U.S. patent application number 14/317121 was filed with the patent office on 2014-10-16 for environmental stewardship based on driving behavior.
The applicant listed for this patent is International Business Machines Corporation. Invention is credited to Gregory J. Boss, Rick A. Hamilton, II, Jacquelyn A. Martino, Clifford A. Pickover, Anne R. Sand.
Application Number | 20140310192 14/317121 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 43855561 |
Filed Date | 2014-10-16 |
United States Patent
Application |
20140310192 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Boss; Gregory J. ; et
al. |
October 16, 2014 |
ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP BASED ON DRIVING BEHAVIOR
Abstract
An approach for managing driving patterns is presented. A first
distance measured at a first time between a first vehicle and a
second vehicle in front of the first vehicle is received and stored
in driving behavior data over a time period. The driving behavior
data includes a second distance between the first vehicle and a
third vehicle in front of the first vehicle measured at a second
time. Based on the first and second distances, the number of times
the first vehicle tailgated other vehicles within the period of
time is determined. Based on the number of times the first vehicle
tailgated within the period of time, an incentive is provided to a
driver of the first vehicle to encourage the driver to drive
without tailgating, or a disincentive is provided to the driver to
deter the driver from tailgating.
Inventors: |
Boss; Gregory J.; (Saginaw,
MI) ; Hamilton, II; Rick A.; (Charlottesville,
VA) ; Martino; Jacquelyn A.; (Cold Spring, NY)
; Pickover; Clifford A.; (Yorktown Heights, NY) ;
Sand; Anne R.; (Peyton, CO) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
International Business Machines Corporation |
Armonk |
NY |
US |
|
|
Family ID: |
43855561 |
Appl. No.: |
14/317121 |
Filed: |
June 27, 2014 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
12578653 |
Oct 14, 2009 |
8812352 |
|
|
14317121 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
705/325 |
Current CPC
Class: |
G06Q 99/00 20130101;
G06Q 50/265 20130101; G06Q 30/0207 20130101; G06Q 30/04 20130101;
G06Q 30/02 20130101; G06Q 50/30 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
705/325 |
International
Class: |
G06Q 99/00 20060101
G06Q099/00; G06Q 50/26 20060101 G06Q050/26 |
Claims
1. A method of managing driving patterns, the method comprising the
steps of: a computer receiving a first distance between a first
vehicle and a second vehicle immediately in front of the first
vehicle, the first distance measured at a first time; the computer
storing the first distance as part of driving behavior data over a
period of time including the first time and a second time, the
second time prior to the first time, wherein the driving behavior
data includes a second distance between the first vehicle and a
third vehicle measured at the second time, the third vehicle having
been immediately in front of the first vehicle at the second time;
based in part on the first and second distances, the computer
determining how many times the first vehicle tailgated one or more
other vehicles within the period of time; and based on how many
times the first vehicle tailgated within the period of time, the
computer providing an incentive to a driver of the first vehicle to
encourage the driver to drive without tailgating, or a disincentive
to the driver to deter the driver from tailgating.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of: the
computer detecting the first vehicle is present at a business; and
the computer initiating a provision by the business of a rebate or
a reimbursement to the driver, wherein the step of providing the
incentive includes the step of initiating the provision by the
business of the rebate or the reimbursement to the driver.
3. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of the
computer determining a frequency of the first vehicle braking over
the period of time, wherein the step of determining how many times
the first vehicle tailgated one or more other vehicles within the
period of time is further based on the frequency of the first
vehicle braking over the period of time.
4. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of the
computer determining a frequency of the first vehicle accelerating
over the period of time, wherein the step of determining how many
times the first vehicle tailgated one or more other vehicles within
the period of time is further based on the frequency of the first
vehicle accelerating over the period of time.
5. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of the
computer determining an average speed of the first vehicle over the
period of time, wherein the step of determining how many times the
first vehicle tailgated one or more other vehicles within the
period of time is further based on the average speed of the first
vehicle over the period of time.
6. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of: the
computer determining the first distance and the second distance are
each less than a predefined threshold distance that indicates
tailgating; the computer receiving first contextual information
that includes first aggregate distances between other vehicles in a
first set of vehicles in a predefined proximity to the first
vehicle at the first time, the first aggregate distances being
dependent on road conditions and/or traffic conditions at the first
time; the computer receiving second contextual information that
includes second aggregate distances between other vehicles in a
second set of vehicles in the predefined proximity to the first
vehicle at the second time, the second aggregate distances being
dependent on road conditions and/or traffic conditions at the
second time; based in part on the received first contextual
information including the first aggregate distances, the computer
determining the first distance does not indicate the first vehicle
tailgating at the first time; and based in part on the received
second contextual information including the second aggregate
distances, the computer determining the second distance indicates
the first vehicle tailgating at the second time, wherein the step
of determining how many times the first vehicle tailgated one or
more other vehicles within the period of time includes determining
the first vehicle tailgating at the second time and determining the
first vehicle did not tailgate at the first time.
7. The method of claim 1, further comprising the computer
retrieving a driving history of the driver from a public vehicle
registration system or a private vehicle registration system, the
retrieved driving history characterizing the driver as a habitual
tailgater, wherein the step of the computer providing the incentive
or the disincentive to the driver includes providing the
disincentive and is further based on the retrieved driving
history.
8. The method of claim 1, the method further comprising: providing
at least one support service for at least one of creating,
integrating, hosting, maintaining, and deploying computer-readable
program code in the computer, the program code being executed by a
processor of the computer to implement the steps of receiving,
storing, determining, and providing the incentive or the
disincentive.
