U.S. patent application number 13/962847 was filed with the patent office on 2014-02-06 for surgical tether apparatus and methods of use.
This patent application is currently assigned to Simpirica Spine, Inc.. The applicant listed for this patent is Simpirica Spine, Inc.. Invention is credited to Todd Alamin, Colin Cahill, Louis Fielding, Manish Kothari.
Application Number | 20140039558 13/962847 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 42728738 |
Filed Date | 2014-02-06 |
United States Patent
Application |
20140039558 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Alamin; Todd ; et
al. |
February 6, 2014 |
SURGICAL TETHER APPARATUS AND METHODS OF USE
Abstract
Methods and apparatus for controlling flexion in a spinal
segment of a patient include performing a spinal fusion procedure
on a pair of adjacent vertebrae in the spinal segment and
implanting a constraint device into the patient. Adjusting length
or tension in the constraint device allows the constraint device to
provide a force a force resistant to flexion of the spinal segment
undergoing fusion. The constraint device also modulates loads borne
by the spinal segment undergoing fusion or tissue adjacent
thereto.
Inventors: |
Alamin; Todd; (Woodside,
CA) ; Cahill; Colin; (Portola Valley, CA) ;
Fielding; Louis; (San Carlos, CA) ; Kothari;
Manish; (San Rafael, CA) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
Simpirica Spine, Inc. |
San Carlos |
CA |
US |
|
|
Assignee: |
Simpirica Spine, Inc.
San Carlos
CA
|
Family ID: |
42728738 |
Appl. No.: |
13/962847 |
Filed: |
August 8, 2013 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
12721238 |
Mar 10, 2010 |
8529606 |
|
|
13962847 |
|
|
|
|
61158886 |
Mar 10, 2009 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
606/279 |
Current CPC
Class: |
A61F 2/442 20130101;
A61B 17/7067 20130101; A61F 2/4455 20130101; A61B 17/7055 20130101;
A61B 17/7062 20130101; A61B 17/7097 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
606/279 |
International
Class: |
A61B 17/70 20060101
A61B017/70 |
Claims
1. A method for controlling flexion in a spinal segment of a
patient, said method comprising: providing a constraint device
comprising at least one compliance member and at least one tether,
wherein the at least one compliance member comprises an elastic
member, and wherein the at least one tether comprises an upper
tether portion and a lower tether portion with the at least one
compliance member coupled therebetween; performing a spinal fusion
procedure on a pair of adjacent vertebrae in the spinal segment,
wherein the pair of adjacent vertebrae comprises a superior
vertebra and an inferior vertebra, the superior vertebra having a
spinous process with a superior surface and the inferior vertebra
having a spinous process with an inferior surface; implanting a
constraint device into the patient, wherein the step of implanting
comprises coupling the constraint device with the spinal segment,
and wherein the coupling comprises engaging the upper tether
portion with the superior surface and engaging the lower tether
portion with the inferior surface or a sacrum.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the constraint device provides an
elastic force resistant to flexion of the spinal segment.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the elastic force encourages the
spinal segment to fuse in a position consistent with a natural
lordotic curve of the patient.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of performing the spinal
fusion procedure comprises posterolateral grafting of the adjacent
vertebrae.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of performing the spinal
fusion procedure comprises intervertebral grafting in a disc space
between the pair of adjacent vertebrae.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the intervertebral grafting
comprises applying bone grafting material to the spinous process of
the superior vertebra and the spinous process of the inferior
vertebra.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of performing the spinal
fusion procedure comprises implanting a first prosthesis into the
patient, the first prosthesis engaged with at least a portion of
the spinal segment, wherein the constraint device modulates loads
borne by the first prosthesis or tissue adjacent thereto.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein implanting the first prosthesis
comprises positioning an intervertebral device between the pair of
adjacent vertebrae, the intervertebral device configured to
maintain an alignment and a distance between the pair of adjacent
vertebrae during a development of arthrodesis.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the intervertebral device
comprises an interbody fusion cage.
10. The method of claim 7, wherein implanting the first prosthesis
comprises positioning bone grafting material between the pair of
adjacent vertebrae.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein the bone grafting material is
selected from the group consisting of an allograft, an autograft, a
synthetic graft, and a xenograft.
12. The method of claim 7, wherein the first prosthesis or the
constraint device comprises a therapeutic agent adapted to modify
tissue in the spinal segment.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein the therapeutic agent comprises
a bone morphogenic protein.
14. The method of claim 1, wherein implanting the constraint device
occurs without implanting a prosthesis directly in an interspinous
region extending between an inferior surface of the spinous process
of the superior vertebra and a superior surface of the spinous
process of the inferior vertebra or the sacrum.
15. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of implanting the
constraint device comprises: piercing an interspinous ligament to
form a penetration superior to the superior surface of the spinous
process of the superior vertebra; and advancing the upper tether
portion through the penetration.
16. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of implanting the
constraint device comprises: advancing the upper tether portion
through a gap between the spinous process of the superior vertebra
and an adjacent process, the gap created by surgical removal of an
interspinous ligament therefrom.
17. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of implanting the
constraint device comprises: piercing an interspinous ligament to
form a penetration inferior to the inferior surface of the spinous
process of the inferior vertebra; and advancing the lower tether
portion through the penetration.
18. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of implanting the
constraint device comprises: advancing the lower tether portion
through a gap between the inferior surface of the spinous process
of the inferior vertebra and an adjacent spinous process or a
sacrum, the gap created by surgical removal of an interspinous
ligament therefrom.
19. The method of claim 1, wherein the compliance member has a
spring constant, the method further comprising selecting the spring
constant such that the elastic force provides enough resistance to
flexion so that fusion can occur between the pair of adjacent
vertebra, while at the same time allowing for micromotion between
the pair of adjacent vertebrae.
20. The method of claim 1, wherein loading, other than tensile
loading, is not transferred to the constraint device.
21. The method of claim 1, wherein implanting the constraint device
is performed without resecting tissue of the spinal segment.
22. The method of claim 1, wherein implanting the constraint device
is performed without resecting bone tissue of the spinal segment.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE
[0001] The present application is continuation of U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 12/721,238 (Attorney Docket No. 41564-714.201)
filed on Mar. 10, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. ______, which is a
non-provisional of, and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional
Patent Application Ser. No. 61/158,886 (Attorney Docket No.
41564-714.101) filed Mar. 10, 2009, now expired; the entire
contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference.
[0002] The present application is also related to the U.S.
Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/158,892 (Attorney Docket
No. 41564-713.101) filed Mar. 10, 2009, the entire contents of
which is incorporated herein by reference.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0003] 1. Field of the Invention
[0004] The present invention generally relates to medical methods
and apparatus. More particularly, the present invention relates to
methods and apparatus used to restrict flexion of a fused spinal
segment. The methods and apparatus disclosed herein may be used
alone or in combination with fusion or other orthopedic procedures
intended to treat patients with spinal disorders such as back
pain.
[0005] A host of spinal conditions exist which often result in
instability issues and/or back pain. A major source of chronic low
back pain is discogenic pain, also known as internal disc
disruption. Discogenic pain can be quite disabling, and for some
patients, can dramatically affect their ability to work and
otherwise enjoy their lives. Patients suffering from discogenic
pain tend to be young, otherwise healthy individuals who present
with pain localized to the back. Discogenic pain usually occurs at
the discs located at the L4-L5 or L5-S 1 junctions of the spine.
Pain tends to be exacerbated when patients put their lumbar spines
into flexion (i.e. by sitting or bending forward) and relieved when
they put their lumbar spines into extension (i.e. by standing or
arching backwards). Flexion and extension are known to change the
mechanical loading pattern of a lumbar segment. When the segment is
in extension, the axial loads borne by the segment are shared by
the disc and facet joints (approximately 30% of the load is borne
by the facet joints). In flexion, the segmental load is borne
almost entirely by the disc. Furthermore, the nucleus shifts
posteriorly, changing the loads on the posterior portion of the
annulus (which is innervated), likely causing its fibers to be
subject to tension and shear forces. Segmental flexion, then,
increases both the loads borne by the disc and causes them to be
borne in a more painful way. It would therefore be desirable to
provide methods and apparatus that can be used alone or in
combination with other spinal treatments to reduce loading in the
area of the disc and adjacent tissue.
[0006] A number of treatments exist for addressing back pain and
spinal instability. Some of these include, but are not limited to,
fusion of the affected spinal segment. The patient may also be
required to wear an external back brace for three to six months in
order to allow the fusion to heal. Unfortunately, external braces
are not always desirable since such braces can be uncomfortable,
expensive, and inconvenient to use, and patient compliance often is
low. An alternative to the back brace is to instrument the spinal
segment with traditional instrumentation. Traditional
instrumentation also facilitates fusion and prevents subsequent
motion along the fused segment. While this treatment may be
effective, it can also have shortcomings. For example, the fusion
procedure with traditional instrumentation is more invasive, and
when rigid instrumentation is used (e.g. pedicle screws and spinal
stabilization rods), the instrumented region of the spinal segment
becomes very stiff, and motion is prevented across the fusing
segment. Loads can be borne by the instrumentation rather than the
tissue, and loads and motion at adjacent segments can be increased.
