U.S. patent application number 12/780502 was filed with the patent office on 2011-11-17 for apparatus and method for providing protective gear employing shock penetration resistant material.
This patent application is currently assigned to The Boeing Company. Invention is credited to Tai Anh Lam, Victor S. Starkovich.
Application Number | 20110277201 12/780502 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 44454094 |
Filed Date | 2011-11-17 |
United States Patent
Application |
20110277201 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Lam; Tai Anh ; et
al. |
November 17, 2011 |
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING PROTECTIVE GEAR EMPLOYING SHOCK
PENETRATION RESISTANT MATERIAL
Abstract
A method for providing a shock penetration resistant apparatus
may include providing an item of protective gear to be positioned
proximate to an object to be protected, and disposing a shock
penetration resistant material proximate to the item of protective
gear to attenuate or redirect shock pulses away from the object to
be protected. An apparatus is also provided that may include an
item of protective gear and a shock penetration resistant material.
The item of protective gear may be configured to be positioned
proximate to an object to be protected. The shock penetration
resistant material may be disposed proximate to the item of
protective gear to attenuate or redirect shock pulses away from the
object to be protected.
Inventors: |
Lam; Tai Anh; (Kent, WA)
; Starkovich; Victor S.; (Maple Valley, WA) |
Assignee: |
The Boeing Company
|
Family ID: |
44454094 |
Appl. No.: |
12/780502 |
Filed: |
May 14, 2010 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
2/2.5 ; 2/102;
2/411 |
Current CPC
Class: |
F41H 1/04 20130101; F42D
5/045 20130101; F41H 1/02 20130101; F41H 5/04 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
2/2.5 ; 2/411;
2/102 |
International
Class: |
F41H 1/02 20060101
F41H001/02; A41D 1/04 20060101 A41D001/04; A42B 3/04 20060101
A42B003/04 |
Claims
1. An apparatus comprising: an item of protective gear configured
to be positioned proximate to an object to be protected; and a
shock penetration resistant material disposed proximate to the item
of protective gear to attenuate or redirect shock pulses away from
the object to be protected.
2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the shock penetration
resistant material comprises an acoustic metamaterial.
3. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the acoustic metamaterial
comprises an array of Helmholtz resonators, rubber ring inclusions,
rubber rods or rubber coated spheres.
4. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the acoustic metamaterial
comprises a material having one or both of a negative elastic
modulus and a negative effective density.
5. The apparatus of claim 4, wherein the negative elastic modulus
and negative effective density of the shock penetration resistant
material is selectable to make acoustic impedance of the shock
penetration resistant material different from acoustic impedance of
air to enable the shock penetration resistant material to be
reflective of shockwave energy.
6. The apparatus of claim 4, wherein the negative elastic modulus
and negative effective density of the shock penetration resistant
material is selectable to make acoustic impedance of the shock
penetration resistant material such that the object to be protected
is substantially invisible to shockwave energy.
7. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the shock penetration
resistant material comprises alternating layers of materials having
respective different densities of moduli.
8. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the alternating layers of
materials include selected respective thicknesses of each material,
the selected respective thicknesses being smaller than a wavelength
of a particular pressure wave.
9. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the material from which the
alternating layers of materials are selected includes wide
bandwidth materials.
10. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the alternating layers of
materials include materials having a positive index of refraction,
but a gradient index selected as a function of radius to have a
resistance to penetration of shock waves.
11. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the item of protective gear
is a helmet, vest or portion of body armor for protecting vital
organs of a wearer.
12. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the item of protective gear
is a portion of armor for protecting a vehicle, robot, mechanical
component or electrical component.
13. A method for providing a shock penetration resistant apparatus
comprising: providing an item of protective gear to be positioned
proximate to an object to be protected; and disposing a shock
penetration resistant material proximate to the item of protective
gear to attenuate or redirect shock pulses away from the object to
be protected.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein disposing the shock penetration
resistant material comprises disposing an acoustic metamaterial
proximate to the item of protective gear.
