U.S. patent application number 14/450834 was filed with the patent office on 2014-11-20 for thermally protective flame retardant fabric.
The applicant listed for this patent is Precision Fabrics Group, Inc.. Invention is credited to Ladson L. Fraser, JR., Vincent Andrews Monfalcone, III, Charles Detwiler Roberson.
Application Number | 20140342140 14/450834 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 40407947 |
Filed Date | 2014-11-20 |
United States Patent
Application |
20140342140 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Monfalcone, III; Vincent Andrews ;
et al. |
November 20, 2014 |
THERMALLY PROTECTIVE FLAME RETARDANT FABRIC
Abstract
The present invention provides a fabric consisting of a single
layer of a non-woven substrate treated with a flame retardant
finish. The non-woven substrate comprises cellulosic fibers and
polyester fibers and has a basis weight ranging from 2.0 to 15.0
ounces per square yard. The fabric has a thickness ranging from
0.01 to 0.15 inches.
Inventors: |
Monfalcone, III; Vincent
Andrews; (Greensboro, NC) ; Roberson; Charles
Detwiler; (Greensboro, NC) ; Fraser, JR.; Ladson
L.; (High Point, NC) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
Precision Fabrics Group, Inc. |
Greensboro |
NC |
US |
|
|
Family ID: |
40407947 |
Appl. No.: |
14/450834 |
Filed: |
August 4, 2014 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
12172681 |
Jul 14, 2008 |
8796162 |
|
|
14450834 |
|
|
|
|
10143833 |
May 14, 2002 |
|
|
|
12172681 |
|
|
|
|
60290352 |
May 14, 2001 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
428/219 ;
2/458 |
Current CPC
Class: |
D06M 11/71 20130101;
D04H 1/46 20130101; Y10T 442/2648 20150401; Y10T 428/1345 20150115;
D06M 11/70 20130101; D06M 13/282 20130101; Y10S 428/92 20130101;
D06M 13/453 20130101; D06M 13/44 20130101; Y10T 428/1362 20150115;
A62B 17/003 20130101; D06M 11/36 20130101; D06M 11/68 20130101;
Y10T 428/1352 20150115; D21H 21/34 20130101; Y10T 442/643 20150401;
D06M 23/00 20130101; Y10T 442/697 20150401; D06M 11/47 20130101;
D06M 2200/30 20130101; Y10S 428/921 20130101; Y10T 428/13 20150115;
Y10T 428/1348 20150115; D06M 11/69 20130101; D06M 13/292
20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
428/219 ;
2/458 |
International
Class: |
A62B 17/00 20060101
A62B017/00; D04H 1/46 20060101 D04H001/46 |
Claims
1. A fabric consisting of a single layer of a non-woven,
needlepunched substrate, wherein the non-woven, needlepunched
substrate comprises cellulosic fibers and polyester fibers, wherein
the non-woven, needlepunched substrate is treated with an
intumescent, flame retardant finish comprising one or more
compounds comprising phosphorous and/or nitrogen, wherein the
non-woven, needlepunched substrate has a basis weight ranging from
2.0 to 15.0 ounces per square yard, and wherein the fabric has a
thickness ranging from 0.01 to 0.15 inches.
2. The fabric of claim 1, wherein the fabric has a contact thermal
protective performance value of at least 6.5.
3. The fabric of claim 1, wherein the fabric has a contact thermal
protective performance value of at least 9.0.
4. The fabric of claim 1, wherein the fabric has a contact thermal
protective performance efficiency greater than 1.1.
5. The fabric of claim 1, wherein the non-woven, needlepunched
substrate has a basis weight ranging from 5.0 to 6.5 ounces per
square yard.
6. The fabric of claim 1, wherein the fabric has a contact thermal
protective performance value of at least 4.5.
7. The fabric of claim 1, wherein the fabric has a thickness
ranging from 0.04 to 0.09 inches.
8. The fabric of claim 1, wherein the fabric has a thickness
ranging from 0.01 to 0.05 inches.
9. The fabric of claim 1, wherein the non-woven, needlepunched
substrate has a basis weight ranging from 2.0 to 5.0 ounces per
square yard.
10. The fabric of claim 1, wherein the non-woven, needlepunched
substrate has a basis weight ranging from 3.0 to 8.0 ounces per
square yard.
11. The fabric of claim 1, wherein the cellulosic fibers comprise
cotton, rayon and/or lyocell fibers.
12. The fabric of claim 1, wherein the cellulosic fibers comprise
rayon fibers.
13. The fabric of claim 1, wherein the cellulosic fibers comprise
lyocell fibers.
14. A protective garment constructed from the fabric claimed in
claim 1.
15. The protective garment of claim 14, wherein the protective
garment is chosen from fire retardant suits, fire retardant gloves
and welding suits.
16. An article of furniture constructed from the fabric claimed in
claim 1.
