U.S. patent application number 13/895699 was filed with the patent office on 2013-09-26 for golf club set.
This patent application is currently assigned to Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc.. The applicant listed for this patent is Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc.. Invention is credited to Brian Bazzel, Marni D. Ines, Sean Toulon, Bret H. Wahl.
Application Number | 20130252754 13/895699 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 44188210 |
Filed Date | 2013-09-26 |
United States Patent
Application |
20130252754 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Bazzel; Brian ; et
al. |
September 26, 2013 |
GOLF CLUB SET
Abstract
Golf club irons having improved forgiveness, playability and
performance characteristics are disclosed. The embodiments set
forth parameters of various irons that affect performance either
alone or in combination with other parameters when the irons are
utilized to strike a golf ball. The parameters, which in some cases
may be systematically progressed or varied, include golf club shaft
length, striking face area, loft, coefficient of restitution, face
thickness, topline thickness, swing weight, sole width at the heel
and toe, and other performance characteristics.
Inventors: |
Bazzel; Brian; (Carlsbad,
CA) ; Ines; Marni D.; (San Marcos, CA) ;
Toulon; Sean; (Vista, CA) ; Wahl; Bret H.;
(Escondido, CA) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. |
Carlsbad |
CA |
US |
|
|
Assignee: |
Taylor Made Golf Company,
Inc.
Carlsbad
CA
|
Family ID: |
44188210 |
Appl. No.: |
13/895699 |
Filed: |
May 16, 2013 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
12980238 |
Dec 28, 2010 |
|
|
|
13895699 |
|
|
|
|
61291294 |
Dec 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
473/290 |
Current CPC
Class: |
A63B 53/10 20130101;
A63B 53/047 20130101; A63B 53/0462 20200801; A63B 53/0475 20130101;
A63B 53/005 20200801; A63B 53/0408 20200801; A63B 53/0412
20200801 |
Class at
Publication: |
473/290 |
International
Class: |
A63B 53/04 20060101
A63B053/04 |
Claims
1. A set of golf club irons, comprising: at least three irons
wherein the irons have topline thicknesses that progress from about
7.5 mm for a shorter iron in the set to about 9.4 mm for a longer
iron in the set.
2. The golf club set of claim 1 wherein the clubs have shaft
lengths that progress from about 34.5 inches for a shorter iron in
the set to about 38.6 inches for a longer iron in the set.
3. The golf club set of claim 1 wherein the set has 3-, 4- and
5-irons with sole toe widths from about 25.5 mm to about 26.5
mm.
4. The golf club set of claim 1 wherein the clubs have a face area
of greater than about 3100 mm.sup.2.
5. The golf club set of claim 4 wherein the set includes a 3-, 4-,
5-, 6-, 7-, 8- and 9-iron and wherein said irons have a face area
of substantially the same size.
6. A set of golf club irons, comprising: at least three irons
wherein the irons have face thicknesses that progress from about
1.9 mm for a longer iron in the set to about 2.5 mm for a shorter
iron in the set.
7. The golf club set of claim 6 wherein the clubs have shaft
lengths that progress from about 34.5 inches for a shorter iron in
the set to about 38.6 inches for a longer iron in the set.
8. The golf club set of claim 6 wherein the clubs have topline
thicknesses that progress from about 7.5 mm for a shorter iron in
the set to about 9.4 mm for a longer iron in the set.
9. The golf club set of claim 6 wherein the clubs have a face area
greater than about 31 00 mm.sup.2.
10. The golf club set of claim 9 wherein the clubs have a face area
of substantially the same size.
11. A set of golf club irons, comprising at least three irons
wherein the irons have shaft lengths that progress from about 34.5
inches for a shorter iron in the set, the shorter iron being one of
a pitching wedge and a 9-iron, to about 38.0 inches for a longer
iron in the set, the longer iron being one of a 2-iron, a 3-iron,
and a 4-iron.
12. The golf club set of claim 11 wherein the set has 3-, 4- and
5-irons with sole toe widths from about 25.5 mm to about 26.5
mm.
13. The golf club set of claim 11 wherein the set has 3-, 4- and
5-irons each having a face thickness of 1.9 mm.
