U.S. patent application number 14/109767 was filed with the patent office on 2014-06-26 for hybrid distribution method for playable media.
This patent application is currently assigned to Media Queue, LLC. The applicant listed for this patent is Media Queue, LLC. Invention is credited to John Nicholas Gross.
Application Number | 20140180933 14/109767 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 37188364 |
Filed Date | 2014-06-26 |
United States Patent
Application |
20140180933 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Gross; John Nicholas |
June 26, 2014 |
Hybrid Distribution Method for Playable Media
Abstract
A hybrid distribution system and method for
distributing/temporarily renting playable media items, such as
movies in a digital format. The distribution system includes a
first option in which a title is delivered in a ranking order
identified by the subscriber and based on an allocation priority
associated with the subscriber for such title. Alternatively the
subscriber can be given a second option to gain access rights to
the first title from a third party. In this manner a content
provider can manage different types of demand through a combination
of dedicated and third party inventory.
Inventors: |
Gross; John Nicholas;
(Berkeley, CA) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
Media Queue, LLC |
Tulsa |
OK |
US |
|
|
Assignee: |
Media Queue, LLC
Tulsa
OK
|
Family ID: |
37188364 |
Appl. No.: |
14/109767 |
Filed: |
December 17, 2013 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
11456535 |
Jul 10, 2006 |
8612311 |
|
|
14109767 |
|
|
|
|
10856909 |
May 28, 2004 |
8433622 |
|
|
11456535 |
|
|
|
|
11422727 |
Jun 7, 2006 |
|
|
|
10856909 |
|
|
|
|
10856909 |
May 28, 2004 |
8433622 |
|
|
11422727 |
|
|
|
|
60473985 |
May 28, 2003 |
|
|
|
60473985 |
May 28, 2003 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
705/307 |
Current CPC
Class: |
G06Q 30/0645 20130101;
G06F 21/10 20130101; G06Q 30/06 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
705/307 |
International
Class: |
G06Q 30/06 20060101
G06Q030/06 |
Claims
1-6. (canceled)
7. A hybrid method of distributing playable media items, the
playable media items corresponding to machine readable media
readable by an electronic media player, the method comprising: (a)
defining an inventory of playable media items selectable with a
computing system by subscribers to an online media service
provider; (b) providing temporary access to first playable media
items in said inventory in accordance with a first set of
distribution rules enforced by the computing system under control
of the online media service provider; said first set of
distribution rules further comprising a predetermined limit on a
number of titles which a subscriber can have out at one time; (c)
providing temporary access to second playable media items in said
inventory through a proxy provider in accordance with a second set
of distribution rules defined by the proxy provider; wherein at
least some of said second playable media items are supplied by the
online media service provider to said proxy provider; said second
set of distribution rules further comprising a predetermined time
limit by which titles must be returned by a subscriber; wherein
individual titles in said inventory can be delivered to subscribers
through a hybrid distribution system which includes two separate
temporary access options.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein said proxy provider has at least
one account with said online media service provider to secure
titles from said inventory of playable media items.
9. The method of claim 7, wherein said proxy provider facilitates a
transaction for a playable media item between the online media
service provider and a third party who is not a subscriber to the
online media service provider.
10. The method of claim 7, wherein said proxy provider also
performs receiving functions to receive titles back from the
subscriber.
11-26. (canceled)
Description
RELATED APPLICATION DATA
[0001] The present application claims priority to and is a
continuation of Ser. No. 10/856,909, which is hereby incorporated
by reference.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The present invention relates to electronic commerce systems
and methods of controlling purchase orders and/or rental selections
made by consumers, and providing automatic selections,
notifications, shipments and exchanges of new items. The invention
has particular applicability to applications in which entertainment
media are rented on a temporary or short term basis by subscribers
over the Internet.
BACKGROUND
[0003] The Internet is now being used for a number of commercial
purposes, including purchase and rental of movie films in different
media formats. One such popular website is maintained by
Netflix.RTM., where subscribers can search, review and select movie
titles (in DVD media format). If a particular title is available,
the subscriber's choice is then placed into a rental selection
"queue." During an interactive online session, a subscriber can
select a number of titles, and then prioritize them in a desired
order for shipment within the selection queue.
[0004] During this same sessions, the system can also make
recommendations for titles to a user using a well-known recommender
algorithm. Such algorithms are commonplace in a number of Internet
commerce environments, including at Amazon, CDNOW, and Netflix to
name a few. While the details of such algorithms are often
proprietary, the latter typically use a number of parameters for
determining a user's movie "tastes" so to speak, including
demographics, prior movie rentals, prior movie ratings, user
navigation statistics, comparison with other users, etc.
[0005] After the movie title selection session is over, the system
proceeds to ship the desired titles in the order requested by the
subscriber. The selections are mailed to the user in special
packaging, which include return mailers pre-printed and adapted for
such movie media. This minimizes the inconvenience to the
subscriber, but there is an indeterminate processing and mailing
delay therefore associated with each selection. In most instances,
a selection is mailed the same day, but even in such cases, there
is typically a three day transaction period associated between the
selection, processing, shipment, mail transit and receipt of a
particular title.
[0006] After shipment, these titles then appear in a list
identified essentially as items that are outstanding (i.e., movies
that have not yet been returned by the user) within a "titles out"
queue. Under the Netflix terms of service, the system places a
limit on the number of outstanding titles that a subscriber may
have at any one time (typically, a function of the level of service
agreement, with more $$/month resulting in more titles). Thus, if
the user selects more movies than they can acquire at one time, the
remaining movie titles remain as un-shipped items in the rental
selection queue. Additional titles in the rental selection queue
are only shipped to the user after the system logs a returned item
from that same user. This happens automatically, so the user does
not need to return to the Netflix website to request the
shipment.
[0007] A limitation of the aforementioned system is that while the
system automatically ships the next items in the rental queue it
fails to notify the subscriber when the rental queue is empty,
near-empty, or perhaps contains less desirable selections than
those that the user would otherwise select if they were aware of
more recent available titles. This is undesirable because if the
rental queue runs empty, the user is not made aware of the fact
that no additional titles are forthcoming. By the time the user
discovers that no new titles are in the rental queue, it is now no
longer possible for the subscriber to receive a new title any
earlier than the minimum delay period noted above (typically three
days). This is clearly unattractive from the subscriber's
perspective, especially since the latter typically pay a fixed fee
per month for the benefits of the Netflix service. In other words,
unless they constantly monitor their own rental queue to make sure
it is stocked with selections for shipping, subscribers run the
risk of being "title-less" for several days.
[0008] Aside from the lack of notification noted earlier, another
limitation of the Netflix system is that it does not give
subscribers any flexible degree of control over their rental
selection queue or shipments. For example, subscribers are not
given an option of whether a particular title in the rental queue
should be shipped; it is automatically shipped, even if they may
have changed their minds.
[0009] In addition, there is no barter or exchange available within
such systems for subscribers. For example, some subscribers may
wish a particular title, and others may have such title in a rental
selection queue available for shipping. By permitting the
subscribers to negotiate directly, demand could be satisfied
through another dynamic. Similarly, there is no provision in such
systems for identifying stock-out situations for particular
subscribers; i.e. situations where a subscriber has a long wait
associated with every entry in their rental queue. In such cases,
the subscriber's business can be lost, simply because he/she is not
receiving even a single title for several days or week. An
automatic exchange system, therefore, is greatly needed in this
instance, to reduce customer cancellations or defections.
[0010] Furthermore, subscribers cannot make optimal use of the
recommender system employed in the Netflix system. In other words,
while the latter provides recommendations of titles to users while
they are online during a particular session, it does not perform
any active monitoring of their selections after such time to see if
a new selection is now available that may be desirable for
consideration in (or automatic insertion into) their rental
selection queue. This further means that the Netflix system does
not provide any mechanism for monetizing such recommendations to
subscribers. Subscribers are not likely to object to a small
surcharge for specific rentals that are achieved by virtue of the
help of an automatic queue monitoring/recommendation system,
particularly when it would mean that they did not have to
constantly monitor and update their rental queue.
[0011] Thus, from a fundamental perspective, the Netflix system
(and other prior art systems like it) do not permit any significant
user interaction, control or monitoring of selections presented in
a rental queue. While the Netflix system has been operational for
several years, the aforementioned limitations have not been
appreciated or addressed, and thus remain a continuing problem.
Accordingly, there is clearly a long-felt need to remedy the
deficiencies of such system, and other systems which employ a type
of "queue" for handling customer selections/shipments of products,
including rental media.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0012] An object of the present invention, therefore, is to
overcome the aforementioned limitations of the prior art.
[0013] Another object is to implement an intelligent queue
monitoring system that allows subscribers/purchasers to define
policies and rules to be used in determining what actions should be
taken with respect to particular items in such queue, and at what
times;
[0014] A further object is to provide a notification system that
alerts and informs subscribers/purchasers of the status of items in
a rental/purchase queue;
[0015] A related object is to provide a feedback system that allows
subscribers/purchasers to react and provide intelligent feedback in
response to such notifications in a rental/purchase queue;
[0016] Still another object is to provide a recommender system that
coordinates with a queue monitoring system, so that the
subscribers/purchasers can enjoy the benefits of such system even
during periods when they are not actively engaged with an online
rental/purchase system;
[0017] Yet another object is to provide a monitoring system that
imposes an optional surcharge to subscribers/purchasers when they
avail themselves of recommendations generated and by an online
rental/purchase system.
[0018] A further object is to provide a system for encouraging
subscribers to given meaningful feedback to the quality of services
provided by Internet based companies;
[0019] Another object is to provide an exchange system (and
methods) to permit subscribers to offer, bid, negotiate and swap
titles (and access rights, capacity) directly, to improve overall
customer satisfaction and respond to demand through another
subscriber-based capacity tool;
[0020] A further object is to provide an automatic exchange system
(and methods) to identify situations in which it is beneficial to
intervene directly and attempt to satisfy a subscriber's rental
selection, such as by negotiating and swapping access rights to
titles directly with inducements;
[0021] Still another object is to provide for the ability to
automatically check titles for availability, instead of requiring a
manual inspection of titles;
[0022] Yet another object is to provide system for measuring an
overall shipping and return behavior and performance by a content
provider.
[0023] Still other objects are to provide associated related
methods of implementing the aforementioned systems.
[0024] A first aspect of the invention concerns a method of
distributing playable media items, the playable media items
corresponding to machine readable media readable by a subscriber
machine player. The method generally comprises the steps of (a)
setting up a subscriber delivery queue for a subscriber, the
subscriber delivery queue consisting of a list of one or more
playable media items to be delivered to the subscriber; the
subscriber delivery queue is set up at least in part in response to
item selection directions provided by the subscriber; (b) setting
up delivery rules for the subscriber delivery queue, which delivery
rules include a randomized delivery option, under which option
playable media items are shipped to the subscriber in a random
sequence.
[0025] In a preferred approach, a priority right for limited number
of the list of one or more playable media items is granted in
exchange for the subscriber selecting the randomized delivery
option. For some applications, the subscriber delivery queue
includes a list of N ordered items ranked in priority by the
subscriber, and the randomized delivery option causes one of M top
ranked items to be sent to the subscriber.
[0026] For DVD rental applications, the playable media items are
digital versatile disks delivered by mail. The randomized delivery
option is done by determining which title has a lowest demand in a
set of top ranked items for such subscriber, and replacing a
priority for receipt of a title between such subscriber and another
subscriber.
