U.S. patent application number 13/675717 was filed with the patent office on 2013-03-21 for preservative material and storage method for liquid.
This patent application is currently assigned to NISSHINBO HOLDINGS INC.. The applicant listed for this patent is NISSHINBO HOLDINGS INC.. Invention is credited to Noriko Osuga, Naokazu SASAKI.
Application Number | 20130068637 13/675717 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 41465967 |
Filed Date | 2013-03-21 |
United States Patent
Application |
20130068637 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
SASAKI; Naokazu ; et
al. |
March 21, 2013 |
PRESERVATIVE MATERIAL AND STORAGE METHOD FOR LIQUID
Abstract
A nanofiber structure having pores is used as a preservative
material for a liquid material. A liquid material can be stored for
a long period without causing deterioration and without the need of
using any additive such as an anti-bacterial agent merely by
contacting the liquid material with the preservative material.
Inventors: |
SASAKI; Naokazu; (Chiba-shi,
JP) ; Osuga; Noriko; (Chiba-shi, JP) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
NISSHINBO HOLDINGS INC.; |
Tokyo |
|
JP |
|
|
Assignee: |
NISSHINBO HOLDINGS INC.
Tokyo
JP
|
Family ID: |
41465967 |
Appl. No.: |
13/675717 |
Filed: |
November 13, 2012 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
12989880 |
Oct 27, 2010 |
|
|
|
PCT/JP2009/061896 |
Jun 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
13675717 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
206/205 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B65D 81/24 20130101;
A01N 25/34 20130101; Y10T 442/60 20150401 |
Class at
Publication: |
206/205 |
International
Class: |
B65D 81/24 20060101
B65D081/24 |
Foreign Application Data
Date |
Code |
Application Number |
Jul 3, 2008 |
JP |
2008-174294 |
Sep 30, 2008 |
JP |
2008-252438 |
Claims
1. A storage method for liquids, comprising the step of contacting
a preservative material for liquids with a liquid, said
preservative material comprising a nanofiber material having a
plurality of pores.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the liquid is held in the
nanofiber material in an amount not greater than a void volume of
the nanofiber material.
3. The method of claim 1 or 2, wherein the shape of the nanofiber
material is cotton wool-like, nonwoven fabric-like, felt-like or
sponge-like.
4. A storage container for liquids, comprising at least one opening
and an interior in which a liquid is placed, wherein a nanofiber
material having a plurality of pores is disposed at the interior in
such a way as to contact the liquid.
5. The storage container of claim 4, wherein the nanofiber material
is disposed on an inside wall or a bottom surface thereof.
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No.
12/989,880, filed on Oct. 27, 2010, which is a 371 of
PCT/JP2009/061896, filed Jun. 30, 2009.
TECHNICAL FIELD
[0002] The present invention relates to a preservative material and
storage method for liquids. More specifically, the invention
relates to a preservative material for liquids which is composed of
a nanofiber material, and to a method of storing liquids using the
same.
BACKGROUND ART
[0003] Liquids that have been placed in containers, such as eye
drops, cosmetics, toiletries, beverages and inks, are sometimes
used over a relatively long period of time after the container is
opened.
[0004] In such cases, to prevent the quality of the liquid from
deteriorating during the period of use due to airborne
microorganisms and falling microorganisms and fungal spores which
enter the container and grow therein, in addition to the
ingredients for achieving the intended effects of the contents
themselves, use is also generally made of additives such as
antibacterial agents and preservatives.
[0005] Synthetic compounds such as synthetic preservatives have
often been used as such additives, but because of the rise in the
safety consciousness of the consumer in recent years, the
preference nowadays is for the use of products of natural origin
(see Patent Documents 1 to 4).
[0006] However, additives such as preservatives and antiseptic
agents not only lead to a decline in the objects and effects of the
contents themselves, various other problems arise, such as an
undesirable odor or taste and color, adverse effects on the human
body (e.g., chapped skin, discomfort, skin irritation), the extra
cost of the additives, and an increase in the elements of quality
control.
[0007] For example, when a synthetic compound is added, depending
on the physical constitution of the user, this may give rise to a
hypersensitivity reaction. When this happens, even if the chief
ingredients are harmless in humans, people who develop a
hypersensitivity reaction are unable to use the liquid.
[0008] As for products of natural origin, these in themselves
sometimes have a distinctive odor or taste and color, which often
limits the products in which they can be used. Moreover, there are
not many types of naturally occurring products which can actually
be used.
