U.S. patent application number 13/548268 was filed with the patent office on 2013-09-05 for multi-resolution precoding codebook.
This patent application is currently assigned to NEC LABORATORIES AMERICA, INC.. The applicant listed for this patent is Mohammad Ali Khojastepour, Xiaodong Wang. Invention is credited to Mohammad Ali Khojastepour, Xiaodong Wang.
Application Number | 20130230116 13/548268 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 41257064 |
Filed Date | 2013-09-05 |
United States Patent
Application |
20130230116 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Khojastepour; Mohammad Ali ;
et al. |
September 5, 2013 |
MULTI-RESOLUTION PRECODING CODEBOOK
Abstract
Systems and methods are for generating a codebook by: generating
a multi-resolution codebook by selecting a common precoder index
from a low resolution codebook for a group of adjacent resource
blocks (RB)s and for each RB within the group, selecting a
high-resolution codebook to fine-tune each RB precoder; and
generating feedback for the multi-resolution codebook by quantizing
channel state variations.
Inventors: |
Khojastepour; Mohammad Ali;
(North Brunswick, NJ) ; Wang; Xiaodong; (New York,
NY) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
Khojastepour; Mohammad Ali
Wang; Xiaodong |
North Brunswick
New York |
NJ
NY |
US
US |
|
|
Assignee: |
NEC LABORATORIES AMERICA,
INC.
Princeton
NJ
|
Family ID: |
41257064 |
Appl. No.: |
13/548268 |
Filed: |
July 13, 2012 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
13439301 |
Apr 4, 2012 |
|
|
|
13548268 |
|
|
|
|
12388485 |
Feb 18, 2009 |
8199836 |
|
|
13439301 |
|
|
|
|
61049823 |
May 2, 2008 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
375/267 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H04L 5/0023 20130101;
H04B 7/0478 20130101; H04B 7/0639 20130101; H04L 2025/03426
20130101; H04L 27/2601 20130101; H04L 25/03343 20130101; H04B
7/0647 20130101; H04L 25/0202 20130101; H04B 7/0456 20130101; H04L
2025/03808 20130101; H04L 25/03936 20130101; H04W 72/04
20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
375/267 |
International
Class: |
H04L 25/03 20060101
H04L025/03 |
Claims
1. A base station used in a wireless communications system for
precoding data, the base station comprising: a receiving unit to
receive from a user equipment a low resolution precoder index for a
group of resource blocks (RBs) and a high resolution precoder index
for one or more resource blocks within the group of RBs; and a
determining unit to determine a precoder using a multi-resolution
codebook according to the low resolution precoder index and the
high resolution precoder index.
2. The base station as in claim 1, wherein a channel for the group
of RBs is correlated in time or in frequency.
3. The base station as in claim 1, wherein the channel for the
group of RBs is correlated in frequency across different OFDM
(orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing) tones.
4. The base station as in claim 1, wherein the group of RBs are
adjacent in time or in frequency.
5. The base station as in claim 4, wherein the group of RBs are
adjacent in frequency over OFDM (orthogonal frequency-division
multiplexing) tones.
6. The base station as in claim 1, wherein the multi-resolution
codebook consists of two resolution levels of a first level and a
second level.
7. A user equipment used in a wireless communications system for
precoding data, the user equipment comprising: a transmission unit
to transmit to a base station a low resolution precoder index for a
group of resource blocks (RBs) and a high resolution precoder index
for one or more resource blocks within the group of RBs; and a
receiving unit to receive data precoded with a precoder from the
base station, wherein the precoder is determined using a
multi-resolution codebook according to the low resolution precoder
index and the high resolution precoder index.
8. The user equipment as in claim 7, wherein a channel for the
group of RBs is correlated in time or in frequency.
9. The user equipment as in claim 7, wherein the channel for the
group of RBs is correlated in frequency across different OFDM
(orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing) tones.
10. The user equipment as in claim 7, wherein the group of RBs are
adjacent in time or in frequency.
11. The user equipment as in claim 10, wherein the group of RBs are
adjacent in frequency over OFDM (orthogonal frequency-division
multiplexing) tones.
12. The user equipment as in claim 7, wherein the multi-resolution
codebook consists of two resolution levels of a first level and a
second level.
13. A user equipment used in a wireless communications system for
precoding data, the user equipment comprising: a transmission unit
to transmit to a base station a low resolution precoder index for a
group of resource blocks (RBs) and a high resolution precoder index
for one or more resource blocks within the group of RBs, wherein
the base station determines a precoder using a multi-resolution
codebook according to the low resolution precoder index and the
high resolution precoder index.
14. The user equipment as in claim 13, wherein a channel for the
group of RBs is correlated in time or in frequency.
15. The user equipment as in claim 13, wherein the channel for the
group of RBs is correlated in frequency across different OFDM
(orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing) tones.
16. The user equipment as in claim 13, wherein the group of RBs are
adjacent in time or in frequency.
17. The user equipment as in claim 16, wherein the group of RBs are
adjacent in frequency over OFDM (orthogonal frequency-division
multiplexing) tones.
18. The user equipment as in claim 13, wherein the multi-resolution
codebook consists of two resolution levels of a first level and a
second level.
