U.S. patent application number 13/876256 was filed with the patent office on 2013-08-29 for coatings for optical components of solar energy systems.
This patent application is currently assigned to 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY. The applicant listed for this patent is Katherine A. Brown, Daniel T. Chen, Timothy J. Hebrink, Naiyong Jing. Invention is credited to Katherine A. Brown, Daniel T. Chen, Timothy J. Hebrink, Naiyong Jing.
Application Number | 20130220402 13/876256 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 45928371 |
Filed Date | 2013-08-29 |
United States Patent
Application |
20130220402 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Brown; Katherine A. ; et
al. |
August 29, 2013 |
COATINGS FOR OPTICAL COMPONENTS OF SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS
Abstract
The present application is directed to a method of providing a
coating to a surface of an optical element of a solar energy
conversion system. The method comprises coating the surface of the
optical element with an aqueous coating composition comprising
water and silica nanoparticles dispersed in the water; and drying
the coating composition to form a nanoparticle coating. The silica
nanoparticles comprise a polymer core surrounded by a shell
comprising nonporous silica particles disposed on the polymer
core.
Inventors: |
Brown; Katherine A.; (Lake
Elmo, MN) ; Jing; Naiyong; (Woodbury, MN) ;
Hebrink; Timothy J.; (Scandia, MN) ; Chen; Daniel
T.; (St. Paul, MN) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
Brown; Katherine A.
Jing; Naiyong
Hebrink; Timothy J.
Chen; Daniel T. |
Lake Elmo
Woodbury
Scandia
St. Paul |
MN
MN
MN
MN |
US
US
US
US |
|
|
Assignee: |
3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES
COMPANY
St. Paul
MN
|
Family ID: |
45928371 |
Appl. No.: |
13/876256 |
Filed: |
October 4, 2011 |
PCT Filed: |
October 4, 2011 |
PCT NO: |
PCT/US2011/054746 |
371 Date: |
May 16, 2013 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
61390492 |
Oct 6, 2010 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
136/246 ;
427/162 |
Current CPC
Class: |
F24S 23/00 20180501;
H01L 31/0547 20141201; H01L 31/0549 20141201; H01L 31/02168
20130101; Y02E 10/44 20130101; Y02E 10/52 20130101; G02B 1/14
20150115; G02B 1/10 20130101; G02B 1/105 20130101; G02B 27/0006
20130101; F24S 2023/86 20180501 |
Class at
Publication: |
136/246 ;
427/162 |
International
Class: |
H01L 31/0216 20060101
H01L031/0216 |
Claims
1. A method of providing a coating to a surface of an optical
element of a solar energy conversion system comprising: a) coating
the surface of the optical element with an aqueous coating
composition comprising water and silica nanoparticles dispersed in
the water; and b) drying the coating composition to form a
nanoparticle coating, wherein the silica nanoparticles comprise a
polymer core surrounded by a shell comprising nonporous silica
particles disposed on the polymer core.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the nonporous spherical silica
particles have a volume average particle diameter of 60 nanometers
or less.
3. The method claim 1 wherein the coating is rinsed prior to
drying.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein the coating composition is dried
in the ambient air.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein the coating composition is heated
during drying.
6. The method of claim 5 comprising heating the optical element to
at least 300.degree. C.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein the optical element is placed into
the solar energy conversion system prior to the optical element
being coated with the coating composition.
8. The method of claim 1 wherein the optical element is placed into
the solar energy conversion system after the optical element is
coated with the coating composition.
9. The method of claim 1 wherein the coating composition has a pH
of 5 or less.
10. A solar energy conversion system comprising an array of
photovoltaic cells; and optical elements positioned relative to the
photovoltaic cells, wherein the optical elements are coated with a
nanoparticle coating comprising a polymer core surrounded by a
shell comprising nonporous silica particles disposed on the polymer
core.
11. A solar energy conversion system comprising at least one
light-to-heat converters; and optical elements positioned relative
to the light-to-heat converter, wherein the optical elements are
coated with a nanoparticle coating comprising a polymer core
surrounded by a shell comprising nonporous silica particles
disposed on the polymer core.
12. The solar energy conversion system of claim 11, wherein the
optical element is a lens.
13. The solar energy conversion system of claim 11, wherein the
optical element is a mirror.
14. The solar energy conversion system of claim 13, wherein the
mirror comprises at least one of a polymer layer, a glass layer, a
metal layer and a polymeric optical stack.
15. The solar energy conversion system of claim 14, wherein the
optical component reflects at least a major portion of the average
light across a first range of wavelengths corresponding to the
absorption bandwidth of a PV cell, and transmits a major portion of
the light that is outside the first range of wavelengths.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The present disclosure broadly relates to solar energy
systems using compositions useful for coating substrates.
BACKGROUND
[0002] Many systems utilizing solar energy conversion systems have
been developed to convert sunlight into electricity. Some of these
systems, often referred to as Concentrated Photovoltaic (CPV)
systems, rely on a lens or one or more mirrors that direct or
concentrate sunlight onto a photovoltaic (PV) component (cell) that
directly converts light into electricity. Other systems, often
referred to as Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) systems, rely on the
conversion of concentrated sunlight into heat, and subsequent
utilization of the heat to generate electricity.
[0003] Typically, a system may be designed for use on a commercial
building such as an office building or a large retail store, or as
a utility-scale system. A wide variety of solar energy system
designs have been developed for this diverse set of applications.
In spite of the huge diversity of solar energy system designs, they
all share the need to provide electricity at the lowest possible
installed cost. And they all comprise at least one solar optical
component, which must either direct or concentrate sunlight in a
specific way.
[0004] Many solar energy systems are advantageously installed in
hot, dry climates and, in particular, in deserts. However, a common
problem in desert locations is accumulation of dust on the exposed
surfaces of the optical components of a solar energy system,
resulting in reduced optical performance. Typically, over a period
of time, the electricity produced by the solar energy system
decreases as dust accumulates, resulting in losses of from 5 to 40%
relative to the originally installed, clean system. Thus, there is
a need to provide solar optical components that will maintain
optical performance in the presence of desert dust.
[0005] There have been many efforts to develop compositions that
can be applied to substrates to provide a beneficial protective
layer with desirable properties such as one or more of easy
cleaning, stain prevention, and long lasting performance. Many
compositions developed for such applications rely on materials
(e.g., volatile organic solvents) that can present environmental
issues and/or involve complex application processes. Further,
problems relating to inadequate shelf-life continue to plague
product developers of such compositions.
[0006] Accordingly, for many products a tradeoff of attributes is
typically struck between the desired performance attributes,
environmental friendliness of the materials, satisfactory
shelf-life, and ease of use by a relatively unskilled user.
[0007] There remains a need for shelf-stable environmentally
friendly compositions that can be coated on a substrate (e.g., a
solar optical component) to provide long lasting protection from
dust accumulation, especially if they can be readily handled by a
relatively unskilled user.
SUMMARY
[0008] The present application is directed to a method of providing
a coating to a surface of an optical element of a solar energy
conversion system. The method comprises coating the surface of the
optical element with an aqueous coating composition comprising
water and silica nanoparticles dispersed in the water; and drying
the coating composition to form a nanoparticle coating. The silica
nanoparticles comprise a polymer core surrounded by a shell
comprising nonporous silica particles disposed on the polymer
core.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0009] Many systems have been developed to convert sunlight into
electricity, also known as a solar energy conversion system. Some
CPV systems rely on a lens or one or more mirrors that direct or
concentrate sunlight onto a photovoltaic (PV) component that
directly converts light into electricity. CSP systems rely on the
conversion of concentrated sunlight into heat, and subsequent
utilization of the heat to generate electricity. All of these
systems must compete with more tradition sources of electricity
(such as electricity produced at a coal-burning plant) and thus a
continual and ongoing desire exists for ways to either reduce the
cost and/or improve the efficiency of solar energy systems,
resulting in lower costs to produce electricity with these
systems.
[0010] Typically, a system may be designed for use on a commercial
building such as an office building or a large retail store, or as
a utility-scale system. A wide variety of solar energy system
designs have been developed for this diverse set of applications.
Systems have also been developed to produce both heat, for example,
hot water, and electricity from a single installation.
[0011] In spite of the huge diversity of solar energy system
designs, they all share the need to provide electricity at the
lowest possible installed cost. All solar energy conversion systems
comprise at least one solar optical component, which either directs
or concentrates sunlight. Optical elements include, for example
glass mirrors, polymer mirrors, optical films and lenses, including
Fresnel lenses. Glass mirrors can comprise a layer of glass and a
layer of metal. Polymer mirrors can comprise one or more films
comprising one or more organic layers and can optionally comprise a
layer of metal. For example, a mirror can comprise a film of PMMA
comprising a layer of silver on one surface. For another example, a
mirror can comprise an optical layer stack. In another example, an
optical layer stack can be combined with a layer of metal, as
described, for example, in WO 2010/078105. A specific example
includes those sold under the tradename MIRO-SUN reflection
products made by Alanod-Solar GmbH & Co., Germany.
[0012] Typically, a CPV solar energy conversion system will
comprise a plurality mirrors or lenses that direct or concentrate
sunlight onto a plurality of PV cells that are combined to form
larger units. The optical elements assist by providing a means to
deliver the sunlight to a smaller area photovoltaic cell. A mirror
may be positioned to reflect sunlight light onto the surface of the
photovoltaic cell, typically providing a means to capture sunlight
over an area that is at least twice as large as the area of
photovoltaic cell surface. Alternatively, linear or radial Fresnel
lens may capture sunlight over an area that is much larger (for
example, at least ten times larger) than the area of the PV cell
and focus this light on the PV cell surface.
[0013] Another example of a solar energy conversion system is a CSP
system wherein large mirrors concentrate sunlight onto a
heat-transfer fluid which is used to drive a steam turbine to
generate electricity. Such systems may also provide a means of
thermal energy storage via storage of the hot fluid, which is
advantageous because the hot fluid can be used when the sun is not
impinging on the systems, for example, at night. Typical system
designs include optical elements such as concave mirrors, parabolic
trough mirrors and one or more flat mirrors to capture sunlight
over a large area and concentrate it by at least a factor of ten
onto a device that convert the sunlight into heat.
[0014] Mirrors with high specular or total hemispherical
reflectance may be used in CVP and especially CSP systems. Lenses
and mirrors may possess additional optical properties, for example
the ability to transmit, absorb or reflect light over a certain
range of wavelengths. It may be preferable to provide a solar
optical component that combines several optical properties, for
example a solar optical film component that reflects at least a
major portion of the average light across the range of wavelengths
that corresponds with the absorption bandwidth of a PV cell and
does not reflect a major portion of the light that is outside the
absorption bandwidth of a PV cell. Examples of suitable solar
optical film components are described in US2009283133 and
US2009283144.
[0015] Many solar energy installations are in locations where solar
irradiance is high, due to combination of latitude and climate
conditions, for example, a climate where there is generally very
little cloud cover. Additionally, large commercial buildings
located in hot climates generally have the greatest need for
electricity during the hottest part of the day, to power
air-conditioning units, and the peak hours of demand for
electricity are close to the peak hours of solar irradiance.
Further, for utility-scale solar energy installations, a large
amount of land is needed. Thus, many solar energy systems are
advantageously installed in hot, dry climates and, in particular,
in deserts.
[0016] A common problem in desert locations is accumulation of dust
on the exposed surfaces of the optical components of a solar energy
system. Air-borne desert dust typically substantially comprises
particles with diameters no larger than 100 micron, and often
substantially comprises particles with diameters no larger than 50
microns. Dust typically reduces optical performance by causing
incident light to scatter, rather than being concentrated or
reflected by the solar optical component onto the intended solar
energy conversion device. As less light is delivered to the solar
energy conversion device, the electricity produced by the system
decreases. Typically, over a period of time, the electricity
produced by the solar energy system decreases as dust accumulates,
resulting in losses of from 5 to 40% relative to the originally
installed, clean system. As the designed output of the installation
increases, losses due to dust are increasingly unacceptable. For
the largest installations, operators may be forced to clean their
optical surfaces, often by methods that require the use of water.
Water is expensive and scarce in most desert locations. Thus, there
is a need to provide solar optical components that will maintain
optical performance in the presence of desert dust.
[0017] A coating may be applied to many exposed surfaces of solar
optical components. In some embodiments, the coating may be applied
in the field to optical elements that are installed in existing
solar energy conversion systems.
[0018] One coating comprises an aqueous continuous liquid phase,
and dispersed silica nanoparticles. For the purpose of the present
application, a nanoparticle is a particle less than 60 nm in volume
particle average diameter.
[0019] The aqueous continuous liquid phase comprises at least 5
percent by weight of water; for example, the aqueous continuous
liquid phase may comprise at least 50, 60, 70, 80, or 90 percent by
weight of water, or more. While the aqueous continuous liquid phase
may be essentially free of (i.e., contains less than 0.1 percent by
weight of based on the total weight of the aqueous continuous
liquid phase) organic solvents, especially volatile organic
solvents, organic solvents may optionally be included in a minor
amount if desired (for example up to 20% by weight). If present,
the organic solvents should generally be water-miscible, or at
least water-soluble in the amounts in which they are used, although
this is not a requirement. Examples of organic solvents include
acetone and lower molecular weight ethers and/or alcohols such as
methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, n-propanol, glycerin, ethylene
glycol, triethylene glycol, propylene glycol, ethylene glycol
monomethyl or monoethyl ether, diethylene or dipropylene glycol
methyl or ethyl ether, ethylene or propylene glycol dimethyl ether,
and triethylene or tripropylene glycol monomethyl or monoethyl
ether, n-butanol, isobutanol, s-butanol, t-butanol, and methyl
acetate.
