U.S. patent application number 14/543115 was filed with the patent office on 2015-03-12 for cell configuration for self-organized networks with flexible spectrum usage.
The applicant listed for this patent is Nokia Siemens Networks Oy. Invention is credited to Frank Frederiksen, Istvan Z. KOVACS, Klaus I. PEDERSEN, Vinh V. PHAN.
Application Number | 20150072699 14/543115 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 39677375 |
Filed Date | 2015-03-12 |
United States Patent
Application |
20150072699 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Frederiksen; Frank ; et
al. |
March 12, 2015 |
Cell Configuration for Self-Organized Networks with Flexible
Spectrum Usage
Abstract
The present invention relates to methods and apparatuses for
controlling cell configuration in a cellular network, wherein a
cell identity and a local cell spectrum resource entity or profile
are assigned to an access device in response to a result of sensing
a local radio environment at said access device to detect possible
neighbor cells. The assigned local cell spectrum resource entity or
profile is used to allocate cell spectrum resource from a shared
multi-operator spectrum to said access device.
Inventors: |
Frederiksen; Frank; (Klarup,
DK) ; PEDERSEN; Klaus I.; (Aalborg, DK) ;
PHAN; Vinh V.; (Oulu, FI) ; KOVACS; Istvan Z.;
(Aalborg, DK) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
Nokia Siemens Networks Oy |
Espoo |
|
FI |
|
|
Family ID: |
39677375 |
Appl. No.: |
14/543115 |
Filed: |
November 17, 2014 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
12934439 |
Nov 1, 2010 |
8923875 |
|
|
PCT/EP2009/002150 |
Mar 24, 2009 |
|
|
|
14543115 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
455/450 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H04W 24/02 20130101;
H04W 84/045 20130101; H04J 11/0093 20130101; H04W 16/14
20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
455/450 |
International
Class: |
H04W 16/14 20060101
H04W016/14; H04W 24/02 20060101 H04W024/02; H04J 11/00 20060101
H04J011/00 |
Foreign Application Data
Date |
Code |
Application Number |
Mar 28, 2008 |
EP |
08006110.4 |
Claims
1-18. (canceled)
19. An apparatus, comprising: one or more processors; one or more
memories including computer program code, the one or more memories
and the computer program code configured to, with the one or more
processors, cause the apparatus to perform at least the following:
sensing a local radio environment of an access device to detect
possible neighbor cells; and controlling assignment of a cell
identity and at least one of a plurality of local cell spectrum
resource entities or profiles to said access device in response to
the sensing result.
20. The apparatus according to claim 19, wherein said sensing is
controlled by said cellular network.
21. The apparatus according to claim 20, wherein said sensing is
initiated from a central control entity of said cellular network in
response to an establishment of a connection of said apparatus to
said central control entity.
22. The apparatus according to claim 20, wherein said sensing
detects physical layer cell identities of nearby cells which use
the same radio access technology.
23. The apparatus according to claim 19, wherein said apparatus is
adapted to use a previous cell configuration profile stored in said
apparatus if said sensing does not indicate any notable change in
said local radio environment.
24. The apparatus according to claim 19, wherein said apparatus is
adapted to broadcast a neighborhood status information.
25-38. (canceled)
39. The apparatus according to claim 19, wherein said assigned
local cell spectrum resource entity or profile includes a
semi-static part that is exclusive to the access device and a
dynamic shareable part to enable allocation of cell spectrum
resource to said access device depending on the local radio
environment operable to establish implicit coordination between
local cells of the cellular network based on the local radio
environment, and to allocate cell spectrum resource from a shared
multi-operator spectrum to said access device based on both the
semi-static part and the dynamic shareable part, wherein the local
cell spectrum resource entity or profile is selected from a limited
set of predefined basic cell spectrum resource entities or profiles
provided for cell configuration of the cellular network, and the
semi-static part accommodates semi-static instances of common and
control channels specific to a local access point and the dynamic
shareable part is adapted to allocate the available system
bandwidth or spectrum resources seen by the local access point.
40. A computer program product embodied on a non-transitory
computer-readable medium in which a computer program is stored
that, when being executed by a computer, is configured to provide
instructions to control or carry out: sensing a local radio
environment of an access device to detect possible neighbor cells;
and controlling assignment of a cell identity and at least one of a
plurality of local cell spectrum resource entities or profiles to
said access device in response to the sensing result.
41. The computer program product according to claim 40, wherein
said sensing is controlled by said cellular network.
42. The computer program product according to claim 41, wherein
said sensing is initiated from a central control entity of said
cellular network in response to an establishment of a connection of
said apparatus to said central control entity.
43. The computer program product according to claim 41, wherein
said sensing detects physical layer cell identities of nearby cells
which use the same radio access technology.
44. The computer program product according to claim 40, further
comprising using a previously stored cell configuration profile if
said sensing does not indicate any notable change in said local
radio environment.
45. The computer program product according claim 40, further
comprising broadcasting a neighborhood status information.