PRIOR-ART DOCUMENTS
Patent Documents
[0009] Patent Document 1: JP-A 2001-178431
[0010] Patent Document 2: JP-A 2000-229804
[0011] Patent Document 3: JP-A 6-70730
[0012] Patent Document 4: JP-A 2004-59525
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Problems to be Solved by the Invention
[0013] The present invention was arrived at in light of the above
circumstances. The objects of the invention are to provide a
preservative material for liquids which is capable of preserving a
liquid for a relatively long period of time without the addition of
additives such as antibacterial agents, and to provide a method of
storing liquids using such a material.
Means for Solving the Problems
[0014] The inventors have conducted extensive investigations in
order to achieve the above objects. As a result, they have
discovered that by bringing a nanofiber material having numerous
pores in contact with a liquid, the growth of microorganisms within
the liquid is suppressed or microorganisms within the liquid are
destroyed. Moreover, they have found that this nanofiber material
can be advantageously used as a preservative material for
liquids.
[0015] Accordingly, the present invention provides: [0016] 1. A
preservative material for liquids, comprising a nanofiber material
having a plurality of pores. [0017] 2. A storage method for
liquids, comprising the step of contacting the preservative
material for liquids of 1 above with a liquid. [0018] 3. A storage
method for liquids, comprising the step of holding, in a nanofiber
material having a plurality of pores, a liquid in an amount not
greater than a void volume of the nanofiber material. [0019] 4. A
storage container for liquids, comprising at least one opening and
an interior in which a liquid is placed, wherein a nanofiber
material is disposed at the interior in such a way as to contact
the liquid. [0020] 5. A storage container for liquids, comprising
at least one opening and an interior in which a liquid is placed,
wherein a filter having at least one layer of a nanofiber material
is provided at the opening in such a way as to isolate the interior
of the container from the exterior. [0021] 6. A liquid-containing
nanofiber material comprising a nanofiber material having a
plurality of pores and a liquid which is held in at least some
portion of the pore voids.
Effects of the Invention
[0022] This invention enables liquids, such as pharmaceuticals,
cosmetics, toiletries, oral hygiene agents, beverages, items of
stationery, liquid cultures and liquid manure, to be stored for an
extended period of time without the addition of additives such as
antibacterial agents. That is, the invention is able, without the
use of additives, to suppress microbial toxins, odors and the like
which are generated by the growth of microorganisms.
[0023] The preservative material for liquids of the invention
renders unnecessary additives such as antibacterial agents that
have hitherto been used, thereby making it possible not only to
eliminate deterioration in the inherent effects of liquids such as
pharmaceutical products and in the odor, taste, color and the like
of such liquids, but also to store these liquids in a condition
that is safe for the human body.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0024] The invention is described more fully below.
[0025] The preservative material for liquids according to the
invention is composed of a nanofiber material having a plurality of
pores.
[0026] Here, the shape of nanofiber material is not subject to any
particular limitation, provided it has numerous pores. Examples
include cotton wool-like, nonwoven fabric-like, felt-like and
sponge-like nanofiber materials. In this case, blending or covering
with fibers having a fiber diameter of 1 .mu.m or more may be
carried out by a known technique.
[0027] The nanofibers account for a proportion (weight ratio) of
the nanofiber material which is not subject to any particular
limitation but, in order to fully elicit the effects of the
invention, is preferably more than 50 wt %, more preferably at
least 70 wt %, and even more preferably at least 80 wt %.
[0028] The fibers making up the nanofiber material have an average
fiber diameter of at least 1 nm but less than 1,000 nm, preferably
from 10 to 800 nm, and more preferably from 50 to 700 nm.
[0029] The basis weight of the nanofiber material, although not
subject to any particular limitation, is preferably from about 1 to
about 100 g/m.sup.2, and especially from about 10 to about 70
g/m.sup.2.
[0030] In addition, the diameter of the pores in the nanofiber
material, although not subject to any particular limitation, may be
set to, for example, from about 0.001 to about 100 .mu.m,
preferably from about 0.01 to about 10 .mu.m, and more preferably
from about 0.01 to about 5 .mu.m.
[0031] When the above nanofiber material is used as the
subsequently described filter, by setting the minimum pore size
therein to 0.1 .mu.m or less, preferably from 0.01 to 0.1 .mu.m,
and more preferably from 0.01 to 0.08 .mu.m, and by setting the
maximum pore size to more than 0.1 .mu.m but not more than 1 .mu.m,
preferably more than 0.2 .mu.m but not more than 1 .mu.m, and more
preferably from 0.3 to 1 .mu.m, microorganisms and the like present
outside of the container can be prevented from entering the
interior of the container.
