U.S. patent application number 14/327930 was filed with the patent office on 2014-10-30 for additive composition and polymer composition comprising the same.
The applicant listed for this patent is MILLIKEN & COMPANY. Invention is credited to K. David Lake, JR., Normand P. Miron.
Application Number | 20140323632 14/327930 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 46491248 |
Filed Date | 2014-10-30 |
United States Patent
Application |
20140323632 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Lake, JR.; K. David ; et
al. |
October 30, 2014 |
ADDITIVE COMPOSITION AND POLYMER COMPOSITION COMPRISING THE
SAME
Abstract
An additive composition comprises a plurality of first particles
and a metal hydroxide compound. A polymer composition comprises a
polymer, a plurality of first particles, and a metal hydroxide
compound. The first particles comprise a magnesium oxysulfate
compound.
Inventors: |
Lake, JR.; K. David;
(Spartanburg, SC) ; Miron; Normand P.;
(Spartanburg, SC) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
MILLIKEN & COMPANY |
Spartanburg |
SC |
US |
|
|
Family ID: |
46491248 |
Appl. No.: |
14/327930 |
Filed: |
July 10, 2014 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
13304646 |
Nov 26, 2011 |
8802762 |
|
|
14327930 |
|
|
|
|
61433512 |
Jan 17, 2011 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
524/414 |
Current CPC
Class: |
C08K 2003/026 20130101;
C08K 2003/2224 20130101; C08K 2003/3063 20130101; C08K 2003/2227
20130101; C08K 3/22 20130101; C08K 3/20 20130101; C08K 3/30
20130101; C08K 3/02 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
524/414 |
International
Class: |
C08K 3/30 20060101
C08K003/30; C08K 3/22 20060101 C08K003/22; C08K 3/02 20060101
C08K003/02 |
Claims
1-8. (canceled)
9. A polymer composition comprising: (a) a thermoplastic polymer;
(b) a plurality of first particles, the particles comprising a
magnesium oxysulfate compound; and (c) a metal hydroxide compound,
wherein the weight of the first particles present in the polymer
composition is about 15% or more of the combined total weight of
the first particles and the metal hydroxide compound present in the
polymer composition, and wherein the polymer composition contains
less than 1% by weight of red phosphorous based on the total weight
of the polymer composition.
10. (canceled)
11. The polymer composition of claim 9, wherein the thermoplastic
polymer is a polyolefin.
12. The polymer composition of claim 11, wherein the polyolefin is
selected from the group consisting of polypropylene, polyethylene,
and mixtures thereof.
13. The polymer composition of claim 9, wherein the polymer is
selected from the group consisting of polypropylene homopolymers,
polypropylene copolymers, polypropylene impact copolymers, and
mixtures thereof.
14. The polymer composition of claim 9, wherein the particles
comprise a magnesium oxysulfate compound selected from the group
consisting of 5Mg(OH).sub.2.MgSO.sub.4.3H.sub.2O;
5Mg(OH).sub.2.MgSO.sub.4.2H.sub.2O;
3Mg(OH).sub.2.MgSO.sub.4.8H.sub.2O;
Mg(OH).sub.2.MgSO.sub.4.5H.sub.2O;
Mg(OH).sub.2.2MgSO.sub.4.3H.sub.2O; and mixtures thereof.
15. The polymer composition of claim 9, wherein at least a portion
of the particles are in the form of whiskers, the whiskers having
an average aspect ratio of about 7 or more.
16. The polymer composition of claim 9, wherein the metal hydroxide
compound is selected from the group consisting of magnesium
hydroxide, aluminum hydroxide, and mixtures thereof.
17. The polymer composition of claim 16, wherein the metal
hydroxide compound is magnesium hydroxide.
18. The polymer composition of claim 16, wherein the metal
hydroxide compound is aluminum hydroxide.
19. The polymer composition of claim 9, wherein the weight of the
first particles present in the polymer composition is about 20% or
more of the combined total weight of the first particles and the
metal hydroxide compound present in the polymer composition.
20. The polymer composition of claim 9, wherein the polymer
composition contains less than 0.3% by weight of red phosphorous
based on the total weight of the polymer composition.
21. The polymer composition of claim 9, wherein the combined weight
of the first particles and the metal hydroxide compound present in
the polymer composition is about 25% to about 75% of the total
weight of the polymer composition.
22. The polymer composition of claim 21, wherein the combined
weight of the first particles and the metal hydroxide compound
present in the polymer composition is about 30% to about 70% of the
total weight of the polymer composition.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED PATENT APPLICATION
[0001] This application claims, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. .sctn.119(e),
the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Patent Application No.
61/433,512, which was filed on Jan. 17, 2011.
TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The invention relates to additive compositions suitable for
use in polymer compositions and polymer compositions comprising
such additive compositions.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0003] As noted above, the invention provides an additive
composition suitable for use in plastics and a plastic composition
containing such an additive composition or the individual
components of such an additive composition. The additive
composition of the invention is believed to be particularly
well-suited for use as a flame retardant for plastics. In
particular, it is believed that the additive composition of the
invention can, at lower total loadings of the components, impart
the same or improved levels of flame retardance relative to more
traditional flame retardants (e.g., metal hydroxide compounds used
alone). Furthermore, in addition to their flame retardant effects,
the first particles of the additive composition are also believed
to improve the stiffness of the polymer (for example, as evidenced
by an increase in the 1% secant modulus of the polymer and/or an
increase in the heat deflection temperature of the polymer) and to
permit a reduction in the density of articles made with the polymer
composition, which can be valuable when seeking to produce lighter
weight articles.
[0004] In a first embodiment, the invention provides an additive
composition comprising a plurality of first particles and a metal
hydroxide compound. The first particles comprise a magnesium
oxysulfate compound.
[0005] In a second embodiment, the invention provides a polymer
composition comprising a polymer, a plurality of first particles,
and a metal hydroxide compound. The first particles comprise a
magnesium oxysulfate compound.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0006] In a first embodiment, the invention provides an additive
composition. The additive composition comprises a plurality of
first particles and a metal hydroxide compound.
[0007] The first particles comprise a magnesium oxysulfate
compound. The magnesium oxysulfate compound can be comprised of any
suitable relative amounts of magnesium hydroxide, magnesium
sulfate, and waters of hydration. Thus, the magnesium oxysulfate
compound can generally conform to the formula
xMg(OH)2.yMgSO4.zH.sub.2O, where x, y, and z are positive numbers
greater than zero and ranging up to about 10. The values for x, y,
and z include both integers and fractions due to the fact that the
stoichiometry of the magnesium oxysulfate compound may result in,
for example, magnesium hydroxide units that are "shared" by
magnesium sulfate units and/or waters of hydration. In certain
possibly preferred embodiments, the magnesium oxysulfate compound
is selected from the group consisting of
5Mg(OH).sub.2.MgSO.sub.4.3H.sub.2O;
5Mg(OH).sub.2.MgSO.sub.4.2H.sub.2O;
3Mg(OH).sub.2.MgSO.sub.4.8H.sub.2O;
Mg(OH).sub.2.MgSO.sub.4.5H.sub.2O;
Mg(OH).sub.2.2MgSO.sub.4.3H.sub.2O; and mixtures thereof.
Additional forms of magnesium oxysulfate are also believed to be
suitable for use in the embodiments of the invention, such as
4.34Mg(OH).sub.2.MgSO.sub.42H.sub.2O and
Mg(OH).sub.2.2MgSO.sub.4.2H.sub.2O.
[0008] The particles comprising the magnesium oxysulfate compound
can be provided in any suitable form. For example, the particles
can be provided in the form of spheres, plates, rods, or whiskers.