46. The computer program product according to claim 40, wherein
said assigned local cell spectrum resource entity or profile
includes a semi-static part that is exclusive to the access device
and a dynamic shareable part to enable allocation of cell spectrum
resource to said access device depending on the local radio
environment operable to establish implicit coordination between
local cells of the cellular network based on the local radio
environment, and to allocate cell spectrum resource from a shared
multi-operator spectrum to said access device based on both the
semi-static part and the dynamic shareable part, wherein the local
cell spectrum resource entity or profile is selected from a limited
set of predefined basic cell spectrum resource entities or profiles
provided for cell configuration of the cellular network, and the
semi-static part accommodates semi-static instances of common and
control channels specific to a local access point and the dynamic
shareable part is adapted to allocate the available system
bandwidth or spectrum resources seen by the local access point.
47. A method, comprising: sensing a local radio environment of an
access device to detect possible neighbor cells; and controlling
assignment of a cell identity and at least one of a plurality of
local cell spectrum resource entities or profiles to said access
device in response to the sensing result.
48. The method according to claim 48, wherein said sensing is
controlled by said cellular network.
49. The method according to claim 49, wherein said sensing is
initiated from a central control entity of said cellular network in
response to an establishment of a connection of said apparatus to
said central control entity.
50. The method according to claim 49, wherein said sensing detects
physical layer cell identities of nearby cells which use the same
radio access technology.
51. The computer program product according to claim 48, further
comprising using a previously stored cell configuration profile if
said sensing does not indicate any notable change in said local
radio environment.
52. The computer program product according to claim 48, wherein
said assigned local cell spectrum resource entity or profile
includes a semi-static part that is exclusive to the access device
and a dynamic shareable part to enable allocation of cell spectrum
resource to said access device depending on the local radio
environment operable to establish implicit coordination between
local cells of the cellular network based on the local radio
environment, and to allocate cell spectrum resource from a shared
multi-operator spectrum to said access device based on both the
semi-static part and the dynamic shareable part, wherein the local
cell spectrum resource entity or profile is selected from a limited
set of predefined basic cell spectrum resource entities or profiles
provided for cell configuration of the cellular network, and the
semi-static part accommodates semi-static instances of common and
control channels specific to a local access point and the dynamic
shareable part is adapted to allocate the available system
bandwidth or spectrum resources seen by the local access point.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention relates to cell configuration methods
and apparatuses for supporting self-organization and/or flexible
spectrum usage in advanced mobile communication networks, such
as--but not limited to--Universal Mobile Communication System
(UMTS), Long Term Evolution (LTE) networks, or International Mobile
Telecommunications--Advanced (IMT-A) systems.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] Home base stations (e.g. home NodeBs or home eNodeBs),
local-area base stations (e.g. local-area NodeBs or local-area
eNodeBs), femto eNodeBs or any other type of home access device (in
the following referred to as "HNB") or local-area access device (in
the following referred to as "LNB") have become a widely discussed
topic. As an example, when deployed in homes and offices, HNBs
allow subscribers to use their existing handsets--in a
building--with significantly improved coverage and increased
broadband wireless performance. Moreover, Internet Protocol (IP)
based architecture allows deployment and management in virtually
any environment with broadband Internet service.
[0003] With the introduction of High Speed Downlink Packet Access
(HSDPA) in various commercial networks, operators noticed quite
substantial date rate, i.e. capacity, consumption of single users.
Those are in most cases users staying at home and using a HSDPA
data card or the like for substantial Internet surfing like
downloading movies etc. However, existing mobile communication
systems (e.g. Global System for Mobile communications (GSM),
Wideband Code Division Multiple Access (WCDMAIHSDPA) are not
optimal suited for such home-based application, as those were
developed and defined under the assumption of coordinated network
deployment, whereas HNBs are typically associated with
uncoordinated and large scale deployment.
[0004] In HNB scenarios, it is generally assumed that an end user
is buying a cheap (Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) like) product
and also installs this physical entity at his home. Such a HNB
would then provide coverage/service to the terminals registered by
the owner of the HNB. Stilt the HNB would use the same spectrum
owned by the operator and as such at least partly the spectrum the
operator is using to provide macro cell coverage to the area where
the HNB is located in.
[0005] Moreover, sharing and pooling properties may be provided in
the core network, where several operator's core networks are
attached to the same access node or foreign mobile terminal devices
or user equipments (UEs) roam into a HNB or LNB nominally "owned"
by a certain operator.
[0006] A self-organization network (SON) is based on a network
concept with functionalities enabling and supporting capabilities
in which certain network entities can change or can be changed in
their configuration without manual intervention. This concept, as
such, is rather broad, ranging from a self-tuning of certain
network configuration parameters for performance optimization
purposes to a self-reorganizing of certain parts of the network
affecting network structures and operations. In this regard,
enabling plug-and-play access devices in a multi-operator
spectrum-sharing environment is one of the ultimate challenges.
This may be advantageous for possible mass-deployment of HNBs or
LNBs in LTE and IMT-A systems.