[0032] The starting polymer for the nanofibers is not subject to
any particular limitation, provided it is a water-insoluble
polymer. Illustrative examples include polyester resins, polyamide
resins, polyurethane resins, polyacrylic resins, polyamideimide
resins, polyvinyl chloride resins, polystyrene resins, polyimide,
polyarylate, polyaniline, polypyrrole, polythiophene, cellulose and
cellulose derivatives.
[0033] The nanofibers used in the invention may be obtained by
spinning a solution (composition) of the above polymer dissolved in
a suitable solvent using any of various spinning processes, such as
electrostatic spinning, spunbonding, melt blowing and flash
spinning.
[0034] In the practice of the invention, the use of an
electrostatic spinning process, which is capable of manufacturing
the fibers to a relatively uniform diameter in a range of at least
1 nm but less than 1,000 nm, is especially preferred.
[0035] Electrostatic spinning is a process in which, as an
electrically charged electrostatic spinning dope (resin solution)
is spun within an electrical field, the dope is broken up by forces
of repulsion between the electric charges, resulting in the
formation of a very fine fibrous material composed of the
resin.
[0036] The basic configuration of the apparatus which carries out
electrostatic spinning includes a first electrode which also serves
as a nozzle for discharging the dope to be electrostatically spun
and which applies to the dope a high voltage of from several
thousands to several tens of thousands of volts, and a second
electrode which faces the first electrode. The dope which has been
ejected or shaken from the first electrode becomes nanofibers due
to the high-speed jets and the subsequent folding and expansion of
the jets within the electrical field between the two opposed
electrodes, and collects on the surface of the second electrode,
thereby giving nanofibers (nanofiber material).
[0037] The solvent used in preparing the dope for electrostatic
spinning is not subject to any particular limitation, provided it
is able to dissolve the polymer. Illustrative examples of suitable
solvents include acetone, methanol, ethanol, propanol, isopropanol,
toluene, benzene, cyclohexane, cyclohexanone, tetrahydrofuran,
dimethylsulfoxide, 1,4-dioxane, carbon tetrachloride, methylene
chloride, chloroform, pyridine, trichloroethane,
N,N-dimethylformamide, N,N-dimethylacetamide,
N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone, ethylene carbonate, diethyl carbonate,
propylene carbonate, acetonitrile, and organic acids such as formic
acid, lactic acid and acetic acid. These solvents may be used
singly or as mixtures of two or more thereof.
[0038] The storage method for liquids according to the invention
involves bringing the preservative material for liquids described
above into contact with a liquid.
[0039] Here, the preservative material and the liquid may come into
contact in any suitable manner; the liquid may come into contact
with only part of the surface of the preservative material, or (a
portion of) the liquid may be impregnated into and held by at least
some portion of the voids of the plurality of pores in the
preservative material.
[0040] The amount of preservative material used is not subject to
any particular limitation, provided it is an amount that ensures a
sufficient probability of contact with microorganisms.
Specifically, it is preferable to use at least 1 mg, more
preferably at least 5 mg, and even more preferably at least 10 mg,
of the preservative material per 500 mL of liquid.
[0041] Moreover, in an embodiment wherein a liquid is held in at
least some portion of the voids of the plurality of pores in the
nanofiber material making up the preservative material, the liquid
may be held in an amount not greater than the void volume of the
nanofiber material so as to give a liquid-containing nanofiber
material.
[0042] In such a liquid-containing nanofiber material, because
deterioration of the liquid held at the interior of the voids does
not readily arise, the nanofiber material can be advantageously
employed as, for example, sanitizing wipes, wet tissues, make-up
puffs and sponges which are used over a relatively long period of
time after being opened.
[0043] The liquid which is used for storage is exemplified in
particular by liquids composed primarily of water, including
pharmaceutical products such as eye drops, medicinal drinks and
sprays; cosmetics such as toners, lotions, tonics, shampoos and
rinses; liquids used in toiletries; liquids used in stationery,
such as India ink and other types of ink; liquid cultures, liquid
manure and water placed in vases; and liquids for drinking, such as
drinking water, long shelf life water, juices and alcoholic
beverages.
[0044] The storage container for liquids according to the present
invention is an ordinary liquid storage container having at least
one opening and an interior in which a liquid is placed, wherein a
nanofiber material is disposed at the interior in such a way as to
contact the liquid.
[0045] Here, the place where the nanofiber material is disposed is
not subject to any particular limitation, provided it is a position
that enables the nanofiber material to come into contact with the
liquid. Examples include any place within the container, such as
the inside wall or the bottom surface. However, because the liquid
placed at the interior decreases with use, to enable constant
contact between the liquid and the nanofiber material, when the
material is fixed to the container, it is preferable to dispose the
material in a manner so as to include the bottom surface of the
container. Alternatively, the nanofiber material may be simply
immersed or allowed to float in the liquid without being fixed to
the container.