The particles can have any suitable dimensions. However, the
particles preferably are provided in a form in which the particles
have, on average, one dimension (i.e., a length) that is
substantially greater than the other two dimensions (i.e., width
and height/thickness), such as plates, rods, or whiskers. Thus, in
certain possibly preferred embodiments, the particles have an
average aspect ratio of about 2 or more, about 3 or more, about 5
or more, or about 7 or more (e.g., about 10 or more or about 20 or
more). As utilized herein, the term "aspect ratio" refers to the
value obtained by dividing the length of a particle (i.e., the
particle's largest dimension) by the arithmetic mean of the two
remaining dimensions of the same particle (e.g., the width and
height/thickness). The "average aspect ratio" is the arithmetic
mean of the individual aspect ratios of the particles within a
sample or collection or a statistically significant and
representative random sample drawn from such a sample or
collection. The aspect ratio and average aspect ratio of the
particles can be determined by any suitable technique. For example,
the two can be determined by measuring the dimensions of individual
particles using, for example, a microscope (e.g., a scanning
electron microscope) and then calculating the aspect ratio from the
measured dimensions as described above.
[0009] As noted above, the particles can have any suitable
dimensions. In certain possibly preferred embodiments, the
particles have a length of about 1 .mu.m or more, about 2 .mu.m or
more, about 3 .mu.m or more, about 4 .mu.m or more, about 5.mu. or
more. In certain possibly preferred embodiments, the particles have
a length of about 100 .mu.m or less, about 90 .mu.m or less, about
80 .mu.m or less, about 70 .mu.m or less, about 65 .mu.m or less,
or about 60 .mu.m or less. Thus, in certain possibly preferred
embodiments, the particles have a length of about 1 .mu.m to about
100 .mu.m, about 2 .mu.m to about 90 .mu.m, about 3 .mu.m to about
80 .mu.m, about 4 .mu.m to about 70 .mu.m, or about 5 .mu.m to
about 65 .mu.m (e.g., about 5 .mu.m to about 60 .mu.m). The two
remaining dimensions of the particle (i.e., the width and
height/thickness) can be of any suitable size. In certain possibly
preferred embodiments, the particles have a width of about 0.1
.mu.m or more, about 0.2 .mu.m or more, about 0.3 .mu.m or more,
about 0.4 .mu.m or more, or about 0.5 .mu.m or more. Also, in
certain possibly preferred embodiments, the particles have a width
of about 10 .mu.m or less, about 9 .mu.m or less, about 8 .mu.m or
less, about 7 .mu.m or less, about 6 .mu.m or less, or about 5
.mu.m or less. Thus, in certain possibly preferred embodiments, the
particles have a width of about 0.1 .mu.m to about 10 .mu.m, about
0.2 .mu.m to about 9 .mu.m, about 0.3 .mu.m to about 8 .mu.m, about
0.4 to about 7 .mu.m, about 0.5 .mu.m to about 6 .mu.m (e.g., about
0.5 .mu.m to about 5 .mu.m).
[0010] The first particles can be untreated, or the first particles
can be treated with one or more surface treatments according to
methods known in the art. Such surface treatments include, but are
not limited to, treatments which facilitate dispersion of the first
particles in a polymer.
[0011] The additive composition of the invention also comprises a
metal hydroxide compound. The metal hydroxide compound can be any
suitable hydroxide of a metal (e.g., alkali metal, alkaline earth
metal, transition metal, or post-transition metal). Furthermore, as
used herein, the term "a metal hydroxide compound" also encompasses
combinations of two or more metal hydroxide compounds, such as
those described above. In certain possibly preferred embodiments,
the metal hydroxide compound is a hydroxide of an alkaline earth
metal (e.g., magnesium) or a post-transition metal (e.g.,
aluminum). Thus, in certain possibly preferred embodiments, the
metal hydroxide compound is selected from the group consisting of
magnesium hydroxide (i.e., Mg(OH).sub.2), aluminum hydroxide (i.e.,
Al(OH).sub.3), and mixtures thereof.
[0012] The metal hydroxide compound in the additive composition can
be provided in any suitable form. For example, the metal hydroxide
compound can be provided in the form of a powder, granules,
pellets, flakes, etc. Furthermore, the metal hydroxide compound can
be untreated, or the metal hydroxide compound can be treated with
one or more surface treatments according to methods known in the
art. Such surface treatments include, but are not limited to,
treatments which facilitate dispersion of the metal hydroxide
compound in a polymer.
[0013] The first particles and the metal hydroxide compound can be
present in the additive composition in any suitable amount. In
certain possibly preferred embodiments, the weight of the first
particles present in the additive composition is about 15% or more
of the combined total weight of the first particles and the metal
hydroxide compound present in the additive composition. In certain
other possibly preferred embodiments, the weight of the first
particles present in the additive composition is about 20% or more
(e.g., about 25% or more, about 30% or more, about 35% or more,
about 40% or more, about 50% or more, about 55% or more, about 60%
or more, about 65% or more, about 70% or more, about 75% or more,
about 80% or more, about 85% or more, about 90% or more, or about
95% or more) of the combined total weight of the first particle and
the metal hydroxide compound present in the additive
composition.
[0014] In addition to the first particles and the metal hydroxide
compound, the additive composition of the invention can contain
other components typically found in plastic additive compositions.
For example, the additive composition of the invention can contain
flame retardants (e.g., phosphorous-based flame retardants,
halogenated flame retardants), flame retardant synergists (e.g.,
antimony oxide, organoclays), nucleating agents, compatibilizers,
surface treatments, coupling agents, flow aids, lubricants,
antiscratch additives, antioxidants, acid scavengers, coloring
agents (e.g., pigments, dyes), waxes, and oils.
[0015] While the additive composition of the invention can contain
components found in other plastics additive compositions, the
additive composition preferably contains only a limited amount of
certain components that have been used as flame retardants. For
example, in certain possibly preferred embodiments, the additive
composition of the invention contains less than 1% by weight (e.g.,
less than 0.9% by weight, less than 0.8% by weight, less than 0.7%
by weight, less than 0.6% by weight, less than 0.5% by weight, or
less than 0.4% by weight) of red phosphorous based on the total
weight of the additive composition. In certain other possibly
preferred embodiments, the additive composition contains less than
0.3% by weight of red phosphorous based on the total weight of the
additive composition.
[0016] As noted above, the additive composition of the invention is
believed to be particularly useful as a flame retardant for
plastics. Thus, in a second embodiment, the invention provides a
polymer composition comprising an additive composition of the
invention and one or more polymers. The polymer composition of the
invention can be produced by adding to a polymer an additive
composition such as that described above (i.e., a composition
containing both the first particles and a metal hydroxide
compound). Alternatively, the polymer composition of the invention
can be produced by individually adding to a polymer each of the
components of the additive composition described above. In other
words, the polymer composition of the invention need not be
produced by simultaneously adding the first particles and the metal
hydroxide compound to the polymer.
[0017] In this embodiment, the polymer can be either a
thermoplastic or a thermoset. Suitable thermoset polymers include,
but are not necessarily limited to, phenol formaldehyde resins,
urea formaldehyde resins, melamine resins, epoxy resins,
polyurethane resins, polyester resins (e.g., sheet molding compound
and bulk molding compound), and polyimides. Suitable thermoplastic
polymers include, but are not necessarily limited to, polyamides,
acrylonitrile butadiene styrene copolymers, polystyrene, and
polyolefins. Suitable polyolefins include, but are not limited to,
polypropylene, polyethylene, polymethylpentene, poly(but-1-ene)
(i.e., polybutene-1), and polyisobutylene. Due to its widespread
use, one type of polyolefin that is of particular interest is
polypropylene. The polypropylene suitable for use in this
embodiment of the invention includes, but is not necessarily
limited to, polypropylene homopolymers, polypropylene copolymers
(e.g., polypropylene random copolymers), polypropylene impact
copolymers, polypropylene-containing thermoplastic polyolefins
(TPOs), and combinations thereof. Suitable polypropylene copolymers
include, but are not limited to, random copolymers made from the
polymerization of propylene in the presence of a comonomer selected
from the group consisting of ethylene, but-1-ene (i.e., 1-butene),
and hex-1-ene (i.e., 1-hexene). In such polypropylene random
copolymers, the comonomer can be present in any suitable amount,
but typically is present in an amount of less than about 10 wt. %
(e.g., about 1 to about 7 wt. %). Suitable polypropylene impact
copolymers include, but are not limited to, those produced by the
addition of a second polymer such as ethylene-propylene rubber
(EPR), ethylenepropylene-diene monomer (EPDM), polyethylene (both
polyethylene homopolymers and polyethylene copolymers), elastomers,
and plastomers to a polypropylene homopolymer or polypropylene
random copolymer. In such polypropylene impact copolymers, the
copolymer can be present in any suitable amount, but typically is
present in an amount of from about 5 to about 25 wt. %. In certain
possibly preferred embodiments, the polymer is a polypropylene
random copolymer made from the copolymerization of propylene and
ethylene, with the amount of ethylene being from about 1 to about 7
wt. %. Suitable polypropylene-containing thermoplastic polyolefins
(TPOs) include, but are not limited to, those produced by the
addition of polyethylene-based or polypropylene-based elastomers
and/or plastomers to a polypropylene homopolymer, polypropylene
random copolymer, or a polypropylene impact copolymer. The
polypropylene-containing thermoplastic polyolefins (TPOs) can be
created in the reactor or they can be manufactured via off-line
compounding that is downstream from the polyolefin producer.
