U.S. patent application number 13/350301 was filed with the patent office on 2012-07-19 for blow molded container.
Invention is credited to Brian David Andres, Todd Mitchell Day, Widalys Luz DESOTO-BURT, Miguel Alberto Herrera, Chow-chi Huang, Su-Yon McConville, Ralph Edwin Neufarth, Alfredo Pagan, Richard Darren Satterfield, Cristian Alexis Viola-Prioli.
Application Number | 20120181292 13/350301 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 46940656 |
Filed Date | 2012-07-19 |
United States Patent
Application |
20120181292 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
DESOTO-BURT; Widalys Luz ;
et al. |
July 19, 2012 |
Blow Molded Container
Abstract
The present invention is directed to a container comprising a
retention mechanism for attaching a closure to an opening or neck
of a container with a portion of the container body comprising a
physical geometry that creates more than one undercut.
Inventors: |
DESOTO-BURT; Widalys Luz;
(Cincinnati, OH) ; Day; Todd Mitchell; (Bethel,
OH) ; Neufarth; Ralph Edwin; (Liberty Township,
OH) ; Satterfield; Richard Darren; (Bethel, OH)
; Huang; Chow-chi; (West Chester, OH) ; Herrera;
Miguel Alberto; (Loveland, OH) ; McConville;
Su-Yon; (Mason, OH) ; Pagan; Alfredo; (Mason,
OH) ; Andres; Brian David; (Harrison, OH) ;
Viola-Prioli; Cristian Alexis; (Loveland, OH) |
Family ID: |
46940656 |
Appl. No.: |
13/350301 |
Filed: |
January 13, 2012 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
61433062 |
Jan 14, 2011 |
|
|
|
61433052 |
Jan 14, 2011 |
|
|
|
61433068 |
Jan 14, 2011 |
|
|
|
61433072 |
Jan 14, 2011 |
|
|
|
61433079 |
Jan 14, 2011 |
|
|
|
61432698 |
Jan 14, 2011 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
220/675 ;
206/524.6; 215/40; 220/669 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B29K 2001/00 20130101;
B29L 2031/7158 20130101; B29K 2067/003 20130101; B29K 2067/046
20130101; B29K 2023/065 20130101; Y02W 30/80 20150501; B29C 49/06
20130101; B29K 2023/06 20130101; B29K 2027/06 20130101; Y02W 90/11
20150501; B65D 1/023 20130101; Y02W 90/13 20150501; B29K 2023/12
20130101; B29C 49/04 20130101; Y02W 90/12 20150501; B29K 2025/06
20130101; B29K 2995/006 20130101; B29K 2003/00 20130101; B65D
1/0223 20130101; Y02W 30/805 20150501; Y02W 30/807 20150501; Y02W
90/10 20150501 |
Class at
Publication: |
220/675 ;
220/669; 215/40; 206/524.6 |
International
Class: |
B65D 23/00 20060101
B65D023/00; B65D 1/02 20060101 B65D001/02; B65D 1/00 20060101
B65D001/00 |
Foreign Application Data
Date |
Code |
Application Number |
Jan 14, 2011 |
CN |
CM3406FP |
Claims
1) A container comprising: a) a retention mechanism for attaching a
closure to an opening or neck of a container; b) a portion of a
container body comprising a physical geometry that creates more
than one undercut.
2) A container according to claim 1 wherein the portion of the
container comprises a geometry of the container about a neck of a
container and a closure interface of the container which is
selected from the group consisting of concave, convex, linear,
non-linear, mixtures of linear and non-linear, or mixtures
thereof.
3) A container according to claim 2 wherein the portion of the
container comprises a non-linear geometry about a neck of the
container and a closure interface of the container.
4) A container according to claim 1 wherein the container comprises
a geometry wherein the vertical side of the shoulder that has an
interface with a closure has a positive draft angle of less than 10
degrees.
5) A container according to claim 1 wherein the neck of the
container is at least partially encompassed by a portion of a
container body.