17. The article of furniture of claim 16, wherein the article of
furniture is chosen from mattresses, chairs, sofas, and seats.
18. A vehicle component constructed from the fabric claimed in
claim 1.
19. The vehicle component of claim 18, wherein the vehicle
component is chosen from vehicle seats, vehicle beds, vehicle
doors, vehicle bodies, mobile homes, trailers, insulation, and fuel
tank exterior liners.
20. The fabric of claim 1, wherein the intumescent, flame retardant
finish is applied to the non-woven, needlepunched substrate in an
amount ranging from 15 to 130 percent solids, based upon the weight
of the non-woven, needlepunched substrate.
21. The fabric of claim 1, wherein the non-woven, needlepunched
substrate has a basis weight ranging from 2.0 to 8.0 ounces per
square yard and a thickness ranging from 0.04 to 0.09 inches.
22. The fabric of claim 1, wherein the non-woven, needlepunched
substrate has a basis weight ranging from 2.0 to 8.0 ounces per
square yard and a thickness ranging from 0.01 to 0.05 inches.
23. The fabric of claim 1, wherein the non-woven, needlepunched
substrate has a basis weight ranging from 3.0 to 8.0 ounces per
square yard and a thickness ranging from 0.04 to 0.09 inches.
24. The fabric of claim 1, wherein the non-woven, needlepunched
substrate has a basis weight ranging from 3.0 to 8.0 ounces per
square yard and a thickness ranging from 0.01 to 0.05 inches.
25. The fabric of claim 1, wherein the non-woven, needlepunched
substrate has a basis weight ranging from 2.0 to 5.0 ounces per
square yard and a thickness ranging from 0.04 to 0.09 inches.
26. The fabric of claim 1, wherein the non-woven, needlepunched
substrate has a basis weight ranging from 2.0 to 5.0 ounces per
square yard and a thickness ranging from 0.01 to 0.05 inches.
27. The fabric of claim 1, wherein the intumescent, flame retardant
finish comprises one or more compounds comprising phosphorous and
nitrogen.
28. The fabric of claim 1, wherein the cellulosic fibers comprise
rayon and/or lyocell fibers and wherein the non-woven,
needlepunched substrate has a basis weight ranging from 2.0 to 5.0
ounces per square yard and a thickness ranging from 0.01 to 0.05
inches.
29. The fabric of claim 28, wherein the fabric has a contact
thermal protective performance value of at least 4.5.
30. The fabric of claim 28, wherein the fabric has a contact
thermal protective performance efficiency of greater than 1.1.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
[0001] This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. .sctn.120
to, and is a continuation of, U.S. patent application Ser. No.
12/172,681, filed on Jul. 14, 2008, which is itself a continuation
of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/143,833, filed on May 14,
2002, which claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C.
.sctn.119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/290,352,
filed May 14, 2001, the disclosure of each of which is hereby
incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] 1. Field of the Invention
[0003] The present invention relates to a thermally protective,
flame retardant fabric and, more particularly, to a lightweight
fabric providing protection from heat, flame, and electrical arc
that is suitable for use in a wide range of products. Applications
of the fabric include protective garments, articles of furniture,
vehicle components, building components, electrical components,
decorative components, appliances, and containers.
[0004] 2. Description of the Related Art
[0005] Thermal protective fabrics are known in the art. In one
application, apparel made from these fabrics protects users in a
range of hazardous environments. Thermally protective fabrics
typically provide a combination of thermal insulation properties
and heat reflection and/or absorption properties. This combination
of properties may reduce or eliminate heat-related and burn-related
injuries.
[0006] There are several qualities a fabric may possess in order to
be a good thermal insulator. One quality is the ability of the
fabric to trap air. A fabric with good air-trapping features may be
formed by constructing the fabric with fibers, such as cotton or
wool, that are themselves good insulators. Such a fabric may also
be formed by constructing the fabric in such a way that it provides
interstices or layers in which air or other gases can collect. One
example of such a fabric is a needlepunched, nonwoven material.
Needlepunched, nonwoven fabrics are manufactured by overlapping
carded layers of fiber and then entangling them by penetrating the
layers with rigid needles. The result is a soft, lofty fabric with
many pockets for air collection.
[0007] Heat reflection and/or absorption properties in a fabric may
be provided by a finish, such as a coating, that can reflect and/or
absorb heat. Conventional thermally protective fabrics have used
coatings made from metallized compounds, including aluminum or
titanium, to reflect the heat energy. However, these finishes are
typically stiff, difficult to apply, and expensive.
[0008] Coatings used to absorb heat have been formed from one or
more intumescent compounds. Intumescent compounds are compounds
that react on contact to flame by charring and swelling. The layers
of char that are formed may fill with nonflammable gas created in
the intumescent reaction and, thus, provide more layers of
insulation. Intumescent compounds have typically been used in
building materials and paints to prevent the spread of fire and
structural damage. These compounds, however, have been used with
only limited success in the field of textiles.