[0018] In another possibly preferred embodiment, the thermoplastic
polymer can be a polyethylene. Suitable polyethylenes include, but
are not limited to, low density polyethylene, linear low density
polyethylene, medium density polyethylene, high density
polyethylene, and combinations thereof. In certain possibly
preferred embodiments, the thermoplastic polymer is selected from
the group consisting of medium density polyethylene, high density
polyethylene, and mixtures thereof. In another possibly preferred
embodiment, the thermoplastic polymer is a high density
polyethylene.
[0019] The high density polyethylene polymers suitable for use in
the invention generally have a density of greater than about 0.940
g/cm.sup.3. There is no upper limit to the suitable density of the
polymer, but high density polyethylene polymers typically have a
density that is less than about 0.980 g/cm.sup.3 (e.g., less than
about 0.975 g/cm.sup.3).
[0020] The high density polyethylene polymers suitable for use in
the invention can be either homopolymers or copolymers of ethylene
with one or more .alpha.-olefins. Suitable .alpha.-olefins include,
but are not limited to, 1-butene, 1-hexene, 1-octene, 1-decene, and
4-methyl-1-pentene. The comonomer can be present in the copolymer
in any suitable amount, such as an amount of about 5% by weight or
less (e.g., about 3 mol. % or less). As will be understood by those
of ordinary skill in the art, the amount of comonomer suitable for
the copolymer is largely driven by the end use for the copolymer
and the required or desired polymer properties dictated by that end
use.
[0021] The high density polyethylene polymers suitable for use in
the invention can be produced by any suitable process. For example,
the polymers can be produced by a free radical process using very
high pressures as described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No.
2,816,883 (Larchar et al.), but the polymers typically are produced
in a "low pressure" catalytic process. In this context, the term
"low pressure" is used to denote processes carried out at pressures
less than 6.9 MPa (e.g., 1,000 psig), such as 1.4-6.9 MPa
(200-1,000 psig). Examples of suitable low pressure catalytic
processes include, but are not limited to, solution polymerization
processes (i.e., processes in which the polymerization is performed
using a solvent for the polymer), slurry polymerization processes
(i.e., processes in which the polymerization is performed using a
hydrocarbon liquid in which the polymer does not dissolve or
swell), gas-phase polymerization processes (e.g., processes in
which the polymerization is performed without the use of a liquid
medium or diluent), or a staged reactor polymerization process. The
suitable gas-phase polymerization processes also include the
so-called "condensed mode" or "super-condensed mode" processes in
which a liquid hydrocarbon is introduced into the fluidized-bed to
increase the absorption of the heat producing during the
polymerization process. In these condensed mode and super-condensed
mode processes, the liquid hydrocarbon typically is condensed in
the recycle stream and reused in the reactor. The staged reactor
processes can utilize a combination of slurry process reactors
(tanks or loops) that are connected in series, parallel, or a
combination of series or parallel so that the catalyst (e.g.,
chromium catalyst) is exposed to more than one set of reaction
conditions. Staged reactor processes can also be carried out by
combining two loops in series, combining one or more tanks and
loops in series, using multiple gas-phase reactors in series, or a
loop-gas phase arrangement. Because of their ability to expose the
catalyst to different sets of reactor conditions, staged reactor
processes are often used to produce multimodal polymers, such as
those discussed below. Suitable processes also include those in
which utilize a pre-polymerization step is performed. In this
pre-polymerization step, the catalyst typically is exposed to the
cocatalyst and ethylene under mild conditions in a smaller,
separate reactor, and the polymerization reaction is allowed to
proceed until the catalyst comprises a relatively small amount
(e.g., about 5% to about 30% of the total weight) of the resulting
composition. This pre-polymerized catalyst is then introduced to
the large-scale reactor in which the polymerization is to be
performed.
[0022] The high density polyethylene polymers suitable for use in
the invention can be produced using any suitable catalyst or
combination of catalysts. Suitable catalysts include transition
metal catalysts, such as supported reduced molybdenum oxide, cobalt
molybdate on alumina, chromium oxide, and transition metal halides.
Chromium oxide catalysts typically are produced by impregnating a
chromium compound onto a porous, high surface area oxide carrier,
such as silica, and then calcining it in dry air at 500-900.degree.
C. This converts the chromium into a hexavalent surface chromate
ester or dichromate ester. The chromium oxide catalysts can be used
in conjunction with metal alkyl cocatalysts, such as alkyl boron,
alkyl aluminum, alkyl zinc, and alkyl lithium. Supports for the
chromium oxide include silica, silica-titania, silica-alumina,
alumina, and aluminophosphates. Further examples of chromium oxide
catalysts include those catalysts produced by depositing a lower
valent organochromium compound, such as bis(arene) Cr.sup.0, allyl
Cr.sup.2+ and Cr.sup.3+, beta stabilized alkyls of Cr.sup.2+ and
Cr.sup.4+, and bis(cyclopentadienyl) Cr.sup.2+, onto a chromium
oxide catalyst, such as those described above. Suitable transition
metal catalysts also include supported chromium catalysts such as
those based on chromocene or a silylchromate (e.g.,
bi(trisphenylsilyl)chromate). These chromium catalysts can be
supported on any suitable high surface area support such as those
described above for the chromium oxide catalysts, with silica
typically being used. The supported chromium catalysts can also be
used in conjunction with cocatalysts, such as the metal alkyl
cocatalysts listed above for the chromium oxide catalysts. Suitable
transition metal halide catalysts include titanium (III) halides
(e.g., titanium (III) chloride), titanium (IV) halides (e.g.,
titanium (IV) chloride), vanadium halides, zirconium halides, and
combinations thereof. These transition metal halides are often
supported on a high surface area solid, such as magnesium chloride.
The transition metal halide catalysts are typically used in
conjunction with an aluminum alkyl cocatalyst, such as
trimethylaluminum (i.e., Al(CH.sub.3).sub.3) or triethylaluminum
(i.e., Al(C.sub.2H.sub.5).sub.3). These transition metal halides
may also be used in staged reactor processes. Suitable catalysts
also include metallocene catalysts, such as cyclopentadienyl
titanium halides (e.g., cyclopentadienyl titanium chlorides),
cyclopentadienyl zirconium halides (e.g., cyclopentadienyl
zirconium chlorides), cyclopentadienyl hafnium halides (e.g.,
cyclopentadienyl hafnium chlorides), and combinations thereof.
Metallocene catalysts based on transition metals complexed with
indenyl or fluorenyl ligands are also known and can be used to
produce high density polyethylene polymers suitable for use in the
invention. The catalysts typically contain multiple ligands, and
the ligands can be substituted with various groups (e.g., n-butyl
group) or linked with bridging groups, such as --CH.sub.2CH.sub.2--
or >SiPh.sub.2. The metallocene catalysts typically are used in
conjunction with a cocatalyst, such as methyl aluminoxane (i.e.,
(Al(CH.sub.3).sub.xO.sub.y).sub.n. Other cocatalysts include those
described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,919,983 (Rosen et al.), U.S. Pat. No.
