U.S. patent application number 13/527768 was filed with the patent office on 2012-10-18 for system and method for blocking objectionable communications in a social network.
This patent application is currently assigned to RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED. Invention is credited to Raymond Reddy, Chris Wormald.
Application Number | 20120266257 13/527768 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 42631812 |
Filed Date | 2012-10-18 |
United States Patent
Application |
20120266257 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Wormald; Chris ; et
al. |
October 18, 2012 |
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR BLOCKING OBJECTIONABLE COMMUNICATIONS IN A
SOCIAL NETWORK
Abstract
A system and method blocks objectionable communications in a
social network. A first user of the social network determines when
communications from a second user to the first user that are
displayed and viewed by third party users of the social network are
objectionable. In response, the first user blocks further display
of communications from the second user to the first user that were
intended by the second user to be displayed and viewed by third
party users of the social network.
Inventors: |
Wormald; Chris; (Kitchener,
CA) ; Reddy; Raymond; (Toronto, CA) |
Assignee: |
RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED
Waterloo
CA
|
Family ID: |
42631812 |
Appl. No.: |
13/527768 |
Filed: |
June 20, 2012 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
12392121 |
Feb 25, 2009 |
8209266 |
|
|
13527768 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
726/27 |
Current CPC
Class: |
G06Q 50/01 20130101;
G06Q 10/10 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
726/27 |
International
Class: |
G06F 21/24 20060101
G06F021/24; G06F 15/16 20060101 G06F015/16 |
Claims
1. A method for blocking objectionable communications in a social
network, comprising: transmitting data from a communications module
of a social network server to communications devices to display a
user interface on the communications devices and post
communications between a first and second user that are viewed by
third party users of the social network; the social network server
automatically determining when communications from the second user
that are posted and displayed and viewed by third party users are
objectionable based on preference settings established by the first
user in the user interface, and in response, blocking further
display of communications from the second user to the first user
that can be viewed by third party users; and displaying further
communications from the second user only to the first user while
blocking display of those communications to the third party
users.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the second user is an
approved user designated by the first user to display
communications to the third party users.
3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the approved second
user is a friend designated by the first user.
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the third party users
are approved users designated by the first user.
5. The method according to claim 4, wherein the approved third
party users are friends designated by the first user.
6. The method according to claim 1, the preference settings
established by the first user in a penalty box of the user
interface on the communications device.
7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the communications from
the second user to the first user comprise posting communications
on a wall of the first user.
8. The method according to claim 1, and further comprising blocking
the second user for a predetermined period of time and allowing
further display of communications from the second user to the first
user to be viewed by the third party users after the predetermined
period of time has passed.
9. The method according to claim 1, and further comprising
indicating to the second user that the communications to the first
user that are intended to be displayed to other third party users
have been blocked.
10. The method according to claim 9, and further comprising
indicating to the second user that the second user has been placed
within a penalty box status indicative of the first user blocking
the second user.
11. The method according to claim 1, wherein communications between
first and second users comprise instant messaging
communications.
12. The method according to claim 1, further comprising: displaying
on a user interface of the first user a penalty box indicating that
the second user is no longer able to post communications intended
from the second user to the first user.
13. A communications system, comprising: a social network server
that is configured to provide a user interface for a social network
and allow a first user to receive communications from a second user
that are displayed and viewed by third party users of the social
network; and a communications module that communicates with the
first and second users and third party users and receives a
blocking request from the first user and communicates the blocking
request to the social network server for blocking further display
to the third party users of communications from the second user to
the first user that are intended to be displayed and viewed by the
third party users after the social network server has automatically
determined that the communications from the second user are
objectionable based on preference settings established by the first
user, said social network server is operative with the
communications module for displaying communications from the second
user only to the first user while blocking display of those
communications to the third party users.
14. The system according to claim 13, wherein the second user is an
approved user designated by the first user to display
communications to the third party users.
15. The system according to claim 14, wherein the approved second
user is a friend designated by the first user.
16. The system according to claim 13, wherein the approved third
party users are approved users designated by the first user.
17. The system according to claim 16, wherein the third party users
are friends designated by the first user.
18. The system according to claim 13, the preference settings
established by the first user in a penalty box of the user
interface.
19. The system according to claim 13, wherein said social network
server is operative for implementing a wall of the first user to
which communications from other users of the social network can be
posted, wherein the communications from the second user to the
first user comprise posting communications on the wall of the first
user.
