U.S. patent application number 12/966301 was filed with the patent office on 2013-04-18 for training devices for trajectory-based sports.
This patent application is currently assigned to Pillar Vision, Inc.. The applicant listed for this patent is John Carter, Thomas A. Edwards, Alan W. Marty. Invention is credited to John Carter, Thomas A. Edwards, Alan W. Marty.
Application Number | 20130095960 12/966301 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 44143582 |
Filed Date | 2013-04-18 |
United States Patent
Application |
20130095960 |
Kind Code |
A9 |
Marty; Alan W. ; et
al. |
April 18, 2013 |
TRAINING DEVICES FOR TRAJECTORY-BASED SPORTS
Abstract
Methods and apparatus related to improving player performance
for trajectory-based sports are described. In particular, sporting
devices are described that can be utilized to improve player
performance in basketball. The sporting devices can include a
camera-based system configured to capture and analyze the
trajectory of a shot taken by a player. The camera-based system can
be configured to provide feedback that allows a player to optimize
the trajectory mechanics associated with shooting a basketball. In
one embodiment, the camera-based system can be used in conjunction
with a training aid that is attached to a basketball rim. The
training aid can be configured to improve the trajectory mechanics
of individuals utilizing the modified basketball rim to practice
their shooting.
Inventors: |
Marty; Alan W.; (Menlo Park,
CA) ; Edwards; Thomas A.; (Menlo Park, CA) ;
Carter; John; (Elkmont, AL) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
Marty; Alan W.
Edwards; Thomas A.
Carter; John |
Menlo Park
Menlo Park
Elkmont |
CA
CA
AL |
US
US
US |
|
|
Assignee: |
Pillar Vision, Inc.
Menlo Park
CA
|
Prior
Publication: |
|
Document Identifier |
Publication Date |
|
US 20110143868 A1 |
June 16, 2011 |
|
|
Family ID: |
44143582 |
Appl. No.: |
12/966301 |
Filed: |
December 13, 2010 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
12015445 |
Jan 16, 2008 |
|
|
|
12966301 |
|
|
|
|
11508004 |
Aug 21, 2006 |
7854669 |
|
|
12015445 |
|
|
|
|
10242373 |
Sep 11, 2002 |
7094164 |
|
|
11508004 |
|
|
|
|
12127744 |
May 27, 2008 |
|
|
|
10242373 |
|
|
|
|
61286474 |
Dec 15, 2009 |
|
|
|
60323029 |
Sep 12, 2001 |
|
|
|
60348057 |
Jan 11, 2002 |
|
|
|
60395875 |
Jul 12, 2002 |
|
|
|
60880773 |
Jan 16, 2007 |
|
|
|
60931950 |
May 24, 2007 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
473/447 |
Current CPC
Class: |
A63B 69/3658 20130101;
G06T 2207/30241 20130101; A63B 2220/89 20130101; A63B 24/0062
20130101; A63B 24/0075 20130101; A63B 2220/806 20130101; G06T 7/70
20170101; A63B 2220/836 20130101; A63B 69/0071 20130101; A63B
2102/32 20151001; A63B 2220/807 20130101; A63B 2071/0625 20130101;
A63B 2225/20 20130101; G06T 2207/30224 20130101; A63B 2024/0037
20130101; A63B 2024/0053 20130101; A63B 2024/0078 20130101; A63B
71/0669 20130101; A63B 2024/0025 20130101; A63B 2063/086 20130101;
G06T 7/20 20130101; A63B 24/0021 20130101; A63B 63/083 20130101;
A63B 2220/80 20130101; A63B 2220/833 20130101; A63B 2024/0034
20130101; A63B 2225/50 20130101; A63B 2243/0037 20130101; A63B
2024/0028 20130101; A63B 2024/0056 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
473/447 |
International
Class: |
A63B 69/00 20060101
A63B069/00 |
Claims
1. A system for analyzing a trajectory of a basketball, the device
comprising: one or more cameras for recording video frame data used
to characterize a trajectory of a basketball shot by a human; a
logic device designed or configured to i) receive the video frame
data, ii) generate trajectory parameters that characterize one or
more states of the basketball along its trajectory and iii)
generate feedback information using the trajectory parameters; and
one or more feedback output mechanisms for providing the feedback
information to the human wherein the feedback information is
related to one or more of the following trajectory parameters: 1)
an angle of the trajectory relative to a plane of a basketball hoop
when the basketball is proximate to the basketball hoop, 2) a point
on the trajectory relative to a fixed point within the plane of the
basketball hoop when the basketball is proximate to the basketball
hoop.
2. The system of claim 1 wherein the fixed point is a desired
target location within the plane of the basketball hoop.
3. The system of claim 2 wherein the desired target location is
within a perimeter of the basketball hoop and is a distance from a
geometric center of the hoop.
4. The system of claim 1 wherein the system is configured to
provide feedback information that allows the human to learn to
shoot a shot toward the desired target location.
5. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more cameras is
located on a portable device.
6. The system of claim 1, where portable device is a cell-phone or
laptop.
7. The system of claim 6, wherein software is downloaded to the
portable device to allow the device to perform as a machine vision
system.
8. A training device for use in basketball, said training device
comprising: a mechanism designed to be coupled to a basketball hoop
said mechanism configured to cause shots proximate to a front of
the basketball hoop that pass through the hoop without the
mechanism installed to be deflected away from the basketball hoop
to encourage a user to aim their shots deeper in the basketball rim
behind the geometric center of the hoop.
9. The training device of claim 8, wherein the mechanism extends
around a portion of the circumference of basketball hoop.
10. The training device of claim 8, wherein the mechanism is
configured to allow shots that clear the mechanism to deflect to
deflect off a back portion of the basketball rim and pass through
the hoop.
11. A system for analyzing a trajectory of a basketball, the device
comprising: a first device including: a) one or more cameras for
recording video frame data used to characterize a trajectory of a
basketball shot by a human; b) a logic device designed or
configured to i) receive the video frame data, ii) generate
trajectory parameters that characterize one or more states of the
basketball along its trajectory and iii) generate feedback
information using the trajectory parameters; c) one or more
feedback output mechanisms for providing the feedback information
to the human wherein the feedback information is related to one or
more of the following trajectory parameters: 1) an angle of the
trajectory relative to a plane of a basketball hoop when the
basketball is proximate to the basketball hoop, 2) a point on the
trajectory relative to a fixed point within the plane of the
basketball hoop when the basketball is proximate to the basketball
hoop and d) a first wireless interface a second device including a)
a video display, b) a storage device for storing data generated by
the first device, c) a second wireless interface configured to
communicate with the first device via the first wireless interface
and to upload data to a remote device separate from the first
device.
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C.
.sctn.119(e) from co-pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application
No. 61/286,474, filed Dec. 15, 2010, titled "TRAINING DEVICES FOR
TRAJECTORY-BASED SPORTS," which is incorporated by reference and
for all purpose.
[0002] This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser.
No. 12/127,744, filed May 27, 2008, by Marty, et al, title,
"Stereoscopic Image Capture with Performance Outcome Prediction in
Sporting Environments," which is incorporated in its entirety and
for all purposes.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0003] 1. Field of the Invention
[0004] The present invention relates generally to devices and
systems for sports training and entertainment and more specifically
to a trajectory detection and feed back systems and outcome
prediction in sporting environments.
[0005] 2. Description of the Related Art
[0006] In sports, player performance is primarily results based. A
player is said to be a good player when they produce a consistent
result over some range of circumstances. For instance, a
professional basketball player might be considered good when on
average they produce a certain number of points per game, rebounds,
assists, etc., over the course of a season. A player is said to be
a great player when they produce a consistent result in more
extreme circumstances, such as, in a championship or play-off game
as well as providing good performances on average at other times.
For example, some basketball players are known for being able to
"take over a game" or impose their will on another team in certain
situations and are considered to be great for this ability.
[0007] The difference between a great and a good player is often
described as some intangible quality, such as their will or drive
to succeed. Sometimes even when a player produces what appears to
be a result consistent with a great player, it is argued that the
player is not really great and their performance is a result of
circumstances, such as having a really great supporting team.
Further, in general, it is often difficult, in a quantifiable
manner, to classify and distinguish the performances between
players of varying abilities or to distinguish between varying
performances by the same player, in regards to answering the
questions, such as, why is player 1 good while player 2 is average,
why does the performance of a player vary so much, what is a
quantifiable different between two performances?
[0008] The intangible nature of describing in a quantifiable manner
the differences between performances in a sporting environment can
be frustrating to players, coaches, broadcasters and spectators
alike. Players want to be able identify in a quantifiable manner
why their own performances vary from one to another or how their
performance varies from a better player so that they can improve
their performance. Coaches in team and individual sports want this
information so that they can help their players improve. In team
sports, coaches may want this information as a way to exploit
weaknesses possessed by opposing players. Broadcasters and
spectators may want this information because it can add to the
entertainment value of watching a sport. Further, spectators are
also participants in many of the sports they watch, and thus the
spectators may want to be able to quantify and compare their own
performances as well as compare their performance to the
performances of professional players or other participants of the
sport in general.
[0009] In view of the preceding paragraphs, methods and apparatus
are described in the following paragraphs for determining
quantifiable differences between performances in a sporting
environment that are not strictly results based. The methods and
apparatus may include but are not limited to methods and apparatus
related to 1) capturing a performance in a sporting environment, 2)
analyzing a performance, 3) comparing performances, 4) presenting
results obtained from any analyses or comparisons, 5) archiving
captured performances, analyses and comparisons and 6) providing
simulations of performances using captured and analyzed performance
data.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0010] The invention will be readily understood by the following
detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings,
wherein like reference numerals designate like structural elements,
and in which:
[0011] FIGS. 1A-1C are examples of graphic output formats related
to the evaluation of a basketball trajectory performance including
outcome prediction.
[0012] FIG. 2 shows a top view of a basketball rim, backboard and
net including the geometric center of the hoop and the geometric
center of the make/miss zone.
[0013] FIG. 3A is plot of predicted shooting percentage for shots
aimed at various locations within a basket ball rim.
[0014] FIGS. 3B-3E show trajectories drawn through the center of a
basketball for shots with entry angles that vary between 43 and 57
degrees respectively.
[0015] FIG. 3F shows make/miss zones and shot locations within the
make/miss zone for the various shots shown in FIGS. 3B-3E.
[0016] FIGS. 3G and 3H show entry angle and shot location data
measured for 1000 players.
[0017] FIG. 4 shows top views of a backboard, basketball rim
structure coupled to the backboard and net where a training aid is
attached to the rim and a cross section of the training aid.
[0018] FIG. 5 is a diagram of a trajectory capture and feedback
scenario employing a trajectory detection and feedback system.
[0019] FIG. 6 is a diagram of trajectory capture scenario employing
various embodiments of a trajectory detection and feedback
system.
[0020] FIG. 7A is an illustration of coordinate system for
determining a make/miss zone for basketball.
[0021] FIG. 7B is a side view of basketball shot passing through
hoop at location of longest possible swish.
[0022] FIG. 7C is a side view of basketball shot passing through
hoop at location of shortest possible swish.
[0023] FIG. 8 is an illustration of the swish zone for a 45-degree
hoop entry angle.
[0024] FIG. 9 is an illustration of the geometry of rim-in shot off
the back rim.
[0025] FIG. 10A is a plot of a make zone for a hoop entry angle of
45 degrees.
[0026] FIG. 10B is a plot of the make zone for a hoop entry angle
of 25 degrees.
[0027] FIG. 11 is a rear view of an experimental set-up for
generating basketball trajectories.
[0028] FIG. 12 is a graph of shooting percentage as a function hoop
entry angle generated both experimentally and analytically.
[0029] FIG. 13 shows standard deviations for launch angle and
launch velocity as a function of entry angle for a number of
experimentally generated shots and a percentage of shots made for
various entry angles.
[0030] FIG. 14 is a block diagram of an embodiment of a trajectory
detection and analysis system.
[0031] FIGS. 15A-15C are perspective drawings of one embodiment of
a trajectory detection and analysis system.
[0032] FIG. 16 is an information flow diagram of an embodiment for
of a trajectory detection and analysis system.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF SELECTED EMBODIMENTS
[0033] Reference will now be made in detail to representative
embodiments illustrated in the accompanying drawings. It should be
understood that the following descriptions are not intended to
limit the embodiments to one preferred embodiment. To the contrary,
it is intended to cover alternatives, modifications, and
equivalents as can be included within the spirit and scope of the
described embodiments as defined by the appended claims.
[0034] The following figures, 1A, 1B and 1C show the effect of the
entry angle of the shot on the size of the make/miss zone. In FIG.
1A, the success criterion that leads to make miss/zones, 302a-302e,
include shots that hit the rim and went in as well as shots that
didn't hit the rim and went in. In FIG. 1B, the success criterion
that leads to make/miss zones, 303a-303e, include only shots that
don't hit the rim. For 302a-302e and 303a-303e, any shot where the
center of the basketball passes through the make zone as it enter
the basketball hoop is predicted to be a made shot, which is
graphically represented in FIGS. 1A, 1B and 1C. As is shown in the
following section, "Calculating Basketball Trajectory Dynamics:
Basketball Swish/Make Analysis," the prediction methodology is
validated experimentally but may not be 100% accurate.
[0035] FIGS. 1A, 1B and 1C provide examples graphic output formats
related to the evaluation of a basketball trajectory performance
for embodiments described herein. The make or miss zones for any
entry angle may be generated, but in FIGS. 1A and 1B increments of
five degrees starting at 30 degrees are shown. The location of
shots in the make/miss zones for entry angles of 50, 45, 40, 35 and
30 are shown in FIGS. 1A and 1B. In FIG. 1C, make/miss zones for
entry angles of 50, 45, 40 and 35 degrees are shown. In FIG. 1A,
the outline of the area defining the make/miss zone is shown. This
make/miss zone includes shot that went in the hoop after hitting
the rim and shots that went in the hoop without touching the rim.
The outline of each of the make/miss zone is drawn in the plane
defining a top of a basketball hoop.
[0036] In FIG. 1B, the outline of the area of the make/miss zone,
which includes only shots that went through the hoop with out
touching the rim are shown. The make/miss zone is plotted for shots
with entry angles of 50, 45, 40 and 35 degrees. Again, the outlines
of the make/miss zones are drawn in the plane defining a top of a
basketball hoop. In FIG. 1B, a graphical format showing the rim
size from the point of view of the basketball is shown. As the
entry angle of the basketball as it approaches the hoop decreases,
the hoop appears smaller to the basketball. The entry angle
decreasing relates to a basketball shot with a decreasing arc.
Drawing the hoop from the perspective of the basketball is a way to
graphically indicate that as the arc of the shot decreases, there
is less room for error in shooting the ball in regards to placement
of the ball between the front and the back of the rim.
[0037] At larger entry angles, the hoop appears larger to the
basketball. Nevertheless, it has been observed the probability of
making a shot decreases when the arc of the shot becomes too large.
The probability of making a shot decreases for higher arced shots
because changes in entry angle to the hoop at larger entry angles,
which are associated with higher arced shots, affects the position
of the ball as it enters the hoop more than changes in entry angle
at lower entry angles associated with lower arced shots. This
effect is illustrated and described in more detail with respect to
FIGS. 3B-3F.
[0038] In FIG. 1C, the make zone is shown plotted within the center
of the basketball hoop. The make zone is generated analytically and
is plotted for different entry angles into the hoop. Any trajectory
where the center of the basketball passes outside of the make zone,
i.e., the area outside the make zone but within the basketball hoop
will be a missed shot. Of course, shots outside of the basketball
hoop will be a missed shot as well.
[0039] In FIG. 1C, the make zone is divided into two parts, a swish
zone and a BRAD zone. The BRAD zone refers to shots where the
basketball hits the Back of the Rim And goes Down through the
basketball hoop. The Swish zone refers to shots that pass through
the basketball hoop without hitting the rim. It can be seen in FIG.
1C, as the trajectory of the basketball flattens, i.e., the entry
angle decreases, the rim becomes more important for making the
shot. The rim becomes more important because as the entry angle
decreases the percentage of made shots involving the rim increases.
At higher entry angles, such as 50 degrees, swish shots are a much
higher percentage of the made shots as compared to the made shots
at the lower entry angles.
[0040] In FIGS. 3B-3F, a number of shot trajectories are simulated
where all of the initial conditions are held constant accept for
the arc of the shot. Each of the shots is a free throw released at
a height of 7 feet. FIG. 3B shows shots with trajectories that
enter the basket from 43-47 degrees, respectively. FIG. 3C shows
shots with trajectories that enter the basket from 48-52 degrees,
respectively. FIG. 3D shows shots with trajectories that enter the
basket from 53-57 degrees, respectively. FIG. 3E shows the portion
of the trajectories near the basket for each of the shots between
43 and 57 degrees shown in FIGS. 3B-3D.
[0041] In the figures, the initial shot conditions are selected
that lead to shots with entry angles from 43-57 degrees. Fifteen
shots are shown where the entry angle of the shots increases by one
degree increments from 43 to 57 degrees. Trajectories are drawn
through the center of the basketball. The trajectories start at the
point where the shot is launch and end where the trajectory
intersects the plane defined by the basketball rim. As the entry
angle of the shots increase the arc of each shot also
increases.
[0042] A comparison can be made between trajectories with entry
angles that differ by one degree. For instance, a comparison can be
made between the trajectories with entry angles of 44 and 45
degrees, 45 and 46 degrees, 54 and 55 degrees and 55 and 56
degrees, respectively. It can be seen in the figures that the
distance between the locations at which the trajectories intersect
the basketball rim is much greater between the 54, 55 and 56 degree
shots as compared to the 44, 45 and 46 degree shots. Thus, if a
first player tries to shoot shots with an average arc of 55 degrees
and a second player tries to shoot shots with an average arc of 45
degrees, an error in the entry angle by the first player has a much
greater effect on location at which the trajectory of the shot
intersects the plane of the basketball rim than the second player.
Entry angle errors for the first player trying to shoot at a 55
degree entry angle is much more likely to lead to a missed shot
than entry angle errors for the player trying to shoot an arc of 45
degrees. This effect is further illustrated with respect to FIG.
3F.
[0043] FIG. 3F shows the locations at which the 43-47 degree
trajectories intersect the plane of the basket ball rim where the
locations are plotted on the make/miss zone for 45 degrees, the
locations at which the 48-52 degree trajectories intersect the
plane of the basketball rim, where the trajectories are plotted on
the make/miss zone for 50 degrees and the locations at which the
trajectories of the 53-57 degree trajectories intersect the plan of
the basketball rim, where the locations are plotted on the on the
make/miss zone for 55 degrees. It can be seen in FIG. 3F that the
make/miss zone at 55 degrees is greater in area than the make/miss
zone at 50 or 45 degrees. However, it can also be seen in the
figure that for shots with entry angles near 55 degrees the effect
of entry angle on shot location within the hoop is much greater
than for shots with entry angles near 45 degrees. For the shots
near 55 degrees, the changes in entry angle lead to shots falling
outside the make/miss zone while at 45 degrees the changes in entry
angle do not lead to shots falling outside of the make/miss zone.
Thus, trying to shoot a shot with a higher entry angle, such as 55
degrees, is going to be more difficult on average to make than
trying to shoot a shot with a lower entry angle, such as a 45
degree entry angle. This result is consistent with experimental
data and theoretical predictions shown in FIGS. 12 and 13, which
shows shooting percentage decreasing at higher shot entry
angles.
