U.S. patent application number 11/538908 was filed with the patent office on 2013-12-12 for vapor deposition process and apparatus therefor.
This patent application is currently assigned to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY. The applicant listed for this patent is Ramgopal Darolia, Boris A. Movchan, Irene Spitsberg. Invention is credited to Ramgopal Darolia, Boris A. Movchan, Irene Spitsberg.
Application Number | 20130327271 11/538908 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 34134615 |
Filed Date | 2013-12-12 |
United States Patent
Application |
20130327271 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Movchan; Boris A. ; et
al. |
December 12, 2013 |
VAPOR DEPOSITION PROCESS AND APPARATUS THEREFOR
Abstract
An apparatus for depositing a ceramic coating on a component.
The apparatus is configured to make use of an evaporation source
containing multiple different oxide compounds, in which at least
one of the oxide compounds has a vapor pressure that is higher than
the remaining oxide compounds. The apparatus is operable to
introduce the evaporation source into a coating chamber, suspend
the component near the evaporation source, and project a
high-energy beam on the evaporation source to melt and form a vapor
cloud having a composition comprising the oxide compounds of the
evaporation source. The apparatus includes a feature that prevents
the vapor cloud from contacting and condensing on the component
during an initial phase of operation, and subsequently permit and
then again prevent the vapor cloud from contacting and condensing
on the component during subsequent phases of operation in response
to changes in the composition of the vapor cloud.
Inventors: |
Movchan; Boris A.; (Kyiv,
UA) ; Spitsberg; Irene; (Pittsburgh, PA) ;
Darolia; Ramgopal; (West Chester, OH) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
Movchan; Boris A.
Spitsberg; Irene
Darolia; Ramgopal |
Kyiv
Pittsburgh
West Chester |
PA
OH |
UA
US
US |
|
|
Assignee: |
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Schenectady
NY
|
Family ID: |
34134615 |
Appl. No.: |
11/538908 |
Filed: |
October 5, 2006 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
10709668 |
May 21, 2004 |
7393416 |
|
|
11538908 |
|
|
|
|
10064887 |
Aug 27, 2002 |
6790486 |
|
|
10709668 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
118/688 |
Current CPC
Class: |
C23C 14/30 20130101;
C23C 16/52 20130101; C23C 14/564 20130101; C23C 14/08 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
118/688 |
International
Class: |
C23C 16/52 20060101
C23C016/52 |
Claims
1. An apparatus for depositing a ceramic coating on a surface of a
component, the apparatus comprising: a single evaporation source
containing multiple different oxide compounds, at least one of the
oxide compounds having a vapor pressure that is higher than the
remaining oxide compounds; means for introducing the evaporation
source into a coating chamber that suspends the component near the
evaporation source; means for projecting a high-energy beam on the
evaporation source to melt the evaporation source, form a molten
pool of the oxide compounds of the evaporation source, and form a
vapor cloud having a composition comprising the oxide compounds of
the evaporation source; a maneuverable barrier that is maneuverable
between a first position in which the barrier is between the
component and the molten pool and a second position in which the
barrier is withdrawn from between the component and the molten
pool, wherein in the first position the barrier prevents the vapor
cloud from contacting and condensing on the component and wherein
in the second position the barrier allows the vapor cloud to
contact and condense on the component to form the coating; means
for sensing a chemistry of the composition of the vapor cloud; and
automation responsive to changes in the chemistry of the
composition of the vapor cloud sensed by the sensing means, the
automation positioning the barrier in the first position if the
chemistry of the composition of the vapor cloud is different from
the evaporation source.
2. (canceled)
3. An apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the at least one
oxide compound is selected from the group consisting of ceria,
magnesia, strontia, barium oxide, lanthana, neodymia, gadolinium
oxide, dysprosia, ytterbia and tantala.
4. An apparatus according to claim 3, wherein the evaporation
source consists essentially of yttria, zirconia and the at least
one oxide compound.
5. An apparatus according to claim 4, wherein the at least one
oxide compound is ceria.
6. An apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the evaporation
source consists essentially of yttria, zirconia and the at least
one oxide compound.
7. An apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the at least one
oxide compound is ceria.
8. An apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the evaporation
source contains about 10 to about 20 weight percent ceria, the
balance essentially zirconia stabilized by about 3 to about 8
weight percent yttria.
9. (canceled)
10. An apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the automation
positions the barrier in the second position if the chemistry of
the composition of the vapor cloud is approximately equal to the
evaporation source.