6,107,230 (McDaniel et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 6,632,894 (McDaniel et
al.), and U.S. Pat. No. 6,300,271 (McDaniel et al). Other "single
site" catalysts suitable for use in producing high density
polyethylene include diimine complexes, such as those described in
U.S. Pat. No. 5,891,963 (Brookhart et al.).
[0023] The high density polyethylene polymers suitable for use in
the invention can have any suitable molecular weight (e.g., weight
average molecular weight). For example, the weight average
molecular weight of the high density polyethylene can be from
20,000 g/mol to about 1,000,000 g/mol or more. As will be
understood by those of ordinary skill in the art, the suitable
weight average molecular weight of the high density polyethylene
will depend, at least in part, on the particular application or end
use for which the polymer is destined. For example, a high density
polyethylene polymer intended for blow molding applications can
have a weight average molecular weight of about 100,000 g/mol to
about 1,000,000 g/mol. A high density polyethylene polymer intended
for pipe applications or film applications can have a weight
average molecular weight of about 100,000 g/mol to about 500,000
g/mol. A high density polyethylene polymer intended for injection
molding applications can have a weight average molecular weight of
about 20,000 g/mol to about 80,000 g/mol. A high density
polyethylene polymer intended for wire insulation applications,
cable insulation applications, tape applications, or filament
applications can have a weight average molecular weight of about
80,000 g/mol to about 400,000 g/mol. A high density polyethylene
polymer intended for rotomolding applications can have a weight
average molecular weight of about 50,000 g/mol to about 150,000
g/mol.
[0024] The high density polyethylene polymers suitable for use in
the invention can also have any suitable polydispersity, which is
defined as the value obtained by dividing the weight average
molecular weight of the polymer by the number average molecular
weight of the polymer. For example, the high density polyethylene
polymer can have a polydispersity of greater than 2 to about 100.
As understood by those skilled in the art, the polydispersity of
the polymer is heavily influenced by the catalyst system used to
produce the polymer, with the metallocene and other "single site"
catalysts generally producing polymers with relatively low
polydispersity and narrow molecular weight distributions and the
other transition metal catalysts (e.g., chromium catalysts)
producing polymer with higher polydispersity and broader molecular
weight distributions. The high density polyethylene polymers
suitable for use in the invention can also have a multimodal (e.g.,
bimodal) molecular weight distribution. For example, the polymer
can have a first fraction having a relatively low molecular weight
and a second fraction having a relatively high molecular weight.
The difference between the weight average molecular weight of the
fractions in the polymer can be any suitable amount. In fact, it is
not necessary for the difference between the weight average
molecular weights to be large enough that two distinct molecular
weight fractions can be resolved using gel permeation
chromatography (GPC). However, in certain multimodal polymers, the
difference between the weight average molecular weights of the
fractions can be great enough that two or more distinct peaks can
be resolved from the GPC curve for the polymer. In this context,
the term "distinct" does not necessarily mean that the portions of
the GPC curve corresponding to each fraction do not overlap, but is
merely meant to indicate that a distinct peak for each fraction can
be resolved from the GPC curve for the polymer. The multimodal
polymers suitable for use in the invention can be produced using
any suitable process. As noted above, the multimodal polymers can
be produced using staged reactor processes. One suitable example
would be a staged solution process incorporating a series of
stirred tanks. Alternatively, the multimodal polymers can be
produced in a single reactor using a combination of catalysts each
of which is designed to produce a polymer having a different weight
average molecular weight.
[0025] The high density polyethylene polymers suitable for use in
the invention can have any suitable melt index. For example, the
high density polyethylene polymer can have a melt index of about
0.01 dg/min to about 40 dg/min. As with the weight average
molecular weight, those of ordinary skill in the art understand
that the suitable melt index for the high density polyethylene
polymer will depend, at least in part, on the particular
application or end use for which the polymer is destined. Thus, for
example, a high density polyethylene polymer intended for blow
molding applications can have a melt index of about 0.01 dg/min to
about 1 dg/min. A high density polyethylene polymer intended for
pipe applications or film applications can have a melt index of
about 0.02 dg/min to about 0.8 dg/min. A high density polyethylene
polymer intended for injection molding applications can have a melt
index of about 2 dg/min to about 80 dg/min. A high density
polyethylene polymer intended for rotomolding applications can have
a melt index of about 0.5 dg/min to about 10 dg/min. A high density
polyethylene polymer intended for tape applications can have a melt
index of about 0.2 dg/min to about 4 dg/min. A high density
polyethylene polymer intended for filament applications can have a
melt index of about 1 dg/min to about 20 dg/min. The melt index of
the polymer is measured using ASTM Standard D1238-04c.
[0026] The high density polyethylene polymers suitable for use in
the invention generally do not contain high amounts of long-chain
branching. The term "long-chain branching" is used to refer to
branches that are attached to the polymer chain and are of
sufficient length to affect the rheology of the polymer (e.g.,
branches of about 130 carbons or more in length). If desired for
the application in which the polymer is to be used, the high
density polyethylene polymer can contain small amounts of
long-chain branching. However, the high density polyethylene
polymers suitable for use in the invention typically contain very
little long-chain branching (e.g., less than about 1 long-chain
branch per 10,000 carbons, less than about 0.5 long-chain branches
per 10,000 carbons, less than about 0.1 long-chain branches per
10,000 carbons, or less than about 0.01 long-chain branches per
10,000 carbons).
[0027] The medium density polyethylene polymers suitable for use in
the invention generally have a density of about 0.926 g/cm.sup.3 to
about 0.940 g/cm.sup.3. The term "medium density polyethylene" is
used to refer to polymers of ethylene that have a density between
that of high density polyethylene and linear low density
polyethylene and contain relatively short branches, at least as
compared to the long branches present in low density polyethylene
polymers produced by the free radical polymerization of ethylene at
high pressures.
[0028] The medium density polyethylene polymers suitable for use in
the invention generally are copolymers of ethylene and at least one
.alpha.-olefin, such as 1-butene, 1-hexene, 1-octene, 1-decene, and
4-methyl-1-pentene. The .alpha.-olefin comonomer can be present in
any suitable amount, but typically is present in an amount of less
than about 8% by weight (e.g., less than about 5 mol %). As will be
understood by those of ordinary skill in the art, the amount of
comonomer suitable for the copolymer is largely driven by the end
use for the copolymer and the required or desired polymer
properties dictated by that end use.
[0029] The medium density polyethylene polymers suitable for use in
the invention can be produced by any suitable process. Like the
high density polyethylene polymers, the medium density polyethylene
polymers typically are produced in "low pressure" catalytic
processes such as any of the processes described above in
connection with the high density polyethylene polymers suitable for
use in the invention. Examples of suitable processes include, but
are not limited to, gas-phase polymerization processes, solution
polymerization processes, slurry polymerization processes, and
staged reactor processes. Suitable staged reactor processes can
incorporate any suitable combination of the gas-phase, solution,
and slurry polymerization processes described above. As with high
density polyethylene polymers, staged reactor processes are often
used to produce multimodal polymers.
