U.S. patent application number 14/082747 was filed with the patent office on 2014-03-13 for system and method for facilitating unified trading and control for a sponsoring organization's money management process.
This patent application is currently assigned to UAT, Inc.. The applicant listed for this patent is UAT, Inc.. Invention is credited to Allan T. Chiulli, Tom H. Warren.
Application Number | 20140074756 14/082747 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 39795995 |
Filed Date | 2014-03-13 |
United States Patent
Application |
20140074756 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Chiulli; Allan T. ; et
al. |
March 13, 2014 |
System And Method For Facilitating Unified Trading And Control For
A Sponsoring Organization's Money Management Process
Abstract
An embodiment of the present invention provides a system,
method, process, software and standards that enable a unified
trading and control process utilized by sponsoring organizations
and asset managers (money managers) for sub advised or externally
managed investment portfolios as to increase control over the
trading process by a sponsoring organization, enhance regulatory
compliance, substantially lower trading costs and improve
investment performance on a recurring basis for the shareholders
and beneficiaries investing in registered and non registered mutual
funds and institutional investment portfolios.
Inventors: |
Chiulli; Allan T.;
(Highlands Ranch, CO) ; Warren; Tom H.; (Greenwood
Village, CO) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
UAT, Inc. |
Englewood |
CO |
US |
|
|
Assignee: |
UAT, Inc.
Englewood
CO
|
Family ID: |
39795995 |
Appl. No.: |
14/082747 |
Filed: |
November 18, 2013 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
13625467 |
Sep 24, 2012 |
8600866 |
|
|
14082747 |
|
|
|
|
13118904 |
May 31, 2011 |
8285634 |
|
|
13625467 |
|
|
|
|
13020121 |
Feb 3, 2011 |
8180699 |
|
|
13118904 |
|
|
|
|
12700218 |
Feb 4, 2010 |
7912783 |
|
|
13020121 |
|
|
|
|
11783690 |
Apr 11, 2007 |
7685057 |
|
|
12700218 |
|
|
|
|
60791209 |
Apr 12, 2006 |
|
|
|
60899393 |
Feb 5, 2007 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
705/36R |
Current CPC
Class: |
G06Q 40/00 20130101;
G06Q 40/025 20130101; G06Q 40/06 20130101; G06Q 40/12 20131203;
G06Q 40/04 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
705/36.R |
International
Class: |
G06Q 40/06 20120101
G06Q040/06 |
Claims
1. A method for facilitating money management processes of a
plurality of sponsoring organizations using a plurality of asset
managers to manage the sponsoring organizations' investment
portfolios, the method comprising: receiving, through a
computer-based communications network, orders of the plurality of
asset managers, each order of an asset manager comprising a number
of asset units to buy or sell on behalf of a sponsoring
organization; determining, for each order, whether the sponsoring
organization associated with the each order or the asset manager
associated with the each order is assigned discretion for
facilitating execution of the each order, wherein the associated
sponsoring organization is assigned discretion if the each order is
a low touch order expected to have low market impact and the
associated asset manager is assigned discretion if the each order
is a high touch order expected to have high market impact; and
facilitating, based on the assignment of discretion to the
associated sponsoring organization, execution of each low touch
order by at least one trading organization designated at the
discretion of the associated sponsoring organization.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising facilitating, based on
the assignment of discretion to the associated asset manager,
execution of each high touch order by at least one trading
organization designated at the discretion of the associated asset
manager.
3. The method of claim 2, further comprising facilitating execution
of the each high touch order by a plurality of trading
organizations and facilitating execution of the each low touch
order by a plurality of trading organizations.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein the plurality of trading
organizations executing the each high touch order comprises a
plurality of executing brokers designated by the associated asset
manager and the plurality of trading organizations executing the
each low touch order comprises a plurality of executing brokers
designated by the associated sponsoring organization.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein each order is received through a
computer-based graphical user interface and associated software
program.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein facilitating execution of the
each low touch order comprises routing a group of low touch orders
to a trading system of a sponsoring organization associated with
the group of low touch orders and routing the group of low touch
orders from the trading system to a network of trading
organizations designated by the sponsoring organization associated
with the group of low touch orders.
7. The method of claim 2, wherein facilitating execution of the
each low touch order comprises providing at least one standard
communication protocol at a trading system, wherein the at least
one standard communication protocol enables communication between
at least two pluralities of the plurality of sponsoring
organizations, the plurality of asset managers, and a plurality of
executing brokers.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein facilitating execution of the
each low touch order comprises routing a group of low touch orders
to a network of executing brokers designated by the sponsoring
organization associated with the group of low touch orders.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the group of low touch orders is
executed among the network of executing brokers.
10. The method of claim 2, wherein facilitating execution of the
each high touch order comprises routing a group of high touch
orders to a network of executing brokers designated by the asset
manager associated with the group of high touch orders.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein the group of high touch orders
is executed among the network of executing brokers.
12. The method of claim 1, wherein facilitating execution of each
low touch order comprises facilitating a direction by the
associated sponsoring organization to the associated asset manager
to route low touch orders, consistent with the associated asset
manager's regulatory requirements, to one or more trading
organizations designated by the associated sponsoring
organization.
13. A method for facilitating money management processes of a
plurality of sponsoring organizations using an asset manager to
manage investment portfolios of sponsoring organizations, the
method comprising: receiving, through a computer, orders of the
asset manager, each order of the asset manager comprising a number
of asset units to buy or sell on behalf of a sponsoring
organization; determining, for each order, using a computerized
rules-based logic engine, whether the sponsoring organization
associated with the each order or the asset manager is assigned
discretion for facilitating execution of the each order, wherein
the associated sponsoring organization is assigned discretion if
the each order is a low touch order expected to have low market
impact and the asset manager is assigned discretion if the each
order is a high touch order expected to have high market impact;
and facilitating, based on the assignment of discretion to the
associated sponsoring organization, execution of low touch orders
by at least one trading organization designated at the discretion
of the associated sponsoring organization.
14. The method of claim 13, further comprising facilitating, based
on the assignment of discretion to the asset manager, execution of
high touch orders by at least one trading organization designated
at the discretion of the asset manager.
15. A method for facilitating money management processes of a
plurality of sponsoring organizations using a plurality of asset
managers to manage investment portfolios of sponsoring
organizations, the method comprising: receiving, through a
computer-based communications network, orders of the plurality of
asset managers, each order of an asset manager comprising a number
of asset units to buy or sell on behalf of a sponsoring
organization; determining, for each order, using a computerized
rules-based logic engine, whether the each order is a low touch
order expected to have low market impact or is a high touch order
expected to have high market impact; and facilitating execution of
each low touch order by at least one trading organization
designated by the sponsoring organization associated with the each
low touch order such that the associated sponsoring organization
has discretion over execution of the each low touch order.
16. The method of claim 15, further comprising facilitating
execution of each high touch order by at least one trading
organization designated by the asset manager associated with the
each high touch order such that the associated asset manager has
discretion over the each high touch order.
17. The method of claim 16, further comprising facilitating
execution of the each high touch order by a plurality of trading
organizations and facilitating execution of the each low touch
order by a plurality of trading organizations.
18. The method of claim 17, wherein the plurality of trading
organizations executing the each high touch order comprises a
plurality of executing brokers designated by the associated asset
manager and the plurality of trading organizations executing the
each low touch order comprises a plurality of executing brokers
designated by the associated sponsoring organization.
19. A method for managing investment portfolios of a sponsoring
organization, the method comprising: receiving, through a computer,
orders of an asset manager managing the investment portfolios of
the sponsoring organization, each order comprising a number of
asset units to buy or sell, wherein the orders are received through
a computer-based graphical user interface and associated software
program; determining, for each order, using a computerized
rules-based logic engine, whether the each order is a high touch
order expected to have high market impact or a low touch order
expected to have low market impact; and facilitating execution of
low touch orders by at least one trading organization designated by
the sponsoring organization.
20. The method of claim 19, further comprising facilitating
execution of high touch orders by at least one trading organization
designated by the asset manager.
21. The method of claim 20, wherein the at least one trading
organization designated by the asset manager comprises at least one
executing broker designated by the asset manager.
22. The method of claim 19, wherein the at least one trading
organization designated by the sponsoring organization comprises at
least one executing broker designated by the sponsoring
organization.
23. The method of claim 22, wherein the at least one executing
broker comprises a network of executing brokers, and wherein the
low touch orders are executed among the network of executing
brokers.
24. The method of claim 19, wherein facilitating execution of the
low touch orders comprises automatically routing the low touch
orders to a trading system that routes the low touch orders to the
at least one trading organization designated by the sponsoring
organization.
25. The method of claim 19, wherein facilitating execution of the
low touch orders comprises facilitating a direction by the
sponsoring organization to the asset manager to route the low touch
orders, consistent with the asset manager's regulatory
requirements, to the at least one trading organization designated
by the sponsoring organization.
26. A computer system for managing investment portfolios of a
sponsoring organization, the computer system comprising: a
computer-based graphical user interface and associated software
program configured to receive orders of an asset manager managing
the investment portfolios of the sponsoring organization, each
order comprising a number of asset units to buy or sell; and a
computerized rules-based logic high touch-low touch engine
configured to receive rules for categorizing an order as a low
touch order expected to have low market impact or a high touch
order expected to have high market impact, wherein the rules
facilitate a determination of for each order, whether the
sponsoring organization or the asset manager is assigned discretion
for facilitating execution of the each order, wherein the
sponsoring organization is assigned discretion for low touch orders
expected to have low market impact and the asset manager is
assigned discretion for high touch orders expected to have high
market impact.
27. The computer system of claim 26, wherein the high touch-low
touch engine is configured to determine, based on the rules,
whether the sponsoring organization or the asset manager is
assigned discretion for facilitating execution of the each order,
wherein the sponsoring organization is assigned discretion for low
touch orders expected to have low market impact and the asset
manager is assigned discretion for high touch orders expected to
have high market impact.
28. The computer system of claim 27, further comprising one or more
trading systems collectively configured to: facilitate, based on
the assignment of discretion, execution of the high touch orders by
at least one trading organization designated at the discretion of
the asset manager, and facilitate, based on the assignment of
discretion, execution of the low touch orders by at least one
trading organization designated at the discretion of the sponsoring
organization.
29. The computer system of claim 26, further comprising a trade
routing rules database on which the rules are stored.
30. The computer system of claim 26, wherein the high touch-low
touch engine is further configured to receive changes to the rules
and adjust the rules in real time.
Description
[0001] This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser.
No. 13/625,467, filed Sep. 24, 2012, which is a continuation of
U.S. application Ser. No. 13/118,904, filed May 31, 2011, now U.S.
Pat. No. 8,285,634, which is a continuation of U.S. application
Ser. No. 13/020,121, filed Feb. 3, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No.
8,180,699, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No.
12/700,218, filed Feb. 4, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,912,783, which
is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/783,690, filed
Apr. 11, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,685,057, which claims the
benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/791,209, filed Apr.
12, 2006, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/899,393, filed
Feb. 5, 2007, all of which are herein incorporated by reference in
their entirety.
BACKGROUND
Field of the Invention
[0002] The present invention relates to the management and trading
of investment portfolios and, in particular, to a system, method,
process, software and standards for facilitating a sponsoring
organization's unified trading and control of a money management
process.
