U.S. patent application number 12/938740 was filed with the patent office on 2011-02-24 for optical reader system and method for monitoring and correcting lateral and angular misalignments of label independent biosensors.
Invention is credited to Anthony G. Frutos, Jacques Gollier, Jinlin Peng, Garrett A. Piech, Michael B. Webb.
Application Number | 20110043828 12/938740 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 36203772 |
Filed Date | 2011-02-24 |
United States Patent
Application |
20110043828 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Frutos; Anthony G. ; et
al. |
February 24, 2011 |
OPTICAL READER SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MONITORING AND CORRECTING
LATERAL AND ANGULAR MISALIGNMENTS OF LABEL INDEPENDENT
BIOSENSORS
Abstract
An optical reader system and method are described herein that
can detect a lateral and/or angular misalignment of one or more
biosensors so that the biosensors can be properly re-located after
being removed from and then reinserted into the optical reader
system. In one embodiment, the biosensors are incorporated within
the wells of a microplate.
Inventors: |
Frutos; Anthony G.; (Painted
Post, NY) ; Gollier; Jacques; (Painted Post, NY)
; Peng; Jinlin; (Painted Post, NY) ; Piech;
Garrett A.; (Horseheads, NY) ; Webb; Michael B.;
(Lindley, NY) |
Correspondence
Address: |
CORNING INCORPORATED
SP-TI-3-1
CORNING
NY
14831
US
|
Family ID: |
36203772 |
Appl. No.: |
12/938740 |
Filed: |
November 3, 2010 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
11789900 |
Apr 26, 2007 |
7851208 |
|
|
12938740 |
|
|
|
|
11210920 |
Aug 23, 2005 |
7629173 |
|
|
11789900 |
|
|
|
|
11027547 |
Dec 29, 2004 |
7604984 |
|
|
11210920 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
356/614 ;
356/246 |
Current CPC
Class: |
G01N 21/7743 20130101;
G01N 21/553 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
356/614 ;
356/246 |
International
Class: |
G01N 21/01 20060101
G01N021/01; G01B 11/14 20060101 G01B011/14 |
Claims
1. A method for detecting and correcting a misalignment of a
microplate in an optical reader system, said method comprising the
steps of: placing said microplate onto a holder; using a fiducial
marking on said microplate to determine a first position of said
microplate; removing said microplate from said holder; re-inserting
said microplate back onto said holder; using said fiducial marking
on said microplate to determine a second position of said
microplate; comparing the first position and the second position of
said microplate; and if there is a difference between the two
positions, then addressing the lateral and/or angular misalignment
of said microplate such that the re-inserted microplate is
positioned to be located at or substantially near to the first
position, wherein said fiducial marking on said microplate is a
coating.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein said addressing step includes the
step of moving said holder so that the microplate is located at or
substantially near to the first position.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein said addressing step includes the
step of moving one or more optical beams used to interrogate said
fiducial marking so that the microplate is located at or
substantially near to the first position.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein said addressing step includes the
step of using software to adjust a measured interrogation reading
based upon the known position error and a known translation
sensitivity.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein said step of using the fiducial
marking on said microplate to determine either the first position
or the second position of said microplate includes: generating an
optical beam; scanning the optical beam across said fiducial
marking on said microplate; collecting the scanned optical beam
which is reflected from said fiducial marking on said microplate;
processing the collected optical beam to determine either the first
position or the second position of said microplate as a function of
a position of said holder; and recording either the first position
or the second position of said microplate as a function of the
position of said holder.
6. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of
determining whether or not a biological substance is present or a
biomolecular event occurred on a surface of a measurement
diffraction grating within a well in said microplate.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein said determination of the second
position of said microplate and said determination of whether or
not a biological substance is present or a biomolecular event
occurred within the well in said microplate are performed in one
optical beam scanning step.
8. The method of claim 6, wherein said determination of the second
position of said microplate and said determination of whether or
not a biological substance is present or a biomolecular event
occurred within the well in said microplate are performed in two
optical beam scanning steps.
9. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of scanning
multiple fiducial markings on said microplate to measure thermal
dilations of said microplate.
10. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of scanning
the fiducial marking which is a fiducial diffraction grating to
determine a temperature gradient.
11. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of scanning
the fiducial marking which includes features that are at one angle
to a scanning direction of an optical beam and features that are at
a second angle to the scanning direction of the optical beam which
enables one to determine misalignments if any in two
directions.
12. An optical reader system comprising: a holder for supporting a
biosensor; a light source for creating an optical beam which is
scanned across a fiducial marking associated with the biosensor; a
detector for collecting the scanned optical beam which is reflected
from the fiducial marking associated with the biosensor; a
processor for analyzing the collected optical beam and determining
a position of the biosensor; and said processor for addressing a
lateral and/or an angular misalignment of the biosensor, if
needed.
13. The optical reader system of claim 12, wherein said fiducial
marking is a fiducial diffraction grating which is located away
from a measurement diffraction grating that is associated with the
biosensor.
14. The optical reader system of claim 12, wherein said fiducial
marking includes features that are at one angle to a scanning
direction of the optical beam and features that are at a second
angle to the scanning direction of the optical beam which enables
one to determine misalignments if any in two directions.
15. The optical reader system of claim 12, wherein said biosensor
is incorporated within a microplate.
16. A microplate comprising: a frame including a plurality of wells
formed therein, each well incorporating a biosensor that includes:
a substrate; a measurement diffraction grating; and a waveguide
film; and said frame further includes at least one fiducial marking
located thereon which is used to help determine a position of the
biosensors.
17. The microplate of claim 16, wherein one of said at least one
fiducial marking is located outside the wells.
18. The microplate of claim 16, wherein said fiducial marking is: a
grating area having a different resonance wavelength; a fiducial
diffraction grating; or a coating.
Description
CLAIMING BENEFIT OF CO-PENDING APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application is a divisional application of U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 11/789,900, filed Apr. 26, 2007, now pending,
which is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser.
No. 11/210,920, filed Aug. 23, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,629,173,
which is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 11/027,547 filed Dec. 29, 2004, now U.S. Pat.
No. 7,604,984. The contents of these documents are hereby
incorporated by reference herein.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] 1. Field of the Invention
[0003] The present invention relates to an optical reader system
and method for detecting a lateral and/or angular misalignment of
one or more biosensors so that the biosensors can be properly
re-located after being removed from and then reinserted into the
optical reader system. In one embodiment, the biosensors are
incorporated within the wells of a microplate.
[0004] 2. Description of Related Art
[0005] A major challenge today is to design an optical reader
system that can properly re-locate a label independent detection
(LID) microplate after it is removed and then reinserted back into
the optical reader system. In particular, what is needed is an
optical reader system that can detect and correct a lateral and/or
angular misalignment of a re-positioned LID microplate. This need
and other needs are addressed by the optical reader system and
method of the present invention.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0006] The present invention includes an optical reader system and
method that uses one or more fiducial markings (e.g., position
sensors) on a LID microplate to monitor and correct if needed any
lateral and/or angular misalignment of the microplate. In one
embodiment, the method includes the steps of: (a) placing the
microplate onto a translation stage; (b) using one or more fiducial
marking(s) on the microplate to determine a first position of the
microplate; (c) removing the microplate from the translation stage;
(d) re-inserting the microplate back onto the translation stage;
(e) using the fiducial marking(s) on the microplate to determine a
second position of the microplate; (f) comparing the first position
and the second position of the microplate; and (g) if there is a
difference between the two positions, then addressing the lateral
and/or angular misalignment of the microplate by: (1) moving the
translation stage so that the microplate is located at or
substantially near to the first position; or (2) not moving the
microplate but instead adjusting via software a measured reading
(e.g., resonance wavelength) based upon the known position error
and a known translation sensitivity. Likewise, steps (a)-(g) could
be accomplished by using a stationary holder for the microplate and
instead the optical beams can be moved that interrogate the
stationary microplate. In another embodiment, the optical reader
system can be used to monitor and correct a lateral and/or angular
misalignment of a biosensor (which has a fiducial marking) that is
not incorporated within a microplate.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0007] A more complete understanding of the present invention may
be had by reference to the following detailed description when
taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:
[0008] FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an optical reader system that
is used to monitor and correct a lateral and/or angular
misalignment of a microplate (or biosensor) in accordance with the