20. The system according to claim 13, wherein said social network
server is operative with the communications module for blocking the
second user for a predetermined period of time and allowing further
display of communications from the second user to the first user to
be viewed by the third party users after the predetermined period
of time has passed.
21. The system according to claim 13, wherein said social network
server is operative with the communications module for indicating
to the second user that their communications to the first user and
that are intended to be displayed to other third party users have
been blocked.
22. The system according to claim 21, and further comprising
indicating to the second user that the second user has been placed
within a penalty box status indicative of the first user blocking
the second user.
23. The system according to claim 13, wherein the communications
between first and second users comprise instant messaging
communications.
24. A non-transitory computer-readable medium having stored thereon
computer-executable instructions for blocking objectionable
communications in a social network, comprising: receiving
communications from a second user to a first user that are viewed
by third party users of the social network; and blocking further
display of communications from the second user to the first user
that were intended by the second user to be displayed and viewed by
third party users of the social network after automatically
determining that the communications from the second user are
objectionable based on preference settings established by the first
user in a user interface; and displaying further communications
from the second user only to the first user while blocking display
of those communications to the third party users.
25. The non-transitory computer-readable medium according to claim
24, wherein said computer-executable instructions are operable for
blocking the second user for a predetermined period of time and
allowing further display of communications from the second user to
the first user to be viewed by the third party users after the
predetermined period of time has passed.
26. The non-transitory computer-readable medium according to claim
24, wherein said computer-executable instructions are operable for
processing instant messaging communications.
27. The non-transitory computer-readable medium according to claim
24, where the preference settings are established by the first user
in a penalty box of the user interface.
28. A method for blocking objectionable communications in a social
network, comprising: transmitting data from a communications module
of a social network server to communications devices to display a
user interface on the communications devices and post
communications between a first and second user that are viewed by
third party users of the social network; the social network server
automatically determining when communications from the second user
that are posted and displayed and viewed by third party users are
objectionable based on preference settings established by the first
user, and in response, blocking further display of communications
from the second user to the first user that can be viewed by third
party users; and displaying on a user interface of the first user a
penalty box indicating that the second user is no longer able to
post communications intended from the second user to the first
user.
29. The method according to claim 28, the preference settings
established by the first user in the penalty box of the user
interface of the first user.
Description
PRIORITY CLAIM
[0001] This application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 12/392,121 filed Feb. 25, 2009, the entire
disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference and
to which the instant application claims priority.
TECHNICAL FIELD
[0002] The present disclosure relates to the field of
communications systems, and more particularly, to communications in
a social network.
BACKGROUND
[0003] Social networking sites, for example, Facebook.TM.,
MySpace.TM., and similar social network sites as well as Instant
Messaging systems, online chat room and bulletin boards, often have
private and public communications that are viewable not only by the
immediate users, but also by third party users of the social
network or Instant Messaging system. These users could be approved
or designated friends by a first user to communicate and view other
communications from similarly designated friends.
[0004] Often in a social network site or Instant Messaging system,
a rogue user will write or text an inappropriate message or do an
annoying action, such as engaging in an incorrect "poke" to annoy a
user or publicly post an unsavory comment about the user.
[0005] For example, a first user could have a message wall as in
Facebook.TM. in which the communications from a second user to the
first user are displayed and can be viewed by third party users of
the social network. The second user may post on this wall
inappropriate or objectionable messages. If the messages are
private messages only intended for the first user, then the first
user may not be overly bothered. If the messages are public
messages to be viewed by others such as the third party users,
however, then the first user may consider these messages
inappropriate for public consumption. Similar instances can occur
in an Instant Messaging system in which messages from a second user
to the first user are inappropriate and the first user does not
want other third party users to see the inappropriate messages and
inappropriate content.