[0020] The silica nano-particle is a nominally spherical particle,
or an elongated particle, or a blend of nominally spherical and
elongated silica nano-particles. In other embodiments the silica
nano-particle is a chain of nominally spherical particles, a chain
of elongated particles, or a chain of nominally spherical and
elongated particles. There may also be a blend of chains and
individual nano-particles.
[0021] In order to minimize haze, the silica particles have a
volume average particle diameter (i.e., a D.sub.50) of 60
nanometers (nm) or less. In some embodiments, the nonporous
spherical silica particles have a volume average particle diameter
in a range of from 1 to 60 nm, for example in a range of from 2 to
20 nm, and in specific embodiments in a range of from 2 to 10 nm.
The silica particles may have any particle size distribution
consistent with the above 60 nm volume average particle diameter;
for example, the particle size distribution may be monomodal,
bimodal or polymodal.
[0022] Nonporous spherical silica particles in aqueous media (sols)
are well known in the art and are available commercially; for
example, as silica sols in water or aqueous alcohol solutions under
the trade designations LUDOX from E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co.,
Wilmington, Del.), NYACOL from Nyacol Co. of Ashland, Mass., or
NALCO from Nalco Chemical Co. of Naperville, Ill. One useful silica
sol with a volume average particle size of 5 nm, a pH of 10.5, and
a nominal solids content of 15 percent by weight, is available as
NALCO 2326 from Nalco Chemical Co. Other useful commercially
available silica sols include those available as NALCO 1115 and
NALCO 1130 from Nalco Chemical Co., as REMASOL SP30 from Remet
Corp. of Utica, N.Y., and as LUDOX SM from E.I. du Pont de Nemours
and Co.
[0023] The nonspherical colloidal silica particles may have a
uniform thickness of 5 to 25 nm, a length, D.sub.1 of 40 to 500 nm
(as measured by dynamic light-scattering method) and a degree of
elongation D.sub.1/D.sub.2 of 5 to 30, wherein D.sub.2 means a
diameter in nm calculated by the equation D.sub.2=2720/S and S
means specific surface area in m.sup.2 /g of the particle, as is
disclosed in the specification of U.S. Pat. No. 5,221,497,
incorporated herein by reference. U.S. Pat. No. 5,221,497 discloses
a method for producing acicular silica nanoparticles by adding
water-soluble calcium salt, magnesium salt or mixtures thereof to
an aqueous colloidal solution of active silicic acid or acidic
silica sol having a mean particle diameter of 3 to 30 nm in an
amount of 0.15 to 1.00 wt. % based on CaO, MgO or both to silica,
then adding an alkali metal hydroxide so that the molar ratio of
SiO.sub.2/M.sub.2O (M: alkali metal atom) becomes 20 to 300, and
heating the obtained liquid at 60 to 300.degree. C. for 0.5 to 40
hours. The colloidal silica particles obtained by this method are
elongate-shaped silica particles that have elongations of a uniform
thickness within the range of 5 to 40 nm extending in only one
plane.
[0024] The nonspherical silica sol may also be prepared as
described by Watanabe et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 5,597,512. Briefly
stated, the method comprises: (a) mixing an aqueous solution
containing a water-soluble calcium salt or magnesium salt or a
mixture of said calcium salt and said magnesium salt with an
aqueous colloidal liquid of an active silicic acid containing from
1 to 6% (w/w) of SiO.sub.2 and having a pH in the range of from 2
to 5 in an amount of 1500 to 8500 ppm as a weight ratio of CaO or
MgO or a mixture of CaO and MgO to SiO.sub.2 of the active silicic
acid; (b) mixing an alkali metal hydroxide or a water-soluble
organic base or a water-soluble silicate of said alkali metal
hydroxide or said water-soluble organic base with the aqueous
solution obtained in step (a) in a molar ratio of
SiO.sub.2/M.sub.2O of from 20 to 200, where SiO.sub.2 represents
the total silica content derived from the active silicic acid and
the silica content of the silicate and M represents an alkali metal
atom or organic base molecule; and (c) heating at least a part of
the mixture obtained in step (b) to 60.degree. C. or higher to
obtain a heel solution, and preparing a feed solution by using
another part of the mixture obtained in step (b) or a mixture
prepared separately in accordance with step (b), and adding said
feed solution to said heel solution while vaporizing water from the
mixture during the adding step until the concentration of SiO.sub.2
is from 6 to 30% (w/w). The silica sol produced in step (c)
typically has a pH of from 8.5 to 11.
[0025] Useful nonspherical silica particles may be obtained as an
aqueous suspension under the trade name SNOWTEX-UP by Nissan
Chemical Industries (Tokyo, Japan). The mixture consists of 20-21%
(w/w) of acicular silica, less than 0.35% (w/w) of Na.sub.2O, and
water. The particles are about 9 to 15 nanometers in diameter and
have lengths of 40 to 300 nanometers. The suspension has a
viscosity of <100 mPas at 25.degree. C., a pH of about 9 to
10.5, and a specific gravity of about 1.13 at 20.degree. C.
[0026] Other useful acicular silica particles may be obtained as an
aqueous suspension under the trade name SNOWTEX-PS-S and
SNOWTEX-PS-M by Nissan Chemical Industries, having a morphology of
a string of pearls. The mixture consists of 20-21% (w/w) of silica,
less than 0.2% (w/w) of Na.sub.2O, and water. The SNOWTEX-PS-M
particles are about 18 to 25 nanometers in diameter and have
lengths of 80 to 150 nanometers. The particle size is 80 to 150 by
dynamic light scattering methods. The suspension has a viscosity of
<100 mPas at 25.degree. C., a pH of about 9 to 10.5, and a
specific gravity of about 1.13 at 20.degree. C. The SNOWTEX-PS-S
has a particle diameter of 10-15 nm and a length of 80-120 nm.
[0027] Low- and non-aqueous silica sols (also called silica
organosols) may also be used and are silica sol dispersions wherein
the liquid phase is an organic solvent, or an aqueous organic
solvent. In the practice of this invention, the silica sol is
chosen so that its liquid phase is compatible with the intended
coating composition, and is typically aqueous or a low-aqueous
organic solvent. Ammonium stabilized acicular silica particles may
generally be diluted and acidified in any order.