[0009] The degree of thermal protection provided by a fabric is
measured with an industry standard test. The NFPA 1971 Standard on
Protective Ensemble for Structural Fire Fighting, Section 6-10
describes a Thermal Protective Performance (TPP) test for
predicting time to second-degree burn when exposed to
convective/radiant energy for a short duration.
[0010] In the test, the thermal resistance of three 6''.times.6''
samples is averaged using a CSI Thermal Protective Performance
Tester. Heat exposure is provided by a combination of a largely
convective heat source provided by two laboratory burners and a
radiant source provided by a bank of quartz tubes. The gas burners
are set at 45 degrees to vertical so that the flames converge at a
point directly beneath the sample and burn 98% pure methane at a
flow rate of 135 units on the CSI apparatus. The quartz tubes are
adjusted to 48% on the instrument scale. The instrument is
calibrated to insure the delivery of an exposure averaging 2.0
cal/cm.sup.2 sec.
[0011] The fabric sample to be tested is mounted in a sample holder
positioned above the heat source. The heat transfer through the
fabric is measured by a calorimeter that is placed above the fabric
sample, either in direct contact with the sample or suspended above
the sample by means of a standard spacer. Test results for these
two types of tests are reported as "contact" or "spaced" results,
respectively.
[0012] During the test, a computer utilizing specially designed
data acquisition software accurately records the rise in
temperature of the calorimeter. The rate of temperature rise (i.e.,
the slope of the temperature vs. time trace) is used in conjunction
with the calorimeter constants to compute the heat flux received. A
square wave exposure sequence is used so that results can be
related to the values obtained in a Stoll curve. A human tissue
tolerance overlay, obtained by integration of the Stoll curve with
respect to time, is used to determine tolerance times to
second-degree burns. The TPP rating is calculated as the product of
exposure energy heat flux and time to second-degree burn.
[0013] Table 1 lists the TPP test results for several conventional
thermally protective fabrics.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 TPP Performance of Conventional Fabrics TPP
TPP Weight TPP Efficiency.sup.1 TPP Efficiency Fabric (osy)
(contact) (contact) (spaced).sup.2 (spaced) NOMEX 4.5 4.8 1.1 11.8
2.6 IIIA 6.1 5.1 0.8 13.4 2.2 7.5 16.1 2.1 INDURA 6.0 7.3 1.2 8.4
6.6 0.8 9.4 1.1 10.0 7.1 0.7 11.1 1.1 BANWEAR 8.6 9.4 1.2 11.5 12.7
1.1 FIREWEAR 5.6 8.4 1.5 9.5 11.0 1.2 .sup.1Efficiency is defined
as TPP/weight. .sup.21/4'' spacer placed between the sample and the
sensor
[0014] The highest TPP value seen in Table 1 is 16.1 on 7.5 ounces
per square yard (osy) NOMEX IIIA during a spaced test, meaning that
a 1/4'' spacer was placed between the sample and the sensor. The
efficiency (spaced) of this weight fabric is therefore 2.1. As used
herein, the term "efficiency" means TPP/weight. Note that the
efficiency (contact) of this same fabric at lower weights is
significantly reduced to 1.1 for the 4.5 osy product and 0.8 for
the 6.1 osy product. A fabric that can produce TPP values in these
ranges at lower weights is therefore a more efficient insulator and
would offer users a lighter weight alternative without sacrificing
protection.
[0015] Most conventional fabrics in the thermal protection market
are designed for extended use for periods of one year or more.
These fabrics must therefore be durable enough to withstand
continual use, possibly in an industrial environment. In the case
of garments, such use may include repeated laundering and repeated
wear. In addition, thermally protective fabrics must remain flame
retardant and thermally protective during the period of use. In
order to achieve this durability, conventional fabrics have
increased thickness and weight, which limit their versatility.
[0016] In one illustrative example, conventional fabrics may be
used to make thermally protective garments. The most prevalent
fabrics in the thermally protective garment market are aramids and
flame retardant cotton. Most high performance thermally protective
fabrics are aramids, such as NOMEX IIIA made by Dupont. For
example, these fabrics dominate the fire department wear market.
Flame retardant cotton, on the other hand, is used more extensively
in general industrial use. This is due primarily to the more
favorable hand (i.e., texture) and comfort of flame retardant
cotton, and the significantly higher costs associated with aramid
fabrics.
[0017] This pattern of usage indicates industry's concern over the
capital expense associated with thermal protective apparel
programs. Aramid fabrics are generally considered superior to flame
retardant cotton in terms of durability, launderability, and
thermal performance, yet the price and comfort associated with
flame retardant cotton make it a desirable alternative. The market
strength of aramids in a particular industry increases as the risk
of exposure to fire increases.