This is not always desirable, since a certain amount of motion and
loading may actually help the healing process, promote fusion, and
prevent excessive wear and tear on adjacent implants and tissue.
Also, loading on the instrumentation may result in loosening or
other mechanical failure of the instrumentation. Therefore, it
would be desirable to have an improved device for instrumenting a
fused spinal segment. It would also be desirable if an improved
device minimized loads at the device/bone interface to minimize the
potential of loosening and other mechanical failure. It would also
be desirable if the device diminished the peak loading patterns at
the bone/implant interface.
[0007] For the aforementioned reasons, it would therefore be
advantageous to provide methods and apparatus that can be used with
spinal fusion to help facilitate fusion of the vertebrae while
still allowing some motion and loading of the fusion graft. It
would be further desirable to provide methods and apparatus that
are minimally invasive to the patient, cost effective and easy to
use.
[0008] 2. Description of the Background Art
[0009] Patents and published applications of interest include: U.S.
Pat. Nos. 3,648,691; 4,643,178; 4,743,260; 4,966,600; 5,011,494;
5,092,866; 5,116,340; 5,180,393; 5,282,863; 5,395,374; 5,415,658;
5,415,661; 5,449,361; 5,456,722; 5,462,542; 5,496,318; 5,540,698;
5,562,737; 5,609,634; 5,628,756; 5,645,599; 5,725,582; 5,902,305;
Re. 36,221; 5,928,232; 5,935,133; 5,964,769; 5,989,256; 6,053,921;
6,248,106; 6,312,431; 6,364,883; 6,378,289; 6,391,030; 6,468,309;
6,436,099; 6,451,019; 6,582,433; 6,605,091; 6,626,944; 6,629,975;
6,652,527; 6,652,585; 6,656,185; 6,669,729; 6,682,533; 6,689,140;
6,712,819; 6,689,168; 6,695,852; 6,716,245; 6,761,720; 6,835,205;
7,029,475; 7,163,558; Published U.S. Patent Application Nos. US
2002/0151978; US 2004/0024458; US 2004/0106995; US 2004/0116927; US
2004/0117017; US 2004/0127989; US 2004/0172132; US 2004/0243239; US
2005/0033435; US 2005/0049708; 2005/0192581; 2005/0216017; US
2006/0069447; US 2006/0136060; US 2006/0240533; US 2007/0213829; US
2007/0233096; 2008/0009866; 2008/0108993; Published PCT Application
Nos. WO 01/28442 A1; WO 02/03882 A2; WO 02/051326 A1; WO 02/071960
A1; WO 03/045262 A1; WO2004/052246 A1; WO 2004/073532 A1;
WO2008/051806; WO2008/051423; WO2008/051801; WO2008/051802; and
Published Foreign Application Nos. EP0322334 A1; and FR 2 681 525
A1. The mechanical properties of flexible constraints applied to
spinal segments are described in Papp et al. (1997) Spine
22:151-155; Dickman et al. (1997) Spine 22:596-604; and Garner et
al. (2002) Eur. Spine J. S186-S191; Al Baz et al. (1995) Spine 20,
No. 11, 1241-1244; Heller, (1997) Arch. Orthopedic and Trauma
Surgery, 117, No. 1-2:96-99; Leahy et al. (2000) Proc. Inst. Mech.
Eng. Part H: J. Eng. Med. 214, No. 5: 489-495; Minns et al., (1997)
Spine 22 No. 16:1819-1825; Miyasaka et al. (2000) Spine 25, No. 6:
732-737; Shepherd et al. (2000) Spine 25, No. 3: 319-323; Shepherd
(2001) Medical Eng. Phys. 23, No. 2: 135-141; and Voydeville et al
(1992) Orthop Traumatol 2:259-264.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0010] The present invention generally relates to medical methods
and apparatus. More particularly, the present invention relates to
methods and apparatus used to restrict flexion of a spinal segment
to be fused. The methods and apparatus disclosed herein may be used
alone or in combination with fusion or other orthopedic procedures
intended to treat patients with spinal disorders such as back
pain.
[0011] In a first aspect of the present invention, a method for
controlling flexion in a spinal segment of a patient comprises
performing a spinal fusion procedure on a pair of adjacent
vertebrae in the spinal segment and implanting a constraint device
into the patient. The step of implanting comprises coupling the
constraint device with the spinal segment. The method also includes
adjusting length or tension in the constraint device so that the
constraint device provides a force resistant to flexion of the
spinal segment undergoing fusion. The constraint device also
modulates loads borne by the spinal segment undergoing fusion,
including the bone grafting material and tissue adjacent thereto.
In some embodiments, the constraint device may have an upper tether
portion, a lower tether portion and a compliance member coupled
therebetween. An upper portion of the constraint device may be
engaged with a superior spinous process and a lower portion of the
constraint device may be engaged with an inferior spinous process
or a sacrum. The length or tension of the constraint device may be
adjusted to a desired value. The length or tension may be adjusted
to encourage the fusion to form in a position consistent with the
natural lordotic curve of the patient.
[0012] The step of performing the spinal fusion procedure may
comprise applying bone grafting material to at least one of
posterior, lateral, posterolateral or interbody locations on the
adjacent vertebrae. Bone graft may be placed between or alongside
the spinous processes of the vertebrae to be fused, and to which
the constraint is coupled. Sometimes performing the spinal fusion
procedure may comprise intervertebral grafting in a disc space
between the pair of adjacent vertebrae or applying bone grafting
material to the superior spinous process and the inferior spinous
process. Performing the spinal fusion procedure may also comprise
implanting a first prosthesis into the patient. The first
prosthesis may be engaged with at least a portion of the spinal
segment. The constraint device may modulate loads borne by the
first prosthesis or tissue adjacent thereto. The constraint device
may be implanted and coupled with the spinal segment during the
same surgical procedure as the fusion procedure. Additionally, the
constraint device stabilizes the segment as it fuses together,
which may take several months to form following the fusion
procedure. After fusion has occurred, the constraint no longer
provides any further benefit and it may be removed or left in
place. If left in place, the constraint device may last longer than
traditional instrumentation. Because of the compliance of the
constraint device, it is able to accommodate micromotion in the
fused segment and therefore the constraint device experiences lower
loading and wear as compared to rigid instrumentation systems which
transmit complex segmental loads and are more likely to fail in
service.
[0013] In some embodiments, implanting the first prosthesis may
comprise positioning an intervertebral device between the pair of
adjacent vertebrae. The intervertebral device may be configured to
maintain alignment and distance between the pair of adjacent
vertebrae during arthrodesis. The intervertebral device may
comprise an interbody fusion cage. In other embodiments, implanting
the first prosthesis may comprise positioning bone grafting
material between the pair of adjacent vertebrae and the bone
grafting material may be selected from the group consisting of an
allograft or an autograft of bone tissue, a xenograft and also
synthetic bone graft material, or agents such as bone morphogenetic
protein designed to stimulate bone growth. In addition to
positioning bone grafting material, the step of implanting the
first prosthesis may further comprise positioning an interbody
fusion cage between the pair of adjacent vertebrae during the
development of arthrodesis.
[0014] Implanting the constraint device may comprise engaging the
constraint device with the superior spinous process and the
inferior spinous process or sacrum without implanting a prosthesis
directly in an interspinous region extending between an inferior
surface of the superior spinous process and a superior surface of
the inferior spinous process or sacrum. The step of implanting the
constraint device may also comprise piercing an interspinous
ligament to form a penetration superior to a superior surface of
the superior spinous process and advancing the upper tether portion
through the penetration. The tether may also be advanced through a
gap between the superior spinous process and an adjacent spinous
process that has been created by surgical removal of the
interspinous ligament therefrom. Implanting the constraint device
may also comprise piercing an interspinous ligament to form a
penetration inferior to an inferior surface of the inferior spinous
process and advancing the lower tether portion through the
penetration. The tether may also be advanced through a gap between
the inferior spinous process and an adjacent spinous process or a
sacrum that has been created by surgical removal of the
interspinous ligament therefrom. Alternatively, the constraint
device may be advanced through a gap between the spinous processes
created by surgical removal of an interspinous ligament.
[0015] Adjusting length or tension in the constraint device may
comprise adjusting the length or tension a plurality of times
during treatment of the spinal segment and during or after healing
of the spinal segment. Adjustment may be performed
transcutaneously.
[0016] Sometimes, at least one of the first prosthesis or the
constraint device may comprise a therapeutic agent adapted to
modify tissue in the spinal segment. The therapeutic agent may
comprise a bone morphogenetic protein.
[0017] In another aspect of the present invention, a system for
controlling flexion in a spinal segment of a patient comprises a
constraint device disposed at least partially around a region of
the spinal segment that is to be fused. The constraint device has
an upper tether portion, a lower tether portion and a compliance
member coupled therebetween. The upper tether portion is coupled
with a superior spinous process along the spinal segment to be
fused and the lower tether portion is coupled with an inferior
spinous process or sacrum along the spinal segment to be fused.
Length or tension in the constraint device is adjustable so that
the constraint device provides a force resistant to flexion of the
spinal segment undergoing fusion. Also, the constraint device
modulates loads borne by the spinal segment to be fused including
the graft material and tissue adjacent thereto.
[0018] The constraint device may be engaged with the superior
spinous process and the inferior spinous process or sacrum and an
interspinous region extending directly between an inferior surface
of the superior spinous process and a superior surface of the
inferior spinous process or sacrum may remain free of an implanted
prosthesis.
[0019] The system may further comprise a first prosthesis coupled
with the region of the spinal segment to be fused. The constraint
device may modulate loads borne by the first prosthesis or by
tissue adjacent thereto. Sometimes, the first prosthesis may
comprise an intervertebral device disposed between two adjacent
vertebrae in the region of the spinal segment to be fused. The
intervertebral device may be configured to maintain alignment and
distance between the two adjacent vertebrae after intervertebral
disc material has been disposed between the two adjacent vertebrae
during development of arthrodesis. The intervertebral device may
comprise an interbody fusion cage that is adapted to facilitate
fusion of the two adjacent vertebrae in the region of the spinal
segment to be fused. The first prosthesis may also comprise bone
grafting material disposed between two adjacent vertebrae where the
bone grafting material is adapted to facilitate fusion of the two
adjacent vertebrae in the spinal segment. The bone grafting
material may be selected from the group consisting of an allograft,
an autograft, a xenograft, a synthetic material and combinations
thereof combination thereof.
[0020] These and other embodiments are described in further detail
in the following description related to the appended drawing
figures.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0021] FIG. 1A is a schematic diagram illustrating the lumbar
region of the spine.
[0022] FIG. 1B a schematic illustration showing a portion of the
lumbar region of the spine taken along a sagittal plane.
[0023] FIG. 2 illustrates a spinal implant of the type described in
U.S. Patent Publication No. 2005/0216017A1.
[0024] FIG. 3A illustrates an instrumented region of a fused spinal
segment.
[0025] FIG. 3B illustrates the use of a constraint device in a
fused region of a spinal segment.
[0026] FIG. 4A illustrates fusion of the transverse processes.
[0027] FIGS. 4B-4C illustrate the use of a constraint device along
with fusion of the transverse processes.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0028] FIG. 1A is a schematic diagram illustrating the lumbar
region of the spine including the spinous processes (SP), facet
joints (FJ), lamina (L), transverse processes (TP), and sacrum (S).
FIG. 1B is a schematic illustration showing a portion of the lumbar
region of the spine taken along a sagittal plane and is useful for
defining the terms "neutral position," "flexion," and "extension"
that are often used in this disclosure.
[0029] As used herein, "neutral position" refers to the position in
which the patient's spine rests in a relaxed standing position. The
"neutral position" will vary from patient to patient. Usually, such
a neutral position will be characterized by a slight curvature or
lordosis of the lumbar spine where the spine has a slight anterior
convexity and slight posterior concavity. In some cases, the
presence of the constraint of the present invention may modify the
neutral position, e.g. the device may apply an initial force which
defines a "new" neutral position having some extension of the
untreated spine. As such, the use of the term "neutral position" is
to be taken in context of the presence or absence of the device. As
used herein, "neutral position of the spinal segment" refers to the
position of a spinal segment when the spine is in the neutral
position.
[0030] Furthermore, as used herein, "flexion" refers to the motion
between adjacent vertebrae in a spinal segment as the patient bends
forward. Referring to FIG. 1B, as a patient bends forward from the
neutral position of the spine, i.e. to the right relative to a
curved axis A, the distance between individual vertebrae L on the
anterior side decreases so that the anterior portion of the
intervertebral disks D are compressed. In contrast, the individual
spinous processes SP on the posterior side move apart in the
direction indicated by arrow B. Flexion thus refers to the relative
movement between adjacent vertebrae as the patient bends forward
from the neutral position illustrated in FIG. 1B.
[0031] Additionally, as used herein, "extension" refers to the
motion of the individual vertebrae L as the patient bends backward
and the spine extends from the neutral position illustrated in FIG.
1B. As the patient bends backward, the anterior ends of the
individual vertebrae will move apart. The individual spinous
processes SP on adjacent vertebrae will move closer together in a
direction opposite to that indicated by arrow B.
