Process For Producton Of Compacted Graphite Iron

SILLEN; Rudolf

Patent Application Summary

U.S. patent application number 13/329561 was filed with the patent office on 2012-04-19 for process for producton of compacted graphite iron. This patent application is currently assigned to NOVACAST TECHNOLOGIES AB. Invention is credited to Rudolf SILLEN.

Application Number20120090803 13/329561
Document ID /
Family ID38188913
Filed Date2012-04-19

United States Patent Application 20120090803
Kind Code A1
SILLEN; Rudolf April 19, 2012

PROCESS FOR PRODUCTON OF COMPACTED GRAPHITE IRON

Abstract

A process for production of compacted graphite iron using in-mould addition of a magnesium alloy is disclosed. The process is characterised by a step of pre-treating the base iron in a ladle or in a furnace with an alloy containing cerium and performing a structure forming treatment in a reaction chamber in the mould using an alloy containing magnesium and lanthanum.


Inventors: SILLEN; Rudolf; (Ronneby, SE)
Assignee: NOVACAST TECHNOLOGIES AB
Ronneby
SE

Family ID: 38188913
Appl. No.: 13/329561
Filed: December 19, 2011

Related U.S. Patent Documents

Application Number Filing Date Patent Number
12086637 Sep 3, 2008
PCT/SE2006/001424 Dec 14, 2006
13329561

Current U.S. Class: 164/57.1
Current CPC Class: C22C 37/10 20130101; C21C 1/105 20130101; C21C 1/08 20130101; B22D 27/20 20130101
Class at Publication: 164/57.1
International Class: B22D 23/00 20060101 B22D023/00

Foreign Application Data

Date Code Application Number
Dec 20, 2005 SE 0502817-0

Claims



1. A process for production of compacted graphite iron using in-mould addition of a magnesium alloy comprising pre-treating the base iron in a ladle or in a furnace with an alloy containing cerium and performing a structure forming treatment in a reaction chamber in the mould using an alloy containing magnesium and lanthanum.

2. The process of claim 1, wherein the base iron is pretreated with an alloy containing cerium in order to reach cerium levels between 0.008 and 0.025% and the iron is further treated in the casting mould using an alloy containing 3-6% magnesium and 0.5-1.5% lanthanum.

3. The process of claim 1, wherein the minimum percentage of cerium in the base iron is estimated as (% S-0.006)*2.9+0.01), where S is the sulphur content in the iron before the addition of cerium.

4. The process of claim 2, wherein the minimum percentage of cerium in the base iron is estimated as (% S-0.006)*2.9+0.01), where S is the sulphur content in the iron before the addition of cerium.
Description



FIELD OF THE INVENTION

[0001] The invention relates to a process for production of cast iron with a structure predominantly consisting of compacted graphite shapes. The process is based on a combination of pre-treatment of a base iron and a final treatment in the mould.

BACKGROUND ART

[0002] Compacted graphite iron is a cast iron alloy with a graphite structure between flake type graphite shapes and spherical shapes. The graphite shape is determined by the conditions in the liquid iron during the solidification. Treatment of a base iron, preferably with a carbon equivalent between 4.0 and 4.4 and with a sulphur content below 0.02%, with a ferrosilicon alloy containing 4-10% magnesium can be used to achieve the compacted graphite structure. The magnesium content must be kept within very narrow limits usually within +/-0.003% and with a level of about 0.008 to 0.015% depending on conditions of the base iron and the cooling rate in the casting to be produced. As used herein percent refers to percent by weight. The treatment with magnesium is usually made in a ladle. Magnesium boils at 1090.degree. C. and since the temperature of the iron usually is higher than 1400.degree. C. during the treatment some of the magnesium therefore vanishes as vapour, and some combines with the sulphur, oxygen and nitrogen in the iron. During holding of the iron before pouring further reduction of the active magnesium content occurs. This gradual reduction of active magnesium is called fading.

[0003] In order to avoid these problems the magnesium treatment can be made inside each mould. That technology known as in-mould treatment/technology is well-known for production of ductile iron. A special version of the technology as described in WO 01/54844 A1, is suitable for production of compacted graphite iron. The in-mould technology is based on placing the magnesium alloy in a chamber in the gating system in the mould. During pouring, the iron flows into the chamber and gradually dissolves the alloy. The treated metal then fills the casting cavity. The problems with fading of magnesium are eliminated when using this process.

[0004] One problem is that the sulphur level in the base iron often varies. Therefore the magnesium level must be adjusted. However, with the in-mould treatment this is practically not possible as the treatment chamber is the same in each mould. Another problem is that treatment with magnesium makes the structure sensitive to variation in cooling rate. With a high cooling rate e.g. in thin sections of the casting the graphite shapes tend to be more spherical. With long cooling rates i.e. in thick sections the graphite will precipitate as flakes.

[0005] It is known that treatment alloys containing both magnesium and cerium reduce these problems. However high levels of cerium can increase the risk for certain casting defects such as formation of primary carbides and shrinkages.

DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0006] It is an object of the present invention to solve these problems.

[0007] The invention concerns a process for production of compacted graphite iron using in-mould addition of a magnesium alloy in accordance with claim 1. Preferred embodiments are defined in the dependent claims.

[0008] The amount of cerium is adjusted in relation to the sulphur content in the base iron. The cerium level should be adjusted according to the formula:

% Cerium=(% Sulphur-0.006)*2.9+A.

[0009] The value for A varies preferably between 0.01 and 0.03 depending on the configuration of the casting i.e. variation in section dimensions and casting modulus. As cerium has a very high boiling point (3470.degree. C.) and a high density (6.14 g/cm.sup.3) it does not show any fading effect. By adding cerium to the base iron it can be properly dissolved and less magnesium alloy has to be added in the reaction chamber in the mould as cerium also has a structure forming effect.

[0010] The treatment alloy preferably contains 3-6% magnesium and 0.5-1.5% lanthanum. Lanthanum has a favourable effect in reducing defects such as carbides and shrinkages in the casting. The effect on shrinkages is highest just after treatment and therefore it is optimal to add the lanthanum as late as possible.

[0011] The alloys used can have various compositions since the paramount feature is the overall fraction of active metal. However, examples of compositions for commercially available alloys include:

[0012] For the magnesium alloy: 48% Fe, 45% Si, 5% Mg, 1.0% Al, 0.5% La and 0.5% Ca, and

[0013] for the Cerium alloy: 65% Fe, 25% Ce, 7% La, and a balance of other rare earth elements.

[0014] According to a preferred embodiment of the invention cerium is added to the oven or the ladle (and not as a part of the magnesium alloy) and magnesium is added to the mould.

[0015] With the proposed process the magnesium addition can be reduced with at least 30% compared to a normal treatment in-the-mould without the pre-conditioning. The reduced magnesium level in the castings has also the advantage that casting defects such as dross and micro-shrinkage are minimized.

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed