U.S. patent application number 13/948137 was filed with the patent office on 2014-01-23 for method of notifying users regarding motion artifacts based on image analysis.
This patent application is currently assigned to DIGITALOPTICS CORPORATION EUROPE LIMITED. The applicant listed for this patent is DIGITALOPTICS CORPORATION EUROPE LIMITED. Invention is credited to Peter Corcoran, Yury Prilutsky, Eran Steinberg.
Application Number | 20140022403 13/948137 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 36316402 |
Filed Date | 2014-01-23 |
United States Patent
Application |
20140022403 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Steinberg; Eran ; et
al. |
January 23, 2014 |
Method of Notifying Users Regarding Motion Artifacts Based on Image
Analysis
Abstract
A digital image acquisition system having no photographic film
comprises a portable apparatus for capturing digital images and a
digital processing component for reducing camera motion blur in an
image captured by the apparatus. The digital processing component
operates by comparing the image with at least one other image, for
example a preview image, of approximately the same scene taken
outside the exposure period of the main image. In one embodiment
the digital processing component identifies at least one feature
which is relatively less blurred than the corresponding feature in
the main image and/or calculates a trajectory of at least one
feature in a plurality of preview images and extrapolates such
feature onto the main image, and calculates a PSF in respect of the
feature, and de-convolves the main image using the PSF.
Inventors: |
Steinberg; Eran; (San
Francisco, CA) ; Corcoran; Peter; (Claregalway,
IE) ; Prilutsky; Yury; (San Mateo, CA) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
DIGITALOPTICS CORPORATION EUROPE LIMITED |
Galway |
|
IE |
|
|
Assignee: |
DIGITALOPTICS CORPORATION EUROPE
LIMITED
Galway
IE
|
Family ID: |
36316402 |
Appl. No.: |
13/948137 |
Filed: |
July 22, 2013 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
12755338 |
Apr 6, 2010 |
8494300 |
|
|
13948137 |
|
|
|
|
12199710 |
Aug 27, 2008 |
7697778 |
|
|
12755338 |
|
|
|
|
10986562 |
Nov 10, 2004 |
7639889 |
|
|
12199710 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
348/208.4 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H04N 5/23254 20130101;
G06T 5/50 20130101; G06T 5/003 20130101; G06T 2207/20201 20130101;
G06T 7/20 20130101; H04N 5/23264 20130101; H04N 5/23248 20130101;
H04N 5/23258 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
348/208.4 |
International
Class: |
H04N 5/232 20060101
H04N005/232 |
Claims
1. A digital image acquisition device, comprising: an image capture
component for capturing digital images; a digital processing
component, including: a processor; and embedded code for
programming the processor to initiate a subsequent action upon
determining that a threshold motion blur has occurred in a captured
digital image based on a real time analysis of the captured digital
image and at least one further image each acquired with said
digital image acquisition device, such that said same digital image
acquisition device captures each of said captured digital image and
said at least one further image, within a temporal range that
includes an exposure period of the captured digital image, and
times proximately before and after said exposure period, and of
approximately the same scene as that of the captured digital image,
and wherein the threshold motion blur comprises a qualitative
non-zero distortion amount around one or more points or lines or
both in the image compared to one or more relatively sharp matched
points or lines, or both, in the at least one further image, and
wherein said captured digital image and said at least one further
image are compared; and wherein the digital processing component is
further arranged to initiate said subsequent action depending on
whether the threshold motion blur has occurred in the captured
digital image.
2. A device according to claim 1, wherein the determining that a
threshold motion blur has occurred is based on qualitatively
determining a motion blur.
3. A device according to claim 2, wherein the motion blur is
mathematically defined as a point spread function (PSF).
4. A device according to claim 2, wherein said digital processing
component further de-blurs the captured image using said determined
motion blur function.
5. A device according to claim 2, wherein said qualitatively
determining a motion blur is performed using an auto-focus
mechanism of the camera as the digital processing component.
6. A device according to claim 1, wherein the digital image
capturing apparatus is configured to capture another image if the
digital processing component determines that the captured image is
blurred.
7. A device according to claim 1, wherein said image capture
component comprises a single sensor for capturing said captured
digital image and said at least one further image.
8. A device according to claim 1, wherein said determining that a
threshold motion blur has occurred in the captured digital image is
further based on a comparison of said captured digital image with
at least two further images each acquired with said same sensor,
such that at least a same portion of said same sensor captures at
least a portion of each of said captured digital image and said at
least two further images, within a temporal range that includes an
exposure period of the captured digital image, and times
proximately before and after said exposure period, and of
approximately the same scene as that of the captured digital
image.
9. One or more non-transitory computer readable media having
digital code embedded therein for programming a processor to
perform a method on a digital image acquisition device that
comprises an image capture component for capturing digital images,
a digital processing component and an auto-focus mechanism, wherein
the method comprises: determining that a threshold motion blur has
occurred in a captured digital image based on a real time analysis
of the captured digital image and at least one further image each
acquired with a same digital image acquisition device, such that
said same digital image acquisition device captures each of said
captured digital image and said at least one further image, within
a temporal range that includes an exposure period of the captured
digital image, and times proximately before and after said exposure
period, and of approximately the same scene as that of the captured
digital image, wherein the threshold motion blur comprises a
qualitative non-zero distortion amount around one or more points or
lines or both in the image compared to one or more relatively sharp
matched points or lines, or both, in the at least one further
image; comparing said captured digital image and said at least one
further image; determining whether to initiate said subsequent
image capture depending on whether the threshold motion blur has
occurred in the captured digital image; initiating said subsequent
action based on the determining depending on whether the threshold
motion blur has occurred in the captured digital image.
10. One or more computer readable media according to claim 9,
wherein the determining that a threshold motion blur has occurred
is based on qualitatively determining a motion blur.
11. One or more computer readable media according to claim 10,
wherein the motion blur is mathematically defined as a point spread
function (PSF).
12. One or more computer readable media according to claim 10,
wherein said qualitatively determining a motion blur is performed
using an auto-focus mechanism of the camera as the digital
processing component.
13. One or more computer readable media according to claim 9,
wherein said digital image acquisition system comprises a portable
digital camera comprising a single sensor for capturing said
captured digital image and said at least one further image.
14. One or more computer readable media according to claim 9,
wherein said determining that a threshold motion blur has occurred
in the captured digital image is further based on a comparison of
said captured digital image with at least two further images each
acquired with said same sensor, such that at least a same portion
of said same sensor captures at least a portion of each of said
captured digital image and said at least two further images, within
a temporal range that includes an exposure period of the captured
digital image, and times proximately before and after said exposure
period, and of approximately the same scene as that of the captured
digital image.
15. On a digital image acquisition device that comprises an image
capture component for capturing digital images and a digital
processing component, a method of initiating a subsequent action
depending on determining whether a threshold motion blur has
occurred in the digital image, wherein the method comprises:
determining that a threshold motion blur has occurred in a captured
digital image based on a real time analysis of the captured digital
image and at least one further image each acquired with a same
digital image acquisition device, such that said same digital image
acquisition device captures each of said captured digital image and
said at least one further image, within a temporal range that
includes an exposure period of the captured digital image, and
times proximately before and after said exposure period, and of
approximately the same scene as that of the captured digital image,
wherein the threshold motion blur comprises a qualitative non-zero
distortion amount around one or more points or lines or both in the
image compared to one or more relatively sharp matched points or
lines, or both, in the at least one further image; comparing said
captured digital image and said at least one further image;
determining whether to initiate said subsequent action depending on
whether the threshold motion blur has occurred in the captured
digital image; initiating said subsequent action based on the
determining depending on whether the threshold motion blur has
occurred in the captured digital image.
16. A method according to claim 15, wherein the determining that a
threshold motion blur has occurred is based on qualitatively
determining a motion blur.
17. A method according to claim 16, wherein the motion blur is
mathematically defined as a point spread function (PSF).
18. A method according to claim 16, wherein said qualitatively
determining a motion blur is performed using an auto-focus
mechanism of the camera as the digital processing component.
19. A method according to claim 15, wherein said digital image
acquisition system comprises a portable digital camera comprising a
single sensor for capturing said captured digital image and said at
least one further image.
20. A method according to claim 15, wherein said determining that a
threshold motion blur has occurred in the captured digital image is
further based on a comparison of said captured digital image with
at least two further images each acquired with said same sensor,
such that at least a same portion of said same sensor captures at
least a portion of each of said captured digital image and said at
least two further images, within a temporal range that includes an
exposure period of the captured digital image, and times
proximately before and after said exposure period, and of
approximately the same scene as that of the captured digital
image.
21. The device of claim 1, wherein said real time analysis occurs
within the device and within a temporal duration commensurate
either with an average delay between capture of consecutive images
or with timing of an auto-focus mechanism of the device, or
both.
22. One or more computer readable media according to claim 9,
wherein said real time analysis occurs within the device and within
a temporal duration commensurate either with an average delay
between capture of consecutive images or with timing of an
auto-focus mechanism of the device, or both.
23. A method according to claim 15, wherein said real time analysis
occurs within the device and within a temporal duration
commensurate either with an average delay between capture of
consecutive images or with timing of an auto-focus mechanism of the
device, or both.
24. The device of claim 1, wherein a local contrast gradient or
edge detection auto-focus technique, or both, is used to
qualitatively determine the motion blur.
25. One or more computer readable media according to claim 9,
wherein a local contrast gradient or edge detection auto-focus
technique, or both, is used to qualitatively determine the motion
blur.