6) A container according to claim 1 wherein the shoulder geometry
can be modified and molded to use a same closure across different
volumetric sized containers.
7) A container according to claim 1 wherein the container is made
by a process selected from the group consisting of extrusion blow
molding, injection blow molding, injection stretch blow molding and
mixtures thereof.
8) A container according to claim 1 wherein the shoulder geometry
is integrated with a closure.
9) A container according to claim 1 wherein the retention feature
is a male component in an interface or attachment of a closure.
10) A container according to claim 9 wherein the retention feature
has a depth of less than about 1.5 mm from a tip of the bead to a
base or outer diameter of a neck.
11) A container according to claim 1 wherein the retention feature
is a female component in an interface or attachment of a
closure.
12) A container according to claim 11 wherein the retention feature
has a depth of less than about 1.5 mm from an outer diameter of the
neck to the base of the female retention feature.
13) A container according to claim 1 wherein the container is
comprised of a material selected from the group consisting of
polyolefins such as polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP),
polystyrene (PS), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polylactic acid (PLA),
polyethylene terephthalate (PET), or mixtures thereof.
14) A container according to claim 1 wherein the container
comprises two standing surfaces in a container geometry.
15) A container according to claim 1 wherein features of the
container are not deformed temporarily or permanently during
removal from the molding cavity.
16) A container, manufactured by the process described in claim 7,
which is composed of biodegradable polymers.
17) A container, manufactured by the process described in claim 16,
wherein the biodegradable polymer is selected from the group
consisting of polylactic acid (PLA), polyglycolic acid (PGA),
polybutylene succinate (PBS), an aliphatic-aromatic copolyester
based on terephthalic acid, an aromatic copolyester with a high
terephthalic acid content, polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA),
thermoplastic starch (TPS), cellulose, or a mixture thereof.
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
[0001] The application claims priority to U.S. Provisional
Application Ser. No. 61/433,062, filed on Jan. 14, 2011; and U.S.
Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/433,052, filed on Jan. 14,
2011; and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/433,068, filed
on Jan. 14, 2011; and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No.
61/433,072, filed on Jan. 14, 2011; and U.S. Provisional
Application Ser. No. 61/433,079, filed on Jan. 14, 2011; and U.S.
Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/432,698, filed on Jan. 14,
2011, all of which are herein incorporated by reference.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The present invention relates to a blow-molded container
with a retention mechanism for attaching a closure to an opening or
neck of said container and a portion of said container comprising a
physical geometry that creates more than one undercut.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0003] A variety of packages, including dispensing packages or
containers, have been developed for household products, personal
care products, and other products. Containers that have a pleasing
aesthetic look to consumers have a closure design that is fully
integrated with the design of the container. This conveys the
message that the integration of the two components was well thought
of. This is important to make closure functioning intuitive to
consumers. An example of a well integrated container/closure system
is one where the container's geometry wraps around the closure to
create shoulders. This geometry can also be referred to as a
container with a recessed neck. This recess geometry serves
different purposes: overall integrated look to the container and
closure, stability to container in inverted orientation, and makes
functioning of closure more intuitive to consumers.
[0004] Blowing this container geometry with today's traditional
blow molding technology, is not possible, as the container would
have undercuts in the concave portion of the shoulder. This is
because when the molding cavity tools are to be opened, the steel
creating the concave part becomes trapped. If one were to shape the
top part using the blow pin head tool, one would then encounter an
undercut under the snap bead feature that is in proximity to the
container's shoulder. This is because one would not be able to pull
the blow pin tooling which creates the snap bead from underneath
the formed bead feature.
[0005] When looking at containers in the market that use a recess
geometry design, it has been noticed that they usually have a
straight shoulder vs. a concave design. The forming of that recess
does not require any inventive step as there is at least one
direction in which the mold can open with a straight-pull motion
without yielding to any mold material becoming trapped within the
container's geometry. Yet, recess geometries that can be unmolded
with a straight-pull in a blow mold are highly restricted in
design, limiting the integration of the closure with the blown
container and therefore all the benefits stated above.