present invention;
[0009] FIG. 2 is a graph that is used to help describe why the
optical reader system should monitor and correct the lateral and/or
angular misalignment of the microplate (or biosensor) in accordance
with the present invention;
[0010] FIGS. 3-5, 6A and 6B are several graphs and diagrams used to
help describe one type of fiducial marking that can be formed on
the biosensor which enables the optical reader system to monitor
and correct the lateral and/or angular misalignment of the
microplate (or biosensor) in accordance with the present
invention;
[0011] FIGS. 6C and 6D are two diagrams used to help describe a
second type of fiducial marking that can be formed on the biosensor
which enables the optical reader system to monitor and correct the
lateral and/or angular misalignment of the microplate (or
biosensor) in accordance with the present invention;
[0012] FIGS. 7A and 7B are two diagrams used to help describe a
third type of fiducial marking that can be formed on the microplate
(or biosensor) which enables the optical reader system to monitor
and correct the lateral and/or angular misalignment of the
microplate (or biosensor) in accordance with the present
invention;
[0013] FIGS. 8-10 are three graphs which are used to help explain
other uses for the third type of fiducial marking in addition to
enabling the optical reader system to monitor and correct the
lateral and/or angular misalignment of the microplate (biosensor)
in accordance with the present invention; and
[0014] FIG. 11 is a flowchart illustrating the steps of a method
for monitoring and correcting a lateral and/or angular misalignment
of a microplate (or biosensor) in accordance with the present
invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0015] Referring to FIGS. 1-11, there are disclosed several
diagrams and graphs which are used to help describe the optical
reader system 100 and method 1100 of the present invention. As
discussed below, the optical reader system 100 is capable of
performing two functions: (1) detecting a biological substance 124
(or a biomolecular binding event) on a biosensor 102; and (2)
detecting and correcting any lateral and/or angular misalignment of
the biosensor 102 which is caused by the removal and subsequent
reinsertion of the biosensor 102 into the optical reader system
100. Prior to discussing the second function, a brief description
is provided about how the optical reader system 100 can detect a
biological substance 124 on the biosensor 102.
[0016] As shown in FIG. 1, the optical reader system 100 is used to
interrogate a biosensor 102 (e.g., resonant waveguide grating (RWG)
biosensor 102, a surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensor 102) to
determine if a biological substance 124 is present on the biosensor
102. The optical reader system 100 includes a light source 106
(e.g., lamp, laser, diode) that outputs an optical beam 104 which
is scanned across the biosensor 102. Typically, the biosensor 102
is moved so the optical beam 104 can be scanned across the
biosensor 102. Alternatively, the optical beam 104 itself may be
scanned with a mirror, galvanometer, electro-optic or acousto-optic
scanner or other suitable adjustable optical element, across a
stationary biosensor 102. While the optical beam 104 is scanned
across the biosensor 102, a detector 108 (e.g., spectrometer, CCD
camera or other optical detector) collects an optical beam 112
which is reflected from the biosensor 102. A processor 110 (e.g.,
DSP 110, computer 110) then processes the collected optical beam
112 to obtain and record raw spectral data 114 which is a function
of a position (and possibly time) on the biosensor 102. Thereafter,
the processor 110 analyzes the raw spectral data 114 to create a
spatial map of resonant wavelength (peak position) data which
indicates if a biological substance 124 is present on the biosensor
102.
[0017] In particular, the biosensor 102 makes use of changes in the
refractive index at the sensor surface 126 that affect the
waveguide coupling properties of the emitted optical beam 104 and
the detected optical beam 112 to enable label-free detection of the
biological substance 124 (e.g., cell, molecule, protein, drug,
chemical compound, nucleic acid, peptide, carbohydrate) on the
superstrate 103 (sensing region) of the biosensor 102. The
biological substance 124 may be located within a bulk fluid that is
deposited on the superstrate 103 (sensing region) of the biosensor
102 and it is the presence of this biological substance 124 that
alters the index of refraction at the surface 126 of the biosensor
102. Thus, to detect the biological substance 124, the biosensor
102 needs to be at least probed with an optical beam 104 and then a
reflected optical beam 112 received at the detector 108 is analyzed
to determine if there are any changes (.about.1 part per million)
in the refractive index caused by the presence of the biological
substance 124. In one embodiment, the top surface 126 may be coated
with biochemical compounds (not shown) that only allow surface
attachment of specific complementary biological substances 124
which enables a biosensor 102 to be created that is both highly
sensitive and highly specific. In this way, the optical reader
system 100 and biosensor 102 may be used to detect a wide variety
of biological substances 124. And, if multiple biosensors 102 are
arranged in array like in a microplate 126 then they may be used to
enable high throughput drug or chemical screening studies. For a
more detailed discussion about the detection of a biological
substance 124 (or a biomolecular binding event) using the scanning
optical reader system 100, reference is made to the aforementioned
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/027,547.