19. A user equipment used in a wireless communications system for
precoding data, the user equipment comprising: a receiving unit to
receive data precoded with a precoder from a base station, wherein
the precoder is determined using a multi-resolution codebook
according to a high resolution precoder index for one or more
resource blocks within a group of resource blocks (RBs) and a low
resolution precoder index for the group of RBs.
20. The user equipment as in claim 19, wherein a channel for the
group of RBs is correlated in time or in frequency.
21. The user equipment as in claim 19, wherein the channel for the
group of RBs is correlated in frequency across different OFDM
(orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing) tones.
22. The user equipment as in claim 19, wherein the group of RBs are
adjacent in time or in frequency.
23. The user equipment as in claim 22, wherein the group of RBs are
adjacent in frequency over OFDM (orthogonal frequency-division
multiplexing) tones.
24. The user equipment as in claim 19, wherein the multi-resolution
codebook consists of two resolution levels of a first level and a
second level.
Description
[0001] This application is a divisional of co-pending U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 13/439,301, filed on Apr. 4, 2012, which in
turn is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No.
12/388,485, filed on Feb. 18, 2009, which in turn claims priority
to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/049,823, filed May 2,
2008, the content of which is incorporated by reference.
[0002] The present invention relates to the codebooks used in
wireless communications.
BACKGROUND
[0003] The next generation wireless communication systems demand
for even higher spectral efficiencies to accommodate the higher
throughput requirements within the limited frequency bands.
Multiple antenna (MIMO) systems and in particular closed loop
transmission technologies such as beamforming and precoding have
been vastly considered to improve the spectral efficiency. In MIMO
precoding schemes, the transmitted data is divided into several
independent streams where each streams is individually precoded and
all precoded streams are superimposed before transmission. The
number of transmitted streams is called transmission rank. The
transmission rank can be optimally chosen for a given channel
realization by considering the transmit power and the overall
channel statistics. For each stream the precoder is a beamforming
vector which consists of a set of weights, one for each antenna,
that are multiplied with the transmitted symbol prior to the
transmission.
[0004] The precoder of rank r is then a matrix consists of r
beamforming vectors as its columns. Generally, the average transmit
power is divided equally between all streams, thus, the norm of all
beamforming vectors are equal and normalized to one. Furthermore,
due to the superposition of the transmitted streams, the
beamforming vectors are chosen to be orthogonal for simplicity of
the decoding. As a result, the precoder is generally a semi-unitary
matrix (V.sub.nxr,r.ltoreq.n is called semi-unitary if and only if
V.sup.HV=1).
[0005] In codebook based precoding strategies, a predetermined
codebook will be made available to the transmitter, i.e., Base
Station (BS), and all receivers, i.e., Mobile Stations (MS). The
receiver will then choose a precoder from the codebook which
maximizes its performance (e.g. its data rate) and feeds back the
precoder index. The selection of precoder rank should also be
included in the precoder selection algorithm. The feedback rate may
vary from a short-term feedback once every coherent time interval
to a long-term feedback once every several coherent time
intervals.
[0006] In many systems, the optimal precoders from the codebook for
two adjacent transmission blocks are close with respect to a proper
distance measure in the set of all possible precoders. Here, the
adjacent blocks may be considered in time or in frequency, e.g.,
over the set of tones in OFDM systems since in practical systems
the channel does not change abruptly from one transmission block to
the adjacent one. Thus, the precoder used in those blocks should be
equal if the channel is pretty steady and the codebook resolution
is not two high. By increasing the codebook resolution or having a
more dynamic channel, the precoders of the adjacent blocks are not
equal anymore, yet, they might be close. The closeness between two
precoders can be measured based on a proper distance metric in the
space of all such precoders.
SUMMARY
[0007] Systems and methods are for generating a codebook by:
generating a multi-resolution codebook by selecting a common
precoder index from a low resolution, codebook for a group of
adjacent resource blocks (RB)s and for each RB within the group,
selecting a high-resolution codebook to fine-tune each RB precoder;
and generating feedback for the multi-resolution codebook by
quantizing channel state variations.
[0008] In one aspect, a method for generating a codebook includes
generating a multi-resolution codebook including codebooks that
successively add to the codebook resolution; using the
multi-resolution codebook to perform feedback based precoding by
selecting a common precoder index from a low resolution codebook
for a group of adjacent resource blocks (RB)s; for each RB within
the group, selecting an index from the high-resolution codebook to
fine-tune each RB precoder; and generating feedback based on the
multi-resolution codebook by quantizing variations in a
channel.
[0009] In another aspect, a communication system includes a base
station having a processor adapted to generate a multi-resolution
codebook by selecting a common precoder index from a low resolution
codebook for a group of adjacent resource blocks (RB)s and for each
RB within the group, select a high-resolution codebook to fine-tune
each RB precoder; and to generate feedback for the multi-resolution
codebook by quantizing state variations in a channel; and one or
more wireless devices communicating with the base station using the
multi-resolution codebook.