[0006] There are other containers currently in the market that have
different shoulder geometries, but these containers use a different
neck from what the present invention has found. These containers
use a closure attachment mechanism, where the closure snaps onto
the container from the inside of the dispensing orifice. A
non-limiting example of a container made through the process
described in the present invention can be referred to as having a
snap-on closure mechanism, which snaps onto the outside of the
container's neck. From the present invention discovery, the present
design provides more reliability against leaking, as the outside
part of the neck is calibrated, providing tighter tolerances, than
the inside part of the container. The inside of the container is
not highly calibrated, increasing the probability of poor
engagement between container and closure, and thus leading to
potential leaking. This is because the parts blown via the
extrusion blow molding process usually have better controlled
geometry on the outside of the part rather than the inside, as the
material wall thickness can vary due to part aspect ratios
translating into differing parison stretch ratios in both radial
and axial directions. In addition, containers whose closures attach
onto the container from the inside of the neck usually require
trimming and reaming of the neck as secondary operations. An
operation that cuts-away excess material is inherently not
cost-effective and should be avoided. Furthermore, any cutting
operation requires straight access to the part that shall be cut
away restricting the available recess geometry and limiting the
integration of the closure with the blown container and therefore
all the benefits stated above. With a closure attachment mechanism
where the closure seals from the inside of the neck and snaps onto
the container from the outside of the neck, a traditional striker
plate and blow pin tool design can be used, where the blow pin cuts
the parison when it comes in contact with the striker plate,
creating a calibrated neck and therefore eliminating the need for
secondary operations such as trimming and reaming.
[0007] Currently, most closures complete the geometry of the
container, thereby requiring the size of the closure to be
proportional to the geometry of the container. In the present
invention, the size of the closure is minimized thereby providing
several benefits. One of the benefits is reducing the weight of the
closure to the minimum amount of resin needed to enable the
required closure functionality. This is a benefit for the
environment as industry currently does not have a well established
polypropylene recycling stream. By having a closure that has a
reduced weight from the overall package, this allows a container to
have improved recyclability. It also reduces the overall costs of
the closure including costs associated with resin, processing,
tooling, injection mold (IM) press selection, and others. Another
benefit of minimizing closure size is that the closure becomes a
less focal point of the design making it more inductive to use the
same closure for different container designs within one brand and
even enable the use of the same closure across different
brands/shaped families. This drives optimization and efficiency and
in return reduces further costs. This further enables the
silhouette of the shape to be scaled proportionally without the use
of additional features such as steps, larger radii or other
geometric alterations and angles to accommodate the closure.
[0008] Another benefit for minimizing the closure size is that it
can be integrated in the container shape. When the container is in
its inverted orientation, an integrated design allows the use of
the container top surface to add stability vs. requiring a larger
closure. It also aids in creating differentiation between the forms
(such as shampoo and conditioner), helping consumers identify the
product that they are looking for. This drives scale in the
container design and development and therefore is an advantage. A
further advantage is that having a recessed closure provides a
higher level of protection from damage due to the recessed closure
being protected by the recess geometry. Another benefit of having a
recessed neck where the container wraps around the closure is that
it enables using the same closure across different sizes while
still having an integrated look between the container and the
closure. A further benefit of the present invention is the
enablement of using the same closure across containers made by
different molding technologies. Non-limiting examples of molding
technologies include extrusion blow molding (EBM), injection blow
molding (IBM), and injection stretch blow molding (ISBM). This
drives scale and further reduces costs.