[0027] Another aspect of the invention is directed to a method of
distributing playable media items, the playable media items
corresponding to machine readable media readable by a subscriber
machine player. In this instance the method generally comprises the
steps of: (a) setting up a subscriber delivery queue for a
subscriber at a media rental provider computer, the subscriber
delivery queue consisting of a list of one or more playable media
items to be delivered to the subscriber; (b) receiving a request
from the subscriber to automatically create a delivery schedule for
the list of one or more playable media items; (c) processing the
list of one or more playable media items to generate the delivery
schedule for the subscriber, which delivery schedule identifies a
playable media item title and a delivery order for the same; and
delivering the playable media items on the list in accordance with
the delivery schedule. In this fashion, a subscriber can know with
some predictability and certainty which titles will be delivered at
what times. In exchange, a rental service can better schedule and
control demand.
[0028] Still another aspect of the invention is a method of
distributing playable media items, the playable media items
corresponding to machine readable media readable by a subscriber
machine player, in which the method comprises the steps of:
offering a set of playable media items for rental; setting up a
subscriber delivery queue for a subscriber, the subscriber delivery
queue consisting of a list of one or more playable media items to
be delivered to the subscriber; in some instances, at least some of
the one or more playable media items are high demand items which
can have an unavailable or relatively long wait status due to
demand for such items; and designating at least some of the high
demand items as immediate rental items which can be received in
exchange for additional consideration from the subscriber. This
allows for a "rent now" feature which may be useful in some
environments.
[0029] In some applications, the high demand item is not "counted"
against a maximum out number available to the subscriber. The high
demand items can be set aside as a subset of inventory available
for such titles, so that there is always an available pool of
materials for such treatment.
[0030] Another aspect of the invention concerns a method of
distributing playable media items whereby the method comprises the
steps of: (a) setting up a subscriber delivery queue for a
subscriber at a media rental provider computer, the subscriber
delivery queue consisting of a list of one or more playable media
items to be delivered to the subscriber;
[0031] wherein at any moment in time the subscriber can have a
maximum of N separate titles in a delivered queue; (b) receiving a
request from the subscriber to designate a first title from the
list of one or more playable media items as a preferred title,
whereby the preferred title is designated to have a weighting
factor M where M>1; (c) processing the list of one or more
playable media items to identify a title to be shipped to the
subscriber, wherein during the processing, the preferred title is
given an additional weighting based on the weighting factor M; (d)
effectively decreasing a value of N when the preferred title is
selected for delivery to the subscriber, such that the preferred
title is treated so as to require more than a single delivery slot
in the delivered queue. In this type of distribution scheme, a user
can trade capacity for availability, so that a particular desired
title can be secured even if it were otherwise not possible given a
particular priority for such subscriber.
[0032] Another aspect of the invention concerns a method of
distributing playable media items, the playable media items
corresponding to machine readable media readable by a subscriber
machine player, where the method comprises the steps of: setting up
a subscriber delivery queue for a subscriber at a media rental
provider computer, the subscriber delivery queue consisting of an
ordered list of one or more playable media items identified in an
order to be delivered to the subscriber; wherein at any moment in
time the subscriber can have a maximum of N separate titles of
playable media items in a delivered queue, and titles are moved to
the delivered queue in accordance with the order; receiving a
request from the subscriber to designate a first playable media
item as a preferred item, wherein the preferred item may or may not
be available for immediate movement to the delivered queue; wherein
the preferred item is designated to be moved to the delivered queue
when it becomes available, even if another item in the ordered list
of one or more playable media items is available and there is
capacity available in the subscriber delivery queue.
[0033] In this approach, a subscriber can designate that certain
titles can "bump" other titles; or, alternatively, even if they are
not immediately available, they can still be treated so as to
supplant an otherwise next-to-shipped item in the subscriber queue.
For some applications the first title can be automatically selected
for the subscriber, such as by a recommender system. In some cases
it may be desirable to present the title to the subscriber and have
it approved before it replaces another title.
[0034] It will be understood from the Detailed Description that the
inventions can be implemented in a multitude of different
embodiments. Furthermore, it will be readily appreciated by skilled
artisans that such different embodiments will likely include only
one or more of the aforementioned objects of the present
inventions. Thus, the absence of one or more of such
characteristics in any particular embodiment should not be
construed as limiting the scope of the present inventions. While
described in the context of a rental system, it will be apparent to
those skilled in the art that the present teachings could be used
in any Internet based rental or purchase system that employs a
queue of some form.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0035] FIG. 1 is an illustration of a queue status interface
employed in the present invention that is adapted for assisting
users/subscribers to monitor the status of a rental queue;
[0036] FIG. 2 is an illustration of a queue control electronic
interface employed in the present invention that is adapted for
assisting users/subscribers to set up queue monitoring control
parameters, queue notification parameters, queue replenishment
parameters and other queue control options;
[0037] FIG. 3A depicts an embodiment of a first type of email
notification provided to a subscriber in accordance with the
teachings of the present invention;
[0038] FIG. 3B depicts an embodiment of a second type of email
notification provided to a subscriber in accordance with the
teachings of the present invention;
[0039] FIG. 3C depicts an embodiment of a typical email
confirmation screen provided to a subscriber in accordance with the
teachings of the present invention;
[0040] FIG. 4 illustrates a preferred process employed in a
preferred embodiment of a queue control system of the present
invention;
[0041] FIG. 5 illustrates a preferred process utilized in a
preferred embodiment of a subscriber queue control set up system of
the present invention;
[0042] FIG. 6 illustrates an exemplary process for generating a
recommendation profile for a subscriber suitable for use in the
present invention;
[0043] FIG. 7 illustrates an embodiment of a media distribution
system that distributes media in accordance with the teachings of
the present invention;
[0044] FIG. 8 illustrates a process employed in a subscriber based
media title exchange system in accordance with the teachings of the
present invention;
[0045] FIG. 9 illustrates a process employed in an automatic media
title exchange system in accordance with the teachings of the
present invention;
[0046] FIG. 10 depicts an availability monitoring process that can
be employed in embodiments of the present invention;
[0047] FIG. 11 depicts a shipping/returns monitoring process that
can be employed in embodiments of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0048] Subscriber Queue Status Interface
[0049] FIG. 1 illustrates an example of a queue status interface
100 employed in the present invention that is adapted for assisting
users/subscribers to set up a queue monitoring system for
monitoring the status of a rental queue for renting/purchasing
playable media items, and specific set up controls for such
monitoring. While the present preferred embodiment is directed to a
rental service for distributing DVD movie titles, it will be
understood by those skilled in the art that, as used herein, the
term "media item" or "playable media item" is intended to have its
broadest meaning to include any machine readable media readable
(including software programs) by a subscriber machine player (such
as a DVD player, a computer, a video recorder/receiver, an audio CD
ROM Player, and the like). Furthermore, other queable content/items
that are not machine readable could be distributed in this fashion
as well, including human readable materials such as printed matter
in the form of books, magazines, and other general purpose items.
Other useful articles can be rented and distributed in accordance
with the present teachings as well.
[0050] During an interactive session with a subscriber over a
network (such as the Internet), queue status interface 100 is
generated under control of a media distribution system (such as an
Internet Server maintained by a media distribution provider as
shown in FIG. 7) as a World Wide Web (WWW) web page and presented
within a client device (i.e., some form of computing system) within
a browser software program. The details of such servers, client
devices, browsers, and WWW page codings are well known, and are not
material to the present invention. Those skilled in the art will
appreciate that any number of combinations of such elements will
interoperate with the present invention. As part of electronic
interface 100, a number of viewable fields are presented to a user
by a WWW page for visualizing media distribution information,
which, in a preferred embodiment, are movie titles distributed in a
DVD format. These include, in this instance three primary areas:
[0051] a first display area 105 depicting status of a Titles Out
Queue 106; [0052] a second display area 111 depicting status of a
Subscriber Selection Queue 110; [0053] a third display area 115
depicting what Queue Control Options 116 are in place; [0054] an
(optional) avatar FIG. 120 representing a "Queue Keeper" character
to assist subscribers;
[0055] Other aspects of a WWW page commonly associated with such
types of rental distribution systems (search engines, ads,
administrative options, links to other related pages of the site)
are not shown in FIG. 1 (or FIG. 2) so as to better emphasize the
nature of the present invention. Thus, it will be understood, of
course, that other items may be present and displayed within such
page(s), including other URL tags, Java applets, etc. along with
header 125.
[0056] As is apparent, Titles Out Queue 106 identifies a first list
of movie titles (AAA, BBB, CCC) that are designated with a first
deployment status, namely, that they are still "out" to the
subscriber in an out queue. In other words, the subscriber still
has these titles outstanding in his/her possession, or they are in
transit (to or from the subscriber). This display area is formatted
essentially the same as a prior art system described earlier. As
noted earlier, in a typical fixed price rental service, the
capacity of a Titles Out queue is typically fixed to some
predetermined number, so that the subscriber cannot exceed this
limit without additional authorization.
[0057] Second display area 110 identifies a second list of movie
titles (DDD through HHH) in a Subscriber Selection Queue 116 that
have a second deployment status, namely, that they have been
selected by the subscriber but are still waiting to be distributed.
Generally speaking these titles are to be distributed to the
subscriber when space is made available in Titles Out queue 106
shown in first field 105--although other schemes are possible.
Typically, in a prior art system, a movie title (such as entry 111)
is moved from Subscriber Selection Queue 110 to the Titles Out
Queue 106 when it is actually shipped (or otherwise distributed) to
the subscriber. This in turn happens in response to the fact that
one of the movies from the Titles Out queue 106 list is returned by
the subscriber, or in some cases upon some other triggering event
(such as the subscriber altering a subscription level). Unlike
Titles Out queue 106, Subscriber Selection Queue 110 is usually not
fixed to some predetermined capacity (but it can be if desired).
Accordingly, a subscriber can load as many of his his/her
preferences in advance as they desire.
[0058] In some instances a subscriber may in fact "overload" a
Subscriber Selection Queue 116 because they have limited access
opportunities to monitor their selections, or they simply do not
wish to constantly monitor later for new selections that may be
available. Nonetheless, this situation is not optimal, because
subscribers are often forced to select what can be described as
essentially second rate (or even third rate selections) during a
particular session/visit, simply because they do not have time to
visit the site at a later time to check for new releases or other
selections that may be more to their liking. One advantage that can
be realized in queue monitoring embodiments of the present
invention is the fact that this requirement of overloading by the
subscriber (which takes time) is avoided because the system
automatically ensures that his/her preference queue is never
allowed to completely run "dry" so to speak.
[0059] As can be seen in second display area 111, Subscriber
Selection Queue 110 contains a number of rows which identify
particular subscriber selections, and a number of columns which
provide unique information about a particular selection. As an
example, in row 112, a subscriber selection is associated with the
following queue control information: (1) a selection priority
indicator (a numerical ranking within the queue to indicate where
the title ranks in sequence to be shipped); (2) a selection title
(in this case DDD); (3) a selection availability (in this case
indicating that the title is available at this time); (4) and a
selection type (in this case, the letter "P" indicating that the
subscriber personally selected the title). In contrast, for
example, a selection 112' indicates that the selection was
automatically selected for the subscriber by the present system (by
the letter "A" designation). In some embodiments, an additional
designation (such as an * for example) can be used to designate
those titles which have been automatically selected (or reserved)
but not yet finally approved (or confirmed) by the subscriber.
Thus, this serves to designate a form of tentative selection.
[0060] Another characteristic of such systems is the fact that
while a first title may be prioritized by the subscriber higher
than a second title in the Subscriber Selection Queue 110, this
does not mean that the first title will be shipped first. This is
because, in many cases, the systems are configured so that if the
first title is not yet available, the next title after this is
examined to see if it is available instead. Thus, if possible, the
system attempts to ship "a" title to the subscriber. A limitation
of this, of course, is that the subscriber can sometimes be left
with only titles that are unavailable, or which have a long wait.