[0028] Non-aqueous spherical silica sols are spherical silica sol
dispersions wherein the liquid phase is an organic solvent.
Typically, the silica sol is chosen so that its liquid phase is
compatible with the remaining components of the continuous liquid
phase. Typically, sodium-stabilized nonporous spherical silica
particles should first be acidified prior to dilution with an
organic solvent such as ethanol, as dilution prior to acidification
may yield poor or non-uniform coatings. Ammonium-stabilized silica
nanoparticles may generally be diluted and acidified in any
order.
[0029] The dispersed silica nano-particles are generally present on
organic polymer particles having a silica particle shell thereon,
wherein the silica particles have a mean particle size of 60 nm or
less. Such nano-particles are described in detail in PCT
Application US 2010/027452.
[0030] As used herein, the term "shell" refers to an assembly of
nonporous spherical silica particles disposed on and covering (for
example, densely covering) the surface of a polymer core. The
nonporous spherical silica particles may optionally be covalently
bonded one to another.
[0031] The polymer core may comprise any polymer, typically one
that can be prepared as a latex, more typically as an alkaline pH
stable latex. Exemplary polymers include acrylic polymers, styrenic
polymers, vinyl acetate-ethylene copolymers, polyvinyl acetate,
styrene-butadiene rubbers, polyurethanes (including
urethane-acrylic polymers), polyesters, and polyamides. Preferably,
the polymer is a film-forming polymer. The polymer may be
thermosetting or thermoplastic. Preferably, the polymer comprises a
polyurethane segment as in the case of a polyurethane or a
urethane-acrylic polymer (which typically has polyurethane and
polyacrylic segments). Suitable polymer latexes and methods for
making them are widely known in the art, and many are commercially
available.
[0032] Examples of commercially available polymer latexes include
those aqueous aliphatic polyurethane and acrylic emulsions
available as NEOREZ R-960, NEOREZ R-967, NEOREZ R-9036, and NEOREZ
R-9699, NEOCRYL-A612, NEOCRYL-A6044 from DSM NeoResins, Inc. of
Wilmington, Mass.; aqueous anionic polyurethane dispersions
available as ESSENTIAL CC4520, ESSENTIAL CC4560, ESSENTIAL R4100,
and ESSENTIAL R4188 from Essential Industries, Inc. of Merton,
Wisc.; polyester polyurethane dispersions available as SANCURE 843,
SANCURE 898, and SANCURE 12929 from Lubrizol, Inc. of Cleveland,
Ohio; an aqueous aliphatic self-crosslinking polyurethane
dispersion available as TURBOSET 2025 from Lubrizol, Inc.; and an
aqueous anionic, co-solvent free, aliphatic self-crosslinking
polyurethane dispersion, available as BAYHYDROL PR240 from Bayer
Material Science, LLC of Pittsburgh, Pa.
[0033] Combinations of polymers may be included in the polymer
core. For example, an individual polymer core may comprise two or
more polymers. Further, the composition may contain two types of
polymer cores, each comprising a different type of polymer, for
example, as would be obtained by mixing an acrylic latex and a
polyurethane latex. Typically, the particles in the polymer latexes
are substantially spherical in shape. Typically, the polymer core
comprises one or more water-insoluble polymers, although this is
not a requirement.
[0034] Useful polymer particle sizes include those typical of
latexes and other dispersions or emulsions. Typical polymer
particle sizes are in a range of from about 0.01 micrometers to 100
micrometers, preferably in a range of from 0.01 to 0.2 micrometers,
although this is not a requirement.
[0035] Core-shell particles may typically be prepared from an
alkaline pH stable polymer particle dispersion and an alkaline
spherical silica sol. Typically, such polymer particle dispersions
become unstable upon acidification to pH values of 5 or less.
Accordingly, it is unexpected that by adding the alkaline nonporous
spherical silica sol to the aqueous polymer particle dispersion,
with acidification, results in core-shell particles that are stable
at low pH values.
[0036] To achieve shell formation the nonporous spherical silica
particles should typically be smaller than the polymer core,
although this is not a requirement. For example, the volume average
particle diameter (D50) of the polymer particles may be on the
order of at least 3 times greater than the volume average particle
diameter (D50) of the spherical silica particles. More typically,
the volume average particle diameter of the polymer particles
should typically be on the order of at least 5 times, at least 10
times, or even at least 50 times greater than the volume average
particle diameter of the spherical silica particles. For typical
polymer particle sizes, a weight ratio of the nonporous spherical
silica particles to the one or more polymer particles is in a range
of from 30:70 to 97:3, preferably 80:20 to 95:5, and more
preferably 85:15 to 95:5.
[0037] Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that
during gradual acidification of such a dispersion of polymer
particles (for example, latex particles) and nonporous spherical
silica particles in the aqueous liquid vehicle, the nonporous
spherical silica particles deposit on the surface of the polymer
latex particles, eventually in sufficient quantity to form a shell
(typically at least a monolayer of the spherical silica particles)
that serves to stabilize the dispersion and reduce or prevent
agglomeration and precipitation of the polymer particles. It is
further believed that upon addition of base to raise the pH that
the nonporous spherical silica particles dissociate from the
polymer latex particles and regenerate a mixture of the two types
of particles.
[0038] In addition, to facilitate coating, coating compositions
according to the present disclosure preferably have a pH of less
than 5, more preferably less than 4, and more still preferably less
than 3. To facilitate handling, the coating compositions preferably
have a pH of at least 1, more preferably at least 2. In some
embodiments, for example, those involving an acid sensitive
substrate, it may be preferable to adjust the pH to a value of from
about 5 to about 7.5, although this may tend to disrupt the
core-shell particle structure.
[0039] The compositions may be acidified to the desired pH level
with an acid having a pK.sub.a of less than 5, preferably less than
2.5, and more preferably less than 1. Useful acids include both
organic and inorganic acids such as, for example, oxalic acid,
citric acid, benzoic acid, acetic acid, methoxyacetic acid, formic
acid, propionic acid, benzenesulfonic acid, H.sub.2SO.sub.3,
H.sub.3PO.sub.4, HCl, HBr, HI, HBrO.sub.3, HNO.sub.3, HClO.sub.4,
H.sub.2SO.sub.4, CH.sub.3SO.sub.3H, CF.sub.3SO.sub.3H,
CF.sub.3CO.sub.2H, and CH.sub.3OSO.sub.3H. Preferred acids include
HCl, H.sub.2SO.sub.4, and H.sub.3PO.sub.4. Combinations of organic
and inorganic acids may also be used. Using weaker acids having a
pK.sub.a of greater than 5 may not result in a uniform coating
having the desirable properties such as transmissivity,
cleanability and/or durability.