[0044] The shape of the make/miss zone can vary depending on the
release point of the shot. FIG. 2 shows a top view of a basketball
rim, backboard and net including the geometric center of the hoop
and the geometric center of the make/miss zone. Because of back
board/rim rebound effects, for shots released from an angle, such
as either side of a straight-on shot as shown in the FIG. 2, the
make/miss zone may not be symmetric around a line drawn from the
shot location through the geometric center of the hoop, as it is
for the straight on shots shown in FIG. 1A. Nevertheless, the
geometric center of the make/miss zone may tend to move to the
right of its location, which is shown for a straight on shot, for
shots released from a location to the left of a straight on shot
and the geometric center of the make/miss zone may tend to move to
the left for shots released from a location to the right of a
straight on shot.
[0045] Returning to FIG. 1A, the geometric center of the hoop
within the area of the make/miss zone is shown. The make/miss zone
includes shots that hit the rim in and go in as well as shots that
pass through without touching the rim. The shot release point is
for a shot released directly in front of the basketball hoop. In
FIG. 1A, it can be seen that the geometric center of the hoop is
not the geometric center of the make/miss zone. The geometric
center of the make/miss zone is behind or deeper in the basket than
the geometric center of the hoop. At an optimal shooting angle of
about 43 degrees for a straight-on shot, the geometric center of
the make/miss zone is about 2 inches behind the geometric center of
the hoop.
[0046] The difference between the location of the geometric center
of the hoop and geometric center of the make/miss zone suggests
that it may be beneficial to shoot the ball deeper in the basket
behind the geometric center of the basket. It can be seen in FIG.
1A that the margin of error a shot aimed toward the center of the
hoop is greater if the shot is long as opposed to if the shot is
short. A more equal margin of error for short and long shots can be
obtained when the shot is aimed deeper, i.e., behind the geometric
center of the hoop.
[0047] As an example, at 30 degrees entry angle, the geometric
center of the hoop is approximately at the boundary of the
make/miss zone. Thus, a shot aimed toward the center of the hoop
will miss if a shooting error results in the shot being short at
all or slightly off-center. If the shooting error results in the
shot being long, then margin of error exists for the shot to still
go in. The margin of error is much greater for the long shot than
for the short shot. If the shot is aimed behind geometric center of
the hoop, such as toward the geometric center of the make/miss
zone, the shooting error margins for long and short shots are more
equally balanced.
[0048] It is often observed that as a player gets tired over the
course of a game, their shots are often short. If one player is
trained to shoot deeper in the basket behind the geometric center
of the hoop and another player is trained to shoot at the geometric
center of the hoop, then as both players tire and their shots are
more likely to go shorter, the player trained to shoot deeper in
the basket may have an advantage over the player trained to shoot
at the geometric hoop center. The player that is trained to shoot
deeper in the basket may have an advantage over the other player
because the player trained to shoot deeper would have a greater
margin of error on their short shots than the player trained to
shoot at the geometric center of hoop.
[0049] The strategy above assumes that for a given player the odds
of making a shooting error, such as `long or short` and `left or
right,` are equally likely for a given player. With an equal
distribution among the probability of making a shooting error, it
may be beneficial to balance the error margins for each type of
shooting error that can occur. For instance, the player has a
similar margin of error for a shooting error that results in the
shot being short of its intended target or for a shooting error
that results in the shot being past its intended target, i.e.,
long. If it were demonstrated for a particular player that their
shooting errors were biased in a particular manner, such as the
player was much more likely overshoot the target they were aiming
for rather than undershoot their shot, it might be more
advantageous to utilize another shooting strategy for this type of
player.
[0050] As an example of a shooting strategy for a player with an
unequal shooting error distribution, for a player that always tends
to shoot their shots long, it may be beneficial to implement a
shooting strategy that favors increasing the error margins for long
shots as opposed to short shots, such as training to aim their
shots more towards the center of the hoop. Conversely, if a player
tended to make more shooting errors short, than for this type of
player it may be advantageous to devise a shooting strategy where
they are trained to aim deeper in the basket as compared to a
player equally likely to miss a shot short or a long shot.
Similarly, a player that tends to have more shooting errors to the
left as opposed to shooting errors to the right might gain an
advantage if they trained to aim for a point in the basket that is
slightly right of the center of the hoop rather than straight
on.
[0051] Besides player variations, a likely hood of a shooting error
may be affected by shooting physics. As described above, it takes
more force to shoot a shot longer than a shot shorter. As the force
used to generate a shot increases, velocity errors can become more
important. Thus, for a given target location within the hoop, the
error distribution for long shots, i.e., past the target location,
as a function of the distance from the target location may differ
with distance differently than short shots as a function of
distance from the target location. For instance, the error rate as
a function of distance for long shots may increase faster than the
error rate as a function of distance for short shots because of the
increasing forces associated with long shots. Based upon the error
distribution, a target location can be selected that optimizes
their chance of making a shot. As described above, this target
location may be different than the geometric center of the hoop and
may be closer to the geometric center of the make/miss zone but may
not be exactly equal to the geometric center of the make/miss
zone.
[0052] In general, shooting strategies can be developed for players
in general or tailored to an individual player. A general shooting
strategy can be developed based on an error analysis of the types
of errors players as a group tend to make and then a shooting
location within the hoop, which accounts for the make/miss zone,
can be tailored that optimizes their chances of making shots based
upon an error distribution of shooting errors that the group is
likely to make. The optimal target location within the hoop that
maximizes their chances of making the shot may be different than
the geometric center of the hoop. For instance, the optimal target
location may be closer to the geometric center of the make/miss
zone, which tends to be deeper in the basket, i.e., behind the
geometric center of the hoop. In addition, if because of a player's
shooting habits or particular physique, i.e., such as being left
handed or right handed, the player's tendency to make shooting
errors is biased in a particular direction, then a shooting
strategy including a shooting target location can be developed that
accounts for the particular shooting errors of the individual.
These shooting errors may be determined from analysis of shot data
gathered using the measuring devices described with respect FIGS.
5-16.
[0053] FIG. 3A shows a prediction of shooting percentage as a
function of the distance from the front of the rim of the
basketball hoop for a basketball rim with an 18 inch diameter. The
prediction methodology is described in more detail with respect to
FIGS. 8-13. In FIG. 3A, the shooting percentage peaks at a distance
of about 11 inches from the front of the rim (the front of the rim
is 0 inches), which is about two inches behind the center of the
hoop at 9 inches. FIGS. 3G and 3H show entry angle and rim location
data gathered using embodiments of the devices described herein for
about 1000 players.
[0054] FIG. 3G shows a distribution of the average shot entry angle
for the 1000 players. As discussed herein, an optimum entry angle
is about 43 degrees. FIG. 3G illustrates that a large majority of
players shoot a shot with a sub-optimal arc. FIG. 3H shows a
location in the basket measure from the front of the rim as a
function of the entry angle. As described above, 11 inches in the
basket optimizes a predicted shooting percentage. FIG. 3H
illustrates that most players shoot shots with trajectories that
are not aimed at an optimal location within the basketball rim.
This data indicates a large majority of players could benefit from
the training methodologies and devices described herein.
[0055] FIG. 4 shows top views of a backboard, basketball rim
structure coupled to the backboard and net where a training aid is
attached to the rim and a cross section of the training aid. A
training aid can be devised that encourages a shot target location
that differs from the geometric center of hoop. The training aid
can extend around some portion of the perimeter of the hoop as
shown in the figure. The distance that the training aid extends
around the perimeter can be selected to allow training for shots
other than straight on shots while also allowing for rim effects
for long shots where the shot hits the back of the rim and goes in.
The training aid can be coupled to the rim and backboard structure
in some manner.
[0056] A possible triangular cross section for the training aid is
shown in the figure. The height of the triangle can be selected to
encourage a player to shoot deeper in the basketball, such as 2-3
inches behind the geometric center of the hoop. Typically, the
height of the training aid will be less than 3 inches and possibly
2-2.5 inches above the top height of the rim. The height of the
training aid in some embodiments may be lower. For instance,
cross-section of the training aid could be more rectangular with
the top of the training aid proximate to the top of the rim. The
training aid can encourage players to shoot deeper because some
shots that would normally be made will be deflected by the training
aid.
[0057] As described with respect to FIG. 1C, shots that hit the rim
and go in can be a large percentage of the made shots for a given
entry angle. For example, as shown in FIG. 1C, shots that hit the
back of the rim and go in, can compose a large fraction of the made
shots for a particular entry angle. As shown in FIG. 1C, rim
effects become more important at lower entry angles. Thus, In view
of FIG. 1C, it may be desirable to consider rim effects when
designing a training aid that encourages a player to shoot deeper
in the basket.
[0058] When a shot approaches the basketball hoop along a
particular trajectory, it can pass over the front of the rim and
then interact with the back of the rim. As described above, a
training aid can be developed that encourages a player to shoot
deeper in the basketball by adding a hoop insert that blocks shots
that just pass over the front the rim along its trajectory within
some margin to encourage shots deeper in the basket. For instance,
an insert can be designed that works for straight-on shots, i.e., a
shot vector that is perpendicular to the backboard. This training
aid can extend around some portion of the front of the rim. Since
the insert only extends around the front portion of the rim, the
back of the rim is unaffected and rim effects can be correctly
reproduced.
[0059] To allow for non-straight on shots, the insert can be
extended around perimeter of the rim. However, if the insert is
extended too far, the insert can interfere with rim effects related
to the back part of the rim associated with the shot vector. For
instance, if the an insert extended around the front half of a
basketball hoop, then for a shot from one side of the hoop, i.e.,
with a vector parallel to the back board, the insert can block
shots that just cleared the front rim, which is desired, but can
also block shots that would hit the back of the rim and go-in,
which is not desired. In one embodiment, an insert can be provided
that covers about 90-110 degree arc of the rim, i.e, about one
quadrant of the basketball hoop. The insert can extend from about
or slightly past the front of the rim to one side of the rim to
allow for straight on shots as well as for shots from the side of
the rim from one side of the basket only.