[0010] Advantages of the above system may include one or more of
the following. The system reduces feedback data transmission as
feedback is communicated for only the variation in the channel,
since typically quantizing the channel variations requires a
smaller codebook than quantizing the channel itself. When the
channel is correlated in time (or in frequency, e.g., across
different tones in OFDM systems), the correlation can be used to
considerably reduce the feedback requirement without loss in
performance. In comparison to single-resolution codebook, the
multi-resolution codebook achieves the same performance using less
feedback bits, achieves better performance with the same feedback
bits, and has about the same computational complexity and slightly
higher memory requirement. Based on the simulation results, for
various number of codebook sizes, precoding schemes based on the
multi-resolution codebook considerably outperforms the ones based
on the single-resolution codebook by using the same or reduced
feedback load. Moreover, the complexity and memory requirement of
such multi-resolution codebook precoding schemes is comparable with
those of the conventional single-resolution codebook.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0011] FIG. 1 shows a downlink multiuser MIMO system with N.sub.r
transmit-antennas at the BS and N.sub.R receive antennas at MS.
[0012] FIG. 2A shows an exemplary diagram illustrating a precoder
as a vector and the spacing of precoders as a sphere.
[0013] FIG. 2B shows an exemplary quantized codebook.
[0014] FIGS. 3A-3B show phases of generating an exemplary
multi-level resolution codebook.
[0015] FIG. 4 illustrates an application of the multi-resolution
codebook to provide better quantization without increasing the
feedback load.
[0016] FIG. 5A shows an exemplary multi-resolution codebook
generation process.
[0017] FIG. 5B shows an exemplary process for applying the
multi-generation codebook.
[0018] FIG. 5C shows exemplary processes for generating high
resolution multi-resolution Codebooks.
[0019] FIG. 6 shows the link level throughput results comparing the
single-resolution codebook .sup.(B) with the multi-resolution
codebook .sup.(B) for various codebook size B.
[0020] FIGS. 7-11 show the link level throughput results comparing
the single-resolution codebook .sup.(B) with the multi-resolution
codebook .sup.(B) for various codebook size B by increasing the
number of resource blocks from M=3 to M=7 and M=11.
DESCRIPTION
[0021] FIG. 1 shows a downlink multiuser MIMO system with N.sub.r
transmit-antennas at the BS and N.sub.R receive antennas at MS. An
exemplary multiple-antenna communication system 100 with a
multi-level precoding codebook is schematically shown, in FIG. 1. A
transmitter 110 transmits from t transmitting antennas 111.1-111.t
over a fading channel 130 to r receiving antennas 121.1-121.r
coupled to a receiver 120. A channel estimator 125 provides an
estimate of the channel 130 to the receiver 120. The channel
estimate is also quantized and provided to the transmitter 110 via
a quantized rate control feedback channel 135.
[0022] In systems that employ beamforming such as the MIMO systems,
the beamforming matrix (referred to herein as a codeword) generated
in response to perceived channel conditions is computed and
quantized at the receiver first, and then is provided to the source
transmitter (e.g., via feedback). A conventional approach to reduce
the overhead associated with this feedback is to provide matrix
codebook(s) at each of the transmitter and the receiver, each of
the codebook(s) comprising a plurality, or set, of potential
beamforming matrixes that may be used depending on the channel
conditions perceived at the receiver. When the receiver has
identified the appropriate matrix codebook(s), the receiver will
typically feed back only an index (instead of the actual matrix
entries) that points to the appropriate codeword in the codebook(s)
stored at the transmitter.
[0023] The baseband fading channel linking the i.sup.th transmit to
the p.sup.th receive antenna can be modeled as a finite impulse
response (FIR) filter with L taps
h.sub.tp=.SIGMA..sub..lamda.=1.sup.L|.alpha..sub.ip(.lamda.).delta.(t-r.-
sub.ip(.lamda.)), i=1, . . . , N.sub.r, p=1, . . . , N.sub.R,
(1)
where .alpha..sub.tp(.lamda.) is the complex gain and
r.sub.ip(.lamda.) is the delay of the .lamda..sup.th path. In this
system, OFDM is employed to convert the underlying
frequency-selective channels to a set of M.sub.T narrowband tones.
Thus, the equivalent complex baseband model for the c.sup.th
channel corresponding to the c.sup.th subcarrier can be expressed
as
y.sub.c= {square root over (P/N.sub.r)}H.sub.cx.sub.c+w.sub.cnc=1,
. . . , M.sub.rs (2)
where x.sub.c is the N.sub.r.times.1 transmitted signal vector,
H.sub.c is the N.sub.R.times.N.sub.r channel matrix,
w.sub.c:.sub.c(O/I) is a circularly symmetric additive white
complex Gaussian noise vector, and y.sub.c is the N.sub.R.times.1
received signal vector. Using (1), the frequency response H.sub.c
of the MIMO channel at the c.sup.th subcarrier is given by
(H.sub.c).sub.ip=.SIGMA..sub..lamda.=1.sup.L|h.sub.ip(.lamda.T.sub.s)e.s-
up.-f2nic/M.sup.r;.SIGMA..sub..lamda.=1.sup.L|.alpha..sub.ip(.lamda.)e.sup-
.-f2nct.sup.ij.sup.(.lamda.)/T.sup.s (3)
where T.sub.s and .DELTA.f=1/T, are the OFDM symbol period and the
subcarrier frequency separation, Respectively. A block fading
channel model is used in which the channel remains constant during
the transmission of each packet (or codeword of length T) and it
changes independently from one block to another. The distributions
of {.alpha..sub.ip(.lamda.), r.sub.ij(.lamda.)} in (1) are modeled
according to spatial channel models as known to those skilled in
the art. To simplify the analysis, E[x.sub.c*x.sub.c].ltoreq.1 in
(2) and the average transmit power on c.sup.th subcarrier in an
OFDM block (denoted by P) is independent of the number of transmit
antennas.