9. A computer system comprising: a central processing unit (CPU); a
memory coupled to the CPU; a computer-readable, tangible storage
device coupled to the CPU, the storage device containing
instructions that, when carried out by the CPU via the memory,
implement a method of managing driving patterns, the method
comprising: the computer system receiving a first distance between
a first vehicle and a second vehicle immediately in front of the
first vehicle, the first distance measured at a first time; the
computer system storing the first distance as part of driving
behavior data over a period of time including the first time and a
second time, the second time prior to the first time, wherein the
driving behavior data includes a second distance between the first
vehicle and a third vehicle measured at the second time, the third
vehicle having been immediately in front of the first vehicle at
the second time; based in part on the first and second distances,
the computer system determining how many times the first vehicle
tailgated one or more other vehicles within the period of time; and
based on how many times the first vehicle tailgated within the
period of time, the computer system providing an incentive to a
driver of the first vehicle to encourage the driver to drive
without tailgating, or a disincentive to the driver to deter the
driver from tailgating.
10. The computer system of claim 9, wherein the method further
comprises the steps of: the computer system detecting the first
vehicle is present at a business; and the computer system
initiating a provision by the business of a rebate or a
reimbursement to the driver, wherein the step of providing the
incentive includes the step of initiating the provision by the
business of the rebate or the reimbursement to the driver.
11. The computer system of claim 9, wherein the method further
comprises the step of the computer system determining a frequency
of the first vehicle braking over the period of time, wherein the
step of determining how many times the first vehicle tailgated one
or more other vehicles within the period of time is further based
on the frequency of the first vehicle braking over the period of
time.
12. The computer system of claim 9, wherein the method further
comprises the step of the computer system determining a frequency
of the first vehicle substantially accelerating over the period of
time, wherein the step of determining how many times the first
vehicle tailgated one or more other vehicles within the period of
time is further based on the frequency of the first vehicle
substantially accelerating over the period of time.
13. The computer system of claim 9, wherein the method further
comprises the step of the computer system determining an average
speed of the first vehicle over the period of time, wherein the
step of determining how many times the first vehicle tailgated one
or more other vehicles within the period of time is further based
on the average speed of the first vehicle over the period of
time.
14. The computer system of claim 9, wherein the method further
comprises the steps of: the computer system determining the first
distance and the second distance are each less than a predefined
threshold distance that indicates tailgating; the computer system
receiving first contextual information that includes first
aggregate distances between other vehicles in a first set of
vehicles in a predefined proximity to the first vehicle at the
first time, the first aggregate distances being dependent on road
conditions and/or traffic conditions at the first time; the
computer system receiving second contextual information that
includes second aggregate distances between other vehicles in a
second set of vehicles in the predefined proximity to the first
vehicle at the second time, the second aggregate distances being
dependent on road conditions and/or traffic conditions at the
second time; based in part on the received first contextual
information including the first aggregate distances, the computer
system determining the first distance does not indicate the first
vehicle tailgating at the first time; and based in part on the
received second contextual information including the second
aggregate distances, the computer system determining the second
distance indicates the first vehicle tailgating at the second time,
wherein the step of determining how many times the first vehicle
tailgated one or more other vehicles within the period of time
includes determining the first vehicle tailgating at the second
time and determining the first vehicle did not tailgate at the
first time.
15. A computer program product comprising: a computer-readable,
tangible storage device; and computer-readable program instructions
stored in the computer-readable, tangible storage device, the
computer-readable program instructions, when carried out by a
central processing unit (CPU) of a computer system, implement a
method of managing driving patterns, the method comprising the
steps of: the computer system receiving a first distance between a
first vehicle and a second vehicle immediately in front of the
first vehicle, the first distance measured at a first time; the
computer system storing the first distance as part of driving
behavior data over a period of time including the first time and a
second time, the second time prior to the first time, wherein the
driving behavior data includes a second distance between the first
vehicle and a third vehicle measured at the second time, the third
vehicle having been immediately in front of the first vehicle at
the second time; based in part on the first and second distances,
the computer system determining how many times the first vehicle
tailgated one or more other vehicles within the period of time; and
based on how many times the first vehicle tailgated within the
period of time, the computer system providing an incentive to a
driver of the first vehicle to encourage the driver to drive
without tailgating, or a disincentive to the driver to deter the
driver from tailgating.
16. The program product of claim 15, wherein the method further
comprises the steps of: the computer system detecting the first
vehicle is present at a business; and the computer system
initiating a provision by the business of a rebate or a
reimbursement to the driver, wherein the step of providing the
incentive includes the step of initiating the provision by the
business of the rebate or the reimbursement to the driver.
17. The program product of claim 15, wherein the method further
comprises the step of the computer system determining a frequency
of the first vehicle braking over the period of time, wherein the
step of determining how many times the first vehicle tailgated one
or more other vehicles within the period of time is further based
on the frequency of the first vehicle braking over the period of
time.
18. The program product of claim 15, wherein the method further
comprises the step of the computer system determining a frequency
of the first vehicle substantially accelerating over the period of
time, wherein the step of determining how many times the first
vehicle tailgated one or more other vehicles within the period of
time is further based on the frequency of the first vehicle
substantially accelerating over the period of time.
19. The program product of claim 15, wherein the method further
comprises the step of the computer system determining an average
speed of the first vehicle over the period of time, wherein the
step of determining how many times the first vehicle tailgated one
or more other vehicles within the period of time is further based
on the average speed of the first vehicle over the period of
time.
20. The program product of claim 15, wherein the method further
comprises the steps of: the computer system determining the first
distance and the second distance are each less than a predefined
threshold distance that indicates tailgating; the computer system
receiving first contextual information that includes first
aggregate distances between other vehicles in a first set of
vehicles in a predefined proximity to the first vehicle at the
first time, the first aggregate distances being dependent on road
conditions and/or traffic conditions at the first time; the
computer system receiving second contextual information that
includes second aggregate distances between other vehicles in a
second set of vehicles in the predefined proximity to the first
vehicle at the second time, the second aggregate distances being
dependent on road conditions and/or traffic conditions at the
second time; based in part on the received first contextual
information including the first aggregate distances, the computer
system determining the first distance does not indicate the first
vehicle tailgating at the first time; and based in part on the
received second contextual information including the second
aggregate distances, the computer system determining the second
distance indicates the first vehicle tailgating at the second time,
wherein the step of determining how many times the first vehicle
tailgated one or more other vehicles within the period of time
includes determining the first vehicle tailgating at the second
time and determining the first vehicle did not tailgate at the
first time.