[0046] Specific modes of use are exemplified by those in which the
nanofiber material is attached to the inside wall and bottom
surface of a container such as a PET bottle, glass bottle, vase or
eye drop container, or in which the nanofiber material is simply
dropped into these containers.
[0047] Also, the inventive storage container for liquids may be one
in which a filter having at least one layer of a nanofiber material
is provided at the opening of the above ordinary liquid storage
container in such a way as to separate the interior of the
container from the exterior.
[0048] Here, the liquid and the nanofiber material come into
contact when the liquid flows into the interior through the opening
and/or when the liquid flows out to the exterior, thereby eliciting
the antibacterial or disinfecting effects of the invention. As a
result, liquid preserving effects are manifested.
[0049] When the above nanofiber material is used as a filter, as
explained above, by adjusting the minimum pore diameter and the
maximum pore diameter within specific ranges, the entry of
microorganisms from the exterior can be blocked. Therefore, through
the synergism of the sterilizing effects on microorganisms in the
liquid and the blocking effect against organisms from the exterior,
it is possible to preserve liquids for a longer period of time.
[0050] Moreover, it is possible to dispose a nanofiber material at
the interior of the container, and also provide a filter which
includes a nanofiber material.
[0051] The nanofiber material may be used alone as a filter, or it
may be laminated with another nonwoven fabric or porous film or
sheet and the resulting laminate used as a filter.
EXAMPLES
[0052] Examples of the invention and Comparative Examples are given
below by way of illustration, and not by way of limitation. Tests
and measurements in the Examples and Comparative Examples below
were carried out by the following methods.
[1] Average Fiber Diameter
[0053] The fiber diameter was measured at 20 places selected at
random from a micrograph obtained by capturing an image of the
specimen surface at a magnification of 5000.times. with a scanning
electron microscope (S-4800I, manufactured by Hitachi
High-Technologies Corporation). The average (n=20) for all the
fiber diameters was calculated and treated as the average fiber
diameter.
[2] Antibacterial Activity Measuring Test 1 (Cell Count Measurement
Method)
[0054] The test was carried out using the following cell count
measurement method (JIS L 1902) described in K.cndot.kin
B.cndot.sh.cndot.Kak.cndot.Seihin no Kak.cndot.K.cndot.ka
Hy.cndot.ka Shiken Manyuaru [Manual for Evaluating and Testing the
Effects of Treatment in Antibacterial Deodorization-Finished
Products] established by the Sen'i Seihin Eisei
Kak.cndot.Ky.cndot.gikai (Japanese Association for the Hygienic
Finishing of Textiles).
[0055] A suspension of Staphylococcus aureus as the test organism
was initially prepared by culturing this organism in a common
bouillon medium and adjusting the concentration to from 10.sup.6 to
10.sup.7 cells/mL. The suspension (0.2 mL) was uniformly inoculated
onto 0.4 g of the specimen in a sterilized threaded vial and static
cultured at 36 to 38.degree. C. for 18 hours, following which 20 mL
of sterile, buffered physiological saline was added to the vessel
and the vessel contents were shaken vigorously by hand 25 to 30
times at an amplitude of 30 cm so as to disperse the live cells in
the specimen within the liquid. Next, a suitable dilution series
was created with sterile, buffered physiological saline, 1 mL of
dilution at each stage was placed in two Petri dishes, and about 15
mL of standard agar culture medium was added. Culturing was then
carried out at 36 to 38.degree. C. for 24 to 48 hours, following
which the number of live colonies was counted and the live cell
count in the specimen was computed in accordance with the degree of
dilution. In rating the effects, the test was judged to be complete
when the growth value exceeded 1.5. The bacteriostatic activity S
and the bactericidal activity L were determined from the following
formulas.
Bacteriostatic activity S=B-C
Bactericidal activity L=A-C
where A: average common log value of live cell count for three
specimens immediately after contacting a standard cloth with test
organisms [0056] B: average common log value of live cell count for
three specimens after culturing standard cloth for 18 hours [0057]
C: average common log value of live cell count for three specimens
after culturing antibacterially finished specimen for 18 hours
[3] Antibacterial Activity Measuring Test 2 (Antibacterial Finished
Product--Antibacterial Test Method; JIS Z 2801)
[0058] S. aureus, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae as the
test organisms were initially cultured on a common agar medium
(Nissui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.), and the grown colonies were
scraped off and suspended in a 1/500 concentration common bouillon
medium (Eiken Chemical Co., Ltd.) to give test organism suspensions
adjusted to about 10.sup.6 CFU (colony forming units)/mL.
[0059] A 50 mm square reinforced polyethylene film was placed in a
sterile Petri dish, and the specimen (40 mm square, 0.1 g) was
placed on top thereof. The test organism suspension (0.1 mL) was
added dropwise to the specimen, and a 50 mm square reinforced
polyethylene film was covered over and brought into close contact
with the specimen. This state is one in which an amount of liquid
not greater than the void volume of the specimen is held in the
specimen. The inoculated specimen was then placed in a closed
vessel held at a relative humidity of at least 90% RH and a
temperature of 35.+-.1.degree. C., and allowed to act for 24 hours.
After 24 hours of action, the specimen was recovered in a sterile
stomacher bag, 10 mL of a soybean casein digest broth with lecithin
and polysorbate (SCDLP) bouillon medium (Eiken Chemical Co., Ltd.)
was added, and the test organisms were washed out. Using the
washing as the stock solution, a ten-fold dilution series was
prepared. One milliliter each of this sample stock solution and of
the dilutions were prepared as pour plates with a standard agar
medium (Nissui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.) and cultured at
35.+-.1.degree. C. for 48 hours, following which the colonies that
grew on the medium were counted and the number of test organisms
for each specimen was determined.
[4] Antibacterial Activity Measuring Test 3 (Antibacterial Activity
Evaluating Test for Airborne Organisms)
[0060] Using a 1 m.sup.3 test chamber made of polyvinyl chloride,
two stirring fans were placed in diagonally opposed corners on the
floor surface. A bacterial suspension spraying hole and an airborne
bacteria collecting hole were provided at the center of one
sidewall of the test chamber, a bacterial suspension spraying
device and a filter holder were connected thereto, and an airborne
bacteria collecting unit was connected after the filter holder. A
glass nebulizer containing a test organism suspension was used as
the bacterial suspension spraying device, and a glass midget
impinger was used as the airborne bacteria collecting unit.
[0061] S. aureus as the test organism was cultured in tryptic soy
agar (TSA medium; available from Difco). The grown colonies were
scraped off and suspended in sterile ion-exchanged water to form a
test organism suspension adjusted to about 10.sup.9 cells/mL.
[0062] Compressed air was delivered to the bacterial
suspension-containing glass nebulizer from a compressor and the
test organism suspension was sprayed into the test chamber at a
rate of 0.2 mL/min for 10 minutes, thereby suspending the bacteria
in air (the airborne cell count was about 2.times.10.sup.9
cell/1,000 L). The suspended bacteria within the chamber were
collected through a specimen (diameter, 49 mm) placed in the filter
holder. That is, a glass midget impinger in which 20 mL of sterile
physiological saline had been placed was connected after the filter
holder, and air within the test chamber was collected each time at
a rate of 5 L/min for 10 minutes (=50 L). As a control, the
airborne bacteria within the chamber were collected through a
filter holder in which a specimen had not been placed.
[0063] Using as the stock solution the sterile physiological saline
within the impinger after the test organisms had been collected, a
ten-fold dilution series was prepared. One milliliter each of this
sample stock solution and of the dilutions were prepared as pour
plates with a TSA medium and cultured at 35.degree. C. for 48
hours, following which the grown colonies were counted and the
number of organisms that passed through the specimen per 50 L of
air was determined.
[0064] At the same time that the attached cells were passed through
the specimen in this way, the cells that attached to the specimen
were subjected to the subsequently described evaluation as
specimen-attached cells. Air within the test chamber containing
suspended cells was passed through the specimen placed in the
filter holder at a rate of 5 L/min for 10 minutes (=50 L), causing
the test organisms to attach to the specimen. The specimen to which
test organisms had been made to attach was removed from the filter
holder, placed in a closed vessel filled with the vapor of a 1.8 wt
% sodium chloride solution (35.degree. C.; relative humidity, 90%),
and held for 24 hours.
[0065] The test specimens were then removed, each was placed in a
sterile stomacher bag, 10 mL of SCDLP medium (Eiken Chemical Co.,
Ltd.) was added, and the attached cells were washed out. Using the
washing as the stock solution, a ten-fold dilution series was
created. One milliliter each of this sample stock solution and of
the dilutions were prepared as pour plates with TSA medium and
cultured at 35.degree. C. for 48 hours, following which the number
of colonies that grew on the medium were counted and the number of
attached cells was determined.