26. A method according to claim 15, wherein a local contrast
gradient or edge detection auto-focus technique, or both, is used
to qualitatively determine the motion blur.
Description
PRIORITY
[0001] This application is a Continuation of U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 12/755,338, filed Apr. 6, 2010; which is
Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/199,710, filed
Aug. 27, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,697,778; which is a Division of
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/986,562, filed Nov. 10, 2004,
now U.S. Pat. No. 7,639,889. This application is related to U.S.
Pat. Nos. 7,636,486; 7,660,478; and 7,639,888; and this application
is also related to PCT published application WO2006/050782.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0002] This invention relates to a digital image acquisition system
comprising a digital processing component for determining motion
blurring artifacts, and preferably a camera motion blur function,
in a captured digital image.
BACKGROUND TO THE INVENTION
[0003] Camera motion is dependent on a few parameters. First of
all, the exposure speed. The longer the shutter is open, the more
likely that movement will be noticed. The second is the focal
length of the camera. The longer the lens is, the more noticeable
the movement is. A rule of thumb for amateur photographers shooting
35 mm film is never to exceed the exposure time beyond the focal
length, so that for a 30 mm lens, not to shoot slower than 1/30th
of a second. The third criteria is the subject itself. Flat areas,
or low frequency data, is less likely to be degraded as much as
high frequency data.
[0004] Historically, the problem was addressed by anchoring the
camera, such as with the use of a tripod or monopod, or stabilizing
it such as with the use of gyroscopic stabilizers in the lens or
camera body, or movement of the sensor plane to counteract the
camera movement.
[0005] Mathematically, the motion blurring can be explained as
applying a Point Spread Function, or PSF, to each point in the
object. This PSF represent the path of the camera, during the
exposure integration time. Motion PSF is a function of the motion
path and the motion speed, which determines the integration time,
or the accumulated energy for each point.
[0006] A hypothetical example of such a PSF is illustrated in FIGS.
3-a and 3-b. FIG. 3-b is a projection of FIG. 3-a. In FIGS. 3-a and
3-b, the PSF is depicted by 410 and 442 respectively. The pixel
displacement in x and y directions are depicted by blocks 420 and
421 respectively for the X axis and 430 and 432 for the Y axis
respectively. The energy 440 is the third dimension of FIG. 3-a.
Note that the energy is the inverse of the differential speed in
each point, or directly proportional to the time in each point. In
other words, the longer the camera is stationary at a given
location, the longer the integration time is, and thus the higher
the energy packed. This may also be depicted as the width of the
curve 442 in a X-Y projection.
[0007] Visually, when referring to images, in a simplified manner,
FIG. 3-c illustrates what would happen to a pinpoint white point in
an image blurred by the PSF of the aforementioned Figures. In a
picture, such point of light surrounded by black background will
result in an image similar to the one of FIG. 3-c. In such image,
the regions that the camera was stationary longer, such as 444 will
be brighter than the region where the camera was stationary only a
fraction of that time. Thus such image may provide a visual
speedometer, or visual accelerometer. Moreover, in a synthetic
photographic environment such knowledge of a single point, also
referred to as a delta-function could define the PSF.
[0008] Given: [0009] a two dimensional image I represented by
I(x,y) [0010] a motion point spread function MPSF(I) [0011] The
degraded image I'(x,y) can be mathematically defined as the
convolution of I(X,Y) and MPSF(x,y) or
[0011] I'(x,y)=I(x,y){circle around (x)}MPSF(x,y) (Eq. 1)
or in the integral form for a continuous function
I(x,y)=.intg..intg.(I(x-x',y-y')MPSF(x'y').differential.x'.differential.-
y' (Eq. 2)
[0012] and for a discrete function such as digitized images:
I ' ( m , n ) = j k I ( m - j , n - k ) MPSF ( j , k ) ( Eq . 3 )
##EQU00001##
[0013] Another well known PSF in photography and in optics in
general is blurring created by de-focusing. The different is that
de-focusing can usually be depicted by primarily a symmetrical
Gaussian shift invariant PSF, while motion de-blurring is not. In
addition, focus is a local attributes meaning some regions of the
image may be in focus while others are not, while motion affects
the entire image, even if not in an equal, shift invariant fashion.
However, in many cases, the qualitative notion of whether the image
was blurred by lack of focus or motion may be similar in
nature.
[0014] The reason why motion de-blurring is not shift invariant is
that the image may not only shift but also rotate. Therefore, a
complete description of the motion blurring is an Affine transform
that combines shift and rotation based on the following
transformation:
[ u v 1 ] = [ Cos .omega. Sin .omega. .DELTA. x - Sin .omega. cos
.omega. .DELTA. y 0 0 1 ] ( Eq . 4 ) ##EQU00002##
[0015] The PSF can be obtained empirically as part of a more
generic field such as system identification. For linear systems,
the PSF can be determined by obtaining the system's response to a
known input and then solving the associated inversion problems.