[0040] Compositions according to the present disclosure may
optionally include at least one surfactant. The term "surfactant"
as used herein describes molecules with hydrophilic (polar) and
hydrophobic (non-polar) segments on the same molecule, and which
are capable of reducing the surface tension of the composition.
Examples of useful surfactants include: anionic surfactants such as
sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate, dioctyl ester of sodium
sulfosuccinic acid, polyethoxylated alkyl (C12) ether sulfate,
ammonium salt, and salts of aliphatic hydrogen sulfates; cationic
surfactants such as alkyldimethylbenzylammonium chlorides and
di-tallowdimethylammonium chloride; nonionic surfactants such as
block copolymers of polyethylene glycol and polypropylene glycol,
polyoxyethylene (7) lauryl ether, polyoxyethylene (9) lauryl ether,
and polyoxyethylene (18) lauryl ether; and amphoteric surfactants
such as N-coco-aminopropionic acid. Silicone and fluorochemical
surfactants such as those available under the trade designation
FLUORAD from 3M Company of St. Paul, Minn., may also be used. If
present, the amount of surfactant typically is in an amount of less
than about 0.1 percent by weight of the composition, for example
between about 0.003 and 0.05 percent by weight of the
composition.
[0041] The composition may also optionally contain an antimicrobial
agent. Many antimicrobial agents are commercially available.
Examples include those available as: Kathon CG or LX available from
Rohm and Haas Co. of Philadelphia, Pa.;
1,3-dimethylol-5,5-dimethylhydantoin; 2-phenoxyethanol;
methyl-p-hydroxybenzoate; propyl-p-hydroxybenzoate;
alkyldimethylbenzylammonium chloride; and benzisothiazolinone.
[0042] Compositions according to the present disclosure may be made
by any suitable mixing technique. One useful technique includes
combining an alkaline polymer latex with an alkaline spherical
silica sol of appropriate particle size, and then adjusting the pH
to the final desired level.
[0043] In some embodiments, the compositions are free of various
nonspherical silica particles, porous silica particles, and added
crosslinkers (e.g., polyaziridines or orthosilicates). Accordingly,
some compositions according to the present disclosure may contain
less than 0.1 weight percent or less than 0.01 weight percent of
nonspherical silica particles, and, if desired, they may be free of
nonspherical silica particles.
[0044] The compositions are generally coated on the optical element
using conventional coating techniques, such as brush, bar, roll,
wipe, curtain, rotogravure, spray, or dip coating techniques. One
method is to wipe the coating formulation on using a suitable woven
or nonwoven cloth, sponge, or foam. Such application materials may
be acid-resistant and may be hydrophilic or hydrophobic in nature,
for example hydrophilic. Another method to control final thickness
and resultant appearance is to apply the coating using any suitable
method and, after allowing the coating composition to dwell on the
optical element for a period of time, then to rinse off excess
composition with a stream of water, while the substrate is still
fully or substantially wetted with the composition. For example,
the coating may be allowed to dwell on the optical element for a
period of time during which some solvent or water evaporates but in
a sufficiently small amount that the coating remains wet, for
example, 3 minutes. Methods such as spraying, brushing, wiping or
allowing the coating composition to dwell followed by rinsing may
be used to apply the composition to the optical element when it is
already installed in a solar energy conversion system. Preferably,
the wet coating thickness is in the range of 0.5 to 300
micrometers, more preferably 1 to 250 micrometers. The wet coating
thickness may optionally be selected to optimize AR performance for
a desired range of wavelengths. The coating composition generally
contains between about 0.1 and 10 weight percent solids.
[0045] The optimal average dry coating thickness is dependent upon
the particular composition that is coated, but in general the
average thickness of the dry composition coating thickness is
between 0.002 to 5 micrometers, preferably 0.005 to 1
micrometer.
[0046] Dry coating layer thicknesses may be higher, as high as a
few microns or up to as much as 100 microns thick, depending on the
application, such as for more durable easy-clean surfaces.
Typically, the mechanical properties may be expected to be improved
when the coating thickness is increased. However, thinner coatings
still provide useful resistance to dust accumulation.
[0047] After coating the surface of the substrate, the resultant
article is heated and optionally subjected to a toughening process
that includes heating at an elevated temperature. The elevated
temperature is generally at least 300.degree. C., for example at
least 400.degree. C. In some embodiments, the heating process
raises the temperature to a temperature equal to at least
500.degree. C., at least 600.degree. C., or at least 700.degree. C.
The temperature may be selected to cause the polymer latex from the
dispersion to at least partially disappear, for example by thermal
degradation. Generally, the substrate is heated for a time up to 30
minutes, up to 20 minutes, up to 10 minutes, or up to 5 minutes.
The substrate surface may then be cooled rapidly, or variation of
heating and cooling may be used to temper the substrate. For
example, the optical element can be heated at a temperature in the
range of 700.degree. C. to 750.degree. C. for about 2 to 5 minutes
followed by rapid cooling.
[0048] Preferably, compositions according to the present disclosure
are stable when stored in the liquid form, e.g., they do not gel,
opacify, form precipitated or agglomerated particulates, or
otherwise deteriorate significantly.
[0049] Objects and advantages of this disclosure are further
illustrated by the following non-limiting examples, but the
particular materials and amounts thereof recited in these examples,
as well as other conditions and details, should not be construed to
unduly limit this disclosure.
EXAMPLES
[0050] Various modifications and alterations to this invention will
become apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from
the scope and spirit of this invention. It should be understood
that this invention is not intended to be unduly limited by the
illustrative embodiments and examples set forth herein and that
such examples and embodiments are presented by way of example only
with the scope of the invention intended to be limited only by the
claims set forth herein as follows.
[0051] These abbreviations are used in the following examples: %T=%
transmission; nm=nanometers, m=meters, g=grams, min=minutes,
hr=hour, mL=milliliter, hr=hour, sec=second, L=liter. All parts,
percentages, or ratios specified in the examples are by weight,
unless specified otherwise. If not otherwise indicated chemicals
are available from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo.
Materials:
Nanoparticles
[0052] Spherical silica nanoparticle dispersions used are
commercially available from the Nalco Company, Naperville, IL under
the trade designations "NALCO 8699" (2-4 nm) "NALCO 1115 (4 nm),
"NALCO 2326" (5 nm), "NALCO 2327" (20 nm), and "NALCO 1050" (20
nm).
[0053] Nonspherical silica nanoparticle dispersion used is
commercially available under the trade designation "SNOWTEX OUP"
from Nissan Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). This
nonspherical nanoparticle dispersion is 15-16 wt. % of acicular
silica, less than 0.03% wt % Na.sub.2O, and water. The particles
are about 9 to 15 nm in diameter and have lengths of 40 to 100 nm.