15. The method of claim 14, wherein disposing the acoustic
metamaterial comprises disposing acoustic metamaterial including an
array of Helmholtz resonators, rubber ring inclusions, rubber rods
or rubber coated spheres proximate to the item of protective
gear.
16. The method of claim 13, wherein disposing the acoustic
metamaterial comprises disposing a material having one or both of a
negative elastic modulus and a negative effective density proximate
to the item of protective gear.
17. The method of claim 16, further comprising controlling the
negative elastic modulus and negative effective density of the
shock penetration resistant material to make acoustic impedance of
the shock penetration resistant material substantially different
from acoustic impedance of air to enable the shock penetration
resistant material to be reflective of shockwave energy or to make
acoustic impedance of the shock penetration resistant material such
that the object to be protected is substantially invisible to
shockwave energy.
18. The method of claim 13, wherein disposing the shock penetration
resistant material comprises disposing alternating layers of
materials having respective different densities of moduli and
selected respective thicknesses of each material, the selected
respective thicknesses being smaller than a wavelength of a
particular pressure wave.
19. The method of claim 13, wherein disposing the shock penetration
resistant material proximate to the item of protective gear
comprises affixing the shock penetration resistant material to an
interior portion of the item of protective gear.
20. The method of claim 13, wherein disposing the shock penetration
resistant material proximate to the item of protective gear
comprises disposing the shock penetration resistant material
between portions of the item of protective gear.
Description
TECHNOLOGICAL FIELD
[0001] Embodiments of the present disclosure relate generally to
protective gear and, more particularly, to a method and apparatus
for employing shock penetration resistant material (e.g., acoustic
metamaterial or selected layered materials) in protective gear.
BACKGROUND
[0002] Modern warfare planners and strategists, much like warfare
planners and strategists throughout the centuries, are continually
looking to technology to provide opportunities to improve the
effectiveness of weapons and also to improve the safety and
security of the troops that employ them. For many centuries,
personnel protective gear such as shields, helmets and armor have
been developed and enhanced. The strength and weight of materials
often became the focal issues of concern in relation to development
of weapons and protective gear. Particularly for protective gear,
design concerns focused on striking a proper balance between the
amount of protection that could be provided and the amount of
mobility that could simultaneously be afforded. More recently,
weapons and personnel carriers themselves have also been designed
with protective gear such as armor that is meant to preserve the
battle effectiveness of the weapon and also protect those employing
the weapon or being transported in the personnel carriers.
[0003] Modern protective gear reached a stage where casualties
among law enforcement personnel and military personnel expecting to
enter the line of fire of small arms have been noticeably reduced.
The image of police and military personnel with helmets and body
armor has been popularized in the media and such protective gear
has undoubtedly saved numerous lives and reduced the severity of
many injuries. However, small arms fire is not the only danger that
faces modern military and security forces. For example, roadside
bombs and improvised explosive devices (IEDs) are becoming common
threats of concern. While typical modern protective gear may be
useful in providing protection from fragments and shrapnel produced
by these weapons, there is some question about the effectiveness of
this gear with respect to the concussive forces produced by the
blast wave that is generated by bombs and IEDs. Brain injuries and
internal organ damage may still occur in situations where body
armor or a helmet actually prevents penetration of fragments or
shrapnel. In fact, some studies suggest that current helmets may
actually act as an acoustic lens and focus shock waves (e.g., on
the far side of the head), which could actually increase the
severity of a brain trauma injury.
[0004] Accordingly, it may be desirable to provide protective gear
that may overcome some of the issues described above.
BRIEF SUMMARY
[0005] Some embodiments of the present disclosure relate to
protective gear that may provide improved performance with respect
to shockwave injuries by reducing or even eliminating shockwave
propagation inside the protective gear. In this regard, some
embodiments may provide for the use of shock penetration resistant
material (e.g., acoustic metamaterial or layered materials with
selected different densities and thicknesses) in connection with
personnel or equipment related protective gear. Embodiments may
therefore provide a gradient index, for example, via selection of
layered materials or via one or both of a negative elastic modulus
or a negative effective density, which renders the protective gear
an effective attenuator or redirector of shockwaves.