14. A set of golf club irons, comprising: a 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, 8-,
and 9-iron, wherein said irons each have a face area of
substantially the same size and greater than about 3100 mm2 and
wherein the 3-, 4-, and 5-irons each have a face thickness of about
1.9 mm, the 6-iron and 7-iron each have a face thickness of about
2.2 mm, and the 8-iron and 9-iron each have a face thickness of
about 2.5 mm.
15. The golf club set of claim 14 wherein the irons each have a
face area of about 3152 mm.sup.2.
16. The golf club set of claim 14 wherein the set further includes
at least a SW, AW or PW having a face thickness of about 2.5.
17. The golf club set of claim 16 wherein the SW, AW or PW has a
face area greater than about 3100 mm.sup.2.
18. The golf club set of claim 14 wherein the 3-, 4-, and 5-irons
each have a shaft length greater than about 37.0 inches.
19. The golf club set of claim 14 wherein the 3-iron has a shaft
length of about 38.6 mm, the 4-iron has a shaft length of about
37.9 mm, and the 5-iron has a shaft length of about 37.3 mm.
20. The golf club set of claim 14 wherein two of said irons have a
coefficient of restitution greater than 0.800.
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
[0001] This application is a continuation of U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 12/980,238, filed Dec. 28, 2010, which claims
priority to and benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No.
61/291,294, filed Dec. 30, 2009, both of which are incorporated
herein by reference.
FIELD
[0002] The present application concerns golf club irons designed to
increase forgiveness, playability and performance.
BACKGROUND
[0003] Golf is a game in which a player, using many types of clubs,
hits a ball into each hole on a golf course in the lowest possible
number of strokes. Golf club manufacturers and designers seek to
improve certain performance characteristics such as forgiveness,
playability, feel, and sound. In addition, in sets of golf clubs,
such as sets of irons, continuity of the performance
characteristics within the set may be desirable. Golfers prefer
golf clubs that exhibit performance characteristics such as
forgiveness, performance and playability. One measure of
"forgiveness" can be defined as the ability of a golf club to
reduce the effects of mis-hits, e.g., hits resulting from striking
the golf ball at a less than ideal impact location and manner on
the golf club head. Greater forgiveness of the golf club generally
equates to a higher probability of hitting a straight golf shot.
"Playability" can be defined as the ease with which a golfer can
use the golf club iron for producing accurate golf shots. Better
performance of a set of irons can be defined to include, among
other things, increased peak trajectory, ball speed and distance,
and/or shot precision.
[0004] Thus, there exists a need for a set of irons that improves
at least the forgiveness and playability characteristics to provide
a golfer with improved performance, consistency, and
confidence.
SUMMARY
[0005] The present application concerns golf club irons designed to
increase forgiveness, playability and performance. In one
embodiment, the irons have substantially larger and consistent face
areas but progressively thinner face thicknesses from the wedges or
shorter irons to the longer irons. In another aspect, the irons
have uniquely wide sole widths or dimensions. In yet another
aspect, the shaft lengths are uniquely and progressively longer
from the wedges or shorter irons to the longer irons. These
parameters and their overall systematic and unique progressions or
variations work individually and together with one or more other
parameters to improve forgiveness, playability, and
performance.
[0006] For instance, in one embodiment, the golf set includes ten
irons (specifically, 3-iron to 9-iron, PW, AW, and SW) and each
iron has a face area greater than 3100 mm.sup.2. The long irons
(i.e., 3-, 4-, and 5-irons) have a face thickness of about 1.9 mm,
the middle irons (i.e., 6- and 7-irons) have a face thickness of
about 2.2 mm, and the short irons and wedges (i.e., 8- and 9-irons
and PW, AW, and SW) have a face thickness of about 2.5 mm. In
another embodiment, the 3- through 9-irons have substantially the
same size face area that is greater than about 3100 mm.sup.2, and
preferably about 3150 mm.sup.2. In other embodiments, the irons
have substantially wide sole widths in order to allow (among other
things) weight to be distributed lower and farther back from the
club's face. The embodiments disclosed herein provide, among other
things, irons with higher coefficients of restitution (COR), which
in some embodiments is greater than about 0.800 (when tested as set
forth herein).