[0032] A major source of chronic low back pain is discogenic pain,
also known as internal disc disruption. Pain experienced by
patients with discogenic low back pain can be thought of as flexion
instability, and is related to flexion instability manifested in
other conditions such as spondylolisthesis, a spinal condition in
which abnormal segmental translation is exacerbated by segmental
flexion. Discogenic pain usually occurs at the discs located at the
L4-L5 or L5-S 1 junctions of the spine. Pain tends to be
exacerbated when patients put their lumbar spines into flexion
(i.e. by sitting or bending forward) and relieved when they put
their lumbar spines into extension (i.e. by standing or arching
backwards). Flexion and extension are known to change the
mechanical loading pattern of a lumbar segment. When the segment is
in extension, the axial loads borne by the segment are shared by
the disc and facet joints (approximately 30% of the load is borne
by the facet joints). In flexion, the segmental load is borne
almost entirely by the disc. Furthermore, the nucleus shifts
posteriorly, changing the loads on the posterior portion of the
annulus (which is innervated), likely causing its fibers to be
subject to tension and shear forces. Segmental flexion, then,
increases both the loads borne by the disc and causes them to be
borne in a more painful way. Patients with discogenic pain
accommodate their syndrome by avoiding positions such as sitting,
which cause their painful segment to go into flexion, preferring
positions such as standing, which maintain their painful segment in
extension.
[0033] Discogenic pain may be treated in a number of ways ranging
from conservative treatments to surgery and implantation of
prostheses. Conservative treatments include physical therapy,
massage, anti-inflammatory and analgesic medications, muscle
relaxants, and epidural steroid injections. These treatments have
varying degrees of success and often patients typically continue to
suffer with a significant degree of pain. Other patients elect to
undergo spinal fusion surgery, which sometimes requires discectomy
(removal of the disk) together with fusion of adjacent vertebra.
Fusion may or may not also include instrumentation of the affected
spinal segment including, for example, pedicle screws and
stabilization rods, and/or intervertebral devices. Fusion is not
lightly recommended for discogenic pain because it is irreversible,
costly, associated with high morbidity, and has questionable
effectiveness. Fusion is, however, still used for discogenic pain
despite these drawbacks, and fusion is also used for many other
spinal disorders related to pain and instability. While fusion with
traditional instrumentation is promising, in some circumstances it
may have drawbacks. Because most instrumentation is rigid or only
provides limited motion, motion around the fused segment is
prevented and loads can be fully borne by the instrumentation
rather than the tissue. While prevention of significant motion is
important during the fusion healing process, a certain amount of
micromotion and loading of the tissue is desirable as this can
promote fusion. Furthermore, allowing such motion and loading may
enable the segment to fuse in a natural position, enabling
maintenance of the lordotic curve in the treated region of the
spine and avoiding the creation of kyphosis or "flat back" with
fusion instrumentation. Therefore it would be desirable to provide
a device that can stabilize a fused region like traditional
instrumentation while still allowing some micromotion and loading
in the fused region. Furthermore, loading along the spinal column
may be modified due to the fusion and this may result in excessive
loading on the fused region, adjacent tissue or devices used. It
would therefore be desirable to provide methods and apparatus that
can be used alone or in conjunction with spinal fusion or other
spinal treatments that allow micromotion at the level of the fusion
and that help to reduce the excessive loading and provide
additional flexion stability.
[0034] FIG. 2 shows a spinal implant of the type described in
related U.S. Patent Publication No. 2005/02161017 A1, now U.S. Pat.
No. 7,458,981 the entire contents of which are incorporated herein
by reference. The constraint device of FIG. 2 may be used alone or
in combination with other spinal treatments to allow micromotion in
a spinal segment that is fused or that is undergoing fusion, and to
reduce loads borne by the region undergoing fusion or devices
implanted into the patient as well as loads borne by adjacent
tissue, thereby facilitating healing and reducing tissue damage and
wear and tear. Furthermore, the constraint device may be used to
provide greater stability to the spinal segment and to encourage
the healing of the fusion at an intervertebral angle consistent
with the lordotic curve of the patient.
[0035] As illustrated in FIG. 2, an implant 10 typically comprises
a tether structure having an upper strap component 12 and a lower
strap component 14 joined by a pair of compliance elements 16. A
small aperture is pierced through the interspinous ligament (not
illustrated) and the upper strap is passed through the aperture.
The upper strap 12 may then be disposed over the top of the spinous
process SP4 of L4. A similar lower aperture is pierced through the
interspinous ligament allowing the lower strap 14 to extend over
the bottom of the spinous process SP5 of L5. The compliance element
16 will typically include an internal element, such as a spring or
rubber block, which is attached to the straps 12 and 14 in such a
way that the straps may be "elastically" or "compliantly" pulled
apart as the spinous processes SP4 and SP5 move apart during
flexion. In this way, the implant provides an elastic tension on
the spinous processes which is a force that resists flexion. The
force increases as the processes move further apart. Usually, the
straps themselves will be essentially non-compliant so that the
degree of elasticity or compliance may be controlled and provided
solely by the compliance elements 16. Additional details on implant
10 and the methods of use are disclosed in International PCT
Applications Nos. PCT/US2009/055914 (Attorney Docket No.