[0006] In one example embodiment, a method for providing a shock
penetration resistant apparatus is provided. The method may include
providing an item of protective gear to be positioned proximate to
an object to be protected, and disposing a shock penetration
resistant material proximate to the item of protective gear to
attenuate or redirect shock pulses away from the object to be
protected.
[0007] In another example embodiment, an apparatus is provided. The
apparatus may include an item of protective gear and a shock
penetration resistant material. The item of protective gear may be
configured to be positioned proximate to an object to be protected.
The shock penetration resistant material may be disposed proximate
to the item of protective gear to attenuate or redirect shock
pulses away from the object to be protected.
[0008] The features, functions and advantages that have been
discussed can be achieved independently in various embodiments of
the present disclosure or may be combined in yet other embodiments,
further details of which can be seen with reference to the
following description and drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING(S)
[0009] Having thus described the disclosure in general terms,
reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, which are
not necessarily drawn to scale, and wherein:
[0010] FIG. 1, which is defined by FIGS. 1A and 1B, shows
propagation of acoustic waves across an interface according to an
example embodiment;
[0011] FIG. 2, which is defined by FIGS. 2A, 2B and 2C, illustrates
an acoustic metamaterial of one example embodiment;
[0012] FIG. 3 illustrates a simulation of a pressure map for a
material with a negative elastic modulus .kappa. according to an
example embodiment;
[0013] FIG. 4 illustrates a plot of the effective dynamic bulk
modulus of an acoustic metamaterial according to an example
embodiment;
[0014] FIG. 5 illustrates a region over which the real portion of
the effective mass density of a material is negative according to
an example embodiment;
[0015] FIG. 6 illustrates a layered series of instances of material
A and material B, each of which is not an acoustic metamaterial
according to an example embodiment;
[0016] FIG. 7 illustrates a ratio of effective density .rho. to the
effective density .rho..sub.0 of air plotted against material
radius of a shell according to an example embodiment;
[0017] FIG. 8, which is defined by FIGS. 8A and 8B, shows
corresponding example realizations of a cloaking helmet with
corresponding different numbers of layers of material alternating
between more and less dense material with corresponding selected
thicknesses to define a shock penetration resistant material
according to an example embodiment;
[0018] FIG. 9 illustrates a diagram showing a portion of a human
body as a protected object that is equipped with protective gear
according to an example embodiment; and
[0019] FIG. 10 illustrates a method of providing protective gear
that has improved effectiveness against shock pulses and bomb
blasts according to an example embodiment.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0020] The present disclosure now will be described more fully
hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which
some, but not all embodiments are shown. Indeed, this disclosure
may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed
as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these
embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will satisfy
applicable legal requirements. Like numbers refer to like elements
throughout.
[0021] As discussed above, protective gear such as helmets, vests
or other body armor garments may implement embodiments of the
present disclosure to improve the effectiveness of the protective
gear at attenuating or redirecting blast or shockwaves. Example
embodiments may also be used in connection with providing armor or
protection to robots or vehicles. As such, any type of protective
gear including helmets, shields, gauntlets, garments, vests,
gloves, shin guards, knee pads, elbow pads, armor (for body parts,
vehicles or machines), and/or the like, may employ example
embodiments of the present disclosure. In some cases, a shock
penetration resistant material may be used in connection with the
protective gear to make the protective gear more effective in
protecting the person, component (e.g., electrical or mechanical)
or machine being protected from shockwave propagation. In some
examples, the shock penetration resistant material may be added to
a protective item, while in others, the protective item may be
formed of the shock penetration resistant material itself.
