
steps of 0.25 M. The pH of the acetate buffer was around 5.5
throughout. Each condition was assessed in duplicate. Around 1
.mu.L of protein solution was admixed with around 1 .mu.L of a
particular reservoir solution on a square OptiClear plastic cover
slide, and the well was sealed with the inverted slide, generating
a hanging drop experiment. The plates were set up and stored at
ambient temperature. Microscopy of the drops was performed multiple
times during the following two weeks. The conditions were
classified into clear drops, drops containing random precipitation,
drops containing crystals and drops containing mixtures of
precipitated species and crystals.
Results:
[0249] From the 18 wells assessed, no crystals were observed.
Example 21
Sodium Chloride/Sodium Acetate Grid Screen in Hanging Drop Vapor
Diffusion Mode
[0250] D2E7 was buffered into a buffer containing around 0.1 M
sodium acetate at a pH of around 5.5. The protein concentration was
adjusted to 10 mg/mL.
[0251] A greased VDX plate and square OptiClear plastic cover
slides were used. 500 .mu.L of a particular reservoir solution was
prepared by admixing acetate buffer, sodium chloride stock solution
and Milli Q water in each well. In this example, the acetate buffer
molarity was kept constant at around 0.1 M, and the sodium chloride
concentration was varied from 1.5 M to 2.5 M, varied in steps of
0.5 M. The pH of the acetate buffer was around 5.5 throughout. Each
condition was assessed in duplicate. Around 1 .mu.L of protein
solution was admixed with around 1 .mu.L of a particular reservoir
solution on a square OptiClear plastic cover slide, and the well
was sealed with the inverted slide, generating a hanging drop
experiment. The plates were set up and stored at ambient
temperature. Microscopy of the drops was performed multiple times
during the following two weeks. The conditions were classified into
clear drops, drops containing random precipitation, drops
containing crystals and drops containing mixtures of precipitated
species and crystals.
Results:
[0252] From the 6 wells assessed, no crystals were observed.
Example 22
PEG 4,000/Sodium Acetate Grid Screen in Hanging Drop Vapor
Diffusion Mode, Influence of Detergents
[0253] D2E7 was buffered into a buffer containing around 0.1 M
sodium acetate at a pH of around 5.5. The protein concentration was
adjusted to 5 mg/mL.
[0254] A greased VDX plate and square OptiClear plastic cover
slides were used. 500 .mu.L of a particular reservoir solution was
prepared by admixing acetate buffer, 50% w/v PEG 4,000 solution and
Milli Q water in each well. In this example, the acetate buffer
molarity was kept constant at around 0.1 M, and PEG 4,000 was
varied from around 10% w/v to around 20% w/v in 2% steps. The pH of
the acetate buffer was around 5.5 throughout. Furthermore,
polysorbate 20, polysorbate 80 and Pluronic F 68 were added to any
resulting buffer as described above at concentrations of 0%, 0.02%
and 0.1%, respectively. Around 1 .mu.L of protein solution was
admixed with around 1 .mu.L of a particular reservoir solution on a
square OptiClear plastic cover slide, and the well was sealed with
the inverted slide, generating a hanging drop experiment. The
plates were set up and stored at ambient temperature. Microscopy of
the drops was performed multiple times during the following two
weeks. The conditions were classified into clear drops, drops
containing random precipitation, drops containing crystals and
drops containing mixtures of precipitated species and crystals.
Results:
[0255] From the 84 wells assessed, no crystals were observed. No
influence of the assessed detergents on the behaviour of the
crystallization system could be observed.
Example 23
Zinc Acetate/Sodium Acetate Grid Screen in Hanging Drop Vapor
Diffusion Mode
[0256] D2E7 was buffered into a buffer containing around 0.1 M
sodium acetate at a pH of around 5.5. The protein concentration was
adjusted to 10 mg/mL.
[0257] A greased VDX plate and square OptiClear plastic cover
slides were used. 500 .mu.L of a particular reservoir solution was
prepared by admixing acetate buffer, zinc acetate stock solution
and Milli Q water in each well. In this example, the acetate buffer
molarity was kept constant at around 0.1 M, and the zinc acetate
concentration was varied from 0.1 M to 0.9 M in steps of around 0.2
M. The pH of the acetate buffer was around 5.5 throughout. Each
condition was assessed in duplicate. Around 1 .mu.L of protein
solution was admixed with around 1 .mu.L of a particular reservoir
solution on a square OptiClear plastic cover slide, and the well
was sealed with the inverted slide, generating a hanging drop
experiment. The plates were set up and stored at ambient
temperature. Microscopy of the drops was performed multiple times
during the following two weeks. The conditions were classified into
clear drops, drops containing random precipitation, drops
containing crystals and drops containing mixtures of precipitated
species and crystals.
Results:
[0258] From the 12 wells assessed, no crystals were observed.
Example 24
Broad Screening of Conditions in Vapor Diffusion Mode
[0259] D2E7 was buffered into a 20 mM HEPES/150 mM sodium chloride
buffer at pH 7.4. The protein concentration was adjusted to 5
mg/mL, 10 mg/mL, or 20 mg/mL.
[0260] Using the Hydra II crystallization robot, 96 well Greiner
plates were set up at ambient temperature, using several
commercially available crystallization screens. The protein
solution and the crystallization agent were admixed in a ratio of
around 1:1, preferably 1:1.
[0261] The following screens were used:
Hampton Crystal Screen 1 & 2 (Hampton Research),
Hampton Index Screen (Hampton Research),
Hampton SaltRX Screen (Hampton Research),
[0262] Nextal The Classics, The Classics Lite, The PEGs, The
Anions, The pH clear and The Ammonium sulfate (all from Nextal
Biotechnologies).
[0263] After addition of protein to the crystallization agent
(three drops per condition, containing the three different protein
concentrations as described above), the plates were sealed with
Clearseal film. Each plate was set up in quadruplicate and then
stored at ambient temperature, 4.degree. C., 27.degree. C. and
37.degree. C., respectively. Microscopy of the drops was performed
after five days and twelve days, respectively. The conditions were
classified into clear drops, drops containing random precipitation,
drops containing crystals and drops containing mixtures of
precipitated species and crystals.
Results:
[0264] From the 864 commercial conditions evaluated, 2 rendered
crystals at protein concentrations and temperatures as defined
below, at least after two weeks. [0265] 0.1 M sodium acetate
anhydrous pH 4.6, 0.9 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate, 0.9 M
potassium dihydrogen phosphate (=Nextal The Anions, E3), 10 or 20
mg/mL, and 27.degree. C., or 20 mg/mL and 37.degree. C. [0266] 0.1
M Bis-Tris Propane pH 7.0, 1.5 M ammonium sulfate (=Hampton SaltRX,
F2), 5, 10, or 20 mg/mL. and 27.degree. C.
[0267] The crystals showed needle cluster-like morphologies.
[0268] The following conditions from commercially available screens
did not render crystals. For detailed solution compositions, please
refer to www.hamptonresearch.com and www.nextalbiotech.com:
Hampton Crystal Screen 1--all conditions (48) Hampton Crystal
Screen 2--all conditions (48) Hampton Index Screen--all conditions
(96) Hampton SaltRX Screen--all conditions despite "F2" (95)
Nextal--The Classics--all conditions (96) Nextal--The Classics
Lite--all conditions (96) Nextal--The PEGs--all conditions (96)
Nextal--The Anions--all conditions despite "E3" (95) Nextal--The pH
Clear--all conditions (96) Nextal--The AmmoniumSulfate--all
conditions (96)
Example 25
PEG 4,000/Sodium Acetate Grid Screen in Hanging Drop Vapor
Diffusion Mode, Different Set Up
[0269] D2E7 was buffered into a 20 mM HEPES/150 mM sodium chloride
buffer at pH 7.4. The protein concentration was adjusted to 5
mg/mL, 10 mg/mL, or 20 mg/mL.
[0270] A greased VDX plate and circle siliconized glass cover
slides were used. 500 .mu.L of a particular reservoir solution was
prepared by admixing acetate buffer, 50% w/v PEG 4,000 solution and
Milli Q water in each well. In this example, the acetate buffer
molarity was kept constant at around 0.1 M, and PEG 4,000
concentration was varied from 4% to 26% in 2% steps. The pH was
around 5.5 throughout. Each condition was set up with the three
protein concentrations as described above. Around 1 .mu.L of
protein solution was admixed with around 1 .mu.L of a particular
reservoir solution on a circle siliconized glass cover slide, and
the well was sealed with the inverted slide, generating a hanging
drop experiment. The plates were stored at ambient temperature.
Microscopy of the drops was performed after six days. The
conditions were classified into clear drops, drops containing
random precipitation, drops containing crystals and drops
containing mixtures of precipitated species and crystals.
Results:
[0271] From the 72 wells assessed, no crystals were observed.