[0018] Conventional aramid fabrics include NOMEX IIIA from Dupont,
PBI from Hoechst Celanese, and KERMEL from Rhone-Poulenc Fibers.
These fabrics are available in a variety of weights and may be
blended with other fibers to reduce cost. Common uses for these
fabrics include fireman's bunker gear, fire entry suits, apparel
for utility workers, and apparel for some industrial
applications.
[0019] Conventional flame retardant cotton fabrics and blended
fabrics include INDURA from Westex, Inc., FIREWEAR from
Springfield, and BANWEAR from ITEX, Inc. Other fabrics include
BASOFIL from BASF, made from a melamine fiber, and FR VISCOSE from
Lenzing Fibers, made from a permanently flame retardant viscose.
The above fabrics are available in a variety of weights. Common
uses include flame retardant apparel, such as coveralls, shirts,
and pants for general industry, apparel for utility workers, and
fireman's stationwear.
[0020] The above fabrics have been used to produce a variety of
durable thermally protective products suitable for extended use in
their respective industries. However, each of these products has
deficiencies, such as weight, comfort, and cost. These and other
deficiencies of conventional thermally protective fabrics have
limited and, in some cases, precluded their use in a variety of
applications other than garments, such as articles of furniture,
vehicle seats, vehicle bodies, electrical products, building
components, and flame blocking components.
[0021] There is currently a need for lightweight, low cost, fabrics
that provide a high degree of protection from heat caused by flame
and electrical arc, for example.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0022] To overcome the drawbacks of the prior art and in accordance
with the invention, as embodied and described herein, one aspect of
the invention relates to a fabric comprising a substrate treated
with a combination of a flame retardant agent and an intumescent
agent. The substrate comprises non-thermoplastic fibers having a
basis weight ranging from 2.0 to 15.0 ounces per square yard and
the fabric has a contact thermal protective performance value of at
least 4.5. The substrate may also comprise a blend of
non-thermoplastic fibers and thermoplastic fibers.
[0023] Another aspect of the invention relates to a method of
forming a thermally protective, flame retardant fabric. The method
comprises applying a flame retardant chemical to a substrate,
applying a finish comprising an intumescent coating to the
substrate, and drying the substrate.
[0024] A further aspect of the invention relates to a method of
forming a thermally protective, flame retardant fabric. The method
comprises applying a finish to a substrate and drying the
substrate. The finish comprises an intumescent, flame retardant
coating.
[0025] Additional advantages of the invention will be set forth in
part in the description that follows. The advantages of the
invention will be realized and attained by the elements and
combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
[0026] It is to be understood that both the foregoing general
description and the following detailed description are exemplary
and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the invention, as
claimed.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS
[0027] Reference will now be made in detail to several exemplary
embodiments of the invention. It should be understood that all
embodiments discussed herein are exemplary regardless of whether
they are referred to as "exemplary" embodiments.
[0028] The thermally protective, flame retardant fabric according
to the present invention is a lightweight fabric providing
protection from heat, flame, and electrical arc. The invention
provides a soft, flexible, finished fabric that may be suitable for
use in a wide range of products. The products may have flame
blocking characteristics. In addition, the fabric may be dyed to a
variety of shades and/or patterns. Further, the fabric may be
durable enough for long term usage, but may also be inexpensive
enough to be disposable and/or suitable for limited use
applications.
[0029] The fabric according to the present invention may be used in
a variety of applications. The fabric may be used in protective
garments, including, for example fire retardant suits, fire
retardant gloves, fire blankets, blast blankets, welding suits,
welding drapes, welding pads, and welding filters. The fabric may
also be used in other types of protective garments.
[0030] The fabric according to the present invention may also be
used in articles of furniture, such as, for example, mattresses,
chairs, sofas, and seats.
[0031] Additional uses include vehicle components, such as, for
example, vehicle seats, vehicle beds, vehicle doors, vehicle
bodies, mobile homes, trailers, insulation, and fuel tank exterior
liners. As used herein, "vehicle" means device used in
transportation.
[0032] Further uses of the fabric of the present invention include
building components, such as, for example, insulation, air filters,
chimney casing liners, roofing underlayments, building partitions,
ceiling tiles, modular homes, and bomb shelters.
[0033] Further uses of the fabric of the present invention include
electrical components, such as, for example, electrical panels,
wire conduit liner, and lightning protection devices.
[0034] Other uses of the fabric of the present invention include
decorative components, such as, for example, fireplace rugs,
Christmas stockings, and Christmas tree skirts.
[0035] Further uses of the fabric of the present invention include
appliances, such as, for example, attic fans, liners for water
heaters, liners for clothes dryers, and exhaust duct liners for
heaters, and exhaust duct liners for clothes dryers.
[0036] Still further uses of the fabric of the present invention
include containers, such as, for example, fire retardant document
pouches, fire retardant safes, packaging containers for explosives,
shipping containers for explosives, and fire retardant ammunition
cases.