[0022] Conventional protective gear often employs metals, ceramics
and/or synthetic fiber materials (e.g., Kevlar) to provide
protection for body parts and/or equipment. While the metals,
ceramics and synthetic fiber materials are typically very effective
at stopping or blunting the effectiveness of small arms fire,
shrapnel, knife blades and other hazards, the metals, ceramics and
synthetic fiber materials are typically not particularly useful in
connection with protection against blast or shockwaves and, in
fact, as discussed above, may actually magnify injuries related to
blast or shockwaves in some cases.
[0023] Metamaterial is an example of a material that may be
configured to perform as shock penetration resistant material. In
particular, acoustic metamaterial having a negative elastic modulus
and/or a negative effective density may be useful as shock
penetration resistant material. In this regard, acoustic waves that
are generated responsive to a blast (e.g., shockwaves) do not
propagate inside a material that has either a negative elastic
modulus or a negative effective density. Thus, a shockwave that
encounters acoustic metamaterial having a negative elastic modulus
and/or a negative effective density may decay and essentially
become harmless when attempting to pass through corresponding
acoustic metamaterial. Accordingly, for example, if a helmet or
vest were lined with or otherwise had acoustic metamaterial having
a negative elastic modulus and/or a negative effective density
embedded therein, a shockwave impacting the helmet or vest would be
attenuated or redirected to prevent damage to vital organs of the
wearer of the helmet or vest.
[0024] Acoustic metamaterial having a negative elastic modulus
.kappa. and/or a negative effective density .rho. may exhibit
desirable acoustic properties based on the acoustic wave
equation:
.gradient. ( 1 .rho. .gradient. p ) + 1 .rho. c s 2 .differential.
2 p .differential. t 2 = Q , ##EQU00001##
where .gradient.p is a pressure vector, p represents pressure and t
represents time. An acoustic wave does not propagate inside a
material that has either a negative elastic modulus .kappa. or a
negative effective density .rho.. Accordingly, an acoustic wave
encountering such a material is rendered substantially harmless.
Control over the negative elastic modulus .kappa. and the negative
effective density .rho. during design may enable the production of
shock penetration resistant material that has desired properties
such as substantial invisibility to a shockwave or reflection or
redirection of the shockwave (e.g., when the acoustic impedance
.rho.c.sub.s is very different from that of air).
[0025] FIG. 1, which is defined by FIGS. 1A and 1B, shows the
propagation of acoustic waves across an interface. As shown in FIG.
1A, if pressure is the same at points that are at equal distances
from the interface, the pressure vectors shown may be reflections
of each other. Furthermore, the boundary condition across the
interface may be physical. FIG. 1B shows a plot of elastic modulus
.kappa. versus effective density .rho.. As can be seen from FIG.
1B, quadrants of the plot represent materials with various
different combinations of elastic modulus .kappa. and effective
density .rho.. The top right quadrant represents materials with a
positive elastic modulus .kappa. and a positive effective density
.rho.. Materials in the bottom right quadrant have a negative
elastic modulus .kappa. and a positive effective density .rho..
Meanwhile, materials in the bottom left quadrant have both a
negative elastic modulus .kappa. and a negative effective density
.rho., while materials in the top left quadrant have a positive
elastic modulus .kappa. and a negative effective density .rho.. As
indicated above, materials having a negative elastic modulus
.kappa. and/or a negative effective density .rho. may be useful as
examples of shock penetration resistant materials.
