U.S. patent application number 14/281526 was filed with the patent office on 2014-09-18 for automated blade with load management control.
This patent application is currently assigned to DEERE & COMPANY. The applicant listed for this patent is DEERE & COMPANY. Invention is credited to Andrew Wayne Kelly.
Application Number | 20140277966 14/281526 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 39473516 |
Filed Date | 2014-09-18 |
United States Patent
Application |
20140277966 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Kelly; Andrew Wayne |
September 18, 2014 |
AUTOMATED BLADE WITH LOAD MANAGEMENT CONTROL
Abstract
There is here disclosed an excavation machine having an
automatic controlled excavation implement that adjusts the
excavation implement to maximize the earth moved in accordance with
vehicle operating parameters, and finished terrain parameters.
Inventors: |
Kelly; Andrew Wayne;
(Sherrill, IA) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
DEERE & COMPANY |
Moline |
IL |
US |
|
|
Assignee: |
DEERE & COMPANY
Moline
IL
|
Family ID: |
39473516 |
Appl. No.: |
14/281526 |
Filed: |
May 19, 2014 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
11565408 |
Nov 30, 2006 |
8726543 |
|
|
14281526 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
701/50 |
Current CPC
Class: |
E02F 9/2029 20130101;
E02F 3/847 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
701/50 |
International
Class: |
E02F 9/20 20060101
E02F009/20 |
Claims
1. An excavation machine including: an excavation implement; at
least one ground engaging traction device; an engine capable of
providing an engine output to the at least one ground engaging
traction device, the engine having an optimum efficiency range; and
a controller configured to determine whether the engine is
operating within the optimum efficiency range and to automatically
control the position of the excavation implement based on the
determination of whether the engine is operating within the optimum
efficiency range.
2. The excavation machine of claim 1, further including a
transmission configured to provide a torque force to the ground
engaging traction device by transferring the engine output to the
ground engaging traction device, wherein the controller is
configured to automatically control the torque force provided by
the transmission to the at least one ground engaging traction
device based on the determination of whether the engine is
operating within the optimum efficiency range.
3. The excavation machine of claim 2, wherein the controller
responds to a slippage of the at least one ground engaging traction
device by adjusting the transmission to a lower gear setting.
4. The excavation machine of claim 1, wherein the controller is
configured to automatically control the engine output based on the
determination of whether the engine is operating within the optimum
efficiency range.
5. The excavation machine of claim 4, wherein the controller
responds to a slippage of the at least one ground engaging traction
device by increasing a torque of the engine output.
6. The excavation machine of claim 1, wherein the controller lowers
the excavation implement when the controller determines that the
engine is operating within the optimum efficiency range.
7. The excavation machine of claim 1, wherein the controller lowers
the excavation implement until a slippage of the ground engaging
traction device.
8. The excavation machine of claim 1, wherein the controller limits
the excavation implement from being lowered beneath a finished
earth contour depth.
9. The excavation machine of claim 1, wherein the controller raises
the excavation implement when the controller determines that the
engine is operating below the optimum efficiency range.
10. The excavation machine of claim 1, wherein the excavation
machine includes one of a grader, a scraper, a bull dozer, a
compactor, and an excavator.
11. The excavation machine of claim 1, wherein the excavation
implement includes one of a blade, a bucket, a plow, a chisel, and
ripping teeth.
12. An excavation machine including: an excavation implement; at
least one ground engaging traction device; an engine capable of
providing an engine output to the at least one ground engaging
traction device; a global positioning receiver for determining a
location of the excavation machine; and a controller that combines
the location of the excavation machine from the global positioning
receiver with a finished earth contour depth to automatically lower
the excavation implement by a programmed increment when the
excavation implement is located above the finished earth contour
depth.
13. The excavation machine of claim 12, wherein the controller
repeatedly lowers the excavation implement by the programmed
increment as long as the excavation implement is located above the
finished earth contour depth.
14. The excavation machine of claim 12, wherein the controller
lowers the excavation implement when the location of the excavation
machine from the global positioning receiver equals an expected
location of the excavation machine.