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This is a continuation patent application of co-pending U.S.
patent application Ser. No. 10/709,668 filed May 21, 2004, which is
a division patent application of prior co-pending application Ser.
No. 10/064,887 filed Aug. 27, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,790,486.
The contents of these applications are incorporated herein by
reference.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The present invention generally relates to coating
processes. More particularly, this invention is directed to a vapor
deposition process and apparatus for depositing ceramic coatings
containing multiple oxides with different vapor pressures using a
single evaporation source containing the multiple oxides.
[0003] Higher operating temperatures for gas turbine engines are
continuously sought in order to increase their efficiency. However,
as operating temperatures increase, the high temperature durability
of the components within the hot gas path of the engine must
correspondingly increase. Significant advances in high temperature
capabilities have been achieved through the formulation of nickel
and cobalt-base superalloys. Nonetheless, certain components of the
turbine, combustor and augmentor sections of a gas turbine engine
can be required to operate at temperatures at which the mechanical
properties of such alloys would be insufficient. For this reason,
these components are often protected by a thermal barrier coating
(TBC) formed of a ceramic material. Because of the different
coefficients of thermal expansion (CTE) between ceramic materials
and the superalloy substrates they protect, an oxidation-resistant
bond coat is typically employed to promote adhesion and extend the
service life of a TBC, as well as protect the underlying substrate
from damage by oxidation and hot corrosion attack. Bond coats used
on superalloy substrates are typically in the form of an overlay
coating such as MCrAIX (where M is iron, cobalt and/or nickel, and
X is yttrium or another rare earth element), or a diffusional
uminide coating. During the deposition of the ceramic TBC and
subsequent exposures to high temperatures, such as during engine
operation, these bond coats form a tightly adherent alumina
(Al.sub.2O.sub.3) layer or scale that adheres the TBC to the bond
coat.
[0004] Various ceramic materials have been proposed for TBC's, the
most notable of which is zirconia (ZrO.sub.2) that is partially or
fully stabilized by yttria (Y.sub.2O.sub.3), magnesia (MgO) or
another alkaline-earth metal oxides, or ceria (CeO.sub.2) or
another rare-earth metal oxides. Binary yttria-stabilized zirconia
(YSZ) is widely used as a TBC material because of its high
temperature capability, low thermal conductivity and erosion
resistance in comparison to zirconia stabilized by other oxides.
YSZ is also preferred as a result of the relative ease with which
it can be deposited by plasma spraying, flame spraying and physical
vapor deposition (PVD) techniques. TBC's employed in the highest
temperature regions of gas turbine engines are often deposited by
PVD, particularly electron beam physical vapor deposition (EBPVD),
which yields a columnar, strain-tolerant grain structure that is
able to expand and contract without causing damaging stresses that
lead to spallation. Similar columnar microstructures can be
produced using other atomic and molecular vapor processes, such as
sputtering (e.g., high and low pressure, standard or collimated
plume), ion plasma deposition, and all forms of melting and
evaporation deposition processes (e.g., cathodic arc, laser
melting, etc.).
[0005] In order for a TBC to remain effective throughout the
planned life cycle of the component it protects, it is important
that the TBC has and maintains a low thermal conductivity. However,
the thermal conductivities of TBC materials such as YSZ are known
to increase over time when subjected to the operating environment
of a gas turbine engine. As a result, TBC's for gas turbine engine
components are often deposited to a greater thickness than would
otherwise be necessary. Alternatively, internally cooled components
such as blades and nozzles must be designed to have higher cooling
flow. Both of these solutions are undesirable for reasons relating
to cost, component life and engine efficiency. As a result, it can
be appreciated that further improvements in TBC technology are
desirable, particularly as TBC's are employed to thermally insulate
components intended for more demanding engine designs.
[0006] To reduce and stabilize the thermal conductivity of YSZ,
ternary YSZ systems have been proposed. For example,
commonly-assigned U.S. Pat. No. 6,586,115 to Rigney et al.
discloses a TBC of YSZ alloyed to contain certain amounts of one or
more alkaline-earth metal oxides (magnesia (MgO), calcia (CaO),
strontia (SrO) and barium oxide (BaO)), rare-earth metal oxides
(lanthana (La.sub.2O.sub.3), ceria (CeO.sub.2), neodymia
(Nd.sub.2O.sub.3), gadolinium oxide (Gd.sub.2O.sub.3) and dysprosia
(Dy.sub.2O.sub.3)), and/or such metal oxides as nickel oxide (NiO),
ferric oxide (Fe.sub.2O.sub.3), cobaltous oxide (CoO), and scandium
oxide (Sc.sub.2O.sub.3). According to Rigney et al., when present
in sufficient amounts these oxides are able to significantly reduce
the thermal conductivity of YSZ by increasing crystallographic
defects and/or lattice strains. In commonly-assigned U.S. Pat. No.