[0024] The system maximizes the sum-rate throughput which is
usually the primary goal in downlink transmissions. In this
embodiment, (1) the channel is known at the receiver perfectly; (2)
the quantized channel state for each user is provided to the
transmitter via a feedback link of limited rate; and (3) only
linear precoding is allowed at the BS. The feedback link is assumed
to be error-free and has zero-delay.
[0025] In order to minimize the feedback rate, the quantized
channel state information is fed back for a group of adjacent OFDM
tones, referred to as a resource block (RB), and only one precoder
is used for each RB. Such per RB precoding can be justified for
systems where the number of tones is much larger than the number of
multi-paths, i.e., M.sub.r>>L. In such cases, the optimal
precoders for adjacent OFDM tones are very close and usually
identical considering the finite (coarse) precision of the
precoding codebook. The system can have M.sub.B resource blocks,
each consisting of M.sub.D/M.sub.B adjacent OFDM tones, where
M.sub.D OFDM tones are used for the data transmission and the
remaining M.sub.r. . . M.sub.D OFDM tones are reserved for
transmitting the control and signaling information.
[0026] The feedback information from MS consists of three parts:
(1) The precoding rank r.ltoreq.N.sub.r which is the number of
independent streams that can be transmitted; (2) the precoder
matrix index (PMI) from a predesigned codebook; and (3) the CQI
that represents the signal-to-interference-plus-noise-ratio (SINR)
for each stream.
[0027] Based on the quantized feedback received from the MSs, the
BS then schedules the appropriate MS for transmission in each RB
and chooses a precoder which is an N.sub.r.times.r matrix Q.sub.n
from a predesigned precoding codebook Q. The transmitted signal
vector is then obtained by precoding r coded QAM symbols
u=[u.sub.1,u.sub.2, . . . u.sub.r], i.e., x.sub.n=Q.sub.nu.sub.n.
The outer code used in this embodiment is the IEEE 802.16e
convolutional turbo code (CTC) and for case of exposition only one
codeword is transmitted to a scheduled MS by coding across all the
tones assigned to that MS. The design of the precoding codebook Q
is discussed below. For a practical system the performance of the
precoder selection algorithm may be enhanced by considering the
receiver structure (e.g., LMMSE or SIC) and calculating the
achievable rate accordingly.
[0028] To further optimize the feedback load, the system can
provide feedback for the set of M adjacent resource blocks (RBs) by
using a multi-resolution codebook. In this embodiment, a
low-resolution codebook can be used to find an precoder index which
is optimal for all RBs. Then, the system provides a resolution
information for each RB by using high-resolution codebook. If a
nested multi-resolution codebook is used, the system may be further
enhanced by applying a successive approach. In this case, the
system first finds the low-resolution precoding index for the
center RB. Then, a refinement index is provided for the center RB
by using high-resolution codebook. Next, the system considers the
two adjacent RBs and only calculates the precoder index from
high-resolution codebook assuming the low-resolution index for
these two blocks are the same as the high-resolution precoder index
for the center RB. This procedure is performed successively for the
next two adjacent RBs by where for each one the previously
calculated precoder index for the adjacent cell is used as the
low-resolution index.
[0029] The precoding codebook design is discussed next. In
conventional codebook design, only one precoder index is fed back
for the resource blocks (RBs) and different RBs are treated
individually. Such codebook can also be used to report a single
precoding index for a group of RBs.
[0030] In the following discussion, the subscript c is dropped and
H denotes the channel matrix of any subcarrier. For a resource
block, the channel matrix of the center tone is used for precoder
selection. For a given transmission rank r and B bits of PMI
feedback, the codebook design problem is formulated as finding the
set Q={Q.sub.1,Q.sub.2, . . . , Q.sub.2.sup.B} of N.sub.r.times.r
semi-unitary matrices that is a solution to the optimization
problem given by
C = max Q [ max Q .di-elect cons. log det ( I + P N T HQQ * H * ) ]
. ( 4 ) ##EQU00001##
[0031] Conventionally, the maximization problem is solved by
equivalently minimizing the Chordal distance between the dominant
right singular vectors of the channel and the corresponding
quantized vectors, where the chordal distance is defined as
d chordal ( Q , V ) = 1 2 VV * - QQ * F = N T - V * Q F 2 . ( 5 )
##EQU00002##
and UDV* is the partial SVD of H obtained by retaining only the r
right singular vectors that correspond to the r largest singular
values of H. Other distance metric such as Fubini-study metric and
p-metric defined between the subspaces V and Q on the Grassmanian
manifold G(N.sub.r,r) may also be used.
[0032] If a single-resolution codebook is used, the precoder Q for
the channel H is obtained from the codebook Q such that logdet
( I + P N T HQQ * H * ) ##EQU00003##
is maximized. This capacity measure may be modified accordingly
depending on the type of the receiver structure, e.g., if LMMSE is
used.