[0026] Accordingly, based on the descriptions herein, some example
embodiments may be provided with shock penetration resistant
material that is formed from acoustic metamaterial (e.g., material
in a quadrant of FIG. 1B that has at least a negative elastic
modulus .kappa. or a negative effective density .rho.). However, in
some alternative embodiments, shock penetration resistant materials
may be formed of layers of materials that are not necessarily
acoustic metamaterial (e.g., material in the quadrant of FIG. 1B
that has a positive elastic modulus .kappa. and a positive
effective density .rho.). FIG. 2, which is defined by FIGS. 2A, 2B
and 2C, illustrates an acoustic metamaterial of one example
embodiment. In this regard, FIG. 2B shows a series or array of
Helmholtz resonators, while FIG. 2A illustrates a cross section
view of one of the Helmholtz resonators of FIG. 2B. In an example
embodiment, each Helmholtz resonator may include a neck area and a
cavity defined within an aluminum sample. The cavity may be
rectangular (in this case having dimensions that are about 3.14 mm
by 4 mm by 5 mm). The neck may be cylindrical in shape with a 1 mm
diameter and a 1 mm length. The cavity and neck may be filled with
water and be connected to a water duct that may have a cross
section of about 4 mm by 4 mm. The resonators may be positioned
with a periodicity of about 9.2 mm. By way of analogy, fluidic
inductance may be provided due to the neck and acoustic capacitance
may be provided due to the cavity. FIG. 2C illustrates the real and
imaginary components of the effective bulk modulus of the Helmholtz
resonators of FIGS. 2A and 2B as a function of frequency. Note that
size, shape and material in which the Helmholtz resonator is formed
and the fluid with which it is filled may be different in other
embodiments.
[0027] Thus, in some embodiments, protective gear may be provided
with acoustic metamaterial such as the metamaterial shown in FIG. 2
in order to provide shock penetration resistant properties to the
protective gear. As an example, the acoustic metamaterial may be a
filling material attached to the interior portion of a helmet or
piece of armor to substantially render the wearer invisible to
shockwaves. The acoustic metamaterial may include an array (e.g., a
two dimensional array) of Helmholtz resonators as indicated in FIG.
2. However, some alternative embodiments may employ rubber ring
inclusions, rubber coated metal spheres, rubber rods or other
acoustic metamaterial structures. Generally speaking, rubber rods
and rubber coated metal spheres may be examples of acoustic
metamaterials with a negative effective density .rho.. Meanwhile,
rubber ring inclusions and rubber coated metal spheres may be
examples of acoustic metamaterials that may have a negative elastic
modulus .kappa.. Acoustic metamaterial with a negative index of
refraction for acoustics may therefore be employed in a unit cell
approach to provide a cloaking device with respect to acoustic
pressure or shockwaves.
[0028] FIG. 3 illustrates a simulation of a pressure map for a
material with a negative elastic modulus .kappa. according to an
example embodiment. The pressure map of FIG. 3, which shows very
low pressure at the center, may be achieved using rubber ring
inclusions or rubber coated metal spheres in acoustic metamaterial.
The geometry of the acoustic metamaterial may determine resonance
for the acoustic metamaterial and will therefore define a bandwidth
over which the acoustic metamaterial is effective at essentially
cloaking an object with respect to a pressure wave. FIG. 4
illustrates a plot of the effective dynamic bulk modulus of an
acoustic metamaterial. As can be seen from FIG. 4, an operating
range 10 over which real portions of the effective dynamic bulk
modulus is a negative value is defined over a specific bandwidth.
Thus, for example, knowing the operating range over which a
particular structure provides cloaking properties, acoustic
metamaterials having specific operating ranges may be selected for
use to protect against specific types of blast or shockwaves. The
image of FIG. 5 illustrates a region over which the real portion of
the effective mass density of a material is negative as well. The
arrangement of materials, the specific materials used and the
frequencies over which they operate are all factors that may impact
the behavior of a material with respect to a shockwave and are
therefore considered with respect to selection of materials for use
in connection with providing a shock penetration resistant material
using acoustic metamaterial according to some example
embodiments.
[0029] By controlling the elastic modulus .kappa. and the effective
density .rho., properties of the shock penetration resistant
material may be flexibly controlled. For example, by controlling
both the negative elastic modulus .kappa. and the negative
effective density .rho., the acoustic impedance of the shock
penetration resistant material may be made very different from that
of air to enable the shock penetration resistant material to
reflect significant portions of shockwave energy. Similarly, by
controlling both the negative elastic modulus .kappa. and the
negative effective density .rho., the acoustic impedance of the
shock penetration resistant material may be made such that an
acoustic cloaking device that renders objects inside to be
substantially invisible to shockwave energy results.