[0003] More particularly, an embodiment of the present invention
provides a system (e.g., a hosted application), method
(organization of activity), process (division of responsibilities),
software (computer based systems), and standards (systems,
connectivity and protocols) supporting a real-time process
inclusive of computer interfaces, order entry, compliance analysis,
market impact analysis, order routing discretion, execution cost
and quality analysis, trade processing, communications engines,
communications networks, and communications protocols that
facilitate centralized portfolio management, directed brokerage
control, and direct and automated compliance monitoring, and
creates substantial and recurring savings for shareholders in
mutual funds and beneficiaries in institutional investment accounts
such as pension plans. This system (referred to as the unified
trading and control system), method, process, software, and
standards are applicable to registered mutual funds, non-registered
mutual funds, and institutional investment portfolios and could be,
for example, utilized by: (1) insurance companies with single or
multi-manager sub advised variable insurance, mutual fund, and
defined contribution portfolios; (2) mutual fund companies
utilizing sub advisors for managing their mutual fund offerings,
education funding, and defined contribution portfolios; (3) defined
benefit plan pension funds, trusts, and endowments that utilize
externally managed or unaffiliated money management services; (4)
large company investment portfolios and separate accounts of
insurance companies that utilize outsourced or unaffiliated money
management services for their institutional investment accounts;
and (5) non-registered mutual funds such as hedge funds, group
annuities, and collective investment funds that utilize outsourced
or unaffiliated money management services.
DEFINITIONS
[0004] For purposes of describing the present invention, FIG. 1
lists components of the present invention and compares the
corresponding terminology used in the investment products within
the registered mutual fund, unregistered mutual fund, and
institutional investment portfolio markets. FIG. 1 shows that
similar structures and responsibilities in various product
categories have different names.
[0005] As used herein, the terms "advisor" and "board of trustees"
in the context of registered and non registered mutual funds can be
considered the equivalent of the "administrator" and "board of
trustees" in the context of pension plan, endowment, or trust
investment portfolios; the term "sub advisor" in the context of
registered and non registered mutual funds can be considered the
equivalent of a "money manager" or "externally managed" in the
context of pension plan, endowment, or trust investment portfolios;
and the term "sub account" in the context of a variable insurance
product can be considered equivalent to a "mutual fund" in a
defined contribution plan (such as a 401(k) product) and a pension
plan's "account" with a money manager. In addition, the retail
investors (for example, the individual persons whose personal
accounts aggregate and are commingled into the assets comprising a
fund's investment portfolio) are referred to as "shareholders" in
registered and unregistered mutual funds and as "beneficiaries" in
institutional accounts, pension plans, etc. It is important to note
that the advisor or administrator and associated board of trustees
(boards) have a fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders and
beneficiaries to property control (minimize) fund and plan
operating expenses, as these expenses reduce the returns
(performance) of the investment portfolios to these same fund
shareholders and plan beneficiaries. The use herein of any of these
terms, as shown in FIG. 1, implies a similar underlying method and
process applicable across registered mutual funds, unregistered
mutual funds, and institutional investment portfolios.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0006] "Sub advised" assets utilize asset management services from
asset managers (also referred to as "sub advisors" or "money
managers") that are external or unaffiliated with the organization
that is responsible for sponsoring the investment product, such as
an insurance company, pension plan, or other financial institution.
Many large and small financial institutions outsource, in part or
whole, the responsibility of managing money for their investment
portfolios to outside organizations in order to capitalize on the
expertise of the asset management organizations and to enable the
financial institutions to focus on their core competencies. The
approximate assets in the investment industry by various markets,
along with their sub advised assets, are summarized in Table 1
below.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Investment Industry Assets Total Sub
Advised/ Industry Date Assets Externally Managed Source Variable
12/05 $1.3 TR $360 BB NAVA, FRC Insurance Mutual Funds 12/05 $10.1
TR $865 BB ICI, FRC Pension Plans 12/06 $4.7 TR $3.6 TR P&I
[0007] As an illustration, insurance companies offering variable
annuity products usually provide between thirty and sixty
investment options ("sub accounts" or "funds") to retail investors
for purposes of implementing an investor's asset allocation
strategy. These investment options are similar to mutual funds in
legal structure and operations and are required by the SEC to
register as mutual funds. An insurance company (functioning as the
"advisor") usually contracts with a number of mutual fund companies
or institutional asset management firms to provide asset management
services as a "sub advisor" (or asset manager or money manager) for
these mutual fund-type investment options (called "sub accounts" in
variable insurance products). A single mutual fund company or
institutional asset management firm may sub advise (manage) between
one and five of the thirty to sixty investment options available to
retail investors in a single variable insurance product (such as a
variable annuity).
[0008] The sub advisor is paid according to an annual fee schedule
based on assets in the fund or investment portfolio. The sub
advisor is paid to manage the assets (determine which securities to
hold in the fund or portfolio and make related buy and sell trading
decisions), but is not required to provide client service and
administrative functions such as opening and closing client
accounts, processing contributions and withdrawals on behalf of
clients, processing movement of funds between sub accounts (as an
investor buys and sells funds within the annuity product), handling
calls and special service requests from clients, maintaining client
addresses, providing tax reporting to clients, and printing and
mailing client statements. Thus, in a sub advisory relationship,
the client service and administrative functions (including
extensive back office system processing required to support these
functions) are provided through the sponsoring organization
(advisor) for the investment product, such as an insurance company,
pension plan, or other financial institution (and not the sub
advisor). A sub advisor's fee for managing the fund or account may
vary with the type of assets, the selected investment strategy, and
the size of the investment portfolio, but an annual fee of 0.50%
(fifty basis points or one-half of one percent) on assets is fairly
common.
[0009] The trading of stocks and bonds by sub advisors in a sub
advised fund or investment account is a complex process. The sub
advisor (mutual fund company and/or money management firm) not only
controls the selection of the stocks and bonds to buy and sell, but
also controls where and how each trade is executed (within
regulatory requirements). Thus, the sub advisor utilizes "step out
trades," whereby the sub advisor (mutual fund company) executes the
trades by directing them to their preferred trade execution
brokers, who then "steps away" from any clearing and settlement
responsibility for these trades. Clearing and settlement of these
trades, in turn, become the responsibility of the custody firm
(such as State Street, Mellon/BONY/Pershing, or Schwab) selected by
the insurance company, pension plan, etc. to custody (hold)
securities and cash for benefit of the fund or plan. Likewise,
pension funds, certain mutual fund companies, hedge funds and other
such entities and/or products as shown in FIG. 1 may also utilize a
money management structure and trading process similar to a
variable insurance product's sub advised structure.
[0010] When trading securities, as a general process, asset
managers (money managers) often incur additional trading costs that
are over and above the cost of the trade alone. For example,
referring to FIG. 2, asset managers 201 (such as mutual fund
companies or institutional asset management firms) usually maintain
a network of approximately twenty-five executing brokers 202
(including broker-dealers (such as Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley,
or UBS Paine Webber), market makers (such as Knight Capital or
Schwab Capital Markets, exchanges (such as the New York Stock
Exchange or NASDAQ), electronic communication networks (ECNs) (such
as INET or TRAC), direct market access (DMA) vendors (such as Lava
Trading, Sonic or UNX), and block trading systems (such as
LiquidNet or Premier)).
[0011] Executing brokers 202 are often selected for the additional
services (beyond executing the trade) that they can provide to the
asset manager 201 (mutual fund company or institutional asset
manager). The cost of these additional goods and services from
executing brokers 202 (such as company and market research, market
data feeds, trade analytics, and software) is added over and above
the trade's cost of execution and results in a higher trade cost
than what would otherwise be incurred by the fund or investment
portfolio. Thus, a trade may have an execution cost of $0.01 (one
cent) per share and have an additional $0.025 cents (two and
one-half cents) per share added to result in a total execution cost
of $0.035 (three and one-half cents) per share. Since many asset
managers trade billions of shares per year, these additional few
cents per share in trade costs cumulatively create a substantial
pool of revenue for the asset manager. The costs for these
additional services utilized by the asset managers 201 (referred to
as "soft dollars") are paid for by the shareholders or
beneficiaries through lower returns (lower performance) of their
funds or accounts. This utilization of "soft dollars," as
illustrated in FIG. 2, is not only a long-standing industry
practice, but these additional trading costs are not included, for
example, in the operating expenses of a mutual fund (such as a
quoted 1.10% annual operating expense) that are disclosed in the
fund prospectus. As such, a fund's trades are often directed to
executing brokers 202 as to maximize the benefits received by the
mutual fund company or institutional asset manager 201.
[0012] An exemplary process 200 for trading by asset management
firms, which generates "soft dollars," is shown in FIG. 2 and
described below in the following steps corresponding to the arrows
and their adjacent reference numerals shown in FIG. 2: [0013] 211)
Asset management firm (or money manager or sub advisor) 201
contracts with executing broker 202 for research. [0014] 212) The
executing broker 202 sends the research to the asset management
201. [0015] 213) The executing broker 202 presents the invoice to
the asset management firm 201 for confirmation. [0016] 214) The
asset management firm 201 records the invoice into a soft dollar
administration system 203. [0017] 215) The asset management firm
201, through the soft dollar administration system 203, derives the
trade obligations for paying the invoice. [0018] 216) The asset
management firm 201 directs trades to the executing broker 202 to
generate sufficient commission volume to offset the costs
associated with the confirmed invoice. [0019] 217) The executing
broker 202 reports the trade executions and associated trading
costs back to the asset management firm 201. [0020] 218) The asset
management firm 201 updates the soft dollar administration system
203. [0021] 219) The executing broker 202 confirms payment of the
invoice to the asset management firm's soft dollar administration
system 203.
[0022] The practice of adding to the cost of trading of securities
to create "soft dollars" is also a common practice in sub advisory
relationships, where money managers (asset managers) are hired (and
paid an annual fee) to manage pools of assets that belong to
external or unaffiliated products or organizations. Furthermore,
the sub advisory contracts with the sponsoring organization usually
contain a clause that eliminates any requirement that "soft dollar"
costs incurred by a specific fund (and its shareholders or
beneficiaries) benefit the fund or account paying the additional
"soft dollar" costs for their trades. As such, a sub advised find
or account can pay additional costs for services that do not even
benefit the shareholders or beneficiaries paying the additional
"soft dollar" expense.
[0023] In fact, most shareholders in mutual funds are not aware
that a fund's trading costs are in addition to the fund's annual
operating expense (as disclosed in the prospectus) and, as such,
serve to lower the performance (return) of their funds. These same
fund shareholders are also usually not aware that the mutual fund
companies and institutional asset managers are using the additional
"soft dollar" costs for trades in their mutual funds as a vaguely
disclosed and unaccountable pool of cash to offset the money
manager's operating expenses in order to increase their corporate
profits.
[0024] Overall, the current process utilized by sub advisors to
direct trades in order to generate "soft dollar" revenue is overly
complex, expensive to shareholders and beneficiaries, and requires
that the sponsoring organization (such as the insurance company)
surrender control over order execution cost, the selection of
executing brokers, and pre-trade compliance with regulatory
requirements, even though the insurance company (as the sponsoring
organization) retains primary regulatory (SEC) responsibility for
the funds (as the advisor for regulatory purposes) whose assets are
being traded. In essence, the insurance company responsible for
regulatory compliance is notified of the trades only after their
execution, usually well after the close of the trading day. Pension
plans and other entities utilizing sub advised portfolio
management, in a manner similar to the insurance companies, employ
a similar structure and experience similar challenges.
[0025] FIG. 3 illustrates a current process 300 for trading by sub
advisors 301 (e.g., money managers) in a sponsoring organization's
304 (e.g., insurance company) investment portfolios (sub accounts).
Typically, the complex process shown in FIG. 3 occurs for each
trade (usually ten to twenty trades per day per fund) in each of
the thirty to sixty investment portfolios (sub accounts) offered by
a sponsoring organization (such as a variable annuity product).