[0006] One technical solution to this problem of inappropriate
messages being posted by the second user on the wall of the first
user is to no longer designate the second user as a friend. When
this occurs, the second user may not view or post messages on the
wall of the first user. This solution could have issues if the
second user as a friend is a family member or long-standing close
friend who only needs the inappropriate behavior modified in an
appropriate manner while discontinuing any public posting of such
inappropriate messages and communications.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0007] Other objects, features and advantages of the present
invention will become apparent from the detailed description which
follows, when considered in light of the accompanying drawings in
which:
[0008] FIG. 1 is a flow diagram illustrating basic aspects of a
method for blocking objectionable communications in a social
network or similar communications network in accordance with a
non-limiting example;
[0009] FIG. 2 is a high-level block diagram showing a
communications system that includes a social network server with
Instant Messaging functionality, a communications network and
various first, second and third party users of the social network
in accordance with a non-limiting example;
[0010] FIG. 3 is a representation of a social network site user
interface showing a penalty box as a non-limiting example; and
[0011] FIG. 4 is a schematic block diagram illustrating example
components of a mobile wireless communications device that could be
used with the system as described relative to FIGS. 1-3.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0012] Different embodiments will now be described more fully
hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which
preferred embodiments are shown. Many different forms can be set
forth and described embodiments should not be construed as limited
to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are
provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and
will fully convey the scope to those skilled in the art. Like
numbers refer to like elements throughout.
[0013] Generally speaking, a method and system, in accordance with
non-limiting examples, blocks objectionable communications in a
social network or other similar communications network such as an
Instant Messaging network where a second user communicates with a
first user such as by communications posted on a wall to be viewed
by other third party users of the system. These users could all be
designated friends. The social network communications could also
refer to wall posting and Instant Messaging. In one aspect, a first
user of the social network determines when communications from a
second user to the first user that are displayed and viewed by
third party users of the social network are objectionable. In
response, the first user blocks further display of communications
from the second user to the first user that were intended by the
second user to be displayed and viewed by third party users of the
social network.
[0014] The second user is typically an approved user designated by
the first user to display communications to the third party users.
The approved second user is typically a friend designated by the
first user. Third party users typically also are approved users
designated by the first user, and typically are designated as
friends in some social networks, such as Facebook.TM. as a
non-limiting example.
[0015] In one aspect, the communications system includes a social
network server that is configured to provide a user interface for
the social network communications and allow the first user to
receive the communications from the second user that are displayed
and viewed by third party users of the social network. A
communications module can communicate with the first and second
users and the third party users such as through a communications
network, e.g., an internet, and receive a blocking request from the
first user and communicate the blocking request to the social
network server for blocking further display to the third party
users of communications from the second user to the first user that
are intended to be displayed and viewed by third party users.
[0016] It is possible to display any further communications from
the second user only to the first user, while blocking further
display of those communications to the third party users. These
communications from the second user to the first user could include
communications posted on a wall of the first user or texting by
Instant Messaging. In one aspect, the second user can be blocked
for a predetermined period of time. This allows further display of
communications from the second user to the first user to be viewed
by the third party users after the predetermined period of time has
passed. In another aspect, an indication can be sent to the second
user that the communications to the first user that are intended to
be displayed to other third party users has been blocked and can no
longer be viewed. This indication could be an indication that the
second user has been placed in a penalty box status. Graphics could
be established from the social network server to be viewed on user
displays, such as on a personal computer or portable wireless
communications device, showing a penalty box status. The graphics
could be public or private, making the penalty box status a private
or public punishment depending on what action is desired by the
first user.
[0017] The communications between first and second users could be
Instant Messaging communications as part of a social network or as
part of another Instant Messaging communications system. A computer
readable medium is also set forth.
[0018] FIG. 1 is a high-level flowchart of an example of a method
used for blocking objectionable communications in a communications
network such as the example social network described above. As
shown, a first user establishes a social network wall for posting
and viewing communications from friends (block 100). Certain users
are designated as friends by the first user. These friends can post
to the wall. A second user as a friend posts communications to the
wall of the first user that are viewed by third party users, for
example, friends of the first user (block 102). A determination is
made whether the communications from the second user are
objectionable to the first user (block 104). This determination can
be automatic based on predetermined criteria such as preference
settings established by the first user. For instance, messages
containing a particular word could be automatically determined as
objectionable by the social network server. The user can control
the objectionable vocabulary through preference settings in a
penalty box or other user interface. It is also possible for the
first user to make an objection on-the-fly as to the content and
communications that are objectionable based on predetermined
criteria that the user decides at that moment and in response send
a request to the social network server to block communications as
explained below. If the communications from the second user are not
objectionable, the second user can continue posting communications
to the wall of the first user. This allows viewing by the third
party users (block 106).