[0007] Moreover, flexible spectrum use (FSU) refers to any
spatially and/or temporarily varying use of a radio spectrum, i.e.,
not based on exclusive harmonized spectrum assignments for each
system and operator. The term "radio spectrum" herein can be
considered as a multidimensional entity, not just about the carrier
frequency and system bandwidth. Dimensions of radio spectrum may
include for example space, time, polarization, frequency channel,
power of signal transmission and interference. The static,
command-and-control management of spectrum has led to barriers to
accessing the spectrum in various dimensions. FSU aims to break
these barriers in one or more of the dimensions. This also includes
the so-called spectrum sharing (SS). SS refers to situations in
which different radio (sub-) systems utilize the same part of
spectrum in a coordinated or uncoordinated manner. These radio
(sub-) systems, typically, are based on similar technology and
offer similar services, e.g., different operators sharing the same
spectrum by utilizing dynamic channel assignment from a common pool
of channels. However, SS between a primary system, such as a fixed
satellite service (FSS) system, and a secondary system, such as an
advanced mobile cellular system which is allowed to use the
spectrum resources of the FSS system wherever and whenever
tolerable, is a probable scenario.
[0008] However, in connection with the above SON and FSU concepts,
inter-cell and co-channel interference problems affecting the
operation of individual neighboring cells and, in particular,
common and control channels which are essential to the cell
operation and may have predefined semi-static allocation, must be
resolved. These problem are even more crucial when considering
plug-and-play nature of HNBs and/or LNBs in SON in single RAT
multi-operator spectrum-sharing environments. Furthermore, initial
setup, reset or removal of a plug-and-play HNB or LNB must ensure
minimum impact on the operating network -environment, i.e.,
avoiding chain-reaction of forced network reconfigurations over a
sizable number of cells around the given HNB or LNB.
[0009] The development of SON for advanced mobile cellular networks
has been so far focusing on self-optimization aspects with
centralized network planning and operation and maintenance
(O&M) support, rather than self-organization. The aspects and
impacts of multi-operator environment in which different networks
of different operators can use the same radio access technology and
be deployed in overlapping spectrum and service area, have not been
addressed yet.
[0010] Furthermore, SON methods and mechanisms which have been
proposed for 3GPP LTE are involved around the so-called automatic
neighbor relation (ANR) concept and optimization of neighbor cell
list (NCL). These, in turn, are based on O&M network
configuration and terminal measurements of neighbor cells.
SUMMARY
[0011] It is an object of the present invention to provide a simple
and robust cell configuration scheme to facilitate efficient SON
and/or FSU for advanced cellular systems.
[0012] This object is achieved at network access level by a method
of controlling cell configuration in a cellular network, said
method comprising: [0013] assigning a cell identity and a local
cell spectrum resource entity or profile to an access device in
response to a result of sensing at an access device a local radio
environment to detect possible neighbor cells; [0014] wherein said
assigned local cell spectrum resource entity or profile is used to
allocate cell spectrum resource from a shared multi-operator
spectrum to said access device.
[0015] Furthermore, at network control level, the above object is
achieved by a method of controlling cell configuration in a
cellular network, said method comprising: [0016] providing a local
cell spectrum resource entity or profile for allocating cell
spectrum resource from a shared multi-operator spectrum; [0017]
receiving at said local cell spectrum resource entity or profile an
information indicating a cell identity assigned to an access
device; and [0018] assigning cell spectrum resource at said local
cell spectrum resource entity or profile to said cell identity.
[0019] Additionally, at network access level, the above object is
achieved by an apparatus for controlling cell configuration in a
cellular network, said apparatus comprising: [0020] sensing means
for sensing a local radio environment of an access device to detect
possible neighbor cells; and [0021] assigning means for controlling
assignment of a cell identity and at least one of a plurality of
local cell spectrum resource entities or profiles to said access
device in response to the sensing result of said sensing means.
[0022] Moreover, at central network control level, the above object
is achieved by an apparatus for controlling cell configuration in a
cellular network, said apparatus comprising: [0023] sensing means
for sensing a local radio environment of an access device (10) to
detect possible neighbor cells; and [0024] assigning means for
controlling assignment of a cell identity and at least one of a
plurality of local cell spectrum resource entities or profiles to
said access device in response to the sensing result of said
sensing means.
[0025] In addition, at local network control level, the above
object is achieved by an apparatus for controlling cell
configuration in a cellular network, said apparatus comprising:
[0026] assigning means for assigning a cell identity and at least
one of a plurality of local cell spectrum resource entities or
profiles to an access device in response to a received sensing
result indicating possible neighbor cells of a local radio
environment of said access device; [0027] wherein said assigned
local cell spectrum resource entity is used to allocate cell
spectrum resource from a shared multi-operator spectrum to said
target cell.
[0028] Accordingly, a framework and related mechanisms for
providing SON and FSU can be provided, irrespective of the number
of operators sharing a certain band-width in a service area. Cell
configuration can be handled upon insertion, reset, reactivation or
removal of an access device (e.g. in mass deployment of
plug-and-play HNB or LNB). An implicit coordination between cells
in a local network neighborhood in term of basic cell resource
allocation and sharing. Thereby, a prior conflict avoidance can be
ensured for resolving problems of inter-cell and co-channel
interference. This, in turn, provides an effective means for
accommodating HNBs or LNBs into the local networking environment,
whereas in conventional cellular systems explicit coordination with
extensive network planning and centralized control is required for
access device deployment causing significant overhead. addresses a
framework and related mechanisms for providing SON and FSU,
irrespective of the number of operators sharing a certain bandwidth
in a service area.
[0029] The proposed solution also provides backward compatibility,
that is, adaptability to existing network structures of the systems
of interest with minimum changes required, yet allowing for
decentralizing operator dependent network planning and O&M
functionalities needed for configuring the network system in an
optimal fashion.