[0016] The known input can be for an optical system, a point, also
mathematically defined in the continuous world as a delta function
.delta.(x), a line, an edge or a corner.
[0017] An example of a PSF can be found in many text books such as
"Deconvolution of Images and Spectra" 2nd. Edition, Academic Press,
1997, edited by Jannson, Peter A. and "Digital Image Restoration",
Prentice Hall, 1977 authored by Andrews, H. C. and Hunt, B. R.
[0018] The process of de-blurring an image is done using
de-convolution which is the mathematical form of separating between
the convolve image and the convolution kernel. However, as
discussed in many publications such as Chapter 1 of "Deconvolution
of Images and Spectra" 2nd. Edition, Academic Press, 1997, edited
by Jannson, Peter A., the problem of de-convolution can be either
unsolvable, ill-posed or ill-conditioned. Moreover, for a physical
real life system, an attempt to find a solution may also be
exacerbated in the presence of noise or sampling.
[0019] One may mathematically try and perform the restoration via
de-convolution means without the knowledge of the kernel or in this
case the PSF. Such methods known also as blind de-convolution. The
results of such process with no a-prior knowledge of the PSF for a
general optical system are far from acceptable and require
extensive computation. Solutions based on blind de-convolution may
be found for specific circumstances as described in "Automatic
multidimensional deconvolution" J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, vol. 4(1), pp.
180-188, January 1987 to Lane et al, "Some Implications of Zero
Sheets for Blind Deconvolution and Phase Retrieval", J. Optical
Soc. Am. A, vol. 7, pp. 468-479, 1990 to Bates et al, Iterative
blind deconvolution algorithm applied to phase retrieval", J. Opt.
Soc. Am. A, vol. 7(3), pp. 428-433, March 1990. to Seldin et al and
"Deconvolution and Phase Retrieval With Use of Zero Sheets," J.
Optical Soc. Am. A, vol. 12, pp. 1,842-1,857, 1995 to Bones et al.
However, as known to those familiar in the art of image
restoration, and as explained in "Digital Image Restoration",
Prentice Hall, 1977 authored by Andrews, H. C. and Hunt, B. R.,
blurred images can be substantially better restored when the blur
function is known.
[0020] The article "Motion Deblurring Using Hybrid Imaging", by
Moshe Ben-Ezra and Shree K. Nayar, from the Proceedings IEEE
Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern
Recognition, 2003, determines the PSF of a blurred image by using a
hybrid camera which takes a number of relatively sharp reference
images during the exposure period of the main image. However, this
requires a special construction of camera and also requires
simultaneous capture of images. Thus this technique is not readily
transferable to cheap, mass-market digital cameras.
[0021] It is an object of the invention to provide an improved
technique for determining a camera motion blur function in a
captured digital image which can take advantage of existing camera
functionality and does not therefore require special measurement
hardware (although the use of the invention in special or
non-standard cameras is not ruled out).
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0022] According to the present invention there is provided a
digital image acquisition system comprising an apparatus for
capturing digital images and a digital processing component for
warning a photographer determining that a threshold camera motion
blur has occurred in a captured digital image. The determination is
based on a comparison of at least two sets of image data each
acquired within a temporal range that includes an exposure period
of the captured digital image, and times proximately before and
after said exposure period, and of nominally the same scene as that
of the captured digital image.
[0023] Preferably, the at least two images comprise the captured
image and another image taken outside, preferably before and
alternatively after, the exposure period of said captured
image.
[0024] Preferably at least one reference image is a preview
image.
[0025] Preferably, too, said digital image acquisition system is a
portable digital camera.
[0026] In one embodiment the digital processing component
identifies at least one characteristic in a single reference image
which is relatively less blurred than the corresponding feature in
the captured image, and calculates a point spread function (PSF) in
respect of said characteristic.
[0027] A characteristic as used in this invention may be a
well-defined pattern. The better the pattern is differentiated from
its surroundings, such as by local contrast gradient, local color
gradient, well-defined edges, etc., the better such pattern can be
used to calculate the PSF. In an extreme case, the pattern forming
the characteristic can be only a single pixel in size.
[0028] In another embodiment the digital processing component
calculates a trajectory of at least one characteristic in a
plurality of reference images, extrapolates such characteristic on
to the captured image, and calculates a PSF in respect of said
characteristic.
[0029] In either case, based on the calculated PSF, the captured
image can be deblurred using a de-convolution technique.
[0030] In yet another embodiment, the digital processing component
analyses the image motion blur in real time based on the captured
image and provides a notification to the user when determined that
the acquired image is not of acceptable quality due to motion
blur.