The suspensions have a viscosity of <20 mPas at 25.degree. C., a
pH of about 2-4, and a specific gravity of about 1.08-1.11 at
20.degree. C.
Resins used for Core of Core-Shell Particles
[0054] Polyurethane resins commercially available under the trade
designations "NEOREZ R-960" and "NEOREZ R9660" and acrylic resin
commercially available under the trade designation "NEOCRYL A612"
were obtained from DSM Neoresins Co., Waalwijk, Netherlands.
Other Additives
[0055] Linear alpha olefin sulfonate surfactant commercially
available under the trade designation "POLYSTEP A-18" was obtained
from Stepan Company (Northfield, Ill.).
Substrates
[0056] PMMA: PMMA (polymethymethacrylate) substrates were
Acrylite.RTM. FF (colorless), 0.318 cm thick, obtained from Evonik
Cyro LLC, Parsippany N.J. These substrates were supplied with
protective masking on both sides, which was removed immediately
prior to coating. PMMA panels are used, for example, as the
sun-facing surface of Fresnel lens panels used in CPV systems.
[0057] Solar Glass: Solar glass substrates were Starphire.RTM.
uncoated Ultra-Clear float glass, 0.318 cm thick, manufactured by
PPG Industries, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pa. Glass panels are used, for
example, as the sun-facing surface of Fresnel lens panels used in
CPV systems.
[0058] GM1: Glass mirror substrate 1 was UltraMirror.TM., 0.318 cm
thick, manufactured by Guardian Industries, Auburn Hills Mich.
[0059] GM2: Glass mirror substrate 2 was Plain Edge Mirror,
purchased as 30.4.times.30.4 cm tiles, 3 mm thick, available in
Home Depot retail outlets as Aura.TM. Home Design Item #P1212-NT,
Home Decor Innovations, Charlotte, N.C.
[0060] "SMF-1100": A polymeric silvered mirror film commercially
available under the trade designation "SMF-1100" from 3M Company,
St. Paul, Minn. For use in Test Method 0-70 Specular reflectance,
the liner was removed from the back of the film and it was
laminated to aliphatic polyester painted aluminum sheets, available
from American Douglas Metals, Atlanta Ga., before testing. SMF-1100
is supplied with a protective mask, which was removed immediately
prior to coating.
[0061] Cool mirror: A cool mirror made by laminating a visible
multilayer optical film and a near infrared multilayer optical film
together using an optically clear adhesive commercially available
under the trade designation "OPTICALLY CLEAR LAMINATING ADHESIVE
PSA 8171" from 3M Company, St. Paul, Minn. to create a multilayer
optical film reflecting light from 380-1350 nm. The preparation of
the individual visible and IR mirrors are described below.
[0062] Visible Mirror: A visible reflective multilayer optical film
was made with first optical layers created from polyethylene
terephthalate (PET) commercially available under the trade
designation "EASTAPAK 7452" from Eastman Chemical of Kingsport,
Tenn., (PET1) and second optical layers created from a copolymer of
75 weight percent methyl methacrylate and 25 weight percent ethyl
acrylate (commercially available from Ineos Acrylics, Inc. of
Memphis, Tenn. under the trade designation "PERSPEX CP63"
(coPMMA1). The PET1 and CoPMMA1 were coextruded through a
multilayer polymer melt manifold to form a stack of 550 optical
layers. The layer thickness profile (layer thickness values) of
this visible light reflector was adjusted to be approximately a
linear profile with the first (thinnest) optical layers adjusted to
have about a 1/4 wave optical thickness (index times physical
thickness) for 370 nm light and progressing to the thickest layers
which were adjusted to be about 1/4 wave thick optical thickness
for 800 nm light. Layer thickness profiles of such films were
adjusted to provide for improved spectral characteristics using the
axial rod apparatus taught in U.S. Pat. No. 6,783,349 (Neavin et
al.) combined with layer profile information obtained with
microscopic techniques.
[0063] In addition to these optical layers, non-optical protective
skin layers (260 micrometers thickness each) made from a miscible
blend of PVDF (polyvinyldenedifluoride, and PMMA
(polymethylmethacrylate, containing 2 wt % of a UV absorber
(commercially available under the trade designation "TINUVIN 1577"
from Ciba Specialty Chemicals, Basel, Switzerland) were coextruded
on either side of the optical stack. This multilayer coextruded
melt stream was cast onto a chilled roll at 12 m per minute
creating a multilayer cast web approximately 1100 micrometers (43.9
mils) thick. The multilayer cast web was then preheated for about
10 sec at 95.degree. C. and uniaxially oriented in the machine
direction at a draw ratio of 3.3:1. The multilayer cast web was
then heated in a tenter oven at 95.degree. C. for about 10 sec
prior to being uniaxially oriented in the transverse direction to a
draw ratio of 3.5:1. The oriented multilayer film was further
heated at 225.degree. C. for 10 sec to increase crystallinity of
the PET layers. The visible light reflective multilayer optical
film was measured with a spectrophotometer ("LAMBDA 950 UV/VIS/NIR
SPECTROPHOTOMETER" from Perkin-Elmer, Inc. of Waltham, Mass.) to
have an average reflectivity of 96.8 percent over a bandwidth of
380-750 nm. The "TINUVIN 1577" UVA in the non-optical skin layers
absorbs light from 300 nm to 380 nm.
[0064] Near IR Mirror: A near infra-red reflective multilayer
optical film was made with first optical layers as described under
"Visible Mirror" except as follows. The layer thickness profile
(layer thickness values) of this near infra-red reflector was
adjusted to be approximately a linear profile with the first
(thinnest) optical layers adjusted to have about a 1/4 wave optical
thickness (index times physical thickness) for 750 nm light and
progressing to the thickest layers which were adjusted to be about
1/4 wave thick optical thickness for 1350 nm light. As described
under "Visible Mirror", in addition to these optical layers,
non-optical skin layers were coextruded but for the Near IR mirror
this multilayer coextruded melt stream was cast onto a chilled roll
at 6 meters per minute creating a multilayer cast web approximately
1800 micrometers (73 mils) thick. The remainder of the processing
steps were identical to that of the "Visible Mirror". The
IR-reflective multilayer optical film had an average reflectivity
of 96.1 percent over a bandwidth of 750-1350 nm.
[0065] Broadband mirror: A broadband mirror was made by vapor
coating aluminum onto the cool mirror under a vacuum of less than 2
Torr.