[0007] In some embodiments, the topline thicknesses of the long
irons are about 9.3 mm to about 9.4 mm, those of the middle irons
are about 8.5 mm, and those of the short irons and wedges are about
7.5 mm to about 7.7 mm. In other embodiments, the 3-iron has a
shaft length of about 38.0 inches or greater, and preferably 38.6
inches, and the 4-iron and 5-iron each have a shaft length of about
37.0 inches or greater, and preferably 37.9 and 37.3 inches,
respectfully.
[0008] It should be understood and appreciated that the parameters
and unique variations of the irons provide increased club head
speed, ball launch angles, higher peak trajectory, and ball speed
and distance. As such, the irons allow for more forgiveness and
playability for golfers of all abilities.
[0009] The foregoing objects, features, and advantages of the golf
club set are not intended to be limiting and will become more
apparent from the following detailed description, which proceeds
with reference to the accompanying figures.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0010] The claimed subject matter is illustrated by way of example
and not limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings in
which like references indicate similar elements.
[0011] FIG. 1A is a toe-ward view of an embodiment of a golf club
head.
[0012] FIG. 1B is a face view of an embodiment of a golf club
head.
[0013] FIG. 2A is a face view of an embodiment of a golf club
head.
[0014] FIG. 2B is a cross-sectional view of an embodiment of a golf
club head.
[0015] FIG. 2C is a cross-sectional view of an embodiment of a golf
club head.
[0016] FIG. 3 illustrates one embodiment of a golf club set.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0017] Various embodiments and aspects of the golf club irons will
be described with reference to details discussed below, and the
accompanying drawings will illustrate the various embodiments.
Numerous specific details are described to provide a thorough
understanding of various embodiments of the claimed subject matter.
However, in certain instances, well-known or conventional details
are not described in order to provide a concise discussion of
embodiments of the claimed subject matter. In view of the many
possible embodiments to which the principles may be applied, it
should be recognized that the illustrated embodiments are only
preferred examples of the golf club irons disclosed herein and
should not be taken as limiting the scope of the claimed subject
matter. It will be evident that various modifications may be made
thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope as set
forth herein. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to
be regarded in an illustrative sense rather than a restrictive
sense.
[0018] Embodiments of a golf club set may include performance
characteristics that may have a particular progression and/or
continuity, meaning, for example, that individual clubs within the
set may have particular characteristics that vary as compared to
other clubs within the set. In one embodiment, a golf club set may
include a plurality of golf club irons. A standard set may include
approximately 8 irons, numbered from 3-pitching wedge (PW),
although less or more than 8 irons may comprise a set, and
embodiments of the claimed subject matter are not limited in this
respect. For example, in one embodiment an iron set may include 10
irons, comprising 3-PW, A-wedge (AW) and sand wedge (SW).
[0019] A typical set of irons may not take into account the needs
of individual golfers, but, generally speaking, tend to be designed
to have a standard progression of performance characteristics. As a
result, one set of golf club irons may not perform well for all
golfers. It may not be practical for each golfer to customize a set
of irons, as this may be cost prohibitive.
[0020] Performance characteristics may include characteristics that
may affect performance of a golf club when utilized to strike a
golf ball. In particular embodiments, performance characteristics
may include golf club shaft length, golf club striking face area,
golf club loft, golf club coefficient of restitution, golf club
face thickness, golf club topline thickness, golf club cavity
volume if the golf club has a cavity, golf club swing weight, golf
club sole width at the heel and/or at the toe, and other
performance characteristics. One or more of these performance
characteristics may be determined by particular methods, including
one or more methods as set forth by current United States Golf
Association (USGA) regulations.
[0021] FIGS. 1A and 1B illustrate a golf club iron head.
Illustrated in FIGS. 1A and 1B is a golf club head 100, which is an
iron golf club head. Golf club head 100 has a face 102, which has a
particular face area and a particular face thickness. Golf club
head 100 includes a toe 106 and a heel 108. Golf club head 100
includes a sole 104 having a width. The sole width may vary between
the toe 106 and the heel 108, although in other embodiments the
sole width may not vary. Golf club head 100 includes a hosel offset
110 and a loft 114. Golf club head 100 also includes a topline 112
having a thickness. The topline thickness may vary along the top
surface of golf club head 100, although in other embodiments the
topline thickness may not vary. Additionally, golf club head 100
may have a particular COR, and when assembled into a golf club may
have a particular swing weight. Also, golf club head 100 may
comprise a cavity back type of golf club head, and the cavity of
the cavity back may have a particular cavity volume.