[0031] Corresponding de-blurring function determining methods are
also provided. One or more storage devices are also provided having
digital code embedded thereon for programming one or more
processors to perform the de-blurring function determining
methods.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0032] Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way
of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in
which:
[0033] FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a camera apparatus operating in
accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
[0034] FIG. 2 illustrates the workflow of the initial stage of a
camera motion blur reducing means using preview data according to
embodiments of the invention.
[0035] FIGS. 3-a to 3-c illustrate an example of a point spread
function (PSF).
[0036] FIG. 4 is a workflow illustrating a first embodiment of the
invention.
[0037] FIG. 5 is a workflow illustrating a second embodiment of the
invention.
[0038] FIGS. 6 and 7-a and 7-b are diagrams which assist in the
understanding of the second embodiment.
DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
[0039] FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of an image acquisition system
such as a digital camera apparatus operating in accordance with the
present invention. The digital acquisition device, in this case a
portable digital camera 20, includes a processor 120. It can be
appreciated that many of the processes implemented in the digital
camera may be implemented in or controlled by software operating in
a microprocessor (.mu.Proc), central processing unit (CPU),
controller, digital signal processor (DSP) and/or an application
specific integrated circuit (ASIC), collectively depicted as block
120 and termed as "processor". Generically, all user interface and
control of peripheral components such as buttons and display is
controlled by a .mu.-controller 122.
[0040] The processor 120, in response to a user input at 122, such
as half pressing a shutter button (pre-capture mode 32), initiates
and controls the digital photographic process. Ambient light
exposure is determined using light sensor 40 in order to
automatically determine if a flash is to be used. The distance to
the subject is determined using focusing means 50 which also
focuses the image on image capture means 60. The focusing means may
also involve a image processing mechanism to detect blurred image.
This mechanism may be used to detect not only blurred images due to
de-focusing but also blurred image due to motion artefacts. If a
flash is to be used, processor 120 causes the flash means 70 to
generate a photographic flash in substantial coincidence with the
recording of the image by image capture means 60 upon full
depression of the shutter button. The image capture means 60
digitally records the image in colour. The image capture means is
known to those familiar with the art and may include a CCD (charge
coupled device) or CMOS to facilitate digital recording. The flash
may be selectively generated either in response to the light sensor
40 or a manual input 72 from the user of the camera.
[0041] The image recorded by image capture means 60 is stored in
image store means 80 which may comprise computer memory such a
dynamic random access memory or a non-volatile memory. The camera
is equipped with a display 100, such as an LCD at the back of the
camera or a microdisplay inside the viewfinder, for preview and
post-view of images. In the case of preview images, which are
generated in the pre-capture mode 32, the display 100 can assist
the user in composing the image, as well as being used to determine
focusing and exposure. A temporary storage space 82 is used to
store one or plurality of the preview images and be part of the
image store means 80 or a separate component. The preview image is
usually generated by the same image capture means 60, and for speed
and memory efficiency reasons may be generated by subsampling the
image 124 using software which can be part of the general processor
120 or dedicated hardware, before displaying 100 or storing 82 the
preview image.
[0042] Upon full depression of the shutter button, a full
resolution image is acquired and stored, 80. The image may go
through image processing stages such as conversion from the RAW
sensor pattern to RGB, format, color correction and image
enhancements. These operations may be performed as part of the main
processor 120 or by using a secondary processor such as a dedicated
DSP. Upon completion of the image processing the images are stored
in a long term persistent storage such as a removable storage
device 112.
[0043] According to this embodiment, the system includes a motion
de-blurring component 100. This component can be implemented as
firmware or software running on the main processor 120 or on a
separate processor. Alternatively, this component may be
implemented in software running on an external processing device
10, such as a desktop or a server, which receives the images from
the camera storage 112 via the image output mechanism 110, which
can be physical removable storage, wireless or tethered connection
between the camera and the external device. The motion de-blurring
component 100 includes a PSF calculator 110 and an image
de-convolver 130 which de-convolves the full resolution image using
the PSF. These two components may be combined or treated
separately. The PSF calculator 110 may be used for qualification
only, such as determining if motion blur exists, while the image
de-convolver 130 may be activated only after the PSF calculator 110
has determined if de-blurring is needed.
[0044] FIG. 2 is a flow chart of one embodiment of calculating the
PSF in accordance with the present invention. While the camera is
in preview mode, 210, the camera continuously acquires preview
images, calculating exposure and focus and displaying the
composition. When such an image satisfies some predefined criteria
222, the preview image is saved, 230. As explained below, such
criteria will be defined based on image quality and/or
chronological considerations. A simple criteria may be always save
the last image. More advanced image quality criteria may include
analysis as to whether the preview image itself has too much motion
blurring. As an alternative to saving a single image, multiple
images may be saved, 240, the newest preview image being added to
the list, replacing the oldest one, 242 and 244. The definition of
oldest can be chronological, as in First In First Out.
Alternatively it can be the image that least satisfies criteria as
defined in stage 222. The process continues, 211, until the shutter
release is fully pressed, 280, or the camera is turned off.