6,808,799 to Darolia et al., a TBC of YSZ is deposited to contain a
third oxide, elemental carbon and potentially carbides and/or a
carbon-containing gas. The resulting TBC is characterized by lower
density and thermal conductivity, high temperature stability and
improved mechanical properties.
[0007] While the incorporation of additional oxide compounds into a
YSZ TBC in accordance with Rigney et al. and Darolia et al. has
made possible a more stabilized TBC microstructures, it can be
difficult to deposit a TBC by an evaporation process to produce a
desired and uniform composition if the additional oxide has a
significantly different vapor pressure than zirconia and yttria.
For example, ceria has a vapor pressure of about 10 mbar, in
comparison to vapor pressures of about 0.05 mbar for zirconia and
yttria at 2500.degree. C. If a YSZ+ceria TBC is to be deposited by
EBPVD or another vapor deposition process, evaporating a single
ingot containing the desired YSZ+ceria composition deposits a TBC
that has an unacceptable nonuniform distribution of ceria. To avoid
this result, co-evaporation of oxides having vapor pressures
significantly different from YSZ (e.g., at least an order of
magnitude higher than YSZ) has been performed with a separate ingot
of each additional oxide. If a single electron beam is used, a
controlled beam jumping technique must be employed, by which the
beam is briefly projected (in the millisecond range) on each ingot,
with the amount of time on each ingot being adjusted so that the
energy output achieves the energy balance required to obtain
compositional control. As an alternative to the use of a single
beam, multiple electron guns operated at different power levels
have been used to maintain molten pools of each ingot material.
However, both of these techniques complicate the deposition process
such that the incorporation of additional oxides in a YSZ TBC can
be difficult to perform in a commercial setting.
[0008] In view of the above, it would be desirable if a process
existed that simplified the co-evaporation of oxides with different
vapor pressures.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0009] The present invention provides a process and apparatus for
depositing a ceramic coating, such as a thermal barrier coating
(TBC) for a component intended for use in a hostile thermal
environment, such as the superalloy turbine, combustor and
augmentor components of a gas turbine engine. The process and
apparatus of this invention are particularly directed to an
evaporation technique for depositing a TBC formed of multiple oxide
compounds, at least one of which has a vapor pressure that differs
from the remaining oxide compounds. An example is in the deposition
of a TBC formed of YSZ alloyed with a third oxide to reduce the
density and/or thermal conductivity of the TBC, improve high
temperature stability, and/or improve mechanical properties.
[0010] The apparatus is configured to make use of a single
evaporation source containing multiple different oxide compounds,
in which at least one of the oxide compounds has a vapor pressure
that is higher than the remaining oxide compounds. The apparatus is
further configured to introduce the evaporation source into a
coating chamber, suspend the component near the evaporation source,
and project a high-energy beam on the evaporation source to melt
and form a vapor cloud having a composition comprising the oxide
compounds of the evaporation source. The apparatus includes a
feature that prevents the vapor cloud from contacting and
condensing on the component during an initial phase in which the
composition of the vapor cloud is such that the relative amount of
the at least one oxide compound in the vapor cloud is greater than
the relative amount of the at least one oxide compound in the
evaporation source. The apparatus is responsive to changes in the
composition of the vapor cloud so as to remove the preventing
feature and allow the vapor cloud to contact and condense on the
component to form the coating during a subsequent phase in which
the composition of the vapor cloud has changed so that the relative
amount of the at least one oxide compound in the vapor cloud is
approximately equal to the relative amount of the at least one
oxide compound in the evaporation source. The apparatus is operable
to position the preventing feature between the evaporation source
and the component following the subsequent phase and during a
second subsequent phase in which a remaining portion of the
evaporation source is relatively rich in the remaining oxide
compounds.