[0033] The preferred embodiment uses multi-resolution codebook,
where for a group of adjacent RBs, the precoder selection process
first selects a common precoder index from a low-resolution
codebook and then for each RBs within the group a high-resolution
codebook is used to fine tune the precoders for each RB. Although
the concept of multi-resolution codebook may be extended to
multiple level of codebook resolution, the following discussion
focuses on the multi-resolution codebooks with only two resolution
levels: the low-resolution and the high-resolution. By using such
multi-resolution codebook similar performance can be achieved with
lower feedback load in comparison to a system using a
single-resolution codebook. Furthermore, both single-resolution or
multi-resolution require almost similar memory to store the
codebooks and the complexity of the precoder selection using either
of the codebooks is also comparable.
[0034] FIG. 2A shows an exemplary diagram illustrating a precoder
as a vector and the spacing of precoders as a sphere. This
embodiment has N.sub.r.times.N.sub.R MIMO channels. The space of
all precoders is of size N.sub.r.times.K, K.ltoreq.N.sub.R with a
proper distance metric defined on it. The time correlation is at
time t, t+1, while the frequency of correlation is the resource
block n, n+1. The optimal precoders for two channel realizations
that highly correlated are almost similar or very close (with
respect to the distance metric).
[0035] FIG. 2B shows an exemplary quantized codebook. In this
example, six precoders are selected as the possible quantization
codebook. Solid lines 202 show the vector in front of the sphere,
while dotted lines 204 are in the back of the sphere. Line 206
shows the actual direction, while line 208 covering space 210 is
the quantized direction. In this example, instead of the actual
channel direction, only the index of the closest precoder is fed
back. Thus, for any lines that traverse the space 210, the
quantized direction is the same, line 208.
[0036] FIGS. 3A-3B show phases of generating an exemplary
multi-level resolution codebook. FIG. 3A illustrates the first
level resolution codebook, while FIG. 3B illustrates the second
level resolution codebook. As shown in FIG. 3B, a set of 6
precoders exist in the vicinity of a given precoder on the sphere.
The second level resolution codebook of FIG. 3B can be obtained in
several ways. For example, individual optimization can be performed
on the second level codebook entries for each vector in the first
level codebook. In another method, the system can obtain second
level codebooks as a transformation (e.g., unitary rotation) of a
single codebook (average performance optimization).
[0037] In one embodiment, precoding based on Multi-Resolution
codebook can be done. FIG. 4 illustrates two actual channel
directions at time t and t+1. If the channel directions are close,
the channel direction at time t+1 can be quantized by using the
second resolution codebook. The second resolution codebook provides
better quantization without increasing the feedback load. The same
concept can be used for the quantization of two adjacent resource
block n, n+1, in either frequency or time.
[0038] In a multi-resolution codebook, the codebook
Q={Q.sub.1,Q.sub.2, . . . , Q.sub.q} consists of q codebooks where
the codebook Q.sub.t+1 is used to add more resolution to the prior
set of codebooks Q.sub.1, . . . , Q.sub.t. By using a
multi-resolution codebook, finding an optimal precoder for a given
channel realization H is performed as follows. First, the optimal
precoder Q.sub.1(H).epsilon.Q.sub.1 is determined for a given
channel realization H. Then, the optimal precoder
Q.sub.2(H,Q.sub.1).epsilon.Q.sub.2 is determined that depends both
on the previous precoder Q.sub.1 and the channel matrix H.
Depending on the required resolution, this action is successively
performed to find the precoder Q.sub.i(H, Q.sub.1, . . . ,
Q.sub.i-1) .epsilon. Q.sub.i, i.ltoreq.q.
[0039] In one embodiment, the multi-resolution codebook is
optimized based on the channel Statistics. In general, different
resolution may be optimized for different channel statistics. For
example, in an OFDM systems, the first codebook Q.sub.1 may be
optimized by considering the statistics of the center tone in any
RBs, and the second codebook Q.sub.2 may be optimized by
considering the statistics of the adjacent RBs as well, and so on
for the higher resolution codebooks
[0040] To simplify the discussion, the following discussion assumes
that the system uses q=2 and uses only one low-resolute codebook
Q.sub.1 and one high-resolution codebook Q.sub.2. Two examples of
the multi-resolution codebook designs are discussed: the
multi-resolution codebook based on partitioning and the
multi-resolution codebook based on the unitary rotation.
[0041] FIG. 5A shows an exemplary multi-resolution codebook
generation process. The process starts by generating low resolution
codebook(s) of size N1 pre-coders (190). Next, the process
generates high resultion codebook(s) based on the low resolution
codebook(s) previously designed (192). The process checks the
resolution of the resulting codebook(s) is acceptable (194). If
not, the process loops back to 192 to refine the codebook
resolution and alternatively if done, the process exits.
[0042] In another implementation, a multi-resolution codebook can
be generated by selecting a common precoder index from a low
resolution codebook for a group of adjacent resource blocks (RB)s.
Next, for each RB within the group, the process selects a
high-resolution codebook to fine-tune each RB precoder and
generates feedback based on the multi-resolution codebook by
quantizing channel state variations. The process can then perform
pre-coding based on the multi-resolution codebook.
[0043] FIG. 5B shows an exemplary process for applying the
multi-generation codebook to perform precoding. First, the process
finds the best precoder index from the low resolution codebook
which is suitable for all RBs in the group (210). Next, for each
RB, the process finds individual indices from the high resolution
codebook(s) based on the common precoder index from the low
resolution codebook(s) (220). Feedback signals are generated by
gathering all indices and sent to the base station (230). The
process performs precoding at the base station by regenerating the
actual precoder using the feedback signals (240).
[0044] FIG. 5C shows exemplary processes for generating high
resolution multi-resolution codebooks. In one embodiment, the high
resolution code books can be individually optimized (250). In this
embodiment, the process generates high resolution codebooks by
directly optimizing each individual codebook for each precoder
entry in a low resolution codebook (252),
[0045] In a second embodiment, the process individually optimizes
the codebooks by partitioning (260). The process of the second
embodiment designs a high resolution codebook C of size N1.times.N2
x . . . x Nk, where k is the number of resolution levels and Nj is
the size of the jth codebook (262). The process then finds N1
precoders in C which have the largest minimum distance between each
pair. The process generates the first level precoder and removes
selected precoders m from C (264). Next, j is set to a
predetermined value (266). Next, for each precoder entry of the low
resolution codebook, the process finds the closest entries from the
remaining precoders in C. The process generates the jth codebook
and removes the selected precoders from C (268). Next, the process
checks if the end is reached (270) and if not, increments j (272)
and loops back to 268.
[0046] In a third embodiment, the process jointly determines
optimized codebook(s) (280). The process selects a set of
transformations fi.j which convert a precoder to another precoder
from the set of all possible precoders (282). For example fi.j
could be multiplication of the original precoder by a unitary
matrix Fi.j from the left. The j'th resolution codebook by then
consists of all the output of fi.j functions for all precoders of
the previous resolution level as an input (284). The process
optimizes the set of fi.j functions which maximizes the joint
(average) minimum distance for the j'th resolution codebook (286)
and this is successively repeated for all resolution levels
(288).
[0047] In yet another embodiment, the high resolution codebook can
be a set of precoders in the vicinity of a given precoder on a
sphere. The second level resolution codebook can be generated by
individually optimizing the second level codebook entries for each
precoder, which can be a vector or a semi-unitary matrix, in the
low resolution codebook. Alternatively, the high resolution
codebook can be generated by obtaining second level codebooks as a
transformation of a single codebook. Alternatively, the process can
generate the high resolution codebook by obtaining second level
codebooks as a unitary rotation of an average performance
optimization.
[0048] The operations of embodiments of FIGS. 5A-5C are discussed
next.
[0049] Multi-Resolution Codebook Based on Partitioning
[0050] For a simple construction of a multi-resolution codebook, a
partitioning concept is used. If denotes a single-resolution
codebook of size which has designed to meet the highest required
resolution, to generate a multi-resolution codebook, the system
first finds a low-resolution codebook Q.sub.1 by taking |Q.sub.1|
elements form which have the maximum minimum distance between each
two elements. For each element Q.sub.i of the codebook Q.sub.1, the
system then finds the set of closest /|Q.sub.1| elements from and
denotes it by Q.sub.2i. The elements are chosen such that each
element of belongs to one and only one Q.sub.2i. The set
Q.sub.2={Q.sub.21,Q.sub.22, . . . , Q.sub.2,|Q.sup.1.sub.|}
eventually includes all the elements of but each element is doubly
indexed, i.e., an index corresponding to a unique element of
Q.sub.1 and an index which enumerate the possible choices of the
precoders in Q.sub.2 for a given precoder index in Q.sub.1. Thus,
the set Q.sub.2 is divided into |Q.sub.1| partitions such that each
partition Q.sub.2i has equal number of elements. As such
partitioning is not unique because the set of closest elements
depends on the order of assignment of the elements of to each
partition, an optimization may be performed to maximize the overall
codebook performance by taking the best partitioning.
[0051] An alternative approach to design a multi-resolution
codebook is to first design a low-resolution codebook Q.sub.1
directly. Next, for each entry of the codebook, say Q.sub.i, the
set of channel conditions for which this entry is chosen is
determined as (Q.sub.i). Then, an optimal codebook Q.sub.2i is
found using only the channel conditions in (Q.sub.i), i.e., solving
the optimization problem (4) where the expectation is taken over
(Q.sub.i). The size of Q.sub.2i is chosen to meed the desired
resolution level. The codebook Q.sub.2={Q.sub.21,Q.sub.22, . . . ,
Q.sub.2,|Q.sup.1.sub.|} is then constructed as the set of all such
designed codebooks.
[0052] In some cases, it is beneficial to design a nested
multi-resolution codebook. The codebook Q=(Q.sub.1,Q.sub.2) is
called nested multi-resolution codebook if and only if
.A-inverted.i,1.ltoreq.i.ltoreq.|Q.sub.1|:Q.sub.2i.OR right.Q.sub.1
(6)
In one embodiment, the system takes the low-resolution codebook
Q.sub.1= and then finds the set of Q.sub.2i.OR right. as the
Q.sub.2i| closest neighbors of each elements
Q.sub.i.epsilon.Q.sub.1 to construct the high-resolution codebook
Q.sub.2={Q.sub.2i}.sub.i=1.sup.|Q.sup.1|. In this case, the
high-resolution codebook does not increase the resolution for the
original RB, but successive application of this codebook for the
adjacent RBs considerably improves the resolution of the precoder
matrix for the adjacent RBs.