[0045] The criteria, 222, that a preview image needs to satisfy can
vary depending on specific implementations of the algorithm. In one
preferred embodiment, such criteria may be whether the image is not
blurred. This is based on the assumption that even if a camera is
constantly moving, being hand held by the user, there are times
where the movement is zero, whether because the user is firmly
holding the camera or due to change of movement direction the
movement speed is zero at a certain instance. Such criteria may not
need to be absolute. In addition such criteria may be based on one
or more 1-dimensional vectors as opposed to the full two
dimensional image. In other words, the criteria 222 may be
satisfied if the image is blurred horizontally, but no vertical
movement is recorded and vice versa, due to the fact that the
motion may be mathematically described in orthogonal vectors, thus
separable. More straight forward criteria will be chronological,
saving images every predefined time which can be equal or slower to
the speed the preview images are generated. Other criteria may be
defined such as related to the exposure, whether the preview
reached focus, whether flash is being used, etc.
[0046] Finally, the full resolution image acquired at 280 is saved,
282.
[0047] After the full resolution image is saved, 282, it is loaded
into memory 292 and the preview image or images are loaded into
memory as well, 294. Together the preview and final images are the
input of the process which calculates the PSF, 110.
[0048] A description of two different methods of calculating the
PSF are illustrated in FIGS. 4 and 5.
[0049] FIG. 4 shows an embodiment 500 for extracting a PSF using a
single preview image.
[0050] In this embodiment, the input is the finally acquired full
resolution image 511, and a saved preview image 512. Prior to
creating the PSF, the preview and final image have to be aligned.
The alignment can be a global operation, using the entire images,
511 and 512. However, the two images may not be exact for several
reasons.
[0051] Due to the fact that the preview image and the final full
resolution image differ temporally, there may not be a perfect
alignment. In this case, local alignment, based on image features
and using techniques known to those skilled in the art, will
normally be sufficient. The process of alignment may be performed
on selected extracted regions 520, or as a local operation.
Moreover, this alignment is only required in the neighborhood of
the selected region(s) or feature(s) used for the creation of the
PSF. In this case, matching regions of the full resolution and
preview image are extracted, 521 and 522. The process of extraction
of such regions may be as simple as separating the image into a
grid, which can be the entire image, or fine resolution regions.
Other more advanced schemes will include the detection of distinct
regions of interest based on a classification process, such as
detecting regions with high contrast in color or exposure, sharp
edges or other distinctive classifiers that will assist in
isolating the PSF. One familiar in the art is aware of many
algorithms for analyzing and determining local features or regions
of high contrast; frequency transform and edge detection techniques
are two specific examples that may be employed for this step, which
may further include segmentation, feature extraction and
classification steps.
[0052] The preview image 512 is normally, but not necessarily, of
lower resolution than the full resolution image 511, typically
being generated by clocking out a subset of the sensor cells or by
averaging the raw sensor data. Therefore, the two images, or
alternatively the selected regions in the images, need to be
matched in pixel resolution, 530. In the present context "pixel
resolution" means the size of the image, or relevant region, in
terms of the number of pixels constituting the image or region
concerned. Such a process may be done by either upsampling the
preview image, 532, downsampling the acquired image, 531, or a
combination thereof. Those familiar in the art will be aware of
several techniques best used for such sampling methods.
[0053] Now we recall from before that: [0054] A two dimensional
image I is given as I(x,y). [0055] A motion point spread function
describing the blurring of image I is given as MPSF(I). [0056] The
degraded image I'(x,y) can be mathematically defined as the
convolution of I(X,Y) and MPSF(x,y) or
[0056] I'(x,y)=I(x,y){circle around (x)}MPSF(x,y) (Eq. 1)
[0057] Now it is well known that where a mathematical function,
such as the aforementioned MPSF(x,y), is convoluted with a Dirac
delta function .delta.(x,y) that the original function is
preserved. Thus, if within a preview image a sharp point against a
homogenous background can be determined, it is equivalent to a
local occurrence of a 2D Dirac delta function within the unblurred
preview image. If this can now be matched and aligned locally with
the main, blurred image I'(x,y) then the distortion pattern around
this sharp point will be a very close approximation to the exact
PSF which caused the blurring of the original image I(x,y). Thus,
upon performing the alignment and resolution matching between
preview and main images the distortion patterns surrounding
distinct points or high contrast image features, are, in effect,
representations of the 2D PSF, for points and representation of a
single dimension of the PSF for sharp, unidirectional lines.
[0058] The PSF may be created by combining multiple regions. In the
simple case, a distinguished singular point on the preview image
and its corresponding motion blurred form of this point which is
found in the main full-resolution image is the PSF.