[0009] It is an objective of the present invention to describe a
blown container, wherein said container contains a recess in the
container's geometry. Such a recess allows integration of a closure
with the container such that when the closure is coupled with the
blown container, it is substantially flush to the apex of the
outmost surface of that blown container.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0010] The present invention is directed towards a blow molded
container comprising a physical geometry that creates more than one
undercut, preferably a recess, and a closure retention mechanism
for attaching a closure to an opening or neck of said
container.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0011] FIG. 1A is an isometric view of a final container shape with
a recessed neck and a snap bead closure attachment mechanism;
[0012] FIG. 1B is an isometric view of a non-limiting example of a
miniature closure;
[0013] FIG. 1C is a container with a recessed neck and a miniature
closure assembled and standing in an up-right and an upside-down
orientations;
[0014] FIG. 1D is a top view of a container illustrating the
molding parting line and directions of mold action.
[0015] FIG. 1E is a top view of a container with a recessed neck
and a miniature closure assembled.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0016] For the purposes of the present invention, suitable recesses
are those that permit a portion of the article to wrap around at
least part of a closure, when said closure is coupled with said
article. Such recess may allow the closure, when coupled to said
article, to remain substantially flush to the apex of the outermost
surface of said article. By "at least part of a closure" it is
herein intended that said portion extends around the perimeter of
the closure to form an angle of at least 45.degree., preferably at
least 60.degree., more preferable between 60.degree. and
360.degree., taken from the centre of the closure and in the x-y
plane, when said closure is coupled to said article.
[0017] The term "integrated" as used herein intends that: (i) at
least part of said closure remains substantially flush with at
least one surface of the article, preferably the outer surface of
said shoulder; and (ii) that at least one shoulder of said article
wraps around at least part of said closure, preferably forming at
least one concave surface. The advantage of such configuration
being a consumer desirable silhouette.
[0018] The term "undercut" as used herein means a physical geometry
that hinders article removal from a mold when said mold is opened
in a linear direction which intersects at least a portion of said
geometry.
[0019] The term "without damage" as used herein means that the
article retains the end physical geometry generated at the end of
the molding process.
[0020] The term "scale" as used herein refers to an economic
benefit obtained by reducing the design and development time and
resources, as well as capital investment obtained by direct
reapplication without negative implications on consumer acceptance,
design aesthetics, etc.
[0021] Blow molding is a well known manufacturing process for the
fabrication of plastic articles such as containers, fuel tanks,
handles etc. The blow molding process begins with melting plastic
and forming it into a parison or preform. The parison is then
clamped into a mold and a pressurized medium, usually air, is blown
or pumped into it. The air pressure forces the plastic to match the
peripheral geometry of the mold. Once the plastic has cooled and
hardened the mold opens and the part is ejected.
[0022] There are three main types of blow molding platforms:
extrusion blow molding (EBM), injection blow molding (IBM) and
stretch blow molding (SBM). In some applications the combination of
the abovementioned blow molding platforms may be more appropriate
depending on the properties and complexity of the articles to be
formed, such as injection stretch blow molding (ISBM).
[0023] Plastic resin materials for use in the present invention can
be polyolefins such as polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP),
polystyrene (PS), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polylactic acid (PLA)
or polyethylene terephthalate (PET).
[0024] As used herein and unless otherwise stated, "polyethylene"
encompasses high density polyethylene (HDPE), low density
polyethylene (LDPE), linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE), and
ultra low density polyethylene (ULDPE). As used herein and unless
otherwise stated, "polypropylene" encompasses homopolymer
polypropylene, random copolymer polypropylene, and block copolymer
polypropylene.
[0025] Therefore, there is a need for a new container design that
has a recessed neck (102) and a closure retention mechanism (103).
The container (101) can be made via any of the different blow
molding processes previously described.
[0026] In an embodiment of the present invention, a container (101)
comprises a closure retention mechanism (103) for attaching a
closure (106) to an opening or neck (102) of a container (101) that
can be selected from the non-limiting group consisting of snap
bead, thread, bayonet, and mixtures thereof.