Example 26
Hanging Drop Vapor Diffusion Experiments Applying the Hampton
Detergent Screen
[0272] D2E7 was buffered into a 20 mM HEPES/150 mM sodium chloride
buffer at pH 7.4. The protein concentration was adjusted to 5
mg/mL.
[0273] A greased VDX plate and circle siliconized glass cover
slides were used. 500 .mu.L of a particular reservoir solution was
prepared by admixing acetate buffer, 50% w/v PEG 4,000 solution and
Milli Q water in each well. In this example, the acetate buffer
molarity was kept constant at around 0.1 M, and the PEG 4,000
concentration around 12% w/v or 14% w/v. The pH was around 5.5
throughout. Around 4 .mu.L of protein solution was admixed with
around 1 .mu.L of a particular detergent solution of the Hampton
screen on a circle siliconized glass cover slide. The drop was
subsequently admixed with 5 .mu.L of a particular reservoir
solution, and the well was sealed with the inverted slide,
generating a hanging drop experiment. The plates were stored at
ambient temperature. Microscopy of the drops was performed after
six days. The conditions were classified into clear drops, drops
containing random precipitation, drops containing crystals and
drops containing mixtures of precipitated species and crystals.
Results:
[0274] From the 144 wells assessed, no crystals were observed.
Example 27
Hanging Drop Vapor Diffusion Using Hampton PEG/Ion Screen
[0275] D2E7 was buffered into a 20 mM HEPES/150 mM sodium chloride
buffer at pH 7.4. The protein concentration was adjusted to 5 mg/mL
or 10 mg/mL.
[0276] Greased VDX plates and circle siliconized glass cover slides
were used. 500 .mu.L of each of the 48 buffer formulations was
pipetted into a well and admixed with 250 .mu.L of Milli Q water,
respectively. Around 1 .mu.L of protein sample was pipetted onto a
cover slide and subsequently admixed with around 1 .mu.L of the
reservoir solution of a particular well. The well was sealed with
the inverted cover slide, generating a hanging drop experiment. The
plates were stored at ambient temperature. Microscopy of the drops
was performed multiple times during the following seven days. The
conditions were classified into clear drops, drops containing
random precipitation, drops containing crystals and drops
containing mixtures of precipitated species and crystals.
Results:
[0277] From the 96 conditions tested, no crystals were
observed.
Example 28
Hanging Drop Vapor Diffusion Using Hampton PEG/Ion Screen,
Different Set Up
[0278] D2E7 was buffered into a 20 mM HEPES/150 mM sodium chloride
buffer at pH 7.4. The protein concentration was adjusted to 5
mg/mL.
[0279] The experimental conditions were identical with those of
Example 27 with the exception that 500 .mu.L of each of the 48
buffer formulations was pipetted into a well and admixed with 500
.mu.L of Milli Q water, respectively.
Results:
[0280] From the 48 conditions tested, no crystals were
observed.
Example 29
Hanging Drop Vapor Diffusion Using Hampton Low Ionic Strength
Screen
[0281] D2E7 was buffered into a 20 mM HEPES/150 mM sodium chloride
buffer at pH 7.4. The protein concentration was adjusted to 5
mg/mL.
[0282] Greased VDX plates and circle siliconized glass cover slides
were used. 1 mL of 24% w/v PEG 3,350 dehydrant solution was
pipetted into 108 wells, respectively. Around 2 .mu.L of protein
sample were pipetted onto a cover slide and subsequently admixed
with around 1 .mu.L of one of the 18 particular buffer reagents.
Thereafter, around 2.5 .mu.L of PEG 3,350 precipitant of one of six
different concentrations was added to the drop. The wells were
sealed with the inverted cover slides, generating 108 different
hanging drop experiments.
[0283] The plates were stored at ambient temperature. Microscopy of
the drops was performed multiple times during the following seven
days. The conditions were classified into clear drops, drops
containing random precipitation, drops containing crystals and
drops containing mixtures of precipitated species and crystals.
Results:
[0284] From the 108 conditions tested, none rendered crystals.
Example 30
Ammonium Sulfate/Bis-Tris Propane Grid Screen in Hanging Drop Vapor
Diffusion Mode
[0285] D2E7 was buffered into a 20 mM HEPES/150 mM sodium chloride
buffer at pH 7.4. The protein concentration was adjusted to 5
mg/mL, 10 mg/mL, or 20 mg/mL.
[0286] A greased VDX plate and circle siliconized glass cover
slides were used. 500 .mu.L of a particular reservoir solution was
prepared by admixing ammonium sulfate stock solution, Bis-Tris
propane stock solution and Milli Q water in each well. In this
example, ammonium sulfate molarity was around 0.5 M, 1 M, 1.5 M or
2 M. The Bis-Tris Propane molarity was 0.1 M throughout, and the
Bis-Tris Propane buffer pH was around 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5 or
8.0. The resulting 24 conditions were assessed with all of the
three protein concentrations as described above, and with storage
at ambient temperature or storage at around 27.degree. C.,
respectively. Around 1 .mu.L of protein solution was admixed with
around 1 .mu.L of a particular reservoir solution on a circle
siliconized glass cover slide, and the well was sealed with the
inverted slide, generating a hanging drop experiment. The plates
were stored at ambient temperature. Microscopy of the drops was
performed after three days. The conditions were classified into
clear drops, drops containing random precipitation, drops
containing crystals and drops containing mixtures of precipitated
species and crystals.
Results:
[0287] From the 144 conditions tested, none rendered crystals after
three days.
Example 31
Sodium Potassium Dihydrogen Phosphate/Sodium Acetate Grid Screen in
Hanging Drop Vapor Diffusion Mode
[0288] D2E7 was buffered into a 20 mM HEPES/150 mM sodium chloride
buffer at pH 7.4. The protein concentration was adjusted to 5
mg/mL, 10 mg/mL, or 20 mg/mL.
[0289] A greased VDX plate and square OptiClear plastic cover
slides were used. 500 .mu.L of a particular reservoir solution was
prepared by admixing acetate buffer, sodium dihydrogen phosphate
stock solution, potassium dihydrogen phosphate stock solution and
Milli Q water in each well. In this example, the acetate buffer
molarity was kept constant at around 0.1 M, and the acetate buffer
pH was around 4.1, 4.6, 5.1 or 5.6.
[0290] The following combinations of sodium dihydrogen phosphate
and potassium dihydrogen phosphate were applied: [0291] around 0.3
M sodium dihydrogen phosphate and around 0.3 M potassium dihydrogen
phosphate; [0292] around 0.6 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate and
around 0.6 M potassium dihydrogen phosphate; [0293] around 0.9 M
sodium dihydrogen phosphate and around 0.9 M potassium dihydrogen
phosphate; [0294] around 1.8 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate, [0295]
around 2.1 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate, [0296] around 2.4 M
sodium dihydrogen phosphate.
[0297] Each condition was set up with the three protein
concentrations as described above. Around 1 .mu.L of protein
solution was admixed with around 1 .mu.L of a particular reservoir
solution on a square OptiClear plastic cover slide, and the well
was sealed with the inverted slide, generating a hanging drop
experiment. The plates were stored at ambient temperature.
Microscopy of the drops was performed multiple times during the
following month. The conditions were classified into clear drops,
drops containing random precipitation, drops containing crystals
and drops containing mixtures of precipitated species and
crystals.
Results:
[0298] From the 72 wells assessed, the following crystallization
buffers generated crystals in the shape of needle clusters: [0299]
around 0.9 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate and around 0.9 M potassium
dihydrogen phosphate, at pH around 4.1; [0300] around 1.8 M sodium
dihydrogen phosphate without the potassium salt, at pH around
4.6.
[0301] Crystals were obtained with these conditions at all three
protein concentrations.
Example 32
Sodium Potassium Dihydrogen Phosphate/Sodium Acetate Grid Screen in
Hanging Drop Vapor Diffusion Mode, Different Temperature
[0302] The experimental conditions were identical with those of
Example 31, except that the storage temperature was increased to
30.degree. C.
Results:
[0303] From the 72 wells assessed, following crystallization
buffers generated crystals in the shape of needle clusters:
[0304] Protein concentration of around 5 mg/mL: [0305] around 0.9 M
sodium dihydrogen phosphate and around 0.9 M potassium dihydrogen
phosphate at pH around 4.1; [0306] around 1.8 M sodium dihydrogen
phosphate without the potassium salt, at pH around 4.1. [0307]
around 1.8 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate without the potassium
salt, at pH around 4.6.
[0308] Around 1.8 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate without the
potassium salt, at pH around 5.1.
[0309] Protein concentration of around 10 mg/mL: [0310] around 0.9
M sodium dihydrogen phosphate and around 0.9 M potassium dihydrogen
phosphate, at pH around 4.1. [0311] around 1.8 M sodium dihydrogen
phosphate without the potassium salt, at pH
[0312] around 4.6. [0313] around 1.8 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate
without the potassium salt, at pH around 5.1.