[0030] The sensing and assigning at the network access level may be
initiated upon at least one of insertion, reset, reactivation, and
removal of an access device. The assigned cell spectrum resource
may comprises at a least structural arrangement and a resource
allocation of cell-specific common and control channels. More
specifically, in an example, the cell spectrum resource may
comprises at least one of channel format, transmit power, system
parameters, and information about dedicated and shared spectrum
resources assigned to a cell of said access device.
[0031] The proposed local cell spectrum resource entity or profile
may be designated based on frequency reuse principles. However,
still, resource allocation to the local cell spectrum resource
entity or profile may allow utilization of an entire system
spectrum or bandwidth at a given cell. Furthermore, the proposed
local cell spectrum resource entities or profiles may be separated
from one another in at least one dimension of an allocated radio
spectrum. According to an example, the at least one dimension may
comprise at least one of carrier frequency, radio bandwidth, slots
within a predefined super-frame, frames within the predefined
super-frame, phase, and transmit power limits.
[0032] Optionally, a mutually exclusive part of the local cell
spectrum resource entities or profiles may be designated to
accommodate at least all semi-static instances of cell-specific
common and control channels. As an additional option, a dynamic
sharable part of the local cell spectrum resource entities or
profiles may be designated to provide at least one of increased
data rates and improved resource utilization by flexible use of an
available spectrum.
[0033] At least one of a predetermined amount of common frequency
carriers and system bandwidth may be shared by different network
operators in the same service area.
[0034] The sensing at the access device may be controlled by the
cellular network. As an example, the sensing may be initiated from
a central control entity in response to an establishment of a
connection of the access device to the central control entity. More
specifically, the sensing may comprise receiving detectable
physical layer cell identities of nearby cells which use the same
radio access technology. However, if the sensing does not indicate
any notable change in the local radio environment, a previous cell
configuration profile stored in the access device may be used.
[0035] A neighborhood status information, e.g. obtained from the
above sensing, may be broadcasted from active access devices. The
neighborhood status information may for example be obtained based
on at least one of a network configuration and a received terminal
measurement report.
[0036] Other advantageous modifications are defined in the
dependent claims.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0037] The invention will now be described in greater detail based
on embodiments with reference to the accompanying drawings in
which:
[0038] FIG. 1 shows a schematic network architecture for HNB or LNB
deployment in a multi-operator FSU environment;
[0039] FIG. 2 shows a schematic diagram indicating spectrum
allocation in a multi-operator environment;
[0040] FIG. 3 shows a schematic block diagram of a cell spectrum
resource entity and a central control entity according to a first
embodiment;
[0041] FIG. 4 shows a schematic block diagram of an access device
according to the first embodiment;
[0042] FIG. 5 shows a schematic diagram indicating an example of a
flexible reuse pattern for overall spectrum resources;
[0043] FIG. 6 shows a schematic processing and signaling diagram of
a cell configuration procedure according to the first
embodiment;
[0044] FIG. 7 shows a schematic processing and signaling diagram of
a cell configuration procedure according to a second embodiment;
and
[0045] FIG. 8 shows a schematic block diagram of software-based
implementation according to a third embodiment.
DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS
[0046] In the following, embodiments of the present invention will
be described based on a multi-operator network environment.
[0047] FIG. 1 shows a schematic network architecture with a generic
deployment scenario of e.g. HNBs or LNBs 11, 12 in an advanced LTE
based mobile cellular system supporting SON and/or FSU. This
deployment scenario can be characterized as a multi-operator
spectrum-sharing networking environment in which different networks
of two different operators A (macro cell 41) and B (macro cell 42)
can be based upon the same radio access technologies (RAT)
operating in an overlapping or even common spectrum and also
geographical service area. The HNBs or LNBs 11, 12 of the different
operators A and B may be placed and set up next to each other
within a short distance by their local owners in a spatially
uncoordinated fashion. In FIG. 1, non-filled circles 11 indicate
HNBs or LNBs of the first operator A, while filled circles or black
dots 12 indicate HNBs or LNBs of the second operator B. Moreover,
X2. interfaces between HNBs or between LNBs may not be available
and thus should not be taken for granted in local-area deployment
scenarios.
[0048] In general, sufficient coordination, either explicit or
implicit or both, between network elements (e.g., neighboring HNBs
or LNBs) within one network system and between different
neighboring network systems in terms of network planning,
deployment arrangement, network configuration, real-time and
non-real-time interactions, and so forth are required for
supporting optimal SON and FSU. Implicit coordination, in which
coordination information is not communicated explicitly by
signaling messages but inferred from the local environment, is more
preferable in SON aspects. It is noted that the insertion, reset,
reconfiguration or removal of a HNB or LNB is traditionally
considered as a part of network planning.