[5] Antibacterial Efficacy Measuring Test
[0066] Specimens were placed in amounts of 10 mg, 0.1 g or 0.2 g in
a sterilized wide-mouth bottle (mouth diameter, 3 cm), and 500 mL
of pre-sterilized drinking water was placed in each bottle so that
the drinking water was in contact with all portions of the
specimen. These bottles were left to stand uncapped at room
temperature for 30 minutes, following which they were capped and
held at room temperature for two weeks. After two weeks, 200 .mu.L
of each solution was inoculated onto a standard agar medium,
incubated at 37.degree. C. for 48 hours, and the colonies that
formed were observed. The antibacterial properties were evaluated
based on the common bacteria within the solution.
[0067] -: no change (no colonies formed)
[0068] +: changed (colonies formed)
[6] Skin Toner Storage Efficacy Test
[0069] S. aureus and E. coli as the test organisms were initially
cultured in a common agar medium (Nissui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.),
and the grown colonies were scraped off and suspended in a 1/500
concentration common bouillon medium (Eiken Chemical Co., Ltd.) to
give test organism suspensions adjusted to about 10.sup.7 CFU
(colony forming units)/mL. The test organism suspension (0.1 mL)
was added to 100 mL of skin toner (FDR Lotion M, available from
Fancl Corporation), and a toner test solution for each organism was
prepared to a cell concentration of 10.sup.4 CFU/mL. The toner test
solutions were each dispensed in an amount of 30 mL to a 50 mL
centrifuge tube and a given amount of the specimen was placed
therein, following which the tubes were stored at room temperature
for a given number of days (0, 1, 3 or 7 days). The cell counts for
the toner test solutions were measured by the pour plate method
after the respective number of days of storage had elapsed. As a
control, a similar test was carried out on a skin toner test
solution in which the specimen was not placed.
[7] Minimum Pore Size and Maximum Pore Size Measurement Test
[0070] The pore sizes were measured and evaluated as described
below based on the bubble point method (ASTM F316, JIS K 3832).
[0071] Using a perm porometer (model CFP-1200A manufactured by
PMI), dry air was passed through a sample having a measurement
diameter of 25 mm and the air flow rate was observed as the air
pressure was increased in stages (dry flow rate curve).
[0072] Next, the sample was soaked in Galwick (available from PMI)
having a surface tension of 16 dynes/cm, and the soaked sample was
pretreated by degassing in a vacuum drier so that no bubbles
remained in the sample. Dry air was passed through the pretreated
sample, and the air flow rate was observed as the air pressure was
increased in stages (wet flow rate curve).
[0073] The minimum pore size and the maximum pore size were
determined from these two dry and wet flow rate curves.
[1] Production of Preservative Material for Liquids
Example 1
Polylactic Acid
[0074] Ten parts by weight of polylactic acid resin (LACEA H280,
available from Mitsui Chemicals, Inc.) and 45 parts by weight of
dimethylformamide (abbreviated below as "DMF") were mixed and
heated to 60.degree. C., thereby dissolving the polylactic acid
resin in the DMF and obtaining 55 parts by weight of a polylactic
acid-containing solution (solids content, 18 wt %).
[0075] This lactic acid-containing solution (spinning dope) was
placed in a syringe and electrostatic spinning was carried out at a
discharge tip orifice diameter of 0.4 mm, an applied voltage of 20
KV (at room temperature and atmospheric pressure), and a distance
from the discharge tip orifice to the fibrous substance collecting
electrode of 15 cm, thereby giving a preservative material for
liquids (nanofiber nonwoven fabric).
[0076] The resulting nonwoven fabric had an average fiber diameter
of 500 nm, and fibers with a diameter greater than 3 .mu.m were not
observed.
Example 2
Nylon 6
[0077] Ten parts by weight of nylon 6 (A1030BRT, produced by
Unitika, Ltd.) was dissolved in 57 parts by weight of formic acid
at room temperature (25.degree. C.), thereby obtaining 67 parts by
weight of a nylon 6-containing solution (solids content, 15 wt
%).
[0078] This nylon 6-containing solution (spinning dope) was placed
in a syringe and electrostatic spinning was carried out at a
discharge tip orifice diameter of 0.4 mm and an applied voltage of
50 KV (at room temperature and atmospheric pressure), thereby
giving a preservative material for liquids (nanofiber nonwoven
fabric). The resulting nonwoven fabric had an average fiber
diameter of 250 nm, and fibers with a diameter greater than 1 .mu.m
were not observed.
Example 3
Polyacrylonitrile
[0079] Ten parts by weight of polyacrylonitrile (Barex 1000S;
available from Mitsui Chemicals, Inc.) was dissolved in 40 parts by
weight of DMF at room temperature (25.degree. C.) to give 50 parts
by weight of a polyacrylonitrile-containing solution (solids
content, 20 wt %).