[0053] The representation of the latter codebook constructions
requires storing |Q.sub.1| and |Q.sub.2| precoders and a set of
indices to denote the partitioning in Q.sub.2. Also, the former
codebook construction needs storing || precoders plus two set of
indices to represent Q.sub.1 and Q.sub.2 codebooks.
[0054] Multi-Resolution Codebook Based on Transformation (e.g.,
Unitary Rotation)
[0055] To simplify the codebook storage, the system can use
functions, f.sub.i, 1.ltoreq.i.ltoreq.|Q.sub.2k| which convert each
element Q.sub.1.epsilon.Q.sub.1 to a new precoder of the same size.
An example of such function is a unitary rotation, i.e.,
Q.sub.2=f.sub.i(Q.sub.1)=F.sub.iQ.sub.1. For the precoder of size
N.sub.T.times.r, the unitary rotations F.sub.i are of size
N.sub.T.times.N.sub.T. Using such transformation, the system needs
to store only |Q.sub.2k| unitary matrices that is constant
irrespective of k to generate the entire high-resolution codebook
Q.sub.2. Thus, the average performance of such generated codebook
over all entries of the codebook Q.sub.1 should be considered in
the design of the functions f.sub.i. More specifically, we divide
the act of all the channel realizations into |Q.sub.1| partitions
(Q.sub.i),1.ltoreq.i.ltoreq.|Q.sub.1| where the precoder Q.sub.i
.epsilon. Q.sub.1 is the optimal precoder.
[0056] Thus the codebook design problem is given by
max i = 1 Q 1 ( Q i ) [ max F .di-elect cons. log det ( I + P N T
HFQ i Q i * F * H * ) ] . ( 7 ) ##EQU00004##
where ={F.sub.1,F.sub.2, . . . } is the set of unitary matrices
that equivalently represent the codebook Q.sub.2.
[0057] Simulation Results
[0058] First, the system setup and the codebooks used for the
simulations are discussed. The simulated system uses a BS with 4
transmit antennas and a MS with 2 receive antennas. Thus, the
precoding schemes use two codebooks of rank 1 and rank 2 with the
same size. The rank-1 and rank-2 codebooks for the
single-resolution codebook are obtained from IEEE802.16e. An extra
feedback bit is also used to feedback the rank of the selected
precoder. The PMI of size 3,4,5, or 6 bits represents 8,16,32, or
64 choices for precoders per rank. The single-resolution codebook
of size 2.sup.B is denoted by .sup.(B). The channel model and the
other important system parameters are summarized in Table 1.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Simulation parameters and channel model.
Parameter Assumption Access OFDM RF carrier frequency 2.0 GHz
Bandwidth 10.0 MHz Number of paths (Multi-path model) 6 Sub-carrier
spacing 10.9375 kHz Sampling frequency 11.2 MHz Number of occupied
sub-carriers 720 Number of OFDM symbols/frame 47 Frame duration 5
ms Number of subcarriers per slot (RB) 24 CP length (1/8) * 102.86
micro second FFT point 1024 Number of antennas at BS 4 Number of
antennas at MS 2 Codebook size (in bits) 3, 4, 5, 6 bits for
low-resolution, 3 bits for high-resolution Number of the resource
blocks (M) 3, 7, 11 Channel models SCM channel model case 1A
Channel estimation Ideal channel estimation MCS 4, 16 and 64 QAM,
code rates 1/2, 2/3, 3/4 and 5/6 Quantized codebook
Single-resolution: IEEE802.16e, Multi-resolution: Design
[0059] For the multi-resolution codebook, for each codebook
.sup.(B), the first set of multi-resolution codebooks .sup.(B) is
obtained by taking the first resolution codebook
.sub.1.sup.(B)=.sup.(B) and designing a 3-bit unitary rotation
codebook .sup.(B) which equivalently represents .sub.2.sup.(B).
[0060] The second set of multi-resolution codebook .sup.(B),
B.gtoreq.5 is designed by using the partitioning approach. We first
find .sub.1.sup.(B) of size 2.sup.B-3 by taking the elements from
.sup.(B) which have the maximum minimum distance from each other.
Then, the set .sup.(B) is partitioned into 2.sup.(B-3) where each
partition contains the set of 8 closest neighbors for each codebook
entry Q.epsilon..sub.1.sup.(B). Thus, .sub.2.sup.(B) is the set of
.sup.(B) along with the acquired partitioning.
[0061] The third set of multi-resolution codebooks O.sup.(B) is
also designed by using the partitioning approach. Here, we take
O.sub.1.sup.(B)=.sup.(B) and then the set of 8 closest neighbor of
each codebook entry Q.sub.i .epsilon..sub.1.sup.(B) is determined
to obtain O.sub.2i.sup.(B), and
O.sub.2.sup.(B)={O.sub.21.sup.(B),O.sub.21.sup.(B), . . . ,
O.sub.2,|.sup.(B).sup.(B).sub.|.sup.(B)}.