[0019] If the communications from the second user, however, are
objectionable, the first user sends a blocking request to the
social network server to block the second user from posting further
communications to the wall of the first user (block 108). It should
be understood that blocking requests can be accomplished at the
request of the first user or it can be accomplished automatically
by the social network server based on the first user's
predetermined criteria, such as preference settings. The second
user is blocked for a predetermined period of time (block 110),
which can vary from a few to 48 hours, for example, to longer
periods of time. During that time, the first user may not wish to
view any posts from the second user or view additional posts, while
third party users cannot view these posts. After the predetermined
period of time has lapsed, the second user is unblocked and is
allowed to post again to the wall of the first user (block 112).
The process then repeats with step 104 and the first user (or
server) again determines if the second user's communications are
objectionable. Although the process would continue with the
blocking and unblocking steps as described, it could be that if on
the second repetition the second user's communications are
objectionable, the blocking action can occur for a much longer
predetermined period of time or the second user can be permanently
blocked.
[0020] FIG. 2 illustrates a communications system 200, in
accordance with a non-limiting example, that can incorporate the
method as described relative to FIG. 1. This communications system
200 could be for a social network or Instant Messaging or a
combination of both. As illustrated, a social network server 202
includes a processor 204 and associated database 206 and
communications module 208. The database 206 can store data relating
to various applications that can be drawn upon by users, including
third party applications, data relating to the users and friends,
data for stored programs and other stored data that can be used in
the social network. The processor 204 is operative with the
database 206 and the communications module 208 and processes data
for a user interface to be used by different users, Instant
Messaging applications in one non-limiting example, third party
applications, such as Facebook.TM. mark-up language applications
and other social network functions. Data is transmitted to and from
different users through the communications module 208 as part of
the social network server 202 through the communications network
220 to the first user 210, second user 222 and various third party
users 224. The communications network 210 could be a wireless
communications network and the different users could use portable
wireless communications devices or personal computers as part of
their office or business. The communications network 210 could also
be a wireless network that communicates with a public switched
telephone network.
[0021] The social network server 202 could be formed from a
plurality of different servers, with each server having one or more
processors, one or more databases and one or more communications
modules. Load balancing could be used when different servers are
employed. It should also be understood that different users can
communicate with each other through the communications network and
incorporate Instant Messaging functionality using an Instant
Messaging server 230 and operating through the communications
network to each other. Functionality for a blocking request from a
first user can be incorporated into an Instant Messaging server 230
(which could be part of the social network server as illustrated or
separate therefrom) and having Instant Messaging functionality.
[0022] FIG. 3 shows an example of a user interface that is
established by a social network site that transmits data to a user
device to display a social network wall depicting a user interface
at 300 that includes the various user interactions and display of
information for the social network site. For example, the name of
the user could be displayed with logout information and a listing
of on-line friends such as shown as the top portion at 300a and in
this example listing Joe Friend and Larry Friend as "friends." This
could be followed by general information such as requests for
friend suggestions or friend requests and a line for "what are you
doing now." Other applications and news feeds and comments are
shown including some advertising by a sponsor shown at 300b.
[0023] A penalty box 302 is shown at the bottom left and displays
information regarding the users that are placed in the penalty box
such that communications to the first user from the second user
cannot be posted to third party users and to the first user if the
first user elects not to view them. For example, a first data item
in the penalty box 302 could be information concerning the identity
of the person placed in the penalty box and whether that person
should be removed (304). A picture of that person could be
displayed. At line 306, any individual that should be added to the
penalty box can be listed. Penalty box settings are set at line 308
and the user can use the user interface at line 308 to establish
predetermined criteria of what types of communications should be
blocked. Line 310 shows basic information concerning which person
was recently removed from the penalty box such as John Mean.
[0024] It should be understood that the method and system as
described typically incorporates software such as part of a social
network platform software, for example, a Facebook.TM. platform,
that provides a framework for different third party developers to
create applications that interact with the core Facebook.TM.
features. For example, in accordance with non-limiting examples,
the blocking feature as described could be incorporated as a third
party application that uses the Facebook.TM. Mark-up Language
(FBML) with an extension to HTML. Different tag sets can be
supported and used with the blocking feature as described such as
different social data tags, sanitization tags, design tags,
component tags and control tags.