[0314] Protein concentration of around 20 mg/mL: [0315] around 0.9
M sodium dihydrogen phosphate and around 0.9 M potassium dihydrogen
phosphate at pH around 4.1 and [0316] around 1.8 M sodium
dihydrogen phosphate without the potassium salt, at pH around
4.1.
Discussion of Results of Vapor Diffusion Crystallization
Experiments:
[0317] Crystallization experiments were initially performed using a
well-described micro scale methodology. Since a PEG 4,000/sodium
acetate buffer condition was described as a promising
crystallization condition by other inventors who were working with
different antibodies of different antigen specificity or origin, it
was decided to start with these agents. It was found after
extensive experimentation that PEG 4,000 in an acetate buffer did
not provide crystals, at least at investigated combinations of
factors influencing crystallization (protein concentration,
precipitating agent concentration, buffer ionic strength and pH,
temperature), and thus it was decided to continue with broad
crystallization screens, thereby introducing a wide variety of
chemicals into the screening process. Finally, it was surprisingly
found that sodium dihydrogen phosphate in acetate buffer is a
powerful crystallization agent for D2E7, which does not introduce
any toxic reagent unacceptable from a pharmaceutical point of
view.
D. Batch Crystallization Experiments
[0318] Concentration values given in the following examples are
initial values referring to the antibody solution and the
crystallization solution before mixing of the two solutions.
[0319] All pH values, if not described otherwise, refer to the pH
of an acetate buffer stock before it was combined with other
substances, like the crystallization agent.
[0320] All buffer molarities, if not described otherwise, refer to
sodium acetate concentrations in a stock solution before pH
adjustment, typically performed using acetic acid glacial.
Example 33
Sodium Potassium Dihydrogen Phosphate/Sodium Acetate Batch
Crystallization at 800 .mu.L Batch Volume
[0321] D2E7 was buffered into a 20 mM HEPES/150 mM sodium chloride
buffer at pH 7.4. The protein concentration was adjusted to 5
mg/mL, 10 mg/mL, or 20 mg/mL.
[0322] Batch crystallization was performed by admixing around 400
.mu.L of each protein solution with an equal amount of
crystallization solution in a 1.5 mL Eppendorff reaction tube. 400
.mu.L of a particular crystallization solution was prepared by
admixing acetate buffer, sodium dihydrogen phosphate stock
solution, potassium dihydrogen phosphate stock solution and Milli Q
water. In this example, the acetate buffer molarity was 0.1 M, and
the acetate buffer pH was around 4.1. The following combination of
sodium dihydrogen phosphate and potassium dihydrogen phosphate was
used: around 0.9 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate and around 0.9 M
potassium dihydrogen phosphate. The reaction tubes were stored at
ambient temperature. Microscopy of 1 .mu.L aliquots was performed
after 11 days.
Results:
[0323] No crystals were observed after 11 days.
Example 34
Sodium Dihydrogen Phosphate/Sodium Acetate Batch Crystallization at
600 .mu.L Batch Volume
[0324] D2E7 was buffered into a 20 mM HEPES/150 mM sodium chloride
buffer at pH 7.4. The protein concentration was adjusted to 10
mg/mL.
[0325] Batch crystallization was performed by admixing around 300
.mu.L of the protein solution with an equal amount of
crystallization solution in a 1.5 mL Eppendorff reaction tube. 300
.mu.L of a particular crystallization solution was prepared by
admixing acetate buffer, sodium dihydrogen phosphate stock solution
and Milli Q water. In this example, the acetate buffer molarity was
0.1 M, and the acetate buffer pH was around 4.1. Sodium dihydrogen
phosphate molarity was around 1.5 M, 1.8 M, 2.1 M and 2.4 M,
respectively. The reaction tubes were stored at ambient
temperature. Microscopy of 1 .mu.L aliquots was performed after 11
days.
Results:
[0326] No crystals were observed after 11 days.
Example 35
Sodium Potassium Dihydrogen Phosphate/Sodium Acetate Grid Screen
Batch Crystallization at 1 mL Batch Volume
[0327] D2E7 was used without exchanging the buffer. Thus, the
initial composition was D2E7 50 mg/mL, mannitol 12 mg/mL,
polysorbate 80 1 mg/mL, citric acid monohydrate 1.305 mg/mL, sodium
citrate 0.305 mg/mL, disodium hydrogen phosphate dihydrate 1.53
mg/mL, sodium dihydrogen phosphate dehydrate 0.86 mg/mL, and sodium
chloride 6.16 mg/mL, pH 5.2.
[0328] D2E7 was brought to a concentration of around 10 mg/mL by
dilution with Milli Q water.
[0329] Batch crystallization was performed by admixing around 500
.mu.L of the protein solution with an equal amount of
crystallization solution in well of a 24 well plate. 500 .mu.L of a
particular crystallization solution was prepared by admixing
acetate buffer, sodium dihydrogen phosphate stock solution,
potassium dihydrogen phosphate stock solution and Milli Q water in
a well. In this example, the acetate buffer molarity was 0.1 M, and
the acetate buffer pH was around 4.1, 4.6, 5.1 or 5.6. The
following combinations of sodium dihydrogen phosphate and potassium
dihydrogen phosphate were used: [0330] around 0.7 M sodium
dihydrogen phosphate and around 0.7 M potassium dihydrogen
phosphate, [0331] around 0.9 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate and
around 0.9 M potassium dihydrogen phosphate, [0332] around 1.8 M
sodium dihydrogen phosphate without the potassium salt, [0333]
around 2.1 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate without the potassium
salt, [0334] around 2.4 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate without the
potassium salt.
[0335] The wells were subsequently sealed after preparation of the
crystallization mixture to prevent water evaporation. Microscopy of
the plate was performed after 4 days.
Results:
[0336] No crystals were observed after 4 days.
Example 36
Sodium Potassium Dihydrogen Phosphate/Sodium Acetate Grid Screen
Batch Crystallization at 1 mL Batch Volume
[0337] D2E7 was buffered into a 20 mM HEPES/150 mM sodium chloride
buffer at pH 7.4. The protein concentration was adjusted to 10
mg/mL.
[0338] Batch crystallization was performed by admixing around 500
.mu.L of the protein solution with an equal amount of
crystallization solution in well of a 24 well plate. 500 .mu.L of a
particular crystallization solution was prepared by admixing
acetate buffer, sodium dihydrogen phosphate stock solution,
potassium dihydrogen phosphate stock solution and Milli Q water in
a well. In this example, the acetate buffer molarity was 0.1 M, and
the acetate buffer pH was around 4.1 or 4.6. The following
combinations of sodium dihydrogen phosphate and potassium
dihydrogen phosphate were applied: [0339] around 1.8 M sodium
dihydrogen phosphate and around 0.8 M potassium dihydrogen
phosphate, [0340] around 2.2 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate and
around 0.6 M potassium dihydrogen phosphate, [0341] from around 2.6
M sodium dihydrogen phosphate to around 4.4 M sodium dihydrogen
phosphate in 0.2 M steps without the potassium salt,
respectively.
[0342] The wells were subsequently sealed after preparation of the
crystallization mixture to prevent water evaporation. Microscopy of
the plate was performed multiple times during the following week.
Furthermore, the crystal yield of three batches was determined by
OD280. An aliquot of the suspension was centrifuged at 14,000 rpm,
and the protein concentration in the supernatant was assessed.
Results:
[0343] Needle cluster like crystals were found in the following
eight batches: [0344] acetate buffer pH 4.1 and sodium dihydrogen
phosphate molarity of around 3.6 M to around 4.4 M (in 0.2 M
steps), [0345] acetate buffer pH 4.6 and sodium dihydrogen
phosphate molarity of around 4.0 M to around 4.4 M (in 0.2 M
steps).
[0346] Crystal yield was assessed for the batches at acetate buffer
pH 4.1 and sodium dihydrogen phosphate molarity of around 4.0 M to
around 4.4 M. The crystal yield as determined by OD280 from
residual protein concentration in the supernatant was above 95%
after five days.
[0347] Precipitated species were obviously present in these batches
immediately after combining the protein solution and the
crystallization solution (milky suspension, typical light
microscopic picture). As no precipitated species were observed
after five days, it was concluded that formerly precipitated
species rearranged into crystalline species. The protein is highly
supersaturated in the crystallization mixture, and protein
precipitates immediately. Some protein may still be dissolved, now
either only slightly supersaturated or perhaps even below
saturation. Crystals form, thereby further lowering the
concentration of dissolved protein. Furthermore, the precipitated
species clearly redissolve over time and are incorporated into the
growing crystals.