In such instances, again, the subscriber is not satisfied, because
there is an inordinate amount of time between deliveries. The
present invention can accommodate for such problematic scenarios,
as well, both by informing the subscriber of such scenarios, and by
further taking proactive steps to remedy the logjam (as explained
below in connection with the exchange mechanism).
[0061] It will be appreciated, of course, that this is merely
exemplary media selection information, and other information could
be provided on an as-needed or as-desired basis. Furthermore, it
will be understood by those skilled in the art that while movies
are used as an example, other items can be easily incorporated
within an electronic interface 100 of the present invention, and
that the nature of the interface will of course vary according to
the type of media item presented.
[0062] Queue Control Options display area 115 is unique to the
present invention. This field identifies a set of subscriber queue
control options in place for a subscriber, as well as links to
additional features by which the subscriber can add or modify such
options. Thus, as shown, an exemplary set of subscriber queue
control options 116 indicate that the subscriber wishes that a
queue monitor system monitor the Subscriber Selection Queue 110 and
with controls such that: [0063] 1. when his/her queue is completely
empty (i.e., there are no titles left in Subscriber Delivery Queue
116 to be moved to a Titles Out Queue 106); [0064] 2. a notice will
be sent indicating such fact, and a new title will be automatically
shipped (or distributed). [0065] 3. the selection of the title
should be automatically recommended by the service provider) based
on prior ratings provided by the subscriber for other films
[0066] Other options will be discussed below, and it will be
understood that this is simply an example of the many different
types of setups that could be used by a subscriber.
[0067] A queue control setup link 117 is provided (i.e., using a
highlighted link within the web page 100) to allow a subscriber to
alter or modify subscriber queue control options 116 through the
use of an additional web page (shown below in FIG. 2). A legend
area 118 provides a notice to the subscriber that an additional
(optional) fee may be charged for selections that are automatically
shipped in this fashion.
[0068] Finally, an electronic avatar 120 is further provided to
interact and assist the subscriber with features of the queue
monitoring system of the present invention. Since some aspects of
the invention may be foreign or unfamiliar to certain types of
subscribers, it may be desirable to include some human like
interaction in such cases. In this instance, electronic avatar 120
is generally referred to and designated as a "Queue Keeper" to
denote to subscribers that (as with a "zoo" keeper for example)
another entity is attentive, responsive and mindful of their
preferences and desires as concerns movie selections, and is
working on their behalf behind the scenes so to speak to effectuate
their wishes and desires. Avatar 120 can take on a variety of
customized appearance desired by the user in accordance with
well-known techniques. In some incarnations avatar 120 can also
provide visual feedback to a user by way of facial expressions
(frowning, smiling, etc.) to respond to user input. The avatar can
in turn communicate to a user both by text, audio output, etc.
[0069] Again, other examples of the fields discussed above will be
apparent to skilled artisans as simple design choices based on the
particular characteristics of the display being used, and the type
of media being rented. Furthermore, to better illustrate the
features of the present invention, other aspects of interface 100
have been omitted, and it will be understood that such interface
could include other options, features, entries, etc., that are not
specifically shown. Finally, as will be apparent to skilled
artisans, it is possible in home video recorded/satellite receiver
systems that interface 100 (and the other interfaces described
herein) will be generated and driven by a menu program within such
systems, and not by connection of a browser to a WWW page per
se.
Notification, Shipping and Recommendation Preference Setup
[0070] FIG. 2 illustrates a queue control electronic interface
employed in the present invention that is adapted for assisting
users/subscribers to set up queue monitoring control parameters,
queue notification parameters, queue replenishment parameters and
other queue control options. It will be understood, of course, that
many of these display areas/fields could be integrated as desired
into queue status interface 100 as well if desired.
[0071] As can be seen herein, a queue monitoring system can be
configured to be extremely active, mostly passive, or something in
between, all the subscriber's control. Furthermore, all or most of
these services/features can be monetized if desired by a service
provider to enhance profitability as well as customer
satisfaction.
[0072] Accordingly, a first preference display area 210 provides a
short description of the reasons and functions associated with the
queue monitoring system to interested subscribers. A preliminary
question is posed to the subscriber, such as, for example, whether
they want to employ the benefits of auto queue monitoring, auto
notifications, auto recommendations, auto shipments, etc. At this
point, if the subscriber wishes to simply elect certain default
values (shown in shaded form in the interface) he/she simply
selects a FINISHED field 295, and the choices indicated by such
shadings would then be stored for such subscriber. If the user
prefers not to use a queue monitoring logic feature, they can
depress the CANCEL field 296 and return to the prior interface.
[0073] Alternatively, assuming that the subscriber wishes to select
their own customized controls, they then interact with and select
from a number of selection areas within interface 200. The nature
of the questions and selections posed in such interface areas is
preferably designed to allow even less experienced computer users
to glean the meaning of the options presented.
[0074] In some instances, as suggested earlier, the service
provider may want to charge a monthly fee for such monitoring
services, as well as additional fees for each title that is
reserved or shipped. In other instances, a service provider may
provide the monitoring service free of charge (or particular
selections free of charge) based on a subscriber's service level,
and/or maintaining a level of average turn-around time that is
below a certain threshold. In other words, if a subscriber
routinely receives and returns titles within a few days, this
practice helps in managing inventory and in spreading
out/satisfying demand for media inventory, particularly popular
titles. Thus, in contrast to many brick and mortar enterprises
which punish late rentals with penalties/fees, the present
invention in fact attempts to reward early rental returns with
various incentives. Accordingly as this type of behavior can be
rewarded, including through non-monetary considerations such as the
services described herein, this further enhances the useability and
marketability of a service provider system configured as described
herein.
[0075] Thus in a second preference display area 220, a so-called
queue trigger threshold question is first posed to the subscriber.
In other words, "when" should the queue monitoring logic review
Subscriber Selection Queue 110? As seen in this area of interface
200, the subscriber is given four threshold options, including
generally the following: (1) when the Subscriber Selection Queue
110 becomes completely empty (i.e., as a result of moving the last
selection into Titles Out Queue 106); (2) when the number of
remaining titles in Subscriber Selection Queue 110 falls below a
certain number (selectable by the user) of movies left; (3) when a
desirable selection is available at the service provider (as
determined by certain auto-recommend logic described herein); (4)
at certain predetermined (selectable by the user) time
intervals--i.e., every day, every week, etc. Some of these options
are not mutually exclusive, and, therefore they can be selected in
tandem of course. Other options may be employed, as well, depending
on the nature of the media, subscriber preferences, etc.
[0076] Threshold Option #1 (default) of course is the least
"proactive" of course, but still serves to accomplish the goal of
reducing the chances that the Subscriber Selection Queue 110 will
become completely empty. In some instances it may be desirable to
incorporate a "swap" feature, for example, that operates as a last
minute check. Thus, when the system detects that the last selection
to be moved into Titles Out Queue 106 is less desirable than
another selection that is available, the user can opt for the
better selection to be shipped instead (either automatically, or
through an email confirmation), thus avoiding a wasted shipment,
wasted time, etc. In another variation the user can also set up a
limited response period (i.e., 1 day) so that if he/she does not
reply favorably to the new choice, the original choice is shipped
as planned to avoid delays.
[0077] Threshold Option #2 gives additional flexibility for a
variety of reasons. First, if there are lesser desirable selections
remaining, these can be supplemented by (or even swapped out for)
better selections before the former are actually moved into Titles
Out Queue 106 for shipment. Furthermore, in some instances it may
be desirable for the system to compare user selections (which may
be identified in a queue with a high priority) against
automatically recommended selections (which may be identified with
a lower priority but predicted to be more "desirable" to the
subscriber) to see if the latter should "bump" the former in
shipping priority. Again, this serves to improve the overall user
experience by ensuring that better quality selections are actually
shipped and received.
[0078] Threshold Option #3 is useful for ensuring that the
Subscriber Selection Queue 110 is continually updated with better
or fresher selections to supplement those that might be present in
the queue. For example, if a new release comes out that is likely
to be of interest, the user is not required to physically log on to
the site, look for, review or study the particular selection.
Instead, the system automatically determines this for the
subscriber, and adds the same to his/her Subscriber Selection Queue
110. In some instances, an additional control could be added to
make sure that these types of selections are merely designated as
"tentative" until the subscriber accepts them into his/her
selection queue. Again, since this feature acts as a form of
"reserve" it is possible that the service provider could associate
a fee for such preferential treatment. Furthermore it may be
desirable to automatically move such popular selections into the
Titles Out Queue 106 to ensure that they are quickly received, seen
and returned by the subscriber for use by other subscribers.
[0079] Threshold Option #4 replaces the typical user experience of
logging on every day, week, month, etc., to check for titles, and
is useful as an additional check for the subscriber to make sure
that any interesting selections have been considered. Again, in
some instances, and particularly where third party monitoring
services are used, a nominal fee could be associated with
"checking" the Subscriber Selection Queue 110.
[0080] A third preference display area 230 is used to specify
options for "what" the system should do when the so-called
triggering threshold is met. Again, these notification selections
can vary from very simple directives, to very detailed
instructions, and it will be understood that what is shown in FIG.
2 is merely exemplary of what can be provided.
[0081] Notification Option #1 indicates that only a notification
should be sent to the subscriber when the triggering threshold is
reached. Preferably this information is sent electronically to
ensure expedient receipt by the subscriber. For instance, a simple
e-mail, text message or instant message could be used. In other
instances a hard-copy regular mail notice could be sent as well.
The content/substance of a preferred notification is discussed
below in connection with FIG. 3A.
[0082] Notification Option #2 indicates that a notification should
be sent to the subscriber when the triggering threshold is reached,
and that an additional media title should be automatically selected
(and if necessary shipped), without further prompting or feedback
from the subscriber. This option may be desirable by some types of
subscribers who do not wish to be bothered with the task of
selecting titles. An additional reminder field can be associated
with this option, so the subscriber can indicate how often he/she
should receive notices. This is useful so that if the Subscriber
Selection Queue 110 is not replenished within a certain time frame,
the subscriber can receive another notice.
[0083] In response to the subscriber selecting Notification Option
#3, the system will skip any official notification to the
subscriber, and simply select a new title to be inserted into
Subscriber Selection Queue 110 or Titles Out Queue 106. Again, this
option may be of interest to certain subscribers who prefer not to
receive additional emails.
[0084] Notification Option #4 gives the subscriber more control, in
that a notification is sent, but it specifically directs the system
NOT to actually move a title into Subscriber Selection Queue 110
(or Titles Out Queue 106 as the case may be) until an actual or
"constructive" confirmation is obtained. An actual confirmation
would require, for example, that the subscriber either visit the
site to remove a tentative designation, confirm the shipment in a
later e-mail, etc. A constructive confirmation can be based on
time, for example, so that the system will automatically remove any
tentative designation (if such exists) and move or ship the title
within a predetermined (controlled by the user) number of days.
[0085] A fourth preference display area 240 is used to specify
options for "how" the system should replenish or supplement the
Subscriber Selection Queue 110. Again, these replenishment/addition
options can vary significantly according to the type of media,
other system features, etc., and it will be understood that what is
shown in FIG. 2 is merely exemplary of what can be provided.
[0086] In the present invention, the service provider preferably
automatically recommends a title to be included in Subscriber
Selection Queue 110/Titles Out Queue 106. A variety of artificial
intelligence, or preference determination systems are known in the
art for predicting preferences of individuals. These systems work
based on such simple factors as demographics, prior selections,
expressed preferences, questionnaires, etc.