[0025] In one aspect, the Facebook.TM. Mark-up Language can use the
extensions and tags with mark-up tags and procedural tags that
include UI elements such that different users can be identified
with a UID (User Identifier). Specific users could view
communications posted made by a particular second user that has
been determined to have inappropriate postings. For example, a
graphic could be displayed that appears as a penalty box in which
the second user is placed. This graphic could be displayed only to
that second user that has been found to post offending messages, or
the graphic could be displayed to one or both the first user and
second user. If the first user wants a more public humiliation, the
graphic for the penalty box with the second user displayed in the
penalty box could be displayed also to third party users. Also, an
application could be implemented in which the first user could
select specific friends or other users with specific UID's to view
the penalty box.
[0026] One advantageous aspect is the first user deciding when a
second user has objectionable behavior or communications in the
social network and must be placed in the penalty box. There have
been some proposals for curtailing objectionable behavior in a
web-based social network in which actions of users of the social
network are monitored by the social network system itself for
objectionable behavior. In those systems, a policy is determined
based on the behaviors and warnings issued. A user's account may be
suspended. The social network system itself takes corrective action
if a threshold is exceeded. This is different from the system and
method as described above in which the first user that has
implemented the wall objects to the behavior of a second user and
places the second user in the penalty box.
[0027] It should be understood that social content can be used with
social data tags, which can retrieve and format data to an
application or a specific user making a request. An example is the
blocking request having data that takes many forms, such as
including specific user information, group information or even
photos such as of a penalty box. A social data tag can identify and
render a user's name in different ways.
[0028] Sanitization tags can be used with different users that each
may have different standards. Some users may want to sanitize or
remove certain HTML tags, such as used by a second user that has
objectionable behavior. A first user can define specific design
tags to define the look of the page of a penalty box. Component
tags can be used for allowing user interaction, for example, the
second user interacting with one of at least the first user and
third party users according to the rules of a penalty box status.
For example, only certain types of messages could be posted or
messages posted only at certain times of the day. Control tags
could be used to allow other users to show content only to the
owner of an application profile box. Thus, the penalty box could be
hid from other third party users and displayed to the second party
user and first party use or just the first party user. Control tags
could be used for such a purpose.
[0029] Example components of a hand-held mobile wireless
communications device 1000 that may be used in accordance the
system as described in FIGS. 1-3 is further described in the
example below with reference to FIG. 4. The device 1000
illustratively includes a housing 1200, a keypad 1400 and an output
device 1600. The output device shown is a display 1600, which may
comprise a full graphic LCD. In some embodiments, display 1600 may
comprise a touch-sensitive input and output device. Other types of
output devices may alternatively be utilized. A processing device
1800 is contained within the housing 1200 and is coupled between
the keypad 1400 and the display 1600. The processing device 1800
controls the operation of the display 1600, as well as the overall
operation of the mobile device 1000, in response to actuation of
keys on the keypad 1400 by the user. In some embodiments, keypad
1400 may comprise a physical keypad or a virtual keypad (e.g.,
using a touch-sensitive interface) or both.
[0030] The housing 1200 may be elongated vertically, or may take on
other sizes and shapes (including clamshell housing structures).
The keypad 1400 may include a mode selection key, or other hardware
or software for switching between text entry and telephony
entry.
[0031] In addition to the processing device 1800, other parts of
the mobile device 1000 are shown schematically in FIG. 4. These
include a communications subsystem 1001; a short-range
communications subsystem 1020; the keypad 1400 and the display
1600, along with other input/output devices 1060, 1080, 1100 and
1120; as well as memory devices 1160, 1180 and various other device
subsystems 1201. The mobile device 1000 may comprise a two-way RF
communications device having voice and data communications
capabilities. In addition, the mobile device 1000 may have the
capability to communicate with other computer systems via the
Internet.
[0032] Operating system software executed by the processing device
1800 may be stored in a persistent store, such as the flash memory
1160, but may be stored in other types of memory devices, such as a
read only memory (ROM) or similar storage element. In addition,
system software, specific device applications, or parts thereof,
may be temporarily loaded into a volatile store, such as the random
access memory (RAM) 1180. Communications signals received by the
mobile device may also be stored in the RAM 1180.
[0033] The processing device 1800, in addition to its operating
system functions, enables execution of software applications
1300A-1300N on the device 1000. A predetermined set of applications
that control basic device operations, such as data and voice
communications 1300A and 1300B, may be installed on the device 1000
during manufacture. In addition, a personal information manager
(PIM) application may be installed during manufacture. The PIM may
be capable of organizing and managing data items, such as e-mail,
calendar events, voice mails, appointments, and task items. The PIM
application may also be capable of sending and receiving data items
via a wireless network 1401. The PIM data items may be seamlessly
integrated, synchronized and updated via the wireless network 1401
with the device user's corresponding data items stored or
associated with a host computer system.