[0027] In an embodiment of the present invention, a container (101)
also comprises a geometry shape that would traditionally be
considered to create more than one undercut (107) and therefore
removing the container from the mold after molding it would become
challenging without temporarily or permanently altering or
deforming the shape of the container. This is because the material
of the mold used to create the shape of the container would become
trapped within the container's geometry, not allowing for a
straight pull opening action of the mold, as shown in FIG. 1D.
[0028] In an embodiment of the present invention, a container (101)
comprises a geometry where the interface (105) between the closure
(106) and the container's geometry about the neck of the container
can be selected from the non-limiting group consisting of concave,
convex, linear, non-linear, or mixtures thereof. The specific shape
of the interface geometry (105) can be defined to match the shape
of the closure (106), allowing therefore the creation of an
integrated look between the closure (106) and the container
(101).
[0029] In a further embodiment of the present invention, a
container (101) comprises a non-linear geometry about a neck of the
container and closure interface of the container. The curvature of
the interface (105) allows having the container wrap around the
closure (106) to enable a fully integrated desired design
aesthetic. The portion of the container (101) that wraps around the
closure (106) can be referred to as the container's shoulder
(104).
[0030] In an embodiment of the present invention, a container (101)
comprises a shoulder (104) geometry where the side of the shoulder
wall having an interface (105) with the closure (106) has a
positive draft angle of less than 10 degrees and in a further
embodiment, there may be further reduction of the draft angle to
less than 8 degrees and preferably even a further reduction of the
draft angle to 5 degrees or less. This shoulder surface creates the
interface (105) between the container (101) and the closure (106),
once the closure (106) is assembled. Having a positive draft angle
of less than 10 degrees is important for two main reasons: [0031]
1) Consumer acceptance--the smaller the draft angle, the smaller
the space or gap (108) that will exist between the closure (106)
and container (101) after the closure (106) is assembled. Large
gaps are typically perceived by consumers as areas where water and
product can accumulate, making the overall assembly be perceived as
messy. In addition, a large gap can give consumers the perception
that the closure and container are not fully integrated, making the
overall package appear as a poor design. When such a gap (108)
exceeds 7.4 mm distance from the shoulder surface (104) to the
closure (106), the consumer also perceives an internal barrier for
product flow. [0032] 2) Potential re-application of closure (106)
across multiple container sizes--having a low draft angle on the
container's vertical shoulder interface (105) wall enables using a
closure (106) with a straight or low vertical draft angle. If the
closure (106) has a low vertical draft angle, it can then be used
not only with containers that have a shoulder (104) that cover this
side of the closure, but also with containers that have a different
shoulder design or even those that do not have a shoulder at all,
where the closure's periphery is partially or fully exposed. Having
the flexibility to use the same closure across different container
designs creates scale, which typically reduces costs and logistic
complexity.
[0033] In an embodiment of the present invention, a container (101)
comprises a shoulder (104) geometry wherein the shape of the
shoulder can be modified to mold containers of different volumetric
sizes, while still being able to couple them with the same closure
(106). Modifying the shape of the shoulder (104) to match with the
same closure (106) creates scale which typically reduces costs,
while allowing the overall assembly to maintain its fully
integrated aesthetic look.
[0034] In a further embodiment of the present invention, a portion
of a container body may have a physical geometry that creates at
least one non-linear or more than one linear undercut. In an
embodiment, a linear undercut may have a portion of the surface
geometry such that the surface is within the same plane. In an
embodiment of the present invention, a non-linear undercut can be
defined by a portion of the surface geometry such that the surface
exists in multiple planes.
[0035] In an embodiment of the present invention, a container (101)
is made by a process selected from the non-limiting group
consisting of extrusion blow molding (EBM), injection blow molding
(IBM), injection stretch blow molding (ISBM) or mixtures
thereof.
[0036] In an embodiment of the present invention, a container (101)
comprises a shoulder (104) geometry that is integrated with a
closure (106) and preferably the integration of this shoulder (104)
geometry with this closure (106) completes a container
silhouette.
