U.S. patent application number 13/224932 was filed with the patent office on 2012-08-16 for explosive residue sampling.
This patent application is currently assigned to L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CYTERRA CORPORATION. Invention is credited to David H. Fine, Freeman W. Fraim, George Jarvis, Ravi K. Konduri.
Application Number | 20120204659 13/224932 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 34526329 |
Filed Date | 2012-08-16 |
United States Patent
Application |
20120204659 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Fine; David H. ; et
al. |
August 16, 2012 |
EXPLOSIVE RESIDUE SAMPLING
Abstract
In one aspect, an apparatus includes a head configured to
receive a pad for sampling explosive residue on a surface and a
feedback system coupled to the head. The feedback system is
configured to indicate when a pressure applied by the head is
greater than a minimum threshold value. In another aspect, an
apparatus includes a head configured to receive a pad and rotate to
apply a shear force to the pad for sampling explosive residue on a
surface. The apparatus includes a feedback system coupled to the
head, which is configured to restrict the shear force applied by
the head to be within a predetermined range. In another aspect, a
method includes applying pressure to a pad to sample explosive
residue on a surface, sensing the pressure applied to the pad, and
providing an indication of when the pressure applied to the pad is
greater than a threshold value.
Inventors: |
Fine; David H.; (Lincoln,
MA) ; Konduri; Ravi K.; (Heathrow, FL) ;
Fraim; Freeman W.; (Lexington, MA) ; Jarvis;
George; (Arlington, MA) |
Assignee: |
L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CYTERRA
CORPORATION
Orlando
FL
|
Family ID: |
34526329 |
Appl. No.: |
13/224932 |
Filed: |
September 2, 2011 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
10928730 |
Aug 30, 2004 |
8011258 |
|
|
13224932 |
|
|
|
|
60498323 |
Aug 28, 2003 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
73/864 |
Current CPC
Class: |
G01N 2001/024 20130101;
G01N 1/02 20130101; G01N 2001/028 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
73/864 |
International
Class: |
G01N 1/02 20060101
G01N001/02 |
Claims
1. An apparatus comprising: a head configured to receive a pad
that, when applied to a surface, samples explosive residue on the
surface; and a feedback system coupled to the head and configured
to indicate when a pressure applied by the head to the surface is
greater than a minimum threshold value and less than a maximum
threshold value, the feedback system comprising: a pressure sensor
for sensing a pressure applied by the head to the surface; and an
electronic processor coupled to the pressure sensor and configured
to determine when a pressure sensed by the pressure sensor is
greater than the minimum threshold value and less than the maximum
threshold value.
2. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising a handle coupled to
the head and grippable by a human operator, wherein the handle is
configured to be manipulated by the operator to cause the head to
apply pressure to the surface.
3. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the feedback system is further
configured to present an indicator when the pressure sensed by the
pressure sensor is greater than the minimum threshold value as the
head applies pressure to the surface.
4. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the feedback system is further
configured to restrict a shear force applied by the head to be
within a predetermined range.
5. The apparatus of claim 2, further comprising the pad.
Description
PRIORITY
[0001] This application is a continuation of U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 10/928,730, filed Aug. 30, 2004, titled
EXPLOSIVE RESIDUE SAMPLING, which claims priority from U.S.
Provisional Application 60/498,323, which was filed Aug. 28, 2003.
The prior applications are incorporated herein by reference in
their entirety.
TECHNICAL FIELD
[0002] This invention relates to sampling for the presence of
explosives and other materials.
BACKGROUND
[0003] Screening carry-on and checked luggage for trace explosive
residues is a common airport security practice. Sampling for trace
explosive residue generally is conducted by wiping over sample
surfaces, such as latches, handles, straps and zippers, with a
paper or plastic detection pad that is attached to a plastic stick
about one foot long. The pad picks up trace explosive particles
left by fingerprints on the surfaces. The pad is then analyzed
using an explosive detection system (EDS), also known as an
explosive trace detector (ETD).
SUMMARY
[0004] In one aspect, an apparatus includes a head configured to
receive a pad for sampling explosive residue on a surface and a
feedback system coupled to the head. The feedback system is
configured to indicate when a pressure applied by the head is
greater than a minimum threshold value.
[0005] Implementations may include one or more of the following
features.
[0006] The feedback system may include a pressure sensor for
sensing the pressure applied by the head to the surface. The
pressure sensor may include a pressure transducer or a spring. The
feedback system may include a processor configured to compare the
applied pressure to the minimum threshold value. The minimum
threshold value may be selected to reduce false negative readings.
The minimum threshold value may be between about 1 psi and about 5
psi, particularly about 3 psi.
[0007] The feedback system may further include an indicator that
indicates when the applied pressure is greater than the minimum
threshold value. The indicator may include, for example, a visual
indicator, an audible indicator, or a tactile indicator, such as a
switching element that activates rotation of the head. The feedback
system may include an indicator than indicates when the applied
pressure is less than the minimum threshold value.
[0008] The feedback system may be configured to indicate when the
applied pressure is less than or greater than a maximum threshold
value, for example, about 5 psi.
[0009] The head may be rotatable and the feedback system may be
configured to indicate when a shear force applied by the head is
within a predetermined range. The apparatus may include a motor for
rotating the head. The feedback system may include a tachometer for
measuring the rotational speed of the head. The feedback system may
cause the motor to rotate the head at a speed between about 100 rpm
and about 300 rpm. The feedback system may be configured to shut
off the motor when the rotational speed of the head exceeds about
300 rpm or is less than about 100 rpm. The head may be rotatable
and the feedback system may be configured to indicate when a shear
force applied by the head is outside a predetermined range.
[0010] The feedback system may include a timer that senses a length
of time that the pressure is applied by the head. The feedback
system may include an indicator for indicating when the length of
time is greater than or less than a predetermined time value, for
example, about 10 seconds. The may include a handle having an axis
and coupled to the head to allow a user to apply the pressure to
the head. The head may be offset from the axis or may be aligned
with the axis. The head also may be arc-shaped to rotate orbitally
about the axis.
[0011] In another aspect, an apparatus includes a head configured
to receive a pad and rotate to apply a shear force to the pad for
sampling explosive residue on a surface. The apparatus also
includes a feedback system coupled to the head. The feedback system
is configured to restrict the shear force applied by the head to be
within a predetermined range.
[0012] In another aspect, a method includes applying pressure to a
pad to sample explosive residue on a surface, sensing the pressure
applied to the pad, and providing an indication of when the
pressure applied to the pad is greater than a threshold value.
Implementations may include one or more of the following features.
Providing an indication may include applying a shear force to the
pad. Applying a shear force may include rotating the pad. The
method may include indicating if the shear force is within a
predetermined range.
[0013] The details of one or more implementations are set forth in
the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features
and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings,
and from the claims.
DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0014] FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a sampling wand.
[0015] FIG. 2 is a side view of a pad attached to a head of the
sampling wand of FIG. 1.
[0016] FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a feedback control system
of the sampling wand of FIG. 1.
[0017] FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a second implementation of a
sampling wand.
[0018] FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a third implementation of a
sampling wand.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0019] Referring to FIG. 1, an automated, pressure-activated,
sampling wand 10 reduces the variability inherent in manual trace
explosive sampling due to inconsistencies in applied pressure,
shearing force and sampling time, which could cause false-negative
readings (i.e., failing to detect explosives). Using wand 10, the
operator can collect more consistent samples, irrespective of the
operator's level of concentration, arm and muscle strength, and/or
fatigue.
[0020] Wand 10 includes a handle 12, a housing 14, and a head 20.
Head 20 receives a paper or plastic detection pad 30 for sampling
trace explosive residue on a surface 41, e.g., a latch 42, handle
44, or zipper 46, of a bag 40. The operator collects a sample from
surface 41 by manipulating handle 12 to apply pressure to head 20
against surface 41 and to slide head 20 across surface 41.
[0021] Head 20 is rotatably coupled to housing 14 by a rotatable
shaft 26, which in turn is coupled to a motor (not shown) located
inside housing 14. The motor is activated to rotate head 20 when
the operator presses head 20 against surface 41 with sufficient
force to obtain a sample. Thus, rotation of head 20 assists in
obtaining a sample by application of a shearing force. As the
torque required to turn head 20 is not large, the required motor
power is small, which, in turn, allows for the use of batteries as
the power source. For ergonomic design reasons, handle 12 has a
longitudinal axis 13 and rotatable head rotates about an axis 22
that is offset from axis 13. The angle of the offset is determined
by the angle of bend 16 in housing 12.
[0022] Housing 14 also includes a light 18 for providing a visual
indication and a speaker 19 for providing an audible alarm, as
described in more detail below. In addition, housing 14 includes an
on-off switch 17 that allows the operator to turn wand 10 on or
off. Apart from on-off switch 17, wand 10 has no user accessible
controls, which makes wand 10 tamper-resistant.
[0023] Referring also to FIG. 2, pad 30 is wrapped about head 20
and is affixed to head 20 by a metal or plastic clip 24. Wand 10
can receive any type of pad that is used with known EDSs. Wand 10
may be used with a variety of EDSs, including those approved by the
United States Transportation Security Administration (TSA), such as
the Ionscan 400B marketed by Smiths Detection of Pine Brook, N.J.,
the EGIS II and EGIS III marketed by Thermo Electron Corp. of
Franklin, Mass., and the ITEMISER marketed by GE Ion Track of
Wilmington, Mass. Sample pads can be re-used multiple times until
they degrade or are contaminated by trace explosive material.
[0024] Referring to the schematic diagram in FIG. 3, wand 10
includes a feedback system 15 that reduces operator-dependant
variability and increases the consistency of the sample taken by
indicating when the pressure applied by head 20 to surface 41 is
greater than a minimum threshold value (to obtain a consistent
sample and avoid false negative readings) and is less than a
maximum threshold value (to inhibit damage to the surface or to pad
30). Feedback system 15 includes a pressure sensor 50, e.g., a
pressure transducer or a spring, for sensing the pressure applied
by head 20 to surface 41. Pressure sensor 50 is coupled to a
processor 52 that is configured to compare the sensed pressure to
minimum and maximum threshold values stored in a memory 54.
[0025] When the processor 52 determines that the sensed pressure is
greater than the minimum threshold value and/or less than the
maximum threshold value, processor 52 activates a tactile
indication by toggling a switch 58 to activate motor 60 to rotate
head 20, activates a visual indication, such as light 18, and/or
activates an audible indication, such as alarm 56. In other
implementations, processor 52 toggles switch 58 to shut off motor
60, activates light 18, and/or activates alarm 56 when the sensed
pressure is less than the minimum threshold value or greater than
the maximum threshold value. In other implementations, only a
minimum threshold value is employed.
[0026] To determine the appropriate minimum and maximum threshold
pressure values, an experiment was conducted in which fingerprints
were deposited on a glass plate and the plate was placed on a small
laboratory electronic scale. A relatively sturdy paper (e.g., a
business card) was used as a surrogate for pad 30 to attempt to
remove a sample of residue from the fingerprint. Different
pressures were applied and measured by the readings on the
electronic scale. Following sampling, the mirror was visually
inspected after each wipe to determine the efficiency of the
fingerprint removal. It was found that an applied pressure of about
3 to about 5 lbs per sq. inch (psi) was needed to remove the
fingerprint from the glass. A pressure of about 1 or 2 psi was
judged to be inadequate for consistent sampling. In practice, it is
difficult for an ordinary person to maintain about 5 psi for a time
interval even as short as 10 seconds, due to muscle fatigue. An
ordinary person can maintain about 3 psi for 30 or more seconds
without much difficulty. It also was determined that applying a
pressure of greater than 5 psi could result in damage to the
sampling medium or to the surface. Accordingly, in one particular
implementation, the minimum threshold pressure value is about 3 psi
and the maximum threshold pressure value is about 5 psi.
[0027] Feedback system 15 also reduces operator-dependant
variability and increases the consistency of the sample taken by
indicating when a shear force applied by the rotation of head 20 is
within a predetermined range for consistent sampling. Feedback
system 15 includes a device for measuring the rate of rotation of
head 20, such as, for example, a tachometer 62 that is coupled to
processor 52. Processor 52 compares the rotational speed of head 20
and compares that speed to a minimum and maximum speed stored in
memory 54. The maximum and minimum speed correspond to the minimum
and maximum shear force that it is desired to apply with head 20.