15. The excavation machine of claim 12, wherein the controller
raises the excavation implement when the location of the excavation
machine from the global positioning receiver differs from an
expected location of the excavation machine.
16. The excavation machine of claim 12, further including a
transmission configured to transfer the engine output to the ground
engaging traction device, wherein the controller lowers a gear
setting of the transmission when the location of the excavation
machine from the global positioning receiver differs from an
expected location of the excavation machine.
17. The excavation machine of claim 12, wherein the controller
increases a torque of the engine output when the location of the
excavation machine from the global positioning receiver differs
from an expected location of the excavation machine.
18. An excavation machine including: an excavation implement; at
least one ground engaging traction device; an engine capable of
providing an engine output to the at least one ground engaging
traction device; and a controller configured to determine whether
the engine has excess power available and to automatically control
the position of the excavation implement based on the determination
of whether the engine has excess power available.
19. The excavation machine of claim 18, wherein the controller
lowers the excavation implement to move a maximum volume of earth
based on the power available from the engine.
20. The excavation machine of claim 18, wherein the controller
lowers the excavation implement until a slippage of the ground
engaging traction device.
21. The excavation machine of claim 18, wherein the controller
repeatedly lowers the excavation implement by programmed increments
until reaching a finished earth contour depth.
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
[0001] This application is a continuation of U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 11/565,408, filed Nov. 30, 2006, the
disclosure of which is hereby expressly incorporated by reference
herein in its entirety.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The invention disclosed and claimed hereafter relates to
mechanical earth excavation equipment exemplified by a motorized
grader. More specifically, the invention relates to controlling the
position of the scraping blade or bucket of such equipment with
respect to the location on the surface of the earth and with
respect to the desired finished grade of the earth.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0003] The instant disclosed and claimed invention is directed to
optimizing the work accomplished by the earth moving equipment in
the preparation of a predetermined earth contour. The invention
provides a savings of time, and energy required to accomplish the
desired earth contour. Global Positioning Systems (GPS) available
for civilian use may locate the position of the of the excavation
equipment on the planet. In addition, the GPS may also provide the
elevation of the equipment at a position on the planet. Together
the position and elevation data constitute the earth contour
desired for a given project such as a highway, parking lot,
etc.
[0004] This invention combines the desired contour with equipment
operations data to optimize the excavation.
[0005] According to an exemplary embodiment of the present
disclosure, an excavation machine is provided including an
excavation implement, at least one ground engaging traction device,
an engine capable of providing an engine output to the at least one
ground engaging traction device, the engine having an optimum
efficiency range, and a controller configured to determine whether
the engine is operating within the optimum efficiency range and to
automatically control the position of the excavation implement
based on the determination of whether the engine is operating
within the optimum efficiency range.
[0006] According to another exemplary embodiment of the present
disclosure, an excavation machine is provided including an
excavation implement, at least one ground engaging traction device,
an engine capable of providing an engine output to the at least one
ground engaging traction device, a global positioning receiver for
determining a location of the excavation machine, and a controller
that combines the location of the excavation machine from the
global positioning receiver with a finished earth contour depth to
automatically lower the excavation implement by a programmed
increment when the excavation implement is located above the
finished earth contour depth.
[0007] According to yet another exemplary embodiment of the present
disclosure, an excavation machine is provided including an
excavation implement, at least one ground engaging traction device,
an engine capable of providing an engine output to the at least one
ground engaging traction device, and a controller configured to
determine whether the engine has excess power available and to
automatically control the position of the excavation implement
based on the determination of whether the engine has excess power
available.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0008] FIG. 1 discloses a typical motor-grader.
[0009] FIG. 2 diagrams a program decision tree for an algorithm
implementing the instant invention.
DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION
[0010] The availability of GPS information for civilian use has
resulted in incorporation of location and elevation data in
construction plans. Heavy equipment such as graders, scrapers, bull
dozers, compactors, excavators and similar earthworks construction
machines also incorporates sensors and controllers that monitor and
adjust the equipment operation such as engine speed, and engine
efficiency. The combination of GPS and wheel rotation (or in the
case of a crawler type vehicle, track travel) informs the
controller through an appropriate algorithm of the wheel (or track)
slippage. As a simplified description of the instant invention,
traditionally, when an equipment operator noticed wheel slippage,
the operator could respond by raising the excavating implement,
which could be a scraping blade, a bucket, or a plow, or a chisel,
or ripping teeth, or a similar excavation implement. Hereafter the
excavation implement, which may be described hereafter as a blade,
could be located at the front of the equipment, such as a
bulldozer, or mounted amidships as in the illustrated motor-grader
or mounted at the rear of a vehicle as is often the case for
`ripper` teeth. Raising the blade reduces the resistance to
movement of the equipment which in turn enables the equipment to
regain traction to move, without wheel slippage, and the now
reduced volume of earth being pushed by the now raised blade.
[0011] In the presently disclosed and claimed invention, the
controller combines the input from the GPS, the desired earth
contour, and equipment operation to adjust the blade depth without
operator input. This automatic feature affords several benefits
including: more rapid response than human response, the opportunity
to adjust optimum power output/engine efficiency to blade depth by
way of integration of engine performance algorithms with wheel slip
and blade depth response, reduced operator fatigue, lower fuel
costs and reduced equipment maintenance resulting from fewer
overloads on equipment.
[0012] FIG. 1 shows a motorized grader 10 which, for purposes of
the instant invention, is illustrative of heavy equipment to which
the instant invention is applicable. The grader 10 has a frame 12
extending the length of the grader 10 with a blade 14 mounted in or
toward the middle of the distance between the front axle 15 having
attached thereto wheel and tire 20 and the hinge point 26 of the
rear tandem wheel assembly 25 including wheels and tires 21,
22.
[0013] A global positioning receiver 30 provides data on the
location of the receiver 30 on the earth's surface, and the
altitude of the receiver 30. The global positioning receiver 30 is
shown on the cab 32 of the grader 10. The receiver 30 interfaces
with the controller, not shown. Also input to the controller is the
blade position. The blade 14 may be raised and lowered by hydraulic
cylinders 16, 18 attached to the grader frame 12 and to the blade
14. The blade position may be determined by measurement with a
laser measurement from a reflector 40 on the blade to a laser beam
generator and receiver 42. Whereby the time delay from the laser
output signal 44 to the return signal 46, associated with
appropriate trigonometry, dimensions of the grader 10, and an
algorithm enable a controller to locate the elevation of the blade
14 with respect to the elevation of the grader wheels 20, 21, 22 on
the earth's surface. A secondary measurement of the blade position
may be derived from measurement of the volume of hydraulic fluid in
each hydraulic fluid in the cylinders 16, 18. Alternatively, if the
grader 10 is equipped with preferred electro-hydraulically
controlled cylinders, the algorithm controlling the blade position
may be interfaced with the controller to provide the controller
with specific data concerning the blade location with respect to
the surface of the earth as reflected by the position of the grader
tires 20, 21, 22.
[0014] Global positioning equipment finding utility in the
excavation/earth contouring industry may have location accuracy
within 3 cm (1.2 inches). Advanced GPS systems incorporation
position correction algorithms, interference correction now finding
application in the excavation/earth contouring industry claim
accuracy location within 5 mm (0.2 inch). Such systems are publicly
offered by sources such as Trimble Navigation Limited, 935 Stewart
Avenue, Sunnyvale, Calif., 94085, USA. (www.trimble.com)
[0015] If the depth of the blade 14 into the earth causes
resistance in excess of the vehicle traction, but not the power
available to the vehicle, the wheels 20, 21, 22 will spin or slip.
When wheel-slip occurs the engine is turning the wheels 20, 21, 22
but the grader 10 is moving at less than the distance that it would
move if there were no slippage at the interface of the wheels with
the earth. Wheel-slip consumes time and energy, but does not
accomplish work.
[0016] Wheel-slip may be determined by the controller by comparing
the distance the grader 10 would move if there were no wheel-slip
with the actual position dislocation as determined by GPS.