[0037] In an embodiment of the present invention, a container (100)
wherein the neck of the container may be at least partially
encompassed by a portion of a container body.
[0038] In an embodiment of the present invention, a container (101)
comprises a closure retention feature (103) wherein the container's
retention feature (103) can be referred to as a "male component",
as it protrudes from the container's outer neck finish, whilst the
closure (106) comprises the "female component", as it has a
recessed area into which the container (101) will fit once
assembled. In an embodiment of the present invention, a container
(101)
[0039] In an embodiment of the present invention, a container (101)
comprises a closure retention feature (103) wherein the container's
retention feature (103) has a depth of less than about 1.5 mm from
a tip of a bead to a base or outer diameter of a neck. Having this
depth is important as it ensures that there will be enough
engagement between the closure (106) and the container (101) to
prevent the unintentional detachment of the closure from the
container. In a different embodiment of the present invention, a
container comprises a closure retention feature wherein the
container's retention feature can be referred to as a "female
component", as it has a recession from the container's outer neck
finish. The closure's retention feature can be referred to as a
"male component", as it protrudes from the closure's finish and
fits into the container once assembled. In an embodiment of the
present invention, a container comprises a closure retention
feature wherein the container's retention feature has a depth of
less than about 1.5 mm from an outer diameter of a neck to the base
of the female retention feature. Having this depth is important as
it ensures that there will be enough engagement between the closure
and the container to prevent the unintentional detachment of the
closure from the container.
[0040] In a different embodiment of the present invention, a
container (101) is comprised of a material selected from the
non-limiting group consisting of polyolefins such as polyethylene
(PE) and polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS), polyvinyl chloride
(PVC), polylactic acid (PLA), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), or
mixtures thereof. These are typical resins used in the
manufacturing of blow molded containers. In one embodiment, the
plastic resin material is the polyolefin high density polyethylene
(HDPE). The plastic materials may be made from
petrochemical-sourced monomers or bio-sourced monomers.
[0041] In a further embodiment of the present invention, a
container (101) comprises two standing surfaces (109) in container
geometry. With this geometry, the molded article can be placed in
multiple orientations, such as upright or inverted orientation.
This geometry further provides for a non-protruding closure (106)
for the molded article.
[0042] In an embodiment of the present invention, a container (101)
is removed from the molding cavity without permanently or
temporarily deforming the molded container features. This is
important because any type of deformation, being permanent or
temporary, can lead to affecting the feature's integrity.
[0043] In an embodiment of the present invention, a container (101)
is comprised of a biodegradable polymer or mixture of biodegradable
polymers.
[0044] In a further embodiment of the present invention, a
container (101) is comprised of a biodegradable polymer material
selected from the non-limiting group consisting of polylactic acid
(PLA), polyglycolic acid (PGA), polybutylene succinate (PBS), an
aliphatic-aromatic copolyester based on terephthalic acid, an
aromatic copolyester with a high terephthalic acid content,
polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA), thermoplastic starch (TPS), cellulose,
or a mixture thereof.
[0045] The dimensions and values disclosed herein are not to be
understood as being strictly limited to the exact numerical values
recited. Instead, unless otherwise specified, each such dimension
is intended to mean both the recited value and a functionally
equivalent range surrounding that value. For example, a dimension
disclosed as "40 mm" is intended to mean "about 40 mm".
[0046] All documents cited in the Detailed Description of the
Invention are, in relevant part, incorporated herein by reference;
the citation of any document is not to be construed as an admission
that it is prior art with respect to the present invention. To the
extent that any meaning or definition of a term in this document
conflicts with any meaning or definition of the same term in a
document incorporated by reference, the meaning or definition
assigned to that term in this document shall govern.
[0047] While particular embodiments of the present invention have
been illustrated and described, it would be obvious to those
skilled in the art that various other changes and modifications can
be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the
invention. It is therefore intended to cover in the appended claims
all such changes and modifications that are within the scope of
this invention.
* * * * *