[0049] According to FIG. 1, several HNBs or LNBs 11 of the first
network operator A (macro cell 41) are connected via an S1
reference point to a first central network control entity 31 (e.g.
a mobility management entity (MME), a pool of MMEs or any other
control entity) allocated to operator A. Additionally, several HNBs
or LNBs 12 of the second network operator B (macro cell 42) are
connected via another S1 reference point to a second central
network control entity 32 (e.g. a mobility management entity (MME)
or a pool of MMEs or any other control entity) allocated to
operator B. Both network control entities 31 and 32 may provide
connections to respective macro NBs (not shown) which serve
respective macro cells 41, 42 in or under which the HNBs or LNBs
11, 12 are located. The protocol over the S1 reference point can be
enhanced Radio Access Network Application (eRANAP) and may use
Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) as the transport
protocol. The S1 reference point can be used for per-bearer user
plane tunneling and interNB path switching during handover. The
transport protocol over this interface may be General Packet Radio
Services (GPRS) tunneling protocol--user plane (GTPU).
[0050] According to the following embodiments, a structural
framework and related cell configuration control mechanisms or
procedures are proposed for providing SON and FSU, irrespective of
the number of operators sharing a certain bandwidth in a service
area. Focusing on handling the cell configuration upon insertion,
reset, reactivation or removal of an access device (e.g. in mass
deployment of plug-and-play HNBs or LNBs), it is proposed to
establish an implicit coordination between cells in a local network
neighborhood in term of basic cell resource allocation and sharing.
This term is intended herein to cover at least all cell-specific
semi-static common and control channels so as to ensure sufficient
priori conflict avoidance for resolving the essential problem of
inter-cell and co-channel interference. This, in turn, provides an
effective means for accommodating HNBs or LNBs into the local
networking environment. In contrast thereto, in conventional
cellular systems explicit coordination with extensive network
planning and centralized control is required for deployment of
access devices causing significant overhead.
[0051] As can be gathered from FIG. 1, a limited set of so-called
predefined basic cell spectrum resource (PBCSR) entities (or
profiles) 20 are introduced for cell configuration in cellular
systems of interests, e.g., 3GPP LTE or ITU IMT-A systems having a
system bandwidth of up to, e.g., 100 MHz and supporting SON and
FSU. In FIG. 1, block 20 may be replaced by a plurality of separate
or discrete PBCSR entities allocated to individual cells.
[0052] The term `basic cell spectrum resource` herein refers to the
essential baseline resources needed to allocate and configure to a
cell so that the cell can be up and running properly. This includes
at least all the necessary structural arrangement and resource
allocation of cell-specific semi-static common and control channels
(e.g., channel format, transmit power, related system parameters,
and so forth.) This may further include information about
dedicated- and shared spectrum resources assigned to the cell to be
used for other, more dynamic channels. The basic cell spectrum
resource can be set and configured for a given cell upon insertion,
reset or reactivation of the cell into the local networking
environment by using a certain PBCSR entity 20.
[0053] The PBCSR entity 20 consumes and confines at least all
cell-specific semi-static common and control channels (necessary
for cell operation) to a certain part of the overall spectrum
resources allocated to the network system. A limited set of PBCSR
entities 20 can be designated based on frequency reuse principles
in order to form a flexible reuse pattern of cell configurations
which can be used among network neighborhoods to support SON. The
orthogonality of this flexible reuse pattern, however, may concern
only the resource allocation of cell-specific semistatic common and
control channels to avoid interference problems between neighbor
cells. For more dynamic channels or channel parts, possible FSU
among cells can be applied. This means that it is still possible
for a given cell to utilize the entire of the system spectrum or
bandwidth if allowed.
[0054] In FIG. 1, a local circular range 43 is depicted as a range
of a respective node located at the center of the local circular
range 43 for neighbor discovery and self-configuration initiative,
as explained later.
[0055] FIG. 2 shows a schematic diagram indicating spectrum
allocation in the multi-operator environment of FIG. 1. The overall
available spectrum resource or range corresponds to the horizontal
width of the diagram. This overall available spectrum is partly
shared between operators A and B as indicated by the arrows A and B
at the bottom of the diagram. The left white portion of the bar
corresponds to a spectrum range exclusively allocated to operator
A, while the right white portion of the bar corresponds to a
spectrum range exclusively allocated to operator B. The hatched
overlap portion at the center of the bar corresponds to a portion
of the overall spectrum, which is shared by both operators A and B.
The overlap portion is a potential contention and local outage
region and is indicated in FIG. 2 by an arrow CR.
[0056] In general, the overall spectrum resources allocated to the
system including the system bandwidth and carriers can be divided
into a certain number of PBCSR entities 20 in a predefined fashion.
These PBCSR entities 20 are separated from one another in at least
one dimension of the allocated radio spectrum, such as for example
frequency (e.g., carriers or radio band resources), time (e.g.,
slots or frames within a predefined super-frame or phase of the
network system), or power (e.g., transmit power limits on the basis
of cell-specific common and control channels, assigned radio band
resources). The number of designated PBCSR entitles 20 and the
separation between them should be sufficient enough so that the
PBCSR entities 20 provide enough resources to satisfy RAT baseline
system requirements, that there are enough different PBCSR entities
20 to assign (and reuse) for any sizable group of neighbor cells,
and that any two neighbor cells which are assigned with two
different PBCSR entities 20 can operate sufficiently with tolerable
inter-cell and co-channel interference.
[0057] FIG. 3 shows a schematic block diagram of a PBCSR entity 20
and a central control entity 50 according to a first embodiment.
The central control entity 50 may correspond to the network control
entities 31, 32 of FIG. 1.