[0026] The process 300 in FIG. 3 works in the following steps
corresponding to the arrows and their adjacent reference numerals
shown in FIG. 3: [0027] 310) The sub advisors 301 direct orders
(trades) to their preferred network of executing brokers 302 (shown
as "Bs") as a single buy or sell order or may break up an order
into smaller orders for execution among several brokers. The
motivation to break orders up among several brokers can be driven
by a sub advisor's desire to remain anonymous in the market (as no
single broker can discern the sub advisor's overall investment
strategy), the specific strengths of each executing broker, and/or
the desire to use the fund assets to generate soft dollars. [0028]
311) The executing broker(s) 302 execute (fill) the orders and the
sub advisor 301 is notified electronically that the trade has been
executed along with the price per share. The data for each trade,
such as number of shares, price per share, total value, execution
costs, and contra broker, is transmitted through a number of
electronic data repositories. [0029] 312) The executing broker(s)
302 also report the trade fill data to a number of industry
organizations and this data is transmitted to the custodial firm
303 for the sponsoring organization's 304 assets. [0030] 313) After
the close of trading, the custodial firm 303 for the sponsoring
organization's 304 assets sends a file of the day's activity and
holdings for each fund and investment portfolio to the sponsoring
organization 304. [0031] 314) In their overnight processing cycle
305, the sponsoring organization 304 reconciles all activity and
holdings for updating account values and in preparation for the
next day's trading activity.
[0032] These trades are usually executed at an average cost 3.00
cents to 3.50 cents per share. The back office system, through the
overnight batch processing cycle, will reconcile the trades,
calculate updated portfolio account values or fund NAVs (Net Asset
Values), and subsequently update the holdings and values for each
client investing in their products. An insurance company (as
advisor for regulatory purposes) may implement some form of
compliance review during the reconciliation process. Most
importantly, the sponsoring organization 304 has little, if any,
control over the sub advisor's 301 choice of executing broker 202
and the associated additional costs incurred by their funds or
accounts through the use of soft dollars. Likewise, the sponsoring
organization 304 has no opportunity to review the trades for
compliance with prospectus and regulatory requirements until hours
after the close of the market or the next day (when trade issues
and errors are more expensive to address and correct). Overall, the
current process was established decades ago when the sub advised
industry was in its infancy and, despite its impressive current
assets, has never been restructured to recognize that the true
beneficiaries of this entire process should be the fund
shareholders and plan beneficiaries whose hard earned dollars
constitute the assets in these investment portfolios.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0033] An embodiment of the present invention provides a system
(e.g., referred to as the unified trading and control system),
method, process, software, and standards that simplify the sub
advisor (money manager) trading process, increase control over the
trading process by a sponsoring organization, and substantially
lower trading costs on a recurring basis for the shareholders and
beneficiaries investing in the funds and investment portfolios. In
particular, the present invention provides a superior trading and
control method for the sub advised industry. The system, method,
process, software, and standards of the present invention address a
number of existing shortcomings in the current trading and
operational processes in the sub advised industry, resulting in
substantially lower trading expenses on a recurring basis, improved
performance, a more simplified operational model, and superior
compliance oversight. The benefit of these lower trading expenses,
by regulatory requirement, must pass directly to the fund
shareholders (retail investors) in these funds and plan
beneficiaries in the form of lower trading expenses. The lower
trading expenses result in improved investment performance for the
funds and plans, thereby attracting additional investments for the
sponsoring organization. Further embodiments of the invention
provide similar systems, methods, processes, software, and
standards for the defined contribution market, 529 plans, hedge
funds, collective investments, deferred compensation plans,
institutional accounts, separate accounts of insurance companies,
defined benefit pension plans, endowments and trusts.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0034] FIG. 1 is a table that defines the terminology utilized in a
number of investment industry products across numerous markets in
registered mutual funds, non-registered mutual funds, and
institutional investment portfolios.
[0035] FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating, a prior art
process for trading by asset management firms (or money managers or
sub advisors) that generates "soft dollars,"
[0036] FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram illustrating a conventional
process for trading by asset managers in sub advised investment
portfolios.
[0037] FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram illustrating an exemplary
process for facilitating a sponsoring organization's money
management process as the sponsoring organization receives trade
orders from the sub advisor and selects the executing brokers,
according to an embodiment of the present invention.
[0038] FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram illustrating an exemplary
system and method for facilitating a sponsoring organization's
money management process utilizing a standard trading system,
messaging engine, communications protocol, and communications
network, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
[0039] FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram illustrating an alternative
exemplary system and method for facilitating a sponsoring
organization's money management process utilizing a standard
messaging engine, communications protocol, and communications
network, according to an alternative embodiment of the present
invention.
[0040] FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram illustrating an exemplary
order entry system and process, according to an embodiment of the
present invention.
[0041] FIGS. 8A, 8B, and 8C illustrate exemplary logical rules in
terms of regulatory, prospectus, and board restrictions, and
requirements for a real-time compliance engine, as implemented by
an operating fund trust.
[0042] FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram illustrating the number and
types of restrictions for a plurality of investment portfolios
along with an exemplary computer process for implementing a
compliance engine for an investment portfolio, according to an
embodiment of the present invention.
[0043] FIG. 10 is a schematic diagram illustrating an exemplary
order management system (OMS), according to an embodiment of the
present invention.
[0044] FIG. 11 is a schematic diagram illustrating an exemplary
high touch-low touch engine (HLE) system and process, according to
an embodiment of the present invention.
[0045] FIG. 12 is a schematic diagram illustrating an exemplary
price-cost-liquidity-quality engine, according to an embodiment of
the present invention.
[0046] FIG. 13 is a schematic diagram illustrating exemplary
component modules of a trade reconciliation system, according to an
embodiment of the present invention.
[0047] FIG. 14 is a table that compares and contrasts the
responsibilities of the sub advisor according to the prior art and
according to an embodiment of the system of the present invention
along with a comparison of the overall impact of the present
invention, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
[0048] FIG. 15 is a list of exemplary sponsoring organizations
offering variable insurance products.
[0049] FIGS. 16A and 16B are a list of exemplary money management
firms (mutual fund companies) that currently provide or potentially
could provide sub advisory services to sponsoring organizations
through registered mutual funds, unregistered mutual funds, and
institutional investment accounts.
[0050] FIG. 17 is a list of exemplary firms providing order
management systems (OMS).
[0051] FIGS. 18A and 18B are a list of many exemplary executing
broker firms providing trade execution services.
[0052] FIG. 19 is a schematic diagram illustrating an embodiment of
the present invention in which a plurality of sponsoring
organizations and a plurality of sub advisors (money managers)
utilize a plurality of order management systems (OMSs) to execute
orders with a plurality of executing brokers.
[0053] FIG. 20 is a schematic diagram illustrating an embodiment of
the present invention in which a sub advisor utilizes a plurality
of manager order management systems to execute orders for a
plurality of funds or investment portfolios with a plurality of
executing brokers.
[0054] FIG. 21 is a schematic diagram illustrating an embodiment of
the present invention in which a plurality of sponsoring
organizations and a plurality of sub advisors (money managers) use
a standard order management system, communications engine,
communications protocol, and communications network to execute
orders with a plurality of executing brokers.
[0055] FIG. 22 is a schematic diagram illustrating a use case
analysis of an exemplary implementation of a system, method,
process, software, and standards for facilitating the unified
trading and control of a sponsoring organization's money management
process, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
[0056] FIG. 23 is a table providing a compilation of research
demonstrating exemplary savings available to fund trusts (groups of
funds) showing the name of the fund trust, the total assets of the
fund trust, the current execution costs for trading cents per
share), the annual turnover rate for the trust, the effective
(total) turnover rate for the trust, and the number of shares
traded in 2005 by the trust. FIG. 23 also shows the exemplary
annual savings in millions of dollars and basis points (b.p.) of
annual savings realized by the fund trust at execution costs of
1.00 cent per share. The data for this table was compiled from
documents filed by each fund trust with the SEC, including the
prospectus, annual report, and statement of additional
information.
[0057] FIGS. 24A, 24B, 24C, and 24D are tables providing a
compilation of research calculating exemplary annual savings for
four popular fund trusts (group of funds) and the individual funds
(with their sub advisor) comprising the trust, showing the annual
cost savings (at an execution cost of 1.00 cent per share) both in
dollars and percentages. FIGS. 24 A-D also show an exemplary
beneficial effect of the annual compounding of these recurring
savings for a 1, 3, 5, and 10 year period.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0058] An embodiment of the present invention provides a unified
trading and control system. FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary sub
advisor (money manager) trading process 400 according to an
embodiment of the present invention. The following numbered steps
correspond to the arrows and their associated reference numerals
shown in FIG. 4. [0059] 410) The sub advisor 301 (or money manager)
for each investment portfolio provides the changes (buy and sell
orders) in the sub advised fund or investment portfolio to the
sponsoring organization 304 (acting as the advisor or
administrator) as to the sub advisor's decisions regarding, for
example: (1) employing the daily net cash contribution or
withdrawal (a decision usually made prior to the opening of
trading); (2) changing the percentage, share, or dollar allocations
of each security in the investment portfolio (decisions that can
occur at the beginning of and throughout the day); (3) changing how
the current model (the percentage allocation by security totaling
to 100%) compares to the target model; and (4) other money
management and trading decisions.
[0060] Once these decisions (and the resulting orders are
determined by the sub advisor or money manager 301, the sub advisor
calculates the resulting number of shares to buy or sell for each
security and communicates the desired orders to the sponsoring
organization 304. (As needed, selected orders could be executed or
"worked" by the sub advisor 301 according to criteria agreed to by
the sponsoring organization and sub advisor.) [0061] 411) The
sponsoring organization 304 maintains (separate and apart from the
sub advisors 301) its own group of relationships with executing
brokers 302. The sponsoring organization routes the orders to
executing broker(s) 302 of their own choice for execution, thereby
enabling the sponsoring organization 304 to seek out and utilize
the lowest cost source of execution, and thereby completely
eliminate the "soft dollar" charges (and the resulting additional
expense to the fund shareholders and plan beneficiaries) incurred
when the sub advisor is directing the trades. Through an embodiment
of the present invention, the sponsoring organization 304 is able
to select executing brokers 302 providing the lowest possible
execution cost (which presently could be one cent or less per
share) consistent with regulatory requirements for Best Execution
(best share price), thereby generating additional savings for the
fund shareholders and plan beneficiaries and improving fund
performance. [0062] 413) The executing brokers 302 report the trade
fins back to the sponsoring organization 304. [0063] 414) The
sponsoring organization reports the trade fills back to the sub
advisor 301.
[0064] The sponsoring organization 304 also has, in an embodiment
of the present invention, the option of implementing a pre-trade
compliance review and an immediate post execution review to ensure
the trade is compliant with prospectus, SEC, and board
requirements. If the trade is not compliant with these regulatory
requirements, the sponsoring organization 304 (as advisor for
regulatory purposes) is able to prevent the order from being
executed or immediately address any violations following execution
(rather than waiting until the next day as in the prior art).
[0065] FIG. 4 illustrates the areas of operational responsibility
according to an embodiment of the present invention, as summarized
in Table 2 below.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Areas of Operational Responsibility Sub
Advisors 301 Create Buy and Sell Orders Execute or "Work" Orders
per Agreed Criteria Sponsoring Maintain Network of Executing
Brokers Organizations 304 Select Executing Brokers for Orders Seek
Lowest Cost Execution Maintain Order Routing Table Eliminate "Soft
Dollars" from Trade Costs Pass Savings Through to Shareholders or
Beneficiaries Single and Comprehensive Compliance System and
Methodology for all Sub Advisors to Utilize for Trading Pre and
Post Trade Compliance Review Option Executing Execute Trades at
Lowest Possible Cost Brokers 302 Compete: Cost, Coverage,
Liquidity, Technology and Service
[0066] An embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG. 5 as
exemplary process 500, whereby the sponsoring organization utilizes
a standard system along with a plurality of other sponsoring
organizations to implement a standard method and process that
enables the sub advisors and executing brokers, through the
creation of a single operational structure with one sponsoring
organization, to easily and rapidly duplicate that same operating
structure with a plurality of sponsoring organizations across
multiple industries. This standardization eliminates the
extraordinary potential for unmanageable complexity created for sub
advisors and executing brokers as a multiplicity of sponsoring
organization select and implement their own individual method and
process utilizing a wide variety of vendors, systems, procedures,
communications engines, communications protocols, and
communications networks.
[0067] FIG. 5 illustrates the exemplary process 500 according to an
embodiment of the present invention. The process 500 works in the
following steps corresponding to the arrows and their associated
reference numerals shown in FIG. 5. [0068] 510) A plurality of sub
advisors 301 direct orders to the sponsoring organization 304
through the communications network 502. [0069] 511) The sponsoring
organization's order management system 503 receives a plurality of
orders from the sub advisors. [0070] 512) The sponsoring
organization's order management system 503 utilizes a
communications engine 504 that incorporates a communications
protocol 505 that translates each order into a usable format.
[0071] 513) Each order is directed to the compliance engine 506
that reviews the order with respect to prospectus, board, and SEC
regulations and requirements. [0072] 514) If a violation occurs
(Violation=Yes), the order is routed to the sub advisor 301 for
further evaluation and review. [0073] 515) If a violation does not
occur (Violation=No), the order is routed to the order management
system (OMS) 503, which, utilizing the communications engine 504
and communications protocol 505, translates the order into a format
acceptable to the executing brokers 202. [0074] 516) The sponsoring
organization's order management system 503 routes the order to the
executing brokers 202 through the communications network 502.
[0075] 517) The executing broker 202 receives the order and
executes the trade. [0076] 518) The executing broker 202 sends the
trade fill report to the sponsoring organization 304 and sub
advisor 301 through the communications network 502. [0077] 519) The
sponsoring organization 304 receives the trade fill report. [0078]
520) The sub advisor 301 receives the trade fill report.
[0079] The standard system 501 for facilitating the sponsoring
organization's 304 unified trading and control of their money
management process consists of the following components in an
integrated format: order management system 503, communications
engine 504, communications protocol 505, and communications network
502. An alternative embodiment of the present invention with an
alternative standard system 507 consists of the following
components in an integrated format: order management system 503,
communications engine 504, and communications protocol 505.
[0080] An alternative embodiment of the present invention is shown
in FIG. 6 as exemplary process 600, whereby the sponsoring
organization 304 utilizes a variance on the common standard system
with other sponsoring organizations to provide a standard method
and process that enables the sub advisors 301 and executing brokers
202, through the creation of a single operational structure with
one sponsoring organization, to easily and rapidly duplicate that
same operating structure with a plurality of sponsoring
organizations across multiple industries. The likelihood of
increasing compatibility of systems over time, and increased
industry acceptance of the system of the present invention, could
potentially ease the standardization requirement and allow these
additional options to become feasible. The standard system 601 and
602 comprises the following standard components in an integrated
format: communications engine 504, communications protocol 505, and
communications network 502. An alternative embodiment of the
standard system 601 consists of a communications engine 504 and
communications protocol 505. Finally, it is conceivable that, over
time, communications integration across the industry evolves to the
point where the standard consists solely of a communications
protocol 505.
[0081] The present invention, in the embodiments illustrated in
FIGS. 4, 5, and 6, provides a simpler process, lower trade
execution costs, and enhanced trade compliance, whereby the
sponsoring organization (the advisor with direct regulatory
responsibility for the investment portfolios), not the sub advisor
or money manager, controls where and how the trades are executed
(the order flow) on behalf of their fund shareholders and plan
beneficiaries.
I. Exemplary System and Process of the Present Invention
[0082] The present invention provides a system, method, process,
software, and standards for achieving a desired social utility of
creating significant and recurring cost savings (and the resulting
improved investment performance for fund shareholders and plan
beneficiaries.
[0083] A. System
[0084] An exemplary system is based on a number of components and
includes an order entry system, compliance engine, order management
system, a high touch-low touch engine, a
price-liquidity-cost-quality engine, trade reconciliation system,
communications engines, communications protocols, and
communications networks, as further described below.
[0085] 1) Order Entry System
[0086] FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram illustrating an order entry
system and process 700, according to an embodiment of the present
invention. The process 700 works in the following steps
corresponding to the arrows and their adjacent reference numerals
in FIG. 7. [0087] 725) The order entry system is a computer-based
graphical user interface (GUI) and associated software program(s)
that can be customized to fit the preference of the individual
portfolio manager and his or her personal style of managing money.
(The individual who is the portfolio manager for the investment
portfolio is typically an employee of the mutual fund company or
institutional asset manager acting as sub advisor.) The order entry
GUI 701 displays, among other data, the investment portfolio's
total value, cash, and securities along with the number of shares,
share price, and dollar value of each position 702. FIG. 7 shows an
exemplary order entry GUI 702 providing this exemplary data. The
order entry system provides important functionality in two
respects:
[0088] a) Daily Net Cash: The order entry system provides data on
the daily net contribution or withdrawal of cash from the
investment portfolio, and enables the portfolio manager to
implement decisions such as maintain this cash, sell specific
securities to cover any net withdrawal, buy certain securities,
buy/sell the current model, buy/sell the target model, or buy/sell
as to move the current model closer to the target model.
[0089] b) Order Execution Options: The order entry system provides
options for the order type for each trade, for example: market,
limit, good to closing, and fill or kill. Also, the system can
allow a portfolio manager to freeze a security's current shares,
that is, exclude the security from any and all future trading.
[0090] 726) The portfolio manager utilizes the order entry system
to implement the buy and sell orders for securities through the
creation of a trade ticket 703. The responsibility for entering the
buy and sell orders into the order entry system remains with the
sub advisor (the portfolio manager or their associated trading
desk/operations group) in an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 7 shows an exemplary trade ticket 703 accessible through the
order entry GUI.
[0091] As the order is entered by the sub advisor (who hits, e.g.
ENTER on the order entry screen), the order entry system calculates
the necessary number of shares and dollars for each security to buy
or sell. Given that the order is determined at the investment
portfolio level, the order entry system does not have nor require
access to information at the account level for individual fund
shareholders or plan beneficiaries. The record of the order is
entered into the trade blotter 704. Thus, for example, when an
asset manager increases the allocation by 1% in IBM in a $100 MM
investment portfolio, the result is an aggregate buy of $1 MM of
IBM. Given a price of $80 per share for IBM, the buy order is
12,500 shares. This process is repeated for each buy and sell order
implemented by the portfolio manager. [0092] 728) The order is
routed to the compliance engine 506. [0093] 729) If a violation
occurs (Violation=Yes), the order is routed to the order entry GUI
701 for review and evaluation by the portfolio manager, trade desk
and/or compliance officer. [0094] 730) If a violation does not
occur (Violation=No), the order is routed to the order management
system (OMS) 503, [0095] 731) The order management system 503
utilizes the order routing table 705 to direct the order for
execution. [0096] 732) The order routing table 705 directs the
order to, among other venues, a market maker 706, an electronic
commerce network (ECN) 707, a direct market access (DMA) vendor
708, or an exchange 709. [0097] 733) Once the order is executed,
the trade fill report is sent back to the order management system
503. [0098] 734) The order entry GUI is updated with the revised
positions, number of shares, price per share, values, and cash
data. FIG. 7 shows an exemplary screen image of the updated order
entry GUI 710.
[0099] 2) Compliance Engine
[0100] The compliance engine is a graphical user interface (GUI)
and associated software program(s) linked to a computerized
rules-based logic engine that enables each buy or sell, order (or
combinations of buy and sell orders) to be analyzed in real time,
according to a set of customizable logical rules, such as rules
specifying that foreign securities cannot exceed 15% of a
portfolio's total value or that the portfolio cannot hold the
securities of the sub advisor nor the sponsoring organization. The
compliance analysis occurs both prior to and immediately following
the execution of each trade (or group of trades) as well as at the
close of each trading day for compliance with prospectus,
regulatory, and board requirements. Any pending order or group of
pending orders that may result in any type of prohibited
transaction are held in suspense (and not executed) and tagged with
a warning flag, and a violation notice is sent to the compliance
group, portfolio manager, and trade/operations group. The order or
group of orders in question, subsequent to the review of the
violation, may be amended, killed, or approved for execution.
Trades (or groups of trades) that are executed are also analyzed to
ensure that the resulting metrics of the trades do not violate any
requirements for the portfolio. (Post-execution price changes could
subsequently trigger a violation not present at the time of
execution.) Approved orders are routed to the order management
system (OMS) to begin the execution process.
[0101] FIGS. 8A, 8B, and 8C illustrate exemplary logical rules in
terms of regulatory, prospectus, and board restrictions and
requirements for a real-time compliance engine, as specified in the
disclosure documents of an operating fund trust.
[0102] FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram illustrating an exemplary
compliance review process 900, according to an embodiment of the
present invention, for implementing a compliance engine for a
plurality of investment portfolios. In the instance for this
operating fund trust, there are a total of 274 individual
restrictions that could apply to all, many, or a single investment
portfolio or fund. FIG. 9 shows the actual restrictions by category
for five of the fund trust's investment portfolios, with the number
of the individual restrictions shown in a breakdown of five
categories, ranging from 41 to 63 compliance and regulatory
restrictions per investment portfolio.
[0103] The exemplary compliance review process 900 works as
described in the following steps corresponding to the arrows and
their adjacent reference numerals as shown in FIG. 9. [0104] 925)
An order for an investment portfolio 902 is entered into the order
management system 503, which records the transaction in the trade
blotter. [0105] 926) The order management system 503 routes the
order to the compliance engine 506 for pre-trade review. [0106]
927) The compliance engine 506 matches the order to the
restrictions for that particular investment portfolio 903 and
conducts an analysis to determine if the order will result in a
violation of any applicable restriction. Exemplary restrictions and
their frequencies are illustrated in table 901 of FIG. 9. [0107]
928) If Violation=Yes 904, the order is not executed and requires a
review. [0108] 929) The rejected order is then routed into the
order evaluation process 905. [0109] 930) The reviewed order
evaluation process 905 gathers input from at least one of the
compliance group 908, portfolio manager 907, and the
trading/operations group 906. The order may be killed at this
point, revised, or allowed to be executed in its existing form 909.
[0110] 931) If the order is to be executed, the reviewed order 909
is routed to the order management system 503 for updating the trade
blotter and resubmission to the compliance engine 506. [0111] 932)
If, in step 927, Violation=No 910, the order is routed to the order
management system 503. [0112] 933) The order management system 503
routes the order for execution 911. [0113] 934) The order is
executed and the trade fill report is generated. [0114] 935) The
trade fill report is routed back to the compliance engine 506 for
post trade and ongoing compliance review and analysis.
[0115] Overall, in an embodiment of the present invention, the
sponsoring organization (the advisor with direct regulatory
responsibility for the investment portfolios) has the option, which
was not available in the prior art, to review all pending orders
and prevent violations of prospectus, regulatory, and board
requirements prior to the orders being executed. The sponsoring
organization, in an embodiment of the present invention, also has
the option, which was not available in the prior art, to review all
executed trades on a real-time basis to prevent post-execution
violations of prospectus, regulatory, or board requirements.
Finally, for the first time, the sponsoring organization, as
advisor or, plan administrator, has the means to place each fund or
account and each sub advisor on the sponsoring organization's
implementation of a common, centrally operated compliance engine,
process and set of restrictions (as opposed to each different sub
advisor or money manager performing compliance reviews on as many
different systems.) The sponsoring organization, as advisor to the
fund or administrator to the pension plan, has a regulatory (SEC)
responsibility to ensure compliance of its funds and plan with all
regulatory requirements and to certify, in writing, that these
investment portfolios do not violate the securities laws. Thus, in
contrast to conventional systems, the present invention enables the
advisor or administrator to fulfill such responsibilities prior to
execution of an order, enables an immediate review of all executed
trades, and allows a single standardized compliance review process
to be implemented across all sub advisors and the funds or
accounts. The present invention therefore empowers the advisor or
administrator to properly fulfill their regulatory (SEC)
responsibilities.