[0018] It is well known that when an optical beam 104 is used to
interrogate a biosensor 102, then the resonance wavelength often
has an undesirable dependence upon the exact spatial location at
which the optical beam 104 strikes the biosensor 102. The
undesirable variation of the resonance wavelength is often caused
by the non-homogeneity of the biosensor 102 which can be
attributable to variations in the thickness of the waveguide and/or
to variations in the grating period (for example). In fact, a
typical variation in the resonance wavelength can be as high as 3
pm per micron. Thus, if one desires to remove and replace the
biosensor 102 from the optical reader 100 during the course of an
experiment, the biosensor 102 needs to be repositioned to a high
accuracy to prevent wavelength shifts induced by translation from
overwhelming those wavelength shifts from biochemical binding. The
impact, in terms of wavelength shift .DELTA..lamda. of such a
translation sensitivity upon the measurement is thus
.DELTA..lamda. = .lamda. x .DELTA. x . ##EQU00001##
[0019] Here .DELTA..lamda./dx is the translation sensitivity
(pm/.mu.m) and .DELTA.x is the displacement (.mu.m) of the
biosensor 102 between measurements. This formula makes apparent two
ways of reducing the impact of translation: 1) reduce the
translation sensitivity, .DELTA..lamda./dx, by careful design of
the biosensor 102 and/or the optical reader system 100; or 2)
reduce the amount of displacement .DELTA.x that occurs between
measurements.
[0020] To reduce the translation sensitivity, the scanning optical
reader system 100 can be used to average these spatial fluctuations
in the resonance wavelength. This has been shown to decrease the
translational sensitivity by an order of magnitude to around 0.3 pm
per micron. FIG. 2 is a graph that shows the typical shape of the
resonance wavelength (spectral shift) that can be obtained when
scanning one 3 mm long biosensor 102 in one direction with a 100
.mu.m diameter optical beam. It should be appreciated that the use
of a "larger" optical beam 104 can help even more by further
averaging down high spatial frequency variations. Although, a
resonance wavelength translation sensitivity of 0.3 pm per micron
works well in many applications, such a sensitivity can still be of
great concern for systems attempting to detect small biomolecular
binding events. Such small binding events can require resonant
wavelength measurement accuracies of better then 0.05 pm. To
address this problem one can minimize the translation induced
wavelength error by ensuring that the biosensors 102 are properly
positioned within the optical reader system 100. This is done by
the second function of the optical reader system 100.
[0021] A detailed discussion is provided next about three different
ways the optical reader system 100 can make sure that the
biosensors 102 are properly positioned therein. Basically, the
optical reader system 100 can detect and correct a lateral and/or
an angular misalignment of the biosensor(s) 102 (microplate 126) by
using anyone or a combination of three different types of fiducial
markings which can be located on either the biosensor 102 or the
microplate 126. The first type of fiducial marking is the edge of
the measurement diffraction grating on the biosensor 102 (see FIGS.
3-5 and 6A-6B). The second type of fiducial marking is a
non-responding line 602, 602a and 602b located on the measurement
diffraction grating of the biosensor 102 (see FIGS. 6C-6D). And,
the third type of fiducial marking is a fiducial diffraction
grating 702 (position sensor 702) that is separate from the
measurement diffraction grating on the biosensor 102 (see FIGS. 7A
and 7B). In yet another embodiment, the fiducial marking can be a
coating (local metallic, dielectric coating) that is applied to a
biosensor 102 or microplate 126. This coating would have a
sufficient reflectivity contrast so it could be detected by the
optical reader system 100.
[0022] In the first way, the optical reader system 100 scans a
biosensor 102 and uses the resulting raw spectral data 114 to
create a spatial map of reflected power that enables one to
precisely locate the edge of the gratings in the biosensor 102.
FIG. 3 is a graph that shows the typical shape to the power
evolution of the resonance wavelength when the optical reader
system 100 scans a square biosensor 102. To determine the edges of
the biosensor 102, various edge detection algorithms can be used.