Description
[0001] This application is a continuation application claiming
priority to Ser. No. 12/578,653 filed Oct. 14, 2009.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The present invention relates to a data processing method
and system for advancing environmental stewardship by improving
driving patterns based on driving behavior information, and more
particularly to a technique for promoting environmentally-friendly
driving patterns via variable incentives and/or variable
disincentives based on driving behavior of individual drivers.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0003] Areas and routes with traffic congestion usually have the
highest amount of pollution in the air. Concentrated pollution is
harmful to pedestrians and others that dwell outside in areas with
traffic congestion. Conventional traffic congestion management
techniques apply a macroscopic perspective that limits the basis of
congestion management actions to a narrow collection of driving
information that is aggregated over a large group of drivers rather
than specific and unique behaviors of individual drivers. Thus,
there exists a need to overcome at least one of the preceding
deficiencies and limitations of the related art.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0004] The present invention provides a method of managing driving
patterns by charging a variable toll based on individual driving
behaviors. The method comprises:
[0005] receiving proximity data detected at a first time within a
time period P by a plurality of proximity sensor systems included
in a plurality of vehicles, wherein the proximity data includes a
one or more distances between a vehicle and a plurality of
vehicles, and wherein a distance of the one or more distances is a
measure of distance between the vehicle and another vehicle
immediately in front of the vehicle;
[0006] storing the proximity data as part of driving behavior data,
wherein the driving behavior data includes other proximity data
that includes the one or more distances measured at other times
within the time period P;
[0007] identifying N tailgating incidents within the time period P,
wherein N.gtoreq.1, wherein identifying N tailgating incidents is
based on one or more determinations that the distance is less than
a first predefined threshold value for a tailgating distance, and
wherein identifying N tailgating incidents is based on the
proximity data and the other proximity data;
[0008] detecting that the vehicle arrives at a toll-charging
station;
[0009] a processor of a computer system determining a variable toll
T by evaluating a function f, wherein the function f is a function
of B and N, wherein B is a base amount, and wherein a result of
evaluating the function f is a value of T selected from the group
consisting of a first value less than B and a second value greater
than B; and
[0010] charging a driver of the vehicle the variable toll T,
wherein charging the driver the variable toll T includes providing
an incentive to the driver to encourage a first driving behavior if
the result of evaluating the function f is the first value and
providing a disincentive to the driver to deter a second driving
behavior if the result of evaluating the function f is the second
value.
[0011] A system, program product and process for supporting
computing infrastructure corresponding to the above-summarized
method is also described and claimed herein.
[0012] The present invention provides a technique for drivers to
increase their contributions to environmental stewardship by
charging variable tolls based on behaviors of individual
drivers.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0013] FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a system for managing driving
patterns by providing variable incentives and/or variable
disincentives based on individual driving behaviors, in accordance
with embodiments of the present invention.
[0014] FIG. 2 is a flowchart of a process for managing driving
patterns by providing variable incentives and/or variable
disincentives based on individual driving behaviors, where the
process is implemented by the system of FIG. 1, in accordance with
embodiments of the present invention.
[0015] FIG. 3 is a flowchart of a process for applying variable
tolls, where the process is implemented by the system of FIG. 1, in
accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
[0016] FIG. 4 is a computer system that is included in the system
of FIG. 1 and that implements the process of FIG. 2 or FIG. 3, in
accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Overview
[0017] Drivers that engage in certain behaviors tend to produce
more pollution. For example, tailgating tends to accentuate traffic
slowdowns due to over correction of speed, which in turns causes
more drivers to go through a cycle of braking and accelerating. As
used herein, tailgating is defined as driving a vehicle hazardously
closely behind another vehicle, so as to prevent the vehicle from
easily stopping or swerving to avoid a collision with the other
vehicle. This driving pattern of tailgating expends more pollution
than the driver who maintains a greater, non-tailgating distance
between the driver's vehicle and other vehicles, and therefore has
a more steady speed and less braking and acceleration.
[0018] The present invention satisfies a need to provide
information to drivers that indicates how green (i.e.,
environmentally beneficial) their driving techniques are and to
provide recommendations regarding how to improve their driving
techniques. Furthermore, in one embodiment, the present invention
provides the aforementioned information to drivers in the form of
incentives to encourage environmentally sound driving techniques
(e.g., provide a rebate to a driver whose number of tailgating
incidents in a predefined time period is below a predefined
threshold) and/or disincentives to discourage environmentally
unsound driving techniques (e.g., charge an increased toll to a
driver whose number of tailgating incidents in a predefined time
period exceeds a predefined threshold).
[0019] The value of one of the above-mentioned incentives or
disincentives is variable and individualized. That is, an incentive
or disincentive in the present invention is a function of driving
behavior data that is collected for an individual driver and may be
compared to one or more predefined threshold values. Thus, an
evaluated incentive or disincentive for Driver 1 may be different
from the evaluated incentive or disincentive for Driver 2 if the
driving behavior data collected for Driver 1 is different from the
driving behavior data collected for Driver 2. Furthermore, the
value of an incentive or disincentive in the present invention is
not exclusively based on driving behavior data that is aggregated
over multiple drivers (e.g., an average speed of multiple drivers
using a toll road during a particular time period).
[0020] In one embodiment, the driving behavior data collected for
individual drivers and their vehicles is collected in real-time by
sensor systems residing in the vehicles. The processing of data to
determine a value of an incentive or disincentive for a particular
driver includes processing the driving behavior data collected in
real-time for the driver and may also include processing historical
data that indicates the driving behavior of the driver in the past
(e.g., number of tailgating incidents recorded in the previous 15
minutes, or the number of times in the last month the driver
received a report indicating that the number of tailgating
incidents exceeded a predefined threshold).
System for Managing Driving Patterns
[0021] FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a system for managing driving
patterns by providing variable incentives and/or variable
disincentives based on individual driving behaviors, in accordance
with embodiments of the present invention. System 100 includes a
central computer system 102, a central data storage unit 104, a
network 106, and N vehicles 108-1, . . . , 108-N, where each
vehicle includes a proximity sensor system (see, e.g., proximity
sensor system 110-1 and 110-N) and local data storage unit (see,
e.g., local storage 112-1 and 112-N). System 100 also includes a
computer system 114 of an interested and authorized entity.