[0030] The medium density polyethylene polymers suitable for use in
the invention can be produced using any suitable catalyst or
combination of catalysts. For example, the polymers can be produced
using Ziegler catalysts, such as transition metal (e.g., titanium)
halides or esters used in combination with organoaluminum compounds
(e.g., triethylaluminum). These Ziegler catalysts can be supported
on, for example, magnesium chloride, silica, alumina, or magnesium
oxide. The medium density polyethylene polymers suitable for use in
the invention can also be produced using so-called "dual Ziegler
catalysts," which contain one catalyst species for dimerizing
ethylene into 1-butene (e.g., a combination of a titanium ester and
triethylaluminum) and another catalyst for copolymerization of
ethylene and the generated 1-butene (e.g., titanium chloride
supported on magnesium chloride). The medium density polyethylene
polymers suitable for use in the invention can also be produced
using chromium oxide catalysts, such as those produced by
depositing a chromium compound onto a silica-titania support,
oxidizing the resulting catalyst in a mixture of oxygen and air,
and then reducing the catalyst with carbon monoxide. These chromium
oxide catalysts typically are used in conjunction with cocatalysts
such as trialkylboron or trialkylaluminum compounds. The chromium
oxide catalysts can also be used in conjunction with a Ziegler
catalyst, such as a titanium halide- or titanium ester-based
catalyst. The medium density polyethylene polymers suitable for use
in the invention can also be produced using supported chromium
catalysts such as those described above in the discussion of
catalysts suitable for making high density polyethylene. The medium
density polyethylene polymers suitable for use in the invention can
also be produced using metallocene catalysts. Several different
types of metallocene catalysts can be used. For example, the
metallocene catalyst can contain a bis(metallocene) complex of
zirconium, titanium, or hafnium with two cyclopentadienyl rings and
methylaluminoxane. As with the catalysts used in high density
polyethylene production, the ligands can be substituted with
various groups (e.g., n-butyl group) or linked with bridging
groups. Another class of metallocene catalysts that can be used are
composed of bis(metallocene) complexes of zirconium or titanium and
anions of perfluorinated boronaromatic compounds. A third class of
metallocene catalysts that can be used are referred to as
constrained-geometry catalysts and contain monocyclopentadienyl
derivatives of titanium or zirconium in which one of the carbon
atoms in the cyclopentadienyl ring is linked to the metal atom by a
bridging group. These complexes are activated by reacting them with
methylaluminoxane or by forming ionic complexes with
noncoordinative anions, such as B(C.sub.6F.sub.5).sub.4.sup.- or
B(C.sub.6F.sub.5).sub.3CH.sub.3.sup.-. A fourth class of
metallocene catalysts that can be used are metallocene-based
complexes of a transition metal, such as titanium, containing one
cyclopentadienyl ligand in combination with another ligand, such as
a phosphinimine or --O--SiR.sub.3. This class of metallocene
catalyst is also activated with methylaluminoxane or a boron
compound. Other catalysts suitable for use in making the linear low
density polyethylene suitable for use in the invention include, but
are not limited to, the catalysts disclosed in U.S. Pat. No.
6,649,558.
[0031] The medium density polyethylene polymers suitable for use in
the invention can have any suitable compositional uniformity, which
is a term used to describe the uniformity of the branching in the
copolymer molecules of the polymer. Many commercially-available
medium density polyethylene polymers have a relatively low
compositional uniformity in which the high molecular weight
fraction of the polymer contains relatively little of the
.alpha.-olefin comonomer and has relatively little branching while
the low molecular weight fraction of the polymer contains a
relatively high amount of the .alpha.-olefin comonomer and has a
relatively large amount of branching. Alternatively, another set of
medium density polyethylene polymers have a relatively low
compositional uniformity in which the high molecular weight
fraction of the polymer contains a relatively high amount of the
.alpha.-olefin comonomer while the low molecular weight fraction of
the polymer contains relatively little of the .alpha.-olefin
comonomer. The compositional uniformity of the polymer can be
measured using any suitable method, such as temperature rising
elution fractionation.
[0032] The medium density polyethylene polymers suitable for use in
the invention can have any suitable molecular weight. For example,
the polymer can have a weight average molecular weight of about
50,000 g/mol to about 200,000 g/mol. As will be understood by those
of ordinary skill in the art, the suitable weight average molecular
weight of the medium density polyethylene will depend, at least in
part, on the particular application or end use for which the
polymer is destined.
[0033] The medium density polyethylene polymers suitable for use in
the invention can also have any suitable polydispersity. Many
commercially available medium density polyethylene polymers have a
polydispersity of about 2 to about 30. The medium density
polyethylene polymers suitable for use in the invention can also
have a multimodal (e.g., bimodal) molecular weight distribution.
For example, the polymer can have a first fraction having a
relatively low molecular weight and a second fraction having a
relatively high molecular weight. As with the high density
polyethylene polymers suitable for use in the invention, the
difference between the weight average molecular weight of the
fractions in the multimodal medium density polyethylene polymer can
be any suitable amount. In fact, it is not necessary for the
difference between the weight average molecular weights to be large
enough that two distinct molecular weight fractions can be resolved
using gel permeation chromatography (GPC). However, in certain
multimodal polymers, the difference between the weight average
molecular weights of the fractions can be great enough that two or
more distinct peaks can be resolved from the GPC curve for the
polymer. In this context, the term "distinct" does not necessarily
mean that the portions of the GPC curve corresponding to each
fraction do not overlap, but is merely meant to indicate that a
distinct peak for each fraction can be resolved from the GPC curve
for the polymer. The multimodal polymers suitable for use in the
invention can be produced using any suitable process. As noted
above, the multimodal polymers can be produced using staged reactor
processes. One suitable example would be a staged solution process
incorporating a series of stirred tanks. Alternatively, the
multimodal polymers can be produced in a single reactor using a
combination of catalysts each of which is designed to produce a
polymer having a different weight average molecular weight
[0034] The medium density polyethylene polymers suitable for use in
the invention can have any suitable melt index. For example, the
medium density polyethylene polymer can have a melt index of about
0.01 dg/min to about 200 dg/min. As with the weight average
molecular weight, those of ordinary skill in the art understand
that the suitable melt index for the medium density polyethylene
polymer will depend, at least in part, on the particular
application or end use for which the polymer is destined. Thus, for
example, a medium density polyethylene polymer intended for blow
molding applications or pipe applications can have a melt index of
about 0.01 dg/min to about 1 dg/min. A medium density polyethylene
polymer intended for film applications can have a melt index of
about 0.5 dg/min to about 3 dg/min. A medium density polyethylene
polymer intended for injection molding applications can have a melt
index of about 6 dg/min to about 200 dg/min. A medium density
polyethylene polymer intended for rotomolding applications can have
a melt index of about 4 dg/min to about 7 dg/min. A medium density
polyethylene polymer intended for wire and cable insulation
applications can have a melt index of about 0.5 dg/min to about 3
dg/min. The melt index of the polymer is measured using ASTM
Standard D1238-04c.
[0035] The medium density polyethylene polymers suitable for use in
the invention generally do not contain a significant amount of
long-chain branching. For example, the medium density polyethylene
polymers suitable for use in the invention generally contain less
than about 0.1 long-chain branches per 10,000 carbon atoms (e.g.,
less than about 0.002 long-chain branches per 100 ethylene units)
or less than about 0.01 long-chain branches per 10,000 carbon
atoms.
[0036] The linear low density polyethylene polymers suitable for
use in the invention generally have a density of 0.925 g/cm.sup.3
or less (e.g., about 0.910 g/cm.sup.3 to about 0.925 g/cm.sup.3).
The term "linear low density polyethylene" is used to refer to
lower density polymers of ethylene having relatively short
branches, at least as compared to the long branches present in low
density polyethylene polymers produced by the free radical
polymerization of ethylene at high pressures.
[0037] The linear low density polyethylene polymers suitable for
use in the invention generally are copolymers of ethylene and at
least one .alpha.-olefin, such as 1-butene, 1-hexene, 1-octene,
1-decene, and 4-methyl-1-pentene. The .alpha.-olefin comonomer can
be present in any suitable amount, but typically is present in an
amount of less than about 6 mol. % (e.g., about 2 mol % to about 5
mol %). As will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the
art, the amount of comonomer suitable for the copolymer is largely
driven by the end use for the copolymer and the required or desired
polymer properties dictated by that end use.
[0038] The linear low density polyethylene polymers suitable for
use in the invention can be produced by any suitable process. Like
the high density polyethylene polymers, the linear low density
polyethylene polymers typically are produced in "low pressure"
catalytic processes such as any of the processes described above in
connection with the high density polyethylene polymers suitable for
use in the invention. Suitable processes include, but are not
limited to, gas-phase polymerization processes, solution
polymerization processes, slurry polymerization processes, and
staged reactor processes. Suitable staged reactor processes can
incorporate any suitable combination of the gas-phase, solution,
and slurry polymerization processes described above. As with high
density polyethylene polymers, staged reactor processes are often
used to produce multimodal polymers.