[0037] The above description of applications of the fabric
according to the present invention is not intended to be an
inclusive list. Other applications are envisioned. In accordance
with these applications, many devices and components may be
constructed from the material of the present invention. As used
herein, "constructed from" means made from exclusively or in
combination with other materials.
[0038] The fabric of the present invention provides a high degree
of thermal protection compared to conventional fabrics. In one
embodiment, the fabric has a contact thermal protective performance
value of at least 4.5. In another embodiment, the fabric has a
contact thermal protective performance value of at least 6.5, In a
further embodiment, the fabric has a contact thermal protective
performance value of at least 9.0. In a still further embodiment,
the fabric has a contact thermal protective performance efficiency
greater than 1.1.
[0039] The weight of the fabric may contribute to comfort as well
as insulative properties. In one embodiment, the substrate
comprises fibers having a basis weight ranging from 3.0 to 8.0
ounces per square yard. In another embodiment, the substrate
comprises fibers having a basis weight ranging from 5.0 to 6.5
ounces per square yard.
[0040] The density of the fabric, defined as its weight divided by
its thickness, may relate to the ability of the fabric to form a
barrier. In one embodiment, the fabric has a thickness ranging from
0.01 to 0.15 inches. In another embodiment, the fabric has a
thickness ranging from 0.04 to 0.09 inches.
[0041] In one embodiment, the substrate is chosen from nonwoven
fabrics, woven fabrics, and knitted fabrics. In another embodiment,
the substrate comprises a nonwoven fabric chosen from
needlepunched, spunbonded, thermalbonded, spunlaced, resin bonded,
stitch bonded, and meltblown fabrics.
[0042] In a further embodiment, the substrate comprises
non-thermoplastic fibers. In a still further embodiment, the
substrate comprises a blend of non-thermoplastic fibers and
thermoplastic fibers. Optionally, synthetic fibers, such as
polyester, may be blended to improve strength and/or dimensional
stability of the finished fabric. The weight, blend ratio, and
thickness of the fabric may be determined by the manufacturing
process.
[0043] In one embodiment, the fabric comprises a blend of
cellulosic fibers combined with at least one temperature resistant
fiber. As used herein, "temperature resistant fiber" means a fiber
having a melting point above 200.degree. C. In a further
embodiment, the cellulosic fibers are chosen from rayon, cotton,
and woodpulp. The cellulosic fiber may provide a source of carbon
that chars to maintain its integrity, rather than melting, upon
exposure to flame. In a still further embodiment, the at least one
temperature resistant fiber is chosen from glass, kevlar, asbestos,
carbon, polyphenylene benzobisoxazole, polybenzimidazole,
para-aramids, meta-aramids, fluorocarbons, polyphenylene sulfides,
melamines, and polyimides.
[0044] There are at least two flame retardant mechanisms that occur
in the fabric of the present invention when the fabric is exposed
to heat. The first is a flame retardant chemistry that prevents
ignition and self-sustaining flame when the fabric is subjected to
a heat source. The second is a barrier chemistry that causes the
fabric to char and swell when exposed to flame to provide an
insulating thermal barrier. These two mechanisms may act
independently or cooperatively.
[0045] The flame retardant chemistry of the fabric of the present
invention will be described first. Combustion requires three key
components commonly referred to as the "Fire Triangle": fuel, heat,
and oxygen. If any of these ingredients are removed from the
reaction, combustion will cease. Thus, to be effective, a flame
retardant may interfere with one or more of the three components of
combustion in one or more of the following ways: removing the heat;
increasing the decomposition temperature at which significant
volatile gases (i.e., the fuel) form; decreasing the amount of
combustible gases and promoting char formation; preventing the
access of oxygen to the flame or diluting the fuel gases to a
concentration lower than that needed to support combustion; and
increasing the combustion temperature of the fuels and/or
interfering with their flame chemistry.
[0046] There are several basic types of finishes that can be used
to render cellulosic fabrics flame retardant. Some of these
compounds have elements in common that act in one or more of the
ways listed above to increase flame retardancy. Compounds
containing boron, phosphorous, nitrogen, and halogens (e.g.,
bromine, chlorine) all find use in commonly produced flame
retardant fabrics.
[0047] Boron compounds coat the fiber with a glassy film to
insulate the polymer being protected. These compounds may increase
the combustion temperature of the fuels and/or interfere with their
flame chemistry.
[0048] Phosphorous compounds react with cellulose to prevent the
formation of volatiles, which act as fuel to the flame. In
addition, these compounds may promote the formation of char.
[0049] Nitrogen compounds alone are generally not good flame
retardants. However, they may synergistically enhance the effects
of phosphorous compounds to provide flame retarding effects.
[0050] Halogen compounds scavenge hydrogen and hydroxyl free
radicals, thus breaking down the combustion chain reaction caused
by these radicals.