[0059] However, as it may not always be possible to determine,
match and align, a single distinct point in both preview and full
resolution image, it is alternatively possible to create a PSF from
a combination of the orthogonal parts of more complex features such
as edges and lines. Extrapolation to multiple 1-D edges and corners
should be clear for one familiar in the art. In this case multiple
line-spread-functions, depicting the blur of orthogonal lines need
to be combined and analysed mathematically in order to determine a
single-point PSF.
[0060] Due to statistical variances this process may not be exact
enough to distinguish the PSF based on a single region. Therefore,
depending on the processing power and required accuracy of the PSF,
the step of finding the PSF may include some statistical pattern
matching or statistical combination of results from multiple
regions within an image to create higher pixel and potentially sub
pixel accuracy for the PSF.
[0061] As explained above, the PSF may not be shift invariant.
Therefore, the process of determining the right PSF may be
performed in various regions of the image, to determine the
variability of the PSF as a function of location within the
image.
[0062] FIG. 5 shows a method 600 of extrapolating a PSF using
multiple preview images.
[0063] In this embodiment, the movement of the image is
extrapolated based on the movement of the preview images. According
to FIG. 5, the input for this stage is multiple captured preview
images 610, and the full resolution image 620. All images are
recorded with an exact time stamp associated with them to ensure
the correct tracking. In most cases, preview images will be equally
separated, in a manner of several images per second. However, this
is not a requirement for this embodiment as long as the interval
between images, including the final full resolution image, is
known.
[0064] One or more distinctive regions in a preview image are
selected, 630. By distinctive, one refers to a region that can be
isolated from the background, such as regions with noticeable
difference in contrast or brightness. Techniques for identifying
such regions are well known in the art and may include
segmentation, feature extraction and classification.
[0065] Each region is next matched with the corresponding region in
each preview image, 632. In some cases not all regions may be
accurately determined on all preview images, due to motion blurring
or object obscurations, or the fact that they have moved outside
the field of the preview image. The coordinates of each region is
recorded, 634, for the preview images and, 636, for the final
image.
[0066] Knowing the time intervals of the preview images, one can
extrapolate the movement of the camera as a function of time. When
the full resolution image 620 is acquired, the parameter that needs
to be recorded is the time interval between the last captured
preview image and the full resolution image, as well as the
duration of the exposure of the full resolution image. Based on the
tracking before the image was captured, 634, and the interval
before and duration of the final image, the movement of single
points or high contrast image features can be extrapolated, 640, to
determine the detailed motion path of the camera.
[0067] This process is illustrated in FIG. 6. According to this
figure multiple preview images 902, 904, 906, 908 are captured. In
each of them a specific region 912, 914, 916, 918 is isolated which
corresponds to the same feature in each image. The full resolution
image is 910, and in it the region corresponding to 912, 914, 916,
918 is marked as 920. Note that 920 may be distorted due to motion
blurring.
[0068] Tracking one dimension as a function of time, the same
regions are illustrated in 930 where the regions are plotted based
on their displacement 932, as a function of time interval 932. The
objects 942, 944, 946 948 and 950 correspond to the regions 912,
914, 916, 918 and 920.
[0069] The motion is calculated as the line 960. This can be done
using statistical interpolation, spline or other curve
interpolation based on discrete sampling points. For the final
image, due to the fact that the curve may not be possible to
calculate, it may also be done via extrapolation of the original
curve, 960.
[0070] The region of the final acquired image is enlarged 970 for
better viewing. In this plot, the blurred object 950 is depicted as
952, and the portion of the curve 690 is shown as 962. The time
interval in this case, 935 is limited to the exact length in which
the exposure is being taken, and the horizontal displacement 933,
is the exact horizontal blur. Based on that, the interpolated
curve, 952, within the exposure time interval 935, produces an
extrapolation of the motion path 990.
[0071] Now an extrapolation of the motion path may often be
sufficient to yield a useful estimate of the PSF if the motion
during the timeframe of the principle acquired image can be shown
to have practically constant velocity and practically zero
acceleration. As many cameras now incorporate sensitive gyroscopic
sensors it may be feasible to determine such information and verify
that a simple motion path analysis is adequate to estimate the
motion blur PSF.
[0072] However when this is not the case (or where it is not
possible to reliably make such a determination) it is still
possible to estimate the detailed motion blur PSF from a knowledge
of the time separation and duration of preview images and a
knowledge of the motion path of the camera lens across an image
scene. This process is illustrated in FIGS. 7-a and 7-b and will
now be described in more detail.