[0080] This polyacrylonitrile-containing solution (spinning dope)
was placed in a syringe and electrostatic spinning was carried out
at a discharge tip orifice diameter of 0.4 mm, an applied voltage
of 30 KV (at room temperature and atmospheric pressure), and a
distance from the discharge tip orifice to the fibrous substance
collecting electrode of 15 cm, thereby giving a preservative
material for liquids (nanofiber nonwoven fabric).
[0081] The resulting nonwoven fabric had an average fiber diameter
of 100 nm, and fibers with a diameter greater than 1 .mu.m were not
observed.
Example 4
Cellulose
[0082] A cuprammonium solution was prepared by weighing out 0.768 g
of copper hydroxide (Wako Pure Chemical Industries) into a flask,
then adding 17.86 g of a 28% aqueous ammonia solution (Wako Pure
Chemical Industries) and 1.372 g of water. One part by weight of
absorbent cotton (Hakujuji Co., Ltd.) was added to 20 parts by
weight of this solution, thereby giving 21 parts by weight of a
cellulose-containing solution (solids content, about 4.8 wt %). The
solution was stirred for 18 hours at room temperature, and the
starting cotton was confirmed to have completely dissolved.
[0083] This cellulose-containing solution (spinning dope) was
placed in a syringe and electrostatic spinning was carried out at a
discharge tip orifice diameter of 0.4 mm, an applied voltage of 30
KV (at room temperature and atmospheric pressure), and a distance
from the discharge tip orifice to the fibrous substance collecting
electrode of 10 cm, thereby giving a nanofiber nonwoven fabric. The
resulting nanofiber nonwoven fabric was washed with 0.1 mol/L
hydrochloric acid so as to remove the copper ions, thereby giving
the target preservative material for liquids (nanofiber nonwoven
fabric).
[0084] The resulting nonwoven fabric had an average fiber diameter
of 700 nm, and fibers with a diameter greater than 1.5 .mu.m were
not observed.
Comparative Example 1
Polylactic Acid
[0085] The same polylactic acid resin as in Example 1 was melt spun
at a spinning temperature of 160.degree. C. using monofilament
nozzles, thereby giving filaments having an average diameter of 20
.mu.m. The resulting filaments were separated and dispersed, then
deposited on a moving conveyor screen-type condenser to form a web.
Next, the constituent filaments were united with each other by
subjecting the web to a conventional nonwoven fabric-forming
operation, thereby giving a nonwoven fabric. The average fiber
diameter was 20,000 nm.
Comparative Example 2
Nylon 6
[0086] The same nylon 6 resin as in Example 2 was melted at a
spinning temperature of 260.degree. C., and formed into a nonwoven
fabric by the same process as in Comparative Example 1. The average
fiber diameter was 15,000 nm.
Comparative Example 3
Polyacrylonitrile
[0087] The same polyacrylonitrile resin as in Example 3 was melted
at a spinning temperature of 260.degree. C. using a pressure
melter-type melt spinning machine, and formed into a nonwoven
fabric by the same process as in Comparative Example 1. The average
fiber diameter was 30,000 nm.
Comparative Example 4
Cellulose
[0088] The same absorbent cotton (Hakujuji Co., Ltd.) as in Example
4 was used. A web was formed by a conventional wet method, and a
nonwoven fabric was obtained by directing a high-pressure stream of
water at the cotton to mutually entangle the fibers. The average
fiber diameter was 30,000 nm.