Through a feedback loop, the processor 52 adjusts the speed of
motor 60 to maintain the speed of head 20 within the desired range
of speeds. In addition, if the measured speed is less than the
minimum speed or greater than the maximum speed, the processor 52
may trigger the illumination of light 18, the sounding of audible
alarm 56, or the opening of switch 58 to shut off motor 60. In
other implementations, the processor 52 triggers illumination of
light 18 or the sounding of alarm 56 when the measured speed is
greater than the minimum speed and/or less than the maximum
speed.
[0028] The predetermined range of speed of head 20 was determined
in an experiment in which fingerprints were deposited on a mirror
and the mirror was placed on an electronic laboratory scale. A one
square-inch piece of sampling paper was attached to the head of a
motorized rotary tool and the tool was applied to the surface of
the mirror with a force of about 3 psi. Experiments with varying
rotary speeds showed that a rotary speed of about 60 to about 300
revolutions per minute (rpm), and preferably about 100 to 300 rpm,
generates a shear force that is sufficient to collect a consistent
sample. It also was determined that it takes approximately five
rotations at these speeds to remove a fingerprint from a smooth
surface.
[0029] Feedback system 15 also reduces operator-dependant
variability and increases the consistency of the sample taken by
indicating and controlling the length of time during which a sample
is taken. Feedback system 15 includes a timer 64 that measures the
time during which a sample is taken and compares that time to a
predetermined length of time. If the sample is taken for too short
and/or too long a period of time, the timer 64 indicates this to
the user, such as by causing light 18 to be illuminated and/or
alarm 56 to be sounded. Once the desired time has expired, the
timer 64 toggles switch 58 to disable motor 60 and stop the
rotation of head 20. In the experiments discussed above, the length
of time that is desired for taking a sample was determined to be
about 10 seconds, for the pressure and rotation speeds set forth
above. Increasing the applied pressure or the applied shear force
would reduce the number of rotations required, and thus the desired
sampling time.
[0030] Wand 10, including feedback control system 15, is built
primarily from off-the-shelf components, such as an electric motor,
bearings, a pressure transducer, and simple integrated circuits,
all of which are integrated into a small plastic housing.
Off-the-shelf components increase the expected reliability of the
final product, while making it cost-effective.
[0031] In use, the operator attaches pad 30 to head 20 using clip
24. The operator then manipulates handle 12 to cause head 20 to
apply pressure to surface 41. When the pressure applied by the
operator to head 20 exceeds the minimum threshold value, motor 60
will automatically rotate head 20. An audible and/or visual alarm
also may be provided to the operator. The operator then manipulates
handle 12 to slide head 20 across surface 41 to collect a sample.
Once a sufficient time has elapsed to collect the sample, motor 60
automatically shuts off and the operator lifts the head off of
surface 41. The operator then removes pad 30 and analyzes pad 30
for explosive residue in an ETD machine. While the operator is
collecting the sample, if the operator applies too little or too
much pressure, the motor will shut off. An audible and/or visual
indicator also may be provided to the operator. Similarly, if the
shear force applied by head 20 is outside a predetermined range,
the motor will shut off. An audible and/or visual indicator also
may be provided to the operator.
[0032] Referring to FIG. 4, in another implementation, a wand 410
includes a head 420 that rotates about an axis 430 that is aligned
with an axis 413 of a handle 412 and a housing 414.
[0033] Referring to FIG. 5, in yet another implementation, a wand
510 includes a head 520 that is arc-shaped so that it rotates
orbitally around axis 522 to facilitate obtaining samples from a
strap 545 of a handbag 540.
[0034] A number of implementations have been described.
Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may
be made. For example, the angle of the housing may be adjustable.
The pad may be attached to the head by other mechanisms, such as
friction fit, staples, or suction. There may be more than one
light, different color lights, or more than one type of audible
alarm for indicating various of the events described above. The
feedback system may be formed by an ordinary electrical circuit or
an integrated circuit. Instead of the head rotating to impart the
shear force, the head can oscillate or vibrate. These and other
implementations are within the scope of the following claims.
* * * * *