[0022] Central computer system 102 manages central data storage
unit 104, which may include vehicle identification (e.g., vehicle
identification numbers (VINs)), vehicle properties, and driver
information, including historical information about past driver
behavior of individual drivers. Central data storage unit 104 may
store contextual information, such as road and traffic conditions
that affect one or more threshold values for determining an
incentive or disincentive for managing driving patterns, or that
determine whether such an incentive or disincentive is evaluated at
all. Data, including driving behavior of individual drivers
collected in real-time, is received by central computer system 102
from proximity sensor systems (e.g., proximity sensor system 110-1
and 110-N) via network 106.
[0023] A report generated by central computer system 102 may be
received by a proximity sensor system (e.g., system 110-1 or 110-N)
via network 106 or by another computing or electronic device (e.g.,
smartphone) that allows the report to be viewed by a driver. The
reports received by the proximity sensor systems or other computing
or electronic device may include information about the driving
behavior of an individual driver (e.g., tailgating incidents
recorded in a predefined time period for a driver) and information
about an incentive and/or disincentive that the interested and
authorized entity or other entity will provide to the individual
driver.
[0024] In one embodiment, central computer system 102 is a single
computing unit. In another embodiment, central computer system 102
includes multiple computing units.
[0025] Computer system 114 may access central data storage unit 104
via central computer system 102. In one embodiment, computer system
114 is a single computing unit. In another embodiment, computer
system 114 includes multiple computing units. In an alternate
embodiment (not shown), computer system 114 may be the same as
central computer system 102.
[0026] Functionality provided by the components of system 100 is
further described below relative to the discussions of FIG. 2 and
FIG. 3.
Process for Managing Driving Patterns
[0027] FIG. 2 is a flowchart of a process for managing driving
patterns by providing variable incentives and/or variable
disincentives based on individual driving behaviors, where the
process is implemented by the system of FIG. 1, in accordance with
embodiments of the present invention. The process for managing
driving patterns by providing variable incentives and/or variable
disincentives based on individual driving behaviors starts at step
200.
[0028] In step 202, a proximity sensor system included in, or
otherwise being transported by, a first vehicle detects distance(s)
between the first vehicle and one or more other vehicles that are
closest to the first vehicle in one or more predefined directions
relative to the first vehicle. Also in step 202, the proximity
sensor system stores the aforementioned detected distance(s) in a
local data storage unit included in or otherwise being transported
by the first vehicle.
[0029] The detected distances are also referred to herein as
proximity data. Hereinafter, in the discussion of FIG. 2, the
proximity sensor system that performs the detecting in step 202 is
referred to as "the proximity sensor system." Hereinafter, in the
discussion of FIG. 2, the vehicle in step 202 that includes the
proximity sensor system is referred to as "the vehicle."
Hereinafter, in the discussion of FIG. 2, the driver of the vehicle
is referred to as "the driver."
[0030] In one embodiment, in step 202, the proximity sensor system
detects and stores (1) a first distance between the vehicle and
another vehicle immediately in front of the vehicle; (2) a second
distance between the vehicle and another vehicle immediately behind
the vehicle; (3) a third distance between the vehicle and another
vehicle immediately to the left of the vehicle (i.e., on the left
side of the driver); and (4) a fourth distance between the vehicle
and another vehicle immediately to the right of the vehicle (i.e.,
on the right side of the driver). As used herein, a first vehicle
(i.e., the aforementioned "another vehicle") is "immediately" in a
specified direction (i.e., in front of, behind, to the left, or to
the right) relative to a second vehicle (i.e., the aforementioned
"the vehicle") if a proximity sensor system in the second vehicle
detects the first vehicle in the specified direction.
[0031] For example, proximity sensor system 110-1 (see FIG. 1)
detects a first distance between vehicle 108-1 (see FIG. 1) and
another vehicle 110-N (see FIG. 1) immediately in front of vehicle
108-1 (see FIG. 1); a second distance between vehicle 108-1 (see
FIG. 1) and another vehicle (not shown) immediately behind vehicle
108-1 (see FIG. 1); a third distance between vehicle 108-1 (see
FIG. 1) and another vehicle (not shown) immediately to the left of
vehicle 108-1 (see FIGS. 1); and (4) a fourth distance between
vehicle 108-1 (see FIG. 1) and another vehicle (not shown)
immediately to the right of vehicle 108-1 (see FIG. 1).
[0032] In another embodiment, a proper subset of the distances
listed above in (1), (2), (3) and (4) is detected and stored in
step 202.
[0033] In step 204, the proximity sensor system records a unique
identification of the vehicle. For example, step 204 may record a
VIN or a license plate number that identifies the vehicle.
[0034] In step 206, the proximity sensor system records properties
(a.k.a. vehicle properties) of the vehicle. For example, the
vehicle properties recorded in step 206 may include the make, model
and modifications of the vehicle.
[0035] In step 208, the proximity sensor system records the
location of the vehicle. The location of the vehicle may be
determined, for example, by a Global Positioning System (GPS) or by
cellular triangulation.
[0036] In another embodiment, a combination of steps 204, 206 and
208 is optional.
[0037] In step 210, the proximity sensor system sends the data
recorded in steps 202, 204, 206 and 208 to central computer system
102 (see FIG. 1). In response, the central computer system stores
the data sent in step 210 to central data storage unit 104 (see
FIG. 1). Step 210 sends the data, for example, by cellular or other
wireless transmission via network 106 (see FIG. 1).
[0038] Steps 202 and 210 and optionally steps 204, 206 and 208 are
periodically repeated at predefined time intervals within a
predefined time period.