[0058] The PBCSR entity 20 can have a unique identity assigned. For
implementation alternatives, the PBCSR entities 20 may consist of a
mutually exclusive semi-static part (SSP) 22 (based on e.g. an
orthogonal frequency and/or time division) and a dynamic sharable
part (DP) 24 (which can be adapted to allocate or configure the
rest of the available system bandwidth or spectrum resources seen
by a given cell). The mutually exclusive semi-static part 22 of the
PBCSR entity 20 may be adapted or designated to accommodate at
least all semi-static instances of cell-specific common and control
channels. The dynamic sharable part 24 of the PBCSR entity 20 may
be adapted to provide highest possible data rates and optimal
resource utilization by means of efficient FSU. Furthermore, a
storage unit (e.g. look-up table (LUT) or the like) 26 is provided
to store information about cell identities (CIDs) of served access
devices (e.g. LNBs or HNBs) and their assigned cell resources.
[0059] The central control entity 50 comprises a cell resource
assignment (CRA) function or unit 52 which is adapted to assign a
PBCSR entity 20 to a CID received from an access device (e.g. LNB
or HNB) in an initial assignment request 54. A mapping between CIDs
and identities of assigned PBCSR entities is stored in a storage
unit (e.g. look-up table (LUT) or the like) 56.
[0060] The DP 24, the SSP 22 and the CRA unit 202 may be
implemented as discrete analog or digital hardware circuits or as a
software controlled central processing unit (CPU) or any other
processor device.
[0061] The introduction of the set of PBCSR entities 20 based on
the proposed PBCSR division allows a basic cell configuration which
is quick, operator-independent and common to all operators sharing
the overall network resources. This provides an implicit
coordination between same RAT systems of different operators which
is necessary for mass deployment scenarios of HNBs or LNBs as
depicted in FIG. 1.
[0062] As already mentioned, different operators A and B are
allowed to share a certain amount of common frequency carriers and
system bandwidth in the same service area.
[0063] FIG. 4 shows a schematic block diagram of an access device
(e.g. LNB or HNB) 10 according to the first embodiment.
[0064] In order to facilitate SON with plug-and-play access devices
(in mass deployment of HNB and LNB in local-area scenarios), it is
proposed that the access device 10 is able to sense local network
neighborhood and detect potential neighbor cells. To achieve this,
a network sensing (NS) function or unit 12 is provided for
performing or controlling the sensing procedure. Additionally,
mapping between a served PLCID (i.e. sensing quantity or range) and
an assigned PBCSR entity 20 and/or unused and thus available
mapping relationships can be stored in a respective storing unit
(e.g. look-up table (LUT) or the like) 14. The mapping relation
between PBCSR and essential access device sensing quantity such as
PLCID ensures that the PLCID assigned to a given cell also
identifies the PBCSR entity 20 used for cell configurations. This
mapping between PLCID and PBCSR entity 20 may be a mutually
exclusive many-to-one relation. Both PLCID and PBCSR unit 20 need
to be unique among neighbor cells or cells within a certain local
network neighborhood, such as the range 43 in FIG. 1.
[0065] Network sensing can be initiated upon e.g. insertion, reset,
reactivation, or major reconfiguration of the access device 10, and
can be configured and controlled by the network 100 (e.g.,
initiated from a central control entity such as MME, network
O&M or a radio resource management (RRM) server as soon as the
access device 10 has got connected to it). The network 100 may
configure e.g. triggering conditions, rules or instructions for
selective measurements, timing and reporting formats.
[0066] The network sensing unit 12 of the access device 10 may, for
example, measure and receive all detectable physical layer cell
identities (PLCID) of nearby cells using the same RAT, e.g., 3GPP
LTE system. The PLCID may be sent in downlink as a
cell-reference-and-synchronization signal and may correspond to a
unique combination of an orthogonal sequence and a pseudo-random
sequence. It is noted that the use of identical PLCID by two
spatially overlapped cells may result in severe identity and
interference problems which disturb network operation. The network
sending unit 12 may be adapted to use more advanced sensing
capabilities such as channel quality or interference measurement in
certain selective radio bands, measurement of other coexisting
RATs, and so forth.
[0067] To enhance sensing of the network sensing unit 12 further,
an optional broadcast service of local network neighborhood
information or neighborhood status information can be introduced
for an active access device operating in a certain network
neighborhood. This means that the active access device 10 may
broadcast its awareness of the local network neighborhood (e.g.,
its neighbor cell list and their detectable characteristics). This
neighborhood status information can be updated based on network
configuration and active terminal measurement reports received from
the network 100. The access device 10 may select during the sensing
phase to read this kind of broadcast information from its detected
potential neighbor(s) to earn more about the local networking
environment and to avoid a conflict situation.
[0068] It is noted that the hardware functionalities underlying the
block diagrams of FIGS. 3 and 4 may be implemented as a chip
device, e.g., integrated on a single chip or a chip set.
[0069] FIG. 5 shows an example of designing such a flexible reuse
pattern consisting of five different PBCSR entities PBCSR1 to
PBCSR5. The upper resource range (e.g. bandwidth) corresponds to
the overall available spectrum range, and the lower partial ranges
correspond to a case where the overall available spectrum range is
equally divided among the five different PBCSR entities PBCSR1 to
PBCSR5. The hatched bars indicate a possible data channel
scheduling (Physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) to one
terminal device or user equipment (UE). Hence, the overall
available spectrum range can be made available for a single UE.