[0051] Commercial products that may be used according to the
present invention may utilize all of the mechanisms described
above. Some of these products are listed in Table 2 with their
chemical nature and manufacturer. This list includes several of the
many possible commercial products that may be used as a flame
retardant according to the present invention. Other available
products may also be used. Many of the listed chemicals may be
mixed with selected binders to add hand or durability to the
finished fabric. These binders may also aid the barrier chemistry
described below.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Exemplary Flame-Retardants for Use in
Invention Product Chemical Nature Manufacturer SPARTAN 590
Organic/Inorganic Phosphate Spartan Flame blend Retardants SPARTAN
880 Organic/Inorganic Phosphate Spartan Flame blend Retardants
SPARTAN Organic/Inorganic Phosphate Spartan Flame AR371 blend
Retardants APEX Organic Phosphate Ammonia Apex Chemical FLAMEPROOF
Salt Corporation 2487 APEX Organic Phosphate Ammonia Apex Chemical
FLAMEPROOF Salt Corporation 2477 ANTIBLAZE N Cyclic Phosphorous
Rhodia Compound ANTIBLAZE NT Cyclic Phosphorous Rhodia Compound
GUARDEX Phosphorous/Nitrogen Glo-tex International, FRC-PHN
Derivatives Inc. GUARDEX FRC Proprietary Compound Glo-tex
International, HV-NF Inc. PYROZYL PCN Phosphoric Acid/Ammonia
Amitech, Inc. E-20602 Proprietary Compound High Point Textile
Auxiliaries APEX 344-HC Halogenated Apex Chemical Compound/Antimony
Oxide Corporation HIPOFIRE BRA Decabromodiphenyloxide/ High Point
Textile Antimonytrioxide Auxiliaries Generic monophosphate,
diammonium Assorted chemicals phosphate, ammonium manufacturers
sulfamate, ammonium borate, ammonium bromide, urea,
pentabromodiphenyl oxide, chlorinated paraffin
[0052] The barrier chemistry of the fabric of the present invention
will now be described. The thermal barrier of the fabric is
provided by an intumescent finish that chars and swells upon
contact to flame.
[0053] There are four basic components to any intumescent system: a
phosphorous-releasing catalyst, a source of carbon (i.e., a
carbonific), a resinous material, and a blowing agent that is a
source of nonflammable gas. On exposure to flame, these components
interact to form the thermal barrier. First, the catalyst
decomposes to form phosphoric acid. The acid then reacts with the
carbonific. Next, the phosphated carbonific decomposes to form a
large volume of foamable carbon and gas, and then releases the
acid. Simultaneously, the resinous material melts to form a film
over the foamable carbon. The blowing agent then releases gas that
further causes the carbon to foam, while the film assists to retain
the gases within the foam. The intumescent system thus forms a
thick, highly effective thermal insulation layer.
[0054] Table 3 lists several of the intumescent products that may
be used in the invention. Other available products may also be
used. Although all of these products are proprietary compounds,
they all use the intumescent mechanism described above. Some are
designed to be applied as a coating, while others may be padded on
the fabric.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Exemplary Intumescent Finishes for Use in
Invention Product Application Method Manufacturer Spartan 982
Coating Spartan Flame Retardants Glotard BFA Pad Glo-tex
International, Inc. Pyromescent Coating Amitech, Inc. 3901 Unibond
1114 Coating Unichem, Inc. Glotard FRC Coating Glo-tex BJ-M
International, Inc. Glotard W263A Pad Glo-tex International,
Inc.
[0055] The present invention provides two embodiments of a method
of forming a thermally protective, flame retardant fabric.
[0056] In the first embodiment, the method comprises applying a
flame retardant chemical to a substrate, applying a finish
comprising an intumescent coating to the substrate, and drying the
substrate.
[0057] The finish may further comprise a colorant. The presence of
the colorant may allow the substrate to be dyed to a desired color
and/or in a desired pattern.
[0058] The flame retardant chemical may be applied by a method
chosen from pad application and spray application. Other known
chemical application techniques may also be used. The application
of the flame retardant chemical may prevent ignition of the fabric
and/or propagation of a flame when the fabric is exposed to a
flame. In one embodiment, the flame retardant chemical is applied
to the substrate in an amount ranging from 5 to 100% solids by
weight based on the weight of the fabric. In another embodiment,
the flame retardant chemical is applied to the substrate in an
amount ranging from 35 to 85% solids by weight based on the weight
of the fabric.
[0059] The finish comprising an intumescent coating may be applied
by a method chosen from pad application, spray application, knife
application, roller application, and die coating. Other known
chemical application techniques may also be used. The intumescent
coating is designed to act as a barrier when the treated fabric is
exposed to flame. The intumescent coating may be foamed and/or
frothed depending on the stability of the foam. In one embodiment,
the finish is applied to the substrate in an amount ranging from 5
to 200% solids by weight based on the weight of the fabric. In
another embodiment, the finish is applied to the substrate in an
amount ranging from 15 to 50% solids by weight based on the weight
of the fabric.