[0039] The linear low density polyethylene polymers suitable for
use in the invention can be produced using any suitable catalyst or
combination of catalysts. For example, the polymers can be produced
using Ziegler catalysts, such as transition metal (e.g., titanium)
halides or esters used in combination with organoaluminum compounds
(e.g., triethylaluminum). These Ziegler catalysts can be supported
on, for example, magnesium chloride, silica, alumina, or magnesium
oxide. The linear low density polyethylene polymers suitable for
use in the invention can also be produced using so-called "dual
Ziegler catalysts," which contain one catalyst species for
dimerizing ethylene into 1-butene (e.g., a combination of a
titanium ester and triethylaluminum) and another catalyst for
copolymerization of ethylene and the generated 1-butene (e.g.,
titanium chloride supported on magnesium chloride). The linear low
density polyethylene polymers suitable for use in the invention can
also be produced using chromium oxide catalysts, such as those
produced by depositing a chromium compound onto a silica-titania
support, oxidizing the resulting catalyst in a mixture of oxygen
and air, and then reducing the catalyst with carbon monoxide. These
chromium oxide catalysts typically are used in conjunction with
cocatalysts such as trialkylboron or trialkylaluminum compounds.
The chromium oxide catalysts can also be used in conjunction with a
Ziegler catalyst, such as a titanium halide- or titanium
ester-based catalyst. The linear low density polyethylene polymers
suitable for use in the invention can also be produced using
supported chromium catalysts such as those described above in the
discussion of catalysts suitable for making high density
polyethylene. The linear low density polyethylene suitable for use
in the invention can also be produced using metallocene catalysts.
Several different types of metallocene catalysts can be used. For
example, the metallocene catalyst can contain a bis(metallocene)
complex of zirconium, titanium, or hafnium with two
cyclopentadienyl rings and methylaluminoxane. As with the catalysts
used in high density polyethylene production, the ligands can be
substituted with various groups (e.g., n-butyl group) or linked
with bridging groups. Another class of metallocene catalysts that
can be used are composed of bis(metallocene) complexes of zirconium
or titanium and anions of perfluorinated boronaromatic compounds. A
third class of metallocene catalysts that can be used are referred
to as constrained-geometry catalysts and contain
monocyclopentadienyl derivatives of titanium or zirconium in which
one of the carbon atoms in the cyclopentadienyl ring is linked to
the metal atom by a bridging group. These complexes are activated
by reacting them with methylaluminoxane or by forming ionic
complexes with noncoordinative anions, such as
B(C.sub.6F.sub.5).sub.4.sup.- or
B(C.sub.6F.sub.5).sub.3CH.sub.3.sup.-. A fourth class of
metallocene catalysts that can be used are metallocene-based
complexes of a transition metal, such as titanium, containing one
cyclopentadienyl ligand in combination with another ligand, such as
a phosphinimine or --O--SiR.sub.3. This class of metallocene
catalyst is also activated with methylaluminoxane or a boron
compound. Other catalysts suitable for use in making the linear low
density polyethylene suitable for use in the invention include, but
are not limited to, the catalysts disclosed in U.S. Pat. No.
6,649,558.
[0040] The linear low density polyethylene polymers suitable for
use in the invention can have any suitable compositional
uniformity, which is a term used to describe the uniformity of the
branching in the copolymer molecules of the polymer. Many
commercially-available linear low density polyethylene polymers
have a relatively low compositional uniformity in which the high
molecular weight fraction of the polymer contains relatively little
of the .alpha.-olefin comonomer and has relatively little branching
while the low molecular weight fraction of the polymer contains a
relatively high amount of the .alpha.-olefin comonomer and has a
relatively large amount of branching. Alternatively, another set of
linear low density polyethylene polymers have a relatively low
compositional uniformity in which the high molecular weight
fraction of the polymer contains a relatively high amount of the
.alpha.-olefin comonomer while the low molecular weight fraction of
the polymer contains relatively little of the .alpha.-olefin
comonomer. The compositional uniformity of the polymer can be
measured using any suitable method, such as temperature rising
elution fractionation.
[0041] The linear low density polyethylene polymers suitable for
use in the invention can have any suitable molecular weight. For
example, the polymer can have a weight average molecular weight of
about 20,000 g/mol to about 250,000 g/mol. As will be understood by
those of ordinary skill in the art, the suitable weight average
molecular weight of the linear low density polyethylene will
depend, at least in part, on the particular application or end use
for which the polymer is destined.
[0042] The linear low density polyethylene polymers suitable for
use in the invention can also have any suitable polydispersity.
Many commercially available linear low density polyethylene
polymers have a relatively narrow molecular weight distribution and
thus a relatively low polydispersity, such as about 2 to about 5
(e.g., about 2.5 to about 4.5 or about 3.5 to about 4.5). The
linear low density polyethylene polymers suitable for use in the
invention can also have a multimodal (e.g., bimodal) molecular
weight distribution. For example, the polymer can have a first
fraction having a relatively low molecular weight and a second
fraction having a relatively high molecular weight. As with the
high density polyethylene polymers suitable for use in the
invention, the difference between the weight average molecular
weight of the fractions in the multimodal linear low density
polyethylene polymer can be any suitable amount. In fact, it is not
necessary for the difference between the weight average molecular
weights to be large enough that two distinct molecular weight
fractions can be resolved using gel permeation chromatography
(GPC). However, in certain multimodal polymers, the difference
between the weight average molecular weights of the fractions can
be great enough that two or more distinct peaks can be resolved
from the GPC curve for the polymer. In this context, the term
"distinct" does not necessarily mean that the portions of the GPC
curve corresponding to each fraction do not overlap, but is merely
meant to indicate that a distinct peak for each fraction can be
resolved from the GPC curve for the polymer. The multimodal
polymers suitable for use in the invention can be produced using
any suitable process. As noted above, the multimodal polymers can
be produced using staged reactor processes. One suitable example
would be a staged solution process incorporating a series of
stirred tanks. Alternatively, the multimodal polymers can be
produced in a single reactor using a combination of catalysts each
of which is designed to produce a polymer having a different weight
average molecular weight
[0043] The linear low density polyethylene polymers suitable for
use in the invention can have any suitable melt index. For example,
the linear low density polyethylene polymer can have a melt index
of about 0.01 dg/min to about 200 dg/min. As with the weight
average molecular weight, those of ordinary skill in the art
understand that the suitable melt index for the linear low density
polyethylene polymer will depend, at least in part, on the
particular application or end use for which the polymer is
destined. Thus, for example, a linear low density polyethylene
polymer intended for blow molding applications or pipe applications
can have a melt index of about 0.01 dg/min to about 1 dg/min. A
linear low density polyethylene polymer intended for film
applications can have a melt index of about 0.5 dg/min to about 3
dg/min. A linear low density polyethylene polymer intended for
injection molding applications can have a melt index of about 6
dg/min to about 200 dg/min. A linear low density polyethylene
polymer intended for rotomolding applications can have a melt index
of about 4 dg/min to about 7 dg/min. A linear low density
polyethylene polymer intended for wire and cable insulation
applications can have a melt index of about 0.5 dg/min to about 3
dg/min. The melt index of the polymer is measured using ASTM
Standard D1238-04c.
[0044] The linear low density polyethylene polymers suitable for
use in the invention generally do not contain a significant amount
of long-chain branching. For example, the linear low density
polyethylene polymers suitable for use in the invention generally
contain less than about 0.1 long-chain branches per 10,000 carbon
atoms (e.g., less than about 0.002 long-chain branches per 100
ethylene units) or less than about 0.01 long-chain branches per
10,000 carbon atoms.
[0045] The low density polyethylene polymers suitable for use in
the invention generally have a density of less than 0.935
g/cm.sup.3 and, in contrast to high density polyethylene, medium
density polyethylene and linear low density polyethylene, have a
relatively large amount of long-chain branching in the polymer.
[0046] The low density polyethylene polymers suitable for use in
the invention can be either ethylene homopolymers or copolymers of
ethylene and a polar comonomer. Suitable polar comonomers include,
but are not limited to, vinyl acetate, methyl acrylate, ethyl
acrylate, and acrylic acid. These comonomers can be present in any
suitable amount, with comonomer contents as high as 20% by weight
being used for certain applications. As will be understood by those
skilled in the art, the amount of comonomer suitable for the
polymer is largely driven by the end use for the polymer and the
required or desired polymer properties dictated by that end
use.