[0070] In the following, the PBCSR entities PBCSR1 to PBCSR5 are
described in more detail based on more concrete examples (e.g. as
an implementation example). For example, as mentioned above,
operating HNBs or LNBs are allowed to `expand` their cell resources
so that all available resources can be shared (if needed) between
operational HNBs or LNBs with regard to their assigned PBCSR
entities. Furthermore, resources may be released when a new HNB or
LNB is commissioned, so that a PBCSR entity can be assigned, e.g.,
between networks.
[0071] It is assumed that the total system resources are given by a
two-dimensional table with time-dependent columns (i.e. horizontal
time dimension) and frequency-dependent rows (i.e. vertical
frequency dimension), common to all local systems of interests.
Each resource element block is indexed with ij for f(i) and t(j),
i={1, . . . , N} and j={1, . . . , M}.
[0072] According to a first example which is based on time
division, PBCSR1 can be defined by the following notion:
F={f(i)for all i}, T={t(1), t(L), t(L+1), . . . , t(M)},
where cell-specific semi-static common and control channels are
confined and transmitted in t(1); more dynamic or user-specific
channels are transmitted in the left-over part of t(1) and {t(L),
t(L+1), . . . , t(M)} in controlled or scheduled fashion.
[0073] Similarly, PBCSR(L-1) can be defined by the following
notion:
F={f(i)for all i}, T={t(L-1), t(L), t(L+1), . . . , t(M)},
where cell-specific semi-static common and control channels are
confined and transmitted in t(L-1); more dynamic or user-specific
channels are transmitted in the left-over part of t(L-1) and {t(L),
t(L+1), . . . , t(M)} in controlled or scheduled fashion.
[0074] Thus, {t(L), t(L+1), . . . , t(M)} is common shared
resources according to the adopted FSU scheme. To ensure that the
cell can be set up and running first and at highest peak rate, this
division is certainly not optimum, as there will always be some
resource unused or wasted, proportional to the number of PBCSR
entities. But this allows for switching off a HNB or LNB to be
effortless. That is, no special tasks are required to reclaim
resources.
[0075] Mapping between PBCSR identity and PLCID can for example be
predefined as follows:
{ PLCID 1 , , PLCIDk } = > PBCSR 1 ##EQU00001## ##EQU00001.2## {
PLCIDy , , PLCIDY } => PBCSRL ##EQU00001.3##
[0076] According to a second example which is based on frequency
division, PBCSR1 can be defined by the following notion:
F={f(1), and the rest for all i}, T={t(j) for all j},
where cell-specific semi-static common and control channels are
confined and transmitted in f(1); more dynamic or user-specific
channels are transmitted in the left-over part of f(1) and the rest
in controlled or scheduled fashion.
[0077] Similarly, PBCSRK can be defined by the following
notion:
F={f(K), and the rest for all i}, T={t(j) for all j},
where cell-specific semi-static common and control channels are
confined and transmitted in f(K); more dynamic or user-specific
channels are transmitted in the left-over part of f(K) and the rest
in controlled or scheduled fashion.
[0078] Thus, in this case the entire of system resources can be
utilized and shared, provided that the scheduling of more dynamic
or user-specific channels must respect the transmission of
other-cell common and control channels at the first place. This
again does not requires any special treatments in regard to the
switching off issue of HNB or LNB.
[0079] Further examples can be based on e.g. more sophisticated
hybrid time and/or frequency divisions.
[0080] In the following, two alternative procedures for PLCID and
PBCSR assignment for cell configuration upon cell initial setup,
reset or reactivation is described with reference to FIGS. 6 and
7.
[0081] FIG. 6 shows a schematic processing and signaling diagram of
a cell configuration procedure according to the first embodiment.
In the diagram, conveyance or forwarding of signaling messages is
depicted as an arrow, while processing at a concerned network
element is depicted as a box arranged below the respective network
element which performs the activity indicated in the box. Time
proceeds in the downward direction.
[0082] In step 1, the access device 10 initiates a sensing of the
radio environment in the neighborhood. Then, in step 2, a request
for assignment of a PLCID and a PBCSR is issued by the access
device 10 and forwarded to the central control entity 50. The
assignment request includes sensing results (e.g. detected PLCID(s)
and neighborhood status information, or the like) obtained in step
1. In step 3, the central control entity assigns a proper PLCID and
PBCSR to the requesting access device based on the received sensing
results. In step 4, the assigned PBCSR entity 20 is notified about
its assignment to the PLCID. In response thereto, the PBCSR entity
20 allocates suitable cell spectrum resources to the PLCID in step
5. Finally, in step 6, the central control entity 50 responds to
the access device 10 with the assigned PLCID, global CID and PBCSR.
Apparently, step 6 may as well be reordered to be performed prior
to step 4.
[0083] Thus, in the first embodiment, the access device 10
indicates the sensing results, e.g., detected PLCID(s) and
neighborhood status information after sensing, to the network 100
to request for assignment of PLCID and PBCSR.