As an example, FIG. 4 is a graph that shows the result of applying
a derivative filter on the power profile shown in FIG. 3. By
detecting the centroids of the positive and negative peaks of the
differentiated signal, one can accurately determine the position of
the biosensor 102. Again, in this case the fiducial marking is the
edge of the measurement diffraction grating on the biosensor
102.
[0023] To estimate the repeatability of this type of position
measurement, a square biosensor 102 was scanned 500 hundred times.
The position of the detected edge then was measured with respect to
the position encoder data on a translation stage 128 which
supported the biosensor 102 (or microplate 126) (see FIG. 1).
Results of this test are shown in FIG. 5. The typical standard
deviation of the measurements is in the range of 0.25 microns,
which is in fact very close to the resolution of the encoder on the
translation stage 128 (see FIG. 1).
[0024] This and other types of position measurements are important,
because when a microplate 126 which contains an array of biosensors
102 is removed from and then reinserted into the optical reader
system 100, one essentially loses track of the absolute
translational position of the microplate 126. However, upon
reinsertion, when the optical beam 104 is scanned across the
microplate 126, by detecting the location where the edges of the
grating(s) occur on the biosensor(s) 102, one can "recalibrate" the
translation stage 128 (e.g., linear stages 128) so it can very
precisely move the microplate 126 back to the same position the
microplate 126 was in before it was removed from the optical reader
system 100. For a more detailed discussion about how the optical
reader system 100 can detect the edges of a measurement diffraction
grating in a biosensor 102, reference is made to the aforementioned
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/027,547.
[0025] Additionally, one may use various edge detection concepts to
monitor the two dimensional (2D) lateral position of the microplate
126 (see FIGS. 6A-6D). In one such edge detection concept, a square
biosensor 102 is scanned in both an x direction and a y direction
to determine the lateral 2D position of the microplate 126 (see
FIG. 6A). In another edge detection technique, one can scan a
triangular biosensor 102 where the x-position is given by the
position of the first edge detection and the y-position is given by
the distance measured between the two edges detections (see FIG.
6B).
[0026] In yet another other edge detection concept, one can use the
second type of fiducial marking(s) 602 which are non-responding
line(s) 602 located on the biosensor 102 to monitor the lateral 2D
position of the microplate 126 (see FIGS. 6C-6D). In one example,
the biosensor 102 has a design as shown in FIG. 6C where a
non-responding line 602 was made diagonally across the biosensor
102. This diagonal non-responding line 602 enables one to estimate
both the x and y positions of the biosensor 102 with a single
1-dimensional beam scan. In particular, when using such a diagonal
non-responding line 602 the rising edge of a power vs. position
trace is used to determine the x-position and the difference
between the rising and falling edges is used to determine the
y-position. In yet another example shown in FIG. 6D, the biosensor
102 has two off-center non-responding lines 602a and 602b that are
set at the edge of the biosensor 102 which allows one to also use
the center portion of the grating to detect a biological substance
124 (or a biomolecular binding event). An advantage of the last
example is that one can put fiducial markings 602a and 602b on all
of the biosensors 102 which allows one to obtain more data that can
be averaged to improve the re-positioning accuracy. However, the
drawback of this example is that a complete measurement requires
two scanning steps, one scanning step for the position measurement
and one scanning step for the biochemical measurement itself. It
should be noted that non-responding lines 602, 602a and 602b can be
generated by having some areas without a diffraction grating or
without a waveguide.
[0027] Referring now to the third type of fiducial marking, the
optical reader system 100 in this case scans a fiducial diffraction
grating 702 (position sensor 702) which is preferably located on a
microplate 126 (see FIGS. 7A and 7B). As shown in FIGS. 7A and 7B,
the optical reader system 100 can interrogate the fiducial
diffraction gratings 702 which are relatively close to the
biosensor 102. Then, in real time measure the position of the
microplate 126a and 126b and if needed make the translation
corrections before the interrogation beam 104 reaches the biosensor
102. This allows continuous scanning with real time position
correction.
[0028] As can be seen in the exemplary microplates 126a and 126b
shown in FIGS. 7A and 7B, one can put a fiducial diffraction
grating 702 and a biosensor 102 in each measurement well 704a (see
FIG. 7A). Or, one can put a fiducial diffraction grating 702 at the
beginning and at the end of the microplate plate 126b (see FIG.