Example 37
Sodium Dihydrogen Phosphate/Sodium Acetate Grid Screen Batch
Crystallization at 1 mL Batch Volume, Different Protein
Concentration
[0348] D2E7 was used without exchanging the buffer (see Example
35).
[0349] D2E7 was brought to a concentration of around 10 mg/mL by
diluting the liquid with Milli Q water.
[0350] Batch crystallization was performed by admixing around 500
.mu.L of the protein solution with an equal amount of
crystallization solution in well of a 24 well plate. 500 .mu.L of a
particular crystallization solution was prepared by admixing
acetate buffer, sodium dihydrogen phosphate stock solution,
potassium dihydrogen phosphate stock solution and Milli Q water in
a well. In this example, the acetate buffer molarity was 0.1 M, and
the acetate buffer pH was around 4.1 or 4.6. Sodium dihydrogen
phosphate molarity was varied from around 2.6 M sodium dihydrogen
phosphate to around 4.4 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate in 0.2 M
steps. The wells were subsequently sealed after preparation of the
crystallization mixture to prevent water evaporation. Microscopy of
the plate was performed multiple times during the following week.
Furthermore, the crystal yield of one particular batch was
determined by OD280. An aliquot of the suspension was centrifuged
at 14,000 rpm, and the protein concentration in the supernatant was
assessed.
Results:
[0351] Needle cluster-like crystals were found in the following six
batches: [0352] acetate buffer pH 4.1 and sodium dihydrogen
phosphate molarity of around 3.4 M to around 4.4 M (in 0.2 M
steps).
[0353] Crystal yield was assessed for the batch at acetate buffer
pH 4.1 and sodium dihydrogen phosphate molarity of around 4.2 M.
The crystal yield as determined by OD280 from residual protein
concentration in the supernatant was above 95% after eight
days.
[0354] Precipitated species were obviously present in these batches
immediately after combining the protein solution and the
crystallization solution (milky suspension, typical light
microscopic picture). As no precipitated species were observed
after six days, it was concluded that a phase transition occurred
where formerly precipitated species rearranged into crystalline
species.
Example 38
Sodium Dihydrogen Phosphate/Sodium Acetate Batch Crystallization at
2 mL Batch Volume
[0355] D2E7 was buffered into a 20 mM HEPES/150 mM sodium chloride
buffer at pH 7.4. The protein concentration was adjusted to 10
mg/mL.
[0356] Batch crystallization was performed by admixing around 1 mL
of the protein solution with an equal amount of crystallization
solution in a 2 mL Eppendorff reaction tube. 1 mL of a particular
crystallization solution was prepared by admixing acetate buffer,
sodium dihydrogen phosphate stock solution and Milli Q water. In
this example, the acetate buffer molarity was 0.1 M, and the
acetate buffer pH was around 4.1. Sodium dihydrogen phosphate
molarity was around 4.0 M, 4.2 M or 4.4 M. The reaction tubes were
stored at ambient temperature. Microscopy of 1 .mu.L aliquots was
performed multiple times during the following week.
Results:
[0357] Needle cluster-like crystals were found in all batches after
six days.
[0358] Precipitated species were obviously present in these batches
immediately after combining the protein solution and the
crystallization solution (milky suspension, typical light
microscopic picture). Formerly precipitated species rearranged into
crystalline species as described in Example 36.
Example 39
Sodium Dihydrogen Phosphate/Sodium Acetate Grid Screen Batch
Crystallization at 1 mL Batch Volume, Different Protein
Concentration
[0359] D2E7 was used without exchanging the buffer (see Example
35).
[0360] Batch crystallization was performed by admixing around 500
.mu.L of the protein solution with an equal amount of
crystallization solution in well of a 24 well plate. 500 .mu.L of a
particular crystallization solution was prepared by admixing
acetate buffer, sodium dihydrogen phosphate stock solution,
potassium dihydrogen phosphate stock solution and Milli Q water in
a well. In this example, the acetate buffer molarity was 0.1 M, and
the acetate buffer pH was around 4.1. Sodium dihydrogen phosphate
molarity was varied from around 0.2 M to around 4.4 M in 0.2 M
steps. The wells were subsequently sealed after preparation of the
crystallization mixture to prevent water evaporation. Microscopy of
the plate was performed multiple times during the following week.
Furthermore, the crystal yield of the batch was determined by
OD280. An aliquot of the suspension was centrifuged at 14,000 rpm,
and the protein concentration in the supernatant was assessed.
Results:
[0361] Needle cluster-like crystals were found in the following two
batches: [0362] sodium dihydrogen phosphate molarity of around 3.4
M and around 3.6 M.
[0363] Precipitated species and oily precipitation phases were also
present in these crystal containing batches
Example 40
Sodium Dihydrogen Phosphate/Sodium Acetate Batch Crystallization at
20 mL Batch Volume, Agitation
[0364] D2E7 was used without exchanging the buffer (see Example
35).
[0365] D2E7 was brought to a concentration of around 10 mg/mL by
dilution with Milli Q water.
[0366] Batch crystallization was performed by admixing around 10 mL
of protein solution with an equal amount of crystallization
solution in a 50 mL Falcon tube. 10 mL of the crystallization
solution was prepared by admixing acetate buffer, sodium dihydrogen
phosphate stock solution and Milli Q water in the tube. In this
example, the acetate buffer molarity was 0.1 M, and the acetate
buffer pH was around 4.1. Sodium dihydrogen phosphate molarity was
4.2 M. The tube was stored at ambient temperature, agitating the
batch on a laboratory shaker. Microscopy of a 1 .mu.L aliquot of
the solution was performed multiple times during the following
month.
Results:
[0367] Precipitated matter was observed in this batch.
Example 41a
Sodium Dihydrogen Phosphate/Sodium Acetate Batch Crystallization at
100 mL Batch Volume, No Agitation
[0368] D2E7 was used without exchanging the buffer (see Example
35).
[0369] D2E7 was brought to a concentration of around 10 mg/mL by
dilution with Milli Q water.
[0370] Batch crystallization was performed by admixing around 50 mL
of protein solution with an equal amount of crystallization
solution in a clean 1 L polypropylene bottle. 50 mL of the
crystallization solution was prepared by admixing acetate buffer,
sodium dihydrogen phosphate stock solution and Milli Q water in the
tube. In this example, the acetate buffer molarity was 0.1 M, and
the acetate buffer pH was around 4.1. Sodium dihydrogen phosphate
molarity was 4.2 M. The container was stored at ambient
temperature. Microscopy of a 1 .mu.L aliquot of the solution was
performed multiple times during the following month.
Results:
[0371] Needle cluster like crystals were observed after seven days.
The crystal yield as determined by OD280 from residual protein
concentration in the supernatant was above 95% after seven
days.
[0372] Precipitated species were present in this batch immediately
after combining the protein solution and the crystallization
solution (milky suspension, typical light microscopic picture).
Since no precipitated species were observed after seven days, it
was concluded that a phase transition occurred where formerly
precipitated species rearranged into crystalline species.
Example 41b
Sodium Dihydrogen Phosphate/Sodium Acetate Batch Crystallization at
1 mL, 50 mL and 10 L Batch Volume, No Agitation
[0373] Large-scale crystallization of D2E7 was also performed by
combining 1 L of 50 mg/mL D2E7 in Adalimumab commercial buffer
formulation pH 5.2 (see Example 35) and 4 L water for injection
(WFI) in a 10 L polypropylene vessel (Nalgene.RTM.). The solution
was homogenized by gentle shaking. This 5 L D2E7 solution (10
mg/mL) was then mixed with 5 L of precipitating agent solution (5 M
sodium dihydrogen phosphate, 4,400 mL, 1 M sodium acetate buffer,
pH 4.1, 500 mL, WFI (Ampuwa), 100 mL) The precipitating agent
solution was added in 500 mL portions. After addition of each
portion the solution was homogenized by gently rotating/inverting
the bottle. After addition of around 2,500 to -3,000 mL of the
precipitating agent solution, a white precipitate appeared. The
remaining precipitating agent was added all at once. Then the
crystal preparation was homogenized (gently rotating/inverting)
again.
[0374] Immediately after batch manufacture (i.e. after admixing of
5 L D2E7 solution and 5 L precipitating agent), 1 mL (filled into
low volume Eppendorf sample vials) and 50 mL aliquots (filled into
50 mL Falcon sample tubes) were pulled and stored adjacent to the
10 L vessel for control and for evaluation of the impact of batch
size on D2E7 crystallization. As outlined by FIGS. 2 to 4, the
batch volume (i.e. 1 mL, 50 mL and 10 L, respectively) had no
impact on D2E7 crystal needle/needle cluster size.
Discussion of Results of Batch Crystallization Experiments:
[0375] As the applied micro scale technique (see Section D. supra)
is not feasible for large scale production of protein crystals, the
crystallization conditions discovered by these micro scale methods
were transferred into a scaleable batch mode.