[0030] As indicated above, some embodiments may employ shock
penetration resistant materials that may be formed of layers of
materials that are not necessarily acoustic metamaterial (e.g.,
material in the quadrant of FIG. 1B that has a positive elastic
modulus .kappa. and a positive effective density .rho. and
therefore does not have a negative index of refraction for
acoustics). In some cases, embodiments employing shock penetration
resistant materials that may be formed of layers of materials that
are not necessarily acoustic metamaterial may be somewhat less
compact than those embodiments that employ acoustic metamaterial
(e.g., unit cell approach based embodiments) due to the need for
multiple layers. When employed in shock penetration resistant
materials, the layers of materials approach may present a positive
index of refraction for acoustics, but may still provide a gradient
index that achieves the result of providing cloaking
properties.
[0031] In some embodiments, the gradient index may be a function of
radius. FIG. 6 illustrates a layered series of instances of
material A (layer 20) and material B (layer 30), each of which is
not an acoustic metamaterial. Material A and material B may each
have different densities of moduli. Accordingly, with thicknesses
of the materials being provided to be smaller than the wavelength
of a pressure wave, the effective mass density and moduli of the
layered material may be given by the equation:
.rho. r = .rho. A + .eta..rho. B 1 + .eta. , 1 .rho. .theta. = 1 1
+ .eta. ( 1 .rho. A + .eta. .rho. B ) 1 .kappa. = 1 1 + .eta. ( 1
.kappa. A + .eta. .kappa. B ) , ##EQU00002##
[0032] where .eta.(=d.sub.B/d.sub.A) is ratio of thicknesses
In embodiments employing an example similar to that of FIG. 6
(e.g., a layered approach), the use of layered materials may
provide a relatively wider bandwidth over which protection is
offered than perhaps a unit cell approach. In this regard, while an
acoustic metamaterial may be effective over a frequency range that
is determined based on properties of the acoustic metamaterial, the
materials selected for the layers of material may be selected as
wideband materials to provide a relatively wide bandwidth over
which the shock penetration resistant material is effective.
[0033] FIG. 7 illustrates an example embodiment in which, from
transformation optics techniques, example material requirements for
a cloaking helmet are shown. FIG. 7 illustrates a ratio of
effective density .rho. to the effective density of air .rho..sub.0
plotted against material radius of a shell (e.g., inner radius
being on the left and outer radius being on the right). An example
realization of a cloaking helmet with forty layers of material
alternating between more and less dense material is shown in FIG.
8A. Density requirements range from 0.01.times. density of air to
100.times. (assuming operation in air, otherwise air may be
replaced with water or some other fluid). A less dense material may
be a partial vacuum between denser materials in some example
embodiments. Denser materials used to form layers may include, for
example, foam, rubber, plastic and other materials that have
densities that can be controlled during the injection, forming or
compression process. As shown in FIG. 8A, a "cloaking shell" 50 may
form around a cloaked object to cause the blast wave to pass
harmlessly around the cloaked object. FIG. 8B shows a simulation of
the cloaking shell 50 formed around the cloaked object in a
scenario in which two hundred layers of alternating more and less
dense materials are employed according to another example
embodiment.
[0034] FIG. 9 illustrates a diagram showing a portion of a human
body as a protected object that is equipped with protective gear.
In this example, the protected object is a head 100 and the
protective gear is a hemispherical shell shaped helmet 110 worn on
the head 100. The helmet 110 may include a shock penetration
resistant material 120 that may be coupled to a portion of the
helmet 110 that is proximate to the head 100. In this example, the
head 100 (or at least the portion of the head that is proximate to
the shock penetration resistant material 120) may be considered a
cloaked object since the shock penetration resistant material 120
may be enabled to attenuate or redirect acoustic pressure directed
thereat. Accordingly, for example, if a soldier wearing the helmet
110 is near a blast that produces a shockwave, the shockwave will
not be focused on the head 100 in the manner in which such focusing
may occur in connection with conventional helmets. Instead, the
shock penetration resistant material 120 may protect the head 100
from the shockwave as described above.