[0034] Communication functions, including data and voice
communications, are performed through the communications subsystem
1001, and possibly through the short-range communications
subsystem. The communications subsystem 1001 includes a receiver
1500, a transmitter 1520, and one or more antennas 1540 and 1560.
In addition, the communications subsystem 1001 also includes a
processing module, such as a digital signal processor (DSP) 1580,
and local oscillators (LOs) 1601. The specific design and
implementation of the communications subsystem 1001 is dependent
upon the communications network in which the mobile device 1000 is
intended to operate. For example, a mobile device 1000 may include
a communications subsystem 1001 designed to operate with the
Mobitex.TM., Data TAC.TM. or General Packet Radio Service (GPRS)
mobile data communications networks, and also designed to operate
with any of a variety of voice communications networks, such as
AMPS, TDMA, CDMA, WCDMA, PCS, GSM, EDGE, etc. Other types of data
and voice networks, both separate and integrated, may also be
utilized with the mobile device 1000. The mobile device 1000 may
also be compliant with other communications standards such as 3GSM,
3G, UMTS, 4G, etc.
[0035] Network access requirements vary depending upon the type of
communication system. For example, in the Mobitex and DataTAC
networks, mobile devices are registered on the network using a
unique personal identification number or PIN associated with each
device. In GPRS networks, however, network access is associated
with a subscriber or user of a device. A GPRS device therefore
utilizes a subscriber identity module, commonly referred to as a
SIM card, in order to operate on a GPRS network.
[0036] When required network registration or activation procedures
have been completed, the mobile device 1000 may send and receive
communications signals over the communication network 1401. Signals
received from the communications network 1401 by the antenna 1540
are routed to the receiver 1500, which provides for signal
amplification, frequency down conversion, filtering, channel
selection, etc., and may also provide analog to digital conversion.
Analog-to-digital conversion of the received signal allows the DSP
1580 to perform more complex communications functions, such as
demodulation and decoding. In a similar manner, signals to be
transmitted to the network 1401 are processed (e.g. modulated and
encoded) by the DSP 1580 and are then provided to the transmitter
1520 for digital to analog conversion, frequency up conversion,
filtering, amplification and transmission to the communication
network 1401 (or networks) via the antenna 1560.
[0037] In addition to processing communications signals, the DSP
1580 provides for control of the receiver 1500 and the transmitter
1520. For example, gains applied to communications signals in the
receiver 1500 and transmitter 1520 may be adaptively controlled
through automatic gain control processes implemented in the DSP
1580.
[0038] In a data communications mode, a received signal, such as a
text message or web page download, is processed by the
communications subsystem 1001 and is input to the processing device
1800. The received signal is then further processed by the
processing device 1800 for an output to the display 1600, or
alternatively to some other auxiliary I/O device 1060. A device
user may also compose data items, such as e-mail messages, using
the keypad 1400 and/or some other auxiliary I/O device 1060, such
as a touchpad, a rocker switch, a thumb-wheel, or some other type
of input device. The composed data items may then be transmitted
over the communications network 1401 via the communications
subsystem 1001.
[0039] In a voice communications mode, overall operation of the
device is substantially similar to the data communications mode,
except that received signals are output to a speaker 1100, and
signals for transmission are generated by a microphone 1120.
Alternative voice or audio I/O subsystems, such as a voice message
recording subsystem, may also be implemented on the device 1000. In
addition, the display 1600 may also be utilized in voice
communications mode, for example to display the identity of a
calling party, the duration of a voice call, or other voice call
related information.
[0040] The short-range communications subsystem enables
communication between the mobile device 1000 and other proximate
systems or devices, which need not necessarily be similar devices.
For example, the short-range communications subsystem may include
an infrared device and associated circuits and components, or a
Bluetooth.TM. communications module to provide for communication
with similarly-enabled systems and devices.
[0041] Many modifications and other embodiments of the system and
method will come to the mind of one skilled in the art having the
benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions
and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is understood that the
described system and method are not to be limited to the specific
embodiments disclosed, and that modifications and embodiments are
intended to be included within the scope of the appended
claims.
* * * * *