[0376] D2E7 was successfully crystallized at 100 mL batch volume
with ultimately high yield (>95%) and reproducibility,
indicating that this crystallization system is applicable for
industrial processing. By SDS-PAGE analysis, the protein character
of the crystals was proven. SE-HPLC analysis of redissolved
crystals showed only a slight increase in aggregated species.
Washing of the crystals was possible by using an acetate buffer
containing sodium dihydrogen phosphate around 4.2M sodium
dihydrogen phosphate in around 0.1M sodium acetate at a pH around
4.1. No measurable solubility of D2E7 crystals in such a washing
buffer occurs, as analyzed by OD280, recovering more than 90% of
the crystals.
[0377] The experimental conditions of the above batch experiments
are summarized in the following Table 1:
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Batch Experiments Crystallization Buffer
Yield pH pH Final Protein day of Ex. Batch Volume solution Exchange
Crystals Buffer Final Conc. mg/ml Temp. visual control 33 800 .mu.l
0.1M NaAc, NaH2PO4 0.9M, yes none 4.1 2.5-10 amb 11 d KH2PO4 0.9M
34 600 .mu.l 0.1M NaAc, NaH2PO4 1.5-2.4M yes none 4.1 5 amb 11 d 35
1 ml 0.1M NaAc, NaH2PO4 0.7M, none 4.1-5.6 5 amb 4 d KH2PO4 0.7M
0.1M NaAc, NaH2PO4 0.9M, 4.1-5.6 KH2PO4 0.9M 0.1M NaAc, NaH2PO4
1.8M, 4.1-5.6 0.1M NaAc, NaH2PO4 2.1M, 4.1-5.6 0.1M NaAc, NaH2PO4
2.4M, 4.1-5.6 36 1 ml 0.1M NaAc, NaH2PO4 3.6-4.4M yes >95% 4.1
3.9-3.7 5 amb 5 d 0.1M NaAc, NaH2PO4 4.0-4.4M 4.6 4.0-3.9 amb 37 1
ml 0.1M NaAc, NaH2PO4 3.4-4.4M >95% 4.1 3.9-3.7 5 amb 6 d 38 2
ml 0.1M NaAc, NaH2PO4 4.0-4.4M yes n.d. 4.1 3.9-3.7 5 amb 6 d 39 1
ml 0.1M NaAc, NaH2PO4 3.4-3.6M n.d + 4.1 25 amb 6 d precipitate 40
20 ml with agitation 0.1M NaAc, NaH2PO4 4.2M precipitate 4.1 3.8 5
amb 4 d 41a 100 ml no agitation 0.1M NaAc, NaH2PO4 4.2M >95% 4.1
3.8 5 amb 7 d 41b 1 ml, 50 ml or 10 l 0.1M NaAc, NaH2PO4 4.4M n.d.
4.1 n.d. 5 amb
E. Methods for Crystal Processing and Analysis
Example 42
Washing of Crystals
[0378] After formation of the crystals, a washing step without
redissolving the crystals is favourable. Therefore, after the
crystallization process was finished, the crystal slurry was
transferred into a centrifugation tube and centrifuged at 500 to
1000.times.g for twenty minutes. The centrifugation was performed
at 4.degree. C., but might also be performed at other feasible
temperatures, e.g. room temperature. After centrifugation, the
supernatant was discarded, and the crystal pellet was resuspended
in a buffer containing around 4.2 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate in
around 0.1 M sodium acetate at a pH around 4.1. No measurable
solubility of D2E7 crystals in the washing buffer occurred, as
analyzed by OD280. The centrifugation/resuspension steps were
subsequently repeated for one to three times, and after this
washing procedure, the pellet was resuspended and stored in a
buffer containing around 4.2 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate in
around 0.1 M sodium acetate at a pH around 4.1.
Example 43
Analysis of Crystals by SDS-PAGE
[0379] To prove the protein character of the crystals, the crystals
were washed with a washing buffer as described in example 42. After
assuring by OD280 that no more dissolved protein was present in the
supernatant after centrifugation, the supernatant was discarded,
and the crystals were subsequently dissolved in distilled water.
OD280 measurement of this solution revealed that the crystals
essentially consisted of protein, as the absorbance of the sample
was now significantly higher as in the residual washing buffer.
SDS-PAGE analysis of this solution of redissolved crystals, when
compared to an original D2E7 sample, showed the same pattern.
F. Miscellaneous Examples
[0380] Concentration values given in the following examples are
initial values referring to the antibody solution and the
crystallization solution before mixing of the two solutions.
[0381] All pH values, if not described otherwise, refer to the pH
of an acetate buffer stock before it was combined with other
substances, like the crystallization agent.
[0382] All buffer molarities, if not described otherwise, refer to
sodium acetate concentrations in a stock solution before pH
adjustment, typically performed using acetic acid glacial.
Example 44
Solid Crystallization Agent
[0383] D2E7 was used without exchanging the buffer (see Example
35).
[0384] D2E7 was brought to a concentration of around 10 mg/mL by
diluting the liquid with Milli Q water.
[0385] Batch crystallization was performed by admixing around 500
.mu.L of the protein solution with an equal amount of acetate
buffer (0.1 M, pH 4.1 or 4.6, respectively) in a well of a 24 well
plate. Subsequently, solid sodium dihydrogen phosphate dihydrate
was added at six different ratios to each pH setting: around 0.23
g, 0.27 g, 0.30 g, 0.33 g, 0.36 g and 0.39 g. Thus, after complete
dissolution of the crystallization agent, the concentration was
around 1.5M to 2.5M in 0.2M steps. The wells were subsequently
sealed and the plate was agitated on a laboratory shaker until
complete dissolution of the crystallization agent. Thereafter, the
24 well plate was stored at ambient temperature without agitation.
Microscopy of the plate was performed after five days.
Results:
[0386] Needle cluster-like crystals were found in the following
seven batches: [0387] acetate buffer pH 4.1 and sodium dihydrogen
phosphate molarity of around 2.1 M, 2.3M and 2.5M, respectively.
[0388] acetate buffer pH 4.6 and sodium dihydrogen phosphate
molarity of around 1.9M, 2.1 M, 2.3M and 2.5M, respectively.
Example 45
Different Buffer Preparation Protocol and Preparation of
Crystals
[0389] In this example, the acetate buffers were prepared as
described in the following: 3 g of acetic acid glacial were diluted
with around 42 mL of purified water. The pH was adjusted with
sodium hydroxide solution and the volume adjusted to 50 mL. In this
case, the total acetate amount is fixed at 1M (100 mM in the
crystallization solution, or 50 mM in the crystallization mixture)
and not expanded by pH adjustment.
[0390] D2E7 was used without exchanging the buffer (see Example
35).
[0391] D2E7 was brought to a concentration of around 10 mg/mL by
diluting the liquid with Milli Q water.
[0392] Batch crystallization was performed by admixing around 500
.mu.L of the protein solution with an equal amount of
crystallization solution in well of a 24 well plate. 500 .mu.L of a
particular crystallization solution was prepared by admixing
acetate buffer, sodium dihydrogen phosphate stock solution,
potassium dihydrogen phosphate stock solution and Milli Q water in
a well. In this example, the acetate buffer molarity was 0.1 M, and
the acetate buffer pH was around 4.1 and 4.6, respectively. Sodium
dihydrogen phosphate molarity was varied from around 3.4 M to
around 4.4 M in 0.2 M steps. The wells were subsequently sealed
after preparation of the crystallization mixture to prevent water
evaporation. Microscopy of the plate was performed after five
days.
Results:
[0393] Needle cluster-like crystals were found in the following
nine batches: [0394] acetate buffer pH 4.1 and sodium dihydrogen
phosphate molarity of around 3.6 to 4.4, in 0.2 steps. [0395]
acetate buffer pH 4.6 and sodium dihydrogen phosphate molarity of
around 3.6 to 4.2, in 0.2 steps.
Example 46
Preparation of Encapsulated Crystals
[0396] Crystals as obtained in example 41 are positively charged as
determined via zeta potential measurement using a Malvern
Instruments Zetasizer nano.
[0397] The crystals are washed and suspended in a buffer containing
excipients which conserve crystallinity, and which has a pH that
keeps the crystals charged. Subsequently, an appropriate
encapsulating agent is added to the crystal suspension. In this
context, an appropriate encapsulating agent is a (polymeric)
substance with low toxicity, biodegradability and counter ionic
character. Due to this counter ionic character, the substance is
attracted to the crystals and allows coating. By this technique,
the dissolution of crystals in media which do not contain any other
excipient maintaining crystallinity is preferably sustained.
Example 47
Preparation of Encapsulated/Embedded Crystals
[0398] Crystals are obtained as described in example 41.