[0039] In step 212, central computer system 102 (see FIG. 1)
processes data in central data storage unit 104 (see FIG. 1). The
processing of data in step 212 may include any combination of the
following steps to determine statistics and/or driver information:
[0040] 1. Determining, over a predefined time period, the distances
detected between the vehicle and one or more other vehicles
immediately in the front, behind, to the left, and/or to the right
of the vehicle. In one embodiment, one or more weights may be
assigned to one or more of the distances determined in step 212, so
that, for instance, the distance to the other vehicle immediately
in the front of the vehicle has a more significant effect on the
value of an incentive or disincentive as compared to the effect of
one or more other distances (e.g., the distance to another vehicle
immediately to the right of the vehicle). [0041] 2. Determining a
frequency over a predefined time period of the driver applying a
braking system to slow down the vehicle. [0042] 3. Determining a
frequency over a predefined time period of the driver significantly
accelerating, where a significant acceleration is based on
predefined criteria. [0043] 4. Determining an average speed of the
vehicle over a predefined time period. [0044] 5. Optionally looking
up driver information, including driver information available by
cross referencing public and/or non-public vehicle registration
systems. The driver information may include historical driving
behavior data that characterizes how much the driver exhibits
predefined driving behavior such as tailgating. Driver information
that characterizes a first driver as a habitual tailgater according
to predefined criteria may, for example, cause a higher toll be
charged as a disincentive (see step 216) as compared to a toll
charged to a second driver whose driver information indicates that
the second driver rarely tailgates according the predefined
criteria.
[0045] In step 214, computer system 114 (see FIG. 1) of an
interested and authorized entity accesses central data storage unit
104 (see FIG. 1) via central computer system 102 (see FIG. 1) to
retrieve the driving history of the driver and, for a specified
period of time P, the distances and statistics determined in step
212.
[0046] In another embodiment, computer system 102 (see FIG. 1)
accesses central data storage unit 104 (see FIG. 1) to retrieve the
distances determined in step 212, optionally retrieve one or more
of the statistics determined in step 212, and optionally retrieve
driver history information that classifies the driver in terms of
how safe the driver has been in the past.
[0047] In step 216, computer system 102 (see FIG. 1) and/or
computer system 114 (see FIG. 1) provides information to the driver
that includes an incentive to encourage a desired driving behavior
or as a disincentive to deter an undesired driving behavior. The
information provided in step 216 may also include a message or a
report presented to the driver. Step 216 consists of four sub-steps
(not shown): 216-1, 216-2, 216-3 and 216-4. In step 216-1, computer
system 102 (see FIG. 1) identifies N tailgating incidents within
time period P, where N is greater than or equal to 1. In one
embodiment, the N tailgating incidents are identified by the
computer system 102 (see FIG. 1) comparing distances accessed in
step 214 to one or more predefined threshold values. Based on the
comparison of the distances, the computer system 102 (see FIG. 1)
determines that each distance of N distances out of M distances
retrieved in step 214 exceeds a predefined threshold value V1 for
determining a tailgating incident. Thus, the determination of the N
distances identifies N incidents of the driver tailgating within
time period P. In the embodiment described in this paragraph, M is
greater than 1 and N is greater than or equal to one.
[0048] In step 216-2, computer system 102 (see FIG. 1) detects a
condition associated with the vehicle and/or the driver (e.g., a
location of the vehicle) that indicates that the driver of the
vehicle is to receive an incentive and/or a disincentive that
manages the driver's driving behavior (e.g., an incentive that
promotes an environmentally sound driving technique or a
disincentive that deters an environmentally unsound driving
technique). For example, the computer system detects that the
vehicle is present at a toll-charging station at which the driver
is charged a decreased toll as an incentive or an increased toll as
a disincentive. As another example, the computer system detects
that the vehicle or driver is present at a business that can
provide an incentive in the form of a rebate or reimbursement to
the driver.
[0049] In step 216-3, computer system 102 (see FIG. 1) determines a
variable incentive or disincentive amount by evaluating a function
f. The function f is a function of a base value (a.k.a. base
amount) B and N (i.e., the number of tailgating incidents
identified in step 216-1). Function f may further be a function of
the driving history and/or the statistics retrieved in step 214. In
one embodiment, computer system 102 (see FIG. 1) instructs computer
system 114 (see FIG. 1) that information needs to be presented to
the driver in step 216-4 based on the evaluation of the function f
in step 216-3.
[0050] In step 216-4, computer system 102 (see FIG. 1) or computer
system 114 (see FIG. 1) provides information including incentive(s)
and/or disincentive(s) to the driver based on the evaluation of
function f in step 216-3. An incentive provided in step 216-4
encourages a first driving behavior (e.g., driving without
tailgating) by the driver. That is, an incentive provided in step
216-4 increases the likelihood that the driver will engage in an
environmentally sound driving behavior (e.g., driving without
tailgating). A disincentive provided in step 216-4 deters a second
driving behavior (e.g., tailgating) by the driver. That is, a
disincentive provided in step 216-4 decreases the likelihood that
the driver will engage in an environmentally unsound driving
behavior (e.g., tailgating). In one embodiment, performing step
216-4 for a first driver and a second driver may provide the first
driver with an incentive to encourage a first driving behavior and
the second driver with a disincentive to deter a second driving
behavior. Furthermore, the aforementioned first driving behavior
may be described as not including an attribute of the
aforementioned second driving behavior. For example, the first
driving behavior is driving that does not include tailgating and
the second driving behavior is driving that includes
tailgating.
[0051] The process of FIG. 2 ends at step 218.
[0052] In one embodiment (hereinafter, the toll embodiment), step
216 provides an incentive or a disincentive in the form of a
variable toll T. In the toll embodiment, detecting the condition in
step 216-2 includes the computer system detecting that the vehicle
arrives at a toll-charging station. In the toll embodiment, the
variable incentive or disincentive amount determined in step 216-3
is the variable toll T. Evaluating the function f in step 216-3 in
the toll embodiment results in a value of variable toll T that is
less than B, a value of T that is greater than B, or a value of T
that is equal to B. In the toll embodiment, the base value B is a
base toll amount charged to drivers having common characteristics
based on predefined criteria. For example, a base toll amount may
be charged to all drivers who entered a highway at the same
entrance, arrive at the same toll-charging station, and drive
vehicles of the same class. Step 216-4 in the toll embodiment
includes charging the driver of the vehicle the variable toll T. In
the toll embodiment, if the value of T is evaluated in step 216-3
to be less than B, then charging the variable toll T in step 216-4
provides an incentive to the driver to encourage a predefined
desired driving behavior that includes driving without tailgating.
Furthermore, if the value of T is evaluated in step 216-3 to be
greater than B, then charging the variable toll T in step 216-4
provides a disincentive to the driver to deter a predefined
undesired driving behavior that includes tailgating.
[0053] As a first example in the toll embodiment, evaluating
function f in step 216-3 results in toll T=B+N-1. If there are two
tailgating incidents in a time period P (i.e., N=2), then T=B+2-1
or T=B+1 (i.e., the toll increases to one unit more than the base
toll amount as a disincentive resulting from the two tailgating
incidents). If there are 0 tailgating incidents in a time period P
(i.e., N=0), then T=B+0-1 or T=B-1 (i.e., the toll decreases to one
unit less than the base toll amount as an incentive resulting from
the zero tailgating incidents).
[0054] As a second example in the toll embodiment, evaluating
function f in step 216-3 results in toll T=B+wN-1, where w is a
weighting factor such as 0.5. If there are 3 tailgating incidents
in a time period P (i.e., N=3) and w=0.5, then T=B+0.5*3-1 or
T=B+0.5 (i.e., the toll increases to 0.5 units more than the base
toll amount as a disincentive resulting from the three tailgating
incidents). If there are 0 tailgating incidents in a time period P
(i.e., N=0) and w=0.5, then T=B+0.5*0-1 or T=B-1 (i.e., the toll
decreases to one unit less than the base toll amount as an
incentive resulting from the zero tailgating incidents).
[0055] As discussed above, the function f evaluated in step 216-3
may also be a function of one or more of the other statistics
(e.g., frequency of applying braking system, frequency of
significant acceleration, and/or average speed) determined in step
212. In a variation of the toll embodiment, if a statistic of step
212 indicates an undesirable driving behavior based on predefined
criteria (e.g., over a time period P, the statistic exceeds a
predefined threshold value associated with the statistic), then
toll T is increased (e.g., by adding a predefined disincentive
amount), and if the statistic of step 212 indicates a desirable
driving behavior (e.g., over a time period P, the statistic does
not exceed the associated predefined threshold value), then toll T
is decreased (e.g., by subtracting a predefined incentive
amount).
[0056] In another variation of the toll embodiment, step 216
includes adjusting the toll T to be based on driver history
information retrieved in step 214. For example, if N exceeds a
predetermined threshold V2 to indicate an excessive amount of
tailgating in time period P, but the driver history information
classifies the driver as a safe driver that has seldom tailgated in
the past according to predefined criteria, then the toll T
determined by the evaluation of function f in step 216-3 is
decreased (e.g., by subtracting a predefined incentive amount) As
another example, if N exceeds V2 and the driver history information
classifies the driver as an unsafe driver that has been a habitual
tailgater in the past according to the predefined criteria, then
the toll T determined in step 216-3 is increased (e.g., by adding a
predefined disincentive amount).
[0057] A toll payment paid by a driver as a disincentive provided
in step 216 may be received by one or more entities, such as:
[0058] 1. a nonprofit organization, carbon offset provider, safety
organization, etc. [0059] 2. another driver (offended party or
payee) who was disadvantaged (e.g., being tailgated) by the driver
(offending party or payor) who is paying the toll. In one
embodiment, the identity of both the offending party and the
offended party are known to a third party service, and the third
party service may provide compensation anonymously, where neither
the offending party nor the offended party is identified to the
other party. The identity of the offending and offended parties may
be provided by self-reporting into the system, by the reading of
license plates, etc. [0060] 3. the aforementioned third party
service that coordinates payment between the payor and the
payee.
[0061] In one embodiment, the process of FIG. 2 prior to step 214
also includes a step (not shown) in which central data storage unit
104 (see FIG. 1) receives contextual information that includes, for
example, aggregate distances between other vehicles in a predefined
proximity to the vehicle, road conditions and/or traffic conditions
that affect one or more threshold values for determining a value of
an incentive or disincentive (see step 216) for managing driving
patterns, or that determine whether such an incentive or
disincentive is evaluated at all.
[0062] The contextual information allows the distances processed in
step 212 to be analyzed relative to the aggregate distances between
other vehicles in proximity to the vehicle. After the contextual
information is received by central data storage unit 104 (see FIG.
1), step 214 includes computer system 114 (see FIG. 1) accessing
the contextual information and step 216 includes computer system
114 (see FIG. 1) determining a value of an incentive or a value of
a disincentive (or determining whether there will be any incentive
or disincentive) based on the contextual information as well as on
the driving history and data processed in step 212.
[0063] The amount of a toll charged to a driver in step 216 may be
adjusted (e.g., determined to be a base amount instead of a greater
amount associated with excessive tailgating) because the accessed
contextual information indicates that the relatively close
distances determined in step 212 were part of a widespread pattern
over a significant number of nearby vehicles and were presumably
unavoidable or appropriate under the circumstances due to roadwork,
a slowdown because of an accident, etc.
Variable Tolls
[0064] FIG. 3 is a flowchart of a process for applying variable
tolls, where the process is implemented by the system of FIG. 1, in
accordance with embodiments of the present invention. The process
of applying variable tolls based on proximity data starts at step
300. In step 302, for Vehicle 1 and Vehicle 2 (collectively, "the
vehicles"), at predefined intervals over a time period P, the
vehicles' respective monitoring systems (e.g., proximity sensor
system 110-1 in FIG. 1) detect proximity data. The proximity data
is detected, for example, by a GPS or by a vehicle avoidance and
collision sensing system based on radar, ultrasonic sound waves or
infrared.
[0065] Also in step 302, each of the vehicles' respective
monitoring systems record the detected proximity data in a local
data storage unit residing in the vehicle (e.g., local storage
112-1 in FIG. 1) or send the detected proximity data over a
wireless network to a third party.