[0116] 3) Order Management System
[0117] FIG. 10 is a schematic diagram illustrating the order
management system (OMS) 503, according to an embodiment of the
present invention. The order management system is a computerized
processing system with a graphical user interface (GUI) and
associated software program(s) enabling the organization conducting
the trading activity to maintain a real-time trade blotter for all
their pending orders and executed trades. An order management
system can comprise one or more of the following modules: portfolio
modeling engine 1002, order entry 700, trade blotter 704, order
routing table 705, and communications engine 504. The portfolio
modeling engine 1002 enables a money manager to evaluate "what if"
scenarios with the portfolio prior to implementing any trade
orders. The trade blotter 704 enables real-time monitoring of all
trading activity such as open orders 1003, cancel/correct orders
1004, and executed orders 1005. The OMS 503 enables the utilization
of various trading strategies, keeping track of positions, P&L,
order acceptance and release, sending IOI's (Indications of
Interest), and amending orders. The order routing table 705 is a
central database for maintaining the instructions for directing
orders to selected executing brokers. The communications engine 502
is used to create data formats acceptable to other order management
systems.
[0118] The order management system 503 also provides logical
workflow solutions to assist in maintaining proper communication
between the various front, middle, and back office functions and
systems for allocations of large orders as well as keeping track of
partial fills of trade orders. Finally, the order management system
503 utilizes market data sources 1001 and provides robust and
flexible compliance, regulatory and audit reporting capabilities
1006, including NYSE Rule 123, OATs, ACT, Short Sale, and Limit
Order Handling Rule reports, as well as capturing, time-stamping,
and archiving all activity for timely reconciliation and
trouble-shooting.
[0119] The order management system 503 functions as described in
the following steps, which correspond to the arrows and their
associated reference numerals shown in FIG. 10. [0120] 1020) The
order management system 503 links with a plurality of real-time and
batch market data feeds 1001. [0121] 1021) The portfolio manager
utilizes the portfolio modeling engine 1002 to perform "what if"
analyses for the investment portfolio and enters orders into the
order entry module 700. [0122] 1022) The orders are recorded in the
trade blotter 704. [0123] 1023) The trade blotter 704 enables views
of the trade data such as open orders 1003, cancel and correct
orders 1004, and executed trades 1005. (The compliance review
process, as illustrated in FIG. 9, can occur at this point in the
process, but is not shown.) [0124] 1024) The orders are sent to
order routing table 705 for selecting executing brokers and
receiving directions to those executing brokers 202. [0125] 1025)
The order routing table 705 transmits the order to the
communications engine 502, which translates the order into a format
accepted by executing brokers 202. [0126] 1026) The order is routed
to the communications network 502. [0127] 1027) The communications
network 502 routes the order to the selected executing broker(s)
202. [0128] 1028) The executing broker(s) execute the order and
send the trade fill report(s) through the communications network
502. [0129] 1029) The communications network 502 directs the trade
fill report back to the order management system 503 and the
communications engine 504 translates the order into a format used
by the order management system 503. [0130] 1030) The trade fill
report updates the trade blotter 704 with the details of the trade
fill report(s). [0131] 1031) The trade report data is used to
update the portfolio holdings for the order entry module 700.
[0132] 1032) The order management system 503 submits transaction
reporting 1006 to the appropriate industry transaction processing
and reporting entities.
[0133] Importantly, in an aspect of the present invention, the
primary responsibility for operating the order management system
503 for processing orders shifts from the sub advisor, who operated
the order management system in the prior art, to the sponsoring
organization.
[0134] 4) High Touch-Low Touch Engine
[0135] The high touch-low touch engine is a graphical user
interface (GUI) and associated software program(s) linked to a
computerized rules-based logic engine that enables each buy or sell
order (or combinations of buy and sell orders) to be analyzed in
real time, according to a set of customizable logical rules, to:
(1) determine the expected market impact of an order and categorize
an order as high touch or low touch; and (2) accordingly route the
low touch orders for execution by the sponsoring organization and
the high touch orders for execution by the sub advisor. In a
preferred embodiment, these logical rules can be adjusted in real
time.
[0136] Orders are categorized as high touch or low touch orders
depending on their expected market impact. For example, the
immediate execution in the market of an order to buy 500,000 shares
for an equity that currently trades 100,000 shares daily at $40.00
per share will almost certainly create an increase in the share
price of that equity. As such, the large order could drive up the
price of the equity by several dollars per share. Once the
execution of that order is completed, the trading volume will
likely return to its original 100,000 shares per day trading volume
and the share price could return to the pre trade level of $40.00
per share. A possible result is that the purchasers of the 500,000
shares will experience an immediate loss on their investment. The
phenomenon of driving up the share price through a very large buy
order or lowering the share price through a very large sell order
is referred to as "market impact." It is usually desirable to
"work" orders with significant expected market impact. By "working"
orders, traders are able to utilize a vane of tools, such as
institutional trading desks, trade algorithms, crossing networks,
dark pools of liquidity, sending IOIs (indications of interest),
and other such techniques (including manually watching the market
for the appropriate times to execute small portions of the total
order) to eliminate or reduce the expected market impact of a large
order. The orders that require special handling ("working") are
referred to as "high touch trades."
[0137] On the other hand, there may be situations in which an order
represents a very small portion of a measure such as daily trade
volume. For example, an order to buy 5,000 shares for an equity
trading several million shares daily will have little or no
expected market impact on the price of that equity. Once entered,
such an order is transmitted, executed, and reported as the
electronic systems and computers (also referred to as "black
boxes") communicate with each other with little or no human
interaction. The orders with low or no expected market impact are
referred to as "low touch trades."
[0138] Finally, once an execution strategy is selected for a high
touch order, the order may be broken up into several smatter orders
that are executed over a period of time. These smaller orders may
now qualify as low touch orders, as each individual order, when
executed over a period a time, may now result in little or no
market impact.
[0139] FIG. 11 is a schematic diagram illustrating an exemplary
high touch-low touch engine (HLE) system and process 1100,
according to an embodiment of the present invention. The process
1100 works as described in the following steps, which correspond to
the arrows and their adjacent reference numerals shown in FIG. 11.
[0140] 1125) The sub advisor 301, sponsoring organization 304, and
board of trustees 1101 determine the rules for categorizing an
order as high touch or low touch. [0141] 1126) The rules for
categorizing an order as high touch or low touch are input into the
trade routing rules database 1102. These rules can be changed in
real-time. [0142] 1127) The high touch-low touch engine (FILE) 1105
utilizes the rules from the trade routing rules database 1102 to
categorize orders as high or low touch orders. [0143] 1128) The
high-low engine (HLE) 1105 incorporates a real-time feed of market
data 1104 for use in analyzing and determining the expected market
impact of an order. [0144] 1129) The portfolio manager 1103, using
the sub advisor's order management system 503 SA, enters an order
that is routed, via the sub advisor routing loop, to the high-low
engine 1105 for real-time analysis and categorization as a high
touch or low touch order. Although the high touch-low touch engine
1105 is illustrated as located within the unified trading and
control system, one of ordinary skill in the art would appreciate
that the high touch-low touch engine 1105 could be located
elsewhere, such as at the sub advisor 301 or sponsoring
organization 306. [0145] 1130) The high touch-low touch engine 1105
determines the expected market impact of orders received from the
sub advisor order management system (OMS) 503 SA and categorizes
orders with significant expected market impact as "high touch"
orders 11106. [0146] 1131) The high touch order 1106 is further
categorized as orders to be "worked" by a block trading desk,
crossing system, matching system, dark pool of liquidity, or some
other form of institution to institution trading system or exchange
1109. These worked orders are routed for review by the sponsoring
organization's compliance engine 506 and, once approved, are ready
for execution. [0147] 1132) As an alternative to step 1131, the
high touch order 1106 is divided into a series of smaller orders
1108 by a trading algorithm or a set of manual decisions 1107.
[0148] 1133) The trading algorithm or set of manual decisions
divides the order into a series of smaller orders 1108 for
execution over a period of time. [0149] 1134) Each of the smaller
orders 1108 resulting from the original high touch order are
re-routed to the high touch-low touch engine 1105 via the sub
advisor re-routing loop. [0150] 1135) The high touch-low touch
engine 1105 evaluates the re-routed smaller orders 1108 and
categorizes the orders with significant market impact as high touch
orders 1109. [0151] 1136) High touch orders 1109, from both the
original and re-routed orders, are directed via auto routing 1110
to the sub advisor's order management system 503 SA. [0152] 1137)
The sub advisor's order management system 503 SA receives the high
touch order 1109 and selects the executing broker(s) 202. [0153]
1138) The sub advisor order management system 503 SA routes the
high touch orders to the executing broker(s) 202 for execution.
[0154] 1139) Once the orders are executed by the executing brokers
202, the trade fill data for the high touch trades 1106 is routed
to the sub advisor order management system 503 SA. [0155] 1140) The
sub advisor order management system 503 SA determines, when
applicable, the allocation of shares for the sponsoring
organization and routes the trade allocation data along with the
trade fill data (for trades not requiring a special allocation) for
the high touch trades to the sponsoring organization's order
management system 503 SO. [0156] 1141) The sponsoring
organization's order management system 503 SO routes the trade
allocation data for the sponsoring organization's allocation of
shares of the high touch trade and the trade fill data for the high
touch trades (not requiring a special allocation) to the sponsoring
organization's trade reconciliation system 1117. Steps 1130 through
1141 constitute the high touch order processing loop. [0157] 1142)
Returning to steps 1129 and 1134, when the high touch-low touch
engine 1105 receives orders from the sub advisor order management
system (OMS) 503 (as either the original and re-routed orders) that
it determines will have little or no significant expected market
impact, the high touch-low touch engine 105 categorizes those
orders as "low touch" orders 1111 that can be processed as
"electronic" or "black box" orders, which computer systems can
execute with virtually no human intervention. The "low touch" order
can be either original orders or re-routed orders from the sub
advisor order management system 503 SA. [0158] 1143) The high
touch-low touch engine 1105 directs trades that do not require a
trade rotation order to the sponsoring organization 304. For
example, a single order for a single fund would not require a trade
rotation order. [0159] 1144) The high touch-low touch engine 1105
routes trades requiring a trade order rotation to the trade order
rotation engine 1112 in order to determine a trade order rotation
between the sub advisor 301 and the sponsoring organization(s) 304
and 1116. For example, when an asset manager places a plurality of
orders in a given security for execution across a plurality of
investment portfolios, trade order rotation is required. Such trade
order rotation is preferably random. The trade order rotation could
be, for example, a defined procedure comprising random selection,
sequential selection, or algorithmic random selection. [0160] 1145)
The trade order rotation engine 1112 prepares trade rotation
instructions 1113 for the sub advisor 301. [0161] 1146) The trade
rotation instructions 1113 are communicated to the sub advisor's
order management system 503 SA via auto routing 1110 (along steps
1146a and 1146b). [0162] 1147) The trade rotation engine 1114
determines the trade rotation order between a plurality of
sponsoring organizations, such as the sponsoring organization 304
and any number of additional sponsoring organizations as
represented by sponsoring organization (SO.sub.x) 1116. The trade
rotation order could also be determined as a single trade rotation
order between the sub advisor 301 and sponsoring organizations 304
and 1116. [0163] 1148) The trade rotation engine 1114 prepares
trade rotation instructions 1115 for the sponsoring organizations
304 and 1116. [0164] 1149) The trade rotation instructions 1115 are
communicated to the sponsoring organizations 304 and 1116. [0165]
1150) The trade orders are routed to the sponsoring organization's
order management system (OMS) 503 SO. [0166] 1151) The sponsoring
organization's order management system (OMS) 503 SO routes the
orders for review by the sponsoring organization's compliance
engine 506 and, once approved, selects the executing brokers 202
and routes the orders through the communications network 502 for
execution. [0167] 1152) The communications network 502 directs the
orders to the designated executing brokers 202 for execution.
[0168] 1153) The executing brokers 202 execute the trade and report
the trade fills back to the communications network 502. [0169]
1154) The communications network 502 reports the trade fill reports
back to the sub advisor's order management system (OMS) 503 SO.