[0399] The crystals are washed and suspended in a buffer containing
excipients which conserve crystallinity.
[0400] The crystals can then be [0401] embedded by drying the
crystals and combining these dried crystals with a carrier, e.g. by
compression, melt dispersion, etc. [0402] encapsulated/embedded by
combining a crystal suspension with a carrier solution which is not
miscible with water. The carrier precipitates after removal of the
solvent of the carrier. Subsequently, the material is dried. [0403]
encapsulated/embedded by combining a crystal suspension with a
water miscible carrier solution. The carrier precipitates as its
solubility limit is exceeded in the mixture. [0404] embedded by
combining dried crystals or a crystal suspension with a water
miscible carrier solution. [0405] embedded by combining dried
crystals with a carrier solution which is not water miscible.
G. Crystal Characterization
[0406] In the following section experiments that were performed to
determine whether crystalline monoclonal antibody D2E7 retains the
bioactivity characteristic of never-crystallized D2E7 upon
redissolution of the crystalline material are summarized.
G1. Bioactivity Test with Murine L-929 Cells
a) General Method
[0407] The neutralizing effect of D2E7 solution against the
cytotoxic effect of recombinant human TNF (rHuTNF) was determined.
This involved incubating mouse L-929 cells as indicator in a
96-well microtiter plate in the presence of various D2E7
concentrations for 48 hours with a defined amount of rHuTNF at
37.degree. C. The surviving cells were stained with crystal violet.
The intensity of color was measured by spectrophotometry in the
individual wells of the microtiter plate and evaluated. The
IC.sub.50 was measured, i.e. the concentration of D2E7 which
reduced the cytotoxic effect of rHuTNF on L-929 cells such that 50%
of the cells survived.
[0408] In a separate dilution box, starting from the 1 .mu.g
protein/mL dilutions, the 9 titer curve measuring points (curve
dilutions) were prepared individually in the dilution tubes for
sample and reference standard.
[0409] The L-929 cell suspension to be used was diluted with medium
to provide a concentration of 60,000 cells/mL. Subsequently 100
.mu.L per well of the respective cell concentration were pipetted
into columns 1-11 of the test plate. The wells in column 12
contained only 100 .mu.L of medium each. Incubation was applied at
37.degree. C. and 5% (v/v) CO.sub.2 for 24 hours in the test
plate.
[0410] After 24 hours' incubation, 50 .mu.L of each of the 9 titer
curve dilutions were transferred from the dilution box to the test
plate for the reference standard or sample, i.e. for the reference
standard to wells in rows A-D in columns 1-9 and for the sample to
the wells in rows E-H in columns 1 to 9.
[0411] 50 .mu.L of medium were pipetted into column 10; and 100
.mu.L each were pipetted into columns 11 and 12.
[0412] 50 .mu.L of TNF reference standard (12.5 ng protein/mL
medium) were pipetted into the wells in column 1 to 10, row A to H,
whereby column 10 corresponded to the 100% lysis value (TNF
control).
[0413] Column 11 was a 100% growth control, and column 12 contained
no cell material and thus acted as a blank. The final volume per
well was 200 .mu.L.
[0414] Incubation of the test plates was performed for 48 hours at
37.degree. C. and with 5% CO.sub.2. Following incubation for 2
days, the liquids from the test plate wells were discarded by
turning quickly and giving a single, vigorous downward shake. Then
50 .mu.L of crystal violet solution (0.75% crystal violet, 0.35%
sodium chloride, 32.4% ethanol and 8.6% formaldehyde) were pipetted
into each well. The solution was left in the wells for 15 minutes
and then discarded as described above. Then the plates were washed
and dried at room temperature for about 30 minutes. Subsequently,
100 .mu.L of reagent solution (50% ethanol and 0.1% acetic acid)
were pipetted into each well. Agitation of the plates (at about 300
rpm for 15 min) produced an evenly colored solution in each of the
wells.
[0415] The absorbance of the dye in the test plate wells was
measured in a plate photometer at 620 nm. Individual values were
plotted on a graph, with the absorbance (y axis) being plotted
against the respective dilution or concentration ng/mL (x axis) of
antibody. From the 4-parameter plot, the concentration was read off
at which half the cells survive and half die (IC.sub.50 value).
This concentration was calculated by parameter 3 of the 4-parameter
function of the curve data. The mean values of the reference
standard concentrations were calculated. The relative biological
activity of the sample was calculated by dividing the mean
IC.sub.50 value of the reference standard by the individual
IC.sub.50 values of the sample and multiplication by 100%. The
relative activities were then averaged.
b) Relative Activity for D2E7 Crystals
[0416] The test was performed as a comparison of the biological
activity of the sample to that of a reference standard. The
absorption values, plotted versus the concentration of D2E7 and
assessed by a 4-parameter nonlinear regression, revealed the
IC.sub.50 values for the inhibition of the TNF effect by the
antibody. Since both samples were run in four repeats on one
microplate this results in four IC.sub.50 values for D2E7 reference
standard and sample respectively. Subsequently, the mean of the
IC.sub.50 values of the reference standard was calculated and the
relative activity of each repeat of the sample was assessed by
dividing the mean IC.sub.50 value of the reference standard by the
relevant IC.sub.50 value of the sample and multiplication by
100%.
[0417] The test of the sample (crystal suspension 2.7 mg/mL,
prepared as described in Example 36) revealed a relative biological
activity of 111%.
[0418] Thus, the sample can be considered as fully biologically
active.
G2. Microscopic Characterization
[0419] In the following, data on microscopic characterization of
crystals of D2E7 will be presented.
a) Optical Analysis of mAb Crystal Batch Samples
[0420] After homogenization, aliquots of 1 to 10 .mu.L sample
volume were pipetted onto an object holder plate and were covered
with a glass cover slide. The crystal preparations were assessed
using a Zeiss Axiovert 25 inverted light microscope equipped with
E-PI 10.times. oculars and 10.times., 20.times. and 40.times.
objectives, respectively. Pictures were taken using a digital
camera (Sony Cybershot DSC S75).
b) Optical Analysis of Vapor Diffusion Experiments, Assessment of
Approximate Crystal Sizes and Detection of Birefringence
[0421] For this purpose, a Nikon Labophot microscope was used,
equipped with CFW 10.times. oculars and 4.times., 10.times.,
20.times. and 40.times. objectives, respectively.
[0422] For assessment of vapor diffusion experiments, the sample
drops in the 24 well plates were screened.
[0423] Crystal sizes were assessed by transferring the microscopic
picture onto a computer screen by means of a JVC TK C1380 color
video camera, and by measuring the length or diameter of
representative needle-like or needle cluster-like crystals,
applying the JVC Digital Screen Measurement Comet software version
3.52a. Furthermore, the microscope was equipped with a filter set
(polarizer and analyzer) to assess the birefringent behaviour of
samples.
[0424] If the polarization directions of the polarizer and analyzer
filters are set at a 90.degree. angle relative to each other
("crossed polarizers"), no light will pass through to the
microscope eyepiece; the image will appear dark or black. If now a
sample, which is placed into the light beam between the crossed
polarizers, is capable of rotating the polarization plane of the
light, a distinct glimmering of the sample against a dark
background will be observed. This behaviour, termed
"birefringence", distinguishes ordered crystalline (anisotropic)
from unordered amorphous (isotropic) matter. As birefringence is
characteristic for anisotropic matter, this glimmering appearance
proves the existence of crystalline matter. However, the absence of
birefringence does not exclude the existence of crystalline matter,
as the crystals might also exhibit cubic symmetry and therefore be
isotropic, like amorphous matter.
c) Results
[0425] In the attached FIGS. 1 to 4 representative pictures of D2E7
crystals are presented.
[0426] FIG. 1 shows D2E7 crystals obtained by small-scale batch
crystallization according to Example 37 after 6 days at room
temperature (5 mg/ml final protein concentration; Crystallization
buffer: 4.2 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate in 0.1 M sodium acetate,
pH 4.1). The crystals exhibited birefringence.
[0427] FIGS. 2 to 4 show D2E7 crystals obtained by large-scale
batch crystallization according to Example 41b.
[0428] Syringeability: A D2E7 crystal suspension 200 mg/mL protein
incorporated in crystals and formulated in a buffer containing 20%
(m/v) PEG 4,000 is syringeable through a 271/2 G needle.
G3. Birefringence
[0429] In order to demonstrate that Adalimumab crystallization in
fact provides crystalline material its birefringence was
analyzed.
[0430] Protein:
[0431] Diluted 70 mg/ml Adalimumab in formulation buffer with
double-distilled water to 10 mg/ml.
[0432] Precipitant:
[0433] 4 M NaH.sub.2PO.sub.4 (dissolved powder in double-distilled
water)
[0434] Method:
[0435] Micro batch crystallization in a hanging-drop tray with 2 ml
compartment well, Mixed 500 .mu.l protein solution with 500 .mu.l
protein; no NaOAc in the solution.