026398-000910PC); PCT/US2009/046492 (Attorney Docket No.
026398-000810PC); U.S. Provisional Patent Application Nos.
61/093,922 (Attorney Docket No. 026398-000900US); 61/059,543
(Attorney Docket No. 026398-000800US); 61/059,538 (Attorney Docket
No. 026398-000700US); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/106,103
(Attorney Docket No. 026398-000410US); U.S. Patent Publication Nos.
2010/0023060 (Attorney Docket No. 02398-000710US); 2008/0262549
(Attorney Docket No. 026398-000151US); and U.S. Pat. No. 7,458,981
(Attorney Docket No. 026398-000210US); the entire contents, each of
which is incorporated in its entirety herein by reference. The
constraint device of FIG. 2 may be used along with fusion to
provide better clinical outcomes than traditionally instrumented
fusion procedures. Additionally, in some situations, it may be
desirable to couple the constraint device with the sacrum rather
than an inferior spinous process. Additional disclosure on sacral
attachment may be found in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No.
61/149,224 (Attorney Docket No. 026398-001200US); International PCT
Application PCT/US2010/022767 (Attorney Docket No.
026398-001210PC); and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/827,980
(Attorney Docket No. 026398-000120US), the entire contents of which
are incorporated herein by reference.
[0036] FIG. 3A illustrates traditional fusion and instrumentation
of a spinal segment. In FIG. 3A, the intervertebral disc D between
adjacent vertebrae V has been removed and bone graft material 304
has been implanted therebetween. Optionally, a spinal fusion cage
304 is also implanted between the adjacent vertebrae in order to
facilitate fusion between the vertebrae. The bone graft material
may be an allograft or an autograft of bone material. Xenografts
and synthetic graft material may also be used. Spinal fusion
between the vertebral bodies (within the disc space) as described
above is known as interbody fusion. Another common spinal fusion
technique is posterolateral fusion, where the bone graft is applied
between the transverse processes of the motion segment to be fused.
The methods and systems described here are applicable to both
fusion techniques. Once the bone grafting material and/or fusion
cage have been implanted, the spinal segment is often instrumented
with pedicle screws 306 and stabilization rods 308 in order to
prevent motion around the fused region thereby promoting fusion.
Often four pedicle screws (two on either side of the spinal segment
midline) and two stabilization rods (one on either side of the
midline) are used, although FIG. 3A only illustrates two pedicle
screws and one spinal rod since it is a lateral view. Some of the
problems and challenges of an instrumented fusion have been
previously discussed above. FIG. 3B illustrates an alternative
embodiment of fusing a spinal segment using a constraint device
such as the one illustrated in FIG. 2.
[0037] In FIG. 3B, the spinal segment is fused in a similar fashion
as previously described with respect to FIG. 3A above. An
intervertebral disc D is removed from between adjacent vertebrae V
and bone grafting material 304 is implanted along with an optional
fusion cage 302. Instead of instrumenting the fused segment with
pedicle screws and rigid spinal rods, a constraint device is
attached to the fused region of the spinal segment. Here,
constraint device 310 generally takes the same form as the
constraint device of FIG. 2 above, although any of the constraint
devices disclosed herein may also be used. The constraint device
310 has an upper tether portion 310, a lower tether portion 314 and
a compliance member 316 coupled therebetween. The upper tether
portion 310 is disposed around a superior surface of a superior
spinous process and the lower tether portion 314 is disposed around
an inferior surface of an inferior spinous process. The constraint
device may be implanted and coupled with the spinal segment such
that the interspinous region extending from an inferior surface of
the superior spinous process and a superior surface of the inferior
spinous process remains free of any implants such as spacers or
other prostheses (although in some embodiments, bone graft may be
implanted in this space). The length or tension of the constraint
device may be adjusted in order to tighten the resulting loop in
order to control how much force compliance member 316 provides
against flexion of the spinal segment. Additionally, the spring
constant of the compliance member may be selected based on desired
operating characteristics. Thus, the constraint device 310 may be
adjusted so that is provides enough resistance to flexion so that
fusion can occur, while at the same time allowing some micromotion
between the adjacent fused vertebrae in order to further promote
fusion and the rate of fusion and to enable healing of the fusion
at an intervertebral angle that preserves the patient's lordotic
curve. The constraint device also allows dynamic loading of the
bone grafting material and/or the bone-cage interface, further
promoting fusion and the rate of fusion. It should also be
appreciated that the same benefits may be derived when the graft is
applied to the transverse processes (as in postero-lateral fusion),
or the posterior elements of the fused vertebrae. Unlike
traditional instrumentation where screws and rods unload the spine
directly, using constraint device 310 helps unload the spine
indirectly.