[0022] As mentioned previously, one or more of these
characteristics may vary between golf club heads within a set. Some
characteristics may vary more than others, and the characteristics
may follow a linear progression or a non-linear progression. As
just an example, in one embodiment the following characteristics
may vary between the golf club heads within a set: shaft length;
topline thickness; face area; cavity volume; swing weight; sole
width at heel and toe; face thickness; loft; and COR. However, as
noted previously, the scope of the claimed subject matter is not
limited to just these characteristics, and may include other
performance characteristics not listed in detail.
[0023] Referring now to FIGS. 2A, 2B and 2C, there are illustrated
multiple golf club heads. Illustrated in FIG. 2A is a golf club
head 200, which is an iron golf club head. Golf club head 200 has a
face 202, which has a particular face area and a particular face
thickness. Golf club head 200 includes a toe 206 and a heel 208.
Illustrated in FIG. 2B is a golf club head 220. Golf club head 220
includes a sole 204 having a width. The sole width may vary between
the toe area and the heel area, although in other embodiments the
sole width may not vary. Golf club head 220 includes a topline 212
having a thickness. The topline thickness may vary along the top
surface of golf club head 220, although in other embodiments the
topline thickness may not vary. Additionally, golf club head 220
may have a particular COR, and when assembled into a golf club may
have a particular swing weight. Golf club head 220 includes a face
214 having a thickness 216. Furthermore, golf club head 220
comprises a hollow area 218. As will be explained later, hollow
area 218 may be filled with materials including polymer and/or
foam, and when included as part of a golf club set, the hollow area
as well as the filler materials may vary from club to club.
Illustrated in FIG. 2C is a golf club head 230. Golf club head 230
includes a sole 232 having a width. The sole width may vary between
the toe area and the heel area, although in other embodiments the
sole width may not vary. Golf club head 230 includes a topline 224
having a thickness. The topline thickness may vary along the top
surface of golf club head 230, although in other embodiments the
topline thickness may not vary. Additionally, golf club head 230
may have a particular COR, and when assembled into a golf club may
have a particular swing weight. Golf club head 230 includes a face
228 having a thickness 226. Furthermore, golf club head 230
comprises a cavity back area 222 having a particular volume. As
will be explained later, when included as part of a golf club set,
cavity back area 222 may vary in shape and/or volume from club to
club within the set.
[0024] Referring now to FIG. 3, there is illustrated a golf club
set 300. Golf club set 300 may include one or more types of golf
club heads 304, including cavity back, muscleback, blades, hollow
clubs or other types of club heads typically used as part of a set.
Golf club set 300 may have varying performance characteristics
between clubs. For example, shafts 302 may vary in length, swing
weight may vary, and one or more of the performance characteristics
noted above may vary. As one example, at least a portion of the
golf clubs of set 300 may include hollow clubs. Individual hollow
clubs may include hollow areas that vary in volume. Furthermore,
hollow areas may be filled with foam, polymer or other types of
materials, and the particular type of filler materials may vary
from club to club. Additionally, the club types within set 300 may
vary, such as by including some hollow clubs, some cavity back
clubs and some muscleback clubs within one set.
[0025] Table 1 illustrates one particular preferred embodiment of a
golf club set having performance characteristics that vary between
clubs within the set. However, it is worthwhile to note that this
is just one embodiment and the claimed subject matter is not
limited in this respect.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Iron # 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 PW AW SW Shaft length
38.6 37.9 37.3 36.7 36.0 35.5 35.1 34.5 34.5 34.3 (inches) Topline
9.4 9.3 9.4 8.5 8.5 7.6 7.6 7.5 7.5 7.7 thickness (mm) Face Area
3152 3152 3152 3152 3152 3154 3150 3166 3207 3348 (mm.sup.2) Swing
Weight D3.5 D3.5 D3.5 D3.5 D3.5 D3.5 D3.5 D3.5 D3.5 D5.0 Sole
Width, toe 25.5 26.1 26.5 24.9 25.2 23.4 23.8 23.8 24.8 26.0 (mm)
Sole Width, 17.5 17.9 18.4 18.4 19.0 18.1 18.5 19.0 19.3 21.3 heel
(mm) Face thickness, 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.2 2.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 base
(mm) Loft (degrees) 19 21 24 27 31 35 40 45 50 55 COR measured .819
.807
[0026] As reflected in Table 1, there is a unique progression in
increased shaft lengths from the SW to the 3-iron. (It should be
understood that the golf club set may have fewer or more irons as
set forth in Table 1.) A club head's speed (as the club is swung)
correspondingly increases with an increase in the club's shaft
length. Greater club head speed equals greater ball speed and hence
distance. It is generally preferable to achieve a consistent
average gapping distance from club to club. In this way, the golfer
is provided with a full range of consistent and increasing club
shot distances so that the golfer can select a club or iron for the
distance required by a particular shot or situation. Typically, the
average gapping distance from club to club in a set of irons for an
average player is about 8-10 yards. As set forth herein, the
uniquely increased shaft lengths from the SW to the 3-iron help
provide for an average gapping distance for an average player of
about 11-15 yards from club to club, respectively. In this respect,
the embodiments herein provide consistency as well as an overall
greater range of distances for the golfer.