[0087] In the present system, an auto-recommend feature can be
based, for example, on prior ratings given by a subscriber to
certain movies which he/she has seen, and/or just based on the
identity if all prior rentals. In this instance, the system uses
prior ratings by default, as these tend to more accurately reflect
a particular individual's tastes. However, the invention is by no
means limited to any particular mechanism, and it will be
understood that any suitable system can be employed for this
purpose. The only criterion, of course, is that recommender should
work in the background, seamlessly and without extensive burdensome
participation by the subscriber so that the queue is automatically
replenished.
[0088] Additional replenishment options are based on various
categories of selections available at the media service provider.
Thus, a subscriber can ask that any automatic selection be
restricted to one or more particular categories, such as a New
Release, a particular genre, a particular collection, from the top
100 most popular choices, from a Critic's choice selection, etc.
Again, additional fees may be identified and collected for New
Releases or other categories of titles. Other examples will be
apparent.
[0089] Finally, a fifth preference display area 250 provides
additional levels of queue management control. For example, in
response to a Queue Management Option #1, a subscriber can elect to
have any new automatically selected title "bump" the next to be
shipped item in the Subscriber Selection Queue 110. In some
instances, additional sub-control features can be employed so that
the new automatically selected item "always" bumps such existing
queue item, or only does so when it is of a higher preference for
the particular user. Again, this type of feature can be used to
further improve the overall experience by the subscriber, who is
then ensured to receive media that is more tailored to their
particular tastes. Alternatively, a Queue Management Option #2 can
be selected, in which case the auto recommended title is simply
placed in the order in Subscriber Selection Queue 110 behind any
other existing entries. In such instance, the item will be shipped
automatically after the other entries are shipped, unless the
subscriber specifically vetoes such selection either during a
notification process, or manually later by visiting the site on
his/her own.
[0090] In yet another (optional) Queue Management Option #3, a
subscriber can elect to have entries moved into Subscriber
Selection Queue 110 and simply designated as tentative. In such
cases, these types of titles are NOT automatically shipped unless
the subscriber specifically requests such action at a later time.
Thus, any such entries can essentially float in the queue until
they are given a non-tentative status. This allows for subscribers
to further designate a class of selections for which they are not
entirely sure that they want shipped, but which can wait in
abeyance in the queue until they are confirmed. Again, to ensure
that subscribers make fair use of such system, it may be desirable
to charge a fee for any title that is reserved in this fashion, and
even if it is not actually shipped.
[0091] As a final note, it will be understood by those skilled in
the art that at least some of the options presented in the
Threshold, Notification, Replenishment and Management are related
to each other, and that additional selection logic would be
employed to make sure that the subscriber elects options in such
areas that are consistent with each other. Thus, for example, if
the subscriber selects Notification Option #3 (autoship without
notice) they will NOT be presented with Queue Management Option #3,
to avoid a conflict in the management logic. To avoid such
possibilities, the system can selectively enable and disable
options between display areas based on the user's selections. Other
examples will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
[0092] The final fields in interface 200 represent standard
FINISHED 270 and CANCEL 271 operations. If the user is done
providing his/her preferences, the FINISHED field 270 is activated,
the preference data is saved, and the user is taken back to
Interface 100. If the user merely selects CANCEL 271, no changes
are saved.
[0093] Again, it will be understood from the present description
that preference interface 200 shown in FIG. 2 is merely exemplary,
and that any particular commercial implementation is likely to
deviate from the same. Furthermore, it is not necessary to include
all the options indicated, and other options could be substituted
in lieu of the same. Accordingly, the final look of any interface
is expected to be a matter of routine design skill based on
particular needs of a particular media service provider and their
respective subscribers.
Electronic Notification, Confirmations & Feedback
[0094] An exemplary notification message 300 in accordance with the
present teachings is shown in FIG. 3A. As noted earlier, this
message is preferably an email based text/graphics message with
embedded links that can be clicked through by a recipient. For
example, as seen in FIG. 3A, a notification message header 310
contains basic identifying information, including a sender field,
recipient field, and a byline field. An optional graphical
character can be included to associate message 300 with a queue
keeper.
[0095] A first message notice field 320 includes information
pertaining to a basic notice that would be elected pursuant to
Notice Option #1 or #2 above. This would also be sent after a
period of time that exceeds a subscriber default confirmation time
as provided in Notice Option #3 above. Again, the description
provided in FIG. 3A is merely exemplary, and any suitable form can
be used for the notice. An additional optional clickably URL could
be embedded in the message to permit the subscriber to see the
status of their particular Subscriber Selection Queue 110. A
further optional field could identify, by title, an additional
selection already pre-selected for the subscriber to consider for
inclusion in their Subscriber Selection Queue 110 when he/she
visits the media service provider site.
[0096] In the event the subscriber has elected some kind of
auto-ship feature as well from the configuration options above, the
message 300 can include an additional second message ship field
330. This field provides details on the title of the automatically
selected item for the subscriber, and an approximate shipping date
for the same. Again, optional clickable URLs are embedded in the
message to permit the subscriber to see more information about the
item in question.
[0097] An additional feedback link field 335 causes an additional
feedback window to open for the subscriber to provide his/her
feedback on the quality of the selection made by the queue
monitoring logic. This can be implemented in any conventional
fashion, using numerical rankings, sliders, etc. The feedback data
can be tabulated to monitor the performance of the queue monitoring
logic, to compile user preferences, etc.
[0098] A confirmation field 340 provides an opportunity for a
subscriber to opt-out of receiving the preselected item. A
clickable URL link is thus provided for the user to change or
cancel the particular selection.
[0099] FIG. 3B illustrates yet another example of a
confirmation-request type notice 300 which may be sent in
accordance with selecting notification option #3 above. In this
type of notice, a user is informed of the fact that a queue
monitoring system has identified a title that he/she may be
interested in, and a specific request for feedback is made to
confirm acceptability of the choice. Thus, in the body of such
message, a subscriber is given essentially the same information as
for the message of FIG. 3A, except that a click through to a
specific URL is made to cause the subscriber to interact with an
interface shown in FIG. 3C. As shown in FIG. 3C, a subscriber can
then elect to have the item shipped, not shipped, or even have the
title modified for another selection. Again, an optional ratings
field can then be employed to solicit feedback on the performance
of the system for monitoring purposes, for updating a subscriber
profile, for use by a recommender system, etc.
[0100] It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the
above are merely examples of a type of notification that can be
sent to subscribers. The precise format, wording and style will be
a matter of design choice for any particular application, and the
invention is not limited by the same. Again, the primary advantage
of the present invention lies in the fact that, unlike the prior
art systems, a subscriber is notified of the deficiency in his/her
selection queue, and is thus given an opportunity to address the
same in a prompt fashion.
[0101] Furthermore, an ancillary benefit to the service provider is
that they can determine, from available inventory, particular
titles which may be of interest to subscribers, and ship them as a
way of "filling" subscriber queues in advance. This can be done,
again, by auto-recommender systems, such as by the Cinematch system
employed by Netflix, or other comparable system. In other words,
every title preemptively shipped by the service provider acts to
supplant a subscriber choice that may be harder to satisfy (i.e.,
because the desired title is scarce). For example, if the service
determines that a customer is highly likely to enjoy title A, if
the subscriber agrees to select title A, and if the title is
shipped to the subscriber, this fills an available spot in the
Titles Out Queue 106 and reduces the expectation/opportunity by the
subscriber of receiving another (potentially more popular) title.
This further frees up an opportunity for the service provider to
ship the more popular title to another subscriber, thus giving more
flexibility in responding to demand. Furthermore, a service
provider can determine which titles have a higher profit margin
(i.e., lower sharing expenses with distributors, studios, etc.) and
control the distribution of titles more closely using cost/profit
as an additional factor as well.
[0102] Finally, it should be noted that this type of proactive
inventory management helps to expand the reach and desirability of
the system to other types of would-be renters, including persons
who are too busy, lazy, or unable to determine appropriate choices
on their own. Moreover, since some renters are impulsive, they can
be presented automatically with title choices to increase their
participation rates as well.
[0103] In other circumstances, a notice can be sent automatically
to those subscribers (i.e., without a setup process by a
subscriber) upon determining that their rental selection queue only
contains titles that are unavailable (or subject to a long wait).
In those instances, again, it is preferable to alert a subscriber
to such fact before an undue amount of time passes, and so the
subscriber (and/or the system) can take some form of corrective
action.
[0104] Of course, from a customer satisfaction perspective it makes
no sense to send a title that is likely to be undesirable to a
subscriber, so it is imperative to select good alternative choices,
and this practice must be tempered to some extent. Furthermore, it
may be desirable, in some instances, to not impose a fee for an
automatic recommendation if the title in question is not
particularly popular, or based on the subscriber's status (i.e., if
he/she is a preferred customer, has a certain subscription level,
etc.) Nonetheless, it should be apparent that the monitoring logic
of the present invention can operate to spread out demand for
popular titles, while achieving a greater degree of customer
satisfaction, and increasing reach of the service provider to other
audiences.
Operation of the Preferred Embodiment
[0105] A preferred Auto-Notify/Auto-Ship process 400 used by a
media distribution system with intelligent queue monitoring
configured in accordance with the present inventions is illustrated
in FIG. 4. Again, as noted herein, such process is expected to be
embodied in a variety of software programs, routines, etc., that
run on one more servers coupled to the Internet. In other
embodiments these programs and routines will run directly on a
computing machine at the subscriber's premises, such as a digital
video recorder, receiver, etc.
[0106] As a first step, a subscriber configures his/her preferences
as noted in step 405, including the various options noted above in
connection with FIG. 2. In the event that a ratings survey is
determined at step 410 to be necessary from the subscriber (i.e.,
there is insufficient information for a recommender system to
generate a meaningful recommendation for a title) this is
effectuated at steps 415 (present ratings schedule) and 420
(tabulate profile) at which time a preliminary preference profile
is created and maintained thereafter for the particular subscriber.
As noted below, recommender systems are well-known in the art, and
the present invention can thus be used with any number of suitable
implementations. The present invention enhances the value of such
recommender systems, in fact, by more proactively "pushing"
valuable, interesting and high profit margin titles to subscribers
in an optimal location along the distribution chain. Furthermore,
in some implementations a recommender system can further consider a
title popularity, a subscriber status, a subscriber turn-around
time for titles, etc., before finalizing a particular choice, to
ensure that a title is appropriate and/or cost-effective for a
particular subscriber. As an example, a very popular new release
may be recommended only to certain kinds of subscribers who
routinely return titles quickly.
[0107] After such initialization steps, a queue monitoring
procedure is performed in a loop-like fashion at step 410, again,
in accordance with the directives selected by the subscriber,
and/or in conjunction with other instructions from a service
provider. If no triggering event is detected at step 430, the
system returns back to a monitoring mode.
[0108] When a triggering event is detected, the system then
generates an auto-recommended title at step 435 for the particular
subscriber using the subscriber's preference profile. A preliminary
preference profile is obtained as noted above, and is supplemented
later, of course, with additional feedback from the user and
observation of user selections. A number of conventional and
customized programs can be configured for performing this type of
task; for example, Netflix uses a system identified as Cinematch
for such purpose. Other alternatives are of course acceptable, and
could be used with the present system to ensure a title that is
likely to be of interest to the subscriber. Again, in some
embodiments, the system may merely alert the subscriber to the
queue deficiency without generating a recommendation, or, at least,
the latter operation may be performed after such alert.
[0109] At step 440, a determination is made to see if the
subscriber is supposed to receive a notice or not. Again, in some
instances, for simplicity, a subscriber may opt out of further
notifications and simply elect to receive the recommended
title.