[0060] In another embodiment, the rim insert could be placed on a
track, such that its position can be rotated around the rim. If a
motor is provided, this rotation can be provided through actuation
of the motor. Else, the rotation could be performed manually, such
as by using a pole. As an example, an insert that spanned
proximately a quarter of the hoop could be rotatable from one side
of the hoop to another side of the hoop. To allow for shots from
one side of the hoop, the insert would be rotated to a first
position. To allow for shots from opposite side of the hoop, the
insert can be rotated to the opposite side of the hoop by sliding
it around the rim.
[0061] In yet another embodiment, if the insert can include parts
that are rigid or flexible depending on the direction of the shot.
For example, an insert can be configured that spans across the
front-half of the rim. For a shot from one side of the basket, the
part proximate to the front of the rim can be rigid, while the part
proximate to the back of the rim can be flexible so as not to
prevent the ball from hitting the back rim and going in. For a shot
from the other side of the basket, the part that was previously
flexible can be designed to be rigid as it is now the front of the
rim for this shot and the part that was previously rigid can be
flexible as it now the back of the rim for this shot. In one
embodiment, the flexibility and rigidity of the insert can be
varied using sensors and mechanical actuators.
[0062] The training aid can be tailored to shooting errors
associated with a particular player, such that it encourages a
shooting target location that is optimized for the shooting errors
of an individual. As an example, the training aid may be asymmetric
around a line drawn between a shot location and the center of the
hoop to encourage a shot target location that is left or right of
this line for a straight on shot. As described above, this may be
advantageous if the player shooting errors are biased to the left
or right of this line in some manner. For instance, for a player
that tends to make more shooting errors to the left as opposed to
the right, the training aid may extend deeper into the rim on left
side of the hoop as opposed to the right to encourage the player to
target a shot location that is shifted to right of center for a
straight on shot. Shooting slightly to the right of the center of
the hoop may better accommodate the player's tendency to the make
more shooting errors to the left.
[0063] A trajectory capture and feedback system, as is described in
the following figures, can also be used to help a player train to
shoot to a target location in the hoop that differs from the
geometric center of the hoop. This system could be used a training
device as described with respect to FIG. 5 or separately from the
training device. The feedback information could be provided
relative to a selected target location within the hoop, such as
`short or long,` left or right' or combinations thereof. The
feedback information could also be combined with other trajectory
information, such as entry angle feedback. For instance,
combination feedback could include short 43 or long 43 to indicate
the entry angle was 43 degrees but the shot entered the basket
short or long of the target location.
[0064] FIG. 5 is a diagram of a trajectory capture and feedback
scenario employing a trajectory detection and feedback system of
the present invention. In the embodiment shown in the figure, a
trajectory detection, analysis and feedback system 100 uses a
machine vision system with a single camera 118 to detect and to
analyze a trajectory 102 of a basketball 109 shot towards the
basketball hoop 103 by the shooter 112. The camera 118 may record
visible light.
[0065] The basketball hoop 103 may be mounted to a backboard 151
with a support system to hold it up, such as a pole anchored into
the ground, a support anchored into a wall or supports suspended
from a ceiling. The basketball hoop 103 may be of a standard height
and the basketball may be a standard men's size basketball.
However, trajectories for a basketball of a different size, such as
a women's ball, shot at basketball hoop of varying heights may also
be detected and analyzed with the present invention.
[0066] The camera 118 in the machine vision system records physical
information within a detection volume 110. The physical information
that is recorded is images of objects at a particular time in the
detection volume 110. The images recorded at a particular time may
be stored as a video frame 106. The camera 118 may capture images
of the basketball 109 as it moves in trajectory plane 104 as well
as images of other secondary objects. The secondary objects may be
closer to the camera than the basketball 109 (i.e., between the
camera 118 and the trajectory plane 104) or the secondary objects
may be farther away from the camera than the basketball 109 (i.e.,
beyond the trajectory plane 104). The machine vision system may
utilize software to distinguish between the movement of secondary
objects that may be detected and the movement of the basketball
109.
[0067] The trajectory detection system 100 may be set-up in a
playing area where basketball is normally played, such as a
basketball court with playing surface 119 located in gymnasium or
arena. The system 100 may be positioned on the side of court and
remotely detect the trajectories of the shots by shooter 112 using
the machine vision system. Thus, the shooter 112 and defender 114
may engage in any of their normal activities on the playing surface
119 without any interference from the detection system 100. In the
figure, the shooter 112 is guarded by a defender 114. However, the
system 100 may also be used when the shooter 112 is unguarded.
[0068] With a machine vision system that uses a single camera 118,
the locations where the trajectory 102 may be accurately analyzed
may be limited. In one embodiment, with the set-up of the
trajectory detection system 100 on the side of playing surface 119,
accurate analysis may require that the shooter 112 shoot from
within the active area 108. In this alignment, the trajectory plane
104 may be nearly normal to the basketball backboard 151. Although,
the system 100 may accurately detect and analyze trajectories where
the angle between the trajectory plane 104 and the normal to the
backboard 151 is within a few degrees. The active area 108 may be
different for different systems 100. Further, the present invention
is not limited to machine vision systems for detecting the
trajectory of the basketball and other sensor systems may allow for
different active areas.
[0069] The trajectory system 100 may be set-up in different
locations around the playing surface 119. By moving the system 100,
the active area 108 may be changed. For instance, the trajectory
detection may be positioned behind the backboard 151. For this
set-up, the active area 108 may be a rectangular area on the
playing surface 119 that is parallel to the backboard 151.
[0070] Although the active area 108 may be limited with a single
camera 118 in a machine vision system, an advantage of the system
is it simple to set-up and to operate. With some multiple camera
machine vision systems, the active area may be larger than with a
single camera system. However, the set-up and calibration of a
multi-camera system may be more time consuming as compared to a
single camera system because a known alignment of the cameras
relatively to one another and relative to the tracked object is
needed to process the data.
[0071] The single camera system 100 is simple enough to be capable
of autonomous set-up and operation with minimal user input. The
system may autonomously calibrate itself using known distance
markers, such as the height of the basketball hoop or a distance to
a free throw line or 3-point arc, which may be captured in video
frame data. In another embodiment, a user may be required to stand
within the detection zone of the system, holding a basketball or
other object, at a fixed distance from the camera and at a fixed
height. After the system is calibrated, a user may use the system
100 to practice without the help of an additional operator to run
to the system 100. The system 100 may accept voice commands
allowing the user to adjust the operation of the system from a
distance.
[0072] To analyze a trajectory 102 of the basketball 109, the
camera 118 may record a sequence of video frames in the detection
volume 110 at different times. The number of frames recorded by the
camera over a give time period, such as the duration of the ball's
trajectory 102, may vary according to the refresh rate of camera
118. The captured video frames may show a sequence of states of the
basketball 109 at different times along its trajectory 102. For
instance, the camera 118 may capture 1) an initial state 105 of the
trajectory shortly after the ball leaves the shooter's hand, 2) a
number of states along the trajectory 102, such as 120, 121, 122
and 123 at times t1, t2, t3 and t4 and 3) a termination point 107
in the basketball hoop 103. Although not shown, the system may also
be used to generate parameters for characterizing the trajectory of
missed shots relating to the rebound flight path, such as but not
limited to a rebound height, rebound angle, rebound velocity.
[0073] The sequence of captured video frames may be converted to
digital data by a video capture card for analysis by the CPU 116.
The analysis of video frame data may require the detection volume
110 to remain constant during the trajectory 102. However, the
detection volume 110 may be adjusted to account for different
set-up conditions of a playing area where the system 100 is
employed. For instance, the camera 118 may be capable of zooming in
or out of a particular area and changing its focus.
[0074] The series of frames used to capture the trajectory may also
capture the shooter 112 shooting the basketball 109 including all
or a portion of the shooter's 112 body as well as the defender's
body 114 during the shot. The physical information captured by the
camera 118 regarding the shooter 112 and the defender 114 may also
be analyzed by the system 100. For example, different motions of
the shooter 112 may be analyzed by the system 100 determine if the
shooter is using proper shooting mechanics. As another example,
data, such as, a jump height, hang-time, a release point floor
position on the playing surface 109, a landing position on the
playing surface 109 may be determined using the video frame data
captured by the camera 118 in the machine vision system.
[0075] After detecting and analyzing the trajectory 102, the system
100 may generate one or more trajectory parameters. The one or more
trajectory parameters may be output as feedback information to the
shooter 112 and the defender 114. Typically, the system 100 may
provide the feedback information while the shot is in the air or
shortly after the shot has reached the hoop 103. The feedback
information may be provided within less than a second or less than
10 seconds of the initiation of the shot depending on the type of
feedback information that is generated. The immediate feedback may
increase the training benefits of using the system. The shooter 112
may use the feedback information to improve their skill at making
shots. The defender 114 may use the feedback information to improve
their defense in preventing the shooter from making their shots. A
brief description of the methods used to develop the feedback
information is described as follows.
[0076] The shooter 112 may also use the feedback information for
rehabilitative purposes. For instance, after an injury and/or for
psychologically reasons, a player's skill at shooting may decline
from a previously obtained skill level. In rehabilitative setting,
the present invention may be used by the player to regain their
previous skill level and even improve upon their previous skill
level. For instance, the feedback information provided by the
present invention may increase a shooter's confidence which may
provide psychological benefits that lead to an improvement in
performance.
[0077] To develop basketball feedback information, the basic nature
of a basketball shot is considered with the objectives of 1)
informing the player in regards to what are a set of optimal
trajectory parameters that they can adjust to increase their
probability of making a shot and 2) informing their player about
how their shots compare to the optimal. This information is output
to the player as feedback information. As an example of this
process, the basketball shot by the shooter 112 is described.
However, the system 100 may be applied to the trajectories of other
objects in different sports where optimal trajectory parameters may
be different than basketball. Thus, the description is presented
for illustrated purposes only.