[0047] The low density polyethylene polymers suitable for use in
the invention can be produced using any suitable process, but
typically the polymers are produced by the free-radical initiated
polymerization of ethylene at high pressure (e.g., about 81 to
about 276 MPa) and high temperature (e.g., about 130 to about
330.degree. C.). Any suitable free radical initiator can be used in
such processes, with peroxides and oxygen being the most common.
The free-radical polymerization mechanism gives rise to short-chain
branching in the polymer and also to the relatively high degree of
long-chain branching that distinguishes low density polyethylene
from other ethylene polymers (e.g., high density polyethylene and
linear low density polyethylene). The polymerization reaction
typically is performed in an autoclave reactor (e.g., a stirred
autoclave reactor), a tubular reactor, or a combination of such
reactors positioned in series.
[0048] The low density polyethylene polymers suitable for use in
the invention can have any suitable molecular weight. For example,
the polymer can have a weight average molecular weight of about
30,000 g/mol to about 500,000 g/mol. As will be understood by those
of ordinary skill in the art, the suitable weight average molecular
weight of the low density polyethylene will depend, at least in
part, on the particular application or end use for which the
polymer is destined. For example, a low density polyethylene
polymer intended for blow molding applications can have a weight
average molecular weight of about 80,000 g/mol to about 200,000
g/mol. A low density polyethylene polymer intended for pipe
applications can have a weight average molecular weight of about
80,000 g/mol to about 200,000 g/mol. A low density polyethylene
polymer intended for injection molding applications can have a
weight average molecular weight of about 30,000 g/mol to about
80,000 g/mol. A low density polyethylene polymer intended for film
applications can have a weight average molecular weight of about
60,000 g/mol to about 500,000 g/mol.
[0049] The low density polyethylene polymers suitable for use in
the invention can have any suitable melt index. For example, the
low density polyethylene polymer can have a melt index of about 0.2
to about 100 dg/min. As noted above, the melt index of the polymer
is measured using ASTM Standard D1238-04c.
[0050] As noted above, one of the major distinctions between low
density polyethylene and other ethylene polymers is a relatively
high degree of long-chain branching within the polymer. The low
density polyethylene polymers suitable for use in the invention can
exhibit any suitable amount of long-chain branching, such as about
0.01 or more long-chain braches per 10,000 carbon atoms, about 0.1
or more long-chain branches per 10,000 carbon atoms, about 0.5 or
more long-chain branches per 10,000 carbon atoms, about 1 or more
long-chain branches per 10,000 carbon atoms, or about 4 or more
long-chain branches per 10,000 carbon atoms. While there is not a
strict limit on the maximum extent of long-chain branching that can
be present in the low density polyethylene polymers suitable for
use in the invention, the long-chain branching in many low density
polyethylene polymers is less than about 100 long-chain branches
per 10,000 carbon atoms.
[0051] In this second embodiment, the additive composition and the
polymer can be present in any suitable amount. In certain possibly
preferred embodiments, the combined weight of the first particles
and the metal hydroxide compound present in the polymer composition
is about 10% or more (e.g., about 15% or more, about 20% or more,
about 25% or more, about 30% or more) of the total weight of the
polymer composition. While the flame resistance of the polymer
composition generally increases with increasing amounts of the
first particles and the metal hydroxide compound, high levels of
the particles and metal hydroxide compound can produce a
composition exhibiting undesirable physical properties.
Accordingly, in certain possibly preferred embodiments, the
combined weight of the first particle and the metal hydroxide
compound present in the polymer composition is about 90% or less
(e.g., about 85% or less, about 80% or less, about 75% or less,
about 70% or less, about 65% or less, or about 60% or less) of the
total weight of the polymer composition. Thus, in certain possibly
preferred embodiments, the combined weight of the first particles
and the metal hydroxide compound present in the polymer composition
is about 25% to about 75% (e.g., about 30% to about 70%) of the
total weight of the polymer composition.
[0052] The polymer composition of the invention is believed to be
particularly well-suited for use in producing articles intended for
applications that require flame resistance. For example, the
polymer composition of the invention is believed to be particularly
well-suited for use in making coatings (e.g., insulation layers)
used in wire and cable applications and in roofing and siding used
in the building and construction industries.
EXAMPLE 1
[0053] This example demonstrates the preparation of and physical
properties exhibited by an additive composition and polymer
composition according to the invention. Twenty-five (25)
polypropylene polymer compositions were prepared using a
commercially-available reactor flake medium impact copolymer
polypropylene resin (LyondellBasell Pro-fax SD375S polypropylene
resin) that has been stabilized with approximately 500 ppm of
Irganox.RTM. 1010 and approximately 1,000 ppm of Irgafos.RTM. 168.
The polymer compositions were prepared by blending the amounts of
magnesium oxysulfate particles (Hyperform.RTM. HPR-803 reinforcing
agent from Milliken & Company) and/or magnesium hydroxide
particles (Vertex.RTM. 60 HST from Huber) indicated in Table 1
below with the polypropylene resin.
[0054] In particular, the samples containing the magnesium
oxysulfate particles and/or magnesium hydroxide particles were
compounded and pelletized on a Leistritz 27 mm co-rotating twin
screw extruder. In each case, the resin was fed into the extruder
throat (Zone 0) while the magnesium oxysulfate particles and/or
magnesium hydroxide particles were side-fed downstream into Zone 3.
For those samples containing both magnesium oxysulfate particles
and magnesium hydroxide particles, the magnesium oxysulfate
particles and metal hydroxide particles were tumble-blended
together into a homogeneous powder mixture prior to side-feeding.
The feed rate into the Zone 3 stuffer was controlled by a K-Tron 20
mm twin screw gravimetric feeder equipped with coarse auger feed
screws. The hopper was equipped with a 4 blade agitator. The molten
polymer compositions were extruded through a 3-hole die, quenched
in a water bath, blown dry, and strand pelletized.
[0055] The resulting polymer compositions were then tested to
determine the melt flow rate (MRF) exhibited by each polymer
composition. In particular, the melt flow rate for each polymer
composition was determined in accordance with the procedure
described in ASTM D1238 using a 2.16 kg weight at 230.degree.
C.
[0056] Portions of the resulting polymer compositions were then
injection molded into ASTM bars having nominal dimensions of 127
mm.times.12.7 mm.times.3.2 mm on a 40 ton Arburg press using a flat
230.degree. C. barrel profile. The resulting bars were then tested
in accordance with ASTM D790-10 Procedure B to determine the
flexural properties (specifically, the 1% secant modulus expressed
in MPa) exhibited by each polymer composition. The resulting bars
were also tested in accordance with ASTM D648-07 Method B to
determine the heat deflection temperature (expressed in .degree.
C.) exhibited by each polymer composition.
[0057] Portions of the resulting polymer compositions were also
injected molded into plaques having dimensions of 154 mm (.+-.2 mm)
in length, 100 mm (.+-.1 mm) in width, and 3.2 mm (.+-.0.03 mm) in
thickness. These plaques were then used to test the horizontal
flammability of the polymer compositions in accordance with ISO
3795.