[0011] The process generally entails providing an evaporation
source containing multiple different oxide compounds, at least one
of the oxide compounds having a vapor pressure that is higher than
the remaining oxide compounds. In a YSZ coating system, examples of
particularly suitable oxide compounds are metal oxides of metals
such as cerium, gadolinium, neodymium, lanthanum, dysprosium,
ytterbium, tantalum, magnesium, calcium, strontium and barium,
which have a sufficient absolute percent ion size difference
relative to zirconium ions to produce significant lattice strains
that promote lower thermal conductivities. The component intended
to be coated is suspended near the evaporation source, and a
high-energy (e.g., electron or laser) beam is projected onto the
evaporation source to melt and form a vapor cloud of the oxide
compounds of the evaporation source, while preventing the vapor
cloud from contacting and condensing on the component during an
initial phase in which the relative amount of the one oxide
compound in the vapor cloud is greater than the relative amount of
the oxide compound in the evaporation source. For this purpose, a
barrier may be physically placed between the component and the
evaporation source. During a subsequent phase, in which the
relative amount of the oxide compound in the vapor cloud has
decreased to something approximately equal to its relative amount
in the evaporation source, the vapor cloud is allowed to contact
and condense on the component to form the coating. If a barrier was
used to initially prevent deposition of the coating, the barrier is
removed during this subsequent phase of the evaporation
process.
[0012] In view of the above, it can be appreciated that the present
invention is based on a determination that, at the beginning of an
evaporation process using an evaporation source (e.g., ingot)
containing multiple oxide compounds including one or more whose
vapor pressure is higher than the other oxide compounds, the vapor
cloud is rich with the oxide compound with the highest vapor
pressure, as a result of the oxide compound evaporating faster than
the other oxide compounds. Furthermore, it was determined that over
a period of time, the evaporation source becomes enriched in the
oxide component(s) having lower vapor pressures (corresponding to
lower evaporation rates), with the result that an equilibrium (or
near equilibrium) is established in the evaporation process,
resulting in a more uniform co-evaporation of the oxide compounds
in the evaporation source. As a result, a coating deposited during
this phase of the evaporation process will have a composition more
nearly equal to that of the evaporation source. Accordingly, a
preferred aspect of the present invention is to allow the vapor
cloud evaporated from an evaporation source to contact and condense
on the article primarily or exclusively during this later phase,
producing a coating whose composition is more predictable and
uniform than otherwise possible when using a single evaporation
source for the multiple oxide compounds.
[0013] Other objects and advantages of this invention will be
better appreciated from the following detailed description.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0014] FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of an EBPVD apparatus
using a single evaporation source containing multiple oxide
compounds, one of which has a significantly higher vapor pressure
than the remaining oxide compounds of the source in accordance with
one embodiment of the present invention.
[0015] FIG. 2 is a graph representing the concentration in a
coating of the oxide compound with the higher vapor pressure,
plotted relative to time during the coating process.
[0016] FIG. 3 is a microphotograph of a cross-section through a
thermal barrier coating deposited in accordance with the present
invention.
[0017] FIG. 4 is a graph of the chemical composition of a thermal
barrier coating deposited in accordance with the present
invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0018] The present invention is generally applicable to components
subjected to high temperatures, such as the high and low pressure
turbine nozzles and blades, shrouds, combustor liners and augmentor
hardware of gas turbine engines. While the advantages of this
invention are particularly applicable to gas turbine engine
components, the teachings of this invention are generally
applicable to any component on which a TBC may be used to provide
protection from a high temperature environment.
[0019] TBC's of particular interest to the invention are typically
bonded to a substrate, such as a superalloy material, with a
metallic bond coat deposited on the substrate. The bond coat is
preferably an aluminum-rich composition, such as an overlay coating
of an MCrAlX alloy or a diffusion coating such as a diffusion
aluminide or a diffusion platinum aluminide of a type known in the
art, though it is foreseeable that other bond coat materials and
types could be used. As with prior art TBC's, TBC's of this
invention are intended to be deposited to a thickness that is
sufficient to provide the required thermal protection for the
particular component, typically on the order of about 75 to about
300 micrometers, though lesser and greater thicknesses are
foreseeable.
[0020] To achieve a strain-tolerant grain structure, TBC's are
deposited using a physical vapor deposition technique, such as
EBPVD, though other evaporation techniques are possible and within
the scope of this invention. The EBPVD process requires the
presence of an evaporation source formed essentially of the coating
composition desired, and an electron beam at an appropriate power
level to create a vapor of the evaporation source in the presence
of the surface to be coated. FIG. 1 schematically represents a
portion of an EBPVD coating apparatus 20, including a coating
chamber 22 in which a component 30 is suspended for coating. A TBC
32 is represented as being deposited on the component 30 by melting
and vaporizing an ingot 10 of the desired coating material with an
electron beam 26 produced by an electron beam gun 28. The intensity
of the beam 26 is sufficient to produce a vapor cloud 34 that
contacts and then condenses on the component 30 to form the TBC 32.