[0084] FIG. 7 shows a schematic processing and signaling diagram of
a cell configuration procedure according to a second embodiment,
where the access device performs self-selection of PLCID and
PBCSR.
[0085] Based on the sensing results obtained in an initial sensing
step 1, the access device 10 selects in step 2 a PLCID from an
unused set of predefined PLCIDs and PBCSR mapped on the selected
PLCID. This mapping relationship can be stored for example in the
storing unit 14 of FIG. 4. The access device then optionally
notifies and confirms the selected PLCID and PBCSR with towards
network (e.g. to the central control entity 50) in step 3 to get
the final PLCID, PBCSR and global cell ID configured from the
network. In step 4, the assigned PBCSR entity 20 is notified about
its assignment to the PLCID. In response thereto, the PBCSR entity
20 allocates suitable cell spectrum resources to the PLCID in step
5. Finally, in step 6, the central control entity 50 responds to
the access device 10 with the assigned PLCID, global CID, and
PBCSR. Again, step 6 may as well be reordered to be performed prior
to step 4.
[0086] It is noted that in the case of cell reactivation, e.g.,
from a standby state, the proposed neighborhood sensing can be
carried out right after the reactivation being triggered. In case
the access device 10 does not detect notable changes in the radio
environment compared to the last detected status, it may use the
last stored cell configuration profile for a fast cell
reactivation. The access device may then indicate and confirm this
to the network 100. For a safer but more time- and
resource-consuming alternative, the cell reactivation may follow
the steps applied for the cell start-up or reset procedures shown
in FIGS. 6 and 7.
[0087] Thus, in the proposed cell configuration method for
supporting SON and FSU in cellular systems of interests (as
depicted in FIG. 1), upon insertion, reactivation, reset etc. of an
access device or base station device (e.g. HNB or a LNB) to a local
network, the inserted access device first senses the local radio
environment for a sufficient period of time. More specifically, a
given access device may be adapted to scan, measure, and detect all
possible neighbor cells, of course, within its configured sensing
range (e.g. range 43 of FIG. 1) and RAT detection capability. It is
assumed that at least all the RATs that are involved in FSU are
detectable to the access device. To the detected neighbor cells of
the same RAT as of the given access device, the NB receives e.g.
their PLCIDs or other designated reference signals mapped on their
PBCSR identities. The access device may also select to read the
broadcast neighborhood status information of some detected neighbor
cell(s) if this is supported. In the first embodiment, the access
device may then feed the sensing results back to the central
network control entity 50, (e.g. MME or control gateway or RRM
server or network O&M server or the like), in a request for
PLCID and PBCSR assignment. The network examines the feedback from
the initiated access device, selects, and assigns proper PLCID and
PBCSR identity to the access device in response. In the alternative
second embodiment, the access device may be allowed to select PLCID
and PBCSR identity by itself. This however may be constrained to
predefined rules and value sets pre-assigned by the network. During
active operation of the access device, PLCID and PBCSR identity can
be reconfigured if needed due to e.g. assignment conflict or
serious interference detected based upon advanced UE measurements
or network monitoring statistics.
[0088] FIG. 10 shows a schematic block diagram of an alternative
software-based implementation according to a third embodiment. The
required functionalities can be implemented in any network entity
400 (which may be provided in the access device 10, the central
control entity 50 or the PBCSR entity 20) with a processing unit
410, which may be any processor or computer device with a control
unit which performs control based on software routines of a control
program stored in a memory 412. The control program may also be
stored separately on a computer-readable medium. Program code
instructions are fetched from the memory 412 and are loaded to the
control unit of the processing unit 410 in order to perform the
processing steps of the above device-specific functionalities
described in connection with FIGS. 3, 4, 6, and 7, which may be
implemented as the above mentioned software routines. The
processing steps may be performed on the basis of input data DI and
may generate output data DO. In case of the access device 10, the
input data DI may correspond to the sensed neighborhood status
information or PLCID(s) of neighbor cells, and the output data DO
may correspond to the assignment request (FIG. 6) or notification
(FIG. 7). In case of the central control device 50, the input data
DI may correspond to the notification received from the access
device 10, and the output data DO may correspond to the assignment
notification. In case of the PBCSR entity 20, the input data DI may
correspond to the assignment notification received from the central
control device 50, and the output data DO may correspond to the
allocated cell resources.
[0089] Consequently, the functionalities of the above embodiments
of the access device 10, central control device 50 and PBCSR entity
20 may be implemented as a computer program product comprising code
means for generating each individual step of the signaling
procedures for the respective entity when run on a computer device
or data processor of the respective entity.
[0090] In summary, methods and apparatuses for controlling cell
configuration in a cellular network have been described, wherein a
cell identity and a local cell spectrum resource entity or profile
are assigned to an access device in response to a result of sensing
a local radio environment at said access device to detect possible
neighbor cells. The assigned local cell spectrum resource entity or
profile is used to allocate cell spectrum resource from a shared
multi-operator spectrum to said access device.
[0091] It is apparent that the invention can easily be extended to
any service and network environment and is not restricted to the
UMTS or LTE technology area and in particular not to HNBs or LNBs.
The proposed embodiments can be implemented in connection with any
cell configuration at a base station or access device deployed in a
cellular or wireless network. The embodiments may thus vary within
the scope of the attached claims.
* * * * *