[0110] In such case, as noted at step 445, the Subscriber Selection
Queue 110 is updated, or, if necessary, at step 450, the Titles Out
Queue 106 as well (in the event the subscriber's queue was
completely empty and the title should be shipped). The title is
then shipped to the subscriber in a conventional fashion as
practiced in the prior art. Again, as noted above, in some
instances a nominal fee can be associated with such activities to
reflect the benefits conferred on the subscriber. Finally, in some
instances, it is possible that before moving the title to a Titles
Out Queue, the subscribe may elect to barter and/or exchange the
title with another subscriber in return for additional inducements
or consideration.
[0111] At step 455, if the subscriber has elected to receive a
notification, the substance of a message (such as illustrated in
FIGS. 3A and 3B) is prepared. The auto-notification message is then
sent, (preferably) electronically, at step 460, using any
conventional delivery mechanism, such as email, text message,
wireless alert, etc.
[0112] At step 465, if the notification consists solely of a notice
(pursuant to the subscriber's request) the process branches to step
495, where a notation is made for the subscriber's profile that the
subscriber was indeed notified. Control then returns to the queue
monitor step 410; as noted earlier, a notice can be re-sent if the
subscriber has elected such option.
[0113] At step 470, if the notification does not require an
affirmative reply confirmation, then the subscriber's preferences
are examined to see if he/she has elected for a predetermined delay
period at step 475. In other words, this procedure determines if
the subscriber has asked for a constructive confirmation option in
the form of a certain number of days. If the answer is no, the
process proceeds to step 445 and continues as noted above. If the
answer is yes, then a delay period is introduced at step 480 equal
to the subscriber's request, and thereafter the process picks up
step 445 as before.
[0114] In the event the user has opted for an actual confirmation
(as opposed to a constructive confirmation) the process then moves
to step 485. At this point, the system determines whether it has
received actual confirmation, or if the user has canceled or
modified the selection. If yes, the system shifts to step 445 as
noted earlier. If no, the system updates the subscriber profile to
indicate that a notice was sent, and initiates a re-notification
process 490 to be executed at a later time to remind the subscriber
if need be.
[0115] At this point, a designation (such as an *) can be made to
the particular title as it is sitting in the Subscriber Selection
Queue 110, so that if the subscriber logs on to view his/her
account, they will understand immediately that the automatically
selected title is merely tentative. In a preferred approach the
subscriber can elect to remove the designation directly at the
service provider website through interface 100, rather than wait
for another email notification/confirmation.
[0116] It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the
above is merely an example of an auto-notify/auto-ship process for
a media distribution system, and that countless variations on the
above can be implemented in accordance with the present teachings.
A number of other conventional steps that would be included in a
commercial application have been omitted, as well, to better
emphasize the present teachings.
[0117] In addition, the present invention could be extended to
perform additional administrative functions as well, such as
determining optimal service plans for subscribers. By monitoring
the levels of subscriber queues, and the frequency at which they
are replenished by subscribers, the system can provide
recommendations to subscribers on an optimal service plan. For
example, for full-service subscribers who rarely check out more
than 1 title at a time, a notification (email) could be sent to
suggest that they alter their service plan to a lesser service.
Similarly, for lower service subscribers who appear to have large
numbers of titles in their Subscriber Selection Queue, a
notification could be sent to suggest that they upgrade their
service. Other examples will be apparent to those skilled in the
art. This type of feature will further allow a service provider to
determine an appropriate service plan for each subscriber, and thus
improve overall customer retention rates.
Subscriber Preference Procedure
[0118] A preferred subscriber preference setup process 500 used by
a media distribution system with intelligent queue monitoring
configured in accordance with the present inventions is illustrated
in FIG. 5. Again, as noted herein, such process is expected to be
embodied in a variety of software programs, routines, etc., that
execute within a conventional user browser program.
[0119] Thus, as seen in FIG. 5, a subscriber enables an
Auto-Notify/Auto-Ship process at step 510. Thereafter, the
subscriber either elects a number of default values, or begins the
process of configuring particular parameters to be used in a queue
monitoring system. For example, at step 520, the "trigger events"
are provided by the subscriber, to identify when the monitoring
logic should examine the subscriber's selection queue. At step 530,
the subscriber identifies what type of movie (or other media
format) he/she wants to be considered for an auto-recommendation
system. At step 540, the subscriber identifies specifically what
type of policies/rules should be employed--i.e., what notice and
action should be sent to him/her, including the Notification
Options described earlier. Finally, at step 550, any other
additional management options (such as a sequence for placement of
automatically selected features) are provided.
[0120] It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the
above is merely an example of an auto-notify/auto-ship
configuration process for a media distribution system, and that
countless variations on the above can be implemented in accordance
with the present teachings. A number of other conventional steps
that would be included in a commercial application have been
omitted, as well, to better emphasize the present teachings.
Subscriber Profiling Procedure
[0121] A preferred subscriber profiling process 600 used by a media
distribution system with intelligent queue monitoring configured in
accordance with the present inventions is illustrated in FIG. 6.
Again, as noted herein, such process is expected to be embodied in
a variety of software programs, routines, etc., that execute within
a conventional user browser program.
[0122] As seen in FIG. 6, a subscriber is presented with a movie
"survey" application, to collect data on a subscriber's tastes in
movies. Thus, at step 610 an interface showing one or more movie
titles, and an entry field for the subscriber to provide a rating
is provided. The movie titles can be selected for presentation
based on an evaluation by the system of movies most likely to have
been by the subscriber, movies that are rated most popular by other
subscribers, movies that have been determined to provide the best
discrimination in tastes between subscribers, etc. Again, the
particular logic used to provide the sample list will be a function
of the particular recommender system employed. Additional fields
for providing short summaries of the movies could be provided as
well. The movies could appear in a list, a table, or as a sequence
of separate pages. The precise format of the interface is
unimportant, of course, and could be implemented in a variety of
ways known in the art.
[0123] At step 620, the ratings are captured for the movies
presented. Again, it is expected that the subscriber may not
provide sufficient information on enough movies to form an
intelligent profile, and, if so, the process would branch at step
630 to prompt for more information. In the event the subscriber
does provide sufficient profiling data, a preliminary subscriber
preference profile is generated at step 640. This preliminary
subscriber preference profile is changed or supplemented later, of
course, in response to additional feedback from the user and as
interpreted by a recommender system (not shown).
[0124] As before it will be understood by those skilled in the art
that the above is merely an example of a subscriber profile capture
process for a media distribution system, and that countless
variations on the above can be implemented in accordance with the
present teachings. A number of other conventional steps that would
be included in a commercial application have been omitted, as well,
to better emphasize the present teachings.
[0125] Furthermore, in some instances, a preliminary subscriber
preference profile might be generated simply based on demographics
information presented by the subscriber, or some other data
presented by the subscriber, without the use of a formal survey. In
other instances the preferences data can be set to some default
value based on average subscriber behavior, thus obviating the need
for any formal data collection process. Again, the precise
mechanism by which a profile is obtained is irrelevant, so long as
a recommender system is able to make an intelligent prediction on a
likely title choice of interest to the subscriber.
Structure of the Preferred Embodiment
[0126] A preferred embodiment of a media distribution system 700
with intelligent queue monitoring that is constructed in accordance
with the present inventions is illustrated in FIG. 7. The system is
composed of several components including a Network 702, through
which a number of separate Network Connections 704 are provided to
a Service Provider Server Device 720 by a plurality of Customer
Network Devices 712. It will be understood by those skilled in the
art that other components may be connected to Network 102, and that
not all connections shown need to be active at all times. There are
also several software components associated with the aforementioned
network-connected devices, including an Item Search/Selection
Module 721, a Media Processing/Shipping Module 722, and a
Subscriber Delivery Queue Module 723, a Recommender Module 724, and
a Subscriber Profile Module 725. These software components are
essentially the same as those found in a prior art system, except
they may be modified appropriately to cooperate with the new
software components of the present invention, including an
Intelligent Queue Monitor module 726, a Subscriber Queue Control
Module 727, a Queue Status Notification Module 728 and a Feedback
System 729.
[0127] Network 702 is preferably the Internet, but could be any
implemented in any variety of commonly used architectures,
including WAN, LAN, etc. Network Connections 704 are conventional
dial-up and/or network connections, such as from analog/digital
modems, cable modems, satellite connections, etc., between any
conventional network device and an Internet Service Provider in
combination with browser software such as Netscape Navigator,
Microsoft Internet Explorer or AOL. In a satellite media
distribution system implementation, Client Device 712 is a
satellite receiver, a TIVO receiver, or the like, and an interface
to a service provider does not require a browser.
[0128] Delivery/return path 705 represents a physical or electronic
route for delivering and returning a particular title to/from a
subscriber. Again, in a preferred embodiment, the media title is a
movie in DVD format that is shipped in a specialized mailer package
by any conventional means to a subscriber, such as US Postal
Service, courier, etc. In other applications, as noted herein,
Delivery/Return path 705 can be an electronic link (broadband
preferably) for delivering content of a media item to a
subscriber.
[0129] In most applications, Customer Network Device 112 will be
typically desk top computers, laptop computers, personal digital
assistants (PDAs), cell phones, or some form of broadcast receiver
(cable, satellite, DSL). Server Network Device 110 is typically a
network server. Of course, other structures and architectures may
be more suitable on a case by case basis for any particular
implementation of the present inventions, and so the present
inventions are not limited in this respect.
[0130] Software elements of the present invention typically will be
custom tailored for a particular application, but preferably will
include some common features, including the following.
[0131] Operating on System Network Device 720 are the following
software routines and/or supporting structures, which implement a
form of media distribution. First, an Item Search/Selection Module
721, contains a list of media items (i.e., movies, books, CDs,
etc.) available on the network organized and searchable by Title,
Artist and other attributes as determined by customer popularity,
system administrative requirements, and the like. This module also
presents a conventional query interface (not shown) to subscribers
to allow them to peruse and view information about the media
items.
[0132] A Media Processing/Shipping Module 722 supports and controls
each subscriber transaction that takes place within system 700,
including updating subscriber accounts, updating subscriber queues,
etc. in response to a subscriber selection of a particular title.
Thus, this module acts as a form of administrator to coordinate
interactions with subscribers, to show them the status of their
accounts, etc. It also generates any appropriate internal
directions required to effectuate a shipment of a particular item
to a particular subscriber by a shipping department (which may be
physically separate from a site at which device 720 is
located).
[0133] A Subscriber Delivery Queue Module 723 controls and updates
subscriber delivery queues in response to subscriber selections,
automatic return and shipping instructions issued by Media
Processing Module 722 (such as when a title is returned) and based
on a Intelligent Queue Monitor module 726 described below.
[0134] A Subscriber Profile Module 724 analyzes subscriber inputs,
queries, title selections, title deliveries, etc., and forms a
customized interest profile for each subscriber. This can be done
in accordance with the overall process flow illustrated in FIG. 6,
or based on any other conventional method. This customized
subscriber-specific information is in addition, of course, to any
other basic customer-specific information that may be maintained,
such as authorized user names, account numbers, physical addresses,
credit card information, etc.
[0135] Based on such information in the subscriber profile, a
Recommender Module 725 operates to provide suggestions for
additional titles that are likely to be of interest to the
subscriber. These can also be provided within a standard query
interface presented by Item Selection/Search module 721. Again, a
variety of such types of recommender systems are well-known in the
art and can be incorporated within embodiments of the present
invention. For example, a well-known system is the Cinematch
program used by Netflix; other acceptable turn-key or custom
solutions could be used. The title suggestions may be provided
while the user is engaged in an interactive session across network
702, or, as explained above, even while the user is not connected
to Service Device 720. The benefit of the latter feature, of
course, is that a subscriber delivery queue can be updated even
without direct ongoing participation by the user, who may be too
busy to engage in a session to locate more titles. In such latter
case, the recommendations are solicited by a Subscriber Queue
Control module in accordance with user directives and are used by a
Queue Control Monitor 726 to replenish/modify/update a subscriber
delivery queue 723.