[0078] The basketball shot by the shooter 112 travels in an
essentially parabolic arc in the trajectory plane 104. The arc is
essentially parabolic and the ball 109 travels in-plane because
after the ball is released the dominant force acting on the ball is
gravity 109. Other forces, such as ball spin, or if the ball is
shot outside, wind, may cause the trajectory to deviate from a
parabolic arc. But, when the ball is shot inside, these forces
cause little deviation from the parabolic trajectory and a
parabolic arc is a good approximation of the trajectory 102.
[0079] For each shot by the shooter with an initial release height,
there are many different combinations of release velocity and
release angles at the initial state 105 that allow the player to
make the shot, i.e., the ball travels through the basket 103 and
then many combinations of release velocity and release angles where
the player does not make the shot. When a player shoots the
basketball 109, the player selects a combination of release
velocity and release angle. Typically, the selection of the shot
parameters is performed intuitively and the player doesn't
consciously think of what release velocity and release angle they
are selecting. However, through training, the player may be able to
improve their intuitive shot selection.
[0080] Within the group of the different combinations of release
velocity and release angle that may be selected by the shooter,
there are combinations of release velocity and release angle that
provide the shooter with a greater or lesser margin of error for
making the shot. For instance, for a basketball shot in the basket
103, an optimal entry angle into the hoop that provides the
greatest margin of error is about 43-45 degrees measured from a
plane including the basketball hoop 103. These optimal trajectories
are close to trajectories that allow for the ball to reach to the
basket 103 with a minimal amount of energy applied by the shooter.
For perturbations around this optimal entry angle, such as when the
defender 114 causes the shooter 112 to alter their shot, there are
more combinations of release velocity and release angle that allow
the shot to be made as compared to other combinations of release
velocity and release angle away from the optimal.
[0081] With the general understanding of basketball trajectories
provided above, methods may be developed for providing feedback
information that allows for the shooter 112 to train for an initial
state 105 that provides the greatest margin of energy i.e., a near
minimum energy trajectory. In one embodiment of the present
invention, an entry angle and an entry velocity of the basketball
109 near the termination point 107 are two trajectory parameters
that may generated from the physical information recorded by the
machine vision system in system 100. The entry angle and entry
velocity are correlated to the release angle and the release
velocity of the shot 102. Thus, after the shooter 112, releases the
shot, the camera 118 may record a series of video frames with
images of the ball 109 as it approaches the basket 103. With this
information, the entry angle and the entry velocity of the shot may
be generated. One or both of these trajectory parameters may be
provided to the player as feedback information.
[0082] The feedback information may be provided to the shooter 112
and the defender 114 in one of a visual format, an audio format and
a kinetic format. For instance, in one embodiment, on a visual
display, the entry angle and/or entry velocity may be viewed in a
numeric format by the players, 112 and 114. In another embodiment,
when projected through an audio device, numeric values for these
parameters may be heard by the players, 112 and 114. The audio
feedback device may be a speaker built into the system 100, a
speaker connected to the system 100 or audio devices worn by the
players, 112 and 114 that receive information from the system 100.
In yet another embodiment, a kinetic device, such as a bracelet or
headband worn by the players may be used to transmit the feedback
information in a kinetic format. For instance, the bracelet may
vibrate more or less depending on how close the shot is to the
optimum or may get hotter or colder depending on how close the shot
is the optimum. Multiple feedback output mechanisms may also be
employed. For instance, the feedback information may be viewed in a
visual format by coaches or other spectators on a display while a
sound projection device may be used to transmit the feedback
information in an audio format to the players.
[0083] In general, the parameters may be presented qualitatively or
quantitatively. An example of qualitative feedback may be a message
such as "too high" or "too low" in reference to the entry angle of
a shot by the player or "too fast" or "too slow" in reference to
the entry velocity. An example of qualitative feedback may be the
actual entry angle or entry velocity of the shot in an appropriate
unit of measurement, such as a message of "45 degrees" for the
entry angle. Again, the qualitative and/or quantitative information
may be presented in different formats, such as a visual format, an
auditory format, a kinetic format and combinations thereof.
[0084] With knowledge of what are optimal values of the trajectory
parameters transmitted in the feedback information, the shooter 112
may adjust their next shot to generate a more optimal trajectory.
For instance, if the feedback information is an entry angle and
their shot is too flat, then the shooter 112 may adjust their next
shot to increase their entry angle. Conversely, with their
knowledge of what are the optimal values of the trajectory
parameters, the defender 114 may adjust their defensive techniques
to force the shooter 112 to launch a shot along a less than optimal
trajectory 102. Thus, the defender 114 can experiment with
different techniques to see which are most effective. In different
training methods, the system 100 may be used to measure a
trajectories for a shooter 112 training without a defender 114 or
as is shown in the figure training with the presence of a defender
114.
[0085] The feedback information may be provided to the player
before prior to the ball 109 reaching the basket or shortly after
the ball reaches the basket 103. The system 100 is designed to
minimize any waiting time between shots. For each shooter and for
different training exercises, there may be an optimal time between
when the shooter shoots the ball 109 and when the shooter 112
receives the feedback information. The system 100 may be designed
to allow a variable delay time between the shot and the feedback
information to suit the preferences of each shooter that uses the
system 100 or to account for different training exercises that may
be performed with the system. For instance, a rapid shooting drill
may require a faster feedback time than a more relaxed drill, such
as a player shooting free throws.
[0086] The present invention is not limited to providing feedback
information for near minimum energy basketball trajectories. For
instance, under some conditions, such as when a smaller player
shoots over a larger player, it may be desirable for the shooter to
shoot with a greater than optimal arc to prevent the larger player
from blocking the shot. Thus, the shooter may use the feedback
information provided by the system 100 to train for different
conditions that may call for different types of shots, such as
shooting over a larger player as compared to a wide-open shot.
Further, the trajectory analysis systems of the present invention
may be used to train in different types of basketball shots, such
as bank shots, hook shots, lay-ups, jump shots, set-shots, free
throws and running shots, that may requiring the mastery of
different shooting skills and may have different optimal trajectory
parameters. Thus, the detection system 100 may be adjustable to
allow for training in different types of shots. Further, for
different sports, different trajectory skills may be optimal for
improving performance, which may be different than basketball. The
different trajectory skills that may be required for different
sports may be accounted for in the present invention.
[0087] A measure of how good a player's shooting skills may be a
consistency of their trajectory parameters averaged in some manner
over many shots. Typically, it has been determined empirically that
better shooters have a lower variability in their trajectory
parameters for a given shot, such as a free throw. Thus, to rate a
shooter's performance, it may be desirable to generate trajectory
parameters for a plurality of trajectories shot by a player in a
trajectory session and then calculate a standard deviation for each
of the trajectory parameters.
[0088] The standard deviation (SD) is a measure of the scatter of a
particular set of data. It is calculated as,
SD=[3(yi-y.sub.mean).sup.2/(N-1)].sup.1/2
[0089] where y.sub.mean is an average value of trajectory
parameter, N is the number of trajectories and yi is a value of the
trajectory parameter for a particular trajectory. There are other
types of statistical parameters that may be used to characterize
data variability and the present invention is not limited to the
standard deviation formula described above.
[0090] During a trajectory session where a plurality of
trajectories are analyzed by the system 100, the trajectory
parameters generated for the plurality of trajectories may be
stored to a mass storage device contained in the system 100 or in
communication with the system 100. After the session, the standard
deviation for all the trajectories in the session may be generated.
In other embodiments, to provide measures of variability of
different data sets representing different playing conditions, the
system 100 may divide the trajectory data into different subsets,
such as grouping according to types of shots, locations of shots,
shots where the shooter is guarded, shots where the shooter is
unguarded, made shots, swished shots, missed shots, shots made
earlier in the session versus shots made later in the session, and
combinations of these groupings.
[0091] The statistical variability calculated from the different
data sets may be used as a guide by the system for suggesting
methods that will improve the player's shooting skills. The system
100 may include software for suggesting methods based upon the
statistical analysis. For instance, the system 100 may determine
that a player's shot variability is greater when they are guarded
as opposed to unguarded, thus, exercises may be prescribed to the
player that focus and shooting while guarded. As another example,
the player's shot variability may be greater later in a session as
opposed to earlier in a session or greater in a training session
before practice as opposed to after practice, thus, the system may
suggest the player work on their aerobic conditioning. In yet
another example, the player's shot variability may vary as a
function of a distance from the basket and the system may suggest
the player concentrate on shots at the distances where the
variability is greatest.
[0092] In some embodiments, the trajectory session data and other
information generated by the system 100 may be viewed via a number
of different output mechanisms, such as a hard copy from a printer
or a display. For example, a printer connected to the system 100
may be used to generate print-outs of trajectory session data in
different formats. As another example, a display interface in
communication with the system 100 may be used to view trajectory
session data in different formats. In particular, the system 100
may include a touch screen interface for viewing trajectory session
data and providing input parameters into the system. As another
example, the system 100 may communicate with a portable viewing
device capable of interfacing with the system 100.
[0093] Information generated with system 100, such as trajectory
data from a plurality of trajectories in a trajectory sessions, may
be archived. The archival storage system may be a remote storage
device in communication with the system 100 or may be a mass
storage device provided with the system 100. The archival storage
system may include raw data of physical information recorded by the
camera 118, such as video frame data, as well as, trajectory
parameters and other information generated from analysis of the raw
data. The archival data may store trajectory session data for a
plurality of different trajectory sessions by one or more different
players.
[0094] By accessing the archival data, an improvement over time for
a particular parameter generated by the system 100, such as a shot
variability parameter, may be assessed. Further, the archival data
may be used for data mining and video editing purposes. For
instance, in a video editing application, the graphic of the
player's average trajectory may be integrated with video data of
the player shooting. In another example, video clips of two or more
different players shooting may be compared or video clips of a
single player shooting during different trajectory sessions may be
compared to show the player's improvement. In data mining
applications, the video data may be further analyzed to
characterize a player's shot mechanics. In another application,
simulations may be generated to predict gains in team performance
based-upon improvements in individual performance on the team. This
type of simulation may require archival trajectory session data to
be analyzed for a plurality of different players.