Preparation of Core-Shell Polyurethane/Silica and Acrylic/Silica
Coating Solutions
[0066] Polyurethane "NEOREZ R-960" latex dispersions and acrylic
resin "NEOCRYL A-612" latex dispersions were diluted with deionized
water to 5.0 wt % and 10 wt % individually. Nalco silica
nanoparticle dispersions "NALCO 8699" (2nm-4 nm, 16.5%), "NALCO
2326" (5 nm), "NALCO 2327" (20 nm), "NALCO 1115" (4 nm, 16.5wt %),
"NALCO 1050" (22 nm, 50 wt %) and Nissan acicular nanoparticle
dispersion "SNOWTEX OUP" (15 wt %) were diluted to 5.0 wt % and 10
wt % with deionized water individually. The diluted polyurethane or
acrylic dispersions were mixed with nanoparticle dispersions
respectively in ratios as described in the Tables. The resulting
mixed dispersions were clear and their solutions were basic with pH
values of 10-11. The mixed solutions were subsequently subjected to
acid titration with 1N HCl, aqueous HNO.sub.3 or other aqueous
inorganic acids to the desired pH values. The mixed dispersion
solutions became slightly cloudy when the solution became acidic.
If "POLYSTEP A-18" was used as indicated in the tables it was added
to the solutions prior to acidification.
[0067] A specific polyurethane/silica blend "PU/Si Blend" FANTASIA
was made mixing 193.2 g "NALCO 2326" and 490.43 g deionized water
in a plastic jar, shaking vigorously for about 10 sec at 20.degree.
C. and then adding 10.24 g "NEOREZ R9660". The mixture was shaken,
2784.6 g deionized water was added and the mixture was shaken
again. The pH was adjusted by adding 80 drops of 35-38% aqueous
hydrochloric acid. After standing for 30 min, the pH was found to
be 2.94. An additional 8 drops of hydrochloric acid was added and
the solution was mixed by inverting and shaking The pH was found to
be 2.81. An additional 14 drops of hydrochloric acid was added to
bring the pH to 2.62. Seven days later, the pH of the batch was
again measured and was found to be 2.64.
Test Methods:
Meyer Bar Coating
[0068] Where indicated in the Table the substrates were coated
using a #6 Meyer bar to provide a dry coating thickness of 100-2000
nm. The coated samples were heated to 80 or 120.degree. C. (as
indicated in the Table) for 5 min to 10 min to affect drying. In
all cases where Meyer bar coating was used the substrate was
corona-treated prior to coating on a corona treater made by Electro
Technic Products Inc., Chicago. Ill. (Model BD-20).
Coating Method "3 min Dwell, Rinse" (3MDR)
[0069] Substrates were used as supplied. Each substrate was placed
on a flat surface, and the coating formulation was applied with a
pipette and spread to within about 3 mm of the edge of each sample,
to produce a thoroughly covered surface (about 2 gm of coating
formulation for 2.99.times.6.99 cm substrates, and about 5 gm of
coating formulation for 10.16.times.15.24 cm substrates). The
formulation was allowed to remain in place for 3 minutes, and then
each sample was rinsed under a gentle stream of deionized water.
The samples were then allowed to air dry for at least 48 hours.
Coating Method "1 min Dwell, Rinse" (1MDR)
[0070] This coating method was the same as "3 Min dwell, rinse"
except that the coating formulation was only in contact with the
sample for 1 minute before being rinsed off with deionized
water.
Dust Treatment and "0-70 Gloss" Measurements for Transparent
Substrates
[0071] Samples of solar glass were cut into pieces 6.99.times.6.99
cm and were prepared by covering the tin side with black tape
(200-38 Yamato Black Vinyl Tape, Yamato International Corp.,
Woodhaven Mich.). The black tape was carefully applied by rolling
the tape onto the glass, so that there were no visible bubbles or
imperfections. There was one seam where parallel pieces of tape
met, and care was taken to avoid this seam when taking gloss
measurements later. The tape provideds a matte black surface for
the gloss measurements, and also maskeds this side of the sample
from dust. Subsequently, the other, untinned side of the solar
glass sample was coated. Three replicates were made for each
coating formulation.
[0072] Samples of PMMA substrate were supplied with a polymer film
mask on both sides. We prepared sample for this test first marking
one mask, so that we were always able to coat the same side of the
PMMA. Then the PMMA (with mask on both sides) was cut into pieces
6.99.times.6.99 cm. The marked mask was removed, and black tape was
applied in the same manner as for solar glass, above. Then the
unmarked mask was removed from the other side of the sample, and
the coating was applied. Three replicates were made for each
coating formulation.
[0073] Subsequent to these procedures preparation of samples for
solar glass and PMMA, the test method was identical.
[0074] After drying (as specified by the coating method), gloss
measurements were made on at three angles and at three locations on
each of the three replicates, for a total of nine measurements at
each angle. Gloss measurements were made with a Model
Micro-TRI-gloss gloss meter, available from BYK-Gardner USA,
Columbia Md. The nine measurements at each angle were averaged, and
the average and standard deviation is reported in the examples.
[0075] The samples were then placed, coated side up, in a plastic
container. The container was just slightly larger than the sample
(about 6-12 mm on each side). A portion of Arizona Test Dust,
Nominal Size 0-70 micron (available from Powder Technology, Inc.,
Burnsville Minn.), approximately 3 gram, was placed on top of the
sample, and a lid was placed on the container. The sample was
gently shaken horizontally from one side to another, for one
minute, with the Arizona test dust moving across the surface of the
sample. Fresh dust was used for each sample piece. After shaking,
the sample was removed from the container, placed in a vertical
position, gently tapped once onto a surface, then turned 90 degrees
and tapped again, and turned and tapped two more times. Gloss
measurements were made again, at three angles in three locations on
each of the 3 replicate samples for each formulation. The nine
measurements at each angle were averaged, and the average and
standard deviation is reported in the examples. Dust Treatment and
"0-70 Specular Reflectance" for Reflective Substrates
[0076] Samples of glass mirror (GM1 or GM2, as indicated in the
examples) or polymeric mirror SMF 1100 (laminated to aluminum),
were cut into pieces 10.16.times.15.24 cm. The sample was then
coated according to the coating methods described. Three replicates
were made for each coating formulation. After drying (as specified
by the coating method), specular reflectance measurements were made
at three locations on each of the three replicates, for a total of
nine measurements for each formulation. Specular reflectance was
measured with a 15 milliradian aperture using a Portable Specular
Reflectometer Model 15 R (available from Devices & Services
Company, Dallas Tex.). The nine measurements were averaged, and the
average and standard deviation is reported in the examples. The
samples were then placed, coated side up, in a plastic container.
The container was just slightly larger than the sample (about 6-12
mm on each side). A portion of Arizona Test Dust, Nominal Size 0-70
micron (available from Powder Technology, Inc., Burnsville Minn.),
approximately 10 gram, was placed on top of the sample, and a lid
was placed on the container. The sample was gently shaken
horizontally from one side to another, for one minute, with the
Arizona test dust moving across the surface of the sample. Fresh
dust was used for each sample piece. After shaking, the sample was
removed from the container, placed in a vertical position, gently
tapped once onto a surface, then turned 90 degrees and tapped
again, and turned and tapped two more times. Specular reflectance
measurement were made again, in three locations on each of the 3
replicate samples for each formulation. The nine measurements were
averaged, and the average and standard deviation is reported in the
examples.