[0136] An Intelligent Queue Monitor module 726 is responsible for
monitoring/updating a subscriber delivery queue 723 in accordance
with the directives noted above in FIG. 2 and FIG. 4 and performs
the functions noted in the same. This module coordinates with Media
Processing System 721, Recommender Module 725 and the modules noted
below to ensure that a subscriber's wishes concerning a particular
title and queue management are actually performed. This module (or
alternatively Feedback Module 729) further causes any appropriate
additional billing module to update a user account and debit any
charge associated with an automatic recommended/shipped title as
noted above.
[0137] Subscriber Queue Control Module 727 is responsible for
generating the interfaces noted in FIGS. 1, 2, interacting with a
subscriber to obtain subscriber
auto-notice/auto-replenish/auto-ship options, and implementing
other associated functions noted in FIGS. 4 and 5. This information
is passed on and used by Intelligent Queue Monitor module 726 to
effectuate the actual control of subscriber delivery queues 723,
and to Queue Status Notification Module 728 to ensure that such
module also interacts properly with subscribers.
[0138] Queue Status Notification Module 728 is responsible for
generating the message notifications illustrated in FIGS. 3A, 3B
(in response to subscriber queue control information solicited by
Intelligent Queue Monitor module 726) and maintaining
administrative information concerning such notifications in
accordance with the directives provided by a user in the interface
of FIG. 2, and the overall operation noted in FIG. 4. For instance,
it will note when a subscriber has been notified and cause a
re-notification to be sent if necessary within a predetermined time
period.
[0139] A Feedback Module 729 coordinates with Queue Status
Notification Module 728 to notify users in accordance with their
queue control selected options. This module also solicits the
subscriber feedback noted above in connection with FIG. 3B, and of
course functions to notify Intelligent Queue Monitor module 726 of
user acceptances of titles (or changes) selected by the latter.
This feedback information is also passed on to Recommender Module
725 and subscriber profile module 724 so that the latter can be
updated. By capturing this feedback, the Recommender module's 725
performance can be improved and enhanced for later subscriber
recommendations.
[0140] A subscriber exchange module 730 helps to implement a
subscriber exchange system, described in more detail below in
connection with FIG. 8. Similarly, an auto-exchange module 731
implements an automated exchange system for controlling inventory,
improving user satisfaction, etc. as detailed below in connection
with FIG. 9.
[0141] It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the
modules of the present invention, including those illustrated in
FIG. 7 can be implemented using any one of many known programming
languages suitable for creating applications that can run on large
scale computing systems, including servers connected to a network
(such as the Internet). The details of the specific implementation
of the present invention will vary depending on the programming
language(s) used to embody the above principles, and are not
material to an understanding of the present invention. Furthermore,
in some instances, a large portion of the hardware and software of
FIG. 7 will be contained locally to a subscriber's receiver, such
as in the case of a user receiving media items through direct
electronic distribution.
[0142] It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that this is
not the entire set of software modules that can be used, or an
exhaustive list of all operations executed by such modules. It is
expected, in fact, that other features will be added by system
operators in accordance with customer preferences and/or system
performance requirements. Furthermore, while not explicitly shown
or described herein, the details of the various software routines,
executable code, etc., required to effectuate the functionality
discussed above in such modules are not material to the present
invention, and may be implemented in any number of ways known to
those skilled in the art.
Subscriber Based Exchange/Bidding for Titles
[0143] As seen in FIG. 8, another aspect of the present invention
concerns an auction or subscriber based exchange system (as noted
by reference numeral 730 in FIG. 7) for allowing subscribers to
compete for and/or reserve certain media titles in a form of media
title exchange system. For example, to improve service and
profitability, a media service provider may elect to place a
certain limited number of popular titles into a kind of
auction/exchange queue. This (optional) function allows subscribers
to improve their chances of seeing a popular but scarce title, and
can be used either in conjunction with the queue monitoring system
described above, or as a stand-alone system. Since many Internet
users are familiar with online auction features, there is at least
some percentage of the subscriber base who are likely to find such
option interesting and useful in their experience with the service
provider.
[0144] In a strict sense, the present embodiment can be considered
an exchange system rather than an auction system, because the
primary interaction is based on bids and offers that can be
accepted immediately by subscribers, as opposed to a pure auction
system which typically employs a competitive bidding process over a
predefined period. Nonetheless, it will be apparent to those
skilled in the art that the present invention can use elements of
both approaches, and thus be used in both an exchange embodiment, a
pure auction embodiment, and mixed embodiments. Thus, as used
below, it should be understood that the term "exchange" could be
substituted with the term "auction" without deviating from the
focus of the present teachings.
[0145] In this particular instance the inducement and cost of
participating in the media title exchange can be either monetarily
based, rights (access) based, service based, or a combination of
the same. For example, a "bid" can be paid for by a subscriber with
a nominal fee, or in exchange for that subscriber releasing another
popular tide from his/her Subscriber Selection Queue 110 back to
the service provider or to another subscriber as consideration.
[0146] In a preferred embodiment, only a subset of the titles is
given this type of treatment, but it will be apparent that the
concept could be extended in embodiments that include inventory
that is entirely exchange-driven. Furthermore it will be apparent
that in some instances it will be desirable to have a certain
inventory number of the same media tide both in a regular inventory
pool and in an exchange pool. For example, the most current release
of an action film may have 10 copies in a regular inventory pool
that can be selected by subscribers, and another 10 copies in an
exchange inventory.
[0147] This subset of inventory can be described generally as
"exchange items" in that their deployment from the provider to
subscribers is primarily (if not exclusively) done on an exchange
and/or auction basis. This designation can be used until such time
as the tide essentially loses its cachet as an
exchangeable/auctionable item because there is essentially little
competition for its use.
[0148] Thus, in a first step 810 as shown in FIG. 8, a media
service provider (or even a third party monitor) designates a
certain set of titles as exchange media items. Thereafter, at step
820 when a subscriber/requester wishes to select a particular title
in the set of exchange media items, the system checks to see if one
is available. An item may be "available" as a result of there being
at least one uncommitted copy of the pool of exchange media items
that is not outstanding in a Titles Out Queue or already in a
Subscriber Selection Queue 110. An item may also be "available" if
an existing subscriber has a copy in a Subscriber Selection Queue
110, and is willing to part with the same for some negotiable
consideration.
[0149] If a title is available because it is uncommitted, the
requester can elect to reserve the title into his/her Subscriber
Selection Queue 110 at step 825. Again, a nominal fee and/or
additional consideration may be requested from the subscriber as a
prerequisite to obtaining the title. In the latter case, the system
may require relinquishment of another popular title from Subscriber
Selection Queue 110. Other examples will be apparent to those
skilled in the art.
[0150] At step 830 if a title is available as a result of at least
one subscriber having a copy in a Subscriber Selection Queue 110
that he/she is willing to part with, then the requester is given
the details of any reserve/offer information that the copy
holder(s) has/have identified with the copy. For example, the
holder(s) may indicate that they want a copy of another title in
exchange, or a certain number of "credits" from the requester. The
credits in this case can consist of additional services from the
service provider, such as a free auto-recommendation title provided
in accordance with the discussion above, or even additional
capacity (such as in the form of an additional slot in their Titles
Out Queue 106).
[0151] At step 840 the requester can then elect to consummate an
exchange with a subscriber for one of the copies in question, by
agreeing to the terms offered by the subscriber. As will be
apparent, this process can be done either directly at the website
through an additional interface, through an email exchange, or any
other suitable method known in the art. The system 700 (FIG. 7)
then makes appropriate adjustments of the respective Subscriber
Selection Queues, account balances, credit balances, etc. at step
845.
[0152] At step 850, if the title is not available, the user is
prompted to see if he/she wishes to place a "bid" for the item to
be considered at a later date by the system when a copy does become
available. Again, the "offer" in this case can consist of a nominal
fee that is preset by the system or adjustable by the user, and is
collected at step 855. As noted earlier, in lieu of monetary fees,
the system can also allow subscribers to bid using various forms of
service credits, electronic coupons, etc. Alternatively, the user
can be prompted to determine if they are willing to offer an item
in their existing queue as consideration. In some instances, of
course, a combination of the same could be used, or other
inducements as well. Furthermore, in some cases a requester can
elect to have email notifications sent to him/her when a copy of a
particular exchange item becomes "available" as noted above.
[0153] In step 860, persons who have successfully secured a copy of
an exchangeable title can opt to associate an asking bid for the
item, if they want to participate in an exchange system for the
title. The particular details of the asking bid, including any
financial component, credit component, or title exchange component
can be provided using any well-known interface at step 865.
[0154] Note that in some instances, as part of step 810, it may be
desirable to allow subscribers to "move" items from a regular pool
of items to an exchange pool if they are willing to do so. This,
again, allows a degree of flexibility to subscribers to help them
acquire titles to their liking. Such items may be thus be tagged
temporarily with an exchange label, and/or be permanently
identified thereafter by the system as exchange items.
[0155] In addition it may be desirable in some instances for system
702 through Exchange Routine 730 (FIG. 7) to monitor the extent and
nature of barterings/swaps between subscribers to glean additional
information about their tastes, desires, etc. This exchange data
can be used for determining inventory requirements (i.e., if a
particular title seems to be in demand), suggesting changes in
subscriber account levels (i.e., if a particular user seems to be
needing more capacity), or predicting success/capacity requirements
of future titles that may be included in inventory to reduce demand
uncertainty. Furthermore, by studying the general form of bids and
acceptable offers, the system can learn from the collective
subscriber base what precisely constitutes an acceptable level of
inducement that can be offered to secure titles (see below FIG.
9).
[0156] The routines for implementing the exchange operations as
described above can be implemented using any conventional software
programs and routines available to skilled artisans, and the
present invention is not limited to any specific embodiment
thereof. Furthermore, it is expected that such routines will vary
from computer to computer in actual commercial practice. To better
illustrate the features of the present invention, other aspects of
the exchange system have been omitted, and it will be understood
that such system could include other options, features, entries,
etc., that are not specifically shown.
Auto Exchange/Bidding for Titles
[0157] In another variation, the service provider can incorporate
automatic exchange features, built on the principle of identifying
and measuring relative subscriber interest in particular titles, in
addition to or in lieu of the subscriber exchange system of FIG. 8.
This process is depicted generally in FIG. 9 and describes
generally the operation of a routine 731 (FIG. 7).
[0158] The exchange system can operate either on an entire
inventory of a service provider, or only a subset. For example, it
may be useful to only actively exchange certain types of popular
titles, or only for certain types of subscribers. In addition, the
auto-exchange system can operate primarily on a titles based driven
strategy, or a subscriber based strategy. In other words, the
system can be instructed to work from a set of popular titles to
re-allocate their deployment in a cost effective, customer friendly
fashion. Alternatively (or in addition to) the system can be
instructed to identify subscribers who are likely to be unhappy,
frustrated and/or likely to cancel their service as a result of not
obtaining an appropriate number of titles within their subscription
period.
[0159] Thus in FIG. 9 at step 910, assuming title A is a popular
article, the exchange system determines if a first subscriber has
title A listed in his/her Subscriber Selection Queue 110; it also
examines what listed ranking it is given--in this case, position
X.
[0160] At step 920, the system determines that a second subscriber
also has title A listed in his/her Subscriber Selection Queue 110
but in position Y, where Y indicates a much lower priority than X.
In other words, from these rankings it is apparent that the second
subscriber ascribes a much lower subjective value than the first
subscriber in obtaining title A.
[0161] At step 930 an access ranking for title A is determined for
both subscribers. While it is shown in this sequence, again, it
will be understood that this step could be done during or before
steps 910 and 920.