[0027] The overall increase in shaft length from the SW to the PW
is about 0.2 inches. As such, the increase in club head speed from
the SW to the PW is not as substantial as each club is similarly
swung. However, other physical parameters of the wedges, including
for instance the degree of loft as set forth in Table 1, influence
the average shot distance for each such wedge. The increase in
shaft length from the 9-iron to the 3-iron is more substantial than
the increase in the shaft lengths of the wedges. As such, the
increase shaft lengths in this respect result in respective
increases in club head speed and hence greater ball speed and
distances. It should be appreciated that such shaft lengths and
their overall progression from club to club are unique. For
instance, the shaft length of the 3-iron is about three-fourths of
an inch longer than the typical 3-iron. The average golfer has more
difficulty hitting longer irons, such as a 3-iron or 4-iron. As a
result, the average golfer using a typical set may not hit the
3-iron or 4-iron as long as a 5-iron. However, in the embodiment
set forth in Table 1, the longer shaft lengths of the irons, such
as the 3- and 4-irons, alone and in conjunction with other
parameters as set forth herein, result in greater club head and
ball speed than in typical golf sets. Thus, in this way, the
average golfer may consistently hit the 3-iron farther than the
4-iron and the 4-iron farther than the 5-iron, for instance.
[0028] Another parameter contributing to overall greater gap
distance in the set, and greater ball speed and distance for each
individual iron, is face thickness. A thinner face thickness
provides a higher coefficient of restitution (COR). It should be
understood that a higher COR generally correlates to a greater
launch speed of a golf ball upon impact with the club face, and
hence greater ball flight distance. As set forth in one embodiment
reflected in Table 1, the face thickness is basically consistent
from the SW to the 8-iron or about 2.5 mm. The face thickness
substantially decreases from the 8-iron to the 3-iron, or from
about 2.5 mm to about 1.9 mm. Specifically, as set forth in Table
1, the face thickness of the 6- and 7-irons is about 2.2 mm, and
the face thickness of the 3-, 4- and 5-irons is about 1.9 mm. This
unique progression of thinner face thicknesses increases the COR of
the clubs in the longer irons, alone and in conjunction with other
parameters as set forth herein.
[0029] Thinner face thicknesses also allow more weight to be
distributed along the perimeter of the club face and/or lower and
farther back from the face of the club, thereby providing for
higher moments of inertia (MOI) and more forgiving "sweet spot"
areas. This allows the face area to be increased while not
increasing or significantly increasing the club's weight or swing
weight. As reflected in Table 1, the face area of the 3-iron
through the 9-iron is substantially the same, and is above about
3100 mm.sup.2, or preferably from about 3152 mm.sup.2 to about 3150
mm.sup.2. The face area of the PW is also substantially the same at
about 3166 mm.sup.2. Typically, the face area of the 3-iron is
smaller than that of a PW by about 300 mm.sup.2 or more, but that
is not the case in the embodiment reflected in Table 1. And the
face areas of the AW and SW are about 3207 mm.sup.2 and about 3348
mm.sup.2, respectively.
[0030] Thus, the larger faces of the clubs, especially in
conjunction with thinner faces, provide for increased COR (or
"trampoline" effect) and "sweet spot" areas. In other words, the
clubs are more forgiving if the ball is not struck in the center of
the face or at the ideal spot since the larger face area in turn
provides for a larger area for the ball to be struck and still
achieve satisfactory trajectory, speed and flight distance. As
shown in Table 1, the COR can be above 0.800. The COR figures set
forth herein are measured first by impacting the iron with a ball
travelling at 133 ft/sec (per USGA protocol for irons) and
measuring the COR. A ball is then impacted with a calibration plate
at 133 ft/sec and the COR is measured. (The calibration plate is
calibrated to represent a COR of 830 for a driver when impacted
with a ball travelling at 160 ft/sec.) The difference in COR values
between the ball impacting the iron at 133 ft/sec and the
calibration plate at the same speed is calculated. That numerical
value is then used to estimate the COR for a ball strike on the
iron at 160 ft/sec (taking into account the COR is 830 for the
calibration plate at that speed), and that estimate is recorded as
the COR value of the irons as reflected herein.
[0031] As reflected in Table 1, the topline thickness progression
of the clubs increases substantially from the SW to the 3-iron. In
particular, the topline thicknesses of the wedges and short irons
(or SW, AW, PW, and 8-, 9-irons) range from about 7.5 to about 7.7
mm. The topline thickness of the middle irons (or the 6- and
7-irons) is about 8.5 mm. The topline thicknesses of the long irons
(or the 3-, 4-, 5-irons) are from about 9.3 to about 9.4 mm. It is
believed that a thinner topline visually makes a club appear more
difficult to hit or requires more precision in striking the ball.
Thus, the increased topline thicknesses of the long and/or middle
irons give the appearance that these clubs are easier to hit than
such clubs having thinner topline thicknesses. Golfers typically
have more difficulty hitting longer and middle irons than shorter
irons or wedges. Thus, thicker topline thicknesses on long and/or
middle irons build a golfer's confidence that he or she can
properly or effectively hit such irons with success. The wedges and
short irons have thinner topline thicknesses since these clubs
typically are easier to hit than long and/or middle irons, and
golfers tend to hit them with more precision than the other irons.
Likewise, the thinner toplines of the shorter irons and wedges also
give the player more confidence that she or he can hit such irons
with the precision often required of them. (It should be
appreciated of course that precision is also often required by
middle and long irons.)
[0032] As shown in Table 1, the swing weight of the irons is
essentially consistent from club to club. Consistent swing weight
contributes to a consistent feel for the golfer to the extent
possible from club-to-club. A consistent feel and balance of the
clubs increases the likelihood that the golfer will produce a
consistent and repeatable swing, and thus gain confidence,
independent of the club selected for a particular shot.
[0033] Another unique feature of one embodiment of the golf club
set when considered individually and in conjunction with the other
parameters is the width of the soles, both at the toe and heel of
each club head. Specifically, the parameters discussed herein allow
for more weight to be distributed lower and farther back in the
club head relative to the face of the club. This allows for
increased launch angles, thereby launching golf balls higher more
quickly and faster and increasing overall peak trajectory and
distance. Traditional club sets generally progress in sole widths
(especially at the toes) from the long irons to the wedges, with
the long irons particularly having much thinner soles. As reflected
in Table 1, the longer irons, such as the 3-, 4-, and 5-irons, have
relatively wide sole widths at the toes that allow (among other
things) more weigh to be distributed lower and farther back in the
club head. The long irons are relatively wider in this respect
compared to the other irons in the set. As with the long irons, the
other clubs in the set have unique sole widths to also provide the
performance characteristics mentioned above. It should be
understood that shorter irons and wedges in particular have higher
loft angles so wider sole widths are somewhat secondary factors in
achieving increased launch angles. As set forth in Table 1, the
progression of loft degree of the clubs increases from the 3-iron
through the SW. It should be appreciated that increased loft angle
increases launch angle and the peak trajectory of the golf ball,
and that the other parameters as discussed herein work in
conjunction with the loft angles of the clubs to improve
performance, playability and forgiveness.
[0034] In view of the many possible embodiments to which the
principles of the disclosed embodiments may be applied, it should
be recognized that the illustrated embodiments are only preferred
examples and should not be taken as limiting the scope of the
claimed subject matter. It will be evident that various
modifications may be made thereto without departing from the
broader spirit and scope set forth herein. The specification and
drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative sense
rather than a restrictive sense.
* * * * *