[0089] Antibacterial Activity Measuring Tests 1 to 3, the
antibacterial efficacy measuring test, the skin toner storage
efficacy test (Examples 2 and 3 only), and the minimum pore size
and maximum pore size measurement test were carried out on the
nonwoven fabrics obtained in Examples 1 to 4 and Comparative
Examples 1 to 4. The results of Antibacterial Activity Measuring
Test 1 are shown in Table 1, the results of Antibacterial Activity
Measuring Test 2 are shown in Table 2, the results of Antibacterial
Activity Measuring Test 3 are shown in Table 3 (passed cell count)
and Table 4 (antibacterial activity against attached cells), the
results of the antibacterial efficacy measuring test are shown in
Table 5, the results of the skin toner storage efficacy test are
shown in Table 6 (S. aureus) and Table 7 (E. coli), and results of
the minimum pore size and maximum pore size measurement test are
shown in Table 8.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Average fiber Antibacterial tests* diameter
Live cell Bacteriostatic Bactericidal (nm) Resin count activity
activity Example 1 500 polylactic acid <600 >4.1 >1.5 2
250 nylon 6 <600 >4.1 >1.5 3 100 polyacrylonitrile <600
>4.1 >1.5 4 700 cellulose <600 >4.1 >1.5 Comparative
1 20,000 polylactic acid 4.5 .times. 10.sup.7 -0.3 -2.9 Example 2
15,000 nylon 6 7.4 .times. 10.sup.7 -0.3 -2.5 3 30,000
polyacrylonitrile 7.2 .times. 10.sup.7 -0.3 -1.8 4 30,000 cellulose
7.9 .times. 10.sup.7 -0.3 -2.5 *Standard cloth (cotton) Immediately
after inoculation: 1.9 .times. 10.sup.4 After 18 hours of
culturing: 7.9 .times. 10.sup.6
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Average fiber Live cell count diameter
Staphylococcus Klebsiella Escherichia (nm) Resin aureus pneumoniae
coli Example 1 500 polylactic acid <10 <10 -- 2 250 nylon 6
<10 <10 48 3 100 polyacrylonitrile <10 <10 1,800 4 700
cellulose <10 <10 <10 Comparative 1 20,000 polylactic acid
380,000 1,500,000 -- Example 2 15,000 nylon 6 400,000 1,400,000 --
3 30,000 polyacrylonitrile 400,000 1,400,000 -- 4 30,000 cellulose
420,000 1,600,000 20,000,000
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Passed cell count Average Passed cell count
fiber diameter (nm) Resin (cells/50 L of air) Example 1 500
polylactic acid <10 2 250 nylon 6 <10 3 100 polyacrylonitrile
<10 4 700 cellulose <10 Comparative 1 20,000 polylactic acid
1,500,000 Example 2 15,000 nylon 6 1,200,000 3 30,000
polyacrylonitrile 1,400,000 4 30,000 cellulose 1,600,000
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Antibacterial activity against attached
cells Average fiber diameter (nm) Resin Attached cell count Example
1 500 polylactic acid <10 2 250 nylon 6 <10 3 100
polyacrylonitrile <10 4 700 cellulose <10 Comparative 1
20,000 polylactic acid 3,300,000 Example 2 15,000 nylon 6 2,100,000
3 30,000 polyacrylonitrile 4,200,000 4 30,000 cellulose
4,200,000
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Average fiber Amount of diameter
preservative material (nm) Resin 10 mg 0.1 g 0.2 g Example 1 500
polylactic acid - - - 2 250 nylon 6 - - - 3 100 polyacrylonitrile -
- - 4 700 cellulose - - - Comparative 1 20,000 polylactic acid + +
+ Example 2 15,000 nylon 6 + + + 3 30,000 polyacrylonitrile + + + 4
30,000 cellulose + + + Control: distilled water only +
TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Skin toner storage efficacy test (S. aureus)
Specimen S. aureus count Weight (g)/ After After After 30 mL of 1
day 3 days 7 days test of of of Resin solution 0 days storage
storage storage Example 2 nylon 6 0.4 -- 16,000 2,000 <10 2
nylon 6 0.2 -- 19,000 4,000 <10 3 polyacrylonitrile 0.4 --
12,000 <10 <10 3 polyacrylonitrile 0.2 -- 12,000 260 <10
Control -- -- 37,000 22,000 14,000 8,400 Control: Skin toner test
solution only
TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Skin toner storage efficacy test (E. coli)
Specimen E. coli count Weight (g)/ After After After 30 mL of 1 day
3 days 7 days test of of of Resin solution 0 days storage storage
storage Example 2 nylon 6 0.4 -- 21,000 7,000 <10 2 nylon 6 0.2
-- 26,000 7,600 40 3 polyacrylonitrile 0.4 -- 20,000 230 <10 3
polyacrylonitrile 0.2 -- 23,000 2,400 <10 Control -- -- 44,000
22,000 22,000 11,000 Control: Skin toner test solution only
TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Average fiber diameter Pore size (.mu.m)
(nm) Resin Minimum Maximum Example 1 500 polylactic acid 0.0432
0.7070 2 250 nylon 6 0.0176 0.501 3 100 polyacrylonitrile 0.0210
0.8560 4 700 cellulose 0.0500 0.9500 Comparative 1 20,000
polylactic acid 15.0 102.0 Example 2 15,000 nylon 6 9.0 80.5 3
30,000 polyacrylonitrile 19.0 132.3 4 30,000 cellulose 19.0
132.3
[0090] It is apparent from Tables 1 to 4 that the preservative
materials obtained in Examples 1 to 4 had antibacterial activities,
and it is apparent from Tables 5 to 7 that bacteria did not grow in
solutions stored using these preservative materials. Moreover, it
is apparent from Table 3 that the preservative materials used in
Examples 1 to 4 allowed substantially no bacteria to pass
through.
* * * * *