[0162] The access ranking is derived from the service provider
processing the respective requests for this title in a type of
"first to request" fashion (or some other fashion), so that the
second subscriber is earmarked to receive title A before the first
subscriber; i.e., the second subscriber has a higher access
ranking. For example, the second subscriber made the request a
month ago, while the first subscriber has just made their request.
The "access ranking" is used herein generally to refer to the
overall priority which a particular user has for obtaining access
rights to an item. Thus, as an example, if 100 subscribers desire
title A, and no free copy of such title is available, such
subscribers could be provided with rankings from 1-100 to designate
the relative priority by which they are to secure eventual access
to a returned copy of such title. In some instances the positions
provided by the subscribers for the titles may be ignored in favor
of only looking at the access rankings. Other variations are
equally useable with the present invention, and it is by no means
limited in this respect.
[0163] Thus, at step 940, an automatic exchange system of the
present invention monitors such occurrences and provides a
notification/alert to the second subscriber indicating the
potential for "swapping" access rankings.
[0164] At step 945, assuming the first subscriber is willing to
provide consideration to the second subscriber in exchange for the
improvement in access ranking rights, the swap is consummated, and
the system would then update the respective queues of the two
subscribers.
[0165] In another variation, in lieu of a second subscriber
engaging with the first subscriber at step 940 (or in addition to),
the automatic exchange system would instead step in and barter for
the parties at step 960. This would be done, for example, as part
of an inventory management operation, such as if the system
determined that the second subscriber has a significantly longer
turnover time than the first subscriber. In other words, the system
can do a primitive form of "capacity" planning by determining
demand and allocating the resource (a title) in a more efficient
matter so that it can be enjoyed by the greatest number of
subscribers. For example, if subscriber #2 keeps movies out twice
as long as subscribers #1 and #3, the overall customer satisfaction
factor can be improved by providing the copy in question to
subscribers #1 and #3 during a time period in which otherwise only
subscriber #2 would receive the copy. The system would provide
various staged inducements automatically to the second subscriber,
in a manner akin to that used by airlines to convince fliers to
give up their seats when they have overbooked a particular
flight.
[0166] In another approach, and as noted earlier, the system can
operate from a subscriber perspective to identify potential
customer problems caused by a stock-out situation. Thus, the system
may consider if the titles in a particular first subscriber
selection queue are all designated as "long wait," meaning that the
first subscriber is unlikely to receive an actual title anytime
soon. In such instances the system may elect to increase an
inducement to another second subscriber (who may have titles out)
to ensure that the first subscriber does not become frustrated or
disenchanted with the service provider. In general, from a customer
satisfaction perspective, it is desirable to always have at least
one title of interest in the possession of the customer, and to
reduce stock-out of particular titles for such customer. By
identifying potential "weak points" the system can preempt and
reduce customer defections by preventing stock-out.
[0167] For example, the system may first offer a free
autorecommendation "credit" to the second subscriber in exchange
for swapping (or giving up entirely) their access ranking. In other
instances, an additional slot in a Titles Out Queue may be
provided, to give the subscriber an opportunity to have more titles
out at a time for a limited period. The level of inducements could
be tied directly to the access ranking that the first subscriber
has for the particular title. Thus, if the subscriber is about to
receive the title because he/she is next in line and a copy is
available, this access right has higher value than a later in time
access ranking. In some instances the subscriber may in fact no
longer care about the title, because they have changed their mind,
already seen the selection, or prefer to receive service credits
instead. By giving them an opportunity to barter in essence with
the automatic exchange system, overall user satisfaction can be
increased because more subscribers are getting what they want. In
other instances the degree of inducement could be a function of the
relative status of subscriber #1 and subscriber #2, so that, again,
higher service clients and/or are exceptionally quick turn-around
clients may be the subject of larger inducements.
[0168] Again, as noted earlier, by observing the behavior and
bargains consummated by the subscribers on their own for particular
titles, a system can learn and identify what types of offers are
likely to be acceptable to induce a particular subscriber to
release a particular title. In some embodiments, an auto-exchange
system may in fact announce (at the service provider web site, or
through emails) that it is offering capacity slots (i.e.,
additional slots int the Titles Out Queue) to subscribers in
exchange for relinquishing a particular title from their rental
selection queue. In some cases the consideration can be provided to
any persons who also physically "return" a copy of such title. The
return could be conditionally credited even before the title is
returned, in some cases, by the subscriber identifying that the
title has been mailed back. The credit could then become final upon
confirmation of receipt of the title from the subscriber. Again,
other alternatives will be apparent from the present teachings.
[0169] If the second subscriber accepts the inducement, the access
rankings for the titles are swapped, and their queues are updated,
as seen in step 945. If the second subscriber does not accept, the
system can simply quit, or look for another possible third
subscriber who presents a reasonable match for the first
subscriber. An additional confirmation could be sent to both
subscribers, as well. This feature has the benefit of seamlessly
and transparently improving a subscriber's choices in a manner that
is likely to be appealing to "prompt" customers, while still being
acceptable and fair to less responsive or timely customers.
[0170] It can be seen that this aspect of the invention provides a
form of revenue sharing at the subscriber level, to complement any
additional normal revenue sharing that is embodied in the original
purchase of the media item from the supplier. By determining a
potential "cost" associated with obtaining a title from a first
subscriber, and comparing it to a potential "benefit" from a second
subscriber, the present invention can identify useful exchange
points and maximize an overall profitability for the service
provider.
[0171] In other instances, the level of inducement may reach so far
as to (temporarily) provide the second subscriber with an
additional "slot" in their Titles Out Queue in exchange for a
popular title desired by a first subscriber. In other words, the
cost to a service provider in granting another Titles Out Queue
slot (temporarily) to one subscriber is, in most cases, much less
than that of a losing another subscriber.
[0172] Alternatively the system could allow a situation in which
two subscribers could even agree to a similar deal; i.e., that they
can exchange capacity by (temporarily) adding one slot in a first
subscriber's Titles Out Queue at the expense of a slot in a
corresponding queue of a second subscriber. This may be attractive
to those subscribers who do not typically use all of their shipping
capacity, and do not need more than a limited number of titles at a
time, and conversely to those subscribers who may temporarily wish
to receive an additional title beyond their normal rate
structure.
[0173] Based on the above teachings, other variations of exchanges,
inducements, etc., will be gleaned by skilled artisans. Again, the
auto-exchange system may be used of FIG. 9 can be used in paired
with exchange system 800, used in conjunction with the queue
monitoring system described above, used as a stand-alone system,
etc.
[0174] The routines for implementing the automatic exchange
operations as described above can be implemented using any
conventional software programs and routines available to skilled
artisans, and the present invention is not limited to any specific
embodiment thereof. Furthermore, it is expected that such routines
will vary from computer to computer in actual commercial practice.
To better illustrate the features of the present invention, other
aspects of the exchange system have been omitted, and it will be
understood that such system could include other options, features,
entries, etc., that are not specifically shown.
Variations of the Invention
[0175] Other options that can be used in connection with the
present invention and programmed under control of the subscriber
using the mechanisms above include: [0176] "Random" ship sequence
option. If a member is not picky, and selects this option, his/her
queue is NOT ordered by them. Instead, they simply create an
unordered list. A selection to be shipped is randomly picked from
their top 10 or 20 selections in their selection queue. This gives
the online service provider more flexibility in scheduling. To
increase the appeal of such option, the service provider could
specify that the subscriber would be guaranteed to receive at least
one of their top X selections if they elect this shipping feature.
[0177] Auto select/queue stuff: in this option, the subscriber can
request that the online service provider provide a list of proposed
movies and a proposed shipping sequence to ensure a steady stream
of titles. [0178] "Rent now" option: for a premium, a subscriber
can guarantee receiving an additional movie instantly, regardless
of a status of other membership, or the status of their queues.
This is analogous to the "buy now" features found in other online
commerce sites, but is unique in the rental industry. [0179] "Count
twice" option: under this option, a subscriber can place the same
title twice (or more than twice) to make it count twice in their
out queue, while simultaneously increasing their chances of getting
it. This may be attractive, again, to certain persons who prefer to
have particular popular titles in exchange for the option to have a
greater number of movies out at the same time.
[0180] In other related embodiments of the present invention, the
queue monitoring logic will be part of a separate web site, and
operated by an entity separate from the service provider and the
subscriber's selection and delivery queues. In other words, a
subscriber to a media provider may pay a separate service provider
for the privilege of having the latter monitor a delivery queue.
This concept is used, for example, in other Internet related
service applications, such as in the case of AuctionSniper (or
Bidnapper), which, as is well-known, assists buyers on EBay to
secure auctions. Thus, a subscriber to a media provider would
simply provide the pertinent details of their account to a
monitoring service provider, and the latter would effectuate the
steps above automatically on behalf of the subscriber on a periodic
basis, or some other basis. Again, these third parties could
collect a monthly flat fee, and/or additional fees depending on the
number of titles actually "reserved" or shipped on behalf of the
subscriber. The benefits of such third party services, of course,
is that they can be better tailored by the subscriber to obtain
desirable selections from a particular media provider, because the
latter may not be economically incentivized to maximize the number
and quality of selections provided to an individual subscriber.
Moreover in many instances such third party services are better
suited for aggregating collective needs of subscribers and
responding to the same, because they are not limited to a single
service provider. In other words, a single queue monitor system
could service multiple online service providers, thus allowing its
users to benefit from a larger population of preference and
interest data.
[0181] In yet another variant, a first online service provider
could compete with a second online service provider, by using the
claimed invention to attract and provide monitoring services to the
latter. In other words, the first online service provider could
allow subscribers of the second online service provider to set up a
monitoring system at the first online service provider site for
queues located on the second site. This type of adjunct service can
enhance the stickiness and attractiveness of the first online
service provider, and possibly help to convert customers from the
second online service provider to switch services.
[0182] In a "supersite" embodiment, a third party can set up
multiple "proxy" accounts at an online service provider site, to
facilitate transactions on behalf of persons who, for one reason or
another, do not wish to have actual accounts at the online service
provider site, or do not wish to receive titles on a regular basis
in a manner that would justify an investment in an ongoing
subscription. Under this embodiment, the third party can set up
accounts at multiple provider sites, and thus be more likely to be
able to find a particular title on behalf of an interested renter
of such title. Thus, occasional renters who may want to find a
particular popular title will have a greater chance of finding a
particular title, and without having to join a service.
[0183] In such cases the third party orders and retrieves titles
from the online service provider during a first leg of the
distribution, and then basically performs the same shipping and
receiving obligations to the ultimate interested renter as the
online service provider would perform. While this embodiment
requires two separate receiving and shipping transactions, it may
be more desirable for persons who do not wish to have a contractual
relationship with the online service provider. Furthermore, since
the original service provider usually provides a return mailer for
the title, the proxy provider in this instance would not need to
pay for such postage.
[0184] In addition, the proxy provider may "rent" the title to the
interested renter under different terms than the online service
provider--i.e., something other than a flat rate for an indefinite
period. For example, it may be based on a limited time basis, so
that the renter would have to return the title within a certain
time window. This can be used to set up a hybrid type distribution
system, so that characteristics of the prospective renters can be
exploited to maximize the potential rental income of a particular
title. This allows for successful additional distributions outside
the scope of the limited distribution requirements imposed by
specific online service provider contracts.