[0170] 1155) The sponsoring organization's order management system
(OMS) 503 SO routes the orders to the sponsoring organization's
trade reconciliation system 1117. Although, for clarity, FIG. 11
shows the trade compliance, execution, and reconciliation process
(steps 1150-1155) only for sponsoring organization (SO 1) 304, the
same or similar process would occur for the additional sponsoring
organizations (SO.sub.x) 1116. Steps 1142 through 1155 constitute
the low touch order processing loop.
[0171] The high touch-low touch engine (HLE) 1100 is unique in that
it performs an expected market impact analysis and assigning of
discretion over order execution and selection of executing brokers
to different organizations utilizing real-time market data and
customizable rules. The high touch-low touch engine's (HLE)
automated, real-time capability does not exist in the prior art and
represents a technology innovation in the system of the present
invention.
[0172] In an embodiment of the present invention, the high
touch-low touch engine 1100 enables the sponsoring organization to
select the executing brokers and direct the pending orders for
execution at brokers providing the lowest cost execution
(consistent with regulatory requirements such as Best Execution).
The result is that, in an embodiment of the present invention, the
sponsoring organizations are able to direct order flow as to
eliminate soft dollar costs and achieve substantial and recurring
cost savings (and improved investment performance) for their fund
shareholders and plan beneficiaries. The high touch-low touch
engine 1100 would, under circumstances approved by the sponsoring
organization, enable the sub advisor to assume discretion to direct
trades to their selected executing brokers.
[0173] 5) Price-Liquidity-Cost-Quality Engine
[0174] The price-liquidity-cost-quality engine is a graphical user
interface (GUI) and associated software program(s) linked to a
computerized, real-time and customizable rules-based logic engine
that enables each buy or sell order (or combinations of buy and
sell orders) to be analyzed, according to a set of customizable
logical rules, to determine, through an optimization process, the
most cost effective order composition in terms of one or more of
share price, number of shares, execution cost or mark-up, expected
price improvement, and execution speed. The output of the
price-liquidity-cost-quality engine is a list of the executing
brokers, share price, number of shares, execution cost or mark-up,
expected price improvement, and execution speed for the sponsoring
organizations and sub advisor to utilize in selecting executing
brokers for their orders.
[0175] The price per share, number of shares and execution costs or
mark-ups are based on actual data gathered through real-time market
data feeds and inputs from executing brokers. The price per share
and number of shares reflect current market data. The execution
cost or mark-up per share reflects the real-time cost entered into
the price-liquidity-cost-quality engine by the executing brokers
and can vary on a security by security basis and over time (as
executing brokers adjust their executions costs or mark-ups to
reflect their desire to accumulate, reduce, or liquidate their
position in a security).
[0176] The trade quality analysis engine provides a real-time and
customizable analysis of the historical and expected price
improvement for each security, by executing broker, in an order.
Currently, orders are executed at the National Best and Offer (Ask)
or NBBO. As such, an equity may be available to buy at $42.25 per
share (ask or offer) and to sell at $42.00 per share (bid). The
difference between the bid and offer (ask) is the spread ($0.25).
As such, the ideal price point between the bid and offer is the Mid
Point between Bid and Offer (MPBO). For this security, the midpoint
between bid and offer is $42.125 per share. The trade quality
engine performs a real-time analysis of the share prices and times
of execution for recently executed trades to determine how close
the share price for a trade was to the MPBO. The range of such a
calculation could range from a trade occurring at a $42.125 (at the
MPBO, which is a 0% effective to quoted spread.) (While it is
possible, orders are rarely executed below the MPBO.) A buy order
occurring at $42.25 or a sell order occurring at $42.00 is
considered 100% of the NBBO and does not provide any price
improvement, which equates to a 100% effective-to-quoted spread.
Unfortunately, orders can also be executed above the spread (above
$42.25 on a buy or below $42.00 on a sell). These transactions are
considered "outside the spread" and, as a result, these trades have
an effective-to-quoted spread that exceeds 100%. The
effective-to-quoted analysis is performed for each order and the
time period utilized for this analysis is customizable and
performed for periods of time ranging from sub-seconds to minutes,
hours, days, and longer, according to the desires of the user. This
data is then utilized by an optimization engine to calculate the
most cost effective group of executing brokers for the order. This
data is then transmitted to the order management system of the sub
advisor or sponsoring organization.
[0177] The quality data can also include factors such as speed of
execution, which reflects the time that is required for an
executing broker, upon receipt of the order, to complete the
execution of the order.
[0178] Currently, the securities industry focuses on share price
and liquidity ("best execution") when determining the optimal order
composition. The price-cost-liquidity-quality engine's capacity to
factor in additional real-time and customizable factors, such as
execution cost and expected price improvement, represents a
considerable step forward in providing shareholders and plan
beneficiaries with lowest total execution cost in a routine and
automated fashion.
[0179] FIG. 12 is a schematic diagram illustrating the
price-cost-liquidity-quality engine's 1201 system and process 1200,
according to an embodiment of the present invention. The process
1200 works as described in the following steps, which correspond to
the arrows and their adjacent reference numerals shown in FIG. 12.
[0180] 1225) Sub advisors 301 and sponsoring organizations 304 and
1116 transmit their individual orders to the
price-liquidity-cost-quality system through the graphical user
interface (GUI) 1202 or through a data feed from their order
management system 503 (not shown). [0181] 1226) The order is
entered into the price-cost-liquidity database 1203. [0182] 1227)
Executing brokers 202 utilize a graphical user interface (GUI) 1204
to enter the execution costs 1204 for orders into the
price-cost-liquidity-quality engine 1201. The execution cost data
1204 can be changed on a real-time basis for each security. [0183]
1228) The execution cost data 1201 is incorporated into the
price-liquidity-cost database 1203. [0184] 1229) Real time market
data 1205 is delivered to the price-cost-liquidity-quality engine
1201 and incorporated into the price-liquidity-cost database 1203.
[0185] 1230) The price-liquidity-cost data is incorporated into the
execution quality analysis engine 1206. [0186] 1231) The system
archive 1207 for the execution quality analysis engine 1206
provides real-time and historical data on the quality of execution,
that is, the effective-to-quoted spread to the execution quality
analysis engine 1206. [0187] 1232) The execution quality analysis
engine 1206 combines the price-liquidity-cost data and the
real-time and historical data and delivers the data to the order
optimization engine 1208. [0188] 1233) The data 1209 incorporates
the share price, number of shares available from each executing
broker, execution cost or mark-up, broker identification, and
quality of execution (calculated effective-to-quoted spread).
[0189] 1234) The order optimization engine 1208 combines the lowest
execution cost based on the price-liquidity-cost data and factors
in the expected price improvement data to determine, through the
optimization process, the most cost effective combination of
executing brokers for the order. For this order, the most cost
effective group of brokers combine for an execution cost of $69.00
with an expected price improvement resulting from an
effective-to-quoted spread of 10% for 11,000 shares, 20% for 2,000
shares, and 25% for 7,000 shares. [0190] 1235) The order
optimization engine 1208 routes the optimized executing broker
combination to the graphical user interface 1202. [0191] 1236) The
sub advisors 301 and sponsoring organizations 304 and 1116 (or any
asset manager 201) utilizes the graphical user interface 1202 (or
data feed) to review the optimized executing broker combination for
that order for use in the order entry process 700 (not shown).
[0192] The price-cost-liquidity-quality engine 1201 is unique in
that it performs a real-time computer analysis and subsequent
assigning of execution costs and expected execution quality
relative to current share price and liquidity offered by a network
of executing brokers. This automated, real-time, and customizable
capability does not exist in the prior art and represents a
technology innovation in the system of the present invention.
[0193] 6) Trade Reconciliation System
[0194] FIG. 13 is a schematic diagram illustrating a trade
reconciliation system 1300, according to an embodiment of the
present invention. The trade reconciliation system is a
computerized trade processing system that functions in the back
office system for the investment portfolios. The trade
reconciliation system can comprise general ledger and accounting
1301, position manager 1302, and stock record 1303 modules. The
position manager 1302 can comprise an auto cage 1304 that connects
to clearing organizations 1305. The position manager module 1302
and stock record module 1303 support the trade processing module
1306 that provides commission accounting 1307 and trade processing
1308. The stock record also supports the purchase and sales module
1309, which incorporates data through external data providers 1310
and market connections 1311. The trade reconciliation system 1300
provides real-time, multi-currency trade settlement rules, trade
comparisons, trade confirmation and affirmations, purchases and
sales, trade exception processing, commission calculations,
accruals, cash flows, and trial balances. In essence, the trade
reconciliation system 1300 operates in an automated fashion through
the incorporation of real-time and batch data feeds from a variety
of different sources. In its simplest form, the trade
reconciliation process ensures that: (1) all trades are properly
accounted; (2) all trading, pricing, and processing errors have
been identified and addressed; and (3) all accounts are in balance.
At the conclusion of this process, the entire system is ready for
the next day's trading activity.
[0195] In the prior art, the trade reconciliation process is the
responsibility of both the sub advisor and the sponsoring
organization while the balancing of accounts is the responsibility
of the sponsoring organization. In an embodiment of the present
invention, the responsibility for both the trade reconciliation
process and the balancing of accounts shifts to the sponsoring
organization.
[0196] 7) Additional Systems
[0197] The system of the present invention can also include
additional systems to support order execution processing. These
systems include a communications engine to translate and direct all
messages between the appropriate parties; a communications protocol
for specifying message format as to eliminate confusion as to
message content, instructions, and destination; and a
communications network to connect all sub advisors, sponsoring
organizations, and executing brokers with real-time, reliable, and
scalable connectivity.
[0198] B. Process
[0199] In an embodiment of the present invention, the functional
responsibilities, personnel requirements, system requirements,
regulatory responsibilities, and data flows are dramatically
different from the prior art. From a perspective of responsibility
for the sub systems, Table 3 below illustrates how the operating
responsibilities for the various systems change from the prior art
to an embodiment of the present invention.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Operating Responsibilities of the Present
Invention System Responsibility Prior Art Present Invention Order
Entry Sub Advisor Sub Advisor Compliance Engine Sub Advisor
Sponsoring Organization Has Compliance Option Order Management
System Sub Advisor Sponsoring Organization High Touch - Low Touch
Not Applicable Sponsoring Organization Engine Real-Time Automated
Process Price - Liquidity - Cost - Not Applicable Sponsoring
Organization Quality Engine Real-Time Automated Process Trade
Reconciliation Sub Advisor Sponsoring Organization Communications
Engine Sub Advisor Sponsoring Organization Communications Protocol
Sub Advisor Sponsoring Organization Communications Network Sub
Advisor Sponsoring Organization
[0200] With respect to the responsibilities of the sub advisor,
there are substantial differences between the prior art and the
embodiment of the present invention. These differences are
summarized in FIG. 14. The unified trading and control system is
flexible in its implementation in that trading responsibility for
certain funds or portfolios, such as an emerging markets or micro
cap stocks, may remain with the sub advisors (assuming the sub
advisor has proficiency with these less liquid issues that the
sponsoring organization may not possess.) Also, the money manager
(or portfolio manager) may desire more control over the trading of
specific assets or issues, the utilization of certain trade
strategies or the direction of orders to a specific executing
broker. The authorization of such exceptions remains with the
sponsoring organization as the sponsoring organization can
authorize those exceptions that benefit the fund shareholders or
plan beneficiaries. Overall, in an embodiment of the present
invention, there are multiple benefits for the sub advisor with
respect to lower operating expenses, less operating and trade error
risk and, of course, superior fund performance.
[0201] Finally, an important user group that must be comfortable
with the system implementation of the present invention is the
portfolio managers making the daily buy and sell decisions in the
fund or investment portfolio. The system of the present invention
addresses the portfolio managers' concern that their asset
management process not be interfered with as new systems,
processes, and procedures are implemented. The result is that the
system of the present invention, as shown below in Table 4,
addresses the concerns of the portfolio managers in a positive and
comprehensive fashion.