[0436] Temperature:
[0437] 24.degree. C.
[0438] Technical Equipment for Birefringence Measurement:
[0439] Nikon SMZ1500 stereo dissecting microscope equipped with a
Nikon CoolPix CCD camera. Crystal birefringence was photographed
under crossed polarizers. Magnification is approximately
200.times..
[0440] Corresponding micrographs are shown in FIG. 5 A. A marked
birefringence of the clusters of Adalimumab needle-like crystals is
observed. The colour of the crystals changes from blue to red, then
back to blue, as the orientation of the crystal needle axis rotates
relative to the light polarization direction.
[0441] A further set of micrographs is depicted in FIGS. 5 B, C and
D.
[0442] All images were taken with a Nikon Eclipse E600 POL
microscope and a Nikon DXM digital camera. Magnification is
approximately 40.times..
[0443] The image of FIG. 5B (grey) is taken with plane polars and
shows the particle morphology. The white crystals on the black
background (FIG. 5D) show birefringence and were taken with crossed
polars. The blue and orange crystals on the purple background (FIG.
5C) show birefringence and were taken with crossed polar and a red
compensator or quarter wave plate.
H. Crystal Syringeability
[0444] In the following section, experiments were performed to
determine the syringeability of crystalline suspensions (in PEG) of
monoclonal antibody D2E7 (10-200 mg/ml) using different gauge
needles.
PEG Buffer:
20% PEG 4,000 m/v
[0445] 12 mg/mL mannitol 0.1 mg/mL polysorbate 80 1.305 mg/mL
citric acid monohydrate 0.305 mg/mL sodium citrate 1.53 mg/mL di
sodium hydrogen phosphate dehydrate 0.86 mg/mL sodium di hydrogen
phosphate dehydrate pH was adjusted to 5.2 with sodium
hydroxide
[0446] Syringe depletion (1 mL filling volume) was performed as it
would be manually by a patient in the course of administration.
20-27.5 G needle sizes were evaluated.
Syringes:
20/23/26 G:
[0447] Henke Sass Wolf GmbH 1 mL Norm-Ject syringes, equipped with
[0448] Henke Sass Wolf GmbH Fine-Ject.RTM. 20 G needles [0449]
Terumo.RTM. 23 G needles [0450] Neopoint.RTM. 26 G needles
27.5 G:
[0451] BD HyPak SCF.TM. 1 mL long syringes, equipped with 27.5 G
RNS needles 38800 Le Pont du Claix
[0452] The results (FIG. 6) suggest that higher gauge needles
provide a slower delivery of the crystals at at high
concentrations.
I. Stability Data (SE HPLC, FT-IR)
[0453] In the following section, experiments were performed to
determine the stability of crystalline suspensions of monoclonal
antibody D2E7 (50 and 200 mg/ml) over 12 month storage at
2-8.degree. C.
[0454] Crystals suspended in medium as used in syringeability
studies:
20% PEG 4,000 m/v
[0455] 12 mg/mL mannitol 0.1 mg/mL polysorbate 80 1.305 mg/mL
citric acid monohydrate 0.305 mg/mL sodium citrate 1.53 mg/mL di
sodium hydrogen phosphate dehydrate 0.86 mg/mL sodium di hydrogen
phosphate dehydrate pH was adjusted to 5.2 with sodium
hydroxide
SE-HPLC
[0456] 50 mg/mL Adalimumab Crystal Suspension, Stable at
2-8.degree. C. Over Time
TABLE-US-00002 Time point Aggregates (%) Monomer (%) Fragments (%)
T0 1.3 98.5 0.2 1 month 1.4 98.3 0.3 3 month 2.2 97.5 0.3 6 month
3.2 96.3 0.5 9 month 4.0 95.5 0.5 12 month 4.2 95.1 0.7
200 mg/mL Adalimumab
TABLE-US-00003 Time point Aggregates (%) Monomer (%) Fragments (%)
T0 1.3 98.5 0.2 1 month 1.3 98.4 0.3 3 month 1.9 97.8 0.3 6 month
2.4 97.2 0.4 9 month 2.5 97.0 0.5 12 month 2.6 96.8 0.6
[0457] A Dionex HPLC system (P680 pump, ASI 100 autosampler,
UVD170U) was used for stability analysis by SEC. D2E7 samples were
separated on a GE Superose.RTM. 6 column, applying a flow rate of
0.5 mL/min. UV quantitation (detection) was performed at a
wavelength of 214 nm. The running buffer consisted of 0.15M sodium
chloride in 0.02M sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.5. IR spectra were
recorded with a Confocheck system on a Bruker Optics Tensor 27.
Liquid samples were analyzed using a MicroBiolytics AquaSpec cell.
Each sample was assessed performing at least two measurements of
120 to 500 scans at 25.degree. C. Blank buffer spectra were
subtracted from the protein spectra, respectively. Protein second
derivative spectra were generated by Fourier transformation and
vector normalized from 1580-1720 cm.sup.-1 for relative comparison.
Redissolution of crystals was performed as follows: Crystal
suspensions were diluted with Humira.RTM. commercial buffer to 10
mg/mL protein concentration. By decreasing PEG concentration
crystals redissolved.
Blue--standard, Humira.RTM. after freeze/thaw Red--redissolved
crystals after 6 month storage at 25.degree. C., 50 mg/mL
Green--redissolved crystals after 6 month storage at 25.degree. C.,
200 mg/mL
[0458] Results: FIG. 7 illustrates that there were no
conformational differences over 6 months of storage at 25.degree.
C.
J. Morphology
[0459] After 12 months of storage at 2-8.degree. C. no significant
morphological changes were observed by light microscopy analysis of
the crystals.
[0460] Aliquots of 1 to 10 .mu.L sample volume were pipetted onto
an object holder plate, diluted with formulation buffer (20% PEG)
and covered with a glass cover slide. The preparations were
assessed using a Zeiss Axiovert 25 inverted light microscope
equipped with E-PI 10.times. oculars and 10.times., 20.times. and
40.times. objectives, respectively.
REFERENCES
[0461] Baldock Peter; Mills, Vaughan; Stewart, Patrick Shaw,
Journal of Crystal Growth (1996), 168(1-4, Crystallization of
Biological Macromolecules), 170-174. [0462] Connell, G. E., M. H.
Freedman, et al. (1973). "Human IgG myeloma protein crystallizing
with rhombohedral symmetry." Canadian Journal of Biochemistry
51(8): 1137-41. [0463] Harris, L. J., S. B. Larson, et al. (1992).
"The three-dimensional structure of an intact monoclonal antibody
for canine lymphoma." Nature (London, United Kingdom) 360(6402):
369-72. [0464] Huber, R., J. Deisenhofer, et al. (1976).
"Crystallographic structure studies of an IgG molecule and an Fc
fragment." Nature 264(5585): 415-20. [0465] Jen, A., Merkle, H. P.
(2001), Diamonds in the rough: Protein Crystals from a from a
formulation perspective, Pharm. Res. (2001), 18, 11, 1483 [0466]
Jentoft, J. E., D. G. Dearborn, et al. (1982). "Characterization of
a human cryoglobulin complex: a crystalline adduct of a monoclonal
IgG and albumin." Biochemistry 21(2): 289-294. [0467] Jones, H. B.
(1848). "On a new substance occurring in the urine of a patient
with mollities ossium." Philosophical Transactions of the Royal
Society. London 138: 55-62. [0468] McPherson, A. (1999).
Crystallization of Biological Macromolecules. Cold Spring Harbor,
New York, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. [0469] Mills, L. E.,
L. R. Brettman, et al. (1983). "Crystallocryoglobulinemia resulting
from human monoclonal antibodies to albumin." Annals of internal
medicine 99(5): 601-4. [0470] Nisonoff, A., S. Zappacosta, et al.
(1968). "Properties of crystallized rabbit anti-p-azobenzoate
antibody." Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 32:
89-93. [0471] Putnam, F. W. (1955). "Abnormal human serum
globulins." Science (Washinaton, D.C. United States) 122: 275-7.
[0472] Rajan, S. S., K. R. Ely, et al. (1983). "Three-dimensional
structure of the Mcg IgG1 immunoglobulin." Molecular Immunology
20(7): 787-99. [0473] Sarma, V. R., E. W. Silverton, et al. (1971).
"Three-dimensional structure at 6 Ang. Resolution of a human gG1
immunoglobulin molecule." Journal of Biological Chemistry 246(11):
3753-9. [0474] Shenoy, B., C. P. Govardhan, et al. (2002).
Pharmaceutical compositions comprising crystals of polymeric
carrier-stabilized antibodies and fragments for therapeutic uses.