[0038] Spinal segment fusion may also be accomplished by fusing
adjacent transverse processes. FIG. 4A illustrates bone graft 402
applied to the transverse processes TP, without any stabilizing
instrumentation. This is known as an uninstrumented fusion. When
the patient bends forward, the transverse processes move apart.
This may disrupt the healing of the graft and result in non-union
(pseudoarthrosis), or the fusion may heal in a flexed position
(kyphosis). FIG. 4B illustrates use of a constraint device 404
engaged with the spinous processes SP, for resisting segmental
flexion, so that the graft will heal and fusion will develop in a
more natural lordosis posture. FIG. 4C is a posterior view of FIG.
4B that more clearly shows the fused regions and attachment of the
constraint device. The constraint device 402 generally takes the
same form as those described herein.
[0039] The present devices and methods are also advantageous over
traditional instrumentation with screws and rods since the
constraint device directly controls flexion and involves engagement
of the facets more than pedicle screws and rods. This results in
some indirect restriction of both axial rotation and sagittal
translation, which may further help with the fusion and provide
additional spinal segment stability. Another advantage of using the
present devices and methods is that loading, other than tensile
loading, is not transferred to the constraint device, and thus the
constraint device is likely to experience fewer failure modes than
traditional instrumentation in which all loading is transferred to
the screws and rods. The present constraint device therefore, not
only attempts to maximize therapeutic effectiveness, but also
attempts to minimize failure, unlike most existing instrumentation
devices which only attempt to maximize the therapy. The present
device disclosed herein intentionally allows backward motion
(extension) which helps avoid issues with extension loading and may
help with balancing of the patient's vertebral column. Most other
instrumentation devices or systems do not permit backward motion of
the spinal segment.
[0040] Applying the constraint device as opposed to using
traditional instrumentation techniques is also less invasive. A
constraint device may be applied using minimally invasive
techniques and does not require that screws be threaded into the
pedicles. The constraint device is delivered through small
incisions in the patient's back and the tether portions of the
constraint device are passed through a small hole pierced in the
interspinous ligament. Therefore, the procedure may be performed
faster and with less blood loss and may require less operating room
time than traditional instrumentation, resulting in a safer and
more cost-effective procedure. Moreover, traditional
instrumentation requires that tissue be resected, unlike the
present method for implanting a constraint device which requires no
resection at the affected level, e.g. no bone is required to be
resected from the affected vertebral body or its posterior
elements. Traditional instrumentation therefore may have more
complications and safety concerns than a minimally invasive
constraint device. The absence of screws and rods also frees up
space in the patient's back, permitting easier access in case
additional back surgery is required and also allowing other devices
to be implanted in the area without the need to avoid interfering
with screws and rods.
[0041] Additional disclosure on the methods and tools for
implanting the constraint device are disclosed in greater detail in
U.S. Patent Publication No. 2008/0262549 (Attorney Docket No.
026398-000151US); U.S. Provisional Patent Application No.
61/093,922 (Attorney Docket No. 026398-000900US); and International
PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/055914 (Attorney Docket No.
026398-000910PC); the entire contents of which were previously
incorporated herein by reference. Additionally, several other
length and tensioning adjustment mechanisms for a constraint device
are disclosed in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Nos.
61/059,543 (Attorney Docket No. 026398-000800US); 61/059,538
(Attorney Docket No. 026398-000700US); U.S. Patent Publication No.
2010/0023060 (Attorney Docket No. 026398-000710US); International
PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/046492 (Attorney Docket No.
026398-000810PC); the entire contents of which were previously
incorporated by reference. Additional embodiments of constraint
devices are also disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No.
12/106,103 (Attorney Docket No. 026398-000410US) and U.S. Pat. No.
7,458,981 (Attorney Docket No. 026398-000210US); the entire
contents of which were previously incorporate herein by
reference.
[0042] While the exemplary embodiments have been described in some
detail for clarity of understanding and by way of example, a number
of modifications, changes, and adaptations may be implemented
and/or will be obvious to those skilled in the art. Hence, the
scope of the present invention is limited solely by the independent
claims.
* * * * *