Dust Treatment and Wavelength Averaged Reflection Measurement
[0077] A "LAMBDA 900 UV/VIS/NIR SPECTROPHOTOMETER" from
Perkin-Elmer, Inc. of Waltham, Mass. was used to provide reflection
measurements every 5 nm over the wavelength range indicated in the
examples. Results were presented as corrected average reflectivity
from 400 nm to 1200 nm for KFLEX, Cool Mirror and OLF 2301 and
350-2500 nm for "SMF1100" before and after dirt testing.
[0078] Coated samples , about 5.1.times.5.1 cm, were were placed,
coated side up, in a plastic container. The container was just
slightly larger than the sample (about 6-12 mm on each side). A
portion of Arizona Test Dust, Nominal Size 0-600 micron (available
from Powder Technology, Inc., Burnsville Minn.), approximately 18
gram, was placed on top of the sample, and a lid was placed on the
container. The sample was gently shaken horizontally from one side
to another, for one minute, with the Arizona test dust moving
across the surface of the sample. Fresh dust was used for each
sample piece. After shaking, the sample was removed from the
container, placed in a vertical position, gently tapped once onto a
surface, then turned 90 degrees and tapped again, and turned and
tapped two more times.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 "0-70 "0-70 Specular Specular Solution "0-70
Gloss" "0-70 Gloss" Refl" Refl" Substrate conc (avg/SD/angle)
(avg/SD/angle) (avg/SD) (avg/SD) Example (coat method) Composition
wt % pH Before soiling After soiling Before soiling After soiling
NC PMMA N/A N/A N/A 80.4/0.1/20 12.7/0.2/20 85.9/0.2/60 3.8/0.9/60
90.0/0.3/85 0.6/0.1/85 NC Solar Glass N/A N/A N/A 84.2/0.3/20
70.6/1.6/20 89.4/0.2/60 64.4/1.4/60 90.0/0.3/85 30.4/3.5/85 NC GM1
88.4/0.04 74.6/0.1 NC GM2 N/A N/A N/A 80.8/0.1 73.9/0.6 NC
"SMF1100" N/A N/A N/A 95.5/0.1 5.8/0.2 1 PMMA 9:1 5 2.5 76.9/1.4/20
19.5/3.2/20 NA NA 3MDR "NALCO 84.2/0.8/60 7.2/2.0/60 1050":"NEOREZ
95.5/0.2/85 0.8/0.4/85 R960" 2 "SMF1100" 9:1 5 2.5 NA NA 94.6/0.1
65.3/0.4 3MDR "NALCO 1050":"NEOREZ R960" 3 "SMF1100" 9:1 5 2.5 NA
NA 95.1/0.1 94.4/0.3 3MDR "NALCO 8699":"NEOREZ R960" 4 PMMA "PU/Si
2.6 80.0/0.1/20 78.9/0.4/20 NA NA 3MDR Blend" 86.0/0.3/60
83.7/1.1/60 96.3/0.4/85 89.8/0.6/85 NA NA 6 Solar Glass "PU/Si 2.6
83.3/0.2/20 82.0/1.0/20 NA NA 3MDR Blend" 88.9/0.2/60 86.6/1.4/60
97.3/0.4/85 87.2/2.0/85 7 GM2 "PU/Si 2.6 NA NA 81/0.01 80.2/0.4
3MDR Blend" 80.2/0.5 9 GM1 (9:1) (7:3) 5 2 NA NA 88.3/0.5 88.0/0.4
3MDR "NALCO 8699":"SNOWTEX UP":"NEOREZ R960 10 GM1 (9:1) 2.5 2 NA
NA 88.8/0.2 88.0/0.2 3MDR "NALCO 1115":"NEOREZ R-960" (5% "POLYSTEP
A-18") 11 GM1 (8:2) 2.5 2 NA NA 88.4/0.4 87.7/0.5 3MDR "NALCO
1115":"NEOREZ R960" (5% "POLYSTEP A-18") 12 "SMF1100" (9:1) (7:3) 5
2 NA NA 95.6/0.2 93.1/0.2 3MDR "NALCO 8699":"SNOWTEX UP":"NEOREZ
R960 13 "SMF1100" (9:1) 2.5 2 NA NA 95.9/0.07 43.5/7.8 3MDR "NALCO
1115":"NEOREZ R960" (5% "POLYSTEP A-18") 14 "SMF1100" (8:2) 2.5 2
NA NA 95.8/0.09 92.6/0.9 3MDR "NALCO 1115":"NEOREZ R960" (5%
"POLYSTEP A-18") NOTES: "NA" = not applicable; "NC" = no coating;
3MDR = see "3 minute dwell rinse"; 1MDR = see "1 min dwell
rinse;
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Solution Post coat Wavelength conc heat
Averaged Reflection Example Substrate Composition wt % pH treat
.degree. C. % T NC "SMF1100" N/A N/A N/A N/A 87 NC cool mirror N/A
N/A N/A NA 87 NC broadband N/A N/A N/A N/A 84 mirror cool mirror
9:1 "NALCO 2327":"NEOCRYL 5 1.5 NONE 94 A612" cool mirror 63:27:10
"NALCO 1115":"SNOWTEX 5 2.5 NONE 94 OUP:"NEOREZ R960" cool mirror
40:40:20 "NALCO 1115":"SNOWTEX 5 2.5 NONE 94 OUP":"NEOREZ R960"
cool mirror 63:27:10:1 5 2.5 NONE 94 "NALCO 8699":"1% POLYSTEP
A-18":"SNOWTEX OUP":"NEOREZ R960" cool mirror 63:27:10 "NALCO
8699":"SNOWTEX 5 2.5 NONE 94 OUP":"NEOREZ R960" Broadband mirror
63:27:10 "NALCO 8699":"SNOWTEX 5 2.5 NONE 93 OUP":NEOREZ R960"
NOTES: "NA" = not applicable; "NC" = no coating; All coatings done
with #6 Meyer bar; For wavelengths averaged over in "Wavelength
Averaged Reflection" for specific substrates see ""Wavelength
Averaged Reflection Measurement".
[0079] All patents and publications referred to herein are hereby
incorporated by reference in their entirety. Various modifications
and alterations of this disclosure may be made by those skilled in
the art without departing from the scope and spirit of this
disclosure, and it should be understood that this disclosure is not
to be unduly limited to the illustrative embodiments set forth
herein.
* * * * *