[0060] The substrate may be dried by means of a tentered oven
and/or other known fabric drying means.
[0061] The fabric produced using the method of the first embodiment
may possess a face and a back. The face is the coated side, which
would face outwards in a garment and be impinged by flame or
heat.
[0062] In the second embodiment, the method comprises applying a
finish to a substrate and drying the substrate. According to this
embodiment, the finish comprises an intumescent, flame retardant
coating.
[0063] The finish may further comprise a colorant. The presence of
the colorant may allow the substrate to be dyed to a desired color
and/or in a desired pattern.
[0064] The finish comprising an intumescent coating may be applied
by a method chosen from pad application, spray application, knife
application, roller application, and die coating. Other known
chemical application techniques may also be used. In one
embodiment, the finish is applied to the substrate in an amount
ranging from 15 to 130% solids by weight based on the weight of the
fabric.
[0065] The substrate may be dried by means of a tentered oven
and/or other known fabric drying means.
[0066] The fabric produced using the method of the second
embodiment may be saturated by the intumescent compound so there is
no dependency on side (i.e., face or back) of the fabric.
[0067] The fabric according to the present invention may be
disposable or suitable for limited use in applications.
Consequently, durability to laundering is not an issue. The fabric
may also be durable enough for extended use applications.
[0068] Examples of a thermally protective, flame retardant fabric
according to the present invention comprising a blend of
non-thermoplastic fibers and thermoplastic fibers will now be
described.
EXAMPLE 1
First Embodiment of Forming Method
[0069] A fabric was produced using the first embodiment of the
forming method described above. The greige (i.e., unfinished)
fabric was a 3.7 osy needlepunched 70/30 Rayon/Polyester blend. The
polyester used was a 4.75 denier by 3'' staple fiber and the rayon
used was a 3.0 denier by 21/2'' fiber. The fabric was finished with
the formulations listed in Table 4. The finish was applied in a pad
application with the pad set to a pressure of 3.5 bar and speed of
2.8 m/min.
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Example 1 Pad Finish Properties Chemical
Concentration Wet Pick-up Dry Add-on APEX 100% 160% 73% owf
FLAMEPROOF 2487
[0070] The intumescent coating was applied as listed in Table
5.
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Example 1 Froth Coating Properties Chemical
Concentration Dry Add-on SPARTAN 100% 41% owf 982 FR
[0071] The SPARTAN 982 FR compound contains a foaming agent that
allows the product to be foamed to a semi-stable froth. This
mixture was foamed using a kitchen mixer. The coating method was
knife over roller. There was no gap between the knife blade and the
fabric.
[0072] The finished fabric was dried in a Werner-Mathis lab-scale
forced air oven at 300.degree. F. for 30 seconds. The flame
retardant and TPP performances of the example are listed in Table
6.
TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Example 1 Performance Properties Fin- Tol.
Time TPP NFPA NFPA NFPA ished to 2.sup.nd Effi- 701 701 701 #
Weight Degree TPP ciency Char After of (osy) Burn (contact)
(contact) Length Flame Drips 7.95 6.04 sec. 11.95 1.50 2.75'' 0
sec. 0
[0073] The TPP value reported in Table 6 was yielded from a contact
test. The TPP value and TPP efficiency (TPP value/Finished Weight)
of Example I are higher than that of NOMEX IIIA or INDURA (see
Table 1).
EXAMPLE 2
Second Embodiment of Forming Method
[0074] A fabric was produced using the second embodiment of the
forming method described above. The greige fabric was the same
greige used in Example 1. The fabric was then finished using the
formula listed in Table 7.
TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Example 2 Pad Finish Properties Chemical
Concentration Wet Pick-up Dry Add-on GLOTARD BFA 60% 270% 43% owf
GUARDEX FRC 36% 270% 62% owf HV-NF Water 4% 270% N/A
[0075] The finish was applied in a pad application with a pad
pressure of 3.5 bar at 2.8 m/min The saturated fabric was then
dried in a Werner-Mathis lab-scale forced air oven at 300.degree.
F. for 30 seconds. The flame retardant and TPP performances of this
sample are presented in Table 8.
TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Example 2 Performance Properties Fin- Tol.
Time TPP NFPA NFPA NFPA ished to 2.sup.nd Effi- 701 701 701 #
Weight Degree TPP ciency Char After of (osy) Burn (contact)
(contact) Length Flame Drips 7.6 6.26 12.38 1.63 3.375'' 0 sec.
0
[0076] The TPP value reported in Table 8 is also the result of a
contact test. The TPP value and TPP efficiency of Example 2 are
higher than those of NOMEX IIIA and the fabric of Example 1 (see
Tables 1 & 6).