[0095] In some embodiments, the archival data may be accessible via
a remote connection. For instance, a password-protected web-site
may be used as a portal for accessing archival data generated from
system 100. The web-site may allow clients, such as players,
coaches, or scouts to gain access to the web-site from remote
sites, such as home computer connected to the Internet or a
portable computer connected to the Internet. The web-site may
include a plurality of analysis tools and a graphical interface for
viewing graphical data from the applications in different formats.
In another embodiment, the archival data may be downloaded to a CD,
DVD or other portable storage medium that the player can take with
them. Analysis software may also be downloaded with the archival
data so that the player can analyze the data on another
computer.
[0096] Information generated during a trajectory session may be
stored in a database. The database may relate player identification
information, such as a name, an address, a team, a session time, a
session location, a session data to raw data recorded during the
trajectory session and information generated during the trajectory
session. The database may be used for player tracking purposes and
targeting services to players that have used the trajectory
system.
[0097] FIG. 6 is a diagram of trajectory capture scenario employing
various embodiments of a trajectory detection and feedback system.
In one embodiment, a portion of the feedback system, such as 100a,
can be wall mounted for a more permanent installation. For example,
a wall mounted system could include a machine vision system using
camera 118 to provide trajectory analysis. The system 100a could
include a CPU 116 that can be used in image processing. Further,
the system 100a could include a speaker for providing feedback
information to a user. In general, the system 100a can be designed
for more permanent installation, such as on a wall, a pole separate
from the basketball hoop structure or attached to the basketball
hoop structure.
[0098] When the device is turned on, it may be configured to begin
providing feedback information until it is turned off. The device
may include a wireless or wired remote to provide options, such as
but not limited to changing the feedback format options,
recalibrating or resetting the device, changing the volume of a
speaker or turning the device on or off. In one embodiment, the
device may include a limited memory that can be overwritten over
time. The memory may include captured images and/or associated
trajectory analysis. For instance, the memory can be sized to store
24 hours of video that includes a time stamp. After the 24 hours of
video are filled, the device can begin to rewrite over the oldest
stored video with new captured video data.
[0099] The device 100a may include a wired and/or wireless
interface that allows stored data including image data to be
downloaded to a separate device, such as but not limited laptop
computer or a cell phone. For instance, image data could be
downloaded over a particular time period as selected by a user and
downloaded to their device. The device 100a may provide video
indexing and skipping features that allow a user to locate video
data stored on the device and review it on their device. For
instance, a preview capability could be provided that is compatible
with a user's cell phone, such that the video stored on the device
100a could be viewed on a screen associated with the user's cell
phone. Software downloads could be provided from the device 100a or
from another remote location, such as server associated with a
website, that allows captured image data downloaded from the device
100a to be further manipulated and stored on the user's device,
such as their cellphone or laptop. In another embodiment, a
web-site may be set up that allows data stored on their personal
device, such as a cell phone or laptop, to be uploaded an further
processed using software provided in association with the
web-site
[0100] In other embodiments, a server associated with a web-site,
may be configured to download software to a user's device with a
camera that allows it to behave like the machine vision system
described with respect to FIGS. 5 and 6. For instance, the web-site
could provide an application that allows an iphone from Apple.TM.
that is available at an app store that allows iphone to act as an
image capture and analysis system. As another example, an
application could be downloaded to a user's laptop, camera or
camcorder that allows these devices to function in this manner.
[0101] Thus, when one of these devices where placed near a sports
venue, such as indoor or outdoor basket ball hoop structure, the
device could be used to provide image capture and trajectory
analysis capabilities. If the device included audio capabilities,
it could also be used to provide feedback information. For
instance, a cell phone could be configured to communicate with a
Blue-Tooth.TM. capable head set worn by a user and coupled to the
cell phone to provide feedback information. In another embodiment,
a portable speaker system could be coupled to the cell phone to
provide audio capabilities.
[0102] In one embodiment, a docking station or stand, such as a
tripod, could be provided for use with a user's device, such as a
cell phone, camera or camcorder. The docking station could be
configured to allow a user's device to be fixed in a particular
orientation. For instance, the docking station or stand could
include a flexible device that attaches to the cellphone or camera
that allows it to be mounted in various orientations, such as a
multi-armed Gorrilapod..TM. The docking station may also be
configured to allow augment features of the user's device. For
instance, the docking station could include a power source, a
power/communication interface, such as a USB compatible interface,
additional electronic storage and additional processing.
[0103] The docking station could also be designed with an enclosure
that provides some protection to the device. For instance, the
enclosure could cover the device to provide some protection from
rain. Further, the enclosure could partially enclose and secure the
user's device to protect it from damage if it were impacted in some
way, such as hit by an errant basketball or other object for which
the device is being used to capture and analyze trajectory
data.
Calculating Basketball Trajectory Dynamics: Basketball Swish/Make
Analysis
[0104] When a basketball shot goes through the hoop without
contacting any part of the rim, we call it a "swish." Since the
hoop is larger than the ball, there can be some variation in the
shot and still get a swish. This analysis first determines the
range of straight-on shots that will swish. The shot possibilities
may be described by locating the center of the ball at the instant
it passes through the hoop or, more technically, when the center of
the ball lies in the plane of the hoop. The locus of points that
describe shots that swish may be referred to as the swish zone, and
can be illustrated by drawing a top view of the hoop with the swish
zone defined within that circular region. The reference point
(coordinate system origin) is the center of the hoop, with the
positive x-axis projecting to the right and the positive y-axis
projecting toward the back of the hoop, as shown in FIG. 7A.
[0105] For the purposes of illustration, it may be assumed that the
hoop is 9'' in radius and the ball is a men's pro ball,
approximately 4.77'' in radius. These assumptions may be varied to
address different hoop and ball geometries as desired. For this
example, it may be assumed that the ball's trajectory is a straight
line in the immediate vicinity of the hoop, described by the hoop
entry angle and measured from the horizontal. In this frame of
reference, a perfectly flat shot would be 0 degrees and a ball
dropped from directly above the hoop would be 90 degrees. This
analysis may be generalized to include a more representative
parabolic trajectory, or even a trajectory corrected for
aerodynamic and buoyant forces, if necessary. For this example, it
may be assumed the curvature of the trajectory in the immediate
vicinity of the hoop is insignificant.
[0106] For the ball to swish, it must pass over the front of the
rim and under the back of the rim. These constraints limit the
range of possible shots that may swish for a given entry angle, and
the widest part of the ball (its diameter) determines the extent of
that range. The geometry may be described for the longest possible
swish at a particular entry angle and shortest possible swish at a
particular entry angle. FIG. 7B is a side view of basketball shot
passing through hoop at location of longest possible swish and FIG.
7C is a side view of basketball shot passing through hoop at
location of shortest possible swish.
[0107] As can be seen in FIG. 7B, the center of the ball is below
the rim when the widest part of the ball passes the rim for the
longest possible swish. This is because the radius of the ball is
measured perpendicular to the flight path in order to ensure the
ball is a sufficient distance away from the rim to pass without
hitting it. Similarly, for the shortest possible swish, the center
of the ball is above the hoop when the widest part of the ball
passes the rim, as shown in FIG. 7C. In order to define the range
of swish shots for a given entry angle, the location of the center
of the ball must be projected onto the plane of the hoop. This is
accomplished by simple trigonometric computation using the
expression
y=R.sub.hoop-R.sub.ball/sin(.theta.)
where y=location of center of ball in plane of hoop
R.sub.hoop=radius of basketball hoop (set at 9'') R.sub.ball=radius
of basketball (set at 4.77'') .theta.=shot entry angle measured
from horizontal
[0108] This formula results in the following values for the longest
and shortest possible swish shots as a function of shot entry
angle:
TABLE-US-00001 Angle Y long Y short 90 4.23 -4.23 89 4.229273
-4.22927 88 4.227092 -4.22709 87 4.223454 -4.22345 86 4.218352
-4.21835 85 4.211779 -4.21178 84 4.203726 -4.20373 83 4.194178
-4.19418 82 4.183122 -4.18312 81 4.170541 -4.17054 80 4.156415
-4.15642 79 4.140721 -4.14072 78 4.123435 -4.12344 77 4.104529
-4.10453 76 4.083973 -4.08397 75 4.061733 -4.06173 74 4.037772
-4.03777 73 4.01205 -4.01205 72 3.984525 -3.98453 71 3.955149
-3.95515 70 3.923872 -3.92387 69 3.890638 -3.89064 68 3.855389
-3.85539 67 3.818061 -3.81806 66 3.778585 -3.77858 65 3.736887
-3.73689 64 3.692889 -3.69289 63 3.646504 -3.6465 62 3.597641
-3.59764 61 3.546201 -3.5462 60 3.492078 -3.49208 59 3.435159
-3.43516 58 3.375319 -3.37532 57 3.312427 -3.31243 56 3.24634
-3.24634 55 3.176905 -3.17691 54 3.103956 -3.10396 53 3.027313
-3.02731 52 2.946783 -2.94678 51 2.862157 -2.86216 50 2.773207
-2.77321 49 2.679688 -2.67969 48 2.581332 -2.58133 47 2.477848
-2.47785 46 2.36892 -2.36892 45 2.254201 -2.2542 44 2.133315
-2.13332 43 2.005848 -2.00585 42 1.871347 -1.87135 41 1.729313
-1.72931 40 1.579197 -1.5792 39 1.420395 -1.42039 38 1.252236
-1.25224 37 1.073977 -1.07398 36 0.884791 -0.88479 35 0.683759
-0.68376 34 0.469849 -0.46985 33 0.241906 -0.24191 32 0 0
[0109] These results apply to a straight-on shot. In order to
calculate the swish zone for off-center shots, compound angles must
be computed that are difficult to illustrate geometrically. The
result is more easily depicted graphically by showing the swish
zone within the hoop. For example, the swish zone for a 45-degree
shot is shown in FIG. 8.