[0058] The results of the melt flow rate tests, the flexural tests,
the heat deflection tests (HDT), and the horizontal flammability
(Hor. Flam.) tests are reported in Table 1 below. Table 1 also
reports the amount of magnesium oxysulfate particles (HPR wt. %)
and the amount of magnesium hydroxide particles (MDH wt. %) used to
prepare each polymer composition.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Filler loading and content, melt flow rate,
flexural modulus, heat deflection temperature, and horizontal
flammability of Samples 1-25. Filler MFR 1% Secant Hor. Loading HPR
MDH (g/10 Modulus HDT Flam. Sample (wt. %) wt. % wt. % min) (MPa)
(.degree. C.) (mm/min) 1 0 0 0 22.6 1104 81.4 27 2 20 20 0 12.4
2945 137.6 29 3 35 35 0 1.5 3893 143.7 7 4 50 50 0 0.9 4673 151.7 5
5 65 65 0 <0.1 4569 150.0 0 6 20 16 4 14.0 2655 127.7 30 7 35 28
7 3.4 3714 139.7 8 8 50 40 10 0.2 4148 148.4 0 9 65 52 13 <0.1
3993 150.9 0 10 20 12 8 16.6 2493 119.9 36 11 35 21 14 9.3 3241
131.0 9 12 50 30 20 0.2 3768 137.9 4 13 65 39 26 <0.1 3925 141.6
0 14 20 8 12 16.1 2158 110.1 37 15 35 14 21 13.4 2671 120.7 21 16
50 20 30 4.1 3025 124.1 0 17 65 26 39 <0.1 3500 132.5 0 18 20 4
16 18.0 1712 100.2 36 19 35 7 28 17.2 2117 107.5 31 20 50 10 40
13.4 2576 114.9 22 21 65 13 52 3.6 3177 124.6 0 22 20 0 20 18.1
1417 86.5 31 23 35 0 35 18.0 1818 92.6 32 24 50 0 50 13.0 2247
100.8 21 25 65 0 65 8.5 2768 109.1 0
[0059] As can be seen from the results set forth in the Table 1,
the polymer compositions containing a combination of magnesium
oxysulfate particles and magnesium hydroxide particles exhibited a
desirable combination of good flexural properties, high heat
deflection temperature, and low horizontal flammability. Applicants
believe these benefits are especially pronounced in the polymer
compositions having a total filler content greater than 20 wt. %
(e.g., 35 wt. % or higher) in which the magnesium oxysulfate
particles make up about 20% or more of the combined total weight of
the magnesium oxysulfate particles and the magnesium hydroxide
particles. Furthermore, Applicants believe these results
demonstrate that the polymer compositions containing a combination
of magnesium oxysulfate particles and magnesium hydroxide particles
are able to achieve a desirable combination of features at lower
total filler loadings than are required when magnesium oxysulfate
particles or magnesium hydroxide particles are used alone.
EXAMPLE 2
[0060] This example demonstrates the preparation of and physical
properties exhibited by an additive composition and polymer
composition according to the invention. Thirteen (13) polyethylene
polymer compositions were prepared using a commercially-available
high-density polyethylene resin (ExxonMobil 6719) having a density
of 0.952 g/cm.sup.3. The polymer compositions were prepared by
blending the amounts of magnesium oxysulfate particles
(Hyperform.RTM. HPR-803 reinforcing agent from Milliken &
Company) and/or aluminum hydroxide particles (Martinal OL-104 LEO
from Albemarle) indicated in Table 2 below with the polyethylene
resin.
[0061] In particular, the samples containing the magnesium
oxysulfate particles and/or aluminum hydroxide particles were
compounded and pelletized on a Leistritz 27 mm co-rotating twin
screw extruder. In each case, the resin was fed into the extruder
throat (Zone 0) while the magnesium oxysulfate particles and/or
aluminum hydroxide particles were side-fed downstream into Zone 3.
For those samples containing both magnesium oxysulfate particles
and aluminum hydroxide particles, the magnesium oxysulfate
particles and aluminum hydroxide particles were tumble-blended
together into a homogeneous powder mixture prior to side-feeding.
The feed rate into the Zone 3 stuffer was controlled by a K-Tron 20
mm twin screw gravimetric feeder equipped with coarse auger feed
screws. The hopper was equipped with a 4 blade agitator. The molten
polymer compositions were extruded through a 3-hole die, quenched
in a water bath, blown dry, and strand pelletized.
[0062] The resulting polymer compositions were then tested to
determine the melt flow rate (MRF) exhibited by each polymer
composition. In particular, the melt flow rate for each polymer
composition was determined in accordance with the procedure
described in ASTM D1238 using a 2.16 kg weight at 190.degree.
C.
[0063] Portions of the resulting polymer compositions were then
injection molded into ASTM bars having nominal dimensions of 127
mm.times.12.7 mm.times.3.2 mm on a 40 ton Arburg press using a flat
175.degree. C. barrel profile. The resulting bars were then tested
in accordance with ASTM D790-10 Procedure B to determine the
flexural properties (specifically, the 1% secant modulus expressed
in MPa) exhibited by each polymer composition. The resulting bars
were also tested in accordance with ASTM D648-07 Method B to
determine the heat deflection temperature (expressed in .degree.
C.) exhibited by each polymer composition.
[0064] Portions of the resulting polymer compositions were also
injected molded into plaques having dimensions of 154 mm (.+-.2 mm)
in length, 100 mm (.+-.1 mm) in width, and 3.2 mm (.+-.0.03 mm) in
thickness. These plaques were then used to test the horizontal
flammability of the polymer compositions in accordance with ISO
3795.
[0065] The results of the melt flow rate tests, the flexural tests,
the heat deflection tests (HDT), and the horizontal flammability
(Hor. Flam.) tests are reported in Table 2 below. Table 2 also
reports the amount of magnesium oxysulfate particles (% HPR) and
the amount of aluminum hydroxide particles (% ATH) used to prepare
each polymer composition.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Filler loading and content, melt flow rate,
flexural modulus, heat deflection temperature, and horizontal
flammability of Samples 26-38. Filler MFR 1% Secant Hor. Loading
HPR ATH (g/10 Modulus HDT Flam, Sample (wt. %) wt. % wt. % min)
(MPa) (.degree. C.) (mm/min) 26 0 0 0 16.0 766 60.0 27 27 20 20 0
10.3 1977 100.1 30 28 35 35 0 2.6 3070 113.5 5 29 50 50 0 0.9 3892
119.4 0 30 65 65 0 <0.1 4986 122.6 0 31 20 12 8 11.3 1673 89.4
38 32 35 21 14 3.2 2481 108.6 9 33 50 30 20 0.2 3499 118.9 0 34 65
39 26 <0.1 No test 121.5 0 35 20 0 20 16.3 1087 69.4 28 36 35 0
35 17.3 1348 79.6 28 37 50 0 50 8.8 1838 92.9 20 38 65 0 65 1.5
2784 108.8 0
[0066] As can be seen from the results set forth in the Table 2,
the polymer compositions containing a combination of magnesium
oxysulfate particles and magnesium hydroxide particles exhibited a
desirable combination of good flexural properties, high heat
deflection temperature, and low horizontal flammability. Applicants
believe these benefits are especially pronounced in the polymer
compositions having a total filler content greater than 20 wt. %
(e.g., 35 wt. % or higher). Furthermore, Applicants believe these
results demonstrate that the polymer compositions containing a
combination of magnesium oxysulfate particles and magnesium
hydroxide particles are able to achieve a desirable combination of
features at lower total filler loadings than are required when
magnesium oxysulfate particles or aluminum hydroxide particles are
used alone.
[0067] All references, including publications, patent applications,
and patents, cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference to
the same extent as if each reference were individually and
specifically indicated to be incorporated by reference and were set
forth in its entirety herein.
[0068] The use of the terms "a" and "an" and "the" and similar
referents in the context of describing the subject matter of this
application (especially in the context of the following claims) are
to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless
otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. The
terms "comprising," "having," "including," and "containing" are to
be construed as open-ended terms (i.e., meaning "including, but not
limited to,") unless otherwise noted. Recitation of ranges of
values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of
referring individually to each separate value falling within the
range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value
is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually
recited herein. All methods described herein can be performed in
any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise
clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples,
or exemplary language (e.g., "such as") provided herein, is
intended merely to better illuminate the subject matter of the
application and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the
subject matter unless otherwise claimed. No language in the
specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed
element as essential to the practice of the subject matter
described herein.
[0069] Preferred embodiments of the subject matter of this
application are described herein, including the best mode known to
the inventors for carrying out the claimed subject matter.
Variations of those preferred embodiments may become apparent to
those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the foregoing
description. The inventors expect skilled artisans to employ such
variations as appropriate, and the inventors intend for the subject
matter described herein to be practiced otherwise than as
specifically described herein. Accordingly, this disclosure
includes all modifications and equivalents of the subject matter
recited in the claims appended hereto as permitted by applicable
law. Moreover, any combination of the above-described elements in
all possible variations thereof is encompassed by the present
disclosure unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly
contradicted by context.
* * * * *