[0062] As a point of comparison, the multi-resolution codebook is
designed such that only 3 bits is required to represent the
high-resolution information about the precoder in all mentioned
cases. Thus, the value B in the codebooks .sup.(B), .sup.(B), and
O.sup.(B) only refers to the size of low-resolution codebook.
However, the size of low-resolution codebook in .sup.(B) is B-3
bits.
[0063] The throughput performances of the different codebooks are
compared through several link level simulations. The precoding is
used over M resource blocks of size 24 subcarrier each. When a
single-resolution codebook .sup.(B) is used, the precoder index for
each resource block is found individually and total of 6M bits is
fed back to the BS. However, when the either of the codebooks
.sup.(B), .sup.(B), and O.sup.(B) is used, the precoding requires B
bits for the center resource block and only 3 bits for the rest of
M-1 resource blocks, thus, the total number of feedback bits is
calculated as 6+3(M-1)=3M+3.
[0064] FIG. 6 shows the link level throughput results comparing the
single-resolution codebook .sup.(B) with the multi-resolution
codebook .sup.(B) for various codebook size B. Here, we have used
M=3 resource blocks. It is observed that the performance of the
multi-resolution codebook is better than that of the
single-resolution codebook for B=3,4,5 while the feedback load has
reduced to 9,10,11 from 9,12,15 bits. The performance of the
multi-resolution codebook .sup.(6) is, however, slightly lower than
that of the single-resolution codebook .sup.(6). Nonetheless, there
is a considerable saving of 6 bits in the feedback load in this
case.
[0065] FIGS. 7-11 show the link level throughput results comparing
the single-resolution Codebook .sup.(B) with the multi-resolution
codebook .sup.(B) for various codebook size B by increasing the
number of resource blocks from M=3 to M=7 and M=11. It is observed
that the performance of the multi-resolution codebook starts
degrading with respect to that of the single-resolution codebook as
the M increases. This is due to the fact that we assume the
low-resolution index for all M RBs are the same and only calculate
the high-resolution indices for the M--1 blocks adjacent to the
center RB. It is observed that for M=7 still the performance of the
multi-resolution codebook is better than that of the
single-resolution codebook for B=3. However, for the M=11 the
multi-resolution codebook .sup.(B) shows considerable degradation
in performance as it is shown in FIGS. 10 and 11. However, one
should note that the feedback loads in this case are 36,35,34,33
instead of 66,55,44,33 for B=6,5,4,3, respectively.
[0066] FIG. 10 shows the link level throughput results comparing
the single-resolution codebook .sup.(B) with three different design
of multi-resolution codebooks, i.e., .sup.(B), .sup.(B), and
.sup.(B). In this case we consider M=11 resource blocks and only
present the result for the codebook size B=6. It is seen that
although the performance of .sup.(B) is not so appealing, the
performance of the multi-resolution codebook O.sup.(B) is
comparable with that of the original single-resolution codebook
.sup.(B). The performance of the other multi-resolution codebook
.sup.-(B) is somewhere in between that of .sup.(B) and O.sup.(B).
Thus, by proper design of the multi-resolution codebook, it is
possible to achieve a performance close to a single-resolution
codebook but with much lower feedback load. In this case, the
feedback load has been reduced to 36 from 66 that is a significant
saving of 30 bits.
[0067] In sum, systems that use the multi-resolution codebook
provides feedback only the variation in the channel, since
typically quantizing the channel variations requires a smaller
codebook than quantizing the channel itself. When the channel is
correlated in time (or in frequency, e.g., across different tones
in OFDM systems), the correlation can be used to considerably
reduce the feedback requirement without loss in performance.
Multi-resolution codebook can be used for the DL transmission in
IEEE802.16m. For various number of codebook sizes, the precoding
schemes based on the multi-resolution codebook considerably
outperforms the ones based on the single-resolution codebook by
using the same or reduced feedback load. Moreover, the complexity
and memory requirement of such multi-resolution codebook precoding
schemes is comparable with those of the conventional
single-resolution codebook.
[0068] The system may be implemented in hardware, firmware or
software, or a combination, of the three. Preferably the invention
is implemented in a computer program executed on a programmable
computer having a processor, a data storage system, volatile and
non-volatile memory and/or storage elements, at least one input
device and at least one output device.
[0069] Each computer program is tangibly stored in a
machine-readable storage media or device (e.g., program, memory or
magnetic disk) readable by a general or special purpose
programmable computer, for configuring and controlling operation of
a computer when the storage media or device is read by the computer
to perform the procedures described herein. The inventive system
may also be considered to be embodied in a computer-readable
storage medium, configured with a computer program, where the
storage medium so configured causes a computer to operate in a
specific and predefined manner to perform the functions described
herein.
[0070] The invention has been described herein in considerable
detail in order to comply with the patent Statutes and to provide
those skilled in the art with the information needed to apply the
novel principles and to construct and use such specialized
components as are required. However, it is to be understood that
the invention can be carried out by specifically different
equipment and devices, and that various modifications, both as to
the equipment details and operating procedures, can be accomplished
without departing from the scope of the invention itself.
* * * * *