[0035] In some embodiments, the shock penetration resistant
material 120 may be a liner or lining material affixed to an
interior portion of the helmet 110. However, it may also be
possible to wear the shock penetration resistant material 120 as a
form fitting hat that may fit under the helmet 110. Similarly,
shock penetration resistant material that is used in connection
with other garments or armor portions may be affixed to the
corresponding garment or armor portion, or may be worn or affixed
to a portion of the protected object (e.g., a body part or piece of
equipment) between the protected object and the garment or armor
portion. The shock penetration resistant material used in various
example embodiments could alternatively be incorporated into the
protective gear such as being positioned at an exterior portion of
the protective gear, or being positioned within a portion of the
protective gear (e.g., sandwiched between other components of the
protective gear). As such, the shock penetration resistant material
(e.g., acoustic metamaterial or layered materials with alternating
different densities and selected thicknesses) may attenuate or
redirect (e.g., via refraction or cloaking) a shockwave to protect
vital organs and/or equipment from damage that the shockwave might
otherwise cause. Moreover, the pressure wave focusing tendencies of
conventional helmets and perhaps also other conventional protective
gear may be overcome.
[0036] FIG. 10 illustrates a method of providing protective gear
that has improved effectiveness against shock pulses and bomb
blasts according to an example embodiment. The method may include
providing an item of protective gear to be positioned proximate to
an object to be protected at operation 200, and disposing a shock
penetration resistant material proximate to the item of protective
gear to attenuate or redirect shock pulses away from the object to
be protected at operation 210.
[0037] In some embodiments, certain ones of the operations above
may be modified or further amplified as described below. Moreover,
in some embodiments additional optional operations may also be
included (an example of which is shown in dashed lines in FIG. 10).
It should be appreciated that each of the modifications, optional
additions or amplifications below may be included with the
operations above either alone or in combination with any others
among the features described herein. In this regard, for example,
the method may further include controlling the negative elastic
modulus and negative effective density of the shock penetration
resistant material to make acoustic impedance of the shock
penetration resistant material substantially different from
acoustic impedance of air to enable the shock penetration resistant
material to be reflective of shockwave energy or to make acoustic
impedance of the shock penetration resistant material such that the
object to be protected is substantially invisible to shockwave
energy at operation 220. In some cases, disposing the shock
penetration resistant material may include disposing an acoustic
metamaterial (e.g., an array of Helmholtz resonators, rubber ring
inclusions, rubber rods or rubber coated spheres) proximate to the
item of protective gear. In some embodiments, disposing the
acoustic metamaterial may include disposing a material having one
or both of a negative elastic modulus and a negative effective
density proximate to the item of protective gear. In an example
embodiment, disposing the shock penetration resistant material may
include disposing alternating layers of materials having respective
different densities of moduli and selected respective thicknesses
of each material in which the selected respective thicknesses are
smaller than a wavelength of a particular pressure wave. In an
example embodiment, disposing the shock penetration resistant
material proximate to the item of protective gear may include
affixing the shock penetration resistant material to an interior
portion of the item of protective gear or disposing the shock
penetration resistant material between portions of the item of
protective gear.
[0038] Many modifications and other embodiments of the disclosure
set forth herein will come to mind to one skilled in the art to
which these embodiments pertain having the benefit of the teachings
presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated
drawings. Therefore, it is to be understood that the disclosure is
not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed and that
modifications and other embodiments are intended to be included
within the scope of the appended claims. Although specific terms
are employed herein, they are used in a generic and descriptive
sense only and not for purposes of limitation.
* * * * *