7B). In the last case, the fiducial diffraction gratings 702 are
located outside the measurement wells 704b and will be in contact
with air or with the glue that holds together the microplate 126.
The design of these particular fiducial diffraction gratings 702 in
terms of a grating period should be optimized to generate a
resonance wavelength close to the one that would be generated if
the fiducial diffraction gratings 702 were in contact with the
aqueous buffer solutions likely to be used in the wells. This is
because the global spectral range of the optical reader system 100
is limited by the spectral width of the light source 106 and
detector 108, and it is important to keep the resonance within the
operational band of this source/detector system 100.
[0029] An advantage of having multiple fiducial diffraction
gratings 702 across the microplate 126a and 126b is that one can
average the data and obtain a better measurement accuracy. Another
advantage of having multiple fiducial diffraction gratings 702 on a
microplate 126a and 126b is that it allows one to monitor thermal
dilatations of the microplate 126a and 126b. To measure thermal
dilations of the microplate 126a and 126b one can optically scan
the microplate 126a and 126b and record the locations of the
fiducial diffraction gratings 702 (F1, F2, F3 . . . ) (or other
types of fiducial markings). Then, after some time and possibly a
temperature change, one may rescan the microplate 126a and 126b and
again record the locations of the same fiducial diffraction
gratings 702 (F1, F2, F3 . . . ) (or other types of fiducial
markings). If the microplate 126a and 126b has grown or shrunk due
to temperature change, then the relative locations of the fiducial
diffraction gratings 702 (or other types of fiducial markings) will
have changed (i.e., .DELTA..sub.21=F2-F1 will have changed, and
.DELTA..sub.31=F3-F1 will have changed . . . ).
[0030] In an alternative embodiment, the fiducial diffraction
gratings 702 and the measurement diffraction gratings can have
different resonance wavelengths. To have different resonance
wavelengths, the fiducial diffraction gratings 702 and the
measurement diffraction gratings can be made with different grating
periods. Or, they can be made with waveguides that have different
thicknesses. In this embodiment, the resonance wavelengths can be
detected by measuring the evolution of the power of the two peaks
corresponding to the different gratings areas. Then, the edge
detection can be made based on the relative power of both
peaks.
[0031] In yet another embodiment, the fiducial gratings 702 can
include features that are perpendicular to the scanning direction
of the optical beam and other features that are at a certain angle
such as 45 degrees with respect to the scanning direction. In this
way, one can determine misalignments in both directions.
[0032] A discussion is provided next about several other uses of
the fiducial diffraction gratings 702 (position sensors 702) in
addition to their use in helping with the repositioning of the
biosensor 102 or microplate 126. When the fiducial diffraction
gratings 702 are not in contact with the liquid that is measured in
the wells of the microplate 126, then those fiducials are
completely isolated and their resonance wavelength is affected only
by disturbing external effects such as temperature variations or
angular misalignments. As a result, one can use the fiducial
diffraction gratings 702 to monitor those external effects as
follows:
[0033] 1. Angular Monitoring--FIG. 8 shows the typical wavelength
shift that can be measured as a function of the incidence angle
when interrogating biosensors 102 at normal incidence with single
mode fibers. As can be seen, the angular sensitivity is in the
range of 10 pm/mRd which can make the angle monitoring very
critical. One way that this angular variation can be monitored is
to interrogate the fiducial diffraction gratings 702 by using a
multimode fiber instead of a single mode fiber for the light
injection. Indeed, as shown on FIG. 9, when this configuration was
tested we obtained angular sensitivities in the range of 432 pm/mRd
which is an order of magnitude greater than the sensitivity that
obtained with the single mode fibers. So, by comparing the
resonance wavelength measured with a multimode fiber and the one
measured with the single mode fiber, one can better deduce any
angular misalignment of the microplate 126 after reinserting it
into the reader 100 by using the multimode fiber.
[0034] 2. Temperature Gradient Monitoring--FIG. 10 is a graph that
shows the temperature sensitivity of an interrogated fiducial
diffraction grating 702 when the temperature cools by 21.degree. C.