.intg..intg.k(x,y)dx dy=1,
[0073] Any PSF is an energy distribution function which can be
represented by a convolution kernel k(x,y).fwdarw.w where (x,y) is
a location and w is the energy level at that location. The kernel k
must satisfy the following energy conservation constraint: which
states that energy is neither lost nor gained by the blurring
operation. In order to define additional constraints that apply to
motion blur PSFs we use a time parameterization of the PSF as a
path function, f(t).fwdarw.(x,y) and an energy function
h(t).fwdarw.w. Note that due to physical speed and acceleration
constraints, f(t) should be
.intg. t t + .delta. t h ( t ) t = .delta. t t end - t start ,
.delta. t > 0 , t start .ltoreq. t .ltoreq. t end - .delta. t ,
##EQU00003##
continuous and at least twice differentiable, where f'(t) is the
velocity of the (preview) image frame and f''(t) is the
acceleration at time t. By making the assumption that the scene
radiance does not change during image acquisition, we get the
additional constraint: [0074] where [t.sub.start, t.sub.end] is the
acquisition interval for a (preview) image. This constraint states
that the amount of energy which is integrated at any time interval
is proportional to the length of the interval.
[0075] Given these constraints we can estimate a continuous motion
blur PSF from discrete motion samples as illustrated in FIGS. 7-a
and 7-b. First we estimate the motion path, f(t), by spline
interpolation as previously described above and as illustrated in
FIG. 6. This path [1005] is further illustrated in FIG. 7-a.
[0076] Now in order to estimate the energy function h(t) along this
path we need to determine the extent of each image frame along this
interpolated path. This may be achieved using the motion centroid
assumption described in Ben-Ezra et al and splitting the path into
frames with a 1-D Voronoi tessellation as shown in FIG. 7-a. Since
the assumption of constant radiance implies that frames with equal
exposure times will integrate equal amounts of energy, we can
compute h(t) for each frame as shown in FIG. 7-b. Note that as each
preview frame will typically have the same exposure time thus each
rectangle in FIG. 7-b, apart from the main image acquisition
rectangle will have equal areas. The area of the main image
rectangle, associated with capture frame 5 [1020] in this example,
will typically be several time larger than preview image frames and
may be significantly more than an order of magnitude larger if the
exposure time of the main image is long.
[0077] The resulting PSF determined by this process is illustrated
in FIG. 7-b and may be divided into several distinct parts. Firstly
there is the PSF which is interpolated between the preview image
frames [1052] and shown as a solid line; secondly there is the PSF
interpolated between the last preview image and the midpoint of the
main acquired image [1054]; thirdly there is the extrapolation of
the PSF beyond the midpoint of the main acquired image [1055]
which, for a main image with a long exposure time--and thus more
susceptible to blurring--is more likely to deviate from the true
PSF. Thus it may be desirable to acquire additional postview
images, which are essentially images acquired through the same
in-camera mechanism as preview images except that they are acquired
after the main image has been acquired. This technique will allow a
further interpolation of the main image PSF [1056] with the PSF
determined from at least one postview image.
[0078] The process may not be exact enough to distinguish the PSF
based on a single region. Therefore, depending on the processing
power and accuracy need, the step of finding the PSF may include
some statistical pattern matching of multiple regions, determining
multiple motion paths, thus creating higher pixel and potentially
sub pixel accuracy for the PSF.
[0079] Advantageously, a determination may be made whether a
threshold amount of camera motion blur has occurred during the
capture of a digital image. The determination is made based on a
comparison of a least two images acquired during or proximate to
the exposure period of the captured image. The processing occurs so
rapidly, either in the camera or in an external processing device,
that the image blur determination occurs in "real time". The
photographer may be informed and/or a new image capture can take
place on the spot due to this real time image blur determination
feature. Preferably, the determination is made based on a
calculated camera motion blur function, and further preferably, the
image may be de-blurred based on the motion blur function, either
in-camera or in an external processing device in real time or later
on. In one embodiment, a same mechanism that determines auto focus
(e.g., local contrast gradient or edge detection) is used for
motion evaluation. In particular, the process of auto focusing is
done in real time and therefore the mechanism is fast. Such
mechanism as understood by those skilled in the art, may be used in
the qualitative and quantitative determination of motion blur.
[0080] While an exemplary drawings and specific embodiments of the
present invention have been described and illustrated, it is to be
understood that that the scope of the present invention is not to
be limited to the particular embodiments discussed. Thus, the
embodiments shall be regarded as illustrative rather than
restrictive, and it should be understood that variations may be
made in those embodiments by workers skilled in the arts without
departing from the scope of the present invention as set forth in
the appended claims and structural and functional equivalents
thereof.
[0081] In addition, in methods that may be performed according to
preferred embodiments herein and that may have been described
above, the operations have been described in selected typographical
sequences. However, the sequences have been selected and so ordered
for typographical convenience and are not intended to imply any
particular order for performing the operations, except for those
where a particular order may be expressly set forth or where those
of ordinary skill in the art may deem a particular order to be
necessary.
[0082] In addition, all references cited herein as well as the
background, invention summary, abstract and brief description of
the drawings are incorporated by reference into the description of
the preferred embodiment as disclosing alternative embodiments.
* * * * *