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Portfolio Manager Concerns Addressed by the
Present Invention Portfolio Manager Concern Unified Trading and
Control System Performance Substantial, Recurring Improvement in
Performance Control of High Remains with Sub Advisor (through high
touch - Touch Trades low touch engine) Anonymity Enhanced as
positions are held in multiple sub advised portfolios Latency
Improved as automated process replace manual processes Chaos from
Standards create a single image across all Multiple Systems sub
advised accounts Trade Rotation Implemented by trade order rotation
engine Order Entry Remains sub advisor responsibility Management
Fees Not impacted by change in process Best Execution SEC Rule NMS
mandates Best Execution on all trades
[0202] C. Rationale for Implementation of a Standard in the System
of the Present Invention
[0203] An embodiment of the present invention provides a standard
system comprising one or more of the following components: order
management system (OMS), communications engine, communications
protocol, and communications network. The standard for the system
of the present invention provides simplicity, reliability,
scalability, and cost effectiveness in contrast to the complexity,
expense, and potentially chaotic processing caused a plurality of
sponsoring organizations making individual systems decisions
without regard to the burden that the plurality of systems and
configuration places on their sub advisors and executing brokers.
As such, the standard represents a single group of specific
components for use by all parties, in which a sub advisor or
executing broker implementing the system of the present invention
with a single sponsoring organization is able to duplicate, as a
"cookie cutter" type process, the initial implementation, inclusive
of process, procedures, protocols, and connectivity, with each
subsequent sponsoring organization that requires their
implementation of the system of the present invention. The result
is that the standard, as a single group of specific components for
use by all parties, vastly simplifies the implementation process
for all parties and creates a far more reliable, cost effective,
and scalable system.
[0204] Currently, a single mutual fund company (such as AIM, Janus,
or Oppenheimer.) may act as a sub advisor to ten to twenty
different sponsoring organizations (usually managing between one
and five funds per sponsoring organization). As such, a mutual fund
company may manage twenty to sixty separate sub advised funds
alongside their thirty to fifty proprietary mutual funds (and as
many or more institutional and private accounts). A money manager
at a mutual fund company making a single trade (such as: buy IBM)
in a single strategy (such as large cap growth) could easily impact
ten to twenty separate individual portfolios utilizing the large
cap growth strategy. In order to simplify this vast complexity, the
mutual fund company selects and utilizes a single integrated system
to execute trades across all proprietary, sub advised, and private
portfolios. This single system calculates the number of shares of
IBM to purchase for each of a plurality of large cap growth
portfolios and aggregates a plurality of share purchases into a
single buy order. The single aggregated buy order and associated
trading strategies are entered into the single system's order
management interface. At that point, if the buy order is large,
this trading and order management system may split the trade and
direct portions of the buy order to a plurality of executing
brokers to complete the buy transaction. These orders are
communicated to their executing brokers through a single
communications engine and communications network. The shares that
are bought are later allocated among the various proprietary funds,
sub advised funds, and institutional and private accounts according
to pre-determined instructions. While this process may have
disadvantages, it is clear that the money manager achieves a high
level of automation and significant reduction in operating risk
(and associated trading tosses), as trading across a plurality of
accounts is implemented through a single integrated system.
[0205] In comparison, the potential complexity of the various
implementations of the system of the present invention reflects the
following factors.
[0206] The National Association of Variable Annuities (NAVA), the
variable insurance industry trade group, indicates that it has over
fifty members acting as sponsoring organizations for their mutual
fund, variable annuity, and defined contribution (401k, 403b and
457) financial products (see FIG. 15). The number of additional
sponsoring organizations, such as private and public pension funds,
easily adds several hundred more sponsoring organizations to the
list shown in FIG. 15.
[0207] The Investment Company Institute (ICI), the mutual fund
industry trade group, has over three hundred member mutual fund
companies suitable to provide money management services to sub
advised funds (see FIGS. 16A and 16B) and there are hundreds of
additional institutional managers capable of functioning as a sub
advisor to an investment portfolio.
[0208] There are also over forty providers of order management
systems (see FIG. 17) and there are several hundred firms offering
their services as executing brokers (see FIGS. 18A and 18B for a
partial list).
[0209] In addition, there are over 75 companies offering over 115
different communications engines for trade order messaging,
translation, and destination routing. These communications engines
usually utilize a common industry communications protocol (usually
the Financial Information Exchange format or "FIX"). However, each
communications engine has its own unique "dialect" as to the
specific implementation of the protocol. As such, despite the
common industry protocol, there remain substantial challenges in
the interoperability and ease of communications between the
pluralities of communications engines. Finally, there are over 25
communications networks available for sponsoring organizations to
utilize as their means of connectivity to sub advisors and
executing brokers, thereby requiring each sub advisor and executing
brokers to link as a node to each system selected by at least one
sponsoring organization.
[0210] Given the plurality of sponsoring organizations (as shown in
FIG. 15 and inclusive of additional sponsoring organizations such
as mutual funds utilizing sub advisors, defined contribution plan
sponsors, pension and defined benefit sponsors, and other user
groups of considerable size), sub advisors (as shown in FIGS. 16A
and B), order management systems (as shown in FIG. 17), executing
brokers (as shown in FIGS. 18A and 18B) along with the 115
communications engine with each utilizing a specific "dialect"
reflecting its original time and purpose of creation, several
communications protocols for messaging and 25 communications
networks, the number of potential unique configurations of these
organizations and systems is so overwhelming as to create such
complexity and chaos as to prevent an implementation of the system
of the present invention based on the well-justified concerns that
any level of industry acceptance could result in unacceptable
complexity, operating costs, personnel costs, order entry errors,
trade processing errors, and associated reduced performance of
investment portfolios. Given that the sub advisor is required to
compensate an investment portfolio for all losses resulting from
their errors of any kind, the likely result of an absence of a
standard is the refusal by sub advisors to cooperate with an
implementation of the system of the present invention.
[0211] FIG. 19 provides an exemplary structure 1900 illustrating
the complexity created by a plurality of sponsoring organizations
304 deciding to implement the embodiment of the present invention
without a standard system 1901. In this illustration, twenty-two
different sponsoring organizations 304 select ten different order
management systems 1901. The sponsoring organizations 301 utilize a
total of forty-two different sub advisors 301 in their financial
product or pension portfolios along with eight different executing
brokers 202 (while in actual practice the actual number of
sponsoring organizations 304, sub advisors 301, and executing
brokers 202 would be considerably higher than the illustration in
FIG. 19). Each sub advisor 301 is asked to move from a single
system to a plurality of systems 1901 (as there are over forty
systems available to a sponsoring organization as shown in FIG. 17)
selected by each sponsoring organization. As a result, a single
trade by a single sub advisor 301 may require order entry into ten
or more different systems selected by sponsoring organizations.
Such a process could be complex, chaotic, costly, and rife with
errors. The associated expense for resolving the errors (as the
fund shareholders and plan beneficiaries are not responsible for
such errors and must be reimbursed for any losses) could make sub
advisors 301 unwilling to implement such a process.
[0212] FIG. 20 illustrates the complexity of such an embodiment
2000 without a standard 1901 through a focus on the complexity
facing a single sub advisor 301 managing nine proprietary funds
2001 utilizing a single system 1901 and nine sponsoring
organization funds or investment portfolios for sponsoring
organizations 2002 utilizing a plurality of systems 1901. The
illustration demonstrates, even at the small scale of a single sub
advisor, the inherent complexity and potential chaos of such an
implementation without the use of a standard system.
[0213] Therefore, to reduce this complexity, an embodiment of the
present invention provides a single standard. FIG. 21 illustrates
the simplicity, ease of use, and efficiency resulting from an
embodiment 2100 utilizing a designated standard single manager
order management system 2101 for use by all sponsoring
organizations 304 and sub advisors 301 (money managers). The
standard system and single network node connection by a single
party to all parties reflects a vast improvement in the operating
reliability, costs, and ease of implementation and operation. As
shown, a single system 2101 (e.g., in this illustration, a standard
order management system, communications engine, communications
protocol, and/or communications network; however, an embodiment
could require fewer of the listed standard components) can be used
as an easily and rapidly duplicated image used by sponsoring
organizations 304, sub advisors 301, and executing brokers 202. A
standard--implemented through, for example, a designated order
management system, communications engine, or communications
protocol--creates the leverage for allowing rapid industry adoption
of the system of the present invention,
II. Exemplary System Components, Services, and Data of a Sponsoring
Organization
[0214] In an embodiment of the present invention, the following
systems, services, and data are preferably in place for a
sponsoring organization's investment portfolios: [0215] Custody
firm to hold the securities and cash for benefit of the funds and
plans. [0216] Daily net cash contribution or withdrawal per
investment portfolio--e.g., can be provided by the sponsoring
organization to the system administrator. [0217] Security master
data service. [0218] Real-time quote service. [0219] Best execution
monitoring service. [0220] Transaction cost accounting system.
[0221] Connectivity among the sponsoring organization, sub advisors
and executing brokers.
III. Exemplary Implementation of the Present Invention
[0222] With reference to FIG. 22, an exemplary system of the
present invention is as follows. The actors include a system
administrator administering the unified trading and control system
2200, a sub advisor 301 acting as money manager for the investment
portfolios, a portfolio manager (money manager) 1103 responsible
for making investment decisions for a fund or investment portfolio,
a sub advisor trade/operations group 2201, a sub advisor compliance
group 2202, a sponsoring organization compliance group (not shown),
a sponsoring organization 304 controlling party for the assets and
responsible for client books and records, a custodial firm holding
all securities and cash (not shown), and executing brokers 202 as
the parties to whom the buy or sell order is directed to be
executed (filled).
[0223] The system includes a unified trading and control system
2200 including a portfolio modeling system 1103, an order entry
system 700, a sub advisor compliance engine 506 SA, a sub advisor
order management system (OMS) 503 SA, the high touch-low touch
engine 1105, the trade order rotation engine 1112 and 1113, the
sponsoring organization standard order management system (OMS) 503
SO, a sponsoring organization compliance system 506 SO, the
price-liquidity-cost-quality engine 1200, the sponsoring
organization's communications network 502, the network of executing
brokers supporting the sponsoring organization 302, the individual
executing brokers 202, and the trade reconciliation system
1117.
[0224] FIG. 22 also illustrates an exemplary process of the present
invention having the following steps, which correspond to the
arrows and their adjacent reference numerals shown in FIG. 22.
[0225] 2225) Sub advisor 301 provides a portfolio manager 1103 for
the fund or investment portfolio. [0226] 2226) Portfolio manager
1103 sends the trade order to the trade/operations group 2201 for
order entry. [0227] 2227) Trade/operations group 2201 enters the
order into the order entry system 700. [0228] 2228) As an
alternative to step 2226 and 2227, the portfolio manager 1103
enters the trade order directly into the order entry system 700.
[0229] 2229) The order entry system 700 routes the order to the
compliance engine 506 SA for evaluating the order relative to
regulatory and prospectus requirements and restrictions. [0230]
2230) If a violation occurs (Violation=Yes), the order is stopped
from execution and routed for review by the sub advisor. The
violation is also reported to the sponsoring organization
compliance group (not shown) and to any or all of the sub advisor
groups shown in steps 2231, 2232, and 2233. [0231] 2231) If a
violation occurs (Violation=Yes), the order can be routed to the
trade/ops group 2201. [0232] 2232) If a violation occurs
(Violation=Yes), the order can be routed to the compliance group
2202. [0233] 2233) If a violation occurs (Violation=Yes), the order
can be routed to the portfolio manager 1103. [0234] 2234) If a
violation does not occur (Violation=No), the order is routed to the
order management system (OMS) 503 SA, which, through the sub
advisor routing loop, directs the order for sub advised funds or
accounts to the high touch-low touch engine 1105. Although FIG. 22
depicts the high touch-low touch engine 1105 as located within the
unified trading and control system, one of ordinary skill in the
art would appreciate that the high touch-low touch engine 1105
could be located elsewhere, such as at the sub advisor 301 or
sponsoring organization 306. [0235] 2235) The high touch-low touch
engine 1105 determines the expected market impact of orders
received from the sub advisor order management system (OMS) 503 and
categorizes orders with significant expected market impact as "high
touch" orders 1106. [0236] 2236) The high touch order 1106 is
further categorized as orders to be "worked" by a block trading
desk, crossing system, matching system, dark pool of liquidity, or
some other form of institution to institution trading system or
exchange 1109. These high touch trades are routed to the sponsoring
organization's compliance engine 506 SO for pre-execution review
and approval and, once approved, are ready for execution. (The
sponsoring organization compliance review step is not shown).