[0066] For example, step 302 includes proximity sensor system 110-1
(see FIG. 1) in Vehicle 1 (i.e., vehicle 108-1 in FIG. 1) detecting
a first set of proximity data at predefined intervals over time
period P and storing the detected first set of proximity data in
local storage 112-1 (see FIG. 1), and a proximity sensor system in
Vehicle 2 detecting a second set of proximity data at the
predefined intervals over time period P and storing the second set
of proximity data in local storage residing in Vehicle 2.
[0067] In step 304, the central computer system 102 (see FIG. 1)
determines from the proximity data detected in step 302 that
Vehicle 1 has tailgated N1 times in the time period P (e.g., 1
tailgating incident in the previous 15 minutes) and that Vehicle 2
has tailgated N2 times in the time period P (e.g., 10 tailgating
incidents in the previous 15 minutes).
[0068] In step 306, the central computer system 102 (see FIG. 1)
determines that N1 tailgating incidents in a time period P does not
exceed a predefined threshold value.
[0069] In step 308, the central computer system 102 (see FIG. 1)
determines that N2 tailgating incidents in a time period P exceeds
the predefined threshold value.
[0070] In step 310, the central computer system 102 (see FIG. 1)
detects that Vehicle 1 reaches a toll-charging station (e.g., based
on data from an electronic toll collection system such as E-ZPass,
GPS tracking, or other means). Based on N1 not exceeding the
predefined threshold value (see step 306), the driver of Vehicle 1
is designated as a safe driver and central computer system 102 (see
FIG. 1) sends a signal to a toll-charging component of computer
system 114 (see FIG. 1) to instruct the toll-charging component to
charge Vehicle 1 a toll T1 equal to a function of base value B and
an amount A, where A does not cause toll T1 to be more than the
base value B. For example, toll T1 is charged as base amount B
(i.e., T1=B+A, where A=0 and B is the amount charged to drivers who
are designated as being safe drivers).
[0071] In step 312, the central computer system 102 (see FIG. 1)
detects that Vehicle 2 reaches a toll-charging station (e.g., again
based on data from an electronic toll collection system such as
E-ZPass, GPS tracking, or other means). Based on N2 exceeding the
predefined threshold value (see step 308), central computer system
102 (see FIG. 1) sends a signal to the toll-charging component of
computer system 114 (see FIG. 1) to instruct the toll-charging
component to charge Vehicle 2 a toll T2 equal to the function of
base value B and amount A, where A causes toll T2 to be more than
the base value B. For example, toll T2 is charged as base value B
increased by an amount A (i.e., T=B+A, where A>0). Thus, toll T1
charged in step 310 to a first driver is less than toll T2 charged
in step 312 to a second driver, thereby illustrating how tolls
calculated by the present invention are variable and
individualized. The amount A added to the toll T2 is information
provided that makes the driver of Vehicle 2 aware of the driver's
tailgating driving behavior and is a disincentive that discourages
the driver from tailgating in the future. If the driver of Vehicle
2 decreases tailgating behavior in the future based on receiving
the information, traffic congestion is decreased and environmental
stewardship is advanced. Furthermore, the amount A added to the
toll T2 provides the driver of Vehicle 2 with an opportunity to
increase the driver's contribution to environmental stewardship.
For example, a percentage of the toll charged to the driver of
Vehicle 2 may be automatically redirected to a carbon-offset
provider. The process of FIG. 3 ends at step 314.
Computer System
[0072] FIG. 4 is a computer system that is included in the system
of FIG. 1 and that implements the process of FIG. 2 or FIG. 3, in
accordance with embodiments of the present invention. Computer
system 400 generally comprises a central processing unit (CPU) 402,
a memory 404, an input/output (I/O) interface 406, and a bus 408.
Further, computer system 400 is coupled to I/O devices 410 and a
computer data storage unit 412. CPU 402 performs computation and
control functions of computer system 400. CPU 402 may comprise a
single processing unit, or be distributed across one or more
processing units in one or more locations (e.g., on a client and
server). In one embodiment, computer system 400 is central computer
system 102 (see FIG. 1). In another embodiment, computer system 400
is computer system 114 (see FIG. 1).
[0073] Memory 404 may comprise any known computer readable storage
medium, which is described below. In one embodiment, cache memory
elements of memory 404 provide temporary storage of at least some
program code (e.g., program code 414) in order to reduce the number
of times code must be retrieved from bulk storage while
instructions of the program code are carried out. Moreover, similar
to CPU 402, memory 404 may reside at a single physical location,
comprising one or more types of data storage, or be distributed
across a plurality of physical systems in various forms. Further,
memory 404 can include data distributed across, for example, a
local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN).
[0074] I/O interface 406 comprises any system for exchanging
information to or from an external source. I/O devices 410 comprise
any known type of external device, including a display device
(e.g., monitor), keyboard, mouse, printer, speakers, handheld
device, facsimile, etc. Bus 408 provides a communication link
between each of the components in computer system 400, and may
comprise any type of transmission link, including electrical,
optical, wireless, etc.
[0075] I/O interface 406 also allows computer system 400 to store
and retrieve information (e.g., data or program instructions such
as program code 414) from an auxiliary storage device such as
computer data storage unit 412 or another computer data storage
unit (not shown). Computer data storage unit 412 may comprise any
known computer readable storage medium, which is described below.
For example, computer data storage unit 412 may be a non-volatile
data storage device, such as a magnetic disk drive (i.e., hard disk
drive) or an optical disc drive (e.g., a CD-ROM drive which
receives a CD-ROM disk).
[0076] Memory 404 may include computer program code 414 that
provides the logic for managing driving patterns by providing
variable incentives and/or variable disincentives based on
individual driving behaviors (e.g., the process of FIG. 2 or FIG.
3). Further, memory 404 may include other systems not shown in FIG.
4, such as an operating system (e.g., Linux) that runs on CPU 402
and provides control of various components within and/or connected
to computer system 400.