[0017] In a manual mode of operation of excavation machines as has
been heretofore employed the vehicle operator is required to
determine implement depth, engine torque availability, torque
optimization through the transmission and wheel slip. The equipment
operator initiated machine movement engagement of the implement to
the earth, engine speed and transmission gearing. The operator may,
for example, direct the tool depth in the earth sufficient to
exceed vehicle traction resulting in wheel-slip. Upon noticing
wheel rotation without corresponding vehicle movement, the operator
may adjust implement depth in the earth. While operator attention
to wheel-slip has served the earth grading industry well, operator
fatigue and earth grading efficiency may be improved by a means to
detect and correct for wheel-slip that does not require operator
attention.
[0018] According to the instant invention, when available torque
applied to the vehicle wheels exceeds the force the wheels can
transmit to the ground, the system disclosed herein detects
wheel-slip, whereupon, the controller directs that the resistance
to vehicle movement be reduced by raising the implement.
[0019] Turning to the condition where the implement engagement with
the earth does not result in vehicle wheel-slip, the controller may
direct the implement further into the earth. When the implement
engages the earth further, two conditions may result: 1) if as in
the circumstance above, the torque applied to the wheels exceeds
the force the wheels can transmit to the ground, or 2) the engine
output torque may not produce sufficient torque to cause
wheel-slip. In the first instance, the controller would then raise
incrementally the implement in response wheel-slip, as described
above. A second possible result is that vehicle torque output may
be increased. In such event, the controller may determine the
engine has additional power available within an efficient operating
range. Further, the controller may determine if the transmission
has available a gear setting having greater torque output. If
additional engine power is available, or a lower transmission gear
is available, then the controller may provide a signal resulting in
additional torque output from the engine, or a transmission
adjustment or a combination engine and transmission adjustments. If
available adjustments to engine and transmission do not result in
wheel-slip, and the engine is operating in an optimum range, then
the controller may direct that the implement be lowered to a still
further depth that initiates wheel-slip. If available adjustments
to engine and transmission do not result in wheel slip, and the
engine is operating at the edge of the acceptable operating
envelope further engine transmission adjustments are not within a
range of acceptable engine efficiency, then the controller will
initiate a signal to cause the blade to be incrementally raised
until the engine operation returns within the envelope of
acceptable engine efficiency.
[0020] As is customary, the foregoing decision tree may be
evaluated by the vehicle controller many times per minute, with
appropriate adjustments. FIG. 2 is an illustration of a decision
tree that may be programmed into the memory of the vehicle
controller. As used herein, a vehicle controller may be one or more
integrated circuit devices, including those on one or more
microchips that monitor the functions of vehicle engine,
transmission, implement position, vehicle position and generate
outputs that cause a change of the status of the vehicle engine,
transmission, implement position, vehicle position pursuant to
preprogrammed algorithms and data input. The vehicle controller
includes the capacity to receive, store, and access earth contour
data as established by a site plan.
[0021] The portion of the decision tree below line 30 that makes
use of the automated wheel-slip control and maximizes available
torque to the wheels from the vehicle engine may be utilized
independent of vehicle position data.
[0022] Above line 30 FIG. 2 illustrates controller decisions that
incorporate the wheel-slip feature and the maximization of
available torque and in addition limit the depth of the excavation
to the final earth contour to the contour established by a site
plan and downloaded to the vehicle controller.
[0023] The utilization of automated implement depth control can
further enhance vehicle efficiency when combined with topographical
data of the finished grade of the job site necessary to describe
the parameters of the surface of the earth representing a
completion of the excavation. By looping to include topographical
data according to FIG. 2, the algorithm may limit the implement
(such as a grader blade) from lowering the blade below the maximum
depth of the finished earth contour thereby providing an accurate
earth contour without cutting too deep necessitating backfilling
and sometimes compaction, or requiring the assistance of an on site
surveyor to continually check the grade with the desired final
earth contour.