As shown, the vapor cloud 34 evaporates from a pool 14 of molten
coating material contained within a reservoir formed by a crucible
12 that surrounds the upper end of the ingot 10. Water or another
suitable cooling medium flows through cooling passages 16 defined
within the crucible 12 to maintain the crucible 12 at an acceptable
temperature. As it is gradually consumed by the deposition process,
the ingot 10 is incrementally fed into the chamber 22 through an
airlock 24. As a result of the vapor process by which the TBC 32 is
deposited, the individual grains of the TBC 32 are characterized by
microstructural defects and pores within the grains and at and
between the grain boundaries. These defects and pores are believed
to decrease the thermal conductivity of the individual TBC grains,
and therefore the TBC 32 as a whole.
[0021] According to a preferred aspect of the invention, the
thermal-insulating material of the TBC 26 is based on binary
yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ), but alloyed to contain at least a
third metal oxide. The invention particularly pertains to the
deposition by evaporation of YSZ-based coatings in which one or
more of the additional metal oxides have a vapor pressure that
differs significantly from zirconia and yttria, e.g., at least an
order of magnitude. Though not a necessary feature of the
invention, the third oxide preferably has the effect of reducing
and/or stabilizing the thermal conductivity of the TBC 32. For this
purpose, and in accordance with commonly-assigned U.S. Pat. No.
6,586,115 to Rigney et al., the third oxide preferably has an
absolute percent ion size difference relative to zirconium ions of
at least that of an yttrium anion (Y.sup.3+), i.e., at least 13
percent, so as to produce significant strains due to ionic size. In
accordance with commonly-assigned U.S. Pat. No. 6,808,799 to
Darolia et al., the TBC 32 may be further modified to contain
elemental carbon in the form of precipitate clusters, from which
may evolve a carbon-containing gas (e.g., carbon monoxide (CO)
and/or carbon dioxide (CO.sub.2)) as a result of thermal
decomposition of carbon. In combination, the presence of elemental
carbon clusters and one or more of the above-specified third metal
oxides is believed to reduce the density and thermal conductivity
of a YSZ TBC.
[0022] The TBC 32 preferred for this invention preferably contains
about 3 to about 8 weight percent yttria, though lesser or greater
amounts of yttria could be used. Examples of suitable oxide
compounds to be alloyed with YSZ are metal oxides such as cerium,
gadolinium, neodymium, lanthanum, dysprosium, ytterbium, tantalum,
magnesium, calcium, strontium and barium, which have vapor
pressures that differ significantly from zirconia and yttria. For
example, ceria, neodymia, lanthana, ytterbia, magnesia, strontia
and barium oxide are all believed to have vapor pressures higher
than zirconia and yttria, some more than an order of magnitude
higher. Based on the teachings of Rigney et al. and Darolia et al.,
ceria in amounts of about 10 to about 20 weight percent of the TBC
32 is believed to be particularly beneficial, though it is
foreseeable that lower and higher levels of ceria could be
used.
[0023] According to the present invention, YSZ and ceria (or
another high vapor pressure oxide) are simultaneously evaporated
from a single ingot 10 having the desired composition for the
coating 32, even though prior art attempts to co-evaporate YSZ and
ceria have produced coatings whose compositions are not uniform or
consistent with the composition of the ingot as a result of the
higher vapor pressure of ceria. In an investigation leading to this
invention, an ingot containing YSZ alloyed with about 16 weight
percent ceria was evaporated by EBPVD to deposit a TBC. With
reference to FIG. 2, analysis of the coating indicated that the
portion of the TBC deposited at the beginning of the evaporation
process (t.sub.1) was rich in ceria. The ceria content dropped
through the initial thickness of the TBC, corresponding to a
coating duration of about ten minutes, after which the ceria
content was relatively stable within the coating (t.sub.2) before
dropping off near the end of the coating operation (t.sub.3). From
this investigation, it was concluded that the vapor cloud 34 within
the coating chamber is initially rich in ceria ions as a result of
the higher vapor pressure of ceria (corresponding to a higher
evaporation rate). However, after a period of time (t.sub.1) an
equilibrium (or near equilibrium) appeared to become established in
the evaporation process, resulting in a more uniform co-evaporation
of YSZ and ceria from the ingot. While not wishing to be held to
any particular theory, it was concluded that the ingot had become
sufficiently enriched in YSZ as a result of the lower evaporation
rates of yttria and zirconia (resulting from their relatively lower
vapor pressures), that the apparent equilibrium was established for
the evaporation rates of zirconia, yttria and ceria. The final
drop-off of the ceria content in the coating (t.sub.3) was
attributed to the remainder of the ingot being rich in YSZ from the
earlier accelerated lose of ceria without any additional ceria
available from the bulk of the ingot.