Make Zone
[0110] It is still possible for the ball to go through the hoop if
it does not pass through the swish zone. Shots near the swish zone
will hit the rim. Depending on the shot and hoop geometry, it is
possible for the ball to bounce off the rim and pass downward
through the hoop. The locus of points for which this occurs may be
called the make zone. The boundary of the make zone may be defined
by the longest shot that can hit the back rim and rebound downward
to the plane of the hoop before contacting the front rim. FIG. 9 is
an illustration of the geometry of rim-in shot off the back
rim.
[0111] The location of the boundary of the make zone for a
straight-on shot may be determined from the following system of
equations, which are shown in FIG. 9.
h= r.sub.b.sup.2-(r.sub.h-y.sub.1).sup.2
.beta.=sin.sup.-1(h/r.sub.b)
.gamma.=.theta.-.beta.
.gamma.=tan.sup.-1(h/(r.sub.h-r.sub.b+y.sub.1))
where h=height of center of ball above plane of hoop when ball
strikes back rim r.sub.b=radius of ball r.sub.h=radius of hoop
y.sub.1=y-location of center of ball in plane of hoop when ball
strikes back rim .beta.=angle between rim-normal and plane of hoop
.gamma.=angle between plane of hoop and resultant ball direction
after rebounding off back rim
[0112] These equations do not have a closed-form solution.
Nevertheless, the equations may be solved iteratively using a
variety of progressive solution techniques, such as the Newtonian
method. Using this method, the location of the make zone boundary
may be determined as a function of entry angle. The results of a
sample calculation are given in the table below.
TABLE-US-00002 Entry angle, deg. Make zone boundary, in. 50 5.04 45
4.88 40 4.73 35 4.61 30 4.51 25 4.42 20 --
[0113] The table indicates that below 25 degrees entry angle, there
is no make zone. The geometry for off-center rim shots is more
complicated, but the make zones may be depicted graphically. There
are some idealizations used in generating these plots that may be
relaxed if necessary to produce a more accurate depiction of the
make zone.
[0114] FIG. 10A is a plot of a make zone for a hoop entry angle of
45 degrees. Three curves are depicted in a circle, which depicts
the hoop. The area between the dashed lines represents the swish
zone. The area between the upper solid line the lower dashed line
represents the make zone. FIG. 10B is a plot of the make zone for a
hoop entry angle of 25 degrees. Again, three curves are depicted in
a circle. There is no swish zone at this entry angle. This is
indicated by the dashed curves in the figure where the lower dashed
curve and upper dashed curves depicted in FIG. 10A have switched
positions in FIG. 10B. The make zone in FIG. 10B is defined by the
area between the solid downward turned curve and the upwardly
turned dashed curve depicted in the figure.
[0115] In performing this analysis, a conservative assumption has
been made that only rim bounces that cause the ball to continue
downward have the potential to score. In practice, many shots are
observed to bounce up off the rim, then either drop through the
hoop or make subsequent contact with the rim and/or backboard
ultimately resulting in a made shot. As a result, the make
percentage calculated by the present method may be lower than what
would be expected in practice. This observation has been confirmed
with empirical data as is described with respect to FIGS. 11 and
12.
[0116] One means of addressing this under-prediction of made shots
may be to develop a calibration factor based on empirical evidence.
The make zone may be enlarged by a multiplicative factor such that
the calculated made shots more nearly replicate observations. This
factor, which may be dependent on a number of variables such as
entry angle and speed, may be deduced from an experimental dataset,
then applied to the algorithm for use in subsequent
predictions.
[0117] Another approach to developing a more accurate make zone may
be to incorporate a more complete kinetic model of the ball and its
interactions with the hoop, bracket, and backboard. Effects to be
included may include the angle of rebound when the ball contacts a
solid surface, the effects of spin and ball friction against a
solid surface, energy loss of the ball as a result of its impact,
and the flexibility and energy absorption of the hoop and
associated hardware. This would allow the calculation to model
multiple ball/rim interactions and thereby determine the make zone
even for very complex dynamics. The bounce dynamics may also be
verified experimentally.
[0118] A rear view of an experimental set-up for generating
basketball trajectories is shown with respect to FIG. 11. The
shooting machine 1302 includes an arm 1308 that can launch a
basketball 1306 (a real basketball is not shown in the figure only
an outline of a basketball is shown) towards a basketball hoop 1300
along a trajectory 1304. The arm is propelled by mechanism 1310.
The shooting machine 1302 includes an on-off switch and a
display/control mechanism 1312.
[0119] The machine 1302 may be programmed to execute a large number
of shots and the outcome for each shot may be recorded. The release
height of the device may be set to a particular value. From shot to
shot, a left-right orientation of the shot relative to the center
of the basketball hoop, a release velocity and a release angle may
be automatically adjusted. Each of the values, left-right
orientation, release velocity and release angle may be varied to
generate a number of shots, such as but not limited to 10,000
shots. Different ball sizes may be employed with the machine 1302,
such as a men's ball or a women's ball.
[0120] The shooting machine may be positioned at a location on the
court 1314 that is a fixed distance from the basketball hoop. In
this example, the shooting machine 1302 is positioned to generate a
shot near the free throw line. The shooting machine is mobile and
may be moved to different locations to generate a set of shots at
each location.
[0121] FIG. 12 is a plot of a theoretical make percentage
predicting from analytical method previously described as compared
to an actual make percentage generated using the shooting machine
described with respect to FIG. 11. The shooting machine was
positioned to generate a free throw shot at a release height of 9
feet using a men's ball. The range of parameters used to perform
both the theoretical calculations and the actual shots generated
using the shooting machine were selected to match a variability of
a particular individual. The variability and the associated range
of parameters was determined from a number of shots actually made
by the individual
[0122] From an entry angle between 40-65%, the theoretical
make/miss percentage is 2-3 percentage points less than the
experimentally predicted values. Below 40%, the error between the
calculations is greater. As previously, mentioned some rebound
dynamics were not considered in the theoretical calculations for
the embodiments described herein and hence some shots that may be
made are not captured by the methodology, such as hitting the back
rim, then the front rim and then going in. At lower entry angles,
shots such as these are more prevalent as compared to the higher
entry angles and hence there is a larger error in the calculations
at lower entry angles.
[0123] As previously noted, it may be possible to better model the
rim effects and hence produce a more accurate simulation. In
another embodiment, it may be possible to correct the theoretical
simulation using a correction factor derived from the shooting
machine data. In yet another embodiment, it may be possible to
generate a series of curves like the one shown in FIG. 12. The
curves may be generated based upon data generated using the
shooting machine, data generated from theoretical calculations,
alone or in combination. Next, based on a measured variability of a
particular individual, an existing curve that is appropriate for
the variability of the individual may be located or a curve may be
interpolated or extrapolated from existing curves as needed. Thus,
it may not be necessary to perform additional trajectory
simulations to determine an optimal or maximum shooting percentage
for the individual in the manner shown in FIG. 11.
[0124] Of note in FIG. 12, an optimum shooting angle is predicted
for the individual based upon their measured variability in their
shooting mechanics (i.e., body motion and body orientation). The
theoretical and experimental data both predict an optimum entry to
be about 45 degrees. In this example, the shooter had a variability
that was characteristic of a highly skilled shooter. Thus, a
recommendation for this type of player may be to adjust their shot
so that their average entry angle is a close to 45 degrees as
possible.
[0125] FIG. 13 shows standard deviations for launch angle and
launch velocity as a function of entry angle for a number of
experimentally generated shots and a percentage of shots made for
various entry angles. Two shots types of shots are plotted: 1)
shots that pass through the rim without touching the rim and 2)
shots that hit the back of the rim and go through the rim. It can
be seen in the figure that as the entry angle increases, the
percentage of swish shots increases. The percentage of shots made
is greatest for the 45 degree entry angle.
[0126] FIG. 14 is a block diagram of a trajectory detection and
analysis system 100 for one embodiment. The components of the
system 100 may be enclosed within a single housing or may be
divided between a plurality of different housings enclosing
different components of the system. Further, the system 100 may
include different components that are not shown, such as the
peripheral devices and remote servers.
[0127] Physical information 216 is input into the system 100 via
sensors 212. In one embodiment, a machine vision system may be used
where the machine vision system comprises one or more cameras 201
(e.g., a CCD camera) and a video capture card 203 for digitizing
captured frame data. The video capture card 203 may capture color
pixel data. The camera 201 may employ a 3.5-8 mm zoom lens and may
allow for different lens attachments. In another embodiment, the
system may employ a plurality of cameras arranged on a mechanism
that allows different type cameras to be rotated or moved into
place where only one camera is used at a time to record frame data.
The different cameras may allow the detection volume of the system
to be adjusted.
[0128] The digitized frame data from a machine vision system and
other sensor data may be processed by a computer 202. The computer
202 may be a modified PC using a 1.6 GHz processor 204 w/RAM and a
CD-RW drive 205 for inputting and outputting data and software. The
computer 202 may also include a mass storage device, such as hard
drive 207 and various network/device communication interfaces, such
as wireless and wired network interfaces, for connecting to a local
area network (LAN), wide-area network (WAN) or the Internet. The
device communication interfaces may allow the computer to
communicate with a plurality of peripheral devices and other remote
system components.