As can be calculated from the wavelength changes of the curves
shown, the sensitivity coefficients are -10 pm/.degree. C. for TE
mode and -26 pm/.degree. C. for the TM mode. Therefore, temperature
changes of as small as 0.01.degree. C. can perturb the measured
resonance wavelengths by 0.26 pm, which is of significance for
small biomolecular binding events. Additionally, even if in-well
referencing is used (see U.S. patent application Ser. No.
11/027,509 entitled "Method for Creating a Reference Region and a
Sample Region on a Biosensor and the Resulting Biosensor and U.S.
patent application Ser. No. 11/027,547 entitled "Spatially Scanned
Optical Reader System and Method for Using Same") temperature
gradients, and in particular changes in temperature gradients,
inside wells may still be large enough to induce resonant
wavelength shifts of concern. Assuming that the fiducial
diffraction gratings 702 are in contact with glue, then the
temperature variation is the major parameter that makes the
resonance wavelength fluctuate over time. With this knowledge one
can then use the wavelength fluctuations measured across the
fiducial diffraction gratings 702 on the microplate 126a and 126b
to deduce the temperature gradient fluctuations and check that they
are under acceptable levels.
[0035] From the foregoing, it can be readily appreciated by those
skilled in the art that the present invention also includes a
method 1100 for monitoring and correcting if needed any lateral
and/or angular misalignment of the microplate 126. As shown in the
flowchart of FIG. 11, the method 1100 includes the steps of: (a)
place microplate (with one or more fiducial markings) on holder
which in one embodiment is the translation stage 128 and in another
embodiment is a stationary holder (not shown) (step 1102); (b)
using one or more fiducial markings on the microplate 126 to
determine a first position of the microplate 126 (step 1104); (c)
removing the microplate 126 from the holder (step 1106); (d)
reinserting the microplate 126 back onto the holder (step 1108);
(e) using the fiducial marking(s) on the microplate 126 to
determine a second position of the microplate 128 (step 1110); (f)
comparing the first position and the second position of the
microplate 126 (step 1112); (g) if there is a difference between
the two positions, then addressing the lateral and/or angular
misalignment of the microplate 126 (step 1114) by: (1) moving the
translation stage 128 so that the microplate 126 is located at or
substantially near to the first position (step 1114a); or moving
the optical beams 104 so that the microplate which is on the
stationary holder appears to be in the first position (step 1114b);
or (3) not moving the microplate 126 or the optical beams 104 but
instead adjusting via software a measured interrogation reading
(e.g., resonance wavelength) based upon the known position error
and a known translation sensitivity (step 1114c); and (h) if there
is no difference (or no substantial difference) between the two
positions, then interrogate the microplate 126 while it is in the
second position (step 1116).
[0036] It should be noted that the term angular misalignment as
used above is the skew that is caused by the microplate 126 being
rotated in the Z axis if the X&Y are the lateral axis.
Alternatively, it should be noted that an angular misalignment can
also be caused if one performs a "skewed" scan across the
microplate 126 where one simultaneously moves the X&Y motion
stages in a coordinated skewed motion.
[0037] It should also be noted that in most of the drawings herein,
were made based on the assumption that the sensor is spectrally
interrogated. This means that the sensor is interrogated at a fixed
incidence angle with a broad spectral source and that the
wavelength is detected in the reflected beam. The source is then a
broad spectral source and the detector is a wavelength sensitive
detector such as a spectrometer. However, it should be appreciated
that the principle of the present invention can also be extended to
an angular interrogation approach where the biosensor is
interrogated with monochromatic light and then a resonant angle is
detected in the reflected beam.
[0038] Furthermore, it should be noted that there are
configurations of the present invention that do not need to use
scanning to position, re-position and/or interrogate the biosensor
102. One such non-scanning system involves the use of a vision
system. The vision system would create an image of the biosensor(s)
102, the optical beams 104, and/or the fiducials on a position
sensitive detector (e.g., CCD camera). And, this vision system
could make use of the fiducials by looking at the position of the
fiducials imaged on the CCD camera and then make the appropriate
adjustments.
[0039] Although multiple embodiments of the present invention have
been illustrated in the accompanying Drawings and described in the
foregoing Detailed Description, it should be understood that the
invention is not limited to the embodiments disclosed, but is
capable of numerous rearrangements, modifications and substitutions
without departing from the spirit of the invention as set forth and
defined by the following claims.
* * * * *