[0024] On this basis, it was concluded that a TBC 32 deposited
during the intermediate phase (t.sub.2) of the evaporation process
can have a composition more nearly equal to that of the ingot.
Accordingly, an object of the invention is to allow the vapor cloud
34 evaporated from the ingot 10 to contact and condense on the
component 30 primarily or exclusively during this intermediate
phase, to produce a TBC 32 whose composition is more predictable
and uniform than otherwise possible when using a single evaporation
source. With reference again to FIG. 1, the EBPVD apparatus 20 is
depicted as including a barrier 36 that is shown to be positioned
between the component 30 and the molten pool 14, representative of
the initial or latter phases of the coating process in which the
proportional composition of the vapor cloud 34 differs from the
ingot 10. A suitable barrier 36 is a stainless steel plate that can
be maneuvered from outside the coating chamber 22. One approach to
using the barrier 36 is to determine the "t.sub.1" and "t.sub.2"
time periods for a given ingot composition, and then programming
the apparatus 20 to withdraw the barrier 36 at t.sub.1 following
startup of the coating process. The barrier 36 can be later
reinserted or the evaporation process simply terminated at the end
of t.sub.2 before evaporation occurs of the YSZ-rich remainder of
the ingot 10. Alternatively, the operation of the apparatus could
be automated based on sensing the chemistry of the vapor cloud
34.
[0025] While the use of a physical barrier 36 is a particularly
effective technique for limiting deposition to the intermediate
phase (t.sub.2) of the coating process, other techniques are
possible. For example, deposition of a coating rich in the higher
vapor pressure constituent(s) of the ingot 10 can be avoided by
performing the initial phase (t.sub.1) of the coating process as a
separate run, during which the component 30 has not yet been placed
in the chamber 22. Deposition of a coating rich in the lower vapor
pressure constituent(s) of the ingot 10 can be avoided by
terminating the coating process prior to entering the final phase
(t.sub.3), i.e., before evaporation occurs of the final portion of
the ingot 10 that is rich in the lower vapor pressure
constituent(s). Furthermore, the latter phase (t.sub.3) of the
coating process can be effectively postponed as long as ingot
material is continuously fed into the chamber 22.
[0026] In a second investigation leading to this invention, TBC's
were deposited by EBPVD on specimens formed of the superalloy Rene
N5 on which a platinum aluminide (PtAl) diffusion bond coat had
been deposited. The specimens were coated by evaporating an ingot
of zirconia stabilized by about seven weight percent yttria (7%
YSZ) alloyed with about 16 weight percent ceria. The specimens were
loaded into a coating chamber so as to be supported above the
ingot, and the chamber evacuated to achieve a partial vacuum of
about 10.sup.-4 Torr (about 1.3.times.10.sup.-4 mbar). The
specimens were then heated to a temperature of about 900.degree. C.
While rotating the specimens at a rate of about 25 rpm, the ingot
was evaporated using an electron beam gun operated at a constant
power level of about 24.5 kW. During an initial period of about 10
minutes, the vapor cloud produced by the evaporation process was
prevented from contacting and condensing on the component with a
barrier of the type represented in FIG. 1. Coating was then
permitted for a duration of about 40 minutes by removing the
barrier, after which the barrier was reintroduced to again prevent
deposition on the specimens. A TBC deposited under these conditions
is shown in FIG. 3 to have a desirable columnar microstructure,
while FIG. 4 evidences that the elemental distribution throughout
the thickness of the TBC was substantially uniform. FIG. 4 shows
that, relative to their stabilized levels in the bulk of the TBC,
the zirconium level was relatively high and the cerium level
relatively low in the first several micrometers of the TBC. The
cause of this variance is not understood, and in any event would
not have a detrimental effect on the desired properties for the
TBC.
[0027] While the invention has been described in terms of a
preferred embodiment, it is apparent that other forms could be
adopted by one skilled in the art. For example, instead of
depositing the TBC by EBPVD, other vapor deposition processes could
be used. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is to be limited
only by the following claims.
* * * * *