PCT Int. Appl. WO, (Altus Biologics Inc., USA). 173 pp. [0475]
Terry, W. D., B. W. Matthews, et al. (1968). "Crystallographic
studies of a human immunoglobulin." Nature 220(164): 239-41. [0476]
von Bonsdorf, B., H. Groth, et al. (1938). "On the Presence of a
High-molecular Crystallizable Protein in Blood Serum in Myeloma."
Folia Haematologia 59: 184-208. [0477] Yang, M. X., B. Shenoy, et
al. (2003). "Crystalline monoclonal antibodies for subcutaneous
delivery." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the
United States of America 100(12): 6934-6939.
Sequence CWU 1
1
61107PRTArtificialvariable region of D2E7 light chain 1Asp Ile Gln
Met Thr Gln Ser Pro Ser Ser Leu Ser Ala Ser Val Gly 1 5 10 15 Asp
Arg Val Thr Ile Thr Cys Arg Ala Ser Gln Gly Ile Arg Asn Tyr 20 25
30 Leu Ala Trp Tyr Gln Gln Lys Pro Gly Lys Ala Pro Lys Leu Leu Ile
35 40 45 Tyr Ala Ala Ser Thr Leu Gln Ser Gly Val Pro Ser Arg Phe
Ser Gly 50 55 60 Ser Gly Ser Gly Thr Asp Phe Thr Leu Thr Ile Ser
Ser Leu Gln Pro 65 70 75 80 Glu Asp Val Ala Thr Tyr Tyr Cys Gln Arg
Tyr Asn Arg Ala Pro Tyr 85 90 95 Thr Phe Gly Gln Gly Thr Lys Val
Glu Ile Lys 100 105 2121PRTArtificialvariable region of D2E7 heavy
chaim 2Glu Val Gln Leu Val Glu Ser Gly Gly Gly Leu Val Gln Pro Gly
Arg 1 5 10 15 Ser Leu Arg Leu Ser Cys Ala Ala Ser Gly Phe Thr Phe
Asp Asp Tyr 20 25 30 Ala Met His Trp Val Arg Gln Ala Pro Gly Lys
Gly Leu Glu Trp Val 35 40 45 Ser Ala Ile Thr Trp Asn Ser Gly His
Ile Asp Tyr Ala Asp Ser Val 50 55 60 Glu Gly Arg Phe Thr Ile Ser
Arg Asp Asn Ala Lys Asn Ser Leu Tyr 65 70 75 80 Leu Gln Met Asn Ser
Leu Arg Ala Glu Asp Thr Ala Val Tyr Tyr Cys 85 90 95 Ala Lys Val
Ser Tyr Leu Ser Thr Ala Ser Ser Leu Asp Tyr Trp Gly 100 105 110 Gln
Gly Thr Leu Val Thr Val Ser Ser 115 120 39PRTArtificialD2E7 light
chain CDR3 region 3Gln Arg Tyr Asn Arg Ala Pro Tyr Xaa 1 5
412PRTArtificialD2E7 heavy chaim CDR3 region 4Val Ser Tyr Leu Ser
Thr Ala Ser Ser Leu Asp Xaa 1 5 10 5214PRTArtificialD2E7 light
chain sequence 5Asp Ile Gln Met Thr Gln Ser Pro Ser Ser Leu Ser Ala
Ser Val Gly 1 5 10 15 Asp Arg Val Thr Ile Thr Cys Arg Ala Ser Gln
Gly Ile Arg Asn Tyr 20 25 30 Leu Ala Trp Tyr Gln Gln Lys Pro Gly
Lys Ala Pro Lys Leu Leu Ile 35 40 45 Tyr Ala Ala Ser Thr Leu Gln
Ser Gly Val Pro Ser Arg Phe Ser Gly 50 55 60 Ser Gly Ser Gly Thr
Asp Phe Thr Leu Thr Ile Ser Ser Leu Gln Pro 65 70 75 80 Glu Asp Val
Ala Thr Tyr Tyr Cys Gln Arg Tyr Asn Arg Ala Pro Tyr 85 90 95 Thr
Phe Gly Gln Gly Thr Lys Val Glu Ile Lys Arg Thr Val Ala Ala 100 105
110 Pro Ser Val Phe Ile Phe Pro Pro Ser Asp Glu Gln Leu Lys Ser Gly
115 120 125 Thr Ala Ser Val Val Cys Leu Leu Asn Asn Phe Tyr Pro Arg
Glu Ala 130 135 140 Lys Val Gln Trp Lys Val Asp Asn Ala Leu Gln Ser
Gly Asn Ser Gln 145 150 155 160 Glu Ser Val Thr Glu Gln Asp Ser Lys
Asp Ser Thr Tyr Ser Leu Ser 165 170 175 Ser Thr Leu Thr Leu Ser Lys
Ala Asp Tyr Glu Lys His Lys Val Tyr 180 185 190 Ala Cys Glu Val Thr
His Gln Gly Leu Ser Ser Pro Val Thr Lys Ser 195 200 205 Phe Asn Arg
Gly Glu Cys 210 6451PRTArtificialD2E7 heavy chain sequence 6Glu Val
Gln Leu Val Glu Ser Gly Gly Gly Leu Val Gln Pro Gly Arg 1 5 10 15
Ser Leu Arg Leu Ser Cys Ala Ala Ser Gly Phe Thr Phe Asp Asp Tyr 20
25 30 Ala Met His Trp Val Arg Gln Ala Pro Gly Lys Gly Leu Glu Trp
Val 35 40 45 Ser Ala Ile Thr Trp Asn Ser Gly His Ile Asp Tyr Ala
Asp Ser Val 50 55 60 Glu Gly Arg Phe Thr Ile Ser Arg Asp Asn Ala
Lys Asn Ser Leu Tyr 65 70 75 80 Leu Gln Met Asn Ser Leu Arg Ala Glu
Asp Thr Ala Val Tyr Tyr Cys 85 90 95 Ala Lys Val Ser Tyr Leu Ser
Thr Ala Ser Ser Leu Asp Tyr Trp Gly 100 105 110 Gln Gly Thr Leu Val
Thr Val Ser Ser Ala Ser Thr Lys Gly Pro Ser 115 120 125 Val Phe Pro
Leu Ala Pro Ser Ser Lys Ser Thr Ser Gly Gly Thr Ala 130 135 140 Ala
Leu Gly Cys Leu Val Lys Asp Tyr Phe Pro Glu Pro Val Thr Val 145 150
155 160 Ser Trp Asn Ser Gly Ala Leu Thr Ser Gly Val His Thr Phe Pro
Ala 165 170 175 Val Leu Gln Ser Ser Gly Leu Tyr Ser Leu Ser Ser Val
Val Thr Val 180 185 190 Pro Ser Ser Ser Leu Gly Thr Gln Thr Tyr Ile
Cys Asn Val Asn His 195 200 205 Lys Pro Ser Asn Thr Lys Val Asp Lys
Lys Val Glu Pro Lys Ser Cys 210 215 220 Asp Lys Thr His Thr Cys Pro
Pro Cys Pro Ala Pro Glu Leu Leu Gly 225 230 235 240 Gly Pro Ser Val
Phe Leu Phe Pro Pro Lys Pro Lys Asp Thr Leu Met 245 250 255 Ile Ser
Arg Thr Pro Glu Val Thr Cys Val Val Val Asp Val Ser His 260 265 270
Glu Asp Pro Glu Val Lys Phe Asn Trp Tyr Val Asp Gly Val Glu Val 275
280 285 His Asn Ala Lys Thr Lys Pro Arg Glu Glu Gln Tyr Asn Ser Thr
Tyr 290 295 300 Arg Val Val Ser Val Leu Thr Val Leu His Gln Asp Trp
Leu Asn Gly 305 310 315 320 Lys Glu Tyr Lys Cys Lys Val Ser Asn Lys
Ala Leu Pro Ala Pro Ile 325 330 335 Glu Lys Thr Ile Ser Lys Ala Lys
Gly Gln Pro Arg Glu Pro Gln Val 340 345 350 Tyr Thr Leu Pro Pro Ser
Arg Asp Glu Leu Thr Lys Asn Gln Val Ser 355 360 365 Leu Thr Cys Leu
Val Lys Gly Phe Tyr Pro Ser Asp Ile Ala Val Glu 370 375 380 Trp Glu
Ser Asn Gly Gln Pro Glu Asn Asn Tyr Lys Thr Thr Pro Pro 385 390 395
400 Val Leu Asp Ser Asp Gly Ser Phe Phe Leu Tyr Ser Lys Leu Thr Val
405 410 415 Asp Lys Ser Arg Trp Gln Gln Gly Asn Val Phe Ser Cys Ser
Val Met 420 425 430 His Glu Ala Leu His Asn His Tyr Thr Gln Lys Ser
Leu Ser Leu Ser 435 440 445 Pro Gly Xaa 450
* * * * *
References