[0129] The computer 202 may include operating system software 206
for controlling system resources, such as feedback interfaces 213
and the system input/output mechanisms 215. The computer 202 may be
used to execute analysis software 208 for analyzing trajectories
using the sensor data from sensors 212 and for generating feedback
information 217. The analysis software 208 may include software for
providing various services, such as 1) providing a list or a plot
of trajectory session information comprising one or more of
physical information, trajectory parameters and feedback
information for the plurality of trajectories, 2) comparing the
trajectory session information from the trajectory session with
trajectory session information from one or more different
trajectory sessions, 3) generating trajectory session parameters
used to characterize a human's performance in the trajectory
session, 4) predicting performance improvement as a function of the
trajectory session parameters, 5) prescribing actions for improving
performance and 6) performing video editing tasks. The computer 202
may also be used to execute database software for relating physical
information 216 and other information generated by the computer 202
to player identification information (e.g., name, age, address,
team, school, etc.) and session identification information (e.g.,
time, data, location, number of trajectories analyzed, types of
shots, etc.).
[0130] Power to the computer 202 and other devices may be provided
from the power supply 209. In one embodiment, the power supply 209
may be a re-chargeable battery or a fuel cell. The power supply 209
may include one or more power interfaces for receiving power from
an external source, such as an AC outlet, conditioning the power
for use by the various system components. In one embodiment, for
in-door/outdoor models, the system 100 may include photocells that
are used to provide direct power and charge an internal
battery.
[0131] Feedback information 217, used by clients of the system 100
to improve their trajectory skills, may be output through one or
more feedback interface devices 213, such as a sound projection
device 211. In general, the system may be capable of outputting
feedback information 217 to a plurality of different devices
simultaneously in a plurality of different formats, such as visual
formats, auditory formats and kinetic formats.
[0132] The system 100 may support a plurality of different
input/output mechanisms 215 that are used to input/display
operational information 218 for the system 100. The operational
information 218 may include calibration and configuration setting
inputs for the system and system components. In one embodiment, a
touch screen display 210 may be used to input and display
operational information 218 using a plurality of menus. Menus may
be available for configuring and setting up the system 100, for
allowing a player to sign into the system and to select preferred
setting for the system 100 and for viewing session information 219
in various formats that have been generated by the system. The
printer 214 may be used to output hard copies of the session
information 219 for a player or other client of the system 100. The
present invention is not limited to a touch screen display as an
interface for operational information. Other input mechanisms, such
as but not limited, a key board, a mouse, a touch pad, a joystick
and a microphone with voice recognition software may be used to
input operation information 218 into the system.
[0133] FIGS. 15A-15C are perspective drawings of exemplary
components of a trajectory detection and analysis system. The
figures provided to illustrate types of components in a trajectory
system and not mean to limit various form factors and
configurations of these components. For instance, the locations,
sizes and form factors of these components could look substantially
different if they were integrated into a golf bag. Further, every
component of the system need not be included in every embodiment.
For instance, the sound output device 211 may be eliminated in some
designs or made substantially smaller, which could alter the form
factor of the design.
[0134] In FIGS. 15A-15C, a camera 201 used in a machine vision
system, a touch screen display 210, a computer 202 and a sound
projection device 211 are integrated into a housing 300 with a
support chassis 301. The system 100 may also include an amplifier
for the speaker 211 (not shown).
[0135] Wheels 304 are attached to the chassis 301 to allow the
system 100 to be easily moved and positioned for use. In general,
the chassis of devices of the present invention may be designed
with a weight and a form factor, which may facilitate transport,
storage and unobtrusive set-up, calibration and operation of the
device. For instance, the device includes a handle 303 attached to
panels 300 comprising the housing that may be used to move the
device and which may aid in set-up and storage of the device.
[0136] The speaker 211 takes up a large portion of the internal
volume of the system. In one embodiment, a travel system may be
used that incorporates a portable computer system such as laptop
that is connected to a machine vision system with the camera 201.
To use the travel system, it may be placed on top of a support
platform, such as a tripod, a table, a chair or even coupled to a
golf bag or golf cart. The travel system may provide feedback
information via a wireless communication interface to audio device,
such as an "earbud," worn by the player or wearable feed back
device. In another embodiment, the travel system may generate
output signals that may be routed through a portable audio system
(e.g., a boom box) for amplification via speakers on the audio
system to provide feedback information.
[0137] FIG. 16 is an information flow diagram for a trajectory
detection and analysis system of the present invention. A sensor
system 502, which may comprise emitters 506 and detectors 506,
receives physical information 507. The physical information 507 may
be energy signals reflected from a tracked object 508, such as a
golf ball. In the case where sensors are mounted to the tracked
object 508, then the physical information 507 may be sent as
signals from the sensors to a detector 504. Typically, the physical
information 508 is transmitted through a medium such as air.
[0138] The sensor system 502 may convert the physical information
507 to sensor data signals 509. For instance, a charge-coupling
device generates electronic signals in response to photons striking
a sensor array. The sensor data signals 509 may be sent through a
wired or wireless connection to a sensor interface 510, which
provides signal conditioning. The signal conditioning may be needed
to allow the sensor data 509 to be processed. For instance, prior
to analysis, video frame data may be digitized by a video capture
card.
[0139] In 513, the conditioned signals 511 may be processed
according to system control software and according to trajectory
analysis software 513 using set-up and control inputs 512 that have
been input into the system. The system control software 513 may
analyze portions of the data 511 to determine whether the sensor
system 502 is operating properly. Based-upon the analysis of the
data 511, the system control software may provide calibration
instructions and other operational instructions to the sensor
system which may be transmitted to the sensors via the sensor
interface 510.
[0140] The trajectory analysis software 513 may be used to process
the conditioned signals 511 and generate trajectory parameters. The
trajectory parameters may be used to generate feedback information.
The feedback information may be one or more trajectory parameters
or a combination of trajectory parameters, such as a ratio of
trajectory parameters or a product of trajectory parameters that
may be useful to a system client in improving their trajectory
skills.
[0141] Depending such factors as the application (trajectory of a
specific type of object), the set-up and components of the system,
the environment in which the system is used and what portion of the
trajectory of an object the device is used to measure, the present
invention may provide feedback to the player nearly immediately,
within a second or within 10 seconds as measured from some time
state along the trajectory that has been analyzed by the system.
For instance, when information on the beginning of the trajectory
is directly generated by the system, then the time to provide
feedback may be measured from the time when the trajectory is
initiated and then first detected by the system. When information
on the end of the trajectory is directly measured, then the time to
provide feedback may be measured from the time to when the
trajectory has neared completion and has been detected by the
system.
[0142] The feedback information may be sent as feedback information
parameters 516 to one or more device interfaces 517. The device
interfaces 517 may communicate with a plurality of feedback
devices. The device interfaces 517, which may include device
drivers, may transmit device data/commands 518 to a feedback device
interface 519 located on each feedback device. The device
data/commands 518 may be used to control the operation of the
feedback devices. The output from the feedback device may also be
modified using set-up/control inputs 520 that may vary for each
device.
[0143] The feedback devices may output the feedback information
parameters 516 received as device data 518 in one of an audio,
visual or kinetic format 521 depending on the capabilities of the
feedback device. For example, the device interface 517 may send
device data/commands 518 to a display that allows a numeric value
of a feedback information parameter 516 to be viewed on the display
by one of the system clients 522, such as players, coaches and
spectators. As another example, a device interface 517 may send
device data/commands 518 to an audio output device that allows
feedback information parameters 516 to be output in an audio format
to one or more of the system clients 522.
[0144] The feedback parameters 516 generated from the trajectory
analysis software 513 and other raw data generated from the sensor
system 502 may be sent to session storage 515. The session storage
515 may accumulate trajectory data from a plurality of trajectories
generated during a trajectory session for one or more players. All
of a portion of the trajectory data 514 may be sent to archival
storage 525 when the session has been completed. For example, only
a portion of the raw data, such as video frame data, may be sent to
archival storage. Further, the data may be filtered for bad data
prior to being sent to archival storage 525. The archival storage
525 may include a database used to relate trajectory data from one
or more trajectory sessions to the conditions of the trajectory
session, such as time place and location, and player identification
information.
[0145] The archival data 524 and session data 514 may be used to
provide one or more services 523 including but not limited to 1) a
session record of trajectory parameters, 2) session diagnostics, 3)
prescription for improvement, 4) a history comparison of trajectory
data from different sessions, 5) individual/group comparisons of
trajectory session data, 6) video analysis and editing tools, 7)
simulations (e.g., predicting a player's driving distance
improvement based upon changing one or more of their swing
parameters and 8) entertainment. As an example of entertainment, a
player's trajectory average trajectory parameters and variability
may be used in trajectory simulations for a video golf game or
another game where the parameters have been measured. Two players
that have used the system 100 may both enter their parameters and
compete against one another in the video game. The player may also
use the game to see how they match up against professional or other
athletes who have had their trajectory parameters defined.
[0146] Output from the data services 523 may be converted to a
portable record 527, such as print-out from a printer, or may be
formatted for viewing on a graphical interface 528. The graphical
interface may also include a storage capacity allowing data to be
viewed at a later time. The output from the data services 523, such
as a portable record 527 or information viewed on the graphical
interface 528, may be used by the system clients 522. The data
services 523 may also be provided via a data mining interface 526.
The data mining interface 526 may include analysis tools and a
graphical interface. When the archival storage is remotely
accessible, it may be used to access archived data 524 via a remote
connection, such as from the Internet.
[0147] Information passed between the different components in the
system may be transmitted using a number of different wired and
wireless communication protocols. For instance, for wire
communication, USB compatible, Firewire compatible and IEEE 1394
compatible hardware communication interfaces and communication
protocols may be used. For wireless communication, hardware and
software compatible with standards such as Bluetooth, IEEE 802.11a,
IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11x (e.g. other IEEE 802.11 standards such
as IEEE 802.11c, IEEE 802.11d, IEEE 802.11e, etc.), IrDA, WiFi and
HomeRF.
[0148] Although the foregoing invention has been described in
detail by way of illustration and example for purposes of clarity
and understanding, it will be recognized that the above described
invention may be embodied in numerous other specific variations and
embodiments without departing from the spirit or essential
characteristics of the invention. Certain changes and modifications
may be practiced, and it is understood that the invention is not to
be limited by the foregoing details, but rather is to be defined by
the scope of the appended claims.
* * * * *