[0077] The finish formulations may be altered to use different
chemicals or to adjust the add-on amounts of each chemical.
[0078] In addition to heat from flames, the fabric according to the
present invention may also provide protection from the pulse of
heat generated by an electrical arc. The heat attenuation factor
(HAF) obtained from testing standard ASTM F-1959-99 is used to
quantify the transfer of heat through a protective layer, such as a
thermally protective, flame retardant fabric. The HAF is a measure
of the ability of a material to inhibit the transmission of heat
and is stated as a percentage. In one embodiment, the fabric has an
HAF according to ASTM F-1959-99 of at least 70%. In another
embodiment, the fabric has an HAF according to ASTM F-1959-99 of at
least 85%.
[0079] The energy breakthrough threshold (Ebt) of a fabric is a
measure of the energy in calories per square centimeter
(cal/cm.sup.2) a fabric can withstand without breaking open and
while preventing a second degree burn. In one embodiment, the
fabric has an Ebt of at least 8.0 cal/cm.sup.2. In another
embodiment, the fabric has an Ebt of at least 14.0 cal/cm.sup.2.
With these Ebt levels, the fabric of the present invention
qualifies for use in a Category II environment under NFPA70E, the
Standard for Electrical Safety Requirements for Employee Workplaces
(2000).
EXAMPLE 3
Panels of 6.4 osy Cellulosic Material
[0080] Testing in accordance with ASTM F-1959-99 was conducted on a
6.4 osy flame retardant cellulosic material. The greige fabric was
the same greige used in Examples 1 and 2 and the fabric was
prepared as described in Example 2. In the tests, flat panels of
the material were exposed to an electrical arc. The panels were
spaced 12 inches from the arc and two electrodes were spaced 12
inches apart. The electrodes were operated with a current of 8.50
kA rms. The data was analyzed in accordance with ASTM F-1959-99.
This data is listed below in Table 9.
TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 Example 3 Test Results Incident Energy Stoll
Curve Heat Attention Break Panel (Cal/cm.sup.2) Deviation.sup.1
(.degree. C.) Factor (%) Open 1 9.43 -4.01 86.83 N 2 10.18 -3.04
86.69 N 3 8.84 -6.06 87.63 N 4 14.6 -2.16 89.97 Y 5 17.44 2.82
89.38 Y 6 16.26 -1.35 89.95 Y 7 11.82 -5.01 89.05 N 8 12.00 -2.54
87.41 N 9 12.01 -2.02 86.31 N 10 12.50 -2.90 88.14 N 11 12.45 -1.38
86.42 N 12 11.51 -4.75 88.28 N 13 13.47 -4.00 89.33 N 14 14.91 4.38
86.91 Y 15 14.40 -2.21 88.52 N 16 14.01 -3.28 89.32 N 17 14.98 .061
88.18 Y 18 13.25 -2.18 86.85 N 19 14.51 -2.41 88.76 N 20 14.27
-2.85 89.30 N 21 14.25 -2.01 88.48 N .sup.1The Stoll Curve is an
industry standard for the heat required to cause second degree
burns.
[0081] As shown, of the 21 panels tested, five broke open when
exposed to the electrical arc. The lowest incident energy (Ei) of
the panels that broke open was 14.60 cal/cm.sup.2. The highest Ei
of the panels that did not break open was 14.51 cal/cm.sup.2. None
of the panels tested exhibited ignition, embrittlement, melting, or
dripping. For the five panels with the highest Ei without
breakthrough, the average Ebt was 14.3 cal/cm.sup.2 and the average
HAF was 88.0%.
[0082] An example of a thermally protective, flame retardant fabric
according to the present invention comprising non-thermoplastic
fibers will now be described.
EXAMPLE 4
Material Comprising Non-Thermoplastic Fibers
[0083] A 3.5 osy needlepunched nonwoven fabric was produced using a
blend of non-thermoplastic fibers as follows: Rayon, 45%; Lyocell,
45%; Para-aramid, 10%. The fabric was treated with GLO-TARD PFG, an
intumescent, flame retardant coating manufactured by Glo-Tex
Corporation. An acrylic binder, GLO-CRYL NE, was added to increase
durability. The formula contained 53% GLO-TARD PFG and 7% GLO-CRYL
NE. The remaining constituent was water. The fabric was dipped in
the chemical bath and nipped to reduce the wet pick-up to 124%. The
performance properties of this sample are presented in Table
10.
TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 10 Example 4 Performance Properties Finished
TPP Weight TPP Efficiency (osy) (contact) (contact) 5.66 12.53
2.21
[0084] As shown, the resulting fabric had a finished basis weight
of 5.66 osy. In addition, the resulting TPP value for this product
was 12.53, with a TPP efficiency of 2.21.
[0085] Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those
skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and
practice of the invention disclosed herein. It is intended that the
specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a
true scope and spirit of the invention being indicated by the
following claims.
* * * * *