[0185] In other applications of the invention, a similar monitoring
system could be employed in other online service provider
environments. For example, for electronic auction sites, a queue
monitor and recommender system could cooperate to locate additional
items of interest to a buyer, based on prior purchases, or based on
other items already located in a so-called "auction watch" type
tool set up by the subscriber. Such "watch" queues are used, for
example, on Ebay. The user could then be (optionally) notified by
email that the additional item has been added to his/her auction
watch. When the user returns for a subsequent online session, the
newly added auction items could be highlighted, for example, to
draw his/her attention to the new item. Again, the queue management
could be set up based on various threshold options, such as whether
the system has located another item of interest, or if the user's
auction watch no longer has items (because the auctions have
expired). Thus, a queue monitoring system can work behind the
scenes for users of auction systems as well, and further enhance
value of such services.
[0186] As alluded to earlier, the invention has application in
actual retail environments as well, particularly in cases where
media is sold on a similar basis--i.e., a fixed number of items for
a flat fee per period. Again, these are but examples, and other
applications of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in
the art.
[0187] Furthermore, while the media items in the present instance
represent one format in which a movie can be distributed, it will
be apparent that other distribution schemes can be used as well.
For instance, a movie may be distributed by a satellite channel,
and/or a broadband channel to a receiver. In the latter cases, the
Subscriber Selection Queue 110, the Titles Out Queue 106 (and
several other hardware and software modules of FIG. 7) may be
located physically on a home receiver/player owned/rented by the
subscriber. For example, a service offered by DirecTV and Tivo
allows users to "rent" movies temporarily from a pay-per-view menu,
and/or to record the same on a fixed storage system at the user's
facility. These organizations could also offer a service similar to
that offered by online DVD rental providers by charging a flat
monthly rate for unlimited selections. While the issue of capacity
(in the Titles Out Queue) may be somewhat irrelevant in some such
environments (because the subscriber's hard drive can store a
significant number of titles, and there is little delay in
receiving the title) the present invention could similarly operate
to review a subscriber's selection queue, make recommendations, and
replenish a Subscriber Selection Queue with suggestions.
Furthermore, in some cases, a subscriber's receiver may be limited
to a certain number of movies, in a manner akin to the Titles Out
Queue concept. The only difference, of course, is that these titles
are typically delivered in accordance with a predetermined time
schedule, as opposed to an on-demand type system, and there is no
"return" required per se. When a subscriber has seen one of the
movies in his/her Titles Out Queue (or analog thereof) the system
gives the subscriber the option of "returning" the title (by
deleting it for example) and receiving another one in its place.
While the Tivo service presently does perform some
auto-recommendation functions (such as automatically recording
programs) it does not do so in the context of programming that must
be paid for, (such as pay-per-view items) and does not restrict a
user's recording of movie titles (i.e. to a certain predefined
limit). Thus the systems and methods of the present invention can
be easily applied to such movie distribution environments as
well.
[0188] In another embodiment of the invention, the queue monitoring
logic resides entirely on a client device, such as for example, a
desk top computer, a laptop, a PDA, a set top box, or some
equivalent computing device. The subscriber Titles Out and
Selection queues are maintained as in the prior art. Thus, no
additional support or programming is needed on the server side. In
this type of standalone version, interface 100 (and the associated
display/control areas and options) could be generated entirely on
the client device, either within a browser, or separately
therefrom. In some instances, a customized browser can be dedicated
entirely to a rental queue monitoring function.
[0189] The advantages of this approach include the fact that the
subscriber can have an intelligent queue monitor execute in various
modes, including an always-on mode, or a periodic execution mode.
In modern broadband connections (such as xDSL, cable, and the like)
an always-on connection allows a user client device to have
continuous access to an Internet Web Page. Thus, the user can set
up a local based queue monitor to continually monitor a subscriber
rental queue, delivery queue using his/her own computing resources.
The local based queue monitor can also automatically download new
information directly to the subscriber, such as potential new
releases, new recommendations, etc. The local queue monitor can
perform can thus perform a range of functions, spanning from purely
passive (i.e., simply downloading and displaying a current status
of delivery/selection queues) to extremely proactive (i.e.,
selecting titles, re-arranging selection queues). The user can thus
be apprised of his/her queue status, queue waits, etc., without
requiring a separate notification by email, and again without
requiring him/her to connect to the Internet. Furthermore, it can
be programmed to perform the auction-like features noted above to
bargain with other subscribers for titles, in a manner similar to
that performed by contemporary stand alone auction software (as
sold by Auction Sentry for example) that interacts with an Ebay
site.
[0190] In similar fashion, the local queue monitor can be
"programmed" instead to execute at controlled intervals, such as
every hour, every day, every week, etc. In some cases the execution
can be timed to coincide with updating functions done on the server
side in connection with new inventory, new queue updates, etc. done
by the service provider. For example, new inventory of titles may
be introduced on a Monday into the system. This may temporarily
change an availability and/or opportunity for new selections. The
present invention can be programmed, opportunistically, to execute
immediately after/before such updatings to gain an advantage over
other subscribers for desired titles. This type of periodic
execution can be done to reduce overhead on the user client device,
to save bandwidth, etc.
[0191] The subscriber is then able to dedicate as little or as much
time as they wish to a rental selection process. The local based
queue monitor can thus operate as a proxy on their behalf,
eliminating the need for the subscriber to monitor his/her own
queues. This type of distributed queue control logic may be more
preferable for certain service providers, since it does not require
additional processing logic on the server side.
[0192] Other functions that could be performed by the local side
queue monitoring logic (or even the server side logic explained
above) include the following: [0193] (1) "gaming" the subscriber
selection queue; [0194] (2) monitoring service provider
shipment/receive information to ensure compliance with subscriber
terms of service.
[0195] These processes are discussed in more detail below.
Availability Monitoring/Reporting
[0196] In the first case above, as seen in FIG. 10 the queue
monitoring logic essentially is programmed to identify and observe
availability of certain titles on the subscriber's behalf using an
availability monitoring process 1000, which, again, could be
implemented in software using any of a variety of well-known
techniques and programs.
[0197] At step 1005, a subscriber identifies a set of queue
placement rules to be used by the queue monitoring logic. For
example, a subscriber may specify as a first rule an availability
requirement that he/she only wishes to have titles which are
immediately available placed in their queues. They may also specify
as a second rule that only certain categories of titles should be
monitored for availability, such as New Releases, or particular
genres. A third rule may specify that the title should include a
certain actor, director, or author (studio originator). A fourth
rule may specify that any titles be automatically placed in the
queue if they otherwise meet all of the subscriber's criteria.
Other rules and examples will be apparent to those skilled in the
art.
[0198] Titles of interest are first determined at step 1010. This
can be done in conjunction with a recommender system as noted
earlier, or in logical order based on examining a database of
titles maintained by the service provider.
[0199] To determine if certain rules are satisfied, such as the
availability requirement, it may be necessary in some instances for
the queue monitoring logic to actually "place" a title in the
subscriber selection queue at step 1015. Again it should be noted
that this step may or may not be required by a particular service
provider system, depending on whether such status information is
already specified as part of the descriptive information for such
title in a database of titles.
[0200] The status of the title is then determined at step 1020 by
noting how the service provider has identified the availability of
the title: i.e., as available, as a short wait, as a long wait,
etc.
[0201] At step 1025 the queue monitoring logic then determines
whether to add the title or not, depending on the rule set provided
by the subscriber, such as described above. Again, as noted, the
queue monitoring logic could be programmed to select/place only
titles that have an availability status showing that they are
currently available. Since in some cases this can only be
determined manually by trial and error normally by the subscriber,
it can be a tedious and time consuming task. Thus, embodiments of
the invention can be programmed to automatically "game" the
subscriber selection queue by finding potential titles of interest,
placing them in the subscriber selection queue, and then observing
what status is given to them by the service provider.
[0202] Alternatively, at step 1010 a selection of titles could be
provided by the subscriber to the queue monitoring logic, and it
can then "test" the availability of each of such titles
automatically for the subscriber. This is helpful, for example,
where the subscriber may be informed, from other online sources or
friends, that certain specific movie titles are popular.
[0203] Finally, as part of the availability monitoring process,
reports can be downloaded periodically to the subscriber at step
1030 (or by email or alert), informing him/her of the status of
different titles, so that they can observe first hand what the
queue monitoring logic determined about the availability of certain
titles, and whether they were automatically added to the
subscriber's queue.
[0204] Thus, the queue monitoring logic can be programmed to
perform this additional task as well, eliminating another
subscriber headache. Such feature could also be used, of course, by
a content provider of titles to gauge demand for their products,
and to determine if the service provider is adequately stocking
particular selections.
[0205] In some embodiments, the above process could be performed
automatically by a server based process as well, to collect
competitive intelligence on the availability of titles on a
competitor's service site and other similar performance data.
Returns/Shipping Monitoring
[0206] In some prior art systems, the user is allowed to indicate
directly to the service provider when a title is returned. Some
providers then use a form of "honor system" and automatically ship
a new title based on the user's indication that another title has
been returned.
[0207] However, this approach is not used by all service providers.
In such case, as noted in the second aspect above, the queue
monitoring logic essentially is programmed to identify and observe
returns and shipping behavior of the service provider, and
particularly to note how the subscriber is being treated.
[0208] For example, as part of a subscriber contract, a service
provider is obligated to send on another title to the subscriber
when a title is returned by the subscriber and received by the
service provider. If a title is misplaced in the mail, or does not
arrive at the service provider, the latter typically does not
inform the subscriber of this "non-event." Thus, unless the
subscriber is again always checking his/her account, he/she does
not know if a title has been actually designated as "returned" by
the service provider. This deficiency in the prior art also has the
effect of reducing the subscriber's enjoyment of their
subscription.
[0209] In embodiments of the present invention, as seen in FIG. 11
the subscriber can reduce the chances of such happening, through
use of a Returns/Shipping Monitoring process 1100, which, again,
could be implemented in software using any of a variety of
well-known techniques and programs.
[0210] The subscriber first indicated to the queue monitoring logic
at step 1105 that a particular title has been returned (i.e.,
placed in the mail) on a particular date.
[0211] An expected receipt date can be generated as well, either
explicitly or automatically by the program at step 1110
[0212] At step 1115 the queue monitoring logic can then
automatically monitors the subscriber's account to determine if and
when the title is received. This step can be programmed, as noted
earlier, to occur at program intervals set by the subscriber, or
automatically if desired.
[0213] If the title is not indicated as "received" at step 1120
within a certain number of days (again, controlled by the
subscriber) by the service provider, an alert is generated. At step
1125 a notification is sent to the subscriber. This allows a
subscriber to be alerted to the existence of potentially lost
titles before an inordinate amount of time passes, during which
time, of course, the subscriber is not getting a new title, or
getting the benefit of their subscription to the service. The
subscriber can then alert the service provider of the potential
loss so that their deliveries are not interrupted.
[0214] At step 1130 if the service provider has indicated that the
title has been returned, the queue monitoring logic notes whether
the service provider has shipped another title to the subscriber
within a predefined time period. The difference in time between
when the returned title is received, and when the new title is
shipped, can be logged automatically by the queue monitoring
system. While service providers (such as Netflix) do provide for
notification when a title is shipped, the subscriber is not
informed of the total delay associated with the receiving/shipping
process.
[0215] In embodiments of the present invention this type of
receiving/shipping compliance information can be relayed to the
subscriber so that he/she can determine if the service provider is
performing reasonably under a service contract. When a service
provider takes an undue amount of time to process returns, this can
significantly impact a subscriber's utilization of a fixed fee
service. Thus, for example, at step 1135, if the service provider
has not sent out a new title in a reasonable period of time (which,
again, can be specified by the subscriber) an automatic
notification/complaint can be sent by the subscriber to the service
provider. Typically, again, this can be in the form of an email, or
an automated telephone call to a service support number.
[0216] The above descriptions are intended as merely illustrative
embodiments of the proposed inventions. It is understood that the
protection afforded the present invention also comprehends and
extends to embodiments different from those above, but which fall
within the scope of the present claims.
* * * * *