[0237] 2237) As an alternative to step 2236, the high touch order
1106 is divided into a series of smaller orders 1108 by a trading
algorithm or a set of manual decisions 1107. [0238] 2238) The
trading algorithm or set of manual decisions divides the order into
a series of smaller orders 1108 for execution over a period of
time. [0239] 2239) Each of the smaller orders 1108 resulting from
die original high touch order is re-routed, via the sub advisor
re-routing loop, to the high touch-low touch engine 1105. Step 2239
starts the sub advisor rerouting loop. [0240] 2240) The high
touch-low touch engine evaluates the re-routed smaller orders 1108,
categorizes the orders with significant market impact as high touch
orders 1109, and routes these orders to be "worked" 1109. [0241]
2241) High touch orders 1109 are directed via auto routing 1110 to
the sub advisor's order management system 503 SA. Although FIG. 22
depicts the high touch-low touch engine 1105 as located within the
unified trading and control system, one of ordinary skill in the
art would appreciate that the high touch-low touch engine 1105
could be located elsewhere, such as at the sub advisor 301 or
sponsoring organization 306. [0242] 2242) The sub advisor's order
management system 503 SA receives the high touch order 1106 and
selects the executing broker(s) 202. [0243] 2243) The sub advisor
order management system 503 SA routes the high touch orders 1106 to
the executing broker(s) 202 for execution. [0244] 2244) Once the
orders are executed by the executing brokers 202, the trade data
for the high touch trades 1106 is routed to the sub advisor order
management system 503 SA. [0245] 2245) The sub advisor order
management system 503 SA determines, when applicable, the
allocation of shares for the sponsoring organization and routes the
trade allocation data along with the trade fill data (for trades
not requiring a special allocation) for the high touch trades to
the sponsoring organization's order management system 503 SO.
[0246] 2246) The sponsoring organization's order management system
503 SO routes the trade allocation data for the sponsoring
organization's allocation of shares of the high touch trade and the
trade fill data (for trades not requiring a special allocation) to
the sponsoring organization's compliance engine 506 SO. [0247]
2247) a violation occurs (Violation=Yes), the trade allocation data
for the sponsoring organization's allocation of shares of the high
touch trade is routed for review by both the sponsoring
organization 306 and the sub advisor 301. [0248] 2248) If a
violation does not occur (Violation=No), the trade allocation data
for the sponsoring organization's shares of the high touch trade is
routed to the sponsoring organization's order management system
(OMS) 503 SO. [0249] 2249) The sponsoring organization's order
management system (OMS) 503 SO routes the trade allocation data for
the sponsoring organization's shares of the high touch trade to the
sponsoring organization's trade reconciliation system 1117. Steps
2235 through 2249 constitute the high touch order processing loop.
[0250] 2250) Returning to steps 2234 and 2239, when the high
touch-low touch engine 1105 receives orders from the sub advisor
order management system (OMS) 503 SA (as either the original and
re-routed orders) that it determines will have little or no
significant expected market impact, the high touch-low touch engine
1105 categorizes those orders as "low touch" orders 1111 that can
be processed as "electronic" or "black box" orders, which computer
systems can execute with virtually no human intervention. The "low
touch" order 1111 can be either original orders or re-routed orders
from the sub advisor order management system 503. [0251] 2251) The
high touch-low touch engine 1105 directs low touch orders 1111 that
constitute an exemplary order for an exemplary fund (and thus does
not require a trade rotation order) to the sponsoring organization
304. For example, a single order for a single fund would not
require a trade rotation order. [0252] 2252) The high touch-low
touch engine 1105 routes trades requiring a trade order rotation to
the trade order rotation engine 1112 in order to determine a trade
rotation order between the sub advisor 301 and the sponsoring
organization(s) 304 and 1116. For example, an order involving
several sub advisor funds and several sponsoring organization funds
would require a trade rotation order. As another example, when an
asset manager places a plurality of orders in a given security for
execution across a plurality of investment portfolios, trade order
rotation is required. [0253] 2253) The trade order rotation engine
1112 prepares trade rotation instructions 1113 for the sub advisor
301. [0254] 2254) The trade rotation instructions 1113 are
communicated to the sub advisor's order management system 503 SA
via auto routing 1110 (along steps 2254a and 2254b). [0255] 2255)
The trade rotation engine 1114 determines the trade rotation order
between a plurality of sponsoring organizations, such as the
sponsoring organization 304 and any number of additional sponsoring
organizations as represented by sponsoring organization (SO.sub.x)
1116. The trade rotation order could also be determined as a single
trade rotation order between the sub advisor 301 and sponsoring
organizations 304 and 1116. [0256] 2256) The trade rotation engine
1114 prepares trade rotation instructions 1115 for the sponsoring
organizations 304 and 1116. [0257] 2257) The trade rotation
instructions 1115 are communicated to the sponsoring organizations
304 and 1116. [0258] 2258) The orders are routed to the sponsoring
organization's order management system (OMS) 503 SO. This step is
illustrated for an exemplary sponsoring organization 306 with a
similar process implemented by all sponsoring organizations
(SO.sub.x) 1116. [0259] 2259) The sponsoring organization's order
management system (OMS) 503 SO routes the order to the compliance
engine 506 SO for evaluating the order relative to regulatory and
prospectus requirements and restrictions. [0260] 2260) If a
violation occurs (Violation=Yes), the order is stopped from
execution and routed for review by the sponsoring organization's
compliance group (not shown) and the sub advisor's compliance group
2202. [0261] 2261) If a violation does not occur (Violation=No),
the order is routed to the price-liquidity-cost-quality engine
1200, which examines the current market share prices, liquidity,
execution cost, and quality factors such as expected price
improvement (and execution speed) to determine the optimal
combination of executing brokers providing the most cost effective
execution options. [0262] 2262) The price-liquidity-cost-quality
engine 1200 communicates the optimal cost effective order
composition of executing brokers to the sponsoring organization's
order management system (OMS) 503 SO. [0263] 2263) The sponsoring
organization's order management system (OMS) 503 SO selects the
executing brokers 202 and routes the orders for execution through
the communications network 502. [0264] 2264) The communications
network 502 directs the orders to the network of executing brokers
302 and to the designated executing brokers 202 for execution.
[0265] 2265) The executing brokers 202 execute the trade and report
the trade fills back to the communications network 502. [0266]
2266) The communications network 502 reports the trade fill reports
back to the sub advisor's order management system (OMS) 503 SA.
[0267] 2267) The sub advisor's order management system (OMS) 503 SA
sends the trade fill reports back to the compliance engine 506 SA
for post trade compliance review. If a violation occurs
(Violation=Yes), the process as shown in steps 2230, 2231, 2232,
and 2233 is implemented. [0268] 2268) If a violation does not occur
(Violation=No), the compliance engine 506 SA routes the trade fill
reports to the order entry system 700. [0269] 2269) The order entry
system 700 provides the trade fill reports to the sub advisor's
trade/operations group 2201, portfolio manager 1103, compliance
group 2202, and the sub advisor's 301 business support systems.
[0270] 2270) The communications network 502 reports the trade fill
reports back to the sponsoring organization's order management
system (OMS) 503 SO. The sponsoring organization also performs a
post-execution compliance check through the compliance engine 506
SO. If a violation occurs (Violation=Yes), the process is
implemented as shown in steps 2246, 2247, and 2248 and the
sponsoring organization's compliance group (not shown) is notified.
[0271] 2271) a violation does not occur (Violation=No), the
sponsoring organization's order management system (OMS) 503 SO
routes the orders to the sponsoring organization's trade
reconciliation system 1117. Steps 2250 through 2271 constitute the
high touch order processing loop.
[0272] Overall, as shown by the various embodiments described
above, the system and process of the present invention provide
clear, substantial, quantifiable, recurring, and compounding cost
savings and the resulting improved investment performance to fund
shareholders and plan beneficiaries. The present invention provides
a highly desirable social utility of considerable, recurring, and
compounding shareholder and plan beneficiary savings. Indeed, a
reasonably effective implementation of the embodiment of the
present invention could easily benefit millions of Americans
through substantially improved performance of their investment
portfolios.
[0273] FIG. 23 shows exemplary projected annual savings, based on
2005 trade data, potentially generated by an embodiment of the
present invention for a number of fund trusts in the variable
insurance industry for average trade execution costs of 1.00 cent
per share. Given that sponsoring organizations (as advisor for
regulatory purposes and the associated fund board of directors and
plan investment consultants have a fiduciary responsibility to
control (minimize) operating expenses, there exists a fiduciary
obligation to evaluate and, if appropriate, implement any process
(such as those provided by the system of the present invention)
that provides substantial, recurring, and quantifiable cost savings
and improved performance to fund shareholders and plan
beneficiaries.
[0274] Furthermore, the savings to the fund shareholder and plan
beneficiaries occur each year that the funds and accounts utilize
the system and process of the present invention. Thus, these
benefit of these savings compound and become increasingly more
valuable over time. FIGS. 24A, 24B, 24C, and 24D represent a
compilation of research for four popular fund trusts (groups of
funds) with $38.7 BB, $12.7 BB, $6.7 BB, and $5.3 BB in assets, and
shows exemplary total compounded shareholder savings and resulting
improved investment performance, at an average execution cost of
1.00 cent per share, over a 1, 3, 5, and 10 year period. Such
improved performance could, potentially, improve the decile
(ranking by tenths) or quartile (ranking by quarter) performance
ratings of these funds relative to their peers (who are not
utilizing the embodiment of the present invention). Given that
these investment portfolios are associated with personal goals for
each fund shareholder and plan beneficiary such as a comfortable
retirement, higher education, and improved health care, the social
utility created by the embodiment of the present invention is
potentially dramatic for millions of Americans.
[0275] For illustration purposes, portions of this specification
describe the present invention in the context of variable insurance
(including variable fund LLCs and registered investment companies
(RICs), mutual fund, or pension plan market). However, as one of
ordinary skill in the art would appreciate, the systems and methods
described herein apply equally well to other similar markets, such
as a sub advised mutual fund market, the defined contribution
market, 529 plans, hedge funds, collective investments, deferred
compensation plans, institutional accounts, separate accounts of
insurance companies, defined benefit pension plans, endowments, and
trusts. For that reason, and notwithstanding the particular
benefits associated with using the present invention in connection
with the variable insurance or pension plan markets, the system and
method described herein should be considered broadly applicable to
any market in need of centralized portfolio management, directed
brokerage control, and/or direct and automated compliance
monitoring by the sponsoring organization with primary regulatory
responsibility for a given sub advised pool of assets.
[0276] The foregoing disclosure of the preferred embodiments of the
present invention has been presented for purposes of illustration
and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit
the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Many variations and
modifications of the embodiments described herein will be apparent
to one of ordinary skill in the art in light of the above
disclosure. The scope of the invention is to be defined only by the
claims appended hereto, and by their equivalents.
[0277] Further, in describing representative embodiments of the
present invention, the specification may have presented the method
and/or process of the present invention as a particular sequence of
steps. However, to the extent that the method or process does not
rely on the particular order of steps set forth herein, the method
or process should not be limited to the particular sequence of
steps described. As one of ordinary skill in the art would
appreciate, other sequences of steps may be possible. Therefore,
the particular order of the steps set forth in the specification
should not be construed as limitations on the claims. In addition,
the claims directed to the method and/or process of the present
invention should not be limited to the performance of their steps
in the order written, and one skilled in the art can readily
appreciate that the sequences may be varied and still remain within
the spirit and scope of the present invention.
* * * * *