[0077] Memory 404, storage unit 412, and/or one or more other
computer data storage units (not shown) that are coupled to
computer system 400 may store a database (e.g., central data
storage unit 104 in FIG. 1).
[0078] As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, the
present invention may be embodied as a system, method or computer
program product. Accordingly, aspects of the present invention may
take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely
software embodiment (including firmware, resident software,
micro-code, etc.) or an embodiment combining software and hardware
aspects that may all generally be referred to herein as a "module"
or "system" (e.g., computer system 400). Furthermore, an embodiment
of the present invention may take the form of a computer program
product embodied in one or more computer readable medium(s) (e.g.,
memory 404 or computer data storage unit 412) having computer
readable program code (e.g., program code 414) embodied or stored
thereon.
[0079] Any combination of one or more computer readable medium(s)
(e.g., memory 404 and computer data storage unit 412) may be
utilized. The computer readable medium may be a computer readable
signal medium or a computer readable storage medium. A computer
readable storage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an
electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared or
semiconductor system, apparatus, device or any suitable combination
of the foregoing. A non-exhaustive list of more specific examples
of the computer-readable storage medium includes: an electrical
connection having one or more wires, a portable computer diskette,
a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory
(ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash
memory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disc read-only memory
(CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or
any suitable combination of the foregoing. In the context of this
document, a computer readable storage medium may be any tangible
medium that can contain or store a program for use by or in
connection with a system, apparatus, or device for carrying out
instructions.
[0080] A computer readable signal medium may include a propagated
data signal with computer readable program code embodied therein,
for example, in baseband or as part of a carrier wave. Such a
propagated signal may take any of a variety of forms, including,
but not limited to, electromagnetic, optical, or any suitable
combination thereof. A computer readable signal medium may be any
computer readable medium that is not a computer readable storage
medium and that can communicate, propagate, or transport a program
for use by or in connection with a system, apparatus, or device for
carrying out instructions.
[0081] Program code (e.g., program code 414) embodied on a computer
readable medium may be transmitted using any appropriate medium,
including but not limited to wireless, wireline, optical fiber
cable, RF, etc., or any suitable combination of the foregoing.
[0082] Computer program code (e.g., program code 414) for carrying
out operations for aspects of the present invention may be written
in any combination of one or more programming languages, including
an object oriented programming language such as Java, Smalltalk,
C++ or the like and conventional procedural programming languages,
such as the "C" programming language or similar programming
languages. Instructions of the program code may be carried out
entirely on a user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a
stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and
partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or
server, where the aforementioned user's computer, remote computer
and server may be, for example, computer system 400 or another
computer system (not shown) having components analogous to the
components of computer system 400 included in FIG. 4. In the latter
scenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user's
computer through any type of network (not shown), including a LAN
or a WAN, or the connection may be made to an external computer
(e.g., through the Internet using an Internet Service
Provider).
[0083] Aspects of the present invention are described herein with
reference to flowchart illustrations (e.g., FIG. 2 and FIG. 3)
and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems) (e.g., FIG. 1
and FIG. 4), and computer program products according to embodiments
of the invention. It will be understood that each block of the
flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of
blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be
implemented by computer program instructions (e.g., program code
414). These computer program instructions may be provided to a
processor (e.g., CPU 402) of a general purpose computer, special
purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus
to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which are carried
out via the processor of the computer or other programmable data
processing apparatus, create means for implementing the
functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram
block or blocks.
[0084] These computer program instructions may also be stored in a
computer readable medium (e.g., memory 404 or computer data storage
unit 412) that can direct a computer (e.g., computer system 400),
other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to
function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored
in the computer readable medium produce an article of manufacture
including instructions which implement the function/act specified
in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
[0085] The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a
computer (e.g., computer system 400), other programmable data
processing apparatus, or other devices to cause a series of
operational steps to be performed on the computer, other
programmable apparatus, or other devices to produce a computer
implemented process such that the instructions which are carried
out on the computer, other programmable apparatus, or other devices
provide processes for implementing the functions/acts specified in
the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
[0086] Any of the components of an embodiment of the present
invention can be deployed, managed, serviced, etc. by a service
provider that offers to deploy or integrate computing
infrastructure with respect to the process of managing driving
patterns by providing variable incentives and/or variable
disincentives based on individual driving behaviors. Thus, an
embodiment of the present invention discloses a process for
supporting computer infrastructure, comprising integrating,
hosting, maintaining and deploying computer-readable code (e.g.,
program code 414) into a computer system (e.g., computer system
400), wherein the code in combination with the computer system is
capable of performing a process of managing driving patterns by
providing variable incentives and/or variable disincentives based
on individual driving behaviors.
[0087] In another embodiment, the invention provides a business
method that performs the process steps of the invention on a
subscription, advertising and/or fee basis. That is, a service
provider, such as a Solution Integrator, can offer to create,
maintain, support, etc. a process of managing driving patterns by
providing variable incentives and/or variable disincentives based
on individual driving behaviors. In this case, the service provider
can create, maintain, support, etc. a computer infrastructure that
performs the process steps of the invention for one or more
customers. In return, the service provider can receive payment from
the customer(s) under a subscription and/or fee agreement, and/or
the service provider can receive payment from the sale of
advertising content to one or more third parties.
[0088] The flowcharts in FIG. 2 and FIG. 3 and the block diagrams
in FIG. 1 and FIG. 4 illustrate the architecture, functionality,
and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods, and
computer program products according to various embodiments of the
present invention. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or
block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of code
(e.g., program code 414), which comprises one or more executable
instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). It
should also be noted that, in some alternative implementations, the
functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in
the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in
fact, be performed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may
sometimes be performed in reverse order, depending upon the
functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of
the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustrations, and combinations
of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustrations, can
be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems that
perform the specified functions or acts, or combinations of special
purpose hardware and computer instructions.
[0089] While embodiments of the present invention have been
described herein for purposes of illustration, many modifications
and changes will become apparent to those skilled in the art.
Accordingly, the appended claims are intended to encompass all such
modifications and changes as fall within the true spirit and scope
of this invention.
* * * * *