[0024] In operation, the controller signals adjustment of blade
position by the interface of data of the power delivered to the
wheels to advance the grader that either does not result in
wheel-slip, or if wheel-slip result is permitted, that wheel slip
is reduced to exceed a permitted maximum. The algorithms of the
controller may rapidly determine wheel-slip from a comparison of
changes of GPS position which are less than the maximum distance
expected from the wheel rotation. When wheel-slip occurs, the
controller re-directs the electro-hydraulic cylinders 16, and 18 to
raise the blade by a programmed increment. The controller may then
repeat the program loop. If the wheel-slip condition continues,
then the blade is again raised by a programmed increment. The
controller repeats the loop until the wheel-slip condition is no
longer indicated by the comparison in the change of GPS position
compared with the expected travel distance from drive wheel
rotation.
[0025] Accomplished work is maximized by operating the engine in a
range of optimized performance and adjusting the blade height to
move the maximum volume of earth. If the controller determines that
additional work may be accomplished by the engine within an
optimized performance range, and that wheel-slip is not occurring,
then the controller may direct that the blade be lowered by a
programmed increment to increase the volume of earth moved. If
wheel-slip does not result from the lowered blade, the loop may be
repeated.
[0026] The correspondence of wheel-slip to actual change in
position may require calibration from time-to-time to account for:
tire wear which reduces the tire circumference and correspondingly
the distance traveled per wheel rotation, or tire pressure, which
may be raised or lowered to accommodate terrain conditions, a
change in the type of tire with which the vehicle is equipped such
as the addition of a `flotation` tire to accommodate terrain
conditions, or tire/wheel circumference may temporarily increase as
by a sticky clay type soil adhering to the tires. Calibration may
be quickly accomplished by appropriate algorithm and operator
interface while the vehicle is moving without resistance from the
excavation implement.
[0027] From the foregoing description it may be learned that the
controller may maximize the volume of work accomplished by
adjusting the blade height, engine torque output and transmission
gearing. The foregoing description assumes that the grader has
available, and is operating at a rate of, power sufficient to cause
wheel-spin rather than stall the grader engine. The controller may
also direct the blade height position under conditions where
wheel-slip does not occur, i.e., the power at the wheels does not
exceed the vehicle traction. The controller may also adjust the
blade height in response to engine power output selected by the
operator. If the engine revolutions per minute drops below the
operating limit programmed for the controller, then as in the case
of wheel-slip, the controller may direct that the blade be raised
by a programmed amount. Alternatively, or in combination, the
controller may direct that the power train shift to a lower gear to
provide more mechanical advantage to the engine. If the engine
revolutions continue below the programmed operating limit, then the
controller may repeat the command to raise the blade and/or shift
to a lower gear.
[0028] Alternatively, as in the case of power available in excess
of that necessary to cause wheel-slip, the controller may direct
that the blade be lowered by a programmed increment to increase the
volume of earth moved to the maximum at the rate of power
available.
[0029] An effective algorithm for the controller also permits the
operator to override the automated system to manually operate the
vehicle, the engine and blade.
[0030] Vehicle axis describes the forward/rearward direction of
travel while turning neither left nor right. Blade angle describes
the movement of a blade from the position perpendicular to the
vehicle axis whereby an end of the blade is moved forward or
rearward to an angle other than perpendicular to the vehicle axis.
Blade pitch may be described as movement of the top edge of the
blade generally along the vehicle axis forward and rearward with
respect to the lower blade edge so as to change the angle at which
the blade intersects level ground. Some blades are contoured in a
concave shape as viewed from the front of the vehicle. The
blade-ground angle of intersection in the case of curved blades in
such instance would relate to the angle created by the intersection
of a tangent to the curve of the blade with level ground. Blade
tilt involves raising, or lowering, one end of the blade relative
to the opposite end. A tilted blade digs deeper into the earth on
one side of the vehicle axis than on the other.
[0031] The blade functions of blade tilt, blade angle, and blade
pitch may also be adjusted by a controller appropriately programmed
according afore described feedback loop scheme.
[0032] As is evident from the foregoing description, the operation
of an earth contouring vehicle may be simplified by the automated
control system. Skilled operators may utilize the system as
desired. Operators having lower skill level may effectively and
efficiently operate an earth contouring vehicle without overloading
the vehicle drive train by reliance upon the automated system.
* * * * *